The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

MOST IMPORTANT
Jack Straw in the Commons making his statement on Zimbabwe has declared that the British government did not recognise the election and that, importantly, they now say the Zimbabwean government as ILLEGITIMATE. This is very good news because the American government also said they do not recognise the election.   Here is the report in full.
 
STATEMENT BY THE FOREIGN SECRETARY, JACK STRAW, TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS,
THURSDAY 14 MARCH 2002

ZIMBABWE: 'AN ISSUE OF UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE'

With permission, Mr Speaker, I should like to make a statement on Zimbabwe. Yesterday Robert Mugabe was declared the official winner of the Presidential election. This result should surprise no one. ZANU(PF) have been bent for months on achieving precisely this outcome, by any means and at all costs. The Zimbabwean Government has subjected its electorate to two years of violence and intimidation. They have harassed opposition candidates and supporters, manipulated the voters' roll  and restricted access to polling stations. They have exploited every instrument of the State to distort the electoral process: military, police, media, youth militias and the bureaucracy. ZANU(PF) have also done their utmost to conceal the extent of their violence and malpractice from the eyes of the world. They excluded European Union election observers, monopolised domestic TV and radio and restricted international media organisations, including the BBC. None of these were
the actions of a party confident of its ability to win a free election.

JUDGING THE ELECTORAL PROCESS
These elections can only be judged by agreed international standards, not least the declaration signed by Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting, chaired by President Mugabe, in Harare itself in 1991. In December of last year, on the basis of those principles already available the Commonwealth concluded that: 'the situation in Zimbabwe constitutes a serious and persistent violation of the Commonwealth's fundamental political values and the rule of law'. This conclusion was reinforced in January and again a week before the polls closed. And the situation got worse during the election itself. A key yardstick by  which any electoral process must be judged is impartial electoral administration. There was nothing impartial about the process in Zimbabwe. Robert Mugabe staffed Zimbabwe's Electoral Supervisory Commission with partisan army officers. The names of who could and could not vote was not settled until just days before the election, amidst allegations of fraudulent practice.

During the election itself the Electoral Commission reduced the number of polling stations in urban areas in order to restrict the opposition vote. In many rural areas, the opposition say their polling agents and monitors were prevented from inspecting ballot boxes before voting started. Others were not allowed inside polling stations. Many opposition workers say they were abducted, detained or arrested by supporters of the ruling party or the security forces.

REPORTS' CONCLUSIONS
I have today received the preliminary report of the Commonwealth Observer Group. It says 'The violence and intimidation created a climate of fear and suspicion'. It says 'Thousands of Zimbabwean citizens were disenfranchised'. It says there was 'a systematic campaign of intimidation'. It goes on that the police: 'appeared to be high-handed in dealing with the MDC and lenient towards supporters of the Zimbabwe African National Union - Patriotic Front, ZANU-PF. This failure to impartially enforce the law seriously calls into question the application of the rule of law in Zimbabwe... Limitations on the freedom of speech, movement and of association prevented the opposition from campaigning freely.'

It concludes: 'The conditions in Zimbabwe did not adequately allow for a free expression of will by the electors'.

That set of conclusions has been confirmed by the Parliamentary report of the Southern Africa Development Community. It contains similar serious criticisms: 'the electoral process could not be said to adequately comply with the Norms and Standards for Elections in the SADC region'. I will be placing both these reports in the Library of the House.

Zimbabweans have plainly been denied their fundamental right to choose by whom they are governed. I am sure I speak for the whole House in expressing my huge admiration for the people of Zimbabwe whose faith in democracy was so strong that they queued for days, and in the face of police violence to vote. They are true democrats. They deserve better.

Robert Mugabe's disastrous economic policies have already severely damaged his own country: Zimbabwe was until recently was the pride of Africa, the breadbasket of the continent. Now there is 70 per cent unemployment, 112 per cent inflation, and a decline in GDP of 10 per cent in the last year alone. The failure of the electoral process in Zimbabwe is a tragedy not just for Zimbabwe but for the people of southern Africa as a whole. Already the South African rand has depreciated by 40 per cent in the last year. The people of southern Africa deserve better too. Their governments will inevitably bear most of the responsibility for helping the region to recover. We shall continue to work with them in this task.

THE DECISIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY
The House will know that the European Union decided on 18 February to impose sanctions targeted against the leadership of ZANU PF. These include a travel ban, an assets freeze and a ban on arms sales. The Prime Minister and I will be travelling to Barcelona this afternoon here we will review the position with our European partners at the EU Summit. We are also working closely with the US Government which has already announced a travel ban on the ZANU PF leadership and is considering a possible broadening of sanctions along the lines of those which the EU has already enforced. We will continue to work closely with them, our G8 and SADC partners.

The House will know that HMG took the view on the evidence available at the New Year that Zimbabwe should be suspended from the Commonwealth. What has happened since has simply confirmed that judgement. In the event however CHOGM appointed a troika of South Africa, Nigeria and Australia to decide on Zimbabwe's status in the Commonwealth. We await
their conclusions, in the light of the strongly worded Commonwealth Observers report to which I have already drawn the attention of the House.

It is crucial that we and the international community stand by the people of Zimbabwe in the face of the deprivation and hardship heaped on them by their government. We will therefore continue our programme of humanitarian assistance and our assistance in the fight against HIV/AIDs. But I can tell the House today that we will continue to oppose any access by Zimbabwe to international financial resources until a more representative government is in place.

CONCLUSION
Robert Mugabe may claim to have won this election. But the people of Zimbabwe have lost. We are faced here with a leader who is determined to ignore the international community, ignore the people and ignore the consequences of his actions. Change will have to come to Zimbabwe. One day, I hope soon, I look forward to a democratic Government of Zimbabwe, acting in the interests of its people, and taking its rightful place in modern Africa. There are those who have sought to suggest that this is a conflict between Africa and the West, black against white or the south against the north. I reject this totally. This is an issue of universal principle - of the right of people freely to determine their own future. It is that principle which has been flouted in Zimbabwe, and all democrats should speak with one voice in condemning what has taken place.




From Geoffrey van Orden, an MEP in Brussels:

Please find attached a copy of the Urgency Resolution that has been passed, with the support of all political groups, by the European Parliament this afternoon.
Yours ever, Geoffrey

14E146 European Parliament
Rue Wiertz, Brussels, Belgium


Session document
11 March 2002

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 50(5) of the Rules of Procedure by Geoffrey Van Orden, Mary Elizabeth
Banotti, John Alexander Corrie, Nirj Deva, Jacqueline Foster, Michael Gahler, Eija-Riitta Anneli Korhola, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hanja Maij-Weggen, Neil Parish and Lennart SacrÈdeus, on behalf of the EPP-ED Group

   .............. on behalf of the EPP Group
   .............. on behalf of the PSE Group
   .............. on behalf of the ELDR Group
   .............. on behalf of the Greens Group
   .............. on behalf of the GUE Group
   .............. on behalf of the UEN Group

   on Zimbabwe

The European Parliament,

-  having regard to resolutions tabled by the European Parliament on 13 April 2000, 18 May 2000, 6 July 2000, 15 March 2001, 6 September 2001 and 13 December 2001 on the situation in Zimbabwe;

-  having regard to the Agreement reached in Abuja on 6 September 2001 between the Committee of the Commonwealth Foreign Ministers, including a number of African States, and the Zimbabwean Government to return Zimbabwe to the rule of law and end all illegal occupations of farmland and to take forward the process of land reform;

-  having regard to the decision of the EU General Affairs Council on 28th January 2002 to close its Cotonou Consultations with Zimbabwe and on 18 February 2002 to introduce a package of targeted sanctions;

-  having regard to the Commonwealth Heads of Government in Coolum, Australia from 2 to 5 March 2002;

A. Whereas the Presidential election in Zimbabwe took place between 9 and 11 March;

B. Whereas the adoption of repressive legislation: the Public Order and Security Act, the General Laws Amendment Act, and the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act severely restricted the ability of opposition politicians to conduct a free and fair election campaign, and seriously undermined the freedom of the local, national and international media to
report objectively;

C Whereas freedom of speech, including freedom of the press and broadcasting to provide balanced and impartial coverage of the election campaign, was significantly impaired;

D. Whereas the Zimbabwean Government encouraged the police to use new powers to cancel rallies organised by the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) and prevent the dissemination of MDC campaign literature, and seconded
72 senior army officers to the Electoral Supervisory Commission - a move that stunned Civil Society;

E. Whereas out of 15.000 local independent election observers, regrouped within the Zimbabwe Election Support Network; only a few received accreditation from the government to monitor the election;

 F. having regard to the withdrawal of the EU election observation mission to Zimbabwe after unacceptable obstructions were placed in its way by the Zimbabwean authorities, including the expulsion of the EU's chief observer, Pierre Schori on 16 £February 2002 and the harassment and obstruction that impeded the work of other observation missions, from Norway, the Commonwealth and elsewhere.

G. Recalling that the EU imposed targeted sanctions in the form of an arm embargo, a visa ban and a freeze on the overseas assets of President Mugabe and 19 close associates with effect from 18 February 2002;

H. Whereas the UN World Food Programme has stated that the needs of 558,000 malnourished Zimbabweans are becoming increasingly urgent as drought and food shortages continue;

I. Whereas economic problems in Zimbabwe are such that inflation is running at 116.7%, unemployment at a record 60%, over 80% of Zimbabweís 15 million people living below the poverty line, the education and health systems are crumbling and over 2,000 Zimbabweans are dying each week from AIDS, and the outlook for the economy is looking even more dismal in the light of the election outcome;

J. Whereas the leaders of many African states have failed to condemn President Mugabeís contempt for the Zimbabwean people and his blatant obstruction of the democratic process.

K. Whereas the Chairman of the Zimbabwean Electoral Support Network, has characterised the electoral process as 'flawed and a potential cause for conflict', and one which has violated almost every electoral norm laid down by the Southern African Development Community;

L. Whereas the 25 Norwegian election observers have documented sustained harassment and violence against Opposition officials, members and supporters, and have concluded that, 'the presidential elections...were conducted in an environment of strong polarisation, political violence and an election administration with severe shortcomings';

M. Whereas the low turnouts in the cities, traditional areas of opposition support and massive ones in the rural areas is unprecedented and suggests widespread ballot rigging;

1. Condemns the political intimidation of opposition leaders and voters, the restrictions imposed on local and international observers and blatant vote rigging, and concludes that the presidential election in Zimbabwe was certainly not free and fair;

2. having regard to the forthcoming meeting of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly in Cape Town 18-21 March 2002;

3. Applauds those politicians and citizens of Zimbabwe who, often in fear of their lives, have consistently stood up for freedom of expression and democratic values and have sought a democratic change in order to promote the well-being of all Zimbabweans;

4. Urges the EU and international community as a whole not to recognise the legitimacy of the Zimbabwean presidential election outcome;

5. Calls on the Council to respond with further measures against the Mugabe government, including an extension of the EUís blacklist of President Mugabe and 19 ZANU-PF insiders to include Zimbabweís Vice-Presidents and the finance minister and others;

6. Insists that assets held overseas by Zimbabwean leaders as result of their exploitation of their power in Zimbabwe and neighbouring countries should be traced and reserved for the benefit of the people of Zimbabwe;

7. Welcomes the decision by the United States to ìmove rapidlyî to implement a similar package of targeted sanctions, and urges other countries and international organisations to follow suit;

8. Urges South Africa, in particular, to show some real regional  leadership and to take strong action in favour of democracy and the rule of law in Zimbabwe, given the impact that the deteriorating situation is having on the stability of the southern African region as a whole;

9. Calls for swift robust action by the OAU, SADC and the Commonwealth, including by the three-member troika, appointed at the Coolum Heads of Government summit;

10. Calls on EU leaders meeting in Barcelona on15th -16th March 2002 to seize the opportunity to deliberate on how to strengthen and consolidate the measures already in place to deal with the crisis in Zimbabwe;

11. Calls upon the EU and the wider international Community to provide large scale assistance to Zimbabwe including support for a legal land reform process when it is evident that democracy, human rights and the rule of law
are re-established following free and fair elections;

12. Urges the ACP EU Assembly to demonstrate its commitment to democratic values and condemn the flawed electoral process that has taken place in Zimbabwe.

13. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Member States and candidate countries, the Government and Parliament of Zimbabwe, the Secretary- General of the United Nations, the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, the Secretary- General of the OAU, the Secretary-General of the SADC, the Secretary-General of the
Commonwealth and the President of the World Bank;




Preliminary Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group to the Presidential Election in Zimbabwe 9/10 March 2002
Publication date: 14/03/02

Four decades ago, the Commonwealth dedicated itself to work collectivelytowards bringing about democracy to the countries of southern Africa.This commitment remains true today and applies to the crisis affectingZimbabwe.

It was in this spirit that Commonwealth countries engaged with Zimbabweat Abuja last year to help resolve the land issue. It was also in thisspirit that the Commonwealth accepted the invitation of the Governmentof Zimbabwe to send observers to the 2002 Presidential election.

The Commonwealth Observer Group consists of 42 Observers and 19 stafffrom the Commonwealth Secretariat. Our terms of reference enjoin us to consider the various factors impinging on the credibility of theelectoral process as a whole and to determine in our judgement whetherthe conditions existed for a free expression of will by the electors andif the results of the elections reflect the wishes of the people ofZimbabwe.

Our teams returned to Harare yesterday, 13 March, from their deploymentto the ten provinces of the country. We carried out a thoroughde-briefing during which we discussed not only what took place on theelection days (9  11 March) but the electoral system, the legalframework, the political background and most importantly the campaignperiod leading up to the elections.

We shall be submitting a full Report of our findings, conclusions andrecommendations to the Commonwealth Secretary-General. This Report willbe made public in due course. In the meantime, we would like to make a short preliminary statement on our observations.

We were deeply impressed by the determination of the people of Zimbabwe to exercise their democratic rights, very often under difficultconditions. At polling stations across the country, voters queued patiently and peacefully, and sometimes for very long hours. We were also impressed by the professionalism and conscientiousness of the majority of the polling staff, many of whom also had to work for very long hours without rest.

