Radio Netherlands
Published: Thursday
01 May 2008 19:55 UTC
Last updated: Thursday 01 May 2008 20:50 UTC
Harare
- In Zimbabwe it is still not clear who won the presidential
elections held
at the end of March. A closed meeting of the election
commission and
representatives of the presidential candidates has broken up
without any
agreements.
The commission made it known during the meeting that
opposition leader
Morgan Tsvangirai, with 47.8 percent, had won the most
votes. President
Robert Mugabe had won 43.2 percent. The commission's rules
state that a
second round is now needed, because nobody has obtained an
absolute
majority.
But opposition party MDC says that according to
its own count, its leader Mr
Tsvangirai has won more that 50 percent of the
votes and therefore, for this
reason, is refusing to take part in a second
round. The commission responded
by saying that if Mr Tsvangirai refuses to
follow the rules, then Mr Mugabe
can remain as president.
The
commission will meet tomorrow to decide what further steps to take.
Zim Online
by Patricia Mpofu Friday 02 May
2008
HARARE – Zimbabwe on Thursday began verifying results of
last month’s
presidential election, as sources told ZimOnline that plans
were already
underway to hold a run-off poll between President Robert Mugabe
and
opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai at the end of May.
Tsvangirai
has insisted that no run-off is required because he won the March
29 ballot
outright but ruling ZANU PF party and independent observers – who
acknowledge Mugabe lost to Tsvangirai – say the opposition leader won with
less than 50 percent of the vote, warranting a second ballot to settle the
contest.
A senior ZEC official, who agreed to speak on condition he
was not named,
said it was going to take probably up to a week before
verification is
completed and a final result announced but said the
commission was looking
to staging a run-off election in the last week of
May.
“It is going to be more than a week to have the final result,” said
the
official. “But what we are preparing for is a run-off election that
should
be held in the last week of May.”
ZEC deputy chief elections
officer Utoile Silagwana refused to comment on
the possibility of a run-off
election at the end of May insisting that
“everything is going to depend on
the pace of the verification process.”
Zimbabwe’s Electoral Act
prescribes that in the event that none of the
contests in a presidential
election is able to garner more than 50 percent
of the vote at the first
instance, a run-off poll should take place 21 days
after announcement of
official results of the first round ballot.
Although there are no
official results of the presidential ballot, political
parties and the
independent Zimbabwe Election Support Network (ZESN) had
been able to
project the likely outcome of the vote using figures that were
posted
outside individual polling stations.
ZESN and ZANU PF agreed in principle
that none of the contestants took more
than 50 percent of the vote while
Tsvangirai’s Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC) party differed saying from
its calculations its leader won with
50.3 percent of the vote, enough to
avoid a run-off poll.
Speculation by local and international media
suggested that a second round
election was needed because Tsvangirai
defeated Mugabe but fell a shade
lower than 50 percent of the
vote.
Deputy Information Minister Bright Matonga told the media on
Thursday that
from the government’s calculations no one took more than 50
percent of the
vote and that a run-off poll was needed in accordance with
the law.
"As far as I'm concerned, there is going to be a runoff. We have
got our own
results," he said without disclosing what those results
were.
Tsvangirai’s MDC won 99 seats in a parallel parliamentary poll
while a
faction of the party led by Arthur Mutambara-led took 10 seats to
bring the
total number of seats controlled by the opposition party to 109
out of the
210-member House of Assembly.
An independent candidate won
one seat while ZANU PF, which had controlled
Parliament since Zimbabwe’s
1980 independence took 97 seats. Three
constituencies where voting could not
take place will hold by-elections at a
yet unknown date.
The ZEC’s
failure to release presidential election results has touched off a
tense
stalemate that analysts fear could lead to violence and bloodshed,
while the
United States has threatened sanctions over delays to issue
results.
The MDC has accused Mugabe of delaying results to use the
time to unleash
violence and terror on voters in bid to cow them to support
him in the
second round run-off ballot.
The MDC says at least 20 of
its supporters have been murdered while another
5 000 have been displaced in
the violence, which it the opposition party has
described as a war being
waged by state security forces and ZANU PF
militants against Zimbabweans. –
ZimOnline.
Zim Online
by Own
Correspondent Friday 02 May 2008
HARARE – Zimbabwe police on
Thursday arrested 10 opposition Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) party
supporters in Harare and Bindura for allegedly
commiting political violence,
including kidnapping and attempted murder.
"We arrested four people who
are alleged to have abducted a soldier in
Chipadze township in Bindura and
another six in Harare in connection with
the burning of a bus," said police
spokesman Andrew Phiri.
"Police are still investigating the cases and
some of the suspects have
appeared in court."
The six who were
accused of burning a bus in Harare during last month’s
failed MDC stay-away
were on Wednesday remanded in custody when they
appeared before a
magistrate's court on public violence charges.
In the farming and mining
town of Bindura, four opposition supporters face
charges of kidnapping and
attempted murder after they allegedly bundled a
soldier into a car they were
driving in the township and headed for an
unknown destination.
