The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

New Zimbabwe

Annan's blast at Mugabe

By Staff Reporter
Last updated: 07/07/2004 02:40:58
THE United Nations secretary general Kofi Annan on Tuesday fired a
thinly-veiled broadside at Zimbabwean tyrant Robert Mugabe for refusing to
hand over power.

Annan urged African despots to "pass the baton to the next generation". His
counsel, delivered in Ethiopia at the opening session of the African Union,
would have been uncomfortable listening for Mugabe, in power for 24 years.

"There is no greater wisdom and no clearer mark of statesmanship than
knowing when to pass the torch to a new generation. And no government should
manipulate or amend the constitution to hold on to office beyond prescribed
term limits," he said to applause.

Annan's rebuke was seen as a direct attack on Mugabe who has been in power
since Zimbabwe's independence in 1980. His comments came just 24 hours after
the African Union broke with tradition, releasing a damning report on
Zimbabwe's human rights abuses.

Annan said the new spirit of democratic empowerment in Africa had to find a
home in every African country. For this to happen, politics had to be
inclusive, and a careful institutional balance needed to be preserved.

This included:
. regular free and fair elections;
. a credible opposition whose role was respected;
. an independent judiciary which upholds the rule of law;
. a free and independent press;
. effective civilian control over the military; and
. a vibrant civil society.

"Let us pledge that the days of indefinite one-man or one-party governments
are behind us," he said.

There was no direct response from Zimbabwean officials but speaking directly
after Annan, outgoing AU chairman Joaquim Chissano said: "Some of us felt
that he was pointing his finger for those of us who are not following the
right direction."
Chissano, who is outgoing president of Mozambique, said Africans accepted
this welcoming the pointing of fingers at each other as envisaged in the
AU's peer review mechanism.

Chissano also took the opportunity to propose Swahili as the African lingua
franca for the AU, delivering his speech in that language.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

New Zimbabwe

      MASOLA WA DABUDABU HOPEWELL

      My flight into exile
      Last updated: 07/06/2004 22:56:08
      ONCE upon a time, I felt that my life in Zimbabwe was not how it was
supposed to be. I felt there was something lacking and that there was
someone lurking in the alleys ready to pounce on me because of my
convictions and beliefs.

      The State could not guarantee my safety as a citizen. My life lacked
the security that a law abiding citizen would normally enjoy; all because I
wrote what I thought was the truth about a regime gone out of control. My
innocent political convictions earned the unlawful chagrin of the lawless
regime; with various arms state mechanisms competing to disable my voice!

      Leaving the country that was led and is still led by the killer regime
was the best I could do. I left in a huff. I did not even have the chance to
say bye to my loved ones. As daring as I am; I could not even post a small
note to bid the torturous facets of the regime a farewell. I left in a
hurry. I left my children. I left my loved ones. I left my friends. More
importantly, I left the bulwark of my enemies.

      I consider myself a loving father, perhaps a bit selfish because when
I left, I never told my children what was happening. They also saw me in
intense conversations with my sister and her husband! I was actually
organising for their up-keep at my sister's place. At least I was glad that
my sister, so dear to me; would be a pillar of hope and support for my
children during my absence from the land of strife.

      My sister gladly took my children and provided them with the comfort
they could possibly need. Her husband would naturally offer the father
figure-head to my little darlings whom I love so much! I was confident that
I had left my children in a family environment! I missed my little brats and
I know they missed me; yet we all had clear consciences that they were well
catered for for their physical and physiological needs!

      As a truly responsible father, when I got a little of this and a
little of that, I did remember to share with my children, my sister, her
husband and their children. It was quiet a pleasure to send this or that to
them. I know that everything I sent was appreciated, however small it was.
Whilst I missed my children; I was happy that they were getting what I
considered the bare necessities given the shortages and the inflationary
prices in Zimbabwe.

            "I wish I could strangle someone! If I were in Zimbabwe, I would
have committed murder to avenge the abuse of my daughter!"
            MASOLA WA DABUDABU
      Life is not fair. Early last year, my sister fell ill and within three
weeks of her illness she passed away. It was traumatic for her children, my
children, her husband and myself. I was so close to her and she was so dear
to my children. I cannot state how loving she was to her little ones.
Needless to say, she was buried in my absence and my heart bled for her. I
would be naive to start wondering what took my sister. It was the plague.
She succumbed to one of the deadly opportunistic diseases of AIDS.

      After mourning my sister, I had to tackle the quandary of the up-keep
of my kids. I made frantic phone calls to this and that relative to see how
best my kids would be catered for. Eventually I talked to my brother-in-law,
my sister's widower. He was kind. He would continue to look after my kids
until such time that he felt he could not. After-all my kids and his had
developed a bond that made it difficult to separate them from his. Being my
nieces and nephews, his kids had even some resemblance to mine. So; it was
passed between my late sister's husband and myself that he would remain with
my kids.

      As agreed between my brother-in-law and myself, my kids remained at
his place and continued to enjoy the privileges they had enjoyed when my
sister was still alive.

      Of my two kids that were at my sister's place there was Sylvia, born
14 February 1989. Well, I do not discriminate my children; but in this case
I would say Sylvia was my little girl whom I liked so much more and she knew
it. This did not however antagonise my relationship with the other kid!

      I shall for-ever term the month of June the season of the witch. It
was in June that I left Zimbabwe with the fear of persecution supreme. It
was in June last year that my sister and my mother died. It was in the moth
of June this year that I got devastating news from home that my lovely
daughter, fifteen year old Sylvia was pregnant! It was in the month of June
that I sadly learnt that my brother-in-law, the widower of my late sister
who died from AIDS related diseases was responsible for my daughter's
predicament.

      I wept.

      I could not imagine my brother-in-law; with his health very much
frail; doing what he did to my daughter. I would not have thought that he
was going to be that evil to my daughter. For God's sake my daughter is
younger than his own son and she used to play with his own little daughter.
I was devastated. I remain devastated. My heart bleeds for my daughter whose
life has been ruined by a sick man who is older than me. I pity my daughter
whose education was cut short by a man I trusted; someone who had been a
father figure-head to her!

      I have to mention that my daughter is now almost seven months
pregnant. Knowing that she was pregnant, this brute had the guts to take my
money, pay the expensive school fees in May as if everything was alright.
When the school authorities decided to expel my daughter from school; he had
the audacity to send his girl-friend to collect her from school. Luckily the
school authorities had already investigated the whole issue and they refused
to hand her over to the girl-friend.

      Enter my conniving maternal uncle! My maternal uncle connived with the
lustful brother-in-law and went to collect my daughter. After collecting
her, he straight away handed her over to the brute again! Frantic telephone
calls were then made in an effort to panel beat me into accepting the sordid
affair as a forgettable one! I refused to be part of a scandal on my
daughter. I made it clear that the man had to face charges of statutory
rape. My daughter will only turn sixteen, the age of consent in February
next year!

      Somehow I find the ugly face of politics rearing its head in this
case. My I mention that the said brother-in-law is an ardent follower of
ZANU-PF, being an ex-ZIPRA combatant and serving in Mugabe's army! My
maternal uncle who wanted to cover the bloody trail is also an ex-ZIPRA
combatant; a new farmer and a new convict in the belief that Mugabe is an
earthly god! Also taking a lead in trying to save the neck of this rapist is
my maternal cousin. He is also an ex-ZIPRA combatant and serving as a
Lieutenant in Mugabe's army.

      These people tried to cover up the whole issue. I had to bull-dose my
way so that at least the police interviewed the culprit. Somehow he was
released and I am yet to speak to the investigating officer to get to the
bottom of the case. I hope the dirty hand of politics does not relegate this
serious case of biological terrorism on my daughter to the dust bin. At the
moment I do not know how far the case would go. It is not a good omen that
the perpetrator is out. A rape suspect should not be given bail! He is a
dangerous rapist who has the additional lethality of HIV!

      I would want the culprit to hang ten times over. I trusted him and he
destroyed that trust. I know that my sister would not mind to see the man
being tormented for his crime. If I could have my way, even those relatives
of mine who tried to pervert the course of justice should face the music.
Unfortunately they belong to the 'right' party. They can escape any judicial
ordeal with ease.

      I wish I could strangle someone! If I were in Zimbabwe, I would have
committed murder to avenge the abuse of my daughter! But then I cannot be in
Zimbabwe because of Mugabe!

      Law breakers beware! This goes for all those who do crimes and hide
behind the ZANU-PF bloody shadows! The time shall come. There shall be
gnashing of teeth!

Back to the Top
Back to Index

SABC

UN says sub-Saharan Africa faces food emergency

July 06, 2004, 15:16

Millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa face food emergencies this year
because of locusts, poor rains, civil strife and HIV/Aids, the UN Food and
Agriculture Organisation (Fao) says. Twenty-three countries in the region
are seriously affected by food insecurity, according to Fao's latest Africa
Report.

Sub-Saharan Africa's food aid requirement for this year is estimated at 2.9
million tonnes, compared to about four million tonnes last year, the Fao
said.

In Sudan, the humanitarian crisis in the greater Darfur region has had grave
consequences with more than 1.2 million people forced from their homes and
fields, the report said.

Despite good rains and a record cereal crop last year, prospects for the
2004 season are extremely poor as a result.

"Reports paint a grim picture where the conflict has engulfed almost all
parts of Greater Darfur, disrupting agricultural production and other
essential activities."

In eastern Africa, poor rains and the lingering effects of past droughts and
conflicts have increased the likelihood of serious food shortages in several
countries.

"In Somalia, the situation is very alarming," the report said, singling out
the drought in the northeast as particularly worrying.

In Ethiopia, rains have been inadequate, while in Eritrea the likelihood of
another drought-reduced harvest is very high. In Uganda, crop prospects are
unfavourable because of erratic rains and Kenya's unfavourable crop
prospects are compounded by cases of aflatoxin poisoning, a poison found in
mouldy crops.

In western Africa, the overall food supply situation remains satisfactory
reflecting good harvests in 2003, the FAO said, but food difficulties
persist in several countries.

An upsurge of desert locusts poses a serious threat to this year's coming
crops in the Sahel, while insecurity and the lack of agricultural input
continue to cause problems in Ivory Coast.

In the Central African Republic, cereal production is expected to fall for
the third year running as a result of civil strife, while in the Congo
Republic a delicate security situation is still hampering humanitarian
assistance.

Southern Africa is beset with HIV/Aids and drought and the preliminary
estimate of the 2004 cereal harvest there puts production at about 20
million tonnes, roughly a 4% drop from last year. Production of maize, the
region's most important crop, declined by 9% from the previous year to 14
million tonnes.

