Reuters
Thu 7 Aug
2008, 5:36 GMT
By MacDonald Dzirutwe
HARARE (Reuters) - Senior
Zimbabwean security officials, seen as key to any
resolution of Zimbabwe's
political crisis, have been meeting South African
mediators, South Africa's
Star Newspaper reported on Thursday.
Citing unnamed sources, The Star
said Zimbabwe's security chiefs, seen as
wielding wide power, "wanted to
ensure that their interests are catered for
in any agreement reached" in
power-sharing talks which began two-and-a-half
weeks
ago.
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe and opposition leader Morgan
Tsvangirai
were due to meet in Harare on Thursday after signs that progress
had been
made in the power-sharing talks.
Zimbabwe's ruling ZANU-PF
and the opposition MDC on Wednesday called on
their supporters to end
political violence in the country, the most tangible
sign of forward
movement in the talks since they began two weeks ago.
Members of South
African President Thabo Mbeki's mediation team met
Zimbabwean security
officials this week in Pretoria, The Star said. Mbeki,
who has been leading
regional mediation efforts, was expected in Harare on
Thursday.
Mugabe's ZANU-PF party and the Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC) began
power-sharing talks last month, following the veteran
leader's re-election
in a widely condemned June poll boycotted by the
opposition.
The two sides are under heavy international pressure,
including from within
Africa, to resolve a crisis that has ruined the once
prosperous economy and
flooded neighbouring states with millions of
refugees.
DRAFT POLITICAL DEAL
The protracted political crisis has
deepened frustrations among millions of
Zimbabweans already suffering from
inflation officially estimated at 2.2
million percent a year -- the world's
highest -- and chronic shortages of
basic goods.
Under a draft
settlement reported in The Star on Wednesday, Tsvangirai would
run the
country while Mugabe would become ceremonial president.
According to the
draft, Tsvangirai would head Zimbabwe as executive prime
minister during a
transitional period, appointing two deputies -- one from
ZANU-PF and the
other from the MDC.
But The Star said the MDC wants a 24-30 month
transitional period, while
ZANU-PF wanted it to last five years.
The
opposition says only Tsvangirai can lead a new government because he won
a
first-round presidential vote in March before pulling out of the June 27
run-off because of violence he says killed 122 of his
supporters.
ZANU-PF has said it will not accept any deal that fails to
recognise
Mugabe's re-election.
If the rumours swirling round the press are anything to be believed, Morgan
Tsvangirai, Arthur Mutambara and Robert Mugabe are on the verge of signing a
power sharing agreement between Zanu PF and the two formations of the MDC. If these rumours are true, I’m impressed by both the speed with which the negotiations have proceeded, and the fact that the talks
stalled as infrequently as they reportedly did. I haven’t seen the reported 50-page draft of the agreement. And perhaps the
whole story is yet another fabrication for the press. But if the contents of
what is signed resembles what The Star’s Fiona Forde is reporting, I have some deep misgivings. Some key points of the proposed agreement include: Apparently the time frame is still at issue – the MDC envisages a 24-30 month
time frame – which may make this arrangement feel like a long transition, but
importantly, it’s a transition nonetheless. Zanu PF, on the other hand, is
reportedly arguing for a 5 year time frame – this doesn’t make it a transitional
arrangement, it makes it the duly constituted government until the next
scheduled elections in 2013. I’m a bit more at ease if, indeed, this is a temporary measure, with the
promise of a transitional Constitution, but I still believe that the political
parties are negotiating away certain fundamental issues, without opening up the
debate to public discussion and input. One of my colleagues in civil society recently wrote in an email discussion
forum: If the Zimbabwean citizenry vote in a government and a political party, and
most of those in civics voted in that party, and then the outgoing party refuses
to leave, why do the civics do anything but support the party that they voted
in? But to me that question is missing the point. These negotiations aren’t
moving towards simply installing the party which most Zimbabweans voted for in
the March Harmonised Election into power. They’re moving towards
some form of negotiated settlement – about which there has been no election.
Zimbabweans haven’t voted for who they’d want in a “coalition government” or
whether they’d prefer a Government of National Unity as opposed to a
Transitional Authority, or how they’d want such an arrangement to be
structured. And Zimbabweans certainly haven’t voted for a blanket amnesty for all
political crimes – from Gukurahundi
onwards. To paraphrase Spinoza, “peace is not the absence of war, it’s the
presence of justice.” Zimbabwean analyst Knox Chitiyo may be willing to make the long-term sacrifice of
justice for the short-term promise of peace, but is the rest of the country? According to Forde, MDC and Zanu PF to divide key ministries – reportedly
Zanu PF to take Defence, and the MDC to take Home Affairs. This, she speculates,
would make campaigning in the next election more even: with control of Home
Affairs, the MDC would have control of the police force, which would enable them
to guarantee greater civic freedoms to demonstrate and assemble. But what about
the role which the army has played in clamping down on public protest and
gatherings? Not to mention groupings like the so-called war veterans and youth
militia. And what about other basic rights like press and broadcast freedom? Where is the referendum on these issues – and the independent body to oversee
such a referendum to ensure that it was not subject to the same electoral
machinery that Zimbabwe’s recent elections have suffered from? Where is the
process for developing a new Constitution for Zimbabwe – not just the 19th
Amendment, which would be required to, for example, (re)create the position of
Prime Minister and define the roles of the Executive President? As Mukoma Wa Ngugi wrote recently: A power-sharing agreement that brings about a “Government of National Unity,”
or a transitional authority, will in fact be undermining the most basic and
important principle of democracy: the vote.
IOL
August 07 2008 at
08:18AM
By Fiona Forde
Harare - Zimbabwe's crisis
talks will enter a critical stage today
(Wednesday) when Robert Mugabe and
Morgan Tsvangirai come face-to-face to
address the more contentious issues
of the proposed settlement.
However, contrary to earlier reports,
President Thabo Mbeki will not
facilitate the encounter, although Arthur
Mutambara, as leader of the
smaller faction of the Movement for Democratic
Change, will join the two
rivals at Rainbow Towers in central Harare for
this afternoon's meeting.
Throughout this afternoon, and Friday if
necessary, the three men will
aim to reach an agreement on who will take
executive power during the
transition period, how many ministries will
constitute that government, what
areas of constitutional reform are
necessary and who will be covered by an
amnesty in the future.
According to a draft settlement, obtained by Independent Newspapers,
Mugabe
will be offered the role of ceremonial president until his retirement
at the
end of the transitional government, after which he will acquire a
life-long
title of Founding President of Zimbabwe, complete with a blanket
amnesty.
Tsvangirai, on the other hand, is tipped to take the
position of
Executive Prime Minister who will preside over a government of
22
ministries.
Critics of the draft settlement call it wishful
thinking in a twilight
zone.
"How can you call this
power-sharing when you have one man in a
ceremonial role and the other with
full executive powers,?" asked Jonathan
Moyo, Mugabe's former information
minister who is now an independent Member
of Parliament.
He
strongly refutes the existence of the 50-page plus document, saying
"If the
people of Zimbabwe were to give all the power to the MDC, then we
wouldn't
need to have these power-sharing talks that are moving towards a
power-sharing agreement".
Yet Moyo is confident that an
agreement is just a matter of days away,
and could be brokered as early as
Heroes Day on Monday, which marks the
anniversary of the 1979 bush battle
that claimed the lives of a number of
freedom fighters.
"If
they can't respect that day and the significance of it for our
country, then
they shouldn't be taking at all," he said.
"Robert Mugabe and
Morgan Tsvangirai have never reached out to each
other as much as they are
doing now," he added.
"They have been in constant contact with one
another."
In recent days Mugabe has begun to address the country on
the
airwaves, courtesy of the public broadcaster ZBC, appealing to all
Zimbabweans whatever "their political affiliations" to work together towards
a better future.
