http://www.dailynews.co.zw/
By Thelma Chikwanha, Staff Writer
Thursday,
24 February 2011 18:55
HARARE - Former Member of Parliament
Munyaradzi Gwisai and six others, who
were among a group of activists
arrested for alleged treason, were severely
tortured by the police while in
detention.
The group appeared at the Harare Magistrates Court on
Thursday and told
harrowing stories of how they were assaulted by security
agents for holding
a meeting which police say was meant to topple President
Robert Mugabe.
A dishevelled- looking but high-spirited Gwisai told the
court how the
police had called six members of his group to a room where
they assaulted
them.
“Whenever I gave an answer that was not
satisfactory, I was told to lie on
my stomach and I was given lashes,”
Gwisai said. “ (It was)indescribable
pain. It is sadistic.”
He said
his torturers tried to beat him into admitting that he had said
“Abasha
Mugabe”, which is Portuguese for “down with Mugabe” and that he must
go.
Gwisai alleged that he was lashed 15 times and was finding it
difficult to
sit and walk.
He told the court that even though Mugabe
was an elected president, people
could still revolt against
him.
“This is the reason why people went to war and died to ensure that
people
govern.”
Among the people arrested on Saturday were HIV and
Aids activists, some of
who are living positively with the
disease.
Magistrate Munamato Mutevedzi was told those living with Aids
Aids were
denied medication whilst in police custody and this had violated
their
medication cycle.
Gwisai and 44 others have been charged with
attempting to topple Mugabe and
circumventing a sitting
government.
Both charges carry a lengthy prison sentence or the death
penalty.
But the former MP for Highfield and law lecturer at the
University of
Zimbabwe told the court that the meeting was called for by the
International
Socialist Organisation to discuss the question of democracy
and
constitutionalism taking into account recent events in Egypt and
Tunisia.
“The meeting was also called to draw lessons for the working
class in
Zimbabwe and Africa,” said Gwisai.
Their lawyer, Alec
Muchadehama, pleaded with the court that his clients be
given medical
attention by independent doctors.
Mutevedzi said the Zimbabwe Prison
Service was in a position to give medical
attention to those requiring it
but should they fail to do so
satisfactorily, the accused should inform the
courts on Monday when the
hearing will resume.
HRDs
Alert
24 February 2011
GWISAI BEMOANS TORTURE AS MUCHADEHAMA CHALLENGES PLACEMENT OF ACTIVISTS
ON REMAND
Detained social justice activist Munyaradzi Gwisai on Thursday 24
February 2011 lamented the torture sessions to which suspects are subjected by
state security agents as tragic and inexpressible.
Gwisai, who testified before Harare Magistrate Munamato Mutevedzi during an
application for refusal of placement on remand for the 45 human rights activists
filed by defence lawyer Alec
Muchadehama disclosed in court that he, together with other activists, were
subjected to torture sessions during their detention by the police at Harare
Central Police Station.
Gwisai said the torture sessions were aimed at securing confessions from
the activists which would implicate them in the commission of treason, a charge
which they are facing in court.
In narrating his ordeal, Gwisai said he was tortured together with five
other detainees in a room in the basement at Harare Central Police Station by
nine state security agents who included some police officers who had arrested
them.
During the torture sessions, which were recorded on video, the detainees
were asked to recount what had transpired during their meeting which was held on
Saturday 19 February 2011 in central Harare.
Gwisai said each of the six detainees received a series of lashes which
were administered while they lay down on their stomachs. He added that he
received between 15 and 20 lashes as the police and his tormentors sought to
obtain confessions from him and the other
detainees.
Gwisai said the pain which he endured and suffered as a result of the
torture sessions was “indescribable, sadistic and a tragedy for Zimbabwe”.
The University of Zimbabwe labour law lecturer said it was extremely
difficult for him to sit and walk because of the torture sessions he underwent
together with other detainees.
Gwisai said the meeting held on Saturday was held to discuss ISO business
and issues of democracy and constitutionalism and not to plot the toppling of
the government as alleged by the police and prosecutors. He added that the
meeting which was attended by HIV/AIDS activists was also meant to commemorate
the life of a deceased HIV and AIDS activist, Navigator
Mungoni.
Earlier on Muchadehama outlined the detainees’ complaints against the
police.
The detainees’ lawyer said the arrest of his clients was unlawful as they
were not advised of the reason/s for their arrest. He also advised that they
were over-detained in filthy and stinking police cells. He said the detainees
only knew of the treason charge when they finally appeared in court on Wednesday
23 February 2011 and no warned and cautioned statements were recorded in
relation to the treason charge.
Muchadehama told the court that the police extensively subjected his
clients to severe interrogation sessions where they attempted to coax some of
the detainees to turn against their colleagues and be considered State
witnesses.
He said some of the detainees were assaulted, brutalised and tortured
while in police custody. The defence lawyer said the torture sessions were
administered through assaults all over the detainees’ bodies, under their feet
and buttocks through the use of broomsticks, metal rods, pieces of timber, open
palms and some blunt objects.
In his application for refusal of remand Muchadehama argued that the
facts as outlined by the State did not constitute the commission of an
offence.
The matter continues on Monday 28 February 2011 when prosecutor Edmore Nyazamba, who applied for the
placement of the detainees on remand, cross examines Gwisai. In the meantime,
all 45 will remain incarcerated in remand prison in Harare and at Chikurubi
Women’s Prison for the women detainees.
ENDS
Posted: 24 February 2011
Amnesty International today expressed shock that at least 45 Zimbabwean activists have been charged with treason and could face the death penalty following their arrest at a lecture on the protests in North Africa.
http://www.abc.net.au/
Leader
'preparing to flee' Libyan bloodshed
Updated 5 hours 14 minutes
ago
A political activist says Libyan leader Moamar Gaddafi is
readying to flee
the country, as violent civil unrest continues and rebels
continue to take
power of towns close to the capital
Tripoli.
Eyewitnesses in Tripoli say the government is escalating its
crackdown on
anti-government protesters, and it is hard to know how much
ground Mr
Gaddafi has lost to local protesters.
Tripoli is still held
by pro-Gaddafi forces. Tanks have been seen in the
suburbs and the streets
are quiet as any protest would almost certainly be
crushed.
The
picture elsewhere is more uncertain and fluid.
There are reports of gun
battles taking place between forces loyal to Mr
Gaddafi and his opponents in
the town of Zawiyah, 50 kilometres west of
Tripoli.
Mr Gaddafi no
longer controls much of the east around Benghazi, where there
are reports
residents have jailed those they say are mercenaries and set up
committees
to run the city.
London-based Libyan political activist, Guma el-Gamaty,
has told the ABC's
Lateline that "quite reliable sources" believe Mr Gaddafi
is readying to
flee his country.
"Gaddifi's own private plane is
loaded with gold bullion and lots of hard
currency, mainly dollars, and is
preparing to flee to Zimbabwe to stay there
with his friend Robert Mugabe,"
he said.
"We think this could happen very shortly because the Security
Council is
threatening to impose a no-fly zone and we think that Gaddafi
will try to
escape before this no-fly zone is imposed, possibly by
tomorrow.
"So this is the most serious story we've heard today. It's very
indicative
of the fact that Gaddafi is totally isolated, surrounded more or
less and is
probably in a state of mind where he's just concentrating and
thinking about
how to escape and run away and stay alive."
Mr
el-Gamaty says Mr Gaddafi's 41-year rule is coming to a close.
"It's just
a matter of time. This time could be hours, could be days. The
whole of the
eastern region is now totally free of Gaddafi's control," he
said.
"In the western region, big towns and cities have also fallen.
We have
confirmation this morning that the third biggest city in Libya,
which is
Misurata, some 200 kilometres east of Tripoli is totally free of
Gaddafi and
they have managed to tackle the last security battalion in the
city and
taken it over.
"In fact, the local radio station in Misurata
is now broadcasting free
material against Gaddafi and celebrating with the
population."
Mr el-Gamaty says Mr Gaddafi's regime has "thousands" of
African
mercenaries.
"They are Africans who speak French or English.
They are totally alien to
the Libyan society and they said they have been
promised large amounts of
dollars to fight for Gaddafi basically," he
said.
"These thousands of Africans are within the Bab al-Azizia barrack.
It's a
huge complex and they unleash them out of the barracks into the
streets of
Tripoli to terrorise the population and to prevent them from
coming out and
demonstrating.
"These mercenaries have orders to shoot
any people who they see on the
streets. So, that is what's holding the huge
population of Tripoli, which is
about two million people, not to come out en
masse. Basically they are held
hostages inside their houses."
'Die
like Hitler'
Earlier, one of Mr Gaddafi's former ministers predicted the
Libyan leader
will follow in Adolf Hitler's footsteps and commit suicide
rather than give
up power.
Mustapha Abdeljalil, justice minister
until he quit over the bloody
crackdown on protesters, says he expects Mr
Gaddafi to make good on his
pledge to die on Libyan soil rather than slink
into exile.
"Gaddafi's time is up. He is going to go like Hitler. He is
going to commit
suicide," Mr Abdeljalil told Swedish media.
Hitler
committed suicide in his bunker in Berlin in April 1945 as he
witnessed the
disintegration of his Nazi empire.
Mr Mr el-Gamaty says that is "a small
possibility".
"We believe that probably Gaddafi doesn't really have the
courage to kill
himself. We think he still have this grandiose idea that he
will go to
Africa and rally all the Africans," he said.
"Remember he
has the title of the "King of Kings" of Africa, so he thinks he
can still go
to Africa and rally all the Africans around him and come back
to Libya and
take it over again.
"But, who knows? That is also a possibility. But
whether he flees, whether
he kills himself, whether he gets arrested, I
think he is doomed and I think
his end is very imminent."
The
official death toll from the violence stands at 300, but some reports
figure
the number at more than 1,000.
http://www.swradioafrica.com
By Lance Guma
24 February
2011
Speculation that members of the Zimbabwe National Army are in Libya
to help
prop up cornered dictator Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, has gained
momentum. This
follows Zimbabwe’s Defence Minister Emmerson Mnangagwa
avoiding giving a
straight answer to a question posed in
Parliament.
With the eastern part of Libya having fallen to anti-Gaddafi
protesters, it’s
being reported that mercenaries from several African
countries, including
Zimbabwe, are putting up a stand in the west of the
country, including the
capital Tripoli, on behalf of Gaddafi. They are
reportedly gunning down
unarmed civilians at random and Arab TV channel Al
Jazeera said that
Zimbabwe was helping to provide mercenaries, along with
Chad and other
African countries.
In Parliament on Wednesday MDC-T MP
and Chief Whip, Innocent Gonese, asked
Mnangagwa to respond to reports that
soldiers from Zimbabwe are involved.
Instead of giving a straight answer
Mnangagwa said “…that there are
mercenaries who are African and are in Libya
– I have no mandate in my duty
as Minister of Defence to investigate
activities happening in another
African country.”
