Africa Media Watch this week concentrates on the tense
situation between Zimbabwe and the UK.
The Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group, meeting in London, has rejected
British-led moves to suspend Zimbabwe from the Commonwealth over political
violence and a media clampdown ahead of March's presidential polls.
"Bid to isolate Zim flops," declares the pro-government The Herald.
"The rejection dealt a major blow to spirited diplomatic efforts by Britain
and its friends in the Commonwealth," it adds.
The paper's editorial is no less triumphant.
"While it is not a mistake to make a mistake, someone
needs to tell the British that repeating a mistake is a sign of being
retarded,"
|
The Herald |
"The British have relentlessly failed to learn anything in their misguided
assault of this country because of our gallant effort to correct past
injustices."
"It is always a difficult thing for a master to ever regard their former
subject as an equal and this prejudice has confined the British diplomats to
international embarrassment," it goes on.
"While it is not a mistake to make a mistake, someone needs to tell the
British that repeating a mistake is a sign of being retarded," the editor
charges.
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw is critical
of Mugabe
|
"The British nation was once drunk with illusionary power
and they have never sobered up since their might waned and they were relegated
to being one of the smaller nations of Europe," the tirade against the
"obnoxious island" continues.
Britain's "only claim to fame these days is basking in the shadow of the
United States," The Herald remarks.
Zimbabwe's presidential elections
The independent The Financial Gazette sounds the alarm over the
elections.
"The sheer magnitude of the unfolding fraud is
frightening,"
|
The Financial Gazette |
"All the gloves are finally off modern history's
unprecedented sham which the government is desperately trying to sell to the
world as a valid presidential ballot." Zimbabwe's election campaign has been
marred by political violence and a clampdown on the independent media.
"The sheer magnitude of the unfolding fraud is frightening," the paper says.
The paper charges that the chief election officer, Douglas Nyikayaramba,
"turns out to have been a brigadier in the army and a well-known ally of
President Robert Mugabe". It also claims that the head of the Electoral
Supervisory Commission, Sobusa Gula-Ndebele, is a "former military intelligence
chief in Mugabe's Office".
Earlier in the week EU foreign ministers threatened targeted sanctions
against Mr Mugabe and his inner circle unless he agrees by 3 February to allow
EU observers at the March election. Mr Mugabe specifically excluded Britain from
an invitation addressed to several countries and organisations to send in
observers.
"Will long-suffering Zimbabweans, plus the international community, allow
this gigantic sham to stand?," The Financial Gazette wonders.
Love him or loathe him
Nigeria's Weekly Trust is at a loss over what to make of Mr Mugabe.
"Mugabe's deliberate choice of land reform as an emotive issue to prolong his
rule and obliterate his political opponents has put many Africans in a great
dilemma." The paper points out that not "everybody who is opposing Mugabe today
is a traitor, agent of settlers, a front for British neo-colonialism or enemy of
African liberation". "It is so sad that a leader who started so promisingly and
so loved has now become the problem for his own people," it laments.
"Who is he fooling about another liberation war?," the Weekly Trust
wonders.
South Africa's The Sowetan says that the call by prominent southern
African church leaders on Zimbabwe's president to step down "might be a signal
to Mugabe that his respectability may not only have waned inside his country,
but that it might be running out outside Zimbabwe".
The paper urges the Southern African Development Community leaders to "take
bold steps to give assurances to the people of the region that the chaos will
not spill over that country's borders".
"That assurance will also contribute to improving the likelihood of free and
fair elections in Zimbabwe," The Sowetan concludes.
Kenya's East African Standard is also critical. Mr Mugabe's "reforms"
in the run up to the poll "smack of dictatorship".
Zimbabwean journalists are restricted by a new
media bill
|
"If the myriad allegations of campaign impropriety
suggest election rigging, then the stringent conditionalities set by Mugabe are
a clear testimony to the intent to cling on to power," The East African Standard
concludes. "Mugabe is finally under pressure and it shows," South Africa's
Business Day exclaims.
Botswana's The Reporter tries to be optimistic believing that "principled
level-headedness and political order will prevail in Zimbabwe as the elections
draw near". "Should Mugabe allow his country to conflagrate into civil war, not
only will he go down with the flames, Botswana and other Zimbabwean neighbours
will also catch fire and go down burning in a fire that we should have helped to
prevent," it cautions.
ABC News
Mugabe Says 'Political War' with Britain
By Cris Chinaka
MUREWA, Zimbabwe (Reuters) - Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe said on
Friday he faced a "political war" against former colonial ruler Britain,
accusing London of backing his opponent in presidential elections next
month.
In his first speech of the campaign, Mugabe cast himself as the defender of
the black majority and portrayed his opponent Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), as a puppet of British and local white
interests.
"We are in a state of political war. We are in a war to defend our rights
and the interests of our people. The British have decided to take us on through
the MDC," Mugabe told 5,000 cheering supporters at a rally 150 km northeast of
Harare.
"Whatever (British Prime Minister Tony) Blair tries to do, we will not back
down. We went to war. We went to prison. We have suffered over the years, but we
are not afraid of the struggle.
"We will not run away. You can count on us to fight," Mugabe told his
supporters, who chanted "Down with MDC, Down with Britain."
