MDC Mailing list
We remember them, We mourn them, We salute
them
This is the roll of honour of some of the gallant sons and
daughters of
Zimbabwe who have died in political violence. They were killed
in cold blood
for daring to stand up for their rights and your rights to be
free. This
roll does not neglect the women who have been raped, the people
who have
been beaten up, their homes burnt. Throughout Zimbabwe the spirit
of
democratic resistance is rising. We pay tribute to the proud spirit of
the
Zimbabwean people. They did not die in vain.
1. ANDOCHE Julius
(farm foreman), 20 April 2000, Mashonaland East, Murehwa
South.
2. BANDA
(MR) (MDC), 24 April 2000, Mashonaland Central, Shamva.
3. BOTHA William,
(commercial farmer)23 July 2000, Mashonaland East, Seke,
Marondera
West.
4. BVUMBURAI Paul, Shamva
5. CHAKWENYA, Tinashe (ZRP), 4 April 2000,
Mashonaland East, Marondera.
6. Chakwenya John, 2/7/01 Harare –
Epworth.
7. CHAITAMA Nicholas (MDC), 25 April 2000, Mashonaland West,
Kariba.
8. CHAPURUNGA Lemani, 19 November 2000, Mashonaland East, Marondera
West.
9. CHEMVURA Lameck, (UZ Student) 24/11/01, Manicaland
10. CHIGAGURA,
Zeke (MDC), 20 June 2000, Midlands, Gokwe East.
11. CHIHUMBIRI, Eswat 23
March 2001, Mashonaland Central, Muzarabani
12. CHIKWENYA, Richard Dzokurasa
(MDC), I May 2001, Manicaland, Buhera North
13. CHIMINYA, Tichaona (MDC), 14
April 2000, Manicaland, Buhera North.
14. Chinhengo (MR), Gokwe North
15.
Chinyere(MR) (MDC) 11/6/00 pulled out of bus and beaten to death.
16.
CHIPUNZA, Takundwa, Patrick, (MDC), 16 May 2000, Harare, Budiriro.
17.
CHIRIMA, Robson Tinarwo (MDC), March 2001, Mashonaland
Central,
Muzarabani
18. Chitemerere Mhondiwa (MDC) 30/10/01 Murehwa
South
19. Chiwara Laban 7/5/00 Harare.
20. CHISASA, Alex (ZRP), 13 May
2000, Manicaland, Chipinge South.
21. COBBET, Robert Fenwick (commercial
farmer), 6 August 2001, Midlands,
Kwekwe.
22. DUMUKANI, Zondani,
(farmworker) 9 June 2001, Harare, Mbare East
23. DUNN, Allan Stewart,
(commercial farmer) 7 May 2000, Mashonaland East,
Seke.
24. Dzokurasa
Richard 30/4/01 Buhera North
25. ELSWORTH, Henry Swan, (commercial farmer)
12 December 2000, Mashonaland
East, Kwekwe.
26. GOMO, Edwin (MDC), 26
March 2000, Mashonaland Central, Bindura.
27. Guvi Obert 14/9/00 Hurungwe
West
28. GWASE, Nhamo (MDC), June 2000, Mashonaland East, Murehwa
South.
29. GWENZI, Gilson (MDC), 27 July 2001, Mashonaland Central,
Mwenezi
30. JEKE, Leo, 10 June 2000, Masvingo, Chivi South.
31.
KANOMERA, John (MDC), 3 July 2001, Harare, Hatfield (Epworth)
32. KANYURIRA,
Luckson (MDC) 25 April 2000, Mashonaland West, Kariba.
33. KAREZA, Howard
(MDC), 13 December 2000(assaulted 23 April), Mashonaland
Central,
Shamva.
34. KAREZA, Peter (MDC), 23 April 2000, Mashonaland Central,
Shamva.
35. Katema Thomas 2/8/01 Harare.
36. MABIKA, Talent (MDC), 15
April 2000, Manicaland, Buhera North.
37. MADZVIMBO, Fanuel, (resettled
farmer), 16 September 2001, Mashonaland
East, Hwedza
38. MAFEMERUKE,
Constantine, 19 June 2000, Mashonaland West, Kariba.
39. MAGUWU, Itayi (MDC),
27 July 2000, Harare, Dzivarasekwa.
40. MAMONERA, John (MDC), 3 July 2001,
Harare, Hatfield
41. MANDEYA, Joseph Ketero (MDC), 17 May 2000, Manicaland,
Mutasa.
42. Mandindishe Peter 22/7/01 Bindura
43. MANHANGO Wonder (MDC),
23 June 2000, Midlands, Gokwe North.
44. MANYAME Ropafadzo (MDC), 16 January
2001, Masvingo, Bikita West
45. MASHINGA Anthony date unreported, Mashonaland
East, Goromonzi.
46. Masango Molly, Murehwa
47. MATARUSE Peter (MDC),
March 2001, Mashonaland Central, Muzarabani
48. MARUFU Doreen (MDC), 2 April
2000, Mashonaland Central, Mazowe.
49. MATEMA Hilary (MDC), 15 October 2001,
Mashonaland Central, Guruve South
50. MATYATYA, 27 June 2000, Midlands,
Gweru.
51. MBEWE, Samson (farmworker), 9 August 2000, Mashonaland East,
Goromonzi,
Seke.
52. Mbudzi(MDC), Mhangura
53. Mudzi Onias,
Mudzi
54. Mudavanhu S (Chesa Farm)
55. MUKWELI, Vusimuzi, (MDC), 9
September 2001, Midlands, Gokwe South
56. MUPESA, Ndonga (MDC), 30 March
2001, Mashonaland Central, Muzarabani
57. Murirawanhu Rogers(MDC)
Karoi.
58. MUSHAYA, Mationa (UP, village headman), 17 May 2000, Mashonaland
East,
Mutoko.
59. MUSHAYA, Onias, (UP) 17 May 2000, Mashonaland East,
Mutoko.
60. MUSONI, Robert, 26 March 2000, Mashonaland Central, Mazowe
West.
61. MUTYANDA, Mandishona (MDC), 29 June 2000, Midlands, Kwekwe.
62.
MWANZA, Misheck (MDC), 4 May 2001, Mashonaland West, Zvimba North
63.
Nabanyama Patrick (MDC) abducted 19/6/00 never seen again Bulawayo.
64.
Ngulube Simon, Shamva
65. NYAMADZAWO, Alexio, (resettled farmer) 15 September
2001, Mashonaland
East, Hwedza
66. Nyambare Winnie 18/5/01 Guruve
67.
NYIKA, James (MDC), 3 July 2001, Harare, Hatfield (Epworth)
68. OATES, Tony,
(commercial farmer)31 May 2000, Mashonaland West, Zvimba
North.
69. OLDS,
Martin, (commercial farmer)18 April 2000, Matabeleland
North,
Bubi-Umguza.
70. OLDS, Gloria, (commercial farmer)04 March 2001,
Matabeleland North,
Bubi-Umguza.
71. PFEBVE, Matthew, 30 April 2000,
Mashonaland Central, Mt Darwin North.
72. Rukara Kufa 20.11.01 Gokwe
North
73. RUKUNI, Thadeus (MDC), 29 May 2000, Masvingo, Bikita East.
74.
RUKARA, Kufa, (MDC), 19 November 2001, Midlands, Silobela
75. SIZE, Rimon,
19 November 2000, Mashonaland East, Marondera West.
76. STEVENS, David (MDC),
15 April 2000, Mashonaland East, Murehwa South.
77. TADYANEMHANDU, Tichaona
(MDC), 20 June 2000, Mashonaland West, Hurungwe
East.
78. Tapera (6/5/00
Macheke
79. Tinarwo Robson ….. Muzarabani
80. WEEKS, John, (commercial
farmer)14 May 2000, Mashonaland East, Seke.
81. Wayner Peter (FR) 26/2/01
Masvingo
82. Zava Felix, (headmaster) (MDC)
83. ZHOU, Fainos
Kufazvinei(MDC), 10 June 2000, Midlands, Mberengwa West.
84. ZIWENI, Osbon,
(MDC) 18 September 2001, Masvingo, Bikita West
May they all rest in
peace.
Sunday Tribune
Zimbabwe's top cop scores a farm for
himself
December 08 2001 at 06:35PM
By John
Matisonn
Zimbabwe's top cop has grabbed a prime farm for himself, telling
the white
owner he was taking over the property under the government's policy
of
redistributing land to the landless poor.
Many politicians and
senior officials in the Zimbabwe government have been
given white-owned farms
in terms of President Robert Mugabe's policy of
supposedly giving land to
poor blacks.
Police commissioner Augustine Chihuri is the latest to
benefit from the land
grabs. He has also vowed to crack down on political
opposition in the runup
to next year's election.
'There needs to be
pressure on Zanu'
With political tension at an all-time high, Zimbabwean
opposition leaders
are appealing to South Africa to put pressure on Mugabe to
accept a
framework agreement for the conduct of the election and its
aftermath.
Mugabe was flying home on Saturday night with his wife and
three children
from an expensive clinic in Madrid.
Chihuri, who is
emerging as a key member of the Zimbabwean kleptocracy,
recently visited a
farm in the prime Shamva area with his wife, to notify
the owner that he was
taking it over. The order granting him the land was
signed by Agriculture
Minister Joe Made.
Chihuri told a police graduation ceremony that he
would "descend hard on
perpetrators and collaborators of terrorist
activities", terms used by the
government to refer to opposition politicians
and the media.
Opposition Movement for Democratic Change members of
parliament told Sunday
Argus that conditions for free and fair elections
appeared to be fatally
damaged, and called on South Africa to act
immediately.
"It's unrealistic to expect a free and fair election under
these
conditions," said MP Paul Themba Nyathi.
