The ZIMBABWE Situation
An extensive and up-to-date website containing views, views and links related to ZIMBABWE - a country in crisis
Return to INDEX page
Please note: You need to have 'Active content' enabled in your IE browser in order to see the index of articles on this webpage

Mpofu misleads nation on diamond sales

 

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27123-mpofu-misleads-nation-on-diamond-sales.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 21:05

MINES minister Obert Mpofu, already facing serious accusations from the World Diamond Council of lying about the Chiadzwa diamonds, has got himself into further trouble by misleading the public over cabinet’s position on the controversial issue, fiercely debated by ministers this week.

Information obtained from high-level sources shows that contrary to Mpofu’s claims in the state media on Wednesday, cabinet did not approve the sale of the Chiadzwa diamonds. Zimbabwe has stockpiled nearly four million carats of diamonds valued at about US$ 2 billion.

“Cabinet did not approve the sale of Marange diamonds,” a senior government minister said. “The truth of the matter is that the issue was referred to the cabinet committee on Chiadzwa. How can cabinet approve the sale of the Chiadzwa diamonds when the KPCS (Kimberley Process Certification Scheme) has not been concluded?”

The cabinet committee on Chiadzwa includes ministers Tendai Biti, Welshman Ncube, Elton Mangoma, Emmerson Mnangagwa and Mpofu.

Another minister said Mpofu was “economical with the truth” in claiming cabinet had approved diamond sales. “It’s not true that cabinet approved the sale of Chiadzwa diamonds. The issue is still under consideration both by the cabinet committee and the KPCS.”

One minister said the principle of selling was agreed to but the issue was referred to the cabinet committee to clear remaining hurdles before renewed exports.

Mpofu was quoted in the Herald on Wednesday claiming cabinet had approved the sale of the controversial Chiadzwa diamonds which have triggered a global storm of protest and hectic lobbying.

“It was clear from the meeting that cabinet agrees with immediate sale of our diamonds,” Mpofu was quoted as saying. “We need to come up with a mechanism of proceeding with this process. The mechanism will be transparent and accountable.”

However, several ministers asked about the issue this week said that was not true.

Local and international human rights groups have been mobilising against the sale of the Marange gems which they describe as “blood diamonds” because of alleged human rights abuses at the Chiadzwa fields. They say human rights violations must end first and the diamonds must be sold transparently for the benefit of the country, not individuals.

The issue has also sucked in big diamonds producers around the world, especially those under the KPCS.

A KPCS meeting in Tel Aviv, Israel, last week ended in a stalemate over whether Zimbabwe could resume diamond exports from the troubled Marange area. Mpofu and his delegation were unhappy with the deadlock, while the civil society coalition working with the KPCS welcomed the outcome.

The Tel Aviv meeting broke up without agreement after through-the-night talks. However, Mpofu came home claiming Zimbabwe had been allowed to sell its diamonds, an assertion rejected by the World Diamond Council president Eli Izhakoff as false.

The Chiadzwa diamond debate has also left cabinet deeply-divided. There have been several clashes over this issue, including on Tuesday.

President Robert Mugbe and his Zanu PF ministers say Zimbabwe must be allowed to sell because it has fulfilled KPCS procedures, but Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and Deputy Prime Minister Arthur Mutambara and their ministers say all necessary procedures must be met first before the sale of the diamonds.

Zimbabwe’s fate on whether to sell the diamonds now through the KPCS would be decided at the World Diamond Council meeting in St. Petersburg in Russia on July 14/15.

Izhakoff said there were burning issues on the table for the meeting, mainly the Zimbabwe matter.

“Our industry will gather at the World Diamond Council annual meeting to reconfirm our commitment to ethical trading and to the eradication of conflict diamonds from our distribution chain,” Izhakoff recently said.

“As the past year has demonstrated, we will not be assembling in St. Petersburg simply to pay lip service to the values upon which the organisation was founded. The ongoing situation in countries like Zimbabwe and the dedication of our industry to operate in a transparent and principled manner means that there are burning issues on the table, which we will discuss and for which we will formulate strategies.”

Efforts to get Mpofu’s comment last night were in vain as he was not answering his mobile phone. - Staff Writer.


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Mpofu slur leaves KP further polarised

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27119-mpofu-slur-leaves-kp-further-polarised.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:33

A LATE-NIGHT brainstorming session in Tel Aviv to break a deadlock on the status of Marange diamonds handed Zimbabwe’s Mines minister Obert Mpofu a golden opportunity to attack his most vocal critics - while at same time leaving the Kimberley Process (KP) even more polarised on the matter.

The case of arrested diamond activist Farai Maguwu provided the Israel meeting with the twist that shifted events. Apart from affecting Marange stones certification, Maguwu’s predicament also left civil society organisations, Partnership Africa Canada (PAC) and Global Witness, key NGO members of the KP, battling against bribery allegations from Mpofu.

For Mpofu and many watchers, the Israel meeting was expected to rubber-stamp green light recommendations made by Abbey Chikane, a founding chairman of the organisation who was appointed by the KP to monitor Marange diamonds. The KP is a joint government, business and civil society group of 75 members formed to stem trade in diamonds mined in conflict situations, or those used to fund conflict and controls over 90%of the alluvial diamond market.

The meeting in Tel Aviv centered on Zimbabwe and turned out to be a battleground over Marange diamonds after Chikane’s recommendations for the immediate export of the controversially mined stones split KP members.

From the outset of the debate on Tuesday, it emerged that Chikane’s report would struggle for approval after Canada, the United States, Australia, representatives of the European Union and civil society groups such as Partnership Africa Canada (PAC) and Global Witness, raised objections. Information from the meetings indicates that the arrest and subsequent ill-treatment of Maguwu came back to haunt Zimbabwe, whose fight for the certification of Marange diamonds was near after Chikane’s recommendations. Because KP decisions require consensus, mediation and last-minute efforts to avoid a historic KP stalemate became fraught after Western nations and civil society dug in their heels on rejection of Chikane’s recommendations.

“Civil society groups were adamant that Marange diamonds would not get KP approval at a time when one of their own, Maguwu, was still in prison and struggling with legal fees,” a source familiar with the meeting told the Zimbabwe Independent. “It would have sent a wrong picture of the KP as a toothless body. Civil society groups, with the support of countries such as the US and Canada were concerned that human rights abuses would continue in Marange if Maguwu’s case was not resolved at the meeting.

“His arrest could deter other rights activists from monitoring Marange, which would leave the fields with a potential of escalating into some sort of war zone, a situation that would make it easy for diamonds mined in traditional war zones such as the Democratic Republic of Congo to be mixed with those from Marange to avoid detection.”

As debate raged on into Tuesday evening, with no consensus in sight, KP chair Boaz Hirsch, an Israeli, stepped in. As the clock ticked to midnight on Tuesday, with efforts heading for a deadlock, two groups gathered separately to brainstorm.

One group included Hirsch, the chair of the Working-Group on Monitoring, Stephane Chardon, president of the World Diamond Council, Eli Izhakoff, and Sheldon Moulton, a country representative from South Africa.

NGOs, led by Global Witness and PAC and a representative from the United States met separately. It is at this meeting where what has become Mpofu’s biggest weapon emerged. During deliberations, like most discussions related to Zimbabwe at the meeting, the issue of Maguwu’s troubles came up. A suggestion was then made within the group that Zimbabwe should be asked to set aside one percent of the net revenues from the Marange mines to help strengthen civil society in Zimbabwe and pay for costs such as Maguwu’s legal fees.

This was around 3am on Wednesday, two-and-a-half hours before breaking after the fruitless discussions. The NGO group however dropped the idea when they met again on Thursday mid-morning following Hirsch’s extension of the plenary.

“It was too late. Mpofu had somehow got wind of the proposal and chose to fully exploit it upon returning home,” said a source.

Global Witness and PAC this week both rejected Mpofu’s claims, but confirmed the issue had at one time come up for discussion during the brainstorming sessions.

“The idea was never formally put on the negotiation table by civil society groups, or anyone else, and at no point in the informal discussions was it posited as a condition for the resumption of diamond exports,” said PAC’s Alan Martin.

While KP members say they are committed to breaking the Zimbabwe impasse at a meeting scheduled for July 14 and 15 in St Petersburg, the bribery claims have heightened fears that the Zimbabwe issue could tear the KP apart.

“The Kimberley Process managed to salvage some of its credibility last week by refusing to endorse a resumption of exports from Marange. Zimbabwe seems intent upon damaging the scheme further with this latest slur,” said Martin.

Farai Mutsaka


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

‘Little progress in Maguwu probe’

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27117-little-progress-in-maguwu-probe.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:32

POLICE yesterday blamed the director of the Centre for Research and Development, Farai Maguwu, and his lawyers for delaying the completion of investigations into allegations that he authored a false document on the goings-on at Chiadzwa diamond fields.

Investigating officer Inspector Henry Dowa told the Harare Magistrates Court that very “little progress had been made” because Maguwu and his defence team were refusing to give the investigating officer access to a laptop which was recovered at his house.

“He (Maguwu) said he would want the authority of the board of directors and all five board members are out of the country,” Dowa said. “One is in Japan, another in the United Kingdom, another in Canada while the fourth was in South Africa. It is very difficult to get in touch with them to get the authority to access the laptop. It is a very difficult task to look for somebody in Japan or South Africa without a specific address.”

However, Maguwu’s lawyers led by Beatrice Mtetwa said access to the laptop was not an issue as the charges facing Maguwu emanated from the document which was already before the courts and it was unnecessary to look for further documents in the laptop.

Harare magistrate Donald Ndirowei is expected to make a ruling on Maguwu’s bail application today.

Dowa said they would have completed the investigations by June 22 as he had promised the court, if it had not been for the delay by the accused and his defence team and failure to get statements from other witnesses.

The witnesses who Dowa wanted to record statements from include the South African-based Kimberley Processing monitor Abbey Chikane who was given the incriminating document. Three other witnesses, whose residential addresses are unknown, would also assist Dowa with investigations.

“I am not having problems (recording a statement from Chikane) but he is very mobile. I missed him as he had gone to Israel and he would soon be going to Russia. It should be noted that before I go, there are certain procedures that I have to go through, for example Cabinet approval.”

Mtetwa said the investigating officer should not have gone on a “state-sponsored holiday in South Africa” as it was not necessary.

“Chikane’s statement is irrelevant,” Mtetwa said. “His (Chikane’s) document is not forming the basis of the charge Maguwu is facing. It is inconceivable that an officer of 25 years experience would go to South Africa without proper appointment. He did not provide any evidence that he went to South Africa.”

In response, Dowa said he had used his police identification to travel to South Africa as his passport had expired but he offered to call a superior he travelled with as evidence that they went to that country.

Mtetwa roundly criticised the investigating officer for trying to record a statement from Chikane when he had failed to do the same locally as the document from where the charges emanate was allegedly authored by Assistant Commissioner N Mawere.

Inspector Dowa had not recorded a statement from N Mawere or the Mines ministry official from whom he got the document.

Mtetwa added that on June 23, the state said Dowa was in South Africa yet the investigating officer said he returned from that country on June 21.

“This discrepancy was because the state had done nothing towards further investigation,” she said.

Mtetwa said Dowa should have made an “elementary e-mail enquiry” to ascertain where the three other witnesses were as they could have been in the country or even in the courtroom.

Dowa insisted that the procedure required that the police inform Interpol if there are any extra-territorial investigations to be undertaken and they had done so though he would not provide evidence in court.

Mtetwa asked why the police had not investigated allegations of abuse and torture as ordered by the court.

She said the trend was that Dowa was involved in cases of abuse and torture as he had been sent back from a United Nations Mission in Kosovo on similar accusations.

Dowa said it was not true that he was sent back or recalled but had fallen ill while in Kosovo prompting his return and he had medical cards to prove that.

Leonard Makombe


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Furore over US$ 100m coal mining project

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27115-furore-over-us100m-coal-mining-project.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:30

A PLANNED US$ 100 million coal mining project in Gwayi is threatening surrounding wildlife conservancies as well as raising fears it will pollute the Gwayi-Shangani dam, which is viewed as Bulawayo’s solution to water problems.

Liberation Mine, a joint venture firm between Zimbabwean and South African investors, was granted a licence to prospect for coal-bed methane on February 22 and has been clearing vast tracks of land for coal extraction.

The community and players involved in the dam construction fear that activity on the coal fields will affect wildlife and the water project.

Maxwell Sibanda, an official with Gwayi Conservancy Association, yesterday said due to the extensive usage of chemicals such as benzene in coal mining, the Gwayi-Shangani Dam and its green belt that sustains a wide array of wildlife could be a casualty.

“What is more worrying is that the environment impact report is not yet out, but exploration work is underway. We fear that chemicals used in mining could seep through to the dam site and contaminate the water. This would require extensive use of water purification chemicals,” said Sibanda.

He added that once the water was contaminated, downstream agricultural industries such as fisheries, which sustain local communities, would collapse.

“It is common knowledge that fish cannot survive in contaminated water, so the fish industries might fail to take off,” Sibanda said.

Regarding wildlife, Sibanda said coal dust would affect the growth of vegetation, while noise associated with mining activities could force animals that include a large herd of elephants to flee.

“Another worry is on vegetation,” he said “Coal dust is known to affect the growth of trees just like in Hwange. Animals here are now used to the vegetation, hence any disturbance is likely to have an effect on eating habits of animals resulting in them migrating,” he said.

Villages in the vicinity of the mine site include Kana Block, Mazwa, Hangano and Chimwara.

A safari operator in the area said: “We are not sure of how far the mine would stretch as we are getting conflicting reports. Two weeks ago Liberation Mine officials told us that they are taking up about 6 500 hectares, but on Monday it emerged during a meeting that 16 545 hectares is under the mining concession.

“Now some safari operators would have their revenue affected as animals are expected to flee the area due to noise from the mine. We need explanations.”

