The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

There are dozens of headlines today some of which are reproduced below but the article
from the ABC sums it up...

ICC still unclear on England's stand on Zimbabwe tie ...
England to boycott Zimbabwe game...
England Deny Boycott....
England gives 'formal notice' to boycott Harare...


ABC Australia
Tuesday February 11, 2003 6:46 AM AEDT

England campaign descends into farce
England's World Cup campaign was reduced to farce and utter confusion on
Monday as tournament organisers demanded a once-and-for-all decision on
whether they would play their match in strife-torn Zimbabwe.

England missed a deadline set by International Cricket Council (ICC) chief
Malcolm Gray to make up their minds over Thursday's match in Harare, despite
four days of talks between players, security experts and officials.

The confusion followed an ICC document released to reporters in Cape Town
which said England had given "formal notice" that they would not play the
game.

The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) denied the boycott had been
officially decided before the game's world governing body released a
statement saying they had received a new letter from the ECB, which still
failed to say whether the team would play or not.

And England captain Nasser Hussain added to the atmosphere of farce by
admitting that some of his players had been reduced to tears at a meeting
called to try and decide whether to play the Harare fixture.

"It was a very emotional, very heated meeting," he said. "There were people
in tears earlier... Each individual was speaking, telling his pros and cons
for going. We weren't sure what we were doing."

Hussain added that some of the squad had been "very much upset" by a letter
containing death threats sent to the England board, but added that some
"were taking (it) lightly, some weren't".

The World Cup, the sport's showpiece event, began on Sunday with main hosts
South Africa losing to West Indies but the tournament has been dominated by
talk of match boycotts.

England's players have voiced concerns for weeks over both the security
situation, and social and political developments in Zimbabwe.

The affair appeared to have been brought to an end last week when the
organisers rejected an England appeal to switch the Zimbabwe game to South
Africa, arguing that Harare was a safe venue.

Supposedly binding

That decision, made by the World Cup technical committee and ratified on
appeal by an ICC-appointed judge, was supposedly binding.

England, however, have continued to argue, both with the tournament
organisers and among themselves. The squad broke that routine on Monday by
practising for the first time in four days.

Nasser Hussain's squad are also angry with their own board for not telling
them early enough about the letter containing death threats to both players
and their families should they play in Zimbabwe.

The ECB, meanwhile, has focused largely on financial issues and the fear
that the board could be sued for millions of dollars in compensation from
sponsors if the Harare game does not go ahead.

The ICC resorted to both stick and carrot on Monday, without success.

First, Gray demanded a decision by 1400 GMT, only for the deadline to pass.

South Africa's second most senior police officer, National Deputy
Commissioner of Police Andre Pruis, then re-iterated at an ICC-organised
news conference that the letter containing death threats had been dismissed
as a hoax by the country's police and intelligence services.

"It has been sent by a person with the purpose of disrupting the World Cup,"
he said. "This person or persons have no capacity to carry out any threat
and should be treated as propaganda and not as a direct threat."

The stick came from the South Africa United Cricket Board's Percy Sonn, who
warned that his team as well as Zimbabwe could retaliate with tit-for-tat
boycotts by not visiting England later this year as planned if the Harare
game does not go ahead.

He told the same news conference: "We are a few days' away from a game in
which we have committed finances and effort to stage - we still don't have
an answer.

"It may become serious. Relationships are built on trust. If you start
believing that trust is not there then you re-examine the relationship."

Asked if the world game would be undermined by counter-boycotts, Sonn added:
"It (the world game) may well fall apart."

Unprecedented attack

Zimbabwe's leading batsman Andy Flower and fast bowler Henry Olonga,
meanwhile, confused the issue still further with an unprecedented attack on
Zimbabwe's leaders minutes before their opening Group A match against
Namibia in Harare.

In a hard-hitting statement, the pair said they would wear black armbands
for the rest of the tournament in protest.

"In doing so we are mourning the death of democracy in our beloved
Zimbabwe," the pair said in a statement.

"We are making a silent plea to those responsible to stop the abuse of human
rights in Zimbabwe. We pray that our small action may help to restore sanity
and dignity to our nation."

England and Australia have come under huge pressure from their governments
to boycott fixtures in strife-torn Zimbabwe in protest at the policies of
President Robert Mugabe, who they say rigged his 2002 re-election and has
triggered mass hunger.

Australia is still committed to playing in Bulawayo on February 24 but are
monitoring the situation.

New Zealand has refused to play in Kenya later in the tournament, also
because of security concerns.

On the field, Zimbabwe won a rain-curtailed match against Namibia by 86 runs
under the Duckworth/Lewis scoring method, while 1996 world champions Sri
Lanka, inspired by a century from their captain Sanath Jayasuriya, beat New
Zealand by 47 runs in Group B.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

BBC
 
Monday, 10 February, 2003, 15:28 GMT
Trained staff quit troubled Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe demonstration
Workers are moving abroad to avoid political unrest at home

The continued political unrest in Zimbabwe and the raft of economic problems now facing the country is having a damaging effect on the workforce.

According to the ACCA in Harare - a body that represents chartered accountants - thousands of professionals have already left the nation.

The medical profession has also been badly effected forcing Zimbabwe to recruit personnel from other regions.

But the exodus could bring some unexpected economic benefits.

New pastures

Political uncertainty, sporadic violence and the daily problems of food and fuel shortages are taking their toll on Zimbabwe's white collar workforce.

Worldwide there is an acute shortage of accountants therefore our members are highly mobile

ACCA spokesman

Accountants, engineers, doctors and teachers alike are finding it impossible to maintain their standard of living in the face of rampant inflation.

The World Bank estimates that the level of inflation will reach 500% this year.

In 2002, more than 6,000 professionals left the country.

Most have joined the growing Zimbabwean expatriate communities in Britain, South Africa and Botswana.

But others have settled in regions as far afield as the Caribbean and Australia.

In demand

An ACCA spokesman, who did not wish to be named, told the BBC that there were plentiful opportunities for accountants who choose to leave.

"Worldwide there is an acute shortage of accountants therefore our members are highly mobile," he said.

"Regardless of the economic situation we are facing, they have always been in demand in the region and across the globe."

Other professionals such as doctors and nurses are also finding work in countries where their skills are in short supply, for example in Britain.

That is causing a problem back in Zimbabwe, which has had to recruit medical staff from other regions.

Unexpected bonus

In the private sector, it is a different story.

Although many workers are leaving, there are plenty of candidates to take their place - because so many companies are closing their doors, as the economic climate worsens.

Although the general picture is bleak, there is an unexpected bonus for Zimbabwe from this skills drain.

Last year, Zimbabweans living abroad collectively sent home more than $40m a month - providing a welcome boost for the country's depleted foreign reserves.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

SABC

 England should not play in Zimbabwe: Survey
            February 10, 2003, 17:45


            The majority of South Africans who participated in a snap survey
this week believed England's Cricket World Cup (CWC) team should not play
its fixture in Zimbabwe on Thursday.

            "The majority, 51%, felt that England should steer clear of
Zimbabwe entirely while 13% did not have an opinion on the issue," Research
Surveys said.

            Ninety-three percent of those who felt that England should not
play in Zimbabwe were of the opinion that the matches should be moved to
another country. Only 5% felt that the scheduled games should be forfeited.

            Only 37% of respondents believed England should play their
scheduled CWC games in Zimbabwe.

            Some 51% of the respondents said they agreed with the claim by
the English players that it would be unsafe for them to play in Zimbabwe.

            "One quarter of respondents felt that England should take a
political stand and not play in the country while 23% felt that a
combination of safety and political issues was reason enough for England not
to play their match in Zimbabwe."

            Research Surveys said it appeared that most South Africans had
been swept up in cricket fever, with only 14% of respondents claiming to
have little or no interest in the game of cricket.

            Their patriotism was reflected in their response to the question
of who would win this year's World Cup. A resounding 72% said South Africa
would win, while 16% of respondents believed Australia would be victorious
again.

            On a separate issue, 43% of respondents said they would prefer
the boys in green and gold simply to be known as the South African Cricket
team.

            Twenty-eight percent of respondents felt "the Proteas" was a
suitable name while 24% thought the team should rather be referred to as
"the Springboks". - Sapa
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Reuters

Zimbabwe Police Quash Protest as Cricket Begins
Mon February 10, 2003 11:19 AM ET


HARARE (Reuters) - Zimbabwe riot police dispersed civil rights activists
trying to demonstrate on Monday against World Cup fixtures in the
strife-torn country.
Witnesses said police chased away a handful of National Constitution
Assembly (NCA) activists who had gathered for a lunchtime march in Harare's
central business district.

They were protesting against President Robert Mugabe's policies about two km
(one mile) from the venue of Zimbabwe's first cricket World Cup match
against Namibia.

Riot police, some carrying teargas canisters, sealed off the area for about
an hour, turning away pedestrians who wanted to get into nearby shops.

The NCA -- a coalition of church and student groups, rights organizations
and political parties -- said last month it planned a series of
pro-democracy protests during the World Cup. It said while the aim was not
to disrupt the tournament, it would not suspend its program for the cricket
games.

On Saturday, a senior police officer told journalists at a security briefing
that no political slogans and songs, placards and dress or "artifacts
associated with political parties" would be allowed at cricket match venues.

On Monday leading Zimbabwe batsman Andy Flower and teammate Henry Olonga
criticized the country's human rights record and came onto the field wearing
black arm bands in a sign of "mourning the death of democracy in our beloved
Zimbabwe."

NCA chairman Lovemore Madhuku dismissed the gesture.

"It's not enough. They (players) should simply have not played. These are
half-hearted efforts which show that they realized the problems exist but
they don't want to participate in finding the solutions," Madhuku said.

Madhuku said the protesters had been beaten by police, but there was no
independent confirmation.

Zimbabwe is grappling with its worst economic crisis -- fueled by record
unemployment and severe food shortages -- since Mugabe came to power on
independence from Britain in 1980.