"To restore law and
order you need a police force. Besides corruption, the
undermining of the
economy means there will be logistical problems. The
government has created a
system that feeds off violence.
"If Mugabe bludgeons himself into power
what will the reaction be? Should
the MDC win, what will the reaction be?
There has to be massive overseas
support to stabilise the country. There
needs to be pressure on Zanu to
negotiate the transition. I'm not sure we can
do it ourselves."
The United States Congress this week approved "smart
sanctions" which will
allow President George Bush to freeze the assets and
cancel the visas of
Mugabe, his cabinet, his advisers and their families,
stopping them from
entering the US, where many of their children are
studying.
Mugabe has imposed a set of laws restricting various categories
of people
from voting, and there is no independent electoral commission.
Young people
without electricity accounts or other means of proving their
residence are
not being allowed to register.
Zimbabweans abroad may
not register unless they are soldiers, and all
Zimbabweans with even a slight
opportunity to become citizens of other
countries are being forced to
renounce their potential citizenship.
Government threats against the
press and foreign correspondents have
escalated, and a draconian new press
bill has been published.
"In my constituency, people can't register.
These elections are already
unfair. So whoever wins, it will not be
acceptable to the other. In the
event of a struggle, what will happen?" asked
MDC MP Priscilla Misihairabwi.
Zimbabwe could ban foreign
journalists |
Zimbabwe's government is proposing legislation to ban all foreign reporters
ahead of next year's presidential elections.
Officials have already labelled some reporters terrorists, expelling several
foreign journalists and refusing to let most others in.
Dozens of local reporters have been arrested by police and beaten by ruling
party militants.
"We are treating Zimbabwe as a war zone," said Zoe Titus, an official at the
Media Institute of Southern Africa, which campaigns for press freedom.
The government also has said it would ban election monitors from "unfriendly"
countries.
Titus accused President Robert Mugabe of seeking an "information blackout" to
allow his government and its supporters free rein to intensify a campaign of
intimidation and violence before the election in March.
Human rights workers accuse the government of trying to frighten people away
from voting in the election, which poses the strongest threat to Mugabe since
Zimbabwe's independence in 1980.
A presidential spokesman, quoted in the state-owned Herald newspaper last
month, accused journalists who reported on an attack by ruling party militants
against whites and opposition officials of aiding a "terrorist" opposition.
"We would like (reporters) to know that we agree with U.S. President Bush
that anyone who in any way finances, harbours or defends terrorists is himself a
terrorist," the spokesman said.
Story filed: 20:49 Tuesday 11th December 2001
MDC Mailing list
CONGRATULATIONS CHEGUTU!
Unconfirmed figures
indicate a narrow but decisive MDC victory:
2900 MDC
2452 Zanu
PF
Congratulations to the brave people of Chegutu, and to Zimbabwe’s
third MDC
mayor!!!
Press Release: 10 December 2001
MDC
mayoral victory in Chegutu- a people’s Christmas present to Zanu PF
This
victory is a people’s Christmas present to Zanu PF. The present
contains a
simple message that the people are resilient. They have stated
that they
will stand firm in the face of tyranny and that they will indeed
complete the
change for a better life for all Zimbabweans that they started
last
year.
This victory is also significant in that it confirms the quiet
but
devastating losses being suffered by Zanu PF at the hands of the people
in
those constituencies where the party either robbed or stole the election
in
June 2000. President Mugabe has been defeated a few kilometers away from
his
Zvimba homestead.
Finally this victory, especially coming after
the violent stoning of the
house of the mayor-elect on the first day of
polling is also a serious
indictment on the bloody electoral strategy that
continues to be pursued by
this out-going regime.
Learnmore
Jongwe,
Secretary, Information and Publicity.
MDC
on Monday
10 December, 2001
MDC hails President Mbeki’s tough stance
on Mugabe
The Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) hails the leadership
shown by the
Southern African Development Community in calling on Zimbabwean
President,
Robert Mugabe, to uphold democratic processes within Zimbabwe and
to cease
the stripping of human rights.
The MDC is particularly
inspired by the stance adopted by South African
President Thabo Mbeki.
Mbeki, as an upholder of democratic processes, has
shown a life-long
commitment to ensuring the empowerment of every South
African.
Mbeki’s
call for free and fair elections in Zimbabwe is warmly welcomed.
Botswana’s
leaders Festus Mogae and Malawian president Bakili Muluzi, have
also raised
their voices concerning the deteriorating human rights situation
within
Zimbabwe.
The African Renaissance Mbeki speaks of is on the right path if
we see our
friends and neighbours uniting against oppression and injustice.
The
struggle in Zimbabwe has always been a struggle for the dignity
and
sovereignty of the people. Workers and peasants have always been at
the
forefront of any struggle for justice and dignity in Zimbabwe.
The
nationalist and liberation movements that led the second uprising were
from
and build on the struggles of workers and peasants. After 21 years
of
Independence, we now have a ruling elite that has exploited this long
and
painful history to justify its wicked end. This national elite has
betrayed
the people’s struggle and created the crisis that Zimbabwe finds
itself in
today.
The crisis has drawn in both national and
international attention. It has
manifested itself in the political,
economic, and human rights abuses. The
net effect of this has been:
¨
a total collapse of farm production resulting in Zimbabwe having a net
maize
shortage of 600,000 tonnes and a further 200,000 tonnes shortage of
other
grain reserves;
¨ the displacement of at least 250,000 farm workers, turning
them into
destitutes overnight;
¨ the clampdown on the opposition through
abductions, arrests, torture and
murder. More disturbing is that those
perpetrating this violence have
hardly been arrested;
¨ the packing of the
courts with Zanu PF supporters, thus undermining the
independence of the
judiciary;
¨ the persistent attacks on the Press characterised by constant
threaets,
arrests and bombings of printing presses and the introduction of
notorious
pieces of legislation like the Access to Information and Protection
of
Privacy legislation;
¨ an increasingly regulated electoral process
toward the presidential
elections next year, which will effectively see rural
women, the urban poor
who lack title deeds, farm workers and young people
have their rights to
register and vote removed.
The government of
Zimbabwe has also taken steps to ban local, regional and
international
monitors from civic organisations from monitoring the
presidential
elections.
The international community has played a part trying to
resolve the crisis
in Zimbabwe. Sadc, the UNDP, the Commonwealth and the
European Union have
taken various initiatives. Sadly, all these initiatives
at solving the
crisis in Zimbabwe have failed primarily because of President
Robert Mugabe’
s lack of dependability. So the MDC understands President
Mbeki’s
frustration with Zimbabwe. Mugabe and his party are unreliable
partners.
Mugbe has absurdly the traditional solidarity within Sadc and
surely even
whtin Sadc there are limits to solidarity. Liberation was won
across the
continent on the grounds of promsiing freedom for all—that promise
is
sacred.
In the 2002 presidential elections, Mugabe must go. Every
Zimbabwean over
the age of 18 is encouraged to register to vote. Voter
registration is an
ongoing process that will continue even after the
inspection of the voters’
roll has been closed. Those who have not
registered must go and register at
their District Offices.
Contact
us:
Email: mdcpublicity@hotmail.com
Website:
www.mdczimbabwe.com
Address: Box
A1728, Harare
Play your part in completing the change by contributing to
the MDC
presidential campaign:
MDC Trust Fund: Standard Chartered,
0100241402900, Bulawayo
Mugabe's Party Loses Third Mayoral Poll to Opposition
Business Day
(Johannesburg)
December 11, 2001
Dumisani
Muleya
PRESIDENT Robert Mugabe's ruling Zanu (PF) party yesterday
slumped to its
third consecutive mayoral election defeat by the opposition
Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) in the town of Chegutu following recent
massive
reversals in Bulawayo and Masvingo.
Mugabe's party, which is
losing support rapidly in the urban areas due to
the deepening economic
crisis, got 2452 votes while the MDC received 2900
votes. The election was
characterised by voter apathy.
Just more than a quarter of the 20000
registered voters participated in the
poll, in which a lot of people were
turned away.
MDC spokesman Learnmore Jongwe said the victory coming
against the
background of next year's crucial presidential poll was important
in that it
showed Mugabe was losing support near his home
area.
Chegutu, which is located about 100 km south west of Harare, is
situated
close to the Zimbabwean leader's Mashonaland West province rural
village and
stronghold. "President Mugabe has been defeated a few kilometres
away from
his Zvimba homestead," Jongwe said.
The Chegutu
parliamentary seat was won by Zanu (PF) in last year's
general
election.
Jongwe said the triumph was a "Christmas present"
for his party and a strong
warning that "Harare's dictatorial regime is
facing liquidation.
"This victory was also significant because it is a
serious indictment of the
bloody electoral strategies pursued by this
outgoing regime. Let it be known
that no amount of fascist coercion and
intimidation will save Mugabe and his
fossilised establishment," he said.
Zanu (PF) has conceded defeat.
Meanwhile, MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai
said his party and Zanu (PF) should
sign a nonviolence pact ahead of next
year's presidential elections.
"I am prepared to share the stage with
Mugabe and publicly denounce violence
which is now prevalent on the
Zimbabwean political scene," he said.
"If it means signing an agreement
then I am prepared to do that," Tsvangirai
was quoted by the private Daily
News as telling a rally on Sunday in
Chitungwiza, outside Harare.
The
Human Rights Foundation claimed in a report last week that at least 32
people
were killed this year alone in political violence and as many as
42711
internally displaced. The foundation, which groups
nongovernmental
organisations who assist victims of violence, said most of
the violence was
committed by Zanu (PF) supporters but the MDC was also to
blame.
