The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
Kopel: Tragedy in Africa gets scant notice Denver dailies, like others around U.S., find little room to cover continent's woes June 18, 2005 Speaking at Kent Denver
School last Saturday, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright bemoaned what
she saw as lack of American support for sub-Saharan black Africa (The Denver
Post, June 12). The same criticism might be leveled at the media, for its
neglect of African events. A June 14 commentary headline in The Christian
Science Monitor asked, "In Congo, 1,000 die per day: Why isn't it a media
story?"
The Monitor noted that absence of reader interest is the standard
explanation. After all, newspapers have a finite amount of space for foreign
news. If readers care more about elections or government intrigue in, say, the
United Kingdom or Israel than they do about similar events in Africa, it is
reasonable for newspapers to give readers what they want.
Yet when genocide is taking place, newspapers have a duty to force the issue
into the consciousness of their readers. In the new book Buried by The Times:
The Holocaust and America's Most Important Newspaper, journalism professor
Laurel Leff explains how The New York Times failed to alert Americans to
the Holocaust during World War II.
As she summarized in an article for History News Network (hnn.com), the
Times "deliberately de-emphasized the Holocaust news, reporting it in
isolated, inside stories . . . The Times' judgment that the murder of
millions of Jews was a relatively unimportant story also reverberated among
other journalists trying to assess the news . . ."
Leff explains that the Times was owned by a Jewish family that was
concerned about appearing to engage in special pleading for Jews. Also, many
American journalists were justifiably wary about falling for a new version of
the fake atrocity stories about Germany that the British used to dupe the U.S.
into entering World War I.
Even so, it is impossible to deny that one of the reasons the postwar promise
of "Never again" has again and again proved impotent against genocide is the
failure of the American press to push genocide stories to the front page.
Both Denver papers included brief items about the Ethiopian government
killing about two dozen protesters in the capital city of Addis Ababa recently
(June 9-10). But a Denver newspaper reader would know nothing about the
government's genocide against the Anuak people of southwestern Ethiopia, which
has been going on since late 2003.
In the Sudan, the ruling Arab tyranny has perpetrated genocide first against
the black Christians and animists of the south, and now against the black
Muslims in the west. Although Albright told The Washington Post in a May
29, 2000, article, "The human rights situation in Sudan is not marketable to the
American people," the main reason that American media has at least risen to the
level of mediocrity are the determined efforts of Christian and other human
rights activists who put Sudan on the congressional agenda.
Meanwhile, the Web site StrategyPage reported on June 3 that "Zimbabwe is
about ready to explode in a nightmare \[of] mass murder." StrategyPage explained
that Zimbabwe is suffering a famine as a result of the Robert Mugabe
dictatorship's destruction of the nation's agriculture. People in the cities
have been surviving only by buying food on the black market, which the
dictatorship has destroyed in the last month by bulldozing huge urban areas,
sending refugees into the countryside. The StrategyPage report concluded: "The
government seems determined to starve its enemies to death. . . . This story
will only get reported after the dead are buried."
In the last month, the Post has covered Zimbabwe with a Washington
Post article on food aid (June 2), while the Rocky Mountain News
offered a five-paragraph editorial (June 3) and a two-paragraph news item (June
15). Better than nothing, but hardly adequate considering the magnitude of the
crisis - especially since none of the articles get to the point about Mugabe
using starvation as an tool of state policy.
And in the Democratic Republic of the Congo? Deliberate genocide is just one
cause of the immense civilian death toll resulting from a multiparty civil war,
reports Survivors' Rights International. The Post has printed nothing on
the subject in the last month. The News has run a few short items, plus
an excellent Associated Press story (June 13).
It's difficult for journalists to report the atrocities taking place in these
African hellholes, since the perpetrators have no more respect for freedom of
the press or a journalist's right to life than they do for the lives of the
victims.
Yet the intrepid New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof succeeds
anyway. He recently reported from a refugee camp in Darfur, Sudan. Before that,
in March, he traveled secretly in Zimbabwe and found conditions there so awful
that the people longed for the days of rule by the white racist Ian Smith
government - which, at least, never tried to starve them to death.
Determined readers can find African genocide news if they look hard enough -
at the sources compiled by the African Studies Center at the University of
Pennsylvania, or at the Web site of the International Association of Genocide
Scholars. But news about genocide ought to be as easy to find - indeed, as
inescapable - as news about Michael Jackson or the Denver Broncos.
Dave Kopel is research director at the Independence Institute, an attorney
and author of 10 books. He can be reached at davekopel@RockyMountainNews.com. |