The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
MDC activist James Munetsi says he was attacked by ruling
party supporters |
The Southern African Development Community (Sadc) team will travel next week to speak to political parties, farmers' groups, civil rights organisations and churches, said Mozambique's foreign minister.
Sadc has been criticised for not putting enough pressure on President Robert Mugabe's government to end political violence but Zimbabwe's Foreign Minister, Stan Mudenge, said he had invited the Sadc team to dispel "propaganda".
The announcement came as the vice president of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) remains in police custody.
Those who resort to military and paramilitary tactics will be
treated in equal if not greater measure and they have no reason to
complain especially when they throw petrol bombs, and dynamite bridges and
buildings Jonathan Moyo Information Minister |
Gibson Sibanda's bail hearing was postponed until Monday after the judge did not turn up because his daughter was ill, reports the privately-owned Daily News.
The MDC condemned "a deliberate ploy by the Mugabe regime to unjustifiably lock up MDC officials".
'Peace and stability'
Following an MDC-called strike two weeks ago, hundreds of opposition activists have been arrested.
The MDC says that many have been tortured but these claims have been dismissed by the authorities, who say those arrested were planning or responsible for acts of violence.
The strike was marred by
violence |
Mr Sibanda was arrested for organising the strike and the police do not want him released in case he organises another "more devastating" one.
An MDC deadline to the government to stop political harassment passed on Monday but the opposition has not yet announced what action it will take after Mr Mugabe ignored the ultimatum.
"We are worried because... we want to see peace, stability and harmony in every member state and in Zimbabwe you don't live under this," said Mozambique's Foreign Minister Leonardo Simao after a meeting of Sadc foreign ministers in Harare.
The MDC had earlier urged Sadc not to "turn a blind" to the "political reign of terror" in Zimbabwe.
Foreign Minister Stan Mudenge said he had invited the ministerial team "to ensure that my colleagues in Sadc, who are subjected to so much propaganda, a lot of it untrue, do come and get a better view, and a better impression of the situation in Zimbabwe."
Government spokesman Jonathan Moyo defended the crack-down which followed the recent strike.
"We want to make it clear that those who resort to military and paramilitary tactics will be treated in equal if not greater measure and they have no reason to complain especially when they throw petrol bombs, and dynamite bridges and buildings," he told the official Herald newspaper.
"These are not instruments of democratic expression nor are they small matters to be handled by the police in the usual manner.
Steve Vickers BBC Sport in Harare |
Thirteen people were killed |
Thirteen people died and many more were injured at a World Cup qualifier between Zimbabwe and South Africa at the National Sports Stadium in July 2000.
Tragedy struck when disgruntled fans began throwing objects onto the pitch when the visitors took a 2-0 lead with seven minutes of the match remaining.
Police responded by firing teargas into the crowd, resulting in a stampede as fans pushed towards the exit points, many of which were closed.
Investigated
Following an inquest into the disaster, Harare magistrate Faith Musinga ruled that police were entirely to blame for the loss of the 13 lives.
She said: "May the case be thoroughly investigated with prosecution in the next two months."
Players were also affected |
"I asked the police to protect my son and daughter from the stampede, but instead they threw teargas at us," said Fidesi, who broke down while testifying.
How can you disperse a full stadium if the gates are closed?
Faith Musinga Harare magistrate |
But the magistrate dismissed the police evidence as "inconsistent and unreasonable."
Musinga said: "There were a handful of hooligans, who should have been identified and arrested. The police were negligent and overreacted."
"Before firing (teargas) they should have ensured that the gates were open. How can you disperse a full stadium if the gates are closed?"
CONTENTS
1.
GENERAL
COMMENT
2.
PARLIAMENTARY
BY-ELECTIONS
3.
POST-STRIKE
RETRIBUTION
The war
in Iraq has attracted the attention of ZTV, which has established a daily
hour-long phone-in programme to discuss the morality of the conflict. But it has
done little to enhance ZBC’s reputation as an impartial national public
broadcaster when the purpose of the programme is to condemn the British and
American military initiative. This was announced by the programme’s anchorman,
Daily Mirror proprietor Ibbo Mandaza, and panelists sympathetic to this
point of view were selected to field viewers’ comments.
When
viewers asked for a balanced panel, ZTV invited ZANU PF MP Eddison Zvobgo and US
official Bruce Wharton (26/3), who both supported the US and Britain’s position.