MSNBC
U.S. official slams Zimbabwe govt over rule of
law
HARARE, Dec. 11 — A senior U.S. official on Tuesday slammed
Zimbabwe
President Robert Mugabe's government over its rule of law record but
said
there was still time to steer the country on the right path to free and
fair
elections next year.
''Unfortunately today the rights and
freedoms of Zimbabweans are
being threatened and we have seen the nation's
laws not being applied
equally and fairly,'' said U.S. assistant secretary of
state for African
affairs Walter Kansteiner in Harare.
''In the
United States this lack of rule of law is (seen as)
arbitrary and has brought
great concern...the international community in the
last few weeks has
realised that Zimbabwe does not seem to be headed on the
right path,'' he
told journalists.
Last week the U.S. House of Representatives endorsed
the Zimbabwe
Democracy and Economic Recovery Bill -- a stick-and-carrot
approach to press
Mugabe to ensure free elections and establish land
ownership protections in
the southern African country.
Mugabe's
government has slammed the United States over the threatened
sanctions, which
it says constitutes interference in its internal affairs,
and accused
Zimbabwe's opposition of sponsoring the legislation.
Mugabe, 77, in
power since independence from Britain in 1980, is
expected to face the
stiffest challenge of his career in presidential
elections due in March from
Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the main opposition
Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC).
''What we believe...is that Zimbabwe in fact can be
headed on the
right path and there is time for hard decisions still to be
made to affect
the outcome of this country,'' Kansteiner said.
''Specifically we think there is time to effect the electoral process
that we
are all headed for and key decisions in the next few weeks and
months will
demonstrate if in fact that electoral process is free and
fair,'' he
added.
FAIR ELECTIONS OR SANCTIONS
Kansteiner said the bill,
passed by the Senate in August, offered
Zimbabwe a broad package of aid and
economic enticements on condition it
ended its sponsorship of violence and
committed to an equitable land reform
programme.
''This bill has a
good many provisions in it that in fact bode very
well for Zimbabwe. If the
rule of law is restored and there is an electoral
process that is free there
are tremendous advantages waiting for Zimbabwe,''
said Kansteiner, citing
international debt relief and financial funding.
Kansteiner said he
had discussed the implications of the restrictions
with ministers from the
Southern African Development Community (SADC) --
currently in Harare for
talks on the country's land reform programme --
adding: ''In fact I think we
share a common position.''
SADC has repeatedly said it does not
support sanctions.
Under the bill, travel and investment restrictions,
and a freeze of
assets would be imposed on some of Mugabe's senior officials
who have homes
or children at school in the United States and
Europe.
Commonwealth ministers are expected to meet in London next
week to
discuss possible sanctions. The EU is also threatening sanctions, and
on
Tuesday Canada imposed visa restrictions on Zimbabwe and six
other
countries.
Mugabe argues the prevailing economic and
political crisis in
Zimbabwe is the result of sabotage by local and
international opponents out
to unseat him over his drive to forcibly acquire
white-owned farms for
redistribution to landless blacks.
MSNBC
Zimbabwe declares war on media
Ahead of elections,
journalists expelled, labeled ‘terrorists’
ASSOCIATED
PRESS
JOHANNESBURG, South Africa, Dec 11 — Ahead of a
presidential election
expected next year, Zimbabwe’s government has declared
virtual war on the
media — labeling some reporters terrorists, expelling
several foreign
journalists and refusing to let most others in. Dozens of
local reporters
have been arrested by police and beaten by ruling party
militants.
PROPOSED LEGISLATION would ban all foreign reporters from Zimbabwe
and
expand the government’s power to arrest journalists it does not
like.
“We are treating Zimbabwe as a war zone,” said Zoe Titus, an
official
at the Media Institute of Southern Africa, which campaigns for
press
freedom.
The government also has said it would ban election
monitors from
“unfriendly” countries.
Titus accused President
Robert Mugabe of seeking an “information
blackout” that would allow his
government and its supporters free rein to
intensify their campaign of
intimidation and violence before the election,
which is expected in
March.
Human rights workers accuse the government of trying to
frighten
people away from voting for the opposition, which poses the
strongest threat
to Mugabe’s rule since he led the country to independence in
1980.
Advertisement
Presidential spokesman
George Charamba did not return repeated
calls from The Associated Press this
week. The government has refused
requests from many foreign reporters,
including several representing AP, to
enter Zimbabwe. Officials have
described previous attempts at regulating the
media as aimed at making sure
reporters act responsibly.
GOVERNMENT THREATS
The crackdown on
journalists has coincided with government threats
against opposition
officials and some judges.
In the election, Mugabe will face Movement
for Democratic Change
leader Morgan Tsvangirai, whose party won 57 of 120
elected parliamentary
seats last year after an election campaign rife with
political violence,
mainly blamed on ruling party
militants.
Mugabe tightened his government’s clampdown on
journalists earlier
this year, warning foreign reporters to keep their
“dirty, interfering
hands” out of Zimbabwe’s affairs.
An anonymous
presidential spokesman, quoted in the state-owned Herald
newspaper last
month, accused journalists who reported on an attack by
ruling party
militants against whites and opposition officials of aiding the
“terrorist”
opposition.
“We would like (reporters) to know that we agree with U.S.
President
Bush that anyone who in any way finances, harbors or defends
terrorists is
himself a terrorist,” the spokesman said.
A week
later, details of Zimbabwe’s proposed Access to Information
and Protection of
Privacy Bill were revealed.
JOURNALISTS BEATEN
The bill would
require journalists to get an annual license from a
government-appointed
panel. The legislation also allows the government to
ban foreign reporters
from the country and imprison journalists who violate
as-yet unspecified
standards.
“It’s a fascist piece of legislation,” said Basildon
Peta,
secretary-general of the Zimbabwe Union of Journalists and special
projects
editor of the independent Financial Gazette. “It’s in my opinion,
the final
nail in the coffin of the media of Zimbabwe.”
But it is
only the latest nail.
Just this year, the journalists’ union has
recorded more than 40
cases of reporters from Zimbabwe’s five independent
newspapers being
attacked by ruling party thugs or being arrested by
police.
Many independent journalists are too frightened to report
on
political violence in the countryside, Peta said.
The government
has deported three foreign correspondents, banned the
British Broadcasting
Corp. and implemented regulations forcing foreign
reporters to get
accreditation before entering Zimbabwe. It also passed
legislation
effectively banning independent radio stations, thereby
preserving the
government’s monopoly on disseminating news to rural areas.
The
Daily News, the most popular newspaper in the country and the
only
independent daily, has perhaps suffered the most.
Its printing press
was destroyed in a bombing January after the
government called the paper a
threat to national security. The paper
continued printing — in greatly
reduced numbers — on other presses.
Daily News reporters have been
beaten or detained; editor Geoff
Nyarota was arrested twice, but charges were
quickly dismissed.
“It’s an ongoing campaign of harassment,” Nyarota
said. “Journalists
can’t run away from their work because the government has
become hostile. We
have an obligation to our readers, an obligation to the
public, an
obligation to our country.”
Yet Peta, with a wife and
two children, is not sure how much danger
he is willing to endure for his
ideals.
“It’s not always advisable to be a dead hero,” he
said.
© 2001 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material
may not
be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Daily News - Leader Page
Approval of Information Bill real cause for
alarm
12/11/01 6:51:27 AM (GMT +2)
By Sizani Weza
THE
proposed Public Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Bill
provides
for the formation of a Media and Information Commission, which will
regulate
the operations of the media industry in Zimbabwe.
Apparently the Bill
seems to grudgingly concede that a voluntary media
council would be an
attractive alternative to its proposed statutory
Commission. However, what is
disturbing is the assumption that the failure
by the media to establish one
is due to polarisation in the media.
". . . The media industry has been
polarised to such an extent that it is
now impossible for the industry to
regulate itself through a meaningful
voluntary body . . ." reads part of the
Bill.
Polarisation is often employed in a generic way to describe the
media in
Zimbabwe. But this is a slack and misleading description of the
state of the
media that demands deeper analysis.
First of all, it
implies that both sectors are somehow extremist and equally
to blame for the
polarisation of the sources of information available to
Zimbabweans. This is
not the case.
Government officials have repeatedly stated that
State-owned media
organisations are obliged to reflect government policy and
opinion. It is
also fair to say that being nominally accountable to the
electorate, the
government is anxious to ensure that the media it controls
portray its
activities and opinions positively.
This agenda,
therefore, binds government-controlled media institutions to a
single narrow
perspective that destroys any claims they may make of
reflecting a genuinely
diverse range of national activity and opinion and
places their news output
at one political extreme.
The intensity with which the
government-controlled media manipulate the news
to communicate this
one-dimensionally flattering image to its audiences
depends on a number of
factors. But it is certain that impending national
plebiscites create a
virulent response from government to promote its
opinions and manipulate news
of its activities to such a degree that the
distortion results in the most
severe lack of balance or fairness and bears
little resemblance to
reality.
The findings of the Media Monitoring Project (MMPZ) during last
year's
referendum and parliamentary election campaigns clearly demonstrate
this
fact. And there is no denying that history is repeating
itself.
The privately-owned Press, on the other hand, have an agenda to
make profit,
which depends on readership and which, in turn, depends on the
credibility
of its news output. While political opinion varies (although not
very
widely) in the private Press, their success or failure depends on
their
ability to report events and opinions accurately and
fairly.
Often these basic standards are not met for various
reasons.
But when a government resorts to subverting all the instruments
of democracy
in order to manipulate the outcome of an election, including the
electoral
process, the extremism has not been introduced by the private
Press, but by
the government itself and the media it controls, which is
obliged to defend
the indefensible.
This is what causes the
polarisation of the media in Zimbabwe today.
Presumably one of the aims of
the Commission will be to work towards
eliminating this so-called polarised
media environment. As conceived in the
Bill, this will amount to total
erosion of diversity in the media.