Safari operators say they average US$ 100 000 in earnings per hunting season which lasts three months.

A stakeholders’ meeting, that would involve safari operators, Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce (ZNCC) Bulawayo chapter Affirmative Action Group (AAG), Bulawayo City Council and government is on the cards to discuss the issue.

Liberation Mining’s Hangano concession covers a total of 16 545 hectares with coal reserves estimated to be 1, 5 billion tonnes with a lifespan of between 15 to 20 years of open-cast mining.

Liberation Mine has set a US$ 100 million budget for mining coal in Gwayi and its South African partners, LontohCoal, have already released US$ 2 million for the project.

The company expects to start mining by year-end and go full throttle during the first quarter of 2011.

The mine is targeting producing 100 000 tonnes of coal monthly.

A Liberation Mine spokesman yesterday confirmed that they were yet to get an environmental assessment impact certificate although workers were already on the ground.

“On the environmental assessment impact, that is work in progress as our consultants are currently on site,” the spokesman said.

“We expect the report to be out in two weeks time, but now we are conducting exploration drilling, taking out samples of the product.”

He said concerns on the potential of the project to affect the Gwayi-Shangani water project would be clarified by the report.

LontohCoal, which says it plans to list on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange by November, is a specialist mining exploration finance company with investments in coal, gold, iron ore, nickel and platinum.

National Parks and Wildlife Management Authority director-general Vitalis Chatenga could not be reached for comment at the time of going to press last night.

Water Resources Minister Samuel Sipepa Nkomo told the Zimbabwe Independent yesterday that he would engage the Mines ministry over the project’s potential effect on the Gwayi-Shangani Dam project.

Nqobile Bhebhe


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Zim to press for sanctions removal

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27113-zim-to-press-for-sanctions-removal-.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:28

ZIMBABWE wants a complete removal of sanctions without any conditionality by the European Union (EU) because of the progress government says it has made in implementing the global political agreement (GPA), a cabinet minister said this week.

Regional Integration and International Cooperation minister Priscilla Misihairabwi-Mushonga told the Zimbabwe Independent before leaving for Brussels on Tuesday that the meetings today with EU officials would seek to clarify issues raised by the bloc on the lack of progress in implementing the GPA.

She, however, said they were not going to Brussels to beg or behave like “schoolchildren”, but would merely state achievements made so far by the inclusive government and the vision they have to improve the economy.

“We are not doing what we are doing to get approval from the EU or for the EU to say good girls and boys, but we are doing it for ourselves - this is for our society and the society we want to build,” she Misihairabwi-Mushonga said.

“We are not going there to be like schoolchildren; we are going there to say this is the society we would want to build. We will ask them if they want our partnership as is in the Cotonou Agreement. If they want then we will all of us define what kind of partnership we should have.”

The government delegation, which also includes Justice minister Patrick Chinamasa and led by Energy minister Elton Mangoma, will meet with EU Foreign policy tsar Baroness Ashton, director-general for development Stefano Manservisi, and Commissioner for Development Andris Piebalgs.

“We have agreed on a common position - we want the sanctions to be completely removed, Misihairabwi-Mushonga said.

“We know the general issues that the EU has raised. We are going to deal with these issues. We are going to clarify issues raised and talk about the progress we have made so far.”

“We will tell them this is a process and there is never a time when we can reach 100% implementation. But what we have done is indicative of the progress made and our commitment. We have made progress - we will talk about freedom of information and the commissions we have set up.”

Government has set up a Zimbabwe Media Commission which has now licensed four dailies, Alpha Media Holdings’ NewsDay, Modus Publications’ Daily Gazette, and ANZ’s Daily News which was shut down by the government in 2003 for allegedly violating provisions of the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

ZMC has also given the green light to the Mail and to the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions to change the frequency of its publication, The Worker, from a monthly to a weekly.

In addition to the media commission, the government has also set up a Human Rights Commission chaired by Reg Austin, a law professor and former Commonwealth secretariat’s head of legal and constitutional affairs division; and an electoral commission headed by Simpson Mutambanengwe, a former Zimbabwean Supreme Court judge, who was serving as acting chief justice in the Namibian Supreme Court.

It has also embarked on the constitution-making process, which has so far been marred by chaos, confusion, and violence.

The EU re-engagement dialogue process was launched by Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai last June.

The meetings will be held under the Cotonou Agreement, which is a comprehensive partnership agreement between developing countries and the EU. The European Development Fund (EDF) is the main instrument for providing EU aid for development cooperation in ACP (Africa/Caribbean/Pacific) states under the agreement.

The Zimbabwe delegation hopes to convince the EU through its body language, which it says would show that there is harmony within government.

In February the EU renewed its sanctions against Zimbabwe for another year, citing lack of progress in implementing the power-sharing agreement.

The three political parties are still to agree on the appointments of Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe governor Gideon Gono, Attorney-General Johannes Tomana, and provincial governors, the swearing-in of Deputy Agriculture minister-designate Roy Bennett, security reforms and opening up of airwaves, among other issues.

Faith Zaba


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Constitution-making off to false start

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27109-constitution-making-off-to-false-start.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:21

A DECISION to black out news coverage of public views offered to constitution-making process outreach teams has shackled the coalition government’s attempt at drawing up a new governance charter for the country. In addition, violence and logistical shortcomings have left hordes of outreach members stranded. The constitution-making project, a key component of Zimbabwe’s agreed but unimplemented democratic reforms, has endured a two-week start of horror.

Copac’s decision this week to stop journalists from reporting on the public’s contributions during official outreach hearings has reinforced suspicion that the coalition government could manipulate the constitution-making process.

Journalists’ unions say Copac’s decision to muzzle the media smells of an attempt by coalition government partners to forge a deal that could result in a negotiated settlement of cornered politicians.

Zimbabwe Journalists for Human Rights (ZJHR), a grouping of scribes formed to fight for reporters’ rights and security at the height of the State’s often violent onslaught on the media, described the move to silence the media as “repressive and typical of agents of political parties hell-bent on excluding the media from its activities to escape public scrutiny and accountability”.

Dumisani Muleya, ZJHR spokesman, said his group viewed the ongoing constitution-making process as worse than any of the previous efforts the country has had in the past.

“We demand that Copac operates in an open and transparent manner. This actually highlights the grave concerns we have been having about this flawed and opaque constitution-making process. It is an opaque body driven by narrow and partisan party political interests as opposed to the public interest,” said Muleya.

Foster Dongozi, elected secretary-general of the Zimbabwe Union of Journalists at a disputed congress earlier this year, said his organisation would take up the matter with Copac.

“We believe a process such as the crafting of a constitution should withstand any test of credibility and that can only be achieved if the process is made as transparently as possible. Allowing the media to act as the public’s eyes and ears is the surest way of achieving transparency,” said Dongozi.

The treatment of journalists covering the outreach programme is turning out to be reminiscent of the old days preceding the formation of the coalition government.

Police detained two Mutare-based journalists, Sydney Saize and Chengetai Murimwa, who were conducting their professional duties of covering the outreach in Mutare South. Saize and Murimwa were released after two hours of interrogation. They say they now fear for their security after police took down their residential addresses, ID numbers and vehicle details.

This same week, MPs from both Zanu PF and its coalition partner, Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s MDC-T party, drove off a news crew of photo journalists in Marondera on Monday. The journalists left without footage, leaving unions to question the credibility of the process given the secrecy surrounding it.

Problems affecting the process continued this week.

Outreach team members for Matabeleland North were yet to start consultative meetings in Lupane and other areas in the province as they were still holed up at Hwange Safari Lodge.

Villagers in Lupane told the Zimbabwe Independent on Wednesday that no single meeting had taken place so far.

“We heard that Copac members are at Hwange Safari Lodge where they are still undergoing training on how to approach villagers and how to use equipment,” said a Kusile Rural District council official.

In Gwai, villagers said they were yet to be informed on the venues and dates for the meetings.

In interviews this week, villagers here said Zanu PF activists, who had been holding meetings in the area had moved to a door-to-door campaign coaching villagers on what to say during outreach hearings. The villagers said the activists warned them that they would use footage captured by Copac cameras to witch-hunt those who would sway from the party position.

Civil society groups have been reporting regular cases of violence, intimidation and disruptions since the outreach started.

Police, which had promised 350 officers, five per outreach team prior to the start of the process, had failed to deploy resulting in rowdy gangs which rights activists and groups claim are supporters of President Robert Mugabe’s party disrupting meetings. These developments have confirmed rights groups monitoring the situation and media‘s concern of slack security.

Police commanders Innocent Matibiri and Faustino Mazango told the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Defence and Home Affairs in May that they could not guarantee security for the outreach programme because of resource shortages.

This was after the Constitutional Parliamentary Committee (Copac) refused to pay US$ 3 million demanded by the law enforcement agents for outreach expenses. Police later reluctantly agreed to provide security, and reduced manpower from 1 000 to 350 officers.

Nqobile Bhebhe/Farai Mutsaka


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Villagers ‘coached’ to back Kariba draft

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27107-villagers-coached-to-back-kariba-draft.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:21

THE issue of gay rights has taken centre stage in the constitution outreach programme with Zanu PF reportedly telling villagers in Mashonaland West that any constitutional provisions outside what is in the controversial Kariba draft will promote same sex marriages and homosexuality. Villagers in President Robert Mugabe’s rural home in Zvimba, 110km west of Harare, and neighbouring Chitomborwizi in Makonde district now strongly believe that those calling for a people-driven constitution, who are opposed to the Kariba draft, want to include the issue of gay rights in the new constitution.

Zanu PF, the villagers allege, is using homosexuality, something which they know people - particularly those in rural areas - are strongly opposed to, to make sure that they parrot what is in the Kariba draft.

Villagers claimed that Zanu PF campaigned for the Kariba draft, written by the three political parties in the inclusive government, during meetings prior to the constitution outreach programme.

Villagers in Chief Chirau’s area, also known as Kawondera village in Zvimba, say that they were addressed by soldiers three weeks ago, who told them that they should demand a constitution with an executive president who has far-reaching powers to appoint without any consultation.

The villagers refused to be named for fear of being victimised for adopting what might be perceived as “anti-Zanu PF” positions on the constitution.

An elderly woman, who had been waiting for almost two hours for an outreach meeting at Kawondera primary school, which was later postponed to Saturday, derided a constitution that promotes gay rights.

“Masoja akati addresser three weeks ago. Vakatiudza kuti vanhu ava varikuda zveconstituation nyowani isiri yeku Kariba, varikuda kuti tibvume zvechingochana. Ah kana ndiwe mwana wangu, zvingaite here kuti ini ndidanane nambuya ava (Q)

Kwete hatidi izvozvo. (We were addressed by soldiers three weeks ago. They told us that those opposed to Kariba draft want the new constitution to allow for homosexuality. My child, how can I have a lesbian relationship with this old woman (Q)

We say no to that),” she said.

A youth wearing a red cap and a Zanu PF t-shirt with Mugabe’s picture, which he referred to as “hembe yenyika” (Zimbabwean outfit) questioned why Zimbabwe was drafting another constitution when the three political parties wrote and agreed to the Kariba draft.

“We don’t understand why they want another one when there is already Kariba draft,” he said. “My sister, even if we are in rural areas we know that there was a constitution written in Kariba and now what’s wrong with it (Q)

We want that one, not the one that they want to write now promoting homosexuality.

“We say No to homosexuality, they want me to marry another man - to pay mombe yehumai (bride price) Ahhh, haizviite (we can’t do that),” he said with a look of disgust.

Zanu PF wants the old executive system comprising a powerful executive president, two vice presidents and a cabinet as advocated in the Kariba draft. It has said no to having a prime minister.

The villagers were not willing to talk about bread and butter issues and were afraid to openly discuss the executive arms of government.

It was clear that there had been some form of intimidation.

Another elderly woman, also from Kawondera village, refused to even hear any questions regarding what kind of an executive arm of government she preferred.

“Handikwanise kutaura nyaya iyoyo (I can’t talk about that issue). Tichangoita ivo zvavanoda (we are just going to do whatever they want),” without clarifying whose wishes she was referring to.

“Handikwanise kutaura zvirimumoyo mangu asi kuti ahh zvavanenge vataura ndizvozvo - Izvozvo zviri muKariba ndizvozvo zvacho. (I can’t say what is in my heart except that whatever they want me to say - what is in Kariba, that is that),” she added after being pressed to state her preferences.

Women said they could speak openly on issues to do with the elderly, orphaned children and widowed women.

They want gender equality, which should mean a 50-50 ratio even in government and cabinet.

The women said the constitution should stipulate that a grant, either in cash or food aid, be given by government to the elderly, orphaned and unemployed widowed women, while the youths were more concerned about government creating job opportunities and ensuring that there are more vocational training centres. The Zimbabwe Independent attended one meeting at Chitomborwizi primary school where villagers seemed to parrot the responses prepared by Zanu PF in its 95-page document on its position.

One particular woman in a purple hat appeared like the spokesperson for the group, with only four youths opposing most of the positions, particularly those related to having an executive president with excessive powers.

She spoke first and another person would second, while the rest would vote in support.

Whenever people spoke on issues regarding appointments to commissions or other arms of government, they would say “the executive president should” or that they should go back to the situation before the inclusive government where there was no need for any consultation.

On the judiciary, the group of about 40 people agreed that the judiciary should remain as it was and that Supreme Court decisions should not be challenged.

They said the appointment of judges and the Judicial Service Commission should be done by the “executive president”, while the youths preferred a commission appointed by parliament to select judges without any input from the president.

The villagers said the executive president should appoint the attorney-general, auditor and comptroller-general, ombudsman, Reserve Bank governor, Public Service Commission, Anti-Corruption Commission, Media Commission, Electoral Commission, Human Rights Commission, Truth and Justice Commission, Gender Commission and Land Commission. In addition, the villagers said the president should appoint heads of the police, defence forces, prisons services and cabinet.