Britain, Zimbabwe's former colonial ruler, has been the strongest
international critic of Mugabe. But the United States and European Union have
recently stepped up their criticism.
Both have threatened "smart sanctions" against Mugabe and his inner circle
if he fails to ensure fair elections.
Mugabe, 78 next month, is facing in Tsvangirai his strongest political
opponent since leading the former Rhodesia to independence from Britain in
1980.
Speaking in the local Shona language, Mugabe mockingly referred to the
former trade union leader as a white puppet.
"Tsvangirai has decided he must be white and he has now become Tsvangison,
in line with his wishes to become all things white," Mugabe said, drawing loud
cheers from the crowd.
The MDC says nearly 100 of its supporters have been killed in political
violence since February 2000 when militants, backed by the government, began
often violent seizures of white-owned farms. Mugabe's supporters accuse the MDC
of fueling unrest.
Mugabe vowed to press ahead with plans to forcibly acquire white-owned land
for redistribution to landless blacks, and promised more food aid for rural
areas where his support is strongest.
He made no comment on a tough media bill passed by parliament on Thursday.
Critics say the legislation will stifle free debate in the run-up to the March
9-10 presidential poll.
The election comes amid a severe economic crisis, with unemployment and
inflation at record highs.
CNN
EU anger over Mugabe press law
February 1, 2002
BRUSSELS, Belgium -- The European Union has joined the United Kingdom in
condemning the Zimbabwe parliament's approval of a tough new media law.
UK Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said Zimbabwe's anti-press laws had
virtually ruled out free and fair presidential elections in March.
Zimbabwe's Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Bill, passed by
the parliament on Thursday, restricts access for foreign reporters and imposes
tight controls on local media in the run-up to the elections.
The EU has given President Robert Mugabe until February 3 to allow in EU
observers, or face targeted sanctions such as the freezing of his assets and
accounts held abroad and a European visa ban on senior government figures and
their families.
Straw said the media law would have to be considered by the EU next week
when it weighed up whether to impose sanctions on Zimbabwe.
Speaking in Washington where he had talks with Secretary of State Colin
Powell, Straw said: "I wholly condemn the passage of these press laws.
"I find it almost impossible to comprehend how free and fair elections can
be held in Zimbabwe when such laws have been passed.
"That will be a matter which will have to be weighed very carefully in the
balance by the European Union to decide whether the sanctions which in principle
were decided upon early this week ought to be triggered."
European Commissioner for External Affairs Chris Patten said in a
statement: "We are profoundly disappointed that Zimbabwe's parliament has passed
this law, which represents a fundamental attack on media freedom."
However, commission spokeswoman Emma Udwin told a daily news briefing that
the new law did not make sanctions inevitable.
"The law does allow for internationally accredited media to operate for a
limited period (during the election)."
Udwin added that Zimbabwe had also indicated it would allow EU election
observers to deploy in the country in good time before the election, though
Harare has also made clear that the team should not include British citizens.
Britain, Zimbabwe's former colonial power, has been the strongest
international critic of Mugabe, who faces the biggest opposition challenge to
his rule since he led the southern African country to independence 22 years ago.
Britain is pushing for Zimbabwe to be suspended from the Commonwealth by
the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting which takes place near Brisbane,
Australia, next month just days before Zimbabwe's elections.
Earlier this week, the Commonwealth rejected a British call to suspend
Zimbabwe from the 54-nation group.
MSNBC
S.Africa working for free and fair Zimbabwe
polls
PRETORIA, Feb. 1 — South Africa
said on Friday it was working hard with other African countries to ensure free
and fair elections in neighbouring Zimbabwe, where a tough media bill threatens
to curb press freedoms ahead of polls in
March.
Deputy Foreign
Minister Aziz Pahad told a news conference that any alternative to free and fair
polls would have damaging consequences for Zimbabwe and its neighbours in the
Southern African Development Community (SADC) region.
''We are now working to ensure, as
South Africa and as SADC, that conditions exist for free and fair elections in
Zimbabwe,'' Pahad said.
The minister
said South Africa had sent a task force led by a senior minister to Zimbabwe to
study the political climate on the ground and its recommendations, to be
submitted on Monday, would form the basis of Pretoria's policy stand on the
matter.
He declined to give details on
what President Thabo Mbeki may do should the task force conclude that free and
fair elections were not possible in Zimbabwe.
''I do not want to preempt the team's
report. Lets wait and see. We shall brief the media next week,'' he added.
South Africa and Mbeki have been
repeatedly accused by the media, opposition groups and Western nations of not
doing enough to rein in President Robert Mugabe, who has brought his country to
the brink of collapse.
Zimbabwe plunged
into its worst economic and political crisis in 2000 with a government-backed
campaign to seize white-owned farms for re-distribution to landless blacks.
Pahad was speaking a day after Mugabe
pushed through parliament a new bill which critics say will stifle free debate
in the run-up to the March 9-10 polls.
The legislation restricts access for foreign reporters and imposes tight
controls on local media. Mugabe is expected to sign it into law shortly.
Pahad said South Africa was still
studying the media bill and would not yet comment.
