Martin Fletcher
and Jan Raath in Harare
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=9040
December 22, 2008
By
Our Correspondent
HARARE - State agents arrested four Britons and an
American in Harare on
Monday claiming they were spies who entered Zimbabwe
more than a week ago
allegedly to finance activities aimed at overthrowing
President Robert
Mugabe's government.
The four, who according to
a ZBC news bulletin, entered the country on
December 13, allegedly claimed
to be human rights doctors on a mission to
assess the health situation in
Zimbabwe.
The four were arrested after it allegedly emerged they had
falsified their
visit to Zimbabwe when in fact they were on a mission to
sponsor the recent
revival of PF-Zapu while paving the way for the Movement
for Democratic
Change (MDC) to take over power. The party was re-launched
two weeks ago,
with Mugabe's former Minister of Home Affairs, Dumiso
Dabengwa as its
leader.
"It emerged that the four were on a spying
mission to meet with opposition
political leaders with a view to sponsoring
the revival of PF-Zapu and
weakening the ruling Zanu-PF in order to pave way
for the MDC-T to assume
power," the ZBC reported.
In the news
bulletin on Monday the ZBC, which is controlled by government,
accused the
opposition and NGOs of hosting the "spies".
"The team came as donors who
were invited by the Zimbabwe Association of
Doctors for Human Rights for the
sole purpose of assessing the heath
situation in the country particularly
the cholera outbreak.
"However information gathered by ZBC news revealed
that the four bogus
physicians ended up holding meetings with several
diplomats and opposition
political leaders allegedly (MDC MPs) Paul Madzore
and Blessing Chebundo,
civic organizations and student
representatives."
The team is said to have visited several health
institutions without
government permission.
The ZBC claimed it had
gathered "concrete data that the team addressed
several meetings on issues
pertaining to security in Zimbabwe".
"It also came to light that on 17
December at Park View restaurant, they
expressed their willingness to
sponsor the revival of PF-Zapu so as to
destroy the unity accord and weaken
Zanu- PF paving the way for MDC-T to
assume power," said the ZBC.
The
ZBC did not state how it had gathered such detailed information. Neither
was
it explained how four British citizens and an American could weaken
Zanu-PF
on a brief visit to Zimbabwe. PF-Zapu, then under the leadership of
the
former opposition leader Joshua Nkomo, who thereafter became Vice
President,
merged with Mugabe's Zanu-PF in 1987 under the now much maligned
unity
accord.
A group of disgruntled former PF-Zapu politicians broke away from
Zanu-PF
last month to revive PF-Zapu.
The arrest of the "spies" is
consistent with the current crackdown on
opponents accused by government of
working with its external enemies to
effect regime change in
Zimbabwe.
"Zimbabwe has over the years come under attack from the United
States and
her allies in their attempt to effect illegal regime change in
the country,"
said the ZBC.
"Observers say it is unfortunate that
some Non-Governmental Organizations
continue to work with foreign forces to
collect information for propaganda
purposes and carry out dubious missions
to tarnish the image of Zimbabwe."
At least 26 people who include MDC
activists and human rights campaigners
have been abducted in mysterious
circumstances over the past few weeks by
suspected state security agents.
Their whereabouts remain unknown.
President Mugabe's administration,
which is blamed by many for creating the
conditions that led to the outbreak
of cholera that has so far claimed the
lives of more than 1 100
Zimbabweans, is apprehensive about any information
that seeks to portray it
as a violator of human rights.
Government last month barred a group of
eminent former world leaders led by
former UN chief Kofi Annan who attempted
to enter the country to assess
Zimbabwe's deteriorating humanitarian
situation.
Government claimed the group, known as the Elders, had been
sent by its
western enemies to bolster widespread claims that Zimbabwe was
violating
human rights.
http://news.yahoo.com
HARARE (AFP) - Zimbabwe's
government on Tuesday slammed US President George
Bush's government's
declaration of loss of confidence in President Robert
Mugabe as a
"diplomatic flute" by an outgoing administration.
"We have no time for US
President George W. Bush's diplomatic flute. We are
talking about an
administration whose sun has set," Mugabe's spokesman
George Charamba said,
according to state-run The Herald newspaper.
About half of Zimbabwe's
population needs food aid, UN experts said Monday,
as a first consignment of
supplies designed to help fight a cholera epidemic
arrived in the troubled
southern African nation.
As Mugabe faced fresh calls to step down from
Western powers, the UN's
warning highlighted yet another crisis facing
Zimbabwe as it also battles a
deadly cholera epidemic and runaway
inflation.
And in a further bid to tighten the screw on Mugabe, US
Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice said she planned to lobby Washington's
allies to impose
sanctions against the regime in Harare.
"An
estimated 5.5 million people may need food assistance," said the UN's
special rapporteur on the right to food, Olivier De Schutterhe, in a joint
statement from four senior UN officials.
There was "just not enough
food" in the country of around 12 million which
was once the bread basket of
Africa, he added, calling on Zimbabwe's
government and the international
community for increased help.
In the same statement, the special
rapporteur on health rights, Anand Grover
said the country's medical
services could not control the cholera outbreak,
which has killed more than
1,120.
"Zimbabwe's health system has completely collapsed. It cannot
control the
cholera outbreak which is spreading throughout the country, with
a daily
increase in the death toll," he said.
As the UN experts
sounded the alarm bells, the children's fund UNICEF was
delivering its first
consignment of aid -- intravenous fluids, drip
equipment, essential drugs,
midwifery and obstetric kits -- to boost
government services in the fight
against cholera.
"This is a strategic measure to address a desperate
situation," said UNICEF
acting representative in Zimbabwe, Roeland
Monasch.
Once seen as a post-colonial role model, Zimbabwe's economy has
been in a
downward spiral since the turn of the decade when thousands of
white-owned
farms began being seized under a controversial land reform
programme.
Food production has since plummetted and inflation has
skyrocketed, hitting
231 percent when the last official data was released in
August.
Zimbabwe has also been in political crisis since elections in
March when the
long-ruling ZANU-PF party lost control of parliament and
Mugabe was pushed
into second place by opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai
in a poll for
president.
Tsvangirai, leader of the Movement for
Democratic Change, pulled out of a
run-off after scores of his supporters
were killed.
A power-sharing agreement signed by the two rivals in
September was seen as
an opportunity for the country to turn a corner but it
has yet to be
implemented amid disagreements over the control of key organs
of state.
Under the terms of the power-sharing deal, Mugabe would remain
president
with Tsvangirai becoming prime minister.
But with Mugabe
now declaring that Zimbabwe is "mine", both the United
States and former
colonial power Britain have the deal will be unacceptable
as unless the
84-year-old Mugabe leaves office.
"Power-sharing isn't dead but Mugabe
has become an absolute impossible
obstacle to achieving it," said Britain's
Africa minister Mark Malloch
Brown.
"He's so distrusted by all sides
that I think the Americans are absolutely
right, he's going to have to step
aside."
Malloch-Brown's comments came a day after the top US diplomat for
Africa,
Assistant Secretary of State Jendayi Frazer, said Washington would
not
restore aid to the cholera-wracked country unless Mugabe stood
down.
In an interview with AFP, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
said she
would consult Washington's allies about imposing international
asset freezes
and other sanctions against the Mugabe regime which Washington
has already
put in place.
"I am going to consult with our allies,
particularly with some of our
African allies and with the British and we
will see," Rice said.
"But I think it high time that the international
community step up the
sanctions on this regime."
Mugabe, who has
ruled the southern African nation ever since independence in
1980, has made
clear that he has no intention of standing down.
In a defiant weekend
speech at ZANU-PF's annual conference, he vowed that he
would "never, never
surrender" and that "Zimbabwe is mine."
http://www.newzimbabwe.com
Posted to the web:
22/12/2008 12:32:11
THE Zimbabwe government has finally released Morgan
Tsvangirai's passport
following the intervention of the South African
government, New Zimbabwe.com
is reliably informed.
Tsvangirai, the
leader of the main opposition Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC) has been
stuck in Botswana after his emergency travel document he used
to leave
Zimbabwe on September 9 expired.
He has refused to return to Zimbabwe
since, insisting that he should be
given his passport first.
"He
should have got his passport on Saturday," a government source said.
"The
South African government applied considerable pressure on President
Mugabe
for Tsvangirai to be issued his passport."
The official who spoke on
condition of anonymity because he was not cleared
to talk to the media said
the South African government was "very keen to do
whatever is necessary for
the power sharing deal to succeed."
He added: "They (South Africans) are
infuriated by the UK and US governments
who have scaled up their efforts to
undermine the power sharing agreement.
They felt the Zimbabwe government was
playing into the hands of those who
want to frustrate the
agreement."
On Monday, MDC spokesman Nelson Chamisa said he could not
confirm if
Tsvangirai had got his passport. "That information has not been
confirmed.
When I spoke to him late on Sunday, he still had not received it.
But it
could be a new development. I will have to check and get back to
you."
President Mugabe revealed last week that he had invited both
Tsvangirai and
Arthur Mutambara, the leader of a faction of the MDC, to be
sworn-in in line
with a power sharing agreement signed on September
15.
Tsvangirai, meanwhile, spoke to reporters in Botswana and threatened
to pull
his party out of the unity government talks at the start of the new
year if
MDC activists believed to be currently held by security services
without
trial are not released.
And on Sunday, the American
government said it would no longer support a
power sharing agreement in
which Mugabe remains President, effectively
undercutting Tsvangirai's
message and presenting Mugabe with a propaganda
opportunity.
Mugabe
has sought to lump Tsvangirai with US and British government efforts
to
force him out of power. Mugabe's supporters say US President George Bush
is
keen to see the back of Mugabe before his own term expires on January 13
as
payback for British support in the invasion of Iraq.
http://www.zimbabwemetro.com
Local News
December 23, 2008 | By Gerald
Harper
The MDC had dismissed media reports that the Zimbabwean
government has
finally agreed to issue MDC President, Morgan Tsvangirai with
a passport,
Metro can reveal.
Speaking on VOA`s Studio 7 last night
MDC MP and Interior Secretary Sam
Sipepa Nkomo said the MDC has not received
Tsvangirai`s passport.
"`Mr.Tsvangirai still has no passport,if they have
indeed issued issued him
with a passport its still with ZANU PF officials,he
has not received the
passport",said Nkomo.
"The passport was not
delivered at Harvest House (MDC Head Office) it was
not at his Strathaven
residence,there is no MDC official who has yet
received it so he did not get
it.If he indeed got it we should not be
hearing it from the media or the
South African government but from those who
are responsible for issuing
passport here.",he added.
Tsvangirai, is in Botswana with only the ETD
issued to him last month when
he left the country and believes he cannot
return because he does not have a
valid travel document.
He has been
denied a passport since early this year, the government claiming
it does not
have the materials to issue him with a new one. But his party,
the MDC, has
pointed out that thousands of other people have been issued
passports since
Tsvangirai applied.
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=9026
December 22, 2008
By Our
Correspondent
HARARE - The family of Chris Dlamini, the MDC's head of
security, has issued
a petition demanding that Zimbabwe 's government
explain his disappearance
at the hands of suspected state
agents.
Dlamini remains missing amid fears over his security and
safety.
"We believe the Zimbabwean government should pay attention to the
righteous
public opinion and voices within and outside the country, and give
a clear
answer to what happened to our father, Mr Chris Dlamini," a petition
by the
family says.
"If the government has restricted his freedom of
movement, it should issue a
legal notification to his family, to confirm
that our father has not been
the victim of mafia-style
kidnapping."
