Zim Online
by Tinotenda Kandi and Wayne Mafaro Wednesday 28
May 2008
HARARE – Zimbabwe opposition leader Morgan
Tsvangirai on Tuesday said 50 of
his supporters have been killed in
political violence and promised to set up
a truth and justice commission to
probe human rights abuses in the country
if elected
president.
Zimbabwe holds a second presidential election on June 27 after
Tsvangirai
defeated President Robert Mugabe in a March 29 ballot but failed
to garner
enough more than 50 percent of the vote required to takeover the
presidency.
Tsvangirai’s Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) party,
Western governments
and human rights groups have accused Mugabe of
unleashing the army and
militias of his ruling ZANU PF party to beat and
torture opposition
supporters in a bid to intimidate them to back him in the
run-off
presidential ballot.
Tsvangirai, who launched a special fund
to assist victims of political
violence, said marauding ZANU PF gangs had
displaced more than 25 000 MDC
supporters who had virtually become refugees
in their own country.
He said: “Over 50 Zimbabweans have been killed in
the past six weeks. More
than 25 000 people have been displaced. I have been
saddened that
Zimbabweans are willing to shed the blood of other Zimbabweans
over
political differences.
"We are taking down the names of those
involved in these heinous crimes and
we know them. We will approach the
Attorney General's office to have these
people prosecuted. We are also
committed to a process of truth and justice
once we get into government. I
don't believe anyone who has murdered a
person should be
forgiven."
Home Affairs Minister Kembo Mohadi was not immediately
available to comment
on Tsvangirai’s claims of rising political murders. But
the Harare
administration denies authorising violence and instead says it is
the MDC
that has carried out political violence in order to tarnish Mugabe’s
name.
Political analysts say Tsvangirai’s frequent referrence to the need
for a
truth and justice commission is partly the reason Mugabe will not give
up
power easily for fear that such a commission could eventually see him
dragged to court to face charges of violating human rights during his
28-year rule.
Mugabe enters the June run-off as an underdog after
garnering 43.2 percent
of the vote compared to 47.8 percent won by
Tsvangirai in March.
The run-off election is being held amid worsening
food shortages and an
economic recession shown in the world’s highest
inflation rate of more than
165 000 percent.
Such a scenario would
mean certain and emphatic electoral defeat for any
sitting government but
analysts say a blistering campaign of political
violence against MDC
structures and supporters might just tilt the scales in
favour of Mugabe. –
ZimOnline
Zim Online
by Lizwe Sebatha Wednesday 28 May
2008
BULAWAYO – Zimbabwe police have held four
opposition legislators and
civic leaders in jail since arresting them last
Sunday for holding a
community meeting without first seeking permission from
the law enforcement
agency.
The two opposition Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) legislators,
Norman Mpofu and Lutho Tapela, were
arrested after holding a consultative
meeting with the community in the
western border town of Plumtree.
Two civic leaders in the town
Helija Moyo and Edwin Ncube were also
arrested after helping organise the
meeting that was held last Saturday.
The four were still being held
in police cells by late Tuesday evening
but were expected to appear in court
today to face charges of violating the
Public Order and Security Act that
requires Zimbabweans to notify police
first before holding political
gatherings or marches in public.
Gordon Moyo, the chairman of
Bulawayo Agenda a local civic group that
works with the community in
Plumtree, said: “We have never sought police
clearance to hold such office
consultative meetings and it is clear that the
government has intensified
its crackdown on the opposition and civic society
groups.
“The
meeting was just like any office or company meeting and does not
require any
police clearance.”
The MDC has in the past accused the police of
using the security Act
to target ban its meetings and arrest its supporters
and allies in a bid to
cripple the opposition’s push to dislodge President
Robert Mugabe from
power. – ZimOnline.
Zim Online
by Mutumwa Mawere Wednesday 28 May 2008
OPINION: On 6
February 1980, Lord Soames, the transitional British Governor
of Rhodesia,
in an interview observed that the election atmosphere was so
polluted by
intimidation and violence prompting him to introduce a new law
empowering
him to ban any party guilty of intimidation.
In response, ZANU leader
Robert Mugabe challenged Lord Soames to decide
whether he wanted war or
peace, meaning that any attempt to ban ZANU would
be tantamount to declaring
war and leaving the status quo of violence and
intimidation as is would be a
declaration of peace.
Lord Soames was under enormous pressure to ban ZANU
but decided to ignore
such calls in the interests of delivering the change
that he genuinely
believed Mugabe and Zimbabweans were yearning and fighting
for.
At the time, the Rhodesian forces, like their post colonial
successors, had
the means to successfully stage a coup-de-etat.
The
Rhodesian forces were determined to keep the country under white control
as
may be the case today where the will of the people may be subordinate to
the
wishes of the Joint Military Command (JMC) in the event that the run-off
election does not take place. Rhodesian army commander General Peter Walls
had to make the hard choice that it was not in the interests of the country
to militarily intervene.
The climate was not conducive for a free and
fair election and yet the
circumstances and national interest compelled
everyone to see the process
through.
It is significant that at the
73rd Ordinary Session of the Zanu PF Central
Committee, Mugabe acutely aware
of the confusion in his party following the
electoral defeat justified the
need for the run-off election at a time when
even the most ardent advocates
of democracy are calling for a government of
national unity outside the
framework of the legal system.
At independence, the image of Mugabe as a
bad man and a Marxist ideologue
was pronounced, leading to many white
Zimbabweans electing to emigrate.
Mugabe finds himself 28 years later
accused of the same violent and
intimidatory approach to
politics.
The choices at independence were clear and, justifiably,
Zimbabweans in
record numbers voted for change. In Mugabe, many believed
that salvation
would come and black hope would be realised. Notwithstanding
the polluted
electoral environment, people decided that the hour of change
had arrived
and the past could no longer be the basis on which nation
building could be
constructed.
In as much as the Rhodesian forces
were apprehensive about change, they too
realised that the colonial state
was no longer sustainable. There is no
doubt that when Mugabe loses the
run-off election, the JMC will behave in a
similar manner to how the
Rhodesian forces reluctantly accepted change.
The intellectual basis of
the arguments advanced so far for a government of
national unity before the
people have decided on who should be their first
citizen is faulty. If Walls
could be persuaded to accept the ballot as the
instrument of delivering
change then surely current commander of the
Zimbabwe National Army General
Constantine Chiwenga and his colleagues will
have no choice but to abide by
the will of the people.
Mugabe could easily have used the environment
prevailing in 1980 to stage a
coup-de-etat but there is no doubt that his
decisions were informed by the
values and principles of the revolutionary
struggle that the future of the
country belonged to the people and not to
those powerful enough to hold
instruments of fear and
intimidation.
The transition of 1980 was far more complex and interest
driven than the
current transition. Mugabe has already accepted that his
party has been
defeated and if the run-off produces the same outcome, there
is no doubt
that opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) party
leader Morgan
Tsvangirai will be the second President of the
Republic.
Lord Soames knew what kind of a client Mugabe was and he was,
therefore,
able to skilfully manage the transition.
What kind of
person is Mugabe? What sustains and motivates him? We all need
to understand
the man and history is pregnant with lessons of how to manage
Mugabe and get
the best of him. The people of Zimbabwe in the post-election
environment
displayed to a large extent the maturity that has helped to
discourage
Mugabe from going the Hugo Chavez, Castro, and etc way.
By choosing to
remain calm in the face of provocation and extreme
intimidation, the people
of Zimbabwe may eventually get the change that they
deserve. However,
surprises should be expected given the slippery road ahead
but it is
important that people keep their eyes on the price, comforted by
the fact
that half the job is already done.
It is instructive that Mugabe has
accepted that ZANU PF has to bear the
brunt of the blame for the electoral
defeat. Accordingly, it is important
that his words to the Central Committee
continue to be interrogated in a
quest to identify the best way of finishing
the job.
This is what President Mugabe said:
“Let us go back to
work fully mindful of the fact that except for one
province, most of our
provinces failed to mobilise even half of their
registered voters to go and
vote. Most people stayed at home and that
sleeping vote is what we must
target and arouse. It is our vote. It is loyal
to us and, in fact, stands
already aroused by the sense of danger, which the
party setback has shown.
Let us galvanise it for an emphatic victory.
“Our fist is against white
imperialism; it is a fist for the people of
Zimbabwe, never a fist against
them.
“Support comes from persuasion, not from pugilism. Let us build
genuine
support for the party and such support cannot come through coercion
or
violence."
Mugabe genuinely believes that the masses do not know
what time it is. It is
evident from the above that he is of the opinion that
the people who chose
not to vote support his continued stay in office and
hence the call to the
party to mobilise the electorate. It is important for
the people who did not
vote to respond to the President and express their
opinion on whether the
status quo ante should remain.
Mugabe has not
accepted that he may be the problem to nation building and
progress choosing
to characterise the voter apathy as a consequence of
naivety on the part of
the citizens. It is clear that Mugabe is definitely
not living in the same
world as the suffering masses.
He says the fist of the party is against
white imperialism when it should be
against black poverty, “Gonomics”,
dysfunctional constitutional order,
unemployment, hyperinflation,
dysfunctional political system, hopelessness,
violence, and economic
disorder.
The ZANU PF leader has not accepted and probably will never
accept any
responsibility for leading the country into despair and
undermining the
Zimbabwean promise. His mind has been directed at pursuing
self-serving
political ends with disastrous social and economic
consequences.
Mugabe must be reminded that he has been in office for the
past 28 years and
he still has a few weeks to justify to the Zimbabwean
people why they should
trust him. Any residual trust that people may still
have in him must surely
be measured by the tone of his post-election
language.
If he still believes that imperialism and not his record is the
issue in
Zimbabwe today, then surely if there was any stimulus required to
energise
people to vote this surely ought to be one such
incentive.
Mugabe is wrong to suggest that his support should come from
persuasion and
not from his record of achievements. In the absence of any
positive message
about the party’s achievements, violence appears to be the
only viable
instrument for the party. He may not be fully aware of what many
of his
colleagues are already aware of that the people are tired of the
rhetoric
and just want to turn a new leaf and move forward with the nation
building
agenda.
It is now clear that Mugabe is like a naked emperor
who is no longer living
in this world but chooses to believe what his
handlers tell him even after
people have spoken. The only message for such
an emperor is not to risk one’s
life by telling him that he is naked but for
him to discover after the votes
have been counted that his time is
up.
It is not too late to tell Mugabe that genuine support for any
political
party must come from delivery and not persuasion or violence. The
only
language that he respects is one that comes from the ballot box and
citizens
have no choice but to deliver this message eloquently on June
27.
Mugabe does not respect any other language and Zimbabwe is just too
important to be wasted arguing with a person who may no longer know the
difference between the truth and lies. – ZimOnline
VOA
By Blessing Zulu, Carole Gombakomba & Patience
Rusere
Washington
27 May 2008
Under
pressure from the Zimbabwean opposition and international groups to
deploy a
reinforced observer mission to the country well before its June 27
presidential run-off election, the Southern African Development Community
has promised to send at least 200 observers - 80 more than it deployed for
the March 29 first round.
Officials in the opposition Movement for
Democratic Change and African and
Western diplomatic sources said they have
been urging SADC to expand its
involvement in the country before the
situation spins out of control given
the political violence which has become
increasingly deadly with more than
50 opposition activists reported
slain.
The MDC is asking SADC in particular to put more observers in
rural areas
that have in effect become no-go areas for the opposition.
Militia members
and war veterans linked to the ZANU-PF party of President
Robert Mugabe have
been terrorizing and killing local residents suspected of
backing the
opposition. Such forces have set up roadblocks in many locations
to control
entry into such target areas.
Mr. Mugabe faces opposition
leader Morgan Tsvangirai, who claimed an
official 47.9% of first-round
ballots compared with the incumbent's 43.2%,
while the combined MDC (the
opposition party split in 2005) won a majority
in parliament's lower
house.
SADC Executive Secretary Tomaz Salamao confirmed in an interview
that his
group will send at least 200 observers for the late-June
presidential
run-off.
Salamao said he will meet Saturday with the
Zimbabwe Electoral Commission
before the first SADC observers arrive. He
said the final number of
observers and the date of their deployment would be
announced after he has
met with ZEC officials.
SADC sources earlier
had said the organization would not send observers
before mid-June, citing
logistical and financial constraints.