Phiri
said, "The soldier managed to jump out of the vehicle but he was
seriously
injured and is still in hospital."
Scores of opposition activists have
been arrested in the aftermath of
Zimbabwe's March 29 general elections in
which President Robert Mugabe’s
ruling ZANU PF party lost its parliamentary
majority for the first time in
28 years when it garnered 97 seats compared
to 110 won by the MDC and other
minor opposition candidates.
The MDC
accuses the police of applying the law selectively targetting
opposition
supporters for arrest while truning a blind eye on ZANU PF
activists who
according to the MDC have committed the most violence since
the
elections.
The MDC says at least 15 of its supporters have been
murdered while another
3 000 have been displaced in politically motivated
violence, which the
opposition party has described as a war being waged by
state security forces
and ZANU PF militants against Zimbabweans. – ZimOnline
By Joram Nyathi
Last updated: 05/02/2008 09:24:30
I
HAVE always abhorred violence. There was a lot of it during the Independence war
in the 1970s. We heard a lot of it as students at Masase School in Mberengwa as
the war raged on. There were tales of “Vakomana” who beat up or shot dead
“sell-outs”.
One day the war theatre got closer. We were woken up in the night in 1979 by the “Freedom Fighters” and led into the village, some two kilometers away. A local woman was accused of “selling out” and she was going to be tried.
Beatings of “sellouts” at nearby bases had become common place.
As we stood singing around a bonfire, the woman was pushed forward through the crowd screaming, her hands and feet tied with wire.
A male “accomplice” managed to flee into the dark as a volley of gunfire tore the night. Before we knew what was happening and quivering in fear, Selina, as the woman was known, had her head blown up in a hail of bullets. That was the end for all “sell-outs”, we were admonished. Nobody cried. No-one could scream. We found our way back to school in grim silence. Vakomana had vanished.
A few days later, an uncle of mine was bombed by helicopters as he returned from repairing water pipes for the school. Soon after, the school was closed down. We moved to Bulawayo.
Then it was Independence. In the merriment and euphoria, the horror of war quietly crept into Matabeleland and Midlands under the name Gukurahundi. The Breaking the Silence report by the CCJP has graphic details of the atrocities there; things normal citizens never imagine possible. Innocent pregnant women had their abdomens ripped open; men were thrown alive into mine shafts and whole families were locked into huts which were set ablaze while the state agents stood by the door to make sure no one escaped.
This was Zimbabwe’s golden era, by some accounts. The rest of the country was enjoying a boom in everything.
The death of PF-Zapu in 1987 brought relative respite. I have heard those who never experienced wanton murder call the Unity Accord a sell-out deal by Joshua Nkomo. I don’t know what the alternative was to end the killings. Yet looking at how people in Matabeleland have voted in all elections ever since, I think they have been more resilient in their silent agony than the rest of the country where Robert Mugabe’s violence has worked wonders for him in every election.
He resorted to it after losing the 2000 constitutional referendum. He has won every seat in Mashonaland through terror, we are told. It is the same story in Manicaland and Masvingo. The period towards the parliamentary elections in June that year was the most violent thing I had witnessed. And for the first time the world was exposed to the horrors previously most parts of Zimbabwe were shielded from by propaganda. A few white commercial farmers who had survived the liberation war had a sense of déjà vu.
"They think nothing of sticking poles up each other’s whatnot, and doing filthy, beastly things to each other. It does happen. It’s a wild thing, an election” |
LORD SOAMES |
People escaped villages with broken limbs, fractured skulls; their homes, food and livestock destroyed in an orgy of violent madness. Many have yet to recover. Many were still trying to reconstruct their shattered dreams when Murambatsvina struck in May 2005. For the first time since Independence, war was brought into the heart of Harare. People were beaten up and homes destroyed. Men and women wailed openly in broad daylight as they watched their life’s investments vanish into the sky in a pall of cement dust.
Just before the March 29 elections, we had an alfresco lunch with workmates at Mereki in Warren Park D. There was animated discussion about how Zimbabweans had “matured” politically as we looked at the posters of different party candidates pasted side-by-side on the walls. Zanu PF and MDC activists shared opaque beer. Some joked that you could put on a Zanu PF skirt and an MDC T-shirt and scarf without getting awkward questions.
My sixth sense told me all this was a grand illusion. I said I didn’t believe in the so-called maturity of Zimbabweans. “You only need a politician to say one word to cross from carnival to mayhem,” I warned.
We went on to hold one of the most peaceful elections since Independence (yes, since 1980, not 2000). Peaceful because psychological terror has become a part of our lives. We talk about overt violence. That is why even in rural areas people voted against Zanu PF despite violent retribution in the past.
A blitzkrieg followed like was never seen before, except after the 1985 elections. Maturity of Zimbabweans! It’s all recriminations between the parties as violence sweeps the countryside, turning up lacerated backs, burnt buttocks, broken skulls, knocked-out teeth and severed lips while political leaders tour western capitals, providing curious amusement to foreign audiences. It is the deadly aftermath of a watershed election which Zanu PF lost. We are witnessing the familiar horror of black-on-black violence.