More rambling
followed as Mnangagwa asked Gonese to “direct his question to
the Foreign
Affairs Ministry, who might also enquire through foreign
relations if there
are any African countries participating there.” Although
he went on to say
there was no provision in the defence act for members of
the army “to
participate in cases or in events outside the country,” he
avoided giving a
“yes or no’ answer to Gonese’s simple question.
Zimbabweans will however
remember that in 1997 Mugabe’s regime, without
consultation, sent troops to
the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to help
the late Laurent Kabila
against rebels backed by Rwanda and Uganda. The
intervention and the huge
sums of money spent funding it crippled Zimbabwe’s
economy, while regime
officials lined their pockets with mineral
concessions.
Meanwhile
it’s being reported that Gaddafi is weighing up his options in
terms of
which country to flee to for sanctuary. Zimbabwe is emerging as a
firm
favourite, with London-based Libyan political activist Guma el-Gamaty,
telling the Australian ABC news channel that "quite reliable sources"
believe Gaddafi is readying to flee his country and heading to
Zimbabwe.
“Gaddafi's own private plane is loaded with gold bullion and
lots of hard
currency, mainly dollars, and is preparing to flee to Zimbabwe
to stay there
with his friend Robert Mugabe. We think this could happen very
shortly
because the (UN) Security Council is threatening to impose a no-fly
zone and
we think that Gaddafi will try to escape before this no-fly zone is
imposed,” Guma el-Gamaty said.
Mugabe is no stranger to giving
sanctuary to murderous dictators. Former
Ethiopian dictator Mengistu Haile
Mariam was offered a safe haven in
Zimbabwe, despite being sentenced to
death by an Ethiopian court for crimes
against humanity. He remains happily
ensconced in his villa in the suburb of
Gunhill, outside Harare, to this
day.
Major Protais Mpiranya, a Rwandan army officer accused of ordering
the
murder of that country’s Prime Minister and the Belgian soldiers who
protected her, is also said to be hiding in Zimbabwe. Mpiranya, a Hutu
extremist who formerly led the Presidential Guard in Rwanda, is wanted for
genocide and crimes against humanity by the UN war crimes tribunal.
http://www.wexfordpeople.ie
Thursday February 24
2011
Iran is expanding its covert global search for the uranium it needs
for its
nuclear activities and a key focus is Zimbabwe, according to a new
intelligence report.
The finding is in line with international
assessments that Iran does not
have the domestic supplies to sustain its
nuclear programme that could be
turned toward making weapons.
An
intelligence report from a member country of the International Atomic
Energy
Agency says Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi met secretly
last
month with senior Zimbabwean mining officials "to resume negotiations
...
for the benefit of Iran's uranium procurement plan".
"This follows work
carried out by Iranian engineers to map out uranium
deposits in Africa and
assess the amount of uranium they contain," said the
two-page intelligence
summary.
The report - confirmed independently by an official from another
IAEA
country - was shared as an Iranian delegation led by the head of the
Co-operative Ministry Abbas Johari was meeting with "agriculture and mining
interests" in the Zimbabwean capital Harare.
The official confirming
the intelligence described the Salehi visit as part
of an international
Iranian effort that stretches across Africa, Asia and
South America and may
involve more than a dozen countries.
Both officials - whose countries
closely follow Iran's nuclear programme -
asked for anonymity in exchange
for discussing intelligence matters.
The assessments are important
because they call into question recent Iranian
assertions meant to dispel
doubts about the country's capability to sustain
and expand its uranium
enrichment programme.
Iran says it is enriching solely to power a future
network of nuclear
reactors.
But it has been targeted by UN sanctions
because enrichment can also create
fissile warhead material - and because of
its nuclear secrecy and refusal to
co-operate with IAEA probes into its
activities.
http://www.radiovop.com
24/02/2011 14:03:00
Gutu- February 24,
2011-Teachers here are being forced to buy Zanu (PF)
membership cards by war
veterans led by controversial leader Jabulani
Sibanda.
The
Progressive Teachers' Union president Takavafira Zhou confirmed the
incident, saying: “I went to see for myself after teachers came to our
provincial office in Masvingo crying for help. The situation is extremely
terrible. Teachers are living in fear. They have no option besides buying
Zanu (PF) cards for their safety. War veterans are moving all over the
district and teachers are jostling to get the cards."
“We shall not
rest while our members continue to be victimised," he added.
"We shall
confront the minister responsible as soon as possible."
Education Sports
and Culture Minister David Coltart is on record saying
schools should not be
used as political battle fields.
Jabulani Sibanda told RadioVOP when
contacted for comment: “I have no time
for journalists right now. If you
want arrange a day so that I will give you
a press conference rather than
calling me when I am busy doing my work.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
By Chengetayi Zvauya, Staff Writer
Thursday, 24
February 2011 18:19
HARARE - Minister of Education, Sport, Arts and
Culture David Coltart, has
put in motion plans to protect teachers from
political harassment during
elections.
Coltart told Parliament on
Wednesday that he was working on a document that
will be presented to
Cabinet, outlining the new measures that include bans
on political
gatherings in schools.
“There are measures we are going to put in place
to protect the teachers and
I shall inform Parliament once I have finished
tabling the matter in
Cabinet, said Coltart. “I am in touch with the
teachers unions constantly on
matters concerning their members who are
harassed.”
The feisty minister said the violence of 2008 did not spare
the teachers who
were easily targeted by suspected Zanu PF supporters in the
run up to the
run off.
“I know that in 2008 elections we had
problems. It was very difficult as
there was a lot of political
intimidation to the teachers, but now there are
a few cases, but we don’t
want any single case of political victimisation,’’
said Coltart.
He
said he had established a close working relationship with the three
unions
representing teachers and was on course to help mitigate the problems
haunting the profession.
Coltart’s was responding to a question from
Chinhoyi MP Stewart Garadhi,
who enquired what measures government had put
in place to protect teachers
against harassment and violations.
Zanu
PF supporters in the volatile rural areas have been accused of turning
some
schools into bases to conduct their party business.
Their critics say
they target teachers in their “indoctrinations” because
they are seen as
sympathetic to the MDC faction led by Prime Minister
Morgan
Tsvangirai.
During the 2008 elections thousands of teachers fled from
their teaching
posts in the rural areas after being harassed and victimised
by Zanu PF
supporters.
http://www.swradioafrica.com
By Tichaona
Sibanda
24 February 2011
Hundreds of villagers from Nyakomba in Nyanga
North are fleeing violence
orchestrated by ZANU PF, and on Wednesday crossed
the border into
Mozambique.
The MDC spokesman for Manicaland
province, Pishai Muchauraya, said those
that crossed the flooded Gairezi
river, which forms the border between
Zimbabwe and Mozambique, are now
living with local communities on the
Mozambican side of the
frontier.
The Gairezi river is the one that Robert Mugabe crossed when he
fled the
country with the help of the late Chief Rekayi Tangwena in 1975, to
join the
liberation war effort.
Muchauraya said it was a day of hell
in Nyakomba on Wednesday when ZANU PF
militia in three truck loads stormed
the area and started going house to
house looking for MDC supporters. The
Manicaland spokesman alleged the
trucks were supplied by Hurbert Nyangongo,
who is trying to wrestle the
Nyanga North constituency from Douglas
Mwonzora, the incumbent MDC-T MP.
Mwonzora is currently locked up at
Mutare remand prison following
allegations that he ‘instigated violence’ in
his constituency. He is being
held together with 24 other MDC activists.
When all of them appeared before
a Nyanga magistrate on Monday, they were
each freed on a $50 bail. But their
freedom was put on hold when the state
invoked section 121, which meant they
could be held in custody for another
seven days, to give state prosecutors
time to appeal against the
bail.
Muchauraya gave more details about what happened in Nyanga North
saying;
‘Most villagers fled the area and crossed the border while others
found
refuge in the nearby mountains. But two gentlemen found herding goats
were
severely beaten with sticks and logs. They are currently admitted in
the
intensive care unit of a private clinic.’
At Nyabvure primary
school the militia targeted a teacher, identified as
Wellington Tazangira,
and beat him up because he supports the MDC.
Nyanhongo has reportedly
launched a program where about a hundred militia
are receiving military
training at Ruwangwe. ‘Nyanhongo is going for broke.
He has gone totally
insane just for the sake of trying to win a
parliamentary seat that the MDC
holds. A thing that makes me sad is that in
1975 Mugabe crossed the flooded
Gairezi river fleeing oppression and 31
years after independence we are
witnessing a repeat of events where people
are fleeing repression from their
own government,’ Muchauraya said.
The MP said it was useless to report
such a crackdown to the local Nyamaropa
police post, because it was overrun
by ZANU PF militia.
‘It’s even worse if you try the police in the town of
Nyanga, because the
fence surrounding the station has posters of ZANU PF and
Mugabe. People have
lost confidence in the partisan police,’ he said.
http://www.zimdiaspora.com
Thursday, 24 February
2011 18:40 Editor News
Harare (afrika.no)- Various campaigns hoping to
defy Robert Mugabe's
clampdown on civic action have been launched, trying to
encourage
Zimbabweans to follow the lead of other African countries
protesting against
their dictators.
The campaigns, launched over
email and through the social networking
websites, Facebook and Twitter,
encourage Zimbabweans to hold peaceful
marches calling for Mugabe to step
down. The 'Zimbabwe Million Citizen
March' was launched a week ago, and
calls for a mass protest next Tuesday
under the theme 'Power in numbers to
remove dictatorship'. At the same time,
the 'Mugabe Must Go' campaign is
also calling for peaceful marches against
ZANU PF, while the 'Mugabe must go
in seven days' campaign, has given Mugabe
a seven day ultimatum to step
down.
The campaigns have been inspired by the uprisings in Libya, Tunisia
and
Egypt, which have sparked debate across other African countries still
ruled
by despots. There are high hopes that the fall of the ruling family in
Tunisia and that of Hosni Mubarak's administration in Egypt, will have a
domino effect elsewhere.
Currently in Libya, notorious dictator
Muammar Gaddafi is facing what
analysts say is the most significant threat
to his 40 year rule, and his
response has been unsurprisingly
violent.
Protesters in both the capital Tripoli and the city of Benghazi
have come
under attack by security forces, with the death toll believed to
be in the
hundreds. Gaddafi is also said to have recruited African
mercenaries to
carry out brutal killings of protesters, with Zimbabwean
mercenaries
believed to be part of this killing team. The effect has been a
terrified
but still angry nation and a host of diplomatic ties with Libya
being
severed in recent days.
Libyan Ambassador to the United States,
Ali Aujali, has cut ties with
Gaddafi and called on the Libyan leader to
step down. Several other Libyan
envoys have said that they resigned,
including the ambassadors to India and
Indonesia and a senior diplomat in
China. At the same time, Libya's
embassies in Malaysia and Australia said
they no longer represent Gaddafi,
while even his Justice Minister, Mustafa
Abdel-Jalil, resigned Monday in
protest at the crackdown. Even some members
of the usual loyal security
forces have changed sides over the attacks. This
week two Libyan fighter
pilots flew their jets to Malta, saying they had
defected, after being
ordered to attack demonstrators, something they
refused to do.