All these appointments, they said, should be done by the president without consultation, as is prescribed in the Zanu PF’s document.

Responding to a question on whether parliament or a standing order committee of parliament should approve cabinet appointments, Zanu PF said: “There is no need for parliamentary approval of the President’s appointments of cabinet ministers since the president is popularly elected directly by the people.”

The youths opposed this, saying that would give too much power to one person without any checks and balances, to which there were interjections.

On transitional mechanisms, the villagers agreed that one of the two vice presidents, who would be acting at that time should take over for 90 days after which he/she should call an election.

“President vakarwara kana kufa (if the president is sick or if he dies), the acting president should take over for 90 days and not the prime minister - one of the two vice presidents,” said the woman in the purple hat.

The villagers said they did not want a prime minister because it was “foreign” and not African as there was none on the continent.

Faith Zaba


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Diamonds - Does Kimberley Process work (Q)

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27099-diamonds-does-kimberley-process-work.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:12

THE Kimberley Process came into effect 10 years ago to stem the flow of rough diamonds used by rebel movements in Africa to finance wars against legitimate governments.

So has it worked (Q)

Critics insist it has not. Some diamonds avoid the Kimberley Process, they say, questioning the efficacy of the system.

Diamonds have fuelled decades of conflicts in countries such as Angola, Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

A report from the campaign group Global Witness says much of this is still going on in parts of Africa.

In Zimbabwe, the military and political elite are allegedly exploiting the country’s diamond wealth, often by using force, Global Witness says.

But Ernest Blom, of the World Federation of Diamond Bourses, argues that the Kimberley Process has succeeded in its aim to stop diamond mining which funds wars.

“As far as Zimbabwe is concerned, we have supposed human rights abuses which I think is out of the ambit of the diamond industry,” he says.

The Global Witness report claims that between 100 and 200 miners were killed in the Marange area in eastern Zimbabwe in 2008, as the army imposed military control over the fields.

And according to Human Rights Watch, Zimbabwe’s military is forcing children and women to work at the mines, whilst also torturing and beating local villagers in the Marange area - claims dismissed last week by Home Affairs minister Kembo Mohadi as “lies”.

Human rights campaigner Farai Maguwu was arrested at the beginning of June for allegedly giving false information about the Chiadzwa diamond fields to Kimberley Process monitor Abbey Chikane.

“Soldiers have been accused of illegal panning activities and they are primarily responsible for mining the diamonds, which are being exported through undesignated points to neighbouring countries and the rest of the world,” Magawu recently asserted. “There have been reports and overwhelming evidence of serious human rights abuses taking place in the Chiadzwa diamond fields.”

Whenever an official from the Kimberley Process visits the diamond fields there is an upsurge in violence, whereby the soldiers victimise ordinary civilians who they accuse of illegal panning, he explained.

“Women have been gang-raped by soldiers and police and these substantiated allegations are very unacceptable and show that Zimbabwe is not complying with the minimum standards of the Kimberley Process,” Maguwu said. “Our officers go to the fields and neighbouring areas surrounding the diamond fields, investigate the abuses and get sworn affidavits from the victims in the company of a lawyer.”

Maguwu said there were no reports from other mines and that the bone of contention is Chiadzwa.

“The Minister of Mines, Obert Moses Mpofu, has openly flouted Zimbabwe’s tender regulations by clandestinely forming companies and giving them licences to mine such a rich public resource that can solve half of our economic problems,” Maguwu maintained.

Global Witness has concluded that the main beneficiary has been Zanu PF and its supporters.

The Kimberley Process has told the government not to sell any diamonds from Marange until they have obtained a certificate, but illegal smuggling of diamonds gets them out of Zimbabwe through Mozambique and South Africa.

Investigations suggest that most of those diamonds find their way to Dubai and Lebanon, where they end up being mixed with diamonds from legitimate sources and they are then sold to western buyers.

Zimbabwe’s army has denied the allegations and Mpofu has declined to be interviewed about the allegations.

In February, President Robert Mugabe threatened to leave the Kimberley Process after Zimbabwe was given until last month to prove that its mines were properly run.

The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) imposes extensive requirements on its diamond-producing member states to enable them to certify shipments of rough diamonds as “conflict-free”.

With a certificate of provenance, it is therefore possible to trace the origin of every single gem stone.

The crisis in Zimbabwe is undermining international efforts to eradicate conflict diamonds.

Concerns about the effectiveness of the Kimberley Process have led to the resignation of one of the officers who set up the system.

“I could no longer, in good faith, contribute to pretence that failure is success,” says Ian Smilie. “It was a very simple idea. If you want to be part of the legitimate diamond trade you have to be in the Kimberley Process. Any diamond exported from a country has to have a Kimberley certificate. There has to be an audit trail and you have to say where a diamond came from.”

But Smilie has become frustrated at the Kimberley Process’s inability or unwillingness to come to grips with some very serious problems.

In the three countries which had the most terrible wars, Angola, Sierra Leone and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the government’s internal controls are very weak, he says.

“The government in Congo has no idea where 40% of its diamonds come from - they could be coming from Angola or Zimbabwe or even from Mars,” Smilie says.

Zimbabwe is a member of the Kimberley Process, so if they do not agree you cannot move forward.

“We haven’t figured out how to stop car theft, which has been going on for 110 years, and we know there will always be theft, but when you have a regulatory system that refuses to come to grips with obvious cases then you have a serious problem,” Smilie says.

“If the US, which is the biggest consumer of diamonds in the world, says ‘listen, if the Congo is unable to enforce the minimum provisions we will no longer allow the importation into the United States from the Congo until they clean up their act’, you would see a huge amount of action take place in the Congo.”

Although there can never be a cast-iron guarantee about the provenance of diamonds, Blom of the World Federation of Diamond Bourses believes the public can rest assured that the Kimberley Process is a robust system that works most of the time.

“We want to give comfort to the consumer that the diamonds they have bought have come from legitimate sources and they can wear it with pride and with love,” he says. - BBCOnline.


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Devolution and its benefits for Zim

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27083-devolution-and-its-benefits-for-zim.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 19:51

AS the much-awaited constitutional outreach programme finally kicks-off, one thematic area that looks set to dominate the public hearings is that of systems of governance, particularly the decentralisation of administration and devolution of power from Harare to regions or provinces.

Virtually every party claims to support devolution. Strangely, the main parties, namely Zanu-PF, MDC, MDC-T and Zapu, seem to mean different things by “devolution of power”. This could be due to lack of understanding of what devolution really is, or the usual pretence and lack of sincerity by politicians.

It is clear Zanu PF and MDC-T’s version of devolution as enunciated by their officials and in press reports, is basically not devolution, but some sort of decentralisation or deconcentration of power. Zapu and MDC’s versions of devolution are in my view meaningful, comprehensive, clear and sincere.

The only commonality across the various party positions on systems of governance is that after 130 years of a unitary, centralised state, now is the time to decentralise.

Decentralisation is fundamentally an argument about governance. Decentralisation was sparked by close to 130 years of highly authoritarian rule and centralised governments, starting from the days of Cecil John Rhodes up to date. Generally, it is argued that centralised governments encourage centralised administrative structures which are major obstacles to people’s participation. These administrative structures retain control over decision-making, resource allocation, and the information and knowledge required if people are to play an effective part in development activities.

Similarly, the planning of development programmes and projects is often centralised and planning procedures discourage local involvement. Government planners are invariably a professional group who do not concede their practice to the local level. Most planning takes place in ministries in urban areas and there is rarely any genuine desire to devolve this responsibility effectively to the local level. According to Oakley, a development scholar, indeed it would be argued that in most Third World countries administrative structures are invariably centralised and, by definition, essentially anti-participatory.

It is clear from the ongoing debate that some powerful people in the inclusive government are hostile to the whole notion of reducing central control, devolving decisions to local level and supporting demands made by people for the kinds of radical changes that might be required. Evidence suggests that few governments have willingly devolved bureaucratic controls to the local level.

According to the Human Development Report (1993) decentralisation can take several forms; it might for example be horizontal or vertical. Horizontal decentralisation disperses power among institutions at the same level. For example a government’s spending decisions, rather than being concentrated in an all powerful Finance ministry, might be spread across different ministries.

Vertical decentralisation is more powerful. It allows some of the powers of government to be delegated downwards to low tiers of authority. This vertical decentralisation can itself take three forms. The first one is deconcentration: this is limited to passing down only administrative discretion to local offices of central government ministries. It involves the transfer of workload and selected administrative or decision-making authority and responsibility from the headquarters to lower field-level officials within central government ministries or public agencies.

“It involves the transfer of authority for specific decision-making, financial and management functions by administrative means to different levels under the same jurisdictional authority of the central government”.

Although it does result in some dispersal of power, few decisions can be taken without reference to the centre.

In the case of Zimbabwe, an example would be the Ministry of Home Affairs, which has de-centralised the issuance of birth and death certificates, passports, identity cards and marriage certificates to provinces and districts, or the issuance of vehicle licence discs at post offices and local authority offices. However, one may still have to go to Harare for some services. In any case, passports are still printed in Harare and the superiors in Harare have final say on any matter.

The other form of de-centralisation is delegation. This involves delegating some authority and decision-making powers to local officials, but central government retains the right to overturn local decisions and can at any time take these powers back. In our case, minister Ignatius Chombo has overturned countless resolutions made by elected councillors in virtually every other local authority. Delegation therefore is the transfer of government decision-making and administrative authority and/or responsibility for carefully spelt out tasks to institutions and organisations that are either under government’s indirect control or semi-independent. Most typically, delegation is by the central government to semi-autonomous organisations not wholly controlled by the government but legally accountable to it.

The third and most important form of decentralisation is devolution. This is the granting of decision-making powers to local authorities and allowing them to take full responsibility, without reference back to central government.

Through devolution, en-

tral government relinquishes certain functions or creates new units of government that are outside its direct control. Devolution in its purest form has certain fundamental characteristics:

=Local units of government are autonomous, independent and clearly perceived as separate levels of government over which central authorities exercise little or no direct control.

=Local governments ha-

ve clear and legally

recognised geographical boundaries within which they exercise authority and perform public functions.

=Local governments ha-ve corporate status and the power to secure resources to perform their functions.

=Devolution implies the need to “develop local governments as institutions” in the sense that they are perceived by local citizens as organisations providing services that satisfy their needs and as governmental units over which they have some influence.

Devolution is an arrangement in which there are reciprocal, mutually beneficial, and coordinate relationships between central and local governments.

Development scholars argue that decentralisation involves the transfer of authority and power to plan, make decisions and manage resources, from higher to lower levels of the organisational hierarchy, in order to facilitate efficient and effective service delivery. Decentralisation deals with the allocation between centre and periphery of power, authority, and responsibility for political, fiscal, and administrative systems. De-concentration progressively decreases central control and increases local discretion. Devolution is associated with more democratic governance and a means to enact and deepen democratic participation.

Democratic decentralisation may be promoted for a number of reasons; administrative, fiscal, political or others. The justification for the adoption of some form of decentralisation is to promote democratic governance and participatory approaches in development. Among the reasons often given is to bring government closer to people and enhance their participation and interaction with local government officers in the affairs of the locality.

The UNDP (1998) points out that decentralisation or decentralising governance should not be seen as an end in itself; it can be a means for creating more open, responsive, and effective local government and for enhancing representational systems of community-level decision making. By allowing local communities and regional entities to manage their own affairs, and through facilitating closer contact between central and local authorities, effective systems of local governance enable responses to people’s needs and priorities to be heard, thereby ensuring that government interventions meet a variety of social needs.

Having explained what decentralisation and devolution are, I go further to lay bare the form of devolution that Zapu wants. Our party basically wants the country to be divided into five provinces/regions, namely Mashonaland, Masvingo, Midlands, Manicaland and Matabeleland. Each province/region should have its own elected premier/governor and mini-government. The regional governments will have control over natural resources and environmental issues in their areas of jurisdiction. Each province should also have its own parliament/assembly, judiciary system, and revenue raising system.

Zapu believes five provinces as opposed to the current 10 would be viable. We wonder what benefit the division of Matabeleland into North, South and Bulawayo, and Mashonaland into East, West, Central and Harare has helped, except to create five more vacancies for governorship.

Under devolution, there would still be a central government to maintain territorial integrity and control crucial affairs such as defence, national security, foreign affairs, and international trade. Also, we would still sing the same national anthem, fly the same flag, have one head of state and commander-in-chief, one currency, and have one national sports team.

A National Executive Authority including the president, deputy president, Speaker of the House of Assembly, the prime minister and the elected provincial governors of the five provinces shall run the country.

The National Executive Authority will be the supreme decision making body of Zimbabwe. Its duties will be to advise the president on the meaning and implication of old and new legislation before he/she signs it into law; advise the president on all matters of national interest and concern; and advise the president on all senior national government appointments, including appointments of people to constitutionally entrenched institutions.

Opponents of devolution have mischievously misrepresented it as federalism or secession. South Africa, which adopted devolution, is undoubtedly the most prosperous and democratic African state. In fact, secessionist and tribalistic tendencies are stronger in unitary states with strong centralised systems like Zimbabwe.

=Methuseli Moyo is the spokesman for Zapu. He can be contacted at methumoyo@yahoo.co.uk .

By Methuseli Moyo


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Devolution could worsen regional disparities

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/local/27085-devolution-could-worsen-regional-disparities.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 19:51

CALLS for devolution in the constitution-making process have brought to the fore complaints from resource-rich regions which feel that central government is robbing them to develop preferred provinces.

The centralised government model has failed to develop all areas equitably, leading to uneven development which is evident as one travels in any direction from the capital city.

Uneven development has largely affected areas in the west of the country, especially the Matabeleland provinces, and this has prompted political parties, civil society and pressure groups from that area to advocate devolution in the new constitution.