In his book, Mugabe, Martin Meredith records these observations by the last Governor of Rhodesia Lord Soames on the eve of 1980 elections: “I want to see the freest, fairest elections possible in this country… but intimidation is rife, violence is rife… You must remember this is Africa. They think nothing of sticking poles up each other’s whatnot, and doing filthy, beastly things to each other. It does happen. It’s a wild thing, an election.”
The March elections show that we have not moved an
inch from that beastly behaviour. If Lord Soames were alive today, he would feel
vindicated in his comments three decades ago. We have disappointed every norm of
civilised behaviour. It’s free choice if we want to blame this abominable
behaviour on a violent colonial past. Or is it something we love doing to
ourselves?
Joram Nyathi is the deputy editor of the
Zimbabwe Independent newspaper. E-mail
him at joram@zimind.co.zw
VOA
By Jonga Kandemiiri
Washington
01 May
2008
Post-election violence continued in Zimbabwe's
hinterland on Thursday even
as the country's electoral authority convened
presidential candidates and
their agents for consultations on the outcome,
which pointed to a
presidential run-off ballot.
The Zimbabwe
Electoral Commission told representatives of presidential
candidates in the
March 29 elections that opposition leader Morgan
Tsvangirai received 47.8%
of the vote, short of a majority, against
President Robert Mugabe's 43.2%
share.
Officials of Mr. Mugabe's ZANU-PF party said a run-off election
would be
necessary, but Tsvangirai's formation of the Movement for
Democratic Change
insisted that he won the election outright, if by a narrow
margin, rejecting
the idea of a run-off.
Many observers believe a
presidential run-off election would be accompanied
by even worse violence
than seen to date, and the U.S. government said that
with a campaign of
"state-orchestrated violence" under way, such an election
could not be
fair.
Sources in Mashonaland Central Province said violence continued to
escalate
there as ZANU-PF youth militia members burned the houses of
opposition
members.
Mashonaland Central sources said homes were
torched in Bushu, in Shamva
South constituency, and at Butter Farm, in
Bindura North constituency.
From the Makoni South constituency of
Manicaland Province, sources reported
that a headmaster at the Chakumba
Primary School there was battling for life
after being assaulted by ZANU-PF
militants on Thursday afternoon.
In Mutare, capital of Manicaland
Province, the body of opposition activist
Thabitha Marume, shot dead by
ZANU-PF militia members last week in the town
of Rusape, was collected from
a local mortuary and was to be buried on
Friday, sources said.
The
U.S. Embassy provided evidence of alleged state-sponsored political
violence
and human rights abuses to the government. Senior officials of the
opposition Movement for Democratic Change say 20 of their members have been
murdered.
Police arrested 10 opposition activists in Harare and
Bindura, Mashonaland
Central Province, on charges of public violence. Those
arrested in Bindura
were accused of kidnapping a soldier by forcing him into
their vehicle.
The state-controlled Herald newspaper quoted police as
saying the soldier
escaped with injuries and was hospitalized for
treatment.
Speaking from Bindura, opposition member Saymore Mhene told
VOA reporter
Jonga Kandemiiri that police are arresting MDC members who
report incidents
of violence.
The Guardian,
Friday May 2
2008
Letter
We are very concerned at the deepening crisis in Zimbabwe and
at the pace at
which matters of utmost constitutional importance are
progressing (Zimbabwe
braced for presidential run-off, May 1). The people of
Zimbabwe have
expressed their democratic will for the future of their
country. They have
the right to see it announced and implemented as a matter
of the most urgent
priority. The continuing delay has thrown a shadow over
an electoral process
and casts doubt on the integrity of the authorities
charged with
implementation. Post-election violence has already compromised
any
continuing electoral process; to inspire confidence all electoral
processes
must be transparent and must operate within the framework of the
constitution.
We call upon all who can bring influence to bear to
ensure that the rule of
law is upheld. This includes the right of all the
people of Zimbabwe to cast
their votes free of coercion by threat of
violence, forcible removal or
detention. It also includes the right to see
their vote at the ballot box
transformed into a democratically elected and
accountable government. The
world is united in admiration for the patience
of the people of Zimbabwe in
pursuing the democratic path to renew their
country. However, the patience
of the world is running out in waiting for
their wishes to be honoured by
the current government of
Zimbabwe.
Václav Havel
Doris Lessing
Bill Morris
David
Puttnam
Kenneth Roth (Human Rights Watch)
VOA
By Carole Gombakomba
Washington
01 May
2008
A crackdown on Zimbabwean non-governmental
organizations intensified
Thursday as police raids on NGO offices and
interrogations of civil society
leaders were followed by the assault of a
humanitarian worker, sending her
to the hospital.
The National
Association of Non-Governmental Organizations said the employee
of Plan
International was seriously injured and hospitalized after being
assaulted
by war veterans in Mashonaland East Province, a focus of
post-election
violence.