Libyans and observers to this most recent revolution are
now waiting to see
what Gaddafi's next move will be, with people pondering
which country will
be next.
Some Zimbabwean commentators have said
this kind of revolution is not
possible in Zimbabwe, while others have said
that the time is ripe for
public action against Mugabe. The question
remains, is an Egypt style
revolution possible in Zimbabwe?
The most
noticeable difference between Egypt and Zimbabwe is the extent of
internet
penetration in the two countries, with Egypt's revolution
coordinated and
displayed for all to see through Twitter, Facebook and on
blogs. According
to the United Nations, internet penetration in Egypt is at
nearly 25% of the
population, with a strong contingent of respected bloggers
who helped
mobilise the nation. By contrast, in Zimbabwe internet access is
measured at
just 13% in urban areas. Efforts such as the Zim campaigns to
get rid of
Mugabe, have been greeted with a level of indifference by most
Zimbabweans,
with less than a hundred people showing their support for these
groups on
Facebook.
Some observers have also commented that Zimbabweans are too
afraid to
publicly protest against ZANU PF, when the party has so
effectively quelled
even talks of uprisings. At the weekend over 50 people
were arrested and
many seriously beaten after gathering to talk about Egypt
and the revolution
there. They are still being held in
detention.
Political analyst John Makumbe told SW Radio Africa that
repressive
legislation and the pro-Mugabe security forces would make
protests very
difficult in Zimbabwe.
"An Egypt-style revolution is
possible in Zimbabwe but it might be unwise,"
said Makumbe. "We could see a
similar bloodbath that we are witnessing in
Libya right now.
But
Makumbe emphasised that "there is a price for freedom," and dismissed
comments that Zimbabweans are too afraid to take their frustrations onto the
streets.
"That is an underestimation of the anger people are feeling
the people-power
that Zimbabweans have. Once this starts in Zimbabwe it will
be unstoppable,"
Makumbe said.
Meanwhile, Zimbabwean civil society is
reported to be "mulling" civic action
to bring an end to the ZANU PF
violence sweeping across the country. ZANU PF
youths have been rampaging in
different areas, harassing residents and
attacking MDC supporters. In Mbare,
thousands of people have been displaced
by the violence, and are now living
in safe houses.
"We have agreed to confront the inclusive government if
our advocacy and
lobbying fail. There is the coming together of
pro-democracy groups and
there is consensus that we must revert to our
strategy of 2007 which brought
results," spokesman of the Crisis in Zimbabwe
Coalition, Phillip Pasirayi
told the Daily News on Tuesday.
In March
2007, civic society groups staged prayer marches in Harare's
Highfield
township which were violently stopped by armed police. Prime
Minister Morgan
Tsvangirai, the leader of the opposition MDC, and a number
of civic society
leaders were severely assaulted by police, prompting
regional leaders to
convene an emergency summit to try and resolve the
Zimbabwean
crisis.
Press Release
Contact: Dr. Menoi
Email: smenoi@yahoo.com
Zimbabweans
Protest to Demand The End of The 31-year Rule By the
Iron-Fisted and
Corrupt Dictator Robert Mugabe
On 1 March, 2011, Zimbabweans will hold
mass protests in Harare to demand
the end of the 31-year rule of the
iron-fisted and corrupt dictator Robert
Mugabe.
WHAT: Mass Protest –
Zimbabwe Million Citizen March
WHEN: Tuesday, March 1st, 11:00
AM.
WHERE: Harare Gardens, Harare, Zimbabwe
and
Countrywide
The protest is intended to demand the immediate cessation and
an end to the
dictatorial regime misruling Zimbabwe. In addition, the mass
demonstrations
countrywide will convey anger and concern about the suffering
of Zimbabweans
from brutal economic, military, political and social
repression under the
regime of Robert Mugabe, who has been in power since
1980.
Inspired by the revolution for democracy by the people of Tunisia
and Egypt,
Zimbabweans urge the pro democracy and freedom loving people
across the
globe to stand together and demand the immediate removal of
Dictator Robert
Mugabe and his cronies.
Zimbabweans will
demand:
1) Robert Mugabe’s resignation, regime change
2) An end to
political violence and all repressive policies
2) Recognition and respect
of the rights of freedom of speech, freedom of
assembly, and freedom of
association and the press
3) Recognition and respect of the legitimate
role of Zimbabwe human rights
defenders and civil society activists and
organizations
4) Freedom, Justice, Fair Elections, Progress and
Development
http://www.voanews.com
Groups led by the
Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition note that hundreds of people
have been forced
out of their homes in Harare suburbs such as Mbare by the
violence while
police have arrested many others
Sandra Nyaira, Thomas Chiripasi &
Jonga Kandemiiri 23 February 2011
Forty-five International Socialist
Organization activists accused of
conspiring to incite mass protests along
Egyptian lines to bring down the
government, were arraigned Wednesday on
charges of treason and subversion
Zimbabwean non-governmental
organizations said Wednesday that they intend to
call for protests against
the government for what they characterized as its
inaction in the face of
resurgent political violence across the Southern
African
country.
Civic groups led by the umbrella Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition
note that
hundreds of people, mainly supporters of the Movement for
Democratic Change
formation of Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai, have been
forced out of their
homes in Harare suburbs such as Mbare by violence
allegedly perpetrated by
militant youths associated with President Robert
Mugabe's ZANU-PF party,
while police have arrested many others.
But
Coalition spokesman Philip Pasirayi told VOA Studio 7 reporter Jonga
Kandemiiri that the protests will not target any single political party in
the power-sharing government.
About 24 MDC activists including
legislator Douglas Mwonzora of Nyanga,
Manicaland province, are behind bars
facing charges lawyers say are
politically-motivated.
Activist Peter
Muchengeti told VOA Studio 7 reporter Brenda Moyo that while
civil society
organizations were justified in calling protests against
violence, the
government is likely to see such demonstrations as an attempt
to replicate
the events witnessed across the Arab world from Tunisia to
Libya to Egypt to
Yemen to Bahrain.
Meanwhile, 45 International Socialist Organization
activists accused of
conspiring to incite mass protests along Egyptian lines
to bring down the
government, were arraigned on charges of treason and
subversion,
correspondent Thomas Chiripasi reported.
ISO Zimbabwe
cordinator Munyaradzi Gwisai appeared before provincial
magistrate Munamato
Mutevedzi jointly charged with his colleagues with
organizing strategies to
remove the government of Zimbabwe through
Egyptian-style mass
protests.
State prosecutors say the ISO executive called an
invitation-only meeting in
Harare on Saturday at which participants,
allegedly subjected to thorouth
vetting before allowed in, watched video
reports on events in Egypt and
planned strategy. They
State
prosecutors alleged that a "mission statement" was circulated saying
the
group "calls on workers, students and working people to support the
struggle
in solidarity with Egyptian and Tunisian workers." Police said they
were
tipped off about the meeting and staged a raid, arresting the 45
activists
arraigned Wednesday in Harare.
Zimbabweans worldwide have watched closely
in recent weeks as governments
have fallen in the Middle East and North
Africa in the face of mass
protests.
VOA Studio 7 reporter Sandra
Nyaira reported that Zimbabwean activists are
debating if this mass-protest
model can be adapted to Zimbabwean conditions.
Political analyst John
Makumbe of the University of Zimbabwe, a longtime
Mugabe critic, says the
call for early elections in 2011, when the country
is not ready for such a
momentous task, "is a sure way of inviting trouble
for its major
perpetrators".
"We all know that ZANU-PF does not have even a ghost of a
hope of winning a
free and fair election in this country," he said. It is
therefore "obvious
that the former liberation movement intends to resort to
indiscriminate
political violence in order to cow the people to vote for
Mubarak’s ageing
friend Mugabe and his blasted party."
Harare, Chaminuka Building, 24 February 2011
“Transparency
and Accountability for Service Delivery”
1. Energy is
an important enabler for economic development apart from it being a symbol of
civilization.
2. The electricity supply in this country is less
than demand leading to load shedding. Zimbabwe generates between 1300-1400MW
against the national requirement of 2000MW. There has been no investment in new
Power generation since the commissioning of Hwange Power Station units 5 & 6
in 1984. There has also been no meaningful repairs and maintenance to both the
generation plant and transmission and distribution network over the last 12
years.
3. Great strides have been made to increase local power
generation since the formation of the Inclusive Government. All six units at
Hwange are now operational although not yet stable. Major maintenance at Kariba
South was undertaken from September 2010 to January 2011, making it operate
reliably at capacity. The three small thermals at Munyati, Bulawayo and Harare
have been brought back to service, although still operating at low capacity.
Local generation is now in the region of 1300MW to 1400MW. This is the best it
has been for over a decade, but certainly the desired ideal.
4.
We are currently importing Power from Zambia and Mozambique ranging between
100MW to 300MW. DRC will export 50-100MW from 1 March 2011. These countries
are willing to export more power if we pay for the current imports and something
towards the accumulated debt of nearly $100m.
5. The country
is exporting 150MW to Namibia. The tariff on this export is below cost and ZESA
has been negotiating to increase this tariff to cover cost of producing the
power at Hwange Power Station. The current situation means that Zimbabwe,
despite its own shortage of electricity is subsidizing Namibia. This situation
has to be corrected soon.
6. The current rains have exposed the
frailty in the Transmission and Distribution networks, exposing the weaknesses
for the lack of critical maintenance over the years. Substations and
transformers have been failing at an alarming rate. Many poles have tumbled
over, succumbing to white ants, having been in service beyond their useful
lives. ZESA has been overwhelmed, and in cases have had to seek outside help.
A lot more investment is required to make the transmission and distribution
networks safe and reliable.
7. To add to the above problems,
vandalism is a major menace. Whole transmission pylons have been stolen, so
have been the electricity wires.
8. ZESA has failed to resolve
the billing problems and consumers have lost faith in the billing system. The
billing problems have given a golden opportunity to some corrupt ZESA employees
to fleece the consumers. The billing system at ZESA is shambolic and beyond
repair.
9. Smart meters will be introduced soon to deal once
and for all with the billing problems. Consumers will be able to pay as they
consume using the meters prepayment facility. The smart meters will be able to
ration the electricity so that more people will be able to have it and reduce
load shedding. Consumers will be able to install their own smart meters using
ZESA accredited installers.
10. ZESA needs a viable tariff to
not only stabilize the current power supply, but to invest in new capacity.
ZESA has come up with a proposed tariff which I have put on hold whilst the
necessary consultative processes are being carried out. The small thermals are
expensive to run, hence the power they produce is also expensive. In the
meantime, there are customers who have voluntarily enlisted to pay a high tariff
in return for not being load shedded. These are being supplied from the
additional electricity being generated by these small
thermals.