They argue that political power and resource allocation decisions are controlled in the capital and there was very little that trickled down to the areas further away from Harare, especially in their direction.

Matabeleland has been sidelined from development and certain projects which could have eased specific problems have either been ignored or stalled. An example is the Matabeleland Zambezi Water Project, which was expected to ease water problems and boost agriculture in the otherwise dry area, but has been stalled for decades.

Matabeleland-based political parties, civic organisations and pressure groups argue that with devolution, authorities at a lower level would be granted statutory powers.

These authorities at a lower level would have powers to draw up budgets and allocate resources based on the need of each area. Zimbabwe’s experiment with decentralisation as a development model can be traced back to the establishment of the Provincial Governors and Administration Act.

Not much was achieved and 11 years later the then Local Government minister, John Nkomo, came up with the 16 principles on decentralisation as a way of dealing with regional development within the decentralised framework, which, like most of the country’s policies and policy statements, gathered dust in the corridors of power.

Analysts said calls for devolution were a clear sign that there has been uneven development in the country and some areas were now frustrated hence they would want to seize the constitutional moment to seek redress.

John Makumbe, a political science lecturer at the University of Zimbabwe, said devolution in the country could face problems because of the size of the country (measuring 380 590 square kilometres) but it was worth a try.

“The real reason why there is a call for devolution is that the experience of governance has seen the development of other provinces and the neglect of others,” said Makumbe. “This is a result of the bitter history of marginalisation of provinces. You can see that companies are relocating from Bulawayo to Harare and if you look at the capital city, you see very tall buildings but in other cities buildings have only one floor.”

Another analyst, Ibbo Mandaza, an academic and former top civil servant, concurred, saying calls for devolution had to do with “the nasty period in post-independent Zimbabwe, including Gukurahundi”.

During Gukurahundi an army brigade was deployed to the western parts of the country to contain dissidents but ended up killing civilians between 1982 and 1987.

“It also has something to do with the unresolved national question in Zimbabwe and it has to be addressed,” said Mandaza. “Today it is Matabeleland saying this and tomorrow it will be Masvingo or Manicaland. It is sad that the leadership has shown that it has failed to address the issue.”

Devolution, analysts added, could be a very strong instrument for enhancing and achieving sustainable development in all provinces unlike now when only the Mashonaland provinces appear to have benefited since Independence.

Morgan Jeranyama, programme manager at the Non State Actors Forum, said devolution would allow for empowered regional development if all the requisite factors, including human, material and financial resources, become available in the regions.

“We must stop just thinking of the benefits with respect to budgetary or financial resources only,” said Jeranyama. “The material, natural, financial and technological resources may be abundant but when the right human resource is not present, the expected benefits will not be realised.”

Jeranyama added that while it was true that a lot of development programmes failed to take effect because the regional plans have not received sufficient budgetary support from the centre, the whole issue required extreme caution as devolution in the absence of adequate resources would not change situations.

“Yes, devolution can be a strong instrument for enhancing and achieving sustainable development,” Jeranyama said. “I must warn though that if not properly managed, the model can result in greater regional imbalances and glaring inequalities. The results would therefore be quite opposite to what is intended.”

Mandaza echoed the same sentiments, saying if not handled carefully, devolution could “exacerbate the problem and lead to secessionism,” that is when regions break away from central government and establish autonomous states.

“But if it was going to be done along the lines of devolution in the United States then there would be no problem,” Mandaza said. “The real fear is the fragility of the state. African states are in the making and there is no nation state. This means that though the states may have authority, there is no consensus.”

State fragility emanates from the failure by many leaders in post-colonial Africa to build nations based on consensus as evidenced by uneven development and rule by coercion which prompts secessionist tendencies, as has been seen in Sudan where the southern parts want to disengage from the north.

Jeranyama added that there are regions that are richly endowed with natural resources and have the capacity to generate a lot of revenue which they can plough back and in the process achieve faster development and growth.

“The argument here is that these regions view collection of the revenue by the centralised system and the subsequent redistribution to other regions as an impediment to their own fast growth,” said Jeranyama. “They consider the centralised system as a short-changing one. These regions see great benefit from being allowed to raise and use those revenues without the central government interfering.”

While central government has a distributive function, the history of uneven development in Zimbabwe has seen regions richly endowed with resources underwriting the development of other areas.

Areas with mineral resources, for example Manicaland, have functioned as a source, with the processing and marketing of the minerals concentrated in the capital which then would create employment opportunities in the surrounding areas.

Leonard Makombe


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Fidelity in US$ 500 000 loss

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/business/27061-fidelity-in-us500-000-loss.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 19:24

ZSE-LISTED Fidelity Life Assurance (FLA) made a US$ 500 000 unrealised loss in the first five months of the year on the back of subdued trading conditions worsened by uncertainty surrounding empowerment regulations and tight liquidity. The unrealised loss resulted from the fall of the FLA share price.

FLA MD Simon Chapereka on Monday told businessdigest that the company made the unrealised loss between January and May after its share price tumbled owing to lacklustre trade on the market.

In February the company incurred a US$ 73 000 loss in investment income after citing low trade that resulted from controversy surrounding indigenisation regulations gazetted in January.

Investment income is capital derived from premiums which insurance companies invest on equities before paying out matured policies.

“We made an unrealised loss of about US$ 500 000 on the ZSE between January and May because of a fall in share prices,” said Chapereka on the sidelines of the company’s annual general meeting on Monday.

FLA shareholders approved a reduction in authorised share capital from the initial target after management cited “prohibitive” administration costs.

This decision means that an initial move to increase share capital from 100 million ordinary shares of a nominal value of US$ 0, 01 each to 500 million shares was dropped for a new plan that would double the authorised share capital for a reduced nominal value of US$ 0,001 per share.

The businessdigest understands that management sought shareholders’ approval after the registrar of companies charged US$ 327 000 in administration costs. But the revised authorised share capital would see the company being charged US$ 10 000.

“At the last Extra Ordinary General Meeting of the company, members approved an increase in the authorised share capital of the company from 100 million ordinary shares of a nominal value of US$ 0, 01 each to 500 million ordinary shares of a nominal value of US$ 0, 01 each. The cost of administering the shares has become prohibitive and as such the company will require shareholders’ resolve, with or without amendment,” said company secretary Nyaradzo Matindike before the annual general meeting.

“The balance of the authorised but unissued ordinary shares of the company, after the proposal, be placed under the control of the directors for an indefinite period, to be issued in compliance with the terms of the company’s Memorandum and Articles of association and the regulations of the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange, provided that no issue will be made which would effectively transfer the control of the company without prior approval of the shareholders in a general meeting.”

This development comes after FLA went on the market to raise US$ 1,7 million through a private placement to boost its underwriting capacity. The insurance industry is on a confidence building drive after years of hyperinflation eroded insurance policies. Initially, the company was seeking US$ 2,5 million but had to review the figure downwards due to liquidity challenges prevailing on the market.

Despite losses made on the ZSE, Chapereka said the company’s micro finance arm performed beyond expectations after it made US$ 1,7 million advances against a US$ 1 million target. He said lending was expected to hit the US$ 2 million mark by weekend. - Staff Writer.


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Coffee output plummets

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/business/27059-coffee-output-plummets.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 19:21

ZIMBABWE’S coffee production has hit a record low since Independence following the chaotic land reform exercise that reduced coffee growing estates to four from 120.

Statistics gathered after a high level coffee stakeholder conference held last week in Mutare show that organic coffee production mostly in Zimbabwe’s Eastern Highlands pl-unged to 300 tonnes in 2010 from a peak production of 15 000 tonnes in 1990 when farmers raked in US$ 37,5 million from sales.

Production has been in freefall for the past 10 years, signalling a threat to the livelihood of both commercial and communal farmers in Manicaland and some parts of Marondera.

Addressing the conference, outgoing European Commission (EC) head of delegation, ambassador Xavier Marchal said the coffee sector fell after newly resettled farmers replaced the coffee tree with the staple maize crop.

Coffee farmers need at least four years to harvest the cash-crop.

“Today the coffee sector is moribund, with 300 tonnes produced in 2010. A sheer embarrassment, particularly for thousands of communal farmers who want to improve their livelihoods and income, and become part of the prestigious world fraternity of growers of what is called the “black gold”, in partnership with commercial coffee farmers,” said Marchal.

“Unless there is immediate intervention with a sustainable business plan, Zimbabwe will no longer be able to produce fine Arabic Coffee. But with good immediate political will and serious technical foundations, it is not an impossible goal to reverse this trend.”

Arabic coffee was originally brought to the country by members of the Moodle Trek in the 1890s, making it a comparatively new crop to Zimbabwe. The crop nearly died out in the 1920s when disease destroyed most of the small plantations, resurging in 1958 and establishing itself in the 1960s.

The EC, according to Marchal, contributed US$ 9, 2 million towards the STABEX fund, a compensatory finance scheme to stabilise export earnings of the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries. The EC, however, suspended assistance to Zimbabwe in 2006 after it became apparent that beneficiaries of the controversial land reform exercise were felling the coffee tree to grow maize.

Coffee Growers Association chairman, Charles Taffs, this week told businessdigest that frequent farm disruptions and a breakdown in the rule of law were affecting coffee production.

“Most of the coffee growing estates were taken over during the land reform exercise. Until we restore our record on property rights, production will continue to be on the decline. We now have four estates from 120,” said Taffs who also doubles as Commercial Farmers Union vice president.

Ethiopia is the only African country in the top 10 of coffee producing countries led by Brazil and Colombia.

Bernard Mpofu


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Fraud on the increase

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/business/27057-fraud-on-the-increase.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 19:21

AT least 1 500 corporate crimes were reported through the Deloitte Tip-offs Anonymous facility in the first quarter of this year, indicating an increase in the prevalence of fraud.

Deloitte Tip offs Anonymous is an independently managed ethics and fraud hotline service offered by Deloitte risk advisory that allows an organisation’s stakeholders, particularly its employees, customers, suppliers as well as members of the public to use confidential and free channels of communication to report unethical activities occurring within an organisation.

Speaking at a workshop on managing the business risk of fraud through internal control systems, Deloitte regional manager (risk advisory) for Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi, Willie Majo expressed concern over the increasing number of fraud cases.

“Fraud, theft, embezzlement abuse and corruption have reached alarming levels in all sectors of the economy,” Majo said “The impact and risk of fraud is now much higher than before. Between January and March 2010 more than 1 500 reports have been made to the hotline,” he said.

He revealed that 25% of the reports were on theft, 22% on fraud and 15% on corruption. The retail sector, Majo said, accounted for 29% of the reports while the manufacturing sector made up 14% with the banking sector accounting for 8% of the reports.

Majo said the risk had greater impact since the adoption of multi-currencies last year because the currency’s value remained stable unlike in 2008 where the value of the Zimbabwe dollar was continuously eroded by inflation.

He said the major challenge they faced since they introduced the facility was resistance from some company executives who feared exposure through the facility.

Kudzai Kuwaza


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Parastatal performance poser for Moyo

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/business/27053-parastatal-performance-poser-for-moyo.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 19:12

MINISTER Gorden Moyo is the new patriarch appointed to shepherd state enterprises and parastatals. He is expected to hit the ground running. Alas, that ground is infested with booby traps.

Changing the fortunes of the perennial under performing of state owned enterprises (SoEs) is no Disneyland stuff, given the bone-deep nature of institutionalised profligacy and misgovernance. Is Moyo being asked to flog a dead horse (Q)

Failure to de-mine the booby traps will condemn the minister’s mission dead on departure.

From the get-go he has to budget for the spectre of turf wars. His ministry potentially creates two centres of power. Moyo has legal brick walls to contend with. Current laws mandate and empower the SoE line minister to appoint and disappoint board members and set their remuneration. Let us consider the Air Zimbabwe Corporation Act Chapter 13.02 to illustrate the poser. Part II 5(1) states that “The board shall consist of six members of whom the others shall be appointed by the minister after consultation and in accordance with any direction the president may give him”.

Will the state enterprises and parastatals minister have the guts to castrate the powers of the relevant line ministers and deftly deal with “any direction the president may give him” (Q)

As they say, no guts no glory. Some heavyweight punching is inevitable, for without influence on who gets into and out of the SoEs boards, the SoEs minister’s revival agenda will remain a pipe dream. Imminent pressure to shorten the channel between policy and delivery might force the minister to take the bull by its horns, pushing for amendments of acts governing SoEs and calling the employ of international governance benchmarks as a spring board. Pushing for such amendments will inevitably set the reformist minister on a collision course with line ministers and possibly the presidency itself.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a body comprising of “30 democracies” came up with the OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State Owned Enterprises, currently the widely accepted international benchmarks on governance of SoEs. The minister may turn to these guidelines in a bid to push a parastatal governance reform agenda. Most likely, reference will be made to Chapter II (The State Acting as Owner), particularly sections D and E.

Section D of Chapter II states that “The exercise of ownership rights should be clearly identified within the state administration. This may be facilitated by setting up a coordinating entity or, more appropriately, by the centralisation of the ownership function”. Section E of Chapter II states that “The co-coordinating or ownership entity should be accountable to representative bodies such as the parliament and have clearly defined relationships with relevant public bodies, including the state supreme audit institutions”.

In my opinion, Moyo should push for a Bill enabling the formation of a central SoE authority and the adoption of an SoE governance code crafted along the lines of the OECD guidelines, niftily steering final arbitration towards parliament. Taking the route of amending specific acts governing each parastatal will more than likely give rise to legislative and procedural logjams. Moyo could also, nimbly enter into alliance with his finance counterpart to push for parastatals’ submission of comprehensive remuneration schedules as part of statutory obligations.