However, it was clear to us that while the actual polling and counting processes were peaceful and the secrecy of the ballot was assured, the Presidential election in Zimbabwe was marred by a high level of politically motivated violence and intimidation, which preceded the poll. While violent acts were carried out by supporters of both of the main political parties, it is our view that most of these were perpetrated by members / supporters of the ruling party against members / supporters of the opposition.

We were particularly concerned about the activities of paramilitary youth groups organised under a National Youth Training Programme. Members of these groups were responsible for a systematic campaign of intimidation against known or suspected supporters of the main opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change, MDC. The violence and intimidation created a climate of fear and suspicion.

Members of our Group found that very often the police did not take action to investigate reported cases of violence and intimidation, especially against known or suspected supporters of the MDC. Indeed, they appeared to be high-handed in dealing with the MDC and lenient towards supporters of the Zimbabwe African National Union  Patriotic Front, ZANU-PF. This failure to impartially enforce the law seriously calls into question the application of the rule of law in Zimbabwe.

We were concerned that the legislative framework within which the elections were conducted, particularly certain provisions of the Public Order and Security Act and the General Laws Amendment Act, was basically flawed. Limitations on the freedom of speech, movement and of association prevented the opposition from campaigning freely.

We further regret the restrictions placed on civil society groups, which effectively barred this important sector from participation in the democratic process. In particular we consider that unnecessary restrictions were placed on the deployment of independent domestic observers.

We also found that thousands of Zimbabwean citizens were disenfranchised as a result of the lack of transparency in the registration process and the wide discretionary powers of the Registrar-General in deciding who is included in or omitted from the electoral register.

It is our view that the ruling party used its incumbency to exploit state resources for the benefit of its electoral campaign. This was compounded by the Government's near monopoly of the broadcast media - a factor which was not offset by the bias of most of the privately-owned print media in favour of the opposition MDC.

On polling day itself, many who wanted to cast their vote could not do so because of a significant reduction in the number of polling stations in urban areas. There was an inexplicable delay in complying with a High Court order to extend voting to 11 March. Voting in Harare and Chitungwiza was especially slow, leading to many voters being turned away even at the end of the third day. These problems were not evident in the rural areas.

All the foregoing brings us to the conclusion that the conditions in Zimbabwe did not adequately allow for a free expression of will by the electors.

In these circumstances, we call on all Zimbabweans to put aside their differences and to work together for the future of their country. We believe the Commonwealth should assist in the process of national reconciliation.




U.S. House of Representatives : Subcommittee on Africa
255 Ford House Office Building, Washington, D.C.  20515 <
http://www.house.gov/international_relations/afhear.htm <http://www.house.gov/international_relations/afhear.htm> >

For Immediate Release                   MEDIA contact:  Bryan Wilkes
March 14, 2002                                          (202) 225-4111

Royce Calls for South African Leadership on Zimbabwe

Rips election results, calling them "one more insult Zimbabwe must endure"

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- House Africa Subcommittee Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) today called on the South African government of President Thabo Mbeki to join with the Commonwealth, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Parliamentary Group, and other international observers to condemn the just-concluded presidential election in Zimbabwe as illegitimate.  On Thursday, President Mbeki deferred commenting on the legitimacy of the election, citing the need to study all the election observer reports.

Pointing to massive intimidation and manipulation by the Mugabe government, many observers and groups, as well as the United States and other governments, have refused to recognize this election as legitimate.  Other observer groups have legitimized the election with their reports.

Royce noted the importance of the South African government.  "Besides the people of Zimbabwe, South Africa has the greatest stake in the health of democracy in Zimbabwe.  The verdict of the South African government may be decisive.  The Mbeki government must show leadership and call the election for what it was: a gross violation of the very same democratic principles that southern African nations have agreed to.  Time is critical.  The world is watching South Africa's response to this sham election," Royce said.

Royce noted that perceptions of South Africa hinged on its call.  "Many in the U.S. Congress have worked hard to strengthen our partnership with South Africa.  With the Africa trade bill the U.S. lowered trade barriers and the results have been impressive for South Africa.  Africans would like more aid.  The South African government may not like it, but the reality is that it will be harder to aid the continent if Americans perceive that South Africa and the region is unwilling to stand up for democratic principles.  Friends of South Africa are waiting."

Royce expressed his disappointment in the statements about the election made by the government of Kenya, saying, "Kenya has done President Mugabe's bidding and told the world how little they regard democracy.  It would be a shame if South Africa joined it."

Royce noted the complexity of the situation in Zimbabwe by saying, "I understand that Zimbabwe is a great challenge for South Africa -- it's not easy.  But the answer starts with honesty.  A whitewash will accomplish nothing.  These elections are just one more insult the people of Zimbabwe must endure, and it's up to the supporters of freedom and democracy to speak out.




 STATEMENT BY THE SADC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION

ZIMBABWE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 9-10 MARCH 2002
statement issued :  13 March 2002

The Southern African Development Community (SADC) Parliamentary Forum has completed its interim assessment of the Zimbabwe 2002 elections.

On the invitation of the government of Zimbabwe by letter dated February 4, 2002, the SADC Parliamentary Forum Observer mission constituted a delegation of 70 members, consisting of 39 Members of Parliament and support staff drawn from the Secretariat in Windhoek, Namibia and eleven parliaments of the region.

It is the policy of the Forum to observe elections of all member states starting with the pre-election phase. This is the seventh election the Forum has observed in the region since 1999.

Since its inception of the observation programme, the Forum has collectively evolved Norms and Standards for Elections in the SADC region approved in March 2001. The main objective of the Norms and Standards is to ensure the conduct of peaceful, free and fair elections in the region.

In observing the elections, the Forum was guided by the constitutional and legal framework of Zimbabwe and the Norms and Standards for Election Observation in the SADC Region. Among other things, the Mission was detailed to assess the security and political environment in which the elections were to be held.

Deployment
The Forum Deployed to all the ten provinces following consultations and interaction with all stakeholders, including political parties, electoral authorities, representatives of civil society, media editors, Security officers and members of the Diplomatic corps.

The teams proceeded to observe the campaign rallies, meetings, preparations for elections, location of polling stations, media coverage of elections, voting and counting processes and actions that impinged on the fundamental rights and freedoms of the citizens of Zimbabwe as enshrined in Part III of the constitution.

The Political and Security Climate
The Forum has observed that the political and security climate in which the elections were conducted was complex. It was characterized by high levels of polarization and political intolerance, lack of communication amongst stakeholders and lack of free flow of information to the electorate, which are necessary conditions for democracy to prevail.

We observed noticeable differences in the provinces but generally there was no euphoria that normally characterizes elections the SADC region.

Violence and Intimidation
The election campaign was marred by incidents of violence in all provinces of the country. Police and party leaders have not denied the fact that there has been violence in various forms. What seemed to be in question was the perpetration of that violence. Violence was visited upon ordinary voters, party supporters and leaders alike. Reports indicated that violence was
perpetrated by supporters of the two main political parties-the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) and the opposition Movement For Democratic Change (MDC).

Not only did the SADC Parliamentary Forum Witness some of these acts, its mission members were themselves targets of an orchestrated attack 10 kilometres out of Chinhoyi on 24 February.

However, evidence indicated that the majority of those affected were supporters of the MDC or those perceived to be opponents of the ruling party and government. Violence was manifest in the number of hospitalized victims, numerous cases of alleged torture, arson, assault and incidences of false imprisonment.

The prevalence of violence is reflected in virtually all reports from our observers in the field, which included abduction of some polling agents of MDC; in one such incident, our observer team intervened when Police in Mashonaland Central detained 24 election agents of the opposition party who were on their way to Harare to vote.

Regrettably, the phenomena of political intolerance and violence seem to have been prevalent since the 2000 legislative elections. Acts of violence appeared to be systematically employed by youth and War veterans with camps
dotted around the country.

Police Conduct
In any situation of conflict, the police were expected to be impartial. In spite of the arrests made, there are significant claims that the police have been partisan in handling of the political situation when called upon to intervene. The use of riot squads to disperse potential voters in some Harare constituencies raised questions about the impartiality of the Police.

Voters Roll
A voter's register is considered a basic condition for a successful election. In this election, concerns have been raised regarding the timeous release of the voter's roll which was only made available three days before the polls, leaving no time for the electorate to verify its accuracy. As a result of this, it was observed that a large number of people were unable to
vote.

Issues of the voter's roll were compounded by the announcement that a supplementary register had been prepared and would be used in the 2002 elections contrary to earlier announcements that registration for 2002 was closed.

Freedom to Campaign
In any election, contestants should be able to move freely among the electorate. In this election whereas the ruling party's campaign was relatively uninterrupted, some of opposition party meetings were cancelled or interrupted by opponents. It was however, significant, in two instances in Harare and Bulawayo, rallies of opposing parties were conducted in the same city without any violence. This should be the norm.

Polling stations
Information to the electorate and other stakeholders on the location of polling stations was not available to enable the electorate to make informed decisions. Much as we appreciate the increase of polling stations in rural areas, the reduction of the number of polling stations in urban areas had a major impact on the elections. This was particularly so in Harare and
Chitungwiza where tripartite elections were held. It resulted in congestion with some people spending more than 48 hours in queues because of their sheer determination to vote.

Voting and counting
We observed that in many provinces the voting was peaceful. Well over 50 percent of the registered voters were able to cast their vote. The major exception was the Harare Province where the voting process was excruciatingly slow resulting in the extension of both times and days of voting.

There were also a number of violent incidents in which the police dispersed voters from polling stations especially in high-density suburbs. Further, although a large number of people voted, a significant number of the electorate was unable to vote as a result of logistical, administrative and other impediments. The counting proceeded very well.

It was significant to note that the recommendation from the Forum observers for the polling agents to ride with the ballot boxes was accepted and implemented. However, free movement of party agents was compromised by acts of intimidation and reported abductions in some provinces.

However, the massive turnout of voters demonstrates the commitment of the people of Zimbabwe to multiparty democracy.

Lack of Independence of the Electoral Commission
Despite various recommendations and practices in the SADC region, Zimbabwe is one of the countries without an Independent Electoral Commission. The assignment of roles to three different electoral bodies, the Electoral Supervisory Commission (ESC), the Election Directorate and the Registrar-General's Office affects efficiency and causes duplication. The
government should seriously consider establishing an Independent Electoral Commission as recommended by the Forum after the 2000 legislative elections and as held by the Norms and Standards of Elections in SADC.


Access to Public Media
There was lack of access to the public media by political parties other than the ruling party. The monopolization of the public media by the ruling party went contrary to the guidelines set out by the Electoral Supervisory Commission (ESC) for equal and equitable access to contesting parties. The slanted coverage the state-owned Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) and the Zimbabwe Newspapers deprived the electorate an opportunity to make an informed choice.

Conclusion
The climate of insecurity obtaining in Zimbabwe since the 2000 parliamentary elections was such that the electoral process could not be said to adequately comply with the Norms and Standards for Elections in the SADC region.

 MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS
It is evident to us that elections may not, in themselves, be a panacea to Zimbabwe's complex situation of political conflict.
We therefore appeal to the political leadership of the country, the churches, civil society and the business sector to join hands and begin a healing process for Zimbabwe in the face of enormous problems. An election should not be construed to be one of "victor" and "vanquished".

We also urge the Heads of State and Government of SADC countries to urgently engage the leadership of Zimbabwe
to facilitate dialogue and reconciliation. We believe it is within the powers of the people of Zimbabwe, through their leaders with the support of SADC to avert a political crisis in the country and bring about peace.

Signed for and on Behalf of the SADC Parliamentary Forum Observer Mission,
Harare, Zimbabwe, 13 March 2002

Hon. Duke G. Lefhoko, MP
Head of Mission

Vice-Chair
Hon Dr Elvy Mtafu, MP

Vice-Chair
Hon. Lutero Simango, MP
 



South African poll observers criticise 'legitimate' finding
By John Battersby in Johannesburg
15 March 2002


Black and white, rich and poor, 'anyone who can' prepares to join mass exodus  <
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/africa/story.jsp?story=274598>

Britain to press EU for wider list of sanctions  <
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/africa/story.jsp?story=274594>

National unity plan 'impossible under Mugabe'  <
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/africa/story.jsp?story=274592>

Secret mission to solve Zimbabwe crisis  <
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/africa/story.jsp?story=274623>

Michael Brown: It is time for Britain to quit the Commonwealth  <
http://argument.independent.co.uk/regular_columnists/michael_brown/story.jsp?story=274622>
Some members of South Africa's observer mission in Zimbabwe broke ranks yes-terday to criticise the dele-gation's decision that the re-election of Robert Mugabe was "legitimate".

Bobby Godsell, who was a member of the 50-strong South African team, said: "I am both confused and uncomfortable about the use of the word 'legitimate' to describe the Zimbabwean poll."

Another observer, who preferred not to be identified, said he and two other South African observers had been taken aback by the "hardline police harassment of government opponents" in the election, both in urban and rural areas.

When the observer mission leader, Sam Motsuenyane, a South African businessman, announced their findings in Harare on Wednesday he was reportedly jeered by journalists and diplomats.

South Africa's Deputy President, Jacob Zuma, who held talks in Harare with President Mugabe yesterday, said the government in Zimbabwe was "happy" with the observers' report that concluded the election "should be considered legitimate" but not "free and fair." But Mr Godsell said that he was confused by the conflicting terminology used.

He said: "I don't understand the difference between legitimate and free and fair. I don't understand how an election can not be free and fair but can also be legitimate."

Mr Godsell was an observer in Harare where there had been some "distinct problems".

"I understand that the mission is to release a final report and I am assuming that there will be an opportunity to debate and discuss the findings that have been made," he said.

"So I am hoping that there will be a chance to clarify the irregularities but I concede that the damage has been done already by now."





BREAKING NEWS from globeandmail.com, Friday, March 15, 2002

On Thursday, the Canadian government took a harsh stand with Zimbabwe when Prime Minister Jean Chretien announced  that members of the   government led by Robert Mugabe are not welcome in Canada.

 Mr. Chretien expressed displeasure with the recent elections in Zimbabwe following the release of a preliminary report by a Commonwealth observer mission. The group's critical report said that the vote was held "in a climate of fear and suspicion" and did not reflect the will of the people.