However, it was Zvobgo who was more vocal in his support for war. He argued that
earlier UN resolutions provided for a possible legal basis for war. He also
noted that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was a dictator and that “dictators
who are prepared to kill their own people cannot plead sovereignty and let the
rest of the world just watch”. His
vehement support for the American and British stance against dictators evidently
disturbed Mandaza and panelist Tafataona Mahoso, who repeatedly interjected to
stop Zvobgo expressing this opinion.
While ZBC
audiences were still relishing this rare feat of balanced coverage, ZTV (27/3,
8pm) turned it into a news story by reporting criticism of Zvobgo’s point of
view, saying “some Zimbabweans…feel there is no basis to justify the
invasion of Iraq”. That same
evening the programme reverted to its original one-sided approach. Suffocating
alternative opinion shortchanges audiences who are entitled to access fair and
balanced information of their choice.
Predictably,
ZBC extended its unprofessional conduct to its coverage of the Highfield and
Kuwadzana by-elections. As in previous elections, ZBC swamped news airtime
allocated to the election campaign with favorable ZANU PF coverage. For example,
out of 17 minutes ZTV devoted to the topic during the week, ZANU-PF was
allocated 11 minutes and 55 seconds (70%), while the remainder was allocated to
the other three contesting candidates from small parties. No
positive coverage was given to the main opposition MDC. Instead, the party was
mentioned negatively in about 8minutes and 10 seconds or 48 percent of the total
time allocated to the election campaign.
ZTV’s
anti-MDC stance was more apparent a day before the election. It aired comments
from most of the contesting candidates (28/03, 8pm) on their chances of winning
the election and then claimed the MDC candidates were not available for
comment.
The
Highfield and Kuwadzana by-elections dominated media space during the week under
review. While the public and private media agreed that violence was a cause for
major concern in the electoral process, they differed on who the perpetrators
were. The public media accused the MDC of fanning violence and used isolated
incidents that broke out during the previous week’s stay-away as examples.
Conversely,
the private Press observed that violence against ordinary civilians and those
perceived to be opposition party supporters by ZANU PF activists and security
agents would render the elections not free or fair. Unlike the public media,
they also noted that the combination of violence, vote-buying and the
manipulation of the voters’ roll by the Registrar-General, Tobaiwa Mudede, would
tilt the scales in favour of the ruling party. For
example, The Daily News (28/3) reported that the MDC had discovered that
about 19,000 “ghost” voters who did not live in the two
constituencies had been added to the voters’ roll. The party’s director of
elections, Remus Makuwaza, was quoted as saying his party suspected these
anomalies to be the main reason why Mudede had delayed providing the opposition
with copies of the roll. In fact, Mudede only released the voters’ roll after
the High Court had ordered him to do so.
ZTV
(28/03, 8pm) tried to dismiss these claims by presenting the RG’s office as
transparent in its conduct. It quoted Mudede as having said interested members
of the public could buy copies of the voters’ roll provided they complied with
conditions set by his office. However, these conditions were not stated.
Neither
was Mudede challenged to explain the alleged irregular inclusion of an extra
19,000 names, a fact also reported by The Daily Mirror (24/3) and (28/03).
Suspicions
that Mudede would use the roll to rig the two elections was also aired in The
Zimbabwe Independent’s comment (28/03), which observed that ZANU PF
was “incapable of winning an election without the help of the
Registrar-General’s office”.
The
Weekend Tribune (29/03)
weighed in with a call for impartiality in the RG’s office. It stated: “ …
it is important that the Registrar-General’s office that is running the
elections be fully prepared and be fair to all contesting parties. We do not
want a sham of an election, one that is skewed in favour of one political
party.” In its
front-page article, the paper reported that the MDC had even contemplated
withdrawing from the elections because of fears that the RG would facilitate a
ZANU PF victory. Indeed,
these fears saw the MDC threatening mass protests if the elections were rigged,
The Daily News (24/03) and The Financial Gazette
(27/03). The Daily
Mirror (24/03)
also carried the MDC’s threats, but deliberately distorted the remarks made by
one of its MPs, Tendai Biti. He said his party would “go onto the
streets” if the elections were rigged, a statement The Daily
Mirror interpreted to mean MDC promises more violence, according to
the article’s headline. The story also sought to present the violence that broke
out during the two-day strike as having been sanctioned by the party.
In fact,
the public media continued to milk the stay-away violence and the MDC’s threat
to protest to bolster the notion that it was a violent party. For example, ZTV
(28/03, 8pm) quoted Home Affairs Minister Kembo Mohadi saying the MDC was
“bussing people from outside Harare to come and cause havoc. The train
last night brought in people from Bulawayo and picked up another group of people
from Gweru just to come and cause some mayhem.” Without
providing any evidence, Mohadi added: “We are very much aware that whether
MDC wins these by-elections or loses they are still going to cause
violence”. The Herald (29/3) also unquestioningly quoted
Mohadi making similar remarks.
