The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Daily News

      Bulawayo councillor starts feeding scheme

      2/12/2003 7:10:34 AM (GMT +2)


      From Our Correspondent in Bulawayo

      A Bulawayo councillor, Stars Mathe of Cowdray, is running a
supplementary feeding scheme for children, breastfeeding mothers and the
terminally ill in her ward to assist families struggling to cope with
increasing poverty and hunger.

      The programme has been running for the past three months.
      The beneficiaries are given soya porridge on Wednesdays, Fridays,
Saturdays and Sundays.

      More than 4 000 children in the suburb are benefiting from the
programme.
      The wards have been sub-divided into 17 sections, with an average of
250 children for each section.

      Mathe said: "When I started this programme, it was only meant for
orphans, but I have had to extend it to include children under the age of 10
because of rising levels of poverty. Now the demand is so high that I'm
failing to cope."

      She said she would have wanted to run the feeding programme daily, but
could not do so because of inadequate supplies.

      "Soya porridge has proven to be very popular with the children, and it
is very nutritious and filling. If they eat it in the afternoon, it can
sustain them until the evening," said Mathe.

      "On days when there is no feeding, some children do not eat anything.
I would be most happy if more donors would assist with food supplies."
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Fuel Communiqué

We would like to inform all members of the public that the following
Service stations will serve fuel tomorrow morning 13th February 2003 from
0700h.
The Exor Service Station on Seventh and Samora Machel Ave.
The Mobil Service Station on Samora Machel and Fifth street.
The B.P. Service station on the corner of 4th and Samora Machel
The Engen on 4th street near Meikles Hotel.
Peacock Service Station.
Montague Service Station.
Caltex Service Station On Robert Mugabe near Rotten Row.

We urge as many people to try and get into at least one of the queues to
make sure that it all goes as planned. We need your support and pass the
word around by any and all means possible.
Prepare for a four-hour delay and make sure you have fuel to get back if
they do not serve you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justice for Agriculture mailing list
To subscribe/unsubscribe: Please write to jag-list-admin@mango.zw
Back to the Top
Back to Index

FinGaz

      Questions? Mibvunzo? Imibuzo?

      Masipula Sithole
      2/13/03 1:49:31 AM (GMT +2)

      THIS contribution is about questions. I propose to ask questions, many
and a lot of questions in this essay.

      I believe it is time we as fellow citizens stopped and asked each
other some pointed questions. We may not always come up with the same answer
or is that desirable.

      But we should ask of ourselves and of each other these and similar
questions from time to time. I know some of you are doing this and have been
doing it for quite some time now.

      Are you happier today than you were many years ago? If many years ago
is a long time, are you happier today than you were, say, three years ago?

      If three years is a long time, are you happier today than you were a
year ago, let's say before the controversial March 2002 presidential
election? If that is still a long time, are you happier today than you were
yesterday?

      Indeed, with the way things are managed today (notice I did not say
"mismanaged"!) do you think you will be happier tomorrow than you are today?
If tomorrow is too early, do you think you will be happier next year - in 12
months; in three years; in six or 10 years from now if things continue being
managed (notice again I did not say "mismanaged"!) the same way they are
being managed (notice yet again I did not say 'mismanaged'!) today?

      Similarly, do you feel freer today than you felt three years before?
Do you feel more secure today than you felt three years ago? Do you think
you will feel more free and secure later this year than you are today, or
just about the same?

      Some have said it's unfair to expect the "war Cabinet" to have
delivered only six months since the Simba Makoni "peace Cabinet" was
dismissed. Others have said this "war Cabinet" has, in fact, dominated the
running of public affairs since the "miracle Cabinet" appointed soon after
the 2000 parliamentary elections three years ago.

      Yet many more say all the cabinets appointed since the 1990s have been
"war cabinets" without winning a single war. What do you say to this
assessment? Is the "war Cabinet" winning the war?

      Some say the reason why the "war Cabinet" is failing to win whatever
war it is fighting is that it is not clear who or what its enemy is, and is
running out of bullets shooting all over the place for the excitement the
noise from a gun makes. Others say the comrades know who or what they are
fighting and they will win sooner or later.

      What is your take on this? Do you think the "war Cabinet" has a clear
vision of the enemy and what it is they are doing, or is it just muddling
through, shooting in the dark hoping to hit a kudu?

      Some say the problem lies with the General and not with the "war
Cabinet". This is to say the General assigns his "war Cabinet" impossible
tasks, in this case unwinnable battles, let alone wars.

      For instance, the war against the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
and the World Bank. No country has picked a fight with these Bretton Woods
institutions and won. Yet we expected Makoni and Nkosana Moyo to win. What
is your view on this?

      Is the General out of focus or is it his "war Cabinet"? Or both are
out of focus? Or, indeed, is it us civilians who are out of focus?

      In other words, could it be that the civilians are in error and the
generals and the "war Cabinet" are not? They are, after all, experts in
target identification and we are not, being underlings such as we are.

      By the way I have a few friends working at both the Fund and the Bank
in Washington. Two of them have taken me for lunch on separate occasions. On
both occasions, each of them has asked me the same question,
ndakangozvinyararira zvangu, mina ngizithulele, as if my presence provoked
the question:

      "By the way, when are you coming to us for money?"

