The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL OUR SUBSCRIBERS! We hope that this year will see
Zimbabwe begin to turn around, and are fully committed to making it do so
in every way we can.

Please send any material for publication in the Open Letter Forum to:
Open Letter Forum <justice@telco.co.zw>

JAG OPEN LETTER FORUM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Letter 1:
To whom it may concern,

Before 1994, SA was prevented to compete in any sport, against any other
country !!!  We were boycotted by the rest of the world.  Most South
Africans were very unhappy about that, but we understood why it had to be.
The present government of SA were the big instigators in what happened
then.  So why can't they take a stand now, as then, against Zimbabwe and
what is happening there at the moment.

There are more intelligent than stupid people in this world.  We all have
eyes and ears.  We can think and do for ourselves.  Let the intelligent
ones stand together and get this mess sorted.

After what the government of Zimbabwe has accused the British and other
governments, all over the world of, how can we allow this?

I do not believe that politics and sport should be discussed in the same
breath, but this has now become a political matter.  Will the English team
be safe in Zimbabwe?  Who knows?  If I were the mother or father of a team
member, I would be very apprehensive to send my son to such a country.
They can't even look after their own citizens, what about those from the
"enemy" ?

As a South African, I can remember well, how upset and disappointed our
cricket board was, with all the boycotts before 1994.  Now it is "unfair
and stupid" according to the two "Bs", to apply the same to Zimbabwe.  Who
do they think they are?

I think it is time that the whole world get on their hind legs and take a
stand against all the "goings-on" in Zimbabwe.  I would not like this to
place the World Cup 2003 in jeopardy.  I do believe, if it comes to the
push, there are fields in SA where those matches can be accommodated.  I
also believe that they will attract more supporters, who will be able to
afford the tickets.

PLEASE!!! THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE THE POWER AND THE WILL TO DO SOMETHING
ABOUT THIS, GET UP AND DO IT!!!

Thank you for taking time to read this.

From a proud South African and ardent cricket supporter

**************************************************

Letter 2: John Worsley-Worswick

THIS IS JUST NOT CRICKET!!!

I have been following with great interest and not a little consternation,
to put it mildly, the fierce debate over the decision of the ICC on
December 19th to allow Zimbabwe to host six world cup cricket matches.

Life, especially here in Zimbabwe, is often reduced by the obvious forces
of adverse circumstances, to no more than the lowest common denominator
dictating, or should I say "dictated", at the time.  For many here in
Zimbabwe, this has come down to the basics of bare survival and staying
alive, many having been deprived of their basic human rights some time ago.

To discuss or debate the above issue along the lines of sport and politics
seems ludicrous in the extreme, especially from a viewpoint within Zimbabwe
where the above basic factors of survival prevail.  This is not just, or
even about, sport.  This is just not, nor about, cricket, nor for that
matter about politics anymore.  Discuss it and debate it on the grounds of
basic human rights and we might be batting on the same wicket*but it is my
firm contention that for many Zimbabweans, it has moved to an even lower
common denominator; that of surviving the imminent and maliciously planned
starvation of half our population.

Our land - our contentiously loved and historically disputed land could soon
become a vast cemetery.  Are we going to allow the world's cricketers to
play games on those graves? Or more to the point , are those same
cricketers prepared to play in what is fast becoming a vast cemetery? Are
they prepared to remain oblivious to the facts?

John Worsley-Worswick

**************************************************

Letter 3: Ben Freeth

HAS STARVATION BEEN MALICIOUSLY ENGINEERED IN ZIMBABWE?

I recently wrote an article on this forum entitled "of Christmas, the
Revolution and genocides in Zimbabwe".  It sought to destroy the myth that
the starvation in Zimbabwe was due to drought.  Starvation in Zimbabwe is a
carefully planned strategy using Stalin's Marxist-Leninist tactics.  Stalin
was responsible for killing more people than any man that has ever lived.
The main tactic he employed was deliberate starvation; it being cheaper
than bullets.  Through this policy he not only managed to retain power but
he consolidated it until his position was unshakable and he was viewed as
some kind of God in the Soviet Union.

The communist outlook dictates that a state of war exists within society
and that the war needs to be prosecuted by the communist elements until
total victory is achieved.  Peace by their definition therefore, is
communist conquest.  Where there are elements in society that do not submit
to complete dictatorial control by the party, war is declared, and in a
state of war anything is permissible so long as it is achieving advancement
for the party.

The party in Zimbabwe is no stranger to war.  It achieved power though war,
has honed its edge in external war zones and it is evident that it intends
to maintain power through war.  When the third chimurenga war started it
was made to appear as a "socially just" war.  Those key communist
propaganda words, used all the way through the communist bloc countries,
were used extensively: "capitalism" and "imperialism".  These were the
common enemy of the party and therefore the people.  The post election
slogan of "chave chimurenga" (the war continues) is churned out ad nauseum.
Mr Mugabe's statement at his party conference was "our survival is an
ongoing war".

The questions to be asked are:
1.  Who are the opponents?
2.  What does the war intend to achieve?
3 and, What is the modus operandi of the war?

On the first question, the opponents of course are anyone who is not
actively part of the party.  It is not good enough in the communist system
to be "apolitical".  The party, the world over, works on the principle that
if you are not for them, you are, necessarily, against them.  Whether you
like it or not the party is at war with you if you do not actively support
what they are trying to do.

The second question is answered simply.  The war intends to achieve the
destruction of all its opposition through the opposition becoming an
extension of itself.