Should the minister succeed in getting over foreseeable legislative hurdles and selling the governance reform proposals, space will be created to modernise our archaic and inadequate SoE governance guidelines. At present, the SoE line minister is both the nominations and remuneration committee. Statutes in force are silent on the issue of board committees. Modern governance practices specifically provide for the setting up of specialist board committees. From an HR standpoint, the key to ensuring good performance is conducting rigorous and professional selection, induction and rewarding of best talent. At board level a similar approach is inescapable. With dearth of strategic talent, Moyo might have to turn to children of the diaspora to improve the depth and width of the pool of candidates from which to populate the boards of over 70 SoEs. However, for now, the law does not allow non-residents to serve on boards of SoEs. Hopefully, any statutory reforms will be alive to this legal hurdle.

Moreover, no formalised procedures for evaluating the performance of board members of SoEs are provided for in the current SoE acts. Performance evaluation is very critical. Utterances from a recently “red-carded” minister, claiming that no agreed targets existed, provide an object lesson. From an HR perspective, the utterances are very disingenuous and serve to justify the minister’s dismissal. If the minister were the captain of the Ghanaian soccer team, he would be happy to play the entire 90 minutes without knowing which goal his team was attacking! This is playing to the gallery. Likewise, SoE boards that play to the gallery must be axed. Steve Covey gives the pillars of a good performance management system namely: desired results, guidelines, resources, accountability and consequences. Bemoaning lack of resources yet you’re not sure of desired results is self-condemnation.

Moyo’s predecessor’s report card is uninspiring, chiefly because he took a management approach to weighty matters. Managers serve to maintain systems designed by others. His mourner-in-chief tag, earned through habitual lamenting non-cooperation from line ministries, suggests he could have been punching above his weight. His 11 somewhat-over-70-something salary schedule gathering success rate bolsters this view. The SoE ministry needs an architect and not a maintenance manager.

Operation Bagration, a military offensive masterminded by Russian generals, deftly executed in the summer of 1944, was a major turning point in World War II. Hitler’s armies were occupying almost all of Eastern Europe, en route to Russia. In the face of an imminent German onslaught, one Russian general came up with a daring plan that defied military logic. According to the cunning plan, Russian armies and armoured tanks would secretly approach through Belyorussia via an expansive swamp! That involved Russian armies felling logs to pile over the swamp creating several highways of skillfully layered logs. Special mat-like shoes for walking through swamps were made, after learning the technology from natives living around the area.

Though Hitler’s intelligence picked information about an impending attack, his army generals gave all possible positions and directions, from which the Russians could approach, except the swamps. The Russians succeeded in moving over tanks and men, springing a summer surprise on the Germans, routing Hitler’s armies in the blitz. That summer campaign repulsed the Germans from Eastern Europe, culminating with the recapture of Poland, a key milestone, in the liberation of Europe from Hitler’s then tightening octopus grip.

I read a sarcastic piece from leadership expert John Maxwell titled Ten strategies for flogging a dead horse. Suggested strategies include conferences to discuss how to make a dead horse go faster and pretending the dead horse was not really dead. That the horse is dead or not is for the minister to ascertain.

Moyo needs Operation Bagration thinking to move through parastastal swamps.

In our African heritage it is said orphans should take heed when parents counsel their children. Here is hoping ‘orphans’ are listening.

=Has the Minister been called to flog a dead horse (Q)

Feedback to brettchulu@consultant.com .


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Zim mineral wealth no match for debt

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/business/27051-zim-mineral-wealth-no-match-for-debt.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 19:08

ZIMBABWE’S mining wealth will not provide sufficient resources to settle the country’s external debt even if the government mortgaged its future fiscal revenues from the sector, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said.

The IMF, in a comprehensive commissioned report titled Zimbabwe: Challenges and Policy Options after Hyper Inflation, said the country should focus on sound policies and debt relief if it were to achieve growth sustainability.

The government has maintained that the sale of diamonds would change the fortunes of the country but the latest report commissioned by the IMF and based on various models discounts this claim and encourages better policies instead.

Zimbabwe has stockpiled over four million carats of diamonds worth about US$ 1,7 billion.

Zimbabwe’s external debt is US$ 4,6 billion which is 104% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), a level which is considered unsustainable.

“More importantly, the government would not be able to generate significant primary non-mineral surpluses to ensure its inter-temporal solvency in the foreseeable future,” said the international financial institution in the report released last week.

“Going forward, a strategy focusing on sound policies and debt relief would help achieve external and growth sustainability in at least three ways.”

Zimbabwe needs sound policies to support macroeconomic sustainability and economic growth and assist the country “establish the track record needed for debt relief from official creditors”.

The IMF said debt relief would immediately increase Zimbabwe’s net wealth by reducing its debt obligations and increasing the value of mining wealth through a reduction in country risk.

Should this happen, then government would have access to fresh financing at lower costs, a development that would create room for much-needed public investment. The move would also facilitate growth in both mining and non-mining sectors.

Even the much hyped diamonds would not do much as the extraction of the mineral is still subject to certification and international price movements.

Diamond mining, like any other business venture in Zimbabwe at the moment, is also very expensive as operational costs are still very high, driven largely by the price of utilities.

It is estimated that Zimbabwe would produce as much as 1,1 million carats of diamonds this year and would fetch an average US$ 100 per carat.

Diamond production would more than double in two years’ time to around 2,4 million carats, the IMF added.

Diamond extraction costs vary widely depending on the type of mining and the Zimbabwe Chamber of Mines estimates that for a rich alluvial deposit, the cost per carat varies between US$ 3 and US$ 10 while for a kimberlitic deposit the costs could be as high as US$ 50 to US$ 70 per carat.

“Because a large share of Zimbabwe’s diamond deposits is of the alluvial type, we assume extraction costs of US$ 10 per carat under the optimistic scenario,” said the IMF. “Under a 17% discount rate, we estimate the gross present value (GPV) of mineral resource export receipts, including diamond proceeds, at US$ 9, 2 billion under an optimistic scenario and US$ 3 billion under the more conservative staff scenario.”

Apart from diamonds, gold and platinum are the other minerals with a potential to earn the country significant revenue streams, but they are also weighed down by high extraction costs.

The Zimbabwe Chamber of Mines estimates that the extraction costs for the two metals would be around US$ 502 per ounce if economies of scale were realised.

Per ounce costs would decline after significant increases in production but at the current low production levels, the costs of production in both gold and platinum are significantly higher: US$ 800 per ounce for gold and US$ 1 000 per ounce for platinum.

Leonard Makombe


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Tobacco rebound could go up in smoke

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/business/27045-tobacco-rebound-could-go-up-in-smoke.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 18:59

POOR prices, shortage of wrapping paper and high input costs threaten the rebound of tobacco production next season, farmers have said. Farmers are holding on to their tobacco, anticipating an increase in prices as a kilogramme was fetching an average US$ 0, 90 throughout June.

Acting chief executive officer of the Tobacco Association of Zimbabwe, Wilfred Nhemwa, said poor finance was also hampering preparations for the next season.

“Farmers are now forced to sell their crop at very low prices as they prepare for the next season,” said Nhemwa. “We are hoping to see a change in the prices (both this season and next season). The inputs are still very high as a bag of Compound D costs between US$ 30 and US$ 35 while Ammonium Nitrate is between US$ 25 and US$ 30.”

Nhemwa said the prices were out of reach for most of the farmers and it does not compare very well with the prevailing cost in Malawi, for example, where a bag sells for US$ 7.

Government has also tried to rebound the crop by providing subsidised fertiliser through the Grain Marketing Board (GMB), which farmers said is not readily available.

Lovegot Tendengu, executive director of the Farmers Development Trust (FDT) said inputs, unlike in the previous seasons, were available at a reasonable cost and insisted that anyone could get fertiliser and other inputs from the GMB.

“The Grain Marketing Board (GMB) is offering fertiliser at US$ 15 per 50kg bag,” said Tendengu. “This is a significant reduction on the US$ 38 charged per bag last year. We should appreciate that fertiliser cost US$ 91 two seasons ago and stop complaining.”

Nhemwa said farmers would not have complained of poor prices if cheaper inputs had been made available.

“There has to be a balance (between the floor prices and input costs) if the production of the crop is to rebound,” added Nhemwa.

Farmers have also faced serious shortage of wrapping paper, leading to cases where growers would fail to deliver the crop to the auction floors.

At least 77 million kgs of tobacco are expected to go through the auction floors this season after the Tobacco Industry and Marketing Board (TIMB) revised output upwards from the projected 65 million kgs.

At 77 million kgs, Zimbabwe has increased production on the 56 million kgs sold last season, setting the foundation for a possible rebound but farmers said there could be stagnation as a result of the problems faced this season.

Tobacco accounts for more than 50 % of agriculture exports in the country, translating to 30% of total exports. Tobacco also makes up 10% of the country’s gross domestic product.

Based on the 2001 tax rate, the crop, if grown on large scale farms which accounts for the bulk of the crop produced, tobacco generates an estimated US$ 132 in government revenue for every hectare that is put under the golden leaf.

The large scale commercial farms produce an average of 2 500 kgs of tobacco per hectare put under the crop.

Leonard Makombe


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Zim’s economic recovery stalls

>

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/business/27041-zims-economic-recovery-stalls.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 18:40

ZIMBABWE’S economic recovery has stagnated and needs major policy measures to move the country forward, the president of the Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries (CZI), Joseph Kanyekanye has said.

Capacity utilisation increased from an average 10% in 2008 to an average 32, 3% last year but it has stagnated between 20% and 40%, Kanyekanye said.

He said while there was an element of stabilisation, following the adoption of multiple currencies last year, there was a threat of stagnation or even a reversal of the gains realised so far “if some significant growth enablers such as power are not addressed urgently”.

“Day to day operations of business have largely stabilised and some few businesses are reporting improved capacity utilisation especially those who are dynamic or have foreign investors,” said Kanyekanye. “The major constraint is the absence of money to fund both recurrent and capital expenditure. The few lines of credit available are expensive to sufficiently address this problem.”

As such, Zimbabwe has to realign policies and posture to deal with a crippling national debt and perceived risk profile in order to attract funding and foreign direct investment.

“We should realise that until the reported returns from our Marange diamonds can be channeled to economic recovery, we will need foreign funding for our economic recovery,” said Kanyekanye. “A lot of service oriented companies have no business, but their rates are too high. Quasi-government institutions responsible for these utilities ought to be realigned to render service at acceptable rates to customers.”

These quasi-governmental institutions have to go through a painful adjustment in their internal systems and this includes the unsustainable wage and salary bills which can cause an unintended inflation spiral.

He added that industry had made submissions requesting additional power for at least 18 hours during weekdays as a way of boosting production. Some industries went for as much as three days without electricity, added the CZI chief.

Kanyekanye said they had participated in the formulation of the Mid-Term Fiscal Policy review and their thesis was that it should be premised on mobilisation of internal resources than relying on external funding as the country was let down last year.

The Short-Term Emergence Recovery Programme, the first economic policy document last year, had anticipated a lot of donor support which never materialised, leaving the country in a deficit.

Kanyekanye, however, said policy makers should not adopt policies which would upset the current

route to recovery, citing the case of Indigenisation and Economic Regulations which “brought confusion in the country.”

“This (Indigenisation Regulation) did a lot of harm to monies which were coming into the country via the stock exchange,” said Kanyekanye. “This has dried up and is cause for concern."

He said industry wants the empowerment policy implemented in a manner that is friendly to business and that does not cause alarm.

Industry, Kanyekanye said, was not against broad-based black economic empowerment but the manner in which it was done.

“Suffice it to say that industry is not the enemy of government but rather we complement each other and above everything else we want this country to succeed,” he added . “We hope and trust that the authorities will take our considered advice to work policies in the context of government clusters and ensure henceforth that any policy initiatives must be cluster consistent within government itself and perhaps incorporate views from industry.”

CZI said they had always had an eager ear from the Finance Ministry and their recommendations had been included in major policy documents after the inauguration of the Government of National Unity.

“Consultations between government and business should ideally be used to bridge differences rather than to consolidate them in the odd situation where they do occur,” said the CZI president.

Kanyekanye added that most companies needed to be recapitalized, a challenge given the prevailing liquidity crunch.

Leonard Makombe


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Import ban spurs chicken shortage

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/business/27043-import-ban-spurs-chicken-shortage.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 18:56

THE Zimbabwe Poultry Association has said production of day-old chicks is expected to increase in the coming weeks. This comes after a ban on imported chickens increased demand for chicks.

Poultry farmers lobbied government to impose a ban on imported meat claiming that the meat was produced from genetically modified methods, currently outlawed in this country.

Government in April responded to the calls by introducing a three-month protectionist policy barring imported chickens.

ZPA chairman Solomon Zawe this week said the policy was good for the local industry which until the ban was facing serious competition from relatively cheaper imports mainly from South Africa and Brazil.

Imported chickens cost as low as US$ 5 for a 2kg bird while local producers demand as much as US$ 7 for the same bird.

“Shortages are in the short term and resulted from a high demand that came after the ban. We, however, expect more than 600 000 day old chicks in the coming week or two. This ban gave us confidence although some of our members were not fully geared to meet the high demand at the time of the ban. We now have the capacity and our abattoirs are producing an average of 40 000 birds per week,” Zawe said.

He blamed some retailers for putting “unrealistic mark-ups” saying the average producer price for a chicken per kilogramme is between US$ 2, 16 and US$ 3.

Zawe added that some producers are improving capacity following a scaling down of operations during the hyperinflationary period of 2008 when stock feed supplies were erratic.

On the contrary, a group identified as Concerned Chicken Producers have pressed the panic button, saying Zimbabwe could be on the brink of a protein deficit. The group also says the ban on imports would result in high cost of locally-bred birds.