The joint statement issued on Wednesday by
representatives of Zanu-PF
and both MDC factions calling for an end to
violence has been the talk of
the Zimbabwean capital where locals have begun
to interpret it as the final
step towards an agreement being
reached.
However, an MDC insider believes rushing a deal "is not in
anyone's
interests, least of all the people of Zimbabwe, and just plays into
the
hands of Mbeki who would like to see a deal going into the SADC summit",
which takes place in Johannesburg on August 16th when the outgoing South
African president takes on the rotating chairmanship of the 14-member
bloc.
Regardless of when that settlement date might fall, it is
clear now
that any future deal will be brokered in Harare and not in
Pretoria, a
significant note for the historic recording of it.
As the focus shifts to the Zimbabwean capital today (Thursday) and
most
likely on Friday, Independent Newspapers understands that the Pretoria
talks
have been suspended until such time as the negotiators receive a
briefing
from their principals on the outcome of the Harare meeting.
August 7, 2008 By our correspondent HARARE - AS reports intensified of the talks between the two Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) parties and Zanu PF drawing to a close, the negotiating
teams issued a joint statement on Wednesday. They challenged their supporters to desist from
further acts of the political violence that gripped the country in the period
between the beginning of April and June 27. Continuing acts of violence have
been reported even as the negotiations reconvened this week. The MDC has accused Zanu-PF of perpetrating the orgy of political violence
that has left more than 200 dead, thousands maimed and thousands more
homeless. MDC president Morgan Tsvangirai defeated President Robert Mugabe, leader of
the then ruling Zanu-PF party in presidential elections held on March 29. His
margin of victory, however, fell short of the majority required for form a new
government. An election re-run was declared for June 27. In between the two
elections Zimbabwe has witnessed some of the most brutal political violence ever
unleashed on the electorate in Zimbabwe. Throughout the talks in Pretoria disturbing reports of violence continued to
be issued by the MDC of violence being unleashed on its supporters. In the joint
statement issued Wednesday, – the first public document to emerge from the talks
being mediated by South African president Thabo Mbeki – the negotiators
“unequivocally called for the cessation and end to all politically motivated
violence in the country”. The statement bore the signatures of Patrick Chinamasa and Nicholas Goche
representing Zanu PF, Tendai Biti and Elton Mangoma, as well as Welshman Ncube
and Priscilla Misihairabwi, representing the MDC parties led by Tsvangirai and
Mutambara respectively. “We unequivocally condemn the promotion and use of violence as a political
tool and call for the cessation and end to all politically motivated violence in
the country,” the delegates said in their statement. “The parties, acknowledging that violence that is attributable to us and
which has been injurious to national and human security has indeed occurred in
the country after the 29th March, 2008 harmonised elections hereby call upon all
our supporters and members and any organs and structures under the direction and
control of our respective parties to stop and desist the perpetration of
violence in any form.” Even as the negotiators worked on their statement in Pretoria, Channel 4 News
in London showed footage of ongoing violence that was shot at one of the Zanu-PF
torture camps. It is said to have been filmed at the invitation of camp guards five days
after Mugabe, Tsvangirai and Mutambara signed a Memorandum of Understanding on
Monday July 21, which committed Zanu-PF and the two MDCs to negotiate a
power-sharing agreement seeking to end the continuing violence. One of the men on the film says the reason he is so opposed to the MDC
gaining power is that he fears he will be punished for the campaign of terror in
which he participated. Located in a rural primary school near the capital Harare, the camp is run by
a man who boasts on film of maiming and killing MDC supporters. “Some we aim to cut off their limbs, some we remove their [sex] organs,” the
man says. The camera focuses on a man cowering as a group of Zanu-PF assailants
brandishing machetes and clubs pulled him by his clothes and stamped on him. Meanwhile, an MDC official circulated a statement of his own on Wednesday. He
said although some militia camps were breaking up and dispersing of their own
accord, no admission of their existence had ever come from Zanu-PF, in the first
place. “No order has gone out from anywhere to tell the police to arrest people who
have been implicated in political violence,” he said. “The police seem willing,
in some cases, to do the right thing but are hesitant without clear orders. “The army still has not been removed from the rural areas. Sure, they are no
longer playing such a visible role, but they are still there; still quietly
threatening, still perpetuating fear. “One can almost feel the JOC commanders plotting daily - trying to come up
with a plan so that they will not have to relinquish their power. From
everywhere come the whispers of their persistent, obstinate stance that there is
no way they will serve under Morgan Tsvangirai.” Last week, the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights assisted MDC supporters in
Manicaland by filing an urgent High Court application against self-proclaimed
war veterans who were terrorising them in Nyanga North. The following document details Zanu-PF militia bases reported to be
operational after Monday, July 21 2008.
“The MDC will never rule this country.”
http://www.zimonline.co.za/Article.aspx?ArticleId=3507
by Own
Correspondent Thursday 07 August 2008
JOHANNESBURG - Any
political settlement to the Zimbabwean crisis should not
include a blanket
amnesty for President Robert Mugabe and his supporters
implicated in
violence and gross human rights abuses in the run-up to the
June 29
presidential run-off election, a South African opposition party
warned on
Wednesday.
"While the Democratic Alliance (DA) supports any initiative to
restore
democracy and the observance of the rule of law in Harare, we warn
of the
danger of settling for an amnesty process without full disclosure,"
party
foreign affairs spokesperson Tony Leon said in a
statement.
Political violence that followed Zimbabwean opposition
Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC)'s shock victory in presidential and
parliamentary
elections last March is said to have killed at least 120
opposition
supporters and displaced 200 000 others.
MDC leader Morgan
Tsvangirai, who defeated Mugabe in the March 29 election
but failed to
secure the margin to take power, withdrew from a June 27
run-off poll saying
widespread violence against his supporters made a free
and fair vote
impossible.
Ruling ZANU PF party militia and some members of the army
have been accused
of committing most of the violence against MDC supporters.
But Mugabe, who
went ahead with the presidential run-off election despite
Tsvangirai's
withdrawal, has accused the opposition of carrying out violence
and blaming
it on ZANU PF.
"To suggest that the injustices of Robert
Mugabe's eight year plunder of
Zimbabwe - including the gross violation of
human rights, the use of
political violence against opponents and crippling
the country's economy -
should be swept under the carpet is to ignore the
intolerable pain inflicted
by his repressive regime on the people of
Zimbabwe.
"Any solution to Zimbabwe's political impasse must also offer
justice to the
people of Zimbabwe," the statement said.
The DA urged
South African President Thabo Mbeki, the chief mediator in the
Zimbabwean
crisis, to take a leaf from the shortcomings of his own country's
Truth and
Reconciliation Commission (TRC) which showed that an amnesty
process could
end up dividing a nation if not managed carefully.
"South Africa will
recall from some of the imperfections of the Truth and
Reconciliation
Commission (TRC) that an amnesty process which is not based
on the principle
of 'knowledge and acknowledgement' can divide a nation
further," Leon said,
adding that any solution to the Zimbabwe crisis must
take into account the
damage Mugabe and his acolytes have done to the
country so as to achieve
national healing.
After the demise of Apartheid in 1994 the Nelson
Mandela-led South African
government instituted a court-like body known as
the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission to uncover the truth about past
abuse, using
amnesty as a mechanism to forgive and forget, rather than to
punish past
crimes.
Seen by many as a crucial component of the
transition to full and free
democracy in South Africa, most analysts felt
the TRC had failed to achieve
reconciliation between the black and white
communities arguing that justice
was a prerequisite for reconciliation
rather than an alternative to it, and
that the TRC had been weighted in
favour of the perpetrators of abuse. -
ZimOnline
http://www.zimonline.co.za/Article.aspx?ArticleId=3510
by Cuthbert Nzou
Thursday 07 August 2008
HARARE - Negotiations between the
National Oil Company of Zimbabwe (NOCZIM)
and two international petroleum
companies to supply fuel to the country have
collapsed over pricing, sources
told ZimOnline.