The relative editorial autonomy the
various media outlets have, will be
eroded.
In the final analysis, the
public will not enjoy a diversity of opinion,
which is healthy in any
democracy.
This does not in anyway imply that the media as public
institutions do not
need a body that will make them accountable in the
exercise of their
professional duty. Media professional organisations have in
the past
acknowledged the need for such a body.
However, their attempt
to form one appears to have foundered on divisions
along ownership lines -
that is lack of agreement between the public and the
privately-owned media.
And the government, which controls the Zimbabwe
Newspapers Group, cannot wash
their hands off this failure.
In a meeting with representatives of the
private Press and media civic
organisations early this year, the Minister
responsible for Information and
Publicity stated that government-controlled
media would not become part of
such a voluntary body.
It is,
therefore, naive for the State to blame squarely on the media
the
non-existence of a voluntary media council.
Even worse, will be an
attempt to impose one on some sections of the media
without their full
approval. The successful implementation of such a body
depends largely on the
co-operation of all parties involved. These include
all media (public or
private) and civic society organisations (labour,
churches, human rights
groups, among others). The latter are more important
because they are the
consumers of media products and play a critical role in
influencing editorial
content.
The repressive provisions contained in the Bill are not
surprising given the
State's record in dealing with the media in the past.
This year alone has
seen the introduction of new legislation which maintains
government's
political grip over television and radio broadcasting; the
arrest,
detention, beatings, and other harassment of critical journalists and
the
bombing of the printing presses of the only privately-owned daily
newspaper.
These moves have been met by national, regional and
international
condemnation. Several organisations, including those
representing media
professionals, have demanded that government respect basic
information
rights, especially the important role of the media, in the
accomplishment of
these rights.
The situation has forced little-known
groups like the Cape Town Press Club,
for example, to make the following
remarks in solidarity:
". . . The Zimbabwean government's brinkmanship
represents easily the worst
abuse of democracy on the sub-continent . . . it
must be remembered that
independent journalists elsewhere, including Namibia
and Mozambique, face
similar pressures, whether tawdry and puerile, or
calculated and brutal . .
."
The approval of the Bill by Cabinet is
real cause for alarm.
Daily News
Homes destroyed in Guruve
12/11/01 7:38:32 AM (GMT
+2)
Staff Reporter
TERROR has gripped Mahuwe village in Guruve
after war veterans and Zanu PF
youths razed to the ground several homes in
the area, leaving several
villagers homeless as punishment for supporting the
MDC.
Mahuwe police confirmed the incident, but could not give
details.
The villagers claimed the police in Guruve had been instructed
by the war
veterans' leadership not to arrest anyone in connection with the
attacks.
In a telephone conversation, one villager said: "Police were
told to keep
their hands off the matter and warned that if they were to act
against these
acts of lawlessness, they would be accused of siding with the
enemy, the
MDC."
Vengai Kanyoka, an MDC supporter, described the
situation in Mahuwe as
volatile.
"The situation is just tense and people
are being forced to attend Zanu PF
rallies," he said.
Kanyoka said
Zanu PF youths and war veterans were demanding that the
villagers convene
regular meetings to drum up support for President Mugabe
ahead of next year's
Presidential election.
In Guruve's Ward 22, several villagers were
displaced from their homes on
allegations that they sympathised with the
MDC.
Daily News
MDC activist found dead
12/11/01 7:36:27 AM (GMT
+2)
From Zerubabel Mudzingwa in Gweru
THE body of Augustus
Chacha, an MDC activist kidnapped and killed by
suspected Zanu PF supporters
in Shurugwi on Saturday, was found dumped in a
dam yesterday morning, a
kilometre from his rural home.
Chacha, 29, was allegedly kidnapped from
his home at Gonye Village on
Saturday evening by a group of suspected Zanu PF
youths and taken to a bushy
area, after being accused of supporting the
MDC.
The incident occurred in the presence of his wife, Theresa Murindi,
and his
five children. His body was found yesterday floating in Gonye Dam
near his
home.
Lazarus Chacha said before the incident his brother had
complained of being
trailed by strangers each time he left home.
A
police spokesman confirmed that a body had been retrieved from the
dam.
"I strongly suspect that my brother was killed by Zanu PF supporters
who
trailed him from Gokwe where he was active as an MDC member before he
came
to Shurugwi in August," he said.
But Francis Nhema, Zanu PF's
provincial spokesperson and MP for Shurugwi,
dismissed the allegations as
highly unlikely.
"There is not much going on in Shurugwi at the moment to
the extent that
people would kill each other because of political
differences," said Nhema.
At the time of his death Chacha was the MDC's
district youth chairman for
Gokwe, but had fled to Shurugwi following an
outbreak of political violence
in Gokwe.
Edgar Sithole, the MDC
provincial secretary for Midlands North, described
the attack as
politically-motivated and pledged his party's support for the
deceased's
family.
Last month, another MDC activist, Kufa Rukara, died after being
admitted to
Gweru General Hospital following a similar attack by suspected
Zanu PF
supporters in violent-torn Gokwe.
Daily News
NCA to rally civic bodies over electoral
amendments
12/11/01 7:35:45 AM (GMT +2)
Staff
Reporter
THE National Constitutional Assembly (NCA) says it will mobilise
civic
organisations to challenge the proposed amendments to the electoral
laws of
Zimbabwe in the Supreme Court, if they are passed by
Parliament.
Lovemore Madhuku, the chairman of the NCA, said yesterday
they had made
presentations to Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Legal and
Parliamentary
Affairs, chaired by David Coltart, last Thursday on the
proposed amendments.
The government last month proposed new requirements
for prospective voters.
But, according to civic organisations, human rights
groups and the MDC, the
proposals threaten to disenfranchise millions of
voters ahead of next year's
Presidential election.
Prospective voters
are required to produce proof of residence for the
inspection of the voters'
roll running from 19 November to 19 December.
Madhuku said it was
unconstitutional for the government to demand proof of
residence from
would-be voters because one did not need to be a resident in
a particular
area to be a voter.
Madhuku asked: "How can an 18- year-old street kid
who moves from place to
place and has no rural home or a chief to speak on
his behalf be expected to
produce proof of residence?"
Daily News
MDC knocks on Mugabe's door
12/11/01 7:08:49 AM (GMT
+2)
Staff Reporters
The opposition Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC) has taken its winning
streak in mayoral elections almost to
President Mugabe's rural doorstep.
Yesterday Zanu PF lost to the MDC the
executive mayoral seat after weekend
polling in the Mashonaland West town of
Chegutu.
Francis Blessing Dhlakama of the MDC, is the new Executive Mayor
of Chegutu,
only 30km south-west of Mugabe's traditional village in
Zvimba.
The presence in the capital city of a high-powered Southern
African
Development Community (Sadc) delegation, in Zimbabwe to check on
progress
made on the land issue, must have added considerably to
Mugabe's
embarrassment and highlighted the claim by his critics that Zanu
PF's real
problem is loss of popularity - not failure to distribute land
equitably.
The United States Assistant Secretary of State for African
Affairs, Walter
Kansteiner, is also visiting Zimbabwe.
Mugabe's only
consolation yesterday must have been that only 2 900 Chegutu
residents voted
for Dhlakama out of a total of 20 618 registered voters. A
total of 5 586
ballots were cast, representing a voter turn-out of
27,09
percent.
Zanu PF's Stanley Majiri's polled 2 452 votes, with
only 197 people voting
for Charles Chiriva, an independent.
While the
MDC and Chiriva attributed the apathy to intimidation and violence
against
their supporters by Zanu PF, the small number of votes garnered by
Chiriva
should strengthen a growing perception that there is little room
for
independents in Zimbabwe's current political arena.
As news of
their latest victory spread, hundreds of jubilant MDC supporters,
some waving
red cards, and others blowing whistles, the party's symbols,
burst into the
Hartley 1 Primary School grounds, where the counting took
place.
All
were singing and shouting their party's slogan "Chinja!"
(Change!)
Yesterday's victory by that party brings to three the number of MDC
mayors
in the country, after Masvingo and Bulawayo.
This is the second
time that Zanu PF has lost an election while a Sadc
delegation is in the
country to debate the land question.
The first time was in September when
the MDC's Japhet Ndabeni-Ncube won the
Bulawayo executive mayoral election,
beating a Zanu PF candidate.
A delighted Dhlakama said: "I am so happy
that we have proved that violence
and intimidation do not pay. The people
have spoken. The voice of the people
is the voice of the Lord and I can
safely say, the Lord has also spoken."
As the MDC supporters burst into
celebrations, Zanu PF supporters watched
from the sidelines before leaving in
dejection.
Majiri, the losing Zanu PF candidate, refused to speak to The
Daily News,
but told the ZBC he accepted the results. The election was free
and fair, he
said.
He referred further questions to his party's
provincial chairman, Phillip
Chiyangwa, who promptly switched off his
cellphone.
Chiyangwa appeared on ZBC/TV on Sunday to say the MDC would
never rule in
Mashonaland West.
Chiriva said: "I am happy with the
result. I think the MDC deserves it,
after all the intimidation."
Last
week, the Supreme Court gave 11 February as the deadline for holding
the
Harare mayoral election after remarking that the Elijah Chanakira
commission,
which has been running the city since 1999, was illegal.
Learnmore
Jongwe, the MDC's spokesman, said yesterday the MDC's victory was
the
"people's Christmas present to Zanu PF".
"This victory is a people's
Christmas present to Zanu PF," he said. "The
present contains a simple
message - that the people will stand firm in the
face of tyranny and that
they will indeed complete the change for a better
life for all Zimbabweans
that they started last year."
