Source: Zim has opportunity to break the stranglehold of kleptocracy – DailyNews Live
Joshua Merservey 13 December 2017
HARARE – Robert Mugabe, one of Africa’s longest-serving, and worst,
presidents is gone after 37 years of misruling the southern African
country of Zimbabwe.
That is cause for rejoicing. It was not a voluntary retirement. In late
November, the Zimbabwe Defence Forces swooped into the capital, Harare, to
arrest “criminals around” him, his wife (and heir-apparent) Grace, and a
number of politicians associated with Grace.
The “coup” was the latest development in a years’ long battle within the
ruling Zanu PF party over who would succeed Mugabe, who is 93.
Sadly, Mugabe’s successor is unlikely to be much of an improvement. The
military installed as the new leader former vice president Emmerson
Mnangagwa, one of Mugabe’s enforcers.
In the 1980s, Mnangagwa was central to the Gukurahundi massacre campaign
in opposition stronghold areas of Zimbabwe. At least 20 000 people died in
that campaign.
Mnangagwa has been under United States sanctions for nearly 15 years for
“undermining democratic processes or institutions.” Institutionally, the
Zanu PF system that enthusiastically empowered Mugabe remains intact.
Mnangagwa is a long-standing party pillar, and now its head, and
Mugabe-era Zanu PF officials, dominate the Cabinet he announced on
November 30.
The “coup” also appears to have only strengthened the kleptocratic and the
military’s hand.
Mnangagwa rewarded his patrons by appointing two senior officers to the
Cabinet: Major General Sibusiso Moyo, who announced the “coup” on
Zimbabwean television, and Air Marshal Perrance Shiri, who led the brigade
accused of being responsible for the Gukurahundi massacre.
As bleak as the situation is, there are some opportunities for Zimbabweans
who want a free and democratic country.
The party’s 2015 expulsion of former presidential contender Joice Mujuru
likely shrank its base with voters loyal to her. Doubtless, there are
more than a few Mugabe devotees now disgruntled over the party’s treatment
of their heroes.
Mnangagwa also faces a difficult task ahead. He has promised to follow
through with scheduled elections next year, but he is unlikely to win them
given his unpopularity with many Zimbabweans unhappy with his past.
That means he will either have to delay the contest or steal a page from
the old Zanu PF playbook.
Certainly, he will need as much Zanu PF and military support as he can
muster. That will require resuscitating the patronage networks that
sustained Mugabe in power. Given the blighted state of the Zimbabwean
economy, that could be difficult.
Zimbabwe also has a feisty civil society that Mugabe was unable to crush,
and a number of competent and accomplished opposition figures.
However, the opposition has frequently been divided; it must heal those
rifts if it is to have a chance to seize the opportunity. The difficult
task before the international community is to use what little leverage it
has to help pressure Mnangagwa into staging genuinely equitable elections
– for the first time in nearly four decades.
Until there are signs of progress, the US should not lift any of the
sanctions it has on Zimbabwe’s leadership.
Washington should work with its allies that have interests in Zimbabwe to
bring concerted pressure on the regime. It can also offer economic and
diplomatic support to kick in after a free and fair election.
Only Zimbabweans can break the Zanu PF stranglehold on their country.
Doing so will be difficult, and it will not be accomplished overnight.
It will require the many Zimbabweans who resisted Mugabe’s regime to
continue striving for a free Zimbabwe.
The US and the rest of the international community should do what it can
to support their efforts to prevent one dictator from replacing another.
o Meservey is The Heritage Foundation’s senior policy analyst for Africa
and the Middle East.
COMMENTS