Sources in the oil industry said NOCZIM was about to
clinch a fuel deal with
Independent Petroleum Group of Kuwait and BP Shell
of South Africa, but it
fell through after NOCZIM insisted that the landing
rate be US$0,60 a litre.
"Negotiations collapsed. The two international
companies were adamant that
the cost of landing must be between US$0,70 and
US$0,90 a litre if they were
to make profit, but government was adamant that
it should be US$0,60" said a
sources, who declined to be named.
As a
result, the source added, the two companies opted out of the deal
forcing
NOCZIM to look for other alternative sources of fuel, including
Equatorial
Guinea.
Last year, a high-powered government delegation went to
Equatorial Guinea to
hunt for fuel. The team was headed by Energy and Power
Development minister
Mike Nyambuya, and included Reserve Bank governor
Gideon Gono.
Government has been on the hunt for fuel in Equatorial
Guinea and Libya in
recent months.
In the past, President Robert
Mugabe's government obtained but failed to pay
for fuel from Kuwait, Libya
and other countries resulting in supplies being
stopped. Efforts to secure
fuel from Iran, Sudan, and Angola also failed
because of Harare's poor
payment record.
The country has been without adequate fuel since 1999 due
to lack of foreign
currency and the severing of lines of credit by foreign
banks and
international money-lenders.
Zimbabwe cannot get lines of
credit due to its poor credit rating and high
political
risk.
Zimbabwe consumes 3,5 million litres of diesel, three million
litres of
petrol and five million litres of Jet A1 daily. The country needs
about
US$130 million a month to import fuel.
In March, government
came up with a plan to use diamonds illicitly mined
from Marange in
Manicaland province in exchange for fuel from Equatorial
Guinea.
The
two countries developed strong diplomatic and trade relations after the
arrest in 2004 in Harare of alleged mercenaries led by Simon Mann who were
purportedly en route to Equatorial Guinea to overthrow that country's
government.
Zimbabwe received fuel worth US$24 million from
Equatorial Guinea which it
was unable to pay for, resulting in the
government coming up with three
options to settle the debt.
The
options were: sourcing the fuel through the purchase and sale of
diamonds;
NOCZIM supporting the Minerals and Marketing Corporation of
Zimbabwe with
financial resources to mop up diamonds for resale; and the
state-run oil
procurement company going into diamond mining.
While the energy ministry
was in support of the first option, the central
bank opposed it saying the
process was flawed.
In turn, the RBZ said it could come up with a debt
settlement agreement with
the West African nation "rather than be part of an
illegal process".
It was reported recently that government was
negotiating with a Libyan bank
for a fuel line of credit, but the deal was
said to be far from being sealed
after the financial institution demanded
guarantees for loan repayments.
The National Economic Recovery Council
reportedly recommended the use of
diamonds, beef or tobacco to back up the
line of credit.
Efforts to get a comment from NOCZIM chief executive
officer Zvinechimwe
Churu were in vain yesterday as he was reportedly out of
his office. -
ZimOnline
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=2198
August 7, 2008
By Owen
Chikari
MASVINGO- Ignatius Chombo, the minister of local government, has
provoked
anger among the ranks of MDC after he appointed three councillors
into the
Masvingo City Council whom the opposition consider to be Zanu-PF
supporters.
According to the amended Urban Councils Act, the minister has
to appoint not
more than a third of the elected councillors into councils to
represent
special interest groups.
Masvingo City Council has ten
elected councillors. Yesterday, Chombo added
three more to make a total of
13 councillors.
Former Masvingo town clerk Tsunga Mhangami bounced back
as an unelected
councillor while former councillor Fabian Mabaya was also
brought back.
Chombo also appointed as councillor the losing Zanu-PF
candidate for Ward 8,
Namatirai Elgy.
The MDC, which dominates the
council, yesterday criticised the appointments
saying the three appointed
councillors represented Zanu-PF, not special
interest groups.
Noel
Mutisi, an MDC official, said Chombo should have waited for the outcome
of
the SADC- mediated talks before appointing the councillors.
Said Mutisi:
"Firstly, it has to be recognised that legally we do not have a
cabinet
because all ministers ceased to be ministers following the
presidential
election.
"For Chombo to appoint anyone this time means that Zanu-PF is
not
negotiating in good faith (in Pretoria). We also want to know which
interest
groups the three represent because to us Chombo only appointed
Zanu-PF
sympathisers and not deserving people".
The Masvingo City
Council has nine MDC councillors while Zanu-PF now has
four, including the
appointed ones.
Meanwhile, the newly-elected Masvingo MDC mayor Femias
Chakabuda was
yesterday officially installed as mayor.
However,
Chakabuda faces a disciplinary hearing within the his party, the
MDC,
following complaints by party supporters that he defected to the ruling
party during the run-up to the June 27 presidential election, which MDC
leader Morgan Tsvangirai boycotted.
Losing ZANU-PF councilors in Zaka District, the same councilors who have joined ZANU-PF militia in violence, are refusing to give up power
Zaka--A report has come in from Zaka in the south East of the country that the violence continues there. On top of this all MDC supporters were ordered to the ZANU PF "terror bases" to be told that all the losing MP's and councillors from ZANU PF would still remain in charge of council affairs. This is despite the fact that the newly elected councils which are dominated by MDC have already been sworn in.
August 6, 2008 Petina Gappah Brian Raftopoulos Munyaradzi Gwisai HOT SEAT INTERVIEW: Journalist Violet Gonda interviews politician Munyaradzi
Gwisai, lawyer and writer Petina Gappah and political commentator Prof Brian
Raftopoulos. Broadcast: August 1, 2008 Violet Gonda: We welcome on the programme Hot Seat, Petina Gappah a
Zimbabwean writer and lawyer based in Geneva, Munyaradzi Gwisai a leader with
the International Socialist Organisation and the chairperson of the Zimbabwe
Social Forum and Professor Brian Raftopoulos a political commentator and
Director of Research for the Solidarity Peace Trust. Welcome to you all. All: Thank you. Gonda: Let me start with Petina, can you give us your general thoughts on how
you are seeing the situation in Zimbabwe and the talks that are ongoing between
the political parties. Petina Gappah: Well, Violet it is very difficult to actually come to any
conclusions based on what we read in the press because I think that the press in
Zimbabwe – the journalists in Zimbabwe have been grossly irresponsible in the
way that they have reported on the ongoing negotiations. Gonda: But is it the press that is to blame here or the political parties who
have put this ban, this media blackout which has been very difficult for
journalists to find what is happening with the talks? Gappah: Well I blame both the politicians and the journalists. I don’t really
think there is a media ban, I think what we have seen is a lot of spinning.
There has been a lot of spinning by the political parties, there has been a lot
of spinning by the mediator and I think it is absolutely disgraceful that
journalists have failed to penetrate this web of spin and they have actually
added even more spin themselves, depending on which particular side they happen
to support. So it is very difficult to actually tell what is going on because
nobody is really giving us any real information. Gonda: You wrote an article entitled: ‘If Journalism is history’s first draft
then Zimbabwe is in trouble,’ what were you concerned about in particular? Gappah: Well, Violet I was really concerned about the extent to which
speculation and rumour has become news especially for our web-based websites and
the extent to which journalists seem to rely on anonymous sources and anonymous
political analysts and they spice it up with a little bit of their own thinking.
To the point that you wonder if what you are reading is actually news or
reporting fiction – something invented by the journalist. And I am just really
concerned that the press really served the Zimbabwean public quite badly in this
last week and it has been happening for some time but this last week highlighted
just how badly we have been served by the press. Gonda: Munyaradzi what are your thoughts on this, and before you answer, can
I add my thoughts – personally as a journalist I am finding it very difficult to
cover the talks in South Africa. When you call ZANU PF, ZANU PF doesn’t talk.