Daily News
MDC knocks on Mugabe's door
12/11/01 7:08:49 AM (GMT
+2)
Staff Reporters
The opposition Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC) has taken its winning
streak in mayoral elections almost to
President Mugabe's rural doorstep.
Yesterday Zanu PF lost to the MDC the
executive mayoral seat after weekend
polling in the Mashonaland West town of
Chegutu.
Francis Blessing Dhlakama of the MDC, is the new Executive Mayor
of Chegutu,
only 30km south-west of Mugabe's traditional village in
Zvimba.
The presence in the capital city of a high-powered Southern
African
Development Community (Sadc) delegation, in Zimbabwe to check on
progress
made on the land issue, must have added considerably to
Mugabe's
embarrassment and highlighted the claim by his critics that Zanu
PF's real
problem is loss of popularity - not failure to distribute land
equitably.
The United States Assistant Secretary of State for African
Affairs, Walter
Kansteiner, is also visiting Zimbabwe.
Mugabe's only
consolation yesterday must have been that only 2 900 Chegutu
residents voted
for Dhlakama out of a total of 20 618 registered voters. A
total of 5 586
ballots were cast, representing a voter turn-out of
27,09
percent.
Zanu PF's Stanley Majiri's polled 2 452 votes, with
only 197 people voting
for Charles Chiriva, an independent.
While the
MDC and Chiriva attributed the apathy to intimidation and violence
against
their supporters by Zanu PF, the small number of votes garnered by
Chiriva
should strengthen a growing perception that there is little room
for
independents in Zimbabwe's current political arena.
As news of
their latest victory spread, hundreds of jubilant MDC supporters,
some waving
red cards, and others blowing whistles, the party's symbols,
burst into the
Hartley 1 Primary School grounds, where the counting took
place.
All
were singing and shouting their party's slogan "Chinja!"
(Change!)
Yesterday's victory by that party brings to three the number of MDC
mayors
in the country, after Masvingo and Bulawayo.
This is the second
time that Zanu PF has lost an election while a Sadc
delegation is in the
country to debate the land question.
The first time was in September when
the MDC's Japhet Ndabeni-Ncube won the
Bulawayo executive mayoral election,
beating a Zanu PF candidate.
A delighted Dhlakama said: "I am so happy
that we have proved that violence
and intimidation do not pay. The people
have spoken. The voice of the people
is the voice of the Lord and I can
safely say, the Lord has also spoken."
As the MDC supporters burst into
celebrations, Zanu PF supporters watched
from the sidelines before leaving in
dejection.
Majiri, the losing Zanu PF candidate, refused to speak to The
Daily News,
but told the ZBC he accepted the results. The election was free
and fair, he
said.
He referred further questions to his party's
provincial chairman, Phillip
Chiyangwa, who promptly switched off his
cellphone.
Chiyangwa appeared on ZBC/TV on Sunday to say the MDC would
never rule in
Mashonaland West.
Chiriva said: "I am happy with the
result. I think the MDC deserves it,
after all the intimidation."
Last
week, the Supreme Court gave 11 February as the deadline for holding
the
Harare mayoral election after remarking that the Elijah Chanakira
commission,
which has been running the city since 1999, was illegal.
Learnmore
Jongwe, the MDC's spokesman, said yesterday the MDC's victory was
the
"people's Christmas present to Zanu PF".
"This victory is a people's
Christmas present to Zanu PF," he said. "The
present contains a simple
message - that the people will stand firm in the
face of tyranny and that
they will indeed complete the change for a better
life for all Zimbabweans
that they started last year."
ZIMBABWE: Presidential election due in March
JOHANNESBURG, 11 December
(IRIN) - Zimbabwe's long-awaited presidential election is due in March, although
the exact dates have not been set, President Robert Mugabe said on Tuesday.
The announcement came after Mugabe met with a task force of ministers
from the 14-member Southern African Development Community (SADC), who were in
Harare for two days of talks to discuss ways to ease Zimbabwe's political and
economic crisis.
An election date brings into even sharper focus
opposition fears that the presidential poll, in which Mugabe will face his most
serious political challenge since independence in 1980, cannot be free and fair
in the current political climate.
The mission by the six-member SADC
ministerial task team - the second in three months - to audit the government's
land reform programme and commitments to the rule of law, faced a tough opening
speech by Zimbabwe's Foreign Minister Stan Mudenge on Monday.
"We are
aware of strategic decisions in Brussels to try and conscript other players to
turn the entire African continent against us, and the sinister effort to turn
our SADC friends against us," Mudenge reportedly said. "We would face anybody,
because might is right," he added.
His remarks referred to criticism in
the last two weeks from South Africa, which appealed to the international
community to "act urgently" to ensure free and fair elections in Zimbabwe.
Last week the US Congress passed the Zimbabwe Democracy Bill which
imposes "smart sanctions" on government officials responsible for "the
deliberate breakdown of the rule of law". The European Union has also edged
towards sanctions over the government's resistance to effective election
monitoring and its human rights record.
Lilian Patel, Malawi's foreign
minister and chair of the SADC task force said the region was "greatly concerned
by what is going on in this country". But she added: "We in SADC would like to
make it clear that we do not support sanctions" as they would cause "untold
suffering to scores of Zimbabweans, as well as to other people in our region".
SADC's apparent unwillingness to act robustly has not come as a
surprise, analysts told IRIN. The regional economic grouping has been
effectively split since 1998, over the military intervention in the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC) by troops from Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia, according
to Moeletsi Mbeki of the South African Institute of International Affairs.
Mbeki, who this week warned of civil war in Zimbabwe if the presidential
elections are not transparent, told IRIN that with a consensus for action by
SADC "totally unrealistic", only South Africa had the clout to act.
While
Zimbabwe was only a "peripheral issue" for the international community, it had a
direct bearing on South Africa's national interests as a neighbour and major
trading partner. "Zimbabwe can only be hauled back from the abyss by the actions
of South Africa," the region's superpower, Mbeki said.
He called for a
national policy that involved the government, business and civil society
implementing a "much more serious set of initiatives", including the cutting of
fuel and electricity supplies - alongside transport links - with landlocked
Zimbabwe.
Economic Implications of the Adoption of the Zimbabwe Democracy and
Economic Recovery Act by the Congress of the United States of America.
The adoption of the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act by the US
Congress on Tuesday this week is a profound and important development. It
signals that the legislature in the US has finally come to the conclusion that
the Zimbabwe government has exceeded the bounds of acceptable behavior in
governance terms and should now be formally excluded from the family of
nations.
This development has been greeted with near hysteria by the state
controlled media in Zimbabwe who have been careful to emphasise the Act as a
violation of our sovereignty and the claim that the proposed sanctions will harm
ordinary Zimbabweans. In fact the Act takes great care to ensure that it does
not impact on the needs of ordinary Zimbabweans or make an already bad situation
any worse for the great majority of our people.
What it does do is to bring closer to reality the threat that if the
Zimbabwe government does not amend its ways in a significant sense, then the US
will use its long reach and enormous power to target the interests of the key
players in the Zanu PF led government so as to try and persuade them that the
cost of their delinquency will be potentially very substantial for them as
individuals.
The threat to use their influence over the multilateral institutions to
ensure that Zimbabwe does not receive any assistance is in fact an empty
pledge. All the multilateral financial agencies, the International Monetary
Fund, the World Bank, the African Development Bank, the European Investment
Bank, have already suspended Zimbabwe from their programs.
This was for
purely technical reasons - our default on the repayment of debt being the
primary cause. But in addition, the fact that our macro economic fundamentals
are still so far adrift from acceptable norms means that we do not qualify for
any forms of assistance at this time.
The threat to suspend other forms of assistance has already been
implemented by the great majority of bilateral donors, including the USA, for
reasons related to our failure to observe the norms of good governance. Donors
are however maintaining, and this includes the USA, the very substantial
humanitarian programs, which have been ongoing throughout the past two years.
This will not change as a result of the new legislation.
What is much more encouraging in respect to the new legislation, is the
commitment by the government of the United States to help Zimbabwe get back on
its feet once we have changed the way we do things and come back to our senses.
This is a very significant step forward.
Normally a country like Zimbabwe, coming out of a period of delinquency,
would have to wait for anything up to a year before the multilateral
institutions could resume support. Zimbabwe will come out of the presidential
elections with a new government burdened by over US$10 billion of debt. We will
have arrears of up to US$1,5 billion in unpaid debt servicing charges. We will
face critical food shortages for at least two years whilst we try to restore our
agricultural production, we will have no reserves of fuel and no international
credibility. We will face a huge crisis in our health and education system -
both of which are going to have to be rebuilt from the ground up. Up to two
thirds of our population will be out of work and up to 80 per cent living below
the poverty datum line. Inflation will be running at well over 100 per
cent.
We will need the help of our friends, and will need that help
urgently.
The decision of the US House of Representatives to ensure that such
help will be forthcoming as soon as we put our own house in order, is the best
news we could have had from anyone this Christmas.
E G Cross Secretary for Economic Affairs.
7th December 2001
Daily News
Plane diverted to pick up Mugabe in Spain
12/11/01
7:37:15 AM (GMT +2)
Staff Reporter
ABOUT 100 passengers on an
Air Zimbabwe flight bound for Harare were on
Saturday evening stranded at
Gatwick Airport in London after the plane was
diverted to pick up President
Mugabe and his family from Spain where he
sought eye treatment last
week.
Mugabe, accompanied by a delegation of about 40 people, quietly
left the
country last week and returned on Sunday morning.
His
unofficial visit to Spain and the condition of his health were not
officially
disclosed.
Speculation is rife in and outside the country over Mugabe's
health.
About 40 passengers were again stranded last week on Sunday when
the
President ordered a London-bound Air Zimbabwe flight to divert to Madrid
to
make way for his entourage.