Dlamini has been missing since he was abducted by nine
gunmen in Harare more
than a month ago.
The police have refused to
respond to inquiries from Dlamini's wife about
her husband's whereabouts,
she said.
Intelligence sources say Dlamini was under 24-hour surveillance
for days by
state security agents before he was abducted.
His
disappearance is believed to be linked to his alleged role in allegedly
organizing the so-called military training for MDC guerrillas in
neighbouring Botswana. Botswana strongly denies the
allegations.
According to MDC secretary-general Tendai Biti, Dlamini is
featured on one
of the three DVDs that President Roberr Mugabe's regime has
produced to
buttress its claims that the MDC was indeed training insurgents
in Botswana
military facilities.
Dlamini is reportedly featured on
one of the DVDs "confessing" that the MDC
was planning acts of banditry with
the ultimate motive of overthrowing
Mugabe. Biti says the confessions were
extracted through coercion and
torture.
Dlamini was among the first
to be abducted this month. Dlamini's daughter
Victoria has returned home
from South Africa where she lives. She is
distraught about her father's
disappearances. She complained that there had
been no cooperation
whatsoever from the police.
"I cannot go back until I know where my
father is," a tearful Victoria said.
"I don't know who to talk to at the
moment. This is an incredibly tough time
for us. We just want to know if he
is alive or dead."
Victoria also expressed concern for other political
detainees.
Among those missing are rights activist Jestina Mukoko and
photo-journalist
Shadreck Manyere. The High Court has ordered the police to
investigate their
abduction and find them.
Two of Mukoko's workmates
are also missing together with at least 23 members
of the MDC provincial
executive in Zvimba, Mugabe's rural home.
The government has denied any
responsibility for the abductions.
The government-controlled press has
complied with a High Court order issued
by Judge Anne-Marrie Gowora to place
adverts in newspapers soliciting
information about the detainees'
whereabouts.
Human rights lawyer Otto Saki, one of the lawyers handling
the abduction
cases, told The Zimbabwe Times that all efforts to locate the
missing
activists had been futile.
Fears have been expressed that the
wave of abductions would worsen given the
imminent collapse of the
controversial power-sharing talks.
MDC leader and Prime
Minister-designate Morgan Tsvangirai has threatened to
pull out the talks
with Zanu-PF if his party members and missing activists
were not
released.
"If these abductions do not cease immediately, and if all the
abductees are
not released or charged in a court of law by January 1, 2009,
I will be
asking the MDC's National Council to pass a resolution to suspend
all
negotiations and contact with Zanu-PF," Tsvangirai told a news
conference in
Gaborone at the weekend.
"There can be no meaningful
talks while a campaign of terror is being waged
against our people," he
said.
The abductions have been organised under the auspices of a security
operation codenamed "Chimumumu" (Shona for a dumb person) which, according
to intelligence sources, seeks to eliminate political and human rights
activists.
The Dlamini family has been holding daily prayer vigils at
their Harare
home.
"We urge the government .not to do anything that
seriously violates
humanity, seriously violates laws, and seriously harms
people's trust in the
government," said the petition.
http://www.nehandaradio.com/
23 December 2008
MDC
Senator Sekai Holland raised concerns about a UK based website run by
lawyer
turned journalist, Itayi Garande, claiming it had now been
'infiltrated' by
Zanu PF and was 'being used to spread stories in support of
Mugabe.' On SW
Radio Africa's Reporters Forum this week Lance speaks to
Garande and asks
him whether this pro-Mugabe label is justified? The
discussion gets heated
when Garande is also asked whether calls for his
deportation from the UK,
under western-backed targeted sanctions, are
justified.
Lance: Hello
Zimbabwe and welcome to Reporters' Forum. This week we have the
editor of
the Zimbabwe Guardian formerly known as Talk Zimbabwe.com, his
name is Itayi
Garande, Mr Garande thank you for joining me on the Forum or
shall I say
rejoining the Forum.
Garande: ehe..thank you Lance
Lance: Itayi
you have been in the news for the best part of the last two
weeks and I will
pinpoint one of the stories that have done the rounds. MDC
senator and
veteran activist Sekai Holland expressing concerns about your
website,
alleging that you are running stories supporting the Mugabe regime.
Lets
start of with that accusation. Is it fair for anyone to conclude that
your
website, Talk Zimbabwe.com or Zimbabwe Guardian is supporting the
Mugabe
regime?
Garande: Well we are a news organisation just like everybody
else. People
might have their opinions about how we report, that is their
opinion and as
we said Sekai Holland is a concerned Zimbabwean about the
issues that are
bedevelling our nation today, so she has got a right to have
her own
opinion. But unfortunately thats not true.
Lance: But the
accusation still remains are you saying you admit to the fact
that your
editorial slant is in favour of the ruling party in Zimbabwe.
Garande:
The problem we had was it was a one liner. There were no particular
issues
or particular stories that were pin pointed that Sekai Holland
mentioned. I
mean the editorial line that we take is pro-Zimbabwean. We can't
be more
specific about that. I think a lot of the reporting that has
been....(interrupted)
Lance: But pro-Zimbabwean sounds rather very
general, you have a crisis in
Zimbabwe and a lot of people feel instead of
focussing on this crisis, you
are running stories that are essentially
trying to hide the magnitutde of
the crisis and propping up the government
that is in power.
Garande: Well that is your opinion Lance, I
think
Lance: Its an opinion that has been expressed by a lot of people
this is why
I am asking
Garande: There are a lot of other people who
visit our site who express a
different opinion. I think the problem that a
lot of people have is there
have had what I would like to call event
focussed reporting which is not
just narrow in time but is very shallow in
depth. I think it does not help
the audience if we dont see beyond the
surface to the underlying sources of
Zimbabwe's problems. I think Zimbabwe
cannot be reduced to one person, I
have noticed a focus on President Mugabe
only as the source of all Zimbabwe's
problems.
I think it is that
narrowness in reporting which has tremednously caused
some of the problems
that we having. Zimbabwe's problem is a multi-facetted
problem which cannot
be reduced to one political party or one individual.
And that is the type of
reporting that we are trying to get. And also as
journalists we should pay
more attention to the rational middle ground of
issues and less attention to
extremes which is what I have found in most
reporting.
Lance: But the
bottom line is anyone going through your site will realise
that you don't
run any anti-government stories. Thats the bottom line?
Garande: Well we
dont have to run anti-government stories or pro-government
stories..(interrupted)
Lance: So that translates into support,
because if you are not running
anything that is not remotely critical of the
government that really amounts
to supporting the government Itayi. Its
straightforward.
Garande: Is the reverse true, do you run MDC
stories?
Lance: No we are running pro-people of Zimbabwe stories, like
highlighting
their suffering. You are not exactly..If I am to conclude from
your
editorial slant, you are running stories that focus more on the
leadership
of Zimbabwe than the people of Zimbabwe. Would that be a fair
statement to
make.
Garande: It could be a fair statement. I think
Nelson Mandela summed it up
very well when he came to England and said there
is a leadership crisis in
Zimbabwe and in the region, I think what he meant
which was misconstrued by
a lot of people, they thought he meant there was a
Zanu PF leadership
crisis. I think we have got a general leadership crisis
in the region and to
narrow down issues to single individuals, I think is a
mistake.
Lance: Its a fair point to make Itayi we do have a leadership
crisis in
Zimbabwe but the problem is that your website is accused of
running
one-sided stories that focus on what is good about the government
and what
is bad about the opposition.
Garande: Ah can you give me an
example about what is good about the
government that we have
covered.
Lance: For example Mr Itayi you have been running stories about
imaginery
military bases in Botswana, I mean, I dont think you for one
minute believe
those stories about bandits being trained in
Botswana?
Garande: Well the SADC region have made it clear they are
investigating that
case..
Lance: Would the SADC region not be better
placed investigating the
abductions of people like Jestina Mukoko? They
would rather be investigating
imaginery training bases in Botswana but why
have we not had them for
example investigating something like Jestina
Mukoko's abduction.
Garande: This is what I was talking about, event
focussed reporting. I think
all those issues you highlighted are just as
important as each other. I
think all of those issues have to be
investigated. But to expect the
Zimbabwe Guardian to report on one or none
of those...and in any case the
fact that you have missed...at SW Radio
Africa the fact that you have not
reported about those bases..that shows
another bias.
Lance: We have, but we have thrown in analysis about how
ridiculous those
claims are. You have taken the oppositie stance and given
oxygen to
ludicrous claims.
Garande: Well thats you opinion Lance,
everyone holds an opinion. I can
assure you a lot of people will have so
many different opinions.
Lance: Let me ask you a blunt question Itayi, so
clearly if I am to visit
the Zimbabwe Guardian I am not going to see any
anti-government stories,
thats for sure isn't.
Garande:
Anti-government stories, I dont understand what you saying...if you
saying..(interrupted)
Lance: Stories that cover human rights abuses,
stories that cover the
violence that we see in Zimbabwe, stories that cover
political repression,
groups like the NCA, WOZA not being allowed to
demonstrate, things like, we
are definately not going to be seeing that on
the Zimbabwe Guardian.
Garande: well you will see some stories about
abductions...(interrupted)
Lance: But I'm on your site right now, there
is absolutely nothing of the
sort
Garande: Well we have got Jestina
Mukoko reported..the missing uh uh Jestina
Mukoko.
Lance: That is the
only one you put there and I think you took your cue from
the Herald
because..the the same way you reported on that is the same way
the Herald
covered the story.
Garande: But, so now we going into a different
terrain, we going into how we
reporting, rather than the actual
story...(interrupted)
Lance: I think this is
why....(interrupted)
Garande: You not giving me time to
answer
Lance: I think this is why people are making these conclusions
Itayi. I mean
look as an organisation you are perfectly entitled to take any
position that
you want. But the thing is people will be entitled to make
conclusions from
the way they see you covering and you cannot complain if
they make those
conclusions. I mean can you?
Garande: If you go on
our site and check on the comments that people put
there, there are some
comments that we censor obviously, which are profane,
which we think are not
good for public consumption, the type of words that
are used, if you are
asking us about..we will only report a story that we
get from our reporters
in Zimbabwe. If you want me to write stories that are
preferable to you as
Lance the journalist or the number of people you are
saying are saying we
are pro-government then thats the wrong notion to take.
I think we will
report a story on the basis of how we see the
event....(interrupted)
Lance: Okay lets do it this way Itayi..sorry
to interupt you..I just wanted
to say in line with that let me read out for
our listeners the type of
headlines you have right now. Mugabe warns
industry and financial sector,
SADC launches Zimbabwe aid package worth over
30 million, Zimbabwe gets
70000 from Tanzania, Japan urges Zimbabwe to form
all inclusive government,
New media the ferral beast destroying us,
Venezuala expresses solidarity
with Zimbabwe, Zanu PF to challenge use of
Zapu name, SADC analyzing
evidence, Mugabe sends letter of appointment to
Tsvangirai, Elders snub
security council meeting on Zimbabwe, Botswana
implicated in MDC militia
training, Removal of Mugabe will do more harm than
good, Zimbabwe choleral
outbreak is genocide by Britain.'
I mean look
its a clear pattern of really trying to hide the crisis and
focussing on
things that could portray the opposition in a negative
light..that is
straight forwad Mr Garande. I dont know why you are denying
this?
Garande: I can see how you are drawn to some bizarre extremes
about our time
link stories. All those things you are mentioning there are
things that are
happening in Zimbabwe.
Lance: So you admit you are
just being selective in what you publish...look
its true, these are things
that are happening in
Zimbabwe.....(interrupted)...