 The Prime Minister, who had opposed any Commonwealth action before the election, said the report confirmed that "there had not been free expression of will and that the election was held in a climate of fear."

 "We will be speaking with other Commonwealth leaders and other key allies in the days ahead to explore building the broadest consensus for the most thorough action possible to ensure that the weight of displeasure by the international community is made known to the Zimbabwean government," Mr. Chretien said in a statement.

 "We have withdrawn all funding from the Zimbabwean government. Members of the present government will not be welcome in Canada," he added.

 The Canadian measures announced Thursday are largely symbolic. Ottawa made it clear last year that it will not finance new aid programs; Thursday's statement simply extends that freeze to existing programs.

In 1998-1999, Canada gave $13.14-million to Zimbabwe, three-quarters of it in the form of bilateral assistance.

Mr. Chretien stopped short of breaking diplomatic relations with Zimbabwe.

 In Britain, the government has refused to accept that Mr. Mugabe was legitimately elected in presidential polling last weekend.

 "Zimbabweans have plainly been denied their fundamental right to choose by whom they are governed," Foreign Secretary Jack Straw told Parliament on Thursday. "They have harassed opposition candidates and supporters, manipulated the voters' roll and restricted access to polling stations. They have exploited every instrument of the state to distort the electoral process."

 "We do not recognize the result nor its legitimacy," he said.

 Washington has also rejected Mr. Mugabe's victory, but Canada had resisted taking a hard line. The Canadian Alliance has repeatedly urged Mr. Chretien to act immediately, but he had insisted on waiting for a collective Commonwealth response to be formulated, some time within the next few weeks.

 Deputy Prime Minister John Manley allowed in the House of Commons Thursday that "it would be impossible to say that the election in Zimbabwe was free and fair," but reiterated the Liberal position that nothing should be done before consensus can be reached at the Commonwealth.

 Alliance MP Rahim Jaffer, whose family fled Idi Amin's brutal regime in Uganda, believes that the federal government is failing the people of Zimbabwe. "It is a shame how many more people will be dead until that two-week process is over," he said earlier this week.

 Mr. Chretien has been accused by some of ignoring abuses in Zimbabwe so as not to damage Organization of African Unity support for a new aid plan that he reportedly hopes to showcase at the G8 meeting in Kananaskis, Alta., this June.

 Britain's decision comes amid mounting pressure on Mr. Mugabe. The United States has also said that it would not recognize his victory and is considering broadening sanctions against the leader of the southern African nation. The EU will discuss extending its own sanctions at an upcoming meeting in Barcelona.

 New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark said on Friday Zimbabwe should be suspended from the Commonwealth and urged Australia not to bow to pressure from African countries to overlook election abuses.

 Meanwhile, Australian Prime Minister John Howard said on Friday he would meet with his South African and Nigerian counterparts in London on Tuesday to decide whether the Commonwealth will take action against Zimbabwe.

 But Mr. Howard withheld judgement on whether Australia, member of a three-nation Commonwealth task force examining Zimbabwe's re-election of Mr. Mugabe, believed the vote had been free and fair.

 Mr. Mugabe soundly beat his main challenger, Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) leader Morgan Tsvangirai, in bitterly contested presidential polling. Official results gave Mr. Mugabe victory over Mr. Tsvangirai with a lead of more than 400,000 votes.

 Reports from the region suggest that MDC leaders are struggling to find their feet again after insisting to the very end that they could still win. Mr. Tsvangirai has publicly urged his followers to protest against the result but not break the law.

 The Commonwealth report could provoke large-scale sanctions against Mr. Mugabe when recommendations are brought to the international body later this month.

 Complicating matters, though, separate observer missions from South Africa and Nigeria both reported Wednesday that the election seemed sufficiently fair. Australia, Nigeria and South Africa are key players in formulating the Commonwealth's ultimate strategy.

  With reports from Oliver Moore and Allison Lawlor


Back to the Top
Back to Index

Mugabe death squad thugs kidnapped and tortured me, says trade union leader

Zimbabwe's stolen election » After 22 years in power the President today begins another term by tightening the screws of repression

Karen MacGregor

17 March 2002

Ephraim Tapa is president of Zimbabwe's civil service union and a member of the general council of the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU). In most countries he would be a respected civic leader. Instead he is the face of Robert Mugabe's stolen election.

Abducted with his pregnant wife, Faith, by President Mugabe's supporters, Mr Tapa says he is "very, very lucky to be alive". After being held hostage for nearly a month, during which he was regularly beaten and tortured, he was rescued by the police on the final day of voting in the presidential election, just as his captors were preparing to kill him.

Now the trade unionist is seeking an escape route to Britain – the police have warned the couple to leave Zimbabwe before they are hunted down and killed by their abductors, who they are able to identify. Zanu-PF militia have already visited Mr Tapa's workplace and his father's house. He spoke to The Independent on Sunday at one of the hiding places he is being forced to use.

"It was terrifying, and horrible to feel so helpless," he said of his ordeal. "Our lives meant nothing to our captors: we could have been killed at any time. It feels sickening to have had a free Zimbabwe under black rule, and now to be deprived of all those rights that we fought so hard to win."

It is clear that Mr Mugabe, who is being inaugurated today for yet another term after 22 years in power, has rejected any notion of reconciliation and opted for greater repression. Some 200 Zanu-PF youths invaded companies in Bulawayo on Friday, no doubt acting on government plans to speed up "indigenisation" of the economy. In some areas, youths and "war veterans" are stepping up invasions of 4,000 white-owned farms.

Mr Mugabe has signed a draconian media bill that bans foreign correspondents and muzzles the local press, while new public order and security laws allow the authorities to break up just about any meeting they want to – such as the one Mr Tapa's ZCTU held to debate a general strike in protest at an election that it regards as massively rigged and illegitimate. The opposition, led by the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), fears a violent crackdown, and the trade unionist knows what to expect.

The ordeal of Mr Tapa, 40, and his 25-year-old wife, who is five months pregnant and believes it "miraculous" that she has not lost her first child, began on Saturday 16 February. They set off from Harare for the primary school at which Faith taught in Mashonaland East, just under 100 miles away. As they left a roadside canteen near the school they saw a group of some 15 youths surrounding the car, some wearing Zanu-PF T-shirts and scarves.

"They ordered us to produce Zanu-PF cards, which we did," said Mr Tapa. "But they'd seen stickers in our car saying 'Vote No to Violence', and pamphlets urging people to vote in the election, and demanded to know why we were in possession of such materials.

"They said we were under arrest, and forced us to drive with them to Faith's school, where they had set up a base in one of the classrooms."

After "war veterans" from the nearby town of Mutoko arrived, led by a Zanu-PF official called John Murwisi, they began to beat Ephraim. "He begged them to hit him instead of me, as I was pregnant," said Faith. The assault continued late into the night, until he lost consciousness. "At one point I was nearly strangled to death with a Zanu-PF scarf," he said. "Then, I managed to escape, and had run a few steps when I heard an order to shoot me. I rushed back into the thick of my assailants.

"All the time I was screaming out that I was being killed by war veterans, by Zanu-PF. I think they decided not to murder me there and then because we began to hear rustling sounds in the bushes. It seemed local people had gathered to see what was happening.

"We were bundled into a truck and driven through a forest. We stopped at least five times and there were heated debates, some of our captors saying they should kill us and dump our bodies among the trees, but others arguing that I had made too much noise at the school."

After more beatings and interrogation at another school taken over by the militants, the couple ended up at a bigger base in Mushimbo, near the Mozambique border. There, for three weeks, they were guarded every minute and regularly questioned, though the beatings slowed. Sometimes they were blindfolded, but Ephraim recognised some of the voices of their interrogators – they were police agents and Zanu-PF leaders.

"They wanted the A to Z of the MDC, everything about everybody and about the party's strategies." Ephraim's wounds slowly healed. "For the first week my face was so swollen I couldn't see a thing. One day I had the beginnings of a stroke. By then they thought we were indoctrinated into supporting Zanu-PF, so they decided to keep me alive. They rushed to a local mission for medicine, but it was a close call.

"We had got to know our captors well, and a few did not support what Zanu-PF was doing: they were just too scared to leave. They smuggled letters out for me. One guy risked his life to drive to Harare and give a letter to my union."

Friends and family, who had been mourning a couple they thought murdered, began frantic efforts to get a court order compelling police to raid the camp. Two of Mr Tapa's brothers, not prepared to wait for the court, rushed off to search for them. They were captured in the Mushimbo area, and also beaten and imprisoned by Zanu-PF.

"On the first day of the election, 9 March, I exploded," said Mr Tapa. "I was furious about not being able to vote. My captors got very angry. They said that clearly we were 'not one with them', as they had thought, and therefore we must die. But they said it would be hard for them to do the job, because they had got used to us, so we would be moved to another base for killing.

"We were to be transferred on Monday morning. We prayed all night, and the police arrived just before we were to leave. We drove with them to rescue my brothers. On the way we saw fresh graves – we could so easily have joined those poor souls."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

The West can't stop Mugabe now

By Joan Smith

17 March 2002

In the end, it all came to nothing: the threats of sanctions, the anguished discussions among EU and Commonwealth leaders, the attempts by foreign observers to ensure that voters were not intimidated. Nothing could stop Robert Mugabe winning a fifth term as president of Zimbabwe, although few people believe he achieved last week's victory fairly.

Even the election observers from South Africa, who declared the result legitimate, were divided. This weekend, prime ministers and presidents all over the world are having to face the outcome that none of them wanted. Mugabe's re-election is a wounding demonstration of their impotence in a continent that Tony Blair has made the focus of his mission to tackle poverty and injustice.

The leaders of the world's democracies have not even been able to find a means of limiting Mugabe's power and preventing him from committing more atrocities. Amnesty International is already warning that supporters of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change could come under attack.

Hopes of limiting the scale of the disaster now rest with South Africa, which has been trying to persuade Mugabe to form a government of national unity with the MDC. That is a long way from deposing a tyrant with one of the worst human-rights records in Africa, and his actions on Friday, which included confirming new laws severely limiting press freedom, do not suggest that his victory has put him in a conciliatory mood. The situation has not been helped by accusations of election-stealing by George Bush, who became US President only after a highly unsatisfactory series of partial recounts; his intervention was a gift, allowing Mugabe to pose as the champion of his people in the face of post-colonial oppression. Mugabe is 78 and does not need to think about long-term consequences. What he clearly does not intend – and this is a potent reason for dying in office – is to find himself facing the kind of tribunal hearing the case against Slobodan Milosevic .

The failure of the international community to deal with Mugabe is symptomatic of a larger problem: the leaders of democratic nations have yet to come up with a consistent policy towards rogue and failed states. They have been ready to overlook gross abuses of human rights and presided over arms sales to some of the nastiest regimes. Their strictures will not be taken seriously by a suspicious non-Western world until they abandon their double standards.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Opposition leaders report violence in wake of disputed election in Zimbabwe
ASSOCIATED PRESS
HARARE, Zimbabwe, March 16 — Opposition leaders and white farmers accused ruling party militia Saturday of stepping up violence aimed at activists who campaigned against President Robert Mugabe in last weekend's disputed presidential election.
A farm worker died Friday after being attacked in an area where white farmers said they were harassed and ordered off their land because they helped people who were campaigning for Mugabe's challenger, Morgan Tsvangirai.
       Separately, five houses have been looted and damaged in Zhombe, a village 140 miles southwest of Harare, the capital, in the past two days, said Learnmore Jongwe, an opposition lawmaker and spokesman who comes from the area.
       ''There is retribution through assaults and threats,'' Jongwe said.
       The accounts of ruling party violence came as European Union leaders condemned the election — which the government said Mugabe won with 56 percent of the vote — and threatened to tighten EU sanctions.
       ''It was agreed these elections in Zimbabwe cannot be considered free and fair,'' British Prime Minister Tony Blair said Saturday at an EU summit in Barcelona, Spain.
       A host of Western countries have condemned the March 9-11 election as violent, chaotic and blatantly tilted in favor of the authoritarian Mugabe, 78, who has ruled for 22 years and is to be inaugurated to a new six-year term Sunday.
       Tsvangirai has rejected the official results as fraudulent, and the opposition has said its 57 lawmakers will boycott the inauguration ceremony.
       Tsvangirai scoffed Saturday at reports that Nigeria and South Africa are pressing for the opposition to be invited into the government.
       ''Mugabe cannot buy legitimacy by forming a government of national unity,'' he said.
       Several observer groups said the election was marred by vote-rigging and intimidation by the ruling party.
       Regional election officials from the Electoral Commissions Forum of the 14-nation Southern African Development Community said Friday that the government failed to create free and fair conditions for the poll.
       They cited political violence blamed mostly on ruling-party supporters and flawed voting regulations enforced by a partisan state election commission.
       Many African leaders, however, praised the election. An observer mission from the Organization of African Unity called them free and fair and a South African observer mission declared the vote legitimate.
       The disputed election has added to tensions already high in Zimbabwe, where Tsvangirai, leader of the main opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change, had posed the strongest challenge to Mugabe since he led the nation to independence from Britain in 1980.
       Mugabe faced little dissent until recent years, when the economy collapsed, political violence increased and Mugabe launched a campaign to redistribute white-owned land to landless blacks. Many farms have been seized violently by militants who farmers say have Mugabe's support.
       The Commercial Farmers Union, an organization that supports white farmers, said that since Wednesday, militant members of Mugabe's ZANU-PF party have ordered 15 farmers who provided transport and logistical support for opposition campaigners to leave their land near the town of in Marondera, 50 miles from Harare.
       Police said one farm worker died and a farmer was hospitalized Friday after being assaulted near Marondera. Two assailants were arrested, said police spokesman Wayne Bvudzijena.
       The farmers' union said several farm buildings were looted, and Ian Kaye, a farmer and a prominent opposition supporter, said he fled his Marondera homestead Friday after youths attacked his car with clubs and iron bars. Armed police watched without intervening, Kaye said.
       ''The police were pointing their guns at us and told us to obey the mob and get out of the vehicle,'' he said. He said he ignored the police order and sped off. He was briefly chased by a police jeep.
       (Copyright 2002 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Mugabe's Election Victory Celebrations May Be Short-Lived


The Daily News (Harare)

March 15, 2002
Posted to the web March 16, 2002

Columbus Mavhunga

PRESIDENT Mugabe's election victory celebrations might turn out to be short-lived, as they will be held in a nation facing hunger and endless queues.