Mugabe, 79 this month, denies charges that he has mismanaged the economy
over the last 22 years, and that his controversial seizure of white-owned
commercial farms for redistribution to landless blacks has led to food
shortages affecting half the country's 14 million people.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Flower's international future hangs in balance
Reuters - 10 February 2003
A huge question mark was hanging over Andy Flower's international career on Monday after he and Zimbabwe team mate Henry Olonga launched a scathing attack on President Robert Mugabe and his government.
Their criticism, made moments before Zimbabwe's opening World Cup game against Namibia, could further disrupt the tournament.
It may also have a fundamental effect on both players' cricketing futures.
Former captain Flower, at 34, is nearing the end of his sporting shelf-life anyway. But it remains to be seen whether the Zimbabwean authorities will tolerate him playing another World Cup game wearing a black armband "mourning the death of democracy" in his beloved Zimbabwe.
Flower and Olonga's protest -- "a silent plea to those responsible to stop the abuse of human rights in Zimbabwe" -- may come to rank among other memorable political protests by sportsmen.
In the 1968 Mexico Olympics, American sprinters Tommie Smith and John Carlos gave a black-power salute from the 200 metres medal podium to protest at the treatment of blacks in the United States.
The incident caused outrage and they were suspended and ordered to leave the Olympic village. Both found it difficult to get jobs for years to come.
Heavyweight boxer Muhammad Ali refused to serve with the US forces in Vietnam in 1967, saying: "I ain't got no quarrel with then Vietcong." He was subsequently stripped of his world title, prevented from travelling abroad and only got his licence back three years later.
At the 1994 Commonwealth Games, Australian Cathy Freeman also made her point, celebrating her 400 metres gold medal by running her victory lap with a huge Aboriginal flag, infuriating team officials.
Flower, whose brother Grant also plays in the side, will certainly have angered the Mugabe administration. The Zimbabwe Cricket Union -- to whom Mugabe acts as patron -- said it was considering its response on Monday.
World Cup organisers are unlikely to be too happy either, with England still considering a boycott of their match in Harare on Thursday because of the social and political unrest there and Australia monitoring the situation before playing in Bulawayo. Flower and Olonga's comments are unlikely to have soothed English nerves.
The International Council (ICC), constantly stressing its non-political status, could also intervene with a disrepute charge. Black armbands are usually only tolerated in cases such as bereavement.
Flower is arguably Zimbabwe's greatest-ever player, with more than 200 one-day appearances and 63 Tests in a 12-year career. In 2001, he reached the top of the world Test ratings.
He still averages more than 50 in Tests, a benchmark passed by only the very best players.
Flower is already preparing for the next stage of his cricketing life. He has already handed over the wicket-keeping gloves to youngster Tatenta Taibu to help develop the next generation of Zimbabwean cricketers.
He seems certain to spend more time in England in the near future after his success with English county Essex last season.
Olonga, the first black player to represent Zimbabwe and the quickest bowler in the country, may have more to lose after putting his name to a statement which followed months of diplomatic side-stepping of political issues by skipper Heath Streak and the rest of the team.
At 26, Olonga is still young, with years of cricket ahead of him.
A committed Christian, born in Zambia and with a Kenyan father, he is a fine singer and considered an acting career before turning to cricket. It is tempting to suggest he might still make a career switch.
After Flower's short innings against Namibia on Sunday -- at a ground nestling right in the shadow of Mugabe's presidential residence -- the left-hander made a small gesture to the Harare Sports Ground crowd as he walked back to the pavilion.
It could have been interpreted as a goodbye.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Statement of Andrew Flower and Henry Olonga
Andrew Flower and Henry Olonga - 10 February 2003

Issued 9.30 a.m. 10 February 2003, at the start of Zimbabwe's opening World Cup match against Namibia.
It is a great honour for us to take the field today to play for Zimbabwe in the World Cup. We feel privileged and proud to have been able to represent our country. We are however deeply distressed about what is taking place in Zimbabwe in the midst of the World Cup and do not feel that we can take the field without indicating our feelings in a dignified manner and in keeping with the spirit of cricket.
We cannot in good conscience take to the field and ignore the fact that millions of our compatriots are starving, unemployed and oppressed. We are aware that hundreds of thousands of Zimbabweans may even die in the coming months through a combination of starvation, poverty and Aids. We are aware that many people have been unjustly imprisoned and tortured simply for expressing their opinions about what is happening in the country. We have heard a torrent of racist hate speech directed at minority groups. We are aware that thousands of Zimbabweans are routinely denied their right to freedom of expression. We are aware that people have been murdered, raped, beaten and had their homes destroyed because of their beliefs and that many of those responsible have not been prosecuted. We are also aware that many patriotic Zimbabweans oppose us even playing in the Wc because of what is happening.
It is impossible to ignore what is happening in Zimbabwe. Although we are just professional cricketers, we do have a conscience and feelings. We believe that if we remain silent that will be taken as a sign that either we do not care or we condone what is happening in Zimbabwe. We believe that it is important to stand up for what is right.
We have struggled to think of an action that would be appropriate and that would not demean the game we love so much. We have decided that we should act alone without other members of the team being involved because our decision is deeply personal and we did not want to use our senior status to unfairly influence more junior members of the squad. We would like to stress that we greatly respect the ICC and are grateful for all the hard work it has done in bringing the World Cup to Zimbabwe.
In all the circumstances we have decided that we will each wear a black armband for the duration of the World Cup. In doing so we are mourning the death of democracy in our beloved Zimbabwe. In doing so we are making a silent plea to those responsible to stop the abuse of human rights in Zimbabwe. In doing so we pray that our small action may help to restore sanity and dignity to our Nation.
Andrew Flower – Henry Olonga

Daily News

Letters

      Wear black armbands in protest

      2/10/2003 7:00:37 AM (GMT +2)



      Given the assurances to the International Cricket Council by the
Commissioner of Police that non-violent, non-disruptive protest is allowed
in Zimbabwe, it is vital that all caring Zimbabweans associated with the
cricket, use this global window to express themselves.

      The Zimbabwe Cricket Supporters for Democracy appeal to all those
participating in the cricket in any way to wear black and white clothing,
and black armband, as a symbol of mourning for the death of democracy in
Zimbabwe.

      We appeal to all spectators to heed this call and to all players and
umpires to wear black armbands during their games in Zimbabwe.


      Zimbabwe Cricket Supporters for Democracy
      ------------------------
      All letters published on the open Letter Forum are the views and
opinions
      of the submitters, and do not represent the official viewpoint of
Justice
      for Agriculture.

      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
      Justice for Agriculture mailing list
      To subscribe/unsubscribe: Please write to jag-list-admin@mango.zw
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Reuters

Zimbabwe Seeks Gag on Deal With Treason Witness
By Cris Chinaka

HARARE (Reuters) - Zimbabwe ordered the key prosecution witness in the
treason trial of President Robert Mugabe's main political opponent on Monday
not to divulge details of a contract he has with the government.

State Security Minister Nicholas Goche issued a certificate ordering
Canadian political consultant Ari Ben-Menashe not to reveal details of the
contract, citing national security concerns. Defense lawyers said the move
was unconstitutional.

Ben-Menashe is the state's star witness against opposition leader Morgan
Tsvangirai and two colleagues who face the death sentence if convicted of
plotting to assassinate Mugabe.

Tsvangirai and two senior members of the Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC) deny the charges, which they say are an effort to discredit the
opposition as the country slides into its worst crisis since independence
from Britain in 1980.

Last week Ben-Menashe refused to answer defense questions about work he did
for the government for a US$100,000 payment, citing a confidentiality clause
in the year-old contract.

Defense lawyers dismissed the certificate, submitted as the trial went into
its second week, as ridiculous.

"The certificate is an unconstitutional attempt to interfere with your
lordship's judicial functions, your lordship has power to...ignore it,"
chief defense lawyer George Bizos told Judge Paddington Garwe.

Bizos, a South African, rose to fame 40 years ago when he defended South
African activist Nelson Mandela in a high-profile treason trial brought
during apartheid rule.

Garwe said he would rule on the certificate on Tuesday.

DEFENSE ALLEGES TRAP

Bizos said if the court accepted the certificate, the defense would like to
cross-examine Goche on his reasons because Ben-Menashe had already been
proving to be an "uncooperative and cagey witness" who refused to tell the
court what work he had done for the Zimbabwe government to earn the money.

"We believe this money was paid for work already done in relation to this
trap. If our hands are going to be tied behind our backs there will be
untold prejudice to the accused in this case. My Lord, we cannot allow
interference in the courts, even from ministers," Bizos said.

Ben-Menashe denied on Friday that any of the money his company received from
the government in early 2002 was payment for recording the Tsvangirai
meeting but gave no more details.

Prosecutor Bharat Patel said the contract was confidential.

"The agreement is curiously crafted, I must agree, but it is crafted in such
a manner that the issue of confidentiality is in-built," Patel said. "Any
attempt to disclose these (contract) details would impair the security of
the state."

The defense argued Ben-Menashe had to give the court all relevant evidence
to help the court to reach a fair verdict.

Bizos said the High Court should reject the gag order or demand that the
minister explain himself. Bizos said he was surprised that Zimbabwe was
relying on a law passed in the 1970s by a white minority government to
suppress blacks.

Patel said the government had a right to protect state secrets, but that
Goche and the acting head of Zimbabwe's Central Intelligence Organization
were ready to give their reasons to court in camera.

Ben-Menashe says his company alerted Canadian, Zimbabwean and U.S.
authorities to the alleged plot after two meetings where Tsvangirai
discussed Mugabe's "elimination" and arranged a third in December 2001 to
gather video-taped evidence.

The defendants say the recording was edited to discredit Tsvangirai and the
MDC before the March 2002 elections, which opponents and some Western
governments say Mugabe rigged.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Globe and Mail, Canada

Commonwealth divided over Zimbabwe

      By JEFF GRAY
      Globe and Mail Update


      South Africa and Nigeria have cancelled a key meeting to review
Zimbabwe's year-long suspension from the Commonwealth, Australia's Prime
Minister says. It is unclear if the move means the 54-member body will allow
Harare to be readmitted next month.

      Australia, South Africa and Nigeria make up the "troika" assigned by
the Commonwealth to deal with the Zimbabwean government of Robert Mugabe,
which remains been isolated over its questionable elections last year and
its human-rights abuses, such as the widespread seizure of white-owned
farms.