The third question is the one I wish to dwell on.  The modus operandi of
the party is simply to starve all opposition into submission so that
individuals have to become an active part of the party if they wish to get
food and the leaders of the opposition have to capitulate.  The simple
precedent to this situation, starting in ancient times, is of course the
classic siege of a fortified city or a fortress which, given time, was
invariably very effective given no outside interference.  The most poignant
siege of more recent times was the siege of Khartoum where General Gordon
held out with no food available to come in to feed his 34000 men for ten
months against the Mahdi.  An expeditionary force was eventually sent out
but it was too late - the town, weakened by starvation, was taken and
Gordon's head was taken off his shoulders.  In more recent times whole
nations had this tactic employed against them.  Stalin's exportation of the
whole Ukrainian harvest to Western Europe resulting in 7 million people
dying in one winter was the most pitiful.  Hitler's U boat campaign in
sinking the supply ships coming to Great Britain across the Atlantic was
another, but it happily didn't succeed.

For Zimbabwe though, hunger has been used very successfully far more
recently.  The plans were well laid with communist North Korean instructors
arriving in Zimbabwe soon after independence in 1981.  The 5th Brigade, a
private army with different uniforms, different equipment, and different
communication systems was made ready with, in Mr Mugabe's words, "a
political orientation".  By 1983 the massacres known as Gukuruhundi
started.  Curfews were imposed, shops were shut, transportation was
stopped, drought relief food was blocked.  In 1984 in Matabeleland South
15000 troops and police laid siege to a population of approximately 400 000
people.  At a meeting with local Ndebele a 5th Brigade officer is reported
to have said regarding the starvation policy: "first you will eat your
chickens, then your goats, then your cattle, then your donkeys.  Then you
will eat your children...". The Bishop of Bulawayo charged the Government
with employing a policy of "systematic starvation".  Gukurahundi continued
over a period of 4 years.  Thousands of civilians died or were murdered. It
was only at the end of 1987 that Nkomo finally capitulated and signed the
"Unity" accord.

In Zimbabwe today the starvation that we see is only the start.  The famine
early warning system reports that our cereal gap is now 907 000 tonnes
(over 30000 large lorry loads).  The U.N. report that our food crop
plantings are less than 50% of normal.  The starvation we face in 2003/2004
is horrific.

The starvation is indisputable.  The strategy to achieve it needs a closer
look.  Anyone wishing to control food supply needs to cover three areas:

· Firstly Food production needs to be significantly reduced.  This has
effectively been done already in Zimbabwe with plantings of food crops down
more than 50%.  It was simple to achieve.  The big farms, where at least
50% of the maize and over 90% of Soya Beans, Sugar Cane, Beef, Dairy,
Poultry, Wheat and Seed crops were produced, were invaded and the farmers
and their workforces were beaten, imprisoned, and in some cases murdered,
and their crops in some cases commandeered.  In excess of 75% of these
commercial farmers have been driven off their land and are in many cases
now destitute and therefore unable to produce again.

· In order to reduce production amongst small-scale farmers the most
effective policy is to make seed and fertilizer difficult to procure.  To
this end G.M.B. bought up nearly half the country's maize seed and the
state controlled the price of Maize produced by the farmer.  At the present
time the costs of production are at over Z$200 000 per tonne for an average
commercial 4 tonne per hectare crop, and the producer price is Z$28 000 per
tonne which leaves the farmer with a net loss of Z$88 000 for each hectare
that he puts in the ground.  It has now become illegal to market maize
except through the G.M.B at the G.M.B price.  Any maize found to be on farm
is regularly seized by the state.  Any farmer therefore legally producing
and marketing maize is going to produce it at a major loss.  Tillage units
were promised to the "new" farmers but only a handful of tractors were
allocated to each district.  Food production was significantly reduced.

· The second area that needs to be covered is the food retailers and food
distributors need to be controlled.  The most effective way of doing this
is by making it illegal to sell food crops above a gazetted price.  In
Zimbabwe this has been done so that most basic commodities have to now be
sold on the black market at exorbitant prices.  Police road blocks have
been set up to stop the illegal movement of food into these markets and
party militia have been stationed in many areas to stop farmers who are off
their farms from bringing food to their workers where they are still there.
War Veterans, Green Bombers and Youth Brigade now monitor not only GMB
outlets but also deliveries of maize and maize meal in rural areas.

· The third area that needs to be covered is that Importers of food need to
be hampered, delayed and controlled.  Individuals or companies wishing to
bring in food to Zimbabwe first need to get a licence to do so.  This is
very difficult to get.  To import food the individual or company first has
to get the foreign currency to do so, which is only possible on the black
market with the foreign currency bureaus having been closed down.  The cost
of food after that is far higher than the price that the individual company
is allowed to sell it at.

· If an individual does not have a licence he is only allowed to bring in
20kg of maize a month.  This is not even enough to feed his family let
alone anyone else.  Customs controls are very strict on the amount of food
an individual can bring into this country.

· That just leaves the aid agencies.  Again, to import food special
licences are required.  These in some cases take months to acquire.  There
are the special conditions set regarding the type of food allowed i.e. no
G.M.O maize.  Long tailbacks occur at customs with lorries loaded with this
vital commodity taking days to clear.  Distribution is another nightmare
with party youths seizing food in some cases and local authorities trying
to control who gets what based on political affiliation.  Meanwhile the
country begins to starve.