Zimbabwe, once the breadbasket of southern Africa and an exporter of grain, has virtually been turned into an importer of grain and food Ð thanks to the price controls and 2000 farm invasions which Mugabe's government endorsed.

The country has been hit by a severe shortage of basic commodities such as maize-meal, sugar, margarine, vegetables, fresh milk and cooking oil.

These products have been in short supply since last year when the government effected price controls.

The Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries last year warned that there would be shortages of basic commodities in the country after the introduction of the controls as producers were manufacturing at a loss. The government said it had introduced the price controls to cushion citizens against price increases of essential goods.

Maize-meal shortages began last year because of a crisis of maize in the country.

Zimbabwe is facing critical maize shortages after it produced a crop of about 1,4 million tonnes last year, which is less than the country's annual requirement of two million tonnes.

The country has secured 200 000 tonnes of maize from South Africa, which is far short of what the nation needs.

As there have been queues at every outlet where maize-meal and other commodities are said to be available occasionally, some people are now putting up at these shops, waiting for these rare commodities to be delivered.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Subject: KEEP HOPE ALIVE
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:06:30 +0200
 
For yesterday is but a dream
And tomorrow is only a vision
But today well lived
Makes every yesterday a dream of happiness
And every tomorrow a vision of hope
Look well, therefore, to this day
 
Sanskrit Proverb
Yes, it is shocking. 
Yes, it is disappointing, depressing, infuriating, very, very, wrong.
However, think a while before sliding into crippling despair.
We need to take our time to process the information after that initial kick in the stomach feeling. 
We need to recover gradually from all the strain and uncertainty, the exhaustion, pain, anxiety and fear, of the past many months - years. 
We need to sleep more, take time out, socialise - with an agreement to take a break from talking politics and horror.
BUT - We must not lose sight of the miracles we have seen,
Nor forget those who have fallen, been tortured, beaten, raped, maimed.
There are so many.
 

In October, a wonderful e-mail was circulated titled "Weaving" which brought tears to my eyes, and still does today.  It described how Zimbabweans were weaving miracles through their extraordinary courage in the face of so much suffering and outrage.  It is as true and valid today as it was then.  I have appended it below, with thanks to the Reelers.

It is a real inspiration, and there are many more achievements and miracles now to add.
 
During the past week, I had the privilege of being involved in a hub of willing, wonderful volunteers answering hotlines to assist people to find the right place to vote, so great was the deliberate confusion.  Some call centres operated from our homes, some from central points in the city.  Soon enough, other sorts of call started to come.
 
By Sunday night, the calls from high density suburbs arrived, describing how those who had waited so patiently for so many hours, even for two whole days, to exercise their most fundamental right, had been chased away by police wielding batons, or even tear-gassed.  The hope and optimism I had held onto for so long, began to fade.
 
When we toured round some of the polling stations on Monday morning, to find that the High Court order had been deliberately ignored, with officials saying "We are waiting for our instructions", it faded more.  Most stations only opened at 11.30 am or even later.
Nearly five precious hours of voting time lost.
 
In a country which has seen genocide on a grand scale in Matabeleland, it is hard not to be reminded of the Nazi atrocities, and of the pathetic explanations of once fair minded men, that they were "only following orders".  People who have written of Hitler's "final solution" have often said that what struck them most in their research was the sheer "ordinariness" of the people who helped to murder twelve million human beings.
They weren't a bunch of crazed psychopaths, on the whole.  They were ordinary people like you and me.  Let us not forget how fast can be the slide into atrocious behaviour.  Let us also confront the cruelty lurking in all of us.  None of us is exempt.
 
The officials who failed to open those polling stations at 7 am, while their countrymen and women waited in their thousands before their eyes, were "only following orders".
The police who tear-gassed their fellow countrymen and women who had been waiting in line since before dawn, once 7 pm came, were "only following orders".  I wonder, how do all these people live with themselves now?  What do they think about, as they too stand in a queue for their staple food?
 
Now that the shock is wearing off, I'm thinking instead of all the miracles, that we witness every day in our country, during so dark a time in its history.  We should not ignore the miracles.  We should not ignore the atrocities.  We need to maintain our hope, our love, our dreams for a better future which will surely come.  No dictatorship has ever lasted.  Dictatorships always fail.  Our patience is being tested almost beyond endurance, but think about it - the endurance we, the people, have shown.  That is a miracle.
 
Tonight, I am lighting a candle and saying a prayer of thanks, for all those who have given up their lives in this struggle, which really is a spiritual war against evil, and all those who have been tortured, raped, beaten, permanently maimed, and rendered homeless.  There are many, many thousands.  Spare a thought for those young men who have been castrated in police custody.  Yes, it is true, that is not an empty rumour.  Why should we spare ourselves the details, turn away from the horrible facts?  Who are we to say "I can't bear to think about it" when these brave people were trying to buy freedom - yours, ours and theirs.  How dare we turn on backs on their suffering?
 
The miracles I have seen are in the unbelievable courage shown by such people, the humbling endurance, patience, resolution, determination, of people who are poor in the material yet so rich in their indomitable spirit.  People who have almost nothing left to lose any more, yet have still kept up the fight against oppression at massive personal risk, some paying the highest price of all.  Zimbabwe is full of heroes and heroines.
 
This century has seen some of the bloodiest of wars and the greatest of atrocities against humanity, during which the most incredible acts of courage and sacrifice have been witnessed.  What a privilege to be living here today and to bear witness to just such courage right before our eyes.
 
The people who stood in the voting queues for 15, 20 hours, two, three days, are heroes and heroines.  The activists who have braved the rural areas, risking beatings, maiming, torture, even death, the people who this very moment, are locked in the cells, for taking food to polling agents, driving their workers to vote, or are falsely accused of trying to vote twice, are all heroes and heroines.  The fund-raisers who have never tired of bringing in the money so essential to run a campaign, when the other side simply raids state coffers without shame, they too are heroes and heroines.  I am constantly humbled by the bravery and sacrifice of the people of Zimbabwe.
 
The greatest miracle is the unity of the people.  Many of us, for all that it was gruelling, exhausting, frustrating, painful, will never forget our many, many hours in the voting queue.  It was a moment of truth.  It was uplifting to the spirit, even as it wore out our physical stamina.  Zimbabweans, side by side, united in resolve, determined to stay the distance, compelled by faith and hope, never to give up, to do whatever it took, to cast their votes - all that they had left them, to try to change their lives for the better.  And even that was to be denied to so many.
 
Ethnic origins have been relegated to complete irrelevance in Zimbabwe's towns and cities, indeed in most places.  The attempted fanning of racial divides, has been for the most part a spectacular failure.  The people, in all our fascinating diversity, stand united in our fervent desire for democracy, freedom from oppression, good governance, press freedom, a new constitution, a new dawn.
 
And one day, because we are united, because we keep hope alive, we will have all these.
 
Outdoor political rallies have been events where few who feel "other" for ethnic reasons have ventured.  Those of us who have, have reaped such great rewards, in the reinforcement of the irrelevance of race in Zimbabwe today, and that sense of unity of purpose and desire.  There can be few more joyous occasions, filled with spontaneous song and dance, hilarious sloganeering, huge smiles, great humour, friendliness, love, mutual protection, and above all, hope that is so palpable, you can reach out and touch it.  Attendance at such, will, like the voting queue, be amongst my best memories of my country and its great people, as together, we make history.
 
We cannot betray the courage and the enormous efforts of so many, for so long, by losing our hope and our focus now.  We have to live our lives, keep our hope, embrace our unity, join the struggle against oppression in any way we can find, that works for us, and feels right for us.
 
We cannot sit idle, we cannot cower in fear, we cannot give up, and we must not run away.  Our amazing resilience will see us through and we will one day triumph.  We owe that to the sacrifices made in life and limb, by so many heroes and heroines of Zimbabwe.
 
Please light a remembrance candle with me tonight, and thank the fallen heroes and heroines, and those who have been so grievously hurt.  It is for them that we have to keep our hope and resolve.  We owe them that much.

To be truly radical is to make hope possible rather than despair convincing
Raymond Williams - from the preface to Leaves of Grass
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"WEAVING"
October 2001
 
In the last 18 months the Zimbabwean economy has been destroyed.
The Zimbabwean people have been intimidated, beaten, raped, and killed.
Their homes have been burnt, or taken from them.
Their lives have been disrupted by lack of transport, escalating prices, the breakdown of infrastructures.
Businesses have been closed, tens of thousands of jobs lost.
Farming has been stopped, land burnt, animals killed.
Thousands of trees have been chopped down for cooking fuel and cash.
The population of homeless and orphaned swells.
 
In the last 18 months Zimbabweans have learned to endure:
To live with grief.
To look pain in the eyes.
To face fear.
 
They have learnt the meaninglessness of money.
The truth of actions.
The lies of words.
 
They have learnt the strength of friendship The folly of racism.
 
In the last 18 months, while the government has been bent on destruction the people of Zimbabwe have woven miracles.
 
Despite this government sabotage.
and with the help of funding angels from across the planet, The people of Zimbabwe have taken the government to court for acts of violence and corruption.
 
They have staged stay aways, and peace prayers and peace marches.
They have established an opposition party which consistently refuses to resort to violence.
 
They have challenged the government's war in the DRC.
They have challenged governments use of the police and judiciary of the country for their purposes.
 
They have challenged the government control of the media.
They have managed to keep an independent press going despite journalists being threatened, beaten, jailed and deported.
Despite their presses being bombed.
 
They have fought, and lost to establish a free radio.
 
Civic Action Groups have officially documented and made public, acts of government initiated violence.
 
They have issued reports and named the perpetrators.
They have provided transport, legal aid, and safe houses for the victims to come to court and tell their stories.
They have set up provisions for food, medical treatment, rape clinics, counselling, group story telling for thousands who have suffered in this process.
 
The Civic groups of Zimbabwe have created a network of more than 250 of the non-government organisations From trade unions to churches to lawyers to human rights workers, Who have presented the government with a unified petition demanding a return to law and order.
 
They have spoken to foreign Governments, Human Rights Organisations, the Press, and presented their reports.
 
They have established Local Action Groups and Rate Payers Associations Who refuse to co-operate with illegally appointed councils.
 
People have been forced out of their comfort zones, And begun to weave their threads into the tapestry.
 
Three Zimbabweans have dedicated their lives to taking Mugabe to court in America after the murders of their loved ones, A doctor leaves her practice to look after victims of violence A managing director of an international company consults with human rights people on behalf of his staff A leading business woman creates a network for distributing food aid to the homeless Farmers and farmer workers stand side with new found friendship to face the violence Therapists give their time to work with the traumatized A businessman sets up an e-mail service which dispenses the latest news A group monitors the media and makes weekly reports People connect in the shops, in the fuel queues, through e-mail - keeping in touch, sharing their pain and strength - Paint their own road signs Fill their own pot holes Black and white and in between Young and old and in between The people of Zimbabwe have been working for peace With incredible acts of courage and love.
 
And in facing our challenges We are weaving a miracle.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Industry Calls for National Task Force On Food Crisis


The Daily News (Harare)

March 15, 2002
Posted to the web March 16, 2002

Ngoni Chanakira, Business Editor

Now that the election result has been announced and President Mugabe declared the winner, the government needs to come clean on the food crisis facing millions of Zimbabweans.

The business community says a national task force comprising representatives from all stakeholders should be appointed to deal with this "disastrous food situation".

The community says the food crisis has been treated with "kid gloves" and used as an electioneering tool throughout the period leading to and until the poll result on Wednesday.

Conflicting figures were being thrown around by politicians on the extent of maize availability in Zimbabwe.

The government has been accused of not heeding advice from experts on the situation.

Agriculture experts say the blame can be apportioned to Dr Joseph Made, the Minister of Lands, Agriculture and Rural Resettlement, who disputed information at his fingertips that Zimbabwe would face a food shortage.

The details came from reputable international organisations including the World Food Programme, the Food and Agriculture Organisation, as well as the Early Warning Unit.

It was only until late last year that Made's ministry admitted that the situation was serious and began importing maize from neighbouring South Africa Ð at an increased cost.

The maize has, however, arrived in drips and drabs and is insufficient for the nation's requirements.

The Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries (CZI), on Wednesday asked the government to deal with the food crisis for the benefit of the nation.

In its economic advice on agriculture, the CZI said: "The government should take positive measures to ensure immediate and long-term food security for the country, as well as restoring Zimbabwe's position as a significant exporter of agro-products.

"The food shortages have become a national crisis and we once again call on government to immediately appoint a national task force comprising representatives from all stakeholders to deal with this disastrous food situation."

Zimbabweans are queuing daily for maize-meal, cooking oil, sugar and margarine as the economy continues to slide. Reports have also been received of a shortage of eggs, chicken and milk.

Once regarded as a southern African economic powerhouse, Zimbabwe has now been downgraded and has had to import basic necessities, including its staple crop, maize.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Yahoo News

Africa bids to avert Commonwealth Zimbabwe ban
By Cris Chinaka


HARARE (Reuters) - South Africa and Nigeria have stepped up diplomatic
efforts to avert Zimbabwe's suspension from the Commonwealth over President
Robert Mugabe's disputed election victory, diplomatic sources said.


They said efforts were under way to try to arrange a meeting in Harare on
Monday between the leaders of Africa's two most powerful countries and
Mugabe. The goal would be to fix an African political compromise before a
planned Commonwealth meeting in London on Tuesday about Zimbabwe's fate.


The European Union was set to issue a strong statement on Zimbabwe on
Saturday after Mugabe was declared winner of the March 9-11 poll.


The United States, Britain, Commonwealth observers, local pro-democracy
groups and Morgan Tsvangirai's opposition all said the 78-year-old's
re-election was unacceptably flawed.


African government have mostly endorsed his victory.


Zimbabwe's state-owned Herald newspaper said presidents Thabo Mbeki of South
Africa and Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria would not be attending Mugabe's
inauguration on Sunday.


But they would be in Harare on Monday ahead of the meeting of the
Commonwealth troika on Zimbabwe. Mbeki and Obasanjo are members with
Australian Prime Minister John Howard.