He said South Africa was willing to
help journalists, especially South African media, to get accreditation to cover
the polls.
Mugabe, 78 next month, faces
the stiffest challenge yet to his 22 years in power from the opposition Movement
for Democratic Change (MDC), led by Morgan Tsvangirai.
Asked to comment on Zimbabwe
Information Minister Jonathan Moyo's remarks that the military would not
tolerate an opposition victory, Pahad declared:
''I really hope that view does not
reflect the thinking in the (Zimbabwean) military. We hope that nobody will
preempt the result of this election.''
The Guardian
Harare raises spectre of nation without newspapers
Jessica Hodgson
Friday February 1, 2002
Zimbabwe's information minister today questioned the need for the existence
of the media following condemnation of a new press bill that has raised fears
that the forthcoming elections in May will not be properly scrutinised.
"Thomas Jefferson said it was better to have newspapers without government.
He was very, very wrong. It is far better to have government without
newspapers," information minister Jonathan Moyo told CNN in Harare.
Mr Moyo denied the bill would restrict access for foreign correspondents,
saying: "We have always accredited international journalists to come.
"There is no reason why we should not do it now, but we are very clear Tony
Blair and his lot will not be allowed to come here.
"We are saying to them: continue your colonial arrogance in London. You are
not welcome here."
New legislation, passed by parliament on Thursday and expected to be signed
into law shortly, restricts access for foreign reporters and imposes tight
controls on local media. President Robert Mugabe is expected to sign it into law
shortly.
Critics have claimed the legislation is designed to stifle criticism of the
Mugabe regime.
The BBC was ejected from Zimbabwe a year ago for alleged bias and has tried
in vain to persuade the government of the former British colony to lift the ban.
The government recently singled out several foreign correspondents -
including the Guardian's Chris McGreal and the Sunday Telegraph's Philip
Sherwell, saying it would hunt them down.
Moyo said the military would not tolerate an opposition victory at the
poll, drawing parallels between his country's liberation war against white-run
Rhodesia and America's war of independence against Britain.
"You are more than two centuries away from the actual individuals who
fought for the liberation of the United States but we are only 22 years from
this and the people who fought are here.
"It would be a mockery to them and to the cause they fought for, if they
were suddenly to be made to salute one of the people they fought against...We
don't expect the Jews to salute the Nazis," Moyo told CNN.
The government labels its opponents a front for whites yearning for a
return to minority rule and says they would be puppets dancing to the whites'
tune if they came to power.
SA 'Pays Price for Failure to Stop Mugabe"
Cape Argus (Cape Town)
February 1, 2002
David Yutar
Cape Town
THE South African government's failure to stand up to President Robert
Mugabe has cost this country billions of rands, a senior Zimbabwe opposition
leader says.
Eddie Cross, secretary for economic affairs for the Movement for Democratic
Change, slated President Thabo Mbeki for not challenging Mugabe's "tyranny" over
Zimbabwe.
As the main speaker at a meeting of the SA Institute of International
Affairs last night, Cross said Mbeki was "the one man in the whole world Mugabe
cannot say no to".
"You (South Africa) are the regional superpower.
If Thabo Mbeki called Mugabe and said to him, 'Enough is enough, this
madness must stop', Mugabe could not say no."
Cross criticised South Africa's role in the crisis as "too little too
late".
Mugabe had "violated all the principles he fought for in the liberation
war" and had used every means possible to cling to power.
He described the crisis in Zimbabwe as "a tragedy for all those who have
fought for political rights in Africa".
The country faced an unprecedented political and economic crisis.
"It might seem incomprehensible that an African country should run out of
its staple food but that is exactly what has happened in Zimbabwe.
"We will have to import half of our food over the next two years."
Per capita income was lower than it was 30 years ago and industrial output
was below its 1970 level, at the height of sanctions.
The Zimbabwe government had "consistently spent more than it earned", with
the result that the national debt was 140% of gross domestic product.
GDP had dropped by 30% in three years and inflation was at 112% and
rising.
Life expectancy was lower than ever, only 20% of adults were employed and
the government had not paid pensions for years, he said.
Three million Zimbabweans had been forced to flee their country and 500 a
day were crossing the border at Beit Bridge into South Africa, because they
could not support their families back home.
Cross said the crisis had had a huge adverse impact on the South African
economy, where food inflation was 30% "as a result of Robert Mugabe".
The South African government had suffered political fallout from the crisis
in Zimbabwe in that the credibility of all African governments had taken a
knock.
Cross vehemently denied allegations that the MDC was a front for white
Zimbabweans, but said it represented all disaffected Zimbabweans.
Mugabe was "just the same as" Rhodesian prime minister Ian Smith in that he
refused to acknowledge when the time had come to step down.
If Mugabe's Zanu-PF party won the March elections, it would be "a
catastrophe for the whole of Southern Africa", he said.
He predicted a "landslide victory" for the MDC in the March
elections.
"We have been fighting tyranny and we will defeat tyranny not with AK47s
but with votes in the ballot box."
BBC
Friday, 1 February, 2002, 13:44 GMT
Zimbabwe sanctions: What would they
be?