SADC leaders are expected to
examine the crisis in Zimbabwe on the sidelines
of a development conference
opening in Tokyo this week.
Senior researcher Chris Maroleng of the
Institute for Security Studies in
South Africa told reporter Blessing Zulu
of VOA's Studio 7 for Zimbabwe that
SADC might be able to stem the tide of
violence if it deploys observers
early enough.
International and
regional observer groups are urging the Zimbabwean
government to uphold its
commitments under SADC protocols governing
democratic elections and the
equivalent African Union declaration free and
fair elections.
Senior
Program Officer Belinda Musanhu of the Electoral Institute of
Southern
Africa in Pretoria commented that Harare is responsible for
ensuring a
peaceful environment in the run-up to elections and afterwards.
She said she
and other regional observers are saddened to note that local
observers are
now being targeted by violence.
David Pottie, associate director of the
democracy program at the
Atlanta-based Carter Center, told reporter Carole
Gombakomba that the main
concern is that violence and intimidation are
denying Zimbabweans their
universal right to cast a free
ballot.
Meanwhile, some 65 civil society leaders met in Harare on Tuesday
to set
strategies for the presidential run-off campaign. They resolved to
launch an
international appeal for assistance to victims of political
violence and to
mobilize funds to help people who have been displaced by
such violence
return to their homes to vote.
Spokesman Fambai
Ngirande of the National Association of Non-Governmental
Organizations told
reporter Patience Rusere of VOA's Studio 7 for Zimbabwe
that the NGO’s are
taking such steps to ensure that people are able to
exercise their right to
vote in what he described as a “crucial” election
for the country.
www.zimbabwejournalists.com
27th
May 2008 23:21 GMT
By Ian Nhuka
BULAWAYO - The Zanu PF propaganda
machinery is now operating at full spate
ahead of the potentially bruising
June 27 presidential election run-off,
with some programmes that had been
scrapped from national television, being
dramatically restored.
The
return of the pro-Zanu PF programmes comes hard-on-the-heels of the
sacking
of former Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) chief executive,
Henry
Muradzikwa.
Pro-Zanu PF programmes that now dominate the airwaves include
Dzimbahwe,
Ndangariro Dzehondo, Chimurenga Music and Melting
Pot.
This is in addition to one-sided news items that prop up President
Robert
Mugabe’s re-election bid while trashing Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC)
candidate, Morgan Tsvangirai.
A senior television
producer said the new programmes have disrupted the
original
schedule.
“They just started coming shortly after the boss (Muradzikwa)
left,” he said
from Harare yesterday. “Some of the programmes are new while
others, like
Dzimbahwe are old but had been removed when Muradzikwa came in.
There are
also musical programmes on which we play revolutionary songs.
Discussants on
Dzimbahwe are not new, they also have basically the same
thrust. What has
changed is the name of the programmes. Previously it was
called National
Ethos.”
Muradzikwa, an experienced and respected
journalist, was fired for allegedly
failing to use the national broadcaster
to campaign for Zanu PF in the March
29 elections.
Zanu PF officials
accused Muradzikwa of supporting the failed presidential
bid of former
minister, and ruling party politburo member, Simba Makoni, who
contested in
the March 29 election as an independent.
On Ndangariro Dzehondo, the
national television broadcasts fresh and
sometimes archival material of Zanu
PF veterans during the liberation
struggle.
On Chimurenga Music, the
country’s sole television station plays
revolutionary songs meant to flaunt
Zanu PF’s liberation war credentials.
Zanu PF praise singers who dominate
this slot include Tambaoga, Comrade
Chinx, Hosiah Chipanga and a group
called Mugabe Chete: 2008.
Chipanga sings, “Gushungo Haana Mhosva,” in
which he absolves Mugabe of
ruining the economy, shifting the blame to his
officials and local business
people. Gushungo is Mugabe’s
totem.
“VaMugabe vane munyama” Chipanga sings, Kupiwa mhosva isiri yavo
---.
Mapurazi mashanu mashanu, wakanga watumwa nani? Mabarwe kupiwa
wotengesa,
wakanga watumwa nani?” asks the musician in the song blaming
everyone but
Mugabe of the ills affecting Zimbabwe.
Panelists on
Dzimbahwe are University of Zimbabwe professors linked to Zanu
PF such as
Claude Mararike who teaches sociology, Vimbai Chivaura, who
lectures
English and Sheunesu Mupepereki of the Department of Soil Science.
These
liberation messages are designed to portray Zanu PF as the custodian
of
national interests having led the armed struggle for independence in the
1970s.
President Mugabe routinely dismisses the MDC as a “sell-out”
party, which he
claims, was formed to reverse “the revolution.” Tsvangirai
denies this.
Chivaura said: “Our programme is back on television. It is
not meant to
campaign for anyone, but to help our people to know who they
are and their
national interest.”
President Mugabe faces his old
nemesis, Tsvangirai in the run-off after he
was out-polled by the former
trade unionist. He polled about 43 percent of
the ballot while Tsvangirai
got 47 percent.
HARARE - 28 May 2008
The Rt Rev Sebastian Bakare, Anglican
Bishop of Harare has issued the
following pastoral letter to his
diocese.
Dear Sisters and Brothers in Christ,
We are shocked and
dismayed by the continuous police interference with
Sunday services and by
the increased brutality causing casualties. Many of
you have been assaulted
and beaten, and several parishioners of St Monica's
Church, Chitungwiza,
were brutally assaulted on 18 May and had to be
admitted to
hospital.
Our struggle to worship without harassment continues. The
Supreme Court
Order issued by the Hon. Chief Justice on 12 May was totally
disregarded by
the police, as previous orders have been. Needless to say
where there is law
and order such defiance would result in the arrest of
those in contempt of
court. Today in Zimbabwe the rule of law does not
exist. That leaves us with
no recourse to ensure that our members can freely
and peacefully exercise
their constitutional right for example, for everyone
to worship without
harassment. We are however not deterred by this
lawlessness and will
continue to seek justice through the
courts.
Once again we appeal to the law enforcement agents, and
especially the
police, to let sanity prevail and refrain from harassing and
brutalising
Anglican Christians in Harare Diocese even if it may fall on
deaf ears. Let
it be said for the record.
As a Diocese we will look
for alternative worship places to ensure that
members of our congregations
remain united as we struggle for freedom of
worship. We will never cease to
worship. We also believe, whether the police
like it or not, that God will
intervene, may be not today or tomorrow but in
His own time. We will rejoice
when this happens.
As Christians we encourage you all to take solace in
reading the Bible and
be guided by the power of the Holy Spirit. We are
reminded of Jesus' promise
to his disciples:
"I will ask the Father,
and he will give you another Counsellor to be with
you forever - the Spirit
of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it
neither sees him nor knows
him. But you know him, for he lives with you and
will be in you. I will not
leave you as orphans; I will come to you" (John
14:16-18).
Our lives as
Christians will always have security in Christ and not in the
powers of this
world. May we take this inspiring message into our hearts.
In the book of
Revelation chapter 13 we are reminded of the image of the
beast whose agenda
is to destroy the followers of Christ (Rev 13:5-10). Rest
assured that the
principalities and powers of this world come and go, but
the God who is
Alpha and Omega remains to achieve His purpose to save
humanity in spite of
the challenges put before us by the beast.
We encourage those of you who
do not belong to a house group, to join one,
as this is a way in which you
can support one another in prayer and
otherwise Bernard Mizeki celebrations
will be on 13-15 June. May God bless
you all!
PRAYER
Lord
Jesus, we talk glibly about your suffering but rarely stop to think
what it
involves. It was not so easy to imagine the physical, mental and
spiritual
suffering you had to bear on our behalf. You underwent all this in
the
company of your Father, although at a time you felt abandoned but not
forsaken (Psalm 22).
The physical, mental and spiritual anguish we are
going through in our
Diocese, meted by non-God fearing police officers and
their superiors is not
hidden from you. We believe that we are with you here
on earth as in heaven.
We believe that those who believe in you are never
forsaken.
Send your Holy Spirit to guide and strengthen us as we go through
the
challenge of being denied to meet together in your name. Your Kingdom
come.
Amen.
+ Sebastian Harare
Bishop of the Anglican Diocese of
Harare CPCA
Source: Anglican Information - A voice for the
voiceless'
© Independent Catholic News
2008
SW Radio Africa (London)
27 May 2008
Posted to
the web 27 May 2008
Tichaona Sibanda
SADC leaders are to meet
on the sidelines of a conference in Japan to
discuss the current political
instability in the region and the deployment
of election observers to
monitor the second round of the presidential poll
in Zimbabwe.
The
SADC leaders will be among 40 heads of state and governments from Africa
meeting in Japan's oldest port city of Yokohama, for a three-day conference
on African development.
The summit starts Wednesday and finishes
on Friday. Robert Mugabe will not
attend the conference despite the fact
that the Japanese government invited
him. He'll be represented by his
foreign affairs Minister, Simbarashe
Mumbengegwi.
Glen Mpani is the
regional co-ordinator in the Cape Town based Centre for
the Study of
Violence and Reconciliation, and he said the time to pretend
that all was
well in the SADC bloc was long gone.
'It's now an open secret that
problems in Zimbabwe have also helped inflame
the crisis of xenophobic
attacks in South Africa. By allowing the crisis in
Zimbabwe to drag on for
years, SADC leaders and in particular Mbeki have
realised they left the
crisis to fester and now it has become an increasing
source of irritation to
the region,' Mpani said.
The Red Cross said on Monday that an estimated
25,000 Zimbabweans were
heading for Zambia, as they flee anti-immigrant
violence in South Africa.
Thousands more are heading for Mozambique and
Botswana. The last thing they
want to do is go back to
Zimbabwe.
Francoise Le Goff, the Red Cross director for Southern Africa,
said in
Zambia their teams were preparing for the arrival of the huge
Zimbabwean
contingent. He said that up till now 5,500 Zimbabweans have had
assistance
in Mozambique, while 342 had been received in centres near the
border with
Botswana.
'The SADC leaders are faced with an explosive
situation and no one, not even
Mbeki, will pretend there is no crisis in
Zimbabwe or the region,' Mpani
added.
Mpani said if Mbeki wanted to
salvage his reputation, he had to ensure the
presidential run-off was going
to be free and fair, as well as urging SADC
leaders to send observers as
soon as possible.
'I'm certain no SADC leader wants a disputed election
in Zimbabwe and added
to that, no country wants an explosion of refugees
because of political
instability in South Africa and Zimbabwe. I think Mbeki
will find it even
harder to keep defending Mugabe,' Mpani said.
With
just a month to go before the presidential election run-off, the MDC
said on
Tuesday that conditions were not conducive for a free and fair poll,
but
still expressed confidence they will oust Mugabe.
Nelson Chamisa, the
chief spokesman for the MDC, said their access to the
state media was now
totally closed and that holding rallies was almost
impossible.
'We
had to appeal to the high court to get an order to hold our last two
rallies. Our supporters are being displaced in rural areas and key players
have been abducted and killed, rendering our campaign crippled and the
Zimbabwe Electoral Commission and the army are working in cahoots to advance
the cause of Zanu-PF,' Chamisa said. He said despite all the disadvantages,
their candidate would win the election.
Political analyst Brian
Kagoro recently predicted that no amount of
violencem would alter decisions
already made in the hearts and minds of
Zimbabweans who are hungry for
change.
Huffington Post
Michealene Cristini Risley
Posted May 27, 2008 | 05:16 PM
(EST)
Can you imagine? Four dollars would buy most of a fast
food meal in the
United States, perhaps a cup of designer coffee. In
Zimbabwe it is enough to
motivate boys to beat pregnant women with nail
ridden planks and smash the
skulls of old men into the earth, blending their
blood with the rich red
soil of this beautiful but anguished
country.
How could life have become so cheap and power so expensive? How
can the
world not scream in despair about the situation occurring in our
Global
village? Are we waiting for proof enough to step in with aid or are
we
waiting for a confirmed genocide that has happened in countries like
Darfur
and the Congo? Are we so caught up in the insignificant details of
every day
life that we cannot take the time to stop the phenomena of civil
war? Where
are the elders?