The precise circumstances of the attack could not immediately
be determined.
Observers say the governing ZANU-PF party has mobilized
veterans of the
liberation war and its youth militia to punish rural
communities which voted
for the opposition in March 29 elections and to
prepare the ground for a
presidential runoff. The opposition Movement for
Democratic Change won
control of the lower house of parliament and MDC
leader Morgan Tsvangirai
outpolled President Robert
Mugabe.
Humanitarian organizations distributing food assistance have been
unable to
relaunch programs suspended before the March 29 elections due to
the climate
of violence in rural areas, which have been the primary
destinations for
food supplies.
Sources in Zimbabwe's NGO community
said other organizations based outside
the main cities have suspended
operations and rights activists have gone
underground after receiving
threats from state security agents and ZANU-PF
militants.
Police are
closely scrutinizing operations of the Zimbabwe Election Support
Network,
Action Aid international and NANGO itself. Officials of the groups
have been
interrogated following raids on their offices in recent days.
Authorities
are accusing ZESN of having run afoul of Zimbabwean law by
releasing
unofficial projections of the presidential election outcome.
National
Coordinator Xholani Zitha of the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition told
reporter
Carole Gombakomba that the ZANU-PF government is harassing NGOS in
an effort
to silence them ahead of what seems likely to be a call for a
presidential
runoff.
Christian Science Monitor
Farmers kicked off their land by President Robert Mugabe have made
new
lives – and raised the local standard of living – in Nigeria.
By
Sarah Simpson | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor
from the May
2, 2008 edition
Shonga, Nigeria - Musa Mogadi says he is better off
since "the whites" came.
He's got a new job, learned new farming skills, and
he can chat on a mobile
phone while zipping around the countryside on a
motorbike.
Three years ago, Mr. Mogadi got by as a subsistence farmer.
But he now earns
a regular wage as a supervisor on one of this town's new
commercial farms.
He's applied skills he learned from some of the two
dozen white Zimbabwean
farmers who moved to Nigeria in 2005, after being
kicked off their land by
President Robert Mugabe and later attracted by
large parcels of land on
offer under 25-year leases and commitments of
support from the Nigerian
government.
Production on his farm is now
up.
"We are starting to use fertilizers," says Mogadi, explaining that he
was
encouraged to buy fertilizer after seeing yield benefits on the
commercial
farm. He's also started planting his maize in a more compact
formation, like
the Zimbabweans, increasing production from each field
planted.
Before the Zimbabweans arrived, there was no mobile phone
network in the
area and so no reason to have a mobile phone. Now he and most
of the other
workers have snazzy cellphones, and many have bought motorbikes
imported
from China, often with a loan from their employer.
In the
future, when the national power network reaches the Shonga farms,
Mogadi is
looking forward to having electricity in his home and village for
the first
time.
Kenny Oyewo, who works as a farm manager, thinks the lessons being
learned
in Shonga should be exported across Nigeria.
"If there were
at least 20 white Zimbabwean farmers in each state," says Mr.
Oyewo,
"Nigeria would become one of the most rich countries in the world and
we
would not even depend on our oil." Nigeria is the largest crude producer
in
Africa, but despite the country's oil-wealth the majority of Nigerians
exist
on just a couple of dollars a day.
Key support from a
governor
Bukola Saraki, governor of Kwara State, actively pursued the
Zimbabwean
farmers, approaching them through Zimbabwe's Commercial Farmers
Union and
paying for them to stay in a hotel in Kwara while they assessed
several
proposed sites.
To date, the governor remains personally
involved in the project, visiting
the farmers in their homes, taking their
calls on his mobile phone and
personally stepping in to help when Nigeria's
confounding – and often
corrupt – bureaucracy gets in the way.
The
Zimbabwean farmers are all too aware how key Mr. Saraki's support
is.
Another group of Zimbabwean farmers who set up in Nasarawa State,
east of
Nigeria's capital, Abuja, are close to abandoning their Nigerian
venture.
There, farmers have not had strong support from the state
authorities, a
promised bridge to link their farms to the nearby capital has
not been built
and agreed-upon bank loans have not materialized.
But
Saraki dismisses fears that the commercial farms may stumble with the
end of
his tenure in three years' time.
"I think the project has sold itself,"
says Saraki. "When we started there
were a lot of people who did not believe
in it. But I think by now, when we
are employing about 3,000 people in
Shonga, they are the ones that are going
to defend it."
Oyewo, who is
a university graduate and ne w to farming, says it's not just
farm employees
who are learning from the Zimbabweans. "Even local people
have been
encouraged to seek advice – and get it – from the farmers," says
Oyewo.
In the long term, veterinarian Abubakar Kannike sees great
potential for
collaboration to develop a new breed of dairy cow that could
be exported
throughout West Africa.
"The future for us is to develop
our own dairy breed mixing the hardy local
Fulani breed with the
Zimbabweans' high milk-producing Jersey cows," says
Mr. Kannike.