“Animal protein availability in Zimbabwe is now approaching crucially low volumes,” the group said. “Not only have retail prices risen in the absence of competition, but chicken meat is becoming short and, as expected, a small illicit market in imports has sprung up. Despite an apparent seasonal decline in off take, Zimbabwe’s chicken producers are now far off the mark in servicing demand. Estimates out of the industry would suggest production levels are currently averaging 1,900 tonnes per month versus consumer demand of near 3,500 tonnes per month in the formal market.”

“If the GMO card is played across the spectrum of all foods and it was possible to police this, the reality is that Zimbabwe’s supermarket shelves would be empty once more,” it said. - Staff Writer.


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Comment - Paying the price for disastrous populism

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/comment/27105-comment-paying-the-price-for-disastrous-populism.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:19

THE election of Julia Gillard as the new prime minister of Australia last week might have gone unnoticed by many Zimbabweans, most of whom are yet to appreciate the lessons to be drawn from the manner in which she came to power.

Gillard replaced Australian Labor Party leader Kevin Rudd who was swept to office in 2007 on a wave of popular support but then lost it all by seeking to impose a 40% super-profits tax to be levied on mining conglomerates such as BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Andrew Forrest.

Rudd had miscalculated by assuming that average voters would see the tax as hitting only the bottom line of billionaire miners rather than the broader Australian economy. The public saw it as damaging populism.

The fall of Rudd should be a lesson to President Robert Mugabe and his cronies who are crafting laws to loot companies under the guise of indigenisation.

The ill-conceived self-enriching measure comes after the disastrous results of the land reform programme that saw the national economy contract by as much as 40%, inflation vaulting to over 231 000 000%, per capita GDP dropping by 40%, agricultural output falling by 51% and industrial production by 47%. Direct foreign investment all but evaporated.

Mugabe clearly refuses to learn from his own mistakes which he touts as a victory for the people of Zimbabwe. He continues to forge ahead with disastrous policies that can only hurt Zimbabweans more.

Australians hold their leaders to account when they promise to “soak the rich” in a way that smacks of crude demagoguery and manifestly fails to serve the country’s interests. We should do the same.

Indigenisation is proving a disaster as investors head for the exits while ministers pretend that companies are conforming with the new regulations. But Mugabe and his gang are blind to the danger of killing the goose that lays the golden egg.

Only this week we read in the state media that Presidential Affairs minister Didymus Mutasa made a brazen threat against New Dawn Mining Corporation after it bought an 89% stake in a Zimbabwean mine, contending that the transaction had strategic implications of major national interest. In the process, Mutasa threatened all manner of probes against the investors.

Mutasa is quoted as saying: “It is manifestly wrong and indefensible for foreigners to play casino with Zimbabwean assets in this way, whichever way one chooses to look at this transaction, be it political, legal, economic or social.”

Mutasa behaves as if he is not part of a government that has spent more than US$ 30 million on foreign trips trying to lure investors to Zimbabwe. In fact, the claim that foreigners are playing casino with local resources are misdirected because it is the likes of Mutasa and his principals who are playing casino with the lives of Zimbabweans. It is obvious that Zimbabwe needs whatever morsel of investment that comes its way. After all, investors have an array of choices when it comes to committing their resources and at this rate it is unlikely that Zimbabwe will be one of them.

Already Mutasa and his cronies have proved their adeptness at the casino with the country’s diamonds as the Finance ministry has confirmed what everybody suspected, that the diamonds were benefiting only a few well-connected individuals.

We draw comfort from the fact that we are not the only sane voice out there. The Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries shares our view that business is not the enemy of government. CZI boss, Joseph Kanyekanye is quoted elsewhere in this paper as saying; “This (Indigenisation Regulation) did a lot of harm to monies which were coming into the country via the stock exchange. This has dried up and is cause for concern.”

Kanyekanye added: “Suffice it to say that industry is not the enemy of government but rather we complement each other and above everything else we want this country to succeed.”

President Mugabe, like Rudd, is miscalculating by assuming that average voters would see his policies as hitting only the bottom line of business rather than the broader Zimbabwean economy. The public will see it as damaging populism.


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Editor's Memo - EU mission impossible!

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/comment/27103-editors-memo-eu-mission-impossible.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:17

THE Zimbabwe-European Union (EU) re-engagement meeting is on in Brussels today with little hope that the union will lift sanctions against the Harare regime given its failure to address its democratic deficits. Energy minister Elton Mangoma is leading a three-member delegation made up of Justice minister Patrick Chinamasa and International Cooperation minister Priscilla Misihairabwi-Mushonga on a mission impossible.

Mangoma’s task to convince the EU to lift all forms of sanctions and measures in line with the September 2008 global political agreement (GPA) is a mammoth one because the inclusive government has failed to meet benchmarks set by the bloc. Moreover, it is failing to fully consummate the GPA.

Mangoma, Chinamasa and Misihairabwi-Mushonga’s mandate is to convince the EU to lift sanctions

against a backcloth of the appointment of constitutional commissions and the licensing of new newspapers. They would argue that these developments exhibit Zimbabwe’s commitment to deliver democracy, albeit at a glacial pace.

The sanctions were imposed on Zimbabwe after it flagrantly violated provisions of the Cotonou Agreement to uphold respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms based on the rule of law and transparent and accountable governance in line with other obligations under international human rights treaties.

For the sanctions to be lifted the EU set various benchmarks we were supposed to meet, among them the full implementation of the GPA - a product of our own negotiations that gave birth to the inclusive government in February 2009.

That we have failed to consummate the GPA demonstrates the lack of seriousness of our leaders and their quest to cling tenaciously to positions that do not move the country forward. In fact they threaten to plunge us into civil strife.

Unless there is the will to address our democratic deficits, it will be foolhardy for anyone to yearn for the EU, Australia and the United States to lift the embargoes.

Reports of political intimidation and violence during the current constitution-making outreach programme are of great concern to the EU and other progressive organisations such as the Commonwealth. Why are we failing as a nation to put an end to all forms of political intimidation, including farm seizures, and ensuring prosecution of perpetrators (Q)

Some politicians see short-term gains from these heinous acts at the expense of the country.

We need to robustly address our democratic and human rights deficits if the sanctions are to go. One way of doing that, and which will cost us nothing, is the abrogation of provisions of the Public Order and Security Act relating to the conduct of political activities such as public meetings and demonstrations, which is limiting the freedom of association and which is used as an instrument of political repression. Sadc’s Mauritius terms for elections which underline public participation are also violated by Posa.

While government has through the Zimbabwe Media Commission licensed new newspapers, little has been done to free the mass media. Airwaves remain the preserve of the publicly-owned but state-controlled ZBC with no indication as to when private broadcasters would become operational.

If sanctions are to go government should abrogate the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act and Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act to ensure freedom of expression. There is also need to withdraw charges against journalists in the country and guarantee those in exile a safe return.

These are government sanctions against the media that could be immediately lifted if the political will was there.

Other benchmarks to be met include the immediate implementation of all court rulings, ensuring an independent audit of the land reform, and enforcement of all bilateral agreements on the promotion and protection of investments.

The Fishmongers Group, made up mainly of EU member states, which met in Oslo on June 1 was unequivocal on what benchmarks Zimbabwe should meet before sanctions can be lifted and balance-of-payments support and lines of credit extended to it.

From this it can be seen the ball is in our court to have the sanctions lifted. Otherwise, Mangoma’s mission will be stillborn.

By Constantine Chimakure


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Candid Comment - Muzzling the press will boomerang on Copac

2010 07 02 -

The Zimbabwe Independent

2010 07 02

 

http://www.theindependent.co.zw/comment/27101-candid-comment-muzzling-the-press-will-boomerang-on-copac.html

 

Thursday, 01 July 2010 20:12

THE Constitutional Parliamentary Committee (Copac)’s order barring journalists from reporting on official proceedings of the outreach programme threatens to return Zimbabwe to the dark days of muzzling the media.

Copac’s fears that news reports on official proceedings would influence the content of the planned new constitution ring hollow. The outreach programme is one of the most critical processes in the constitution- making project. Public views gathered from this process are expected to form the core content of this country’s new governance charter. Conducting such an important process under the cover of darkness would be criminal and further dents Zimbabweans’ waning trust in Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and President Robert Mugabe’s union.

Why Copac would want to keep views expressed by the public under wraps fuels suspicion that some underhand political dealings are at play. And this government’s record of abandoning legitimate processes for under-the-table dealings makes it all the more frightening. The inclusion in the Zimbabwe Media Commission of people who failed parliamentary select committee interviews held in the presence of journalists is instructive.

Already several journalists have been barred from covering some of the outreach meetings which spells doom for fair and factual coverage of the outreach process. Without official access to information, journalists will resort to sourcing stories from politicians, most of whom are obviously biased. The results could be disastrous.

The constitution-making process, a key project in laying the foundation for stabilising the country’s polarised population, is worryingly a complete mess. Banning journalists from reporting on this shambolic exercise only compounds the problem.

The violence, intimidation and imposition of views recorded during the first two weeks of this critical process have not come as a surprise to many. The media and civil society had forecast this situation.

It was only too predictable, especially following the dismal failure of the chair-warming national healing organ to drive a meaningful programme to heal the wounds inflicted on the population as a result of decades of state-sponsored violence.

Much of the chaos affecting the outreach programme could have been avoided if Copac had taken the media and civil society’s warnings more seriously. But then these politicians don’t learn.

Muzzling the press will not change the reality that this process has been hijacked for political expediency and that horse-trading between Zanu PF and the two MDC factions is inevitable. Zimbabwean journalists have for the past decade been working in one of the world’s most difficult and dangerous environments, characterised by violence, intimidation and arrests and exclusion from official events.

The coalition government or at least its formation had filtered hope that the

media environment would change. Copac’s blackout dims this hope, and renews fears that Zimbabwean authorities prefer to keep the population in the dark. Copac joint chairman Paul Munyaradzi Mangwana, as a former Information minister, should know better than to stop journalists from covering events. That is their job.

Partners in this failing coalition government tried something similar when they were negotiating the power-sharing arrangement. The result was unbalanced, uninformed and distorted reporting that did not help Zimbabweans one bit.

By Farai Mutsaka


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Rio Tinto says no significant loss from Zimbabwe diamond ban

2010 07 02 -

http://www.miningweekly.com/article/rio-says-no-significant-loss-from-zimbabwe-diamond-ban-2010-07-01

DIAMONDS

By: Reuters

1st July 2010

JOHANNESBURG

Global miner Rio Tinto said on Thursday it had not suffered significant loss from Zimbabwe's ban on diamond exports and the interruptions to shipments from the country were limited.

Zimbabwe banned all diamond exports on May 28 until stones from the government's controversial Marange fields were certified by industry regulators.

"The ban has caused limited interruption to shipments," a Rio spokesman told Reuters by email in response to questions. "There has been an impact (on finances) but it is not significant for Rio Tinto," he said.

"Rio Tinto is in discussions with the government of Zimbabwe and is hopeful of resolving the ban shortly."

Rio Tinto owns 78% in Murowa mine, which produced 124 000 ct last year.

Murowa, together with privately owned River Ranch, are both certified to export diamonds by the Kimberley Process (KP) certification scheme, an international initiative to ensure trade in diamonds does not fund violence.

Zimbabwe is in a dispute with the KP over the Marange diamonds but this week said it would soon start exports of the stones after regulators from 70 countries failed last week to agree to suspend trade in diamonds from Zimbabwe.

Rights activists allege serious abuses by security forces deployed by the Zimbabwean government to stop illegal diamond digging after up to 30 000 panners descended on the poorly secured Marange fields in 2006.

Early this year, Zimbabwe's unity government spooked investors when it published rules that force foreign-owned companies to sell at least 51% shares to locals.

A government minister recently said the rules had been revised to encourage investment.

"We are encouraged by the approach of the new government but seek greater clarity around the investment environment before investment decisions can be considered," the Rio Tinto spokesman said.

Edited by: Reuters


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Zim gay activist denies charges

2010 07 02 -

http://www.news24.com/Africa/Zimbabwe/Zim-gay-activist-denies-charges-20100701

2010-07-02 08:15

Harare

A Zimbabwean gay rights activist on Thursday pleaded not guilty to breaching censorship laws when he appeared before a magistrate's court accused of possessing pornography.

Ignatius Muhambi, an accountant for Gays and Lesbians of Zimbabwe, and office administrator Ellen Chademana were arrested in a police raid at the association's offices in May.

Both are free on bail, and Muhambi formally entered a plea of "not guilty" in court on Thursday.

Prosecutor Memory Mugabe said police found pornographic material during the raid on the office.

"A search was done in the office and one pornographic DVD and pornographic booklet was recovered from the office being used by the accused," Mugabe told the court.

Mugabe said both contained graphic images of men having sex.

At the time of their arrest, the two also had been accused of insulting President Robert Mugabe, but that charge was not read out in court.

Homosexuality is illegal in Zimbabwe, although GALZ is allowed to operate.

President Mugabe, no relation to the prosecutor, has railed against the gay community for more than a decade, once calling gays "worse than pigs and dogs".

In March, he said efforts to include gay rights in a new constitution were "madness".

Neighbouring South Africa is the only nation on the continent that gives equal rights to gays.

Mhambi's trial resumes on Monday while Chademana's case will begin on Wednesday.

- AFP


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

2 000 apply for asylum daily (RSA)

2010 07 02 -

http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/2-000-apply-for-asylum-daily-20100701

2010-07-02 08:07

PRETORIA

Over 2 000 foreign immigrants apply for refugee status or asylum across the country each day, Deputy Home Affairs Minister Malusi Gigaba said on Thursday.

Briefing the media in Pretoria, he however said he was not aware of any asylum seekers specifically from the 32 countries taking part in the World Cup.

There were seven home affairs offices across the country, but the department was looking at introducing refugee facilities at borders so immigrants would not have to travel to city centres.

SA the country of choice

According to a United Nations report, South Africa was the country of choice for refugees, specifically those from Botswana, Mozambique, Zambia and Tanzania.