Garande: You and
me know, we have been on these forums for a very long time.
You know that
when you report you are reporting on the basis of the
investigation that has
been done by the people that are giving you that
story. I can bet you at SW
Radio Africa you have even more capacity to
report than we have simply
because of the nature of your budget.
What I am saying as journalists we
should know our role in society. Our role
is not to take those
bizarre...which I will want to call bizarre extremes.
But in democratic
decision making most of the people and their actions are
found in the middle
these extremes that you are trying to bring, these
partisan extremes should
be done by individuals not by journalists,
journalists should be,
.....(interrupted)...
Lance: But that is a contradiction because your
website is doing exactly
that. Your website has taken the position to
support Mugabe and Zanu PF and
run stories that will never portray Mugabe in
a negative light but always
portay the MDC in a negative light. You are
doing exactly what you are
criticising.
Garande: Can you pinpoint for
me a story on your site which is critical of
Morgan
Tsvangirai.
Lance: We have several programmes that have criticised the
MDC.
Garande: But we dont run radio programmes, we use the internet. I am
saying
of all the stories that are on your website today, can you pinpoint
any
stories that are anti-MDC. This is what I am saying. If we are at fault
for
not showing the diversity of the Zimbabweans, then you could criticise
us
for that.,,, .....(interrupted)...
Lance: The problem Itayi, and I
think if we reduce this to maybe pro Mugabe,
pro Tsvangirai type of thing.
The issue to make is Itayi. The people of
Zimbabwe are suffering. We might
not have an appreciation of that suffering
because maybe we are in the
diaspora, but there is nothing in the coverage
of the Zimbabwe Guardian to
suggest you appreciate what the people of
Zimbabwe are going through? It
would suggest from your coverage, you are
more interested in propping up the
people who are causing that suffering.
Garande: If we report, Lance for
instance if we report that SADC has given a
more than 10 billion aid
package, I remember last week we reported that 1111
people, cholera had
risen to that extent and then we report that SADC is
bringing some
effort,,,, .....(interrupted)...
Lance: There is nothing wrong with that
Itayi... .....(interrupted)...
Garande: And then if I take another story
which we have on there, which is
that Mugabe has sent a letter of
appointment to Tsvangirai, how does that
prop up, how does that prop
up?
Lance: There is one analyst who used the following the phrase to
describe
your website, he said the Herald's sister paper the Zimbabwe
Guardian, now..
.....(interrupted)...
Garande: Again Lance you using
opinions to state matters of
fact.....(interrupted)...
Lance: Well
look this programme is about opinions, this is Reporters Forum
this is what
we do here we discuss opinions, but look let me get to the
issue that has
really been topical here. A lot of people are saying in view
of targetted
sanctions that target people who are said to be aiding and
abetting the
regime and Mugabe, you qualify under that criteria, because you
are
supporting the regime from here in the United Kingdom and as a result
you
should be deported. Whats your response?
Garande: Again Lance that is an
opinion, I mean the flip side should be the
same, are you then saying we
should discredit all the British people who are
in Zimbabwe who are
criticising President Mugabe... .....(interrupted)...
Lance: The question
is there exists a set of targetted measures targetting
people who support
the regime and the argument is that you fit that criteria
and you should be
deported because of those measures.
Garande: Deported to where? To
Zimbabwe?
Lance: Yes Zimbabwe
Garande: Its your opinion
Lance
Lance: No its not my opinion, I'm presenting what is already in the
public
domain. So I am saying even if I was to say that is my opinion, my
opinion
does not really matter on this programme.
Garande: I think
you misrepresenting the facts... .....(interrupted)...
Lance: Okay just
answer the question...do you think the call for you to be
deported because
of your support, is misplaced.. .....(interrupted)...
Garande: Its very
misplaced
Lance: Why is that, would you not fit the criteria of someone
who supports
Mugabe?
Garande: Well Lance..(sighs). Do I fit the
criteria of someone who supports
Mugabe?
Lance: Yes
Garande:
No I don't.
Lance: You don't... OK
Garande: If you basing on, we
are reporting on what's happening in Zimbabwe,
most of the stories that we
are reporting on, you will find them in other
places. We have got the BBC
reporting that SADC has increased those efforts
as well so..OK should I ask
you a different question, yah? You have called
for the movement of troops to
Zimbabwe. You have said Mugabe should be
removed by force, do you think that
is responsible? Do you think condoning
war is responsible? You have used a
forum like SW Radio Africa to call for
an armed insurrection in
Zimbabwe.
Lance: I don't know which interview you are talking about here,
I dont
remember a time that I called for war, I called for tough action, to
change
the situation in Zimbabwe and I quoted...
.....(interrupted)...
Garande: Wait a minute you asked me a question...
.....(interrupted)...
Lance: But we cannot proceed on the basis of a
misrepresentation. I quoted
Kenya's Prime Minister Raila Odinga and I said
his attitude reflected a
paradigm shift for tougher action.....I did not
say....
.....(interrupted)...
Garande: There is video that is
available even on google, if you google it,
its availbale on You Tube right
now, which has Lance Guma on Sky News,
saying there is tougher action that
is needed now. Tougher action within the
current context would suggest...
.....(interrupted)...
Lance: Would suggest? That is an interesting word,
would suggest..But anyway
Itayi you are entitled to your opinions and I am
entilted to mine, but you
are still running away from the question, the
question is people are saying
there are
measures.........(interrupted).
Garande: You had Tererai Karimakwenda on
BBC World suggesting that lets have
troops right at the border of Zimbabwe.
Tererai Karimakwenda is an employee
of SW Radio Africa. You were on Sky
News, you had SW Radio Africa, Sky News,
you were calling for tougher action
against Mugabe, at a time a Global
Political Agreement is being.....even the
MDC itself has not called for
tougher action ..what they have said is we
still support what is going on in
Zimbabwe. We still support
dialogue.
Lance: The primary problem with what you are presenting is that
when we give
analysis on programmes like that we are capturing the sentiment
from the
ground and presenting it and saying this is what people are
saying...
.....(interrupted)...
Garande: This was your..when you were
on Sky News.. .....(interrupted)...
Lance: I think we rather diverting
here, but we here to discuss..
.....(interrupted)...
Garande: We
talking about reporting, expressing your views Lance is a good
thing, making
an earnest attempt to understand someone else's view is
equally
important.
Lance: Which is why we got you onto the programme Mr Garande,
we got you
onto the programme to answer questions relating to
this.
Garande: Helping and encouraging members of the community to make
that
earnest attempt at reciprocal understanding is also a key aspect of
public
journalism.
Lance: Which is why we want to you to answer the
question. In view of
targetted snactions which are targetting people aiding
an abetting the
Mugabe regime, do you feel you as Itayi Garande, editor of
the Zimbabwe
Guardian fit that bill as someone who is aiding and abetting
the regime?
Garande: Should I ask another question?
Lance: No we
don't want that, answer the question
Garande: Its not black or white. Is
that question you are asking me
consistent with the traditional notion of
the journalists as a free society's
watch dog. You are supposed to be a
journalist that is a watch dog for a
free and fair society. The Movement for
Democratic Change a party that you
support.
Lance: Why are you saying
a party that I support, I am not a member of the
MDC? If you are a member of
Zanu PF it doesn't mean I am a member of the
MDC?
Unfortunately
because of time constraints we had to cut that interview
there. That was
Itayi Garande the editor of the Zimbabwe Guardian previosly
known as Talk
Zimbabwe.com, that does it for Reporter's Forum this week, my
name is Lance
Guma.
Source: SW Radio Africa.
http://www.pretorianews.co.za
December 23, 2008 Edition 1
Christelle
Terreblanche and SAPA-DPA
As the UN warns that 5.5 million people in
Zimbabwe - or about half the
population - need food aid, Allan Boesak has
called on Zimbabweans to stand
and challenge President Robert if they want
an end to their suffering.
Boesak told Independent Newspapers that he
sees radical action by
Zimbabweans themselves as a more empowering option to
the possibility of
foreign troops being sent in to break Mugabe's refusal to
let go of the
reins while disease and hunger are killing
thousands.
The cleric, who joined the Congress of the People last week in
a return to
the political arena after 14 years on the sidelines, said the
time for
passive resistance to Mugabe's stranglehold was over.
"I
have always said that the people of Zimbabwe cannot avoid further
suffering
before this thing ends," Boesak said in an interview. The only way
I have
learnt (that would) get the world to sit up and do something is to
confront
it with your own suffering.
"Not passive suffering as with a hunger
epidemic or pestilence, but through
active suffering where you put yourself
in harm's way for the sake of ending
the greater suffering ...," he
said.
A first consignment of UN Children's Fund (Unicef) aid has arrived
in
Zimbabwe to help fight the cholera epidemic which has killed more than 1
120
people, the UN agency said yesterday.
Intravenous fluids, drip
equipment, essential drugs, midwifery and obstetric
kits were delivered by
air on Sunday, said a Unicef statement.
Unicef supplies more than half a
million litres of potable water daily,
together with 3 800 tons of water
treatment chemicals for urban areas in
Zimbabwe, the statement
said.
The World Health Organisation said on Friday that 1 123 people had
died in
the epidemic with about 21 000 reported cases.
A stalled
power-sharing agreement in Zimbabwe came under fresh strain
yesterday after
Western powers said it would be unacceptable if Mugabe were
to remain
president.
Although the opposition Movement for Democratic Change remains
committed to
a deal which would allow Mugabe to stay on as president while
its leader
Morgan Tsvangirai would become prime minister, both the US and
Britain said
the 84-year-old had to leave office.
"Power-sharing
isn't dead but Mugabe has become an absolute impossible
obstacle to
achieving it," Britain's Africa minister Mark Malloch-Brown told
the
BBC.
Malloch-Brown's comments came a day after the top US diplomat for
Africa,
Assistant Secretary of State Jendayi Frazer, said Washington would
not
restore aid to the cholera-wracked country unless Mugabe stood
down.
Boesak said the world had not listened to South Africa's problems
until the
people themselves resisted actively.
"Mugabe has to go,"
said Boesak who still believe targeted financial
sanctions could
assist.
"That still remains a very effective way to target these
criminals who use
the guise of governmental authority to rob their people,"
he said.
Meanwhile, the Special Rapporteur on health rights, Anand
Grover,
highlighted the medical crisis facing the country as main public
hospitals
were closed because of the lack of medical supplies, doctors and
nurses.
"Zimbabwe's health system has completely collapsed - it cannot
control the
cholera outbreak which is spreading throughout the country, with
a daily
increase in the death toll," he said.
With the rainy season
approaching, experts fear the crisis will deteriorate.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk
December
23, 2008
Martin Fletcher
British companies that support Robert Mugabe's
regime financially could face
new restrictions, a minister hinted
yesterday.
Responding to a report in The Times that 14 British-based
companies - and
four more based in British territories - were operating
freely despite being
blacklisted by the Bush Administration last month, Lord
Malloch-Brown, the
Africa Minister, acknowledged that Britain had been slow
to restrict their
activities.
"Where the US moves, we try to stay as
closely aligned to them as possible.
Our procedures, because they're done
through Europe, are slower," he told
the BBC.
A Foreign Office
spokesman refused to say which of the companies might be
targeted. Officials
were reportedly worried that the Zimbabwean subsidiary
of the London-based
Standard Chartered Bank was violating EU sanctions, but
Lord Malloch-Brown
said that aid agencies depended on certain "big-name
banks" being able to
operate in Zimbabwe.