The
lessons go both ways
But the lessons aren't all being passed in one
direction. The Zimbabweans
are learning how to deal with a new climate, a
new way of doing things.
This area of Nigeria is a far cry from the cool
sunny plateaus of Zimbabwe.
It's relentlessly hot and close enough to the
Sahara to be shrouded in
dust-laden desert winds for months at a time. And
in the low-lying tropics,
farmers and their families are learning to cope
with malaria.
White farmer Hunter Coetzee is paying close attention to
Nigeria's weather
patterns, earning a reputation among the rest of the
groups as something of
a meteorologist.
One of the steepest learning
curves, farmers say, has been unearthing the
hidden corrupt practices that
mar Nigerian society.
"Our first year farming here, we bought our
fertilizer off the market," says
farmer Irvine Reid. But when the yield was
disappointing, they sent a sample
of the fertilizer off for analysis. "There
was next to no fertilizer, so
little of the active ingredient in there, that
we may as well not have
bothered."
But after a traumatic and often
violent departure from Zimbabwe, the
commercial farmers are learning about
West African hospitality. "Everyone's
been very welcoming," says Reid, "and
that's really nice."
Christian Science Monitor
Farmers who moved to Nigeria after being kicked off their farms by
President
Robert Mugabe say they won't return to the land they love even if
Mugabe
fails to emerge victorious in the disputed March 29 election.
By
Sarah Simpson | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor
from the May
2, 2008 edition
Shonga, Nigeria - A jet carrying a herd of Jersey
cows touches down at an
airstrip in the Nigerian countryside, transporting
dairy cows from South
Africa.
Their new owners, a small group of white
farmers from Zimbabwe, watch as the
herd clip-clops down the gangplank. The
farmers casually contemplate flying
back to homes they lost to President
Robert Mugabe's supporters. But
whatever the outcome of Zimbabwe's disputed
presidential poll, they are not
likely to be returning to the land they love
soon.
"My heart would want to go back, but my brain would say no," says
Susan
Mactavish, who's spent her whole life in Africa and now lives on a
1,000-hectare (2,471-acre) farm in Nigeria's west-central Kwara State. "I've
put too much into this place to abandon it."
Zimbabwean farmer John
Sawyer says he would look closely at the Zimbabwean
economy before
reinvesting in farming there. Zimbabwe's infrastructure and
services have
decayed as Africa's breadbasket has turned basket case with
hyper-inflation
of 165,000 percent and 80 percent unemployment. The seized
farms have
largely failed, and nearly half of Zimbabweans are malnourished.
"If we
go back to Zimbabwe tomorrow, then it's like when we arrived here.
We'd have
to start all over again," says Mr. Sawyer, who wears the khaki sun
hat and
shorts that are almost a uniform for the white farmers. He goes
barefoot,
even when working in the fields.
While the Zimbabwean government evicted
most of the 4,000 white farmers
without compensation (some 130 were chased
off in the past month), the
Nigerian government has spent millions of
dollars to woo these farmers here.
In southern Africa, English and Dutch
settlers tilled large farms for
hundreds of years, causing friction with
local groups over ownership of the
land. But Nigeria's history is different:
English colonialists never tried
to own land and race relations have never
been politicized.
For the Zimbabwean farmers it's a commercial
opportunity and personal
challenge. For the Nigerian government, it's a
chance to tap into years of
expertise and kick-start commercial farming
operations in a country of 140
million where farming has long been
neglected.
Until the group of 13 arrived in Nigeria, the land they now
farm was, they
say, "bush." There were a few scattered subsistence farms, no
electricity,
and no mobile phone coverage. But the nearby Niger River
promised unlimited
water once bore holes and irrigation systems were in
place.
Three years later, Nigerian farmers have been moved to alternative
land,
with compensation from the government. Boreholes have been drilled,
some
13,000 hectares of land cleared, mobile phone coverage is in place, and
each
farm has a house with Internet access, satellite TV, pretty gardens,
pet
dogs, and swimming pools.
Though the farms have yet to turn a
profit, the farmers are optimistic about
their investment. "My projected
wealth is more here [in Nigeria], than what
I left behind," explains Irvine
Reid, who moved here with his wife, Gayle,
and son, Callum, though their two
older daughters are in South Africa. "If
everything goes to plan," he
adds.
The enthusiasm from Nigerian authorities is in sharp contrast to
the
government-sponsored violence that forced the farmers out of Zimbabwe.
The
Reid family was repeatedly visited by large mobs performing protest
dances
until one day they visited when Mrs. Reid was home alone.
"I
was sat down and told that if we were not off the farm by the following
Monday, they would come back and chop off his head," she says, pointing to
her husband. Their farm is now owned by a general in the Zimbabwean Army and
commercial farming has all but ceased, say the Reids.
Despite the
farmers' welcome in Nigeria, their time here has not been
without problem.
The newcomers were promised that their land would be
connected to the
national power grid with guaranteed 24-hour power and
irrigation to the
farms. None of that has happened.
