The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

MDC Mailing list

We remember them, We mourn them, We salute them


This is the roll of honour of some of the gallant sons and daughters of
Zimbabwe who have died in political violence. They were killed in cold blood
for daring to stand up for their rights and your rights to be free. This
roll does not neglect the women who have been raped, the people who have
been beaten up, their homes burnt. Throughout Zimbabwe the spirit of
democratic resistance is rising. We pay tribute to the proud spirit of the
Zimbabwean people. They did not die in vain.


1. ANDOCHE Julius (farm foreman), 20 April 2000, Mashonaland East, Murehwa
South.
2. BANDA (MR) (MDC), 24 April 2000, Mashonaland Central, Shamva.
3. BOTHA William, (commercial farmer)23 July 2000, Mashonaland East, Seke,
Marondera West.
4. BVUMBURAI Paul, Shamva
5. CHAKWENYA, Tinashe (ZRP), 4 April 2000, Mashonaland East, Marondera.
6. Chakwenya John, 2/7/01 Harare – Epworth.
7. CHAITAMA Nicholas (MDC), 25 April 2000, Mashonaland West, Kariba.
8. CHAPURUNGA Lemani, 19 November 2000, Mashonaland East, Marondera West.
9. CHEMVURA Lameck, (UZ Student) 24/11/01, Manicaland
10. CHIGAGURA, Zeke (MDC), 20 June 2000, Midlands, Gokwe East.
11. CHIHUMBIRI, Eswat 23 March 2001, Mashonaland Central, Muzarabani
12. CHIKWENYA, Richard Dzokurasa (MDC), I May 2001, Manicaland, Buhera North
13. CHIMINYA, Tichaona (MDC), 14 April 2000, Manicaland, Buhera North.
14. Chinhengo (MR), Gokwe North
15. Chinyere(MR) (MDC) 11/6/00 pulled out of bus and beaten to death.
16. CHIPUNZA, Takundwa, Patrick, (MDC), 16 May 2000, Harare, Budiriro.
17. CHIRIMA, Robson Tinarwo (MDC), March 2001, Mashonaland Central,
Muzarabani
18. Chitemerere Mhondiwa (MDC) 30/10/01 Murehwa South
19. Chiwara Laban 7/5/00 Harare.
20. CHISASA, Alex (ZRP), 13 May 2000, Manicaland, Chipinge South.
21. COBBET, Robert Fenwick (commercial farmer), 6 August 2001, Midlands,
Kwekwe.
22. DUMUKANI, Zondani, (farmworker) 9 June 2001, Harare, Mbare East
23. DUNN, Allan Stewart, (commercial farmer) 7 May 2000, Mashonaland East,
Seke.
24. Dzokurasa Richard 30/4/01  Buhera North
25. ELSWORTH, Henry Swan, (commercial farmer) 12 December 2000, Mashonaland
East, Kwekwe.
26. GOMO, Edwin (MDC), 26 March 2000, Mashonaland Central, Bindura.
27. Guvi Obert 14/9/00 Hurungwe West
28. GWASE, Nhamo (MDC), June 2000, Mashonaland East, Murehwa South.
29. GWENZI, Gilson (MDC), 27 July 2001, Mashonaland Central, Mwenezi
30. JEKE, Leo,  10 June 2000, Masvingo, Chivi South.
31. KANOMERA,  John (MDC), 3 July 2001, Harare, Hatfield (Epworth)
32. KANYURIRA, Luckson (MDC) 25 April 2000, Mashonaland West, Kariba.
33. KAREZA, Howard (MDC), 13 December 2000(assaulted 23 April), Mashonaland
Central, Shamva.
34. KAREZA, Peter (MDC), 23 April 2000, Mashonaland Central, Shamva.
35. Katema Thomas 2/8/01 Harare.
36. MABIKA, Talent (MDC), 15 April 2000, Manicaland, Buhera North.
37. MADZVIMBO, Fanuel, (resettled farmer), 16 September 2001, Mashonaland
East, Hwedza
38. MAFEMERUKE, Constantine, 19 June 2000, Mashonaland West, Kariba.
39. MAGUWU, Itayi (MDC), 27 July 2000, Harare, Dzivarasekwa.
40. MAMONERA, John (MDC), 3 July 2001, Harare, Hatfield
41. MANDEYA, Joseph Ketero (MDC), 17 May 2000, Manicaland, Mutasa.
42. Mandindishe Peter 22/7/01 Bindura
43. MANHANGO  Wonder (MDC), 23 June 2000, Midlands, Gokwe North.
44. MANYAME Ropafadzo (MDC), 16 January 2001, Masvingo, Bikita West
45. MASHINGA Anthony date unreported, Mashonaland East, Goromonzi.
46. Masango Molly, Murehwa
47. MATARUSE Peter (MDC), March 2001, Mashonaland Central, Muzarabani
48. MARUFU Doreen (MDC), 2 April 2000, Mashonaland Central, Mazowe.
49. MATEMA Hilary (MDC), 15 October 2001, Mashonaland Central, Guruve South
50. MATYATYA,  27 June 2000, Midlands, Gweru.
51. MBEWE, Samson (farmworker), 9 August 2000, Mashonaland East, Goromonzi,
Seke.
52. Mbudzi(MDC), Mhangura
53. Mudzi Onias, Mudzi
54. Mudavanhu S (Chesa Farm)
55. MUKWELI, Vusimuzi, (MDC), 9 September 2001, Midlands, Gokwe South
56. MUPESA, Ndonga (MDC), 30 March 2001, Mashonaland Central, Muzarabani
57. Murirawanhu Rogers(MDC) Karoi.
58. MUSHAYA, Mationa (UP, village headman), 17 May 2000, Mashonaland East,
Mutoko.
59. MUSHAYA, Onias, (UP) 17 May 2000, Mashonaland East, Mutoko.
60. MUSONI, Robert, 26 March 2000, Mashonaland Central, Mazowe West.
61. MUTYANDA, Mandishona (MDC), 29 June 2000, Midlands, Kwekwe.
62. MWANZA, Misheck (MDC), 4 May 2001, Mashonaland West, Zvimba North
63. Nabanyama Patrick (MDC) abducted 19/6/00 never seen again Bulawayo.
64. Ngulube Simon, Shamva
65. NYAMADZAWO, Alexio, (resettled farmer) 15 September 2001, Mashonaland
East, Hwedza
66. Nyambare Winnie 18/5/01 Guruve
67. NYIKA, James (MDC), 3 July 2001, Harare, Hatfield (Epworth)
68. OATES, Tony, (commercial farmer)31 May 2000, Mashonaland West, Zvimba
North.
69. OLDS, Martin, (commercial farmer)18 April 2000, Matabeleland North,
Bubi-Umguza.
70. OLDS, Gloria, (commercial farmer)04 March 2001, Matabeleland North,
Bubi-Umguza.
71. PFEBVE, Matthew, 30 April 2000, Mashonaland Central, Mt Darwin North.
72. Rukara Kufa  20.11.01 Gokwe North
73. RUKUNI, Thadeus (MDC), 29 May 2000, Masvingo, Bikita East.
74. RUKARA, Kufa,  (MDC), 19 November 2001, Midlands, Silobela
75. SIZE, Rimon, 19 November 2000, Mashonaland East, Marondera West.
76. STEVENS, David (MDC), 15 April 2000, Mashonaland East, Murehwa South.
77. TADYANEMHANDU, Tichaona (MDC), 20 June 2000, Mashonaland West, Hurungwe
East.
78. Tapera (6/5/00 Macheke
79. Tinarwo Robson ….. Muzarabani
80. WEEKS, John, (commercial farmer)14 May 2000, Mashonaland East, Seke.
81. Wayner Peter (FR) 26/2/01 Masvingo
82. Zava Felix, (headmaster) (MDC)
83. ZHOU, Fainos Kufazvinei(MDC), 10 June 2000, Midlands, Mberengwa West.
84. ZIWENI, Osbon, (MDC) 18 September 2001, Masvingo, Bikita West

May they all rest in peace.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Sunday Tribune

Zimbabwe's top cop scores a farm for himself

December 08 2001 at 06:35PM



By John Matisonn

Zimbabwe's top cop has grabbed a prime farm for himself, telling the white
owner he was taking over the property under the government's policy of
redistributing land to the landless poor.

Many politicians and senior officials in the Zimbabwe government have been
given white-owned farms in terms of President Robert Mugabe's policy of
supposedly giving land to poor blacks.

Police commissioner Augustine Chihuri is the latest to benefit from the land
grabs. He has also vowed to crack down on political opposition in the runup
to next year's election.

'There needs to be pressure on Zanu'
With political tension at an all-time high, Zimbabwean opposition leaders
are appealing to South Africa to put pressure on Mugabe to accept a
framework agreement for the conduct of the election and its aftermath.

Mugabe was flying home on Saturday night with his wife and three children
from an expensive clinic in Madrid.

Chihuri, who is emerging as a key member of the Zimbabwean kleptocracy,
recently visited a farm in the prime Shamva area with his wife, to notify
the owner that he was taking it over. The order granting him the land was
signed by Agriculture Minister Joe Made.

Chihuri told a police graduation ceremony that he would "descend hard on
perpetrators and collaborators of terrorist activities", terms used by the
government to refer to opposition politicians and the media.

Opposition Movement for Democratic Change members of parliament told Sunday
Argus that conditions for free and fair elections appeared to be fatally
damaged, and called on South Africa to act immediately.