      The leaders of the "troika" countries were to meet next month to
decide whether to extend Zimbabwe's year-long suspension imposed last
March - but Australian Prime Minister John Howard said his two African
counterparts have already called off the talks.

      "They didn't agree with me that further measures should be taken
against Zimbabwe, and I deduced from that discussion that they would not be
unhappy if Zimbabwe were readmitted. Now whether they will argue strongly
for that, I don't know," Mr. Howard said, according to Radio Australia.

      The Australian Prime Minister, who was in Washington, D.C., on Monday,
said South African President Thabo Mbeki told him by phone over the weekend
that the meeting was off.

      Australia has pushed hard for sanctions against Harare, and Mr. Howard
made it clear that Australia would lobby other Commonwealth leaders to have
the suspension extended until December, when the body is to meet in Nigeria.

      "If anything, the situation appears to have deteriorated, and I
certainly wouldn't be supporting any notion that Zimbabwe should be
re-admitted to full membership," Mr. Howard said.

      After a meeting in London last March, the troika agreed to suspend
Harare for 12 months after observers criticized the elections that saw Mr.
Mugabe re-elected for his fifth term as president. The troika also agreed to
meet again to determine whether the suspension should be renewed.

      In Pretoria, a spokesman for Mr. Mbeki told wire services that talks
between the troika members on Zimbabwe were still continuing and that South
Africa was disappointed that Mr. Howard chose to speak out.

      The debate over Zimbabwe has split the Commonwealth along racial
lines, with many African countries urging a less confrontational approach.

      Meanwhile, the country's economy has remained in turmoil, with farm
confiscations and violence exacerbating a drought that has left as much as
half the population of 14 million threatened by starvation.

      Zimbabwean politics have also gripped the sporting world, as England's
cricket team ponders whether to skip a match scheduled for Harare later this
week in the sport's world cup. The England Cricket Board has asked
organizers to move the game, and English players have complained of
receiving death threats.

      On Monday, two Zimbabwean cricketers took to the pitch for their match
against Namibia wearing black armbands, protesting against what they said
was the "death of democracy" in their country.

      Officials have banned political signs from the stands, and there were
reports that police disrupted a small protest in Harare's financial
district, about two kilometres from where the game was taking place.

U N I T E D  N A T I O N S
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
Integrated Regional Information Network (IRIN)

ZIMBABWE: Re-admission to Commonwealth a step closer

JOHANNESBURG, 10 February (IRIN) - Zimbabwe could well be readmitted into the Commonwealth after a year-long suspension ends in March, news reports said on Monday.

The BBC reported that two of the three nations in the Commonwealth troika - which is comprised of Australia, South Africa and Nigeria - did not want Zimbabwe's one-year suspension from the Commonwealth to be extended when it ends in March. The troika was mandated by the Commonwealth to take the lead on what, if any, actions should be taken regarding the crisis in Zimbabwe.

Australian Prime Minister John Howard said that the South African and Nigerian leaders had told him they did not agree with his view that further measures should be taken against Zimbabwe because of political and human rights violations.

Howard, who is in Washington for talks on Iraq with US President George W Bush, said South Africa's President Thabo Mbeki told him in a telephone conversation on Saturday that South Africa and Nigeria did not want to hold another meeting of the panel. Effectively allowing for the automatic re-admission of Zimbabwe when the suspension lapses.

The Australian newspaper reported that Howard was seeking legal advice about the ban on Zimbabwe, and writing to all Commonwealth members after the breakdown in agreement between himself and the other members of the troika.

Opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) leader Morgan Tsvangirai told IRIN he was not yet prepared to comment on the decision or its implications.

But MDC shadow minister of foreign affairs, Moses Mzila, told IRIN that Zimbabwe's re-admission would be tantamount to granting legitimacy to an "illegitimate" government.

"[Re-admission] would be recognising an illegitimate government that they decided was illegitimate only 11 months ago as the electoral process was heavily flawed and fraudulent. Any change in that stance would mean [President Robert] Mugabe would literally get away with murder. He will feel recognised [by the international community]," Mzila said.

Zimbabwe's re-admission would have implications for "how Mugabe conducts himself here at home in relation to the rule of law", he noted.

"He [Mugabe] will feel he has free reign now that the international community has accepted that the way he is conducting affairs [in the country] is normal," Mzila added.

The Commonwealth suspended Zimbabwe in March last year, following a poll which the Commonwealth said was neither free nor fair.

South African-based international affairs analyst, Professor John Stremlau, told IRIN that Nigeria and South Africa's position could be a sign that more was going on behind closed doors in terms of resolving the Zimbabwe crisis.

"I get the impression that Obasanjo was working the issue rather hard in Zimbabwe, Mugabe did not appear to be enthralled ... especially by Obasanjo meeting with Tsvangirai. The Howard [statement] should be viewed in somewhat larger context of a lot happening, [but] the action is all under the surface, like water-polo," he said.

There was speculation late on Monday that the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group - which pre-dates the troika - may be asked to assess what actions should be taken with regard to Zimbabwe, in the absence of an agreed position of the troika.

Meanwhile, the MDC has said there was no truth to media speculation around the substance of the talks between Obasanjo and Tsvangirai on the crisis in Zimbabwe at the weekend.

Media reports had earlier claimed that Obasanjo had told Tsvangirai that there would be no end to the current crisis without negotiations between the MDC and the ruling ZANU-PF.

A statement from MDC secretary-general Welshman Ncube said: "There is no truth in media speculation on the substance of the discussion. What is true is that the MDC president, Morgan Tsvangirai, briefed President Obasanjo on the deteriorating economic, political, and social situation in Zimbabwe. Nothing further was discussed."

Obasanjo, on an official visit to Zimbabwe, also held talks with Mugabe.

Tsvangirai is still facing treason charges arising from an alleged plot to "eliminate" Mugabe, a charge he denies.

[ENDS]

IRIN-SA
Tel: +27 11 880-4633
Fax: +27 11 447-5472
Email: IRIN-SA@irin.org.za

[This Item is Delivered to the "Africa-English" Service of the UN's IRIN
humanitarian information unit, but may not necessarily reflect the views
of the United Nations. For further information, free subscriptions, or
to change your keywords, contact e-mail: IRIN@ocha.unon.org or Web:
http://www.irinnews.org . If you re-print, copy, archive or re-post
this item, please retain this credit and disclaimer. Reposting by commercial
sites requires written IRIN permission.]

Copyright (c) UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 2003
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

Leader Page

      Ruling could be a blessing in disguise

      2/10/2003 6:50:42 AM (GMT +2)



      FROM the moment relations between President Mugabe and British Prime
Minister Tony Blair turned frosty following the former's decision to trample
upon his people's basic freedoms and human rights in the name of land
reform, Mugabe has not missed an opportunity to tell the world that he did
not want to have anything to do with the British.

      He has poured much scorn and hurled all manner of insult at the
British in general and Blair in particular, capping his sustained fusillade
of invective with the infamous "let him have his Britain and I will keep my
Zimbabwe" declaration at the Earth Summit in Johannesburg last September.

      Against such a background, one would have expected violent opposition
to be the Mugabe regime's most logical and natural reaction to the
International Cricket Council (ICC)'s announcement that six of the matches
in the World Cup cricket tournament starting this week would be played in
Zimbabwe.

      People would have seen it as being totally in keeping with the
President's utter disdain for the British if the government had declared the
entire England cricket team including their officials, as well as Australia
whose Prime Minister, John Howard has become another persona non grata in
Zimbabwe prohibited immigrants. In fact, knowing how much Mugabe loves
cricket, such a stance would have lent much substance to and greatly
      enhanced his constant claim to being a principled man.

      By taking completely the opposite stance while everyone else except
the ICC are fiercely opposed to those matches being played here, the
government has exposed Mugabe as a man who is not only laying false claims
to being principled, but also as being double-faced.

      And the fact that the government is prepared to meet the enormous
expenses that it is obviously incurring by deploying security personnel in
such large numbers just as visible proof that cricketers will be safe never
mind from what or whom in Zimbabwe, when they cannot find enough of the same
personnel to patrol Kuwadzana to ensure residents' safety from harassment
and torture at the hands of political hooligans, is a loud statement on its
inability to get its priorities right.

      Not only is the government wasting so much of the taxpayer's money
protecting cricketers from imaginary danger, but it is also inconveniencing
so many people by taking measures meant to create the impression that the
situation in this country political, social and economic is normal.

      Some of the measures included prohibiting filling stations along the
road to the airport from conducting business because the visitors must not
be allowed to see fuel queues which, like queues for all the other basic
necessities of life, have become a common
      everyday feature of Zimbabweans' life. There was also the virtual
cordoning off of one Harare hotel where the cricketers were scheduled to
stay and the turning of the Harare Sports Club premises into some kind of
police station.

      It would be a monumental exercise in self-deception to say that there
were, outside government circles, any people who were pleased with the the
ICC's decision to overrule all opposition to the staging of matches in this
country.

      We are not privy to the reasons which may have influenced that
decision but the truth is that it was not a popular decision at all as it
was opposed even outside this country by everyone who is aware of the Mugabe
regime's appalling human rights abuses and political repression.

      It was, therefore, most disappointing to see a South African judge
who, purportedly, is also an independent commissioner, Justice Albie Sachs,
rejecting the England and Wales Cricket Board's final appeal to have its
Cricket World Cup opener against Zimbabwe in Harare on 13 February switched
to South Africa.

      As a neighbour, Sachs ought to know just how bad things are in this
country. Zimbabweans cannot help feeling betrayed by someone they consider a
relative. Looking at it positively, though, it could be a blessing in
disguise. With the glare of the whole civilised world focused on Zimbabwe,
this is a God-sent opportunity to stage all those demonstrations people had
itched to stage but didn't dare to for fear of police brutality. Foolhardy
as it may be, the government will not let the police loose on peaceful
demonstrators. If they do, they will have exposed themselves.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Investment Analysts Take US for Fools



Zimbabwe Independent (Harare)

February 7, 2003
Posted to the web February 10, 2003

By Tafirenyika Wekwa Makunike


While the exercise of tomfoolery by Zimbabweans as the nation sinks into an
abyss is now legendary and the political landscape is littered with
carcasses as evidence thereof, a similar process seems to be taking place in
the local business market.