But with all this going on - some of the measures subtle, others downright
obvious, it seems incredible that Zimbabwe's neighbouring states, and
especially South Africa, continue to condone the war taking place against
the Zimbabwean people.  Where are those champions of democracy like Nelson
Mandela and Desmond Tutu?  Those that naively blame the starvation on
"misguided policy" or "inefficiency" or "drought" or even "incompetency"
need to think again.  The starvation in Zimbabwe is maliciously engineered.
The people are under siege just as those towns and fortresses were besieged
since ancient times.  The people of Zimbabwe need South Africa, S.A.D.C,
the U.N. or anyone that can assist to step into the breach very soon.  Or
are they going to prevaricate and pontificate until, like Gordon of
Khartoum it is "too late?"

Ben Freeth

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All letters published on the open Letter Forum are the views and opinions
of the submitters, and do not represent the official viewpoint of Justice
for Agriculture.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justice for Agriculture mailing list
To subscribe/unsubscribe: Please write to jag-list-admin@mango.zw

Back to the Top
Back to Index

NEW LISTINGS

The Herald yesterday contained further listings of farms listed for
acquisition, once more giving the lie to Mugabe's claims that "the land
acquisition process is over". 46 properties were listed, 27 of them in the
Tengwe area, 4 in Lomagundi, 4 in Hartley, 4 in Marondera, 2 in Harare, 2
in Bulawayo and 3 in Nyamandhlovu. Furthermore, thirteen of these are below
the supposed 400 hectare size allowed to commercial farmers, including one
of only 36 hectares (hardly a viable size for commercial farming, and one
would think well worth overlooking for resettlement). Finally, to add
insult to injury, one person has been listed for the seventh time, when the
actual property meant to be listed is the adjacent property (which is
apparently desired by a member of the CIO).

Below is a list of do's and don'ts for 2003 - sound advice for all farmers
and Zimbabweans.

The DO's

·Support Justice and the return to the rule of law by becoming a member of
JAG.  If you can not afford the $25 000.00 membership fee we will assist
you!

· Protect your title by challenging your Section 5 notice and Section 8
Order and keeping abreast of all legal developments through JAG.

· Protect your workers where possible (and thereby your fixed assets) by
keeping contact and feeding them through the JAG welfare scheme.

· Protect your property rights by completing a full JAG LOSS CLAIM
DOCUMENT.

· Protect your future by ensuring full accountability through documenting
and diarising all events that take place on your property with as much
detail of dates, people involved, threats, police reports etc. as you can.
This will also form part of your JLCD but we need it sooner by Email as
well.

· Protect your "community" by assisting them to do things in the right way
wherever they might be now.

· Keep JAG informed so that we can publicise the injustices as they take
place.

The DONT's

· Do not allow yourself to get on the wrong side of the law as so many did
in August 2002.

· Do not allow your title to get compromised through dealing outside of the
law.

· Do not hand over your title deeds or any certified copies of them under
any circumstances.

· Do not fill in L.A.3 forms.

· Do not make any deals without proper legal representation. Check with JAG
if in any doubt.

· Do not, where possible, leave your farm without first completing a loss
document.

· Do not be afraid of getting injustices publicised otherwise they will
continue.

· Do not do things in isolation.  Contact JAG for advice.  We are here for
you!

"The greatest sin of our time is not the few who have destroyed, but the
vast majority who've sat idly by".  (Martin Luther King Jnr.)


Be Active! Support Justice!


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justice for Agriculture mailing list
To subscribe/unsubscribe: Please write to jag-list-admin@mango.zw


Back to the Top
Back to Index

MDC MP Faces Charges of Inciting Violence

The Herald (Harare)

January 4, 2003
Posted to the web January 4, 2003

Harare

MDC Nkayi MP Mr Abednico Bhebhe has been arrested by police for allegedly
inciting public disorder by pasting posters on walls.

Mr Bhebhe was arrested on Thursday evening in Bulawayo in the company of an
unidentified party supporter in Bulawayo's Domington industrial area while
sticking up a poster on the walls inscribed "Hoot enough is enough".

Police spokesman Assistant Commissioner Wayne Bvudzijena said Mr Bhebhe was
suspected of breaching the Public Order Security Act, which makes it a crime
to publish or communicate information with the intention of causing public
violence.

"Currently police investigations are going on and he is expected to appear
in court once investigations are over," he said.

By late yesterday afternoon Mr Bhebhe was still in police custody.

MDC spokesman Paul Themba Nyathi was quoted by AFP downplaying Mr Bhebhe's
arrest claiming that his arrest was part of a grand plan by police targeting
the opposition.

Since coming to Parliament in 2000, Mr Bhebhe has been arrested twice.

He was first arrested in June 2001 under the then Law and Order
(Maintenance) Act at a rally in Bulawayo after allegedly saying the
President must go, even if it meant removing the President violently.

He was arrested again in February last year for allegedly possessing
offensive weapons, which included axes, machetes and knobkerries in Nkayi.

The MDC leadership has been caught on the wrong side of the law on several
occasions.

The party's leader Mr Morgan Tsvangirai, Professor Welshman Ncube and Mr
Renson Gasela are facing treason charges over a plot to remove the
legitimate Government of President Mugabe from power.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

BBC
 
Saturday, 4 January, 2003, 16:46 GMT
Food riots in Zimbabwe
Zimbabweans queue for food outside a store in Harare
All over the country people queue daily for basic food
Thirty-four people have been arrested as police used tear-gas to break up a riot at a grain depot in Zimbabwe's second largest city, Bulawayo, state media reports.

A report in the state-run Bulawayo Chronicle newspaper said those arrested had been protesting over what they said was the unfair distribution of food.

We have had enough of this - we are starving while some people have plenty of maize

Bulawayo resident
The state-run Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation reported that residents had accused grain board officials of corruptly supplying maize to unscrupulous millers, who then sold it on at exorbitant prices.