In Zimbabwe, cereal production remains well below average levels, with
anticipated food shortages for 2.3 million rural people - and at least as
many in urban areas.

The report cited a number of underlying factors including erratic rains,
shortages of seeds and fertiliser, underused commercial farms, and the
impact of HIV/Aids.

"Hyper-inflation, combined with extremely high levels of unemployment,
greatly limit access to food for the most vulnerable people," the FAO
added. - Reuters

Back to the Top
Back to Index

New Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe ministers dodge question time

By Staff Reporter
Last updated: 07/06/2004 22:55:40
QUESTIONS of national importance posed during Parliament's question and
answer session are going unanswered due to non-appearance and in some cases
the late arrival of cabinet ministers.

The session held every Wednesdays consists of questions with and without
notice, generally covering any issue under a particular minister's
jurisdiction.

Last week, when the august House started its business, only one minister,
Paul Magwana, who is in charge of the Public Service, Labour and Social
Welfare ministry, was present.

The majority of ministers trooped in late when parliament was close to a
motion on the Movement for Democratic Change's alleged links with the
British government as well as voting on the Criminal Procedure and Evidence
Act was underway.

Their presence was widely attributed to the fact that the two items were
treated as matters of priority by the ruling Zanu PF party.

Their absenteeism from providing answers led the MDC's chief whip, Innocent
Gonese, to lodge a complaint with the Deputy Speaker, Edna Madzongwe.

"I just want to raise a concern and l have raised it before that on
Wednesdays, we do not have ministers coming to answer questions. We have got
only the Acting Leader of the House and one minister. I just want to place
on record that previously the Leader of the House has undertaken that in
future he will ensure that ministers attend question time and it does not
seem to be happening .We will be grateful if your office could assist and
make sure that the Leader of the House complies with his undertaking," said
Gonese.

In some instances after their arrival, some ministers sought questions
directed at them to be deferred to a later date.

This was despite the fact that some of them had asked for the same questions
to be waived before, in addition to a notice given, effectively giving them
time to prepare the answers.Parliament's question and answer time generally
reveals how a minister is well versed with issues under his or her
portfolio, judging by the way he or she tackles questions posed.
From the Daily Mirror
Back to the Top
Back to Index

New Zimbabwe

Mbeki stance on Zim baffles UK MPs

By Henry Makiwa
Last updated: 07/06/2004 22:56:09
THE name of South African president Thabo Mbeki once again emerged
prominently in a House of Commons parliamentary debate on Zimbabwe last week
in which British MPs fell just short of fingering him as the major stumbling
block to a speedy resolution of the country's political crisis.

Mbeki, who has for the past year adamantly professed presiding over talks
between ruling Zanu PF party and the opposition MDC, was criticised for his
"quite diplomacy" tactics on President Robert Mugabe's increasingly despotic
regime.

In a lengthy and often heated debate in the House of Commons last Thursday,
the British secretary of Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Jack Straw,
expressed concern over Mbeki's slow approach at addressing Zimbabwe's
worsening crisis.

"The Prime Minister (British Premier Tony Blair) and I have had an ongoing
dialogue with President Mbeki of South Africa and his foreign minister,
Nkosazana Zuma, and we have encouraged them to shift their position," Straw
told British parliamentarians during the near six-hour long debate.

"We respect the view that they are taking but we do not altogether agree
with it. But we have encouraged President Mbeki to continue with the private
talks between the MDC and Zanu PF that he says have begun to develop. We
have yet to see a positive result, but if they produce one we will be the
first to cheer," he said.

Straw's statements echo sentiments of Bulawayo's Catholic Archbishop Pius
Ncube who, in a recorded speech that was put out in London at the UN Torture
Day commemorations a fortnight ago, blamed Mbeki for having a "club
mentality" towards Mugabe.

On Thursday another British MP, Henry Bellingham, called for more
international pressure to be put on Mbeki and subsequently on the ageing
Mugabe's regime.

Bellingham said: "The greatest deficit is in the international response. I
have to say that it has been lamentable. For a start, far greater pressure
must bear on Mbeki. He must be told the bold truth that his policy of quiet
diplomacy is dead and buried.

"What happened in his vain promise to President (George) Bush last year that
by June 2004 Zimbabwe's problems would be solved?" Bellingham asked.
Other parliamentarians who participated in the discussion include David
Winnick and the fiery Kate Hoey of the Labour party.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

New Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe life expectancy to drop below 35

By Staff Reporter/Agencies
Last updated: 07/06/2004 22:53:46
THE prevalence of HIV/Aids in Zimbabwe is set to reduce the life expectancy
to below 35 for people born over the next decade, according to shock new
figures released this week.

Across southern Africa, the world's hardest-hit region by Aids, life
expectancy has dropped to 49 and without large-scale treatment programmes
could plummet to below 35 in some countries, a UN AIDS report said Tuesday.

Food shortages hitting at least six countries are also giving AIDS a
"magnifying effect" exacerbating problems surrounding poverty, the plight of
women and the government's ability to respond, the report said.

On average, the prevalence rate in southern Africa is about 25 percent with
Aids and HIV affecting, in order of magnitude for 2003, 38.8% of adults in
Swaziland, 37.3% in Botswana, 28.9% in Lesotho and 24.6% in Zimbabwe.

"In seven African countries where HIV prevalence exceeds 20 percent the
average life expectancy of a person born between 1995 and 2000 is now 49
years - 13 years less than in the absence of Aids," said the UN's 2004
Global report on Aids.

"In the worst affected countries of eastern and southern Africa the
probability of a 15-year-old dying before reaching age 60 has risen
dramatically," said the report, which is being released worldwide.

South Africa, which has the largest number of people living with Aids at 4.8
million, has a prevalence rate of 21.5% while 16.5% of adults are living
with HIV and Aids in Zambia, 21.3% in Namibia, 14.2% in Malawi and 12.2% in
Mozambique.

Infection rates are still climbing in some countries, the report said,
adding that while HIV and Aids may appear to be making fewer inroads in
others, that may be because the death rates conceal the continuing high rate
of new infections.
"In Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe, the average life expectancy of people
born over the next decade is projected to drop below 35 years in the absence
of anti-retroviral treatment," the report added.

"Unless the Aids response is dramatically strengthened, by 2025, 38 African
countries will have populations which will be 14% smaller than predicted in
the absence of Aids," the report said.

As in the rest of Africa, more women are suffering from HIV and Aids than
men in southern Africa, with 20 women affected for every 10 men in South
Africa.
The UN report said a combination of factors were working in concert to fan
the spread of Aids in southern Africa.

"These factors include poverty and social instability that result in family
disruption, high levels of other sexually transmitted infections, the low
status of women, sexual violence and ineffective leadership during critical
periods in the spread of HIV."

A food crisis in the region is also worsening the situation.

"In six of the 10 highest-prevalence countries - Lesotho, Malawi,
Mozambique, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe - more than 15 million people
required emergency food aid due to widespread chronic and acute food
shortages," the report said.

Food shortages were triggered by adverse weather conditions and a "series of
policy and governance-related failures that seriously affected food
production."
"Aids made the situation worse," said the report highlighting countries like
Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe where households with sick adults suffered
"marked reductions in agricultural production and income generation."

The report said Aids has spread rapidly in many southern African countries,
including Swaziland where the average prevalence among pregnant women was
39% - up from from 34% in 2000 and only 4% in 1990.

Only Angola appears to have been spared from the ravages of Aids with a
prevalence rate of only 3.9% in 2003, up from 3.7% in 2001, the report said.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Herald

Parents in rush to meet examinations deadline

Herald Reporter
THERE was a flurry of activity at most schools in Harare last week as
parents tried to beat Ordinary and Advanced level examinations' registration
deadlines for their children.

While registration for the examinations only began on Monday last week, some
schools have already closed the entries.

Parents who called the Zimbabwe Schools Examinations Council to inquire
about the registration dates were reportedly told to "hurry up and register"
or their children would fail to sit for the examinations.

They described this as "unfair", saying Zimsec should take the blame because
it had taken long to announce the registration dates and the new examination
fees.

Examination fees went up mid-June from $100 to $500 for "O" Level and $1 000
to $5 000 for "A" Level.

But a week after they went up, some schools were already closing entries.

According to staff at Zimsec, it was up to the schools to determine when to
close entries.

As soon as a school was satisfied that all prospective candidates had
registered, it could close entries.

"The last we heard from Zimsec was that the registration dates would be
announced soon and then our children just started telling us that they had
to register by last Friday or else they would not write.

"Yes, as a caring parent, I had the money put aside already but my daughter
is in boarding school and getting the money to her is a process, which might
result in the money taking long to reach her so there should be more time
for registration," said Ms Maria Muchena of Harare.

Others said they did not even have the money and needed time to look around
for it.

"I had set aside the old examination fees because the Government had
indicated that there would be no changes. So, naturally, I would have wanted
more time to get the extra cash," said another parent who spoke on condition
of anonymity.

Hardest hit are those students whose fees are paid under the Basic Education
Assistant Module. They had applied for the new fees only after they were
announced.

It took long for them to get the money in some instances, while in others,
the pupils were told that the money was not available.

The Secretary for Education, Sport and Culture, Dr Stephen Mahere, said the
matter would best be dealt with at the provinces, but efforts to contact
Harare's provincial director for education, Mr Tomax Dhoba, were fruitless.

A snap survey conducted by The Herald yesterday showed that there were still
a few centres open for registration.

Others had already submitted their entries to Zimsec.

Efforts to get a comment from Zimsec's information and publications manager
Mrs Faith Chasokela were unsuccessful.

Previously, Mrs Chasokela had said registration dates would be announced
last week or this week.

Registration for the November examinations was delayed after Government
refused to sanction a proposal by Zimsec to increase examination fees from
$100 to $20 000 per subject for "O" Level and from $1 000 to $100 000 for
each subject for "A" Level. Parents and pupils were becoming anxious at the
continued delay in announcing the new fees and registration dates. There
were also growing fears that the November examinations might not take place.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Herald

Small opposition parties resurface ahead of polls

Herald Reporter
THE handful of small opposition political parties which have had very little
impact on the country's political terrain have started resurfacing ahead of
next year's parliamentary elections.

Although next year's parliamentary election is largely expected to be a
two-horse race between the ruling Zanu-PF and the MDC, leaders of some small
opposition parties told The Herald yesterday that they were already making
preparations to contest the polls scheduled for March next year.

Zanu secretary for information and publicity Mr Reketayi Semwayo yesterday
said his party would definitely take part in next year's elections.

