http://www.swradioafrica.com
By Tichaona Sibanda
24
May 2011
Police in Tsholotsho on Monday mounted a roadblock ‘to
specifically arrest’
two Zimbabwe Human Rights Association employees
(ZimRights), its director
said on Tuesday.
Okay Machisa told SW Radio
Africa that police prevented regional coordinator
Florence Ndlovu, and
paralegal officer Walter Dube, from conducting a
‘torture workshop’ despite
the two having a court order allowing them to do
so. The workshop was
organised to give villagers information about torture
and its effect, as so
many Zimbabweans have suffered from this cruel abuse
of human
rights.
‘They were in Tsholotsho legally because a magistrate granted us
permission
on the 20th May to hold the workshop. Initially we notified the
police on
the 17th of our intentions but they blocked us and we ended up
seeking the
services of the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights who applied
for a court
order for us to have the workshop,’ Machisa said.
The
director said when the police barred Ndlovu and Dube from addressing
villagers at Tshino business centre, they told the duo to leave the area.
The ZimRights officials complied and proceeded to drive back to Bulawayo,
but a few kilometres from Tshino they came across the
roadblock.
‘That roadblock was specifically mounted to arrest them and
they were taken
to Nyamandlovu police. But they did not break any law and
we’ve not heard
from them since yesterday (Monday). Attempts by our lawyers
to have access
to the two have been in vain as the police are misleading us
as to their
whereabouts,’ Machisa added.
Police at Nyamandlovu are
denying that they are holding Ndlovu and Dube
while ZimRights contend that
is where they are being held.
‘The vehicle that the two were using is
still parked at Nyamandlovu police
station. Tomorrow (Wednesday) is a
holiday and we strongly believe the
police just want to punish them for
nothing. They want to keep them for 48
hours before releasing them and we’ve
seen this being done to other
activists,’ Machisa said.
The ZimRights
director claimed police were in breach of the country’s laws
when they
arrested their employees. He said there are statutes in the
constitution
that guarantee freedom of assembly and expression, particularly
when you
notify the authorities in advance.
‘We are calling on the inclusive
government to ensure that all individuals
are allowed to express their views
freely and openly without fear of arrest,
violence, or other forms of
intimidation. We also call on the authorities to
issue clear instructions to
the police that they should not use force to
respond to peaceful protests,
and to bring justice to those found
responsible for carrying out or ordering
such abuses,’ Machisa said.
The arrest of these human rights officials is
the latest in a series of
arrests of civil society activists, lawyers,
journalists and legislators
from the MDC-T.
URGENT APPEAL - THE OBSERVATORY
ZWE 003 / 0511 / OBS 081
Arbitrary arrest /
Obstacle to freedom of peaceful assembly
Zimbabwe
May 24, 2011
The Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, a joint programme of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), requests your urgent intervention in the following situation in Zimbabwe.
Description of the situation :
The Observatory has been informed by reliable sources about the arbitrary arrest by the police of Ms. Florence Ndlovu and Mr. Walter Dube, respectively Regional Coordinator for Matabeleland province and Paralegal Officer for Matabeleland, Midlands and Masvingo provinces for Zimbabwe Human Rights Association (ZimRights), as well as about the disruption by the police of a meeting convened by ZimRights on torture in Tsholotsho, Matabeleland North province.
According to the information received, on May 23, 2011, Ms. Florence Ndlovu and Mr. Walter Dube were arrested by the police as they were coming from Tshino Business Centre in Tsholotsho, where the police had earlier on disrupted a workshop that was being convened by ZimRights to raise villagers’ awareness about torture and its effects, on the pretext that the meeting was unlawful.
As of issuing this Urgent Appeal, Ms. Florence Ndlovu and Mr. Walter Dube remained detained at Nyamandlovu police station in Matebeleland North province, at about 40km out of Bulawayo. In addition, two lawyers from Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) who had gone to deal with the case were denied access to them after mounting a rapid response to their arrest. The police denied detaining Ms. Ndlovu and Mr. Dube and claimed that the two ZimRights employees had been taken to Sipepa Business Centre despite evidence of their detention through the presence of their vehicle that was parked at the police station.
By the night of the same day, the lawyers were working on filing a habeas corpus petition to challenge the detention of the two ZimRights staff members.
The police action in disrupting the ZimRights workshop is in defiance of a court order which was issued on May 20 by Bulawayo Magistrate Ntombizodwa Mazhandu. Indeed, in accordance with legal provisions, on May 17, 2011, ZIMRIGHTS regional officers gave notice to the police of their intention to hold the meeting. ZimRights was then forced to engage the services of ZLHR after the Police Officer Commanding Tsholotsho District in Matabeleland North banned them from holding the workshop after claiming that “the subject of torture is not in line with Zimbabwean culture”. ZLHR filed an application before the Bulawayo Magistrate Court arguing that under Section 24 of the Public Order and Security Act (POSA) they were exempt from notifying the police as this was not a political gathering. On May 20, 2011, Magistrate Mazhandu interdicted the police from disturbing or interfering in any way with the ZimRights workshop and ordered the organisation to proceed with the workshop as scheduled and promote its right to freedom of association and assembly as set out in Section 21 of the Constitution and the right to freedom of expression as guaranteed under Section 20 of the Constitution.
The Observatory deeply condemns the arbitrary arrest of Ms. Florence Ndlovu and Mr. Walter Dube, which seems to merely aim at sanctioning their human rights activities, and urges the Zimbabwean authorities to guarantee their physical and psychological integrity as well as to release them immediately and unconditionally since their detention is arbitrary.
Actions requested:
Please write to the authorities of Zimbabwe asking them to:
i. Guarantee in all circumstances the physical and psychological integrity of Ms. Florence Ndlovu and Mr. Walter Dube as well as all ZimRights members and all human rights defenders in the country;
ii. Release Ms. Florence Ndlovu and Mr. Walter Dube immediately and unconditionally since their detention is arbitrary as it only aims at sanctioning their human rights activities;
iii. In the meantime, guarantee unconditional access to their lawyers and families;
iv. Order an immediate, thorough, effective and impartial investigation into the above-mentioned facts, the result of which must be made public, in order to identify all those responsible, bring them before a civil competent and impartial tribunal and apply to them the penal and/or administrative sanctions provided by the law;
v. Put an end to any kind of harassment - including at the judicial level - against Ms. Florence Ndlovu and Mr. Walter Dube as well as against all human rights defenders in Zimbabwe;
vi. Conform with the provisions of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on December 9, 1998, especially its Article 1, which states that “everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to promote and to strive for the protection and realisation of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the national and international levels”, and Article 12.2, which provides that the State shall “take all necessary measures to ensure the protection by the competent authorities of everyone, individually and in association with others, against any violence, threats, retaliation, de facto or de jure adverse discrimination, pressure or any other arbitrary action as a consequence of his or her legitimate exercise of his or her rights”;
vii. More generally, ensure in all circumstances the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in accordance with in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international and regional human rights instruments ratified by Zimbabwe.
Addresses:
· President of Zimbabwe, Mr. Robert G. Mugabe, Office of the President, Private Bag 7700, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe, Fax : +263 4 708 211 / + 263.4.70.38.58;
· Mr. Khembo Mohadi, co-Minister of Home Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs, 11th Floor Mukwati Building, Private Bag 7703, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe, Fax : +263 4 726 716;
· Ms. Terese Makone, co-Minister of Home Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs, 11th Floor Mukwati Building, Private Bag 7703, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe, Fax : +263 4 726 716;
· Mr. Patrick Chinamasa, Minister of Justice and Legal Affairs, Fax: + 263 4 77 29 99 / +263 4 252 155;
· Mr. Augustine Chihuri, Commissioner General, Police Headquarters, P.O. Box 8807, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe, Fax : +263 4 253 212 / 728 768 / 726 084;
· Mr. Johannes Tomana, Attorney-General, Office of the Attorney, PO Box 7714, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe, Fax: + 263 4 77 32 47;
· Ms. Chanetsa, Office of the Public Protector, Fax: + 263 4 70 41 19;
· Ambassador Mr. Chitsaka Chipaziwa, Permanent Mission of Zimbabwe to the United Nations in Geneva, Chemin William Barbey 27, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland, Fax: + 41 22 758 30 44, Email: mission.zimbabwe@ties.itu.int;
· Embassy of
Zimbabwe in Brussels, 11 SQ Josephine Charlotte, 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert,
Belgium, Fax: + 32 2 762 96 05 / + 32 2 775 65 10, Email: zimbrussels@skynet.be.
Please also write to the embassies of Zimbabwe in your respective country.
***
Paris-Geneva, May 24, 2011
Kindly inform us of any action undertaken quoting the code of this appeal in your reply.
The Observatory, a FIDH and OMCT venture, is dedicated to the protection of Human Rights Defenders and aims to offer them concrete support in their time of need. The Observatory was the winner of the 1998 Human Rights Prize of the French Republic.
To contact the Observatory, call the emergency line:
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Alex Bell
24 May
2011
Pressure continues to grow on the British government to suspend all
direct
financial aid to the leadership in the Southern African Development
Community (SADC), until it implements a plan that will bring real democratic
change to Zimbabwe.
The London based protest group, the Zimbabwe
Vigil, has been calling for
these measures for several months, “to help
focus the minds of SADC
leaders.” The group’s Rose Benton told SW Radio
Africa on Tuesday that
country’s who insist on supporting Robert Mugabe
should not receive any
financial support from Britain, because they act
against Britain’s own
commitments to protection of human rights.
“The
whole region will be affected if Mugabe is allowed to continue his
reign of
bad governance. The whole region will be compromised, if it isn’t
already,”
Benton explained, adding: “If Britain wants stability in the
region and
respect for human rights, then they need to take serious action
against the
governments that stand in the way.”
Benton was speaking just days after
rampant corruption within the SADC
Secretariat was revealed by the Namibian
newspaper, the Windhoek Observer.