SOUTH AFRICAN PUSH


Sources in the South African government told Reuters on Friday that Mbeki
was pressing Mugabe to assemble a government of national unity with
Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).


The Zimbabwean government has not commented on the South African initiative,
which Harare-based diplomats say is backed by Nigeria, but Tsvangirai says
he has no wish to legitimise Mugabe's victory by joining him in government.


"We will not be party to any Caesarian operation by South Africa. We are not
going to have short-cuts...and force issues on Zimbabweans," he told
Reuters.


The West has slammed the poll and EU sanctions would deepen the southern
African state's isolation on the world stage.


In another action sure to provoke further condemnation from Western nations
who provide aid and investment, Mugabe on Friday enacted a media law
criticised as a bid to muzzle the press.


Minister for Europe, Peter Hain, told reporters at an EU summit in Barcelona
that a communique agreed by all 15 heads of government in the bloc would
say: "Elections in Zimbabwe cannot be accepted as free or fair".


EU foreign ministers would consider "additional targeted measures" when they
next met in April, Hain said. He gave no further details.


Britain has led the international criticism of its former colony and Mugabe,
once widely hailed for leading the struggle against white-minority rule in
the former Rhodesia.


In power since 1980, Mugabe extended his rule against the backdrop of a
collapsing economy and acute food shortages in a violence-marred election.


The country has been in crisis since Mugabe sanctioned invasions of
white-owned farms two years ago. His government says it will redistribute
the land to poor rural blacks to rectify the legacy of colonial imbalances.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Business Day

Zimbabweans will decide their fate: Mbeki

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- The fate of Zimbabwe cannot be decided by people who are not Zimbabweans,
President Thabo Mbeki said on Friday.
"Whatever happens in Zimbabwe in future must be a matter centrally decided
by Zimbabweans," Mbeki told SABC television news after an African National
Congress National Executive Council meeting.

He said the world has a right and a duty to express itself on matters in
Zimbabwe.

"The world must be concerned and express itself quiet openly, quiet frankly
and quiet forcefully but in the end whatever happens to Zimbabwe cannot be
decided by people who are not Zimbabweans."

Mbeki will travel to London next week for a meeting of the Commonwealth
troika tasked with deciding Zimbabwe's fate.

Mbeki, Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo and Australian Prime Minister
John Howard serve on the committee.

They were mandated at the recent Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in
Australia to decide on punitive action should the body's observer team
declare the elections not free and fair.

The Commonwealth observer team said in an interim report earlier this week
that "the conditions in Zimbabwe did not adequately allow free and fair
expression of will by the electorate".

It said the election was conducted in a climate of fear.

All eyes are now on the troika on whether it will decide that the Mugabe
government should be penalised.

In terms of the Commonwealth's mandate, action against Zimbabwe could range
from collective disapproval to suspension.

However, Mbeki is already on the record as saying that the Commonwealth has
more issues to consider.

He told reporters in Cape Town this week that the Commonwealth Heads of
Government Meeting had also decided that the troika should look at ways the
54-member body could help Zimbabwe resolve the land question and assist that
country's economic recovery.

Mbeki sent Deputy President Jacob Zuma as his emissary to Harare on Thursday
with a special message for Mugabe. Obasanjo, meanwhile, is expected in
Harare on Monday for talks with Mugabe, ahead of Tuesday's troika meeting in
London.

Zimbabwe's Information Minister Jonathan Moyo on Thursday night rejected the
government of national unity proposal saying on state television that
reconciliation was not a Zimbabwean issue.

"Some people have been misguiding our people, talking about the government
of national unity, and yet the people have endorsed the ruling party.

"They did not vote for people who were pandering to interests that did not
put Zimbabwe first," he reportedly said.

Commonwealth secretary-general Don McKinnon said in a statement on Friday
the three heads of government would meet "to determine appropriate
Commonwealth action on Zimbabwe".

Among those calling for Zimbabwe's suspension is New Zealand's Helen Clark,
who had supported British Prime Minister Tony Blair's call for punitive
action ahead of last weekend's presidential poll.

Howard has declined to comment saying he did not want to pre-judge the issue
before Tuesday's meeting.

Meanwhile, the European Union will decide this weekend whether to extend the
partial sanctions it has already applied against Mugabe and his cronies.

The ANC has said that the will of the people of Zimbabwe had prevailed.

The party said on their official website that Mugabe had won an overwhelming
majority amid chronic polarisation of the Zimbabwean people, claims of
widespread intimidation, and in the context of clear flaws in the electoral
process.

It was important to focus on the fundamental task of reconstructing and
developing the country to ensure a better life for the people of Zimbabwe.

Commenting on political violence that marred the poll the party referred to
the ANC's observer mission which said they had observed that violence in the
country came from all sides and that unfortunately on certain occasions,
instances of false and exaggerated claims were reported.

"The issue of isolated violence in Zimbabwe could not and should not be used
as a stumbling block in the elections process in the country," the observer
mission said.

Mugabe will be inaugurated for another six year term this weekend.

Sapa


Asahi.com

EDITORIAL: Zimbabwe's Mugabe retained in an election flawed at outset

 Elections are legitimate only if free debate and fair campaigning are
guaranteed.

Zimbabwe's incumbent President Robert Mugabe has formally been re-elected,
according to the nation's registrar-general. In office since independence in
1980, Mugabe used several measures to muzzle his opposition before the
election.

Criticism of the president was made illegal, and the police were given power
to disperse demonstrations at will.

Voting itself was obstructed. The opposition Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC), and others, claimed the number of polling stations was reduced in
urban areas that are MDC strongholds. In many areas, armed supporters of the
ruling party intimidated and harassed MDC supporters.

Elections are legitimate only if free debate and fair campaigning are
guaranteed. Such authoritarian measures are unacceptable.

The returns, which led Mugabe to claim a landslide victory, are also under
suspicion. If the ballot counting was rigged, legitimacy is out of the
question. Even if the vote count was not rigged, the results obviously do
not correctly reflect the will of the people.

The situation was so serious that European and Japanese election observers
called the election flawed even before the official results were announced.

Opposition supporters have strong doubts about the election outcome. Their
anger has the potential of erupting into violence. Security forces have been
deployed in key areas, but if they repeat their oppressive use of force, it
will only enrage the international community.

When Zimbabwe gained independence, it was one of the very few well-off
developing countries in Africa, and there were high hopes for its strong
economic growth.

Yet, farm produce exports faltered, domestic politics fell into disarray,
and the country was caught in an economic crisis. Drought and famine and the
never-ending AIDS epidemic all exacerbate Zimbabwe's tailspin.

As long as there is authoritarian rule, economic aid from the West and Japan
will inevitably dwindle, worsening the plight of Zimbabwe's people. Mugabe,
once a respected champion of independence, should stop tarnishing his
twilight years and pursue political reform.

Land reform is essential to resuscitate Zimbabwe. ``Historical baggage''
from the colonial era has given a small white minority control over most of
Zimbabwe's fertile farmland. Mugabe, despising the remnants of colonial
rule, urged black supporters to occupy white-owned land. He instituted a
policy of seizing land without compensation, and jeopardized relations with
Britain, its former colonial ruler.

Land reform is necessary, but not by authoritarian violence, and certainly
not by instigating racial animosities, neither of which lead to a basic
solution. The government needs to talk with the white landowners and follow
a non-violent path toward land reform.

The world cannot afford to sit idle to leave Zimbabwe to its turmoil, for
unrest can destabilize all of southern Africa. We believe South Africa and
Nigeria, two regional powers, should try harder to influence Mugabe.

We urge Africa to take a broad view and look toward Zimbabwe's future and
Africa's development. Authoritarian rule should be removed from Zimbabwe.
(The Asahi Shimbun, March 15)(IHT/Asahi: March 16,2002)


Back to the Top
Back to Index

Canberra Times

Zimbabwe on downward road to chaos

ZIMBABWE IS poised for a steady descent into chaos. There is widespread
recognition in the First World that President Robert Mugabe "stole" last
weekend's election. The governments of the United States, Britain and other
European nations will not deal sympathetically with the Mugabe regime. And
in the absence of that support Zimbabwe's economy is deeply vulnerable.

It is almost wholly dependent on agricultural commodities. It is presently
being ravaged by drought. Its international reserves have been dissipated.
Its markets are limited. Its foreign investment has dried up. Its population
is divided. Its white farmers, the source of much of its remaining
productive wealth, have seen the writing on the wall. They may be expected
to depart the scene in increasing numbers. They will leave behind a nation
in crisis, perhaps of a terminal nature.

Much of the blame rests with the ageing Robert Mugabe. But it is hard to
avoid the conclusion that at least part of it must be shouldered by the
countries that have rejected the election results. It is one thing for
leading Commonwealth members - Britain, New Zealand and Australia - to adopt
a posture of democratic outrage. But neither they nor Canada and other
wealthy members of the club have sought to involve themselves in the
struggle to help Zimbabwe through a decade of economic and social crisis.

Zimbabwe, together with other African nations, has been desperate for
assistance to overcome the scourge of AIDS. Indeed, some 25 million
sub-Saharan Africans have been stricken with the killer disease. Yet the
response from Australia and other wealthy nations has been derisory.

And when the recent Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Coolum
offered an opportunity to make a difference, the Commonwealth was found
wanting. It may well be that its failure to act decisively on Zimbabwe will
signal the effective end of the Commonwealth as an institution.

The Coolum meeting revealed that the attitudes dividing Commonwealth members
were far more powerful than the historic ties that bound them. This is
hardly surprising. It was always somewhat optimistic to expect that black
colonies which had been exploited by Britain for generations should have
grown to find common cause with their former colonial masters.

The issue was further complicated by the perception of Britain's leaders who
have successively turned more urgently toward a European future in which the
days of empire are but fading memories. Australia under the Howard
Government has shown little interest in Africa from whence most of the
dissenting voices came during the Commonwealth deliberations. It is
therefore understandable - if unacceptable - that they would picture the
move to sit in judgment on Zimbabwe's electoral process as racially based
interference.

However, the official report of Commonwealth observers which has condemned
the election as preventing a free and fair expression of electorate will
trigger a response from the troika nominated to decide on the "punishment"
to be meted out to Zimbabwe - from widespread sanctions to expulsion from
the Commonwealth.

It is highly unlikely that the three men - South African President Thabo
Mbeki, Nigeria's Olusegun Obasanjo and John Howard - will reach a meaningful
consensus. But even if they do decide to apply some symbolic strictures, the
effect on Zimbabwe will be negligible. Indeed, the likelihood is that the
gesture will be far more damaging to the Commonwealth itself since it will
reveal the institution as being no more than an outdated and valueless
facade.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zimbabwe faces growing cuts in aid

   Edmund L. Andrews The New York Times  Saturday, March 16, 2002
Germany and Canada vow to slash funding as EU considers action

VIENNA Leaders from Europe and Canada stepped up their criticism of Zimbabwe
on Friday, with Germany and Canada vowing to cut off development aid as a
result of what they denounced as Zimbabwe's unfair elections last weekend.
.
After three days of voting, during which many people waited in long lines
only to see the polls close before being allowed to cast their ballot,
President Robert Mugabe claimed to have won re-election with about 56
percent of votes cast.
.
But opposition leaders and many foreign observers said the government made
it difficult for people to vote, particularly in areas where Mugabe's
opponents had an advantage, and that the police and soldiers created an
intimidating presence at many polling stations.
.
In Washington, President George W. Bush has already let it be known that the
United States will not recognize the validity of Mugabe's re-election. But
the United States has not made any decisions about cutting off aid.
.
Germany, however, announced Friday that it would stop all aid to the
Zimbabwean government. "We will not work together with the Mugabe government
in any form and we will urge the EU to put further pressure and sanctions on
the government," said Heidemarie Wieczorek-Zeul, Germany's minister in
charge of development aid.
.
Germany will continue providing aid to non-governmental organizations, some
of which are providing assistance to combat hunger in parts of the country.
Germany has provided about $4.6 million in aid to Zimbabwe in the past two
years.
.
Canada took the same measure Friday, denouncing the election practices. Jean
Cretien, Canada's prime minister, announced the decision after meeting with
Bush in Washington.
.
The European Union as a whole will take up the issue this weekend in
Barcelona, where leaders from the 15 member countries are holding their
summit meeting. Although it remains unclear whether European leaders will
agree on either a cut in aid or other sanctions, European diplomats said the
leaders were certain to issue a "strong statement" condemning the action.
.
The leader of the EU observer delegation to Zimbabwe, Pierre Schori of
Sweden, was expelled from the country before the elections on the grounds
that he had violated the terms of his tourist visa. Schori declared Friday
that the elections had been unfair and distorted.
.
Goran Persson, Sweden's prime minister, added his voice to the growing
chorus of criticism toward Mugabe.
.
"It is a danger for the development of all of southern Africa that those
countries which were liberated do not seem to be able to handle the next
phase, which is securing democracy," Persson said. "It is a dangerous
situation and we are all gravely concerned." Prime Minister Tony Blair of
Britain is also pushing European leaders to increase the pressure on Mugabe.
.
Jack Straw, Britain's foreign secretary, said: "I hope very much he is
coming under the most intense pressure from the people who have the greatest
ability to put him under pressure, namely his African neighbors."
.
Senegal expresses concern
.
A rare note of African concern came from Senegal's president, Abdoulaye
Wade, who was quoted by Reuters as saying Friday that "these elections do
not conform to the norms that I would expect for elections."
.
But Wade, speaking in Dakar, added that he "would not be in a position now
to know if they should be considered invalid."
.
In a move sure to provoke further Western condemnation, Mugabe on Friday
enacted a controversial media law. The government gazette published an
Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, which bars foreign
correspondents from working full-time in Zimbabwe.
.
It imposes tight control on local reporters, who have to be accredited by a
state-appointed commission. Journalists face up to two years in jail for
breaking the regulations.
.
In South Africa, government officials said President Thabo Mbeki was pushing
Mugabe to bring the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, into a national
unity government.
.
But analysts said Mugabe was not inclined to share power.
.
Tsvangirai was adamant that his Movement for Democratic Change wanted more
than cabinet seats.
.
Mbeki has yet to comment on Mugabe's election, saying he wants to see
reports from South African, Commonwealth and other observers first. He has
been criticized at home and abroad for his approach to a crisis that could
destabilize the region and dent investor confidence in Africa,

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Violence reignites in Zimbabwe
 The Irish Examiner 16 Mar 2002



By Angus Shaw, Harare

POLITICAL killings returned to Zimbabwe yesterday amid reports South Africa
is pressing Robert Mugabe to form a government of national unity with the
opposition. As officials prepared for President Mugabe's inauguration
tomorrow, his supporters were reported to have murdered two people and a
human rights agency said there had been a sharp rise in political violence.