"It's frustrating," says Sawyer, of his
new life in Nigeria. "Everywhere
there is a lack of regard to time. And in
farming that's a major problem.
Crops won't grow if they're not in the
ground on time," he says in between
shouting instructions into his
walkie-talkie. "If it hadn't been for people
not understanding the timing
factor, we should have been further down the
road now."
Nigerian
banks, which have provided the bulk of the investment through loans
underwritten by the Kwara State government, have been slow, too. "Banks here
don't understand agriculture," says Sawyer.
Nigerian banks have
little experience of lending to commercial farmers.
Though agriculture
accounts for about one quarter of Nigeria's gross
domestic product, that
production comes from small-scale and subsistence
farmers. Since crude oil
exports took over as the bulwark of the economy in
the 1960s, food
production has steadily declined.
To date, the Zimbabwean farmers say,
the maize and soya yields have been
disappointing. "It's just too hot," says
Reid. In Zimbabwe, Reid could
expect at least eight tonnes of yield per
hectare, compared with just four
tonnes in Nigeria.
"And in Zimbabwe,
the inputs [such as fertilizer and seeds] were cheaper,"
says Reid. Like
most of the other farmers, Reid has decided there's more
money to be made
from dairy or poultry farming, but that's required more
expensive investment
in milking and slaughtering facilities.
Back on the airport tarmac of
Kwara State's main airport at Ilorin, crowds
watch the first batch of some
690 cows imported at a cost of about $3,000
per head. Despite the expense,
Nigerian officials are optimistic that
large-scale investment will bring
large-scale returns.
"The government realized that agriculture could grow
our economy, but that
to do this there must be a shift from just peasant
farming," says Mohammed
Gana-Yisa, Kwara State commissioner for agriculture
and natural resources.
"At the time the government was conceptualizing
moving into commercial
agriculture, there was this land use problem with
Zimbabwean white farmers,"
says Mr. Gana-Yisa. "So the government took
advantage of that situation."
Christian Science Monitor
Correspondent Sarah Simpson was impressed by the courage shown
by the
Zimbabwean farmers now starting farms in Nigeria . "These are not
young
farmers. To many people, this would seem quite late in life to be
starting
afresh. This is a big investment for them, not just financially,
but
emotionally," she observes.
Sarah found that a persistent theme
among the uprooted Zimbabwean farmers
was the loss of family unity. "These
are families who have been in Zimbabwe
for generations. That's home. But now
their parents are living in flats in
London. Their children are looking for
jobs in South Africa or Australia.
Their families are scattered around the
world," she says.
BBC
16:33 GMT, Thursday, 1 May 2008 17:33 UK
By Peter Greste
BBC News,
Johannesburg
The "verification process" for Zimbabwe's
presidential election is, at
long last, formally under way.
At
around 1400 local time, agents for the four candidates who
contested last
month's poll gathered at the offices of the Zimbabwe
Electoral Commission
(ZEC) for a process that, in theory, could stretch out
for days, weeks or
even longer.
It has taken the ZEC more than a month to get to this
stage.
The commission blames the delays on the complexity of
counting the
four-tiered voting system, as well as a series of disputes over
the results.
Given the way the commission chairman says the
process for the
presidential vote is to proceed, still further delays appear
imminent.
According to the chairman George Chiweshe, under an
agreement reached
before the elections, the presidential candidates were
expected to present
their own tally of results at the verification
meeting.
"They do their own tallies, and we do ours; then we get
together to
compare the results," he told the AFP news agency.
"Where we don't agree, we will pull out every relevant document to
ensure we
have the same figures. Once we agree, then we check out our
additions¿ and
at some stage we have to agree."
Greater transparency
It is impossible to say exactly how long that may take, if ever.
The opposition Movement for Democratic Change insists its candidate,
Morgan
Tsvangirai, won the presidential election outright, and by a
comfortable
margin.
It has based its figures on a sample of results posted
outside every
polling station on the day of the vote.
The
requirement to post those results has been the single most
important change
to Zimbabwe's elections.
It both dramatically increased the
level of transparency compared to
previous polls, and became the source of
most of the disputes.
But according to the MDC, it is all the
evidence they and the
electoral authorities needed to proclaim
victory.
"The question of a run-off vote doesn't arise," declared
the party's
Secretary General Tendai Biti at a recent news
conference.
"We won outright. The people have spoken."
But the ruling Zanu-PF party has been hinting for weeks that Mr
Tsvangirai
failed to cross the 50% threshold to avoid a run-off against
President
Robert Mugabe, and on Wednesday evening, news agencies quoted
government
sources as saying that was indeed the case.
Those claims have been
supported by the independent watchdog, the
Zimbabwe Election Support
Network, which compiled its own tallies, and
concluded that Morgan
Tsvangirai has probably won about 49.3% - less than
50%, but still within
the margin of error, so an outright win is still
theoretically
possible.
Delays 'contrived'
Whatever the case, the
MDC fears that the true figures may never be
known.
It believes
the electoral commission has contrived the delays to give
Zanu-PF time to
massage the results, force a run-off, and win the second
round through a
combination of intimidation and ballot-stuffing.
