The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
SOKWANELE
Enough is
Enough
We have a fundamental
right to freedom of expression!
On 17 August 2004, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) leaders meeting in Mauritius adopted the SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections. Zimbabwe, as a member of SADC, also signed the document and committed itself to implementing its standards.
“Mauritius Watch” provides a
regular, objective and non-partisan assessment of Zimbabwe’s compliance with the
SADC Principles and Guidelines. In the run-up to the 2005 Parliamentary
Elections we note any significant failures to adhere to the SADC
standards.
This special weekly feature assumes an even greater significance now that the date of the Parliamentary Elections has been announced – 31 March. Less than six weeks remain before this crucial poll.
This week Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, the South African Foreign Minister, was quoted as saying that “good progress was being made towards a free and fair election in Zimbabwe”. But is she reading the situation correctly ? After all the consequences of South Africa misreading the Zimbabwean situation (deliberately or otherwise), could be catastrophic, not only for Zimbabwe but for the entire Southern African region. Our weekly reports are intended to provide you with the evidence upon which to make an informed and reasoned judgment.
Date |
Incidents/Developments
|
SADC standards breached |
|
STILL
NO INVITATIONS! Less
than six weeks before the date of the parliamentary elections and well beyond
the minimum of 90 days stipulated in the SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing
Democratic Elections,
the Mugabe regime has still not issued any invitations to observe or
monitor the Poll, either to SADC or any other group. The
SADC guidelines require the host country to issue such an invitation at least 90
days before the voting day “in order to allow an adequate preparation for the
deployment of the Electoral Observation Mission”. |
7.10 (Host government responsible for) issuing invitation … to SADC 90 (ninety) days before the voting day in order to allow an adequate preparation for the deployment of the Electoral Observation Mission |
17.02.05 |
POLICE RAID MDC CANDIDATES’ MEETING Zimbabwean police raided and broke up a training meeting of
the opposition party ahead of next month’s parliamentary election. The meeting of the Movement for Democratic
Change’s 120 parliamentary candidates at Harare’s Sheraton Hotel was disrupted
by police on 16 February. The MDC
elections director, prominent businessman Ian Makone, was arrested during the
raid and held at Harare Central Police Station for a number of hours. No charge was laid against him
immediately. As the MDC meeting was about to get under way three plain
clothes police details arrived and demanded to sit through the meeting. They then informed the gathering that the
meeting was illegal under the Public Order and Security Act (POSA) and that all
those present should leave immediately or face arrest. The MDC secretary for information and publicity, Paul
Themba Nyathi, put out a statement saying “the MDC notes with concern the
continued disruption of its campaign programme and the continued harassment of
its candidates and leaders. The disruption of MDC meetings is a clear violation
of the SADC guidelines on the conduct of fair and free elections.” The statement also draws attention to the
continued rejection of its advertisements and editorials by the public media,
and concludes “Today’s events make a mockery of statements claiming that
Zimbabwe is on course to hold fair and free elections. Such statements only serve to encourage the
Mugabe regime to further breach the SADC principles on democratic
elections.” (See the report in The Star (SA): www.thestar.co.za/ 17.02.05) |
2.1.2 Freedom of association 4.1.1 Constitutional and legal guarantees of freedom and rights of the citizens 4.1.2 Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful elections 7.4 (Government to) safeguard the human and civil liberties of all citizens including the freedom of movement, assembly, association, expression and campaigning as well as access to the media on the part of all stakeholders … |
19.02.05 |
PROMINENT
OPPOSITION MP BARRED BY NOMINATION COURT A
nomination court in Zimbabwe has barred prominent opposition MDC member of
parliament, Roy Bennett, from contesting in the forthcoming elections for the
seat he currently occupies for the Chimanimani constituency. Roy Bennett is serving a year long sentence
of imprisonment imposed by parliament following a minor scuffle in the House
when, severely provoked by the racist comments of Justice Minister Patrick
Chinamasa, he pushed the latter to the floor.