"It's unrealistic to expect a free and fair election under these
conditions," said MP Paul Themba Nyathi.

"To restore law and order you need a police force. Besides corruption, the
undermining of the economy means there will be logistical problems. The
government has created a system that feeds off violence.

"If Mugabe bludgeons himself into power what will the reaction be? Should
the MDC win, what will the reaction be? There has to be massive overseas
support to stabilise the country. There needs to be pressure on Zanu to
negotiate the transition. I'm not sure we can do it ourselves."

The United States Congress this week approved "smart sanctions" which will
allow President George Bush to freeze the assets and cancel the visas of
Mugabe, his cabinet, his advisers and their families, stopping them from
entering the US, where many of their children are studying.

Mugabe has imposed a set of laws restricting various categories of people
from voting, and there is no independent electoral commission. Young people
without electricity accounts or other means of proving their residence are
not being allowed to register.

Zimbabweans abroad may not register unless they are soldiers, and all
Zimbabweans with even a slight opportunity to become citizens of other
countries are being forced to renounce their potential citizenship.

Government threats against the press and foreign correspondents have
escalated, and a draconian new press bill has been published.

"In my constituency, people can't register. These elections are already
unfair. So whoever wins, it will not be acceptable to the other. In the
event of a struggle, what will happen?" asked MDC MP Priscilla Misihairabwi.


Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zimbabwe could ban foreign journalists

Zimbabwe's government is proposing legislation to ban all foreign reporters ahead of next year's presidential elections.

Officials have already labelled some reporters terrorists, expelling several foreign journalists and refusing to let most others in.

Dozens of local reporters have been arrested by police and beaten by ruling party militants.

"We are treating Zimbabwe as a war zone," said Zoe Titus, an official at the Media Institute of Southern Africa, which campaigns for press freedom.

The government also has said it would ban election monitors from "unfriendly" countries.

Titus accused President Robert Mugabe of seeking an "information blackout" to allow his government and its supporters free rein to intensify a campaign of intimidation and violence before the election in March.

Human rights workers accuse the government of trying to frighten people away from voting in the election, which poses the strongest threat to Mugabe since Zimbabwe's independence in 1980.

A presidential spokesman, quoted in the state-owned Herald newspaper last month, accused journalists who reported on an attack by ruling party militants against whites and opposition officials of aiding a "terrorist" opposition.

"We would like (reporters) to know that we agree with U.S. President Bush that anyone who in any way finances, harbours or defends terrorists is himself a terrorist," the spokesman said.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

MDC Mailing list

CONGRATULATIONS CHEGUTU!

Unconfirmed figures indicate a narrow but decisive MDC victory:
2900 MDC
2452 Zanu PF

Congratulations to the brave people of Chegutu, and to Zimbabwe’s third MDC
mayor!!!


Press Release: 10 December 2001

MDC mayoral victory in Chegutu- a people’s Christmas present to Zanu PF

This victory is a people’s Christmas present to Zanu PF. The present
contains a simple message that the people are resilient.  They have stated
that they will stand firm in the face of tyranny and that they will indeed
complete the change for a better life for all Zimbabweans that they started
last year.

This victory is also significant in that it confirms the quiet but
devastating losses being suffered by Zanu PF at the hands of the people in
those constituencies where the party either robbed or stole the election in
June 2000. President Mugabe has been defeated a few kilometers away from his
Zvimba homestead.

Finally this victory, especially coming after the violent stoning of the
house of the mayor-elect on the first day of polling is also a serious
indictment on the bloody electoral strategy that continues to be pursued by
this out-going regime.


Learnmore Jongwe,
Secretary, Information and Publicity.






MDC on Monday
10 December, 2001

MDC hails President Mbeki’s tough stance on Mugabe

The Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) hails the leadership shown by the
Southern African Development Community in calling on Zimbabwean President,
Robert Mugabe, to uphold democratic processes within Zimbabwe and to cease
the stripping of human rights.

The MDC is particularly inspired by the stance adopted by South African
President Thabo Mbeki.  Mbeki, as an upholder of democratic processes, has
shown a life-long commitment to ensuring the empowerment of every South
African.

Mbeki’s call for free and fair elections in Zimbabwe is warmly welcomed.
Botswana’s leaders Festus Mogae and Malawian president Bakili Muluzi, have
also raised their voices concerning the deteriorating human rights situation
within Zimbabwe.

The African Renaissance Mbeki speaks of is on the right path if we see our
friends and neighbours uniting against oppression and injustice. The
struggle in Zimbabwe has always been a struggle for the dignity and
sovereignty of the people.  Workers and peasants have always been at the
forefront of any struggle for justice and dignity in Zimbabwe.

The nationalist and liberation movements that led the second uprising were
from and build on the struggles of workers and peasants. After 21 years of
Independence, we now have a ruling elite that has exploited this long and
painful history to justify its wicked end.  This national elite has betrayed
the people’s struggle and created the crisis that Zimbabwe finds itself in
today.

The crisis has drawn in both national and international attention.  It has
manifested itself in the political, economic, and human rights abuses.  The
net effect of this has been:

¨ a total collapse of farm production resulting in Zimbabwe having a net
maize shortage of 600,000 tonnes and a further 200,000 tonnes shortage of
other grain reserves;
¨ the displacement of at least 250,000 farm workers, turning them into
destitutes overnight;
¨ the clampdown on the opposition through abductions, arrests, torture and
murder.  More disturbing is that those perpetrating this violence have
hardly been arrested;
¨ the packing of the courts with Zanu PF supporters, thus undermining the
independence of the judiciary;
¨ the persistent attacks on the Press characterised by constant threaets,
arrests and bombings of printing presses and the introduction of notorious
pieces of legislation like the Access to Information and Protection of
Privacy legislation;
¨ an increasingly regulated electoral process toward the presidential
elections next year, which will effectively see rural women, the urban poor
who lack title deeds, farm workers and young people have their rights to
register and vote removed.

The government of Zimbabwe has also taken steps to ban local, regional and
international monitors from civic organisations from monitoring the
presidential elections.

The international community has played a part trying to resolve the crisis
in Zimbabwe.  Sadc, the UNDP, the Commonwealth and the European Union have
taken various initiatives.  Sadly, all these initiatives at solving the
crisis in Zimbabwe have failed primarily because of President Robert Mugabe’
s lack of dependability. So the MDC understands President Mbeki’s
frustration with Zimbabwe.  Mugabe and his party are unreliable partners.

Mugbe has absurdly the traditional solidarity within Sadc and surely even
whtin Sadc there are limits to solidarity.  Liberation was won across the
continent on the grounds of promsiing freedom for all—that promise is
sacred.

In the 2002 presidential elections, Mugabe must go.  Every Zimbabwean over
the age of 18 is encouraged to register to vote.  Voter registration is an
ongoing process that will continue even after the inspection of the voters’
roll has been closed.  Those who have not registered must go and register at
their District Offices.

Contact us:
Email: mdcpublicity@hotmail.com
Website:  www.mdczimbabwe.com
Address:  Box A1728, Harare

Play your part in completing the change by contributing to the MDC
presidential campaign:
MDC Trust Fund: Standard Chartered, 0100241402900, Bulawayo


Mugabe's Party Loses Third Mayoral Poll to Opposition
Business Day (Johannesburg)

December 11, 2001

Dumisani Muleya


PRESIDENT Robert Mugabe's ruling Zanu (PF) party yesterday slumped to its
third consecutive mayoral election defeat by the opposition Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) in the town of Chegutu following recent massive
reversals in Bulawayo and Masvingo.

Mugabe's party, which is losing support rapidly in the urban areas due to
the deepening economic crisis, got 2452 votes while the MDC received 2900
votes. The election was characterised by voter apathy.

Just more than a quarter of the 20000 registered voters participated in the
poll, in which a lot of people were turned away.

MDC spokesman Learnmore Jongwe said the victory coming against the
background of next year's crucial presidential poll was important in that it
showed Mugabe was losing support near his home area.

Chegutu, which is located about 100 km south west of Harare, is situated
close to the Zimbabwean leader's Mashonaland West province rural village and
stronghold. "President Mugabe has been defeated a few kilometres away from
his Zvimba homestead," Jongwe said.

The Chegutu parliamentary seat was won by Zanu (PF) in last year's general
election.

Jongwe said the triumph was a "Christmas present" for his party and a strong
warning that "Harare's dictatorial regime is facing liquidation.

"This victory was also significant because it is a serious indictment of the
bloody electoral strategies pursued by this outgoing regime. Let it be known
that no amount of fascist coercion and intimidation will save Mugabe and his
fossilised establishment," he said. Zanu (PF) has conceded defeat.

Meanwhile, MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai said his party and Zanu (PF) should
sign a nonviolence pact ahead of next year's presidential elections.

"I am prepared to share the stage with Mugabe and publicly denounce violence
which is now prevalent on the Zimbabwean political scene," he said.

"If it means signing an agreement then I am prepared to do that," Tsvangirai
was quoted by the private Daily News as telling a rally on Sunday in
Chitungwiza, outside Harare.