      I replied on the two different occasions by articulating national
policy:

      "No, never; we will never, ever! You keep your money, we will keep our
sovereignty!" They each smiled, except the World Bank chap who said, rather
emphatically: "We will see you when you come."

      Notice he said "when you come" not "when you should decide to come"!

      I repeated: "Never, ever!"

      To which he retorted: "The Bank has heard that many times before and
they came. You will be the first ones not to come."

      Do you believe Zimbabwe can solve its economic problems without
assistance from the World Bank and/or the IMF?

      In your view, is President Robert Mugabe's judgment improving or
deteriorating with age?

      Some, like the editors of Pravda, have said the reason Mwai Kibaki won
the recent Kenyan presidential election is that he is connected to the
Kenyan anti-colonial struggle, while Uhuru Kenyatta is not despite that his
father fathered both Uhuru and uhuru (freedom) in Kenya.

      Others think that the reason young Kenyatta lost and lost badly has
nothing to do with having not fought in Kenya's anti-colonial struggle, but
had everything to do with Daniel arap Moi endorsing him. In other words, Moi
's endorsement was a kiss of death. What do you think?

      Do you think Mugabe's potential successors within ZANU PF are now
worried about a similar "kiss of death"? Or, is his endorsement a "kiss of
life"?

      Some people have asked if the President was as popular as Pravda makes
him out to be. Why does he not decree an internationally monitored free and
fair election and silence the international community and his local
detractors once and for all?

      While the Daily Truth and authoritative Pink Paper and Independent
Voice have said Mugabe does not cherish this idea because he knows he hasn't
a ghost of a chance in such an election, what is your take on this?

      Some have felt that the late Ndabaningi Sithole's sacrifice and
contribution to Zimbabwe's liberation should have been recognised despite
mistakes he might have made along the way; while the President may have felt
that Sithole's mistakes far much outweighed his sacrifice and contribution.
What do you feel on this issue?

      Meanwhile, Ndaba, continue resting in peace.



      Finally, do you feel there is a question or questions I should have
asked that I didn't ask? What is the question? Why do you think I left it
out?

      If you are correct, do you feel he should be given Ndaba's treatment?
Tigosvi-kepi? Sithi senzani? Until when, thinking this narrow?

      The man made a significant contribution. Lokhu okwe consistency
ngokwenu lokho; zve consistency zvava zvenyu izvi. Even the gods are not
consistent, what about us mortals? We all make mistakes, even the gods; that
's why at times they apologise.

      Next week we discuss: The "good life" and the purpose of government.
By the way, I am back in Harare.



        a.. Professor Masipula Sithole is a lecturer of political science at
the University of Zimbabwe and director of the Harare-based Mass Public
Opinion Institute. His e-mail address is mpoi@mweb.co.zw and mobile phone
number 091 271 605.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

FinGaz

      Dry conditions force government to consider compulsory irrigation

      Staff Reporter
      2/13/03 1:08:08 AM (GMT +2)

      AN Irrigation Act that will make it compulsory for the government to
provide irrigation facilities for communal and newly resettled small-holder
farmers is on the cards for Zimbabwe, according to Ministry of Rural
Resources and Water Development permanent sec-retary Simon Pazvakavambwa.

      The proposed legislation is supposed to contribute towards increased
agricultural output and food security for the country's small-scale farmers,
most of whose farming activities are determined by the rainy season because
they do not have access to irrigation infrastructure.

      Pazvakavambwa said his ministry had been prompted to consider drafting
an Irrigation Act by the drought that hit Zimbabwe and other southern
African countries last year.

      The region could also experience low rainfall in 2003 if a detected El
Nino weather phenomenon brings dry conditions to southern Africa.

      Last year's drought has combined with the government's controversial
land reform programme to slash agricultural output by over 50 percent,
leaving Zimbabwe in need of emergency food aid.

      Pazvakavambwa told the Financial Gazette: "We are working for the
establishment of an Irrigation Act in the next few months.

      "Because of the drought, we are now concentrating on the development
of small-holder irrigation in the future because that is the way to go."

      He said several communal farmers who lived in areas that had access to
dams did not have irrigation infrastructure and could not take advantage of
the water resources in their communities.

      Even in areas where water is available from rivers, the communities
have not been able to adequately take advantage of the water available to
them by using irrigation, Pazvakavambwa said.

      Most of the irrigation infrastructure available in communal or
small-holder farming areas was introduced by international donors as part of
their poverty alleviation efforts in Zimbabwe.

      However, many donors have suspended or scaled down operations in the
past two years, citing the erosion of the rule of law in the country, among
other concerns.

      Pazvakavambwa said the state's provision of irrigation was not
adequately addressed in the Water Act, which would be complemented by the
Irrigation Act, if it was enacted into law.

      "The Act will ensure compliance within the (agriculture) sector and
will operate in synergy with the Water Act," said Pazvakavambwa.

      At least eight million of Zimbabwe's 11.6 million population is facing
starvation because of food shortages blamed on the government's seizure of
white-owned farms since 2000 and the drought that hit southern Africa last
year.