A security guard, named only as Darlington, was beaten to death on a farm in
Marondera, 50 miles east of Harare, and his white employer, John Rutherford,
was admitted to hospital after being beaten with a pickaxe handle.



Steve Pratt of the Commercial Farmers' Union said Mr Rutherford was accused
by ruling party youths squatting on his farm of telling his workers he would
burn the squatters' houses down after the elections. The assailants were
arrested.



The independent Daily News said Funny Mahuni, a worker in a chrome smelting
works in Kwekwe, 125 miles west of Harare, was killed on Wednesday night,
soon after Mr Mugabe's victory was announced.



A family spokesman was quoted as saying Mr Mahuni had been threatened with
death "for refusing to obey ZANU(PF) orders".



Mr Mugabe's win received another international rejection yesterday, this
time from the Electoral Commissions Forum of the Southern African
Development Community, the 14-nation regional economic and political bloc.



Meanwhile, there were reports yesterday that South Africa is quietly
applying pressure to have the opposition brought into a coalition
government.



Most observers said the election which returned the 78-year-old Mugabe was
neither free nor fair, with widespread reports of violence and intimidation
against supporters of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change.



South African President Thabo Mbeki has come under fire for not yet speaking
publicly about the result, although his deputy Jacob Zuma visited Harare to
congratulate Mr Mugabe on his success.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Yahoo News

More EU sanctions loom over Zimbabwe
By Emelia Sithole


HARARE (Reuters) - The European Union is set to issue a strong statement on
Zimbabwe today after its controversial presidential election and was
considering tightening sanctions on President Robert Mugabe.


The West has slammed the poll and the EU move would deepen the southern
African state's isolation on the world stage.


In another move sure to provoke further Western condemnation, Mugabe on
Friday enacted a controversial media law criticised as aimed at muzzling the
press.


But several African nations have given the March 9-11 poll their seal of
approval, signalling a rift between the world's poorest continent and the
developed world it is looking to for further aid and investment.


Britain's Minister for Europe, Peter Hain, told reporters at an EU summit in
Barcelona that a communique agreed by all 15 heads of government in the bloc
would say: "Elections in Zimbabwe cannot be accepted as free or fair".


The EU's foreign ministers would consider "additional targeted measures"
when they next met in April, Hain said. He gave no further details.


Britain has led the international criticism of its former colony and Mugabe,
who was once widely hailed for leading the struggle against white-minority
rule in the former Rhodesia.


In power since 1980, Mugabe extended his rule for another six years against
the backdrop of a collapsing economy and acute food shortages in a
violence-marred election.


The country has been plunged into crisis since Mugabe sanctioned invasions
of white-owned farms two years ago. His government says it will redistribute
the land to poor rural blacks to rectify the legacy of colonial imbalances.


But critics say the land seizure is one of many crude methods Mugabe has
employed to cling to power and the disruption of commercial farming has
compounded the effects of drought, leaving half a million people in need of
food aid.


WEST, AFRICA DIVIDED


After the head of the EU's election observer mission was expelled from
Zimbabwe in February, the Union withdrew its monitors from the country and
imposed a visa ban and a freeze on the overseas assets of Mugabe and 19
close associates.


But there is little evidence that the sanctions imposed last month have made
any impact on the ruling ZANU-PF.


Germany is reviewing its aid programmes to the troubled country. Even before
the poll, the United States last month imposed a travel ban on Mugabe and
his inner circle.


But the reaction in Africa has so far largely been positive with observers
from the two biggest regional powers, Nigeria and South Africa, as well as
Namibia and the Organisation of African Unity, all pronouncing the poll
legitimate.


A rare note of African concern came from Senegal's President Abdoulaye Wade.


"From what I know, these elections do not conform to the norms that I would
expect for elections," Wade told reporters in Dakar, but added that "he
would not be in a position now to know if they should be considered
invalid".


South African President Thabo Mbeki has yet to render a verdict, saying he
wants to see reports from South African, Commonwealth and other observers
first.


South African government sources said on Friday Mbeki was pushing Mugabe to
bring defeated opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai into a national unity
government.


But analysts said Mugabe was not inclined to share power and Tsvangirai was
adamant that his Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) wanted more than
cabinet seats.


"We will not be party to any Caesarian operation by South Africa. We are not
going to have short-cuts...and force issues on Zimbabweans," he told
Reuters.


Mbeki, Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo and Australian Prime Minister
John Howard are members of a three-nation task force mandated by the
Commonwealth to decide whether to take action against Zimbabwe over the
elections.


Howard said he would chair a meeting of the group in London on Tuesday.


Officials in Harare said Mugabe, who has remained publicly silent since the
election, would be sworn in for his fifth term as leader on Sunday. State
television in Zimbabwe said 20 heads of state were expected to attend.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Sun, Mar 17 2002 7:20 AM AEDT

The Commonwealth is yet to decide a course of action over Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's election victory.

'United analysis' of observers to guide PM on Zimbabwe

The Prime Minister, John Howard, says he will use the observer team's clear and united analysis of the election in Zimbabwe to help him decide the country's future in the Commonwealth.

Mr Howard will meet the Presidents of South Africa and Nigeria in London on Tuesday, to discuss the poll victory of Robert Mugabe.

The Commonwealth observer team has determined the election was not free and fair.

Mr Howard has told delegates at the Liberal Party state council meeting in Melbourne, he has spoken to all four Australians on the observer team.

"They gave me a very clear and coherent and very united analysis of what they saw and what they experienced and what they believe had occurred," he said.

"That will help me greatly as well as the report, when I have my meeting in London on Tuesday afternoon."


Call for sanction

Meanwhile the Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs, Kevin Rudd, says Australia must undertake targeted sanctions against the Zimbabwean Government.

Mr Rudd will return to Australia today after a fortnight in Harare as part of the Commonwealth observer team which has determined the election was not free and fair.

Mr Rudd says Zimbabwe presents a critical test of international credibility for both Australia and the Commonwealth.

Instead of broad trade sanctions, he has called for Australia to introduce targeted sanctions dealing specifically with the personal financial transactions and travel of members of the Mugabe Government.

Mr Rudd says when the Prime Minister, John Howard, meets the presidents of Nigeria and South Africa on Tuesday he should pursue their support for the targeted sanctions as well as Zimbabwe's suspension from the Commonwealth.

"It is a challenge which lies fairly and squarely on their shoulders and they must rise to the occasion.

"He must rise to the occasion in order to take firm, resolute and decisive action," Mr Rudd said.


Howard

South African President Thabo Mbeki has given qualified support to the outcome of the Zimbabwean elections.

In his first public comment since the elections, Mr Mbeki says the fate of the country would have to be decided by its owns citizens.

However, he also says the world has a right to be concerned about the situation in Zimbabwe.

"Whatever happens to Zimbabwe in future must be a matter that's centrally gets decided by the Zimbabweans," Mr Mbeki said.

"The world has got a right and a duty to express itself on things that are going there, including wrong things, to say these things are wrong, they should stop and so on.

"It's correct that the world must be concerned and express itself quite openly, quite frankly, quite forcefully."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Mugabe to be sworn in as foreign pressure mounts

HARARE, March 16 — Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe starts a new six-year term on Sunday as Western powers pile pressure on him over his disputed election victory. Mugabe, 78, and in power since independence from Britain in 1980, is due to be sworn in at 1030 a.m. (0830 GMT) on Sunday after being declared winner of the March 9-11 elections.

European Union countries will boycott the ceremony, a diplomatic source in Paris said on Saturday.
       ''European diplomats will not attend Mr Mugabe's swearing-in ceremony,'' the source said, adding: ''this is a European decision.''
       EU leaders, ending a summit in Barcelona, also threatened more sanctions and pledged to send a team to talk with Zimbabwe's neighbours.
       Mugabe's main rival in the elections, Morgan Tsvangirai, has branded the vote ''daylight robbery.''
       Western powers, including the U.S, the European Union, Britain, local pro-democracy groups and Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) all say Mugabe's re-election was unacceptably flawed.
       But many African states have endorsed Mugabe's victory, which his ruling ZANU-PF party is lauding as a triumph against Western imperialism.
       State-owned Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation said Mugabe had invited about 20 African leaders to the inauguration.
       It said the presidents of Tanzania, Zambia, Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of the Congo were expected to attend the ceremony at State House.
       But the leaders of Africa's two most powerful states, South Africa and Nigeria, are not expected to attend. They will instead meet Mugabe in Harare on Monday to try to ease Western pressure on his government.
       Diplomatic sources said on Saturday that South Africa and Nigeria had stepped up efforts to avert Zimbabwe's suspension from the Commonwealth over Mugabe's disputed victory.
       They said South African President Thabo Mbeki and Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo hoped to fix a political compromise before talks of the so-called troika of Commonwealth leaders in London on Tuesday who have been asked to devise a response to the election.
       Mbeki and Obasanjo are members along with Australian Prime Minister John Howard.
       Commonwealth analysts believe the three leaders will not advocate collective sanctions against Zimbabwe. Howard was likely to favour some form of suspension which Mbeki would oppose, leaving the deciding vote to Obasanjo, they said.

EU MOVES
       After the head of the EU's election observer mission was expelled from Zimbabwe in February, the European Union imposed a visa ban and a freeze on the overseas assets of Mugabe and 19 close associates.
       A final communique issued on Saturday evening after the Barcelona EU summit said: ''The European Union will maintain its humanitarian assistance to the people of Zimbabwe and will consider possible additional targeted measures against its government.''
       Britain's Minister for Europe, Peter Hain, told reporters that EU foreign ministers would consider tougher measures when they meet next month.
       The EU leaders also agreed to try to turn African opinion about Mugabe and said they would send a high level mission in the near future to confer with countries of the SADC (South African Development Community) region about European concerns over Zimbabwe.

Copyright 2002 Reuters Limited.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Irish Independent

Unity plan shot down by defiant Mugabe


PRESI DENT Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe yesterday firmly rejected a plan,
backed by the West, for a government of national unity to save his country
from plunging into anarchy after the presidential elections.


The secret plan for the unity government, which would include Mr Mugabe's
defeated rival, the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, was put to the
Zimbabwean leader on Thursday by the South African Deputy President, Jacob
Zuma.


But Mr Mugabe's chief spokesperson, Information Minister Jonathan Moyo,
ruled out unity with people "who were pandering to interests that did not
put Zimbabwe first".


Mr Mugabe, who was re-elected in the chaotic elections last weekend, accuses
Mr Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) of being an "extension"
of the British Labour Party.


Many people feel that the unity government deal, brokered by Presidents
Thabo Mbeki of South Africa and Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria, is the only
way to put Zimbabwe on the path to economic recovery, after the majority of
international observers concluded that the elections were anything but free
and fair. But the MDC has also dismissed the proposal.


The MDC justice spokesman, David Coltart, said a unity government was
inconceivable because Mr Mugabe would not consider it.


Despite being one of the sponsors of the deal, President Mbeki endorsed the
result of the Zimbabwe election yesterday as witchhunts and attacks took
place on opposition supporters and draconian legislation to gag the press
was put into effect.


Hundreds of people were reported to be fleeing the three Mashonaland
provinces in northern Zimbabwe, while two people were reported murdered
since Mr Mugabe's disputed election victory was announced on Wednesday.


Mobs of ruling party youths were also marching on to white owned-farms and
ordering the owners to leave within six hours, the Commercial Farmers' Union
said.


However, police in most cases were "acting decisively" and the farmers had
so far been able to stay.


In his first comment on the presidential contest, Mr Mbeki said: "The will
of the people of Zimbabwe has prevailed.


"Amid chronic polarisation of the Zimbabwean people, claims of widespread
intimidation, and in the context of clear flaws in the electoral process,
President Mugabe has won the elections with an overwhelming majority."


The new violence and lawlessness came as scores of foreign election
observers and journalists were leaving the country.


"Zanu (PF) are systematically hunting down people who voted for the Movement
for Democratic Change, and our election agents," said the opposition's
secretary general, Welshman Ncube.


The attacks started on Thursday, he said. "People have fled, others are
missing and no-one knows what has happened to them."


In Marondera, about 50 miles east of Harare, Zanu (PF) squatters yesterday
allegedly beat to death a farm security guard and severely injured the farm
owner.


The first reported death after the election result was in the central town
of Kwekwe, where the body of Funny Mahuni was found "with his stomach cut up
with a knife" according to witnesses.


Also yesterday in a calculated snub to the West, the so-called Access to
Information and Protection of Privacy Act was passed into law, in what is
expected to be the regime's next move towards silencing the country's
independent press.


The law will effectively ban foreign journalists from the country altogether
and calls for all local journalists to be licenced by Mugabe's government.


(Independent News Service and agencies)

Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Times

March 16, 2002

Raids and press curbs mark new Mugabe era
From Jan Raath in Harare



AS President Mbeki of South Africa endorsed the result of the Zimbabwe
election yesterday, a wave of witchhunts and attacks took place on
opposition supporters and draconian legislation to gag the press was put
into effect.
Hundreds of people were reported to be fleeing the three Mashonaland
provinces in northern Zimbabwe, while two people were reported murdered
since Mr Mugabe’s disputed election victory was announced on Wednesday.

Mobs of ruling party youths were also marching on to white owned-farms and
ordering the owners to leave within six hours, the Commercial Farmers’ Union
said.

However police in most cases were “acting decisively” and the farmers had so
far been able to stay.

In his first comment on the presidential contest Mr Mbeki, on the website of
the ruling African National Congress, asserted: “The will of the people of
Zimbabwe has prevailed.