Lord Malloch-Brown also backed Washington by
declaring that a power-sharing
government in Zimbabwe was out of the
question while Mr Mugabe remained
President. "Power-sharing isn't dead, but
Mugabe has become an absolute
impossible obstacle to achieving it," he said.
"He's going to have to step
aside."
On Sunday Jendayi Frazer, the US
Assistant Secretary of State for Africa,
said that a coalition government
was "off the table" while Mr Mugabe
remained in office.
On September
15 Mr Mugabe and Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the opposition
Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC), agreed to share power to break the
deadlock caused
by the disputed presidential election. The agreement has yet
to be
implemented because Mr Mugabe has refused to cede real power,
including
control of the police.
South Africa, whose former President, Thabo Mbeki,
brokered the agreement,
considers it the only way forward. So do some
members of the MDC, who argue
that if they secure ministries such as health,
education and finance they
can receive Western aid, expose corruption and
reduce Mr Mugabe's powers of
patronage.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk
December
23, 2008
Bronwen Maddox: World Briefing
In less than a fortnight South
Africa steps down from the United Nations
Security Council. Does that give
Britain more chance to step up the pressure
to get Robert Mugabe out of
Zimbabwe?
A tiny bit. The departure of South Africa removes the most
obstinate of
three obstacles on the council to UN action against the
President who has
brought Zimbabwe to despair.
Russia and China are
still there, however, although the crisis, agonisingly
slowly, may create
reasons for them to change their minds. A better chance
for a breakthrough
is elections in South Africa in the spring and the
freedom to focus on
foreign problems that they might bring.
Britain's outspokenness, after a
year of misplaced faith in quiet diplomacy,
will help to rally the growing
number of leaders, in Africa and elsewhere,
prepared to call for Mugabe to
go.
But it won't make him go: only the region can do that, either by
sanctions
or an African-led force. Both options are only just coming in from
the zone
of the inconceivable.
The frustration with Zimbabwe is that
everyone knows the solution - the
removal of Mugabe - where no one has the
answer, for instance, to the
problems of the Democratic Republic of Congo,
said one British official last
week. It has taken the outbreak of cholera
for ministers to say so openly.
David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary,
was right (if late) in helping to
bring about the meeting of the Security
Council last week, the first since
Russia and China vetoed sanctions in
July.
Although the council heard the outright call from Britain for
Mugabe to go,
consensus on intervention is not within sight. Kofi Annan, the
former UN
Secretary-General, and one of three UN "elders" advising on
Zimbabwe, did
not even attend to present a joint report.
He did not
say why, but other diplomats said that it was for fear of seeming
too close
to the UN and of offending South Africa. Britain could not
persuade him,
despite his closeness to Lord Malloch-Brown, the Africa
Minister and his
former adviser.
So what now? With South Africa replaced on the council by
Uganda, which is
less reflexively supportive of Mugabe, Britain might push
for a resolution
telling Mugabe to let UN envoys in. But more sanctions? Or
armed
intervention? Those would depend on China and Russia
abstaining.
Setting aside Russia for the moment - because any hope of
changing its
position depends on isolating it - the question is whether
China might
abstain. "China won't want to offend Africans," argues Alex
Vines, the head
of the Africa programme at Chatham House.
Its
position depends on the region's. Richard Dowden, director of the Royal
African Society, who says he is "sensing a push-back by African countries,
saying 'Don't bully us'", is sceptical that there is the political will. He
warns that Angola's support for Mugabe is so strong that it might even be
tempted to send troops to defend him if South Africa, say,
intervened.
All the same, the decision by Britain to turn up the noise,
while producing
no results so far, is forcing council members and the region
to work hard to
defend positions that they must know are now untenable.
http://www.gulfnews.com
Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News
Service
Published: December 22, 2008, 23:36
The pale blue bank
note that says 1,000,000 Zimbabwean dollars really means
10,000,000,000,000,000,000. Yes, that is 10 quintillion, taking into account
the 13 zeros Zimbabwe's central bank has lopped off in the last couple of
years to make the country's currency somewhat more manageable.
Every
time the zeros get out of hand, Zimbabwe's Reserve Bank scythes away
00000s.
The largest note, Z$100,000,000,000, released in July and useless
within
weeks, looked so bizarre with all the zeros squeezed in that it
became an
instant collector's item.
Regardless, inflation is soaring so fast in
Zimbabwe that it is hard to
figure out what a Z$1 million note is actually
worth on a given
day.
Somewhere
between July's Z$100 billion note and the more recent zero-reduced
Z$1
million note it is easy to get mixed up. Even more confusing are the
wildly
different exchange rates that depend on how you pay for
purchases.
Zimbabweans chuckle when they see a foreigner bumbling with
their currency.
They launch into long, looping explanations that leave you
lassoed by the
zeros, and more confused than when you started. It is
difficult to resist
just holding up the Z$1,000,000 note and asking a
reliable local, "What's
this worth?"
But they can get confused
themselves. To my surprise, when I tried it
recently, my math-savvy friend
no longer had the calculation in his head. So
he pulled up his cell phone
calculator and tapped away.
"Ech! My cell phone can't cope with all these
zeros," he grumbled, while I
stared at the bustling crowd on Robert Mugabe
Street, wondering where they
could be going, in an economy where nothing
works.
Finally he had an answer: "That's worth about 50 cents (Dh1.8), a
bit less
than 50 cents."
So I used the blue notes for tips. Fifty
cents might not sound like much,
but in early November, Z$1,000,000 was more
than a week's pay for a police
inspector.
After tipping car guards,
parking men and waiters for several days, I
checked the value again. It
turned out my friend had been mistaken; the note
had been worth about $4,
not 50 cents.
Hyper-inflation
Zimbabwe's hyperinflation rate, the
highest ever known, is officially more
than 230 million per cent, but some
economists place it in the quadrillions.
It seems just a matter of time
before Zimbabweans will be grappling with
octillions, nonillions,
decillions, duodecillions and more.
Just trying to explain the
complications in the money system is, well,
complicated.
Imagine
this: You go from the crowded, dusty streets of the capital, Harare,
into a
dimly lit black market money changer's shop that masquerades as a
video
outlet. Ask the dealer the rate for a US dollar and he says "27."
Twenty-seven "what" is not clear.
Ask him the rate for a South
African rand (worth about 10 cents US), and he
still says, "27." But this
time the decimal point is in a different place.
You walk out with a handful
of pale blue notes and little idea of what they
are worth. If all that is
complicated, try this scenario: You are in a
supermarket, and for the first
time in months there is food there (though it
is too expensive for most
Zimbabweans). You calculate the cost of about 2
pounds of meat: If you have
a Zimbabwean bank account and pay with a debit
card, it will cost about
$10.
If you exchange American cash for enough Zimbabwean notes to buy the
same
meat, you will be out $1,000 because of a huge difference in the
official
exchange rate, which applies to electronic payments, and the rate
on the
black market. It would seem easy enough to just pay by debit card,
but
nothing is easy here. In many supermarkets, bank debit cards do not
work,
either because there is no power or the electronic transfer systems in
banks
are overloaded.
For the masses squashed together like upright
sardines in queues outside
banks, buying staples such as maize meal and
cooking oil is a struggle. They
stand in line for hours to withdraw the
maximum weekly limit of $Z100
million, about $10 on the black market these
days, but not even enough for a
loaf of bread. The withdrawal limit was just
lifted to Z$10 billion a week
to enable people to buy food for Christmas.
The government also released a
new Z$10 billion note.
'Burning'
cash
Many people use their Z$100 million for bus fare to town. It is a
bizarre
situation: People come to town to stand in line to get money that
barely
covers the cost of coming to town. Crowds of 500 or more jostle
outside
banks in the heat. Soldiers prowl, beating people with batons when
fights
break out.
Other Zimbabweans use their phones at work to track
down hard-to-come-by
necessities and do quick deals.
That is not the
only complicated trick. Ben, 28, a used-car salesman,
explains the art of
"burning" money. He has the air of a magician making a
rabbit appear in a
hat, only this time it is conjuring $1,000 out of $100 in
US currency in a
day.
"It's very easy and simple," said Ben, who gave only his first name
for fear
of prosecution for profiteering.
In a nutshell, by shuffling
money between the exchange rates - one for cash
and the other for bank
transfers - one can multiply a sum of US dollars by
tenfold or
more.
Zimbabweans who are sent foreign funds by relatives abroad are
generally in
the best position to employ the strategy.
At one point
the government banned bank transfers to try to eliminate
"burning," but in
December they re-introduced them with stricter limits.
Ben made several
long, patient explanations before I got the gist of
"burning," carefully
writing down each convoluted twist.
But as soon as I got the trick, it
seemed to vanish, like looking at a
mirage.
It is confusing.
http://www.abc.net.au/
AM - Tuesday, 23 December , 2008
08:00:00
Reporter: Lyndal Curtis
PETER CAVE: Australia's Foreign Minister,
Stephen Smith, says the state of
affairs in Zimbabwe has gone from
catastrophic to perilous. But, he has
stopped short of endorsing a call by
the former Australian prime minister,
Malcolm Fraser, to cut off the
country's electricity in an attempt to force
the dictator Robert Mugabe to
step down as President.
Mr Fraser says the situation is so desperate
Zimbabwe's neighbours must use
all means short of declaring war to force
change.
The Foreign Minister, Stephen Smith, spoke to our chief political
correspondent, Lyndal Curtis.
STEPHEN SMITH: The Australian position
all year has effectively been the
solution is for Mr Mugabe to walk off the
stage, for him to leave. That
would be the best thing that could occur for
Zimbabwe's future. That was
true in the immediate aftermath of the first
round of parliamentary and
presidential elections and it remains true
now.
LYNDAL CURTIS: The US envoy to Africa also says that Robert Mugabe
is
completely discredited within the region. Is she right or has South
Africa
still not moved far enough to condemn him?
STEPHEN SMITH:
Well, all year we've been urging South Africa to take a more
robust
position, a more robust response, and that was true earlier in the
year.
South Africa remains the nation state in Africa that can influence the
position in Zimbabwe the greatest.
So, we continue to urge South
Africa, as we have publicly and privately in
the course of the year, to be
much more robust in trying to get an outcome
in Zimbabwe which effectively
doesn't involve Mr Mugabe.
LYNDAL CURTIS: The former prime minister,
Malcolm Fraser, says options such
as not providing Zimbabwe with electricity
should be taken because the step
after that, military intervention, would
leave Zimbabweans worse off. Is it
time for drastic action?
STEPHEN
SMITH: Well, it's certainly time for ongoing pressure. I think one
would
have to be very careful about the notion of cutting off electricity
because
one of the things which Australia has sought to do very carefully is
to
place pressure, through sanctions, on members of the regime, but, to do
its
best not to adversely impact further on ordinary Zimbabweans.
And the
reason, for example, that we are now the fifth largest humanitarian
contributor to Zimbabwe is because ordinary Zimbabweans are now living in
terrible circumstances.
We've also made it clear that as soon as we
see progress being made towards
Zimbabwe emerging as a fully fledged member
of the international community
and returning to democracy and respecting
human rights and the rule of law,
we are open as are other members of the
international community to provide
not just humanitarian assistance, but
also to look at the rebuilding of
Zimbabwe.
LYNDAL CURTIS: Do you
despair in the shorter term about the future of
Zimbabwe and do you think
there's a realistic chance that things will get
better sooner rather than
later?
STEPHEN SMITH: Oh I've been somewhere between a state of
frustration and
despair over Zimbabwe for some time and I think I'm not
alone or unique in
that respect.
I think the international community
has been very frustrated and close to a
state of despair for some time and
my grave fear is that however bad the
situation is in Zimbabwe now, my grave
fear is that it will get worse before
it gets better.