The Human Rights Foundation claimed in a report last week that at least 32
people were killed this year alone in political violence and as many as
42711 internally displaced. The foundation, which groups nongovernmental
organisations who assist victims of violence, said most of the violence was
committed by Zanu (PF) supporters but the MDC was also to blame.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

MSNBC

U.S. official slams Zimbabwe govt over rule of law



HARARE, Dec. 11 — A senior U.S. official on Tuesday slammed Zimbabwe
President Robert Mugabe's government over its rule of law record but said
there was still time to steer the country on the right path to free and fair
elections next year.

       ''Unfortunately today the rights and freedoms of Zimbabweans are
being threatened and we have seen the nation's laws not being applied
equally and fairly,'' said U.S. assistant secretary of state for African
affairs Walter Kansteiner in Harare.
       ''In the United States this lack of rule of law is (seen as)
arbitrary and has brought great concern...the international community in the
last few weeks has realised that Zimbabwe does not seem to be headed on the
right path,'' he told journalists.
       Last week the U.S. House of Representatives endorsed the Zimbabwe
Democracy and Economic Recovery Bill -- a stick-and-carrot approach to press
Mugabe to ensure free elections and establish land ownership protections in
the southern African country.
       Mugabe's government has slammed the United States over the threatened
sanctions, which it says constitutes interference in its internal affairs,
and accused Zimbabwe's opposition of sponsoring the legislation.
       Mugabe, 77, in power since independence from Britain in 1980, is
expected to face the stiffest challenge of his career in presidential
elections due in March from Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the main opposition
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).
       ''What we believe...is that Zimbabwe in fact can be headed on the
right path and there is time for hard decisions still to be made to affect
the outcome of this country,'' Kansteiner said.
       ''Specifically we think there is time to effect the electoral process
that we are all headed for and key decisions in the next few weeks and
months will demonstrate if in fact that electoral process is free and
fair,'' he added.

FAIR ELECTIONS OR SANCTIONS
       Kansteiner said the bill, passed by the Senate in August, offered
Zimbabwe a broad package of aid and economic enticements on condition it
ended its sponsorship of violence and committed to an equitable land reform
programme.
       ''This bill has a good many provisions in it that in fact bode very
well for Zimbabwe. If the rule of law is restored and there is an electoral
process that is free there are tremendous advantages waiting for Zimbabwe,''
said Kansteiner, citing international debt relief and financial funding.
       Kansteiner said he had discussed the implications of the restrictions
with ministers from the Southern African Development Community (SADC) --
currently in Harare for talks on the country's land reform programme --
adding: ''In fact I think we share a common position.''
       SADC has repeatedly said it does not support sanctions.
       Under the bill, travel and investment restrictions, and a freeze of
assets would be imposed on some of Mugabe's senior officials who have homes
or children at school in the United States and Europe.
       Commonwealth ministers are expected to meet in London next week to
discuss possible sanctions. The EU is also threatening sanctions, and on
Tuesday Canada imposed visa restrictions on Zimbabwe and six other
countries.
       Mugabe argues the prevailing economic and political crisis in
Zimbabwe is the result of sabotage by local and international opponents out
to unseat him over his drive to forcibly acquire white-owned farms for
redistribution to landless blacks.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

MSNBC

Zimbabwe declares war on media


Ahead of elections, journalists expelled, labeled ‘terrorists’



ASSOCIATED PRESS



JOHANNESBURG, South Africa, Dec 11 —  Ahead of a presidential election
expected next year, Zimbabwe’s government has declared virtual war on the
media — labeling some reporters terrorists, expelling several foreign
journalists and refusing to let most others in. Dozens of local reporters
have been arrested by police and beaten by ruling party militants.
PROPOSED LEGISLATION would ban all foreign reporters from Zimbabwe and
expand the government’s power to arrest journalists it does not like.
       “We are treating Zimbabwe as a war zone,” said Zoe Titus, an official
at the Media Institute of Southern Africa, which campaigns for press
freedom.
       The government also has said it would ban election monitors from
“unfriendly” countries.
       Titus accused President Robert Mugabe of seeking an “information
blackout” that would allow his government and its supporters free rein to
intensify their campaign of intimidation and violence before the election,
which is expected in March.
       Human rights workers accuse the government of trying to frighten
people away from voting for the opposition, which poses the strongest threat
to Mugabe’s rule since he led the country to independence in 1980.
 Advertisement




         Presidential spokesman George Charamba did not return repeated
calls from The Associated Press this week. The government has refused
requests from many foreign reporters, including several representing AP, to
enter Zimbabwe. Officials have described previous attempts at regulating the
media as aimed at making sure reporters act responsibly.

GOVERNMENT THREATS
       The crackdown on journalists has coincided with government threats
against opposition officials and some judges.
       In the election, Mugabe will face Movement for Democratic Change
leader Morgan Tsvangirai, whose party won 57 of 120 elected parliamentary
seats last year after an election campaign rife with political violence,
mainly blamed on ruling party militants.



        Mugabe tightened his government’s clampdown on journalists earlier
this year, warning foreign reporters to keep their “dirty, interfering
 hands” out of Zimbabwe’s affairs.
       An anonymous presidential spokesman, quoted in the state-owned Herald
newspaper last month, accused journalists who reported on an attack by
ruling party militants against whites and opposition officials of aiding the
“terrorist” opposition.
       “We would like (reporters) to know that we agree with U.S. President
Bush that anyone who in any way finances, harbors or defends terrorists is
himself a terrorist,” the spokesman said.
       A week later, details of Zimbabwe’s proposed Access to Information
and Protection of Privacy Bill were revealed.

JOURNALISTS BEATEN
       The bill would require journalists to get an annual license from a
government-appointed panel. The legislation also allows the government to
ban foreign reporters from the country and imprison journalists who violate
as-yet unspecified standards.

       “It’s a fascist piece of legislation,” said Basildon Peta,
secretary-general of the Zimbabwe Union of Journalists and special projects
editor of the independent Financial Gazette. “It’s in my opinion, the final
nail in the coffin of the media of Zimbabwe.”
       But it is only the latest nail.
       Just this year, the journalists’ union has recorded more than 40
cases of reporters from Zimbabwe’s five independent newspapers being
attacked by ruling party thugs or being arrested by police.
       Many independent journalists are too frightened to report on
political violence in the countryside, Peta said.
       The government has deported three foreign correspondents, banned the
British Broadcasting Corp. and implemented regulations forcing foreign
reporters to get accreditation before entering Zimbabwe. It also passed
legislation effectively banning independent radio stations, thereby
preserving the government’s monopoly on disseminating news to rural areas.

          The Daily News, the most popular newspaper in the country and the
only independent daily, has perhaps suffered the most.
       Its printing press was destroyed in a bombing January after the
government called the paper a threat to national security. The paper
continued printing — in greatly reduced numbers — on other presses.
       Daily News reporters have been beaten or detained; editor Geoff
Nyarota was arrested twice, but charges were quickly dismissed.
       “It’s an ongoing campaign of harassment,” Nyarota said. “Journalists
can’t run away from their work because the government has become hostile. We
have an obligation to our readers, an obligation to the public, an
obligation to our country.”
       Yet Peta, with a wife and two children, is not sure how much danger
he is willing to endure for his ideals.
       “It’s not always advisable to be a dead hero,” he said.

       © 2001 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not
be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News - Leader Page


Approval of Information Bill real cause for alarm

12/11/01 6:51:27 AM (GMT +2)


By Sizani Weza

THE proposed Public Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Bill
provides for the formation of a Media and Information Commission, which will
regulate the operations of the media industry in Zimbabwe.

Apparently the Bill seems to grudgingly concede that a voluntary media
council would be an attractive alternative to its proposed statutory
Commission. However, what is disturbing is the assumption that the failure
by the media to establish one is due to polarisation in the media.

". . . The media industry has been polarised to such an extent that it is
now impossible for the industry to regulate itself through a meaningful
voluntary body . . ." reads part of the Bill.

Polarisation is often employed in a generic way to describe the media in
Zimbabwe. But this is a slack and misleading description of the state of the
media that demands deeper analysis.

First of all, it implies that both sectors are somehow extremist and equally
to blame for the polarisation of the sources of information available to
Zimbabweans. This is not the case.

Government officials have repeatedly stated that State-owned media
organisations are obliged to reflect government policy and opinion. It is
also fair to say that being nominally accountable to the electorate, the
government is anxious to ensure that the media it controls portray its
activities and opinions positively.

This agenda, therefore, binds government-controlled media institutions to a
single narrow perspective that destroys any claims they may make of
reflecting a genuinely diverse range of national activity and opinion and
places their news output at one political extreme.

The intensity with which the government-controlled media manipulate the news
to communicate this one-dimensionally flattering image to its audiences
depends on a number of factors. But it is certain that impending national
plebiscites create a virulent response from government to promote its
opinions and manipulate news of its activities to such a degree that the
distortion results in the most severe lack of balance or fairness and bears
little resemblance to reality.

The findings of the Media Monitoring Project (MMPZ) during last year's
referendum and parliamentary election campaigns clearly demonstrate this
fact. And there is no denying that history is repeating itself.

The privately-owned Press, on the other hand, have an agenda to make profit,
which depends on readership and which, in turn, depends on the credibility
of its news output. While political opinion varies (although not very
widely) in the private Press, their success or failure depends on their
ability to report events and opinions accurately and fairly.

Often these basic standards are not met for various reasons.

But when a government resorts to subverting all the instruments of democracy
in order to manipulate the outcome of an election, including the electoral
process, the extremism has not been introduced by the private Press, but by
the government itself and the media it controls, which is obliged to defend
the indefensible.