In a country where there is a parallel rate for virtually everything, I have
come to realise that there is now a parallel rate for the truth,
particularly among investment analysts.

Analysts tasked with informing the nation on the best investment options
have exercised too much economy with the truth while glossing over many
issues. Any money put on the local money and stock markets, with the
exception of a few counters, is collectively loafing.

While by the end of December 2002 official inflation was running at around
200%, the actual figure could be as much as 300% because officials at the
Central Statistical Office are practising their own truth economy. While our
analysts are gushing over companies increasing their bottom-line by 100%, if
the above figure is correct then any company which has performed by less
than 300% is not profitable.

While many people may not be concerned about the goings-on of stockmarkets,
the destruction of value occurring in the economy ultimately affects
everybody. Pension funds, despite their prescribed assets rules, are putting
people's life savings into these declining assets and calling it investing.

Of course those whose careers involve moving around assets like a master
chess game have to continue to justify their existence. But there is need
for innovation both at regulatory and operational levels if we are not to be
turned into a nation of hustlers.

One way to determine value in a hyperinflationary environment is to look at
the volume of whatever is being produced and the relative cost of
production. The turnover may hide this aspect due to inflationary price
increases.

The cost of debt is also being kept low by "political" interest rates which
have no link to fundamentals. The level of debt would also indicate if a
company can survive real interests rates. Investments that preserve value
have become a rarity on the Zimbabwean market. Fund managers need to become
more innovative within their limited regulatory environment instead of
playing Russian roulette with other people's money.

Two years ago a person could have retired on $10 000 a month and still
maintain a comfortable lifestyle. That existence now requires at least $60
000 and is falling fast. We currently have the most uncompetitive business
environment in the whole of the Sadc and Comesa regions. In a situation
where value is decimated, whole national assets become vulnerable to
"predatory" businesses. These are not involved in any value addition but in
stripping the few national assets left. Evidence abounds that this is
already happening. The economy is declining at a rate of more than 10% a
year. It will take less than 10 years to totally destroy it at that rate.

Mining has the potential to quickly generate foreign currency for this
nation given the difficulty of other options because of the pariah status
the country is enduring. Prices for gold and platinum are giddy yet the
volume of gold being produced has been declining. A simpleton like me would
promote massive digging of bigger holes while ensuring that companies can
bring in whatever they require to process the minerals and get a higher
price for their labour.

Borrowing from the earth to me is better than mortgaging the country to a
benevolent North African dictator who can change his mind anytime. To
continue to argue that we need more tobacco money is to use the same
argument one old lady used to justify selling mbanje and kachasu because she
needed the money to send her children to school. Tobacco is responsible for
many of the world's health problems and there cannot be blessings in this
destructive pursuit.

I agree with what General Vitalis Zvinavashe reportedly said recently, that
the political fortunes of this land could not be left to chance. Equally
important in the investment environment is the need to perform "what-if"
scenarios and weigh them into the investment decisions.

Contrary to the belief that a solution will have to come from the Zanu PF
central committee who occasionally troop to the headquarters to be lectured
on by the emperor, I am not putting my faith in those mortals. Since the
eighties, evidence abounds that the party has always been a one-man outfit
with the exception of the odd decision that the two 80-year-old cheerleaders
in the presidency have been allowed to make.

That the party is run by three near-octogenarians who should be in rocking
chairs telling stories of hares and baboons to grandchildren, points to the
absence of spine that Margaret Dongo alluded to years back. The irony is
that the deteriorating environment affects even the businesses of the Zanu
PF faithfuls that have been allowed to prosper through patronage.

While a political party and people in general can be bullied and controlled,
the economy is a spontaneous animal. The more one tries to bully inflation
downwards, the further it goes up. The more the US dollar is told that it is
only worth $55 the more it inches in reality towards $2 000. The more we
fool ourselves that petrol is only worth $74 the less we will have of the
commodity. The macroeconomic environment cannot be improved through
political insults.

Biblical wisdom teaches the therapeutic effect of the truth. Knowledge of
the truth sets a nation free. The truth, however unpalatable, needs to be
propagated also in the business environment.

Tafirenyika Wekwa Makunike is currently based in Johannesburg
Back to the Top
Back to Index

News24

Obasanjo meets Mugabe, Tsvanigrai
09/02/2003 18:20  - (SA)


Harare - Visiting Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo held separate
meetings overnight on Sunday in Zimbabwe with both President Robert Mugabe
and his rival, Morgan Tsvanigrai.

Few details were available from either meeting.

Obasanjo, along with the leaders of South Africa and Australia, form a
committee charged with deciding how the Commonwealth of Britain and its
former territories should deal with member nation Zimbabwe.

The southern African country is reeling from political chaos, a collapsing
economy and a massive hunger crisis.

After elections in Zimbabwe last year that were widely criticised as
corrupt, Obasanjo and his counterparts decided to suspend Zimbabwe from the
group's committees for a year.

That decision will be reviewed next month.

Tsvanigrai who heads the main opposition party, described his 15 minute
meeting with Obasanjo as courtesy call.

"(It was) just a chat about the way forward," said Tsvangirai.

Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change says it was cheated out of
victory in the most recent parliamentary and presidential elections by
government sponsored rigging and intimidation.

Coverage of Obasanjo's visit in the state press with Mugabe was limited.

"We talked about the welfare of our people, the people of Zimbabwe and the
people of Nigeria," Obasanjo is quoted as saying by the state-run Sunday
Mail.

When Obasanjo meets with President Thabo Mbeki and Australian Prime Minister
John Howard next month to review Zimbabwe's suspension from Commonwealth
committees, there will be increased pressure on them to institute harsh new
measures.

In reaction to Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's increasingly
authoritarian rule, the United States and the European Union imposed "smart
sanctions" on Zimbabwe that deny top government and ruling party officials
visas into those countries and freeze their assets there.

In South Africa last week Obasanjo and Mbeki pledged to continue their route
of quiet diplomacy to resolve the crisis in Zimbabwe.

Obasanjo's visit to Zimbabwe came as controversy swirls over the country's
holding of several Cricket World Cup cricket matches, and as a trial is
underway in which Tsvangirai is accused of treason.

England's cricket team is considering boycotting its scheduled match in
Zimbabwe, citing safety concerns. They argue Mugabe's opponents have
threatened to disrupt the match and that could lead to violence.

The British government has accused Mugabe's regime of human rights
violations.

Track Armor manager of a popular upscale cafe in Harare, said on Sunday he
had received a written ultimatum on the letterhead of Mugabe's ruling
Zanu-PF party ordering him to close the cafe when matches were played in
Zimbabwe, in order to boost game attendance.

Armor said he would deny the order which warned the management of the cafe
and its patrons would be deemed "unpatriotic" if they watched matches on
satellite TV.

"Our cadres will make sure you obey this rule," the letter said, signed by
the office of National Youth Service.

Human rights group say gangs of ruling party militant youths known locally
as the Green Bombers because of their green uniforms, have been behind much
of the intimidation and violence in the country.

Tsvangirai and two fellow opposition officials have pleaded not guilty to
plotting Mugabe's assassination in the trial that began last week.

The prosecution's main witness is Canadian-based consultant Ari Ben Menashe.
He has accused Tsvangirai and two other opposition leaders of hiring him to
help kill President Robert Mugabe ahead of presidential elections last
March.

The independent Sunday Standard reported Ben Menashe was being put up by the
government in a suite normally reserved for visiting royalty and heads of
state at Harare's Sheraton International.

The economy in tatters, Mugabe's government has been unable to import
sufficient food and gasoline to meet national needs. - Sapa-AP

Daily News

      Tsvangirai briefs Obasanjo on crisis

      2/10/2003 6:52:06 AM (GMT +2)


      Staff Reporter

      NIGERIAN President Olusegun Obasanjo in South Africa pledged to have
frank discussions with President Mugabe behind closed doors in his mission
to resolve Zimbabwe's deepening political crisis.

      However, he said he was not going to adopt a confrontational and
hostile attitude.

      Following talks with South African President Thabo Mbeki on Friday,
Obasanjo spoke with Mugabe in Harare on Saturday before meeting MDC leader
Morgan Tsvangirai later the same day.

      While in South Africa, Obasanjo told journalists: "We must help
Zimbabwe out of its predicament and problem and we cannot do that if we
become unduly and
      unnecessarily critical and antagonistic to Zimbabwe.
      "If there are points to be raised in Zimbabwe, like brothers we put
ourselves into a room, we lock the door and we tell ourselves the truth."

      The Nigerian leader and Mbeki are members of the Commonwealth troika
on Zimbabwe, chaired by Australian Prime Minister John Howard.

      The troika suspended Zimbabwe from the Commonwealth councils last
March following a grossly flawed presidential election which the
international community says was stolen by Mugabe.

      The troika is to review the matter when the one-year suspension
expires next month.
      Besides suspension from the Commonwealth, the European Union (EU) also
slapped travel restrictions on 78 government officials, including Mugabe, in
reaction to the disputed poll and human rights abuse in the country.

      Obasanjo held brief discussions with Tsvangirai and Welshman Ncube,
the MDC secretary-general.

      Confirming the meeting at State House, Ncube yesterday said: "There is
no truth in media speculation on the substance of the discussion. What is
true is that the MDC president briefed President Olusegun Obasanjo on the
deteriorating economic, political and social situation in Zimbabwe. Nothing
further was discussed."

      There has been widespread media speculation about the meeting as
having focused on Zimbabwe easing some of its restrictive media laws,
restoring the rule of law and upholding human rights, as a trade-off for the
EU sanctions and suspension from the Commonwealth to be lifted.

      Ncube's cautious response underlines the delicate nature of the
discussion with Obasanjo. It appears he would not want to scuttle the
crucial negotiations at a time when calls for Mugabe to retire are now
coming from his own lieutenants, to save Zimbabwe from the drawn-out crisis.

      Talks between the MDC and the ruling Zanu PF broke down last year amid
counter-accusations from both sides of breaching the conditions under which
the talks were to be held.

      Obasanjo was quoted in the State-controlled Sunday Mail newspaper
yesterday as saying the talks were "fruitful" and that he had discussed with
Mugabe "the welfare of our
      people, the people of Zimbabwe and the people of Nigeria".