"Because of limited resources within our party, we will, however, restrict
our participation to areas where we believe we have significant support and
these are provinces like Manicaland, Masvingo and Harare," said Mr Semwayo.

"One problem we have is that although we are represented in Parliament we
are not beneficiaries of the Political Parties Finances Act. We would have
wanted to contest in all constituencies but we can not."

According to the Political Parties Finances Act, a party which has at least
15 percent of representation in Parliament is entitled to funding from the
State.

The party is currently represented in Parliament by its president, Mr Wilson
Kumbula, who is the MP for Chipinge South.

National Alliance for Good Governance political commissar Mr Douglas
Chihambakwe said although his party was keen to participate, it was still
weighing its options.

He said his party was wary of the violence usually associated with the
elections.

NAGG does not have a substantive president after Dr Shakespeare Maya
relinquished his post to join the MDC recently.

"We have already embarked on a consultative process within our structures to
come up with a common position," said Mr Chihambakwe, who is tipped to
succeed Dr Maya as president.

Small political parties are often dogged by disagreements which subsequently
lead to splits and their inability to stand the political heat.

For example, in the run-up to the March 2002 presidential election, Zapu was
rocked by differences among its leadership which saw Mr Paul Siwela opting
to stand as an independent.

In Manicaland, disagreements within Zanu spilled into the High Court.

Supporters loyal to Ms Vesta Sithole, the wife of the founder of the party,
the late Reverend Ndabaningi Sithole, sought a High Court order interdicting
Mr Kumbula from using the party's symbol in registering his name for the
elections.

Zimbabwe's elections have since independence been marked by the emergence of
small parties, which tend to disappear - some of them for good - once
elections are over.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Global Debate.

On Sunday Zimbabwe tennis players in the form of Cara Black and her brother,
Wayne, made real history at Wimbledon - Cara won the ladies doubles title
with her partner and then took to the court with her brother to win the
mixed doubles title on the same day. Cara is a small person - but obviously
has a big heart. We are all so proud of her and Wayne. Makorokoto.

For the Black family this must be the crowning achievement of a long history
of success on the tennis court. Only sorry her dad could not be there to see
it happen. But Zimbabwe flags were flying and at home here in Zimbabwe we
were watching and cheering.

Its not part of the great debate going on in the world - Darfur, Iraq, the
presidential campaign in the US are all the main news. But for us in this
tiny African State in the middle of the continent it was a sign that life
does go on in the midst of turmoil and conflict. How do you get from a dusty
tennis court in the backyard of your parent's home to winning the premier
tennis titles in the world? By sheer determination plus a little talent. The
other key is clearly committed and determined parents - look at the Williams
sisters.

There must have been many times when Cara felt that it was all a waste of
time - she was never going to get into the big time. When that happened she
had to pick herself up and get the courage to go back out onto the courts to
practice and then to the competitions and lonely hotel rooms. Not easy, but
I bet Sunday made it all worthwhile.

All around me I see despair. Headmasters, who are struggling to keep their
schools running, doctors without medicines, business without orders, hotels
without tourists. People are tired and weary and many are dropping by the
wayside. It is at times like these that you can separate those who will
eventually win and become champions and those who will drop out and be
forgotten. No one says it is easy.

If we needed to be reminded that we do matter there were three important
developments this week - the British Parliament held a full-scale debate on
Zimbabwe for the first time in 7 years, exhibiting a substantial degree of
bipartisan support for the democrats in Zimbabwe. The AU came out with a
damming report on human and political abuse in Zimbabwe and at last Thabo
Mbeki spoke out on the issue of the slow progress in the resolution of the
deepening crisis in Zimbabwe.

The last two items are clearly linked. Mbeki met with the MDC last Sunday,
then spoke to Zanu PF representatives and on Thursday he authorised a
statement by his office to the effect that progress was too slow and that
this was a matter for the AU. On Saturday the AU Executive Council (53
Foreign Ministers) met and adopted a damming report that had been prepared
two years ago and held under wraps until now. Only the Zimbabwe Foreign
Minister objected and his views were noted and the report adopted. That
could not have happened if Mbeki had maintained his protective cover for the
Mugabe regime.

Reading the report makes sobering reading - but for me the most astonishing
thing about this is that the AU has had this report for two years and done
nothing about it until now. But it is comprehensive and honest and we just
hope that today at the Heads of State meeting, the report will be debated
with Mugabe present and he will be told to go and put his house in order. A
week ago I would have said that was impossible - now I am not so sure.

Reading the debate in the British Parliament I was also surprised by the
depth of knowledge and understanding of the Zimbabwe situation and the very
real concern expressed. However it was worrying that there was such a
shortage of ideas as to how to help resolve the crisis. The Conservatives
put forward a 5-point programme that I thought had real merit.

But it all comes back to African leadership. The days are over when the
major western countries could dictate solutions, or even suggest solutions.
We must also accept that in the great debates of the world community, the
Zimbabwe crisis is a minor irritant. A reminder that bad governance can
quickly destroy all that has been created over many years of hard work.

I spent the weekend with the Mayors and Deputy Mayors of the 11 cities and
towns that elected MDC majorities in the recent local government elections.
They are all under siege by a rogue administration that is determined to
undermine any chance of these MDC administrations being successful. Even so,
I was deeply impressed with their commitment and their determination to do
what they can and to continue to do so until we can change central
government. What a privilege to work with these men and women.

We are doing all we can as individuals and as organisations to keep things
going. We are succeeding - under very difficult conditions. But this is
important if we are going to pick up the pieces and start rebuilding one day
soon. Others actually say we should let things slide - the sooner we hit the
bottom the better. The problem with this approach is that it pays little
attention to the needs of those who suffer most in any collapse of this
nature.

This week saw the money supply numbers hit 1000 per cent growth in 12
months. This means that inflation cannot be far behind. This week also saw
the Rand go through the 1000 to 1 barrier for the first time - at Beitbridge
the rate on the street on Friday was 1200 to 1. That is a 50 per cent
devaluation over the official auction rates, which stand at about 860 to 1.
Business is very slow in all sectors. My son and his wife went out to a game
park for their 10th wedding anniversary - they had the whole place to
themselves.

The economic crash continues - I doubt if we have planted 10 000 hectares of
winter wheat and much of this has been planted too late to develop. The
preparations for next year's tobacco crop are even slower than last year -
and we will only market about 20 per cent of our normal crop this year. In
many areas the country is starting to look really destitute - broken signs,

dirty buildings, broken windows, sewerage on the streets, people in rags.

I am one year away from having 5 pension policies mature after a lifetime of
saving. When they mature, their combined value will not buy me one month's
groceries. That is a measure of just how far down we have gone in the past 5
years. It's got nothing to do with our "colonial past", nothing to do with
"globalization", nothing to do with the imperial west. Its just plain greed,
corruption and political tyranny - all self imposed by intelligent, well
educated political leaders who have lost their way.

It is time for them to go.

Eddie Cross
Bulawayo, 7th July 2004
Back to the Top
Back to Index

JUSTICE FOR AGRICULTURE URGENT LEGAL COMMUNIQUÉ - 5TH JULY 2004

Email: justice@telco.co.zw; justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Internet: www.justiceforagriculture.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEGAL COMMUNIQUÉ

Herewith Friday 2nd July 2004 Listing of Section 8 Acquisition
Orders published in the Herald under Lot No. 9 pertaining to 85 properties.
Collection of Section 8 Orders for lodgement of Section 5 Notice objection
letters can be effected at the following address which is not given in the
Herald:

Block 2
Makombe Complex
cnr. Herbert Chitepo Street/Harare Street
Harare
See Mr. Pazavakombewa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 LAND ACQUISITION ACT (CHAPTER 20:10)
  Vesting of land, taking of materials and
  exercise of rights over land

NOTICE is hereby given, in terms of paragraph (iii) of subsection (1) of
section 8 of the Land Acquisition Act (Chapter 20:10), that the President
has acquired compulsorily the land described in the Schedule for
resettlement purposes.

J L NKOMO,
Minister of Special Affairs in the President's Office in Charge of Lands,
Land Reform and Resettlement.

______________________________________________

LOT 9 SECTION 8 2ND JULY 2004

Bellingwe

2.7.2004.  1.  1847/01.  Maxville Farming (Private) Limited: Bellingwe:
Shenandoah of the Umsungwe Block: 80,9359 ha
2.7.2004.  2.  1338/59.  Moorcroft and Moorcroft: Bellingwe: Remaining
Extent of Lromdraao Estate: 8 420,6127 morgen

Goromonzi

2.7.2004.  3.  2959/71.  Melfort Farm P/L: Goromonzi: Melfort B:
398,2267 morgen
2.7.2004.  4.  8629/99.  Becontree Investments (Private) Limited:
Gormonzi: Rots Der Eeue Estate A: 189,5461 ha
2.7.2004.  5.  11038/97.  Propkept Investments (Private) Limited:
Gormonzi: Remainder of Subdivision C of Learig: 370,5811 ha