      The government says it is planning an ambitious maize irrigation
project in Mwenezi in Masvingo province, which it says will ensure the
country's food security, but whose chances of success were questioned by
agro-experts this week.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

FinGaz

      Obasanjo, Mbeki move could plunge Zim into violence

      By Abel Mutsakani Deputy Editor-in-Chief
      2/13/03 3:45:25 AM (GMT +2)

      NIGERIA and South Africa's open backing for President Robert Mugabe
could plunge Zimbabwe deeper into crisis and in the long run spark off
violent opposition to Mugabe's rule, analysts said yesterday.

      They spoke as Morgan Tsvangirai, the leader of the country's main
opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) vowed that Abuja
and Pretoria's stance could ignite "greater rebound against state
repression" by his party.

      Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo this week wrote to Australian
Prime Minister John Howard proposing that a 12-month Commonwealth suspension
of Zimbabwe be lifted.

      The Nigerian leader, who together with Howard and South African
President Thabo Mbeki was tasked with handling the Zimbabwe problem on the
Commonwealth's behalf, indicated in his letter that Mbeki backed his request
to the Australian prime minister.

      Tsvangirai told the Financial Gazette that since Nigeria and South
Africa had torpedoed the Commonwealth troika working to pressure the
government to abandon its controversial land policies and a bloody crackdown
on the opposition, the challenge was on Zimbabweans to "free themselves".

      Tsvangirai said: "Their (Mbeki and Obasanjo)'s action is contrary to
the peaceful resolution of the crisis in Zimbabwe and may trigger a rebound
against the ongoing repression."

      The opposition leader refused to disclose what options his party would
pursue after Obasanjo and Mbeki, sub-Saharan Africa's two most powerful and
influential leaders' apparent endorsement of Mugabe's rule.

      University of Zimbabwe Institute of Development Studies analyst Brian
Raftopoulos said with the draconian laws enacted by Mugabe and his ruling
ZANU PF party before and after his re-election last March, there were few
legitimate democratic options left for the Tsvangirai and his MDC.

      "And this has very dangerous implications for the country,"
Raftopoulos told the Financial Gazette.

      He added: "At the moment there is limited internal capacity for
violent reaction to this situation. However in the long run, Obasanjo and
Mbeki's decision to give support to a repressive regime could create a very
violent opposition, especially if Mugabe tries to use the two leaders'
support as an opportunity to crush the opposition."

      In his letter to Howard, Obasanjo claimed Mugabe had pledged to
address the international community's concerns on his land policies and that
he had also promised to amend repressive laws stifling the media and the
opposition.

      But there is little improvement on the ground. Several MDC leaders
have been arrested in the last few weeks for a variety of alleged crimes,
including the holding of rallies which, if done without prior police
permission, is an offence under the government's draconian Public Order and
Security Act.

      South Africa Institute for International Affairs analyst Ross Herbert
said open support by Nigeria and South Africa was a strategic diplomatic
victory for Mugabe but one that would not dissipate a biting economic crisis
fuelling public anger and discontent against Mugabe's rule.

      The South African analyst spoke as the government's Central
Statistical Office released figures showing the country's inflation rate hit
at an all time high of 208.1 percent in the year to January 2003.

      "That Obasanjo and Mbeki came out arguing on his behalf will no doubt
be perceived by Mugabe as a victory," Herbert said by telephone from South
Africa.

      "The problem is that the only way to fix Zimbabwe's problem is to end
the crisis of confidence in the country, which of course would encourage
vital foreign capital and investment to consider returning to the country."

      The South African analyst also predicted a possible violent end to
Zimbabwe's deepening crisis, arguing that the country's foreign currency,
fuel and food shortages, if left to fester, could spark popular uprising
against Zimbabwe's rulers, whom many hold responsible for the country's
plight.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com



Cricket team won't play in Zimbabwe

Paul Martin
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Published February 12, 2003

     LONDON — England's national cricket team said yesterday that it will not appear in a major international match in Zimbabwe scheduled for tomorrow, ratcheting up tensions between the two governments.
     The players said they had defied the sport's international governing body by refusing to play because of a written death threat, even though the threat was dismissed by police in southern Africa as a hoax.
     The move, announced after weeks of agonizing by the English cricket authorities, was urged a month ago by members of Prime Minister Tony Blair's government who wanted to inflict a major snub to Zimbabwe's leader, Robert Mugabe.
     Britain has accused him of instigating sustained violence against white farmers, many of whom are descendants of British colonialists, abusing human rights and fraudulently winning a national election.
     The decision has thrown the first week of the world's premier cricket competition into further disarray after the New Zealand team refused to play a match in East Africa because of previous terrorism in Kenya.
     A hotel in Kenya was attacked last year by al Qaeda, which also blew up U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar-es-Salaam in 1997. One match was played in Zimbabwe this week, pitting the home team against neighboring Namibia, and five more are scheduled.
     Two senior Zimbabwean players wore black armbands during that match in an unprecedented protest, saying later that the armbands symbolized the "death of human rights and democracy" in their country.
     The death threat to the English team, now cloistered in a hotel in Cape Town, came from an unknown group calling itself the Sons and Daughters of Zimbabwe. A South African police chief described it as "rubbish of the sort we receive 20 a day."
     The decision could cost English cricket authorities as much as $15 million in fines by the International Cricket Council and compensatory payments, primarily to television sponsors.
     The British government had opposed English participation in the match, which would have been seen by as many as 1 billion television viewers, for fear it would seem to endorse the rule of Mr. Mugabe.
     The World Cup, held once every four years, is extremely popular in many former British territories, including Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and the Caribbean states.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

REPORT FROM CHIEF INSPECTOR MERYL HARRISON - ZNSPCA
 
It is not often that I have time to put pen to paper - but tonight I feel compelled to do so.
 