This is what causes the polarisation of the media in Zimbabwe today.
Presumably one of the aims of the Commission will be to work towards
eliminating this so-called polarised media environment. As conceived in the
Bill, this will amount to total erosion of diversity in the media.

The relative editorial autonomy the various media outlets have, will be
eroded.

In the final analysis, the public will not enjoy a diversity of opinion,
which is healthy in any democracy.

This does not in anyway imply that the media as public institutions do not
need a body that will make them accountable in the exercise of their
professional duty. Media professional organisations have in the past
acknowledged the need for such a body.

However, their attempt to form one appears to have foundered on divisions
along ownership lines - that is lack of agreement between the public and the
privately-owned media. And the government, which controls the Zimbabwe
Newspapers Group, cannot wash their hands off this failure.

In a meeting with representatives of the private Press and media civic
organisations early this year, the Minister responsible for Information and
Publicity stated that government-controlled media would not become part of
such a voluntary body.

It is, therefore, naive for the State to blame squarely on the media the
non-existence of a voluntary media council.

Even worse, will be an attempt to impose one on some sections of the media
without their full approval. The successful implementation of such a body
depends largely on the co-operation of all parties involved. These include
all media (public or private) and civic society organisations (labour,
churches, human rights groups, among others). The latter are more important
because they are the consumers of media products and play a critical role in
influencing editorial content.

The repressive provisions contained in the Bill are not surprising given the
State's record in dealing with the media in the past. This year alone has
seen the introduction of new legislation which maintains government's
political grip over television and radio broadcasting; the arrest,
detention, beatings, and other harassment of critical journalists and the
bombing of the printing presses of the only privately-owned daily newspaper.

These moves have been met by national, regional and international
condemnation. Several organisations, including those representing media
professionals, have demanded that government respect basic information
rights, especially the important role of the media, in the accomplishment of
these rights.

The situation has forced little-known groups like the Cape Town Press Club,
for example, to make the following remarks in solidarity:
". . . The Zimbabwean government's brinkmanship represents easily the worst
abuse of democracy on the sub-continent . . . it must be remembered that
independent journalists elsewhere, including Namibia and Mozambique, face
similar pressures, whether tawdry and puerile, or calculated and brutal . .
."

The approval of the Bill by Cabinet is real cause for alarm.


Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

Homes destroyed in Guruve

12/11/01 7:38:32 AM (GMT +2)


Staff Reporter

TERROR has gripped Mahuwe village in Guruve after war veterans and Zanu PF
youths razed to the ground several homes in the area, leaving several
villagers homeless as punishment for supporting the MDC.

Mahuwe police confirmed the incident, but could not give details.

The villagers claimed the police in Guruve had been instructed by the war
veterans' leadership not to arrest anyone in connection with the attacks.

In a telephone conversation, one villager said: "Police were told to keep
their hands off the matter and warned that if they were to act against these
acts of lawlessness, they would be accused of siding with the enemy, the
MDC."

Vengai Kanyoka, an MDC supporter, described the situation in Mahuwe as
volatile.
"The situation is just tense and people are being forced to attend Zanu PF
rallies," he said.

Kanyoka said Zanu PF youths and war veterans were demanding that the
villagers convene regular meetings to drum up support for President Mugabe
ahead of next year's Presidential election.

In Guruve's Ward 22, several villagers were displaced from their homes on
allegations that they sympathised with the MDC.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

MDC activist found dead

12/11/01 7:36:27 AM (GMT +2)


From Zerubabel Mudzingwa in Gweru

THE body of Augustus Chacha, an MDC activist kidnapped and killed by
suspected Zanu PF supporters in Shurugwi on Saturday, was found dumped in a
dam yesterday morning, a kilometre from his rural home.

Chacha, 29, was allegedly kidnapped from his home at Gonye Village on
Saturday evening by a group of suspected Zanu PF youths and taken to a bushy
area, after being accused of supporting the MDC.

The incident occurred in the presence of his wife, Theresa Murindi, and his
five children. His body was found yesterday floating in Gonye Dam near his
home.

Lazarus Chacha said before the incident his brother had complained of being
trailed by strangers each time he left home.

A police spokesman confirmed that a body had been retrieved from the dam.

"I strongly suspect that my brother was killed by Zanu PF supporters who
trailed him from Gokwe where he was active as an MDC member before he came
to Shurugwi in August," he said.

But Francis Nhema, Zanu PF's provincial spokesperson and MP for Shurugwi,
dismissed the allegations as highly unlikely.

"There is not much going on in Shurugwi at the moment to the extent that
people would kill each other because of political differences," said Nhema.

At the time of his death Chacha was the MDC's district youth chairman for
Gokwe, but had fled to Shurugwi following an outbreak of political violence
in Gokwe.

Edgar Sithole, the MDC provincial secretary for Midlands North, described
the attack as politically-motivated and pledged his party's support for the
deceased's family.

Last month, another MDC activist, Kufa Rukara, died after being admitted to
Gweru General Hospital following a similar attack by suspected Zanu PF
supporters in violent-torn Gokwe.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

NCA to rally civic bodies over electoral amendments

12/11/01 7:35:45 AM (GMT +2)


Staff Reporter

THE National Constitutional Assembly (NCA) says it will mobilise civic
organisations to challenge the proposed amendments to the electoral laws of
Zimbabwe in the Supreme Court, if they are passed by Parliament.

Lovemore Madhuku, the chairman of the NCA, said yesterday they had made
presentations to Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Legal and Parliamentary
Affairs, chaired by David Coltart, last Thursday on the proposed amendments.

The government last month proposed new requirements for prospective voters.
But, according to civic organisations, human rights groups and the MDC, the
proposals threaten to disenfranchise millions of voters ahead of next year's
Presidential election.

Prospective voters are required to produce proof of residence for the
inspection of the voters' roll running from 19 November to 19 December.

Madhuku said it was unconstitutional for the government to demand proof of
residence from would-be voters because one did not need to be a resident in
a particular area to be a voter.

Madhuku asked: "How can an 18- year-old street kid who moves from place to
place and has no rural home or a chief to speak on his behalf be expected to
produce proof of residence?"
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

MDC knocks on Mugabe's door

12/11/01 7:08:49 AM (GMT +2)


Staff Reporters

The opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) has taken its winning
streak in mayoral elections almost to President Mugabe's rural doorstep.

Yesterday Zanu PF lost to the MDC the executive mayoral seat after weekend
polling in the Mashonaland West town of Chegutu.

Francis Blessing Dhlakama of the MDC, is the new Executive Mayor of Chegutu,
only 30km south-west of Mugabe's traditional village in Zvimba.

The presence in the capital city of a high-powered Southern African
Development Community (Sadc) delegation, in Zimbabwe to check on progress
made on the land issue, must have added considerably to Mugabe's
embarrassment and highlighted the claim by his critics that Zanu PF's real
problem is loss of popularity - not failure to distribute land equitably.

The United States Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Walter
Kansteiner, is also visiting Zimbabwe.

Mugabe's only consolation yesterday must have been that only 2 900 Chegutu
residents voted for Dhlakama out of a total of 20 618 registered voters. A
total of 5 586 ballots were cast, representing a voter turn-out of 27,09
percent.

Zanu PF's Stanley Majiri's polled 2 452 votes, with only 197 people voting
for Charles Chiriva, an independent.

While the MDC and Chiriva attributed the apathy to intimidation and violence
against their supporters by Zanu PF, the small number of votes garnered by
Chiriva should strengthen a growing perception that there is little room for
independents in Zimbabwe's current political arena.

As news of their latest victory spread, hundreds of jubilant MDC supporters,
some waving red cards, and others blowing whistles, the party's symbols,
burst into the Hartley 1 Primary School grounds, where the counting took
place.

All were singing and shouting their party's slogan "Chinja!" (Change!)
Yesterday's victory by that party brings to three the number of MDC mayors
in the country, after Masvingo and Bulawayo.

This is the second time that Zanu PF has lost an election while a Sadc
delegation is in the country to debate the land question.

The first time was in September when the MDC's Japhet Ndabeni-Ncube won the
Bulawayo executive mayoral election, beating a Zanu PF candidate.

A delighted Dhlakama said: "I am so happy that we have proved that violence
and intimidation do not pay. The people have spoken. The voice of the people
is the voice of the Lord and I can safely say, the Lord has also spoken."

As the MDC supporters burst into celebrations, Zanu PF supporters watched
from the sidelines before leaving in dejection.

Majiri, the losing Zanu PF candidate, refused to speak to The Daily News,
but told the ZBC he accepted the results. The election was free and fair, he
said.

He referred further questions to his party's provincial chairman, Phillip
Chiyangwa, who promptly switched off his cellphone.

Chiyangwa appeared on ZBC/TV on Sunday to say the MDC would never rule in
Mashonaland West.

Chiriva said: "I am happy with the result. I think the MDC deserves it,
after all the intimidation."

Last week, the Supreme Court gave 11 February as the deadline for holding
the Harare mayoral election after remarking that the Elijah Chanakira
commission, which has been running the city since 1999, was illegal.

Learnmore Jongwe, the MDC's spokesman, said yesterday the MDC's victory was
the "people's Christmas present to Zanu PF".