Defiant Mugabe says EU's attitude is
"colonial"
BBC News Online looks at the "targeted" sanctions the
European Union is considering imposing on Zimbabwe if EU observers and
journalists are not given free access to cover next month's presidential
elections, and their likely impact.
What "targeted sanctions" would mean:
- European travel ban on some 20 top individuals in Mugabe's inner circle
and their families
- Freezing of assets and foreign bank accounts held by senior figures in the
Mugabe regime who are believed to have sent large sums of money out of
Zimbabwe
- Ban on arms exports to Zimbabwe
When would sanctions come into force?
- The European Union has already decided "in principle" to impose sanctions
- But the EU would still have to make a formal decision - possibly within
days after the 3 Feb deadline
What would trigger sanctions?
- If the Mugabe government prevents the deployment of European Union
election observers by Sunday 3 February, or
- If it later prevents them from operating effectively
- If international media are not given free access to cover the election
- If there is a worsening of the human rights situation or attacks against
the opposition
- If the election is not considered free and fair
What impact are the sanctions likely to have?
- Further isolate Mr Mugabe's government and hinder relations with key aid
donors and trading partners
Business Day
Zimbabwe impoverished: win or lose
By Donwald Pressly
Zimbabwe's economic crisis is far deeper than it
is generally understood in Southern Africa with a national debt of 10 billion US
dollars or about 140% of its gross domestic product, says the opposition. State
pensions have not been paid for months and the nation is hungry.
The economic affairs secretary for the Movement for Democratic Change,
Eddie Cross, is in South Africa to urge South Africans to take the March
Zimbabwean presidential elections seriously.
He warns that if President Robert Mugabe wins that election it will be a
disaster for the sub-continent.
Cross argues that the international community has lost patience with
Zimbabwe and a range of sanctions will be imposed if Mugabe wins another term as
president after 22 years in office. It will have a serious impact on the
economic stability of the sub-continent.
Cross believes already South Africa is paying the price - its growth rate
is already lower and its currency weaker than it should be despite sensible
economic policies.
Both he and his colleague Ian Makone, who is personal assistant to MDC
leader Morgan Tsvangirai, say that if there is a free and fair election, the
former trade union leader will win easily. But they believe Mugabe is capable of
anything to stay in power.
Cross points out that Zimbabwe is in far deeper trouble than Argentina -
although that country's economic woes have sent shockwaves through the world. In
that country the national debt is only 50% of GDP.
Much of the financial problem in Zimbabwe grew out of the Z$3.7 billion
payment to thousands of war veterans who received 50,000 Zimbabwean dollars each
in special payout by the Zimbabwean government.
Added to that Zimbabwe has since independence in 1980 consistently spent at
a faster rate than its economic growth.
Cross believes the election is a make or break one for Zanu-PF which has
ruled Zimbabwean since independence under Mugabe in 1980. Its leadership knows
that if the presidential bid by Mugabe is lost, Zanu "is finished".
Events appear not to be working in favour of Zanu. It lost a referendum in
2000 when Mugabe wished to change the constitution to provide himself with
greater powers. His party only held on to power "by the narrowest of
margins" in the parliamentary elections - with the MDC winning a majority of
votes - 52% - but notching up only 58 of 120 elected seats. Mugabe appointed 30
other members of parliament, including 10 chiefs.
Even after the MDC's strong showing the South African government wasn't
keen to confer with the MDC.
Cross believes the constitutional referendum was rigged "by 15%" and even
then Mugabe was beaten.
Cross, who was in Cape Town to address the South African Institute of
International Affairs, also argues that Mugabe never believed in urban
commercialism and wanted a rural system of plots - a kind of agrarian
people's project similar to the vision of the Khmer Rouge.
Although Mugabe showed no signs of corruption in his first years in office
- and he presided over strong economic growth, by 1999 he was corrupt "to the
neck".
Now the figures were dismal. Incomes per capita were lower than they were
30 years ago, says Cross. Some estimates were that only 20% of the population is
employed. About two million people were homeless, he says.
Both Cross and Makone say there is an upside to all of this: if there is a
free and fair election the MDC will win.
With South Africa doing very little in their opinion to support the rule of
law and democratic procedures, the
MDC may have to carry out the work alone
- deploying 15,000 people at the 5,000 polling stations to check on the
balloting process.
An MDC victory would do "wonders for the image of Africa," says Cross. "We
will defeat tyranny by votes in the ballot box," he says confidently.
The party will also need 5,000 vehicles to allow it to oversee the security
of ballot boxes on the way to the count. "We will do just that," says Makone.
In the event of an MDC victory, the party will ensure that power is not
focused on a single individual and there would be genuine land reform. Each
farmer would be given title to his or her land - rather than a prevalent
system of communal land ownership.
A three year programme of economic reform would be swiftly put in place to
ensure sustainable food production. A huge stakeholder conference on land
matters would have to be held.
Whatever happens it will be a tough road ahead for the MDC, the most likely
party to defeat Mugabe.
Cross, who describes himself as a white African and who is one of four
whites in the MDC national executive, warns South Africa that when the MDC wins:
"You (South Africa) will have to pay".
He does not explain further, but it is clear that broadbased South Africa
aid - be it financial, technical or food aid - will be part of the cost that
Zimbabwe's neighbour will have to pay for being too quite during the erosion of
its economic cake.