On the same day the regional bloc’s Summit
of leaders got underway, the
newspaper reported that this corruption is set
to be investigated.
According to inside sources quoted by the newspaper,
the audit will examine
a wide range of issues surrounding the operations of
the top management at
the Secretariat. The sources told the Windhoek
Observer that if SADC goes
ahead and institutes the forensic audit, “it
could open up a can of worms.”
“We want an investigation because this has
become an institution of money
laundering, they create illegal contracts,
they are always travelling
abroad, there is no transparency and
accountability, and they lie to the
Council,” the sources are quoted as
saying.
The sources also told the newspaper that corrupt SADC officials
“use
regional integration as a shield and in this case an investigation will
be
the only solution.” The sources said the implementation of regional
projects
“has suffered because those heading the Secretariat do not seem to
have the
plight of SADC citizens at heart, but show more interest in flying
first-class and living in luxury hotels.”
It was further alleged that
there was “rampant misuse of donor and member
state funds,” saying top
officials at the Secretariat “have an addiction to
lavish
spending.”
The Zimbabwe Vigil’s Benton said such allegations of
corruption do not come
as a surprise, adding that these reports alone should
force the UK and
Europe to at least consider some kind of funding
cut.
“We believe that Britain and the European Union can be much tougher
on the
countries and institutions that they give aid to. They should be
insisting
that human rights be a top priority for any country they give aid
to,”
Benton said.
http://www.zimonline.co.za/
by Thulani Munda Tuesday 24 May
2011
HARARE – Zimbabwe’s embattled white farmers says they are
devastated at the
dissolution of a regional court they had seen as their
last hope for
protection against President Robert Mugabe’s relentless land
reforms.
The Southern African Development Community (SADC) Tribunal had
raised hope
among farmers they could keep their land or get compensation for
farms
already seized after the court in 2008 ruled Mugabe’s reforms
illegal.
But a summit of SADC leaders in Namibia last weekend agreed to
dissolve the
Tribunal while also invalidating its Zimbabwe land rulings, in
a major
victory for Mugabe who had ignored the court’s orders saying they
were not
binding because a protocol establishing the court had not been
properly
ratified.
"It’s huge, massive disappointment for us," said
Deon Theron, president of
the Commercial Farmers Union that represents most
of Zimbabwe’s few
remaining white farmers.
"It’s a major step
backwards fro us. We are disappointed at the decision
against the Tribunal
….. the Tribunal could have played a vital role in
conflict resolution
either between individuals within the region or between
states within the
region," Theron told ZimOnline.
A group of 78 farmers who said they had
failed to get justice from the
Zimbabwean courts appealed to the Tribunal
for protection against attempts
to seize their land.
The Namibia
–based Tribunal appeared to deal a heavy body blow to Mugabe’s
controversial
programme to seize white-owned farmland for redistribution to
blacks when it
ruled in November 2008 that the chaotic and often violent
programme was
discriminatory, racist and illegal under the SADC Treaty.
The regional
court also ordered Harare not to evict the 78 farmers and that
it pays full
compensation to those it had already forced off farms.
Mugabe publicly
dismissed the Tribunal’s ruling, with his Justice Minister
Patrick Chinamasa
insisting the court’s constituting treaty had not been
ratified by
two-thirds of the regional bloc’s members as required.
The Zimbabwean
High Court also refused to register the Tribunal’s ruling
saying registering
and enforcing the judgment would have a negative impact
on Zimbabwe’s
agrarian reforms.
Analysts expect SADC justice ministers and attorney
generals tasked by
regional leaders to review the terms of reference of the
Tribunal to
recommend that any new regional court be limited to hearing only
inter-state
disputes, ruling out access for the Zimbabwean farmers to the
court.
The farmers also cannot contest acquisition of their land in
Zimbabwe’s
courts because Section 16 B of the country’s Constitution
prohibits
landowners or occupiers whose property has been acquired by the
government
for purposes of resettlement from challenging the legality of
such
acquisition in a court of law.
Land redistribution -- that
Mugabe says was necessary to correct a “unjust
and immoral” colonial land
ownership system that reserved the best land for
whites and banished blacks
to poor soil -- is blamed for plunging Zimbabwe
into food shortages after
the veteran leader failed to support black
villagers resettled on former
white farms with inputs to maintain
production.
On the other hand
critics say Mugabe’s powerful cronies, and not ordinary
peasants, benefited
the most from farm seizures with some of them ending up
with as many as six
farms each against the government’s stated
one-man-one-farm policy. --
ZimOnline
Crawford von
Abo has reached the end of the road in his bid for compensation from the SA
Government for the expropriation of his farms in Zimbabwe. According to a Beeld report, Von Abo approached the Constitutional Court after the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) found that although the government had acted in an unconstitutional manner in its diplomatic assistance to Von Abo, SA law does not recognise a principle where one government may be held accountable for the actions of another. The North Gauteng High Court initially ordered the government to compensate Von Abo due to its failure to provide diplomatic assistance. According to the report, Von Abo argued in his Constitutional Court application that the SCA judgment itself was unconstitutional as the court could not find unconstitutional conduct with purely 'theoretical value'. The report says the government also appealed to Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo, arguing that the SCA erred in finding that it acted in an unconstitutional manner towards Von Abo. However, both applications were unanimously dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success. Full Beeld report |
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
By Chengetai Zvauya, Staff Writer
Tuesday, 24 May
2011 15:11
HARARE - Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s MDC has said
the disbandment of
the Sadc Tribunal is unjust as it strengthens dictators
who have a firm hand
on their countries’ judiciary.
Douglas Mwonzora,
the party spokesperson, said it was tragic that regional
leaders had been
swayed by countries such as Zimbabwe that have received
negative rulings
from the Tribunal in the past.
Sadc leaders agreed to suspend the
Tribunal by a year at the Windhoek
extra-ordinary summit held on
Friday.
But Mwonzora said his party would continue lobbying for the
resuscitation of
the Tribunal, which gave people whose rights are trampled
at home a voice.
“It is a tragedy that the Sadc Tribunal was
dissolved.
We feel that when we have domestic interference within the
judiciary we
expect that the external Tribunal would provide a safety valve
for Zimbabwe,
and we hope that it will be reconstituted soon,” said
Mwonzora.
Minister of Justice and Legal Affairs Patrick Chinamasa, who is
Zanu PF’s
chief inter-party negotiator, told the Daily News that the
government would
now push with its land reforms without the Tribunal on its
back.
http://www.radiovop.com/
5 hours 9 minutes
ago
WINDHOEK, May 24, 2011- The Namibian Police on Monday said a
report that
Zimbabwean activists were detained and thrown out of the
Southern African
Development Community (SADC) Extraordinary Summit on Friday
was a
“fabricated” story, the Namibian newspaper reported.
The paper
reported on Monday that Irene Petras of Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human
Rights,
Joy Mabenga of the Institute for Democratic Alliances for Zimbabwe
(IDAZIM),
and freelance journalist Jealousy Mawarire were arrested in the
Safari Hotel
lobby where the summit took place.
Lloyd Kuveya of the Southern African
Litigation Centre (SALC) also suggested
that the reported Namibian Police
action appeared to have been at the behest
of Zimbabwean security police who
recognised the Zimbabweans at the summit.
A statement issued by Chief
Inspector Angula Amulungu of the Namibian Police
said at “no stage were the
three arrested or detained”.
He said that the Police did not take any person
into its holding cells
anywhere in Windhoek.
He did, however, confirm
that the group was instructed to leave the summit
premises after the
security detail noticed that the group was not accredited
to attend the
event as required by the organisers.
“These people were in groups; one
group was not accredited,” said Amulungu,
adding that it was trying to get
into the summit.
Amulungu said journalist Mawarire, apart from not being
accredited for the
summit, “could have been arrested for transgressing
immigration laws which
require him to possess a temporary work permit, which
he admittedly did not
have when asked to produce it”.
He said the
Namibian Police’s mandate to maintain law and order, “did not
land on our
hands by coincidence by rather through Constitutional mandate
and we are
proud to carry it out without fear or favour”.
The CEO of the Nangof Trust,
Ivin Lombardt, said he had established by
yesterday afternoon that the three
Zimbabweans were “detained” on the
premises of the Safari Hotel and then
released two hours later – some time
between 15h00 and 18h00 – “to prevent
them from going anywhere or talking”
to anyone.
The activists were
planning to present delegates at the summit with a
document calling for the
full implementation of the Global Political
Agreement (GPA). The document
also demanded that SADC lay out in clear terms
firm preconditions to ensure
democratic elections in Zimbabwe that are
without violence and intimidation,
and in full compliance with SADC
principles and guidelines governing
democratic elections.
Lombardt said most of the Zimbabwean activists who came
to Namibia last week
had left the country over the weekend.
http://www.voanews.com
Southern
African diplomatic sources and SADC officials say they were shocked
by the
initiative pursued by various high-level Mugabe envoys dispatched
last week
to regional capitals ahead of the SADC summit
Blessing Zulu &
Benedict Nhlapho | Washington 23 May 2011
Diplomatic sources say a
move by Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe to
neutralize the tough
communiqué issued in April by the Southern African
Development Community
troika on Zimbabwe and dismantle the facilitation team
of South African
President Jacob Zuma, SADC's mediator in Harare, has hit a
brick wall and
stirred regional backlash.
The Livingstone, Zambia, meeting of SADC's
troika politics, defense and
security called on President Mugabe to halt
political violence and
accelerate democratic reforms. The statement was
widely seen as a rebuke to
President Mugabe and a 180-degree turn by the
regional organization, which
has often been hesitant to confront
him.
Southern African diplomatic sources and SADC officials say they were
shocked
by the initiative pursued by various high-level Mugabe envoys
dispatched
last week to regional capitals ahead of the SADC summit on Friday
in
Windhoek, Namibia. That summit was to have taken up Zimbabwean issues
before
a last minute change of agenda.