"This victory is a people's Christmas present to Zanu PF," he said. "The
present contains a simple message - that the people will stand firm in the
face of tyranny and that they will indeed complete the change for a better
life for all Zimbabweans that they started last year."
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

MDC knocks on Mugabe's door

12/11/01 7:08:49 AM (GMT +2)


Staff Reporters

The opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) has taken its winning
streak in mayoral elections almost to President Mugabe's rural doorstep.

Yesterday Zanu PF lost to the MDC the executive mayoral seat after weekend
polling in the Mashonaland West town of Chegutu.

Francis Blessing Dhlakama of the MDC, is the new Executive Mayor of Chegutu,
only 30km south-west of Mugabe's traditional village in Zvimba.

The presence in the capital city of a high-powered Southern African
Development Community (Sadc) delegation, in Zimbabwe to check on progress
made on the land issue, must have added considerably to Mugabe's
embarrassment and highlighted the claim by his critics that Zanu PF's real
problem is loss of popularity - not failure to distribute land equitably.

The United States Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Walter
Kansteiner, is also visiting Zimbabwe.

Mugabe's only consolation yesterday must have been that only 2 900 Chegutu
residents voted for Dhlakama out of a total of 20 618 registered voters. A
total of 5 586 ballots were cast, representing a voter turn-out of 27,09
percent.

Zanu PF's Stanley Majiri's polled 2 452 votes, with only 197 people voting
for Charles Chiriva, an independent.

While the MDC and Chiriva attributed the apathy to intimidation and violence
against their supporters by Zanu PF, the small number of votes garnered by
Chiriva should strengthen a growing perception that there is little room for
independents in Zimbabwe's current political arena.

As news of their latest victory spread, hundreds of jubilant MDC supporters,
some waving red cards, and others blowing whistles, the party's symbols,
burst into the Hartley 1 Primary School grounds, where the counting took
place.

All were singing and shouting their party's slogan "Chinja!" (Change!)
Yesterday's victory by that party brings to three the number of MDC mayors
in the country, after Masvingo and Bulawayo.

This is the second time that Zanu PF has lost an election while a Sadc
delegation is in the country to debate the land question.

The first time was in September when the MDC's Japhet Ndabeni-Ncube won the
Bulawayo executive mayoral election, beating a Zanu PF candidate.

A delighted Dhlakama said: "I am so happy that we have proved that violence
and intimidation do not pay. The people have spoken. The voice of the people
is the voice of the Lord and I can safely say, the Lord has also spoken."

As the MDC supporters burst into celebrations, Zanu PF supporters watched
from the sidelines before leaving in dejection.

Majiri, the losing Zanu PF candidate, refused to speak to The Daily News,
but told the ZBC he accepted the results. The election was free and fair, he
said.

He referred further questions to his party's provincial chairman, Phillip
Chiyangwa, who promptly switched off his cellphone.

Chiyangwa appeared on ZBC/TV on Sunday to say the MDC would never rule in
Mashonaland West.

Chiriva said: "I am happy with the result. I think the MDC deserves it,
after all the intimidation."

Last week, the Supreme Court gave 11 February as the deadline for holding
the Harare mayoral election after remarking that the Elijah Chanakira
commission, which has been running the city since 1999, was illegal.

Learnmore Jongwe, the MDC's spokesman, said yesterday the MDC's victory was
the "people's Christmas present to Zanu PF".

"This victory is a people's Christmas present to Zanu PF," he said. "The
present contains a simple message - that the people will stand firm in the
face of tyranny and that they will indeed complete the change for a better
life for all Zimbabweans that they started last year."
Back to the Top
Back to Index

ZIMBABWE: Presidential election due in March

JOHANNESBURG, 11 December (IRIN) - Zimbabwe's long-awaited presidential election is due in March, although the exact dates have not been set, President Robert Mugabe said on Tuesday.

The announcement came after Mugabe met with a task force of ministers from the 14-member Southern African Development Community (SADC), who were in Harare for two days of talks to discuss ways to ease Zimbabwe's political and economic crisis.

An election date brings into even sharper focus opposition fears that the presidential poll, in which Mugabe will face his most serious political challenge since independence in 1980, cannot be free and fair in the current political climate.

The mission by the six-member SADC ministerial task team - the second in three months - to audit the government's land reform programme and commitments to the rule of law, faced a tough opening speech by Zimbabwe's Foreign Minister Stan Mudenge on Monday.

"We are aware of strategic decisions in Brussels to try and conscript other players to turn the entire African continent against us, and the sinister effort to turn our SADC friends against us," Mudenge reportedly said. "We would face anybody, because might is right," he added.

His remarks referred to criticism in the last two weeks from South Africa, which appealed to the international community to "act urgently" to ensure free and fair elections in Zimbabwe.

Last week the US Congress passed the Zimbabwe Democracy Bill which imposes "smart sanctions" on government officials responsible for "the deliberate breakdown of the rule of law". The European Union has also edged towards sanctions over the government's resistance to effective election monitoring and its human rights record.

Lilian Patel, Malawi's foreign minister and chair of the SADC task force said the region was "greatly concerned by what is going on in this country". But she added: "We in SADC would like to make it clear that we do not support sanctions" as they would cause "untold suffering to scores of Zimbabweans, as well as to other people in our region".

SADC's apparent unwillingness to act robustly has not come as a surprise, analysts told IRIN. The regional economic grouping has been effectively split since 1998, over the military intervention in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) by troops from Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia, according to Moeletsi Mbeki of the South African Institute of International Affairs.

Mbeki, who this week warned of civil war in Zimbabwe if the presidential elections are not transparent, told IRIN that with a consensus for action by SADC "totally unrealistic", only South Africa had the clout to act.

While Zimbabwe was only a "peripheral issue" for the international community, it had a direct bearing on South Africa's national interests as a neighbour and major trading partner. "Zimbabwe can only be hauled back from the abyss by the actions of South Africa," the region's superpower, Mbeki said.

He called for a national policy that involved the government, business and civil society implementing a "much more serious set of initiatives", including the cutting of fuel and electricity supplies - alongside transport links - with landlocked Zimbabwe.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Economic Implications of the Adoption of the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act by the Congress of the United States of America.
 
The adoption of the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act by the US Congress on Tuesday this week is a profound and important development.  It signals that the legislature in the US has finally come to the conclusion that the Zimbabwe government has exceeded the bounds of acceptable behavior in governance terms and should now be formally excluded from the family of nations.
 
This development has been greeted with near hysteria by the state controlled media in Zimbabwe who have been careful to emphasise the Act as a violation of our sovereignty and the claim that the proposed sanctions will harm ordinary Zimbabweans.  In fact the Act takes great care to ensure that it does not impact on the needs of ordinary Zimbabweans or make an already bad situation any worse for the great majority of our people.
 
What it does do is to bring closer to reality the threat that if the Zimbabwe government does not amend its ways in a significant sense, then the US will use its long reach and enormous power to target the interests of the key players in the Zanu PF led government so as to try and persuade them that the cost of their delinquency will be potentially very substantial for them as individuals.
 
The threat to use their influence over the multilateral institutions to ensure that Zimbabwe does not receive any assistance is in fact an empty pledge.  All the multilateral financial agencies, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the African Development Bank, the European Investment Bank, have already suspended Zimbabwe from their programs.
This was for purely technical reasons - our default on the repayment of debt being the primary cause.  But in addition, the fact that our macro economic fundamentals are still so far adrift from acceptable norms means that we do not qualify for any forms of assistance at this time.
 
The threat to suspend other forms of assistance has already been implemented by the great majority of bilateral donors, including the USA, for reasons related to our failure to observe the norms of good governance.  Donors are however maintaining, and this includes the USA, the very substantial humanitarian programs, which have been ongoing throughout the past two years.  This will not change as a result of the new legislation.
 
What is much more encouraging in respect to the new legislation, is the commitment by the government of the United States to help Zimbabwe get back on its feet once we have changed the way we do things and come back to our senses.  This is a very significant step forward.
 
Normally a country like Zimbabwe, coming out of a period of delinquency, would have to wait for anything up to a year before the multilateral institutions could resume support.  Zimbabwe will come out of the presidential elections with a new government burdened by over US$10 billion of debt.  We will have arrears of up to US$1,5 billion in unpaid debt servicing charges.  We will face critical food shortages for at least two years whilst we try to restore our agricultural production, we will have no reserves of fuel and no international credibility.  We will face a huge crisis in our health and education system - both of which are going to have to be rebuilt from the ground up.  Up to two thirds of our population will be out of work and up to 80 per cent living below the poverty datum line.  Inflation will be running at well over 100 per cent.
 
We will need the help of our friends, and will need that help urgently.
The decision of the US House of Representatives to ensure that such help will be forthcoming as soon as we put our own house in order, is the best news we could have had from anyone this Christmas.
 
E G Cross Secretary for Economic Affairs.
7th December 2001
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

Plane diverted to pick up Mugabe in Spain

12/11/01 7:37:15 AM (GMT +2)


Staff Reporter

ABOUT 100 passengers on an Air Zimbabwe flight bound for Harare were on
Saturday evening stranded at Gatwick Airport in London after the plane was
diverted to pick up President Mugabe and his family from Spain where he
sought eye treatment last week.

Mugabe, accompanied by a delegation of about 40 people, quietly left the
country last week and returned on Sunday morning.

His unofficial visit to Spain and the condition of his health were not
officially disclosed.

Speculation is rife in and outside the country over Mugabe's health.