Gwelo

2.7.2004.  6.  5508/89.  Christoffel Gideon Laurens: Gwelo: Subdivision
A of De Rust of Fallowfield: 1 027,8196 ha
2.7.2004.  7.  1111/80.  Heynie Lodewikus Kiebenberg: Gwelo: Taranaki of
East Shangani Block: 933,1793 ha
2.7.2004.  8.  211/65.  Freda Mary Kaschula: Gwelo: Remaining Extent of
Subdivision 20 of West Gwelo Block: 1 961,8913 acres
2.7.2004.  9.  3117/73.  Joseph Pytlik and Maria Elizaabeth Pytlik:
Gwelo: "Shaw Lands": 1 284,771 ha
2.7.2004.  10.  4710/90.  Manuel Dos Santos: Gwelo: Lot 75 of the
Umsungwe Block: 389,7143 ha
2.7.2004.  11.  398/66.  James Redmond and Cathering Mary Redmond: Gwelo:
Berkshire of the Prie Scott Block: 1 787,7874 acres
2.7.2004.  12.  1014/71.  Walter James Avery: Gwelo: Gwelo small Holding
28: 239,6509 ha
2.7.2004.  13.  1302/99.  Davis Granite (Private) Limited: Gwelo: La
Rochelle of Bendhu: 102,4531 ha
2.7.2004.  14.  2248/83.  Clive Leopold Hein: Gwelo: Remainder of
Dopton: 2 284,7657 ha
2.7.2004.  15.  2843/72.  Petrus Jacobus Van Der Merwe: Gwelo: Buda: 2
446,9736 ha
2.7.2004.  16.  1949/68.  Ina Stewart Cos: Gwelo: Adamantia: 4 517,6155
acres
2.7.2004.  17.  2559/86.  Hester Antoenetta Mortley-Wood: Gwelo:
Remainder of Dewhurst: 1 357,3013 ha
2.7.2004.  18.  1517/94.  Despute Farm (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Despute
of Ghoko Block: 1 131,3514 ha
2.7.2004.  19.  1353/82.  Michael Edwin Futter: Gwelo: Remainder of Four
Chums Block: 921,4884 ha
2.7.2004.  20.  2107/70.  Colin Charles Barry: Gwelo: Ellangowan of
Foxton: 1 000,0507 cares
2.7.2004.  21.  1248/97.  Chrisgid (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Woodlands:
2 802,5028 ha
2.7.2004.  22.  341/96.  Elsie Hester Herbst: Louisa Antionetta Erasmus;
Anna Magdalena Van Durten and Hendrika Maria Griffiths: Gwelo: Good Hope
of Ghoko Block: 2 213,5004 ha
2.7.2004.  23.  2004/76.  Norman Naisbitt (Private) Limtied: Gwelo:
Hursley Park of Walton: 736,6055 ha
2.7.2004.  24.  2004/76.  Norman Naisbitt (Private) Limtied: Gwelo:
Subdivision A of Staines: 1 070,5754 ha
2.7.2004.  25.  98/47.  Robert Basson: Gwelo: Farm 'Koppies' portion of
East Shangani Block: 1 100 morgen 201 square roots
2.7.2004.  26.  2377/94.  Maliyetu (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Hebron of
Kenilworth: 213,7327 ha
2.7.2004.  27.  870/84.  Arcadia Farm (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Gwelo
Small Holding 26: 215,8126 ha
2.7.2004.  28.  1428/81.  Agnes Particia Mountford, George Mountford and
Godwin Emmaunel Mountford: Gwelo: Fairview C of Fairview A: 501,9196 ha
2.7.2004.  29.  3022/97.  Holyland Farming (Private) Limited: Gwelo: The
Remainder of Lot 3 of Bushy Park 2: 3 946,8085 ha
2.7.2004.  30.  2588/94.  Basil Walter Scheepers: Gwelo: Lot 1G Mnyomi:
224,6212 ha
2.7.2004.  31.  856/79.  Moral Re-Armament: Gwelo: The Remainder of
Gwelo Small Holding 18: 134,726 ha

Hartley

2.7.2004.  32.  3621/97.  Ellingham Investments P/L: Hartley: Remainding
Extent of French Hoek: 581,8641 ha

Lomagundi

2.7.2004.  33.  770/65.  Hilltop Farms (Private) Limited: Lomagundi:
Remaining Extent of Hilltop: 2 473,9504 acres
2.7.2004.  34.  2558/60.  Mhangura Copper Mines Limited: Lomagundi: Lot
1 of Suiwerspruit: 750,008 acres
2.7.2004.  35.  1991/72.  Lomagundi Smelting & Mining (Private) Limited:
Lomagundi: The Remainder of Subdivision B of Sinoias Drift: 242,0565 ha
2.7.2004.  36.  998/81.  J J Estates (Private) Limited: Lomagundi: Alfa
A: 1 021,0565 ha

Makoni

2.7.2004.  37.  4482/86.  Hanging Rock (Private) Limited: Makoni:
Hangklip: 1 239,69 ha
2.7.2004.  38.  5128/74.  Dagbreek Estates (Private) Limited: Makoni:
Dagbreek: 486,5422 ha

Que Que

2.7.2004.  39.  2937/00.  Michael Barry Jansen: Que Que: Xanthippe of
the Main Belt Block: 1 333,0262 ha
2.7.2004.  40.  1491/97.  Eggton (Private) Limited: Que Que: Boulderwood
of the Main Belt Block: 1 284,7771 ha
2.7.2004.  41.  862/84.  N G Coetzee and Son (Private) Limited : Que Que:
Subdivision 4 of East Clare Block: 41,2790 ha
2.7.2004.  42.  4284/89.  Brimley Estate (Private) Limited: Que Que:
Bezuidenhout's Kraal: 1 284,7771 ha
2.7.2004.  43.  3124/72.  Henry Swan Elsworth: Que Que: Kilkenny: 2
569,5570 ha
2.7.2004.  44.  188/84.  Richard James Danvers: Que Que: Maliami:
809,3567 ha
2.7.2004.  45.  660/61.  Bealuieu Farm Holdings (Private) Limited: Que
Que: Lot 1 of Newlands: 3 065,1754 acres
2.7.2004.  46.  2691/81.  Harold John Corbelt: Que Que: Bridgewater of
the Quantocks: 987,2561 ha
2.7.2004.  47.  2348/77.  Colin Charles Barry: Que Que: Remainder of
Kingswood of the Main Belt Block: 877,0381 ha
2.7.2004.  48.  3671/72.  Eduan Estate (Private) Limited: Que Que:
Remainder of Lot 1 of Sherwood Block: 794,7301 ha
2.7.2004.  49.  367/72.  Eduan Estate (Private) Limited: Que Que:
Toekoms Droom of Sherwood Park of Sherwood Block: 368,1420 ha
2.7.2004.  50.  292/98.  Junita Farm (Private) Limited: Que Que: Junita
of the Main Belt Block: 1 675,7662 ha
2.7.2004.  51.  2666/73.  Caberfeigh Estate (Private) Limited: Que Que:
Runnimede: 940,4568 ha
2.7.2004.  52.  2666/73.  Caberfeigh Estate (Private) Limited: Que Que:
Collynie: 1 027,8216 ha
2.7.2004.  53.  363/01.  Finchley Farms (Private) Limited: Que Que:
Finchley: 467,6500 ha
2.7.2004.  54.  616/79.  Hilton Stewart Gifford: Que Que: Kabanga Ranch:
8 604,6302 ha
2.7.2004.  55.  2335/81.  Anthony David Graham Blarke: Que Que:
Remainder of Bon Accord of the Main Belt Block: 188,6096 ha
2.7.2004.  56.  4313/87. Mark Anthony Macgregor: Que Que: Lot 1 of
Graydene: 124,6356 ha
2.7.2004.  57.  1279/89.  Derek John Louis Austen: Que Que: Lot 2 of
Matchebel: 258,4497 ha
2.7.2004.  58.  2020/81.  Edwin Ridley Trewin Parker: Que Que: Gwengula:
1 417,3662 ha
2.7.2004.  59.  3493/00.  Theunes Farming Company (Private) Limited: Que
Que: Lime Ridge of the Main Belt Block: 1 564,0134 ha
2.7.2004.  60.  1095/98.  Douglas Harry Hensberg and Heather Hensberg:
Que Que: Summerfield of East Clare Block: 102,0557 ha
2.7.2004.  61.  670/76.  Paul Redin Savory: Que Que: Remainder of Loozan
Estate: 2 733,7627 ha
2.7.2004.  62.  413/64.  Patrick Joseph Burke: Que Que: Circle G Ranch:
17 264,2780 ha
2.7.2004.  63.  2742/88.  Jenville (Private) Limited: Que Que:
Sandspruit Estate: 1 058,0361 ha
2.7.2004.  64.  4309/88.  Maria Elizabeth Steyn: Que Que: Long Valley of
Belgrave: 808,1267 ha
2.7.2004.  65.  141/87.  Pavloma (Private) Limited: Que Que: Maryann: 3
419,8564 ha
2.7.2004.  66.  1687/86.  Que Que Cinema Investment Company (Private)
Limited: Que Que: Solitaire: 1 735,1571 ha
2.7.2004.  67.  2639/80.  H E Elsworth & Son: Que Que: Gabbari
Extension: 2 589,1470 ha
2.7.2004.  68.  226/90.  D I J (Private) Limited: Que Que: Remainder of
Glen Arroch of the Main Belt Block: 1 221,2191 ha

Selukwe

2.7.2004.  69.  2065/76.  Arcadia Farm (Private) Limited: Selukwe:
Valentia: 815,4052 ha

Urungwe

2.7.2004.  70.  8214/96.  R K Farm (Private) Limtied: Urungwe: Tengwe
89: 1 472,2473 ha
2.7.2004.  71.  4196/90.  Ropet Investments (Private) Limited: Urungwe:
Lot 1 of Massau Estate: 1 011,7106 ha
2.7.2004.  72.  8631/88.  M Liebenberg (Private) Limited: Urungwe:
Tengwe 55: 273,3247 ha
2.7.2004.  73.  8631/88.  M Liebenberg (Private) Limited: Urungwe:
Tengwe 62: 416,7007 ha
2.7.2004.  74.  5685/73.  Charles Aarthur Parker: Urungwe: Tengwe 119:
371,4274 ha
2.7.2004.  75.  812/89.  D A Duvenage (Private) Limited: Urungwe: Tengwe
57: 304,2572 ha
2.7.2004.  76.  812/89.  D A Duvenage (Private) Limited: Urungwe: Tengwe
56: 300,9224 ha
2.7.2004.  77.  812/89. D A Duvenage (Private) Limited: Urungwe: Tengwe
61: 513,1443 ha
2.7.2004.  78.  2971/76.  Nicholas Philip Wiggins: Urungwe: Tengwe 117:
298,1460 ha
2.7.2004.  79.  7254/86.  Hendrick Pieter Terblanche: Urungwe: Lot 1 of
Temple Combe: 386,7580 ha
2.7.2004.  80.  2244/71.  James Melville Barker: Urungwe: Nyahoa Estate:
1 328,2998 ha
2.7.2004.  81.  180/85.  Tesson (Private) Limited: Urungwe: Remainder of
Kyogle: 811,0338 ha
2.7.2004.  82.  4492/2000.  Ruggick Investments (Private) Limited:
Urungwe: Kemasembi: 281,8765 ha
2.7.2004.  83.  7058/96.  Danasha Farming P/L: Urungwe: Tinhini:
448,1462 ha
2.7.2004.  84.  7254/86.  Hendrick Pieter Terblanche: Urungwe: Lot 1 of
Dundazi: 362,5971 ha
2.7.2004.  85.  2912/85.  Rockwood Estate P/L: Urungwe: Remaining Extent
of Ansdell: 696,7998 ha

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE JAG TEAM

JAG Hotlines:
(011) 612 595 If you are in trouble or need advice,
(011) 205 374
(011) 863 354 please don't hesitate to contact us -
(011) 431 068
                                we're here to help!
263 4 799 410 Office Lines
Back to the Top
Back to Index

JUSTICE FOR AGRICULTURE URGENT LEGAL COMMUNIQUÉ - 5th July 2004

Email: justice@telco.co.zw; justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Internet: www.justiceforagriculture.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEGAL COMMUNIQUÉ

Herewith Friday 2nd July 2004 Listing of Section 5 Acquisition
Orders published in the Herald under Lot No. 148 pertaining to 87
properties.
The above listings will be circulated on Monday 5th July 2004.
_______________________________________________

Collection of Section 8 Orders for lodgement of Section 5 Notice objection
letters can be effected at the following address which is not given in the
Herald:

Block 2
Makombe Complex
cnr. Herbert Chitepo Street/Harare Street
Harare
See Mr. Pazavakombewa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 LAND ACQUISITION ACT (CHAPTER 20:10)
  Vesting of land, taking of materials and
  exercise of rights over land

NOTICE is hereby given, in terms of paragraph (iii) of subsection (1) of
section 8 of the Land Acquisition Act (Chapter 20:10), that the President
has acquired compulsorily the land described in the Schedule for
resettlement purposes.