Telegraph
Straw hits at Zimbabwe anti-press laws
(Filed:
01/02/2002)
ZIMBABWE'S anti-press laws have virtually ruled out free and fair
elections being held next month, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has
declared.
He said the media law, which makes it illegal for journalists to operate
without government accreditation, would have to be considered by the EU next
week when it weighs up whether to impose sanctions on Zimbabwe.
Mr Straw, speaking in Washington where he had talks with Secretary of State
Colin Powell, said: "I wholly condemn the passage of these press laws. I find it
almost impossible to comprehend how free and fair elections can be held in
Zimbabwe when such laws have been passed.
"That will be a matter which will have to be weighed very carefully in the
balance by the European Union to decide whether the sanctions which in principle
were decided upon early this week ought to be triggered."
The EU has given President Robert Mugabe until this weekend to allow in EU
observers, or face targeted sanctions such as the freezing of his assets and
accounts held abroad and a European visa ban on senior government figures and
their families.
Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Menzies Campbell said: "Anyone
who thought that the Mugabe regime would draw back after the Commonwealth
ministers' meeting has had a rude awakening.
"The sad but unpalatable truth is that the present government in Zimbabwe
is determined to prevent any freedom on the part of the press which might allow
scrutiny of the government's illegitimate efforts to ensure victory for Mugabe
in the forthcoming presidential election."
Britain is pushing for Zimbabwe to be suspended from the Commonwealth by
the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting which takes place near Brisbane,
Australia, next month just days before the March 10 Zimbabwe elections.
Daily News
BBC correspondent arrested
2/1/02 9:18:02 AM (GMT +2)
From Mduduzi Mathuthu in Bulawayo
THABO Kunene, a British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) correspondent based
in Zimbabwe was arrested on Tuesday afternoon and detained for an hour in the
strife-torn Lupane district, about 100km north of Bulawayo.
Kunene was with a visitor from Holland and the driver of a Bulawayo
car-hire firm when they were arrested at a roadblock in the
politically-charged
Insuza area of Lupane.
They were led to Insuza police post where they were detained on the
accusation that they were a threat to security, Kunene told The Daily News
yesterday.
"They separated us on arrival at the police station and we were
continuously told that we were a security risk. The interrogation lasted about
30 minutes," said Kunene yesterday.
"They seized a recorded cassette from the car", he said.
The Matabeleland North police spokesman, Inspector Alfred Zvenyika
confirmed the incident.
"After interrogation, we were made to wait for 30 minutes after being
informed that the police were waiting for instructions from an undisclosed
person," said Kunene.
Three journalists, Foster Dongozi, Rhoda Mashavave and Cornelius Nduna were
arrested in Harare last Wednesday for demonstrating against a new media Bill
currently before Parliament which seeks to impose an iron curtain on the
public's access to information.
Daily News -The Mole
Ridiculous fiction
2/1/02 9:28:39 AM (GMT +2)
The Mole is on record, on at least two occasions, for saying Eddison
Zvobgo, who is not only a spell-binding orator and towering intellectual, but is
also probably the most brilliant lawyer this country has ever produced, has
lived his life as one big bundle of contradictions, much to the disappointment
and chagrin of many of his compatriots.
The question has been posed in this column as to how an eminently learned
lawyer and fierce advocate of good governance and democracy could have willingly
assumed the role of chief craftsman in the creation of the monster called the
Executive Presidency with all those diabolical powers.
Not only that: I have also wondered on several occasions how, being the
intellectual that he obviously is, Zvobgo in a most unlikely marriage of
convenience with nemesis, Jonathan Moyo, could have compounded that first
mistake with his eloquent arguments in support of that fatally flawed draft
constitution which, fortunately, was massively rejected by the people of
Zimbabwe in February 2000.
I have also wondered aloud in this same column why, seeing that of late he
has seen the error of his ways and is taking every opportunity to upbraid the
government for its ruinous actions, he cannot have the courage of his
convictions and part ways with Zanu PF once and for all.
This is especially so in view of that terrible, near-fatal car accident
which many people thought was "organised" by Zanu PF and his subsequent
humiliation by President Mugabe when he dropped him from both Cabinet and the
politburo.
Instead, much to everyone's disbelief and dismay, he always vows he will
remain in Zanu PF to his dying day - thereby denying himself the chance to run
for the highest office in the land.
He even repeated the vow after that other mafikizolo (upstart), the late
Border Gezi, had publicly insulted him by saying the MDC could have him if they
so desired.
I am pleased to note that Zvobgo went a long way in redeeming the high
esteem he had lost among Zimbabweans by his recent performance in Parliament.
Zvobgo must have relished every moment he was on his feet in the House
defending his committee against false accusations levelled at it by Mugabe's two
constantly blundering hirelings.
I certainly enjoyed it when he made Jonathan Moyo and, to a lesser extent,
Patrick Chinamasa, look thoroughly foolish. The two men, who are the
co-architects of the thoroughly obnoxious Access to Information Bill, seem to
think it is their ordained duty to inflict as much suffering as they can on the
people of this country before their day of reckoning comes - which day may not
be far away.