11. The short term objective is to stabilize the
internal generating capacity at Hwange Power Station, increase the output of the
small thermals from 65MW to 270MW. This is then augmented with imports, small
hydro power plants and solar. The Ministry will encourage business to generate
their own electricity – this is called co-generation.
12. The
medium term objectives are to:
i) Increase generating capacity at
Hwange Power Station by 600MW (units 7 & 8).
ii) Increase
generating capacity at Kariba South by 300MW through either replacing current
units by more powerful ones, or install additional units. The recommendations
from the Engineers are expected soon.
iii) New on grid solar plants
are expected to come on stream with one having been licensed.
iv)
Sengwa Power Station is expected to come on stream in 2014 and a lot of progress
has been made to date. This will produce 2500MW when fully
functional.
v) Lusulu Power Project has been licensed and they still
have to secure a coal purchase agreement. It will produce 2000MW when fully
functional.
13. In the long term by 2030 new generation to
increase power generation to over 15000MW will come from:
i) Batoka
(800MW) and Devils (600MW) gorges along the Zambezi. These require
collaboration with Zambia who want the CAPCO asset issue must be resolved
first.
ii) Lupane Coal-bed methane – this still requires
quantification.
iii) New Thermal stations.
iv) Regional Projects –
Great INKA Dam (DRC) and Cabora Basa North Bank.
14. Turning on
to Fuel, the country experienced fuel shortage in December 2010 and early part
of January 2011. The shortage was caused by the following:
a)
The country relied on short term contracts with no long term supply
contracts.
b) The Northern Hemisphere cold spell came earlier and
was more severe than expected, thereby diverting the short term supplies to the
North.
c) NOCZIM had stolen $35m of ZIMRA funds between February
2009 and February 2010. This was a symptom of malpractices at
NOCZIM.
d) NOCZIM allowed ZIMRA to garnish the account that had
funds for the Strategic Reserve.
e) NOCZIM had not bought and kept
the Strategic Reserve from the levy from February 2009. Therefore the country
had no reserves to cushion the shortages.
15. A forensic audit
was conducted by Ernest and Young and it uncovered that among other
things:
NOCZIM management:
i) had committed
fraud.
ii) had taken third party stocks.
iii) misrepresented
facts regarding the amounts due to ZIMRA.
iv) had failed to account for
the stocks properly between its own and third party stocks.
v) had
failed to account for the Strategic Reserve and Debt Redemption levies.
vi) had failed to account for the Strategic Reserve stocks.
In addition
the management has deliberately failed to produce audited financial statements
for 2009.
16. During December 2010 and January 2011, there was
virtually no fuel to sell available for Zimbabwe. NOOA petroleum of South
Africa offered 5m litres of diesel. The Ministry had in the meantime agreed
with ZIMRA to stop the garnish and make good the amounts due to the Strategic
Reserve levy. The US$6 million was then paid into a Noczim account and
transferred into the Petrotrade account as Noczim was no longer functional. This
was then handled as a purely administrative matter. In a meeting attended by
the Director – Petroleum, the Permanent Secretary and myself, we considered it
prudent to procure, the only fuel that was available at that time using the
Strategic Reserve levy. The Strategic Reserve Levy will be used in future to
purchase fuel to cover market failures.
17. Delays were
encountered in transferring the funds taking six days in total. However, when
the first train came with fuel, it spent over 10 days at Beitbridge without
being cleared. This was clearly the work of a bureaucracy determined to create
a story. The fuel was only offloaded last week after the intervention of the
Minister of Finance.
18. Cabinet approved the Restructuring of
NOCZIM into two companies, one responsible for trading and the other for the
infrastructure. The Restructuring was done on 31 December 2010 and the two
companies started operating from 1 January 2011. The two companies have similar
board members being:
• Mr Justin Mupamhanga – the Ministry’s Permanent
Secretary,
• Col Morgan Mudzinganyama (Rtd) – Director Petroleum and
• Ms Ndomupei Chikonye – Director Power.
19. Out of the 379
employees of NOCZIM, the successor companies absorbed 273 employees leaving 106
employees to be retrenched. Negotiations on the retrenchments are on going, and
expected to be resolved by 28 February 2011.
20. The two new
companies are being given a fresh start and a break to mismanagement and
fraudulent activities of NOCZIM. Substantive Boards will be put in place as
soon as consultations are completed. The debt will remain in NOCZIM and will be
transparently serviced using the Debt Redemption Levy. It is likely to be fully
paid within two years if the projected fuel levels are
attained.
21. The Ministry is working hard to bring confidence
to the fuel suppliers to make them bring and store their product in Zimbabwe.
The country has over 500m litres of storage, which is more than double that in
Beira. NOCZIM had in previous years taken the fuel suppliers fuel without
permission or payment. To restore confidence, some of the suppliers have
requested that they co-manage their stocks in our tanks and others are
requesting Government Guarantees. There are several advantages in getting the
fuel suppliers to keep their fuel in Zimbabwe. These include:
http://www.newzimbabwe.com
24/02/2011 00:00:00
by Staff
Reporter
SOUTH African President Jacob Zuma began a new push for a
cross-party
roadmap to new elections in Zimbabwe this week when his
mediation team began
a round of talks with the country’s main political
parties.
On Tuesday, the team met officials from the Joint Monitoring and
Implementation Committee (Jomic) – a body set up to monitor compliance with
a 2008 power sharing agreement between Zanu PF and the two rival MDC
factions.
On Wednesday, Zuma’s emissaries held talks with Moses Mzila
Ndlovu and
Priscilla Misihairabwi – the two negotiators from the MDC led by
Welshman
Ncube. They later separately met with Ncube.
The team meets
officials from the MDC led by Morgan Tsvangirai on Thursday,
and are
expected to meet Zanu PF negotiators and President Robert Mugabe on
Friday.
Ncube told New Zimbabwe.com: “President Zuma is particularly
anxious to
ensure there is broad agreement on conditions necessary to hold
free and
fair elections. His mediation team is here to help kick-start that
process
at the end of which the parties hopefully agree on the minimum
conditions
necessary before we go to elections.”
Zuma was named by
regional leaders as the point man in the resolution of
political disputes in
Zimbabwe after President Robert Mugabe was forced into
a shaky power sharing
arrangement with his former opposition rivals in 2008.
Mugabe’s Zanu PF
party says it wants elections later this year, ideally
under a new
constitution, but warns that it could force the dissolution of
the coalition
if it feels Tsvangirai’s MDC, in particular, is delaying a
constitutional
referendum, and therefore the elections.
The MDC factions, on the other
hand, are demanding a raft of political,
media, police, army and electoral
reforms and guarantees to avoid a repeat
of a March 2008 ballot which ended
in a wave of political violence blamed on
Mugabe’s supporters.
Zanu
PF’s top decision making body the politburo met on Wednesday and
restated
its desire to have elections this year, while accusing Finance
Minister
Tendai Biti of withholding funds for a referendum on a draft
constitution.
Party spokesman Joram Gumbo said: "We are mainly
concerned in the delay in
releasing money to conclude the work of the
Constitutional Parliamentary
Committee. It is deliberate. The Ministry of
Finance wants the situation we
are in to continue.
“We are saying
Biti has to act; if he does not act then we can walk out of
the coalition.”
http://www.newzimbabwe.com/
24/02/2011 00:00:00
by Staff
Reporter
ZAPU leader Dumiso Dabengwa has met emissaries of South
African President
Jacob Zuma who are in Zimbabwe on a mission to draw up a
cross-party roadmap
towards free and fair elections.
The meeting on
Wednesday was the first time that Zuma’s special envoys have
met politicians
from outside the three parties who form Zimbabwe’s coalition
government –
Zanu PF and two rival MDC factions.
ZAPU spokesman Methuseli Moyo said
Dabengwa and his deputy Emelia
Mukaratirwa met Zuma’s team at their request
in Harare.
“The agenda of the meeting was obviously to hear ZAPU’s
position on the
proposed roadmap to elections. We are at liberty for now to
discuss what we
told President Zuma’s team, except to say we are just as
anxious as everyone
else about the manner in which some people want to
proceed on the matter,”
Moyo said.
“It is important for all players
to agree on the way forward for us to have
a legitimate, free and fair
election to bring a properly elected government
to run the affairs of our
country.”
ZAPU, like the two MDC groups, opposes the holding of elections
this year as
suggested by President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu PF.
Zanu
PF’s rivals insist on major reforms in the security sector, media and
electoral rules before elections are held, fearing a repeat of the 2008
general elections when election results were delayed by up to a month and a
presidential run-off in June triggered a violent backlash by Mugabe’s
supporters, forcing MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai into a
boycott.
Zuma’s team met officials from the Welshman Ncube-led MDC on
Wednesday,
before holding talks with Tsvangirai’s MDC on Thursday. Further
meetings
were planned with Zanu PF negotiators and Mugabe on
Friday.
Zuma was named by regional leaders as their point man in
Zimbabwe,
succeeding his predecessor Thabo Mbeki who oversaw the formation
of the
power sharing government in September 2008.
http://www.eyewitnessnews.co.za
Camilla Bath | 3 Hours
Ago
The South African government was called upon to intervene in the case
of 46
pro-democracy activists in Zimbabwe, who were charged with treason
after
attending a meeting on mass protests in North Africa.
The group
was arrested on Saturday and they were kept in custody for five
days. They
appeared in court on Wednesday.
Prosecutors accuse the group of trying to
organise an Egyptian-style
uprising to remove President Robert
Mugabe.
Human Rights Watch’s Tiseke Kasambala called on President Jacob
Zuma to
refocus his mediation efforts in Zimbabwe.
“We are trying our
best to galvanise advocacy around this, to push President
Zuma and his
mediation team to condemn what’s happening in Zimbabwe right
now,” she said.
“People… [were] arrested for simply viewing a video about
events in the
Middle East.”
http://www.zimonline.co.za
by Tobias Manyuchi Thursday 24 February
2011
HARARE – Cash-rich Chinese merchants will snap up nearly
half of Zimbabwe’s
2011 tobacco crop helping to drive up prices, while
breaking the
stranglehold of mostly European buyers accused of keeping
prices down in
past years, Harare tobacco authorities said.
Tobacco
Industry and Marketing Board (TIMB) chief executive officer Andrew
Matibiri
told a special parliamentary committee that the entry of the
Chinese had
been a boon to Zimbabwean growers with prices now averaging
US$0.58 more per
kilogramme than before arrival of buyers from the Asian
giant.
“Of
the tobacco sold 40 percent is going to China, the other 40 to Europe
and
the remainder to other parts of the world,” Matibiri told Parliament’s
portfolio committee on agriculture, water, lands and resettlement earlier
this week.
“Before the arrival of the Chinese US$2.99 per kilogramme
was the ceiling,”
he said, adding that tobacco prices have averaged US$3.57
per kg since the
tobacco auctioning season began last week.
According
to Matibiri, who spoke to the parliamentary committee on
Wednesday, prices
were expected to continue firming up on the back of
growing Chinese
demand.