In the rural areas of Zimbabwe, the youth
Militia are passing out plates of
terror. It was after the 2000 elections
that President Mugabe recruited
young boys to help him administer control
over the country. The kids were
recruited for a national Zimbabwe training
program. Since the election
results of this year did not come out in
Mugabe's favor, he took 150 of his
Senior Army officials and assigned them
to administer terror. He asked them
to focus on the 58 districts of the
country and to make sure that these
districts received enough torture to
re-think their votes. In order for
these officials to carry the torture,
they again called in the youth
militia.
Since the current election
run off in not until June 27th, Mugabe has ample
time for these young men to
set up base torture camps. Right now there are
roughly 20,000 young boys and
men who make up the youth militia. Each member
gets a billion Zimbabwe
dollars a day. This pay is equivalent to 3 to 4 US
dollars. The youth
militias have set up base camps in each of these
districts and bring in MDC
supporters for questioning.
The camps are usually set up at a police
station, a local store or an
abandoned schoolyard. Anywhere the Youth
Militia decides they would like
place the training camp. Once the base is
established the militia carries
out the required requests from the senior
officials. It can be as simple as
torturing 15 of the locals so that the
rest of the village runs away. The
trick is, once these people run away, the
Youth Militia makes sure to
destroy their identity cards. They are not able
to vote without these cards.
It's an easy way for Mugabe to destroy
Tsengeri's lead.
The political violence in this once economic pillar of
African country
success stories is out of control. I wonder what it will
take for the
International Community to move and stop this murderous
rampage. I have
spent countless hours on the phone with the United Nations
and The Red
Cross-Zimbabwe needs HELP! I am flabbergasted by the
Bureaucratic maze of
humanitarian efforts.
The state backed violence
has reached a pinnacle in rural areas. Mugabe and
his allies think the rural
vote will decide the octogenarian's grip on
power.
17-year-old Chido
(her name has been changed) of Mbizi village in Murewa
will live with the
horror of the political violence orchestrated by Zanu PF
for the rest of her
life. Her life may not be much longer. In their desire
to maintain power,
Zanu PF tortures any real or perceived threat from MDC
supporters. This wave
of human retribution is calculated to instill fear in
Tsengeri supporters
before the presidential run off next month. Truth be
conveyed, Mugabe is
instilling terror in every single human being still
stranded in
Zimbabwe.
For Chido, May 18, 2008 will always remain deeply etched in her
mind as the
blackest day in her life. This was when marauding Zanu PF
supporters invaded
their village, kidnapped MDC supporters, took them to
their "bases" and beat
them into submission.
"There were 50 of them
who came to our homestead at around eight in the
morning and marched my
father to one of their bases at Nhakiwa Township. My
father was beaten
together with others accused of supporting the MDC."
"About 80 villagers
were kidnapped and beaten, 15 people died. My father was
one of the few
survivors. I think they gave him a controlled beating because
they knew he
is an ailing man." Chidos father suffers from aids.
Apart from beating up
the villagers, the marauding thugs reportedly
destroyed homes that belonged
to those accused of supporting MDC. "Headman
Gotora Mbizi fled to Harare
with his entire family after escaping from the
militia. His homestead is now
a heap of rubble and ashes after the thugs had
completed their work. Many
homes have suffered the same fate." Said Chido.
Ashe and rubble; broken
bodies and souls: a human Myanmar in Zimbabwe.
The leaders of the terror
campaign in the area have been identified as
Bonnie Magunje and Fibion
Mbizi. Two Zimbabwean men in their mid thirties
who report directly to
President Mugabe's team of elimination strategists.
For girls like Chido,
the notorious bases set up at Nhakiwa, Mapfeka and
Chitimbe embody the
horror suffered by women in such barbaric circumstances.
Thousands of girls
under the age of 18 are forced into these bases where
many of them are face
gang rape, sexual abuse and torture.
"If they kidnap or beat up a woman,
rape is sure to follow and girls like me
become desperate where there is no
organization to assist us." Chido is now
hiding in Harare. Her worst fear is
that the youth militia will return to
finish off her father who was left
behind in Murewa.
A very sad story. Murewa is just a microcosm of the
brewing hurricane that
is sweeping through Zimbabwe's rural landscape. The
world can show no
greater insensitivity than to watch quietly when thousands
of innocent human
beings are caught up in the eye of the storm. Think of
that, next time you
buy a cup of designer coffee.
Zim Standard
Local
Saturday, 24 May 2008 18:13
War veterans
rampaging through Matabeleland South last week were
allegedly forcing
villagers to remove satellite television receivers from
their
homes.
They closed down schools and irrigation schemes
after targeting
teachers and Ministry of Agriculture workers they accused of
influencing
rural voters to turn against President Robert Mugabe and Zanu PF
in the 29
March elections.
Terrified villagers told The
Standard the ex-combatants, who set up
bases throughout the province, had
revived the wartime all-night vigils or
"pungwes".
On
Wednesday, they forced villagers in the Lushongwe area of Gwanda
North to
remove their satellite dishes.
The militias claimed the receivers,
popular in most parts of
Matabeleland because there is no transmission of
local radio and television,
were "misleading’ them into voting against Zanu
PF.
Most villagers can only watch and listen to South African and
Botswana
television and radio channels.
The MDC, which says
more than 40 of its supporters have been killed
and thousands displaced in
the violence countrywide, condemned the latest
assault on villagers’ right
to exercise their freedom of association.
"War veterans and Zanu PF
militia went through Lushongwe on Wednesday,
forcing villagers to remove
satellite dishes, saying the dishes were a bad
influence on the villagers,"
said Petros Mukwena, the provincial secretary
of the MDC-Arthur
Mutambara.
"Education has also been disrupted after the teachers
were chased
away, resulting in the schools being closed."
Matabeleland South police could not be reached for comment on the
latest
developments.
Meanwhile in Kezi district, five schools were forced
to close down
after the former liberation war fighters chased away all the
teachers,
accusing them of influencing the villagers to vote against Zanu
PF.
The schools are Tjewondo primary and secondary, Marinoha and
Zamanyoni
primary and St Anne’s secondary. This brings to 15 the number of
schools
closed by the war veterans in Matabeleland South.
Other
schools forced to shut down after teachers fled Zanu PF militia
include
Zezani Mission and Zhukwe, Sizeze, Sitezi, Maphane, Khozi, Wabayi,
Nyandeni,
Nkazhe and Gohole primary schools.
Raymond Majongwe, the
Progressive Teachers’ Union of Zimbabwe
secretary general said: "Schools
have become targets of the Zanu PF militia,
resulting in dozens of them
closing down.
On Thursday the war veterans allegedly took over
plots at Mhabhinyane
irrigation scheme in Matobo district, helping
themselves to vegetable and
maize that is still to be
harvested.
By Nqobani Ndlovu
Zim Standard
Local
Saturday, 24 May 2008 18:08
Ex-ZIPRA
high command combatants have warned the current wave of
political violence
could deal a fatal blow to the fragile Unity Accord.
Observers said the warning from the top military brass of Joshua Nkomo’s
PF
Zapu armed wing during the struggle showed Zanu PF was divided over
President Robert Mugabe’s violent campaign for re-election on 27
June.
A faction of the Zimbabwe National Liberation War Veterans’
Association (ZNLWVA), led by Jabulani Sibanda is reportedly leading the
attacks against MDC supporters, especially in rural areas.
But
Retired Colonel Thomas Ngwenya, formerly of the Zipra high command
and the
Revolutionary Council, last week said they wanted to distance
themselves
from the violence.
Ngwenya said he was speaking on behalf of his
colleagues in the former
Zipra hierarchy.
Ngwenya is a member
of Zanu PF’s National Consultative Assembly (NCA).
He said many
people, among them Zanu PF supporters, were beginning to
wonder if the
struggle was waged for "one person, one vote".
"On behalf of Zipra
cadres and commanders as well as the war veterans’
association formed by
Zanla and Zipra ex-combatants, I want to categorically
state we are not part
and parcel of Jabulani Sibanda’s campaign of harassing
and beating up
innocent people," he said.
"As former members of the high command
we have much respect for the
party leadership, in particular those from PF
Zapu, which merged with Zanu
PF, but we cannot allow our cause to be
rubbished by rogue elements."
Analysts say by speaking out against
the violence ex-Zipra fighters
might influence South African President Thabo
Mbeki to be firmer in his
dealings with President Robert Mugabe because of
their solid ties with SA’s
African National Congress.
Zipra
fought side by side with ANC’s Umkhonto We Sizwe during the
struggle. A
group of retired South African army generals have been in the
country to
investigate reports of political violence on behalf of Mbeki.
Ngwenya said it was time Mugabe showed leadership by reining in the
rogue
war veterans and allow voters to elect leaders of their choice.
The
MDC claims more than 42 of its supporters have died in the
violence, while
thousands more have been displaced.
Human rights groups have
accused Zanu PF of launching a campaign to
drive out MDC members from their
homes so they would not vote in the
run-off.
Zanu PF has denied
the allegations and instead accused the MDC of
busing its youths from urban
areas to attack ruling party supporters in
rural areas.
A
number of senior ex-Zipra commanders joined former Home Affairs
Minister,
Dumiso Dabengwa when he broke ranks with Mugabe to support Simba
Makoni in
his bid for the presidency.
Dabengwa has dismissed some of the war
veterans leading Mugabe’s
campaign as "bogus", saying they were too young to
have taken part in the
struggle.
Sibanda was not available
for comment as he was said to be campaigning
for Mugabe in rural
areas.
By Kholwani Nyathi
Zim Standard
Local
Saturday, 24 May 2008 18:06
ON the morning of Sunday, 11
May 2008 Sam Kahari, an MDC supporter
from Chidembo village in Shamva, was
dragged out of bed by Zanu PF youths
and war veterans, according to his
wife, Loveness Matumi, 29.
In hers and her four children’s
presence the group now known in
Madziwa as the "Chabopa squad," murdered
Kahari.
He was found dead with three axes stuck in his skull,
according to
fellow MDC activists who came to the house later. His wife and
children fled
after witnessing the murder.
Later that morning,
the same group burnt down more than 20 homesteads,
claiming they belonged to
MDC supporters in the village.
More than 50 people, including
Kahari’s widow, now scattered at
hospitals in Mashonaland Central and
Harare, were injured in that early
Sunday morning attack.
According to MDC officials in the area, on Sunday 17 May the "Chabopa
squad"
abducted the MDC treasurer for Ward 9, Edson Zaya, from his home
around 1PM,
dragged him to Chidembo shopping centre and killed him in broad
daylight.
The member-in-charge of Madziwa police station,
identifying himself
only as Dongonda, said the police made a number of
arrests at Peter farm on
Tuesday and Wednesday last week in connection with
the murders and the
violence in the area. But he declined to release the
names of those
arrested.
"I refer you to our headquarters for
any further details," Dongonda
said.
The police spokesperson,
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Bvudzijena could
not be reached for
comment.
During a visit to the area on Wednesday last week, The
Standard was
shown the spot where Zaya’s body was found, outside a shop said
to belong to
a Zanu PF House of Assembly member re-elected on 29
March.
"Everyone knows where Edson died," said Stanford Kachaya,
MDC youth
chairperson for Shamva North, "and they don’t want to set foot on
the spot.
Our community is very superstitious."
Zaya’s friends
and relatives claimed they found his body with bruises
which they believe
were caused by human teeth, a deep cut to the head and
scars that they
suspected were due to hot plastic being applied to his back.
The
gruesome murders of Zaya and Kahari are among the harrowing tales
of terror
The Standard heard from eyewitnesses and others affected by the
political
turmoil in the area last week.
This area is part of Shamva North
constituency in Mashonaland Central
and is situated about 200km from
Harare.
We arrived at the homestead of Godfrey Chimombe, the MDC
House of
Assembly candidate for the constituency.
There was a
huge poster of Morgan Tsvangirai at the gate and other
party campaign
material around the yard.
Chimombe’s home is now a sanctuary to
more than 50 MDC activists from
Chidembo, Kahari and Madzivanzira villages,
all displaced by political
violence. The activists’ tales are
heart-rending.
The so called Chabopa squad, they said, had killed,
maimed, threatened
and burnt people’s houses and livestock, stolen people’s
belongings,
destroyed shops belonging to MDC supporters and raped innocent
women.
The group forces people to attend endless meetings where
they are
verbally abused and accused of being "traitors".