President Mugabe met Namibian
leader Hifikipunye Pohamba, current SADC
chairman. Vice President John Nkomo
was dispatched to South Africa and
Botswana.
Presidential Affairs
Minister Didymus Mutasa was in Tanzania, Defense
Minister Emmerson Mnangagwa
traveled to Angola and the Democratic Republic
of Congo, while National
Security Minister Sydney Sekeramai was sent to
Mozambique and Zambia and
Land Reform Minister Herbert Murerwa lobbied in
Seychelles and
Mauritius.
Zimbabwe's former ruling party also dispatched
non-governmental
organizations led by party activist Goodson Nguni under
aegis of the
All-Africa Association of NGOs.
Nguni is said to have
been distributing a pamphlet during the Windhoek
summit entitled, "The MDC
and the Culture of Violence." The document sought
to blame political
violence in Zimbabwe on Prime minister Morgan Tsvangirai
Movement for
Democratic Change.
Diplomatic sources say regional leaders are determined
to deal decisively
with Harare when they meet June 11 in South Africa, and
to adopt the
Livingstone resolutions.
Political analyst Charles
Mangongera told VOA reporter Blessing Zulu that
ZANU-PF's attempt to stem
the tide of pressure for on reforms has been
counterproductive.
In
Johannesburg, meanwhile, civic groups led by the Crisis in Zimbabwe
Coalition expressed outrage at the harassment and detention of activists at
the SADC summit by Namibian security officials and Zimbabwe’s Central
Intelligence Organization.
VOA Studio 7 correspondent Benedict
Nhlapho reported on the controversy.
http://mg.co.za/
HARARE, ZIMBABWE - May 24 2011
20:26
Zimbabwe requires $9-billion to fund a structural overhaul
that policymakers
hope will see the economy grow 7% annually over the next
five years, a
minister said Tuesday.
"Today Cabinet set and
deliberated on the Medium-Term Plan, which will cover
a span of five years,
from 2011 to 2015," Economic Planning Minister Tapiwa
Mashakada told
journalists in the capital, Harare.
"Cabinet has launched the plan and
the main vision ... is enhancing a
democratic developmental state, anchored
by a growing and transforming
socially just economy."
Mashakada said
the $9-billion needed to fund the plan would be raised
through new
investments, equity injections into existing businesses and
domestic savings
in areas such as pension funds.
Zimbabwe's economy has shown signs of
recovery since President Robert Mugabe
and Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai
formed a power-sharing government in
2009, ending a decade of instability
and reversing record-setting
hyperinflation.
But Mashakada said
economic rebuilding is complicated by the fact that just
10% of the work
force participates in the formal economy.
He said the blueprint
prioritises employment creation, infrastructure
development, economic
stability and good governance.
The plan seeks to increase the number of
jobs by 6% annually and build
foreign exchange reserves sufficient to cover
at least three months of
imports by 2015.
Zimbabwe's economy is set
to grow 9% this year on the back of strong tobacco
production and increased
mining output, according to Finance Minister Tendai
Biti.
But
analysts say the projection may not be met as uncertainty over new
elections
tipped for this year has spooked investors, who also worry about
Mugabe's
threats to take over foreign firms. -- Sapa-AFP
http://www.swradioafrica.com
by Irene Madongo
24 May
2011
Nine members of Women and Men of Zimbabwe Arise (WOZA) in Bulawayo
were
arrested on Tuesday following another demonstration against the
Zimbabwe
Electricity Supply Authority’s continued power cuts and tariffs.
One of the
women is detained along with her 3 month old baby.
As part
of its campaign for a fairer system for residents, the group is
calling for
ZESA to install pre-paid metres for residents, who complain that
they are
being hit with ridiculously high bills.
WOZA’s Magodonga Mahlangu told SW
Radio Africa that ZESA can afford to
install the metres, but it simply
refuses to do so as it knows people will
only pay for what they use. She
says this will be a blow for ZESA, which is
robbing residents.
“We
are seeing ZESA with brand new luxury cars and they even hosted a
cocktail
dinner party at the Zimbabwe International Trade Fair. It is a
known thing
that ZESA managers and staff are paid high salaries – so they
have the
money,” she said.
As part of the Tuesday protest, 150 WOZA members in
Pumula, Bulawayo,
marched to their local ZESA office carrying a mock coffin
to symbolise the
power utility’s burial. They began their march from a
nearby shopping
centre, intending to walk past the police station to the
ZESA office, but a
vehicle drove out and dispersed them.
“Police
officers on bicycles then chased the activists but many managed to
double
back to the door of ZESA to deliver the yellow cards and coffin. A
drama
ensued with residents shouting at police officers to stop chasing
people as
they do not have electricity themselves. All the police officers
seem to
come out to pick up and read the yellow cards, flyers and placards,”
a WOZA
statement said.
As the protest dispersed, nine members were arrested,
with the police
claiming the demonstrators were blocking the pavement. By
late afternoon
they were still being held at Pumula police
station.
On Monday, six women from WOZA appeared in court to face charges
of defacing
roads in Bulawayo during another protest against ZESA last week.
The state
alleges the women were writing graffiti on the tarmac.
The
six were released on $100 bail each and will appear in court again on
6th
June.
Mahlangu stated that the six women deny the allegations, but were
forced to
sign statements admitting to the charges. “Under this duress, five
of the
accused admitted to the charge. This took place in the absence of
their
lawyers despite officers being well aware of the legal team. Over the
weekend two homes were raided without any search warrant but no arrests were
made,” WOZA said.
“The state case is based on ‘malicious damage to
property’ but they will
have to prove what repairs are needed and how they
have calculated the
damage at US$345 when the paint used is normal road
paint which is used to
draw traffic lines and fades over time.”
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
24 May 2011
On Monday
Nyanga North Member of Parliament, Douglas Mwonzora, and 32 Nyanga
residents, were granted permission by a magistrate to take their case
against the state to the Supreme Court. The group claim they were wrongfully
arrested and mistreated by the police earlier this year and this was a
violation of their rights.
In February they were arrested and charged
with public violence, after
disturbances in Mwonzora’s consituency where he
had addressed a rally. The
MDC-T say it was pure police harassment. They
were held in filthy cells in
Nyanga and Mutare but in March were released on
bail.
This month they filed a constitutional challenge, arguing that the
authorities violated their rights to liberty and protection from inhuman and
degrading treatment as enshrined in the Constitution. The state had
dismissed this claim, stating that it was frivolous.
However on
Monday, a Nyanga magistrate granted the group’s application to
refer their
case to the Supreme Court to determine if their rights were
indeed
violated.
In another update of MDC harassment; on Tuesday the MDC-T
announced that 27
activists and mourners who were being held for assault
have been released on
$20 bail each. They are expected to appear in court
again on 7th June.
The group was arrested last Thursday in Warren Park,
at the funeral of
MDC-T activist Jack Ndeketeya who died in a car accident.
They included
MDC-T activists, Ndeketeya’s elderly and ailing father, his
mother, a pastor
and other mourners. They were held at Harare Central Police
Station and
charged with assault and theft. Over the weekend, Ndeketeya’s
parents were
released.
The MDC-T had complained that the charges were
trumped up because the police
would not say they who they are alleged to
have robbed.
And next month a man will appear in court to face
allegations that he posted
a message on Facebook, saying the pro-democracy
protests in Egypt were worth
emulating.
The state alleges that in
February Vikas Mavhudzi posted a message on Prime
Minister Morgan
Tsvangirai’s Facebook wall, encouraging him to take a cue
from the
uprisings.
“I’m overwhelmed, don’t know what to say Mr PM,” Mavhudzi is
alleged to have
written, “what happened in Egypt is sending shockwaves to
all dictators
around the world. No weapon but unity of purpose. Worth
emulating hey.”
Mavhudzi, is believed to be the first person to be
arrested in Zimbabwe for
posting comments on Facebook. In February, 46
Zimbabweans were charged with
treason for discussing the mass protests in
Egypt. Although 38 were freed,
the remaining six were detained and totured,
before being released on bail.
http://www.radiovop.com
10 hours 47 minutes ago
MUTARE, May 24,
2011- the head of Mapo Primary School in Odzi area has fled
from his school
after receiving death threats from suspected liberation war
veterans and
Zanu (PF) militants.
The head who was identified as a Masango is being
accused of accepting
building material that was bought for the school by a
local senator
Keresenzia Chabuka of the MDC-T.Chabuka built a classroom
block for the
school under the Constituency Development Fund and this irked
Zanu (PF)
supporters and the war veterans.
A staff member at Mapo
Primary School who spoke on condition that he remains
anonymous said a war
veteran by the name Kamanja and a school teacher Mike
Kevin Ndumiyana
coordinator for the Progressive Teachers Union of Zimbabwe,
PTUZ, said they
condemn in the strongest terms acts of violence against
teachers.
He
said it is disturbing that war veterans and Zanu (PF) supporters are not
happy with the development that has been made to Mapo Primary
School.
“It is so disturbing that these war veterans are so narrow minded
that they
only want to see development coming from only one side.Teachers
are targeted
by war veterans and Zanu (PF) supporters each time the country
is about to
have elections,” said Ndumiyana.
Recently a school
teacher at Mwoyoweshumba Secondary in Mutasa district lost
all his household
property after his house was torched by suspected war
veterans in the
area.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw/
By Thelma Chikwanha, Staff writer
Tuesday, 24 May 2011
13:08
HARARE - Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe workers have called for
heightened
government intervention at the crisis-ridden institution, amid
allegations
that the central bank’s board members were pillaging the
bank.
Senior managers at the bank alleged yesterday that board
members were paying
themselves hefty allowances, running into thousands of
dollars a month, at a
time that workers were getting
“pittances”.