J L NKOMO,
Minister of Special Affairs in the President's Office in Charge of Lands,
Land Reform and Resettlement.

______________________________________________

LOT 148 SECTION 5 2ND JULY 2004

Goromonzi

2.7.2004.  1.  945/01.  Propkept: Goromonzi: Lot 2 of Subdivision 'C; of
Learig: 252,1499 ha

Gwelo

2.7.2004.  2.  1726/87.  Sidney Petrus Schoultz: Gwelo: Remainder of
Sonambula: 832,2044 ha
2.7.2004.  3.  3081/99.  Malthar Enterprises (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Sunnyside: 766,3124 ha
2.7.2004.  4.  1762/84.  Arthur Graham Granceys: Gwelo: Merve of
Buttercups: 513,8265 ha
2.7.2004.  5.  478/95.  Corrangamite Farm (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Corrangamite: 2 602,1489 ha
2.7.2004.  6.  1722/01.  Basil Farming Company (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Remainder of Farm 9 of West Gwelo block: 544,7938 ha
2.7.2004.  7.  3845/99.  Jeam Pamela Thompson: Gwelo: Lot 1 of Lot 55 of
the Umsungwe Block: 172,3571 ha
2.7.2004.  8.  3167/03.  Pentatron Services (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Remaining Extent of Lot 62 of the Umsungwe Block: 377,4767 ha
2.7.2004.  9.  1720/93.  S C Shaw (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Subdivision
4 of Four Chums Block: 2 111,5668 ha
2.7.2004.  10.  251/93.  Louis Mallory Paul: Gwelo: Remainder of
Figtree: 2 809,1577 ha
2.7.2004.  11.  2248/83.  Clive Leopold Hein: Gwelo: Remainder of
Dopton: 2 284,7657 ha
2.7.2004.  12.  3222/87. Graham Ingle: Gwelo: Cheshire of Fife Scott
Block: 408,6276 ha
2.7.2004.  13.  628/94.  Simpoco Enterprises (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Allysloper Estate: 2 605,7911 ha
2.7.2004.  14.  2221/95.  Jomat (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Groenvlei of
East Shangani Block: 781,9682 ha
2.7.2004.  15.  140/49.  Robert Basson: Gwelo: Koppies Ptn of East
Shangani Block: 1 100 morgen
2.7.2004.  16.  3556/88.  P R Hapelt and Company (Private) Limited:
Gwelo: Hillpath: 521,2712 ha
2.7.2004.  17.  3605/99.  Rundle Farms (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Hilo of
Weltervreden: 598,6740 ha
2.7.2004.  18.  568/93.  Phillpina Hohanna Susara De Meyer: Gwelo:
Belton of Clydesdale: 47,0512 ha
2.7.2004.  19.  1255/93.  Foxton Estate (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Remainder of Foxton: 880,0751 ha
2.7.2004.  20.  2874/95.  Cropal Farming (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Subdivision A of Stormvale: 1 175,9103 ha
2.7.2004.  21.  1414/95.  Audrey Florence Meikle: Gwelo: Remainder of
Farm 8 of West Gwelo Block: 963,1014 ha
2.7.2004.  22.  2704/81.  Olaf Wentzel: Gwelo: Forestvale of Bembezaan:
1 456,0807 ha
2.7.2004.  23.  1259/81.  Christoffel Giedon Herbst: Gwelo: Remainder of
Pender: 868,4340 ha
2.7.2004.  24.  677/85.  Mark Andrew Heathcote: Gwelo: Fallow Corner:
428,2590 ha
2.7.2004.  25.  2035/83.  Friederick Garth Heathcote: Gwelo: Sangari:
588,9589 ha
2.7.2004.  26.  1474/90.  Staper (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Lingfield:
426,9343 ha
2.7.2004.  27.  2278/75.  John Ernest Stanton: Gwelo: Loads: 1 267,6467
ha
2.7.2004.  28.  4198/88.  Charles John Rundle: Gwelo: Middel Bult of
West Rapids: 794,3094 ha
2.7.2004.  29.  991/67.  J A Barry: Gwelo: Long Valley: 2 120,70043 ha
2.7.2004.  30.  709/65.  J N H Viljoen: Gwelo: Sandwich: 1 351,536o ha
2.7.2004.  31.  2218/78.  P S Viljoen: Gwelo: A of Vlaakfontein:
428,2633 ha
2.7.2004.  32.  1287/88.  Ernest Hughes Smith: Gwelo: Willow Run:
767,3274 ha
2.7.2004.  33.  1626/75.  R and T J Alwanger: Gwelo: S/D 16 of West
Gwelo Block: 182,1014 ha
2.7.2004.  34.  5629/99.  J P Thompson: Gwelo: Lot 55A of the Umsungwe
Block: 274,8139 ha
2.7.2004.  35.  883/00.  Flan enterprises (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Caradoc of Indiva: 809,6294 ha
2.7.2004.  36.  1867/80.  W B Lawry: Gwelo: S/D 21 pf West Gwelo Block:
1 544,3977 ha
2.7.2004.  37.  1248/97.  Chrisgid (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Woodlands:
2 802,5028 ha
2.7.2004.  38.  1607/96.  Galaxy Farming (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Remainder of Lincoinshire of Fife Scot Block: 419,3384 ha
2.7.2004.  39.  2690/70.  Owen Lockie Shaw: Gwelo: Lot 49 of Wildebeeste
Block: 1 291,3982 ha
2.7.2004.  40.  35/82.  Posts and Telecommunication: Gwelo: Small
Holding: 4 188,6096 ha
2.7.2004.  41.  4043/87.  Len Harvey & Sons (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Lot 1 of Lot 1 of Coulder Estate: 809,3579 ha
2.7.2004.  42.  1231/59.  Jane Lockie Smith: Gwelo: Hyrcania: 1 694
morgen
2.7.2004.  43.  3703/73.  Tarma Company (Pvt) Ltd: Gwelo: Derbyshire of
Fife Scott Block: 701,1029 ha
2.7.2004.  44.  987/81.  Heynie Lodewikus Liebenberg: Gwelo: Remaining
Extent of Lot 6A East Shangani Block: 1 115,7503 ha
2.7.2004.  45.  841/76.  Jan Mathyze Kapp: Gwelo: Subdivision C of
Bendhu: 123,8822 ha
2.7.2004.  46.  2572/99.  Beuna Suerte Mining (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Subdivision E of Bonnyvale: 77,4912 ha
2.7.2004.  47.  2592/99.  Tombern Engineering (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Subdivision D of Bonnyvale: 40,8670 ha
2.7.2004.  48.  641/78.  Heynie Lodewikus Liebenberg: Gwelo: Remainder
of Lot 15 of East Shangani Block: 636,7229 ha
2.7.2004.  49.  606/80.  Green Gwelo: Gwelo: Laymore of Bendhu:
101,5806 ha
2.7.2004.  50.  4391/87.  Frederick Garth Heathcote: Gwelo: Lot 64 of
the Umsungwe Block: 700,4933 ha
2.7.2004.  51.  4670/97.  Yellow Leaf Farming P/L: Gwelo: Lot 1 of Lot
6A East Shangani Block: 1 956,4603 ha
2.7.2004.  52.  2645/88.  Bar 'V' Ranching (Private) Limited: Gwelo: Lot
65 of Umsungwe Block: 477,9442 ha
2.7.2004.  53.  2645/88.  Bar 'V' Ranching Company (Private) Limited:
Gwelo: Lot 63 of Umsungwe Block: 363,7646 ha
2.7.2004.  54.  2353/75.  Lodewicus A M Coetsee: Gwelo: Remainder of
Oxfordshire of Fife Scott Block: 295,7334 ha
2.7.2004.  55.  5006/98.  Peachucle Investments (Private) Limited: Gwelo
Subdivision A of 9 West Gwelo Block: 635,8953 morgen
2.7.2004.  56.  3167/03.  Pentatron Services (Private) Limited: Gwelo:
Lot 62 of Umsungwe Block: 377,4767 ha
2.7.2004.  57.  2900/00.  A P A Distributors (Private) Limited.  Gwelo.
Lot 73 of Umsungwe Block: 397,8070 ha
2.7.2004.  58.  2766/98.  Golden dollar Ranching Company (Private)
Limited: Gwelo: Lot 67 of Umsungwe Block: 202,3410 ha
2.7.2004.  59.  514/93.  Lower Gwelo Bambanani club: Gwelo: Mangwene: 1
190,5601 ha
2.7.2004.  60.  3267/90.  Elizabeth Cathrine Rundle: Gwelo: Remainder of
Welterrvreden: 598,6740 ha
2.7.2004.  61.  1773/91.  Stuart Brendon Roselt: Gwelo: Arizona: 2
591,3982 ha

Lomagundi

2.7.2004.  62.  2380/66.  Harold Edwin Schultz: Lomagundi: Remainder of
Lion's Den: 1 801,5572 acres
2.7.2004.  63.  1422/67.  Leslie Reginald De Jager: Lomagundi: Friedawil
of Renfield: 991,7851 acres

Mrewa

2.7.2004.  64.  7167/95.  R C Reeve (Private) Limited: Mrewa: Lot 1 of
Graigielea: 739,9513 ha

Que Que

2.7.2004.  65.  1285/82.  Rudolph Hohannes Van Den Bergy & Nicholas
Johannes Van Den Bergh: Que Que: Remaining Extent of Benholm: 4 011,5028
ha
2.7.2004.  66.  659/79.  Anthony David Graham Clarke: Que Que: Zoe of
the Main Belt Block: 1 522,5265 ha