Correspondents say that millions of people in Zimbabwe are threatened by famine as the result of the continuing drought and the disruption caused by government's seizure of white-owned farms.

Favouritism

Maize meal, the national staple food, is supposed to be sold at controlled prices, but there have been reports that some millers are trying to evade the price controls.

Police fired tear-gas at the crowds and charged them with batons to try to quell the violence, witnesses said.

White farmers arrested
Thousands of white-owned farms have been seized

The privately-run Daily News said that about 4,000 people had been queuing at the depot on Friday when the fighting began.

The violence was said to be the most severe since food shortages began but no injuries were reported.

Some witnesses said the rioting had started because supporters of President Mugabe's Zanu-PF party were getting preferential treatment at the grain distribution centres.

"We have had enough of this. We are starving while some people have plenty of maize," the Daily News quoted one demonstrator as saying.

Full blown crisis

Correspondents have reported seeing state grain depots only selling maize to people holding party membership cards.

Robert Mugabe
Mugabe blames colonialism for Zimbabwe's problems

They say Mr Mugabe is using food a weapon to ensure that he remains in power.

Zimbabwe is in the grips of a massive economic crisis and about eight million people are thought be under threat of famine, with the problems not just restricted to rural areas.

Opposition parties point the finger of blame at Mr Mugabe and his government, but for his part the president says the cause of the crisis is a combination of a drought and a Western imperialistic plot aimed at keeping power in the hands of Zimbabwe's whites.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zimbabwe bars private imports of food, UN aide

January 4, 2003

BY PETA THORNYCROFT











MURAMBINDA, Zimbabwe--President Robert Mugabe is refusing to let Zimbabweans
privately import food, a decision that is condemning millions of people to
shortages, a UN aid spokesman said Friday.

More than 5,000 people gathered at Murambinda, 140 miles south of Harare, to
collect corn, beans and oil from the World Food Program.

Patience Mukondomi, 31, was not given any. As a teacher she has a job, and
therefore does not qualify for aid.

"There is nothing in the shops. We have money, but there is no food to buy.
Please sell us some," she implored officials.

But Luis Clemens, a WFP spokesman, explained that doing so would be against
the rules. "We cannot sell food, however much we want to help people," he
said. "We would be able to feed many more people if the government allowed
private importation of corn."

Zimbabwe has awarded a monopoly on trading in grain to a government agency
and there are countless verified reports from opposition supporters that
they have been denied permission to buy this food.

At the WFP distribution center, another woman, with a baby on her back, said
her husband was in the army and so she, too, did not qualify for food aid.

"We are starving," she said. "Even if my husband sent money, which he
doesn't because I am the second wife, there is no food to buy. My neighbor
helps me. Without her we would be dead."

The neighbor is one of 3 million people receiving food from the WFP. Mugabe
has been unable to find foreign currency to import anything but a trickle of
grain from South Africa.

"Private importation of corn would change the situation dramatically," said
Clemens. "We have made the offer to facilitate the importation of food, but
there is no change in policy."

Few crops have been planted by the inexperienced farmers who replaced more
than 4,000 white commercial farmers evicted in the past three years under
the government's land reforms.

Also, Zimbabwe and other Southern African states have been stricken by
drought.

Daily Telegraph
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zimbabwe Report of IDI Safety and Security Delegation

 

 

1. Purpose

 

At its meeting of 1 October 2002, the IDI Board determined that it would send a Safety and Security Delegation to Zimbabwe to inspect arrangements for the ICC Cricket World Cup 2003.

 

The purpose of the Delegation was to inspect the situation in Zimbabwe in order to determine if it was safe for the six games to be played in the country during the tournament.

 

All members confirmed that the only issue in relation to Zimbabwe was safety and security and that political considerations should not be a factor in the ICC’s decision making process.

 

The Delegation comprised the following representatives from the ICC and its members:

 

• Mr Malcolm Speed Managing Director, ICC Development (International) Ltd;

 

• Mr James Sutherland Chief Executive, Australian Cricket Board (ACB);

 

• Mr SK Nair Honorary Secretary, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI);

 

• Mr Tim Lamb Chief Executive, England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB);

 

• Mr Hans Mulder Team Manager, Koninklijke Nederlanse (Holland) Cricket Board (KNCB);

 

• Mr Laurie Pieters President of the Namibian Cricket Board (NCB);

 

• Mr Chishty Mujahid Director of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB);

 

• Mr Vince Hogg Chief Executive of the Zimbabwe Cricket Union (ZCU).

In addition, the Delegation had a number of advisors. These were:

• Mr Ian Frykberg Director of ICC's commercial partner, Global Cricket Corporation (GCC);

• Mr Tim May Joint Chief Executive of the Federation of International Cricketers Associations (FICA);

• Mr Jeff Rees Senior Investigator from the ICC Anti-Corruption Unit;

• Mr Ben van Deventer Member of the ICC CWC 2003 Security Directorate and a senior South African policeman;

• Mr Jonathan Ticehurst ICC Insurance advisor, from Windsor Insurance

• Mr Brendan McClements ICC General Manager, Corporate Affairs.

 

2. Itinerary

 

The inspection itinerary was as follows.

 

Wednesday 27th November

 

7.30am Internal Breakfast Briefing Session – Function Room, Meikles Hotel.

 

8.30am Australian High Commission – 29 Mazowe St, Harare

Mr Trevor Wills - Acting High Commissioner

 

9.30am Zimbabwe Republic Police Headquarters – representatives of Police, Army, Air Force

 

10.30am Meeting with Ministry of Education, Sport & Culture, The Honourable Mr E Chigwedere.