When you call the MDC it is now behaving like ZANU PF – you can’t even get a
comment from the MDC. So that is a problem we are facing with the political
parties. Munyaradzi what are your thoughts on this? Munyaradzi Gwisai: Yes, we can only agree with you in terms of the civic
society. We have now done about two meetings in the last couple of weeks - where
we are extremely worried and frightened by what is happening in Pretoria, as
Petina has said. Clearly the country is now at crossroads. The Reserve Bank
governor Gideon Gono made it clear that the country is standing on its last leg
– if not the last toe – and yet the politicians have decided to sit together and
slice the country amongst themselves at the exclusion of everyone else. So this
is a very worrying situation. That is our own view from civic society. That the exclusive talks that are
being done cannot and will not be a resolution of the crisis in this country,
which requires involvement of all stakeholders in terms of political, economic,
civic and other players. So this is a very worrying situation that we are facing
and we really have to stand up and demand our space and rights in this
process. Gonda: Professor Raftopoulos, you are there in South Africa. What are your
thoughts on what’s been happening because on the other hand some say, some kind
of a media blackout is necessary for the political parties to get some headway.
How do you see things? Raftopoulos: There has been a very strict media blackout on the talks so I
really sympathise with journalists trying to get information because there is
very little coming out. I think what should have been happening is that the
mediators should have had a spokesperson who was at least keeping the Zimbabwean
public in touch with the major processes underway. I think it is highly
problematic that we will only know what’s happened once the deal is signed. I
think there should have been a way of keeping Zimbabweans in touch – if not in
all the details but at least with the general details or lack of progress in the
talks. I think that really was the responsibility of the facilitator
himself. Gonda: And what about the conflicting reports we have been receiving from,
mainly, the MDC? The Tsvangirai MDC spokesperson George Sibotshiwe said talks
are deadlocked, but then we heard from Mr Tsvangirai saying he is fairly
satisfied with the progress of the talks. What do you read into that? Raftopoulos: We all knew from the beginning there was going to be major
challenges – particularly around the type of government that would come into
play, the role of Mugabe himself, the role of Tsvangirai. So we knew these were
major problems and I think it is not surprising that there are periods of
blockage and decline. But I don’t think this will stop the talks. I think the
talks will continue. I think there is a lot of pressure to get some kind of
agreement. I think it is going to be a messy compromise but I suspect that by
next week this time we may have some kind of agreement facing Zimbabweans. Gonda: Munyaradzi what are your thoughts on how the MDC has been handling
things at the talks, are you happy with the way things are going where the MDC
is concerned? Gwisai: Not at all. As I have said they are the ones who really have been
done up in this sense. The governing regime here – ZANU PF – clearly the March
29th election showed to what extent it has lost its popular appeal and obviously
Mbeki’s mediation has been a mess, has been discredited. But the MDC allowing
itself to be – that is the MDC Tsvangirai in particular – allowing themselves to
be dislocated and be removed from their natural allies in civic society, in
labour, in churches, the youth and so forth means they are going into these
talks with naïve illusions about what is possible. I hear what Brian is saying – the pressure for reaching an agreement and so
forth – but it is also quite likely that given the arrogance, the intransigence
of the regime in Harare that despite the economic collapse there might still be
serious difficulties and problems with government keeping its position that they
have said are non-negotiable. So my real worry is the MDC is going into these negotiations without a plan
B, without preparations and without mobilisation of its allies as we have seen
in other crisis situations. Whereas the Mugabe regime has made clear its
preparedness and ability to go for broke if need be - through what we have seen
with Bacossi and so forth. The MDC requires a united front but they are allowing
themselves to go alone and that to me bodes very ill for a people centred deal
coming out of this. Gonda: So do you think it is too late for the MDC to initiate this plan B and
bring on board the civil society and other stakeholders? Gwisai: No we don’t think it’s too late. In fact as civic society we have met
under the auspices of the group that met under the people’s convention and we
have made our position very clear. That we believe that these talks must be
inclusive and we believe that whatever comes out of them, must result in a
Transitional Authority that will ensure bread and butter concerns - because
people are suffering, and also a people driven constitution. And we have made it
clear that we are stakeholders in this country and we are mobilising our forces
in the next couple of weeks for us to be heard and we hope that the MDC will
rethink and be able to come back just like they did on 11 March last year, and
just like what we have been doing in the last 10 years to come back and work
together. And we hope that elites in the MDC especially business elites and
other such elites will in fact not scupper those possibilities in favour of a
compromised deal with ZANU PF, that does not deliver for the people of
Zimbabwe. Gonda: Petina do you agree that the MDC has gone into these talks without a
plan B? Petina: You know Violet I agree with both Munyaradzi and Brian on this. I
agree with Brian that the MDC faced tremendous challenges and really beyond
actually going into the negotiating process there was really not much they could
do. So as a show of good faith I think it was important that they engage in the
process. At the same time there is nothing in the MoU that says all the issues
covered by that framework have to be decided within the next two weeks. I think
this is the fallacy that we really should penetrate to its essence because there
is nothing that prevents the parties, for instance from saying ‘yes, we agree on
a new constitution and we take that constitution making process out of the
negotiation process and put it to the people and we involve people and we engage
civil society in coming up with a new constitution. SO I don’t really see that
there is necessarily a conflict between the MDC engaging in these negotiations
and also the participation of civil society. It is simply a question of what
then happens, what sort of deal they agree on. Gonda: What about the civil society’s call for a Transitional Authority – how
realistic is that especially as the talks are now underway? Gappah: This is one of the ironies of Zimbabwe. I am one of the people who
would definitely agree with this Transitional Authority but we are essentially
asking ZANU PF to be a participant in dismantling itself and I am really not
sure how successful that particular approach will be. But certainly as a
negotiating position I think that is something that the MDC should push for –
backed by civil society as Munyaradzi says. Gonda: And we have talked about the MDC not having a plan B, but what about
ZANU PF? What happens to it if the talks fail because it is widely believed that
Mugabe realises he needs the MDC to restart the economy? Gappah: Well, Violet I am not a political analysts that is probably a
question for Brian, but my sense of it is that I don’t think ZANU PF can survive
any real democratic election. There is just no way can that it do that. It has
relied so much on violence and intimidation. In a sense we are really, as I said
before, we are really asking ZANU PF to be a participant in its own distraction
here. Gonda: And Prof. Can you give us your thoughts on this - I remember
interviewing you on our news programme and you were saying ZANU PF is using
violence to force the MDC into negotiations. But what’s its plan B if
negotiations fail? Raftopoulos: Well, I think what is likely to happen is the economy will get
worse and as bad as things are they can get worse, as we have seen in other
parts of the continent. Sanctions are likely to be intensified and Zimbabwe may
come onto the UN agenda again. So ZANU PF simply doesn’t have a strategy to
bring the country out of the economic and political crisis on their own. They
very much require this negotiated settlement. Of course they could hang on for a
certain period but the situation will certainly continue to deteriorate. With
regards to the MDC it is clear that going into the negotiations was a correct
strategy. I think they had little alternatives to do that. In terms of plan B, I don’t think at this stage that the Zimbabwean populace
and the nature of what’s happened to our society is capable of carrying out a
frontal attack on the Zimbabwean State through mass action strategies. I think
that will be highly problematic given the nature of the poverty in the country,
the movement of people out of the country, the weakening of the central
structures of the civic movement - like the trade unions. So it’s likely that
plan B will be calls for international and regional pressure on the regime
should the negotiations fail. Gonda: But on the issue of the sanctions that you have just mentioned, it
seems there is a growing number of people who feel that sanctions or smart
sanctions are a wrong thing. What is your view on this? Raftopoulos: Look I think that it was important for the sanctions issue to be
put on the agenda it is one of the issues that certainly pushed the mediations
forward - whether President Mbeki wishes to admit that or not - the threat of
sanctions has been something that has had an effect in giving impetus to the
discussions. Also I think that ZANU PF needs to know if they continue to spit in
the face of Zimbabweans, and if the region is not able to take a stronger
position then they will face greater obstacles from the broader international
community. So I am not totally negative about the effects of sanctions. I think
in some ways they have given an impetus to the negotiations. Gonda: Munyaradzi do you support the sanctions? Gwisai: No I must be quite clear on this. To assume that ZANU PF cannot
survive over the next couple of months, over the next year or so I think will be
a very dangerous conception of what is possible. And in fact I think when you
look at what they are doing - the latest policy statement and the Bacossi
activities - the reality is they will bunker in and go into a command economy,
just like how countries like CUBA and North Korea and others have been able to
sustain those regimes and made to sustain themselves under sanctions. And it
will also massively increase repression - arguing that it is under siege from
the West and the sanctions. So yes the people of this country are going to suffer much, much more than we
have ever seen if this happens. But already what we are seeing is ZANU PF
preparing for that possibility if they don’t get what they want in these talks.