Another
independent watchdog, the South African based pro-democracy
think-tank,
IDASA, recently compiled a report entitled "The Inconvenient
Truth: A
complete guide to the delay in releasing the results of Zimbabwe's
presidential poll".
In it, the organisation said the
"verification process" as defined in
the electoral law only involves
confirming that the results of the count
conducted at polling stations were
accurately conveyed to the electoral
commission's headquarters.
It does not mean challenging the accuracy of the count in the first
place.
So in theory, it ought to be relatively quick and
straight forward.
But the fact that the entire process for the
parliamentary poll,
(including counting, recounting, verification and
collation,) has taken
almost five weeks, suggests that it may be anything
but straight forward.
Church Times, UK
by Pat Ashworth
CHRISTIANS throughout
the world responded to the urgent call by the
Anglican diocese of Harare for
a day of prayer for Zimbabwe on Sunday. The
Archbishops of Canterbury and
York described it as “part of a search for
increased solidarity and justice
for the people of Zimbabwe at home and in
the UK” (News, 25
April).
The Archbishops’ statement called for immediate, concerted,
and
effective action by the government of South Africa and other regional
organs, and for the UN to mediate and intervene as needed.
“Continuing political violence and drift could unleash spiralling
communal
violence, as has been seen elsewhere in the continent,” the
Archbishops
warned.
They declared that the current climate of “political
intimidation,
vote-rigging, and delay” had left the presidential election
process without
credibility, making the people of Zimbabwe “even more
vulnerable to conflict
heaped upon poverty, and the threat of national
disintegration”.
Referring directly to the invasion by riot
police of a Mothers’ Union
gathering last week, they said: “Faithful men,
women, and young people, who
seek better governance in either political or
church affairs, continue to be
beaten, intimidated, or oppressed, as was the
recent Mothers’ Union
gathering in Mbare. Anglicans cannot worship in their
Cathedral in Harare,
and Mothers’ Union groups cannot now gather without
fear of violence or
intimidation against them.”
Dr Sentamu
spent a day of fasting and prayer in York Minster on
Sunday, encouraging the
public to join him for the vigil and light a candle
in solidarity with the
people of Zimbabwe. “We must all stand together with
our brothers and
sisters living under the tyranny of Mugabe, and pray that
they will find
deliverance,” he said.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu described
Zimbabwe as “staring into the abyss”.
He joined the worldwide calls to stop
the supply of weapons to the country
until the political crisis was
resolved, and warned: “If violence flares
further in Zimbabwe, those
supplying the weapons will be left with blood on
their
hands.”
The emboldened Anglican Council of Zimbabwe has
publicly decried the
delay in publishing the results of the presidential
election. As Christians,
the Council members said in a statement that they
were “embarrassed, ashamed
and disappointed at what is clearly a flawed
election process. We are
shocked and totally disapprove . .
.
“There are reports of torture, killings, breaking into and
burning
houses, damage and theft, threats and intimidation. This is
happening to
ordinary, innocent, law-abiding citizens in our beloved
Zimbabwe. We totally
condemn this vindictive, lawless behaviour, and call
upon the perpetrators
and masters to halt this violence.”
Churches in Zimbabwe opened their doors on Sunday to give refuge to
people
fleeing the violence. Christian Aid, a partner of the Zimbabwe
Christian
Alliance (ZCA), said that its member churches had received people
in Harare
and in Bulawayo. In the latter, militia are reported to be
undergoing
intensive training on the outskirts of the city.
“Such a heavy
presence and involvement of the military is having a
traumatic affect on the
population,” reported Pastor Promise Manceda of ZCA.
Tearfund
is also receiving reports from its Zimbabwean partners, which
include
churches in Bulawayo. Karyn Beattie, Tearfund’s Disaster Response
Manager
for Zimbabwe, said: “Fear and confusion are spreading across the
country in
this vacuum of uncertainty and threat. We are very concerned for
the safety
of people, those just simply trying to exist — although there is
nothing
simple about existing in a country in collapse.”
A Harare
resident described the escalating situation to the Church
Times as “A game
of poker played out on the world stage. . . We are on our
knees and really
trusting the Lord.”
The Bishop of Natal, the Rt Revd Rubin
Phillip, called for a campaign
of prayer for Zimbabwe, to take place daily
in the Cathedral of the Holy
Nativity in Pietermaritzburg. It began on
Sunday, which was Freedom Day in
South Africa, and will continue until Youth
Day on 16 June. “Intense prayer
is one of the crucial ways in which we can
struggle against this appalling
situation,” said Bishop
Phillip.
Bishop Phillip has been praised by the South African
shack-dwellers’
movement, Abahlali baseMjondolo, together with the South
African Transport
and Allied Workers’ Union, for his active solidarity with
the Zimbabwean
people.
An impassioned statement said: “We
call on others to follow their
example. We call on all clergy to stand with
the poor . . . We express our
solidarity with the people of Zimbabwe
suffering terrible oppression in
their own country, and terrible xenophobia
in South Africa.”