“Amid chronic polarisation of the Zimbabwean people, claims of widespread
intimidation, and in the context of clear flaws in the electoral process,
President Robert Mugabe has won the presidential elections with an
overwhelming majority . . . While the process was clearly not perfect, the
ANC believes that the people of Zimbabwe have spoken.”

The new violence and lawlessness came as scores of foreign election
observers and journalists were leaving the country.

“Zanu (PF) are systematically hunting down people who voted for the Movement
for Democratic Change, and our election agents,” said the opposition group’s
secretary-general, Welshman Ncube. The attacks started on Thursday, he said.
“People have fled, others are missing and no-one knows what has happened to
them.”

Kare Vollan, head of the Norwegian observer mission, was able to confirm
some of the reports.

“These are very serious allegations. We have pretty good evidence of some
incidents, but we are still looking into it. Unfortunately there is nothing
we can do.”

The delegation, regarded as the most professional of all the international
observer groups here during the election, leaves on Sunday.

A spokesman for the Amani Trust, a local charity dedicated to helping
victims of political violence, said there had “definitely been a marked
increase” in the past few days.

“There are a lot more torture victims — attempted drownings, attempted
murder, burnings, beatings,” she said. “Now we have got more work than we
have ever had before. I am not sure we can cope with this.”

Yesterday in Marondera, about 50 miles east of Harare, Zanu (PF) squatters
beat to death a farm security guard, named only as Darlington, and severely
injured the farm owner, John Rutherford, 31, according to Steve Pratt, the
local CFU administrator. Mr Rutherford had been accused of telling his
workers that squatters’ huts would be burnt after the elections. Police
later arrested “some” of the alleged assailants.

The first reported death after the election result was in the central town
of Kwekwe, where the body of Funny Mahuni was found “with his stomach cut up
with a knife”, according to the independent Daily News. It quoted relatives
as saying that Mr Mahuni had been told by a local Zanu (PF) leader that “he
was going to be killed for refusing to obey Zanu (PF) orders”. Earlier he
had barred his daughters from attending a night rally at a party militia
base. While militia mobs encountered resistance as they tried to drive white
farmers off their land, black commercial farmer Tawanda Nyambirai, a former
lawyer and agricultural college graduate, was trying to protect his property
from being grabbed by a local Zanu (PF) MP, Bernard Makokova.

Last month Mr Nyambirai, who bought the farm three years ago with borrowed
finance, obtained a court order to stop the MP’s earlier attempts to seize
the farm.

Also yesterday, the so-called Access to Information and Protection of
Privacy Act was gazetted as law, in what is expected to be the regime’s next
move towards silencing the country’s independent press.

When it was first introduced in parliament in January, the legislature’s
legal watchdog denounced it as “the most calculated and determined assault
on our liberties”.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Times

March 16, 2002

Tourists avoid reality in Zimbabwe's parallel world
From Tim Reid at Victoria Falls



ZIMBABWE’S tourist industry is all but dead today thanks to the scare
tactics of President Mugabe. But there is one merry band of travellers who
still flock to the country, blissfully ignorant of the battle for its soul.
Unencumbered by colonial guilt, unperturbed by the plight of white farmers,
unaware of who Robert Mugabe is and perplexed when questioned about last
week’s rigged election — across the land roam hordes of Germans.

Felix Linning, 53, heavily sunburnt and taking a break amid the roaring
spray of Victoria Falls, says people in Germany know nothing about Zimbabwe,
or the election. “I heard something about it the other day, someone told me
about it on safari,” he said. “And now that Mobutu has been elected . . .”

“Mugabe.”

“Yes, now that Mbeki has won . . .”

“You mean Mugabe?”

“Now that the Prime Minister has won, they told me that now there will be
peace. I am just here because you have to see Victoria Falls once in your
life. I have been to Niagara Falls but these are better.”

It is still difficult to spot tourists here, until recently one of Zimbabwe’
s most popular destinations, even though the Government says 1.4 million
visited the country last year. In reality, there are hardly any British
travellers, once the most frequent visitors, and tourism, which used to
account for 15 per cent of GDP, has fallen by over two thirds since Mr
Mugabe’s campaign to seize white-owned farms began in earnest two years ago.

Those that do venture here are almost exclusively German. The one charter
flight into Victoria Falls airport yesterday held 70 people, all but 10
German. “The election? We did not even know about it,” Johannes Frey, a
student from Bremen, said. “It is not an issue at all in the German media.”

And did anyone tell them that the country was meant to be dangerous to
travel in? “No, nobody told us anything. We have been here a week. It seems
very nice. The people are very friendly.”

Their presence brings succour to the desperate tourist operators, safari
companies and lodge owners, thousand of whom have gone bankrupt in the past
three years. They inhabit an extraordinary parallel world, in which tourists
can enjoy life in Zimbabwe out of sight of political violence, failed
agriculture and economic catastrophe.

At the stunningly elegant Victoria Falls Hotel, a monument to the pomp of
British colonial rule, they saunter around in Bermuda shorts and sandals.
But Mildred Zulu, the receptionist, approves. “I prefer German visitors to
the British,” she said. “The Germans know nothing about this country, so
have no preconceptions. Unlike the British.”

Back to the Top
Back to Index

From The Times (UK), 16 March

Raids and press curbs mark new Mugabe era

Harare - As President Mbeki of South Africa endorsed the result of the Zimbabwe election yesterday, a wave of witchhunts and attacks took place on opposition supporters and draconian legislation to gag the press was put into effect. Hundreds of people were reported to be fleeing the three Mashonaland provinces in northern Zimbabwe, while two people were reported murdered since Mr Mugabe’s disputed election victory was announced on Wednesday. Mobs of ruling party youths were also marching on to white owned-farms and ordering the owners to leave within six hours, the Commercial Farmers’ Union said. However police in most cases were "acting decisively" and the farmers had so far been able to stay. In his first comment on the presidential contest Mr Mbeki, on the website of the ruling African National Congress, asserted: "The will of the people of Zimbabwe has prevailed. Amid chronic polarisation of the Zimbabwean people, claims of widespread intimidation, and in the context of clear flaws in the electoral process, President Robert Mugabe has won the presidential elections with an overwhelming majority . . . While the process was clearly not perfect, the ANC believes that the people of Zimbabwe have spoken."

The new violence and lawlessness came as scores of foreign election observers and journalists were leaving the country. "Zanu PF are systematically hunting down people who voted for the Movement for Democratic Change, and our election agents," said the opposition group’s secretary-general, Welshman Ncube. The attacks started on Thursday, he said. "People have fled, others are missing and no-one knows what has happened to them." Kare Vollan, head of the Norwegian observer mission, was able to confirm some of the reports. "These are very serious allegations. We have pretty good evidence of some incidents, but we are still looking into it. Unfortunately there is nothing we can do." The delegation, regarded as the most professional of all the international observer groups here during the election, leaves on Sunday. A spokesman for the Amani Trust, a local charity dedicated to helping victims of political violence, said there had "definitely been a marked increase" in the past few days. "There are a lot more torture victims – attempted drownings, attempted murder, burnings, beatings," she said. "Now we have got more work than we have ever had before. I am not sure we can cope with this." Yesterday in Marondera, about 50 miles east of Harare, Zanu PF squatters beat to death a farm security guard, named only as Darlington, and severely injured the farm owner, John Rutherford, 31, according to Steve Pratt, the local CFU administrator. Mr Rutherford had been accused of telling his workers that squatters’ huts would be burnt after the elections. Police later arrested "some" of the alleged assailants.

The first reported death after the election result was in the central town of Kwekwe, where the body of Funny Mahuni was found "with his stomach cut up with a knife", according to the independent Daily News. It quoted relatives as saying that Mr Mahuni had been told by a local Zanu PF leader that "he was going to be killed for refusing to obey Zanu PF orders". Earlier he had barred his daughters from attending a night rally at a party militia base. While militia mobs encountered resistance as they tried to drive white farmers off their land, black commercial farmer Tawanda Nyambirai, a former lawyer and agricultural college graduate, was trying to protect his property from being grabbed by a local Zanu PF MP, Bernard Makokova. Last month Mr Nyambirai, who bought the farm three years ago with borrowed finance, obtained a court order to stop the MP’s earlier attempts to seize the farm. Also yesterday, the so-called Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act was gazetted as law, in what is expected to be the regime’s next move towards silencing the country’s independent press. When it was first introduced in parliament in January, the legislature’s legal watchdog denounced it as "the most calculated and determined assault on our liberties".

From The Independent (UK), 15 March

South African poll observers criticise 'legitimate' finding

Johannesburg - Some members of South Africa's observer mission in Zimbabwe broke ranks yesterday to criticise the delegation's decision that the re-election of Robert Mugabe was "legitimate". Bobby Godsell, who was a member of the 50-strong South African team, said: "I am both confused and uncomfortable about the use of the word 'legitimate' to describe the Zimbabwean poll." Another observer, who preferred not to be identified, said he and two other South African observers had been taken aback by the "hardline police harassment of government opponents" in the election, both in urban and rural areas. When the observer mission leader, Sam Motsuenyane, a South African businessman, announced their findings in Harare on Wednesday he was reportedly jeered by journalists and diplomats.

South Africa's Deputy President, Jacob Zuma, who held talks in Harare with President Mugabe yesterday, said the government in Zimbabwe was "happy" with the observers' report that concluded the election "should be considered legitimate" but not "free and fair." But Mr Godsell said that he was confused by the conflicting terminology used. He said: "I don't understand the difference between legitimate and free and fair. I don't understand how an election can not be free and fair but can also be legitimate." Mr Godsell was an observer in Harare where there had been some "distinct problems". "I understand that the mission is to release a final report and I am assuming that there will be an opportunity to debate and discuss the findings that have been made," he said. "So I am hoping that there will be a chance to clarify the irregularities but I concede that the damage has been done already by now."

From The Daily Telegraph (UK), 16 March

U-turn over Mbeki support for poll

South Africa's ruling African National Congress said last night that a statement endorsing the Zimbabwe election result was attributed in error to President Thabo Mbeki. The declaration on the ANC website under Mr Mbeki's name said: "While the process was clearly not perfect, the ANC believes that the people of Zimbabwe have spoken." A party spokesman said later it was a party statement, not the president's. The U-turn came as European Union leaders meeting in Barcelona pressed for further sanctions against the regime. Peter Hain, minister for Europe, said the joint communique was almost certain to conclude that the election was not fair. He said foreign ministers would be told to consider further measures against the government. These go beyond the present travel ban and asset freeze on President Mugabe and his inner circle.

From The Independent (UK), 16 March

Mugabe spurns proposal for unity government

President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe yesterday firmly rejected a plan, backed by the UK and the United States, for a government of national unity to save his country from plunging into anarchy after the presidential elections. The secret plan for the unity government, which would include Mr Mugabe's defeated rival, the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, was put to the Zimbabwean president on Thursday by the South African deputy president, Jacob Zuma. But Mr Mugabe's chief spokesman, Information Minister Jonathan Moyo, ruled out unity with people "who were pandering to interests that did not put Zimbabwe first". Mr Mugabe, who was re-elected in the chaotic elections last weekend, accuses Mr Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) of being an "extension" of the British Labour Party.

Many people feel that the unity government deal, brokered by Presidents Thabo Mbeki of South Africa and Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria, is the only way to put Zimbabwe on the path to economic recovery, after the majority of international observers concluded that the elections were anything but free and fair. But the MDC has also dismissed the proposal. The MDC shadow Justice Minister, David Coltart, said a unity government was inconceivable because Mr Mugabe would hardly consider it. But Presidents Mbeki and Obasanjo are not giving up. Mr Obasanjo will fly to Harare on Monday for a day's talks with Mr Mugabe to urge him to accept the proposal to "heal the deep divisions" in Zimbabwe. Mr Obasanjo will then travel to London for a meeting with Mr Mbeki and the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard. The three were mandated by the Commonwealth to take action against Zimbabwe if the elections were undemocratic.

The EU is considering stiffening sanctions against Mr Mugabe and his top aides and was due to issue a tough statement after the Barcelona summit said the election was invalid. Mr Mugabe has also moved to consolidate his de facto dictatorship by signing into law a draconian Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Bill that will ban foreign correspondents from Zimbabwe and muzzle the local press. Correspondents can now be jailed for two years for working illegally under the law. The country's Information Minister, Jonathan Moyo, will, however, retain the discretion to admit foreign writers into the country to cover specific events. Last year, the Zimbabwean government expelled several foreign journalists long before the media law had been tabled in Parliament. Mr Moyo then banned foreign media organisations, particularly those from the UK and South Africa, from covering the election.

Critics of the law say it makes Mr Moyo an editor of all the newspapers in Zimbabwe. It requires all Zimbabwean journalists to get renewable accreditation from a statutory media council appointed by him. It also forbids local journalists from publishing a wide range of information held by the government without specific authorisation to do so. It particularly bans journalists from reporting on the proceedings of Mr Mugabe's cabinet or on the work of any government department or commission appointed to give advice to Cabinet. Journalists offending the provisions face hefty fines and two year jail terms. All media organisations, except state-owned statutory media outlets, will be required to register with the media commission for two year periods. It was also announced without explanation yesterday that the ceremony to swear Mr Mugabe in to another six-year term of office would be postponed until tomorrow. The move prompted fresh speculation about his failing health, after national television news on Thursday showed him stumbling and apparently gripping a table after his meeting with Mr Zuma.

From The Zimbabwe Independent, 15 March

Zanu PF caught red-handed

Cases of vote-buying by ruling Zanu PF supporters were unearthed last week in Bulawayo where party members were caught in the act by South African election observers and international journalists in the Lobengula-Luveve constituency. A group of women operating from a house in Lobengula was seen taking down names and identification numbers of potential voters promising them money if they voted for President Robert Mugabe. One of the women approached by the Zanu PF supporters, Ethel Moyo, tipped off South African observers and the media who rushed to the house and found the women with lists of people who had already been paid for voting for Mugabe. The Zanu PF members claimed they were only registering the names of supporters who wanted to vote. The exercise was also seen outside a polling station in Makokoba and at MacDonald Hall in Mzilikazi. The women in Makokoba were allegedly paying $100 to anyone promising to vote for the ruling party candidate.