Using the sanctions as a tool, I think, is a very dangerous approach because it
simply empowers countries and forces at the global level, who would want a
resolution of the Zimbabwean crisis but on their own terms. Whose own
intervention in countries like Iraq and Afghanistan has not necessarily brought
positive results for the ordinary people. So yes the sanctions are biting and
are going to bite more. I must point out that these talks started after 11 March (07) when in fact a
united front activity of the MDC and civic society in Highfields activated
action. I have no doubt that given where we are today, given the spirit of
resistance we saw in the March 29th election, if the leadership and activists of
the main opposition and civic society and the democrats in this country
supported by working people in the region and nationally, I believe that the
will and the possibility of taking on this regime is there and I think we can
fight. We saw women of WOZA coming out this past week. What we now need to do is
to do this together and fight for democracy and food. Gonda: But Munyaradzi if the sanctions hadn’t been there do you think Mugabe
would be at the negotiating table? Gwisai: They might have their own effect in the sense but the negotiations
that Mugabe does is then designed to respond to the pressures from the West,
which could lead to an elitist view. But we must remember that long before
sanctions were done in 1997, 1998, 1999 or the March 11 thing in 2007 - the
action from below, the stayaways, and the general strikes created sufficient
pressure to allow Mugabe in fact to accede for instance the demands for a new
constitution in 2000. We also saw working class pressure in South Africa with
the Chinese arms, managing to stop Mugabe from receiving for some time the arms
from China-. So I believe the most powerful force and one that will ensure we
have a people driven resolution to the Zimbabwean crisis is people to people
action and solidarity in Zimbabwe and regionally. Gonda: And Petina what are your views on the issue of the sanctions? Gappah: Well, I just wanted to comment on this idea that the economy is
what’s going to bring Zanu-PF down in the end. It’s a view I have heard
expressed many, many times by people, you know ‘Mugabe can rig the elections but
he can’t rig the economy.’ I don’t believe that for a minute because as
Munyaradzi says there are ways of developing a command economy in such a way
that you still manage to ‘bunker down’ and I suspect that is what we are looking
at if these negotiations fail. I am not sure that the economy is going to
destroy Zanu-PF for us. I think it has to be a combination of factors, it has to
be a combination of pressure from the international community, pressure from
within Zimbabwe and also the MDC has to try and get absolutely the best deal
that it can, because I really think that beyond these negotiations there isn‘t
really a lot of light at the end of this tunnel. Gonda: And how do you think they should go around this ‘stalemate’ where we
understand that they have agreed on most of the issues on the agenda but that
they are stuck on the issue of who should lead this transitional phase. Gappah: But I will go back to my first contribution in this discussion, I
don’t really think it’s possible for us to comment on what’s going on, on the
basis of what speculation we read in the press. And without the MDC really
informing people and especially the civil society what is going on it is very
difficult for us to come up here with models. Do we have an executive Prime
Minister? Should Tsvangirai accept a 3rd Vice President? There are all these
things that are being talked about and it’s very difficult to say what exactly
should happen because we really don’t know what the models are that are being
discussed. Gonda: From a legal point of view what are your thoughts on the issue of
amnesty for Mugabe because the country has been bludgeoned by a few individuals
in ZANU PF? And some have said someone should answer for this. Is Justice being
traded for unity here? Gappah: You know Violet that’s a really important question and it’s something
we all have to think about seriously. On the one hand you do not want people to
get away with the horrific crimes that they committed, but at the same time we
have seen throughout history that sometimes justice has to be traded for peace.
And I really don’t know where we are going to be after next week on this. And it
is actually quite striking that in the MoU itself that item is not a separate
item on the agenda. You could argue that you can bring it in through the rule of
law clauses but there isn’t a single item that talks about justice that talks
about reconciliation. There are all these things about national healing but we
really don’t know what kind of a commission or whether there is going to be any
kind of truth and reconciliation at all. So this is something that again the
civil society needs to pressure the MDC on, needs to pressure ZANU PF on. And I will go back to my earlier contribution when I said that I don’t think
that this process is necessarily closed to civil society. There are still issues
that can be taken out to be discussed within the framework of the nation as a
whole. Gonda: Brian what are your views on amnesty for Mugabe? And also back to what
Petina was saying, perhaps this is the reason the civil society should be
involved in these talks and actually have some input, because how can political
parties be trusted to give attention to things to do with humanitarian issues or
human rights concerns? Raftopoulos: I agree. I think the issue of transitional justice is something
that the civil society groups need to be pushing and lobbying for not just now
but in the near future. I don’t think they are on the negotiating table and what
we are likely to see out of this current agreement is another round of immunity
for human rights abusers. So we have now a long legacy of this abuse and I think
it’s something that human rights organisations should take up. I also want to come back to the question of the kind of factors that will
bring about change. I agree that the economy on its own won’t be a factor. I
think the economy can produce even more repressive conditions. And I think that
it will be a combination of national, regional and international factors and
that’s what we are seeing at play in the negotiations - precisely that
combination of forces and unfortunately the weakest part of that combination is
the internal social forces and that of course will affect the kind of outcome
that comes out of these negotiations. Gonda: And Munyaradzi what about the military’s role in this? It’s widely
believed the military is in charge of the country - so how effective do you
think these talks will be if the military is not directly involved? Gwisai: Well, I suppose since this is part of the system that Mugabe is
running whereby there is a situation that whatever is agreed there, their party
is going to be in agreement in terms of consulting each other. We have heard
they had their own consultative meeting and so forth. So when you look at ZANU
PF now you are looking at a party that has become highly militarised and which
is very difficult to distinguish between ZANU PF the political party and
institutions of the State, in particular the military. So they are operating as
a combined team, as a combined force. Which goes back to my argument that no single force, no single party in the
democratic political and civil movement is going to be able to take on such a
force on its own. It can only be on a united front. But also that raises the
issues that were also discussed by the other comrades about the issue of
amnesty. I think Brian is dead right, if we leave this whole thing to
politicians alone - as is the case right now - their concern is just going to be
about sharing power and sharing benefits and for their own sponsors in terms of
business and capitalist classes that back them. But we are not creating a ground and a basis for a democratic society that
ensures that those who perpetuate and perpetrates human rights violations are
brought to justice and so forth. So whilst I would say that as part of a
comprehensive holistic deal you could look at those issues but equally we demand
as civil society - there are serious issues of compensation, there are serious
issues of victims being given a reconciliation process in which they are able to
have their matters raised and the perpetrators also showing remorse and so
forth. So it has to be a holistic process before you grant that process. But
ultimately at the end of the day what we require now is to put into place
structures that ensure proper democratic governance in this country as well as
economic justice for the poor and ordinary people in this country. Gonda: And a final word Petina? Gappah: I agree with everything that Munyaradzi has said. He is absolutely
right. Gonda: Brian? Raftopoulos: Obviously the military are a key factor in the ZANU PF strategy.
