| The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
|
"Bonjour Monsieur Monster", is the Mail's greeting for Mr Mugabe.
The Daily Telegraph deplores what it says is the shaming presence of a tyrant in Europe.
According to the Times, the French authorities seemed to be doing all they could to pamper and protect him at his luxury hotel - described by the Guardian as a much chandeliered establishment, and by the Mail as the last word in Gallic opulence.
Attack
The Telegraph says Mr Mugabe chose the hotel because it was convenient for his wife's shopping.
A number of papers manage to carry a picture of Grace Mugabe leaving the hotel for a suspected shopping trip, in spite of a bodyguard's attempt to block the photographers' view with his raincoat.
As for Jacques Chirac, the Sun has printed a special front page for an edition being distributed in Paris.
In an article written in French, the paper attacks his stance on Iraq.
It describes him as a worm, and to emphasise the point, it prints a picture of one - with Mr Chirac's head.
In the Mail, the journalist and broadcaster Andrew Neil, accuses Mr Chirac of becoming a pimp to some of the world's worst regimes.
Another man in the sights of some of the papers is Mr Justice Collins - he's the High Court judge who ruled that the law denying some asylum seekers the right to claim benefits was illegal.
'Robust'
The judgment is the main story for the Telegraph, Mail and Express - which describes Mr Justice Collins as the asylum seeker's friend.
The Telegraph points out that whenever the government has been at the wrong end of an asylum ruling in recent years, he has often been the villain of the piece.
This particular judge, it says, is considered a serial offender in Whitehall.
The Guardian, however, describes the ruling as a robust judgment and urges the Home Secretary, David Blunkett, to stop denouncing judges and their constitutional role.
Amid the extensive reporting of the latest developments in the Iraq crisis, several articles consider the plans being drawn up by Washington for the future of Iraq after a war.
The Financial Times warns that bringing down Saddam Hussein will be the easy part.
Music without 'fizz'
Getting a grip on post-Saddam Iraq - an ethnic, religious, tribal and political patchwork - makes the Balkans look relatively straightforward, it says.
In the Telegraph, the head of the opposition Iraqi National Congress, Ahmad Chalabi, rejects the idea of a foreign military government or a United Nations administration for Iraq.
There must be no gap in the sovereignty over Iraq by Iraqis, he declares.
As the British music industry gears up for its big party night of the year - the Brit awards - the Independent asks why, in its words, the fizz is going out of British pop.
It quotes an un-named senior executive as saying: "This is as bad as I've ever seen it.
"Sales are slipping, internet piracy is rising, and people are finding other things to spend their money on, such as DVDs and computer games."
Pop goes the drink
Offering a possible answer, the paper suggests that the home-grown market has shown an inability to produce acts that captivate the public imagination.
It seems spectators at Cricket World Cup matches have been falling foul of what the Guardian calls South Africa's draconian sponsorship rules.
Under legislation passed last year, the paper explains, any spectator carrying a product made by a competitor of one of the main sponsors is liable to have it confiscated.
But with Pepsi one of the four main sponsors, the main problem appears to be with fans carrying bottles of Coke.
According to the paper, stewards nicknamed by crowds as the Coke police have been removing the drink from spectators' cooler bags to protect Pepsi's investment.
|
By Adam Lusekelo Dar-es-Salaam |
Pictures of African plight obscure African success
stories |
"The state of Africa is a scar on the conscience of the world," said UK Prime Minister Tony Blair in October 2001.
Just weeks after the 11 September attacks on the US had reminded the world of the folly of letting Afghanistan disintegrate for a decade, Mr Blair insisted on the importance of healing Africa's problems.
Fifteen months on, what has come of that crusade to make Africa's plight a global concern?
Do his words have a hollow ring or is there a real prospect of a fresh start for Africa?
Huge task
Tanzania's president, Benjamin Mkapa, says the challenge is to "narrow the gap between protestations for global good on the one hand and meaningful, sustainable action on the other".
Kenya's election - a sign of hope?
|
African leaders have come up with ambitious new proposals to stimulate development through Nepad, a partnership with the G8 to pour funds into Africa whilst expanding democracy and tackling corruption.
