Zim ivory tusks valueless: Muchinguri

ENVIRONMENT minister Oppah Muchinguri yesterday claimed other African countries such as Kenya, Botswana and Chad were scuttling efforts by Zimbabwe to sell its huge ivory stockpile insisting that it must be burnt.

Source: Zim ivory tusks valueless: Muchinguri – NewsDay Zimbabwe October 13, 2016

ENVIRONMENT minister Oppah Muchinguri yesterday claimed other African countries such as Kenya, Botswana and Chad were scuttling efforts by Zimbabwe to sell its huge ivory stockpile insisting that it must be burnt.

by VENERANDA LANGA

Muchinguri said this in the National Assembly, while responding to a question by Shamva South MP, Joseph Mapiki (Zanu PF), who had asked her to explain when Zimbabwe would benefit from its ivory stockpile.

“The problem is that other countries like Botswana, Kenya and Chad are pushing other countries to ensure Zimbabwe does not sell its ivory,” she said.

“When we went to Cites (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) they wanted us to burn our ivory, but we refused because the value of our tusks is very high, and we will wait until we have a chance to sell them.”
Muchinguri said all that the country could do now was to manufacture artefacts such as earrings and bangles from ivory, but it had also proved difficult to sell them to tourists.

“Those tourists are required to get permits so that their countries allow them to bring the earrings made out of elephant tusks. The process is almost a ban on Zimbabwe’s ivory, but we will keep fighting to ensure our tusks are sold,” she said.

Mapiki also asked if Zimbabwe could use its tusks as collateral to get loans from countries like China and Muchinguri said: “China closed their domestic market, saying they do not want to deal in ivory, and as it stands our ivory has no value at international level. It is considered valueless.”

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 2
  • comment-avatar
    Tabonga mbanje 8 years ago

    ” no value ” and ” valueless ” have completely different meanings and thus cannot be used interchangeably dofo reZanu.

  • comment-avatar
    Barry 8 years ago

    1. Ivory does not burn. The US Fish & Wildlife Service proved this many years ago. All of this burning of stockpiles is just for show and to make the rest of the world donate money.
    2. In countries like Kenya the wildlife authorities are de facto controlled by the big first world international animal “charities” and they are the ones dictating government policy. The Kenya Wildlife Service is nothing but a puppet on a string.
    3. The big activist organisations’ main concern is their CEOs ‘ annual 6-figure+ salaries.
    4. It will become more and more difficult to sell ivory as end user destinations ban ownership. So go ahead and “burn ” the ivory, which does eliminate it’s value, but use it as a hostage first. “You want us to burn our ivory? No problem, we’ll do that as soon as you pay for it.”
    5. If Zimbabwe pulls out of CITES, the legitimate sport hunting industry is dead. That will cost us around $20m a year, which is also fine as long as the activists pay in the shortfall.