      Reuters quoted Zimbabwean government officials as saying Obasanjo had
discussed how he could ease Zimbabwe's deepening crisis but they did not
give further details.

      The Standard newspaper yesterday reported that Obasanjo had asked the
MDC to break the impasse between them and Zanu PF. "Tsvangirai is believed
to have told the Nigerian leader that it was President Robert Mugabe who had
broken off the talks between the two," the paper said.

      On Friday, about 300 MDC youths marched to the Nigerian High
Commission in Harare and handed over a petition to press Obasanjo to
persuade Mugabe to retire.

      Wilberforce Juta, the Nigerian High Commissioner, on the same day
expressed his government's concern about the arrest of opposition Members of
Parliament and Harare Executive Mayor Elias Mudzuri.

      He said: "Elected MPs are leaders. Although they are members of
political parties, once they are elected we look at them as leaders of
communities."

      Juta said Nigeria had communicated to Zimbabwe its displeasure about
the torture of St Mary's MP, Job Sikhala, while in police custody.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Please send any material for publication in the Open Letter Forum to
justice@telco.co.zw with "For Open Letter Forum" in the subject line.

JAG OPEN LETTER FORUM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 1: J.L. Robinson

S. Hawgood Esq.,
CFU,
Marlborough.

My dear Stoff,

Commercial Agriculture has a very fascinating history in this country, and
we are all part of it. Generally speaking it has been based on Title
Deeds, and characters, and goes back just over one hundred years. There
have been books written, like My Life was a Ranch, Sally in Rhodesia, The
Goldbergs of Leigh Ranch, and then the classic that we need to give some
thought to, by Hylda Richards - Next year will be better.

At some stage, the current phase will be written up as well - I mean the
last three years. This has caused me to give our current situation some
more thought. How will I be judged for standing up and questioning the
policies and principles, and motives of about seventeen CFU Council
members? How will the three members, namely C. Wilde Esq., T.G. Conolly
Esq. and E. Gundry Esq. be viewed for wanting a return to the rule of law
and respect for title? How will the other seventeen Council Members be
viewed for supporting the eleven million Ha resettlement programme, at the
expense of about two thousand of their fellow farmers? Logically, their
support of the eleven million Ha resettlement will make them complicit in
the starvation that so many of our people now face.

If the whole process has not been legitimate, could we not find the
displaced farmers now claiming against the seventeen for complicity in the
whole affair? Surely, if our own Council supports its own members' farms
being appropriated, the Council Members are responsible for some of the
losses incurred? The President of the Union has openly supported the
resettlement, and the bulk of the Council insisted that he be re-elected
in November, 2002.

As the Communications man in the Union, please could you clarify this
issue, by asking the duly appointed Legal Adviser, Mr. Ray Passaportis.

                           Yours faithfully,
                                J.L. Robinson.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All letters published on the open Letter Forum are the views and opinions
of the submitters, and do not represent the official viewpoint of Justice
for Agriculture.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justice for Agriculture mailing list
To subscribe/unsubscribe: Please write to jag-list-admin@mango.zw
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Mail and Guardian

Zimbabwe comes in from the cold

      Canberra

      10 February 2003 09:31

South Africa and Nigeria will allow Zimbabwe to be readmitted to the
Commonwealth group of nations when its suspension expires next month,
Australian Prime Minister John Howard said on Monday.

Howard said a decision by South African President Thabo Mbeki and Nigeria's
Olusegun Obasanjo to cancel a meeting with him next month would effectively
see Zimbabwe readmitted to the 54-nation grouping of former British
colonies.

Howard is chairman of a three-nation panel that includes Mbeki and Obasanjo
that was appointed by a summit of Commonwealth leaders in February 2002 to
decide how the group should respond to government-sponsored violence during
Zimbabwe's presidential elections last year.

In March last year the three leaders suspended Zimbabwe from the
Commonwealth for 12 months. They were to meet again next month to see if the
suspension should be extended.

Howard, who is in Washington for talks on Iraq with US President George
Bush, said Mbeki told him in a telephone conversation on Saturday that South
Africa and Nigeria did not want to hold another meeting of the panel.

If the panel does not meet the suspension lapses, Zimbabwe would
automatically be readmitted to the Commonwealth. Howard said he disagreed
with the decision and wanted the suspension to continue until the next
meeting of Commonwealth leaders next year.

"Zimbabwe has not done anything effectively to respond to what it was asked
to do," Howard said in a transcript released on Monday in Australia by his
office.

"If anything, the situation appears to have deteriorated."

The Australian prime minister said that as chairman of the panel he would
write to Commonwealth leaders and recommend the suspension remain in place
until the next Commonwealth summit. - Sapa-AP
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Financial Times

      Cricket board offers new Zimbabwe evidence
      By James Lamont in Johannesburg
      Published: February 10 2003 4:00 | Last Updated: February 10 2003 4:00

      The England and Wales Cricket Board says it has new evidence to
support its claim that a match in Zimbabwe this week poses a security threat
to the England team.


      The ECB was expected to decide over the weekend whether to honour Eng-
land's Cricket World Cup fixture in Harare, the Zimbabwean capital, on
Thursday.

      However, it has appealed to the International Cricket Council to
consider "significant new information" about players' safety in a last-
minute attempt to have the match moved to South Africa.

      "This information has confirmed concerns of the ECB that we have had
regarding safety and security," said Tim Lamb, head of the ECB.

      England's cricketers fear that opting out of the match will damage
their chances of progressing in the championship and incur financial
penalties from cricket's governing body and sponsors.

      The team have come under pressure from the British government to
register a moral protest against the rule of Robert Mugabe.

      Relations between Zimbabwe and the UK have deteriorated sharply over
the past two years. Britain has criticised Mr Mugabe's policy of resettling
landless blacks on white-owned farmland and his crackdown on political
opposition to extending his 23-year rule.

      England had unsuccessfully appealed to the ICC to move the match to
South Africa.

      But disclosure of information in addition to a report on security in
Zimbabwe by Kroll Associates, an investigative company, and death threats
from an unknown Zimbabwean group may tip the balance.

      New Zealand's pull-out from their match in Kenya on security fears had
already dealt a blow to the tournament. Organisers fear that Australia,
which have a match scheduled in Harare, may follow England's lead.

      The consequences of pulling out of a World Cup match are a loss of
points in the championship. A team also face a heavy fine from breaking
their contractual agreement with the ICC and possible legal action by
sponsors for lost air-time.

      South Africa, the championship's main host, has expressed
disappointment that teams are considering spurning Zimbabwe and Kenya, in
the absence of any international boycott.

ICC Cricket World Cup South Africa 2003

Politics banned



Reuters, Harare


Zimbabwe police warned on Saturday that no political protests would be
allowed at World Cup games in the southern African country, saying security
would "be very tight" during the tournament.
Senior Assistant Commissioner Albert Mandizha told journalists at a security
briefing that no political slogans and songs, placards and dress or
"artefacts associated with political parties" would be allowed at match
venues.

"We would not expect cricket players to take their bats and to sing cricket
songs at a political rally, likewise we don't expect people to bring their
politics to the cricket games," said Mandizha.

"Security will be very tight...and we will apply the law to ensure that
people enjoy their cricket in peace."

England and Australia have both expressed concerns about playing their Group
A matches in strife-torn Zimbabwe, and England's players will only decide on
Sunday whether to boycott their February 13 game in Harare.

Champions Australia continue to watch the situation intently, although they
are still preparing to play their February 24 match against Zimbabwe in
Bulawayo.

Half of Zimbabwe's 14 million people face food shortages while main
opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai is currently on trial facing a possible
death sentence on a charge of trying to kill Zimbabwean President Robert
Mugabe.

Planned opposition protests around matches scheduled to be held in Zimbabwe
have fuelled fears for players' and fans' safety.

The World Cup still has to deal with one other boycott threat, with New
Zealand refusing to travel to play Kenya in Nairobi on February 21, again
over security worries.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Business Day

Black farmers' union optimistic about production in Zimbabwe

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agriculture Correspondent

THE National African Farmers Union (Nafu) has come out in support of
Agriculture and Land Affairs Minister Thoko Didiza's optimistic view of
Zimbabwe's land reform programme after they visited the country on a
fact-finding mission.

Their views are in stark contrast to the statements by commercial farming
union, AgriSA, which was also part of the minister's delegation. AgriSA said
last week "irreparable damage" had been done to Zimbabwe's agricultural
production and the land-reform process was used to "secure political
patronage".

Nafu, which represents mainly black emerging farmers, said agricultural
production "was not destroyed" in the country, and that government officials
had assured the SA delegation the "temporary setback" in production would
last for only one season.

Nafu president Peter Rammutla echoed Didiza's comments that newly settled
farmers were experiencing some challenges, such as lack of inputs and
financial support, but the prospects for farming overall was positive.

"We did not see anything drastically wrong there. (The country) is in
transition and people must be given a chance," said Rammutla.

Farms visited on the two-day official tour were mainly in the northeast
region that has received favourable rains and showed a potentially good
maize crop, Rammutla said.

"There is conflict because those who were forced to leave the farms, don't
want to. This stops progress on the land and food security suffers, but only
for a while. This should only be temporary (The Zimbabwean government) said
there would not be years of starvation," he said.

Didiza also painted a positive picture of Zimbabwe's agricultural sector
after her short visit to the country as part of a commission to promote
dialogue between the two governments.

She said the Zimbabwean government had admitted some "administrative errors"
in the land reform programme, but prospects for the agricultural sector
looked promising.

AgriSA remained behind in Zimbabwe after the official tour to have meetings
with farming unions and the official opposition party Movement for
Democratic Change.

Contrary to government estimates that the maize crop could reach 1,1-million
tons, AgriSA was told by the unions that commercial maize production was
expected at a low of 75000 tons, compared with a long-term average of 600000
tons.

Rammutla said the delegation had not seen farms in other areas, such as
Matabeleland, where drier conditions had reduced production.

Daily News

      Macheke farmer excels

      2/10/2003 6:54:08 AM (GMT +2)


      By Takaitei Bote Farming Editor

      FOR Macheke commercial farmer Golden Jiti, 47, all is well despite
problems currently besieging the agriculture sector.