The nomination court rejected
Bennett’s nomination application on the grounds that he is now in jail,
overlooking entirely the fact that the law only disqualifies a candidate from
standing if he has been convicted of a criminal offence by a criminal
court. The
MDC has given notice that it will be filing an urgent court application on
February 21, seeking to overturn the nomination court decision. Meanwhile the opposition party has put
forward the name of Bennett’s wife, Heather, as a stand-in candidate until the
courts rule whether her husband should be allowed to
contest. (See
the full report in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za 19.02.05)
|
2.1.6 Equal opportunity to exercise the right to vote and be voted for 2.1.7 Independence of the Judiciary and impartiality of the electoral institutions 7.3 (Government to) establish impartial, all-inclusive, competent and accountable bodies staffed by qualified personnel, as well as competent legal entities including effective constitutional courts to arbitrate in the event of disputes arising from the conduct of elections |
13.02.05 |
MINISTER
TELLS OF GERRYMANDERING A cabinet minister of the Mugabe regime recently visited a police recreational club bragging that the Delimitation Commission had twisted constituency boundaries to the benefit of the ruling ZANU-PF. The revelation has sparked fresh controversy over the manipulation of the constituencies by the Commission that was appointed by Mugabe and has been accused of ignoring input from the opposition. According to The Sunday Mirror’s source, “The minister (name supplied) went to the police club where he told senior officers that Harare Central should definitely go to ZANU-PF since the Delimitation Commission had done a ‘splendid job’ by ensuring that as many voters as possible in the police, army, prisons and other security arms fell within the area by virtue of residing in military and quasi military camps”. A study of the current constituency compared with the previous boundaries shows that Harare Central (easily captured by the MDC in the 2000 election) has grown in size with a substantial voting population from the uniformed forces added to the constituency. (See the full report in The Sunday Mirror: http://www.africaonline.co.zw/mirror/index.html13.02.05, and also carried in ZWNEWS: www.zwnews.com 14.02.05) |
2.1.7 Independence of the Judiciary and impartiality of
the electoral institutions 7.3 (Government to) establish impartial, all-inclusive, competent and accountable
national electoral
bodies …. |
24.02.05 |
GHOST VOTERS UNEARTHED The voters’ roll has glaring errors that are likely to disenfranchise thousands of voters, especially in urban constituencies, in the March 31 parliamentary election. A voters’ roll audit conducted last week unearthed hundreds of ghost voters, with some entered more than once. There are also numerous incomplete addresses and dubious entries. The opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) party says it has identified anomalies on the Harare Central, Mbare and Harare North rolls. The MDC is carrying out audits in all urban areas. Anomalies include the appearance of names of people in constituencies in which they do not reside and multiple entries of the same names and identity numbers. Independent candidate for Harare Central and former member of parliament for Harare South, Margaret Dongo, claims the discrepancies are a deliberate tool to be used by ZANU-PF to rig the March election. In 1995 Dongo won the Harare South seat in a re-run against a ZANU-PF candidate after the court had confirmed the first round had been rigged. “This is a tool ZANU-PF has always used to rig elections,” she said, “and if the opposition is not critical of this process, we are likely to see a two-thirds majority for ZANU-PF.” Meanwhile MDC Harare North MP Trudy Stevenson has discovered 82 incorrect entries at the Institute of Agricultural Engineering alone, and 52 at Pomona South Quarries. As the MDC audit continues, so the massive extent of the inaccuracies on the voters’ roll becomes apparent and the oft-repeated claim of those who have made a study of it, that the roll is in a shambles, is borne out again and again. (See the front page report in the Zimbabwe Independent: www.theindependent.co.zw 24.02.05) |
2.1.7 Independence of the Judiciary and impartiality of the electoral institutions 4.1.4 Existence
of updated and accessible voters’ roll 7.5 (Government
to) take all necessary measures and precautions to prevent the perpetration of
fraud, rigging or any other illegal practices throughout the whole electoral
process … |
18.02.05 |
OPPOSITION MP WINS RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST POLICE The High Court in Bulawayo on February 17 ordered the police not to prevent or interfere with an exercise by opposition member of parliament David Coltart to verify whether supporters in his Bulawayo South constituency were properly registered on the constituency voters’ roll. Earlier in the week the police had arrested seven Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) activists who were on a door-to-door campaign in the constituency checking whether party members appeared on the roll. In his ruling in chambers Justice Misheck Cheda interdicted the police from taking any further action to interfere with the voters’ roll verification and analysis process. The judge found the conduct of the police “reprehensible and retrogressive”. The MDC accuses the police of selectively applying the law to victimize its activists and hamstring its campaign ahead of next month’s election. (Reported in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za 18.02.05) |