They are at the centre of Mugabe’s power that any agreement that comes out of
there will have to have the go ahead of the military. At the same time the
military are the key problem in the negotiations so it’s something of a paradox
and a challenge for the current mediator. Gonda: And Munyaradzi final word. Gwisai: Well, all we can say is to encourage people of Zimbabwe that they
came out in March - so the fight must continue. As civil society we are calling
for national, regional and international protests in the next few weeks if not
days. Details will be coming out. We must not give up. The time for salvation is
arriving. Thank you. Gonda: Thank you Munyaradzi Gwisai, Petina Gappah and Professor Brian
Raftopoulos for taking part in the programme Hot Seat. Comments and feedback can be emailed to
violet@swradioafrica.com
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=2188
August 7, 2008
By Our
Correspondent
BULAWAYO - Dumiso Dabengwa, a former top Zanu-PF official
and Minister of
Home Affairs has warned Zimbabweans to be wary of former
Information
Minister, Jonathan Moyo in a new political
dispensation.
Dabengwa one of Matabeleland's most seasoned and respected
politicians and a
former Zanu-PF politburo member, said Moyo, now the
independent Member of
Parliament for Tsholotsho North, was the kind of
individual who could change
overnight for money.
"Moyo has proved to
be a political chameleon," Dabengwa said.
It was recently reported in the
Zimbabwe Times that Moyo, who worked close
to President Robert Mugabe as his
spin-doctor from 2000 to 2005, had played
a central role in engineering
Mugabe's violent re-election campaign in the
controversial single-candidate
presidential election on June 27. Although
Moyo has denied the allegation,
Dabengwa reiterated in an address at the
Bulawayo Press Club that Moyo had
engineered Mugabe's campaign.
"Moyo cannot be trusted in a new political
dispensation as he has, since
independence, shown that he has the political
colours of a chameleon and
cannot be trusted in a new political
dispensation," Dabengwa said. "He
crafted Mugabe's violent campaign for the
June 27 elections.
"Moyo is such a usable person who can change overnight
and can do anything
for money. He was with the MDC before the March 29
elections but later
dumped the party to craft a violent re-election for
Mugabe."
In the run-up to the March 31 Moyo had appeared to be aligned to
MDC leader,
Morgan Tsvangirai. The MDC therefore gave Moyo a free kick in
the Tsholotsho
North parliamentary election by no nominating a candidate to
challenge Moyo.
In the presidential election on the same day, Tsvangirai
defeated Mugabe but
not by a large enough margin to be able to form the next
government. An
election re-run was therefore declared. Tsvangirai withdrew
his candidature
in the face of an orgy of violence, leaving Mugabe to win
the election by
what Zanu-PF called a landslide.
Many in and out of
Zimbabwe dismissed the election as a sham.
Dabengwa was a Zanu-PF
politburo member until he joined former finance
minister Simba Makoni, also
a member of the party's politburo, who quit the
party to launch his
presidential bid a few weeks before the elections.
Makoni came a distant
third in the March 29 presidential election.
Thereafter Dabengwa realigned
himself behind the mainstream MDC led by
Tsvangirai.
Dabengwa
revealed that before the elections, Moyo had approached him with a
proposal
that he challenge Mugabe in the presidential polls. He said he had
dismissed
his proposal.
"Moyo was a government critic before 2000 but was lured
with money and he
joined Zanu-PF during the constitutional referendum
period," said Dabengwa.
While the government- sponsored constitution was
rejected in a referendum,
Mugabe still rewarded Moyo with the post of
information minister.
A professor of political science, Moyo was sacked
from Zanu-PF and the
government after he stood as independent in the 2005
general elections. He
won the seat in Tsholotsho, which he regained this
year after the MDC
decided not to challenge him in the
constituency.
Last month, Moyo told journalists at the Quill Club in
Harare that he did
not rule out the prospect of rejoining Zanu-PF, arguing
that it was his
democratic right to join any political grouping of his
choice. He also said
that Mugabe was the ideal candidate to lead a
government of national unity.
His statement appeared to lend credence to
claims that he was angling for a
return into a Zanu-PF government as a
sequel to the crucial role he
allegedly played in Mugabe's controversial
re-election.
During his tenure as information minister, Moyo influenced
the
implementation of draconian legislation while the independent
newspapers,
including The Daily News, became targets of his campaign against
a free
press.
Dabengwa disclosed that while he had not formally left
Zanu-PF; he was no
longer attending the party's politburo and central
committees meetings
because he did not agree with some of the issues
discussed there, such as
the use of violence to win elections, he
said.
"There is no statement which was issued to say that I have been
fired from
Zanu-PF," said Dabengwa. "I just don't attend Zanu-F politburo
and central
committee meetings because of the trivial agenda of these
meetings, like
inciting violence to win elections."
The former Home
Affairs Minister also said he advised Tsvangirai to agree to
proposals for
the formation of a government of national unity with Mugabe as
the MDC
leader did not have much political experience.
AFP
HARARE (AFP) - HIV-positive widow Lilian Butau sits on a rickety
stool on
the veranda of her home in Harare's Mbare township, chewing on a
small piece
of calcium-rich rock, the only thing she has had to eat all
day.
While many are going hungry in crisis-wracked Zimbabwe, Butau's case
is more
disturbing in that she is both struggling to get food and has also
been
unable to take life-prolonging antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) for the last
four
months.
Butau -- who is blind, unemployed and has four children
to look after -- is
entitled to free ARVs under a government-sponsored
scheme, but when she last
went for new supplies, she was told the hospital
had run out.
"I am taking this as a vitamin supplement. It's all I can
afford," says
Butau, showing an AFP reporter a piece of rock believed to be
rich in
calcium and widely licked by pregnant women in Zimbabwe.
The
45-year-old is just one of the many silent victims of Zimbabwe's
political
and economic turmoil which has devastated the health sector.
She had been
a beneficiary of food aid from a Harare-based aid agency until
last month
when NGOs were ordered to suspend their operations after being
accused by
government of meddling in politics ahead of an election.
Although the
government says it has since issued an exemption for those
involved in
HIV/AIDS and supplementary feeding schemes, the word does not
seem to have
filtered through to those on the ground.
"Yes there was initially a
directive that all NGOs must stop operating, but
we stepped in and said all
those involved in HIV/AIDS should not be stoppped
because of the delicate
nature of their work," David Parirenyatwa,
Zimbabwe's health minister, told
AFP.
Parirenyatwa admitted the directive had had an adverse impact, but
said
authorities were working to rectify it.
"It has had a ripple
effect which we need to correct urgently.
"I am hoping that the
disruption was not long. We fear not only relapses,
but also an emergence of
resistance."
Despite the minister's comments, Fambai Ngirande, spokesman
for the National
Association of Non-governmental Organisations, says field
workers still face
obstacles.
"Some (NGOs) have tried going back to
the field, but workers have not been
free to move with truckloads of food
and get stopped at roadblocks and asked
for a clearance letter, which they
would not possess," said Ngirande.
Douglas Muzanenhamo, who works with
Butau as a counsellor for HIV sufferers,
struggled to suppress his anger at
the impact of the original order.
"They have killed people," said
Muzanenhamo who was until recently
coordinating a feeding scheme for orphans
of AIDS victims.
"One of the children in my (feeding) programme died
recently. It's
heartbreaking."
Despite the economic turmoil which has
enveloped Zimbabwe since the turn of
the decade, the government's record on
combating AIDS has won plaudits.
Officials representing Zimbabwe at the
world AIDS conference in Mexico City
will be able to point to an HIV
prevalency rate which now stands at 15.6
percent of the adult population,
having dropped from 31 percent in 2000.