      Raised by small-scale farmer parents in Tandi in Rusape, Jiti has
known no other occupation all his life other than farming.

      He is one of the few indigenous commercial farmers whose farming
venture is thriving in an uncertain environment.

      Many commercial farmers, especially those resettled recently, failed
to plant in the past two years because of lack of equipment and inputs,
while farmers resettled prior to the current land reform programme are
facing operational problems due to poor funding.
      Commercial banks have been reluctant to fund farmers because of the
uncertainties caused by the land reform programme.

      Jiti said: "For me farming has only begun paying now after going
through trying times since I bought my farm in 1996. When I began farming,
banks were reluctant to release money as I was new in the business."

      In the 1990s, indigenous commercial farmers like Jiti were regarded as
risky loan recipients because some farmers had failed to pay back loans from
the then Agricultural Finance Corporation.

      Some indigenous farmers then were accused of buying luxury vehicles
when they did not have tractors. They reportedly purchased these vehicles
with money borrowed from the banks.

      "Along the way I struck a deal with one bank, which has to date
financed my operations, but problems remained because interest rates of over
60 percent before 2000 were very prohibitive," he said.

      Interest rates for the farming sector have since been reduced to
between 15 and 40 percent.

      Jiti said he started by specialising in tobacco when he moved on his
Yardford Farm after having worked as a farm manager for 20 years.

      "While tobacco is my main crop, I realised prices are not very good
sometimes. In tobacco farming, I wait for earnings once in a year. I have
since diversified to horticultural crops which I plant throughout the year
and my earnings are spread all year round," he said.

      Most of his horticultural crops are for export.
      He has irrigation facilities that were installed in 1998 and this has
enabled him to grow crops throughout the year.

      Jiti, who has been nominated the Zimbabwe Tobacco Growers' Association
Mashonaland East Province Tobacco Grower of the Year (2003), also grows
cabbages, peas, tomatoes, potatoes and baby corn.

      He said during a field day on his farm last Friday: "I currently have
45 hectares of baby corn and by end of February I will have about 55ha of
baby corn on the ground."

      "My baby corn programme starts in July until February. We plant a
hectare of baby corn every week."

      Jiti also plants his pea crop every week from January to August. By
the end of the pea season, he would have planted 24 ha of peas.

      "Earnings for peas begin in December when we harvest the first
hectare, while baby corn is reaped from November, December, January,
February March, April and May. All these months I am guaranteed of earnings
as opposed to waiting for one crop to pay you once a year and this is where
my secret to success is," he said.

      Jiti said he planted 30 000 cabbage plants in November and is already
harvesting them. He sells the cabbages on the local market at $150 a head.

      He said this year he would earn about $1 million a hectare from his
pea crop and about $900 000 from the baby corn.

      "What a farmer should bear in mind is that you do not just plant crops
on a large piece of land before finding a market. One should have a
guaranteed market. In my case, all my crops are sold after harvest," Jiti
said.

      He has 105 permanent workers and hires about about 50 seasonal workers
as and when required.

      Jiti graduated with a diploma in agriculture after having studied at
Chibero Agricultural College from 1973 to 1976.

      From college he became a farm manager on Ruya Farm in Mvurwi where he
worked for 20 years. He started his farming business soon after leaving Ruya
Farm owned by Alexander Bisset.

      "I told myself I did not want to work for someone all my life and
decided to start my own business because I knew how to do it anyway," Jiti
said.

      Jiti is the vice-president of the Indigenous Commercial Farmers'
Union. He is married to Maivepi and they have five children
Back to the Top
Back to Index

It's just not cricket

Elisabeth Mahoney
Monday February 10, 2003
The Guardian

"It's such a shame," Julian Worricker mused on his eponymous show yesterday
(5 Live) "that we can't just talk about the cricket." What he meant, opening
his programme just two hours before the first game of the World Cup in South
Africa, was that the pleasures of the game - leather on willow on a
sun-baked village green - have been lost in a tangle of questions about
politics, ethics and personal safety.
What the Archive Hour - Rebel Hell (Radio 4) made clear is that there's
rarely just "the cricket". Focusing on the English rebel tour to South
Africa in 1982, the audio clips showed the game being tugged at in
remarkably similar ways to now, though with a rather different moral agenda:
20 years ago, the players were under pressure not to play but did, and now,
under pressure to go ahead with their match in Zimbabwe, it looks as if they
might not.

Rebel players depressingly insisted on having no regrets. Some tried to
argue that they were moved to play by motives other than the obvious
financial one - Geoffrey Boycott earned 10 times his annual salary for the
short tour - but most were at least honest that the money, rather than the
morals, was uppermost in their minds.

Presented by Jonathon Agnew, the programme contextualised what's happening
in the game now, and didn't shy away from tricky ironies. The president of
the MCC in 1982, for example, was also chairman of Barclays Bank. Trade
continued, but only sport was singled out to take a stand. Sound familiar?

Agnew also turned up on Worricker's show, now in its second week. Aiming to
blend broadsheet quality analysis with red top "sauce" - because, Worricker
suggested, "most of us like both" - it's a lively news-driven programme with
a good mix of fluff (last week's show included a guide to blagging an
upgrade at airport check-ins) and weightier material.

It's also home, in its first hour, to an extended, and more informal version
of the 5 Live Report, and this works very well. Last week, the use of Viagra
as a recreational drug was under the spotlight, and yesterday, despite
technical problems across the miles (we were supposed to hear an aid worker
talking about the spread of Aids in Malawi and instead went to a fruity
jingle saying "The Premiership"), Rajesh Mirchandani gave an affecting live
report from the country.

Street children there have a word for their plight - it translates as "I'm
already dead" - and they sounded it. A four-year old boy, with a tiny squeak
of a voice, talked about going without food for ten days, and being robbed
of the money he has begged for. For the whole time he spoke, everyone forgot
about the cricket.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily Telegraph

Mugabe still not out
(Filed: 10/02/2003)


You will often hear it said that sport and politics should be kept apart.
Like many slogans, this sounds impressive enough until you test the theory.

Few would argue that we should boycott every regime with which we disagree:
even during the height of the Cold War, Western sportsmen regularly took on
competitors from the Soviet bloc. But Robert Mugabe's actions bracket him
with Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong-il as a man so murderous that the correct
response to his regime is quarantine.

In any case, the notion that sport and politics do not mix ought to cut both
ways. There is a reason why Mr Mugabe is so keen on hosting part of the
cricket world cup: it will allow him to act as though Zimbabwe is a country
like any other. It is not; it is a tyranny in which dissent is violently
repressed, and in which part of the population is being deliberately
starved.

The International Cricket Council sought no guarantees about the
exploitation of the tournament for propaganda purposes - neither on the role
of Mr Mugabe at matches, nor on the freedom of journalists to operate in
Zimbabwe during the tournament. In other words, allowing the games to go
ahead would mix sport and politics.

Ideally, of course, the ICC should have moved the fixture to South Africa.
In practice, however, international bureaucracies can almost always be
relied on to do the wrong thing. In the face of ICC hopelessness, the
responsibility has been flung back to this country - although not to the
Government (for ministers to decide the issue really would be mixing sport
and politics, in a way which any tinpot dictator would salute).

No, harsh as it may seem, the decision falls to our own cricketing
authorities. It will not do to claim that political judgments can only be
made by politicians. Cricketers are also human beings capable of making
moral choices. In a case as clear-cut as Zimbabwe, the only correct course
of action is to refuse to go.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

Letters

      Inactivity can only prolong suffering

      2/10/2003 7:00:02 AM (GMT +2)



      I am very disappointed that a spirit of resigned martyrdom has set in
and, as has become the norm, Zimbabweans are immersed in the whirlpool of
this madness.

      It really amazes me that we continue to watch the current chaos
unfolding while doing nothing to avert our demise.

      It is this inactivity that has prolonged our suffering and is unlikely
to retrieve us from edge of the precipice we are at.

      Everyone wants the situation to change. However, not many of us are
prepared take part in the decisive walk to freedom.

      Most of us would rather die in the various queues that have
characterised this country ever since the controversial land reform
programme started. It is such a pity that the citizens of this country,
would let power be usurped by a few geriatrics and not seize it for the good
of the nation.Peaceful common action, would, in my mind, halt the madness
engulfing us.

      Why would anyone feel that someone has to lead them to action when
each one of us is suffering individually?

      I thus end by posing this question to you: What are you doing to save
your country from further collapse?

      L Saungweme
      Dangamvura
      Mutare

Daily News

Letters

      Travel ban on Mugabe should be enforced

      2/10/2003 6:58:53 AM (GMT +2)



      The prevailing political and economic cataclysms of Zimbabwe demand
high priority action from the international community.

      Peace and security in the country are no longer under mere threat, but
breached in real terms, with dire implications internally and regionally, if
the atrocious human rights violations in the country are permitted to
persist or escalate.

      The politically motivated violence and blatant contempt for justice,
law and order is the direct result of President Mugabe's untenable
governance policies.

      There can be nothing more horrifying than Mugabe's political insanity
in full sail, save perhaps for his government's dastardly financial and
social management techniques.

      No less horrific is the recent revelation that the Zimbabwe government
is abhorrent to
      its own citizens, in its resolute determination to swiftly destroy its
own tormented kind en masse, for the benefit of a handful of ungrateful and
avaricious individuals.

      Zimbabwe's crisis has reached an explosive point, with determined
external
      intervention now intrinsic to resolutely combating poverty,
starvation, violent land reform, political violence, extensive human rights
violations underscored by uncontrolled torture and the overall tyranny being
deliberately perpetrated by Mugabe's government.

      Western and European countries and African nations claiming adherence
to sane democracy and supposed alignment with the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, are thus obligated to engage their diplomatic offices, trade
links and other missions, as an avenue for stating disapproval of Mugabe's
rampant and all-embracing abuse of innocent Zimbabweans.

      It is, furthermore, a means of bringing tangible pressure on Mugabe's
regime to immediately restore justice, law and order and unequivocal
abidance by the rule of law.
      If timeous demands by the international community meet with Mugabe's
continued disregard within a specified time frame, evocative and
consequential calls must be lodged for his immediate resignation.