PETER CAVE: The
Foreign Affairs Minister, Stephen Smith, speaking there to
Lyndal Curtis in
Canberra.
http://www.abc.net.au
AM - Tuesday, 23
December , 2008 08:04:00
Reporter: Lyndal Curtis
PETER CAVE: The Federal
Opposition says the Government is not taking strong
enough action against
Robert Mugabe.
The shadow foreign affairs minister, Helen Coonan, also
spoke to Lyndal
Curtis.
HELEN COONAN: Well, look I think the US
Special Envoy got it right yesterday
when she said that the world has to
speak with one voice. And quite frankly
I think Australia needs to speak a
bit more loudly than we are currently
doing.
It is important that
pressure is brought to bear, firstly on South Africa
and the South African
development community states, to urge Mugabe to go.
They simply have to say,
you cannot remain.
LYNDAL CURTIS: The Foreign Minister has described the
situation in Zimbabwe
now as perilous. He says Mugabe should go and he's
called for South Africa
to be stronger in its opposition to Robert Mugabe.
Are you saying that the
Foreign Minister could be even stronger than
that?
HELEN COONAN: Well, I think we can send a special envoy from
Australia.
Obviously these representations to South Africa need to be
coordinated.
It is dire. There are people dying; there are people fleeing
Zimbabwe; and
inflation is out of control. It is a failed state and it needs
to have much
stronger, coordinated world action than just domestic calls for
things to
get better.
PETER CAVE: The shadow foreign affairs
minister, Helen Coonan, speaking to
Lyndal Curtis.
http://www.metro.co.uk
by AIDAN RADNEDGE - Monday,
December 22, 2008
Human rights activists are being spied upon and even
abducted in Zimbabwe,
while grandfathers beaten up and threatened with a
bullet live in fear of
their lives.
If some had hoped Robert Mugabe was
mellowing during truce talks with the
opposition, events suggest the
president remains as ruthless as ever.
Much of the country's
infrastructure and public services may be in meltdown,
but Mugabe can still
call upon a loyal cadre of well-paid acolytes eager to
enforce a ferocious
crackdown on dissent.
Even elderly grandfathers are not immune from being
brutally beaten and
intimidated by Zanu-PF thugs, I learned during an
undercover trip to the
country.
Bernard, a 66-year-old councillor,
was abducted from his home, repeatedly
punched, and dumped - with a bullet
left ominously in his hand.
His crime was to stand as a Movement for
Democratic Change candidate in
local elections in Maswingo - and beat his
Zanu-PF rival.
But Bernard has continued to stand up to his oppressors.
The former teacher
said: 'Of course I was scared. But I refused to give the
soldiers the names
they wanted. Not only my grandchildren, but everyone of
school age in
Zimbabwe - they're being lost. I can't see how they'll ever
recover from
what Mugabe is doing to this country.'
Neighbour Andrew,
70 - another MDC activist - has been beaten up twice. The
father of 18, and
grandfather of eight, said: 'Zimbabwe is a country with a
heart of gold -
but the teeth of Mugabe.'
BINDURA, 22 December 2008 (IRIN) -
Peterson Daiton, a mining engineer now based in Botswana, last visited Bindura
Nickel Mine, about 85km northeast of Zimbabwe's capital, Harare, nine years ago,
when it was a thriving concern. "It is shocking; the mine has become a ghost of
its former self," he told IRIN.
Photo:
Manoocher Deghati/IRIN
Fond
memories of mining
"When I visited it after such a long
time, I thought I was lost - you don't hear the drone of the machines that had
become a part of the life of the people here any more. It's now all ruins, and
how sad to see one of the best mines in the country go down like that."
The nickel mine recently suspended operations, joining a growing list of
gold, asbestos, coal and iron mines that have closed in the face of withering
hyperinflation, officially estimated at 231 million percent annually, and
government mismanagement.
In November 2008, Metallion Gold, which
produced more than half the country's gold, shut down five of its mines, causing
the loss of 3,500 jobs. According to Zimbabwe's Chamber of Mines, gold
production fell from around 7,000kg in 2007 to 125kg by October 2008.
Asbestos mines have also come under extreme pressure since neighbouring
South Africa banned asbestos use on health grounds. The Herald, a
state-controlled newspaper, reported that about 70,000 workers in the industry
were affected.
John Robertson, a Harare-based economic consultant,
blamed the drop in gold production mainly on failure by the government to pass
on payments to the mining companies; the Chamber of Mines said the Reserve Bank
of Zimbabwe owed mining companies US$30 million.
"The gold mines have
been left with no option but to suspend business because they don't have money
to keep operating," Robertson told IRIN. "Nickel mining, on the other hand, has
been affected by falling prices on the world market, but the bottom line is that
corruption, mismanagement and a skewed economic environment are making it
extremely difficult for mines to keep afloat."
He said it would be "a
very long time before those mines that have closed can start operating again,
and that adds to the woes of people and communities that depended on mining for
a living but are already hard hit by financial woes."
"We
had everything we needed"
The Bindura Nickel Mine once
underpinned a flourishing community with a school, a clinic, well-stocked shops,
and other social amenities. "Most of us never dreamt of a life outside this
mining compound," Crainos Bhaureni, 54, a former underground mine worker from
Malawi, told IRIN.
"We had everything we needed, even though outside
people scoffed at us, saying we were poorly paid. We saw the collapse of the
mine coming, though, because the situation has been deteriorating over the
years."
The mine's clinic has closed and fallen into
disrepair, while the staff accommodation is dilapidated, with sewage flowing
into the roads and residents having to contend with no water for weeks at a
time.
Those of us that still remain
in the mining compound are having a torrid time accessing health care. When
diseases break out, they spread easily and residents have no money to cover
medical expenses
"Those of us that still remain in the mining compound are having a
torrid time accessing health care. When diseases break out, they spread easily
and residents have no money to cover medical expenses at the nearby Bindura
Hospital, which in any case is performing badly," Bhaureni said.
Hardly
a week passes without someone in the compound dying, he said, and the morgue at
the hospital is overflowing with dead bodies because the relatives of those who
die are too poor to claim them for burial. "They end up being given pauper's
burial, and that pains the heart a lot."
The mine used to pay the
teachers and also provided free maize-meal, beans and cooking oil at the end of
every month to keep them at the school. But the death of the mine has seen the
teachers leave.
Without access to education, children have joined the
adults in illegal gold panning in the area, and also work underground, digging
for ore in disused mines.
Migrants
stranded
"Because of lack of a proper education, our children
cannot find employment and they end up doing all sorts of bad things to raise
money. Most of the young girls have now turned to prostitution, and you find
them competing for clients at drinking places, even with their own mothers,"
Bhaureni said.
Most of the mine's workers are migrants with few
alternatives and have decided to stay; for those who decide to leave, the going
is tough - unemployment in Zimbabwe is estimated at more than 80 percent.
There have been no farm jobs since President Robert Mugabe embarked on
the fast-track land reform programme that displaced more than 4,000 commercial
farmers and caused the collapse of the agricultural sector, one of Zimbabwe's
major employers.
"Even if the economy is turned around
tomorrow, it will take years before normal operations can resume. The mine is
now flooded due to lack of activity, equipment is rotting, and almost all the
skilled staff have left," a senior employee who declined to be identified, told
IRIN.
Even if the economy is turned
around tomorrow, it will take years before normal operations can resume. The
mine is now flooded due to lack of activity, equipment is rotting, and almost
all the skilled staff have left
"I worked for this mine for many years and when I see it like
that, I almost shed tears. Life used to be good here, but what you see now is
misery and a lot of uncertainty among workers and residents."
|
Just a day after ANC president Jacob Zuma said he could not call Robert Mugabe a comrade, a new Zimbabwean political party is on the cards.
The new party, named Christians For Peace, Justice and Democracy, will be officially launched on December 26 at the Central Methodist Church in the Johannesburg CBD.
It will be launched in Zimbabwe early next month. Founding president Reverend Timothy Chiguvare, 51, said he was moved by the number of Zimbabweans who have been victimised by Mugabe’s regime.
“Negotiations to bring Zanu-PF and MDC into a government of national unity have failed while starvation and cholera kill our people every day,” he said.
CPJD has three immediate objectives:
Robert Mugabe and his wife Grace: she appears infinitely avaricious
http://www.iol.co.za
Lee Rondganger
December 23 2008 at 07:10AM
The border town of Musina is at the
coalface of a humanitarian crisis, as
residents and aid organisations battle
to deal with a flood of sick, broke
and hungry Zimbabweans.
More than
a 1 000 Zimbabweans are living on the streets of the Limpopo town,
scrounging for food and looking for work, just kilometres from their home
country.
They are living in deplorable conditions and are dependent
on food aid from
organisations such as the United Nations, Save the Children
and the South
African Red Cross, while Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors
Without Borders)
provides them with medical care.
And despite the
Christmas and New Year holidays being days away, Zimbabwe's
desperate keep
streaming in.
Those with no money to head to
Joburg immediately end up at the Musina
showgrounds, where non-profit
organisations provide them with meals.
Most sleep in the open field with
no shelter or mattresses, and have turned
the area into a refugee
camp.
Nine portable toilets and four taps service the nearly 1 000
people.
Musina mayor Caroline Mahasela told The Star that the steady flow
of people
into her town was putting pressure on the municipality's
resources.
"We never expected to care for more than a 1 000 people, so
there are
challenges. We are currently in the process of finding a suitable
place for
the people to stay, where there will be sufficient toilets," she
said.
While the conditions are terrible, people like Kufandaedzoa
Mudzoriwa, from
Bulawayo, don't care.
"I would rather be here than in
Zimbabwe," said the salesman, who left his
country a week ago.
"It is
terrible back there. At least here in South Africa I have a chance to
find a
job so that I can send money home. Right now in Zimbabwe, even if you
have a
job, it is not worth it," he said.
While many in the camp talk openly
about the hard- ship back in Zimbabwe,
others whisper, as rumours are rife
that some among them are agents of
Robert Mugabe's feared Central
Intelligence Organisation.
Said refugee said Charles Mashindi: "There are
too many of them
(intelligence agents) here. But I don't care because my
only concern is to
get to Joburg. As soon as I get money I am going to
Joburg."
A parish priest at the St Martin's Catholic Church in Musina
said the
situation was dire as they were handing out between 300 and 350
food parcels
every day to the most vulnerable people.
"In April we
were only handing out between 30 and 40 food parcels every day.
That alone
just shows how the situation in Zimbabwe has turned," he said.
To deal
with the influx of people, the Department of Home Affairs has set up
a
mobile office at the showgrounds where people can apply for
asylum.
Officials say that since July last year, they have been
processing up to 300
applications every weekday at the mobile offices, with
more new faces
turning up every day.
The asylum-seeker documents are
valid for only three months and must be
renewed until officials decide
whether to grant the applicant asylum.
In addition to the influx of
people, Musina has in recent weeks also had to
deal with an outbreak of
cholera brought into the town by Zimbabweans
crossing the border in search
for a health system that works properly.
By Monday, health officials said
they had contained the waterborne disease
and were now treating only eight
people for cholera at Musina Hospital.
Zimbabwe has been battling its
worst cholera outbreak in decades, and the
disease has claimed the lives of
more than 1 200 people.
Limpopo MEC for Transport Cassel Mathale visited
Musina yesterday as
chairperson of the ANC in Limpopo, and called on
Zimbabwe's political rivals
to resolve their "petty
differences".