Chimombe says the gang, from Peter farm, is led by a self-proclaimed
war
veteran.
Chimombe chokes with emotion as he speaks of the
circumstances
surrounding Kahari and Zaya’s deaths.
"It saddens
me that these young, energetic people with families
looking up to them, are
gone. The way they were brutally murdered pains me
even more," says
Chimombe.
"I have this huge family now, but we have nothing and
watching all
these people go through all this pain just makes me
angry."
At Chimombe’s homestead where MDC supporters are huddled
for safety,
the youths take turns as security guards every hour of the
day.
MDC candidate for the council elections for Shamva North,
Chenayi
Yohane, was the first in the village to have his home torched by the
Chabopa
squad.
"I have no home, as I speak, but have refused to
be chased away from
my home by these lunatics," Yohane said.
"The very next day they burnt my house, I put up a makeshift home
there. I
remain defiant and I dare them to come back."
Obert Nhara and more
than 20 other youths in secondary school were
forced to leave school after
continuous harassment by the Zanu PF youths.
Ambuya Naume Makamero,
from Chidembo village, is homeless after Zanu
PF youths burnt down her
house. She has sought refuge at Chimombe’s home,
together with her three
grandchildren and daughter.
"We will support the MDC to the bitter
end," says the 67-year-old
former teacher. "This is what we decided when we
went to the elections and
now we are paying for it. Ini ndiri chinja kusvika
muguva rangu." (I shall
remain with MDC into my grave.)
By Bertha Shoko
Zim Standard
Business
Saturday, 24 May 2008 15:38
RESETTLEMENT boss Dr
Christopher Mushambi has reportedly taken over a
horticultural concern in
Odzi which is protected under the Bilateral Treaty
and Protection of
Investments (BIPAs).
Mushambi was repeatedly asked by The
Standard if he had moved onto the
farm which is protected under BIPAs. Each
time, his response was: "Why don’t
you ask the Ministry of Foreign Affairs?
If there is anything regarding
BIPAs the ministry is the one to answer. I
don’t sign protocols."
The Standard heard last week that Hunthrin
Services P/L — a joint
horticultural venture between an indigenous
Zimbabwean and Dutch investors —
is protected under BIPAs between the
government of Zimbabwe and the Royal
Kingdom of the
Netherlands.
Hunthrin is a Hypericum flower project, the variety of
Hypericum being
Honey Flair.
This is grown under licence to a
Dutch breeder, H & B R van den Bosch
BV, and Hunthrin Services P/L is
currently the only licensee of this variety
of Hypericum in the
world.
An offer letter dated 2 October 2007, was written to
Mushambi, the
director of Resettlement, for the farm under the A2
scheme.
But on 14 December in the High Court, Justice Charles
Hungwe issued a
provisional order barring Mushambi from occupying the farm.
He granted an
interim relief that "to the extent that it becomes necessary,
the Deputy
Sheriff be and is hereby authorised and empowered to attend the
eviction of
the Third respondent or any other person claiming occupation of
the property
through him".
The interim relief empowered the
Deputy Sheriff to enlist the
assistance of the police so that the order was
executed and implemented in
full.
Notwithstanding Justice
Hungwe’s order, on 8 February Mushambi moved
onto the property and took up
residence of the farmhouse.
The owners of the farm said Mushambi’s
action resulted in work
stoppage, with flowers awaiting shipment to Holland
for Valentine’s Day 14
February) "left to rot in the cold rooms and the
lands".
Leoni Cuelenaere, the Netherland’s deputy ambassador, said
she went to
the farm but was denied entry by Mushambi’s
workers.
Another provisional order was granted in the High Court,
Justice
Anne-Marie Gowora which barred Mushambi from occupying the
farm.
After their eviction from the property by the Deputy Sheriff
on 11
March, the illegal occupants returned to the property almost
immediately.
Hunthrin Services employees tried to return to the farm the
following day,
together with a police escort, but were met by a mob who
denied them access,
saying this was now "Mushambi Farm", The Standard was
told last week.
The farm owners told The Standard last week that
Mushambi’s takeover
of the farm had rendered some workers redundant as he
employed only six of
the 180 original workforce.
In addition to
the main flower enterprise, wheat, soya beans and maize
were also grown, and
10 ha of Macadamia trees were established in 2007 as
the beginning of a new
40 ha Macadamia project.
Cuelenaere confirmed she was barred from
entering the farm in
February.
She said the Dutch Embassy had
raised the issue of the farm with the
Foreign Affairs Ministry.
"They (ministry of Foreign Affairs) said they will forward the
questions to
relevant authorities," Cuelanaere said.
Ambassador Joey Bimha,
Foreign Affairs permanent secretary said he was
not aware of any
representations made to the ministry by the Royal
Netherlands Embassy
pertaining to the farm.
Bimha said: "I am not aware of that. I have
not received any
communication from the Netherlands Embassy."
He referred The Standard to the Ministry of Land, Land Reform and
Resettlement.
Repeated efforts to get comment from Sophia
Christina Tsvakwi, the
ministry’s permanent secretary were
fruitless.
By Ndamu Sandu
Zim Standard
Local
Saturday, 24 May 2008 18:10
United States citizens have been warned
against travelling to Zimbabwe
in the run-up to the presidential run-off
election next month due to
political instability caused by tension after the
disputed 29 March
elections.
The travel warning — the
second in as many months — is likely to
escalate losses in revenue from
tourism, already suffering as a result of
the violence immediately after the
29 March elections.
The MDC says the post-election violence is part
of a Zanu PF campaign
strategy to intimidate its supporters into voting for
President Robert
Mugabe, pitted for the second time this year against MDC
leader, Morgan
Tsvangirai.
"US citizens should defer
non-essential travel to Zimbabwe at this
time," reads the US State
Department’s warning.
"While the country prepares for a run-off of
the presidential
elections . . . Zimbabwean security forces, including some
military police
and the police, as well as so-called war veterans are
creating a climate of
intimidation and fear across the
country."
It said there were continued risks of arbitrary detention
or arrest.
The updated travel advisory expires on 1 July this year.
No comment
could be obtained from Sikhanyiso Ndlovu, the Minister of
Information and
Publicity.
The run-off election on 27 June
comes amid rising violence against
opposition activists.
The
MDC blames the violence on Zanu PF which it says is intended to
intimidate
its supporters into voting for Mugabe, a charge Zanu PF has
denied.
At a police pass out parade in Harare last week, Mugabe
was quoted as
having said: "The MDC opposition, formed at the behest of
Britain, is on an
evil crusade of dividing our people along political lines
as they continue
to fan and sponsor heinous acts of political violence
targeting innocent
citizens."
Human rights organisations, the
MDC and the regional Sadc say the
political environment characterized by
violence is not conducive for a free
and fair election.
According to the MDC, more than 40 of its supporters have been killed
while
over 6 000 have been displaced.
By Nqobani Ndlovu
Zim Standard
Saturday, 24 May 2008 14:29
ONE of the more subtle but
nevertheless great impediments to the
transfer of power in Zimbabwe is a
rigid belief by President Mugabe and Zanu
PF in a kind of "end of history"
approach with regards to matters of
governance.
There
has been, it must be said, great underestimation by opponents of
the weight
of the ideology that guides Zanu PF and in particular, Mugabe
himself.
Resolving the conflict in Zimbabwe requires a proper understanding
of this
belief system and the ideology that fuels it. There is a particular
need to
understand, challenge and overcome the "end of history" approach
that
characterises Zanu PF politics.
Mugabe and Zanu PF believe very
strongly that the historical
progression of ideas on governance in Zimbabwe
effectively ended when they
helped to overcome the imperialist forces at
independence.
In their view, the anti-imperialist ideology and
system established
since 1980 was and remains the epitome to which every
Zimbabwean must aspire
and which cannot, therefore, be bettered. According
to this view, the search
for a new ideology and system of governance
effectively ended upon the
realisation of the anti-imperialist ideal.
Accordingly, the anti-imperial
ideology presents the ultimate and only point
around which a system of
governance can be built.
It is,
therefore, hardly surprising that in the eyes of Zanu PF, the
MDC merely
represents a counter-revolutionary force that is being engineered
by those
threatening what is considered the supreme and final ideal.
There
is nothing wrong with the anti-imperialistic ideology but Zanu
PF has failed
to grasp at least two things:
First, they have failed to implement
their ideas in such a way as to
protect the country against forces of
imperialism they claim to be fighting.
If anything, having reduced the
country to its current condition, they have
weakened both the state and
citizens, thereby making the country ever more
vulnerable to outside
forces.
Second, adopting an "end of history" approach to
matters of governance
is a grave mistake that overlooks the realities of the
evolution of ideas
and systems of governance. It is a mistake to believe
that there is nothing
else beyond anti-imperialistic ideas upon which to
build governance systems.
In other words, Mugabe and Zanu PF are mistaken if
they believe that their
ideas represent the "end of history" in the
evolution of ideas on
governance. Rather, ideas in politics, as in life,
continue to be developed,
challenging accepted wisdom and offering new
alternatives.
But Zanu PF’s "end of history" approach to politics
and governance is
akin to that taken by some people following the end of the
Cold War and the
collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. Then,
there was great
optimism among those who saw it as an occasion of triumphal
celebration for
the success of the idea and system of liberal democracy and
market
capitalism. Some went so far as to call it the "end of history" in
the sense
that in finding liberal democracy, humankind had finally reached
the "end of
history" in terms of ideological evolution.
Perhaps
the most prominent proponent of this idea is Francis Fukuyama,
whose book,
The End of History and the Last Man, became a bestseller in many
countries.
It was argued that liberal democracy had triumphed over its
competitors in
the battle of ideas on how the affairs of humankind should be
governed. It
was, therefore, argued that there was nothing else to better it
and for that
reason, history had effectively "ended".
This thesis has, quite
rightly, been challenged and critiqued from
many angles since it was put
forward in 1989. The conclusions that history
had ended appear to have been
premature.
In the same way, though in respect of a remarkably
different set of
ideas, Mugabe and Zanu PF appear to subscribe (without
saying so expressly)
to an "end of history" thesis with regards to matters
of governance in
Zimbabwe.
For where Fukuyama and others see
liberal democracy as representing
the "end of history" for humankind, Mugabe
and followers see the
anti-imperialist ideology as representing the "end of
history" for the
Zimbabwean. And where Fukuyama thinks there is nothing else
to better the
ideology and system of liberal democracy, Mugabe believes that
there is
nothing to better the ideology and system of
anti-imperialism.
Anti-imperialist ideology, like liberal
democracy, has many merits but
to suggest that it represents the "end of
history"; that there is nothing
else beyond it, is, surely, taking an
extreme position that closes space to
other ideas that could improve upon
it.
In so doing, Zanu PF is refusing to acknowledge that the
battle of
ideas is a continuous process; that history is about the constant
evolution
of ideas about governance and societal arrangements.
What Mugabe and Zanu PF fail to grasp is that however much they love
Zimbabwe; that however greatly their see themselves as its ultimate
guardians; that there is no serious Zimbabwean who would willingly submit
himself and the country to the forces of imperialism. An anti-imperialistic
stance is not a bad thing — but if it is narrowly construed in the way that
Zanu PF has done, then it becomes counter-productive. There is need to
minimise paranoia and instead to open space for new ideas to enable the
evolution of current thinking on governance.
The
anti-imperialist ideas for which they fought remain as strong
among the new
generation of Zimbabweans as they did during their time.
Mugabe and
his colleagues are mere mortals who, one day, must answer
the invitation of
the Creator. Things will not stop simply because of that
circumstance. Ideas
will continue to be developed long after our generation.
The defeat of
imperialism did not represent the end of history, but the
continuation and
evolution of ideas on governance.
The MDC may yet assume a
governance role but it, too, will succumb to
defeat if it does not deliver
according to its undertakings. And when it
fails, a new set of people and
ideas will emerge to take its place. That way
systems and ideas
evolve.
But if someone considers that their idea and system
represents the
"end of history", then there is a big problem. This is the
big problem with
Zanu PF’s approach to politics and governance. There is a
refusal to
acknowledge that ideas evolve; that they are evolving but that
this
evolution is in no way indicative of counter-revolutionary intent. They
simply have to get out of this mode in which they are guided by the idea of
the "end of history" and acknowledge that there is something more to which
Zimbabweans can aspire.