      To accentuate the Zimbabwean dilemma, we are now informed by the UK
Guardian, of Ms Claire Short reporting that British Prime Minister, Tony
Blair and his government, have agreed with France to allow Mugabe to evade
the European Union (EU) travel ban and attend a Franco-African Summit in
Paris in February 2003, in a trade-off that France would not oppose the
renewal of EU sanctions at the next sitting of the General Council.

      This development is not only outrageous and objectionable, but also
wholly dishonourable in its betrayal of nearly eight million comprehensively
disadvantaged and starving Zimbabweans.

      Any responsible governments which have contributing to smart sanctions
on
      Mugabe and his government are now verging on partnering mechanisms.
They are supporting further human rights violations, economic destruction
and the desecration of
      social order in Zimbabwe, by taking a non-retaliatory position on the
emerging laxness
      of the current smart sanctions against Mugabe, enabling him to attend
the Franco-African Summit.

      This position also renders the people of any country participating in
smart sanctions fundamentally supportive of mass starvation, torture and
oppression, through their
      respective governments' inactivity in ensuring Mugabe is banned from
attending the summit.

      The international community's moral integrity cannot permit a
continuation of
      gross human rights violations, mass starvation and the mockery of
democracy that permits trading with human lives to uphold Mugabe's
treacherously brutal rule.

      Unequivocally therefore, this is a plea on behalf of the millions of
innocent and disadvantaged, starving Zimbabweans, to the international
community to urgently initiate processes that will restore peace, security,
social and economic stability in Zimbabwe, beginning with the enforcement of
the EU ban to prevent Mugabe attending the Franco-African Summit in Paris in
February 2003.

      International Observer
      South Africa


Daily News

Letters

      JAG should divorce itself from CFU

      2/10/2003 7:01:08 AM (GMT +2)



      AS an outsider and non-farmer, please forgive me if I intrude in the
Justice for Agriculture (JAG) open letter forum. I am, however, intensely
concerned with the future of our country.

      First, I was very surprised at the re-election of the "old" executive
after all the criticism that had been levelled at their policy of
negotiation.

      But I was not at the meeting, and therefore can't comment further. My
only connection with farming has been as a councillor in a farming area, but
I think the underlying principles involved are universal.

      To me it is sad to see JAG squabbling with the Commercial Farmers'
Union (CFU)
      because this distracts from the real problem, which is Zimbabwe
government policy. Perhaps by being further away, I can tell the wood from
the trees a little better?

      There will always be two ways of reacting to a threat: to oppose the
threat with all one's might or to do a deal with those who pose a threat.

      The latter is, of course, considered the "smart" thing to do. A
problem is that you have to rely on the other side sticking to their side of
the deal!

      The question of ethics and morality tend to clash with doing the
"smart" thing, religious considerations aside.

      I believe that we ignore ethics and morality at our peril, because
that's a recipe for anarchy.

      Farmers are being spun around until they are dizzy, pushed this way
and that like puppets, as some are told they are "allowed" to carry on
farming while most recently another 31 farmers' properties were listed for
"seizure." I think this strategy is deliberate.

      I also think that allowing some to farm (how arrogant!) near the end
of the rainy season has nothing at all to do with the government seeing the
light, the error of their ways or an attempt to stave off starvation.
Instead I believe it has everything to do with trying to escape from the
re-imposition of targeted sanctions by the EU, everything to do with
suspension from the Commonwealth and everything to do with Mbeki's statement
      of "positive moves" from the Zimbabwe government.

      Please don't forget South Africa's recent plea to let bygones be
bygones as the land reform was now completed.

      Once again I apologise if I appear to butt in, but please at least
consider the government's most likely actions if they are totally
unconcerned about famine and are playing to the political gallery in
conjunction with South Africa and Nigeria.

      It may also be worth consideration for JAG to divorce itself entirely
from the CFU as the approach and methods of both parties appear to be
mutually exclusive.

      Charles Frizell
      Kent

Daily News

Letters

      Some killers have an unwavering belief in their infallibility

      2/10/2003 7:02:04 AM (GMT +2)



      Too often killers manage to rise to the top, but to do so they need a
polluted environment. Corruption of the political, corporate, capital or
social systems can create the conditions in which killers can thrive. Once
in power they are ruthless and difficult to remove.

      Often killers believe they are working for a greater social good, and
in many cases their initial motivation and actions appear to bear this out.

      Romania's Nicolae Ceaucescu began his political career fighting
Fascists during the Second World War and in the initial years of his
dictatorship appeared to be steering his country to independence and
prosperity. Indonesia's Mohamed Suharto was successful in holding together
his highly diverse and fractious nation at a particularly vulnerable time in
its history. Even Adolf Hitler's regime initially brought stability to a
society in danger of complete collapse.

      But killers always cloud their achievements with the toll of their
excesses.
      Other killers can only be described as extremely bad self-serving,
ignorant and corrupt.

      Uganda's Idi Amin did nothing for his country except inflict terror
and destruction. Efraín Ríos Montt, Guatemala's Bible-bashing despot, was
just another in that country's long line of murderous presidents.

      Burma's Ne Win and his cohorts have turned a country full of promise
into one of the world's most downtrodden and poor nations.

      A common feature of all the killers described here is their unwavering
belief in the
      rightness of their acts, if not the complete righteousness of those
acts. None of those who are now deceased went to their graves with any sense
of guilt or regret, and it is unlikely that any of those still living will.
World-class killers are always loaded with hubris, an overweening belief in
their own infallibility. They are paternalistic and proud.

      It is no coincidence that they are all men, just as it is no
coincidence that they scorn democracy.

      The extent to which killers are products or reflections of their
societies should also not be overlooked.

      Just as heroes are icons of movements for social justice, killers are
a distillation of the darkness on the outskirts of society that at times of
stress seeps to the core.

      Hitler was a past master at playing on the underlying anti-Semitism
that was endemic in Germany between the world wars. Serbia's Slobodan
Milosevic never hesitated to exploit the historic distrust between the
populations of Croats, Serbs, Muslims and Christians in Yugoslavia.

      Japan's Prince Yasuhiko Asaka was a symbol of the havoc that can be
wrought when imperialism and militarism converge.

      Mwenzi Wavanhu
      Harare
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

      Food shortages set to continue as rains fail

      2/10/2003 6:54:36 AM (GMT +2)


      By Takaitei Bote Farming Editor

      THE rainfall situation has deteriorated with much of the country now
below the expected accumulated rainfall since the beginning of last October
to date, the Department of Meteorological Services has said.

      Food shortages are expected to continue after April this year because
crops have been affected by the poor rains.

      More than seven million people already face starvation countrywide.
      The department said in its weekly report for 5 February 2002 that the
whole of the country had experienced poor rains since last year with
Beitbridge and Gweru having received less than 50 percent of the expected
rainfall.

      However, Gokwe and Kadoma have received above 90 percent of the
expected rainfall so far and they have recorded the highest rainfall
countrywide.

      The department said in its 10-day weather outlook running from 6 to 15
February that wet conditions were anticipated throughout the whole period in
Mazowe, Makonde, Harare, North of Eastern Highlands and North of the
Midlands. However, dry conditions were expected in the rest of the country
in the period under review.

      The department warned farmers not to apply fertilisers during this
period if they have no irrigation facilities.

      The department said: "Application of fertilisers during this period is
not advisable for rain-fed agriculture from a meteorological perspective.

      "If it is carried out, it must be accompanied by irrigation. This is
mainly because the atmosphere could be fairly dry from the middle of
February until towards the end of the month."
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

      Economists dismiss industry survival plan

      2/10/2003 6:53:30 AM (GMT +2)


      By Chris Mhike Business Reporter

      THE much-talked-about industrial survival plan that was presented to
the government by business late last year has come under fire by economists
and political commentators, who believe that the plan displays a superficial
understanding of the prevailing economic crisis.

      The proposed joint position paper, marked "strictly confidential", and
entitled Government and Business Partnership on Key Economic Issues, has
been leaked. Its contents are now, since last week, available unofficially
in business circles.

      The document was presented to government officials last December by
the Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries (CZI) president, Antony Mandiwanza.

      The CZI president met Vice-President Muzenda at the time, to discuss
the rescue plan.
      The proposed plan starts off with a desire by the business leaders to
have "regular meetings between business and His Excellency the President".

      In essence, the plan focuses on four key components of the economy,
namely the exchange rate, price controls, the export sector, and the retail
price of fuel.

      Under the proposed plan, an exchange rate of $800 to the American
dollar would be introduced for exporters while miners would enjoy a rate of
$1 350. Critical imports would still be procured on the 50 percent system at
$55 to the greenback scale.

      A "joint business/government price management programme" not price
freeze was proposed for the regulation of prices. Price movements would be
managed by a Fair Trade and Regulatory Authority.

      The business leaders proposed a two-tier fuel pricing strategy. The
first supply regime would entail "subsidised, strategic allocation to
productive and transport sectors through
      indigenous oil distributors".

      Government would finance the subsidy.
      The second dimension of the strategy would "allow multinational oil
companies to import and charge commercial/ market rates" on non-public
motorists.

      Tapiwa Mashakada, the MDC shadow Minister of Finance said the document
was flawed from the onset, in calling for meeting with "His Excellency the
President", a position that could be interpreted as an endorsement of
President Mugabe's claim that "nobody could have managed the economy better
than I have".

      Mashakada said: "This is business populism at its worst. There is no
such thing as a free lunch. Economies are complex systems and there are
rules which cannot be broken indefinitely."

      The rules referred to included subsidies and the maintenance of
multiple exchange rates.
      On fuel, Mashakada said: "Subsidies have to be paid for via increasing
the budget deficit and raising the borrowing requirement.

      After all there are serious practical problems to the two-tier system.
How does one distinguish fuel for productive purposes from that for the
non-productive category, at the same filling station?"

      He said what the nation needed was a comprehensive macro-economic
stabilisation and recovery programme that would "properly" co-ordinate
fiscal and monetary policy.
      A Harare economist said the document had numerous hazy areas that
presented real implementation problems.