A farm rescue necessitated ZNSPCA being in the Karoi area today.
 
Whilst in Mashonaland West I decided to check on the welfare of some of the Tredar Security dogs that escaped being euthanaised for one reason or another.  Most of them have been re-deployed on farms, but a fair number just got 'lost in the system'.  They were never uplifted by ZNSPCA because no one thought to let us know they were still on the respective farms, and as Tredar's records were destroyed by their guards during the strike - there were no records of where the dogs were deployed.
 
At the height of ZNSPCA's very sad task of euthanaising the hundreds of Tredar dogs - Marcelle Meredith, Executive Director of NSPCA in South Africa, phoned to give me moral support, and during the course of conversation, she said the dogs that we were euthanaising were the 'lucky ones'.  Of course I knew that this was true but the situation was not helped by some of the hate mail (anonymous of course) that I received, and one local newspaper referring to me "as that murderess at the SPCA".
 
For those that ever doubted whether ZNSPCA acted in the correct manner, let me tell you what Trainee Inspector Jimmy Zuze and I found yesterday:
 
Farm No. 1:  A very gentle Bouvier X dog called 'Boots' whom the farmer had insisted he wanted to keep - no longer there - he had been beaten to death by thieves who stole 126 irrigation pipes.
 
Farm No. 2:  A lovely Ridgeback dog called 'Zimbabwe'.  The kennel had no floor and as a result he was lying on the hot sand, water dish virtually empty (the nearest water point is apparently "too far"), filthy food dish - plastic split down the side - kennel totally isolated, but then his job is purely to guard the farm implements.
 
Farm No. 3:  A Rottweiller dog found to be in reasonable condition but also lying on the hot sand, filthy grooming brush, but at least he had two new dishes for food and water.
 
Farm No. 4:  A brindle X breed - the new Fawcett guard now working with the dog did not know its name, said that nobody had ever told him.  Cement floor with grass 'walls', very low roof, appeared as if dog was housed in a cave, never received any sunlight.  Kennel surrounds filthy, with broken light bulbs, pieces of plastic, material, etc.  A few dried twigs tied together (very worn) served as the brush to clean out the kennel.
 
Two old, rusty enamel dishes were inside his kennel, but not a drop of water - both dishes had enough holes in them to serve as colanders.  On questioning, guard said that he had told the employer that the dog's dishes leaked.
 
Farm No. 5:  We were shown to a kennel situated near the barns - noticed that dish of food had not been touched and water bowl only had a small amount of water, inside of dish covered in green slime (algae).  Black and Tan Rottweiler X made no attempt to move as we approached the kennel - patches of foamy vomit were visible on the kennel floor.  On lifting him out, he immediately collapsed on the ground.  His breathing was laboured and his eyes were jaundiced.  We guessed he was suffering from advanced biliary.  Fawcett guard informed us that he knew the dog was very sick and once again had no idea what the dog's name was.  He told the commercial farmer on two occasions that the dog was very sick but nothing had been done for the dog.
 
On questioning the farmer he admitted that he had been informed about the dog, admitted that he did not take the trouble to go and look at it, admitted that he would recognise the symptoms of biliary and admitted that if it had been one of his own two house dogs he would have done something to help the dog.
 
I instructed him to immediately take the dog through to a veterinarian in Harare, and informed him that if the dog died, he would be charged under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.  Farmer admitted he had been wrong and would take whatever punishment was due.
 
Later on that afternoon, Jimmy and I called in at the vets - the dog had died an hour after admission.  This beautiful ex-Tredar dog, abandoned by humans when he needed them most.  Now just one more statistic in the tragedy surrounding the collapse of Tredar Association.
 
If ever I needed convincing - I know now, that the dogs which we euthanaised were indeed the lucky ones.
 
Meryl Harrison
Chief Inspector & National Co-ordinator
ZNSPCA
GOROMONZI
 
 
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily Telegraph



Harare farce brings new squabble
By Mihir Bose in Cape Town  (Filed: 12/02/2003)


England's controversial World Cup match against Zimbabwe, due to be played
in Harare tomorrow, has been cancelled.



David Morgan, the chairman of the England and Wales Cricket Board, insisted
"this has not been a sordid squabble about money", but the squabbling about
who gets the points for the match will now begin. England will still press
for the match to be played outside Zimbabwe, before the group phase ends on
March 4, but that seems highly unlikely.

The points decision and the rescheduling of the match will depend on the
International Cricket Council technical committee who last week rejected
England's plea that tomorrow's match be moved. However, England now feel
they have fresh evidence which can persuade the committee to change their
minds. The committee are likely to meet in Johannesburg some time over the
next week.

The ECB, having decided that they could not risk sending their players and
officials to Zimbabwe, have now put their case in the hands of lawyers
hoping that, by splitting legal hairs, either the match will be replayed or
England would share the four points with Zimbabwe.