By Alex Magaisa is based at The
University of Kent Law School and can
be contacted at wamagaisa@yahoo.co.ukThis e-mail
address is being protected
from spambots, you need JavaScript enabled to
view it or
a.t.magaisa@kent.ac.uk
Zim Standard
Opinion
Saturday, 24 May 2008 14:23
Speaking in Parliament
during the budget debate of the Minister of
Foreign Affairs in 2003, amongst
other things I said:
"Like peace and stability, democracy
and good governance are
developmental issues. Africa waged a century-long
struggle against
colonialism and apartheid precisely to establish the
principle that
governments should derive legitimacy through the consent of
the governed.
Democratic institutions are therefore not privileges that may
be extended or
withheld at the discretion of those who wield power. They are
an
entitlement; a right that the people of this continent waged struggle to
attain and won at great cost!
"In the ANC’s continuing
interaction with the political parties in
Zimbabwe, we have warned against
the subversion the rule of law as we have
about the heightening of
tension.
"We have also warned against the temptations of
recklessness that
could easily precipitate armed conflict. We have
consistently appealed to
the values and norms that the national liberation
movement in Zimbabwe waged
struggle to attain — the values of democracy;
accountable government; the
rule of law; an independent judiciary;
non-racialism; political tolerance
and freedom of the media. Not a single
one of these values was observed
under British colonial rule, let alone
under the UDI regime of Ian Smith and
his cronies. We consider it a scandal
that they are now being undermined by
the movement that struggled to achieve
them."
Consequently I was deeply shocked, if not alarmed, by an
article on
Zimbabwe from the pens of Eddie Maloka and Ben Magubane carried
in on Sunday
4 May 2008.
I was shocked by the suggestion of the
two authors that the criteria
we normally employ in judging the behaviour of
governments are extremely
flexible and are so malleable that what we judge
as criminal in one instance
we should find quite acceptable, even
defensible, in another.
I thought it was common cause, within the
ranks the ANC that the
legitimacy of a government derives from the mandate
it receives from the
people. That mandate is usually expressed through free
and fair general
elections. The record will show that the ANC has
consistently adhered to
these principles since its inauguration and
re-affirmed them in "The African
Claims" of 1943; the Freedom Charter of
1955, the Strategy and Tactics
document adopted at Morogoro and in every
subsequent document setting out
its aims and principles, including the 1987
"Constitutional Guidelines for a
Democratic South Africa". What is more, we
have also insisted that these are
principles applicable to all countries,
including Zimbabwe.
Anyone familiar with the history of European
colonialism in Africa and
Asia knows that at the core of the colonialist
project was seizure and
control over the natural resources of the colony. In
the white settler
colonies of Africa, like Kenya, Zimbabwe and Namibia,
seizure of the land
was invariably the means of acquiring such control. The
reproduction of the
long quotations from The Guardian in the City Press
article thus serves no
other purpose but to remind the forgetful of that
reality. But, the
information they contain adds neither light nor weight to
the principal
thrust of the two authors’ line of argument.
Underlying the line of argument which the two authors advance is the
suggestion that since the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) came into
existence after independence, that political formation is necessarily
suspect. They try to buttress this by suggesting that given that, like
Britain, the revanchist "Rhodesian" whites, the USA and the European Union,
the MDC is not happy with the Zanu PF government, there is an indissoluble
link amongst them and they all must be pursuing the same agenda. Proceeding
from these highly flawed premises, they go on to argue that it is therefore
incumbent on anti-imperialists to support Zanu PF.
There are
disturbing parallels between these two writers’ line of
argument and the all
too familiar ones emanating from former US Presidents
like Teddy Roosevelt,
Ronald Reagan and, in our day, George W Bush. Step
back a little, invert the
names, and the line of reasoning can be seen for
what it is. Justifying
unqualified US support for right wing dictators in
Latin America, Teddy
Roosevelt declared:" Somoza (the former banana-republic
dictator of
Nicaragua) is a bastard, but he is our bastard!" The authors
also deploy the
same guilt by association, so loved by anti-Communists and
other rightists
when they repress dissent. Virtually echoing the sentiments
of Senator Joe
McCarthy: "If someone sounds like a duck, associates with
ducks, and walks
like a duck, can it be unfair to infer that he is a duck!"
But
perhaps the most alarming suggestion of all is that opposition to
Zanu PF,
irrespective of its merits, is ipso facto illegitimate and
necessarily
counter-revolutionary, and therefore pro-imperialist.
This curious
line of reasoning dominated in the Communist parties of
the Soviet Union and
other east European countries. When workers complained
about the conditions
of work (as they did in Poland) that was characterised
as
counter-revolution. If intellectuals complained about rigid censorship
and
the repression of the free flow of information, ideas and knowledge,
that
was counter-revolution. Even youth, yearning to enjoy rock and other
forms
of popular music produced in the rest of the world, that was
counter-revolution.
Is it any wonder that those countries are
now governed either by right
wing coalitions or by anti-Communist liberals
who want to hitch their
countries firmly to the EU or to US-led alliances
like NATO?
Proceeding from the tried and tested principles of our
liberation
movement, I contend that democracy is not a luxury, perhaps
affordable in a
few rich countries, but far too expensive for peoples and
countries emerging
from decades of colonial domination. What is more, I
insist that democracy
is not merely the right to participate in elections
every few years; it is a
complex institutional framework that serves to
secure the ordinary citizen
against all forms of arbitrary authority,
whether secular or ecclesiastical.
It is an undisputed historical
fact that colonialism denied the
colonised precisely these protections,
subjecting them to the tyranny, not
only of imperialist governments, but
often to the whims of colonialist
settlers and officials. All liberation
movements, including both Zanu PF and
Zapu, deliberately advocated the
institution of democratic governance with
the protections they afford the
citizen. All liberation movements held that
national self-determination
would be realised, in the first instance, by the
colonised people choosing
their government in democratic elections. Hence
Kwame Nkrumah: "Seek ye
first the political kingdom!" The content of
anti-imperialism was precisely
the struggle to attain these democratic
rights. In the case of Zimbabwe,
democratic rights arrived that night when
the Union Jack was lowered and was
replaced by the flag of an independent
Zimbabwe.
The questions
we should be asking are: What has gone so radically
wrong that the movement
and the leaders who brought democracy to Zimbabwe
today appear to be its
ferocious violators. What has gone so wrong that they
appear to be most
fearful of it?
Maloka and Magubane brush such questions aside with
a breathtaking
recklessness. To invoke the memory of Patrice Lumumba in this
context can
only be an example of woolly thinking. Lumumba, let us remember,
was
democratically elected by the majority of the Congolese people. To
subvert
the will of the Congolese, as expressed in general elections, the
imperialists stage-managed Mobutu’s coup, kidnapped Lumumba and had his
enemies murder him.
The same applies to Salvador Allende of
Chile. The CIA subverted the
expressed will of the Chilean people by staging
a coup to overturn the
democratically elected government of
Chile.
Maloka and Magubane want us to ignore the will of the
Zimbabwean
people, as expressed in elections, and do what the imperialists
did in Congo
and Chile. Such action, they claim, would be anti-imperialist.
In other
words, we must behave like the imperialists to demonstrate our
commitment to
anti-imperialism.
‘For us or against
us’
Rather than raising and attempting to answer such tough
questions,
they skirt around them by marshalling a mixture of emotive
arguments and
outright political blackmail, again reminiscent of the
far-right and its
adherents. You are either with Zanu PF in the
anti-imperialist camp, or
against it (and therefore with Blair, Bush, the
DA, etc).
If that has familiar ring, it is because the Bush
administration has
employed it repeatedly in support of its aggressive
actions against all and
sundry. To quote them: "You are either with us, or
against us!"
It cannot possibly be right that, while we in South
Africa expect our
democratic institutions to protect us from arbitrary
power, we expect the
people of Zimbabwe to be content with
less.
If Zanu PF has lost the confidence of a substantial number of
the
citizens of that country, such that the only means by which it can win
elections is either by intimidating the people or otherwise rigging them, it
has only itself to blame. Nobody doubts the anti-imperialist credentials of
Zanu PF, but that cannot be sufficient reason to support it if it is
misgoverning Zimbabwe and brutalising the people.
Let all
recall that the people of Zimbabwe endured a 15-year war of
national
liberation, during which the colonialist regime employed every
device from
beatings, to torture, to executions and massacres to repress
them. They did
not waver.
Yet it is being suggested that today, for no apparent
reason, they
have fallen under the sway of the helpers and agents of that
colonial power.
I think that betrays a worrying contempt for the ordinary
Zimbabwean. A
contempt reminiscent of the colonialists’ contention that the
people rose
against them because they had been incited by "outside
agitators"! By the
Russians! By the Chinese!
I do not support
the MDC and my track record in the struggle against
imperialism speaks for
itself, but I differ most fundamentally with Maloka
and Magubane. It is
precisely my commitment to the anti-imperialist agenda
that persuades me
that our two comrades are wrong.
We will not assist Zanu PF by
encouraging that movement to proceed
along the disastrous course it has
embarked on. Offering it uncritical
support because it is anti-imperialist
will not help Zanu PF to uncover the
reasons for the steep decline in the
legitimacy it once enjoyed. That party
would do well to return to its
original vision of a democratic Zimbabwe,
free of colonial domination and
the instruments of that domination - such as
arbitrary arrests, police
repression of opposition, intimidation of
political critics,
etc.
Given the outcome of the recent elections, Zanu PF should
surrender
power to the party that has won. Another anti-imperialist
movement, the
Sandinistas of Nicaragua, lost an election in 1991. Today they
are back in
office having won an election that even the US was unable to
subvert. In
order to win the Sandinistas had slowly to win back the
confidence of the
people, who then voted them back into power. Any attempt
by Zanu PF to cling
to power through overt or covert violence will only
compound its problems by
stripping it even further of the legitimacy it won
by leading the Zimbabwean
people in their struggle for independence, freedom
and democracy!
Commenting on the dilemma faced by the Bolsheviks
after their victory
in October 1917, that great internationalist and
Communist, Rosa Luxemburg,
wrote:
"Freedom only for the
supporters of the government, only for the
members of one party - however
numerous they may be - is no freedom at all.
Freedom is always and
exclusively freedom for the one who thinks
differently. Not because of any
fanatical concept of ‘justice’ but because
all that is instructive,
wholesome and purifying in political freedom
depends on this essential
characteristic, and its effectiveness vanishes
when ‘freedom’ becomes a
special privilege."
Maloka and Magubane would do well to weigh her
remarks seriously.
Perhaps, had the Bolsheviks been a bit more attentive to
such constructive
criticism from an unimpeachable revolutionary, we might
not be complaining
of the demise of the Soviet Union, but could possibly be
celebrating its
triumphs.
By Z Pallo Jordan :Member of the ANC
National Executive Committee
(NEC). This article is written in his personal
capacity.
Zim Standard
Opinion
Saturday, 24 May 2008 14:18
THE new ZBH boss seems to have been
rewarded for a single act of
television outrage featuring an opposition
presidential candidate in the 29
March election.
Happison Muchechetere was at his waspish, acerbic best in a comical
encounter with Simba Makoni.
The script must have called for
him to either shut up the former
minister of finance with invective, or to
give him hell with inflammatory
accusations of disloyalty to Zimbabwe and
allegiance to a foreign power.
But Simba took the fight to his
corner. He appealed to the viewers, in
what I thought was a parody of the
mendicant friar: Look, this man is
preventing me from responding to his
accusations — is this what the
government views as free and fair
campaigning?
Or words to that effect.
Happison looked
mortified at the unexpected rejoinder. Like many other
viewers, I thought
Simba had scored big. It’s fortunate he didn’t win, or
Happison would have
faced the hellfire of a political Gehena.
Happison’s reward for
what most of us thought was a third-rate
performance in that TV debate — the
top job at ZBH — was not unexpected, if
slightly undeserved.
Zanu PF is still reeling from the after-effects of that thorough
drubbing by
the MDC. In such a dazed state, the party may be forgiven for
acting like a
punch-drunk heavyweight boxer after a pounding by the one and
only one who
floated like a butterfly and stung like a bee.
The party’s
state of desperation is not only tragic, but somewhat
comical, as well. To
win the presidential run-off next month, it is
prepared, not only to shed
blood, but to shed whatever dignity it had
retained after that historic
rout.