Gwelo

2.7.2004.  67.  2707/79.  Colin Charles Barry: Gwelo: Remainder of
Queenswood of the Kingswood of the Main Belt Block: 674,5242 ha
2.7.2004.  68.  233/94.  Rolling River Enterprises (Private) Limited:
Gwelo: The Remainder of Rolling River Tanch: 8 645,8615 ha
2.7.2004.  69.  18976/83.  Sable Chemical Industries Limited: Que Que:
Lot 1 of Lot 5 of Sherwood Block: 52,0378 ha
2.7.2004.  70.  1942/80.  Sebakwe Farms (Private) Limited: Que Que: Lot
9 of Sherwood Block: 21,4963 ha
2.7.2004.  71.  1941/80.  Sebakwe Farms (Private) Limited: Que Que: Lot
8 of sherwood Block: 1 270,5840 ha
2.7.2004.  72.  1279/89.  Derel John Louis Austen: Que Que: Lot 2 of
Matchebel: 258,4497 ha
2.7.2004.  73.  2691/81.  Harold John Corbett: Que Que: Bridgewater of
the Quantocks: 987,2561 ha
2.7.2004.  74.  5552/88.  Aberblock (Private) Limited: Que Que:
Remainder of Aberfoyle Block: 4 341,7895 ha
2.7.2004.  75.  85/76.  Stephen Charles Johnson: Que Que: Subdivision 28
of East Clare Block: 101,6622 ha
2.7.2004.  76.  2348/77.  Colin Charles Barry: Que Que: Remainder of
Kingswood of the Main Belt Block: 877,0381 ha
2.7.2004.  77.  2743/88.  Jenville (Private) Limited: Que Que: Lot 1 of
Loozani: 319,5872,ha
2.7.2004.  78.  3269/88.  Selvia Investments (Private) Limited: Que Que:
Lot 3 of Oliphant of East Clare Block: 309,1467 ha
2.7.2004.  79.  3670/72.  Eduan Estate (Pvt) Ltd: Que Que: Remainder of
Lot 1 of Sherwood Block: 794,7301 ha

Selukwe

2.7.2004.  80.  1195/84.  Noel Frank Dollar: Selukwe: Lot 2 of Home
West: 364,3689 ha
2.7.2004.  81.  2556/80.  Lawrence Edward Pinchen: Selukwe: Remaining
Extend of Impali Source: 1 105,3627 ha
2.7.2004.  82.  3385/86.  Oliver Baden Henderson Anderson: Selukwe:
Subdivision 2 of Aberfoyle Block: 1 003,9896 ha
2.7.2004.  83. 2554/81.  Lonrho Limited: Selukwe: Remainder of
Subdivison A of Safgo: 1 048,2139 ha
2.7.2004.  84.  166/82.  Bruce Michael Rensburg: Selukwe: Remainder of
Adare: 1 360,7400 ha
2.7.2004.  85.  1484/01.  Kur-Ref Farms (Private) Limited: Selukwe:
Remaining Extent of Subdivision A2 of Wallclose: 462,9426 ha
2.7.2004.  86.  5842/88.  Hendrik Petrus Bakkes: Selukwe: Remaining
Extent of Clarans: 1 427,1701 ha
2.7.2004.  87.  2385/84.  Aletta Petronella Barry: Selukwe: Lot 6 of
Home: 117,0170 ha

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE JAG TEAM

JAG Hotlines:
(011) 612 595 If you are in trouble or need advice,
(011) 205 374
(011) 863 354 please don't hesitate to contact us -
(011) 431 068
                                we're here to help!
263 4 799 410 Office Lines
Back to the Top
Back to Index

IOL

MDC welcomes AU report slamming Zimbabwe
          July 06 2004 at 03:15AM

      By Beauregard Tromp and Peta Thornycroft

      Addis Ababa - The African Union's executive council was set to defer
publication of a damning human rights report on Zimbabwe to afford Robert
Mugabe's government an opportunity to respond to the allegations of abuse
raised in the report.

      While the Zimbabwe government has remained silent about the report,
opposition groups and lawyers welcomed it.

      The report slams the Zimbabwean police, the government and youth
militias for human rights violations.

      The report by the African Commission on Human and People's Rights is
the first ever clear condemnation of the Mugabe regime by the AU.

      A working document under discussion by the AU executive council
suggested deferring publication of the report until the Mugabe government
responded.

      A working document compiled for the heads of state and government
meeting which begins today recommended the "adoption" of the report, but
added that publication be deferred until the government of Zimbabwe was
given an opportunity to respond.

      The AU executive council recommended that Zimbabwe be given two weeks
to respond.

      When the report was first introduced last Friday, Zimbabwe's Minister
of Foreign Affairs Stan Mudenge objected to its presentation, arguing that
his government had not seen the report and were not afforded the opportunity
to respond.

            'Zanu-PF can no longer hide'
      Arnold Tsunga, director of Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights said:
"Although it has taken far too long, the (African) commission has found the
courage to confront the Zimbabwe government.

      "The report confirms what many Zimbabwean rights activists have said
for so long and not been heard in Africa until now. The abuses have nothing
to do with race, or land reform and black empowerment. Zimbabwe signed
international and African human rights conventions which it does not
respect."

      The AU's Gambia-based commission on human rights visited Harare in
2002, three months after the violent and disputed elections brought Mugabe
back to power.

      The commission, headed by South African academic Barney Pityana took
evidence from a broad section of Zimbabweans including the government.

      Several members of the Zimbabwe government said on Monday that they
have not yet seen the report and could therefore not comment.

      Paul Themba Nyathi, spokesperson for the opposition Movement for
Democratic Change, said he welcomed the report as an encouraging sign from
Africa.

      He said, as far as he could tell, this was the most powerful African
voice so far to have condemned Zimbabwe's human rights record.

      "Zanu-PF can no longer hide. They can't rubbish the report saying it
comes from white voices about land, or the British government, or the
European Union or the Commonwealth.

      "The commission has passed a verdict which should wipe out any
lingering doubts, if there are any, over Zanu-PF's record of human rights
violations."

          .. This article was originally published on page 4 of Cape Times
on July 06, 2004

Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Star

      The truth will out
      July 6, 2004

      By the Editor

      A year ago President Thabo Mbeki promised that the Zimbabwe crisis
would be solved within 12 months. It has patently not been and looks no
closer to being solved.

      Last week Mbeki expressed disappointment with the lack of progress in
negotiations between President Robert Mugabe's ruling Zanu-PF and the
Movement for Democratic Change.

      Though Mbeki did not apportion blame between the two parties for this
delay, it is obviously mostly, if not entirely, Mugabe's fault. This weekend
he firmly rejected talks with the MDC, dismissing them as puppets of the
British government.

      Though Mugabe has made some concessions towards a more acceptable
electoral system, it is clear that he is not serious about negotiating a way
out of the crisis. And he is making a fool of Mbeki by privately promising
him that he will talk to the MDC and then publicly contradicting this.

      Today the heads of the African Union meet for their annual summit in
Addis Ababa. It is surely now high time that they discipline Mugabe. So far,
they have been, at least publicly, accepting his basic premise that the
crisis is essentially about countering the historic injustices of land
ownership.

      But this weekend one of the AU's own bodies - the African Commission
on Peoples' and Human Rights - let the cat out of the bag. In a report
leaked to our sister paper The Sunday Independent, it expressed grave
concern about a multitude of human rights abuses in Zimbabwe and
characterised the problem as essentially one of human rights abuse, not of
land.

      The spotlight is now on the AU leaders to see how they deal with this
report. Will they shelve it, as sceptics suggest they will, on some
bureaucratic pretext? Or will they summon up their courage at last and
endorse this excellent report, thus sending a clear message to Mugabe that
his conduct is completely at odds with the basic democratic and humanitarian
principles of the new African Union and can no longer be tolerated?

      We wish we could confidently predict the latter but experience
cautions us to expect the former. That would be a travesty and a tragedy for
Africa.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

From: "Trudy Stevenson"

This reflects Hatcliffe Extension (in my constituency) quite well!  We need
HELP to overcome these very serious problems.
.....................................
M&G
Watch out! Here come the flying toilets ...

Nawaal Deane

02 July 2004 05:33

‘Flying toilets’ are a new phenomenon in Kibera, Kenya’s largest slum, where
women and girls are forced to use desperate measures to overcome inadequate
sanitation. “We keep our business [faeces] for the evenings. In the dark we
wrap it in plastic bags and throw it as far away as possible. These are our
flying toilets and our neighbours do the same.”

Plastic bags of human waste are thrown on to the roofs of shacks in the slum
because it takes two hours to queue for the public toilets, which are often
unhygienic and overflowing with human waste. For most people living in the
slum in the country’s capital city, the “flying toilets” are the only way of
answering nature’s call: you simply use a plastic bag, and then fling it as
far out of sight as possible.

This testimony from Halima, a Nubian girl who lives in Kibera, was heard by
delegates attending the 12th Commission of Sustainable Development (CSD12)
at the United Nations in New York during the last two weeks of April. Her
testimony, read out by Kenyan civil engineering student Teshamulwa Okioga,
brought to the fore the reality of how inadequate sanitation impacts on the
safety and health of women in developing countries.

Halima said when it rains the “flying toilets” and their contents get washed
along with the rainwater and accumulate on the doorstep. “The faeces stay
there for days and my younger sisters play with it. We have no hope of
leaving here,” she added in desperation.

Her story was a part of a session coordinated by UN-Habitat, called “Unheard
voices of women at CSD12”. Women from India, Tanzania, Kenya and Jamaica
shared tales of the impact of inadequate sanitation on the lives of women in
slums.

The overriding message was that sanitation is not just about waste
management or providing latrines, but is linked directly to issues of
privacy, safety, convenience and above all human dignity. Delegates heard
blunt, shocking testimonials of women from developing countries about issues
like the lack of dignity involved when girls get their periods and they have
no access to water or sanitation.

“I will ensure that there is a toilet in the house where I marry my daughter
because I know how important a toilet is for a blind person. Life is hell,
and I would not let my daughter’s life become hell.” This was the testimony
of an Indian mother who criticised governments for not consulting women when
building toilets.

The commission – a review of progress on targets set at the 2002 World
Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) and by the UN Millennium
Development Goals – provided a wake-up call for the global community when it
reviewed progress of the past two years since WSSD.

It found that if the efforts of the international community are not scaled
up, the targets that have been set for water, sanitation and human
settlement will not be met. The inter- national community has pledged to
provide 1,6-billion people with access to water and two billion people with
access to sanitation by 2015. It has also promised that by 2020, the living
conditions of 100-million slum dwellers will be substantially improved.

“Achieving the targets is do-able,” said Børge Brende, Norwegian Minister of
Environment and chairperson of CSD12. “The time-bound targets are specific,
practical and realistic. They are technically feasible and financially
affordable.”