Tobacco's earnings potential has fallen behind that of mining in
recent
years chiefly because of President Robert Mugabe’s controversial land
reform
programme that saw large-scale white commercial growers expelled from
the
land and replaced by black villagers without experience or capacity to
maintain production.
Before land reforms, a few hundred white
commercial farmers produced on
average more than 200 million kilogrammes of
tobacco per year that earned
Zimbabwe around $400 million annually, making
the crop the country’s single
largest foreign currency earner.
But
the tobacco sector is on the road to recovery with 60 000 mostly black
farmers -- or 35 000 more farmers than were recorded last year -- expected
to deliver 170 million kilogrammes of tobacco by close of the selling season
at the end of September.
Zimbabwe produced 123 million kilogrammes
last year that earned the country
US$384 million.
The Chinese
companies have in recent years targeted cash-strapped Zimbabwean
small-scale
tobacco farmers whose production they finance in return for
preferential
access to the crop.
China purchases the crop through the China Tobacco
Company represented in
Zimbabwe by Tian Ze.
“Farmers are responding
positively and the prices have been favourable
mostly attributable to the
presence of the Chinese,” Matibiri said.
Since the marketing season
opened last week, tobacco worth more than US$175
million has been
exported.
China has emerged as one of Zimbabwe’s most important political
allies and
trading partners since 2000 when Mugabe adopted his ‘Look East’
policy.
The policy is premised on the need to find new trading partners
and markets
after traditional investors from Western nations turned against
Harare in
protest over Mugabe’s human rights abuses, repression against
political
opponents and his violent land reform programme.
The “Look
East” policy specifically targets investors from Muslim and Asian
nations
and in exchange Zimbabwe has promised minerals – including diamonds
and gold
– and prime land to the investors, resulting in Harare penning
several
agreements mainly with China, Russia and Iran.-- ZimOnline
http://www.swradioafrica.com
By Tichaona Sibanda
24 February 2011
The MDC
led by Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai has launched a complaint
against the
state controlled ZBC, following a recent surge in criticism and
a blackout
of its officials by the broadcaster.
The letter of complaint was copied
to South African President Jacob Zuma, as
the SADC mediator to the Zimbabwe
crisis, plus the three principals to the
GPA, Information Minister Webster
Shamu and JOMIC.
In a letter to ZBC chief Happison Muchechetere, MDC
party spokesman Nelson
Chamisa said they wanted to place on record what
appeared to be ‘an
insatiable, and unhelpful desire to perpetuate selective
vilification of
senior MDC officials and Cabinet ministers by the sole
television station in
Zimbabwe.’
Chamisa also complained that the ZBC
rarely gave them airtime to explain
policies on issues of national
significance, saying; ‘It appears ZBC has
mounted a relentless campaign to
malign, vilify, defame and to smear the MDC
at the earliest opportunity
often without giving the party and its officials
a chance to tell their own
side of the story,’ Chamisa said.
The complaint by the MDC comes at a
time when television viewership of the
state-controlled ZBC channels fell
sharply, as the country’s sole
broadcaster stepped up its propaganda against
Robert Mugabe’s opponents.
Results of the Zimbabwe All Media Products and
Services Survey (Zamps)
showed that viewership of ZBC TV 1 slumped from 34%
of the population to 24%
in the last quarter of 2010.
Zimbabweans who
can afford to have hit back at the poor quality of state TV,
by installing
satellite dishes. This viewership has remained constant at 46%
for the last
two years.
http://www.radiovop.com
24/02/2011
13:59:00
Masvingo, February 24, 2011-Masvingo regional prosecutor,
Mirirai Shumba,
has thrown out the criminal defamation case filed by Zanu
(PF) chairman
Lovemore Matuke against the Masvingo Mirror editor Golden
Munganidze.
Shumba said the case lacked incriminating
evidence.
Maunganidze was arrested on Wednesday morning and detained for
about three
hours by detectives from the Law and Order section at the
Masvingo Central
Police station. His arrest came after Matuke said the paper
had published a
defamatory article linking him to a sex scandal.
In
its edition of 11-18 February, the paper's gossip column, 'Hot on the
Heels'
talked of an unnamed party official caught in the act with a fellow
party
member.
Although the article did not explicitly reveal Matuke, the Zanu
(PF) chair
said it meant him and pressed the charges.
Maunganidze was
represented by Rodney Saratoga Makause of Makonese and
Chihambakwe law firm.
http://af.reuters.com/
Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:00am
GMT
MUMBAI (Reuters) - Zimbabwe have lined up international
visits from
Bangladesh, Pakistan and New Zealand in 2011 but have not yet
confirmed that
they will include their first tests in five years, a Zimbabwe
Cricket source
said.
The country voluntarily withdrew from hosting
test matches in January 2006
but have in the past year staged one-day games
with Ireland, Sri Lanka and
India.
"We're still not sure if they'll
be including tests this year," the source
told Reuters on Thursday.
A
spokesman for governing body, the International Cricket Council (ICC),
said
it had not barred the country from hosting test matches and had done
everything possible to facilitate its return in staging the five-day
international form of the game.
Zimbabwe lost their first match in
the 50-over World Cup on Monday, falling
by 91 runs to holders Australia in
Ahmedabad.
Solidarity Peace Trust The Changing Politics of Matebeleland since
1980 by Sabelo J. Ndlovu-Gatsheni - Associate Professor of Development Studies at the University of South Africa We invite you to participate in discussion stimulated by this article by following this link and submitting comments on this or other essays included in the section on our website known as the Zimbabwe Review. You may also respond via email: please send your comments to discussion@solidaritypeacetrust.org. Please note that some comments may be selected for publication on our website alongside the article to further stimulate debate. Introduction I think the best way to understand the present day manifestations and character of Matebeleland politics is to situate them properly historically and politically within the broader terrain of the development of the idea of Zimbabwe and the eventual configuration of the Zimbabwe nation-state. The changing nature of politics in Matabeleland is largely a response to realities and perceptions of exclusion, marginalisation and confinement to second class citizenship of Ndebele-speaking people that began in 1980. The politics that is emerging from Matebeleland region is that of protest to perceptions and realities of exclusion, marginalisation and domination. The launch of such radical formations as the Matebeleland Liberation Front (MLF) last year calling for complete secession of Matebeleland and Midlands regions from Zimbabwe is the climax of regional politics of frustration and resentment of domination. President Robert Mugabe’s recent response to the developments taking place in the MDC led by Welshman Ncube and his seemingly overt support for Arthur Mutambara to remain as Deputy Prime Minister and refusal to swear-in Welshman Ncube as the new Deputy Prime Minister is fuelling perceptions of Ndebele-speaking leaders being unwanted and excluded from the corridors of power. It is therefore important to deploy a sober analysis that seeks to understand the motive forces behind the character of politics in Matabeleland since the 1980s. While one can get some glimpse of the core grievances from such forums as newzimbabwe.com and many others, it is equally important to situate the Matebeleland problems historically. The idea of Zimbabwe and Matabeleland question The idea of Zimbabwe is traceable to the 1960s. It emerged as a nationalist idea and an imagination of the postcolonial nation-state. The idea emerged within a terrain saturated with various ethno-cultural societies such as the Matebele Home Society, Monomotapa Offspring Society, Kalanga Cultural Society and many others-socio-cultural societies that indicated where the people were coming from and how they were responding to colonial environment and how they defined themselves identity-wise. The naming of associations indicated a formative consciousness that was torn-apart between pre-colonial nostalgia and colonial realities. Zimbabwean nationalism had to spring from this milieu. The name of the imagined nation had to be indigenous. The Great Zimbabwe heritage site that is closely associated with the Karanga people (a branch of Shona as an enlarged identity) provided the name. Michael Mawema, a Karanga is credited for coming up with the name during his short stint as the interim president of the National Democratic Party (NDP). But the first political formation to officially use the name Zimbabwe was the Zimbabwe National Party (ZNP) an insignificant party that was formed by some Karanga-speaking politicians that had broken up from NDP. From this outset, a voice from Matabeleland coming through some members of Matebele Home Society protested against the choice of the name Zimbabwe for the imagined nation. They reasoned that it was an ethnic name that was not accommodative of other peoples. They preferred the name Matopos as inclusive and non-ethnic. Ethnicity was beginning to be a factor in the imagination of the postcolonial nation-state itself. African nationalism as the medium of implementation of the idea of Zimbabwe became deeply interpellated by ethnicity from its birth despite some pretensions of unity by the early nationalists. At the centre of articulation of nationalism were such considerations as what the foundation myth of the imagined nation-state was, and which heroes, symbols and history had to be projected as an anchorage of the imagined nation. Beginning with the naming, Shona histories, symbols and heroes were increasingly elevated into anchorages of the imagined nation. This has partly to do with the fact that a majority of postcolonial nation-states had to be built and crystallise around the dominant ethnie. But nationalists had the mammoth task of creatively managing and balancing such vectors of identity as race, class, ethnicity, region, gender, and generation as they imagined a unitary postcolonial nation-state. The difficult question is: Were there real nationalists existing as de-tribalised actors committed to the imagining and building a stable nation? Was the label nationalist not only a respected one that masked tribalism? Did we not have lip-service nationalists who only assumed nationalist identities in front of crowds and then withdrew to their primal tribal identity soon after? These are important questions that beg for responses. The 1963 split in the Zimbabwe African People’s Union (ZAPU) that gave birth to a Shona dominated Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU) remains one important event that indicated how tribalism and ethnicity were deeply embedded within nationalism. However hard those who were involved in this split deny the prominence of tribalism and ethnicity as a factor behind the split the subsequent events spoke loudly about the role of ethnicity in spoiling the birth of a nation. The immediate post-split ZAPU-ZANU faction fights in Harare, Gweru, Bulawayo and other sites took clear tribal and ethnic dimensions. Later splits including the one that resulted in the formation of the Front for the Liberation of Zimbabwe (Frolizi) and others also indicated how ethnicity was playing havoc within nationalist politics. The same is true of postcolonial split that rocked the MDC in 2005. Even factions within ZANU-PF indicate the reverberation of regional, kinship, clannish, ethnic and tribal alignments. In short, the liberation struggle became a terrain of re-tribalisation of nationalism with particular ethnic groups positioning themselves to lead and dominate the imagined postcolonial nation. Even a seemingly unitary Shona identity unravelled as the Karanga fought to eliminate the Manyika and the Zezuru fought for ascendance over the Karanga. Along the way lives were lost due to what Masipula Sithole termed ‘struggles within the struggle.’ The sum of all is that the Zimbabwe nation-state that was born in 1980 was a product of a deeply tribalised nationalism. The nationalists who spearheaded the liberation struggle dreamt in both nationalist and tribal languages and terms. The nation-state was therefore born with a terrible ethnic-tribal birth-mark. As put by Eldred Masunungure, Zimbabwe as a state came into being in 1980 but Zimbabwe as a nation did not. There was outright and unapologetic building of the state as a ‘Zanufied’ and ‘Shonalized’ political formation where other political actors like PF-ZAPU that drew most of its support from Matabeleland and Midlands regions had no dignified space and Ndebele-speaking people were an inconvenience that had to be dealt with. This mentality was clear from music, symbols, heroes and national celebrations of independence. Zimbabwe and the Matebeleland question As noted above Zimbabwe was born out of an armed liberation war spearheaded by ethnically fragmented leadership, fought by equally ethnically fragmented freedom fighters and supported by masses that were socialised into tribal politics. It was against this background that ZANU-PF electoral victory in 1980 was celebrated as not only a victory of a liberation movement over settler colonialism but also as victory of Shona political elite over Ndebele political elites in PF-ZAPU. While ZANU-PF built their political legitimacy on their nationalist liberation war credentials, they also openly connected the party, the state, and the nation to Shona historical symbols. This set the stage for an ethnic showdown between the triumphant Shona and the defeated Ndebele that became openly violent in 1982. On this issue, Norma Kriger noted that from the very day of achievement of independence, the triumphant Shona-dominated ZANU-PF leadership displayed a unique desire to build a ‘party-nation’ and a ‘party-state’ that excluded other political formations, crafted around and backed by ZANU-PF’s war-time military wing (ZANLA) and Shona historical experiences. Specific party slogans, party symbols, party songs, and party regalia of the liberation war time continued to be used at national ceremonies like Independence and Heroes Days. It was amidst this fanfare and celebratory mood that Shona triumphalism unfolded against Ndebele particularism reeling under a feeling of defeat. Through music and dance, the triumphalism of ZANU-PF over PF-ZAPU was openly displayed and conveyed to everybody as though the liberation struggle was a duality between the Shona dominated ZANU-PF and the Ndebele dominated PF-ZAPU. A decidedly partial history of the liberation war and a decidedly partial imagination of the state and the nation ensued backed by an openly biased historical master-narrative of the struggle for independence. The typical example of that history was David Martin and Phyllis Johnson’s The Struggle for Zimbabwe: Chimurenga War freely distributed throughout the country into every school and college. This book became the official history of ZANU-PF and ZANLA, celebrating their centrality in the struggle while at the same time sidelining the contribution of PF-ZAPU and ZIPRA. The triumphant ZANU-PF politicians immediately used the state controlled media to cast PF-ZAPU, its leader Joshua Nkomo, and its military wing (ZIPRA), as no heroic liberators, as no committed nation-builders, but as a threat to the country’s hard won independence. Historians like T. Ranger, N. Bhebe, and E. Sibanda have tried to add the Matabeleland narratives into the story of nationalism through Matabeleland focused research in recent years. This academic compensation has not been accompanied by a clear drive for political and economic inclusion of Ndebele people into the mainstream of post-colonial Zimbabwe save for the Unity Accord of 22 December 1987. Up to now Shona history, Shona symbols, and rituals still underpin state ideology at the exclusion of the Ndebele. Even such minor issues such as which news bulletin comes first on ZTV is permeated and driven by imperatives of Shona-Ndebele power imbalances. News in the Shona language must always come first. But in democratic countries like South Africa where there are eleven recognised official languages there is no rigid format of which news in which language comes first. The central state of Zimbabwe sanctioned deployment of military and ethnicised violence against the Ndebele in the period between 1982 and 1987 within this background. What happened deserves some close analysis because it reveals the behaviour of the central state and how it handled what was considered a form of dissidence of the Ndebele speaking people. The key feature of this period was the attempt by ZANU-PF to crush PF-ZAPU that had constituted itself as the strongest opposition in the country. PF-ZAPU and Joshua Nkomo were ‘provincialised’ and stripped of their nationalist liberation credentials to the extent that Nkomo was openly disparaged as the king of the Ndebele and a father of dissidents. The open exclusionary state practices took the form of preferential treatment of ex-ZANLA as a victorious force, use of exclusionary language by the political leadership of Zimbabwe, and exclusion of Ndebele history and symbols from the imagination of the new nation. These issues combined to create what eventually became known as the dissident situation in Matabeleland. ZANU-PF desperately needed such a situation to justify its crackdown on PF-ZAPU and its military wing using state power. Violent handling of ‘dissidents’: Gukurahundi and the Ndebele Eliakim Sibanda has noted that ‘The crisis in Matabeleland started in the army.’ This means that any analysis of how the Shona dominated central state dealt with the Ndebele-speaking people as dissidents must take into account the complexities of a tale not only of politicised ethnicity and abuse of state power, but also a story of problematic integration of ex-ZANLA, ex-ZIPRA and ex-Rhodesian forces into the Zimbabwe National Army (ZNA). It is also a tale of problematic nation-building that was exclusivist as well as part of elite politics of competition for power and nationalist vendettas. As early as November 1980, the integration of forces was hit by its first crisis when ZIPRA and ZANLA forces fought against each other in Assembly Points (APs). This ZIPRA-ZANLA fights spread to eNtumbane, Ntabazinduna, Connemara, Chitungwidza, and Silalabuhwa. The underlying cause of all these violent clashes had to do with a combination of inflammatory political speeches by ZANU-PF leaders, open discrimination of ZIPRA, open favouritism of ZANLA, and abuse of PF-ZAPU leaders to whom ZIPRA was loyal. Kriger noted that ZANU-PF began to behave as though Zimbabwe was a one party state-’In other areas, too, ZANU (PF)’s grass-roots supporters and its national leadership exhibited a one-party mentality.’ The ZANU-PF slogans were openly provocative and disparaging of PF-ZAPU, the person of Joshua Nkomo and the liberation credentials of ZIPRA. This led Josiah Chinamano, a deputy president of PF-ZAPU to warn that these slogans would incite the anger of armed ZIPRA forces without any political platform from which to answer back except through their guns. Indeed the continued exclusion of ZIPRA, PF-ZAPU, and the entire leadership of this party from the imagination of the new nation, the attempt to belittle their contribution to the liberation war and the monopolisation of the media by ZANU-PF made the people of Matabeleland and ZIPRA agitated, restless and unsure of their security in Zimbabwe. On the other hand, ZANU-PF was bent on eliminating PF-ZAPU and its leadership as they considered it an obstacle to the agenda and drive for the one-party state in Zimbabwe. This agenda was loaded into numerous speeches by ZANU-PF leaders that included Enos Nkala who openly stated that PF-ZAPU and ZIPRA were not heroes-’They contributed in their own small way and we have given them a share proportional to their contributions.’ Following the first clashes between ZIPRA and ZANLA, Edgar Tekere, another ZANU-PF leader openly sided with ZANLA and blamed ZIPRA. He stated that ‘We did not need his army in the war, so why are they making a nuisance of themselves now?’ To him, ZIPRA and Rhodesian forces were not to be integrated into the new national army-’the government must work seriously and quickly for the abolition of ZIPRA and Rhodesian armed forces.’ A feeling of being unwanted developed not only among ZIPRA forces but also among the people of Matabeleland both loyal to Joshua Nkomo and PF-ZAPU. As the ZIPRA found themselves being accused of disloyalty, some began to desert from ZNA with their arms back to the liberation-wartime bush operational areas. Some were escaping torture and witch-hunts that were masterminded by ZANU-PF and ZANLA. ZIPRA found themselves in a very unenviable position within the ZNA. One ex-ZIPRA colonel had this to say:
The violent clashes between the ZIPRA and ZANLA, the desertion of some ex-ZIPRA from the national army, the exploitation of the antagonistic situation by apartheid South Africa via Super ZAPU and the ‘discovery’ of arms caches in PF-ZAPU owned farms around Bulawayo gave government the pretext to use state power to crush PF-ZAPU. ZANU-PF wanted to gain control in the south-western part of the country and to consolidate its power. As noted by Brian Eric Abrams, ZANU-PF and the state ‘developed a clear message, sharp media campaign and a multi-layered military response to achieve its highly focused political goals.’ Within this ZANU-PF political agenda, PF-ZAPU was a party that sponsored dissidents, Joshua Nkomo was the father of dissidents, every young Ndebele man was a potential dissident, all ex-ZIPRA including those serving in the army were dissidents, and the entire population of Matabeleland constituted a dissident community. State sanctioned, military-style and ethnicised violence was unleashed on all Ndebele-speaking people between 1982 and 1987. The storm-troopers in this violence were a combination of a select, Shona-speaking Fifth Brigade, specially trained by Koreans in cruelty and torture of its victims, ZANU-PF Youth Brigade, ZANU-PF Women’s League and other regular forces. The time of violence is remembered as Gukurahundi atrocities. The military Brigade that carried out the atrocities is remembered as Gukurahundi. Gukurahundi is a Shona name for early rains that wash away chaff of the previous season. The chaff to be washed away was this time the Ndebele-speaking people. The Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace (CCJP) and the Legal Resources Foundation (LRF)’s Report, Breaking the Silence: Building True Peace: A Report on the Disturbances in Matabeleland and the Midlands, 1980-1989, provides crucial details of how a military operation orchestrated through Fifth Brigade (Gukurahundi) became a bizarre combination of random killing of every Ndebele-speaker, hunting and killing of every PF-ZAPU supporter, raping of Ndebele women and girls, as well as abduction, torture, and forcing every Ndebele-speaker to switch to Shona language and then support ZANU-PF. What started as a mission to stamp out dissidents became from start to finish an ethnicized crusade to make the Ndebele account for the nineteenth century raids on the Shona, and a purely anti-Ndebele campaign that deliberately conflated Joshua Nkomo, PF-ZAPU, ex-ZIPRA and every Ndebele-speaking person into a dissident, dissident collaborator, dissident sympathiser and sponsor. This was a situation where the state itself became tribalist with ethnicity being openly used as an instrument to eliminate a rival ethnic group. The Fifth Brigade-a military unit outfit answerable to the then Prime Minister Mugabe that was said to be politically compliant to ZANU-PF political philosophy was only withdrawn from Matabeleland and the Midlands in 1987 following the signing of the Unity Accord. Before the Accord, the Fifth Brigade committed serious atrocities characterised by brutal and indiscriminate state sanctioned violence targeting Ndebele speaking communities. The carnage started in 1982 and ended in 1987 claiming the lives of over 20 000 civilians. The impact and meaning of Gukurahundi in Matebeleland More than any other violent episode in post-colonial Zimbabwe, the Gukurahundi episode reconstructed and reinforced Ndebele identity resulting in deep polarisation of the Zimbabwe nation. Bjorn Lindgren noted that the atrocities carried out by the Fifth Brigade, heightened the victims’ awareness of being Ndebele at the cost of being Zimbabwean. While this violence was meant to destroy Ndebele particularism as a threat to Shona triumphalism, its consequences were the reverse. The openly ethnic nature of the violence pushed the Ndebele into an even greater awareness of their differences with the Shona. Lingren, wrote that ‘people in Matabeleland responded by accusing Mugabe, the government and the ‘Shona’ in general of killing the Ndebele.’ Besides the Fifth Brigade atrocities instilling fear in Matabeleland and the Midlands, it heightened the victims’ awareness of being Ndebele and a sense of not being part of Zimbabwe. The Unity Accord signed between PF-ZAPU and ZANU-PF on 22 December 1987 amounted to nothing less than a surrender document where the PF-ZAPU politicians threw in the towel and allowed PF-ZAPU to be swallowed by ZANU-PF. The only positive result was that atrocities stopped. Beyond that, the Accord became just a form of nationalist leaders accommodating each other across ethnic division but leaving the people still divided. It was very far from being a comprehensive conflict resolution mechanism. Bitterness and the memory of having lost family members, relatives and friends remained engulfing those areas where the Fifth Brigade and the dissidents operated. This was confirmed by oral interviews that I carried out in 2002 in Bulawayo and Gweru relating to how the Ndebele perceived the military in Zimbabwe. Every interviewee remembered the military in the context of how the Fifth Brigade killed innocent people. Ndebele particularism emerged out of this violence highly politicised and wounded posing a danger to the pretences of a unitary nation-state of Zimbabwe. In the first place, radical Ndebele counter-hegemonic ethno-nationalism manifested itself in the form of radical Ndebele cultural nationalism and secondly in the form of radical Ndebele-oriented pressure groups that openly questioned the dominance of the Shona in employment in general, senior civil service, security and education as well as open neglect of economic development of Matebeleland and the Midlands regions. Some radical Ndebele-speaking people began to question the value and benefit of associating themselves with the whole idea of a unitary Zimbabwe state that was openly used to oppress and kill them. This spirit manifested itself more openly in the formation of such radical Ndebele pressure groups as Vukani Mahlabezulu, Imbovane Yamahlabezulu, ZAPU 2000 as well as Mthwakazi Action Group on Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing in Matabeleland and Midlands and Mthwakazi People’s Congress (MPC). Vukani Mahlabezulu modelled itself as a radical cultural organisation focused more on revival of particularistic features of Ndebele culture and its main proponent was a novelist and academic, Mthandazo Ndema Ngwenya. He lost life in a mysterious car accident on the Bulawayo-Harare Road in 1991 together with another Ndebele-speaking academic known as Themba Nkabinde. Imbovane Yamahlabezulu was a radical pressure group that opened debates on the sensitive issue of the Fifth Brigade, putting pressure on the ZANU-PF government to be taken to account for the atrocities. The pressure group organised rallies and meetings where such political figures as Enos Nkala and others like Joseph Msika were invited to explain to the people as to who gave the instructions for the atrocities. ZAPU 2000 was a belated attempt to revive ZAPU following the death of Joshua Nkomo in July 1999. Its focus was a repudiation of the Unity Accord which was interpreted as a surrender document that did not benefit the ordinary people of Matabeleland who suffered the consequences of ethnic violence. It attacked the former ZAPU elite for selling out the people of Matabeleland for personal interests. Mthwakazi Action Group on Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing in Matebeleland and Midlands and Mthwakazi People’s Congress were a Diaspora phenomenon. They campaigned for the atrocities committed by the Fifth Brigade to be internationally recognised as genocide and for those people including Mugabe to be prosecuted for this action. They also sought the establishment of an autonomous United Mthwakazi Republic (UMR) as the only way for the Ndebele people to realise self-determination. The embers of the Matabeleland problem also pulsated around the death of Joshua Nkomo in July 1999. Despite having joined ZANU-PF in 1987, Joshua Nkomo was still revered in Matabeleland as umdala wethu (our old man). Joshua Nkomo occupied a special place within Ndebele particularism and was persecuted for being a Ndebele leader for a long time. Nkomo himself provides details of his persecution by ZANU-PF in his autobiography. During his burial at the Heroes Acre in Harare, a big delegation from Matabeleland and the Midlands regions came to pay their last respects. What distinguished the Matabeleland delegation was the persistent song-uNkomo wethu somlandela, yenu Nkomo wethu (We will follow our Nkomo where ever he goes). This was an old PF-ZAPU song of liberation that encapsulated the loyalty and confidence of ZAPU supporters in Joshua Nkomo’s leadership. In a purely hegemonic style, ZANU-PF competed with the people of Matabeleland over ownership of Joshua Nkomo. Robert Mugabe took advantage of his death to express some lukewarm regrets about the atrocities committed by the Fifth Brigade for the first time. He assured the people of Matabeleland that the Unity Accord would be respected. For the first time, Mugabe described the Fifth Brigade atrocities as having happened during ‘a moment of madness.’ Besides coming nearer to apologising for the atrocities, Mugabe posthumously, granted Nkomo the long contested title of ‘Father Zimbabwe,’ arguing that Nkomo was a national model and a supra-nationalist that embodied all the cultures of the country. The editorial column of the Zimbabwe News, an official organ of ZANU-PF carried the following title: ‘Farewell Dear Father’ and the editorial partly read:
For the first time, the founders of the Ndebele state, Mzilikazi and Lobhengula were listed together with Shona national heroes, in a desperate attempt by ZANU-PF to keep the people of Matabeleland within the fold of their party and within the Shona imagined nation and state. In the midst of all this, the younger generation of Matabeleland politicians like the president of Imbovane Yamahlabezulu, the late Mr. Bekithemba John Sibindi, responded by repudiating the Unity Accord that was emphasised by Mugabe and calling for an apology from Mugabe and compensation for the people of Matabeleland. The young generation of political activists in Matabeleland became even more sceptical of territorial nationalism as represented by ZANU-PF in the absence of Nkomo. The common perception that had developed in Matebeleland was that ZANU-PF is a tribal party that survived on tribalism and served the interests of one ethnic group. This is how some people put it: ZANU-PF is a party that is founded on splitting Zimbabwe into tribal groupings, i.e. Shona and Ndebele, whereby Shonas must provide national leadership. ZANU-PF, usually referred to as ‘The Party,’ has always had in their leadership deck Shonas taking up key leadership positions with a lacing of Ndebele apologists making up the leadership elite numbers. The party had to enlist the services of Ndebele apologists to paint a picture of a government of national unity following the inconsequential ‘Unity Accord’ signed in December 1987. The Ndebele apologists were to behave like gagged guests at this party-’make no key decisions and above all don’t raise questions about the development of the other half of the country. The violence of the 1980s continued to be a major issue in Matabeleland. Its embers influenced politicians like Jonathan Moyo to design a Gukurahundi National Memorial Bill that he sought to table in Zimbabwe Parliament as part of a closure on the atrocities that left the country divided on ethnic lines. Justifying the need for a Gukurahundi National Memorial Bill, Jonathan Moyo noted that:
While some contemporary analysts think that Moyo was just using the atrocities to gain support in Matabeleland, the fact remained that the Gukurahundi atrocities have remained open for political mileage. The action of Moyo provoked some Matabeleland political gladiators like John Nkomo, Dumiso Dabengwa, and Joseph Msika from the old PF-ZAPU to also make comments on Gukurahundi for the first time since their party was swallowed by ZANU-PF in 1987. This salience of the Matabeleland problem has led Khanyisela Moyo, a Zimbabwean lawyer to state that: ‘In my opinion, the Matabele question is critical and cannot be cursorily thrust aside. It should be subjected to an intellectual and candid debate.’ Since 2000, the embers of the Matabeleland problems became more prominent in the Diaspora than inside Zimbabwe. This was partly due to the fact that the Zimbabwe crisis that unfolded in 1997 had forced millions of people into the Diaspora and partly because of the lack of democratic spaces in Zimbabwe to practise alternative politics to ZANU-PF’s one party mentality. Diaspora, Matebeleland question and cyberspace As Zimbabwe descended deeper into crisis punctuated by violence and displacement, many people migrated to Botswana, South Africa, Britain and other far away countries. Some of the displaced individuals and groups from Matebeleland once in the Diaspora began to make sense of the crisis in Zimbabwe and their fate as a minority group. Unlimited access to the cyberspace enabled some young Matebele people to articulate aspects of the Matebeleland question without fear or favour. Radical irredentist and secessionist ideas emerged in the Diaspora and were articulated within the cyberspace. This culminated in the creation of a ‘virtual nation’ known as the United Mthwakazi Republic (UMR), complete with its own national flag and other ritualistic trappings of a real national formation such as radio station. Ndebele speaking people were among the first crop of Zimbabweans to migrate out of Zimbabwe even before the collapse of the national economy in 2000. Gukurahundi violence forced some Ndebele speaking people to take refugee at Dukwe Camp in Botswana in the 1980s. Some were forced to take asylum in such countries as the United Kingdom, Canada and USA. Thus by 2000, there was already a sizeable number of what one can term ‘pre-2000 Ndebele Diasporic community.’ This Diasporic community was composed mainly by PF-ZAPU activists and ex-ZIPRA combatants who were targeted by the Fifth Brigade. By 1983, even the ZAPU leader Joshua Nkomo was driven into exile in Britain. This earlier crop of Ndebele Diaspora particularly in the United Kingdom were better institutionalised and organised, having carried with them a strong sense of PF-ZAPU identity and Matabeleland nationalism. Some of these earlier groups have remained die-hard ZAPU at heart even in the absence of PF-ZAPU. They consistently tried to revive ZAPU as they did not recognize the legitimacy of the Unity Accord of 22 December 1987 that enabled ZANU-PF to swallow PF-ZAPU. As the Diaspora Ndebele emerged from a highly ethnicised environment in Zimbabwe one can easily understand why their politics soon took ethnic forms. The United Mthwakazi Republic (UMR), complete with a flag and a radio station emerged in the United Kingdom. If one opens the website, it becomes clear that this organisation was born out of grievance and resentment of Shona triumphalism, leading the Ndebele in the Diaspora to define all the problems affecting the people of Matabeleland in ethnic terms. Gukurahundi atrocities provided the background against which cyber politics of secession of Matabeleland and the Midlands from Zimbabwe formed itself. This is combined with mobilization and appropriation of the proud memory of pre-colonial Ndebele history as well as the recent sad memories of the Fifth Brigade atrocities. A separate history was claimed together with the appropriation of Joshua Nkomo, ZAPU and ZIPRA as the property and heritage of the Ndebele. Mthwakazi proponents declared that:
One other key contour of Ndebele Diaspora identity was that those that were in South Africa were finding it very easy to claim Zulu as well as Xhosa identities. This was due to similarities in language and some elements of common history and common clan names. It became very difficult for South African police to distinguish these Ndebele people from South Africans of Nguni origin particularly. Others, who came from areas like Beitbridge and the southern part of Gwanda, integrated themselves easily with the Venda and Suthu speaking communities, again because of close linguistic factors. Internally ethnicity continued to cause trouble within political parties with ripple effects on the Diaspora. The split of the MDC into two factions in 2005 immediately polarised supporters of MDC outside the country with many Ndebele-speaking ones opting for the MDC that was led by Welshman Ncube. This split affected MDC structures in Britain and South Africa. What became known as the Welshman Ncube faction was considered to be a Ndebele faction. The Tsvangirai faction was cast as a Shona faction. This was despite the fact that both factions retained both Ndebele and Shona supporters and leaders. Bringing in Arthur Mutambara as a compromise leader of the Bulawayo-based faction did not prevent its being defined in ethnic terms as a Ndebele faction. What is not clear though is how the radical Diaspora Ndebele secessionist politics is impinging on internal Matabeleland politics. Within Matebeleland there has been a strong support for MDC-T since 2000. The smaller MDC also made significant inroads into some constituencies during the 2008 harmonised elections. But ZANU-PF was rejected. The consistent Matebeleland vote for the opposition is commonly interpreted as a protest vote against ZANU-PF that authorised the Gukurahundi atrocities. Those voting for the opposition seem to still believe in territorial nationalism and that with the introduction of democracy and human rights, there is still possibility of peaceful coexistence of ethnicities and races. But gradually the radical Ndebele Diaspora politics is also impinging on internal regional politics. Such organizations as the pressure group called Ibhetshu LikaZulu have imbibed radical secessionist ideas to the extent of trying to make separate celebrations of those people they considered to be heroes from the region during the Heroes Holidays. In 2009, Ibhetshu LikaZulu even celebrated such controversial figures as Gwesela and Gayigusu who were always in the press in the 1980s as notorious dissidents as a Matebele heroes. A close look at the politics of Matebeleland, reveals that a number of community activists and political leaders including the late Governor of Matebeleland North Welshman Mabhena and former ZANU-PF Politburo member Joshua Malinga, have complained about Matebeleland’s marginalization since 1980. The Ndebele people’s complaints about exclusion from the nation-state and domination by the numerically preponderant Shonas have been ignored by the central state. As a result, the people of Matebeleland not only continue to feel like second class citizens of Zimbabwe but also continue to seek alternative ways of redressing their political and economic grievances, with the younger generations increasingly calling for violence and secession to redress their plight. Their feelings of discontentment and frustration with the national politics of the day have been equally shared by the older generation of leaders. Matebeleland has also been in the forefront of pushing the agenda of devolution of power in the recent constitutional outreach programme. But what is clear is that Matebeleland has successfully banished ZANU-PF from the region through consistent voting for the opposition since 2000. But ZANU-PF has consistently tried to use the Unity Accord as their bait to lure the people of Matabeleland into voting for it forgetting that this unity reminded the Ndebele of how they were brutalised and forced into being members of ZANU-PF after the death of thousands of Ndebele-speaking civilians. Joshua Nkomo’s legacy and his support for national unity were also used by ZANU-PF in its attempts to win votes in Matabeleland. But ZANU-PF has not been successful. But a number of political activities have taken place in recent years in Matebeleland which indicate the increasing political assertiveness of the Ndebele-speaking people, particularly taking the form of resistance to imposed ideas from Harare. They quickly saw through how Nkomo’s legacy was being instrumentally used to capture the Matebeleland constituency. The recent walking out of the Unity Accord by some high-ranking Matabeleland politicians and the re-emergence of ZAPU in 2009 under the leadership of Dumiso Dabengwa, has however added a new dimension and, consequently, there is an observable process of re-aligning in the politics of ‘re-capturing’ Matebeleland. The recent repudiation of the Unity Accord of 22 December 1987 by some high-ranking ZANU PF leaders from Matabeleland, such as Thenjiwe Lesabe, Cyril Ndebele and Dumiso Dabengwa, and their re-launching of ZAPU in 2009, is not only a big vote of no confidence in ZANU PF’s nation-building project but also a reflection of Matebeleland’s continual cry for recognition. The relaunched ZAPU under the leadership of Dabengwa seeks to reclaim its pre-1963 national resonance and representativity which it claims ZANU-PF has destroyed through ethnicisation and racialisation of national politics and development. Current Matabeleland politics and forthcoming elections Currently Matabeleland is showing increasingly ethnic and regional dynamics with ZAPU having been revived and positioning itself to claim its Matebeleland and Midlands support-base from both MDC political formations. At another level, ZAPU under the veteran nationalist Dumiso Dabengwa is trying to claim its pre-1963 national political resonance while at the same time trying to regain its Matebeleland constituency. ZAPU’s publicity secretary Methuseli Moyo has been dishing out mixed signals-at one level articulating purely Matebeleland regional issues and on the other projecting ZAPU as an authentic liberation movement with strong national credentials poised to replace ZANU-PF from power. The Matebeleland region is currently issuing mixed and complex political signals. These range from a new repertoire of secessionist and irredentist politics, to electoral unpredictability. The revival of ZAPU and re-organisation of the MDC under the leadership of Professor Welshman Ncube who, unlike Arthur Mutambara, is considered a politician from the Matebeleland and Midlands regions, have the potential to contribute to the intensification of electoral competition come new elections. There is even possibility of a new regional coalition being formed including ZAPU and MDC aimed at maximizing electoral success in Matabeleland and the Midlands regions. Already, some ZAPU officials have begun imploring the officials of the smaller faction of the Movement for Democratic Change to ‘surrender the cross’ and join ZAPU before the forthcoming elections. Some civil society groups have also implored the two parties to unite so that they could enter the elections as a strong regional force. There is an incipient ‘political scramble’ for Matebeleland from different political gladiators with MDC-T fighting to retain its electoral dominance that it has enjoyed since the split of 2005. Some ZANU PF party heavyweights from the Matabeleland region whose political grip has waned over the years, have also made known their intentions to contest and recapture parliamentary seats in the region in the forthcoming elections. More than any region in the country, this has raised the spectre of bruising plebiscitary battles. But there are some young Ndebele-speaking political activists who lump MDC-T together with ZANU-PF as political formations representing those regions inhabited by dominant Shona-speaking people rather than Matebeleland. To these young activists, the people of Matebeleland are just being used to propel MDC-T into power and once that is done Matabeleland would be forgotten and its marginalization will continue. But ZANU-PF too has not given up on making inroads into Matebeleland using those former ZAPU members who decided to remain in ZANU-PF at the time Dabengwa revived ZAPU. The politics that has developed around the statue of Nkomo is revealing. It is also widely believed that the recent Nkomo statue debacle is part of the continuum of the efforts to recapture Matebeleland using Nkomo’s legacy and through the symbolism of Nkomo as a form of appeasement. The statue project was however hit by bad political weather taking the form of opposition from the surviving Nkomo family members and other members of the Matebeleland region tired of being recipients of ideas imposed from Harare. Beginning with the refusal by Welshman Mabhena to be buried at the Heroes Acre, there is increasing snubbing of directives from ZANU-PF and Harare. When the other veteran nationalist Thenjiwe Lesabe died, ZANU-PF avoided another snub by not considering her for heroine status, with Didymus Mutasa of ZANU-PF saying ‘we could not confer on her the national heroine, which was rightful status, because she was not consistent when she joined ZAPU led by Dabengwa.’ Lesabe had made it clear before her death that she did not want to be buried at Heroes Acre. But a third ‘snub’ came soon after. Cornius Nhloko hailing from Silobela in the Midlands and a former Zimbabwe People’s Revolutionary Army (ZIPRA) intelligence chief died at the age of 63 during the same week of Lesabe’s death. ZANU-PF conferred him a national hero status but his family indicated that Nhloko had made it clear that he did not want to be buried at Heroes Acre. These ‘snubs’ reinforce the widespread criticism that National Heroes Acre has essentially become a ZANU-PF burial ground rather than a national shrine. The popular view is that the much talked about ‘forthcoming elections’ that President Mugabe said will be held in 2011, will be the possible decider of the decade-long presidential challenge between Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and President Robert Mugabe. The Matabeleland strand clearly promises to be brewing an election within an election. It could as well be the deciding region, either through its use as a decoy by some parties and/or the division of votes among multiple parties scrambling for regional support. Matebeleland dynamics are as equally important to watch as the national focus on the Mugabe-Tsvangirai duet. The Matebeleland question has continued to be felt throughout all aspects of national politics, and opposition parties like MDC and Mavambo have all struggled to deal with the issue. The MDC split of 2005, for instance, largely evolved around the question of Matebeleland and how to handle issues of regional and ethnic representation within the party. Similarly, the split in Mavambo after its modest performance in the 2008 elections also had a lot to do with issues of Ndebele people’s ethnic and regional representation within the party and how the party’s policies dealt with issues of Matebeleland’s historic marginalization. The Matebeleland question has continued to loom large in the MDC-T’s current internal politics, and the party has increasingly come under fire from its Matebeleland supporters for its alleged insensitivity to the problems of the region and its failure to come out with clear policies on ethnic power balancing as well as a concise justice and reconciliation framework that adequately deals with the Gukurahundi legacy. At the same time, there has also continued to be simmering ethnic and regional struggles within the Welshman Ncube-led MDC over how to handle the Matebeleland question. All these problems, in a way, indicate serious challenges in current approaches towards resolving the Matebeleland question. Conclusion Nowhere throughout Zimbabwe have feelings of exclusion and marginalization been felt more strongly than in Matebeleland. Since 1980, the ‘Matebeleland Question’ has continued to project dynamics that speak to the unexplored legacies of hegemonic politics and violence as modes of governance, decentralization and devolution of power, linguistic and cultural diversity, and perceptions and realities of regional marginalization. The failure by the central state to address all these issues satisfactorily has evoked different responses from the people on the ground. The responses have included intensified calls for devolution of power, regional and ethnic fundamentalism as well as secessionism. Today, Matebeleland has become a theatre of renewed and frenzied political interest and the centre of a potentially seismic shift. As captured by The Standard of 15 January 2011: ‘If developments over the past year are anything to go by, there is every reason to expect the region to play a leading role in influencing the political direction in Zimbabwe.’ But what is this Matebeleland question? It can be best described as a multifaceted one. It is historical and political. It is old and new. It is a national question. Its roots are traceable to the pre-colonial, colonial and postcolonial periods. It is deeply lodged within the development of the idea of Zimbabwe itself. It is about nation-building and authentic subjects of the nation. It is about who is considered a Zimbabwean and who is not. It is about inclusion of ethnicities into a single nation. It is a challenge to ethno-nationalism. It is about the style of governance and inclusive citizenship. It is about fair exercise of power and tolerance of diversity. As such, its resolution is inevitably about rethinking nation-building, citizenship and belonging as well as sharing of resources and power configuration. To resolve it, there is need to re-visit the idea of Zimbabwe and to democratize it. ZANU-PF messed it up since its emergence in 1963. Its resolution needs genuine nationalists, not lip-service ones. It reveals the failures of nation-building. It indicates the limits of coercion as a lever of nation-building. It points to the limits of ethno-nationalism that masquerades as territorial nationalism. It cannot therefore be resolved simply by elections as elections have proven to be more of an ethnic census. Full references to all sources cited in this paper are available on our website. For further information, please contact Selvan Chetty - Deputy Director, Solidarity Peace Trust Email: selvan@solidaritypeacetrust.org Tel: +27 (39) 682 5869 Address: Suite 4 |