Some 110,000 patients are
recipients of free ARVs under a programme which
began in 2004 and which
ultimately aims to cater for 300,000.
"We want very well that those on
ARVs should continue. We will not allow to
stock in some areas and not in
others," said Parirenyatwa.
Parirenyatwa also denied there were any ARVs
supply problems.
"All of our people on ARVs are able to access them for
the next three
months".
Infected 23 years ago, Butau's greatest
concern is that while she has lived
this long with the virus, the stress of
the past few months could accelerate
her demise.
"I get so stressed
the moment I start thinking about my status that I lose
sleep," she said,
her lips white from the stone she has been chewing.
"If we are going to
die, it is going to be from hunger and stress."
http://www.unicef.org/media/media_45100.html
UNICEF
calls for the immediate lifting of the NGO ban
HARARE, 6 August 2008-
Zimbabwe's national biannual Child Health Days kicked
off on Monday, with
the aims of providing the country's two million children
(under-five) with
essential Vitamin A supplementation and catch-up
immunization, and of
providing communities with life-saving information on
nutrition and
breastfeeding practices.
"The nationwide campaigns are important
life-saving, low-cost and
high-impact support towards reducing child
illnesses and deaths in
Zimbabwe," said UNICEF's Acting Country
Representative in Zimbabwe, Roeland
Monasch. "The days are an essential
boost to a health system under great
stress and children made vulnerable by
declining social services."
The Child Health Days (CHDs) are led by the
Ministry of Health and Child
Welfare in partnership with UNICEF, the World
Health Organisation (WHO) and
Helen Keller International. Past child health
drives have demonstrated that
this campaign method is highly successful.
During the campaigns, UNICEF
adequately funds social mobilization and
provides health staff and
volunteers with allowances and additional
transport is provided for outreach
activities.
The week-long US$
1million campaign is supported by essential funding from
the UK's Department
for International Development (DFID), Canada's
International Development
Agency (CIDA) and UNICEF's National Committee of
the
Netherlands.
During the campaign health workers and volunteers conduct
outreach
activities to schools, community centres and mobile clinics across
the
country. Children, even those in hard to reach areas, are immunised
against
tuberculosis, measles, diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough,
hepatitis B,
haemophilus influenza and polio.
UNICEF's Regional
Director Per Engebak, who was in Zimbabwe last week,
reaffirmed that Child
Health Days are pivotal for the well-being of
Zimbabwean children. The
agency, however, expressed serious concerns about
the impact on children of
the current ban prohibiting non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) from
operating in communities. The ban, imposed on the
4th of June, has now been
in effect for over two months.
"We applaud and are committed to efforts
such as the Child Health Campaign,
but we cannot forget that a growing
number of children are suffering daily
because of the NGO ban," said Mr.
Engebak. "Every day that such an important
lifeline of humanitarian aid for
children remains cut off, puts the children
of this country at ever greater
risk."
Recent child health campaigns have boosted vitamin A coverage from
less than
10 per cent in 2005 to over 80 per cent today. Overall
immunization
coverage, which had dropped by almost 50 per cent, has once
again reached 70
per cent. The campaign in November 2007 reached 81per cent
of the country's
children with polio vaccination and 80 per cent with
Vitamin A
supplementation.
The child health days are part of the
country's ongoing efforts to eliminate
vaccine preventable diseases,
maintain high vitamin A coverage and improve
child survival across the
country.
UNICEF continues to provide support to the Zimbabwe Expanded
programme on
Immunisation (ZEPI) in the procurement of vaccines for
immunisation, cold
chain equipment for vaccine storage and technical support
to the health
workers.
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=43471
By Thalif Deen
UNITED
NATIONS, Aug 6 (IPS) - As China tries to boost its international
image,
playing host to a summer Olympic games, the government in Beijing is
being
singled out as a key arms supplier to some of the world's worst human
rights
abusers, according to a new study released here.
Although China controls
only 2 percent of the global arms market, Beijing's
impact "is measured less
by the value of its sales than by the character of
its clients," says
William D. Hartung, director of the Arms and Security
Initiative at the New
America Foundation. A brief by the Washington-based
non-profit public policy
institute, released Wednesday, points out that
China is currently "an arms
supplier of last resort for dictators and human
rights abusers", including
Sudan, Zimbabwe and Myanmar (Burma).
"China's domestic policies have come
under much-deserved scrutiny in the
run-up to the Olympics," noted Hartung,
author of the study, who says
Beijing's clients include politically
repressive regimes.
"We shouldn't forget that the Chinese government's
most egregious act has
been its role as an enabler of mass murder in
Darfur," he said.
Without Chinese support, he argued, the ability of the
Sudanese government
and its allies to kill, maim, and intimidate the people
of Darfur would be
greatly diminished.
Asked whether Western nations
are equally guilty in their arms sales
policies, Hartung told IPS that major
suppliers like the United States,
Britain and France all supply
dictatorships and human rights abusers.
But he pointed out that China's
markets include the few repressive regimes
that these major exporters have
chosen not to supply.
For example, in the case of the U.S., 17 of its 25
largest recipients of
weapons in the developing world in 2007 were
designated as major human
rights abusers or undemocratic regimes by its own
State Department.
"Under various laws and political commitments [not
formal treaties], major
suppliers are committed to limiting sales to regions
of conflict and major
human rights abusers," according to
Hartung.
But in practice, he said, these rules are violated more often
than they are
observed, generally on grounds of "national interest", which
could mean
anything from exporting to major oil producing countries to
supporting
nations in "strategic locations".
In order to address the
hypocrisy of current arms export rules, such as they
are, Amnesty
International, Oxfam, and scores of other groups are promoting
the concept
of a global Arms Trade Treaty that would make these loose
promises to avoid
arming dictators and human rights abusers into formal
legal commitments, he
added.
In a statement released Wednesday, Human Rights First and the Save
Darfur
Coalition said the International Criminal Court's (ICC) recent
efforts to
charge Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir with genocide puts the
world's
governments on notice that war crimes may well be occurring in
Darfur.
Countries such as China and Russia are bound by the Genocide
Convention to
take all possible action -- including immediately suspending
arms sales to
Sudan -- the two non-governmental organisations (NGOs)
said.
At a meeting of the Security Council last week, Chinese Ambassador
Wang
Guangya spoke against the recent ICC indictment of Al-Bashir on charges
of
genocide in Darfur. "China supports the reasonable request by the African
Union and other organisations for the Security Council to take early action
to suspend the indictment of the Sudanese leader by the ICC, in accordance
with the relevant provisions" of the Rome Statute that created the
ICC.
Under Article 16 of the Rome Statute, the 15-member Security Council
has the
power to suspend any indictment of Al-Bashir -- under a "deferral of
investigation and prosecution" clause.
Hartung said that China has
been the most egregious violator of the global
arms embargo on Sudan,
providing everything from guns and ammunition to arms
manufacturing
facilities.
Since 2004, the vast majority of Sudan's small arms and light
weapons have
come from China -- and many of them have found their way into
the hands of
the notorious Janjaweed militias in Darfur.
The arming
of Sudan is "just the most damning example of a Chinese policy
that has
resulted in major weapons exports to repressive regimes in Zimbabwe
and
Myanmar, as well as sales of missile technology to Iran and Pakistan,"
Hartung said.
China is essentially "bartering arms and political
support for access to
Sudan's oil resources," Hartung explains.
China
has also sold combat aircraft to Myanmar, Sudan, and Zimbabwe, as well
as
air--to-air missiles to Sudan.
Asked to detail some of the Chinese
weapons sales, Hartung told IPS that
shipments to Myanmar include 12 F-7
fighter aircraft; 40 PLA-2A short- range
air-to-air missiles; 40 PLA-2B
short-range air-to-air missiles; and 12 K-8
aircraft, which can be used for
training or for combat.