      "The multiple-exchange rate system for instance, is still far from the
ideal of having a single national exchange pattern. We should, however,
concede the fact that we are in a deep economic jungle and some of the
solutions reflected in that document had to be transitory in nature," said
the economist.

      The most positive aspect of the joint position was the proposal for
the devaluation of the dollar.

      Another economist said as long as the present government remained in
power, economic woes would continue to prevail.

      He said: "It has been said before and we say it again now that the
validity of the Joint
      Position Paper contents is totally irrelevant if the proposals are
before the present
      government.

      "The government has failed for 23 years now, to administer healthy
economic policies. It would be foolhardy of business to think that anything
positive could be done now".

      Efforts are still under way to establish government's reaction so far
to the business leaders' proposals. The furthest it seems to have gone is to
concede that there are pricing disparities in the fuel industry, hence the
need for increases.

Daily News

Leader Page

      Poor Zimbabweans, when is the time?

      2/10/2003 6:51:14 AM (GMT +2)


      By Ngoni Tashayawedu

      It pains me very much when I think of how naturally beautiful our
country is. Its splendour doesn't tally at all with the chaos, lawlessness
and misrule prevalent in our country. This is all because of one old man who
believes he is the owner of this country which he claims is, "My Zimbabwe".

      That old man has the courage to castigate the British Prime Minister,
Tony Blair and yet no guts to face the more than six million starving
people, apologise and boldly announce: "For the betterment of the country, I
'm stepping down to make way for new blood."

      I put it to you, my fellow Zimbabwean citizens that the old man has
failed, a fact undoubtedly acknowledged by everyone, including children of
pre-school-going age. But we can't go on whispering in the dark: "Mugabe has
destroyed our country". What good does that to do us? We have surely been
taken for a ride.

      To be honest, what is happening in this country is what is called jema
newadya (shedding crocodile tears) in Shona. Poverty has become part of our
daily life. The gap between the rich and the poor is just too wide. The
middle class no longer exists you're either feasting or starving.

      Yes, some people believe the solution is to flee the country but
remember the cost of reaching what are believed to be greener pastures is at
least Z$2 million. Now how many people are earning an annual salary
amounting to Z$2 million? Only a few, including
      Mugabe himself, his cronies and sycophants. To those who can afford
the cost of leaving our once beloved country, blessed are you.

      What is the way forward for the majority who cannot afford the cost of
fleeing the country? Should we starve to death?

      The pain inflicted on us from all corners, sides and angles is now
just more than enough. Going back to the bush is not the best of solutions,
my friends. Let's leave that as the last resort. I'm saying this because of
two main reasons:
      It's too long a way to oust Mugabe from power. Since it is said "to be
a warrior you must train", we won't be patient enough to fight from Beira
till we reach State House. So a fast-track method will have to do.

      It will involve even more than the expected bloodshed. This option is
different from the
      Second Chimurenga which involved whites fighting against blacks; this
time it will be blacks versus blacks (Mugabe vs Zimbabweans).

      It will be extremely difficult to make a distinction between a
colleague and an enemy.
      I think I have a solution. We cannot expect to be led in the struggle
by somebody from the posh northern suburbs. No!

      Do you know what happened just last year in Madagascar the rivalry
between Ravalomanama and Ratsitaka?

      There was a mass protest and sure enough, blood was shed, but the
bloodshed led to the
      deserving man ruling the country.

      Why can't blood be spilt all the way to State House here in Zimbabwe
so that the deserving Morgan Tsvangirai can rule the country?

      At the moment we are queuing for bread when we know it's still in the
oven. If we relax, the time will come for us to queue for bread when the
wheat is still green in the fields.

      How can an honourable country like Zimbabwe become the world's
laughing stock in such a short time? Sure enough vakafa havana chavakaona
(the dead never experienced
      anything).

      The riot police and army who beat and terrorise us also have parents
and relatives who are starving should remember that. There are no exclusive
branches OK, TM or Edgars in either Morris Depot or One Commando Barracks.

      Let's set a date, rise in our millions, march towards State House,
face the riot police and army as we protest against the entire Mugabe
government.

      Sometimes it is necessary to express anger through action. What's more
honourable to die a hero fighting for freedom or sitting around and starving
to death?

      Poor Zimbabweans, our fear will get us nowhere. It will only yield
poverty and yet more suffering. I aim to be among the protesters on that
day.

      The government fast-tracked the disastrous so-called land reform
programme so why can't we fast-track the ousting of Mugabe from power?

      We have no more time. Let's make it a "Give me life or give me death"
situation.
      Tsvangirai and Lovemore Madhuku should lead the way.

      I salute the two gentlemen for making efforts to lead us to the
elusive promised land.

From The Sunday Independent (SA), 9 February

Waiting in a food queue for three months

By Paul Olivier

Cross Roads - Bambani Ndlovo (not her real name) has been waiting in a food queue for three months, eating mopani worms and sharing scraps of food with her compatriots to stay alive. She is one of thousands of Matabeles who has been waiting for a consignment of mealie meal from the international food agency, World Vision, since November last year. Here at Cross Roads in the Mangwe district east of Bulawayo, the only maize mill belongs to Justice Malaba, a judge and staunch Zanu PF supporter, says Mangwe Edward Mkhosi, an Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) MP. The men in Malaba's employ have been accused of selling 5kg bags of mealie meal to young girls in the queue at a reduced price in return for sex - in effect, statutory rape. The food queue snakes across the barren open ground in sweltering heat for more than a kilometre. On Sunday everything is orderly. The hungry people sit in the little shade the few trees can provide, but last month four people died in a stampede when a few bags of mealie meal arrived on a private truck.

"We have been in this queue for three months but nothing comes," Bambani tells me through an interpreter. "We are being troubled by war veterans, government agents and the Green Bombers [Zanu-PF Youth Brigade] who force us to chant Zanu PF slogans and produce Zanu PF party cards. "We live 30km away but cannot leave and come back because then we have to join the queue from the back again. Is it worth it that our daughters get raped for a bucket of mealie meal?" Bambani asks. According to Michael Mary Roman, a Catholic sister at the nearby Brunnapeg mission hospital, people have become so hungry that they lose control when they see food. "The starvation is real and people will start dying of hunger soon. "There has been no food delivered for three months and the people eat mopani worms and grind motopi roots for porridge to survive. The worms, their only source of protein, are fast running out and the situation in Makorokoro on the Botswana border is even worse because it is further away from the normal food distribution points. Every one in two here in this community of 38 000 is HIV/Aids-infected. Without the necessary nourishment, deaths have become a daily occurrence," Sister Roman tells me later over a simple lunch of wheat porridge and sour milk at the mission hospital.

Figures show that the average life expectancy of Zimbabweans has declined from 59 years old in 1990 to 37 years old today as a result of HIV/Aids, poverty and inadequate social services. According to figures released by the MDC, only 9 percent of the population is employed, a third of girls of schoolgoing age attend school and more than half of the population of 11,5 million faces starvation. The MDC and aid workers say President Robert Mugabe is "deliberately starving millions of Matabeles for voting against Zanu PF" in a "new wave of genocide". They say the government's food aid programme has been highly politicised and that only highly placed Zanu PF officials have access to scarce food commodities, which they buy at state-controlled rates and sell at exorbitant prices. During the food crisis in 1983 and 1985, Mugabe's government also used food as a weapon against Matabeleland, which resisted his autocratic rule, resulting in starvation and death. That was before he unleashed the notorious Korean-trained Fifth Brigade to massacre about 20 000 people in Matabeleland. Now his government prevents the MDC from importing its own food to feed its people.

In one documented case, 130 000 tons of maize the MDC bought from Free State farmers in South Africa was impounded at Beitbridge and lies rotting in a customs warehouse. "Zanu PF's food programme has three facets," says Eddie Cross, the MDC economics spokesperson. "The first is to withhold food from the Matabele to punish them for voting against Zanu PF. The second is to provide finance for Zanu PF structures. The third is to reward Zanu PF supporters for remaining loyal to the party. The way they are deliberately starving the Matabele, and in fact all who do not support Zanu PF, is tantamount to genocide," Cross says. According to Mkhosi the government's food distribution programme stipulates that all occupants of a homestead in the villages are to be registered as a single entity. "But Zanu-PF officials and chiefs that support the party are allowed to register their homesteads as well as its occupants, thereby receiving double rations of food. "Kembo Mohadi, our home affairs minister, whose daughter attends school in Australia, is buying maize at Z$26/kg and reselling it to the hungry at Z$90/kg. In another case of Zanu-PF profiteering, Obed Mpofu, the Matabeleland North governor, owns a major maize-milling and selling operation and pockets the profits," Mkhosi says.

Deep in the Manjolo tribal trust land, at Kanywasulwe village, about 20km south of Lake Kariba, Joseph Mabiza (not his real name) tells of his struggle for survival against the drought, failing crops, wild animals and Zanu PF intimidators. "Our crops are failing because of the heat, and the rain stays away. "We have big problems with Zanu PF because we support the opposition. Green Bombers come into our villages and pillage and beat us. They beat us with sticks, prevent us from going to the food queues to buy mealie meal and force us to buy Zanu PF party cards. "We also have problems with the animals and the little we can salvage from our crops is destroyed by buffalo and elephant. The lions roam free here and catch our livestock. Several people have also become prey," Mbizi says. At the Mphisa in the Matobo district in Matabeleland South, where people have been queuing for food for weeks, people say they are being forced to pay bribes to Green Bombers and Central Intelligence Organisation agents to be allowed to buy food and fuel. Those who refuse are arrested on fabricated charges and could spend weeks in jail.

According to Lovemore Moyo, the Matobo MDC MP, only four organisations - the Grain Marketing Board, the World Food Programme, the Red Cross Society and the Catholic Development Campaign - are licensed by the government to import food into Zimbabwe. "The Grain Marketing Board is a politicised government-controlled body and is staffed with war vets and Zanu PF officials. Areas where the MDC is in control are being ignored and the people receive no food. The Food for Work Programme is no better and is also highly politicised, giving preference to those supporting Zanu PF. In many cases MDC supporters don't get paid although they have completed the work." Moyo said that although most of the international food aid organisations experience "chronic shortages and would never be able to adequately feed the starving masses", they remain neutral in the registration of people and the distribution of food.

Back to the Top
Back to Index