http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Tichaona Sibanda
1 March
2010
The controversial indigenisation law that forces foreign-owned
companies to
sell a majority stake in their businesses to indigenous people
comes into
effect on Monday.
The Indigenisation and Empowerment Bill
was passed by Parliament in 2007 and
signed by Mugabe in 2008 before the
creation of an inclusive government.
Among other things, the regulations
demand that all foreign and locally
owned companies hand over at least 51
percent ownership to black
Zimbabweans.
The law requires every existing
business, partnership, association or sole
proprietorship with an asset
value of US$500 000 or more to submit a report
to Youth Development,
Empowerment and Indigenisation Minister Saviour
Kasukuwere by April 15.
Defaulters might face a fine and/or imprisonment for
up to five
years.
Mugabe defended the new regulations on Saturday, saying they were
meant to
correct historical imbalances. He told hundreds of supporters at
his 86th
birthday celebrations in Bulawayo that the indigenisation policy,
like the
land reform programme, was meant to correct historical imbalances
in the
ownership of the country’s resources.
“This policy is not
meant to nationalise companies but to broaden ownership
of our resources.
Yesterday, we were down trodden, there was slavery... Back
home, the people
were colonised and turned into slave and semi-slave to do
work for masters
who had colonised us. It was slavery in the colonies and
that is what
created the imbalances.” Mugabe said. Many analysts including
Mugabe’s
partner in government Morgan Tsvangirai have said the law is ‘bad
for the
country.’
Economic analyst Luke Zunga told us that the new law will make
people think
twice before investing in Zimbabwe, adding that it would also
deter further
badly-needed foreign investment.
“The level of
industrialisation in Zimbabwe is very small and the
introduction of this law
will kill the little industry that is there. Nobody
is going to allow
someone to just grab their companies like that. It’s
almost impossible to
imagine,” Zunga said.
‘The worst thing about this law is the
beneficiaries. All the companies will
be given to party loyalists, people
with no experience in big business. This
is an exact replica of the land
reform programme that killed off the country’s
agriculture sector,’ Zunga
added.
The move to target foreign-owned firms has further divided the
inclusive
government. While Mugabe has repeatedly defended the law, saying
that
foreign firms would be ‘foolish’ not to comply, Tsvangirai, in contrast
has
rejected it, saying it was published without due process.
The
main trade union group, the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU),
has
also warned that the new law could have negative consequences. ZCTU
President Lovemore Matombo said while the principle of the law was good, he
feared that this could lead to a creation of new minority blacks who will
just replace the minority whites.
‘The law should have not been
rushed; we are just coming out of a
self-inflicted economic crisis. This law
could create fears that the process
could be chaotic, just like the land
reform, which will affect the economic
recovery of the country and we do not
need this right now as we need
investments,’ said Matombo.
(AFP) - 10 hours
ago
BULAWAYO, Zimbabwe - Zimbabwe's new local ownership law, requiring
locals to
own 51 percent of major foreign firms, could hurt the nation's
economic
recovery, the main labour body said Monday.
The law took
effect Monday, giving companies valued at more than 500,000 US
dollars 45
days to inform the government of the racial make-up of their
shareholders.
The companies will be given five years to comply with
the 51 percent rule.
"Although the principle of the law is good, we fear
that this could lead to
a creation of new minority blacks who will just
replace the minority
whites," Lovemore Matombo president of Zimbabwe
Congress of Trade Unions
told AFP.
"The law should have not been
rushed, we are just coming out of a self
inflicted economic
crisis.
"This law could create fears that the process could be chaotic
just like the
land reform, which will affect the economic recovery of the
country and we
do not need this right now as we need investments," said
Matombo.
Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe, in power since independence in
1980,
launched a chaotic land reform scheme in 2000, taking over white-owned
farms
to resettle with blacks.
The programme was meant to redress
colonial-era inequities, but was marred
by widespread political violence and
resulted in plunging output, decimating
the farm-based economy and leaving
the nation dependent on foreign food aid.
The new ownership law was
passed by parliament in 2007 but was only
published as law last
month.
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai, Mugabe's partner in a strained
unity
government, has rejected the law, saying it was published without due
process. But Mugabe has repeatedly defended the law and said foreign
companies would be "foolish" not to comply.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Alex Bell
01 March
2010
South African President Jacob Zuma is being urged to take a decisive
stand
on Zimbabwe, as he heads to the UK for a visit during which the
Zimbabwe
crisis is set to be high on the agenda.
Zuma is heading to the
UK for an official visit and he has indicated that he
will fight on
Zimbabwe’s behalf for targeted sanctions against the Mugabe
regime to be
lifted. Zuma told journalists recently that sanctions were
‘undermining’ his
efforts to push Mugabe and Prime Minister Morgan
Tsvangirai to agree to an
electoral framework that could guarantee a free
and fair vote.
“We want
to create a conducive environment so that they can have elections
to choose
their own government, but the continuation of sanctions is
undermining the
agreement,” Zuma said.
The European Union (EU) last month extended the
targeted sanctions on Mugabe
and his inner circle by another year citing
lack of progress in implementing
the Global Political Agreement (GPA).
Zuma’s statement on the sanctions has
since attracted severe criticism from
analysts who said the person to blame
for Zimbabwe’s woes was none other
than Mugabe himself, as well as his ZANU
PF party, the very same people that
would be rewarded if the measures were
dropped.