"This is a man-made crisis which the MDC and Zanu-PF must
resolve for the
sake of people's lives. The two parties must find a solution
to their
problems. What is happening here could have been avoided," he
said.
While the death toll remains at eight in the province, Musina has
recorded
15 cases since Sunday, bringing the total number of suspected cases
treated
to 909, with five patients still in hospital, said department
spokesperson
Phuti Seloba.
Botlokwa, near Musina, has reported 18 new
cases and 11 were recorded in
Madimbo.
A total of 23 cases were also
reported in Dilokong, with 42 people being
treated in hospital. The town of
Knobel had three new cases, which brings
the number of suspected cases in
this area to 49.
This article was originally published on page 3 of
The Star on December 23,
2008
http://www.iol.co.za
December 23 2008 at
07:59AM
By Clayton Barnes
The Zimbabwean Ministry
of Foreign Affairs has intensified measures to
market the country's tourism
sector ahead of the 2010 Fifa World Cup,
despite Fifa's call for football
supporters to stay out of that country if
the cholera crisis
persists.
Zimbabwe's national newspaper, The Herald, last week
reported that
secretary for foreign affairs, ambassador Joey Bimha, was
using the
diplomatic offices abroad to market its tourism
sector.
Bimha said the country's specialised diplomatic course on
offer to
hoteliers would "be tailored to share with them the ministry's
experience in
diplomacy, and impart grooming, deportment and effective
communication
skills required on the ever changing dynamic international
plane".
The article quoted him as saying the course would help
hoteliers
improve Zimbabwe's tourism product and promote a positive image of
Zimbabwe,
to "boost tourist arrivals and room nights now and beyond the
World Cup 2010
showcase".
This came just days after Fifa
discouraged football supporters from
setting up base in Zimbabwe during the
2010 World Cup if the economic and
cholera crises persisted.
To
date, the disease has claimed more than 1 100 lives and an
estimated 21 000
cases had been reported to Zimbabwean health authorities.
Fifa
spokeswoman Delia Fischer said it was monitoring the situation,
but doubted
Zimbabwe would form part of its 2010 plans. She said Fifa and
Match
Hospitality, its official hospitality partner, were working with South
Africa's neighbours to see how supporters could be given a "truly African
experience", including tours to Namibia, Zambia, Mozambique and Botswana,
but not Zimbabwe at this stage.
She said all 32 World Cup teams
would be based in South Africa
"because we are busy ensuring this country
has the infrastructure and is
safe enough to host the teams".
Michael Tatalias, of the South African Tourism Services Association,
said it
was unlikely that supporters would consider visiting the country.
Tatalias said Zimbabwe was one of the main reasons visitor numbers to
the
region had dropped.
This article was originally published on page 3
of Daily News on
December 22, 2008
http://www.zimbabwejournalists.com
22nd
Dec 2008 06:07 GMT
By Chenjerai
Chitsaru
HARARE's central business district has seen some mayhem
recently.
Disgruntled soldiers of Robert Mugabe's underpaid army rampaged
through the
capital's streets recently. They smashed plate glass windows and
looted a
number of shops.
Last week, along Nelson Mandela Avenue, the
huge plate glass at an internet
café was blown to smithereens as a teargas
canister, apparently fired by
police officers on the alert in the city,
smashed into it.
There was panic in the streets, with people scurrying
hither and thither as
they feared the worst: the teargas canister would be
replaced by live
bullets.
Such is the tension in Zimbabwe, nobody is
in any doubt that the soldiers
and the police are under instructions "to do
whatever it takes" to quell any
violence and unrest
All over the
country, in the opposition MDC strongholds of the urban
centres, and Zanu
PF's much-vaunted bailiwick in the rural areas, can be
discerned an
atmosphere of unease.
This was not improved at all by the raucous
anti-MDC ranting of President
Robert Mugabe and his cohorts at their
conference last week in Bindura in
Mashonaland Central province, the home of
Elliot Manyika, who died in a car
accident a few days ago and was buried at
the Heroes' Acre .
Although he was only a minister without portfolio,
Manyika was a key man in
the party, holding the position of national
commissar.
There were rumours, both before and after his death, that he
might have been
one of a number of Mugabe's party to be affected by the
composition of a new
government which would include MDC members.
Many
of Zanu PF's prominent members are bound to be affected, some of them
finding themselves virtually out of a job -at least, in the
government.
Shortly after Manyika's burial, there was the shooting
incident involving
another Mugabe ally, the Airforce commander, Perence
Shiri, generally linked
to the Gukurahundi massacre of the 1980s.
The
official line was that this was the work of enemies of the state. In one
instance, Zanu PF officials blamed the MDC for the attack.
But
others, even neutrals, tended to single out internal squabbles within
Zanu
PF.
The party conference in Bindura was aimed at solidifying Mugabe's
position
and to strengthen the party in preparation - say critics - for a
possible
rerun of the presidential election, which Mugabe lost to Morgan
Tsvangirai
in March.
There was nothing spectacular at the conference,
apart from Mugabe's
cliché-ridden closing speech. For many observers, there
was a rather
outlandish tone of contempt for both Tsvangirai and the MDC in
the party the
sloganeering.
It was if there were no talks at all to
form a so-called inclusive
government, featuring as the new prime minister,
the MDC leader. This
astonished many observers, who had imagined that Mugabe
would be publicly
more conciliatory as the Sadc leaders seem inclined,
recently, to distance
themselves from Mugabe's hardline position against
Tsvangirai and the MDC.
This raised suspicion that Mugabe could be
planning to spring a surprise on
everybody, including his party. It would
now seem that there is no likely
successor to Mugabe at the head of the
party, most of the contenders having
burnt their bridges by making it
difficult for Mugabe to publicly endorse
them as his successor.
The
unlikely scenario now being imagined is one in which Mugabe would put
forward his wife, Grace, as a "neutral" contender, even as a stop-gap
measure until a substantive candidate emerges.
During the March
election campaign, Grace, a former secretary at State
House, featured
publicly for the first time, supporting her husband and
going on the
offensive against Tsvangirai and the MDC.
Although some of her speeches
tended to be hysterical, there were those who
thought she was no longer the
"Eliza Doolittle" that they had always figured
her out to be.
They
thought she had "graduated" to an Eva Peron, the wife of the late
Argentine
dictator, Juan Peron. Mugabe would be the first African leader to
groom his
spouse in such a fashion.
But analysts say he is so desperate for his
"dynasty" to continue that, in
the absence of an adult offspring, Grace, who
bore his children in
circumstances which many Catholics in Zimbabwe thought
were scandalous, may
be "it".
The succession battle in Zanu PF has
been long and bloody and most of this
is a result of Mugabe himself wanting
to be able to pick his own successor.
He wants someone who can continue his
flawed political and economic
programme, which has landed the country into a
veritable mess.
Emmerson Mnangagwa, a cabinet minister and a leading
light in the party, has
been mentioned as a possible successor. But he is
apparently showing signs
of being "his own man" and not likely to take
Mugabe's advice on who to
include in a new leadership headed by him, the
former security minister.
Joyce Mujuru, one of the vice-presidents in the
party and the government,
had previously been counted among the favourites
to take over the
presidency - until she, apparently, pushed for a role for
her husband, the
former army commander, Solomon Mujuru, who is said to have
brought up an
entirely new list of "possibles", including people Mugabe
considered
enemies.
The speculation is now rife that there is so such
preoccupation with the
succession battle that little attention is being paid
to the conclusion of
the talks on a new government.
Zanu PF is using
as a ruse the recalcitrance of the MDC leadership to agree
to its proposals
for certain ministerial appointments to delay any decision,
while it tries
to unravel the succession imbroglio.
This is where the Sadc leadership
may be missing the point of what Mugabe is
really up to. A new government
with Tsvangirai as prime minister would
receive such international approval
and support, most of the world - except
perhaps for China and Russia - would
probably rush in with much-needed aid.
The Zimdollar would probably
bounce back to its pre-2000 levels against most
world currencies. There is
no doubt that the IMF and the World Bank would
immediately "forgive" the
country its previous delinquent behaviour and make
generous allowances for
an infusion of aid and balance of payments
facilities.
Zanu PF would
be seen for what it really is - a party that clung to power
for no other
reason than its own survival as a party.
It would be accused, even by its
former allies, of condemning the country
and millions of its people to a
life of misery, not on any legitimate
ideological grounds, but out of
selfish and almost evil motives.
Although Mugabe might not end up at the
International Court of Justice for
crimes against humanity, his record as a
leader in Zimbabwe, would be
effectively ruined: he might not even be buried
at the Heroes Acre.
In reality, the people would no longer consider the
land issue as the
shining example of Mugabe's era. They would instead think
only of the years
since 2000. When their economy took a massive tumble and
sent to the dogs
their reputation as a country self-sufficient in
food.
A very proud man, unable to perceive of his future without the
heroism of
the struggle for independence, Mugabe seems determined to hang on
until that
part of the world which considers him a reckless and heartless
leader
concedes, finally, that he did possess "the right stuff" to lead the
country, even if, at the end, he went disastrously off the
rails.
What is scary about that is the legacy he would bequeath to future
generations. Few would accord him the respect of a wise, caring
leader.
Most historians would not hesitate to place in the same
compartment s Idi
Amin, Jean-Bedel Bokassa and Mobutu Sese Seko.
http://www.guardian.co.uk
Editorial
The Guardian, Tuesday 23 December
2008
Zimbabwe's nightmare will not end any time soon. The foreign office
minister
Mark Malloch-Brown was only stating yesterday what had been evident
for some
time - that efforts to form a power-sharing government were
deadlocked and
that Robert Mugabe had become the chief obstacle to forming
one. On Sunday
Jendayi Frazer, the US assistant secretary of state for
Africa, said the US
would not support a power-sharing agreement with Mr
Mugabe remaining as
president.
The target of both statements was not
Mr Mugabe, who continues to mouth
inanities like "Zimbabwe is mine", but his
Southern African neighbours. They
too were the subjects of Mr Mugabe's wrath
when he dared them to invade his
country. He told Zanu-PF's central
committee on Friday that he did not know
of any African country brave enough
to do that. In other words: come and get
me.
The collapse of the deal
signed in September is a challenge that South
Africa in particular, will
find increasingly hard to ignore, not least
because it has consistently
voted with Russia and China to block attempts by
the UN security council to
get involved. But it always had the pretext that
an alternative was at hand,
a negotiated end to Zanu-PF's monopoly on power,
and an African solution to
an African problem. It is doubtful whether Mr
Mugabe ever intended to share
power, or whether Thabo Mbeki, the mediator
appointed by the Southern
African Development Community (SADC), ever
intended to enforce a deal which
gave Morgan Tsvangirai anything more than
the role of senior minister in a
government in which Zanu-PF retained
control both of the military and the
police. But while a process existed,
the inevitable outcome could be
postponed. But now it cannot, and the South
African president, Kgalema
Motlanthe, is left with nowhere to hide.
The SADC is already split with
Zambia and Botswana calling on Mr Mugabe to
stand down, and Botswana
offering to host a government in exile. The split
will deepen as the death
toll from the cholera outbreak increases, as the
regime resorts to
repression, and as the Movement for Democratic Change goes
underground or
into exile. Declaring a state of emergency will do nothing to
help Mr Mugabe
retain control of his country's economy, the health system,
and the ability
to feed the population. Collapse is no longer a possibility
but a certainty.
The only question, as the SADC is forced to supply ever
greater quantities
of emergency aid, is how long it takes. The longer the
agony, the more it
will fall on South Africa to end it. As it is, the only
thing that is
growing in Zimbabwe is the graveyard.