This state of affairs was resulting in mass resignations by
key staff and
the remaining ones applying, en masse, to be retrenched,
including senior
managers from vital departments.
Were all the
applications for retrenchment to be successful, this would see
the central
bank being severely paralysed, with “ghastly” consequences and
negative
ripple effects across the entire banking sector, the Daily News’
sources
warned.
Board members were allegedly taking thousands of dollars home
every month,
while workers were being paid $150 each a month.
Alarmed
by the extent of the problems at the central bank and the “looting”,
finance
minister Tendai Biti is said to have summoned the board members to
his
office recently, to get explanations on the spending sprees and the mass
resignations by senior employees.
RBZ governor Gideon Gono confirmed
the mass resignations recently.
The fresh allegations of problems at the
bank come at a time when more RBZ
properties, acquired during the
quasi-fiscal days, are being auctioned –
with the bank failing to pay
creditors millions of dollars.
Workers say they are “mystified” by what
board members of the bank actually
do since Biti took away most of the
powers of the bank.
RBZ’s traditional sources of revenue, such as
printing money, dried up with
the coming in of the multi-currency
era.
Documents in the possession of the Daily News show that from May
last year,
board members collected more than $111 000 in retainer and
sitting fees, as
well as fuel and communication allowances.
In one of
the documents titled ‘2010 RBZ Directors’ Fees’, deputy chairman
Charles
Kuwaza is listed as the biggest board member beneficiary, where he
earned
$14 020 in gross allowances, while workers, including senior
managers,
earned 10 percent of that amount.
Another board member, Willard Manungo,
claimed a gross of US$10 745, while
labour economist Godfrey Kanyenze
received $10 920, Primrose Kurasha claimed
$12 870 and Daniel Ndlela claimed
$11 570.
Surprisingly, Gono, who is the board chairman, did not claim any
money like
the rest of his colleagues.
However, Gono – who recently
announced that the under-capitalised
institution faced closure unless it was
rescued – said the directors had
nothing to do with the solvency problems at
the bank.
“In any case, the issue of the directors’ fees is a standard
one and it is
determined by the Minister of Finance. He is the one who sets
levels of
directors’ remuneration. The amounts you claim are being paid to
directors
are insignificant, relative to market standards, as well as the
challenges
and responsibilities which they are
shouldering,” he
added.
Gono said he would only get his share of directors’ allowances
once the Bank
had got back to its feet.
“The fact that you claim that
I have not been paid is neither here nor
there. I shall be paid when the
bank can afford it.”
When contacted for comment, RBZ board deputy
chairman Charles Kuwaza could
neither confirm nor deny receiving the hefty
allowances, but referred all
questions to the central bank’s spokesperson
Kumbirai Nhongo, who was not
available for comment.
So weak is the
Reserve Bank that it no longer has the muscle to rein in
banks.
One
of the disgruntled senior employees said: “The developments at the
Central
Bank are a serious cause for concern. It is going to be a wild west
scenario
in the banking sector and the economy should brace for serious
systematic
collapses of banks.
“We cannot continue working for $150 per month when
the board members are
giving themselves about US$2 000 a
month”.
Under the amended RBZ Act, the central bank was authorised to
sell off its
non-core assets to fund the bank’s activities. But due to
bungling and
infighting within the board, they have failed to dispose of the
assets, a
development which has worsened the bank’s financial
problems.
http://www.radiovop.com
5 hours 34 minutes ago
HARARE, May
24, 2011- High Court judge Joseph Musakwa has ordered the
release of Albert
Matapo and five other coup plotters with whom he is
jointly charged for
plotting the overthrow of President Robert Mugabe,
saying their continued
incarceration was unlawful.
In his ruling Tuesday, Justice Musakwa said
the State’s failure to bring
them to trial within the stipulated six month
grace period
following their re-indictment for treason, was in violation of
the Criminal
Procedure and Evidence Act and this warranted their
release.
“The appellants were not liable to be committed to custody upon
being
re-indicted,” read Musakwa’s ruling.
However, the charges against
the accused shall remain.Harare lawyer Charles
Hwarara, who is representing
the accused was non
committal about the ruling saying the State was in the
habit ofignoring
court rulings often passed against it.
“ I hope they
will be released this time but I do not know what the Attorney
General’s
office is thinking of doing after this ruling. All
I can say is that if they
think of keeping them inside obviously its
something illegal and might have
problems for them because they
obviously know that the law has been clearly
spelt out, ” he said.
Hwarara did not rule out any legal suit against the
state saying any such
action would be effected with the instructions of the
accused.
Matapo, a former army captain and alleged ring leader in the plot
was
arrested in 2007 together with six other suspects namely Nyasha Zivuku,
Oncemore Mudzurahona, Emmanuel Marara, Patson Mupfure,Shingirai Mutemachani,
and Rangarirai Maziofa on allegations of plotting to violently topple
President Mugabe and replace him with the
powerful Defence Minister
Emerson Mnangagwa.Mnangagwa has since distanced
himself from the group and
denied the allegations describing them as ‘stupid’.
http://www.radiovop.com/
10 hours 15 minutes ago
HARARE, May
24, 2011- President Jacob Zuma’s international relations advisor
Lindiwe
Zulu has hit back at officials of President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu
(PF) party
saying their attacks will not stop her from doing her job and to
help the
people of Zimbabwe find a solution to the political crisis in their
country.
Zulu is part of Zuma’s facilitation team in the Zimbabwe
crisis.
“I cannot comment on things that distract me from doing my work,”
Zulu was
quoted by NewsDay. “I have no comment to make. I usually give you a
comment,
but on this one I have no comment.”
Weekend reports said
Zanu (PF) had formally lodged a complaint with South
Africa’s ruling ANC
over Zulu’s statements which they claimed were “reckless
and
inflammatory”.
The statements were allegedly in regard to the succession
law in Zimbabwe.
The complaint against Zulu stems from the publication in
the ANC weekly
newsletter, ANC Today, on May 13, that the facilitation team
had said the
negotiators to the GPA “are concerned about the succession law
should
(President) Mugabe die or retire before the adoption of a new
constitution”.
The reports quoted an unnamed Zanu PF official as saying
Zulu was “playing a
very cheap and dangerous game which can be played by any
fool. What she says
about our leaders, we can say about her with more
credibility”.
The unnamed party officials added: “She is forgetting that
she is a mere
assistant to the facilitator. She is just an aide. We have
more senior ANC
members in the facilitation team like Cde Marc Maharaj, who
are not acting
recklessly like her.
“She wants to speak with a voice
stronger than President Mugabe and stronger
than President Zuma, who is the
facilitator. There is even a tinge of
personal advocacy in Zulu’s activities
and we are watching.”
http://www.voanews.com/
Peta Thornycroft | Harare,
Zimbabwe May 23, 2011
Zimbabwe’s state media have escalated
propaganda for the party of President
Robert Mugabe since southern African
leaders met Friday in Namibia. Analysts
say the high level of publicity,
including alleged misrepresentation of
facts, appears to be a reaction to
the Southern African Development
Community’s recent criticism of the ZANU-PF
party.
South African President Jacob Zuma, chief mediator for SADC on the
long
Zimbabwe political crisis, decided he could not attend the region’s
summit
last week in Namibia, because of South Africa’s just-concluded local
government elections.
As a result of his non-attendance, a late-March
communiqué from SADC’s
Troika on Politics, Defense and Security was not put
to the summit for
discussion or endorsement.
Without naming names,
that communiqué carried heavy criticism of ZANU-PF’s
failure to fulfill the
2008 multi-party political agreement that is the
foundation of Zimbabwe's
inclusive government.
Despite the lack of developments at the Namibia
summit, the pro-ZANU-PF
state media has printed and broadcast stories
claiming victories for the
party.
The daily Herald reported Saturday
that SADC’s Tribunal, a regional court of
last resort, had been disbanded at
the Windhoek summit thanks to ZANU-PF
pressure.
The Tribunal
repeatedly ruled the Mugabe government's seizure of white
farmers’ land
beginning in 2000 was racist.
SADC says it has not disbanded the
Tribunal, but has suspended it until
reports from regional justice ministers
and international consultants’ are
considered.
Meanwhile, the
pro-ZANU-PF state media has lambasted one of Zuma’s
mediators, Lindiwe Zulu,
who is also Zuma’s international affairs advisor.
The Sunday Mail, in
which the government has a 50-percent stake, carried a
report headlined,
“South Africa’s Lindiwe Zulu in trouble.” The report says
ZANU-PF has
formally lodged a complaint with South Africa’s ruling African
National
Congress, citing several criticisms of statements recently
attributed to
Zulu.
The report claimed Zulu's remarks were taken from the publication,
ANC
Today - in particular statements about the succession issue - should
Mugabe
die in office.
But there is no record that Zulu made any
remarks to any South African media
about Mugabe or the succession
issue.
The Sunday Mail also noted Zulu is accused of saying that anyone
in ZANU-PF
who believed elections would be held this year was “day
dreaming.”
The director of a Zimbabwean media monitoring group, Andy
Moyse, said
pro-ZANU-PF propaganda had escalated to what he called a
“deafening
crescendo" in the past few days.
He also said state media
have misreported the contents of the 2008 political
agreement that led to
Zimbabwe's inclusive government. ZANU-PF says in
those reports that a new
constitution before fresh elections is not part of
the
agreement.
Moyse said this is incorrect, as the political agreement
insists all parties
draw up a new constitution that will be put to a
referendum before any new
elections.
He said that report is intended
for the domestic audience, while the attack
on Lindiwe Zulu was an attempt
to discredit the SADC facilitation team. That
team has recommended regional
representatives be sent to Zimbabwe to help
monitor and fully implement the
2008 political agreement.