2.1.6 Equal opportunity to exercise the right to vote and be voted for 4.1.4 Existence of updated and accessible voters’ roll 7.5 (Government to) take all necessary measures and precautions to prevent the perpetration of fraud, rigging or any other illegal practices … |
|
|
|
20.02.05 |
HOUNDED OUT
BY MUGABE THUGS Three senior correspondents for leading international news agencies were forced to flee the country last week as the ZANU-PF onslaught on the media intensified ahead of next month’s elections. Jan Raath writing for The Times of London, Angus Shaw for Associated Press and Brian Latham for several South African papers, were subjected to the most intrusive and threatening police scrutiny. They were accused of operating a spy ring and subsequently of working as journalists without being registered under the draconian Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA), both of which charges they strongly denied. In fact they had submitted their applications to the Media and Information Commission when the law came into effect, and were awaiting a response from the commission. The trio’s lawyer, Beatrice Mtetwa, denied the journalists had violated any law and said the police action against them was a “clear case of harassment and intimidation”. Jan Raath describes his ordeal in an article in The Times (February 19): “For three days they (the police) poked around our office …. It was obvious they were looking for anything they could stick on us. On the third visit, they were led by the head of the CID’s “Law and Order” section, suggesting that the orders to raid us must have come from the very top.” Then the trio received a tip off from a friend who had a contact in the Central Intelligence Organisation (CIO) that “they are gunning for you … this time it is going to be rough. You must get out now.” The three journalists who had been reporting from Zimbabwe for many years, decided the time had come to leave the country they loved, without delay. They put into effect contingency plans made some time ago when the level of repression began to increase significantly, and each made their way independently to different border posts. The action against Raath, Shaw and Latham is the latest in a series of moves against the independent and foreign media. The previous week the CIO launched a massive manhunt for journalist Cornelius Nduna, whom they said they wished to interrogate in connection with sensitive videotapes in his possession. At the same time state prosecutors revived a three-year old case against newspaper columnist, Pius Wakatama, in connection with a story, subsequently proved to have been false, which he is accused of repeating in one of his columns. (See Jan Raath’s report in The Times (London): www.timesonline.co.uk/ 19.02.05 and Brian Latham’s account in The Sunday Times (UK): www.timesonline.co.uk/ 20.02.05) |
2.1.3 Political
tolerance 4.1.1 Constitutional
and legal guarantees of freedom and rights of the citizens 4.1.2 Conducive
environment for free, fair and peaceful elections 7.4 (Government to) safeguard the human and civil
liberties of all citizens including the freedom of movement, assembly,
association, expression and campaigning as well as access to the media on the
part of all stakeholders, during (the electoral process) |
17.02.05 |
MEDIA GROUP
SAYS ZIMBABWE NON-COMPLIANT WITH SADC The Media Monitoring Project of Zimbabwe (MMPZ), a local non-governmental organisation that fights for media freedom, says Zimbabwe has failed to open up public media to all political parties in line with regional requirements governing the running of elections. In a report entitled “Media and the 2005 Parliamentary Elections”, the MMPZ criticizes the public media’s election coverage in the run-up to next month’s election saying it is heavily tilted in favour of the ruling ZANU-PF party and government. The coverage flouts Southern African Development Community (SADC) regulations agreed by the regional bloc last August, says the media group. “Clearly, even by mid-February, conditions for fair and equitable access to the state media by all political parties still do not exist … these media organisations (state-controlled) continue to favour the ruling party while suppressing the activities of the main political opposition.” “Neither the ESC (Electoral Supervisory Commission) nor the ZEC (Zimbabwe Electoral Commission) have set minimum standards for direct access and mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing these standards,” it says. The two electoral bodies, whose members were appointed by Mugabe, will run the March election. Meanwhile the main opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) party spokesman, Paul Themba Nyathi, has dismissed new government regulations purporting to allow all political parties access to state radio and television as “cosmetic” and “primarily aimed at tricking the region into believing that Zimbabwe is complying with the set guidelines.” (Reported in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za 17/19.02.05) |
2.1.5 Equal
opportunity for all political parties to access the state
media |
18.02.05 |
MUGABE BLOCKS
OBSERVERS – WITH SOUTH AFRICA’S