This messy conclusion was reached after a private meeting yesterday between
Malcolm Speed, chief executive of the ICC, and Tim Lamb, chief executive of
the ECB. Lamb went with a document drafted by lawyers, including Queen's
Counsel in London, which said that England's players and officials could not
travel safely to Zimbabwe and, in the present state of civil disorder in the
country, the match would have to be relocated.

Speed understood this to mean that England were withdrawing from the Harare
match and announced it had been cancelled. But in keeping with the farce,
where one set of lawyers do not agree with another, the ECB insisted they
had not refused to play the match.

The ECB's director of legal affairs, Mark Roper-Drimie, said: "We reserve
our position on the statement that the match was cancelled. The agreement
which I believe was reached was that we agreed the match would not take
place on the scheduled date. There is a difference."

England have consulted a leading QC in London and are engaging counsel in
Cape Town and while this high-powered legal team will hope to win the
argument, they cannot disguise what has been one of the shabbier episodes in
English cricket.

Three weeks ago when the players issued their remarkable statement asking
that the match be moved they cited moral, political and security concerns.

Yesterday Lamb said: "I can't speak for the players. The sole reason for our
decision, regretfully not to fulfil the fixture in Harare, is based on
security and safety concerns." But even on this issue the ECB have shifted
ground quite dramatically in the last few days.

Last week, when England initially approached the ICC technical committee
asking for the match to be moved from Harare, they were worried that an
England match could be an occasion for repression of demonstrations against
the Mugabe regime. However, next week when England go back to the technical
committee asking for the match to be rescheduled in South Africa, they will
not be talking about what might happen to demonstrators, they will be
concerned about the health and security of the England players.

Their main evidence will centre on the letter written by a group called the
Sons and Daughters of Zimbabwe, who had threatened to kill the players and
harm their families if they set foot in the country. At one stage the letter
was dismissed as a hoax but the Zimbabwean police e-mailed their South
African counterparts saying they were taking the threat seriously.

The Dutch Government, meanwhile, say they are now also opposed to their team
playing in Zimbabwe later this month.

"Considering the humanitarian and political situation there, we don't think
this is a desirable development," Foreign Minister Jaap De Hoop Scheffer
said yesterday.

Zimbabwe players Andy Flower and Henry Olonga, who launched a scathing
attack on President Robert Mugabe and his government on Monday, have been
reported to the ICC by their own national cricket board.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

VOA

CIA Warns US Needs to Address Instability in Sub-Saharan Africa
VOA News
11 Feb 2003, 22:18 UTC


The director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency has warned that chronic
instability in sub-Saharan Africa will demand the attention of the United
States.

George Tenet made the comment during testimony Tuesday to a U.S. Senate
committee, outlining evolving dangers in the wake of the September 11
terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.

Regarding Africa, Mr. Tenet highlighted ongoing political and ethnic
tensions as well as deep-seated corruption in several African nations.

Mr. Tenet said a weak economy and religious strife in Nigeria could cause
upheaval before elections this year. He said while U.S. crude oil imports
from Nigeria are mostly safe from potential unrest, relations between the
United States and Nigeria could rupture should a military government come to
power.

The CIA director said the crisis in Zimbabwe could also result in the need
for U.S. help. He said President Robert Mugabe's mismanagement of the
economy and political oppression could spark serious unrest and refugee
flows in the coming months.

Finally, Mr. Tenet addressed the civil war in Ivory Coast, bluntly saying
the nation is collapsing. He added its fall will be felt throughout West
Africa as neighboring countries suffer from a decrease in trade.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Guardian

A moral maze, mind games, and a beauty contest.

Lawrence Booth
Tuesday February 11, 2003

THE LAST STRAW
If it wasn't obvious before the cricket got under way, it is now: the
Zimbabwe question is the World Cup's pub bore. He sits in the corner,
refuses to budge and steals the show from anyone who wants to talk about the
game. Brian Lara's comeback? Er, excuse me, the ICC technical committee blah
blah blah. Lance Klusener's brainstorm? I'm sorry, but Justice Albie Sachs
etc etc. Sanath Jayasuriya's fireworks? Bah, that independent security firm
doesn't know its arse from its grumble moan blather. At some point today, we
should know for certain whether England will play in Harare on Thursday. But
whatever happens, the pub bore will be left with plenty of ammunition.

The list of governing bodies who at one stage or another have deserved to
hang their heads in shame is already long. And it just got longer. According
to a report in yesterday's Daily Telegraph, the UCBSA (United Cricket Board
of South Africa) has told the ECB that South Africa could pull out of their
trip to England this summer if England don't play in Harare. Of all the
various offences committed by men in suits over the last few weeks, this is
the most cowardly. South Africa should know all about the power sport can
wield over politics - it's one of the reasons apartheid is now a historical
footnote. To attempt to punish England for trying to find their way out of
this moral maze is a disgrace.

England are in turmoil. Their players are emotional wrecks. They have
received death threats (and however serious the Sons and Daughters of
Zimbabwe are, a death threat is not to be sneered at). Their World Cup is
almost over before it has begun. Yet - whether they reach the Super Six or
not - they can still emerge from this mess with credit by sticking to their
guns while all about them are firing theirs.

