Mujuru rejects pension

via Mujuru rejects pension – NewsDay Zimbabwe September 1, 2015 by Xolisani Ncube

FORMER Vice-President Joice Mujuru has reportedly turned down a government pension and retirement benefits offered to her by President Robert Mugabe, claiming she does not want to be politically tied to Zanu PF, an indicator she could be ready to return to mainstream politics.

Mugabe three weeks ago gazetted pension and terminal benefits for former Vice-Presidents in a move widely believed to be aimed at “politically containing” Mujuru, who has been linked to a new political outfit, People First, which comprises ex-Zanu PF members.

Contacted by NewsDay yesterday Mujuru cryptically said: “Thats water under the bridge, nothing to tie me to anything.”

She declined to elaborate further.

But her close ally,who declined to be named, said: “For her, the issue is on principle. She is not concerned about material benefits but the dignity that has been removed from her as a woman and a war veteran.

Sources close to her said she had spurned the offer as she feels “it’s meant to tie her down to the Zanu PF political clique”.

“She is of the belief that the terminal benefits that were publicised could be politically motivated and also because of the manner in which she was removed from office, she did not resign or retire, but was fired,” the source close to her said.

“Hence, getting the package would be wrong morally. Moreso, the manner in which the President has allowed his wife (First Lady Grace Mugabe) to continue talking about her and her late husband (ex-army general Solomon Mujuru) – makes it difficult for one to accept the offer even if it’s genuine.”

The offer came eight months after Mujuru was booted out of both government and Zanu PF together with more than 140 top party officials on allegations of plotting to kill Mugabe.

The benefits, as outlined in Statutory Instrument 86 of 2015, published on August 7, include personal security, medical aid, travel allowances and domestic workers paid for by the State.

According to the Government Gazette, which political analysts said was bound to have implications on Mujuru’s political life, had among other things, a domestic worker, a gardener, two drivers, a private secretary, a close security unit officer, two aide-de-camp officers, an office, a Mercedes Benz vehicle and a colour television set.

The law states that Mujuru would lose her terminal benefits if she were to be employed privately or as a public official and the rejection of the pension could be indicating she is plotting a return to public life.

Political analysts yesterday said Mujuru’s snub of the pension offer could have been driven by emotion and her desire to send a message that she wants to remain independent.

University of Zimbabwe political science professor, Eldred Masunungure said: “If it’s true that she has turned down the benefits, then she is making a statement that she wants to be politically independent and not be attached to any loyalty of any kind. But what should be clear is that these are constitutional benefits she is entitled to.”

Another analyst, Alexander Rusero said Mujuru could have made the decision out of frustration and anger.

“This is a misguided decision because constitutionally she has a legal right to the benefit,” he opined.

“Also, she is making a mistake because this is not a Mugabe making or Zanu PF intention, but the people of Zimbabwe who through the 2013 Constitution, said they want to take care of former Vice Presidents, not Mujuru alone.

“One has to understand that she has been subjected to humiliation, but she should have overcome that and understood that she once served Zimbabwe as the Vice-President for a decade with diligence.”

Since her unceremonious exit from the political limelight, Mujuru has continued to be on the receiving end of relentless attacks from the Mugabes.

Recently, Mugabe told party supporters that the late army General Solomon Mujuru,who died in a mysterious inferno at his Beatrice farmhouse in 2011, had plotted a palace coup.

Mujuru has, however, denied the allegations of conniving with her late husband to plot Mugabe’s ouster, but has kept her future political plans close to her chest, fueling speculation that she could be plotting to spring a surprise in the 2018 elections.

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 5
  • comment-avatar
    toperasu 2 years

    Somebody explain something– Nhongo was planning to oust Mugabe from power. The reason he gave was that one man cannot hold the country/people at ransom. This is being considered as being unpatriotic and treasonous. Am I missing something here? How can standing with the people be treasonous. Is this an open acceptance that the current leadership has rejected the people? Unless I am missing something– Nhongo was a bigger giant than we currently accord him.

  • comment-avatar
    jo 2 years

    …and a colour TV set, sounds like an old hotel advert from the 70 ‘s. Anyway a new black/white TV is now more expensive and has to be imported .

  • comment-avatar
    Mother 2 years

    I salute Dr Joyce Mujuru. A woman of principles. A true leader. What the president and his wife did is unacceptable. The humiliation, the trauma, the stress and all the negative impact of their irresponsible behaviour on her life cannot be washed away by an offer of material things which at the end of the day will be used to further humiliate her. She is educated enough to know what is best for her. Thanks Joyce. I know makadonedza ndege and I know maiteura ropa kuhondo. No one can take that from you. We salute you. I say again no one can take that from you and you are respected for that by those who know the truth. Be still, He is watching.

  • comment-avatar
    Tjingababili 2 years

    TROJAN HORSE, IT IS!

  • comment-avatar
    FromTheHip 2 years

    “Political analysts yesterday said Mujuru’s snub of the pension offer could have been driven by emotion …..”

    Which half baked analysts are these? By all accounts, mai Mujuru is a very wealthy woman – would she need the pension money? On the other hand, accepting the pension would have been tantamount to declaring to her supporters that she is not interested in running in 2018. In addition, half the staff supplied by the state (be it security personnel, drivers or gardeners) would probably have been CIOs. No emotional decision there, I’m sure…