Athol Trollip, the
parliamentary leader for South Africa’s main political
opposition, the
Democratic Alliance (DA) on Monday said Zuma needed to focus
on two key
issues: plans for the ‘indigenisation’ of foreign firms, and
South Africa’s
stance on the ‘shopping’ sanctions. Trollip told SW Radio
Africa on Monday
that these are considerations critical to stabilising
Zimbabwe’s tenuous
political situation.
Trollip called the indigenisation plans ‘extremely
problematic’ not only
because of Mugabe’s various destructive policies such
as land reform, but
also because of his access to state wealth. Trollip
accused Mugabe of using
state wealth to ‘shore up his position,’ to the
detriment of the country
whose economy has been decimated.
“This most
recent proposal appears, on face value to serve a similar purpose
and there
is absolutely no evidence that the Zimbabwean state is capable of
properly
managing such a massive share (or, indeed, any share) of the
Zimbabwean
market,” Trollip said.
He added that if Mugabe is serious about properly
managing the Zimbabwean
economy, “he needs to reform his policies.” Trollip
explained that Mugabe
needs to demonstrate a commitment to democracy, and
ensure that the state’s
wealth will not be used for political
purposes.
On sanctions, Trollip said the Global Political Agreement
between the MDC
and ZANU PF, which was meant to address the numerous crises
facing Zimbabwe,
had not resulted in any meaningful change by the country's
administration.
Trollip said there “remains no sufficient political reason
for the sanctions
imposed on Mugabe to be lifted.”
”In the light of
few real steps taken by the Zimbabwean administration
towards truly
democratic governance, President Zuma needs to support the
European
community’s decision to reconstitute sanctions against President
Mugabe,”
Trollip said.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Alex Bell
01 March
2010
The entire leadership of the General Agriculture and Plantation
Workers
Union (GAPWUZ) has gone underground after a series of police raids,
arrests
and threats against them.
According to lawyer Trust Maanda,
the raids have been a direct response to
the release of a shock report and
documentary last year which the union
produced exposing violent abuse of
workers on farms seized by the Robert
Mugabe regime. Maanda confirmed that
Gertrude Hambira, the union's Secretary
General, was in hiding since last
Wednesday. Hambira had been interrogated
that day for two hours at the
police national headquarters by 17 senior
officers of the Joint Operations
Command (JOC), which combines the country's
military, police and
intelligence service.
The panel of security officials stated that the report
and documentary
contained very serious allegations for which Hambira should
be 'behind bars.'
Hambira and her colleagues were eventually released but
the security
officials warned that they would call on her again. A second
raid was
carried out on Hambira's office on Friday in which two officials
were
arrested, but released after a few hours. The threats and harassment
have
now seen the rest of GAPWUZ's leadership go underground in fear for
their
lives. Lawyers say it is unprecedented and illegal for the JOC to
carry out
interrogations and issue threats.
The damning GAPWUZ report and
documentary expose the devastating effects of
the so called land 'reform'
programme on the livelihood of farm workers. The
documentary entitled 'House
of Justice' contains 26 minutes of footage
laying bare the evidence of human
rights violations targeting farm workers
over the ten years of Robert
Mugabe's land grab campaign. It also details
top government officials'
involvement in the torture, harassment and
eviction of farm workers in the
chaotic land seizures.
Another report, 'If Something is wrong,' which
accompanies the documentary
also highlights the impact of the land reform
exercise on the farm workers
during the past ten years. This is the first
report on the so called 'land
reform' to deal solely with the experiences of
farm workers and makes for
sobering reading. The report balances statistical
evidence from farm workers
with shocking narrative examples of the types of
violations they have
experienced. It also provides damning evidence that the
violence perpetrated
on the farms has been largely targeted at farm
workers.
Peta Thornycroft
Photo journalist Andrisen
Manyere, who spent several months in detention in
2009, accused of
terrorism, was arrested Monday filming outside the Harare
Magistrate's
Court and is now in custody at Harare Central Police Station,
locked up for
the night.
Zimbabwe Laywers for Human Rights say he is to be charged with
"disorderly
conduct."
He was covering an appearance by two of seven
men accused of plotting a
coup d'etat against the previous Zanu PF
government nearly three years ago.
Among those arrested at the time
were, Patison Mupsere, Nyasha Zibuku,
Shingirai Mutemachani, Oncemore
Mudzurahawa, Emmanuel Marara and Albert
Matapo who repeatedly denied
charges. Matapo was an officer in the Zimbabwe
National Army. When they
were arrested journalists and family members were
barred from remand
hearings and there are uncomfirmed reports that some of
those originally
detained, have since died.
Initially those arrested from May 29,
2007, were accused of plotting with
Zanu PF defence minister Emmerson
Mnangagwa to overthrow President Robert
Mugabe. Mr Mnangagwa openly says he
wants to succeed Mr Mugabe.
The seven accused repeatedly applied for
bail, and the last recorded case
was late last year in the Harare High Court
heard by Judge Chinembiri Bhunu,
presently presiding at the trial of
Movement for Democratic Change
treasurer, Roy Bennett, who is also accused
of terrorism.
Mr Manyere was kidnapped from his Harare home in
December 2008,and along
with human rights activist Jestina Mukoko and more
than 20 others, was
accused of treason and is claiming substantial damages
from the former
Zimbabwe government alleging he was tortured during six
months detention.