Yesterday, Andy Flower and Henry Olonga - two Zimbabweans, one white and one
black - issued a statement saying they would be wearing black armbands
throughout the competition in protest at the "death of democracy". It could
cost them their careers, but it was easily the most dignified moment of the
World Cup so far. Now if you'll excuse me, there's some cricket to watch.

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

"I still feel that when it is dished out to them, they don't handle it too
well." - Viv Richards spots a chink in the Australian armoury. They don't
like being sledged.

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

SILLY POINT: A TASTE OF THEIR OWN MEDICINE

By the time you read this - and the Spin thanks you for sticking it out -
Australia's game with Pakistan will be well under way. Australia might even
be well on top. But don't be fooled. Not for one second. Because the
Australians are officially in disarray, and that was before Shane Warne was
sent home for losing weight with suspicious haste. Just ask Waqar Younis,
the Pakistan captain. "The Australians are panicking," announced Waqar in
the pre-match build-up as a roomful of journalists wondered whether
Australia had accidentally sent a team of rugby league players to South
Africa and had only just realised their error. "We must cash on it to have a
cracking start in the tournament."

What Waqar actually meant soon became clear when Rashid Latif took up the
attack. "Dropping Steve Waugh tantamounts to dropping the cup," said Latif,
cunningly subverting Waugh's apocryphal remark to Herschelle Gibbs in 1999.
But it wasn't just the absence of Waugh that tickled Latif's fancy: Darren
Lehmann is still serving his suspension for losing it against the Sri
Lankans, and Michael Bevan is injured. "They will play with four top batsmen
and an inexperienced fifth in Jimmy Maher," pointed out Latif, triumphantly,
"and that could be the crucial factor."

The last time the two sides met in the World Cup, Pakistan flopped horribly
in the 1999 final at Lord's. Ricky Ponting, the Australian one-day captain,
is hoping for an instant replay, but Waqar is prepared. "We, too, have a
plan to tame them," he said with a wink and a nudge. When no one asked him
what the plan was, he elaborated anyway. "If he [Ponting] reminds me of the
Lord's final, I will remind him of the Super Challenge series last year
which we won on their home turf." The same roomful of journalists scratched
their heads and tried to remember exactly what Super Challenge series Waqar
was going on about. But it was no good. Still, Australia were in disarray.
And for the time being, that was all that mattered.

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

COW CORNER: HUNKS

"Everything about him is perfect - the hair, the twinkly eyes, the luscious
lashes, the strong jaw, the lean body." The Spin on a Friday night after a
few pints at the local karaoke bar/Mongolian eatery? Alas, no. These are the
qualities attributed to the New Zealand captain, Stephen Fleming, who came
second in a poll in Johannesburg's Star newspaper which asked women readers
to help pick a World Hunks XI. Sickened by the sexism of it all, and in no
way piqued not to have rated so much as a mention, the Spin read on. "When
he smiles, women swoon," continued the song of praise. "One look at him and
we immediately want to have his children."

First place in this Hall of Shame, however, belongs to Wasim Akram.
Apparently, Wasim is endowed with "slightly louche, bad-boy looks which
promise delightful wickedness". Other players in this dubious pantheon of
pulchritude include Bangladesh's Alok Kapali ("delicious dimples, kissable
lips"), Makhaya Ntini ("dips and curves in the most extraordinary places"),
Corey Collymore ("great bone structure"), Zaheer Khan ("depths to be
plumbed"), Brett Lee ("blond bombshell"), Rahul Dravid ("women would relish
being driven up The Wall"), Chris Cairns ("rugged, strong and macho") and
Sachin Tendulkar ("small, perfectly formed package").

Where, the Spin hears you cry, are all the Englishmen? Step forward Craig
White. Now the English might not be everyone's cup of tea of present, but
you have to ask what they have done to deserve the following sweeping
generalisation from an Indian journalist. "The inclusion of Craig White in
the list is proof that there is no account for taste," he quips. "Even
though he was born in Australia, the 33-year-old looks like a typical
Englishman." For once, the Spin is speechless.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

 The Scotsman

England on a sticky wicket after finally refusing to play in Harare

HAMISH MACDONELL


ENGLAND'S cricketers were told officially last night what they had privately
known for days - their World Cup match against Zimbabwe will definitely not
take place in Harare tomorrow.

After days of wrangling, the game was cancelled by the International Cricket
Council (ICC) when the England team management made it clear that they would
not travel to Zimbabwe under any circumstances because of the potential
danger to the players.

The ICC has agreed to consider England's request for the game to be moved to
a safer venue in South Africa, although this is extremely unlikely.

If, as expected, the world cricket body turns down the request, it then has
to decide what penalty to impose on the side, whether to deduct all four
World Cup points and whether to fine the England and Wales Cricket Board
(ECB) for lost television and sponsorship earnings.

The severity of England's punishment will depend on new security information
which the ECB has passed to the ICC about the threat to the England players.
The ICC will assess this information and decide what action to take within
the next few days.

But for the England players, yesterday's decision meant they were able to
get on with planning for the game which will now be their first, against
Holland on Sunday, free from the distraction over their on-off fixture which
has dominated the past few weeks.

The England players have come under increasing pressure to boycott the match
in Harare.