"Police officers deal with large numbers of people, many of which are economic migrants," he said, adding that because of low or mid-level skills the asylum-seekers were unable to get employment in their own countries.

There were about 1 000 applications daily at the Musina border post, "hundreds" in Johannesburg, up to 800 in Pretoria and "large numbers" in Cape Town. In Port Elizabeth and Durban however applications were negligible.

The other office in Marabastad, Pretoria was frequented mainly by Zimbabweans seeking asylum.

In addition to its seven offices the department was looking at opening a new one in Bloemfontein and an additional one in the Western Cape.

- SAPA


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

"Selling diamonds never discussed in Cabinet, Obert Mpofu out of control"- MDC

2010 07 01 -

http://www.thezimbabwemail.com/zimbabwe/5537.html

01 July, 2010 11:35:00

 

Obert "Chiadzwa" Mpofu - "The issue of selling the diamonds was never discussed in Cabinet," said MDC Minister.

 

Related news

The blood diamond is making a comeback

Old Mutual to disinvest in bloody diamond company

Zimbabwe's amended mining bill ready - minister

Africa reels as global crisis hits mines

Zimbabwe mining: Mugabe (really) wants the money

 

JOHANNESBURG

A statement by Zimbabwe's mining minister, Obert "Chiadzwa" Mpofu, that the Cabinet had approved the sale of diamonds from the controversial Marange fields has been dismissed by another minister as "lies" and accused the Mines Minister of getting out of control

"It was clear from the meeting that Cabinet agrees with the immediate sale of our diamonds," Mpofu told The Herald daily newspaper in an interview. He had just returned from a gathering of the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS)

an international initiative designed to stem the flow of conflict diamonds - in Tel Aviv, Israel.

A cabinet minister and member of Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), who declined to be identified as protocol prevented him from discussing cabinet meetings with the media, told IRIN: "The issue of selling the diamonds was never discussed in Cabinet."

The MDC formed a unity government with President Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF in 2009 after violent elections that saw ZANU-PF lose its majority in parliament for the first time since independence from Britain in 1980.

The MDC minister commented: "He [Mpofu] has taken to misleading Zimbabweans and the world on the diamond issues. First, he lied that the recent meeting in Israel had resolved that Zimbabwe could sell its diamonds, when no such decision had been reached. Now, he is telling the world that the Cabinet has resolved to sell the diamonds, when no such decision has been taken."

The KPCS meeting in Tel Aviv was dominated by the issue of Zimbabwe, but failed to find any resolution to the sale of diamonds from Marange, which has been the scene of alleged human rights abuses, including the military using adults and children as forced labourers. In 2008 hundreds of "illegal" miners were reportedly killed and many others beaten and raped in an operation to clear the 66,000 hectare area of diggers.

The KPCS, formed in 2002, meets twice a year, bringing together governments, the diamond industry and NGOs to police the trade in "blood diamonds". Its 49 members represent 75 countries, covering about 99.8 percent of global production.

The World Federation of Diamond Bourses (WFDB) said in a statement after the Tel Aviv meeting that "diamonds originating from Marange should not be purchased until approved by the Kimberley Process Working Group on Monitoring. As no approval has yet been given, any member found doing so will be subject to WFDB disciplinary procedures."

The World diamond Council will hold an unprecedented mini-summit at its July 2010 annual meeting in St Petersburg, Russia, to try to break the impasse over Zimbabwe.

Andy Bone, director of international relations at the De Beers diamond company, told IRIN that should Zimbabwe go ahead and sell Marange diamonds, it would have "very serious consequences for the KP and Zimbabwe", and urged all sides to continue engaging in dialogue, "which is vitally important to millions of people around the world [in the diamond industry]."

The Marange diamond fields are said to be some of the richest finds in a century; Zimbabwe has reputedly amassed a stockpile of four million carats of diamonds worth about US$ 1.7 billion, which they have been unable to sell on the international market because of the KPCS ban.

Annie Dunnebacke, a campaigner for Global Witness, a UK-based NGO that was among the prime movers in the creation of the KPCS, and now monitors international trade in conflict diamonds, told IRIN that the Zimbabwe question had led to civil society "constantly assessing [the KPCS] ... And if we step away, it's pretty much the end of it [the KPCS]."

"The fact that Zimbabwe did not walk away from the KP, and that Mpofu sat in a room [in Tel Aviv] in discussions for more than 10 hours until six in the morning seems to suggest Zimbabwe has a lot to lose as well," she said.


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

"I used Makoni to stop Tsvangirai become President" - Dabengwa

2010 07 01 -

http://www.thezimbabwemail.com/zimbabwe/5536.html

01 July, 2010 10:01:00

By Methuseli Moyo

“We used Makoni to stop both the old man and Tsvangirai; whose track record we did not feel would make him a good president.

INTERIM ZAPU leader who was Robert Mugabe's Home Affairs Minister during farm invasions Dumiso Dabengwa says losing 2008 independent presidential candidate, Dr Simba Makoni was “a braai stick” he used to stop both Mugabe and Morgan Tsvangirai from winning a majority to change the course of events.

Dabengwa made the remarks while addressing ZAPU branch executive representatives at Gwamayaya communal lands in Nkayi North in Matabeleland North province on Wednesday, June 29. Gwamayaya is 250kms north of Bulawayo. The event was attended by ZAPU Council of Elders, ZAWU and ZAPU Youth Front members from six wards.

Dabengwa said after failing to convince Mugabe to step down for a younger leader in Zanu-PF, and the failure by Tsvangirai to accommodate the other faction of the MDC, he was convinced that a one-on-one election between the two would have more disastrous consequences for the country, no matter who won.

Simba Makoni....A mere braai stick

“We used Makoni to stop both the old man and Tsvangirai; whose track record we did not feel would make him a good president. UMakoni wayeludlawu lokos’inyama. Nxa usuqedile ukosa inyama uyalulahla udlawu uzidlele inyama yakho (Makoni was a braai stick. You put away the braai stick when you have finished roasting and then enjoy your meat,” said the former Zipra intelligence supremo to cheers from the branch executives.

Dabengwa said it was apparent that Tsvangirai would be like Mugabe after winning, “in his attitude and actions” because he wanted MDC-T to dominate, even to the extent of failing to accommodate the other faction of the MDC.

He added that his hope was that the then mediator to the Zimbabwe crisis, former president Mbeki of South Africa would broaden the talks to include civil society, churches, all parties and war veterans after the elections for a more sustainable solution, but he did not. “He (Mbeki) continued to confine the talks to the three parties. That was a mistake. That is why there is no progress in the Inclusive Government. You needed all the forces to be included.”

Dabengwa added that the post-election scenario had resulted in a much safer political environment though, hence now was the time to revive ZAPU. “We achieved our aim of stopping both devils from being in power alone. We are now eating the braai. That is why ZAPU is back. Let us enjoy the braai. It is now anyone’s game and we are in with a very strong chance,” he said.

Dabengwa said ZAPU belonged to all the people of Zimbabwe. “Nkomo did not form ZAPU, like (Ndabaningi) Sithole, (Enos) Nkala, (Robert) Mugabe and others formed Zanu. That is why Mugabe does as he pleases because he thinks the party and the country belong to him. ZAPU belongs to the people.”

Party supporters told Dabengwa that there were Zanu-PF, MDC, and MDC-T agents going around decampaigning ZAPU saying Dabengwa would go back to Zanu-PF.

ZAPU elder Mrs Thenjiwe Lesabe assured them that “ZAPU is back for good”.

“ZAPU is back and in serious business. Even Mugabe knows that. That is why he conveniently avoids ever mentioning the words ZAPU and Dabengwa because he knows very well what that means. He would rather castigate his partners in government, not ZAPU. Dabengwa assisted Mugabe, under Nkomo’s orders, to come back to Zimbabwe from Ghana during the sixties. They have no answer to ZAPU. Mugabe was made publicity secretary for ZAPU. Waye njengo Methuseli (He was like Methuseli),” she said, referring to the ZAPU spokesperson Methuseli Moyo, who was also present.

“I am proud to be lead by real hero and soldier Dumiso because I know him very well. He was never Zanu-PF in his heart even during the Unity Accord period. He would have joined Zanu when he was imprisoned for five years during Gukurahundi. Zanu promised him freedom within minutes if he left ZAPU and joined Zanu, but he and his late fellow Zipra commander Mafela (Lookout Masuku) would rather die in prison than join Zanu,” Mrs Lesabe said.

On his release from prison, Dabengwa refused to join the unity government until Nkomo, his commander-in-chief, ordered him to do so, Mrs Lesabe added.

“Most of us were very excited about being ministers and riding the new Mercedes Benz, but Dabengwa was not impressed. It took an order from his commander-in-chief to join Zanu, and being the soldier he is, he obeyed that order but his heart was not in Zanu. Nkomo told him “lala ngenxeba mfanami, iZanu izaqeda abantu,” (pretend you don’t feel your hounds my boy, Zanu will kill all the people (if we don’t join them).”

Mrs Lesabe said she, Dabengwa and other ZAPU elders wanted to lay the foundation of the party, and then let the younger generation takeover.

Giving a vote of thanks, a community leader said the people were happy ZAPU was back. “We were like children who watch their mother bring different men at home and call them dad, but they know their real father. Siyamaz’ubaba (we know our real father),” he said.

One of the ZAPU elders dramatized the excitement when he said he had brought his son to the event “just to have a glimpse of the man that even Mugabe fears”.

“I have been telling him about Dabengwa and what a brilliant soldier he was, and that even Mugabe fears him. My son insisted on coming along with me to see that man (Dabengwa),” said, pointing to his son, who looked in his late 30s.

A kraal head interrupted proceedings at one time and asked to be allowed to walk over to the VIP tent and shake “the heroes’ hand”, and said afterwards he would now die peacefully. - (ZimEye, Zimbabwe)


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Robert Mugabe's rogue Justice Minister in Europe for 'Sanctions' Talks

2010 07 01 -

http://www.thezimbabwemail.com/zimbabwe/5535.html

01 July, 2010 09:10:00 Peta Thornycroft

Johannesburg

The motor-mouthed rogue Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa, of the ZANU-PF Party is the Europe for talks.

 

Related news

Zimbabwe's false hope

Western calls have little impact on Zimbabwe

The blood diamond is making a comeback

Zimbabwe mines group proposes 10% local ownership

Big mouthed Chiyangwa sealed Mugabe’s targeted sanctions fate

 

One of Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe's closest lieutenants is at the European Union to discuss lifting travel and financial restrictions on the ZANU-PF Party and some of its companies.

Zimbabwe Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa, of the ZANU-PF Party, along with members of Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change, and a smaller MDC faction, are meeting with European Union officials in Brussels.

They are discussing eight-year-old travel and financial restrictions against Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF Party and some government institutions judged to have financially supported ZANU-PF.

The meeting follows months of negotiations to have the European Union travel ban waived for Chinamasa. During the past decade, the European Union, the United States and other Western nations have imposed restrictions against Mr. Mugabe and his close allies for alleged political repression and human-rights abuses.

Mr. Mugabe says the restrictions, which he calls sanctions, have caused the collapse of Zimbabwe's economy. Most financial analysts in the private sector in Harare say the economy collapsed because Zimbabwe's main foreign currency earner, agricultural exports, ended when Mr. Mugabe began seizing productive white-owned farms that grew most of the valuable crops.

South Africa, the Southern African Development Community and the African Union have called for an end to the restrictions imposed by the E.U. and the U.S.

One of the restricted companies is the state's Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation, which is in joint ventures with two mining companies extracting rough stones from controversial diamond fields in southeastern Zimbabwe.

According to Israeli diamond analyst, Chaim Even-Zohar, even if the international regulator certifies those rough stones for export, few international banks would be able to authorize payment for them, because of the E.U. and U.S. restrictions.

The visit by the Zimbabwe delegation to the European Union is part of the outstanding issues of the political agreement that underpins the 16-month old unity government. The agreement committed the three political parties to ensure the E.U. and U.S. restrictions were lifted.

European Union diplomats in southern Africa say there are differing views on retaining the Zimbabwe restrictions among its 35 member states. VOA


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Detailed Interview with Zimbabwe Finance Minister Tendai Biti

2010 07 01 -

http://www.thezimbabwemail.com/zimbabwe/5534.html

01 July, 2010 09:01:00

Next month, the Minister of Finance, Tendai Biti will announce his mid-year economic statement.

 

Related news

South Africa budget deficit grows as economy slows

Manuel puts brave face as Africa's largest economy goes sick

Capital, power woes threaten Zimbabwe mining recovery

Africa reels as global crisis hits mines

The Role of the Diaspora to Zimbabwe’s reconstruction revisited - By Lloyd Msipa

 

Next month, the Minister of Finance, Tendai Biti will announce his mid-year economic statement. Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s Newsletter spoke to the Minister to find out which issues are likely to influence the review.

Q: Minister, kindly update us on the first half economic performance (Q)

Tendai Biti: The first quarter of the year was very challenging. The economy went through a period of sickness and there were a number of key things that were the architects of that sickness. First, was the issue of lack of capital. Lack of capital in the form of foreign direct investment which was affected in particular by the publication of the indigenisation regulations.

The regulations had a major effect on the capacity of the economy to attract investment and an immediate multiplier of capital flight. We had huge capital flight in the first quarter of the year and that manifested itself sharply and acutely on movement of share prices on the stock market. The prices were depressed and continue to be depressed.

The second deficit of capital was in respect of lack of lines of credit. There were no lines of credit in the economy in the first half of the year impacting on the cost of money, interest rates shot up to as high as 70 percent. This money was short term, 90 day facilities. This affected the capacity of industries to recover. We aimed at 60 percent capacity utilization by December 2010, but this does not look likely.

The third aspect of lack of capital was the Vote of Credit, that is, budgetary assistance from donors and partners. As I indicated in my statement at the end of April, we had only received US$ 2.9 million out of a target allocation of US$ 810 million.