It was
not surprising the public media allowed Mohadi’s claims to pass without scrutiny
because they suited the media’s stance to sell the MDC to the electorate as a
violent party. In the
same ZTV bulletin, President Mugabe was quoted employing grossly inflammatory
rhetoric when he accused the MDC of fanning violence, describing it as a
“terrorist party” that “murders wives and kills women”,
adding, “it should thus be confined to the electoral scrap heap
and I hope this happens tomorrow and Sunday” His remarks were also
carried the in public Press the following day (29/3).
While the
public media remained silent on ZANU PF candidates’ vote-buying tactics through
the use of scarce basic commodities, the private Press diligently exposed this
chicanery. For
example, The Weekend Tribune, Basic foods galore in Highfield,
reported ZANU PF candidates had brought scarce commodities to the two
constituencies to lure voters. The
paper interviewed two political commentators, Heneri Dzinotyiwei and John
Makumbe who both agreed that food would not yield support for ZANU PF.
Although
the private Press was tenacious in exposing ZANU PF’s irregular efforts to
engineer election conditions that would favour its candidate, it failed to fully
explore the issue of polling stations and their location. It was only on voting
day that The Daily News (29/03) revealed that polling stations had
been increased in both constituencies. The paper quoted MDC candidate for
Kuwadzana Nelson Chamisa as saying, “The number of polling stations has
been increased to facilitate the traffic of their (Zanu PF’s) ghost voters. The
intention is dubious.”
However,
Chamisa did not clearly explain how the increase would facilitate rigging.
The
Herald (28/3)
merely announced that a total of 19 polling stations had been established for
both constituencies without even notifying its readers that this was an increase
of six from the previous 13 that were used during the presidential election.
Similarly,
ZBC, (ZTV, 28/03, 8pm & Radio Zimbabwe, 29/03, 1pm) reported the issue as a
mere announcement.
Besides
the Zimbabwe Election Support Network (ZESN)’s supplement in The Daily
News (26/3), no other media carried adequate information on voter
education. Also, no
media fully investigated the boundaries of the two constituencies particularly
Kuwadzana, following speculation that settlers at White Cliff farm, which is
outside Kuwadzana, would vote.
Meanwhile,
the extremes of perspective between the private and the public Press were again
highlighted in their coverage of the election days. While The Sunday News
& The Sunday Mail (30/03) and The Herald (31/3)
reported that the polls were conducted “without incident” and
“ended peacefully”, The Standard (30/3) and The Daily
News (31/03) observed otherwise. The
Standard reported that ZANU PF youths “ran amok trying to
intimidate voters and to influence the poll result”. It also
alleged that the police “watched helplessly” as ZANU PF supporters
held gatherings near polling stations where “voters were being invited …
to register for scarce food commodities such as mealie-meal which could be seen
piled up nearby”. The Daily
News (31/03)
and (1/04) corroborated The Standard’s report.
There
were also conflicting reports on voter turn-out. While The Sunday
Mail reported, Huge voter turn out in Highfield, Kuwadzana
by-elections, The Sunday Mirror led with, Low turn-out mars
decisive by-elections. Notably, both papers based their reports on the same
statistics of the number of people who had voted by 7pm on Saturday, figures
which represented a mediocre response at best.
ZTV
(29/3) also confused its audiences on the turn-out on the first day of the
election. While its 6pm bulletin reported that voting in Kuwadzana began at a
“slow pace”, it later reported, in its 8pm bulletin, that,
“when polling started at 7 o’clock in the morning in Kuwadzana, there was
a large turnout of voters, the biggest queue of 350 voters was reported at
Kuwadzana district office.”
When it
emerged that the MDC had won the elections, the public media downplayed the
newsworthiness of the opposition’s victory. For
example, ZTV (31/03) carried the results as item five out of 11 news pieces in
its 6pm bulletins. And in its 8pm bulletin, the station led with a review of a
previous day’s soccer match between Zimbabwe and soccer minnows Seychelles. The
story was accorded about 10 minutes. It was only after the soccer story and a
short break, that ZTV then announced the results in a two-minute report.