This came first from the British Government, determined to prevent Robert
Mugabe from milking the publicity such a fixture would generate, and later
from some of Mugabe's more militant opponents, threatening the players lives
if they travelled to the crisis-hit country.

The ICC chief executive, Malcolm Speed, told a Cape Town press conference
that the fixture had been cancelled after the ECB decided not to fulfil it.

He said: "The ECB has told us they will not play the match in Harare on
Thursday. The ECB cited safety concerns for the players as their reason for
not fulfilling that commitment."

And he added: "Accordingly the ICC has moved to cancel the match which is
scheduled for Thursday. The ICC is disappointed that the match will not go
ahead."

The ECB responded at a separate press conference, with the chairman, David
Morgan, insisting: "This has not been a sordid squabble about money. We are
concerned for the cricket fraternity in Zimbabwe and particularly those who
would have been spectators at the match on the 13th."

But he insisted: "Although this process been lengthy we have not dithered or
been guilty of procrastination."

England were not the only team with off-field problems yesterday, as the
world champions Australia found themselves without one of their most
effective bowlers after Shane Warne was sent home after failing a drugs
test.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

MSNBC

Nigeria reopens Zimbabwe debate

Nigeria, South Africa call for end to sanctions


LONDON, Feb. 12 - Nigeria and South Africa urged an immediate end to
sanctions against Zimbabwe on Tuesday, reopening a bitter controversy among
Commonwealth nations.
       SOUTH AFRICA, NIGERIA and Australia form a Commonwealth troika which
last March decided to suspend Zimbabwe for one year in punishment for
elections - widely criticized as deeply flawed - that kept President Robert
Mugabe in power.
       "I believe that the time is now auspicious to lift the sanctions on
Zimbabwe with regard to her suspension from the Commonwealth Councils,"
Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo wrote in a letter to Australian Prime
Minister John Howard.
       He said his views were endorsed by South African President Thabo
Mbeki.
       The two African nations also accused Australia of failing to act as
an honest broker over the former Rhodesia.
       The moves risked reopening racial wounds that surfaced a year ago
inside the 54-nation group of mainly former British colonies.
       Howard is due to discuss the new crisis with British Foreign
Secretary Jack Straw and Commonwealth Secretary General Don McKinnon in
London on Wednesday.
       The troika is supposed to meet again before the suspension expires,
but Obasanjo said there should be no further meeting.
Advertisement




       While Obasanjo painted a positive picture of events in Zimbabwe since
the suspension in March 19, Howard has complained that nothing had improved
in the intervening year - a view echoed by Britain's foreign office.
       "The situation in Zimbabwe has in many ways deteriorated in recent
weeks," a spokesman said, declining further comments.
       Expert African commentator Jesmond Blumfeld said the joint
Nigerian/South African maneuver was throwing down the gauntlet to the
Commonwealth.
       "The implication is that either the Commonwealth has been downgraded
in their eyes, or they are challenging it to split down black/white lines as
it did last year," he told Reuters.
       "Maybe the Commonwealth is not high on Mbeki's agenda anymore. He is
focusing increasingly on the African Union to represent collective Africa,"
Blumenfeld added.

POSITIVE PICTURE
       In the letter to Howard, Obasanjo - himself facing re-election in
April - painted a positive picture of land
       redistribution in Zimbabwe and praised Mugabe who has now been in
power since independence from Britain in 1980.

        Raising the issue of colonial responsibilities, Obasanjo accused
Britain of having stolen the land in the first place and said it had to pay
compensation to the white farmers being evicted under the land resettlement
programme since 2000.
       Obasanjo, who last March praised the Commonwealth's action on
Zimbabwe, said the resettlement programme had run its course last August and
the government was taking firm action against any reported instances of
violence against evicted farmers.
       His letter was in flat contradiction to regular reports out of
Zimbabwe of continuing land invasions and intimidation.
       Africa's former breadbasket is now a net importer of food, millions
face famine, unemployment is over 60 percent and inflation is out of
control.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Sun

England's £1m bill
From JOHN ETHERIDGE
in Cape Town

ENGLISH cricket chiefs were facing a £1million bill last night after
refusing to play their World Cup match in Zimbabwe.

Tournament organisers cancelled tomorrow's game after rejecting England's
bid to reschedule it.

Captain Nasser Hussain and his players are refusing to play against Zimbabwe
in Harare after receiving death threats from opponents of dictator Robert
Mugabe.

The team is now almost certain to forfeit four vital World Cup points, while
the English Cricket Board faces a £1million claim for failing to fulfil its
contract.

Last night the ECB were STILL trying to get the match played in South Africa
at a later date. But the International Cricket Council refused that plea
yesterday and is highly unlikely to change its mind.

Zimbabwe have in any case already said they will refuse to play the match
elsewhere.

The ICC's latest rebuff to England came in tense talks with ECB chief
executive Tim Lamb and chairman David Morgan.
ICC chief Malcolm Speed said: "The ECB cited safety concerns as their
reason. The ICC give a direction to the ECB to comply and play the match.
The ECB said it does not believe that direction is reasonable. Accordingly,
the ICC has moved to cancel the match."

Mr Morgan denied dithering. He said: "The safety of our players, officials
and their families has always been paramount."

The lengthy row has put England at loggerheads with South Africa and the
Asian nations as well as Zimbabwe and the ICC.