"The chaos (in connection with the Bill)," sneered Zvobgo, "has been caused
by the government and the minister in particular who has failed to put together
his Bill a bit more neatly."
Zvobgo's thinly-veiled derision of Moyo for wanting to turn himself into
"the government" must have pained Moyo much like a red-hot spear going through
the heart.
There can be no doubt Zvobgo caused much discomfort on the government side
of the House when he said: "The Bill, in its original form, was the most
calculated and determined assault on our liberties, as guaranteed by the
Constitution, that I have ever seen in the 20 years I served as Cabinet minister
and as a member of the Cabinet Committee on Legislation for 16 of those years.
"What is worse, the Bill was badly drafted, and several provisions were
obscure, vague, ill-conceived and dangerous. Ask yourself whether it is rational
for a government in a democratic and free society to require registration,
licences and ministerial certificates in order for people to speak.
It is a sobering thought" (a "terrifying thought" would, I think, have been
even more to the point). Then came what The Mole thinks qualifies to be
described as a sobering thought: "Supposing it is the government's new policy
that one ministry is now the government as proposed here, the desire to review
all court decision, including those of the Supreme Court, is clearly
unconstitutional."
Somebody ought to have told all the Zanu PF zombies in Parliament and the
opportunist media practitioners who support all these repressive Bills with
fiendish glee that Zanu PF will certainly not be in power for ever and that when
that party is no longer in power, it is just possible the cruel provisions of
all these Satanic laws could be used against them before they can be repealed,
as they simply will have to be, when sanity returns to our beloved motherland.
Perhaps then they might remember - for ever - Jesus Christ's golden rule:
"That which you don't want others to do unto you, don't do to them." *A story
was published in the two government-controlled dailies on Wednesday this week
which I think will for ever hold the record as the ultimate monument testifying
to the sick and wicked joke that Motor Mouth has turned the public media into in
his bid to demonise the MDC and lionise Mugabe in the run-up to the 2002
presidential election.
The "story" which The Mole has no hesitation in describing as the greatest
fiction ever to be passed by any editor anywhere in the world as "news" appeared
in The Chronicle as the front-page lead under the screaming headline "Chronicle
attacked".
In The Herald, it was "Suspected anthrax sent to Chronicle editor". The
kindest thing anyone can say about that incredible fabrication is that, if they
had waited for just two months, it would have been great stuff for 1 April.
I am sure quite a few people could be fooled into believing it was true.
That is, of course, until they got to the details which gave the report away as
fiction even to the least intelligent among the papers' readers. You didn't need
to possess much brains to realise it was part of the now only too familiar
hogwash from Munhumutapa Building.
Especially when they gave as background information the nonsensical
reference that: "The incident follows another one in Harare in which mail
suspected to be laced with anthrax addressed to the Minister of State for
Information and Publicity in the President's Office, Professor Jonathan Moyo was
detected."
Are the two papers the only ones that have still not been told what all
other newspapers were told by experts in the Department of Veterinary Services a
few days after that hoax? We were all told - and diligently published that fact
- that laboratory tests proved the purported "powder" was certainly not anthrax.
I am not given to being spiteful by nature. But anyone who read that
"story" would confirm that it was palpable nonsense. I have never read such
gobbledygook in my life.
Just try to make sense of the following: According to the "story", three
anonymous letters "posted from the United Kingdom on January 18" arrived at the
Chronicle offices.
The editor's secretary then opens them and some time later takes them to
the editor - she obviously didn't take them to him immediately. Only when she
was returning to her office did she "feel very itchy throughout the body,
especially my hands".
Come off it, who did she expect to believe that clearly cock-and-bull
story? We are then told: "Several people phoned to express solidarity with The
Chronicle, urging the paper not to be scared."
People phoning even before they had read the "story"? Good gracious! I bet
this level of editorial daftness is unmatchable.
Daily News
Zanu PF trio charged with murder of two MDC activists
2/1/02 9:19:04 AM (GMT +2)
From Energy Bara in Masvingo
Three Zanu PF supporters allegedly murdered two MDC activists at
Chigumisirwa village in Bikita two weeks ago and dumped their bodies in the
bush, a Masvingo magistrate heard yesterday.
William Nhongo, 36, and Shadreck Musoro, 26, both Zanu PF Bikita district
members, yesterday appeared in court charged with the murder of MDC members
Richard Maposa and Richard Chatunga.
Another suspect, Mayenga Mayenga, a Zanu PF member as well, is still at
large. Nhongo and Musoro were not asked to plead and were denied bail by
Masvingo magistrate Musiona Shortgame.
They were advised to apply for bail to the High Court. The court heard that
the three went to their alleged victims' homestead at Chigumisirwa village at
night and force-marched them along a path before ordering them to renounce their
MDC membership. They assaulted them with sticks in full view of about 140 other
Zanu PF youths who sang and applauded the action.
It is alleged that Maposa collapsed after the beating and died. The accused
then pulled his body off the road and dumped it in the bush. But Maposa's death
did not deter them from beating up Chatunga who collapsed, his body being
dragged into the bush as well, the court heard.
He later died on arrival at Chikuku Hospital in Bikita. Nhongo and Musoro
were remanded in custody to 8 February.