The Bahama Journal
December 23rd, 2008
Today we send a reminder to all who celebrate Christmas. This reminder
has
to do with the fact that the Jesus they celebrate was fated to be
acquainted
with grief.
Indeed, this fact is not lost on the millions of
people around the world
[many of them professing Christ as Lord and Savior]
who are today being
distressed - crucified even - by war, pestilence and
poverty.
Here the long-suffering people of Zimbabwe come to
mind.
In this regard, it is interesting to note that, the Catholic Church
in
southern Africa says that there can be no solution to the horrific crisis
in
Zimbabwe as long as Robert Mugabe is in power.
As the Catholic
bishops put their case, "We express our deepest solidarity
with the people
of Zimbabwe at this desperate time. We recommit ourselves
and our people to
praying that they will be able to unite and to have the
courage and the
strength to persevere in the struggle to remove the evil
brought on them by
Mugabe's dictatorship and the armed forces he uses to
enforce it."
We
wholeheartedly agree with this position as taken by the Catholic bishops
of
South Africa, Botswana and Swaziland.
As they say, "It is now time to
isolate Mugabe completely and to remove all
forms of moral, material or
tacit support for him and his party. Regardless
of whether he is a former
'liberator' or an 'Elder African Statesman', he
must be forced to step
down."
They are absolutely correct when they say that, "No true liberator
or
statesman clings ruthlessly to power as Mugabe has done, while his people
live and die in misery and destitution. No solution to the crisis in
Zimbabwe is possible as long as he is there."
Note also that, "The
church statement, issued by Cardinal Wilfrid Napier,
spokesman for the
Southern African Catholic Bishops' Conference, noted that
Mugabe lost the
March presidential election, but "he has continued to cling
to power, waging
war against anyone suspected of not supporting him, and
refusing to share
any real power with those who beat him in the election."
We note also
that the bishops further said Mugabe "is willing to watch
thousands of
innocent people die of starvation and cholera as long as he is
able to
retain power. Like Pharaoh he is obstinate and refuses to listen to
the
people (Exodus 8:15). He will do so only if enough pressure is brought
to
bear on him."
The bishops also indicate that, regional political leaders,
including the
new South African President Kgalema Motlanthe, have failed to
push Mugabe. "
Like the bishops, we too take issue with all those African
leaders who
continue to support the tyrant Mugabe. Indeed, like the same
bishops, we
urge leadership in southern Africa "to re-direct their
solidarity towards
the needs of the suffering people of the once-thriving
country."
As the Catholic bishops note, "The South African Government has
the capacity
to force Mugabe to go. All that is lacking is the political
will. History
will judge very harshly the tacit support still given to
Mugabe and the
little (if any) support given to his opposition as well as
the total
disregard for the people of Zimbabwe."
More to the point,
we agree with the bishops when they say that, "President
Motlanthe should
stop immediately all collusion with Mugabe and cut off any
support South
Africa is offering him, especially electricity and fuel. In
addition, any
assets held by Mugabe and his cronies in South Africa should
be frozen
immediately. "
By way of more general comment, we note that as it was
some two thousand
years ago, so is it in today's world. Here we reference
the fact that in
that time when Jesus Christ was born - the talk everywhere
had to do with
the pervasiveness of a culture that was suffused in
violence.
In addition, it was a world where many dared hope that - at
long last - they
would be freed from the tyranny of Caesar. In other words,
those times were
such that dread, hope and fear were to be found intertwined
and woven
throughout that society.
While it was truly a time of
despair; that era was also a time of hope.
Two thousand and more years
later, hope and despair delineate the contours
of life in these times and in
this world of ours.
With this as backdrop, we turn to that situation in
Zimbabwe where an aging
tyrant and his power-mad cohorts preside over a
cowered, diseased and
battered people.
As these thugs do what they
must do [Christmas or no Christmas in mind] in
order to 'run things' in a
troubled Zimbabwe, more and more men, women and
children are dying - some
from hunger and some others from a dread
combination of HIV-AIDS and
cholera.
In the meantime, that country's megalomaniac of a leader -
Robert Mugabe and
his band of thugs - stubbornly and defiantly cling to the
reins of power.
So, to this modern day pharaoh, the word remains in this
blessed Advent
season: Let my people go!
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au
Jack the Insider | December 23, 2008
Article
from: The Australian
While we're sitting down for our Christmas lunches, we
might wish to pause
for a moment and reflect on the sort of Christmas the
people of Zimbabwe
will experience this year.
On Tuesday, Médecins
Sans Frontières (MSF) released its 11th annual list of
the top ten major
humanitarian crises around the globe. All the usual
suspects are there.
Ahmad al-Bashir's Sudan, war in the Congo, the heartache
of Iraq's four
million displaced citizens, ongoing humanitarian nightmares
in Ethiopia's
Somalia region, entrenched state sponsored poverty in Myanmar,
the sorrow of
malnutrition and disease affecting millions of the world's
children and the
ravages of AIDS throughout sub Saharan Africa.
The failed state of
Somalia is almost a perennial listing in this gloomy
catalogue of
wretchedness. The people of Mogadishu are stuck in the cross
fire of a
seemingly endless civil war. One in five Somalian children will
not live to
their fifth birthdays.
And looming large on MSF's list is Robert Mugabe's
Zimbabwe.
Once the bread basket of Africa, Zimbabwe is now nothing more
than a basket
case.
Over the thirty years of Mugabe's rule, property
has been raided and handed
to Zimbabwe's power elite, in the name of land
reform. Profitable farms that
fed the country and created export earnings
have been seized from their
owners and now lie in disorder and
dysfunction.
Almost one half of Zimbabwe's population currently relies on
food relief
from the World Food Programme.
Mugabe continues to blame
drought for the food shortages but Zimbabwe is
living proof that famine and
related disease can only occur with the active
participation of a corrupt
and amoral state. Drought, crop failures, global
market downturns - all may
create the preconditions but famine ultimately
has a political
cause.
For the people of Zimbabwe who have had to endure political
oppression,
state sponsored violence, famine and the outbreak of entirely
preventable
diseases like cholera, there is fear now that their country will
slide
further into despair.
Australia's Foreign Minister, Stephen
Smith has indicated that there are
signs of further tumult and violence in
the coming weeks.
Speaking to the ABC today, Smith said, "My grave fear
is that however bad
the situation is in Zimbabwe right now, it will get
worse before it gets
better."
As the urging of the world's leaders
for Mugabe to go reaches a crescendo,
Mugabe simply digs in deeper. At the
ZANU-PF annual conference on 19
December, Mugabe declared, ""I will never,
never, never, never surrender.
Zimbabwe is mine."
These are words
taken straight out of the African dictator's playbook.
Uganda's Amin,
Zaire's Sese Seko, the Central African Republic's Jean Bedel
Bokassa -
Mugabe's name rests fittingly in the litany of madmen who have
brought
sorrow to sub-Saharan Africa.
Another measure common to African dictators
is the final megalomaniacal
bloody purge. There are indications that Mugabe
and his thugs have reached
that point and may commence the wholesale
slaughter of the people of
Zimbabwe in the coming weeks.
Last week,
the Commander of Zimbabwe's Air Force and close Mugabe ally, Air
Marshall
Perence Shiri was shot and wounded outside his own farm (yet
another farm
seized by force).
There is some talk that this is a sign that the
Zimbabwean military is
fracturing as interests within it clamour for power
in a post Mugabe phase
and a violent civil war may be in the
making.
More likely is that Mugabe and ZANU-PF have contrived these
events in order
to justify a security crackdown. More arrests and violence
can be expected.
The next few weeks in Zimbabwe look very grim
indeed.
There will be few festivities in Zimbabwe on 25 December this
year. It is
only when Mugabe leaves in a wooden box that the people of
Zimbabwe will
have anything to celebrate.
http://www.mg.co.za
CHIEF K MASIMBA BIRIWASHA - Dec 23 2008 06:00
Every year, when
Christmas time comes, the Harare City Council puts up
multicoloured lights
in First Street, the city's main road. The lights glow
brilliantly like
rainbow colours in the dark.
When the lights went up in late November, I
was busy running around the city
in search of my baby son Tadana's
three-month immunisation jab. As I
criss-crossed the city and passed through
First Street, I couldn't help but
think that the Christmas lights were a
big, tasteless joke given the
circumstances in Zimbabwe.
Every day,
early in the morning till late into the night, hordes of men and
women
huddled beneath the lights, waiting and hoping like little Godots to
get at
their hard-earned cash locked up in banks. Money was in short supply,
and
once you managed to withdraw some cash it flew away with the wind
because
ofunquantifiable inflation. Perhaps as a sign of their dejection,
the people
would leave loads of trash below the Christmas lights, turning
Harare's main
street into a mess.
I don't think many of the people waiting in bank
queues that stretched like
garden worms around the city gave much thought to
the Christmas lights. I am
sure, for many long-suffering Zimbabweans, the
idea of Christmas faded into
nothingness under the daily pressure to satisfy
temporal necessities.
Anyway, as the Christmas lights blinked away, my
wife Michelle and I took
baby Tadana to a local clinic, about 3km from where
we live. We were shocked
to find that were no nurses except for an old lady
at the front desk. She
informed us that the clinic had no stock of vaccines,
and that we had to
make our own plan to get baby Tadana vaccinated.
I
knew that this meant Michelle and I had to run like dogs until the
vaccines
were found. Thoroughly dumbfounded, we went home splitting our
heads on what
to do next. We thought of travelling to South Africa, Botswana
or Zambia to
find the vaccines but we had no cash.
But as they say in Zimbabwe, you
have to make a plan, and then shift it to
the left and the right and squeeze
it until it is bone dry to make the
impossible work. Michelle summoned the
mother inside herself and spent one
morning at work calling her friends with
babies.
Luckily, she was given the names of paediatricians who are
filling in the
gap left by a public health system that has failed to deliver
services to
its own people. We contacted one of the paediatricians and for
US$2 we
managed to get baby Tadana his jab.
I couldn't help but think
about what is happening to millions of children in
Zimbabwe born in our
season of despair, particularly in the rural areas.
Unlike baby Tadana, many
children in my country are not receiving essential
vaccinations because of
the collapse of the public health system.
It's like a whirlwind that will
undoubtedly explode in the coming years: we
will surely witness a rise in
children's diseases in my country, and my
spirit stings with pain at the
thought.
Soon after baby Tadana received his jab, which made him bawl
madly, we took
him on his longest journey in the human world -- to Mutare,
approximately
265km from Harare. It's Zimbabwe's third largest city, located
in the
eastern highlands and notorious for the nouveau riche flaunting loads
of
cash made from blood diamonds.
In recent years, thousands and
thousands of Zimbabweans have flocked to
Chiadzwa, a rural compound a few
kilometres outside Mutare, to try their
luck at searching for diamonds. The
blood diamonds have made many people in
the country get rich quickly while
many others have lost their lives.
We arrived in Mutare at night after
driving non-stop for nearly three hours.
From the top of Christmas Pass,
which provides a panoramic view of the city,
Mutare's multicoloured lights
look like a splatter of Christmas crackers in
the dark.
Michelle,
Tadana and I were in Mutare for a clean-up campaign to sweep trash
off the
city's streets with a group of young people who live in the city, as
part of
the 16 Days of Action Against Gender Violence. The young people were
members
of Youth Initiative for Democracy in Zimbabwe, a youth organisation
committed to a free, democratic and just Zimbabwe.
Michelle asked me
to join so that I would look after baby Tadana while she
coordinated the
clean-up activities. As I carried him around Mutare city
centre, I was
amazed at the many stares that came our way from both men and
women.