COLLUSION ? The Mugabe regime is refusing to sanction the visit of a high-powered SADC delegation which wants to assess whether conditions in the country comply with regional guidelines for democratic elections. They are not prepared to allow a team of lawyers from the SADC organ on politics, defence and security to inspect electoral conditions – and it appears that South Africa’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs at least is willing to collude with this defiance. The SADC Secretariat in Gaberone, Botswana, received a letter on February 15 from the South African Department of Foreign Affairs, stating that “the issue of the legal experts’ visit should not be followed up.” SADC spokesperson Esther Kanaimba said from Gaberone that they had received the South African notification from Dr Jessie Duarte’s office. She is the director for multilateral affairs in the Department of Foreign Affairs. Kanaimba said she could not comment on the contents of the letter. However it is believed the letter states the issue was discussed “at the highest level” in South Africa and that it was felt it was “unnecessary to follow it up.” Kanaimba said the SADC Secretariat has no power to send in a legal team to Zimbabwe and they were awaiting further orders from South Africa – which chairs the directorate of politics, defence and security. Meanwhile Mugabe is continuing to lobby neighbours to declare that he is complying with the regional electoral norms. He sent one trusted ally, Zanu-PF Secretary for Administration, *Didymus Mutasa, to seek outgoing Namibian President Sam Nujoma’s backing last week and dispatched Special Affairs Minister John Nkomo to meet Botswana’s President Festus Mogae. Diplomats in Harare said Mugabe wanted SADC leaders to whitewash the result of the election likely to be won by his party. Also last week a Democratic Alliance (DA) mission was turned back at Harare Airport, as had been a Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) delegation and two Southern African Trade Union Co-ordinating Council officials earlier in the month. (Reported in the Mail & Guardian: www.mg.co.za/ 18.02.05 in News24 (SA): www.news24.com 16.02.05 and The Sunday Times (SA): www.suntimes.co.za/ 20.02.05) * In a report published on 8 September 2003 in Zimbabwe’s Daily News, Didymus Mutasa, then ZANU-PF’s secretary for external affairs, said Zimbabweans abroad were out to spread lies about the conditions at home. He said: "They are a crazy gang on a mission to spread falsehoods about their mother country. Everything is normal in Zimbabwe, and anyone who thinks otherwise should have his head examined.” |
Paragraph
6 of
the SADC Guidelines requires accreditation for SADC Election Observers, that
they be given freedom of movement within the host country, unhindered access to
the media, free access to all electoral legislation and to the voters’
roll. Other
provisions afford further rights to those appointed by SADC to observe the
electoral process. 7.8 (Host
government to) ensure the transparency and integrity of the entire electoral
process by … accrediting national and/other
observers/monitors 7.12 Host
government to be responsible for) accreditation of the members of the SADC
Electoral Observation and Monitoring team as election observers on a
non-discriminatory basis |
|
ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL LEGISLATION : SADC
CHECK LIST
SOKWANELE has produced a detailed analysis of the
Zimbabwean statutes that are in breach of the SADC Principles and Guidelines
Governing Democratic Elections and the policy breaches by the ZANU-PF
government.
Entitled
“ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL LEGISLATION : SADC CHECK LIST”, the document can be seen on
our website at www.sokwanele.com |
|
Note: The fraudulent and violence-ridden
elections of 2000 and 2002 were narrowly “won” by Robert Mugabe and his ZANU-PF
party, who have maintained their iron grip on the country by using strategies
designed to annihilate all forms of opposition.
As many independent commentators have already pointed out, there is no prospect that the parliamentary elections scheduled for March 31 will be fair and free. Equally, given the magnitude of the task and the few weeks remaining before the poll, there is no prospect of the regime’s compliance with the SADC Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections. Indeed, in recent months we have witnessed a steady movement by the regime away from compliance with any international norms for democratic elections. Behind the façade of democracy which the regime likes to put on all their activities, we have seen a deliberate and systematic attempt to subvert every institution of government in order to secure in the forthcoming poll a pre-determined result favouring ZANU-PF.
People who would like to register their grave concern
regarding the Zimbabwean government’s violations of the SADC Principles and
Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections and the ongoing violations of human
rights and media rights in Zimbabwe are invited to record their protests. You can do so by emailing South African
President Thabo Mbeki (president@anc.org.za). Copy your messages
to his spokesperson BK (bheki@po.gov.za ).
Ends
Moyo a hero? Are you crazy?
Editor - The article on prof
Moyo is a misfit on this page I regard very highly. I am an Zimbo based in New
Zealand for obvious reasons including Moyo. It is sad to imagine that they are
normal Zimbabweans who even think Moyo is something to write about. As far as I
am concrened Moyo is a sellout, selfish and an object for hire. I respect people
of Matebeleland and I dont think Moyo is anything but a greedy person who thinks
he can make it using whatever avenue is available. I pray that everybody will
see this.
Mahowas
Editor - I am not a journalist, I am not a political activist, I am just a nurse but I have decided to say one or two words to our friend Admore Tshuma concerning the article he wrote and was published on your website on 26-02-2005.