Mugabe, who is 77, consulted an eye
specialist during the visit to Spain.
Britain's Independent newspaper
reported that doctors from France were flown
in to treat him in Spain. Mugabe
attended the eye clinic at the Barraquera
hospital in Barcelona, renowned for
its world-class eye treatment.
Mugabe's health has remained a closely
guarded secret over the years.
Sources said doctors from France treated
Mugabe for other undisclosed
ailments, but not the prostate cancer that has
reportedly plagued him
recently. But the Spanish doctors concentrated on his
eye problem.
There has been speculation too that Mugabe went to Spain in
an attempt to
heal a widening rift with the European Union
(EU).
Mugabe stormed out of a recent meeting with senior EU officials
and
politicians in Harare.
It has now emerged the President did not
meet any Spanish government
officials. Spain is due to assume chairmanship of
the EU in January.
Mugabe, who is to address the Zanu PF annual congress
in Victoria Falls this
week, addressed his party's politburo
yesterday.
This is not the first time that Mugabe has commandeered an Air
Zimbabwe
flight to travel abroad after dumping paying passengers. The
airline
announced on Saturday it was cancelling its flight to London,
probably to
collect the First Family from Spain.
Angry passengers
telephoned The Daily News from London complaining that
their UM725 flight had
been "hijacked by the Presidential delegation".
Air Zimbabwe paid £200
(Z$16 000) per passenger for a night at a hotel at
the airport following the
airline's change of route to Spain without notice.
The parastatal lost
about £15 400 (Z$1,23 million) to keep the
inconvenienced passengers at
Gatwick. The passengers spent two nights in
London.
Moses Mapanda,
acting senior manager public relations, blamed the incident
on a technical
fault developed by one of the airline's aircraft.
Mapanda said: "Air
Zimbabwe has introduced extra flights from Harare to
London for the month of
December 2001 on Wednesdays and Fridays. One of our
Boeing 767 aircraft had a
technical fault whilst in London on Monday 3
December 2001. This resulted in
the airline combining passenger loads from
two flights into
one.
"However, whilst awaiting the arrival of the operating aircraft,
clients
were put up in hotels. The Saturday flight from London did not leave
any
passengers behind as alleged."
He said a standard boarding fee of
£200 (maximum) is payable by all airlines
operating from British airports to
clients denied boarding.
"Delays from technical faults happen every day, even
with major carriers.
These are standard operating procedures which airlines
adopt in the event of
such delays. These are what we are following," said
Mapanda.
Daily News
Jongwe dismisses Sunday News report
12/11/01 7:41:01 AM
(GMT +2)
Staff Reporter
LEARNMORE Jongwe, the opposition MDC's
secretary for information and
publicity, has dismissed a report in the
State-controlled Sunday News
weekly, which said he threatened to deal with
journalists working for the
State media if his party won the Presidential
election next year.
The Bulawayo-based newspaper quoted Jongwe as telling
a conference on the
media and democracy jointly organised by Bulawayo
Dialogue and Crisis in
Zimbabwe, that the MDC would summon "one by one"
journalists serving in the
State-controlled media to account for their
activities.
The paper claimed Jongwe had failed to answer questions from
delegates on
whether the MDC would let the Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation
and Zimbabwe
Newspapers operate without interference.
In a statement,
Jongwe said: "The half-truths, omissions and naked lies in
The Sunday News
front-page story have shocked nearly all the delegates who
attended and
listened to my presentation.
"My presentation is on video. At no stage
did I say that the MDC would
summon journalists serving in the public media
houses 'one by one' to
account for their activities."
He said he had
not failed to answer the question referred to by the
newspaper "because no
such question was ever asked".
Jongwe said: "What I said about
journalists is that those journalists who
are abusing information on behalf
of individuals or groups of individuals
and inciting regional, tribal and
racial hatred and lying to the nation with
impunity may need to be extra
careful because some day they may, and within
the confines of the law, be
called to account."
He said he had referred to an international precedent
for this, citing a
radio journalist who abused his position and broadcast
live messages on
radio urging Hutus to go and kill Tutsis during the 1994
genocide in Rwanda.
The journalist was jailed for life by an
international tribunal.
Zimbabwe will define its own
future
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROBERT
Mugabe is a thug with his back to the wall. He has every reason to
fear that
if he loses power he faces financial ruin, possibly a public trial
for his
atrocities, and imprisonment. At the least he will be stripped of
his kingly
lifestyle.
Therefore he intends to hold on to power, preferably by
terrorising the
population to elect him, but by any means if necessary. He
has shown himself
willing to provoke murderous conflict, to ruin his country,
and to starve
his people to stay in power.
I make this point baldly
because failure to grasp the nature of the game in
Zimbabwe lies at the heart
of many of the policy prescriptions urged on
President Thabo Mbeki, mainly
and not coincidentally, by his enemies.
The pressure has finally
persuaded him to abandon his ineffectual "quiet
diplomacy" for equally
ineffectual denunciation. The proponents of
denunciation know it will also
prove useless, so we are already hearing
demands for "targeted" sanctions
directed at Mugabe and his ruling cabal.
Mbeki is on the
escalator.
The limited sanctions will not succeed, but then they are not
intended to
succeed, only to embroil us in the conflict. When limited
sanctions prove as
useless as " quiet diplomacy", we shall get demands for
fiercer sanctions,
and if Mbeki accedes to them, we shall become complicit in
the final
shattering of Zimbabwean society.
Amid the ruins, behold,
Mugabe may still be standing!
The simple truth is that this country
cannot dictate the future of Zimbabwe,
except perhaps by the methods of
President Bush against the Taliban, for
which we lack both the resources and
the will.
Responsibility for rescuing Zimbabwean democracy lies not with
us but with
the people of Zimbabwe. If they want democracy they will fight
for it. So
far, there has been some brave electioneering and some
courageous
journalism, but we have seen nothing of the methods of mass
mobilisation use
d to bring down Ian Smith. Why not?
Nor indeed have
we seen the kind of international support which the United
Nations, the
Commonwealth, and the great democracies gave to Mugabe, among
others, to
topple Smith. Again, why not?
Among the many reasons is the notion, very
popular in London and Washington,
that South Africa can be induced, or
manipulated, or bullied into taking up
the burden which greater countries
countries whose citizens do not lack
houses or schools, whose poor are
sustained by social security nets, whose
bureaucracies are competent and
long-established refuse to carry.
That burden may become huge. Zimbabwe's
economy has been so shattered by the
Al Capone behaviour of its ruler that we
must now expect it to implode, with
inflation rates perhaps climbing from
100% to 1000%, while price controls
and a shortage of foreign exchange lead
to a collapse of productive
capacity. Agriculture, already damaged, seems
likely to be replaced by mere
subsistence farming, with general deprivation
and starvation.
The influx of refugees to South Africa, foreseen at the
start of this debate
as our single overriding interest in the Zimbabwe
crisis, has begun without
response from our government. Nelson Mandela says
the President is too
involved with his foreign ventures to be able to provide
leadership against
AIDS. He is presumably also too busy to deal with crime,
non-functioning
bureaucracies, or refugees.
So things will, we may
confidently predict, get worse until the United
Nations, the Commonwealth and
the former colonial power which did so much to
create the present situation
choose to intervene. They will not do so while
they think there is a chance
to shove President Mbeki into the front line.
What President Mbeki should
do instead is to use his considerable diplomatic
skills to bring the United
Nations and the international aid agencies into
the fray. He should declare
that the sustenance of illegal refugees is
beyond our resources, but that we
shall co-operate in an international
programme to gather fleeing Zimbabweans
in places of safety, to feed them,
and to screen them so that those who are
healthy and skilled can be offered
permanent homes in this
country.
That would be preferable to our present policy of useless but
escalating
pressure on while doing nothing about the refugees.
Owen's
next column will be on January 14 2002.
Dec 10 2001 12:00:00:000AM Business
Day 1st Edition
SA must consider hard and soft options against
Harare
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE
onslaught by Zimbabwe's state-owned Herald newspaper against President
Thabo
Mbeki may turn out to be the "breath of fresh air" needed for Pretoria
to
start entertaining fresh thoughts on Zimbabwe's problems.
The question
is, how badly does Pretoria want to prevent a major crack-up in
its next-door
neighbour, one that destabilises much of the Southern African
Development
Community (SADC) and SA in particular? And what are Pretoria's
options, if
any?
While Mbeki's spokesman, Bheki Khumalo, said Zimbabwe is not a
"10th
province of SA", President Robert Mugabe's ruling Zanu (PF) has
turned
Zimbabwe into an economic colony of this country with its campaign
of
political and economic anarchy.
With Zimbabwe now totally dependent
on SA for electricity, maize and
transport links, that country has become
virtually a "10th province". Yet
Pretoria has robbed itself of leverage by
ruling out sanctions.
One would think that avoiding a civil war in
Zimbabwe, at all costs, is even
more important than an aversion to
sanctions.
It can be assumed from the reported reaction of Mugabe to
Mbeki's criticism
in his wanting an urgent meeting with the SA leader that
there is a split
among Mugabe's colleagues: between moderates like Finance
Minister Simba
Makoni and hardliners like Information Minister Jonathan
Moyo.
After all Pretoria has done to shield Mugabe from international
isolation,
only to be humiliated by his disdain, some ministers in his
cabinet are
stressing his need for Mbeki's support to stop impending European
and
American sanctions that will target many of them in terms of their
financial
assets abroad and their ability to travel. It seems Pretoria has
some
leverage on Zimbabwe after all.
A last-ditch effort to stave off
sanctions by Pretoria ought to be
predicated on a strategy aimed at
strengthening moderates around Mugabe at
the expense of the "chaos faction".