Zimbabwe and South Africa may now retaliate by pulling out of tours here,
costing English cricket more millions.

England were looking increasingly isolated last night as the Dutch vowed to
play their match in Zimbabwe - defying their government's advice to stay
away.

Namibia has already played in Harare. Australia, India, and Pakistan will
also visit Zimbabwe.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Scotsman

France Sidesteps Fresh Mugabe Travel Ban

By PA News Reporters


A Europe-wide travel ban on Zimbabwe's president Robert Mugabe was expected
to be renewed today, despite France's insistence on playing host to the
dictator.

French president Jacques Chirac's insistence on inviting Mr Mugabe
regardless of the EU sanctions highlights another aspect of the current
political disagreements between member states on key foreign policy issues.

Mr Chirac has told Tony Blair it is better to engage with Mr Mugabe than to
freeze him out, but the Prime Minister is furious that, as he sees it, the
French are yet again undermining European unity on a major area of foreign
affairs.

Britain's ambassador to the EU, Sir Nigel Sheinwald, was today insisting on
adding a formal written "reservation" to any sanctions deal which includes a
temporary French "opt-out" to enable Mr Mugabe to visit Paris.

The move follows the protracted wrangling involving England's cricketers and
the International Cricket Council (ICC) over their first World Cup match in
Harare scheduled for tomorrow.

The ICC announced yesterday that the game was cancelled following concerns
over player safety, although there had been mounting pressure for the
fixture to be boycotted in opposition to Mugabe's murderous regime.

Several other EU governments - Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden - are
likely to follow Sir Nigel's example today and register their objections to
the French defiance.

The contentious Paris meeting is a gathering of African heads of state on
February 19, the day after the renewed EU sanctions come into force.

But rather than exacerbate the rifts running through the EU and NatoK and
the other objectors will tolerate the French exemption for the duration of
the Paris event only.

Mr Chirac says it is "essential" that all key Africanhe talks to discuss
human rights.

An EU official said: "As the meeting inruary 19 is about human rights and is
not strictly an EU meeting, there will be an exception to the renewed travel
ban to allow it to take place with President Mugabe's attendance."

That ends Mr Chirac's worries that turning away Mr Mugabe would lead to a
boycott of his summit by other African leaders.

But it hardly improves the EU mood at a time when its declared aim of
establishing a "common foreign policy" has never seemed more unattainable.

Zimbabwe's opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, now on trial accused of
treason, warned last month: "Any avenue granted to Mugabe to attend
international meetings at which he is treated as a statesman and an equal is
an affront to the feelings of the people of Zimbabwe."

A UK Government spokesman said: "The UK and several other EU governments
will insist on adding a statement making clear as part of the renewal of the
sanctions that they have reservations about the French action."

The EU's sanctions against Zimbabwe were triggered by doubts about the
legitimacy of Mr Mugabe's re-election last year and by concern aboing human
rights situation in the country.

Ss and family of the Mugabe polincluding the president's wife, are banned
from visiting EU countries and any private assets they hold in EU countries
have been frozen.

The UK and France tried teir differences on Zimbabwe last w

In a joint statement, Mr Blair and Mr Chirac said:ain and France have
continued their discussions on the different ways to promoe democracy, human
rights and the rule of law in Zimbabwe.

"Our insistence on a respect for democracy, human rights and the rule of law
applies for this country as well as all others.

"Our two countries will continue to provide humanitarian aid for the
population of Zimbabwe suffering from famine."
Back to the Top
Back to Index

SABC

            Zimbabwe question sparks Commonwealth crisis
            February 12, 2003, 04:00


            The Commonwealth faced fresh controversy after Nigeria and South
Africa urged an immediate end to sanctions against Zimbabwe and accused
Australia of failing to act as an honest broker over the former Rhodesia.
The call risks reopening racial wounds that surfaced a year ago inside the
54-nation group of mainly former British colonies.

            "I believe that the time is now auspicious to lift the sanctions
on Zimbabwe with regard to her suspension from the Commonwealth Councils,"
Olusegun Obasanjo, the Nigerian President, wrote in a letter to Australian
Prime Minister John Howard. He said his views were endorsed by Thabo Mbeki.

            The three men form a Commonwealth troika which last March
decided to suspend Zimbabwe for one year in punishment for elections -
widely criticised as deeply flawed - that kept President Robert Mugabe in
power.

            Howard is due to discuss the new crisis with Jack Straw, the
British Foreign Secretary, and Don McKinnon, the Commonwealth
secretary-general in London today.

            The troika is supposed to meet again before the suspension
expires, but Obasanjo said there should be no further meeting. While
Obasanjo painted a positive picture of events in Zimbabwe since the
suspension in March 19, Howard has complained that nothing had improved in
the intervening year - a view echoed by Britain's foreign office.

            Obasanjo, who last March praised the Commonwealth's action on
Zimbabwe, said the resettlement programme had run its course last August and
the government was taking firm action against any reported instances of
violence against evicted farmers. His letter was in flat contradiction to
regular reports out of Zimbabwe of continuing land invasions and
intimidation. Africa's former breadbasket is now a net importer of food,
millions face famine, unemployment is over 60% and inflation is out of
control. - Reuters
Back to the Top
Back to Index