About 40 passengers were again stranded last week on Sunday when the
President ordered a London-bound Air Zimbabwe flight to divert to Madrid to
make way for his entourage.

Mugabe, who is 77, consulted an eye specialist during the visit to Spain.

Britain's Independent newspaper reported that doctors from France were flown
in to treat him in Spain. Mugabe attended the eye clinic at the Barraquera
hospital in Barcelona, renowned for its world-class eye treatment.

Mugabe's health has remained a closely guarded secret over the years.

Sources said doctors from France treated Mugabe for other undisclosed
ailments, but not the prostate cancer that has reportedly plagued him
recently. But the Spanish doctors concentrated on his eye problem.

There has been speculation too that Mugabe went to Spain in an attempt to
heal a widening rift with the European Union (EU).

Mugabe stormed out of a recent meeting with senior EU officials and
politicians in Harare.

It has now emerged the President did not meet any Spanish government
officials. Spain is due to assume chairmanship of the EU in January.

Mugabe, who is to address the Zanu PF annual congress in Victoria Falls this
week, addressed his party's politburo yesterday.

This is not the first time that Mugabe has commandeered an Air Zimbabwe
flight to travel abroad after dumping paying passengers. The airline
announced on Saturday it was cancelling its flight to London, probably to
collect the First Family from Spain.

Angry passengers telephoned The Daily News from London complaining that
their UM725 flight had been "hijacked by the Presidential delegation".

Air Zimbabwe paid £200 (Z$16 000) per passenger for a night at a hotel at
the airport following the airline's change of route to Spain without notice.

The parastatal lost about £15 400 (Z$1,23 million) to keep the
inconvenienced passengers at Gatwick. The passengers spent two nights in
London.

Moses Mapanda, acting senior manager public relations, blamed the incident
on a technical fault developed by one of the airline's aircraft.

Mapanda said: "Air Zimbabwe has introduced extra flights from Harare to
London for the month of December 2001 on Wednesdays and Fridays. One of our
Boeing 767 aircraft had a technical fault whilst in London on Monday 3
December 2001. This resulted in the airline combining passenger loads from
two flights into one.

"However, whilst awaiting the arrival of the operating aircraft, clients
were put up in hotels. The Saturday flight from London did not leave any
passengers behind as alleged."

He said a standard boarding fee of £200 (maximum) is payable by all airlines
operating from British airports to clients denied boarding.
"Delays from technical faults happen every day, even with major carriers.
These are standard operating procedures which airlines adopt in the event of
such delays. These are what we are following," said Mapanda.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News
Jongwe dismisses Sunday News report

12/11/01 7:41:01 AM (GMT +2)


Staff Reporter

LEARNMORE Jongwe, the opposition MDC's secretary for information and
publicity, has dismissed a report in the State-controlled Sunday News
weekly, which said he threatened to deal with journalists working for the
State media if his party won the Presidential election next year.

The Bulawayo-based newspaper quoted Jongwe as telling a conference on the
media and democracy jointly organised by Bulawayo Dialogue and Crisis in
Zimbabwe, that the MDC would summon "one by one" journalists serving in the
State-controlled media to account for their activities.

The paper claimed Jongwe had failed to answer questions from delegates on
whether the MDC would let the Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation and Zimbabwe
Newspapers operate without interference.

In a statement, Jongwe said: "The half-truths, omissions and naked lies in
The Sunday News front-page story have shocked nearly all the delegates who
attended and listened to my presentation.

"My presentation is on video. At no stage did I say that the MDC would
summon journalists serving in the public media houses 'one by one' to
account for their activities."

He said he had not failed to answer the question referred to by the
newspaper "because no such question was ever asked".

Jongwe said: "What I said about journalists is that those journalists who
are abusing information on behalf of individuals or groups of individuals
and inciting regional, tribal and racial hatred and lying to the nation with
impunity may need to be extra careful because some day they may, and within
the confines of the law, be called to account."

He said he had referred to an international precedent for this, citing a
radio journalist who abused his position and broadcast live messages on
radio urging Hutus to go and kill Tutsis during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.

The journalist was jailed for life by an international tribunal.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zimbabwe will define its own future

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROBERT Mugabe is a thug with his back to the wall. He has every reason to
fear that if he loses power he faces financial ruin, possibly a public trial
for his atrocities, and imprisonment. At the least he will be stripped of
his kingly lifestyle.
Therefore he intends to hold on to power, preferably by terrorising the
population to elect him, but by any means if necessary. He has shown himself
willing to provoke murderous conflict, to ruin his country, and to starve
his people to stay in power.

I make this point baldly because failure to grasp the nature of the game in
Zimbabwe lies at the heart of many of the policy prescriptions urged on
President Thabo Mbeki, mainly and not coincidentally, by his enemies.

The pressure has finally persuaded him to abandon his ineffectual "quiet
diplomacy" for equally ineffectual denunciation. The proponents of
denunciation know it will also prove useless, so we are already hearing
demands for "targeted" sanctions directed at Mugabe and his ruling cabal.
Mbeki is on the escalator.

The limited sanctions will not succeed, but then they are not intended to
succeed, only to embroil us in the conflict. When limited sanctions prove as
useless as " quiet diplomacy", we shall get demands for fiercer sanctions,
and if Mbeki accedes to them, we shall become complicit in the final
shattering of Zimbabwean society.

Amid the ruins, behold, Mugabe may still be standing!

The simple truth is that this country cannot dictate the future of Zimbabwe,
except perhaps by the methods of President Bush against the Taliban, for
which we lack both the resources and the will.

Responsibility for rescuing Zimbabwean democracy lies not with us but with
the people of Zimbabwe. If they want democracy they will fight for it. So
far, there has been some brave electioneering and some courageous
journalism, but we have seen nothing of the methods of mass mobilisation use
d to bring down Ian Smith. Why not?

Nor indeed have we seen the kind of international support which the United
Nations, the Commonwealth, and the great democracies gave to Mugabe, among
others, to topple Smith. Again, why not?

Among the many reasons is the notion, very popular in London and Washington,
that South Africa can be induced, or manipulated, or bullied into taking up
the burden which greater countries countries whose citizens do not lack
houses or schools, whose poor are sustained by social security nets, whose
bureaucracies are competent and long-established refuse to carry.

That burden may become huge. Zimbabwe's economy has been so shattered by the
Al Capone behaviour of its ruler that we must now expect it to implode, with
inflation rates perhaps climbing from 100% to 1000%, while price controls
and a shortage of foreign exchange lead to a collapse of productive
capacity. Agriculture, already damaged, seems likely to be replaced by mere
subsistence farming, with general deprivation and starvation.

The influx of refugees to South Africa, foreseen at the start of this debate
as our single overriding interest in the Zimbabwe crisis, has begun without
response from our government. Nelson Mandela says the President is too
involved with his foreign ventures to be able to provide leadership against
AIDS. He is presumably also too busy to deal with crime, non-functioning
bureaucracies, or refugees.

So things will, we may confidently predict, get worse until the United
Nations, the Commonwealth and the former colonial power which did so much to
create the present situation choose to intervene. They will not do so while
they think there is a chance to shove President Mbeki into the front line.

What President Mbeki should do instead is to use his considerable diplomatic
skills to bring the United Nations and the international aid agencies into
the fray. He should declare that the sustenance of illegal refugees is
beyond our resources, but that we shall co-operate in an international
programme to gather fleeing Zimbabweans in places of safety, to feed them,
and to screen them so that those who are healthy and skilled can be offered
permanent homes in this country.

That would be preferable to our present policy of useless but escalating
pressure on while doing nothing about the refugees.

Owen's next column will be on January 14 2002.
Dec 10 2001 12:00:00:000AM  Business Day 1st Edition
Back to the Top
Back to Index

SA must consider hard and soft options against Harare

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE onslaught by Zimbabwe's state-owned Herald newspaper against President
Thabo Mbeki may turn out to be the "breath of fresh air" needed for Pretoria
to start entertaining fresh thoughts on Zimbabwe's problems.

The question is, how badly does Pretoria want to prevent a major crack-up in
its next-door neighbour, one that destabilises much of the Southern African
Development Community (SADC) and SA in particular? And what are Pretoria's
options, if any?

While Mbeki's spokesman, Bheki Khumalo, said Zimbabwe is not a "10th
province of SA", President Robert Mugabe's ruling Zanu (PF) has turned
Zimbabwe into an economic colony of this country with its campaign of
political and economic anarchy.

With Zimbabwe now totally dependent on SA for electricity, maize and
transport links, that country has become virtually a "10th province". Yet
Pretoria has robbed itself of leverage by ruling out sanctions.

One would think that avoiding a civil war in Zimbabwe, at all costs, is even
more important than an aversion to sanctions.

It can be assumed from the reported reaction of Mugabe to Mbeki's criticism
in his wanting an urgent meeting with the SA leader that there is a split
among Mugabe's colleagues: between moderates like Finance Minister Simba
Makoni and hardliners like Information Minister Jonathan Moyo.

After all Pretoria has done to shield Mugabe from international isolation,
only to be humiliated by his disdain, some ministers in his cabinet are
stressing his need for Mbeki's support to stop impending European and
American sanctions that will target many of them in terms of their financial
assets abroad and their ability to travel. It seems Pretoria has some
leverage on Zimbabwe after all.