 

12.00pm Lunch at Harare Sports Club during the ODI vs Pakistan.

 

to 2.30pm Meeting with the Deputy Mayor of Harare and Acting Town Clerk

 

Thursday 28th November

 

7.30am Delegates collected from the Hotel for transport to Charles Prince airport.

 

8.00am Flight to Bulawayo

 

9.20am Arrival in Bulawayo – collection at the airport by ZCU Personnel.

 

10.00am Executive Mayor of Bulawayo, His Worship Mr J Ndabeni-Ncube.

 

11.00am Zimbabwe Republic Police, Matabeleland Province – representatives of Police and Army.

 

12.00pm Visit to Queens Sports Club – inspection of facilities.

 

2.30pm Flight to Harare

 

Friday 29th November

 

8.30am British High Commission

Mr B Donnelly – High Commissioner

 

10.00am Indian High Commission

Mr A K Basu – High Commissioner

 

11.30am Namibian High Commission

Mr E Haipinge – Acting High Commissioner

 

12.30pm Royal Netherlands Embassy

Councillor Mr P van der Linde

 

2.30pm Pakistan High Commission

Mr K A Babar – High Commissioner

 

3.30pm Security briefing from Zimbabwe World Cup Security Directorate, Mr Paul Friendship, in the ZCU Boardroom.

 

4.30pm Closing discussion session chaired by Malcolm Speed in the ZCU Boardroom.

Unfortunately the scheduled appointment with the Namibian High Commissioner was cancelled during the visit.

 

3. Zimbabwe – Safety Environment

 

The Delegation was able to obtain a clear picture of the safety and security environment within Zimbabwe through its discussions with a broad cross section of Government, security and diplomatic contacts.

 

The issue was addressed directly by the Delegation in each of its meetings.

 

Internal Safety Environment

 

Universally, it was recognized that there has been considerable improvement recently in the safety environment in Zimbabwe since the decision by the Australian Cricket Board to postpone its tour to the country earlier this year. The Pakistan Team has just completed a three week tour and had not encountered any problems.

 

The Australian High Commission highlighted that this change was reflected in its travel advice to its citizens which had been downgraded from advising against all non-essential travel, to recommending that visitors to the country exercise due caution in their travel arrangements.

The British High Commission and the Dutch Embassy travel advice is similar.

 

Pakistan and India regard Zimbabwe as safe and have not seen fit to issue a travel advisory for the country.

 

All diplomats commented that Harare and Bulawayo experienced the street crime associated with most cities but that they would expect it to be safe and secure for the players and officials, provided that due vigilance and caution was exercised, particularly after dark.

It should be noted that no foreign tourist has been killed or injured in Zimbabwe for political motives.

 

A similar point was also made by the security forces that will be responsible for the teams in these cities.

 

The sense of the advice is summed up in the following comment made to the delegation by a consular official.

 

“Sensible tourism is perfectly possible”

 

All diplomats regarded the high profile of the players and the security surrounding the teams and officials as factors that would reduce the security risk.

 

Of particular note were the comments of the Deputy Mayor and Town Clerk of Harare and the Mayor of Bulawayo.

 

While both cities are politically controlled by the opposition party (the MDC), both local governments emphasised that the games are in the national interest and highlighted the economic boost that staging the matches will provide to their cities.

 

In particular, the Deputy Mayor of Harare identified the critical shortage of foreign currency in Zimbabwe and the benefits that will come to his constituency from staging the matches.

 

It was also identified that while the political situation in Zimbabwe is difficult, the risk of orchestrated violence from within the country that could place the players and officials at risk is minimal.

 

Diplomatic sources confirm that the MDC is committed to finding a political solution through non-violent means and is unlikely to attempt to orchestrate any violence against the government or use the World Cup matches as a political platform to promote their cause.

 

The local government officials confirmed the support of their cities for the matches, that their party supports the participation of Zimbabwe in international sport, that these games are regarded as being in the national interest and that their party does not support violence.

 

“When it comes to national issues that reflect the national identity, the MDC will not engage in any political points scoring”

Senior city official

 

“Everyone is supportive of the World Cup and the MDC is the same. The World Cup is fundamentally a good thing and we’re not going to call it a bad thing and go against public opinion”

Senior city official

 

One major area of concern identified during the inspection was in relation to food shortages.

Zimbabwe is currently experiencing significant food shortages, particularly in the rural areas, and this situation is likely to get worse ahead of the ICC CWC 2003 with the next harvest not due until April. Zimbabwe has previously experienced food riots in Harare (1997) and this cannot be ruled out again.

 

However, it is apparent that should this occur it will not be an organized program by the MDC. Any action is likely to be as a result of localized disaffection spilling over into violence.

 

“A hungry stomach can make a man angry.”

Senior city official

 

Equally, it is likely that any violence, should it occur, would be well away from the players and officials. This type of outbreak is likely to occur in the suburbs of Harare and Bulawayo while the teams and officials will be located in the centre of the city.

 

It was also highlighted to the Delegation that in the event of any violence of this type, the internal security forces were very well equipped to quickly isolate, contain and address the problem.

 

“If food riots occur, it is highly likely that the police and military would be able to contain them as the layout of the city of Harare makes this easy to achieve. The city has been planned this way”

Consular official

 

External Safety Environment

 

A number of sources highlighted to the ICC that the main security threat in Zimbabwe would not come from within the country but is posed by the risk of an outside terrorist organisation targeting the ICC CWC 2003.

 

It should be noted that in making these comments, the sources also highlighted that Zimbabwe posed no greater or lesser risk than any other country hosting the tournament and that this was simply a comment on the situation in the world today.