Mr Manyere was arrested briefly twice in the last
three weeks.
His detention comes as information seeps in from several
areas outside
Harare of increasing repression of human rights activists, and
supporters of
the Movement for Democratic Change, now in an uneasy coalition
government
with Mugabe's Zanu PF.
ends
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Alex Bell
01 March
2010
The Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition has accused a ZANU PF councillor of
victimisation after an outreach meeting conducted by the pressure group was
disrupted by ZANU PF youths last week.
Crisis Coalition Intern Edwin
Sithole, and Youth Committee Members Tichaona
Masiyambiri and Oscar Dhliwayo
were last week Wednesday threatened,
interrogated and harassed by Mr.
Sanyika, the ZANU PF councillor for Nhekiwa
ward in Uzumba district.
According to the Crisis Coalition, the ZANU PF
official and a group of
youths disrupted the outreach meeting saying it had
not been sanctioned by
the party.
The three Crisis Coalition officials were then ordered to
leave the
community and take back all T-shirts and other materials that had
been
distributed. The group also reported that ZANU PF youths were harassing
villagers in the area prior to the meeting trying to discourage them from
attending.
The outreach meeting was held under the 'Voice up
Campaign,' aimed at
educating the public on the importance of a
people-driven constitution, as
well as to inform them about the constitution
reform process underway across
the country.
Participants at last
week's disrupted meeting in Uzumba district said that
the process was
already 'monopolised by political parties,' with seven ZANU
PF members
'selected' as ward representatives at a closed meeting recently.
It is
alleged that the seven are moving around the area campaigning for the
implementation of the ZANU PF preferred Kariba Draft.
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written by MORGEN KULARE
Friday,
26 February 2010 13:43
It is ridiculous that the United Nations (UN) in its
wisdom or lack of,
continues to put its faith in the much discredited
Zimbabwe Republic Police
(ZRP) for international peacekeeping duties. This
is despite the fact that
it has been brutal, corrupt, incompetent and
partisan in its discharge of
duties at home. One of the key duties of the
international peacekeeping
force in war torn countries is to protect
innocent civilians against warring
parties in an impartial manner, and make
sure all parties abide by the
ceasefire agreement. The ZRP has never been
anywhere equal to this task.
The Police Commissioner General Augustine
Chihuri has been excellently
leading his force by example in disregarding
the rule of law. Addressing a
parade of Police Officers going for UN Peace
keeping force on 09 February
2009 Chihuri took the opportunity to threaten
accomplished journalist and
publisher of ***The Zimbabwean, Wilf Mbanga, for
publishing falsehoods.
These unfortunate statements come at a time when the
nation is expecting
Chihuri to uphold press freedom as agreed to in the
GPA.
The perpetrators of the violence against MDC supporters to run up
leading to
the June 2008 Presidential run-off elections are scot free and
still roaming
the villages and streets of Zimbabwe even though the majority
of them have
been named and evidence given to the Police.
A pivotal
role in abuse
The ZRP has continued to play a pivotal role in the abuse of
human rights,
especially against perceived opponents of the former ruling
Zanu (PF) Party,
despite the formation of the inclusive government over a
year ago. The ZRP
has, of late, scored major successes in arbitrary arrests
and torture of
innocent WOZA women, students, MDC officials and supporters,
lawyers, human
rights activists and farmers against greater crime such as
poaching of
rhino, and looting of diamonds which is rampant in Marange
district in
Manicaland Province.
Recently the Parliamentary select
committee on the Constitution (COPAC)
requested the security services of the
ZRP during its forthcoming outreach
programmes. The premise of the request
was that they needed security in
case opponents of constitutional reforms
pounced on them. Surprisingly,
Police Commissioner General Augustine
Chihuri demanded US$ 3 million upfront
before he could release his
incompetent Police Officers to accompany the
commissioners. This is despite
the fact that it is the police's
constitutional duties to protect and
support state organs and institutions.
Chihuri has never in the past
demanded cash upfront to arrest demonstrating
students or women. He is
quick to mobilize his force to crush any peaceful
religious gathering every
Sunday convened by the Anglican Church in Harare.
In the run up to the sham
June 27, 2008 Presidential run-off election, ZRP
Officers either actively
participated in torture, murder and displacement of
Prime Minister
Tsvangirai's supporters or they simply watched as ZNA
soldiers or Zanu (PF)
youths do the same. Some police officers confessed
that they were powerless
to act, saying they were political matters. This
is despite the fact that
all Police Officers are well acquitted to the fact
that they are
constitutionally obliged to carry their duties in non-partisan
manner and
are expected to arrest all perpetrators of violence regardless of
political
affiliation. Now what boggles the mind is why the UN continues to
entrust
such great responsibility to men and women who have openly displayed
gross
incompetence and partisanship in handling political violence cases.
Worse
off, in their UN peacekeeping duties, they will be dealing with
Political
violence cases.
Riddled with corruption
Besides incompetence, the ZRP
has been riddled with corruption among its
rank and file, the Police
Commissioner General recently publicly admitted in
the Herald (16 February
2010) that corruption was rife in force and
threatening to tarnish its
image. Police Officers are also implicated in
the costing of the Marange
diamonds and other murky deals which involve
release of diamond dealers upon
receiving a bribe. Recently a police officer
manning a roadblock was
arrested after he was found in possession of
diamonds in Mutare (Herald 16
Fed 2010) What assurance does the world body
have that such on force will
not engage in those murky deals abroad?