Admore describes Moyo as
being a hero because he brought development to Tsholotsho. My friend, what Moyo
was doing is what I call nepotism and this is what has brought our country down
-- lack of disciple and greediness. Ministers should develop the country not
where they come from. That is corruption and is the same reason that Mashonaland
is more developed that Matabeleland, because greedy people always think of
themselves. They enrich their home areas using the tax payers' money. Moyo is
your Hero, Admore, but to some of us he was practising nepotism, regionalism and
tribalism. Because of greediness, ministers like Moyo give a blind eye to
national problems. We cannot bless evil because it's now on our side. We cannot
repeat the same mistakes made by our fellow comrades, we must all try to be just
and distribute the tax payers' money equitably.
Waza
Muhago
Editor - The man is a former reporter of a paper that upheld a regime which oppresses of Zimbabwei ncluding the folks in Matebeleland. His friend and former boss was a part the system and it was OK with him as long as he was being paid.
His friend and boss has
fallen out of favour with those opressing Zimbabweans in general and he (and his
ex boss and friend) comes with some flowery tribal accusations! How much will it
take this man and all that think like him to realise that we have all cried foul
for a long time and NOT on any tribal but on NATIONAL lines?
Mugabe and
his cronnies, (the Prof included) have been opressing EVERYBODY IN ZIMBABWE
Ndebeles in Tsholotsho INCLUDED. As long as we look at ourselves as tribes or
other form of socially disadvantaged groups we will always suffer ladies and
gentleman.
You are allowed to be friends with who you like but try and
look at the Zimbabwean issue from a broad perspective. The devide and rule
tactic that Moyo has lost just to get the power he needs in Matebeleland will
not solve the problems of the Ndebeles and all those suffering in Zimbabwe. This
is not the time to split our unity against ZANU to please a few opportunists,
which is what Moyo is. Why did the ex-reporters' friend (Moyo) ever leave the
pressure groups to join the evil regime? Kwaidyisa. Vamudhingura manje ave
kuvhara mamwe Mandevere ake kuti arambe achidya. Mheno henyu vanhu
va Matabeleland if you are so gullible..... We will give him a place at the
Heroes Acre if you want. I just feel once a snake, always a snake. Kana iye
Mugabe akatanga ari munhu akanaka wani? PAFUNGE mukoma
Admore.
Alfred Marerwa
Editor - I dont understand this, does one have to be victimized by ZANU for him to be a hero? Before I knew it, there are praises for Jonathan Moyo because he was sacked from the ruling party.
I'm sure this is the man who
made the Zimbabwe situation so unbearable and why would people want to
sympathize with him? Is it because he is now the target of the harsh laws that
he masterminded? That guy deserves
it!
Denford
Canada
Editor - Jonathan Moyo has
been part of the machinery that has brought misery to Zimbabwe. During his
tenure, he introduced legislation that have completely muzzled the media. I hope
he will now realise that his voice of frustration stemming from his expulsion
from the Cabinet will face the muzzle of the very same legislation that he
championed during his days as a Zanu PF hero. Good bye Jonathan Moyo. You should
have known that it was just a matter of time. The same applies to your
ex-colleagues who have bled my country to death and confined the majority of the
people of Zimbabwe to generations of poverty and despair.
Weathered
Marango
Editor - Your report
entitled "Jonathan Moyo, my hero" is both stupid and unhelpful. Moyo should
never be glorified and should be exposed for what he is: selfish and arrogant.
Given a chance, he could be worse than Mugabe. Here is a man who still thinks
Mugabe is the best thing that ever happened to Zimbabwe! Have we forgotten who
was responsible for the enactment of the most draconian media laws in post
colonial Zimbabwe? People should not be naive or blinded by what has become of
him, he is still a satirist and propagandist. This could turn out to be one of
his spins. Zimbabweans don't be quick to forgive and forget. As for your former
Chronicle reporter, he is still singing his master's music, keep on
singing.
MnhAntn
Editor - This is for Admore
Tshuma : please do not mention Prof Moyo and democracy in the same sentence. Are
you crazy? He is not a hero, he is responsible for lots of problems in Zimbabwe
and he is a puppet for Uncle Bob. He is a thief and he must be punished for all
the bad he has done. Many people died in Matabeleland but he still supped with
the Zanu PF devils and wanted Mnangagwa - the 2nd biggest devil - to be Vice
President. I am not going to say
anymore!!!!
A.B.Moyo
Editor - I don't mean to
offend Admore, but Prof Jonah Moyo has been exploited to an extent that has made
more enemies than friends. He has absolutely nowhere to run except to his home
area, but besides only standing for that paliamentary seat what is he going to
do? In the diaspora I don't see anyone accepting him because of the comments he
has been made to make. With all due respect to his academic level and quality of
his work in ZANU PF, he hasn't learnt enough to realise that ZANU
chiororo and this marks the beginning of the end of the
professor.
Simba Bako
Australia