A last-ditch effort to stave off sanctions by Pretoria ought to be
predicated on a strategy aimed at strengthening moderates around Mugabe at
the expense of the "chaos faction". This is where, by the way, there is
still room for socalled "quiet diplomacy", where SA leaders are in a
position to drive home certain terms and conditions for what they want to
see unfold in Zimbabwe in exchange for holding off sanctions.

The obvious is to salvage the March elections and ensure that they are free
and fair. For that, Mugabe has to forgo enforcing a host of Draconian
measures his government has adopted, aimed at rigging the elections in Zanu
(PF)'s favour. This has to also include allowing international election
observers.

If Mugabe's colleagues want to avoid European Union (EU) and US sanctions,
they need to reverse their decision to ban EU and US election observers.

However, the entire monitoring exercise should fall under the oversight of
the SADC Organ on Politics, Defence and Security, with a major role carved
out for the southern African church and organised labour community.

If these conditions cannot be agreed to by Harare, or if they are agreed to
but are breached, then Harare should face sanctions, with SA joining in the
effort for good measure.

To that extent, the Congress of SA Trade Unions and the Southern African
Trade Union Coordinating Council might need to begin lobbying now for SADC
sanctions. In the meantime, if Mugabe and his colleagues show good faith,
there is a role for "quiet diplomacy" whereby SA and SADC talk with Zanu
(PF) moderates and the Movement for Democratic Change.

Those talks could be about considering establishing a postelection
government of national unity linked to a Development Bank of Southern
Africa-based multilateral strategic recovery process to reverse the economic
decline and depolarise politics.

The US sanctions bill, for example, does hold out the prospect for $26m in
aid, some debt forgiveness as well as trade and investment promotion, all
conditioned on fair elections.

If Zimbabwe takes such a path, then Pretoria's aim should be to work with
Harare towards guiding Zimbabwe into the Southern African Customs Union as
the core of an expanding economic community within SADC and the African
Union.

Another possibility would be for an apparently ailing Mugabe to declare
victory after "winning" the election and pass off to a younger successor who
might then contemplate the national unity government option.

Should civil war be unavoidable, SA's "quiet diplomacy" may still be
required to talk Zimbabweans into agreeing to a humanitarian, peace-building
presence under SADC auspices.

The point is a whole range of hard and soft options have to start being
considered urgently. Zimbabwe has become a regional security threat on SA's
doorstep egged on by the likes of Libya's Muammar Gadaffi in competition
with Pretoria for continental leadership. There is a lot at stake.

Kornegay is the programme co- ordinator for the Centre for Africa's
International Relations at Wits University.

Zimbabwe has become a regional security threat on SA's doorstep
Dec 10 2001 12:00:00:000AM Francis Kornegay Business Day 1st Edition

Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Farmer

Supreme injustice

LAST week saw Zimbabwe plummet to new depths of absurdity, but far too few
people raised more than passing interest. The absurdity arose from a Supreme
Court ruling declaring that Zimbabwe's government has restored the rule of
law - and that it has put in place a legitimate land reform programme.
Neither assertion has any basis in fact.

Quite why so few people raised objections is hard to imagine. Some, mainly
in the legal profession, balked at the idea of criticising the Supreme
Court. That is daft; the Supreme Court can be criticised and should be
criticised. It may decide that Orwellian legislation puts Mr Mugabe and his
self-styled war veterans (along with anyone connected with the ruling party)
above or within the law, but it is extremely doubtful if Chief Justice
Godfrey Chidyausiku wants to claim he and his court are above the law.

So… if the chief justice acts in a manner that is incomprehensible when it
comes to the principles of natural justice - or any justice - then questions
need to be asked. His may be a lofty position, but when he heaps discredit
and international opprobrium on the one remaining arm of government that
still had a modicum of respectability and plausibility to it, then we need
to know why this man has acted in such a manner.

On the streets, the word is that Chidyausiku is under immense pressure from
the president. If that is true, then he has acted unwisely because the
judiciary and the executive should be independent of one another. He is
supposed to be above such matters.

Farmers and their organisations have undoubtedly been set back by the
ruling, while the gloating from the state-controlled media, under the
jackboot of information minister Professor Jonathan Moyo, will burn farmers
in a place unmentionable in this paper.

But that doesn't mean that all is lost. From the negative impact of this
strange ruling, farmers (and their organisations) will be able to reap some
reward. There are, after all, fruits for the picking when one's adversary
commits a blunder of this magnitude and in a country where just about every
arm of government has been thoroughly and absolutely discredited, it now
remains only to do the same to the judiciary. After all, every aspect of Mr
Mugabe's rule is open to severe criticism - and Chief Justice Chidyausiku
has opened himself up for the same sort of denigration.

He will, undoubtedly, take a stab at justifying his bewildering judgment. He
will probably do so by saying he ruled in favour of millions of starving
people who have waited patiently for 21 years to have access to land. If he
does so, no one will believe him, simply because no one believes that land
is the issue. For a start, and to borrow an already borrowed phrase from
Professor Moyo, it does not take a rocket scientist to work out that
displacing a potential three million people to make way for substantially
fewer people does nothing to alleviate the alleged land hunger that exists
in Zimbabwe. Secondly, no one will believe him because the world knows all
too well that the anarchy on the farms has nothing to do with satisfying the
very people ZANU-PF has ignored since it assumed power 21 long years ago,
but everything to do with winning a presidential election early next year.

Bleating won't help. It won't help farmers and it won't help lawyers who are
(or should be) doing something constructive about the fact that the
judiciary has just suffered a very serious tragedy. There is only one way
for agriculture to survive and it is the same way that the rest of the
country is going to survive - and that is by exposing injustice at every
turn. Now, when injustice turns up so inauspiciously in the very halls of
justice, surely there is even more reason to rant and rave and to make
absolutely certain that everyone, everywhere, knows exactly what it is that
Chief Justice Chidyausiku has done?

There is nothing hallowed, nothing sacred about the Supreme Court, still
less about the chief justice. The one is a building where learned men of the
law are supposed to gather to interpret the law, while the other is just a
man in comical colonial garb who oversees those men. They are paid by the
sort of people who read this paper and we expect them to do their work
honourably and in a manner that satisfies our sense of justice and doesn't
embarrass us in the eyes of the world.

Following the Supreme Court's silly judgment, the Herald, predictably,
announced that the CFU "admits defeat" and will no longer represents its
members when it comes to the land issue. This is deceitful nonsense, but
it's the sort of supercilious rubbish farmers can expect from the State's
increasingly foolish propaganda machine. The fact of the matter is that the
CFU is seeking expert legal advice both within and outside Zimbabwe. Until
that advice is forthcoming it has issued interim statements showing the
situation as it sees it now, bearing in mind that nothing is cast in stone
and that its advisers may well say that there is a way of challenging the
Supreme Court ruling.

Besides, no one admitted defeat, least of all the farmers' union. Still,
this is a crisis born of a conflict - at the end of which someone will be
defeated. With the entire free world, and now even SADC opposed to the
present regime in Zimbabwe, it seems likely that far from staring defeat in
the face, farmers are more likely to be picking up the pieces and
re-establishing themselves as the engine of Zimbabwe's economy when all this
madness draws to a close.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

VOA news

Southern African Ministers Meet On Zimbabwe Turmoil
Peta Thornycroft
Harare, Zimbabwe
10 Dec 2001 20:20 UTC




Ministers from the Southern African Development Community, or SADEC, are
meeting in Harare for discussions on the political crisis in Zimbabwe. At a
SADEC meeting in September, Zimbabwe agreed to restore the rule of law,
particularly on mainly white-owned commercial farms.

The meeting opened with a 45-minute speech from Zimbabwe's foreign minister,
Stan Mudenge, who said Britain had conspired to turn the European Union, the
United States, and now some southern African states against his country.

This meeting is a follow-up to a recent SADEC meeting in which the 14-member
organization, behind closed doors, criticized President Robert Mugabe's
government and the seizure of land from commercial farmers.

Since then, South African President Thabo Mbeki has been more openly
critical of Zimbabwe, and has tried to prepare the regional organization to
support stronger, but as yet unspecified, actions against Mr. Mugabe's
government.

During the two-day meeting, SADEC ministers are to hear from various
interest groups, including members of opposition parties, the Commercial
Farmers Union, and independence war veterans, the group that is playing a
key role in the farm seizures.

Representatives of the General Agricultural and Plantation workers union,
which represents farm workers, say they will tell SADEC ministers that
Mugabe's supporters had forced more than 70,000 commercial farm workers to
leave their jobs and homes.

The opposition Movement for Democratic Change, for its part, says it will
provide evidence that hundreds of its supporters have been beaten, tortured,
or imprisoned since the previous SADEC meeting.

However, several political analysts say that even if SADEC is united in its
opposition to President Mugabe during this meeting, it is powerless to do
more than criticize, for fear of upsetting regional trade and transport
links with Zimbabwe.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

From The Cape Times (SA), 11 December

You'll suffer too, Harare warns SA

Harare - Zimbabwe has vowed not to bow to international sanctions or African pressure to stop its plans to seize white-owned farms. Foreign Minister Stan Mudenge, speaking to southern African officials visiting Zimbabwe to assess its land programme, cautioned neighbouring countries on Monday against siding with "foreign players" who called for sanctions, including "smart" sanctions targeting government and ruling party officials. "There can be no sanctions smart enough to affect Zimbabweans alone. Our destinies are intertwined," Mudenge told the six-member Southern African Development Community (SADC) ministerial team.