Nairobi's rapidly growing Kibera slum symbolises the problems that Nepad is designed to address.
More than 500,000 Kenyans live in squalid shacks, without water or sanitation.
Yet for the past 20-years Kenya's ex-president Daniel Arup Moi could see Kibera from his hillside residence.
Aid worker Chris Williams describes finding a 14-year old girl living in a latrine there.
"Mud walls, a mud floor and a hole... It's probably the lowest level you can get, and it's wrong. It's just wrong."
Africa is by far the world's poorest continent. Half the population of sub-Saharan Africa live on about $1 a day.
Will Nepad go the same way as previous grandiose plans for Africa conjured up by international donors?
Glimmers of economic hope
There is no doubting that the challenges facing the continent remain real and stark.
But there are signs that this could be a time of opportunity for Africa.
Economically, the picture is not all hopeless.
Uganda and Mozambique have annual economic growth rates of 7% and 10%, showing the downward trend is not inevitable.
More than 20 African countries achieved economic growth rates of more than 4% in 2001, whereas Britain's has been revised downwards to 1.7%.
Professor Ali Mazrui, one of Africa's most distinguished political scientists, thinks that a new era of African leadership is needed.
Corrupt leaders
Many of Africa's greatest leaders were liberation leaders.
"But the skills of liberation are not necessarily relevant for mobilising people for development," says Mr Mazrui, regretting the decline of many leaders into "corrupt politicians".
|
Clare Short, UK international development minister
|
Nepad and the African Union - as the relaunched Organisation of African Unity is now known - does seem to represent a fresh determination amongst African leaders to ensure better government.
One of the main architects of both is South Africa's president, Thabo Mbeki.
Mr Mbeki has argued that "experience over the last 40 years shows that where you don't have democracy, where you have military governments, civil conflicts... no observance of rule of law... all these things need to be addressed in order to form a basis for development".
What makes this new partnership different is that it's a home grown African initiative.
'Made in Africa' pact
At its heart lies a deal between Africa and the world.
African leaders will take responsibility for creating the right political conditions for development in Africa, ending regional conflict and improving government.
In return, they are seeking international support to end Africa's marginalisation.
Nepad aims to share experience to improve
prosperity |
Leaders of developed nations have noticed trends to better government, most recently Kenya's landmark handover of power following elections.
Such events unleash "trends (that) tend not to make headlines but show on the ground how the tide can be turned in Africa's favour", says Baroness Valerie Amos, the UK's minister responsible for policy on Africa.
Furthermore, despite the fragility of the situation in Ivory Coast, there are currently no military governments in sub-Saharan Africa.
"What's important about Nepad (is)... it's a reform agenda being articulated by Africans," says Clare Short, UK international development minister.
No naming and shaming
Critics have questioned whether Nepad can bring about better government in a voluntary framework assessed by fellow leaders, who include ex-dictators such as Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo.
"The reason it's voluntary is that it was felt we're not going to move forward if this thing is conditional on all 53 countries agreeing to this far reaching process," says Professor Wiseman Nkuhlu, chairman of Nepad's Steering Committee.
He defends voluntary reviews as vital to discuss openly "why country A is more successful in this or that matter".
Already the credibility of Nepad and the African Union have been stretched by their failure to influence policy in Zimbabwe.
Defenders argue that the new framework is still teething, that it is too soon to judge.
Critics also point to famine in southern Africa states such as Malawi, where empty state grain silos stand witness to continuing corruption in the sales of basic goods.
Grassroots protest organiser Thierno Khan from Senegal says top-down reform is not enough.
"I applaud that we have some leaders that took time to think about the renaissance of Africa," he says.
"But it's not enough. Come back and talk to your people."
South African Trade Minister Alec Erwin compares the initiative with Europe's recovery from World War II.
"Just over 50 years ago, Europe had dictators who killed 20 million people," he says.
"But then they decided to change, and look what Europe is now."
No doubt making Nepad work will be a marathon rather than a sprint, one which will need long term determination in Africa and across the world