Many former colleagues of Henry Muradzikwa were saddened by
his public
ouster from that job as head of ZBH. It reminded many of how,
again in the
public glare, he was fired as editor of The Sunday
Mail.
Under the editorship of Willie Musarurwa, the paper, though
acquired
by the government in 1981, had become gutsier than it had ever
been, with a
regular column whose contents belied its alleged lapdog loyalty
to Zanu PF.
Muradzikwa did little to dilute the paper’s
iconoclastic, doggedly
balanced presentation of news and opinion — and paid
the price.
He ended up at Ziana, another government media outfit
the government
eventually succeeded in shaping into its own empty vessel of
non-news.
Since independence, the government has struggled to
tailor public
broadcasting into its own image of a stodgy, passionless,
inelegant fascist
party of the Stone Age.
Anyone placed in
charge of ZBC who has strayed from the straight and
narrow path of "seeing
no evil and hearing no evil" about the government was
soon thrown out on
their ear.
At one time, particularly in the early years of
independence, there
seemed to be a passionate attempt to make both radio and
TV listener- and
viewer-friendly.
This was in spite of the
presence at the helm of people with solid
liberation struggle credentials,
people who seemed to long for the days of
the original Voice of Zimbabwe,
broadcasting from Maputo during the
struggle.
What always
stunned me was the reluctance of the new government to
learn from the
experience of their predecessors. The Muzorewa-Smith regime
had the
resources to use both radio and television to "sell their story"
like
heavily buttered toast to the voters.
Yet that still wasn’t enough
to influence the outcome of the
independence elections against "Huruyadzo".
They were thoroughly pulverised.
The truth is if a party enters an
election with a plausible, credible
platform, nothing can stop its
juggernnaut advance.
For the 29 March election, Zanu PF had a
platform, but as someone
said: "Me vote for a party whose talent is for
floating raw sewage in the
suburbs?"
In the run-off, it has no
platform, in spite of spending a king’s
ransom on newspaper, radio and TV
advertising.
Robert Mugabe can shout about land, empowerment and
sovereignty. Most
voters know what they want. It’s not Mugabe and raw
sewage.
No doubt the murders being committed against unarmed
villagers may
frighten a few not to vote with their consciences, but enough
will show the
courage that has seen Good triumph over Evil — the readiness
to sacrifice
for a good cause.
There must come a time soon when
Zimbabwe can have a media kingdom
that regulates itself, knows its limits,
owes allegiance only to the Truth —
which could never translate into Zanu PF
and its control freak mandarins.
The beauty of such a system must
lie in the freedom of the people to
make up their minds on the basis of
facts, offered to them without comic
desperation.
By Bill
Saidi
saidib@standard.co.zw
From: Veritas <veritas@mango.zw>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 21:13:26 +0200
BILL WATCH 21/2008
[24th May 2008]
Update on Presidential Run-off and By-Elections
Polling Day is Friday 27th June - The Presidential Run-off Election and the three By-elections will be held concurrently on this date.
No new election-related regulations or rules were gazetted this week.
By-election nominations
Nomination day for all three by-elections is next Friday, 30th May. The nomination courts will sit at the Magistrates Court, 5th Avenue, Gwanda for Gwanda South; the Magistrates Court, Tredgold Building, Bulawayo for Pelandaba-Mpopoma; and the Magistrates Court, Main Street, Gweru, for Redcliff. Note: A candidate who was duly nominated for one of these constituencies for the 29th March elections does not need to submit a fresh nomination paper; if he or she intends to contest the by-election, all that is necessary is written notification to the constituency elections officer of the intention to remain a candidate. New candidates must submit nomination papers.
Information from ZEC
Accreditation of observers and journalists
Accreditation of observers and journalists - international and local - will start next week. Enquiries should be directed to ZEC.
National Multi-Party Liaison Committee meeting
The National Multi-Party Liaison Committee met on Friday 23rd May to discuss matters relating to the Presidential run-off election scheduled for 27th May. Only ZANU-PF and MDC-T representatives were invited, because only their candidates will contest the run-off election. The meeting was chaired by ZEC Commissioner Mrs Sarah Kachingwe. In a closed session the two parties discussed the problem of inter-party violence and agreed to formulate modalities on conflict resolution; they will report back at the Committee's meeting next week.
Number of Polling Stations
The number of polling stations may be reduced, following very low turn-outs at some polling stations in the poll of 29th March. ZEC will discuss this subject with contesting parties,
Sealing of Postal Ballot Boxes
Postal ballot boxes will be will be sealed by constituency elections officers on 20th June. Candidates and their agents are entitled to be present at this procedure. [Note: When covering envelopes containing postal votes are received, the constituency elections officer must place the envelopes, unopened, in the sealed postal ballot box. The postal ballot boxes will be opened in the presence of candidates, their agents and accredited observers after the conclusion of the poll, at the time fixed for the collation of polling station returns by the constituency elections officer; at that time the covering envelopes will be opened and their contents checked, and valid ballot papers included in the vote count for the constituency.]
Voting procedures
Postal Votes
The postal voting option is available only to a registered voter who will be absent from his or her constituency by reason of being-
· on duty as an electoral officer or a member of a "disciplined force" [police, army, air force, prison service], or
· absent from Zimbabwe on Government service, or
· a spouse of such a person [but only if also absent from his or her constituency accompanying the person on duty].
Applications for postal ballot papers must be submitted to the Chief Elections Officer not later than noon on 17th June. The application form must be completed in the presence of a "competent witness" of their choice [this must be a commissioner of oaths, a commissioned officer, bank manager, lawyer, doctor, etc.] who must certify the applicant's identity and the truth of the application. If the application is accepted, the Chief Elections Officer sends the applicant a ballot paper, a declaration of identity form, a ballot paper envelope and a larger covering envelope addressed to the constituency elections officer.
The procedure for the casting of a postal ballot also requires a "competent witness", who must certify the identity of the voter on the declaration of identity form and witness the placing of the marked ballot paper in the ballot paper envelope and the placing of that envelope in the official covering envelope. The competent witness must also be present when the voter places his or her cross on the ballot paper, but the voter must do this secretly and must not allow the competent witness to see how he or she has voted [Electoral Act, section 75(1)(c)]. No-one else may be present when the voter places his cross on the ballot paper. The covering envelope is then sent to the relevant constituency elections officer. On receipt of covering envelopes, the constituency elections officer must place them in the sealed postal ballot box, where they will remain until opened after polling [see above, under Sealing of Postal Ballot Boxes].
Postal Voting in the Disciplined Forces
Notwithstanding these elaborate provisions for the secrecy of postal voting, there were complaints of irregularities in postal voting by members of the disciplined forces in the poll of 29th March, including allegations that personnel were ordered by senior officers how to vote, were not permitted to vote secretly, had ballot papers marked for them, or were otherwise denied the benefits of the statutory procedure that would have enabled them to vote with due secrecy. The system is open to these allegations because the Electoral Act permits members of the disciplined forces to use their own commissioned officers as competent witnesses and to submit their postal vote applications and ballot paper to the electoral authorities via their commanding officers; it also precludes independent outside monitoring of what happens between voter and competent witness when the postal vote is cast.
Concerns Relating to Elections
Polling officers
According to Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights' reports "many presiding and polling officers have been arrested and accused of having been part of a plot to rig the elections in favour of candidates from the Movement for Democratic Change". There have also been reports from teachers unions of teachers who acted as polling officers being beaten up and not being able through injury or fear to return to their schools. This raises the problem of whether ZEC will be able to recruit and train replacement polling officers of the necessary education and calibre.
Civic Society Observers
All recent Zimbabwe elections have had domestic observers. This year the Zimbabwe Election Support Network [ZESN] trained and deployed observers from 38 civic organisations. Recent ZESN reports have indicated that since the March 29 polling many of their accredited observers have been victimised - some beaten severely, hundreds having had to flee after having property and homes destroyed.
Post Election Violence
The increase in severity and numbers of incidents of violence militate against free and fair elections. As the election period has commenced [with ZEC fixing the date] observers have the right to be observing election conditions throughout the country NOW.
Internally Displaced People Disenfranchised?
The destruction of homes and crops as part of post-election violence is leading to a growing number of IDPs. There is as yet no provision for their casting their votes outside their home constituencies to which they may not be able to return to vote.
National Media
As the election period has commenced, the media should already be observing the fair coverage provisions of Part IVA of the ZEC Act and the Media Coverage of Elections Regulations [SI 33/2008]. Compliance by State-controlled media is questionable.
[Reports available - detention of election agents [tinashe@zlhr.org.zw]; violence on election observers [info@zesn.org.zw]; national violence monitoring [tendai@hrforum.co.zw; zpp@africaonline.co.zw; zadhr@mweb.co.zw; media monitoring [monitors@mmpz.org.zw]
Update on Council Election Results
Council election results for Matabeleland South were published in the press this week. Only the results for Midlands are still to come.
Election Related Court Cases
Chiota and Shumba v ZEC
On 22nd May the Supreme Court reserved judgment in the case brought by would-be Presidential candidates Chiota and Shumba who claim infringement of their constitutional rights by reason of the rejection of their nomination papers by the Presidential nomination court in mid-February. They seek a declaration that both were duly nominated and an order for the holding of a Presidential poll in which they can take part. Both parties had earlier appealed unsuccessfully to the Electoral Court. The Electoral Act rules out an appeal against the Electoral Court's decision, so the case has been brought to the Supreme Court as a constitutional application.
Moyo v ZEC and the President
In this case, also in the Supreme Court, Prof. Jonathan Moyo MP challenges ZEC's fixing of the date for the Presidential run-off election, arguing that that the President, not ZEC, should have fixed the date, and seeking an order directing the President to fix a date not later than the 14th June for the run-off. The case has not yet been heard.
Election Petitions
During the week pre-trial conferences were held for the first group of the 105 election petitions lodged with the Electoral Court. Hearings have not yet commenced.
Veritas makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot take legal responsibility for information supplied.
Institute for War & Peace Reporting
General
consensus among MDC officials that Tsvangirai’s absence has made it
difficult for the party to roll out its run-off campaign.
By
Jabu Soko in Harare (ZCR No. 148, 27-May-08)
The seven weeks spent
outside Zimbabwe by Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the
Movement for Democratic
Change, MDC, following the March election has raised
fears among supporters
that he may have conceded some ground to President
Robert
Mugabe.
Tsvangirai returned home only on May 24, with just over a month
to go before
the June 27 presidential run-off.
MDC members privy to
the way Tsvangirai operates say that although his
absence occurred while his
supporters were reeling from the alleged brutal
retribution wrought by
Mugabe and his militia, Tsvangirai used those seven
weeks to better his and
his party’s image in the eyes of the region, the
continent and the
West.
But MDC insiders have been charging that in the wake of violence in
both
rural and urban areas for the past month, Tsvangirai had not helped
matters
by “over-staying” in South Africa at a time when his followers were
reportedly being persecuted by militia and state security agents linked to
ZANU-PF – which, having lost parliament to the MDC, is counting heavily on
the run-off.
There was a general consensus among MDC officials and
supporters that
Tsvangirai’s continued absence had created a leadership
vacuum in the party,
making it difficult for it to adequately roll out its
run-off campaign,
especially in the no-go areas created to give Mugabe an
edge over Tsvangirai
in the three Mashonaland provinces, Masvingo,
Manicaland and some parts of
the Midlands. Thousands of MDC supporters have
fled the violence in the
rural areas.
Party officials had felt that
the no-go areas and the displacement of
opposition supporters could distort
the outcome of the run-off poll – hence
the need for the MDC leader to move
with speed to outline strategies to
break into those areas, a strategy they
said did not warrant his long
absence from the country.
However,
Takura Zhangazha, a political analyst, while agreeing that
Tsvangirai had
stayed for too long outside the country, felt he had used his
absence wisely
by launching a successful diplomatic offensive in and around
the
globe.
“It was necessary to meet regional, continental and world leaders
as well as
any other leaders to make the plight of the country apparent,”
said
Zhangazha, who is also acting director of the Zimbabwe chapter of the
Media
Institute of Southern Africa. “The success of his diplomatic offensive
is
all there for all to see. He has been well received in SADC [the Southern
African Development Community], the AU [African Union] and even had a
chit-chat with the secretary general of the UN.”