The arms shipments to Sudan include 3 A-5C Fantan
fighter/ground attack
aircraft and 12 K-8 trainer/combat aircraft, along
with 10 Type-85 IIAP
tanks and 10 WZ-551 armoured personnel
carriers.
The sales to Zimbabwe include 12 K-8 trainer/combat aircraft,
plus small
arms and ammunition.
http://www.zimonline.co.za/Article.aspx?ArticleId=3508
by Mutumwa
Mawere Thursday 07 August 2008
OPINION: "Long Walk
to Freedom" is an autobiographical work written by
South Africa's former
President Nelson Mandela, and published in 1995. It is
a story of the
audacity of hope that describes his early life, coming of
age, education, 27
years in prison, his political ascension, and his belief
that the struggle
against poverty and political inclusivity continues in the
post-apartheid
order.
The road to freedom was closed to persons of colour during
the
colonial/apartheid eras and yet for many would be candidates for
political
office in post-colonial Africa, the road remains closed with the
state
increasingly being manipulated to be the biggest and most lethal enemy
of
democracy.
In trying to better understand the construction
of post-colonial
Africa, one is often reminded that the values, principles
and beliefs that
informed the creation of an exclusive colonial race-based
constitutional
democratic order are no different from those that drive the
post-colonial
system.
The state house in post-colonial Africa
ought to be a house of the
people. The resident of the peoples' house must
necessarily be an agent of
the people if democracy has to have a
meaning.
The role of the state cannot, therefore, be more than the
administration of the people's agenda.
Who should qualify to be
the first citizen in a democratic order? How
should the incumbent be
selected? Whose agenda should he/she be pursuing?
What should be the role of
the state?
In a constitutional democracy, any citizen as defined in
the
constitution should be eligible to qualify for the office of president.
Such
a citizen must come from the people through a credible and transparent
system.
The state itself as an institution is a foreign
construct in many
developing countries. Its foundation has to be located in
the colonial
system that had as its cornerstone the values and worldview of
a settler
community that had originated from so-called civilised
societies.
The relationship between the settlers and the colonial
state was
understood as was the role of the state. The alienation of the
majority of
the citizens was justified on the grounds that natives could
conceivably
have no interest in a constitutional democratic
order.
The struggle for independence was, therefore, informed by
the
interests of political elites to connect them to the state so as to
influence their affairs.
The charge against the colonial state
was ably led by intellectuals
seeking to assert their civil rights.
Intellectuals played and continue to
play an inspirational and leadership
role in Africa.
It has been generally accepted although not written
in any
constitution that a political leader must have some knowledge about
how to
advance the interests of the citizens in a democratic
order.
The transition from the colonial to a post-colonial order
saw African
agitators assume positions in the state that they had been
fighting hard to
destroy and undermine. When they took office, some of the
intellectuals had
no clue about how to organise a successful and vibrant
post-colonial state.
To a large extent it was always understood
that the control of the
state would assist in alleviating poverty. It is
evident that no serious
attention was paid to understanding the complex
interplay between the
colonial state and the market system.
The
colonial state was as successful as the settlers wanted it to be
rather than
as a benign consequence of the whims of the imperial power. It
cannot be
denied that the colonial settlers were good at building
institutions to
serve their interests.
After 52 years of uhuru, Africa's youngest
child, South Africa, at 14
years of age is already exhibiting classic
symptoms of the African political
and succession disease. The transition
from the apartheid state to the
Mandela regime was seamless and
inclusive.
The transformation of the atmosphere of fear that
characterised the
transition to a hopeful one was instrumental in building
confidence that has
allowed whites to continue to earn income, a portion of
which has been used
to help in the alleviation of poverty through
taxes.
Thabo Mbeki, an intellectual, took over from Mandela having
been his
deputy and it was widely hoped that the baton of power would also
be
seamlessly passed on. His deputy, Jacob Zuma, occupied the number two
spot
in both the government and the party until things went fundamentally
wrong
in 2005.
What was expected to be a smooth and pleasant
walk to state house has
been a tortuous and dangerous one.
Zuma
has navigated carefully and purposefully through the landmines of
corruption
and rape charges since his dismissal as deputy to Mbeki in the
state.
Against all odds, he was elected in December 2007 as president of the
African National Congress (ANC) party and the next in line to be the state
president.
Who would have thought that while Mandela is still
alive, the ANC
would be found wanting on the leadership, values and
principles debate?
Zuma genuinely believes that he has been
unfairly treated by a state
whose legitimacy derives from the party that he
now leads and yet he finds
himself helpless. Instead of relying on the state
to advance the interests
of the party as is customary in post-colonial
Africa, Zuma finds himself at
the receiving end of a system that emerged
from the womb of oppression.
If Mandela by describing his journey
from apartheid/colonialism to
post-apartheid as a freedom journey then he
obviously had no idea that a
party that has given him a home is capable of
doing worse things than
apartheid to those like Zuma who have the audacity
to seek residency in the
statehouse.
The ANC under Zuma's
leadership has been reduced to resorting to mass
action rather than using
the organs of state to correct what they feel to be
abuses of state power by
their own product, Mbeki.
Since June 2005, Zuma through his lawyers
has thrown everything into
ensuring he does not stand trial or that, if he
does, the amount of evidence
against him is limited. He has been put on the
defensive while claiming to
be a victim of conspiracy.
Rightly
or wrongly he has claimed all manner of dirty tricks on the
part of the
state - from political persecution to seizing privileged
documents to obtain
an inside track into his defence - while failing to
expose the "conspiracy"
against him.
As expected, last week, the Constitutional Court (CC)
rejected his
appeal against the Supreme Court of Appeal's decision to allow
the state to
use 93 000 documents it had seized in the August 2005 raids on
his homes and
offices and those of his lawyer, Michael Hulley.
The CC also rejected his appeal against the SCA's ratification of a
Durban
High Court decision to allow the state to secure evidence against him
from
Mauritius, including the encrypted fax allegedly soliciting a bribe of
R1
million for him from co-accused Thint.
What the CC has managed to
do is to put pressure on Zuma to use the
courts to challenge the corruption
allegations rather than giving the
impression that he has something to hide.
By carefully managing Zuma, Mbeki
may achieve what he could not at Polokwane
to ensure that Zuma will never
call the state house his home.
Mbeki's opinion on Zuma's presidency is already known and yet the
party that
gives both of them legitimacy is of the opinion that Zuma should
be the next
resident of the state house.
While Mbeki's view may have legal
substance, an absurd outcome seems
to be emerging where the general
consensus in the party and possibly in the
country if ANC were to be
returned to power as expected is that
notwithstanding the corruption
allegations, Zuma must be the head of state.
The manner in which
Zuma has been treated by the state raises key
constitutional and legal
questions that will continue to haunt the Republic.
The role of the
courts particularly the CC in the contestation for
power will continue to be
a subject of debate in years to come but what is
significant is that the
ultimate jury and fountain of political power, the
people, hold different
views from their servants in the state.
The ruling by the CC opens
the way for the state to present nearly all
the evidence it has amassed
against Zuma in an unprecedented five years of
investigation which has split
the ruling party and led to the country's
biggest political crisis since the
end of apartheid in 1994.
The ANC has already voted to disband the
police unit that headed the
investigation.
The mixed message
from Zuma that he wants his day in court while using
all instruments within
the law to ensure that the day will never arrive
while Mbeki is at the helm
of the state may serve to undermine the position
of the party regarding his
innocence.
Zuma's walk to state house is pregnant with lessons that
much more
work needs to be done to realise the objectives of the liberation
struggle.
Mbeki and Zuma have succeeded in exposing how fragile and
perishable
the constitutional democratic order is.
A better
understanding of the role of the state and the responsibility
of citizens to
invest in the kind of society they want to see is critically
important in
driving the transformation and nation building agendas. -
ZimOnline