The SADC Troika is now expected to forward its
recent report on Zimbabwe to
the region’s leaders, who are scheduled to meet
next month in Johannesburg.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
24 May 2011
There has been
another twist in the leadership saga of the smaller faction
of the MDC led
by Welshman Ncube. The party is reportedly pleading with
South African
President Jacob Zuma not to recognize their former President
Arthur
Mutambara, who refuses to accept that he is no longer leader of the
party.
Earlier this month Mutambara is understood to have also
written a letter to
Zuma, asking him not to recognise Ncube and threatening
to ‘withdraw’ the
two negotiators appointed by party to the Global Political
Agreement (GPA)
talks, if they continued to ‘abuse their positions.’ Zuma
heads the GPA
facilitation team on Zimbabwe.
In the run up to the
party’s congress in January, Mutambara stepped down as
president, paving way
for Ncube to take over. Mutambara then made a u-turn
and refused to accept
this. But the party went ahead and obtained a court
interdict, barring him
from claiming to be party president. A splinter group
made up of Mutambara’s
backers has also filed a High Court application to
nullify the congress
where Ncube was elected as party resident.
With this bickering in the
background, the GPA talks have gone ahead, and
Mutambara has been attending
crucial talks in his capacity as Deputy Prime
Minister and
Principal.
The MDC-N is now understood to have written a letter to Zuma,
saying both
Robert Mugabe and Morgan Tsvangirai are interfering in their
party politics
and condemned their backing of Mutambara’s presence in the
GPA meetings.
They say that because of this their party does not have a
principal
representing them.
“Once again supported by President
Mugabe and Prime Minister Tsvangirai, he
[Mutambara] now claims that there
is a distinction between the President of
the MDC and its principal in the
inclusive government and indeed outside
government. This position is
self-evident nonsense because it is plain that
President Mugabe is a
principal because he is the leader of ZANU PF while
Tsvangirai is a
principal because he is the leader of MDC-T and therefore
Mutambara cannot
be principal unless he is also the leader of the MDC,” the
letter
read.
Political analyst John Makumbe has also said Mutambara’s conduct is
confusing people and doesn’t help the nation.
Meanwhile it’s been
reported that the Ncube MDC has again ruled out a unity
deal with the MDC-T,
saying their differences are ‘too deep and strongly
felt.’ Ncube is
understood to have also said he does not believe the MDC-T
will accept unity
under equal terms. The two factions split in 2005 over
differences around
the party’s participation in Senate elections
http://www.dailynews.co.zw/
By Reagan Mashavave, Staff Writer
Tuesday, 24 May
2011 15:26
HARARE - South Africa’s ruling African National Congress
(ANC) has insisted
an election roadmap recommended by Sadc and being
negotiated under the watch
of President Jacob Zuma remains the best way out
of Zimbabwe’s crisis,
despite President Robert Mugabe’s
opposition.
This comes as Zanu PF, in a misleading manoeuvre, sought
to abandon
ownership of the roadmap they have always been part
of.
ANC head of communications, Keith Khoza told the Daily News yesterday
that
his party, whose views are significant because of its control of
Africa’s
biggest economy, remained convinced that the roadmap was the best
alternative.
This position is likely to deepen the unease
characterising Mugabe and Zuma’s
relations.
Tension between Mugabe
and Zuma’s mediation team is high as Zanu PF seeks
ways of reversing
milestones that have been set by Zuma, the no nonsense
Sadc front man on
Zimbabwe.
These include the roadmap to free elections as well as
resolutions by the
Sadc Troika Organ on politics, defence and security
emphasising the need for
a roadmap, an end to violence and full compliance
with the Global Political
Agreement before elections.
The Troika’s
resolutions were heavily influenced by Zuma’s progress report
presented to
the Organ at the meeting held in Zambia end of March.
A cornered Zanu
PF—realising the roadmap, if allowed to succeed could nail
the party because
it can’t win a fair election- has told Sadc it is against
the roadmap
despite being involved in early meetings that resulted in a
draft
document.
Keith Khoza, the ANC’s head of communications said key steps
had already
been taken to make the roadmap effective.
“The ANC is
confident that the current process of negotiations will usher in
a peaceful
solution in Zimbabwe. The roadmap … has been broken down to a
matrix that
will guide the way forward,” Khoza said in a written response to
queries.
South Africa’s insistence on a roadmap that could undo
attempts to rig the
next election has rattled Zanu PF, which is now lobbying
for the sidelining
of Zuma as chief mediator.
Mugabe and his top
allies have accosted regional leaders and diplomats over
the past month,
including at the Sadc summit held in Namibia on Friday, to
push for this
position. The party is unlikely to succeed, diplomatic sources
said, citing
the high level confidence Sadc has in Zuma.
Mugabe’s bid to smuggle
himself out of the election roadmap that he
initially backed follows
discomfort expressed by military and other security
leaders at the
concessions being agreed to by Zanu PF negotiators.
Zanu PF hardliners,
including Mugabe, insist elections should be held this
year. Zuma’s
mediation team, through spokesperson Lindiwe Zulu say elections
are
impossible this year because of the slow progress in implementing the
GPA,
which forms the basis of the Zimbabwe’s awkward coalition
government.
Zanu PF’s push against Zuma took a step forward when party
hardliners
planted a story in the State-controlled Sunday Mail indicating
that the
party had formally lodged a complaint against Zulu’s
conduct.
The Sunday Mail report, quoting sources, said Zanu PF was
unhappy with Zulu,
citing comments on the ANC website which expressed fears
of chaos in the
event of Mugabe dying without solving his succession
issues.
Zanu PF spokesman Rugare Gumbo, yesterday however disowned the
report. He
said his party had not forwarded any such communication to the
ANC.
“I don’t know anything about that I only read it in the newspaper,”
said
Gumbo.
Khoza said his party had not received the purported
letter of complaint
against Zulu.
“The ANC is satisfied that the
succession allegation cannot be attributed to
Comrade Lindiwe Zulu as the
report attributes it to the Negotiators,” Khoza
said.
“The article
was lifted from Polity.org.za, an international publication
that covers
world events. In the article carried by ANC Today, the South
African Team of
negotiators reported that there is serious progress with
regards to
talks.
“The second paragraph that raises concern on succession law is
attributed to
the negotiators (who are Zimbabweans) and not the mediators.
As the ANC we
are satisfied that the comments of the Mediation Team did not
raise the
issue of succession as alleged in the complaint,” he added,
exposing Zanu PF
lies.
http://www.zimonline.co.za/A
by Edward Jones Tuesday 24 May
2011
HARARE -- President Robert Mugabe’s advanced age and his
failure to groom a
successor has become the biggest threat to Zimbabwe’s
future stability and
its transition to democracy, analysts said as ZANU-PF
seeks to hurry the
country into elections this year before Mugabe’s health
deteriorates.
At 87, Mugabe is now Africa’s oldest serving President.
Mugabe has held
power for 31 years, a feat achieved only by three other
African leaders,
including Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, who is fighting a
popular uprising
against his 42-year rule.
Political negotiators in
Zimbabwe’s fragile unity government are trying to
hammer out a road map that
will pave way to fresh presidential and
parliamentary elections which
ZANU-PF wants this year but which the Movement
for Democratic Change (MDC)
says could only be possible within 12 months
after electoral and security
reforms to guarantee a free and fair vote.
Mugabe has since the start of
the year shuttled between Harare and Singapore
for medical reviews,
heightening fears that the former guerilla leader’s
health is deteriorating.
Mugabe has denied that his health is failing.
“Unfortunately Mugabe’s
health and the future of Zimbabwe are intertwined
and there needs to be a
clear succession mechanism within ZANU-PF first and
another constitutional
mechanism for power transfer outside ZANU-PF,” John
Makumbe, a University of
Zimbabwe political science lecturer said.
“There are a lot of grey areas
there and if not handled well, this could
pose the biggest threat to the
country’s national security.”
South Africa’s ruling ANC party has already
said Zimbabwe’s three governing
parties, including Mugabe’s ZANU PF, fear
that should Mugabe retire or die
in office this could jeorpadise the
adoption of a new and democratic
constitution that is still being drafted
and is seen as prerequisite to
ensuring the next vote is free and
fair.
South African President Jacob Zuma is the regional SADC group’s
mediator in
the Zimbabwe inter-party negotiations.
Mugabe is believed
to be suffering from prostate cancer, which tends to
develop in men above
fifty years and causes pain, difficulty in urinating,
problems during sex,
or erectile dysfunction.
Official sources in the President’s Office have
suggested that Mugabe had
gone under surgery in January, one of the many
treatments for prostate,
which also include radiation therapy, stereotactic
radiosurgery, and proton
therapy.
The sources also say Mugabe is
suffering from peripheral edema or the
swelling of ankles, linked to heart,
liver and kidney problems.
Analysts say Mugabe has purposefully avoided
anointing a successor and
instead played two main factions in his ZANU-PF
party as part of a plan to
continue in power.
But the lack of a clear
succession plan may have serious consequences for
the country.
The
political analysts said ZANU-PF’s factions could not agree on a post
Mugabe
successor, which could plunge the country into political
instability.
“The constitution is very clear on the route to take if
Mugabe were to wake
up not there but for this to work ZANU-PF needs to have
a clear succession
plan in place. It is simply not there, which creates a
dangerous recipe for
instability,” Eldred Masunungure, chairman of local
think-tank Mass Public
Opinion.
Zimbabwe’s constitution stipulates
that the two Houses of Parliament sit
together as an electoral college to
elect a successor when the Office of the
President falls vacant and the
elected successor serves for the remainder of
the terms of the
predecessor.
Under the Global Political Agreement if Mugabe's post
becomes vacant, it
would be filled by a member of ZANU-PF.
“But
because ZANU-PF cannot close ranks or reach consensus on single
candidate to
take over from Mugabe, these constitutional provisions become
meaningless,”
Makumbe said.
ZANU-PF is pushing for elections this year, hoping Mugabe
will win and
manage the succession issue internally but officials in a
multi-party
constitutional committee say this is impossible as a referendum
is only
possible after September this year.