It also emerged on Monday that President Robert Mugabe's cabinet had already decided before the visit to stop negotiating with international bodies which did not endorse its land programme, and to squeeze white farmers even more should sanctions be instituted. The Commonwealth will meet within two weeks to discuss a possible embargo against Zimbabwe. The US House of Representatives has endorsed a bill that threatens sanctions against Zimbabwe. The visiting SADC team is likely to leave empty-handed after a decision last week by Mugabe's cabinet not to consider international arbitration of its land policies. Authoritative sources said a cabinet meeting convened by Mugabe had agreed that Zimbabwe would only accommodate international bodies which endorsed the planned reforms.

Mudenge confirmed this, and said on Monday that the SADC team should not monitor or judge Zimbabwe's land reforms, but should merely support what he described as Mugabe's "efforts to eradicate neo-colonialism" in Africa. The cabinet also resolved to react to any sanctions from the Commonwealth with more drastic action against white farmers, sources said. The Zimbabwe government has already passed two decrees. The first was that farmers should leave their farms within three months after being listed for acquisition by the government, and the second was to cut all farms to 2 000ha, with the remaining land to be seized without compensation.

At the start of the visit on Monday, Mudenge called on African states to rally behind Mugabe, saying Zimbabwe's ruling Zanu PF party was fighting for the interests of the black majority against Western interests that backed white colonial rule in the former Rhodesia. "We are being opposed for not accepting the mini-dosages of justice being offered our people, when in fact doing so would perpetuate the deprivation of our people." Lilian Patel, the Malawian foreign minister and head of the SADC team, said the regional economic bloc was concerned about the situation in Zimbabwe. "We are here as your friends because we are greatly concerned. We do not support sanctions." Political analysts say Mugabe, in power since independence in 1980, is using the land programme in a bid to retain power in elections due by April next year.

From SAPA (SA), 10 December

SADC ministers meet on Harare crisis

Harare - Ministers of five Southern African nations began a meeting in Harare on Monday in a bid to resolve the country's political crisis. Lilian Patel, the Malawian foreign minister and chairman of the Southern African Development Community's task force on Zimbabwe opened the conference, saying members of the 13-nation economic bloc were "greatly concerned by what is going on in this country". There was also a tacit admission by Zimbabwean foreign minister Stan Mudenge that his government was for the first time facing strong criticism from African states demanding Mugabe end political violence and ensure presidential elections due by April are free and fair.

In a lengthy speech at the opening of the two-day meeting, Mudenge repeated the government's charge that the British government was "managing and manipulating" international action against Zimbabwe. "We are aware of strategic decisions in Brussels to try and conscript other players to turn the entire African continent against us, and the sinister effort to turn our SADC friends against us," he said. He said he believed SADC was in support of Zimbabwe's case, but, he added, "even if not," the government would win. "We would face anybody, because might is right," he vowed. His remarks referred to criticism in the last two weeks from South Africa, including President Thabo Mbeki who appealed to the international community to "act urgently" to ensure free and fair elections in Zimbabwe. Mbeki said the situation in Zimbabwe was "deteriorating" and warned of an outbreak of civil war if people were denied the right to vote freely.

The SADC meeting follows the passing in the US Congress last week of the "Zimbabwe Democracy bill" which imposes sanctions targeted specifically against Mugabe and other officials responsible for "the deliberate breakdown of the rule of law." The European Union has also started diplomatic mechanisms that will allow it also to impose sanctions against Zimbabwe. Patel said the meeting was part of a series of diplomatic initiatives to end the crisis in Zimbabwe, but she clearly separated SADC from the stronger Western form of sanctions. "We in SADC would like to make it clear that we do not support sanctions," she said. "Sanctions would cause untold suffering to scores of Zimbabweans, as well as to other people in our region." US officials have pointed out that the Zimbabwe Democracy bill, yet to be signed into law by President George Bush, will stop Mugabe and senior aides and their families from travelling to America, and freeze their bank accounts there.

Last week South African officials confirmed that Mbeki was "losing patience" with Mugabe and said he should not any longer expect protection from South Africa. The SADC meeting in Harare was a follow up to a two-day regional summit here in September where the presidents of five nations listened to representatives of several bodies linked to Mugabe's ruling Zanu PF party, as well as to civic rights bodies and farm union officials. It ended with what diplomats said was an ambiguous conclusion that softened the pressure on the government. However, they say that following Mbeki's strong remarks, Harare is likely to be delivered with much firmer demands for compliance with international calls for the restoration of the rule of law. The SADC task force is one of a series of international diplomatic initiatives that have brought Mugabe's regime into widening isolation over state-driven lawlessness that began in February last year with violent invasions of white-owned farms by Mugabe's militias of war veterans, and a campaign of repression that has continued since then.

From The Mail & Guardian (SA), 10 December

Mugabe to "tough it out"

Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe is likely to "tough it out" and appeal to black South Africans over President Thabo Mbeki’s head, in response to the South African government’s ditching of its "quiet diplomacy" policy

Further intensifying the country’s isolation, the United States Congress adopted the Zimbabwe Democracy Act by an overwhelming majority. Diplomats said Mugabe was most likely to respond to the pressures by projecting himself to black South Africans as "a Pan Africanist hero" and "toughing it out, at least until he has won a further six-year term". He has already tried to strike a posture as Africa's revolutionary crusader against globalisation and the relics of white imperialism, setting an example to the region - particularly South Africa – on how to conduct land reform. Diplomats said another possibility - although remote - was that Mugabe would make cosmetic changes to appease Mbeki. A small group of wealthy white farmers who have backed Mugabe to win forthcoming elections may be brought on board, with at least one being offered a Cabinet seat. A minister able to speak a South African language, such as Ndebele-speaking Zanu PF party chairperson John Nkomo, currently Minister of Home Affairs, may be charged with improving Harare-Pretoria relations. In the past week Mugabe has ditched the centuries-old rule book of diplomatic practice by permitting his hard-line Minister of Information, Jonathan Moyo, to pillory targeted Western diplomats in the state-controlled media, in addition to launching a war of words on Pretoria. Danish ambassador Ole Moesby and British High Commissioner Brian Donnelly were vilified.

The day Mbeki let it be known he had finally lost patience - Mugabe's worst external setback in years - the new Supreme Court bench under former minister Godfrey Chidyausiku handed the Zimbabwean president a predicted internal triumph in the form of 4-1 endorsement of the "fast track land reform programme". The last hopes that internal pressure could bring change were destroyed on Monday by the newly reconstituted Supreme Court. Envoys and jurists said only external pressure could ensure anything resembling clean presidential elections next year. Chief Justice Chidyausiku cleared the government of all wrongdoing despite the murder of 39 farmworkers and nine farmers in two years of what Mugabe calls the "Third Chimurenga" or civil war. It was unreasonable to expect the government to "bring about a totally crime free environment", said Chidyausiku. He added that land reform "is a matter of social justice, not strictly speaking a legal issue". Three newly appointed Mugabe sympathisers backed Chidyausiku's finding, which now clears the way for summary redistribution of 5 000 white-owned farms to 300 000 Zanu PF supporters. Human rights lawyer Adrian de Bourbon said the ruling marked "the end of the road" for farmers’ attempts to fight through the courts. Anyone attempting to defend human rights from now on "runs a very severe risk of not getting a fair adjudication", he warned.

However, Zimbabwe's legal community were ringing in their praise for the personal courage and moral integrity of Appeal Judge Admed Ibrahim (61), who issued a dissenting judgement. Ibrahim rejected demands that he resign earlier this year, despite warnings by Minister of Justice Patrick Chinamasa that "anything could happen" following death threats from Mugabe's war veterans. In his minority ruling, likely to be reprinted in legal journals around the world, Ibrahim accused the government of coming back to Judge Chidyausiku with the same arguments that had been rejected by the previous Supreme Court bench under Judge Anthony Gubbay. He said that on the evidence put before the Supreme Court by the Commercial Farmers’ Union it was impossible to say law and order had been restored. "Haphazard squatting cannot form part of a lawful programme of land reform," he said. "It is not the function of the courts to support the government of the day. The courts' duty is to the law and the law alone. They may never subvert the law. To do otherwise would create huge uncertainty in the law."

De Bourbon's warning that internal means of legal redress were running out was echoed by Professor Tony Hawkins of the University of Zimbabwe’s business school. He believes there is little hope the local business community will exert internal pressure for reform, despite the worsening economic crisis. However, Zimbabwe remained vulnerable to South African pressure on transport, fuel and electricity, said Hawkins. "The economic pressures will continue to intensify in the months ahead, but this government is going nowhere until the elections. If Mugabe wins he will have to try and do something - I don't know what - to reverse some of the things he is doing now. Undermining the dynamo of the economy - agriculture - will not fully hit us until next year or the year after. "We haven't felt the full effect of financing the budget deficit by the tax on savers, and the exchange rate policy." Institutional investors are currently receiving a maximum of 30% returns in the face of nearly 100% inflation, which Hawkins describes as "a concealed tax". "There will also be a substantial outflow of skills post election," said Hawkins. Despite the country’s economic decline, political entropy and increasing international isolation, no challenge is expected to Mugabe’s leadership at next week’s Zanu-PF congress in Victoria Falls. An orgy of anti-Western and anti-South African rhetoric is expected when close on 14 000 delegates turn up in the resort town

Back to the Top
Back to Index