The World Council of Churches (WCC) and the
World Student Christian
Federation also joined the growing outcry for
immediate release of the
presidential election results. The WCC’s general
secretary, the Revd Dr
Samuel Kobia, said that the electoral process had
again been compromised by
“rigging and reprisals”. He supported church
leaders’ calls for intervention
by the UN, the African Union, and the
Southern African Development Community
“to prevent a political crisis from
escalating into mass violence”.
A joint report from the WCC and
the All African Conference of Churches
called on the Zimbabwean Church to
give leadership to the people of the
southern African
nation.
Although the churches have been “outspoken in promoting
and
entrenching a transparent governance structure that is sensitive to the
plight of the Zimbabwean populace”, they nevertheless “have not spoken with
one voice, nor do they seem to read from the same script over the years”,
the report says.
· Forged documents outline
'British invasion plans'
· UK dismisses fakes as ruse to delay election
results
Chris McGreal in Harare
The Guardian,
Friday May 2
2008
It is Gordon Brown's name on the letter with the familiar Downing
Street
address at the top. If it weren't for the pesky business of the
signature,
it would place the prime minister at the heart of a conspiracy to
drag the
old Rhodesia from its grave in league with German bankers and South
African
white supremacists.
You could have read all about it across
the front pages of Zimbabwe's
state-run press over recent weeks, backed by
what are purported to be
documents outlining opposition schemes to steal the
unresolved presidential
election, British plans to invade and put President
Robert Mugabe on trial
at The Hague, and the alleged letter from Brown
saying that the ruling
Zanu-PF party is "no longer relevant to the people of
Zimbabwe".
Under headlines such as "Return to Rhodesia", weeks of
supposed revelations
have included claims that white former generals will be
brought back to take
over the Zimbabwean army, that racially segregated
residential areas will be
reintroduced and that the opposition Movement for
Democratic Change
presidential candidate, Morgan Tsvangirai, has proven to
be an imperialist
puppet by enduring a course in British
etiquette.
The purported authors of the documents say they are forgeries,
and not very
good ones. The signature on the Downing St letterhead printed
in the Herald
newspaper bears no resemblance to Brown's. But that has not
stopped Mugabe's
government from presenting the documents to regional
leaders as "evidence"
that the MDC is trying to rig the election.
The
first appeared in the Herald a few days after the election, once Mugabe
got
over the shock of defeat and decided to fight on. It laid out a supposed
opposition plan to hand over many of the country's assets to foreign
control, including the central bank to the Germans. More importantly, it
said that if Tsvangirai became president he would sack the military and
intelligence chiefs.
The Herald's story came as Tsvangirai was
negotiating with senior army
officials, offering them guarantees for their
conditions of service and
amnesty from prosecution for past crimes.
Suddenly, the generals stopped
meeting the opposition.
A week later,
the Herald ran another "world exclusive" in which it claimed
to have laid
its hands on a paper written by the MDC's general secretary,
Tendai Biti,
detailing plans to bribe teachers and civil servants working as
election
officials.
Conveniently, this came just as Zanu-PF was trying to persuade
regional
leaders that the delays in releasing the presidential election
results were
the result of opposition irregularities.
Inevitably, the
opposition was accused of being in league with white
conspirators. Part of
the alleged plan was for Zimbabwe's military to be
taken over by "selected
reputable generals and senior officers of the former
Rhodesian Security
Forces who are presently in Australia, Britain and South
Africa", and for
hundreds of white farmers to get back their land.
"The beneficiaries of
Mugabe's land grab should quickly be made to
understand that their number is
up," the document said. "We have also
directed some of the remaining white
farmers in the country to mobilise
their workers to poison cattle, slash or
burn crops in the fields and carry
out other acts of sabotage of the
resettled farms."
Some of the fake documents were presented at a summit
in Zambia as a
justification for the delays in releasing the election
results. They also
implicitly played up Mugabe's claim that the power
struggle is with British
surrogates acting on behalf of their white masters
in London.
A few days later, the Herald published two separate forgeries
on the front
page of the same edition. One was the letter supposedly written
by Brown,
promising to back Tsvangirai against Mugabe, the other was a long
and
bizarre "memorandum of understanding" between the MDC, white farmers,
foreign business interest and Eugene Terre'Blanche, leader of the neo-Nazi
Afrikaner Resistance Movement that resisted the end of apartheid as well as
"various ex-Rhodesian elements exiled in South Africa".
The British
embassy in Harare swiftly said the Brown letter was a forgery.
"No such
letter, or wider correspondence, exists. It reflects the regime's
desperation that Zanu-PF and state-controlled media have resorted to faking
documents for crude propaganda purposes, and not for the first time," it
said.
But that was of little consequence to Zimbabwe's justice
minister, Patrick
Chinamasa. When asked if he would withdraw his accusations
after the
documents were shown to be fake, he declined because "even if
Brown hadn't
put it in writing, everyone knows that is what the British are
plotting".