The commission aimed to encourage dialogue between trade unions, UN
agencies, women’s groups, youth groups and more than 100 government
representatives. It was urged to be a “watchdog” on progress in reaching the
millennium goals.

UN Secretary General Kofi Anan criticised global efforts, pointing out that
“high-level political attention has been diverted from sustainable
development by the recent emphasis given to terrorism, weapons of mass
destruction and the war in Iraq”. He said currently R900-billion is being
spent on arms while reaching the goals requires R50-billion, yet the world
is finding it hard to reach the goals. “We need to overcome entrenched
interests and economic short-sightedness that hinder progress.”

In his final summary, Brende said although there has been progress since
WSSD towards reaching the goals, a large number of countries are not on
track. “Achieving the goals will require high-level political commitment and
a strengthening of governance at all levels, and substantial efforts at
mobilising and effectively using resources.”

SA sets new trends

Throughout the two weeks that the three pillars of sustainable development
were discussed, South Africa was constantly referred to by delegates as an
example of where sustainable projects are in use.

On the issue of water, the country is setting a trend in combining a right
to water with payment for water. Brende was just one of the delegates who
referred to the innovative use of water meters with a tariff-based system
for each household to receive 6 000 litres of free water each month. “Those
who want to have long baths must pay for it,” he said.

The figure is calculated on the assumption that a family of eight can get by
on 25 litres per person/per day (the World Health Organisation recommends a
minimum of 50 litres per person/per day). But this system is still facing
controversy locally around issues of privatisation of basic services.

Mike Muller, director general of Water Affairs and Forestry, gave a brief
presentation at CSD12 where he discussed the water challenges faced by South
Africa since the advent of democracy. He said the country has gone through
radical water reform and the key focus has been to “confirm water as an
indivisible national asset over which provincial and local governments have
no jurisdiction”.

The department also had to end the link between the use of water and
ownership of land by abolishing the riparian principle. “Determine that
water is not owned but merely used and that its use can be regulated in the
public interest,” he advised.

Muller attributed South Africa’s high profile at CSD 12 to the fact that the
country was an important architect of a new approach to issues of
sustainability introduced during the WSSD in Johannesburg and that people
look to the country to provide some direction. “What is important from the
discussions on sanitation during the first week is recognition that it is
not just South Africa, and indeed not just developing countries, that have
major challenges to face.”

Muller said it was clear that the problem lies not in finding technical
solutions to sanitation challenges, but rather solutions that are acceptable
to people. “In this regard, I found it encouraging that large European
organisations are installing alternative sanitation technologies in their HQ
buildings.”

A pilot project in South Africa using ecological sanitation was cited in a
paper entitled “Ecological sanitation and re-use of wastewater”, by
Professor Petter Deinboll Jenssens from the Agricultural University of
Norway. In his “thinkpiece on ecological sanitation”, he cited different
practices where communities do not use conventional water-flushing toilets.

The South African project has 3 000 inhabitants living in new, medium-income
households in Kimberley equipped with ecological sanitation systems. Urine
is collected and is used by the forestry department for silviculture. The
faecal matter is collected for composting and grey water.

“In developing countries 90% of this sewage is flushed into surface waters,
polluting rivers – this has contributed to the spread of diseases among the
poor,” said Dr Ken Gnanakan in the same paper.

Putting a face to problems

Anna Kajumulo Tibaijuka, executive director of UN-Habitat, said issues of
water and sanitation cannot be addressed without placing human settlements
high on the agenda. “We all know that a business-as-usual approach will not
be enough. We need a fundamental change in our approach – we need a strategy
that is workable, realistic and will make a difference in the lives of
people,” she said.

But non-governmental agencies attending the commission said human
settlements and slums had not received “due attention” and they called for
this failure to be redressed at CSD13, planned for February and March 2005.

Financing access to water and sanitation and improvements to human
settlements was a key discussion topic at CSD12. Partnerships are still
punted as the best option, especially by the European Union and the United
States. But the NGOs challenged the focus on partnerships, saying they were
not the only option and the international donor community still needs to
invest in countries.

South Africa also stood out in human settlement practices at a session where
representatives of the South African Homeless People’s Federation sat on a
panel that discussed financing in human settlement.

“Urban poverty is vividly manifested in slums,” said Tibaijuka. About
930-million people live in slums. “If the trends continue, 1,5-billion
people will live in slums by the year 2020 … The finance gap is huge, and
requires close partnerships of UN agencies with the international financing
institutions to supplement domestic resources.”

The South African Homeless People’s Federation was established in 1990 and
is a national network of autonomous local organisations that develop
savings, credit schemes and develop their own housing schemes. It has earned
a name for itself as an international pioneer in the field of tenure
security and people’s housing.

It is made up of more than 1 500 active savings groups, whose size ranges
from a minimum of 15 to a maximum of more than 500 members. The federation
has a presence in all nine provinces of South Africa, and has set up and
supports federations of savings groups in Namibia, Zimbabwe, Swaziland,
Zambia, Madagascar, Kenya, Uganda and Ghana.

One of the federation’s savings schemes, the Victoria Mxenge Housing Savings
Scheme in the Western Cape, is an example of how financial responsibility is
generated from community mobilisation. Formed in 1991 by Victoria Mxenge, it
has managed to construct 140 good-quality houses by women.

“In 1992, I heard about the federation. At the time, no one trusted it in
Khayelitsha. They all said it was those crazy women. Then they did not like
the fact they should make their own bricks. And it was all women,” said one
member in a book called Empowering Squatter Citizen.

The book is a compilation of eight case studies where local and national
initiatives seek to address the deprivations suffered by low-income urban
populations. It was evident through the participation of some of these
members from the case studies at CSD12 that the gathering in New York was
aimed at including all role-players.

But ultimately CSD12 ended with the recognition that there is no silver
bullet to reach the goals. A popular speaker at the commission was David
Satterswaite, a senior fellow on the human settlements programme from the
International Institute for Environment and Development, who did not shy
away from critically assessing whether the global community is “hitting the
target or missing the point”.

He said currently the goals are very output- and outcome-driven and are too
focused on the role of international agencies and national governments.
Goals neglect the investments and ingenuity that low-income groups can bring
to problems, and the scale they can achieve working with local government.

“We need to change the Millennium Development Goals’ focus on the poor from
being ‘targets’ to being the agents for the achievement of the goals,” said
Satterswaite.

The biggest issue involves the institutional difficulties donor agencies
have supporting complex, diverse local processes in ways that often do not
need much money. For Satterswaite, the investment should be directed at
grassroots organisations like the eight case studies featured in Empowering
Squatter Citizen, and not through the complex financial structures that
international donor agencies generally use.

“Much of the most important innovation in water and sanitation in urban
areas has been locally driven. The importance of these [works] as ‘precedent
setting’ for what local governments can and should do.” He said often
problems arise because national governments do not want donor funding or aid
allocated directly to local organisations that benefit poor groups. “Each
locality has powerful interests that do not want pro-poor local processes.”

Women in the Eastern Cape are still struggling to gain access to water.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

6 July 2004

 

PRESIDENT TSVANGIRAI’S TUESDAY MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE OF ZIMBABWE

We completed our provincial consultative meetings on Zimbabwe’s electoral standards in Chinhoyi on Sunday.

Unlike the violence that marked the end of the Mashonaland Central meeting on Friday, the Chinhoyi gathering ended without incident.

There is a broad acceptance countrywide that once a dictatorship starts to yield to popular pressure, the people must push it further towards full political reform for the sake of a lasting solution and peace. Deceit is a recipe for long-term national instability.

Political transformation is a comprehensive process of change, as was the case in Eastern Europe and in South Africa. We are prepared to maintain the pressure for a total package. Zanu PF has run out of options. Zimbabwe needs the guidance and leadership of the people.

I am happy that all the senior leaders of the MDC, right down to our provinces and districts, are united on the need for a radical revision to our electoral standards before we embark on another national plebiscite.

The Mashonaland assemblies vowed to reject any cosmetic changes to our electoral framework. Our successes at the weekend exposed the myth and unmasked the falsehoods and perceptions that Mashonaland provinces are no-go areas for the MDC. Our party is as strong in those areas as in other parts of the country. Against all odds, our structures are still visible and our membership is increasing daily.

At our meetings, we worked out ways to revive the spirit of 1999. We designed strategies to intensify our campaign for free and fair elections and to curb violence. There is so much political confidence in the three provinces – sufficient confidence in the MDC to deal with any attempts to repeat the horrors and experiences of the past five years.

Starting today, we are taking the campaign to individual districts. We shall liaise with all the communities and share our vision for the future. We have to reach out to millions of people in the next few months, even if it requires us to conduct our meetings at night.

Our country is hungry. Our country is bleeding. Our country desperately needs help. The MDC has to do its best to consult and search for solutions from the people.

As I drove through Mashonaland at the weekend, it became impossible to ignore the highly visible knock on agriculture in an area whose previous production levels helped to earn Zimbabwe the term the breadbasket of the SADC region.

From the Mazowe Valley to Mvurwi, from Concession to Bindura, from Mt Hampden to Chinhoyi, vast tracts of prime commercial farmland lie fallow and abandoned. In some places, I noticed strings of smoke trickling out of a few pole-and-thatch shacks dotted around, usually near the roadsides, in scenes similar to what can be seen in remote areas normally occupied by shift cultivators. All these people are need of food aid.

The restoration of order onto our land is a national priority. We aim to introduce an efficient distribution mechanism, accompanied by a comprehensive land use programme in order to clean up the mess in the former commercial farming areas. We are committed to land reform. We are committed to ending the crisis in agriculture through a democratic, transparent and lawful process. We are committed to food security and prosperity.

Zimbabwe will have surplus food as soon as we implement our programme, based on need and ability to work on the land.

Agricultural recovery will be rooted on a non-negotiable return to the rule of law, restoration of private property rights and a strict adherence to the fundamental rights enshrined in a people-driven Constitution.

What I witnessed on the former commercial farms in the Mashonaland prime agricultural districts is too much for anybody to conclude that claims of bumper harvest and food security this year are mere political statements from a cornered regime that is keen to cover-up a failed populist experiment.

For an economy largely dependant on agriculture, what happened here in the past four years is unfortunate. If you tamper with the land, you destroy your revenue base. You blow life out of all essential services: health, education, taxation, public services and employment. We must restore sanity in agriculture to use that industry to revive education, to repair our health services, to restart the economy and to create jobs.

Food security is a basic human right. The MDC policies and programmes seek to observe that fundamental right as a social and legal obligation, on the part of the state, to ensure that all Zimbabwean citizens get sufficient food. Because of our abundant resources, full employment can be a reality within a short space of time.