Article 13.2(a) of the Global
Political Agreement (GPA) signed between the
former ruling party Zanu (PF)
party and the two MDC formations states that,
"that there be inclusion in
the training curriculum of members of the
uniformed forms of the subjects on
human rights, international humanitarian
law and statute law so that there
is greater understanding and full
appreciation of their roles and duties in
a multi-party democratic system."
The wisdom of this section arose from the
fact that all three parties
signatory to the GPA acknowledged that the
uniformed forces were previously
discharging their duties in a partisan
manner and disregard basic human
rights.
Now the former ruling Zanu (PF)
party has flatly rejected my moves to reform
the security sector till the
MDC removes the so called 'sanctions.' This is
nothing but a ploy to keep
its stranglehold on the uniformed forces which it
has annexed to its
campaign machinery. The UN is aware of this abuse of the
Police force and
the security sector reforms as required by the GPA yet they
continue to cast
a blind eye on these human right abuses by the ZRP.
Reconsider ZRP's
future
Although the UN is a world body born out of universal suffrage, it
constitutes rogue and undemocratic states such as China, Iran and North
Korea which have no regard for democracy. We sincerely appeal to civilized
countries in the world body such as the US, France, Britain and other EU
countries to seriously reconsider ZRP's future role in peacekeeping
missions. The manner in which the ZRP has conducted itself at home is
disgraceful to say the least.
The UN cannot afford to continue
legitimizing arbitrary arrest and
detention, torture, murder and corruption
of the ZRP by giving it
"peacekeeping missions when they have clearly failed
to maintain peace at
home the UN must first insist on security sector reform
as agreed to by the
GPA before assigning them to any future role in the
world body peacekeeping.
Furthermore if the UN wants anyone to take it and
its programs seriously,
they must also insist on evidence of these reforms
before undertaking to
engage the ZRP in any future peacekeeping role. -
Morgen Kulare is the
National Research and Advocacy Officer for Youth of
Zimbabwe for
Transparency and Progress (YZTP.) For feedback, email yztpzimbabwe@gmail.com
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written by The
Zimbabwean
Monday, 01 March 2010 16:08
Leaders of Women and Men of
Zimbabwe Arise (WOZA/MOZA) today met with the
co-Ministers of Home Affairs,
Kembo Mohadi and Giles Mutsekwa . The meeting
was requested through the
Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP). The human rights
defenders were accompanied
by Dzimbabwe Chimbga from Zimbabwe Lawyers for
Human Rights (ZLHR). The two
hour meeting was attended by the Permanent
Secretary of Home Affairs, Mr.
Melusi Machiya and three other unnamed
officials. Surprisingly, Registrar
General, Tobaiwa Mudede was also in
attendance.
The ministers advised
that they had called the meeting after receiving
numerous reports from law
enforcement agencies regarding the activities of
WOZA. Minister Mutsekwa
opened by advising that the motive of the meeting
was to "bring WOZA and the
ZRP to equal terms, restore harmony and to remove
discord and suspicion".
The minister went on to mention that the power
sharing government is
negatively regarded locally and internationally as an
oppressive government
as a result of WOZA's negative publications and that
this is affecting their
ability to attract investors.
Minister Mohadi admitted that the police had
been accused of being partisan
in the past which had led to the sharing of
the Home Affairs ministry. He
stressed that Zimbabweans should obey their
laws fully or if they do not
like the Public Order and Security Act (POSA),
which is on their statute
books, they should lobby parliament for
amendments. He went on to say that
when the ministers had come into office
they had announced to Zimbabweans
that the time for squabbles is over and
that they should desist from any
activities that could jeopardise the
inclusive government and that WOZA
should have taken their cue from that. He
also insisted that WOZA should put
their trust the police as they are
supposed to keep order. .
With that introduction, they asked the WOZA
delegation to respond. National
Coordinator, Jenni Williams related that at
first WOZA had notified police
of their intention to hold peaceful
demonstrations. Police interpreted
'notify' as 'apply' and that had lead to
police trying to refuse our right
to assembly. At one stage they had
threatened that they would shoot to kill
if members went into the streets.
Williams also mentioned that police do not
comply with POSA regulations as
regards how to disperse a gathering, be it
lawful or unlawful, but use
excessive force. Williams also advised that WOZA
does not need to notify
police as it falls under POSA exemption schedules as
a non-political
organization. In this regard, WOZA has successfully defended
its right to
assembly in seven trials.
At this point a legal argument began which
continued for over 30 minutes
with the ministry interpreting the exceptions
to suit their demand that WOZA
must notify before their demonstrations.
Despite clarity that a 'gathering'
included a procession or a demonstration,
and therefore exemptions applied,
the ministers were adamant that exemptions
do not apply to a demonstration.
This matter remained unresolved and
Minister Mutsekwa insisted that the
legal matter be argued between the
Attorney General and Mr. Chimbga.
In closing the meeting, Minister Mutsekwa
lectured on the "need for peace
and tranquillity in the country and we have
to correct the wrong impression
that we are a lawless country." "We ask you
to start to obey the country's
laws so that investors start coming in and we
can all benefit. There is a
bigger picture than your issues. We are going to
call a press conference
about our meeting with you."