Mugabe was forced to form
a unity government with Prime Minister Morgan
Tsvangirai after contentious
elections in 2008 and political analysts have
said any fresh vote without
reforms and mechanisms to transfer power could
lead to another
stalemate.
The next election is seen as a watershed as it has the
potential to usher in
a new era of democracy or further entrench what
Mugabe’s critics say is
ZANU-PF’s dictatorship.
Mugabe is also coming
under pressure from regional leaders who want his
smooth exit to prevent
distabilising the region with a repeat of the
economic and political crisis
that saw thousands of Zimbabweans fleeing to
neighbouring countries. --
ZimOnline
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Lance Guma
24 May
2011
Every Tuesday SW Radio Africa will be looking at some of Zimbabwe’s
unsolved
and deliberately ignored cases of political violence, torture,
murder and
other forms of abuse, by people in positions of
authority.
This week we look back to the day Robert Mugabe’s spokesman
and Permanent
Secretary in the Information Ministry, George Charamba, bashed
his wife Rudo
in what was described as an attempt to kill her.
It was
reported that on the 24th February 2004 Rudo confronted Charamba,
accusing
him of having infected her with HIV. An out of control Charamba,
who has a
black belt in karate, responded by battering her until she was
unconscious.
Another report said he also assaulted her baby "badly".
Although the
police responded by arresting Charamba for the savage assault,
Mugabe
immediately intervened, ordering police Commissioner Augustine
Chihuri to
ensure the case was dropped. The case file at Borrowdale Police
station went
missing and the official line put out was that Rudo had dropped
the
charges.
Details of the case are that sometime in 2004 Charamba travelled
with Mugabe
on an official trip to Cuba. On coming back, instead of going
home, Charamba
chose to spend the night with a prostitute. This was
allegedly just one of
several escapades that Rudo got to find out about. She
decided to get tested
and found out she was HIV positive.
Weeping
uncontrollably Rudo confronted Charamba asking why he had brought
the
disease into their marriage. Charamba went into a rage beating her until
she
fell unconscious. Rudo was taken to a local hospital, bleeding
profusely.
Her friends rushed to report the matter at Borrowdale Police
Station and
also kept her blood stained dress as evidence.
Several women’s groups
took up the case and signed affidavits supporting
Rudo, but the case never
got anywhere. Family friends described Charamba as
a "heavy and reckless
womaniser who turns into a monster and bully at home".
He also has a well
known record of “picking up prostitutes in Harare's
avenues” they
said.
Confirmation of what happened was to come later when George
Charamba penned
an article personally attacking Jonathan Moyo. A furious
Moyo responded by
dishing out Charamba’s dirty linen in public. He wrote an
article in which
he said;
"Zimbabweans would be told many things
about everything, including how
Charamba has attempted to murder his wife in
cold blood and how that
attempted murder has been covered up. And the
disgusting bloody evidence
would be given because it is available. This is
not a threat but a promise."
Last year several newspapers reported that
Rudo Charamba wrote a letter to
the Swedish Ambassador Sten Rylander,
pleading to be removed from the
European Union targeted sanctions list. Rudo
described herself as the former
wife of George Charamba and claimed although
they are not officially
divorced they parted ways and have lived separately
since 2004.
“I am still officially married to George only because I
cannot afford to
file for divorce. I am out of employment and I am not well.
He left me our
home thereafter and he now lives with his second wife. I have
remained quiet
because I wanted to protect my children but I cannot continue
to suffer like
this,” part of the letter read.
This year in February
Rudo’s wish was granted when she was one of 35 members
of the Mugabe regime
who had the targeted sanctions by the EU lifted. The
spouses of central bank
chief Gideon Gono, CIO boss Happyton Bonyongwe and
prisons chief Paradzai
Zimondi, were also removed from the list.
In previous weeks we have
looked at the cases involving co-Home Affairs
Minister Kembo Mohadi and
notorious CIO operative Joseph Mwale, who both
should be facing murder
charges but have continued to enjoy high level
protection. Despite Rudo
Charamba’s relatives and friends keeping her
clothes as an exhibit for
future prosecution, Charamba continues to enjoy
the protection of his boss,
Mugabe.
May 24th, 2011
The State of the GPA
The SADC mediated Global Political Agreement, signed in September 2008, and brought into operation in February 2009, is clearly in trouble. Established as a modality for creating the conditions for a generally acceptable election, after ZANU PF’s violent response to a popular vote against the Mugabe regime in 2008, many hoped, in the face of indications to the contrary, that the resultant interim government would serve as a bridge to an internationally acceptable electoral solution to the Zimbabwe crisis.
While the process has done little to open up democratic space in Zimbabwe, it is clear that after June 2008 some form of compromise between the parties was necessary given the balance of forces in the country. However, the prospects of a cohesive transition were always problematic given that the GPA was, in its very make up, a site of struggle for state power between the contending parties ahead of a future election. It was also a badly constructed and ambiguous document that in itself has led to unnecessary problems for governance.
In the two years since the establishment of the interim government, ZANU PF and the two MDCs have fared rather differently. For the once-dominant ruling party, the dent to its self-perception as the uncontested representative of the Zimbabwean people, provided by the 2008 result and power sharing arrangement that followed, forced a reappraisal of its future. ZANU PF’s power is predominantly located in the military-economic complex that has been forcibly acquired over the last decade with the result that its control has been wielded largely through the deployment of force. Over the last two years, it has used its hold on the structures of coercion to obstruct the implementation of those aspects of the GPA which ostensibly sought to open up democratic spaces in Zimbabwe. In a persistent fashion, the Mugabe regime has held on tenaciously to the military and security sectors, blocked entry of alternative voices into the electronic media in the country (the central mode of information to the majority of the population), and delayed the implementation of the constitutional process. Moreover, at a regional level, ZANU PF has continued to command SADC support, largely through its manipulation of the ‘sanctions issue’ and its construction of the issue within the context of longer term liberation solidarities. ZANU PF has thus used the GPA period to claw back lost political spaces, even as it was forced to give way in certain areas of state policy.
The most popular party in the inclusive arrangement, the MDC-T, has attempted to use this time to gain a foothold in state power, given its inability to translate electoral superiority into state power because of ZANU PF’s monopoly control over the military. With its limited share of state power, the MDC-T made some progress in stabilising the economy and opening up a dialogue for future normalization of the Zimbabwean situation with international forces. It has however faced severe limitations in its capacity to change the democratic make up of the state, not only because of the obstacles placed in the way by ZANU PF, but also because of the lack of capacity and clearer strategic interventions at national, regional and international levels. This often led to a cycle in which the protests by the MDC, in relation to what they saw as the obstacles to progress, were followed by capitulation to ZANU PF’s obduracy. Additionally, MDC’s leverage within the state has been severely weakened by the decimation of its major social base, the urban workforce, as a result of the wholesale destruction of livelihoods during the crisis.
The smaller MDC formation, with its credibility always under question because of a weak social base, has been further weakened by the political delinquency of its one-time leader, and the ongoing constriction of its support base. Both processes have resulted in further fragmentation of this formation and a desperate need to find new ways to survive in the near future. The fact that the two MDCs have not been able to work together constructively in this period has also weakened both, to the advantage of ZANU PF. However, the recent cooperation between the two MDCs over the selection of the Speaker for the House of Assembly is indicative of how much more effective their interventions could be in the interim government.
In the event of an election, such cooperation could become particularly important in Matabeleland where the politics have fractured even further along regional lines, amplifying long-held Ndebele ethnic demands for more inclusion in national development, and a stronger political commitment to deal with the open wounds of Gukurahundi.
Regional and International Dimensions
Since the change of mediation teams between the Mbeki and Zuma administrations, there has been a decisive drop in the initiative and energy levels of the SADC intervention. Progress has been slow and there has been little movement in getting beyond the many outstanding issues in the GPA. Where there has been some movement it has largely been in SADC’s support for Mugabe’s call for the end of ‘sanctions’, an issue that has almost completely worked in ZANU PF’s favour. At least this was the case until the meeting of the SADC Troika on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation held in Zambia on 31st March 2011. The communiqué issued at the end of this gathering appears to have taken a stronger position on violence and the continued obstructions to the implementation of the GPA. In addition, most importantly, the Troika agreed to “appoint a team of officials to join the Facilitation Team and work with the Joint Monitoring and Implementation Committee (JOMIC) to ensure monitoring, evaluation and implementation of the GPA.” The Troika also agreed to develop Terms of Reference, time frames and provide regular progress reports, the first of which is to be presented during the next SADC Extraordinary Summit. This link between the officials appointed by the Troika, the Facilitation team and JOMIC could be an important step forward in a fuller implementation of the GPA.
The international bloc, for its part, has attempted to use a dual strategy in Zimbabwe. On the one hand its has provided humanitarian-plus support for the inclusive government as an encouragement for further reforms, while holding on to the stick of ‘restrictive measures’ as a means of continued pressure on the Mugabe regime. The problem is that this strategy has largely backfired on the West and the opposition, providing little leverage to move the recalcitrant ZANU PF, while at the same time providing the latter with its sole message for the forthcoming election. Whereas in 2000 and beyond, the land was the single election message for the ruling party, the bearer of this task has now moved to the ‘anti-sanctions’ campaign, allied implicitly to the discourse on land, and carried out with monolithic fascist-style singularity. Thus the international forces caught up in the Zimbabwe question are now left with a strategy that has not worked, that they would like to move away from, but cannot do so without more movement on the GPA.