 

It was also highlighted that there was no history of external terrorist attacks or extremism in the country.

 

In light of this information, the Delegation sought information on the capacity and capability of the Zimbabwean intelligence and security forces to deal with this type of threat.

 

Not surprisingly, the security forces themselves believed that they were entirely capable of dealing with this issue.

More importantly, a number of other independent sources also supported this view.

 

“The Zimbabwe security forces are well staffed and well organized”

Senior Consular official

 

“Zimbabwe has the expertise, infrastructure and capability to deliver a safe and secure event”

Senior Consular official

 

“I know that the US has been working closely with the Zimbabwe intelligence community and that they are pleased with the co-operation. There is no sense that Zimbabwe is sympathetic with or helping terrorists.”

Senior Consular official

 

4. Zimbabwe – Player and Officials Security

 

The accountability and responsibility for the safety and security of players and officials in Zimbabwe rests with the United Cricket Board of South Africa through its Cricket World Cup Organising Committee and the Safety Directorate of that Committee.

 

The Delegation was accompanied by Director Mr Ben van Deventer, a member of the Security Directorate and a very senior serving policeman in the South African Police Force with specific skills in the area of safety and security for major international events.

 

Mr van Deventer confirmed that security of the players and officials in Zimbabwe was subject to the detailed Security Plan developed for the event.

 

This plan has previously been approved by the Government of South Africa and is a comprehensive and detailed guide to the necessary levels of security at the World Cup. It covers all aspects of security including airport arrivals and departures, transfers, accommodation and at-match arrangements.

 

The focus of the Delegation was on the extent to which this security plan was understood by the relevant security personnel in Zimbabwe and to what degree it is being implemented.

 

Meetings with the police and security forces identified that the management structures had been put in place with the necessary security committees established in both Harare and Bulawayo. These committees bring together the relevant stakeholders responsible for overseeing and implementing the security plan.

 

The Delegation’s visit also coincided with the trial, at the 3rd ODI between Zimbabwe and Pakistan, of the match day security arrangements for traffic free zones, vehicle checks, spectator searches (including magnotometer scans) and zoned accreditation areas within grounds.

 

These trials worked successfully with the plans proceeding smoothly. Weaknesses that were identified are now being addressed as the final plans are developed.

 

In meeting with the various security and coordinating groups involved in the provision of this security, it was apparent to the Delegation that this issue must remain a priority in the lead-up to the tournament.

 

The Delegation received undertakings from all parties that this commitment is in place and the Delegation is of the view that the ZCU and the CWC Security Directorate must work more closely together to ensure that the Security Plan is well understood by all organisations responsible for its delivery.

 

The Delegation was satisfied with the commitments from both the ZCU and the Security Directorate.

It noted that the ZCU would be submitting a full report on the implementation of its Security Plan to the Security Directorate for final sign-off in early January 2003 and recommends that the approved plan should be provided to all Boards whose teams are playing in Zimbabwe as a matter of course.

 

The Delegation also sought assurances on the security arrangements that would be in place to deal with the possibility of terrorist attack.

 

The Directorate advised that increased security would be implemented including:

 

• The creation of a secure perimeter of some 200 meters around the hotel protected by strong roadblocks such as concrete barriers;

 

• Vehicle access to the area permitted only through an accreditation system; and

 

• Inspections of every vehicle entering the area.

 

The Delegation regards these steps as mandatory.

 

It is also important to note that the Security Plan includes a significant component dedicated to the provision of suitable medical facilities at and close to both venues.

 

The on-site facilities to include:

 

1. One doctor;

 

2. Two ambulances, both with two crew members and equipped to Intermediate Life Support levels.

 

3. One trauma nurse

 

4. One paramedic.

 

The medical staff to be provided with the full range of equipment specified in the Security Plan.

Both locations have primary and secondary designated hospitals and suitable medical facilities. In Harare these are within a 3 km radius of the venue and at Bulawayo they are within an 8 km radius of the venue. Families of players who are travelling to Zimbabwe should also be provided with an understanding of the security measures in place for the games to ensure that they are able to take the necessary steps to minimise any security risk.

 

5. Zimbabwe – Media and Spectator Safety Issues

 

The ICC recognizes that there are likely to be many media personnel and spectators who are also looking to travel to Zimbabwe for the ICC Cricket World Cup 2003. The delegation also sought an understanding of security issues from this perspective.

 

In looking at this issue it should be noted that the decision of whether or not to travel to Zimbabwe can only be made by these individuals and organizations and ICC plays no part in that decision.

The views of the diplomats were of particular interest regarding the safety assessments for their own nationals.

 

Even the most cautious advice was that Zimbabwe was a safe and secure country for tourists, provided they were sensible in their travel arrangements.

 

Sensible precautions include:

 

• ensuring that travel arrangements are made with a reputable travel company;

 

• not traveling to rural areas;

 

• keeping a low political profile and avoiding crowds;

 

• being aware of the sensitivities in Zimbabwe such as no photography of state buildings.

 

The British High Commission was very keen to ensure that its citizens travelling to Zimbabwe made sure that they were aware of these issues while the Australian High Commission stressed the need for people to seek out and follow the travel advisories issued by its staff.

 

“Visitors to Zimbabwe should make sure that they travel with experienced tour operators to well known destinations. The issues for tourists are no different to any other country.”

Senior Diplomat

 

It is anticipated that the largest contingent of overseas spectators will come from England with the “Barmy Army” likely to be well represented.

 

The British High Commission is particularly keen to establish contact with its supporters.