The fourth challenge was inflationary pressure from a target regime of under one percent to the current 6.1 percent. Inflation offsets economic reward. The fifth challenge was the lack of fiscal space. We had a situation where 70 percent of Government revenues went towards salaries, which salaries were in fact challenged because the average salary for civil servants is US$ 150.

So we had a situation where civil servants went on strike but we had no capacity at all to improve their salaries. The other challenge had to do with bank supervision while the capacity to attract cheap credit to Zimbabwe was also a challenge in the first half. I made a trip to China and I came back empty handed and part of the problem is Zimbabwe’s US$ 6 billion debt. We have to deal with this as a matter of urgency.

The bottom line is that the first quarter of 2010 was a very challenged one. There were spikes that were put in the path of economic recovery, challenges that threatened to derail even the little stabilization matrix that we had put in place this year. What it means is that the mid-term statement which I will be delivering in July is going to be very critical.

The good thing is that in the second quarter of the year, there are clear indications that we have reversed a number of the distortions that occurred in the first quarter of the year.

Q: What is really affecting this economy (Q)

Biti: We have structural and non-structural issues that are affecting this economy. The biggest structural issue that is affecting this economy is a false accumulation model that is based on economic activity that doesn’t generate sufficient rent, which is profit or surplus. When an economy cannot develop sufficient surplus then it cannot develop. The false accumulation in Zimbabwe is premised on agriculture and mining. We are producing goods in raw value, there is no value addition and the same applies to mining.

We have to move to an accumulation model that creates surplus. So technology must come into it, value addiction and increased manufacturing too. Unless and until this economy fundamentally graduates from these non-rent accumulation models, we have got a problem. The second accumulation model is a capital deficit, a capital kwashiorkor, a marginal disinvestment that has taken place in this economy since 1965, since the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI).

There has been marginal disinvestment and we are paying the price for that in the form of a collapsed infrastructure and enablers. For instance, if you look at the electricity sector, Kariba was built in the 1950s, after that there was no major investment in electricity. And yet there has been marginal disinvestment from this economy and that is a problem. So we have got a 45 year deficit of marginal capital disinvestment in the country.

What it means is that the current infrastructure is hardly different from the infrastructure that was there in 1965, whether we talk of roads, railway any other sectors.

The third major challenge is technology. We are 23 years behind in technological development. There are some companies in Zimbabwe that are using outdated software. There’s technological kwashiorkor in this country. The other major structural issue is to do with our politics. We have got a cyclical political base. We go through cycles of crises, every short-term period we encounter a political bomb.

When politics is too cyclical it affects the economy. We have not delinked our politics from the economy so much so that when politics sneezes, the economy does not just catch a cold but goes straight into intensive care. Part of the solution to these structural issues is to have a common vision. This country does not have a common vision. That is why at any given time the decision making in Government is dialectic, that is reflective of an absence of a common vision.

This makes our task here at the Ministry of Finance difficult. But we are not despondent and there will be critical answers that we will provide in the mid-term statement.

Q: How are we performing in terms of revenue collection (Q)

Biti: We have met our target of US$ 120 million revenue collection per month but this economy for it to be normal we must collect about US$ 300 million per month. The reason why we are not able to collect the kind of revenue we need is because of the marginal disinvestment and the net effect of the disinvestment is that this economy has been terminal. It has slowly been dying.

Q: But Minister, how can we fail to raise only US$ 300 million per month when ZMDC and the Mines Ministry have confirmed selling diamonds (Q)

Biti: The Government of Zimbabwe has not received a single cent from diamond sales. It’s important that we get a certificate from the KP. Our diamonds cannot be categorized as blood diamonds. Blood diamonds are conflict diamonds and used to fuel conflict as in Liberia and Sierra Leone. That is not the case in Zimbabwe.

However, this is not to say that there are no issues of non-compliance around the KP process, alleged issues around forced labour, human rights abuses, smuggling and inconsistent records between what has been exported and what is alleged to have been mined. There is a legal dispute with ACR. All these issues must be resolved in the context of the KP process.

The KP must allow us to sell our diamonds, but must then come to Zimbabwe to help resolve these issues. It will be very unfortunate if the KP does not allow us to sell the diamonds because they will be punishing the people of Zimbabwe. We can’t pay for electricity, we can’t pay our civil servants and yet we are sitting on one of the finest find of alluvial diamonds in the history of mankind.

You cannot punish ordinary citizens because of the omissions and commissions of the elite political leadership. If you have issues with an elite political leadership allow diamonds to be sold but reign in on the political elite because they will still sell diamonds outside the KP at the expense of the poor. Myself, sitting in this cold office will feel the heat because I have to pay civil servants and pay for electricity and other Government expenses.

Whatever mistakes that have been committed in the past must provide lessons for the KP and Zimbabwean authorities to come up with a new matrix that avoids the omissions and commissions of the past. The KP must help us to stop smuggling, and to ensure that whatever is sold, Government will receive a chunk and how to come up with an investment model that benefits the communities around the diamond fields.

Q: As a lawyer, how does the ACR legal issue affect the sale of diamonds from Chiadzwa (Q)

Biti: As a disciple of the rule of law, I believe court orders must be respected. We are in this struggle for the rule of law, democracy and justice, so there should be no excuse for breach of the rule of law.

Q: Have the ghost workers been removed from civil service payroll (Q)

Biti: The audit is being conducted by the Minister of Public Service and we want this to be completed so that we rationalize the numbers on the payroll.

Q: Minister Biti, in the past you have complained about parastatals milking the fiscus, what is the position now (Q)

Biti: The majority of parastatals are ill-run. They are being treated like little kingdoms. The disaster at Noczim proves beyond reasonable doubt that these entities are little fiefdoms of inefficiency and arbitrage.

Q: Let us talk about corruption, Minister. Is there anything that the Government is doing to contain corruption (Q)

Biti: There is fundamental institutional corruption in this economy. I’m afraid that we have legitimised corruption and the culture of impunity. People get away with murder. The solution goes beyond the legal solution because you can have 20 anti-corruption commissions in Zimbabwe but you cannot stop corruption. You need to deal with the structural issues that are at the epicentre of corruption. We need to deal with the corruption drivers. Some of the problems are shortages in this non-performing economy.

This creates distortions and shortages and that is when middlemen arise. We have to deliver and match demand. We are now used to shortcuts. There are so many people who now have false role models, where you find a crook driving a Hummer, and you think that’s a role model. Our value system has been debased and this must be corrected.


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

ZANU PF tells villagers what to say

2010 07 02 -

http://www.zimonline.co.za/Article.aspx?ArticleId=6176

by Patricia Mpofu

Friday 02 July 2010

PAUL MANGWANA . . . Joint chairman of the parliamentary committee leading the constitutional reform process

Harare

Reports that villagers attending meetings on the drafting of a new constitution are reading from scripts allegedly prepared by President Robert Mugabe’s ZANU PF party have plunged Zimbabwe’s constitutional reforms deeper into controversy.

Rights groups accused ZANU PF of coaching villagers what to say and said in some areas Mugabe’s party had appointed some of the villagers to speak on behalf of the rest. The selected spokespeople were reading from prepared notes when responding to questions by constitutional outreach teams, according to rights groups.

One of the country’s leading rights groups, ZimRights, said its representatives attending outreach meetings at Matepatepa Country Club and Number One Play Center in Bindura, Mashonaland Central province observed suspected ZANU PF supporters reading from scripts written for them by their party.

ZimRights said: “Both meetings were characterised by high levels of tension between opposing party members. That participants had to rely on party written scripts to make contributions is a serious cause for concern given that a constitutional making process must be non-partisan and people-driven.

“Clearly in this case people are being denied a right to freely air out their views.”

The Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition (CZC) that brings together several civil rights and pro-democracy groups said at one meeting at Sikosana primary school in Makonde district in Mashonaland West province only five people were making contributions with the rest of the more than 1 000 villagers present sitting in silence.

“There was no debate at all, those that participated were referring to position papers that had been distributed by their parties with the rest of the people merely acting as cheerleaders,” the CZCZ said in a report.

The exercise to gather the views and ideas of the public they want included in a proposed new constitution began last week. But there is mounting doubt on the credibility of the outreach programme, amid reports of serious administrative glitches, resurgent political violence and intimidation largely blamed on ZANU PF militants and the security forces.

ZANU PF and the armed forces want the new charter based on a controversial draft constitution known as the Kariba Draft prepared by Mugabe’s party and the then opposition MDC parties of Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and his Deputy Arthur Mutambara.

The 2007 Kariba Draft - that the MDC parties now oppose - retains a strong presidency and allows Mugabe to stand for another two terms in office.

ZANU PF denies that its supporters are committing violence and intimidation, while the Constitutional Parliamentary Committee (COPAC) that is leading the reforms yesterday vowed to press ahead with the exercise saying it was making progress despite the teething problems it had faced.

“Although there were challenges when the process started, there has been some progress in areas where meetings have been held,” COPAC joint-chairman Paul Munyaradzi Mangwana told journalist at a press briefing in Harare on Thursday.

Mangwana, who is a member of ZANU PF, said logistical problems that had seen meetings canceled were being addressed with stationery and recording equipment delivered to the provinces for use by the outreach teams.

But Mangwana said the COPAC was still battling for resources to keep the reforms going.

“One of our major challenges continue to be that of funding,” said Mangwana. “We still have limited resources and this is what is hampering our process. We have brought this to the attention of the government and donors. We are currently working on a supplementary budget.”

The cash-strapped coalition government is unable to raise resources for the exercise and is banking on the United Nations Development Programme to mobilise funds from international donors.

Douglass Mwonzora, another of the three COPAC chairmen, said the commission would review the performance of the secretariat to try and improve management of the reforms.

Unconfirmed reports suggested the commission might dismiss the secretariat it blames for poor management of the outreach exercise.

Mwonzora, a member of Tsvangirai’s MDC party, said: “We are currently reviewing the outreach and everything associated with it, ranging from preparations to duties of the COPAC staff to find out what actual went wrong.”

The proposed new constitution is part of reforms agreed by Mugabe, Tsvangirai and Mutambara that are meant to entrench democracy in Zimbabwe.

The coalition government is expected to call fresh elections once a new constitution is in place although there is no legal requirement for it to immediately do so.

Zimbabweans hope a new constitution will guarantee human rights, strengthen the role of Parliament, as well as guaranteeing civil, political and media freedoms.

ZimOnline

.


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Zim police want statement from KP monitor

2010 07 02 -

http://www.zimonline.co.za/Article.aspx?ArticleId=6175

by Own Correspondent

Friday 02 July 2010

Harare

Zimbabwe police want to interview Kimberley Process monitor to the country Abbey Chikane in connection with charges against a top rights activist they accuse of communicating false statements prejudicial to the state.

A senior police officer Henry Dowa, investigating the case against Centre for Research and Development (CRD) director Farai Maguwu, said he travelled to South Africa to meet Chikane but did not find him because the monitor was away in Israel attending a KP meeting.

"I went to South Africa, I missed him (Chikane)" Dowa told the court during a bail application by Maguwu on Thursday.

"He had gone to Israel to attend a conference. I (wanted) a statement regarding the conservation he had with Maguwu and the documents he was given," the police said in the first official confirmation that police want to use information given to the monitor by Maguwu as evidence against the activist.

Maguwu, whose CRD has exposed smuggling and other illegal activities at the controversial Marange diamond mines, was arrested more than three weeks ago after he allegedly wrote reports detailing rights abuses by security forces at the diamond field. He faces up to 20 years in jail if found guilty.

The activist was arrested days after meeting Chikane who was in the country to assess whether operations at Marange met the diamond regulator’s standards.

The CRD boss allegedly handed Chikane a top state secret document detailing cases of rights abuses by soldiers and police stationed at Marange. The KP monitor handed the document to the Zimbabwean government triggering a chain of events that eventually led to Maguwu’s arrest.

The KP last week failed to reach consensus on Chikane’s recommendations that Zimbabwe should be allowed to export Marange diamonds because it had met all conditions set by the regulator.

The magistrate will make a ruling on the bail application today.

ZimOnline

.


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

JAG RELOCATION COMMUNIQUE

2010 06 29 -

BOOKMARK ASR

dated 29 JUNE 2010

JAG’S NEW OFFICE

ALL FARMERS PLEASE BE ADVISED

The JAG Trust is on the move. Our premises of the past eight years have been renovated and sold and we are moving to more aesthetically pleasing and quieter surrounds.

As of the 1st JULY 2010, we will be at our new offices at No 2, Routledge Street, MILTON PARK.

 

KING GEORGE RD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

O

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S

 

PRINCE EDWARD STREET

I

 

KENSINGTON

L

 

L

 

H/

 

V

 

C

 

C

 

A

 

SHOPS

E

 

A

 

B

 

A

 

O

 

L

 

H

 

 

Z

 

W

 

R

 

N/

 

X

 

E

 

 

PRINCE

 

A

 

S

 

O

 

P

 

W

 

V

 

T

EDWARD

 

R

 

O

 

W

 

R

 

E

 

E

 

O

SCHOOL

 

D

 

N

 

N

 

A

 

L

 

L

 

N

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A

 

L

 

A

 

G

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

G

 

 

 

N

 

O

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H

 

 

 

D

 

G

 

 

BATES STREET

 

 

A

 

 

A

 

A

 

A

 

A

 

A

 

A

 

R

 

 

V

 

V

 

V

 

V

 

V

 

V

 

A

 

 

E

 

E

 

E

 

E

 

E

 

E

 

 

 

 

ROUTLEDGE STREET

 

 

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NO 2

 

 

V

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JAG

 

 

E

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OFFICE

 

 

 

 

CHAPLIN DRUMMOND STREET

 

 


Click here or ALT-T to return to TOP

Back to the Top
Back to Index