This is where, by the way, there is
still room for socalled "quiet
diplomacy", where SA leaders are in a
position to drive home certain terms
and conditions for what they want to
see unfold in Zimbabwe in exchange for
holding off sanctions.
The obvious is to salvage the March elections and
ensure that they are free
and fair. For that, Mugabe has to forgo enforcing a
host of Draconian
measures his government has adopted, aimed at rigging the
elections in Zanu
(PF)'s favour. This has to also include allowing
international election
observers.
If Mugabe's colleagues want to avoid
European Union (EU) and US sanctions,
they need to reverse their decision to
ban EU and US election observers.
However, the entire monitoring exercise
should fall under the oversight of
the SADC Organ on Politics, Defence and
Security, with a major role carved
out for the southern African church and
organised labour community.
If these conditions cannot be agreed to by
Harare, or if they are agreed to
but are breached, then Harare should face
sanctions, with SA joining in the
effort for good measure.
To that
extent, the Congress of SA Trade Unions and the Southern African
Trade Union
Coordinating Council might need to begin lobbying now for SADC
sanctions. In
the meantime, if Mugabe and his colleagues show good faith,
there is a role
for "quiet diplomacy" whereby SA and SADC talk with Zanu
(PF) moderates and
the Movement for Democratic Change.
Those talks could be about
considering establishing a postelection
government of national unity linked
to a Development Bank of Southern
Africa-based multilateral strategic
recovery process to reverse the economic
decline and depolarise
politics.
The US sanctions bill, for example, does hold out the prospect
for $26m in
aid, some debt forgiveness as well as trade and investment
promotion, all
conditioned on fair elections.
If Zimbabwe takes such a
path, then Pretoria's aim should be to work with
Harare towards guiding
Zimbabwe into the Southern African Customs Union as
the core of an expanding
economic community within SADC and the African
Union.
Another
possibility would be for an apparently ailing Mugabe to declare
victory after
"winning" the election and pass off to a younger successor who
might then
contemplate the national unity government option.
Should civil war be
unavoidable, SA's "quiet diplomacy" may still be
required to talk Zimbabweans
into agreeing to a humanitarian, peace-building
presence under SADC
auspices.
The point is a whole range of hard and soft options have to
start being
considered urgently. Zimbabwe has become a regional security
threat on SA's
doorstep egged on by the likes of Libya's Muammar Gadaffi in
competition
with Pretoria for continental leadership. There is a lot at
stake.
Kornegay is the programme co- ordinator for the Centre for
Africa's
International Relations at Wits University.
Zimbabwe has
become a regional security threat on SA's doorstep
Dec 10 2001 12:00:00:000AM
Francis Kornegay Business Day 1st Edition
The Farmer
Supreme injustice
LAST week saw Zimbabwe plummet to new
depths of absurdity, but far too few
people raised more than passing
interest. The absurdity arose from a Supreme
Court ruling declaring that
Zimbabwe's government has restored the rule of
law - and that it has put in
place a legitimate land reform programme.
Neither assertion has any basis in
fact.
Quite why so few people raised objections is hard to imagine. Some,
mainly
in the legal profession, balked at the idea of criticising the
Supreme
Court. That is daft; the Supreme Court can be criticised and should
be
criticised. It may decide that Orwellian legislation puts Mr Mugabe and
his
self-styled war veterans (along with anyone connected with the ruling
party)
above or within the law, but it is extremely doubtful if Chief
Justice
Godfrey Chidyausiku wants to claim he and his court are above the
law.
So… if the chief justice acts in a manner that is incomprehensible
when it
comes to the principles of natural justice - or any justice - then
questions
need to be asked. His may be a lofty position, but when he heaps
discredit
and international opprobrium on the one remaining arm of government
that
still had a modicum of respectability and plausibility to it, then we
need
to know why this man has acted in such a manner.
On the streets,
the word is that Chidyausiku is under immense pressure from
the president. If
that is true, then he has acted unwisely because the
judiciary and the
executive should be independent of one another. He is
supposed to be above
such matters.
Farmers and their organisations have undoubtedly been set
back by the
ruling, while the gloating from the state-controlled media, under
the
jackboot of information minister Professor Jonathan Moyo, will burn
farmers
in a place unmentionable in this paper.
But that doesn't mean
that all is lost. From the negative impact of this
strange ruling, farmers
(and their organisations) will be able to reap some
reward. There are, after
all, fruits for the picking when one's adversary
commits a blunder of this
magnitude and in a country where just about every
arm of government has been
thoroughly and absolutely discredited, it now
remains only to do the same to
the judiciary. After all, every aspect of Mr
Mugabe's rule is open to severe
criticism - and Chief Justice Chidyausiku
has opened himself up for the same
sort of denigration.
He will, undoubtedly, take a stab at justifying his
bewildering judgment. He
will probably do so by saying he ruled in favour of
millions of starving
people who have waited patiently for 21 years to have
access to land. If he
does so, no one will believe him, simply because no one
believes that land
is the issue. For a start, and to borrow an already
borrowed phrase from
Professor Moyo, it does not take a rocket scientist to
work out that
displacing a potential three million people to make way for
substantially
fewer people does nothing to alleviate the alleged land hunger
that exists
in Zimbabwe. Secondly, no one will believe him because the world
knows all
too well that the anarchy on the farms has nothing to do with
satisfying the
very people ZANU-PF has ignored since it assumed power 21 long
years ago,
but everything to do with winning a presidential election early
next year.
Bleating won't help. It won't help farmers and it won't help
lawyers who are
(or should be) doing something constructive about the fact
that the
judiciary has just suffered a very serious tragedy. There is only
one way
for agriculture to survive and it is the same way that the rest of
the
country is going to survive - and that is by exposing injustice at
every
turn. Now, when injustice turns up so inauspiciously in the very halls
of
justice, surely there is even more reason to rant and rave and to
make
absolutely certain that everyone, everywhere, knows exactly what it is
that
Chief Justice Chidyausiku has done?
There is nothing hallowed,
nothing sacred about the Supreme Court, still
less about the chief justice.
The one is a building where learned men of the
law are supposed to gather to
interpret the law, while the other is just a
man in comical colonial garb who
oversees those men. They are paid by the
sort of people who read this paper
and we expect them to do their work
honourably and in a manner that satisfies
our sense of justice and doesn't
embarrass us in the eyes of the
world.
Following the Supreme Court's silly judgment, the Herald,
predictably,
announced that the CFU "admits defeat" and will no longer
represents its
members when it comes to the land issue. This is deceitful
nonsense, but
it's the sort of supercilious rubbish farmers can expect from
the State's
increasingly foolish propaganda machine. The fact of the matter
is that the
CFU is seeking expert legal advice both within and outside
Zimbabwe. Until
that advice is forthcoming it has issued interim statements
showing the
situation as it sees it now, bearing in mind that nothing is cast
in stone
and that its advisers may well say that there is a way of
challenging the
Supreme Court ruling.
Besides, no one admitted defeat,
least of all the farmers' union. Still,
this is a crisis born of a conflict -
at the end of which someone will be
defeated. With the entire free world, and
now even SADC opposed to the
present regime in Zimbabwe, it seems likely that
far from staring defeat in
the face, farmers are more likely to be picking up
the pieces and
re-establishing themselves as the engine of Zimbabwe's economy
when all this
madness draws to a close.
VOA news
Southern African Ministers Meet On Zimbabwe Turmoil
Peta
Thornycroft
Harare, Zimbabwe
10 Dec 2001 20:20
UTC
Ministers from the Southern African Development
Community, or SADEC, are
meeting in Harare for discussions on the political
crisis in Zimbabwe. At a
SADEC meeting in September, Zimbabwe agreed to
restore the rule of law,
particularly on mainly white-owned commercial
farms.
The meeting opened with a 45-minute speech from Zimbabwe's foreign
minister,
Stan Mudenge, who said Britain had conspired to turn the European
Union, the
United States, and now some southern African states against his
country.
This meeting is a follow-up to a recent SADEC meeting in which
the 14-member
organization, behind closed doors, criticized President Robert
Mugabe's
government and the seizure of land from commercial
farmers.
Since then, South African President Thabo Mbeki has been more
openly
critical of Zimbabwe, and has tried to prepare the regional
organization to
support stronger, but as yet unspecified, actions against Mr.
Mugabe's
government.
During the two-day meeting, SADEC ministers are
to hear from various
interest groups, including members of opposition
parties, the Commercial
Farmers Union, and independence war veterans, the
group that is playing a
key role in the farm seizures.
Representatives
of the General Agricultural and Plantation workers union,
which represents
farm workers, say they will tell SADEC ministers that
Mugabe's supporters had
forced more than 70,000 commercial farm workers to
leave their jobs and
homes.
The opposition Movement for Democratic Change, for its part, says
it will
provide evidence that hundreds of its supporters have been beaten,
tortured,
or imprisoned since the previous SADEC meeting.
However,
several political analysts say that even if SADEC is united in its
opposition
to President Mugabe during this meeting, it is powerless to do
more than
criticize, for fear of upsetting regional trade and transport
links with
Zimbabwe.
From The Cape Times (SA), 11
December
You'll suffer too, Harare warns
SA
Harare - Zimbabwe has vowed not to bow to international
sanctions or African pressure to stop its plans to seize white-owned farms.
Foreign Minister Stan Mudenge, speaking to southern African officials visiting
Zimbabwe to assess its land programme, cautioned neighbouring countries on
Monday against siding with "foreign players" who called for sanctions, including
"smart" sanctions targeting government and ruling party officials. "There can be
no sanctions smart enough to affect Zimbabweans alone. Our destinies are
intertwined," Mudenge told the six-member Southern African Development Community
(SADC) ministerial team.