Recent Developments
Two issues have become clear about recent ZANU PF strategy. Firstly, the party does not want the ‘sanctions’ removed as this would undermine their single election message, one directed more at SADC and the AU than at the people of Zimbabwe. Secondly, there was a strong push from the dominant elements in ZANU PF to go for an early election in 2011 for several reasons including:
However, as is frequently the case in Zimbabwe, the political terrain has altered more recently, in what would appear to be a direct result of the SADC Troika decision in Livingstone and changing understandings of Mugabe’s health. Thus, the desire for an early election by certain elements in ZANU PF has been affected in a number of ways:
It is in this context that the recent arrests of MDC and civic leaders, and violence in some parts of the country, need to be understood. It serves as a reminder to the electorate of ZANU PF’s capacity for electoral violence, while making it difficult for the West to consider moving away from the sanctions strategy. It may also be an indication of the strategic battles within ZANU PF over how and when to fight the next election.
The Way Forward
All of the above suggests that this is a critical time for civil society to make a major input into the process. Fundamental to any input would be a cohesive and unified position by civil society.
The following suggestions constitute a possible way forward:
1. It seems crucial that civil society as a whole
strongly endorse the decision of the SADC
Troika without
amendment;
2. Following such endorsement, representatives of the
major civic platforms should
undertake the following:
3. Ensure that there is widespread dissemination of the civil society position within Zimbabwe through statements, newspaper articles, opinion pieces, and meetings.
These interventions should culminate in the convening of a regional conference of civic actors to pressure the SADC mediators into enforcing their new position and ensuring conditions for a free and fair election.
This analysis was undertaken during two roundtable discussions, and is endorsed by the following organizations: Idasa, RAU, SAPES, Solidarity Peace Trust, the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum, and the Zimbabwe Liberators Platform.
Notes:
[1] However, the Ivory Coast issue does have some traction for Zimbabwe since it is a crisis around an election with the refusal of the loser group to step down, a clear endorsement now by the AU that Gbagbo must go (and has gone), and the difficulty for the AU in whether Gbagbo’s refusal to go is a „coup?. The resolution of the Ivory Coast crisis may be more relevant for Zimbabwe than the uprisings in North Africa.
[2] But some within Zanu PF may favour delaying an election in the light of the President’s health, and prefer to deal with the succession problem in Parliament rather than through the ballot box.
May 24th, 2011
As talk of a possible election in 2011 begins to make serious discussion currency in Zimbabwe’s ever undulating political terrain, it is once again to the electoral environment that all observers will turn. As usual, the error will be made to focus on the election as an event, thus missing out the bigger picture of viewing it as rather a process comprised of various factors. However, this error of judgement is understandable ostensibly because many in our midst think that what matters is how conditions are on election day(s) in particular and/or the few days or weeks preceding it. Yet years preceding an election, the election period itself and indeed the period after are all aspects of what will eventually be determined by whoever as a so-called ‘free and fair’ election or otherwise. This is the fallacy of election observers and monitors that continues to be missed. This advice is particularly urgent in a country like Zimbabwe where elections have always been an area of fiercely contested terrain in many ways than the orthodox electoral competition. But there are many more matters arising as regards elections in Zimbabwe. This is in part drawn from the lessons of our past electoral history as well as the other external dynamics that we have gone through as a maturing post-colonial state.
A silent, but important development to Zimbabwe’s voting population has been the movement out of Zimbabwe particularly at the turn of the Millennium by a steadily rising amount of the electorate. Whereas there hasn’t been an official or proper census of exactly how many Zimbabweans are outside of our borders but still holding Zimbabwean citizenship, it is inconceivable anyone would doubt that whatever the figure, it now constitutes a critical component of Zimbabwe’s electoral matrix. Unverifiable, conservative estimates put the number of Zimbabweans outside of the country at nothing less than 3 million. The majority are of course illegal and legal immigrants in neighbouring South Africa, Botswana and Namibia. The UK, Canada, Australia, US also weigh in with high figures.
This may be restating the obvious, but, the main point is that the past 10 years have seen a steady growth and establishment of Zimbabwean Diaspora population in the countries mentioned above but also in Zambia, Mozambique, Swaziland regionally and many others around the globe. The reasons for this state of affairs are well known.
Given the fact that Zimbabwe’s total population has always been estimated at somewhere in the region of 13 million, then when slightly below a quarter of its nationals are outside the country, it may now be in the national interest to let them play their part of the national political process. It has not yet been determined how much Zimbabwe is potentially losing by technically ‘disenfranchising’ millions of potential voters. It can be assumed with great plausibility that Zimbabwe is losing out by leaving a very crucial component of its people outside of the political process. Democracy entails giving everybody the opportunity to participate in such elections as the outcome of any elections impacts on them, invariably.
Whilst there is nothing ordinarily special about living outside the country, there is growing concern that defining national population in terms of only those within the country and only extending franchise to a few in the diplomatic community is an affront to broad-based electoral democracy. Leaving out a significant section of a country’s electorate only for the sake of it sounds extremely discriminatory and exclusionary. The Diaspora population deserves a chance to contribute to Zimbabwe’s democracy or democratisation drive not only because they are Zimbabwean nationals, but because they already constitute a ‘critical mass’ with a lot to contribute to their country other than remitting money.
During the decade long economic crisis, the Diaspora population kept the (then) ailing economy’s heart beating through significant injections of liquidity via remittances to families back home. The overall Zimbabwean population has yet to be fully convinced that it is in the national interest to confine voting only to Zimbabweans resident in the country. Nationals of Zimbabwe living outside, and those especially still clinging proudly to their citizenship, wish to contribute politically in as much as they are contributing socially and economically. If immigration has become part and parcel of contemporary Zimbabwe population dynamics, then the political attention must also adapt accordingly to ensure access to politically and economically active Zimbabweans to continue to be stakeholders in their country.
Finally, Zimbabwe’s democratisation scorecard and legitimacy of electoral politics is rendered poor by shutting the door on Zimbabweans outside the country. Whereas there would always be excuses especially on issues bordering on feasibility and logistical bottlenecks associated with democratising elections in Zimbabwe this way, the most worrying aspect of it all is that nobody seems to be seriously talking about it in civil society but especially in the corridors of power. This suggests that the idea is yet to dawn on policymakers’ imagination, assuming they possess any. Increased volumes of international migration and general movement of people across borders is a 21 Century reality that should not trivialise the primacy of at least according loyal nationals a chance to exercise their democratic right to choosing national leaders. Whereas this may be an extremely difficult thing to do with constituency based elections like for Council, House of Assembly or Senatorial elections, the ERC does not see how in the Presidential election this cannot be done as long as there is adequate political will.
Published in The Election Eye – 30 April 2011
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/
Written by MISA-Zimbabwe
Tuesday, 24 May
2011 15:01
As Zimbabwe joins the rest of Africa in commemorating Africa
Day on 25 May
2011 the country should seize the opportunity to reflect on
its progression
or lack thereof towards fulfilment of its obligations in
terms of the
African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights.
This is
critical as the country forges ahead with its constitution making
process
which should culminate in the production of a democratic home-grown
constitution moulded along the various regional and international
instruments that it subscribes to.
The government should therefore
self-introspect on its human rights record
as enshrined and espoused under
the African Charter. Other African
instruments include the Banjul
Declaration of Principles of Freedom of
Expression, Windhoek Declaration,
African Charter on Broadcasting, SADC
Protocol on Culture, Information and
Sport and SADC Protocol on Gender and
Development.
MISA-Zimbabwe is
therefore urging the government to critically review the
country’s record as
it pertains to promotion and protection of citizens’
rights to freedom of
expression, assembly, association and access to
information. While
MISA-Zimbabwe notes the commendable steps towards
fulfilling the obligations
of the 1991 Windhoek Declaration which has seen
the licensing of more than
25 media houses in the print sector by the
Zimbabwe Media Commission, the
same cannot be said of the broadcasting
sector.
The sector has remained
stagnated since Zimbabwe’s independence in 1980 as
evidenced by monopoly of
the airwaves by the state-controlled Zimbabwe
Broadcasting Corporation.
Private broadcasters and community radio stations
continue to mushroom and
proliferate throughout the southern African region
and Africa as a whole
save for Zimbabwe and Eritrea. In 2008, for example,
the DRC had 41 radio
stations and 51 TV stations in Kinshasa alone out of a
total of 381 radio
stations and between 81 and 93 TV channels throughout
the country. In 2006/7
Benin had 73 radio stations while Uganda has more
than 120 and Mali
200.
Also of concern is the continued existence of criminal defamation and
insult
laws as enshrined under the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform)
Act which
pose obstacles to the media and civic society organisations’
watchdog roles
over the three arms of the state in keeping with the
principles of good
governance, transparency and accountability.
Zimbabwe
cannot be proud of such laws which are relics of colonialism
notwithstanding
the fact that the former colonial power Britain scrapped
these in 2009.
MISA-Zimbabwe therefore reiterates its calls for
constitutional provisions
that explicitly guarantee media freedom and the
citizens’ right to access to
information.
In coming up with a new constitution vis-à-vis the envisaged
media reforms,
MISA-Zimbabwe urges the constitutional thematic committees
and the inclusive
government to take into serious consideration the
principles of the African
human rights instruments whose founding cascade
from the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights.
Harare,
May 24, 2011: Over
the next three weeks, the U.S. Embassy in Zimbabwe is partnering with the
Independent and Mirror newspapers to sponsor three Youth Dialogues about the
future of Zimbabwe. The debate-format dialogues will take place in Harare on
May 26, in Masvingo on June 1, and in Bulawayo on June 16. All three events are
free and interested individuals should request an invitation by calling
04-758-800 or emailing hararepas@state.gov.
Two of the dialogues, in Harare and
Bulawayo, are part of the monthly high-level discussion series hosted by the
weekly Zimbabwe Independent newspaper. The Zimind has a respected track record
as a media leader and stimulator of public debate and discussion on topics of
critical importance to Zimbabwe’s citizens. The Mirror, host of the Masvingo
Youth Dialogue, is an equally strong, objective voice for honest news and
editorial comment in Masvingo and Midlands provinces.