Given the existing informal relationship between the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) and the Barmy Army, ECB CEO, Mr Tim Lamb, agreed to facilitate this discussion to allow the British High Commission to provide the Barmy Army with information and advice specific to British citizens visiting Zimbabwe for the World Cup.

 

The inspection highlighted the need for all visitors to Zimbabwe to make sure that they are fully informed about the situation within the country when coming to their own decisions about travelling to the World Cup.

 

Based on the information provided by diplomatic staff, the Delegation is satisfied that Zimbabwe is safe for spectators and media travelling to the tournament on the basis that any person travelling to Zimbabwe obtains and follows the travel advice issued by their own diplomatic mission.

 

The Delegation strongly urges all spectators and media considering travelling to these matches to consult with their own High Commissions/Embassies to get the most up to date information available in order to make a fully informed and considered decision on this issue.

 

6. Insurance Issues

 

Following our meetings and discussions the insurance assessment identified that that any violent attack on the tournament is likely to be from outside Zimbabwe rather than from within. That is an attack directed against the Tournament, to create international publicity, by extremists based outside Zimbabwe.

 

Attacks on soft targets by determined extremists are very difficult to foresee and they are occurring with increasing frequency and severity in different parts of the world. However, as the situation stands at the moment there is confidence that insurance is available for the Players and Officials for death, disablement and medical expenses associated therewith, arising out of terrorist attacks within Zimbabwe.

 

This is at a level of benefit that it is believed will be regarded by ICC, the National Cricket Associations/Board, and the Players as adequate and reasonable.

 

Such a policy would automatically extend to include death, disablement and medical expenses caused by riots and civil commotion, as well as the risk of everyday accident such as motor crash, personal assault, injury in the hotel etc.

 

The attack on 28 November 2002 in Mombasa, Kenya, is regarded by Insurers as yet another tragic episode in the ongoing conflict between two known adversaries. It does not prejudice the insurances available to ICC but it does demonstrate the unpredictability of the location of these events.

 

However, in giving an indication of terms, Insurers may wish to reserve the right to cancel the policy if the political climate deteriorates, with the feared consequences of rioting and deaths, or if there are incidences of terrorist attack in Zimbabwe between now and February 2003.

 

7. Conclusions

 

1. The Delegation is satisfied that it met with a sufficient number of people in a diversity of positions in Zimbabwe to provide adequate sources of information to reach the conclusions that are detailed hereunder.

 

2. It is satisfied that there is widespread support within Zimbabwe for the ICC Cricket World Cup 2003 matches to take place. ZCU is a Full Member of ICC and has earned the right to host these Cricket World Cup matches.

 

3. In the course of its meetings, the Delegation was unable to identify any group that would benefit significantly from the relocation of the matches. On the other hand, there are significant benefits that will flow from playing the matches in Zimbabwe.

 

4. It is clear that levels of safety and security have improved since earlier in 2002 when the tour by the Australian Cricket Team to Zimbabwe was cancelled.

 

5. It is also clear that there are serious political and economic issues that have arisen in Zimbabwe and it is apparent that the situation will most likely deteriorate between now and the time when the Cricket World Cup matches are to be played. It is evident that increased anxiety in relation to political and economic affairs and, in particular, food shortages that will be exacerbated in the coming months, will create a risk of increased violence in the community.

 

6. However, the Delegation is satisfied that the processes that have been put in place by the relevant officials in Zimbabwe are more than adequate to deal with any such threat of increased violence and that it will not pose a safety and security risk for players and officials.

 

7. The Delegation received a comprehensive presentation of those aspects of the Cricket World Cup Security Plan that impact on matches in Zimbabwe. This Security Plan has been approved by the Government of the Republic of South Africa. The ICC CWC Security Directorate has undertaken to continue to monitor the implementation of those aspects of the Security Plan that relate to the matches in Zimbabwe to ensure that all of the planned activities take place.

 

8. Spectators and media intending to travel to Zimbabwe are strongly urged to contact their respective diplomatic officials and to get a thorough understanding of the current situation in Zimbabwe to ensure that they are able to make a fully informed decision about travelling to the country.

 

9. There is an appropriate level of insurance cover at an acceptable cost available to all of the teams scheduled to play in Zimbabwe, should they wish to take advantage of that insurance.

 

10. There are many serious issues that face the world at large in relation to safety and security and the sport of cricket is not immune from these issues.

 

However, as things stand at the moment, it is the view of the Delegation that there is no good reason in terms of the safety and security of players to relocate any of the six matches that are planned to be played in Zimbabwe in February and March and they should continue as scheduled. In the intervening weeks, IDI and ZCU will continue to monitor events in Zimbabwe very carefully. If there is any significant deterioration in the perceived levels of safety in Zimbabwe, this issue will be revisited immediately.

 

8. Recommendations to the IDI Board

 

1. That the IDI Board confirms that the six first round matches scheduled for Zimbabwe will take placed as planned.

 

2. That the ICC CWC Security Directorate ensures that the Security Plan is fully implemented in Zimbabwe by regularly monitoring the progress of this plan and providing the ICC with reports on a two weekly basis as to its implementation.

 

3. That the final Security Plan submitted by the ZCU and approved by the Security Directorate, including the additional security measures identified following the terrorist attack in Kenya, be provided to each country scheduled to play in Zimbabwe for their information.