We wish to make it clear that Zimbabwe will never experience food shortages again, given the lessons confirmed by the current wave of carelessness. Zimbabwe has enough agriculture resources to steer us from starvation, economic deprivation and poverty. We have all it takes to reassert our previous position as a net exporter of food.

Surviving on handouts either from the state or from international donors diminishes the people’s dignity and their influence and choices over what and how they are being fed. The situation gets worse when the little that is available is distributed along partisan lines.

Access to food and food availability affect the protection and promotion of human dignity.

One of our values as a party emphasise the concept of equity and solidarity. Since we recognise adequate food as a fundamental right, we shall deploy considerable resources to dealing with the concerns of weaker communities and vulnerable groups.

The concept of human rights refers to the manner in which our human dignity is respected and recognised. Merely feeding people degrades them, especially when they know that they are capable of looking after themselves.

What Zimbabwe needs is a comprehensive political programme that creates conditions for the nation to feed itself, to achieve self-sufficiency and to export. Agriculture is an economic asset – a national resource that must be within the reach of all who wish to take up farming as a way of life.

We need to meet without hindrance and to express ourselves without restrictions. We need an atmosphere in which mechanisms exist for us to question and to remedy developments that infringe on our sovereignty.

The MDC believes the right to assemble and to speak out provides essential solutions to food deficits. That is the only way we can shape our destiny because we will be in control of the conditions in which we live.

Food production and access to food have strong links to our crisis of governance. What I observed in Mashonaland explains why politics is the main factor in our failure to assure Zimbabweans of adequate food as a human right.

After our consultations in Mvurwi on electoral standards with the grassroots leadership of the MDC from Dande, Kanyemba, Guruve, Mukumbura, Mt Darwin, Dotito, Shamva, Bindura and Chiweshe, the subject of access to food cropped up.

Hundreds of MDC supporters, whose property was destroyed in political violence, complained about discrimination in the allocation of food in their wards. Some had their granaries burned down; others were denied seed.

The issue was raised again on Saturday by delegates from Uzumba Maramba Pfungwe, Hwedza, Chikomba, Murehwa, Mutoko, Marondera West and Goromonzi. Officials from Zvimba, Msengezi, Chegutu, Chitomborwizi, Makonde, Mhangura, Banket, Hurungwe, Karoi and Kariba made similar submissions, protesting at the use of food as a coercive political weapon. The levels of abuse are so open and so deep that only a truth and justice commission can assist in healing our nation.

At the centre of this Zanu PF tragedy is political intolerance. Unless Zanu PF accepts multi-party democracy and advises its supporters about the diversity of Zimbabwe’s political thought, we shall always run into problems with our election process. It became clear from the attack on our meeting in Mvurwi that our political system is still too primitive and too raw for comfort. It could be unthinkable in other societies that a stone, or a brick, is still a useful political weapon, to Zanu PF, in modern politics. The hooligans who disturbed us used Zanu PF and government trucks, indicating official collusion in the scheme to destabilise a lawful meeting.

Instead of creating conditions for debate and discussion where consensus and disagreement are possible outcomes, our opponents in Zanu PF still believe that whenever we meet, notwithstanding the police clearance and monitoring, they should start to organise violence.

The society we seek to build has no room for such behaviour. In concert with civil society, we shall search, promote and establish a Zimbabwe that is open to all. We shall strive to develop communities that recognize our historical, traditional and cultural diversity. The need for a new, tolerant society is long overdue in Zimbabwe. That explains why we have a serious food deficit.

Our people shall be encouraged to get down to work. The rationalization of land allocation will reconcile the MDC’s policy principles with on-the-ground realities. We shall resolutely apply the principles of justice to the letter to rectify the anomalies created in Mugabe’s land reform process.

Total agrarian reform, covering the whole country including the communal lands, must be one of our top priorities. With an impartial, independent and well-resourced Land Commission to determine the legal status of all land holdings through a comprehensive land audit, our aim is to rationalize ownership and land use patterns as a precursor to a properly planned resettlement programme. Zimbabweans must never be hungry again.

Together, we shall win.

Morgan Tsvangirai

President.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Accountability Commission

 

 

2nd floor   berkeley square house   berkeley square   london   w1j 6bd   united kingdom

 

telephone +44 (0)20 7396 5575       fax +44 (0)20 7396 5599

 

email  info@theaccountabilitycommission.com

u  www.theaccountabilitycommission.com   u

 

 

 

The Accountability Commission  Z i m b a b w e

 

 

 

Press Statement

 

Date: 6 July 2004

 

Re: African Union Report on Zimbabwe

 

The Accountability Commission-Zimbabwe (AC) welcomes with relief the African Union Executive Council report on Zimbabwe. The report condemns the government of Zimbabwe for ‘flagrant human rights abuses’, arrest, harassment and torture of opposition Members of Parliament, human rights lawyers and journalists as well as the breakdown of the rule of law in general.

 

As a human rights organisation involved with victims of gross human rights violations in the country, the AC feels that civil society has been vindicated in noting that the Zimbabwe government if ruling the country through terror, torture and tyranny. Indeed, the AU has urged the government of Zimbabwe to take measures to ensure that the country ‘withdraws from this precipice’. The AU would like to see this unprecedented and forthright condemnation followed by tangible and concrete action from all African countries to force the ZANU (PF) regime to restore fundamental human rights and to create an environment in which every citizen of Zimbabwe can elect his or her own government freely.

 

The AC also urges individual the Southern African Development community and individual governments, in particular South Africa, to take the cue from the African Union and stop shielding the Mugabe regime from international pressure.  To condemn human rights abuses on our continent is an imperative for all progressive country and is also consistent with the principles that guide the New Partnership for Africa’s Development and the African Renaissance.

 

In conclusion, the AC hopes that the African Heads of State will have no hesitation to endorse the report of the Executive Council.

 

 

 

Gabriel Shumba

Legal Director

Accountability Commission-Zimbabwe

C/o Centre for Human Rights

University of Pretoria

Pretoria 0002

South Africa

Cell: +27 72 6393 795

PH: +27 (12) 420 3034

Fax: +27 (12) 362 5125

 


Back to the Top
Back to Index

Something to laugh about from Zimbabwe

Chicken tale - lighterworld

SEVERAL people were asked a simple question: "Why did the chicken cross
the road?"
Such a simple question ... This is what they had to say:

*Kindergarten teacher: "To get to the other side."

*George Bush: "The chicken is either with us or with them. If its on
their side then it will be destroyed."

*Ronald Reagan: "I forgot."

*Martin Luther King: "I have a dream where all chickens will be free to
cross roads without having their motives called in question."

*Richard Nixon: "The chicken did not cross the road. I repeat, the
chicken did NOT cross the road."

*Nelson Mandela: "It was on its long walk to freedom. A true Rainbow
chicken."

*Phillip Chiyangwa: "The government will ensure that a fair quota of
black chickens cross the road as well. Why should black chickens remain
on this side of the road?" I only watch black chickens crossing the road
anyway ..."

*Gideon Gono: "Makes me think: We don't tax chickens crossing roads yet
..."

*Chinotimba: "No wonder where thati chickeni goes, we have the able to
went back to the bush to fight back to safeguard our sovhereniti."

*Welshman Ncube: "Let's join the chicken and cross the road !"

*Pius Ncube: "Weee should have crossed the road with him. Together weee
will make a difference."

*Thabo Mbeki: "I don't really have an opinion about this ..."
(puff..puff..puff)

*Jonathan Moyo: "All right thinking and patriotic Zimbabweans will
obviously agree that the idea of chickens crossing the road and making
this place to be viewed as a Tarzan zone for the amusement of Americans
and Europeans who want to come to primitive and jungle Africa has no
future."

*Robert Mugabe: "Stop that chicken! It must be repossessed together with
the farm it belongs to. And the farm opposite the road where it was
going to. And all the chickens on both farms. Repossess them all.
"And it's nobody's business what I do in my country. It is the British's
fault for bringing chickens here anyway."
Back to the Top
Back to Index

News24

'Africa must not pay its debt'
06/07/2004 07:15  - (SA)

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia - A top economic adviser to UN secretary-general Kofi
Annan told African countries on Monday to refuse to pay their huge debts if
rich countries did not cancel them.

American economist Jeffrey Sachs made the comment to a conference on hunger
on the eve of a summit of the heads of state of the African Union (AU),
which estimates sub-Saharan Africa has foreign debts of $201bn.

"The time has come to end this charade. The debts are unaffordable," said
Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University and special
adviser to Annan on global anti-poverty targets.

"If they won't cancel the debts I would suggest obstruction. You do it
yourselves."

The 53-member African Union, which is to discuss taking a more prominent
role in conflict resolution on the continent, announced on Monday that it
will send a 300-strong armed protection force as soon as possible into
Sudan's Darfur province.

Sam Ibok, director of the AU's peace and security division, said the troops'
role will be to protect refugees in Sudan and in neighboring Chad, where
many have fled from a campaign of terror by Arab militiamen - a situation
the United Nations describes as the world's worst humanitarian crisis.

The force will also protect military observers currently being sent to
Darfur, he said.

The number is significant increase from the 150 unarmed AU monitors that
were expected to go to Darfur as part of an April cease-fire agreement in
Sudan. A few AU monitors already are there.

The leaders of Ethiopia, Mauritius, Sudan, Uganda, Mozambique, Mali and
Burkina Faso attended Monday's hunger conference.

Sachs called on the developed world to double aid to Africa to $120bn a
year, and meet commitments they made in 1970 to spend at least 0.7% of their
gross domestic product on grants and loans.

The United States and other rich nations spend billions of dollars on arms
but only a minute fraction of that on fighting poverty, he said.

Budget

In his remarks to the conference, Annan warned that hunger was becoming
worse for the most vulnerable segment of Africa's population.

"Africa is the only continent where child malnutrition is getting worse
rather than better," said the UN secretary-general.

"Tragically, the past decade has seen very little progress."

Annan said Africa needs a "green revolution" to meet a 2015 target to end
hunger.

Jacques Diouf, director-general of the U.N. Food and Agriculture
Organisation, said progress in ending hunger was "painfully slow" and
predicted it will take more than a century to achieve it in Africa.

On Tuesday, the chairperson of the AU's commission will unveil a three-year,
$1.7bn plan to beef up the organisation.

At present the African Union has an annual budget of $43m, but contributions
from its 53 members add up to only $13m, leaving the organisation with a
$30m deficit, according to AU officials who did not want to be identified.

The organisation spends only $1.6m resolving conflicts on the continent,
said Ibok.