The United States
Government, led by the State Department, is hosting youth engagement programs
throughout Africa during the months of May and June to showcase the efforts of
young African leaders, to engage with them in discussions about current
challenges on the continent, and to help them discover ways to bring about
positive change.
The Dialogue presents
an opportunity to showcase and reflect on how young African leaders are building
the future of their communities and nations. In addition to events sponsored by
the State Department, the United States International Development Agency (USAID)
and the Peace Corps, there will be digital interactions via the Bureau of
African Affairs’ Facebook page (www.facebook.com/DOSAfricanAffairs), Twitter, and other social media platforms to allow young
Africans and Americans, entrepreneurs and business leaders, to exchange ideas on
an array of topics.
The Dialogue is part
of ongoing engagement with young Africans stemming from the August 2010
President’s Forum with Young African Leaders held in Washington, D.C. and
follow-on events, with future high-level youth engagement activities and
programs on the continent planned. Three Zimbabwean youth leaders participated
in the Forum.
Objectives of the
Dialogue with Young African Leaders is to:
·
Showcase young
African leaders in civil society and business who are motivating youth and
highlighting to global audiences a new generation of Africans who are shaping
the continent’s future;
·
Emphasize the
Administration’s priority of mutual responsibility as the foundation of the
U.S.-Africa partnership and reinforce the U.S. commitment to supporting African
solutions to Africa’s challenges;
·
Help build
networks between young American and African leaders that will lead to lasting
partnerships.
# # #
Comments
and queries should be addressed to Sharon Hudson-Dean, Public Affairs Officer.
E-mail: hararepas@state.gov Tel. +263
4 758800-1, Fax: 758802. http://harare.usembassy.gov
Become a
Fan on Facebook!
Follow us on Twitter!
Three (3) Consultant vacancies with UNDP
Deadline: 1 June 2011The United Nations Development Programme would like to invite suitably qualified candidates to fill the below positions financed through a grant from The Global Fund, to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
1. 7010: Consultant for the development of Phase 2 of Capacity Development Plan (Global Fund R8)
2. 7011: Consultant for the Development of Human Resources strategy and plans for the National TB Program
3. 7012: Consultant for facilitation of workshops for Health Services Board
The programme is implemented by UNDP Zimbabwe Office in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Child Welfare in Zimbabwe.
Interested candidates should visit and download the detailed Terms of Reference here for their further action and submission of application letters.
http://www.kubatanablogs.net/kubatana/?p=5962
2012 Hubert H. Humphrey Fellowship Program: Call for
Applications
Deadline: 5 June 2011
The American Embassy is pleased to
announce the 2012 Hubert H. Humphrey
Fellowship Program. This one-year,
full-scholarship program is offered to
mid-career professionals working at
policy-level who have a record of
leadership, a commitment to public
service, and the initiative to take full
advantage of a self-defined program
of independent study at a leading
American university.
The Hubert H.
Humphrey Fellowship Program brings accomplished professionals
from
developing countries to the United States at a midpoint in their
careers for
a one-year program of non-degree study and related professional
activities.
The program seeks to foster an exchange of knowledge and mutual
understanding between American citizens and professional counterparts from
Zimbabwe. Successful applicants will be placed at participating universities
in the United States for the August 2012-June 2013
period.
Fellowships are available in the following fields:
-
Communications/Journalism;
- Natural Resources and Environmental
Management;
- Public Policy Analysis and Public Administration;
-
Economic Development;
- Agricultural Development/Agricultural
Economics;
- Finance and Banking;
- Teaching of English as a Foreign
Language;
- Law and Human Rights;
- Urban and Regional
Planning;
- Education, including planning, administration, and curriculum
development;
- Public Health Policy and Management; and
-
HIV/AIDS policy and prevention.
To be eligible for a Humphrey Fellowship,
applicants must have:
- A first university degree
- Five years
of substantial professional experience
- Demonstrated leadership qualities
and a record of public service
- Fluency in English
- Zimbabwean
citizens working & living in Zimbabwe at the time of
application
Application/Selection Process: Interested applicants must
apply to the U.S.
Embassy on official application forms which can be
downloaded from
http://harare.usembassy.gov
Forms
and copies of degree transcripts should be received no later than June
5,
2011.
The Hubert Humphrey Fellowship provides:
- Round-trip
economy international travel for the grantee.
- Tuition and university
fees.
- Limited accident and sickness insurance for the grantee only. The
Humphrey Program does not provide financial support for accompanying
dependents.
Applications must be sent to the:
Program Officer
(H.H. Program)
U.S. Embassy Public Affairs Section
P.O. Box
4010
HARARE
Email: HararePAS@state.gov
This entry
was posted on May 24th, 2011 at 2:55 pm by Bev Clark
Dear fellow Zimbabweans,
Are you tired of paying ridiculous prices?
After paying $4 for a pint of local beer at an Irish pub at Sam
Levies yesterday, $5 for a jar of cane sugar syrup labelled as “Honey” and $11
for a box of cereal sold for R42 in RSA , I , as well as many other people are
feeling ripped off...
I
thus intend to start a consumer watch email which will tabulate the prices of
stable foods, hardware and household goods etc weekly, so that we know where the
cheapest prices are. This will hopefully force retailers to be more competitive
and help consumers to act wisely.
This is a not for profit concern and I am looking for several
volunteers to help collect price data, consolidate, enter data etc. If you want
to make a difference please email me and we’ll get this off the ground ASAP.
Volunteers required :
·
Shoppers who can record prices / shop / comments and regularly email
such information to the Zim Choice Manager
·
Consultants / connoisseurs / food technicians / handymen who can
provide best price comparisons and other feedback on a range of consumer topics
such as value for money at cafes, restaurants, hardware suppliers, pet foods,
artificial additives to avoid, organic food suppliers etc
·
Data assistants who can help sort and consolidate and tabulate
information coming from various “Shoppers” in Harare, Bulawayo, Mutare, Kwekwe
and RSA
o
Assist in the publishing of a weekly e-magazine
·
Web site manager (yet to be implemented by aim to have something up
and running by end 2011)
Manager ZimChoice@gmail.com
Anyone wanting to get in early and add your email for the consumer
updates please add your email on this web site: Group home page: http://groups.google.com/group/zimchoice
A group
dedicated to consumer awareness in Zimbabwe. Prices will be collected weekly and
sent out to subscribers tabulating prices are various shops in Zimbabwe where
volunteers will collect prices. Identification of products with food additives
to avoid and healthy products will be added in due
course.
THE SADC Lawyers' Association
SADC Lawyers Association Condemns the
Harassment of Civil Society
Representatives by
Zimbabwean State Security
Agents at the SADC Extraordinary Summit In
Windhoek.
The SADC Lawyers
Association is appalled by the harassment of civil society
organizations’
representatives at the SADC Extraordinary Summit in
Windhoek on 20 May 2011
by Zimbabwean
state security agents accompanied
by Namibian police officers. Various
members of civil
society
organizations from Zimbabwe and the region were at the Summit to
highlight
their concerns on
issues that were on the summit agenda,
including the crisis in Zimbabwe and
the future of the
SADC
Tribunal.
The Civil Society Organizations held meetings and press
conferences in
various venues in Windhoek
to highlight their concerns. At
the venue of the Summit, Safari Court Hotel,
some Zimbabwean
state
security agents who refused to identify themselves targeted Zimbabwe
National Association of Non
Governmental Organisations (NANGO)
chairperson Dadirai Chikwengo, Crisis in
Zimbabwe Coalition
officials
MacDonald Lewanika, Pedzisayi Ruhanya and Dewa Mavhinga and other
representatives of
the Zimbabwe Election Support Network who were
distributing statements with
civil society
demands to the summit. They
were taken away from the hotel by the Namibian
police under the
watchful
eye of the Zimbabwean state security agents. This was despite the
fact that
ZANU PF
youths, led by one Nguni were allowed to freely distribute glossy
booklets
titled “Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC-T) and the Culture
of Violence” without any
interference from either the
Namibian Police or
the Zimbabwe state security agents.
The SADC Lawyers’ Association Executive
Secretary Makanatsa Makonese,
Executive Director of the
Zimbabwe Lawyers
for Human Rights Irene Petras, Lloyd Kuvheya of the
Southern Africa
Litigation
Centre and Joy Mabhenge of the Institute for a Democratic
Alternative in
Zimbabwe were also
targeted whilst holding a meeting at
the Safari Court Hotel. They were taken
from the hotel into the
parking
area by armed police officers and interrogated by aggressive
Zimbabwe state
security agents
for more than an hour. The security agents asked personal
questions about
the CSO
representatives’ addresses in Zimbabwe, villages
of origin, who had paid for
their tickets to Namibia
and where they were
staying in Namibia. They also demanded the four’s
passports to record
their
national identity numbers and other identity information.
Another
civil society representative Jealousy Mawarire was briefly detained
for
taking pictures whilst
a car that was being used by Dewa Mavhinga was
confiscated. Both Mawarire
and the car were only
released after the
intervention of Namibian human rights lawyer Norman
Tjombe.
The SADC
Lawyers Association is dismayed that the Zimbabwe state security
agents
continue to
behave as a law unto themselves, even on foreign land. To this
end the
Association supports the call
made by the Zimbabwe Lawyers for
Human Rights on 20 May 2011 for the reform
of the
Zimbabwean security
sector as enunciated in the Zimbabwe Global Political
Agreement. It is sad
that
the Namibian police officials allowed themselves to be used by these
agents
to harass harmless and
peaceful civil society organization
representatives who had not committed
any offence. The
Government of
Zimbabwe, state security agents in that country and SADC
Governments
are
reminded that civil society organizations and individual citizens have a
right to be heard and to
participate in issues that affect how they are
governed.
Issued for and on behalf of the SADC Lawyers Association
By
Thoba Poyo-Dlwati
President
23 May 2011.