There is a general stereotype that African men should not be
seen in public
carrying tiny babies. It is regarded as a European thing for
an African man
to carry a baby. I guess the stereotype is that men are
justsupposed to
provide the baby's material needs while the emotional, soft,
lovey-dovey
stuff should be solely the domain of women.
Whatever the
case, carrying Tadana around gave me the closest sensation to
being pregnant
that I think I could ever muster. To my satisfaction, Tadana
never cried.
The way I see it, men need to claim the space of fatherhood and
show warmth,
love and affection to their children.
When Tadana was born three months
ago, I could never have predicted the
script that has played out so far. The
journey from the pregnancy through to
the birth and first earthly months of
baby Tadana has been mercurial,
jagged, rolling and full of new things that
I daresay my creative
imagination could never conjecture.
In sum,
it's been a journey with all sorts of unpredictable twists and
turns, much
like my home country's political and socioeconomic landscape.
As we drove
up towards Christmas Pass, on our way back to Harare after being
in Mutare
for 24 hours, baby Tadana began babbling many sounds more than he
has done
in the past. On our parenthood journey, Michelle and I eagerly look
forward
to the day when baby Tadana will speak his first actual words.
But we
make it a point to thoroughly cherish and embrace each moment with
our
little bundle of joy. All said, when next Christmas comes, baby Tadana
will
surely have much to talk about.
Public Agenda (Accra)
Daniel Chachu
22 December 2008
Accra - "I recall
reading pessimistic analyses in the mid-1960s that said
South Korea was
doomed to failure because it lacked the ingredients deemed
necessary for
development. Yet in the span of a few decades, Korea and East
Asia have
experienced the greatest increase in wealth for the largest number
of people
in the shortest time in the history of humanity. When Africa's
challenges
seem overwhelming and the statistics staggering, let us remember-
for every
Afro pessimist today, there was an Oriental fatalist forty years
ago." Paul
Wolfowitz, former President of World Bank.
The Cato Institute's Hanke
Hyperinflation Index for Zimbabwe (HHIZ) puts
Zimbabwe's annual inflation
rate at 2 trillion%, contesting official results
for July which puts the
figure at 231 million%. Whatever it is, it is all
too clear that all is not
well with Zimbabwe, to put it mildly. Perhaps a
better description would be a
state of political and economic quagmire. But
how did this come about? Most
analysts believe that what triggered
Zimbabwe's current crisis was President
Mugabe's attempt to fast track land
reforms (which had been going on even
before the country's independence)
with the aim of redistributing land back
to black Zimbabweans. In my
opinion, the principle was right and indeed the
British government had
provided million of pounds to facilitate the process
after Zimbabwe's
independence. The implementation was however fraught with
many problems.
Unfortunately too, Mugabe could not garner the confidence and
trust of his
own people, as many accused him of redistributing lands to his
ZANU-PF party
sympathisers. A combination of drought, the global food,
fertilizer and fuel
crisis as well as a botched Presidential and
parliamentary election have
contributed to worsening the situation. But can
our leaders taken any cue
from the Zimbabwean case?
Even before the
elections, the Zimbabwean economy was virtually on its
knees. Moreover, the
droughts, food, fuel and fertilizer crisis affected
virtually the whole of
Africa, with riots in several African countries. So
what makes the Zimbabwean
case unique? Many believe that the turmoil has
mainly been driven by
political and economic machinations from Western
countries opposed to the
land reforms. This school of thought seems to
suggest that these western
countries are seeking to protect the interests of
the minority white
population engaged in large-scale agriculture in
Zimbabwe. Sanctions
therefore intended to punish Mugabe and his government
have only ended up
plunging the country into a deep crisis with the poor
bearing the brunt.
Whether this conspiracy theory is true or not, I believe
our leaders have a
lot to learn from the situation.
Firstly, building a strong and resilient
domestic economy (certainly not the
type we have in Ghana where about 40% of
our annual budget is donor-funded
with the IMF and World Bank running the
show) is no longer a choice but a
necessity. Our leaders must aim at making
Ghana self-sufficient in food
production just as China has succeeded in doing
in the last thirty years.
Besides a green revolution, Ghana's industrial
potential is yet to be
harnessed. A structural transformation would require
adding value to the
many raw materials the country exports.
Moreover,
Nkrumah's cry for a strong continental union is yet to resonate in
the ears
and minds of African leaders. In an era of multilateralism, no
African
country can survive on its own. Africa must prove that it can think
and make
decisions on its own. Also, Africans must take advantage of the
market its
750 million population provides, bearing in mind that the US,
European Union,
China and India, among others are scrambling for the same.
Further, our
leaders must be wary of the many multilateral and bilateral
political and
economic partnerships being bandied about, some of which are
undermining
efforts to create sub-regional economic blocks and a
continental
union.
Finally, Africans must believe in themselves! We must
produce what we
consume and consume what we produce at the same time
maintaining a carefully
sequenced trade relationship with the rest of the
world.
(doc.chachu@gmail.com)
22 December, 2008
On Friday, 19
December 2008, President Robert Mugabe addressing his party's
annual
conference declared that "Zimbabwe is mine" and vowed never to
surrender to
calls to step down, as his political rival threatened to quit
stalled unity
government talks.
This is what he said: 'I will never, never, never,
never surrender. Zimbabwe
is mine, I am a Zimbabwean. Zimbabwe for
Zimbabweans. Zimbabwe never for the
British, Britain for the
British.'
The concept of African citizenship is one that has confused
many to the
extent that even Mugabe with the benefit of leading a post
colonial state
for the last 28 years has not understood the concept in its
proper context
and the obligations it imposes on its intended
beneficiaries.
Like Mugabe, I was born in Zimbabwe. Unlike Mugabe, I have
had to accept
that Zimbabwe like Africa belongs to all we believe in it and
are willing to
contribute in shaping its future. To Mugabe, the face of a
Zimbabwean is
black or what is commonly referred to as "mwana we vhu" meaning
"son of the
soil".
The connection between what Mugabe believes in as
Zimbabwean and land is a
direct and causal one helping explain why he holds
the view that Zimbabwean
land must permanently be attached to the true owners
of Zimbabwe i.e. black
Zimbabwean born like me.
To the extent that I
have now acquired a foreign citizenship, albeit an
African one, Mugabe would
regard me as a traitor of the highest order. After
all, he spent a greater
part of his life fighting for what he believed to be
the Zimbabwean cause to
accept that taking a foreign citizenship does not
injure any Zimbabwean
interests.
Whose Africa is it anyway? The relationship between Africa and
black people
will remain a contentious issue but what is important is that
existential
capitalism will never advance the interests of Africa. The mere
fact that
blacks are attached to land will not necessarily result in farm
output to
feed the stomachs of the current generation.
If Mugabe's
construction of Zimbabwean citizenship is allowed to take root
then the
consequences are dire not least because there are many foreign born
blacks
who have naturalized as Zimbabweans whose future automatically
becomes
precarious as well as white Zimbabweans who over the last 28 years
have
believed that they also had a vested future in the country only to find
that
Mugabe does not accept their contribution and citizenship.
Imagine, for
example, a white person who was so inspired by Mugabe's speech
on
reconciliation in 1980 that he relocated to Zimbabwe bought a farm
and
naturalized as a citizen. He now is called names but the output produced
by
this farm was used to feed Zimbabweans.
It is also important to
make the point that citizenship ought not to be
reserved to only natural
persons but also to juristic persons i.e.
companies. There are many companies
registered in Zimbabwe who may have
holders of share certificates who are
domiciled outside Zimbabwe. Such
entities are in all respects Zimbabwean
vested with the rights and
obligations of citizenship.
Should the face
of Africa be restricted to blacks and what would be the
implications on
economic progress? Unfortunately, capitalism has its own
rules and is founded
on a simple concept that human beings are rational and
will pursue their own
interests.
The experience of the last 52 years of post-colonial
experience has shown
that blacks are not as patriotic as people like Mugabe
would like them to be
for his own self-interest.
In fact, they have
been known to pursue their own interests to the extent
that many of them are
now living comfortably in the diaspora. They have
taken the choice to sell
their time to the best bidder and in this case the
time of professional
blacks has found more value in other parts of the world
than Zimbabwe or
Africa in general.
Mugabe is not alone in holding the view that Zimbabwe
should belong to black
people and title to land must be reserved for sons and
daughters of the
soil. The same view is widely held in the rest of the
continent.
Even after 28 years in power, Mugabe still continues to hold
the view that
any call for a change of leadership necessarily means the
return of the
British hegemony over land.
In making the case, Mugabe
speaks for many who believe that Africa should
rather be poor than its
citizens continue to be alienated from the land.
However, no attempt is made
to explain how the mere transfer of title deeds
to black born Africans will
improve the standard of living of all of
Africa's
citizens.
Mugabe
should smart enough to know that Zimbabwe belongs to the people of
Zimbabwe
and last time they voted they genuinely wanted to see a different
face in the
statehouse.
I have made the point before that the election of Obama has
opened a new
window of hope for even white Africans to aspire to the highest
office.
The Obama phenomenon has many enemies including Mugabe who hold
the view
that the concept of Zimbabwe should be a restricted one.
The
statement made by Mugabe sums up what is at the root cause of
Africa's
contemporary problems. The past is gone and the future can only be
shaped by
the decision made by this generation.
Any leader should look
at government as an organ of the people to serve
their interests. The state
of Zimbabwe should ideally be a people's project
and the leader should know
when it is time to go.
Mugabe's views resonate with many Africans to give
him confidence that he
will not face any roadblock from any African head of
state except a few who
are easily labeled as agents of
imperialism.
Human nature and mankind's relationship to existence is more
compatible with
the life of a rational being.
If one assumes Africans
are also rational and the only mechanism through
which they can advance their
interests is to put in place a system that
recognizes value and allows for
trading.
In the case of land, a person could perhaps be given a right for
99 years
and can only proceed to add value to the land if he/she knows they
can
convert the land into some other asset class like cash in an open
market
system.
What Mugabe seems to advocate is a closed system
whereby if a white person
were to approach a black person who has been
allocated land with an offer
he/she cannot refuse, the black person would be
condemned to only sell the
right to one class of people i.e. blacks who may
not have the cash by virtue
of wrong policies put in place.
I have
often made the case that white people are not successful as farmers
in Africa
merely because of skin color but because of the system that they
put in place
to promote and protect their interests. If blacks are against
the capitalist
system and wish to replace it with some kind of existential
capitalism then
poverty will remain part of the African story.
Without freedom, Africa's
future will remain compromised. One cannot deny
that colonialism was a bad
system and investing in the past will not feed
Africa. A modern Africa will
require that farmers look at land as just like
any other asset class whose
value is determined by what it can produce.
The Africa that we should
want to see is an working Africa in which
citizens, for instance, go to a
supermarket to buy beans without caring
about who produced the beans. They
should be comforted by the fact that the
price they pay reflects what they
think the beans are worth otherwise they
should have the option of buying the
same beans from other farmers in the
country or outside the country as they
case may be.
The moment Africa retreats to a stage where, for example, it
becomes
important at the till to know who produced this or that product then
Africa's
future will continue to be doomed less by the machinations of
its yesterday
enemies than by the rhetoric of its current
leaders.
Mugabe has opened the great debate of our time and we should not
be shy to
engage in it. Is it correct to say that Zimbabwe should belong to a
certain
class of people and the market for Zimbabwean land should forever
be
restricted to such a class of people irrespective of the
economic
fundamentals at play?