With those comments
they then declared that if WOZA notify police before any
demonstrations,
both ministers would not be found wanting in personally
disciplining any
police excesses. Implicit in this statement is the threat
that if WOZA
continues to exercise their constitutional rights to freedom of
expression
and assembly and their exemption under the Public Order and
Security Act,
they will continue to allow the police to ignore clear
instructions for
dispersing a procession covered under law.
WOZA's legal opinion remains as
follows: the Public Order and Security Act
currently provides the law for
the maintenance of public order and security
in Zimbabwe. Under Section 2 of
the Act, a public gathering is defined as a
"public meeting or a public
demonstration". Sections 23, 24 and 25 outline
the procedure to be followed
by a convener who intends to organize public
demonstrations as defined under
the Act. At the end of the Act appears a
schedule of gatherings to which
sections 23, 24, 25. Of particular relevance
to this situation is paragraph
(i) of the schedule which excludes "any club,
association or organization
which is not of a political nature and at which
the discussions and matters
dealt with are not of a political nature' from
having to give any
notification.
WOZA therefore clearly falls within the provisions of section
(i) of the
schedule and is not obliged to give notice whenever it has its
peaceful
processions on issues which are non-political in nature. WOZA
values the
opportunity to directly engage with the co-ministers and
acknowledges the
time they spent discussing with us. We will continue to
stand firm on our
right to enjoy fully our freedom of expression and
assembly without
hindrance. And in so doing, know that we are obeying the
letter of the
constitutional provisions and the unfortunate Public Order and
Security Act.
Peaceful protest is not the only means by which WOZA members
choose to
engage with their leaders about issues that affect them in their
daily
lives. In a country where democratic space remains limited, however,
we the
ordinary people of Zimbabwe will continue to grab any space possible
to get
our voices heard.
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/
Written by Staff Reporter
Monday, 01 March
2010 07:15
TENGWE - Top army officials who grabbed land during the infamous
land reform
programme are reported to be leasing their farms to former white
commercial
farmers after failing to utilise them.
An investigation by
this paper indicated that most farms in Tengwe,
Mashonaland West, which is
regarded as the breadbasket of the country, were
being leased after
politicians and army officials failed to utilize them.
A farm manager at a
local farm told The Zimbabwean last week that white
commercial farmers were
supplying the inputs, expertise and paying labour.
The farm owner will get a
20 per cent of the total profits of the harvests.
Most farms in Tengwe were
grabbed by top army officials and politicians.
"These are not army officials
who are doing all this excellent work but
there are some former white
commercial farmers behind the scenes. The white
farmers are paying us
salaries and supplying all the inputs. The army
official will get 20 per
cent of the profits of the harvest," said one farm
manager who refused to be
named.
A local white commercial farmer who was evicted from his farm
confirmed that
he is renting a farming space from an army officer for a
fee.
He said he was approached by the officer who revealed that he had failed
to
utilise the land and fearing that this may tarnish the image of the
country
and President Robert Mugabe's land reform programme.
Farm workers
interviewed said life had improved slightly compared to when
the army
official was running the operations.
"At least the white commercial farmer is
paying us a decent salary, compared
to the army officials. We are also
receiving food rations and this motivates
us to work," said one farm worker
who preferred anonymity.
However, a survey by this paper revealed that
infrastructure such as tobacco
barns and irrigation pivots were vandalized
during the infamous farm
invasions and white commercial farmers were facing
challenges in irrigating
their crops.
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/
Written by Natasha Hove
Monday, 01 March 2010 06:44
BULAWAYO
– The city council has resolved to seek audience with individual
ministers
to force them to direct their government departments to pay up
their
outstanding debts.
Government departments in Bulawayo owe the council
over US$3,7m for water
and other services dating back to February last
year.
Attempts by the BCC to disconnect water supplies at various government
ministries to force them to settle their outstanding fees have been met with
resistance. In some cases, the police have barred council engineers from
disconnecting water supplies at police stations.
Failure by the various
government departments to settle their outstanding
debts was severely
affecting service delivery, council officials said, at a
time when the local
authority was experiencing a cash squeeze.
“Meeting the ministers personally
is the last resort by the council to
recover our money,” Bulawayo Mayor,
Thaba Moyo, said in an interview last
week.
The latest city council
minutes indicate that the local authority is
struggling to meet its service
delivery target due to failure by government
departments and other
ratepayers to pay their bills. Although residents and
other private
companies also owe the council, the government departments’
debts constitute
the largest amount.
In January, the BCC was forced to cut water supplies to
the Bulawayo Prison
Complex, popularly known as Grey Street Prison and
Western Commonage
Magistrates’ courts, over unpaid water bills amounting
toUS$700 000.
Meanwhile, the BCC has also resolved to sue parents and
guardians of pupils
who finished their Grade 7 at its schools last year to
force them to settle
outstanding fees for the third term of 2009.
The BCC
is owed about US$800 000 by the former Grade 7 pupils.
“Schools were
requested to submit list of fees defaulters for all grade 7
pupils. The list
was passed on to the Chamber Secretary (legal section) for
action as Grade
7’s would be leaving our schools,” read in part the council
minutes.
http://www.kuna.net.kw/
Politics 3/1/2010
9:25:00 PM
WASHINGTON, March 1 (KUNA) -- U.S. Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton
announced the ten Winners of the 2010 International Women of Courage
(IWOC)
Award, the State Department said here Monday.