Meanwhile, scores of Zanu PF youths, who disappeared before the weekend polls, resurfaced at a polling station in Sauerstown on Saturday where police allowed them to form their own queue and to vote ahead of other people who had been queuing for hours. When the Independent together with the foreign press arrived at the polling station, scores of the militia were seen milling outside the polling station while a sizeable number were inside casting their vote. Independent election monitors stationed about 100 metres from the polling station said the youths were initially turned away but later allowed to vote after the intervention of Zanu PF officials. The election agent for the Movement for Democratic Change at the polling station, Dave Mnkandla, claimed the youths were not on the voters' roll but were still allowed to vote.

From The Daily News, 14 March

Tempers flare as postal ballots reported missing

Mutare - Tempers flared on Tuesday between Zanu PF and MDC officials in Mutare Central constituency after the constituency registrar, Lena Nhiwatiwa, failed to account for 25 postal votes. This led to the rejection of the postal ballot box. Two thousand people were registered to vote through the postal ballot in Mutare Central and only 180 cast their votes. Of those, 155 were accounted for and there was no immediate explanation as to what happened to the remaining 25. Postal votes are for registered voters who, for one reason or another, were unable to cast their ballots in their respective constituencies. Verification at all 14 command posts in Manicaland kicked off at 7am and the missing postal votes came to light during the process at Mutare Teachers’ College. These include soldiers on duty outside the country or deployed to other parts of the country, the police and voters at diplomatic missions. Nhiwatiwa said: "I don’t know what happened to the votes. I can’t explain it. The problem originated in Harare from where the postal ballot box was dispatched to us for verification and counting. Meanwhile, the box has been rejected."

An argument broke out between Kenneth Saruchera, President Mugabe’s election agent, and Innocent Gonese, for Morgan Tsvangirai, when Saruchera said counting of the votes should proceed, with Gonese arguing the box had been tampered with. Saruchera said: "Although there was a shortfall, this should not stop the counting because we would be denying the 155 people who voted their constitutional right to be heard. I sternly objected to the rejection because the problem originated from Harare and not from here. I recommended that since it’s not a local problem, we should continue with the counting." Saruchera refused to comment on the constitutional rights of the 25 who had also cast their votes. "Gonese said: "We cannot proceed to count when some votes are missing. There was definitely some tampering with the ballots. The constituency registrar failed to account for the missing votes. They may have been deliberately removed."

From The Montreal Gazette, 11 March

Mugabe claims McGill doctorate

London – As President Robert Mugabe , the tyrant of Zimbabwe, prepares to continue to ride roughshod over his terrorized nation, he does so covered in academic honours from one of Britain’s leading universities. Mugabe also claims to have an honorary doctorate from McGill University in Montreal. In 1984 the University of Edinburgh awarded Mugabe a doctorate in law, honoris causis. This just happened to coincide with the time when his army was slaughtering the opposition, breaking the law and trampling on human rights all over Matabeleland, as the Roman Catholic Justice and Peace Commission has fully documented. Yet this week, senior Edinburgh university officers said there were "no current plans" to revoke Mugabe’s degree. Indeed, they did not even appear to find it controversial. Those who made the decision in 1984 are all now retired, the officials said. A university spokesperson said: "The degree was awarded in 1981 on the merits of the case at the time. The University of Edinburgh has no procedures for withdrawing such degrees and we have a concern that a withdrawal…might rebound on any in the country associated with the university. We understand that the government, with our full support,, is applying diplomatic pressure as appropriate."

David Orr, president of the Edinburgh University Student Association, was a little more forthcoming. Admitting to his own personal reservations about the award "in the light of current circumstances," he said he would be "discussing the issue with his fellow office bearers." Robin Harper, a member of the Scottish Parliament and the University’s 40th rector said: "I am not sure…whether in fact a degree can be rescinded, but certainly I would not be against the university considering whether perhaps they would like to rescind it. I think we should wait for a few weeks to see the outcome of the elections…but in principle I am not against the idea of…discussion." No one could say whether those on the honorary degree committee in 1984 had ever considered the human rights atrocities attributed even then to Mugabe and his ruling Zanu PF party. Yet the Roman Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace in Zimbabwe, reporting on the disturbances in Matabeleland, showed 1 437 people had died between 1982 and 1987, victims of human rights violations. Numerous other reports of the time also revealed the brutality of a man who was masquerading in public as a reconciliator. Indeed, Mugabe has a record of misery, murder and mayhem that outranks some of the most appalling in post-independence Africa, a continent not short on atrocity.

Born at Kutama Mission north-west of Harare, Robert Gabriel Mugabe had a Jesuit upbringing and likes to lecture his people on morality. He is a professing Roman Catholic and basks in the prestige of his hard-won higher education. He boasts a BA from Fort Hare, a Bed from Unisa, a BSc from the University of London, a BAdmin from Unisa, an L.LB, L.LM and MSc (Economics) all from London. His Who’s Who entry claims an honorary doctorate from McGill University, an assertion firmly rebutted by that university, which says it has a "strict policy" on its awards – and clearly, by implication, one that Mugabe does not match up to. The McGill reference is made in the second and third editions of Who’s Who in Africa. A spokesperson for the university said its rules preclude the awarding of honorary doctorates to sitting politicians. No one would say whether the university would attempt to press the publisher to edit the entry. Author Ruth Weiss said: "Mugabe is a terribly vain man." In the early days of Zimbabwean independence, Weiss was one of his strongest supporters – but she fell out with him over the slaughter in Matabeleland. "He places much store on his academic achievements. It would be symbolically significant for Edinburgh to remove his honorary doctorate…and it would hurt his vanity.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

South African observers next to useless


WE were delighted to hear that cover-up artist Kaire Mbuende was given a rough reception when he visited polling stations on Saturday. His foolish remarks that violence had been "blown out of proportion" were clearly designed to assist President Mugabe's public relations campaign.
"Enda Mbuende", the crowd called out when he arrived at one Harare polling station.

As Sadc executive secretary Mbuende repeatedly made remarks in support of Mugabe during his regular visits to this country and he must have felt his loyalty ill-rewarded when he was fired from that post by the Sadc leaders for incompetence. He is now evidently attempting to win back their affection while at the same time preparing Zimbabweans for a Sadc rubber stamp.

Sam Nujoma and Benjamin Mkapa told Commonwealth leaders in Coolum that they shouldn't anticipate the poll outcome. But their agents here, masquerading as observers, have done precisely that. For attempting to minimise the impact of state-sponsored violence across the country, people like Steve Tshwete, Mbulelo Musi, Kaire Mbuende, Ernest Shonekan, and Nkoma Wamunza have earned the contempt of thousands of Zimbabweans who have seen their loved ones abducted, killed or mutilated by Mugabe's thugs. They have also shown us how useless observers are when they wear blindfolds.

There was a gang of South Africans at Spinalong Newlands on Saturday buying CDs when they should have been out inspecting the painfully slow progress of polling officers. At night they all retreated to their hotels as the militia gangs caused mayhem in rural districts.

One voter said she understood perfectly why voting took so long. The person in front of her was called Zondo. The polling officer started looking for his name under A. Then under B. And so on!
And will the observers be taking into account the partisan role of the police who arrested 11 farmers in Raffingora for having radio transmission equipment that was licensed under the law and designed for their own security? They were sending "suspicious messages" to poll monitors, we are told. Wayne Bvudzijena was quick to say police were investigating. But he said nothing about what police were doing about the abduction of MDC polling agents in Raffingora and in Matabeleland North and South.

Needless to say we had the gullible state media linking this to the hundreds of spies who they imagined to be crawling around the country trying to thwart their leader's candidacy. That included the Mutare "white man" who was alleged to have bought up all available copies of the Herald.

Somebody buying a copy of the Herald was evidently so unusual in Mutare that a plot was immediately suspected. Only gradually did it dawn on the police that it is not in fact illegal to buy more than one copy of the Herald. Foolish yes, illegal no!

The Sunday Mail tried to convince us that this was all a plot to deprive voters of the chance to read about the Herald's saturation coverage of President Mugabe's speech in Bindura on Friday.
Herald readers were certainly not told about the stampede by people who tried to leave Mugabe's rallies in Kadoma, Chinhoyi and Marondera on Thursday. The Daily News told us that fences were flattened and the riot police had to be called in to deal with hundreds of Mugabe "supporters" who couldn't wait to get out.

Both Mugabe and Elliot Manyika pleaded with the crowd to stay and hear the president's views on Tony Blair and his promises to do in the next six years what he had failed to do in 21. But their pleas fell on deaf ears. People just wanted to go home. They had heard it all before and they were hungry too! We liked the poster on how to vote that used a steaming tea cup as the symbol of a hypothetical party. Most people queuing on the cold and drizzly Saturday morning must have thought this was an enticing prospect. Even more so when they realised its significance. Which party is the Tea Party? More Tea? Mor(gan) T(svangirai), the tea boy?

Who innocently designed that piece of government-approved voter education?
We can hear Jonathan Moyo now: "Heads must roll"! And what happened to Moyo's decree that there should be no extension of voting on Monday? Is he now president, high court judge and Justice minister?

We said we would announce the first sighting of Grace back in her more fashionable apparel. It was in Highfield on Saturday when the Mugabes arrived to vote. The Java-print dress hadn't survived a day longer than the campaign. It was replaced with a very smart outfit designed to complement the president's Saville Row suit. Rules about no campaigning on election day probably influenced this change of wear.

Does that also explain the lack of any response from the crowd when the First Couple arrived to cast their vote? The Mugabes proceeded into the polling station without a single cheer from the Highfield multitude crushed together as a result of Mugabe's electoral interference, which saw the redistribution of polling stations to his electoral heartland.

The president apparently had difficulty finding a polling station in the township where he was listed as entitled to vote for a local councillor as well as president. The Sunday Mail reported Secretary for Information George Charamba as saying Mugabe had to move from one polling station to another "due to the ward boundaries for the council elections".

The Media Monitoring Project noted that the Sunday Mail decided not to ask the obvious question: that if Mugabe didn't know which ward he belonged to, how did the election authorities expect ordinary members of the public to know - especially without the benefit of some public information to tell them where they should vote?

"Nor did the paper attempt to compare Mugabe's ability to 'station-hop' with the fate of ordinary voters who found themselves missing from one or other of the voters' rolls after spending 12 hours or more in a queue," MMPZ said.

"Would they have had the determination to join the queue in the neighbouring ward?"

SABC reporters here have been in a bit of a fix this week. Following what Olivia Muchena considered a hostile grilling by Sally Burdett in a live link from Johannesburg recently, she made a strong complaint to the South African authorities. We can only assume that as a result the News department at Auckland Park was told to give Zimbabwean ministers a free rein in interviews. How else do we explain why Makhosini Nkosi and Dan Makokera have been allowing ministers like John Nkomo and Patrick Chinamasa to get away with ridiculous and unsupported claims?

Nkosi appears anyway to be rather gullible. He let Membathisi Mdladlana suggest that Welshman Ncube was "facing very serious charges" following his arrest and should "cooperate with the police".

Mdladlana must be the only person left who is taking the treason charges, based on a doctored videotape, seriously. And he explained the delay in reopening polling stations on Monday was due to "administrative problems".

Where South African ministers assume the role of apologists for Mugabe's repression and delinquency they become part of the problem - along with interviewers who fail to ask challenging questions.

We must thank SABC for one thing at least. As members of Safcoc, the South African federated chambers of commerce which supports Zanu PF, were saying how free and fair the election was, SABC showed film footage of riot police breaking up the voting queues on Sunday night. Well done guys!

Still with news management, why did Jonathan Moyo dismiss the Financial Gazette story of Didymus Mutasa's coup threat as "sheer madness"?

"Such irresponsible statements and claims can only come from individuals and institutions bent on validating the British self-fulfilling prophecy of an unfree and fair poll," Moyo said.
The report conceded that Mutasa's remarks had been made on SABC. We all heard them. They were unambiguous: Zanu PF would support a coup if the MDC won. So why blame the Financial Gazette for carrying them?

Well, if you look more closely at Moyo's criticism, it seems to be aimed more at Mutasa than the Fingaz. We all recall him in 1996 saying "Mugabe is our king. You don't elect a king". What a fool!

We followed with interest this week a Herald report on complaints by staff working at the United Nations Development Programme about salary adjustments. The story was based on an e-mail the Herald had got hold of. The paper said "the UNDP resident representative for Zimbabwe, Mr Carlos Lopez, could not be reached for comment at the time of going to press".

That's hardly surprising. Carlos Lopes was transferred to New York two years ago. And he always said he divided the Zimbabwe media into those who could spell his name and those who couldn't.
Sill on the subject of the UN, how about this statement for sheer dishonesty.

Catherine Bertini, executive director of the UN World Food Programme warned on February 26 of severe food shortages sweeping through Southern Africa.

"In Zimbabwe, more than half a million people face severe hunger as shelves in stores around the country run out of basic foodstuffs and inflation soars," she said. "Months of dry weather have withered fields of maize and the April harvest is bleak.."

So "months of dry weather" explains the food shortages does it? It's got nothing to do with land invasions, destruction of crops, farmers forbidden to plant, and false forecasting by ministers?
Muckraker's attention has been drawn to what looks like a statement prepared on State House notepaper.

"Today marks a stop on a long journey towards liberation," it says. "A journey that started many years ago when our country was first colonised. We rejoiced in 1980 but still we were not free. The long shadow of imperialism loomed over the nation. The British did not want to relinquish the glittering prize that is our land Zimbabwe. They tried to undermine it at every turn.
"We readdressed (sic) that balance. Go home, we told the British. This is our land. Our country. But still the shadow loomed."

"We gave you back your land. What did they do? 'Mugabe is a monster' they said. We reclaimed your heritage. 'Mugabe must go', they wrote in their newspapers."

It is evident from this that young Chatunga has been at Daddy's keyboard. It was so obviously written by somebody under 12 that it is perhaps unfair of us to use it.

Could we safely say it was faxed to newspapers in the hope they would use it, only to have Moyo descend on them for "lying". We believe there is enough evidence now to show that Zanu PF has been running a disinformation department and this is one of its products.

Muckraker's question for the week: What was Nick Goche doing in Montreal in February? We understand he was there. We want to know what he was up to. Or can we guess?

   
Back to the Top
Back to Index