Daily News
UK unfazed by ban from observing poll
2/1/02 9:19:36 AM (GMT +2)
Political Editor
THE British government yesterday said it was immaterial which European
Union (EU) countries came to observe Zimbabwe's toughest presidential poll next
month.
Sophie Honey, the spokesperson for the High Commission in Harare, was
commenting on President Mugabe's statement that Zimbabwe had invited the EU and
the African Caribbean and Pacific (EU-ACP) countries and the Commonwealth as
blocs to observe the 9 and 10 March election but without Britain.
She said what was important was that EU observers should be in the country
before and after the election.
She said: "In our view, it is important that international observers,
including an EU mission, should be able to come to Zimbabwe without delay. EU
foreign ministers made it clear on 28 January they would like deployment of an
EU observation mission to begin by 3 February."
Mugabe this week succumbed to international pressure and invited observers
from the Commonwealth, EU, the Southern African Development Community (Sadc) and
other groups in Africa. But he said British nationals would not be part of the
EU or Commonwealth teams.
"What we would like is to see the deployment of an EU observation mission
by 3 February," said Honey.
Mugabe said Sadc and Nigeria were free to send their observers as soon as
possible but did not give the time-frame.
Meanwhile, the British High Commission yesterday said the United Kingdom
had nothing to do with letters suspected to have been laced with anthrax
allegedly delivered to the offices of The Chronicle newspaper in Bulawayo this
week.
A Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation report suggested some of the letters
came from the UK. Honey condemned the attack on The Chronicle unreservedly.
Daily News
Maize-meal runs out
2/1/02 8:30:38 AM (GMT +2)
Farming Editor
MAJOR supermarkets in Harare have completely run out of maize-meal as the
Grain Marketing Board (GMB) tries frantically to import the 150 000 tonnes
required by the country for the next month.
Yesterday most supermarket sales departments in the city centre said they
had last received maize-meal last week.
Supermarkets such as OK, TM, Food Chain Group (FCG) and Jarzin did not have
any stocks of maize-meal at all.
Even super-refined maize-meal, usually left out by most shoppers who prefer
the cheaper coarse variety, was not available in all four supermarkets.
Erratic supplies of maize-meal began late last December.
Zimbabwe is facing shortages of maize-meal because of a poor rainfall
season last year resulting in low yields. A 50 percent reduction in production
in the commercial farming sector due to uncertainties caused by the violent land
reform programme has caused the shortages.
GMB chairman Enock Kamushinda said last week the country would import maize
before the stocks ran out completely but maize transporters said it would
probably take a month to import the 150 000 tonnes from South Africa because
there was a shortage of rail wagons.
While sugar supplies have improved, cooking oil and bar soap remain scarce
commodities countrywide. The following table sums up prices of essential
commodities as of last week at four selected supermarkets in Harare and
immediately as they are this week.
Daily News - Leader Page
Dangerous to let Zimbabwe off the hook at this stage
2/1/02 10:23:30 AM (GMT +2)
Before they start popping the champagne corks in celebration over the
decision by the Commonwealth not to suspend Zimbabwe for its widespread
violations of human rights, Zanu PF leaders would be well-advised to hold off
the revelry.
They could decide that what they perceive as this victory over Britain
signals the Commonwealth's willingness to let them off the hook completely,
allowing them to continue to kill, maim and rape innocent citizens as we head
towards the presidential election.
Or they could immediately abandon the violence against innocent citizens,
including opposition activists, the anti-Zanu PF urban dwellers, the independent
media and commercial farmers.
A day or two after filing their nomination papers yesterday, President
Mugabe could hold a joint news conference with the MDC's Morgan Tsvangirai and
the leaders of the smaller parties in the presidential contest, to pledge their
parties against the use of violence.
Mugabe could pledge to order Elliot Manyika, the man in charge of the youth
brigade, held largely responsible for most of the violence, to see that they
return to their barracks or whatever hole they came from.
If there is truly no secret Zanu PF agenda to rob the people of the vote,
then there should be no problem for Mugabe to share a platform with Tsvangirai
and the others and declaring publicly that, for the sake of peace in the country
he loves, he will order all Zanu PF leaders to stop their violent activities
immediately.
It would be a terrible mistake for Zanu PF to wallow in its alleged victory
over the British. The Third World members of the Commonwealth Ministerial Action
Group (CMAG) who stood firm against suspension could soon change their minds, if
they realised Zimbabwe took them for a ride, which is not inconceivable.
The
Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) takes place on 2 and 3 March in
Australia, having been postponed last year after the 11 September terrorist
outrage in the United States.
In London on Wednesday, the CMAG spelt out what it expects the government
in Harare to do in exchange for holding off suspension.
There is to be an
immediate end to political violence and all political parties must be allowed to
campaign freely for the presidential election.
Violence against the
independent media, a linchpin of Zanu PF's campaign strategy, must end. If, by
the time CHOGM convenes in early March, the situation has not changed, then it
is quite likely that Zimbabwe could still be suspended, only a few days from the
presidential election.
At one level, the CMAG decision to hold off the suspension could be very
dangerous, emboldening Zanu PF into a cockiness that might translate into the
escalation of violence against the opposition and other detractors.