The winners are
Shukria Asil and Shafiqa Quraishi from Afghanistan, Androula
Henriques from
Cyprus, Sonia Pierre from the Dominican Republic, Shadi Sadr
from Iran, Ann
Njogu from Kenya, Dr. Lee Ae-ran from the Republic of Korea,
Jansila Majeed
from Sri Lanka, Marie Claude Naddaf from Syria and Jestina
Mukoko from
Zimbabwe, the State Department said in a satatement.
The statement added that
Clinton will present the awards to the honorees at
the Department of State
on March 10.
On this occasion, State Departments first ever
Ambassador-at-Large for
Global Womens Issues Melanne Verveer said "These ten
women have overcome
personal adversity, threats, arrest, and assault to
dedicate themselves to
activism for human rights." "From striving to give
more voice to politically
underrepresented women in Afghanistan to
documenting human rights abuses in
Zimbabwe, these heroic individuals have
made it their lifes work to increase
freedom and equality in the world," she
added.
The annual International Women of Courage Award was started in March
2007 to
recognize women around the globe who have shown exceptional courage
and
leadership in advocating for women's rights and advancement.
This is
the only award within the Department of State that pays tribute to
outstanding women leaders worldwide. It recognizes the courage and
leadership shown as they struggle for social justice and human rights. (end)
si.bz.
KUNA 012125 Mar 10NNNN
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Tichaona Sibanda
1 March
2010
A 24 year-old Zimbabwean man who has been languishing at an
immigration
detention centre in the UK for close to two years has made a
fresh plea for
his freedom.
Tatenda Jera who turns 25 next month, has
been held in Portsmouth since 2008
awaiting deportation. Two months ago he
was moved to a psychiatric clinic
after fears that he might be suffering
from bouts of depression, anxiety and
general mood disorders.
Jera
told SW Radio Africa on Monday that following treatment he has been
moved
back to Haslar immigration detention centre.
"I feel fine now but I'm
generally disappointed that they are taking me back
to the detention centre.
My solicitors have tried in vain to have me
released on bail, so I'm
shattered and don't know what to do,' Jera said.
"Now I'm making a direct
appeal to the authorities to please look at my case
as I've been left to rot
in the detention centre. I am not a criminal, but I'm
being treated like
one,' Jera added. He came to the UK in 2000 when he fled
Zimbabwe's
political troubles.
He got into trouble with UK authorities in July 2008
when he was arrested
for not paying fines. He accumulated substantial fines
for not paying fares
on London's public transport network in
2008.
"The immigration authorities are arguing that I have no respect for
the
British laws. But having spent almost two years in a detention centre I
believe I've paid for the misdemeanours that got me into trouble," he
said.
Jera claimed asylum three times but his applications have been
denied. He
says he fears he might relapse into another bout of depression if
he's
denied his freedom.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Alex Bell
01 March
2010
Critics have slammed this weekend’s lavish celebrations held in
honour of
Robert Mugabe’s 86th birthday, calling it a ‘senseless’
extravagance in
light of the ongoing civil servants strike and critical food
shortages.
The party, which started with an all night musical gala on
Friday night and
ended with a sumptuous feast on Saturday, is believed to
have cost close to
US$300 000. The musical gala featured international
artists including
Jamaican reggae icon Sizzla Kalonji, who gushed to
journalists over his
‘honour’ at being invited. Other artists included South
Africa’s Soul
Brothers and Mzwakhe Mbuli. Saturday’s feast meanwhile
featured a decadent
array of food, a display which was broadcast live via
the ZBC.
SW Radio Africa correspondent Simon Muchemwa was among the many
of people
gathered for the event, which critics have called a ‘waste of
money,’ and
insensitive. He explained that hotels throughout Bulawayo were
fully booked
and school children from across the country had been bussed
into the city to
watch Mugabe cut his 86kg cake. Muchemwa reported how top
officials from
ZANU PF and other noted guests were wined and dined in
luxurious style,
while many of the school children were left hungry during
the live televised
party on Saturday. He added that while the event was
generally a joyous
affair, there were numerous reports of thefts amongst the
crowds of people
gathered.
Several people in Bulawayo and Harare told
Muchemwa that the party was ‘a
waste of money;’ money that could have been
spent on improving vital
services in both cities. The party was also
organised amid a nationwide
civil servants strike that, despite losing much
of its momentum, has
highlighted the financial crisis facing the government,
which cannot
increase its wage bill. At the same time, IRIN News has
reported that about
1.6 million Zimbabweans are ‘food-insecure,’ with about
1.9 million
receiving food aid. The report, based on an update compiled by
several UN
agencies, said at
least 35% of children in Zimbabwe are
severely malnourished.
“Holding these huge celebrations, even as civil
servants strike for better
wages, shows that the inclusive government has
done nothing to change the
arrogance of ZANU-PF, which insists on
maintaining a personality cult around
its leader, Mugabe, by nationalising
what should be a private affair,” said
political commentator John
Makumbe.