It also emerged on Monday that President Robert Mugabe's
cabinet had already decided before the visit to stop negotiating with
international bodies which did not endorse its land programme, and to squeeze
white farmers even more should sanctions be instituted. The Commonwealth will
meet within two weeks to discuss a possible embargo against Zimbabwe. The US
House of Representatives has endorsed a bill that threatens sanctions against
Zimbabwe. The visiting SADC team is likely to leave empty-handed after a
decision last week by Mugabe's cabinet not to consider international arbitration
of its land policies. Authoritative sources said a cabinet meeting convened by
Mugabe had agreed that Zimbabwe would only accommodate international bodies
which endorsed the planned reforms.
Mudenge confirmed this, and said on Monday that the SADC team
should not monitor or judge Zimbabwe's land reforms, but should merely support
what he described as Mugabe's "efforts to eradicate neo-colonialism" in Africa.
The cabinet also resolved to react to any sanctions from the Commonwealth with
more drastic action against white farmers, sources said. The Zimbabwe government
has already passed two decrees. The first was that farmers should leave their
farms within three months after being listed for acquisition by the government,
and the second was to cut all farms to 2 000ha, with the remaining land to be
seized without compensation.
At the start of the visit on Monday, Mudenge called on African
states to rally behind Mugabe, saying Zimbabwe's ruling Zanu PF party was
fighting for the interests of the black majority against Western interests that
backed white colonial rule in the former Rhodesia. "We are being opposed for not
accepting the mini-dosages of justice being offered our people, when in fact
doing so would perpetuate the deprivation of our people." Lilian Patel, the
Malawian foreign minister and head of the SADC team, said the regional economic
bloc was concerned about the situation in Zimbabwe. "We are here as your friends
because we are greatly concerned. We do not support sanctions." Political
analysts say Mugabe, in power since independence in 1980, is using the land
programme in a bid to retain power in elections due by April next year.
From SAPA (SA), 10
December
SADC ministers meet on Harare
crisis
Harare - Ministers of five Southern African nations began a
meeting in Harare on Monday in a bid to resolve the country's political crisis.
Lilian Patel, the Malawian foreign minister and chairman of the Southern African
Development Community's task force on Zimbabwe opened the conference, saying
members of the 13-nation economic bloc were "greatly concerned by what is going
on in this country". There was also a tacit admission by Zimbabwean foreign
minister Stan Mudenge that his government was for the first time facing strong
criticism from African states demanding Mugabe end political violence and ensure
presidential elections due by April are free and fair.
In a lengthy speech at the opening of the two-day meeting,
Mudenge repeated the government's charge that the British government was
"managing and manipulating" international action against Zimbabwe. "We are aware
of strategic decisions in Brussels to try and conscript other players to turn
the entire African continent against us, and the sinister effort to turn our
SADC friends against us," he said. He said he believed SADC was in support of
Zimbabwe's case, but, he added, "even if not," the government would win. "We
would face anybody, because might is right," he vowed. His remarks referred to
criticism in the last two weeks from South Africa, including President Thabo
Mbeki who appealed to the international community to "act urgently" to ensure
free and fair elections in Zimbabwe. Mbeki said the situation in Zimbabwe was
"deteriorating" and warned of an outbreak of civil war if people were denied the
right to vote freely.
The SADC meeting follows the passing in the US Congress last
week of the "Zimbabwe Democracy bill" which imposes sanctions targeted
specifically against Mugabe and other officials responsible for "the deliberate
breakdown of the rule of law." The European Union has also started diplomatic
mechanisms that will allow it also to impose sanctions against Zimbabwe. Patel
said the meeting was part of a series of diplomatic initiatives to end the
crisis in Zimbabwe, but she clearly separated SADC from the stronger Western
form of sanctions. "We in SADC would like to make it clear that we do not
support sanctions," she said. "Sanctions would cause untold suffering to scores
of Zimbabweans, as well as to other people in our region." US officials have
pointed out that the Zimbabwe Democracy bill, yet to be signed into law by
President George Bush, will stop Mugabe and senior aides and their families from
travelling to America, and freeze their bank accounts there.
Last week South African officials confirmed that Mbeki was
"losing patience" with Mugabe and said he should not any longer expect
protection from South Africa. The SADC meeting in Harare was a follow up to a
two-day regional summit here in September where the presidents of five nations
listened to representatives of several bodies linked to Mugabe's ruling Zanu PF
party, as well as to civic rights bodies and farm union officials. It ended with
what diplomats said was an ambiguous conclusion that softened the pressure on
the government. However, they say that following Mbeki's strong remarks, Harare
is likely to be delivered with much firmer demands for compliance with
international calls for the restoration of the rule of law. The SADC task force
is one of a series of international diplomatic initiatives that have brought
Mugabe's regime into widening isolation over state-driven lawlessness that began
in February last year with violent invasions of white-owned farms by Mugabe's
militias of war veterans, and a campaign of repression that has continued since
then.
From The Mail & Guardian (SA),
10 December
Mugabe to "tough it
out"
Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe is
likely to "tough it out" and appeal to black South Africans over President Thabo
Mbeki’s head, in response to the South African government’s ditching of its
"quiet diplomacy" policy
Further intensifying the country’s isolation, the United States
Congress adopted the Zimbabwe Democracy Act by an overwhelming majority.
Diplomats said Mugabe was most likely to respond to the pressures by projecting
himself to black South Africans as "a Pan Africanist hero" and "toughing it out,
at least until he has won a further six-year term". He has already tried to
strike a posture as Africa's revolutionary crusader against globalisation and
the relics of white imperialism, setting an example to the region - particularly
South Africa – on how to conduct land reform. Diplomats said another possibility
- although remote - was that Mugabe would make cosmetic changes to appease
Mbeki. A small group of wealthy white farmers who have backed Mugabe to win
forthcoming elections may be brought on board, with at least one being offered a
Cabinet seat. A minister able to speak a South African language, such as
Ndebele-speaking Zanu PF party chairperson John Nkomo, currently Minister of
Home Affairs, may be charged with improving Harare-Pretoria relations. In the
past week Mugabe has ditched the centuries-old rule book of diplomatic practice
by permitting his hard-line Minister of Information, Jonathan Moyo, to pillory
targeted Western diplomats in the state-controlled media, in addition to
launching a war of words on Pretoria. Danish ambassador Ole Moesby and British
High Commissioner Brian Donnelly were vilified.
The day Mbeki let it be known he had finally lost patience -
Mugabe's worst external setback in years - the new Supreme Court bench under
former minister Godfrey Chidyausiku handed the Zimbabwean president a predicted
internal triumph in the form of 4-1 endorsement of the "fast track land reform
programme". The last hopes that internal pressure could bring change were
destroyed on Monday by the newly reconstituted Supreme Court. Envoys and jurists
said only external pressure could ensure anything resembling clean presidential
elections next year. Chief Justice Chidyausiku cleared the government of all
wrongdoing despite the murder of 39 farmworkers and nine farmers in two years of
what Mugabe calls the "Third Chimurenga" or civil war. It was unreasonable to
expect the government to "bring about a totally crime free environment", said
Chidyausiku. He added that land reform "is a matter of social justice, not
strictly speaking a legal issue". Three newly appointed Mugabe sympathisers
backed Chidyausiku's finding, which now clears the way for summary
redistribution of 5 000 white-owned farms to 300 000 Zanu PF supporters. Human
rights lawyer Adrian de Bourbon said the ruling marked "the end of the road" for
farmers’ attempts to fight through the courts. Anyone attempting to defend human
rights from now on "runs a very severe risk of not getting a fair adjudication",
he warned.
However, Zimbabwe's legal community were ringing in their
praise for the personal courage and moral integrity of Appeal Judge Admed
Ibrahim (61), who issued a dissenting judgement. Ibrahim rejected demands that
he resign earlier this year, despite warnings by Minister of Justice Patrick
Chinamasa that "anything could happen" following death threats from Mugabe's war
veterans. In his minority ruling, likely to be reprinted in legal journals
around the world, Ibrahim accused the government of coming back to Judge
Chidyausiku with the same arguments that had been rejected by the previous
Supreme Court bench under Judge Anthony Gubbay. He said that on the evidence put
before the Supreme Court by the Commercial Farmers’ Union it was impossible to
say law and order had been restored. "Haphazard squatting cannot form part of a
lawful programme of land reform," he said. "It is not the function of the courts
to support the government of the day. The courts' duty is to the law and the law
alone. They may never subvert the law. To do otherwise would create huge
uncertainty in the law."
De Bourbon's warning that internal means of legal redress were
running out was echoed by Professor Tony Hawkins of the University of Zimbabwe’s
business school. He believes there is little hope the local business community
will exert internal pressure for reform, despite the worsening economic crisis.
However, Zimbabwe remained vulnerable to South African pressure on transport,
fuel and electricity, said Hawkins. "The economic pressures will continue to
intensify in the months ahead, but this government is going nowhere until the
elections. If Mugabe wins he will have to try and do something - I don't know
what - to reverse some of the things he is doing now. Undermining the dynamo of
the economy - agriculture - will not fully hit us until next year or the year
after. "We haven't felt the full effect of financing the budget deficit by the
tax on savers, and the exchange rate policy." Institutional investors are
currently receiving a maximum of 30% returns in the face of nearly 100%
inflation, which Hawkins describes as "a concealed tax". "There will also be a
substantial outflow of skills post election," said Hawkins. Despite the
country’s economic decline, political entropy and increasing international
isolation, no challenge is expected to Mugabe’s leadership at next week’s
Zanu-PF congress in Victoria Falls. An orgy of anti-Western and anti-South
African rhetoric is expected when close on 14 000 delegates turn up in the
resort town