At another level, the decision could force Zanu PF to show its true
intentions. If the party is being honest with the Commonwealth and the European
Union (EU), then the violence against the opposition should end
immediately.
If it doesn't end, then everybody, even the Nigerians and the South
Africans in the Commonwealth - the most influential African members - must know
that Mugabe has once again pulled the wool over their eyes.
The bottom line for all this flurry of activity is that the presidential
election should be absolutely free and fair.
Many Zimbabweans - and the EU - share the scepticism of the British on
whether Mugabe's government is genuinely committed to a free and fair election.
The legislation they have fast-tracked and still want to fast-track through
Parliament suggests they would like to use a loaded dice in this election. They
are installing cast-iron guarantees that, come what may, Mugabe will win.
Then there is the terrible declaration of loyalty to Mugabe by the security
chiefs, putting paid to any prospect of a free and fair election. Many dangers
lie ahead for the Commonwealth as it pins its hopes on people whose record of
honesty is dubious.
Daily News - Feature
EU attacks Zvinavashe's statement as a threat to the democratic
process
2/1/02 8:24:37 AM (GMT +2)
By Ngoni Chanakira Business Editor
THE European Commission (EC) says the recent statement by the chief of the
armed forces of Zimbabwe, General Vitalis Zvinavashe, is a threat to overturn
the democratic process if military commanders do not agree with the result of
this year's presidential poll.
The EC is the executive arm of the European Union (EU).
The poll, set for 9 and 10 March, pits President Mugabe of Zanu PF against
Morgan Tsvangirai, former leader of the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions who
now heads the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).
In a statement read by Zvinavashe early last month, all the armed forces
and security chiefs said they would not "salute any individual who does not
possess liberation struggle credentials".
The Minister of Defence, Dr Sydney Sekeremayi, has since thrown his weight
behind the declaration.
The EU has ruled that the essential elements defined in Article 9 of the
Cotonou Agreement are "not being respected" by Zimbabwe.
These concern obligations to respect democracy and governance issues by
signatory countries, of which Zimbabwe is one.
The ministers say they regret that despite all efforts so far, the Article
96 consultations have not resulted in a healthy situation in Zimbabwe and,
therefore, the EU would close consultations and begin targeted economic
sanctions against the country.
The EC's Council of Ministers, commenting on the situation in Zimbabwe,
said: "The Council expressed its serious concern about the situation in
Zimbabwe, particularly the recent escalation of violence and intimidation of
political opponents and the harassment of the independent Press.
"It noted that the Government of Zimbabwe has not taken effective measures
to improve the situation as called for by the European Council in Laeken last
December.
"The Council deplored the statement by the chief of the armed forces of
Zimbabwe, General Vitalis Zvinavashe, on 9 January, 2002, as a threat to
overturn the democratic process if military commanders did not agree with the
result of the presidential elections."
President Mugabe this week barred United Kingdom observers for the
presidential election, saying they were bent on sabotaging Zimbabwe which he has
ruled for nearly 22 years.
The UK is, however, is an influential member of
the EU.
The EC said: "The Council expressed serious concern about recent
legislation in Zimbabwe which, if enforced, would seriously infringe on the
right to freedom of speech, assembly and association, mainly the Public Order
and Security Act and the General Laws Amendment Act, both of which violate the
norms and standards for free and fair elections as agreed by the Southern
African Development Community Parliamentarians in March, 2001, and the proposed
legislation to regulate the media."
The ministers dismissed the lengthy letter written to them by Foreign
Affairs Minister, Dr Stan Mudenge, on 18 January, saying despite his promises
there were still cases of "serious human rights violations in Zimbabwe" as
reported by the independent media.
The EU said: "The Council, however, remains concerned that serious
violations of human rights continue to occur and that little progress has been
made in allowing access for international election observers and for media.
"The Council underlined that the Government of Zimbabwe is judged by its
actions on the ground."
Poem by a young lass, Charlene.
Our Zimbabwe
This upheaval, this unrest,
This time that has been sent to test,
My
faith, my love, my rational thought,
If I let go, will sink to naught.
So
Father, I ask by me you'll stand,
As I stand proud for my land.
Let not
race nor class nor colour decide,
Let me stand in the gap of this
divide.
Help me to stand strong, when others fall,
Let me stand firm, let
me stand tall.
Let no man question my will,
Even when provoked, let me be
still.
Give me calm and peace of mind,
Uncover my eyes, remove the
blind.
Father place your mighty hand,
To cover the wounds of this broken
land.
Wash away the blood of war,
Open the locked, closed door.
Father
stand by those who weep,
And show us that colour is only skin deep.
Let us
stand for what is right,
But not with anger nor with fight.
Be with those
brave enough to stand,
For what they believe for this land.
Be with those
who fear,
Show them your presence ever near.
And even in our darkest
hour,
Remind us of your ultimate power.
Zimbabwe will be a shining
light,
Not through power, nor through might,
But with forgiveness, and
without greed,
Lord raise strong people to lead.
A new
Zimbabwe will rise again,
Without the anguish and the pain.
And united,
together we will stand,
Upon the ground of this our land.