The MDC leader’s
foray into the region forced SADC current chairman, Zambian
president Levy
Mwanawasa, to call an extraordinary meeting of the regional
bloc to discuss
the political stalemate in Zimbabwe after the Zimbabwe
Electoral Commission,
ZEC, delayed announcing the results of the elections.
The meeting coincided
with the start of ZANU-PF’s retribution campaign,
which the MDC says has
left hundreds of its supporters injured and 45 dead.
South African
president Thabo Mbeki, the SADC-sponsored mediator in the
Zimbabwean crisis,
visited the country twice as he attempted to break the
political impasse in
Harare. “Were it not for [Tsvangirai’s] diplomatic
initiative, all these
events would not have unfolded,” said Zhangazha. “It
has made an impact.
People should now be happy that he has come back to lead
from the front as
all leaders should do.”
Eldred Masunungure, a professor of political
science at the University of
Zimbabwe, concurred. “While his absence caused
some consternation, it looks
like his diplomatic initiative has scored some
successes,” he said, but
added that “it is not good for a leader to be away
from his people for so
long, especially considering that his supporters are
facing the brunt of the
violence. Politicians should know that politics is
risky business”.
Useni Sibanda, a political analyst based in Bulawayo who
works as a
coordinator for the Christian Alliance, attributed Tsvangirai’s
continued
stay outside Zimbabwe to threats on his life.
“I don’t think he
was safe,” said Sibanda.
“Remember the security chiefs are on record as
having said that they would
not salute Tsvangirai. The threat was real.
There was no need for him to
rush to Zimbabwe and turn out to be a dead
hero.”
Sibanda said, nonetheless, the diplomatic offensive helped
Tsvangirai pick
up valuable support in the region, on the continent and in
the West.
Like Zhangazha, he pointed out that Tsvangirai attended the
extraordinary
summit of SADC in Lusaka and subsequently visited the
individual countries
that made up the bloc.
“Also attitudes within
SADC, which have been siding with Mugabe, have
changed. Some SADC leaders
are now openly supporting the MDC,” he said.
While in South Africa,
Tsvangirai also held discussions with the United
Nations chief Ban Ki-moon
and visited traditional allies in Europe,
including Northern
Ireland.
Tsvangirai was due to return to Zimbabwe from Northern Ireland
after
attending a conference there on May 16. He was, however, allegedly
advised
by his security staff that his safety could not be guaranteed after
revelations that the Joint Operations Command, the military junta presently
running the country, wanted him dead to avoid a run-off which analysts say
Mugabe would lose in a free and fair contest.
According to Nelson
Chamisa, the MDC spokesman, the death toll of MDC
supporters touched 45 on
May 21 following the discovery of the body of
Tonderai Ndira, a well-known
MDC activist who was allegedly abducted by
state security agents two weeks
ago in the poor suburb of Mabvuku just
outside the capital.
Along
with allegedly letting loose his militia to terrorise MDC supporters,
Mugabe
has closed all the democratic space for Tsvangirai and his MDC,
including
the state media.
Under SADC principles, norms and guidelines relating to
the staging of
elections in member countries, all contestants should be
given equal access
to the media. This was the case during the first round of
voting.
This time, the MDC says ZANU-PF and the government are banning
its rallies
and turning down its advertisements in the state
media.
Last week, the MDC had to seek redress from the courts after
Zimbabwe
Republic Police denied the party permission to hold a rally in
Bulawayo.
At the same time, says the opposition, the police are giving
ZANU-PF
officials carte blanche to hold political meetings, including their
infamous
night vigils or pungwes in the rural areas where villagers are
allegedly
being subjected to night-long “political re-orientation”
meetings.
“Tsvangirai must now know that the struggle is in Zimbabwe. He
can now
afford to send his other executive members to the region and
overseas,” said
Zhangazha.
The true test of Tsvangira’s leadership
will be how he will organise his
campaign in the no-go-area communal lands
where the majority of voters
reside and also how he will counter ZANU-PF’s
propaganda blitz in the
official media, from which the MDC has been blacked
out.
When Tsvangirai arrived in Harare, ZANU-PF had been taking full-page
adverts
in the official media for weeks and state radio and television were
constantly broadcasting ZANU-PF jingles.
Jabu Soko is the pseudonym
of an IWPR-trained journalist in Zimbabwe.
www.zimbabwejournalists.com
28th
May 2008 00:30 GMT
By a
Correspondent
Despite concerted efforts by the Zimbabwe Government to
muzzle critical
voices, Zimbabwean theatre never runs dry of politically
sensitive plays.
A new play, "The two leaders I know" premiered at the
recently concluded
Harare International Festival of arts (HIFA). The one-man
stage production
acted by talented actor and theatre producer Daves Guzha is
both sharply
satirical and a moving personal evaluation of the political
consequences of
Ian Smith, the last leader of rebel Rhodesia and Robert
Mugabe the current
leader of Zimbabwe currently fighting with all he has to
remain the leader
of Zimbabwe.
The play explores the wars, riots,
sanctions, food shortages, price controls
and life in general under the rule
of these two leaders. It captures what
goes on in the mind of the
protagonist as he celebrates his birthday alone.
His friends and family can
not be with him because they busy in all sorts of
queues. His girlfriend is
at the bank and fails to get money so she fails to
make it to the birthday
party. The protagonist says rather fittingly
"Dictatorial leaders keep you
busy all the time to a point that you can
find neither the time nor the
energy to rise up against injustice".
The play co-written by
veteran playwright and former permanent secretary in
the Ministry of
Education and Culture Dr. Stephen Chifunyise and equally
renowned playwright
Raisedon Baya, is directed by Swede Helge Skoog and
produced by the
controversial Cont Mhlanga of Bulawayo's Amakhosi
theatre.
Another play critical of Mugabe's Governance of Zimbabwe
is "The crocodile
of the Zambezi" will premier at the forthcoming
Umthwakazi Arts Festival to
be held in the so-called Zimbabwe's culture
capital city Bulawayo on 19 May
2008.The play co-written by Raisedon Baya
and up-and -coming playwright
Christopher Mlalazi, explores a day in the
life of an aging leader of a
troubled fictional country along the Zambezi
river beset by personal and
professional problems. On the occasion of his
94th birthday, the aging
leader celebrates by proclaiming a general amnesty
for all political
prisoners. Among the released prisoners is his main
political enemy, a man
the aging leader has kept in jail for a long
time.
As fate would have it, a train is commandeered for the birthday
celebrations
of the aging President and it happens that the leader meets his
main
political enemy on the commandeered train. An argument ensues between
the
bitter political adversaries particularly on such issues as succession,
retirement and the leadership crisis.
"The time is now ripe for this
kind of play because we should keep reminding
ourselves and those that lead
us that it is unacceptable for us to be
prisoners in our own homes", said
Baya. "This project has taken a long time
and courage to create.We started
working on the project two years ago but we
tomporarily shelved it because
felt the atmosphere was not safe enough for
us to come up with such critical
work", he added.
"The two leaders I know" and "The cocodile of the
Zambezi" join a long list
of plays critical of President Robert Mugabe and
his inner circle who stand
accused of destroying the once vibrant Zimbabwean
economy through populist
policies.These critical plays of recent times
include the controversial "The
Good President" penned by Cont Mhlanga who is
generally credited to have
created the first play critical of Robert
Mugabe's Government in the early
Eighties at a time when criticism of the
establishment was a taboo. The play
was called "Workshop Negative". Another
Bulawayo-based playwright Raisedon
Baya who co-authored "The two leaders I
know" has also written plays
critical pof Mugabe such as "Super patriots and
morons" and the forthcoming
"The crocodile of the Zambezi".
<http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/93864/>
(MISA/IFEX)
- The following is a MISA-Zimbabwe press release:
MISA-Zimbabwe complains
to African Humans Rights Body
The communication on Capital Radio, filed
jointly by MISA-Zimbabwe, Article
19, and Institute for Human Rights and
Development in Africa, together with
two proprietors of Capital Radio, Gerry
Jackson and Michael Auret Jnr,
challenges various sections of the
Broadcasting Services Act as being
inconsistent with the African Charter on
Human Rights. Capital Radio, an
aspiring commercial radio station in
Zimbabwe was violently shut down by the
Zimbabwe government and had its
equipment confiscated by the police in 2000.
The station had begun operating
after successfully challenging the broadcast
monopoly of the state owned
Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) in 2000.
In pleading for the speedy
conclusion of this matter, MISA-Zimbabwe argued
that the matter is taking
too long to be heard. "For the record, we lodged
this communication in
August 2005.
The ACHPR agreed to be seized with the matter at its 37th
ordinary session
which was held in Dakar, Senegal in November 2005. We filed
our
Admissibility Brief in March 2006 and the respondent state made its
submissions in reply in September 2006," submitted MISA-Zimbabwe Legal
Officer Wilbert Mandinde who attended the ACHPR 43rd session in Ezulwini,
Swaziland.
MISA Zimbabwe further submitted that at the 40th Ordinary
Session, the
Government of Zimbabwe, which is the respondent in the matter,
had requested
for an adjournment after it realised that its submissions
addressed the
issue of merits and not admissibility.
During the 42nd
Session in Congo-Brazzaville, there was a written
undertaking by the
respondent state to file the necessary submissions in
terms of the ACHPR
rules of procedure.
"We note with concern the fact that to date, the
respondent state has
failed, refused or neglected to file these
submissions," complained
MISA-Zimbabwe. "We verily believe that justice
delayed is justice denied. In
the circumstances, we feel the failure by the
respondent state to file
correct papers is an attempt to frustrate
proceedings before this
commission. This cannot be
condoned."
MISA-Zimbabwe requested the Commission to immediately proceed
to declare the
matter admissible during this session. The Zimbabwe
government, however,
pleaded with the Commission to be given one last chance
to file the
submissions arguing that they had failed to work on the
Communication as
they were busy working on the harmonised
elections.
Meanwhile the ACHPR has come up with a decision on another
matter filed by
MISA-Zimbabwe, the Independent Journalists Association of
Zimbabwe (IJAZ)
and the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR). The
decision can however
only be publicised once it has been adopted by the
African Union Heads of
State Summit.
In this matter, the applicants
had requested the Commission to make a
finding that various provisions of
the repressive Access to Information and
Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA)
are inconsistent with Article 9 of the
African Charter.
And in yet
another matter, Dzimbabwe Chimbga of the Zimbabwe Lawyers for
Human Rights
(ZLHR) complained to the Commission over the failure by the
Zimbabwean
government to comply with provisional measures issued by the
Commission to
the effect that the government should hand back to the owners
of Associated
Newspapers of Zimbabwe (ANZ), publishers of the banned Daily
News and Daily
News on Sunday, the equipment the police confiscated when
they closed the
Daily News in 2003. MORE INFORMATION:
For further information on the
banning of the ANZ publications, see:
http://www.ifex.org/e_n/content/view/full/87669
For
further information, contact Kaitira Kandjii, Regional Director,
Rashweat
Mukundu, Programme Specialist, or Chilombo Katukula, Media Freedom
Monitoring and Research Officer, MISA, Private Bag 13386 Windhoek, Namibia,
tel: +264 61 232 975, fax: +264 61 248 016, e-mail: director@misa.org,
research@misa.org, rashweat@misa.org, chilombo@misa.org, Internet:
http://www.misa.org
MISA-Zimbabwe Alert:
Media
Alert
27 May 2008
Copies of The Zimbabwean on Sunday newspaper set
ablaze
Unknown assailants on 23 May 2008 waylaid and set ablaze a
truck-load of 60
000 copies of The Zimbabwean on Sunday newspaper and
assaulted its driver
Christmas Ramabulana, a South African national and
distribution assistant
Tapfumaneyi Kancheta.
Ramabulana and Kancheta
were stopped 67 km from Zimbabwe’s southern town of
Masvingo and forced to
drive along the Chivi-Mandamabwe road for 16 km
before turning into
Mandamabwe Road where the truck and its contents were
set
alight.
According to Wilf Mbanga, the publisher of The Zimbabwean on
Sunday and its
stablemate The Zimbabwean, the two were severely assaulted
before being
dumped in the bush. Mbanga noted that the incident comes hard
on the heels
of remarks by Zanu PF Secretary for Administration Emmerson
Mnangagwa
blaming The Zimbabwean for Zanu PF’s electoral defeat in the 29
March 2008
elections. He said Ramabulana and Kancheta could not give details
of what
transpired as they were in severe shock.