 

Signed By The Members Of The Delegation

 

Malcolm Speed – IDI Managing Director

 

James Sutherland – ACB Chief Executive

 

SK Nair – BCCI Honorary Secretary

 

Tim Lamb – ECB Chief Executive

 

Hans Mulder – Holland Team Manager

 

Laurie Pieters – Namibia President

 

Chishty Mujahid – PCB Director

 

Vince Hogg – ZCU Chief Executive

 

Ian Frykberg – GCC Director

 

Tim May – Chief Executive FICA

 

Jeff Rees – ICC Anti Corruption Unit

 

Ben van Deventer – CWC Security Directorate

 

Jonathan Ticehurst – Windsor Insurance

 

Brendan McClements – ICC General Manager, Corporate Affairs

 

December 2002

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Independent (UK)
England stars face violent demos
By Basildon Peta, Zimbabwe Correspondent
05 January 2003


English and Australian cricketers due to play World Cup matches in Zimbabwe
next month - and the officials, journalists and fans who accompany them -
face the threat of violent demonstrations, heavy-handed security and chaos
caused by the country's economic collapse.

Zimbabwean opposition groups, angry at the prestige that President Robert
Mugabe will gain from the presence of international cricket teams, have
formed an umbrella group called Organised Resistance, and are threatening to
disrupt the matches if they go ahead.

"Should the World Cup come to Zimbabwe, it will present a useful opportunity
to expose and highlight human rights abuses - in particular, the partisan
distribution of food aid," Organised Resistance said in a statement.

"The media coverage, and the fact that foreign journalists and world
television will be focusing on Zimbabwe, means our state-sponsored
victimisation will once again become front-page news around the world," the
group added. "It is likely that mass demonstrations will be co-ordinated to
take advantage of the media event of the World Cup."

If the cricketers go to Zimbabwe, they will have ignored pressure for a
boycott from the British and Australian governments. Ironically, Mr Mugabe
himself had to be talked out of banning the two sides. Not only had he been
itching to retaliate against London and Canberra, Zimbabwe government
sources said, he believed the influx of British and Australian cricketers
and fans would provide an opportunity for MI6 to infiltrate agents with
orders to assassinate him.

Tony Blair and other "Western detractors" had hoped Mr Mugabe would lose the
presidential election last March. Since those hopes were dashed, the sources
said, Mr Mugabe had become convinced that Tony Blair and his allies were
working with the local opposition to kill him. But the President's
colleagues persuaded him that the cricketers had to be admitted to avoid
loss of face.

It was reported yesterday that action might be taken against the Zimbabwean
team, most of whom are white, if they agreed to a compromise proposal to
play their England and Australia matches in South Africa. Such action might
lead to the players losing their Zimbabwean passports and being prevented
from leaving the country.

To appease Mr Mugabe, his ministers promised the touring parties would be
swamped in security, with at least three agents of the Central Intelligence
Organisation assigned to every player and official to check their movements.
Their rooms could also be bugged and their baggage searched.

Apart from the risk of being caught up in violence, visiting cricketers and
their followers will face problems caused by Zimbabwe's economic meltdown.
Supermarket shelves are empty and a crippling fuel shortage will affect the
movement of cricket fans between the two main cities, Harare and Bulawayo,
which are nearly 300 miles apart.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Spectator (UK), 28 December 2002

FEATURES

Afro-Saxon attitudes

Andrew Kenny says the Afrikaner nationalists love their culture but
the African nationalists hate theirs

Cape Town

A series of terrorist bomb blasts across South Africa, one of which
killed a woman in Soweto, has rubbed a wound of resentment between
Africans and Afrikaners. This terrorism, unlike 11 September, has not
required us to worry about its 'root causes'. It has required only
simple condemnation. This is because the bombs are believed to be the
work of 'right-wingers'.

South Africa has enriched political philosophy by giving definition to
the terms 'left-wing' and 'right-wing', which otherwise mean nothing
at all. (Is Fidel Castro left-wing or right-wing? He persecutes
homosexuals, supports capital punishment, bans trade unions, is a
billionaire in an impoverished country, and has decreed that his
brother should succeed him in absolute power.) In South Africa, as
might be expected, the meaning is racial. If you hate capitalism and
globalisation, loathe the US, seethe with ethnic nationalism, see your
people as the victims of an evil conspiracy and have a black skin, you
are 'an extreme left-winger'. If you hold exactly the same set of
beliefs but have white skin, you are 'an extreme right-winger'.

The 'extreme right-wingers' are tiny groups of hardline Boer
nationalists. They have as much chance of taking over South Africa as
the Druids have of taking over England. There is no hard evidence that
they are behind the bombings but the circumstantial evidence points
towards them. This month members of the Boeremag ('Boer Power') were
arrested with large amounts of explosives. I have spoken to members of
similar groups, such as the AWB (Afrikaner Resistance Movement), and I
know what they stand for. They feel that South Africa rightly belongs
to the Afrikaners, and is given to them by God. It has been stolen
from them by a wicked Jewish-capitalist conspiracy, whose roots go
back to the Illuminati and whose master is the Antichrist. Black
people, who are subhuman innocents, are being used by the conspiracy
to wreck South Africa in preparation for its takeover by the 'New
World Order'.

In other words, the 'right-wing' plotters are a dreary lot, not
peculiarly Afrikaans, whose thoughts are little different from those
of any other bunch of fascist, Marxist or religious fanatics. Much
more interesting has been the reaction of ANC commentators to
Afrikaners in general.

Their most outrageous suggestion was that any Afrikaner who is
campaigning to promote Afrikaner culture must have links with the
bombers. This is like saying that because I am a vegetarian I must be
blowing up animal laboratories. Afrikaners hit back angrily. Then
followed arguments about language and identity, and about the rights
of minority groups in the new South Africa. As an English-speaking
South African, I found myself staring into a chasm of jealousy and
suspicion between the Afrikaners, who ruled me in the past, and the
Africans, who rule me now.

Each group is faced with a central