The trend
was not different in the public Press. The Herald (01/03) and
Chronicle (01/03) reported that results showed that ZANU PF “was
consistent by maintaining its support base while that of MDC
fluctuated”. While
The Herald led with the story, the Chronicle placed it on page two
preferring to lead with an unsubstantiated article, MDC’s security agents
revolt. The
papers also quoted Chinotimba as saying, “Zanu PF supporters were on
Sunday threatened by Glen View MDC MP Paul Madzore who moved around polling
stations wielding a pistol.” Notably, it was the same papers that
reported the elections were peaceful.
In
announcing the results, The Daily News (1/4) reported that the MDC had
managed to retain the two Harare seats “despite massive intimidation by
pro-Zanu PF militias in the run-up to the polls.” According to the
report, both Chinotimba and the winning MDC candidate Mungofa acknowledged that
the elections had not been free and fair.
The Daily
Mirror (01/03)
comment expressed surprise that MDC candidates accepted the results
“despite the fact that the MDC had made claims to the international world
that the elections had been rigged before they were held”, adding
that “Zanu PF candidates, Joseph Chinotimba and David Mutasa must be
commended for accepting by-election results.”
Surprisingly
however, its lead story contradicted this position, reporting that Chinotimba
had refused to accept the results and had “briefly addressed his
supporters outside Cecil (sic) Jennings Hall who in turn let volleys of stones
at the celebrating MDC supporters
…”
The
by-elections in Kuwadzana and Highfield were conducted against a backdrop of
widespread allegations of human rights abuses by state security agents in the
form of arrests, detentions, harassment and torture of opposition supporters
following the success of the MDC-organised national job stay-away.
Eleven
incidents of this nature were reported in the week and all were carried in
The Daily News. In one of
its stories, The Daily News (28/03) reported that soldiers
had forced nightclub patrons in Chitungwiza to have unprotected sex and “
…those men who failed to get erections were severely assaulted”.
The paper
(27/03 and 29/3) also revealed that some opposition MPs had fled their homes as
a result of state-sanctioned retribution.
The
public media ignored reports of the security agencies’ gross human rights
violations and merely presented the arrest of MDC activists (24/3) for
allegedly supporting the party’s mass action as the right course of justice.
They also
called for the arrest of the MDC leadership.
For
example, the Chronicle comment (24/03), Terrorists must be locked
up, described Tsvangirai as a “coup plotter” adding that
“Such coup plotters and thugs must be locked up and the keys thrown in
Lake Kariba.”
Similarly,
The Sunday Mail story (30/03), Arrest Tsvangirai, say local
leaders, claimed that “ordinary Zimbabweans, legal experts, church
leaders and some indigenous business leaders” had called on the police
to arrest the opposition leader whom they accused of inciting violence
“despite the fact that he is facing high treason charges”.
Meanwhile, the clampdown on the MDC and the public in general put
Zimbabwe back under the spotlight of the international community. The private
Press reported that the international community had criticized Zimbabwe for
gross human rights violations.
For
example, The Daily News (24/03), US official slams Mugabe for
abuses reported that the US had tabled a resolution calling on the
international community to take note of the gross human rights violations by the
government. The
Zimbabwe Independent reported
that German MPs had criticized the clampdown on dissent and urged their federal
government to use its position in the UN Security Council to have Zimbabwe put
onto the agenda. In
another story, Mbeki slams Mugabe clampdown, The Daily News (27/03)
reported the South African President telling his country’s Parliament that the
he had instructed the South African High Commissioner to Zimbabwe to investigate
the alleged human rights violations.
“Indeed,
we have said to the Zimbabwean government that we would not agree with actions
that deny the right of Zimbabweans to protest peacefully,
democratically…” Mbeki was quoted saying.
The
Herald (28/3)
only carried some of the international community’s concerns as part of
Information Minister Jonathan Moyo’s response to them. Moyo made it clear that
government would not relent in its stance towards MDC activists, saying any
government “anywhere in the civilized world would not tolerate such
thuggery and violence”.
His
statements set the tone for President Mugabe, whom The Herald (29/03)
quoted defiantly saying, “It is now time for law and order to have the
upper hand, and we will not seek the approval of outsiders to enforce law and
order in our country.”
Ends.
The MEDIA
UPDATE was produced and circulated by the Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe, 15
Duthie Avenue, Alexandra Park, Harare, Tel/fax: 263 4 703702, E-mail: monitors@mmpz.org.zw; monitors@mweb.co.zw
Feel free
to write to MMPZ. We may not able to respond to everything but we will look at
each message. For
previous MMPZ reports, and more information about the Project, please visit our
website at http://www.mmpz.org.zw