“We condemn this
barbaric attack against our staff and the newspaper and vow
to leave no
stone unturned until the perpetrators of this atrocity are
brought to book,”
he said.
MISA Position
MISA-Zimbabwe condemns in the strongest
terms possible this unwarranted
onslaught on the citizens’ right to access
alternative information and ideas
through publications such as The
Zimbabwean on Sunday.
These acts of lawlessness and disregard for human
life continue at a time
when the country is preparing for the 27 June 2008
presidential election
run-off raising mounting fears that the high stakes
contest between
President Robert Mugabe and MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirayi
will not be free
and fair in the wake of the determined efforts to shut out
any form of
dissent and opposing views.
This is a serious breach of
the 1991 Windhoek Declaration which stresses
that the establishment and
maintain an independent, pluralist and free press
is essential to the
development and maintenance of democracy in a nation.
The Declaration of
which Zimbabwe is a signatory, defines the establishment
of a pluralist
media as bringing to an end monopolies of any kind and the
existence of “the
greatest possible number of newspapers, magazines and
periodicals reflecting
the widest possible range of opinion within the
community”.
MISA-Zimbabwe notes with great concern that with the
closure of The Daily
News and Daily News on Sunday, The Tribune and Weekly
Times under the
repressive Access to Information and Protection of Privacy
Act (AIPPA), the
Zimbabwean government appears even more determined to
muzzle opposing views
in its contemptuous disregard of its obligations as
espoused under the
Windhoek Declaration and other international conventions
and charters that
it has willingly but deceptively ratified.
The
responsible authorities should therefore demonstrate their commitment to
dealing with these wanton endemic acts of violence by bringing the
perpetrators to book and ensure the safety and security of journalists
especially those working for the private media ahead of the presidential
election run-off. Anything short of that will only serve to further dent the
country’s worsening human rights record.
End
For any
questions, queries or comments, please contact:
Nyasha
Nyakunu
Research and Information Officer
International Herald Tribune
Published: May 27, 2008
Crackpot and dangerous
theories on AIDS. Extreme and widening levels of
income inequality. Enabling
Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe and only belatedly
trying to halt mob atrocities
against desperate Zimbabwean and other African
immigrants. This is the
legacy of South Africa's president, Thabo Mbeki, who
has one more year in
his second term.
It would be hard to imagine a more depressing contrast
with the leadership
of Nelson Mandela, Mbeki's predecessor and one of the
20th century's great
heroes.
History will laud Mandela for leading
his country, peacefully, from hateful
apartheid to democratic majority rule,
marvel at his commitment to honesty
and healing and celebrate his promotion
of South Africa as a diverse and
tolerant "rainbow nation."
If it
remembers Mbeki at all, it will be for appointing a health minister
who
favored garlic and beet root as treatment for South Africa's more than 5
million citizens infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, and for his
stubborn refusal to use South Africa's economic and political clout to stop
Zimbabwe's horrors.
Instead, Mbeki declared that there was "no
crisis," even as Zimbabwe's
electoral count was being hijacked, opposition
supporters terrorized and
thousands of its citizens fleeing over the border
to South Africa where they
still have not found safety. The only explanation
is his misplaced loyalty
to Mugabe, who was once a hero for leading Zimbabwe
to majority rule.
South Africa is the richest, most developed country
south of the Sahara and
the continent's largest, most exemplary democracy.
Africa badly needs its
enlightened leadership.
Under Mbeki, the fruits of
the nation's hard-fought victory over apartheid
have gone mainly to
officials and former officials of the ruling African
National Congress, not
to the millions of poor people in the townships who
must live without
adequate jobs, education, housing or health services.
The resulting
frustration helps explain, though it cannot justify, the
outbreak of
xenophobic violence in the shantytowns. At least 42 people have
been killed
and some 25,000 have been chased from their homes.
Mbeki's most likely
successor, Jacob Zuma, the current leader of the ANC, is
no Nelson Mandela
either. While more popular among the poor than Mbeki, he
has offered few
coherent ideas for addressing their economic plight. His
ignorance on AIDS
and appalling attitudes toward women - revealed in a 2006
rape trial that
ended in his acquittal - stained his personal reputation.
Serious corruption
charges against him are still pending.
South Africa can ill afford
another five years of failed leadership. Whoever
succeeds Mbeki must look
long and hard at all that has gone wrong and vow to
do better. South
Africans and all of Africa need and deserve better.
18:09 GMT, Thursday, 22 May 2008 19:09 UK
|
There is still an hour to go, but the passengers have already grabbed their seats and are settling down for the 12-hour ride.
Mingling with the traders who travel this route regularly are Zimbabwean refugees, terrified by the xenophobic violence they have witnessed in the past few days, in settlements in and around Johannesburg. Anti-foreigner sentiment has led to homes being destroyed, women being raped and people being burnt alive. Not what you expect in a country preparing to welcome visitors for the 2010 World Cup. "My South African friends do not want me to go," confides retired schoolmistress Theresa Gwatiringa, who made South Africa her adopted home a year ago. "But I am afraid, so now I must go," she sighs. When she first arrived, South Africans welcomed Zimbabweans like her with open arms. Now foreigners are blamed for stealing jobs and rising crime.
The targeted attacks of the past few days have shaken the confidence of people like Ms Gwatiringa. It has made the prospect of returning to her modest plot of land not far from Zimbabwe's capital, Harare, attractive - even if it means hardship, soaring inflation and a country in disarray. It is the same for 24-year-old Maurice who scraped together the money for the bus fare to take him back to Zimbabwe. "This is not a safe place... they were beating foreigners," he says. "Even the place where you stay they come and destroy all your property, they smash everything and that's not good." Camp fires A half-hour drive away from where the Zimbabweans are beating a hasty retreat, you find Primrose, an eastern suburb of South Africa's commercial capital. Here thousands of miserable migrants from Mozambique are trying to fend off the Johannesburg chill, huddling around small improvised fires in the dark.
They also want to leave but did not make it on to the 10 coaches laid on by their country's embassy earlier in the day to give them safe passage home. "I think I am going to be doing this run several times," laments coach driver Jorge Meneles, who at lunchtime had been grappling with a list of Mozambican names which he was trying to match up with the limited seats on his bus. "I have never seen anything like this before - not in South Africa. It is very sad."
This sprawling bus stop-cum refugee camp outside Primrose police station, is situated in Africa's most prosperous state, not in Somalia or Sudan's Darfur region. These are people used to living in homes and being warm. Bicycles, radios and kitchenware scattered next to suitcases hint that these people were not destitute. They once had good jobs working as gardeners, taxi drivers and farm labourers, but have come to be seen as a threat to citizens of the country that has hosted them. In the words of so many South Africans who roundly condemn the violence, foreigners do not deserve to be treated in this way. Even so, the South African government should have seen the resentment coming. |
http://www.athlone.co.za
by Martin
Pollack
26 May 2008
Since the start of xenophobic violence
on Thursday night, about 10000
people have been displaced in Cape
Town.
The City of Cape Town, in partnership with
welfare agencies, is
providing food, shelter and assistance to 8 700 of the
refugees. A further 1300are being sheltered by churches.
The City's
first priority is to secure the safety of all people who
have been
threatened or displaced. It is indeed a contradictory way to
celebrate
Africa Day – 25 May – noted Executive Mayor Helen Zille.
"On the
one hand we see marauding gangs sowing a reign of terror, not
only in South
Africa against foreign nationals, but in Zimbabwe, by a
government against
its own people.
"On the other hand we see many costly
advertisements to "celebrate"
Africa day, some of which border on the
sentimental, as we recite the tired
old mantras that are usually used when
we want to mask our failures.
Ubuntu is one of the world's most
important philosophies, but is also
one of the most fundamentally
misunderstood, noted Zille. "Most often it is
interpreted with a kind of
sloppy and superficial sentimentality, which is
actually a perversion of the
real concept.
"Ubuntu is NOT a feeling. It is a commitment to do
the hard work
required and make the sacrifices necessary to ensure the
growth and
development of other people.
"It involves a
commitment to the truth, it involves the capacity to
take responsibility, it
involves exceptional discipline and good judgement,"
she said.
And so it happened that on this Africa Day, instead of all South
Africans
working together for the growth and development of other people,
the City's
Disaster Management Centre could be found working to build Safety
Sites for
displaced people and refugees.
At the Safety Sites, displaced
people can receive basic accommodation
and support, with law enforcement
officers present to ensure that they are
safe.
The temporary
Safety Sites also provide:
a.. Safety and security
b..
Temporary accommodation in marquee tents
c.. Three meals a
day
d.. Blankets
e.. Clothing
f.. Health
services
g.. Toilets and washing facilities
h.. Drinking
water
i.. Transport
j.. The presence of officials from the
Department of Home Affairs to
assist in tracking or replacing lost
documents
The City of Cape Town is committed to providing safe havens
for all
affected people during this crisis, and to facilitate their safe
return to
their communities as quickly and seamlessly as
possible.
On Africa Day, Executive Mayor Helen Zille thanked the
many
Capetonians who volunteered to assist with this crisis, either with
their
time or with donations.
She also paid tribute to Minister
of Defence, Mosouia Lekota, "who was
the only national Minister who actively
assisted the relief efforts in Cape
Town. He responded quickly and
efficiently when we called on him to open
Youngsfield military base when we
needed it for relief efforts," she said.
Afrique en ligne
In commemoration of the African Liberation Day, obser ved here
Monday,
Liberian civil society groups have urged Africans, their leaders and
gov
ernments, as well as the international community to resort to peaceful
actions in resolving the current political crisis in the East African
nation.
In a communiqué issued at the end of the one-day celebration,
aptly dubbed
Zimbabwe Day and themed "Stand Up for Zimbabwe, Now!", the
groups called for
an "immediate end to the continuing violence in Zimbabwe"
involving the
ruling ZANU-PF and the opposition Movement for Democratic
Force and all
others with direct stake in the political process in that
country.
The groups called for the "ultimate respect for the decisions of
the people
of Zimbabwe during the upcoming presidential run-off election
that must be
held in observance of all known democratic norms".
The
communiqué said the Monrovia session during which several speakers
analysed
the crisis in Zimbabwe, was a follow-up to meetings held by African
civil
society organisations in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and Abuja, Nigeria,
in the
past few weeks.
It urged African leaders to work towards the lifting of
economic sanctions,
and helping to donate basic food and other supplies to
the people of
Zimbabwe.
The document prevailed on Liberian
authorities to "immediately engage with
colle agues from ECOWAS and the
African Union (AU) to enhance mediation
efforts in Zim b abwe, regardless of
which side wins the run-off poll later
next month".
It emphasised on
the need for a future collaboration between the opposition
and ruling
parties to ensure a lasting peace in Zimbabwe.
Monrovia -
27/05/2008
Pana
IOL
May 27 2008 at
10:56AM
The Chinese government has insisted again that the Chinese
arms that
were being shipped to Zimbabwe have not been unloaded and are
being returned
to China.
The Chinese embassy in Pretoria on
Monday issued a statement quoting
Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Qin
Gang as saying that recent news
reports that the Chinese cargo ship An Yue
Jiang had unloaded its arms cargo
in Africa were "utterly
groundless".
According to the embassy, a journalist asked Qin in
Beijing to comment
on SA media reports that "China's cargo ship An Yue Jiang
had arrived in
Zimbabwe (sic) and that the Zimbabwe government had confirmed
receiving the
goods".
Qin replied: "As
we have said on many occasions, relevant military
goods will be shipped back
by An Yue Jiang which is now on its way home.
Relevant report is utterly
groundless."
He appeared to be referring to SA press reports
quoting a Zimbabwe
government spokesman as saying the Chinese arms had been
delivered to
Zimbabwe.
The movement of the ship and its cargo
of arms has been shrouded in
mystery and controversy for several weeks ever
since it was prevented from
delivering the arms in Durban by a union refusal
to unload the cargo, and a
court decision.
Later reports
suggested that the ship had sailed round the Cape to
unload the arms in
Angola or the Republic of Congo. - Mercury Foreign Editor
This article was originally published on page 4 of The Mercury on May
27,
2008