Notably absent from the birthday bash was Mugabe’s partner in
the unity
government, Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai. MDC spokesman Nelson
Chamisa
is quoted as saying that the event was a “ZANU PF function, not a
national
function,” adding the MDC only joins ZANU PF during ‘national
events’.
Another MDC spokesperson quoted by the AFP news service, said the
party was
a ‘senseless extravagance.’
Mugabe meanwhile used the
occasion to defend the controversial
indigenisation law, which compels
foreign firms to cede at least 51%
shareholding to indigenous Zimbabweans.
Foreign owned companies have 45 days
from Monday to declare the racial
make-up of their shareholding to the
government. The companies will then
have five years to comply with the law,
or face possible jail
time.
“We will need partners from outside, partners of our own choice not
partners
who impose them. Those who would want to impose partners would be
aggressors. They are unwanted, we would repulse them,” Mugabe
said.
Mugabe also called on youths to demand the lifting of Western
imposed
targeted sanctions on Zimbabwe which he termed evil and an
impediment to
Zimbabwe’s development. He accused Western countries of
relentless attempts
to gain control of the country’s rich natural
resources.
“I would want to urge all the youth movements across the
country and perhaps
even across Africa to now raise their voices louder than
before in demanding
that imperialists countries of Europe and America leave
us alone and drop
those evil sanctions that they have imposed on us,” he
said.
Kate Hoey has praised the role of the churches and trade unions in Zimbabwe during an address at Southwark Cathedral.
Speaking on Sunday at a fundraising Masvingo Link Day held in the cathedral's
nave,
the campaigning Vauxhall Labour MP, who has visited Zimbabwe three
times undercover, recalled seeing peoples homes being literally knocked
down.
"What was so striking is that it was the ordinary church members of Bulawayo who had swung into action to help those people whilst the Red Cross and other agencies took much longer. It was the church which was in the forefront.
"On another visit to Zimbabwe I called on Lucia Matibenga at her home in Gwelo when she was recovering from a savage beating from the secret police because as a vice-president of the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions she had led a protest on the streets of Harare."
Kate Hoey wore a white silk scarf decorated with the slogan 'Enough is Enough' and the letters WOZA for 'women of Zimbabwe arise' which had been presented to her by women in Bulawayo.
"I am so proud of the fact that wherever I went in Zimbabwe I saw women leading the struggle," she said.
"The women of Zimbabwe, when we get a peaceful democracy, are going to be so important to bringing the country back to what it was before."
The MP was introduced by Canon Bruce Saunders who said that the lunch event was definitely not part of President Mugabe's birthday celebrations.
Earlier in the day Fr James Mukunga from Zimbabwe, currently a member of the cathedral clergy team, was celebrant at the Sunday Choral Eucharist.
As chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Zimbabwe, Kate Hoey will this week be taking part in talks about Zimbabwe with the South African foreign minister.
Masvingo Link Day marked the launch of the cathedral's partnership with the Anglican Diocese of Masvingo in Zimbabwe. The Cathedral Council has pledged to raise £10,000 a year to support clergy stipends, theological training, church building and healthcare projects.
The United Nations's emphasis on
working with and through governments can horribly undermine its efforts to
alleviate suffering - especially when governments are key drivers of the
suffering to begin with. A Foreign Policy article
this week offers a chilling story of how this has unfolded in Zimbabwe over the
last several years.
The article discusses policy disagreements between
the U.N. country director for Zimbabwe, Agostinho Zacarias, and Georges Tadonki,
who headed up the U.N. humanitarian office in the country. According to the
article, Zacarias desired a cooperative relationship with President Mugabe and
his ruling ZANU-PF party, and to that end was willing to downplay many of the
problems plaguing the country.
The resulting policy included "forcing agencies in Zimbabwe
to . . . [equate the situation in Zimbabwe with that in other African countries]
that the agriculture is troubling because there is no rain, that the education
is failing because of a lack of resources from taxes." These explanations
deliberately excluded contributing factors such as land seizures, centrally
planned prices for agricultural goods and other basic commodities, and political
repression - factors for which Mugabe and his
supporters were responsible.
When Mugabe failed to win the March 2008
election, it was dubiously asserted that opposition candidate Morgan Tsvangirai
also failed to receive a majority of the votes, and a run-off election
was set for June 2008. Mugabe's supporters launched a violent campaign,
resulting in many deaths. The violence eventually led Tsvangirai to withdraw out of
concern for the welfare of his supporters.
According to Tadonki, "We are
responsible for those deaths. If the United Nations had told Mugabe, 'We know
what you are planning,' we wouldn't have seen it. . . . We all sat [in Harare]
and knew that in the countryside, 60 percent of Zimbabweans were being killed or
raped."
Also, the U.N. downplayed a looming cholera outbreak at the
behest of Mugabe. According to the article:
In the 11 months between August 2008 and July of last year, nearly 100,000 Zimbabweans came down with cholera in the first countrywide epidemic of the disease in modern history. Previous outbreaks in Zimbabwe, which have occurred annually since 2003, had affected only pockets of the country. This time, cholera was everywhere. Corpses filled the streets and hospital beds. In some districts early in the crisis, half of those infected died. . . .
A Nov. 19, 2008, U.N. appeal for aid, issued months after the cholera epidemic began, predicted just 2,000 cholera cases. Just two months later, the death toll alone had already reached that number. In all, more than 4,000 people died between August 2008 and July 2009, and roughly 98,600 people had caught the disease. The true figures might be even higher.
Ed Schenkenberg van Mierop, an independent analyst
present in Zimbabwe at the time, corroborates Tadonki's claims that his warnings
of a cholera outbreak went unheeded, observing, "It was very clear that no
action was taken. That is what I would call criminal neglect on the part of the
U.N."
Unsuprisingly, Tadonki was fired - for refusing to go along with
the U.N. country director's policy of appeasing Mugabe, for confronting the
government with NGO estimates (admittedly without permission) of the burgeoning
epidemic, and for raising objections in correspondence with the country director
and with his own superiors in New York. He has appealed, and his case is under
review.
It would be nice to think that the Zimbabwe
situation was unique. However, the U.N. is involved in virtually every
developing country on the planet, including those controlled by despotic
regimes, such as North Korea, Burma, and Iran. The article quotes a senior U.N.
official on the dilemma faced by the U.N. in these countries:
The U.N. has to work with the government. Clearly, we work in a lot of countries where the government can make it very challenging. But should we say forget it? Or stay and try to help? . . . To be the resident coordinator in some of these countries is not an easy task; you have to deal with the consequences of the actions of those regimes, but in a way that those regimes don't take for granted that you'll be there to clean up.
But how much does U.N. assistance aid the governments in
these countries instead of the people suffering under their rule? The
organization's officials all too often ignore the dilemma altogether.
Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs Lynn Pascoe recently stated
about U.N. assistance to North Korea, "These are human beings that need the
food. It's not the political system. This shouldn't be argued in a political
way."
This amounts to whistling past the graveyard. Governments often
cause these crises directly, or exacerbate smaller problems until they grow to
unmanageable proportions. Pretending that a crisis can be addressed effectively
without addressing its underlying causes does a disservice to those most
affected - and those most likely to be affected by the next crisis.
The
desire to help those in need is understandable. However, it does not obviate the
responsibility of donors to face the situation - and its causes - forthrightly.
As I recommended in my papers on U.N. aid to North
Korea and Burma,
it is eminently reasonable (though politically difficult) for the U.S. and the
U.N. to deny food and humanitarian assistance that may aid a repressive
government rather than its citizens, and to demand that the government agree to
rigorous, transparent monitoring standards and delivery verification. Failing to
do this can have consequences that rival those of doing nothing at all - as the
citizens of Zimbabwe can testify.
- Brett D.
Schaefer is the Jay Kingham Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs in the
Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation and editor of
ConUNdrum:
The Limits of the United Nations and the Search for Alternatives (Rowman
& Littlefield Publishers, 2009).
145 Robert Mugabe Road,
Exploration House, Third Floor; Website: www.chra.co.zw
Contacts: Mobile: 0913 042 981,
011 862 012, 0733 368 107 or email info@chra.co.zw, admin@chra.co.zw, ceo@chra.co.zw
Mabvuku-Tafara residents
relieved
…as Council decides to
regularize ‘illegal structures’
01 March
2010
The
Harare City Council has regularized and approved extensions of about 2000 houses
in the high density suburb of Tafara. This development came after residents in
the area had raised an outcry over the US$63 penalty that was being charged by
the City of Harare for converting the verandahs of their four roomed houses into
small living rooms. The City of Harare had labelled this exercise as illegal and
residents were now being penalized for building ‘illegal structures’. Residents
however, argued that the housing situation in the area was becoming a problem
(as is the situation in many other high density areas e.g. Dzivarasekwa) and the
City of Harare has not responded to the population growth by building more
houses.
The
regularization came after the Ward 20 Councilor, Casper Takura, presented the
residents’ plight to Council citing the challenge of accommodation which has
seriously affected residents of Tafara, many of whom are still suffering from
the effects of Operation Murambatsvina. In an interview with the CHRA Team,
Councilor Takura explained that at least 2000 more rooms will be created and on
average 6000 residents will benefit from this set up considering that 3 to 4
people are sharing a room in Tafara. In this new setting the Harare City Council
has come up with three standard plans for the extensions of verandahs that are
available at Tafara District Offices. Residents can get these Plans for $30
which will cover both submission and approval fees. Councilor Takura highlighted
that all Tafara residents who had been penalized for ‘illegal structures’ will
have the penalties reversed by the 1st of March 2010. Mr Kurauone,
the Acting Town Planner for the City of Harare confirmed the new arrangement and
encouraged residents to purchase their Housing Plans as the Town Planning
department had already worked on the Plans. Most residents in Tafara have
received whopping bills of up to US$450 due to the penalties on ‘illegal
structures’.
Many residents have applauded the regularization of
house extensions saying that this will go a long way in alleviating the
challenges of accommodation in the suburb; a situation that has forced some
residents to relocate to nearby Caledonia Farm. Residents however, urged the
Harare City Council to prioritize and expedite the process of reversing
penalties so that they can have assurance of Council’s commitment and confidence
in the regularization. Sarudzai Kembo, CHRA Ward 46 Coordinator, welcomed the
move but highlighted that many residents were still not aware of the new
arrangement and recommended that the City Council should publicize the
regularization of the structures.
CHRA also urges the City of Harare to work on the water
infrastructure in the area as well so as to enhance its capacity to cater for
the growing population. The Association is committed to fighting for the
residents’ cause and advocating for quality and affordable municipal
services.