NEWS ALERT
11 November 2009
Brutal torture is
being meted out to 120 Zimbabwean soldiers at KG V1
Barracks in Harare as
members of the army's military intelligence, the
military police and the
Central Intelligence Organisation intensify
interrogation of personnel
following the alleged theft of guns from the
armoury two weeks
ago.
According to news just in from reliable sources,
shifts of
militia are being transported into the barracks day and night to
beat and
torture the soldiers.
Today the
state-owned newspaper, The Herald, reported that Major
Maxwell Samudzi had
committed suicide in the military cells. However, the
sources warn that he
was in fact beaten to death.
Colonel Garira, who is alleged to
have master-minded the theft of the
weapons, is believed at the time of
writing to be close to death.
On October 31, The Zimbabwean
newspaper reported that at least 12 soldiers
had died the previous week
after they were brutally tortured by military
intelligence agents following
the disappearance of an assortment of guns and
bombs from Pomona
barracks.
This took place just two days after the government
barred United Nations
torture expert Manfred Nowak from visiting the country
on a mission to probe
torture and the treatment of
prisoners.
Twelve soldiers died at Two Medical Company Hospital
at KGV1 in Harare,
while additional soldiers were admitted to hospital
following interrogation
at the hands of the Military Intelligence
Division.
In a sinister twist, soldiers who spoke to The
Zimbabwean reported that
foreigners were being used for the torture sessions
and that they were
possibly Congolese or Angolan
nationals.
Expressing grave concern for the safety of the
soldiers, leading human
rights activists warn that once again crimes against
humanity are taking
place in Zimbabwe.
They are calling on
the country's transitional government to ensure
immediate access by medical
and legal practitioners to these members of the
Zimbabwe National
Army.
Calls for UN intervention
The human rights
activists are also calling for the urgent intervention of
the United Nations
Human Rights Council, the highest political body of the
UN dealing with
human rights.
After Mr Nowak was expelled from Zimbabwe, he told
a news conference in
Johannesburg that he would ask the UN Human Rights
council to investigate
the situation in Zimbabwe. He also said the UN would
not abandon its work
in Zimbabwe.
"I am still very concerned by the
serious and credible allegations of
torture, ill-treatment and inhuman
prison conditions in the country," Mr
Nowak said. "Each hour is critical,"
he added.
On December 2, 2008, it was reported that 16 soldiers
accused of rioting in
Harare had been executed by members of the
Presidential Guard death squads.
Three additional soldiers were reported to
have died during torture
sessions.
Torture is used
extensively by President Mugabe and Zanu PF in their
desperate bid to retain
power.
Trial of Roy Bennett
Today the Harare High Court
ruled that lawyers representing Roy Bennett, the
Movement for Democratic
Change Deputy Minister of Agriculture designate, who
is facing terrorism
charges and a possible death penalty, could raise
allegations the main
witness against him was tortured.
Prime Minister Morgan
Tsvangirai says the charges against
Bennett are trumped-up and politically
motivated.
The planting of arms caches in order to
jail political opponents
on treason charges - or accusations of the theft of
weapons - are favoured
ploys used by Zanu PF in order to neutralise or
eliminate political
opponents.
ENDS
News release supplied
by Zimbabwe Democracy Now
www.zimbabwedemocracynow.com
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=24911
November 12, 2009
By
Our Correspondent
HARARE - Major Maxwell Samudzi (48), one of the
soldiers charged with theft
of firearms from Harare's Pomona barracks last
month, committed suicide
under unclear circumstances while in army detention
on Sunday
night.According to Wednesday's Herald newspaper, Samudzi, who was
the Deputy
Officer Commanding One Engineers Support Regiment at Pomona
Barracks, was
found on Monday morning lying dead on the floor.
A
black electrical code was tied around his neck while blood was coming out
of
his nose and mouth.
Samudzi allegedly carried three packets containing
cotrimohazole aspirin and
nevirapine in his left trousers pocket.
It
was, however, not clear who brought him both the cord he allegedly used
to
hang himself or the tablets.
The cause of his death, it is said, is being
investigated by Braeside Police
Station.
Samudzi had been detained at
One Commando Detention Barracks for allegedly
conniving in the theft of 20
AK47 rifles and a shot gun.
He was among 13 soldiers who now stand
accused of breaking into an armoury
at Pomona to steal the
weapons.
The names of the other soldiers were given as Sungiso Musa,
Darlington
Kanyingwe, Nyaruwata Lawyers, Charles Muzondo, Dzingai T
Chibutwaka, Stanley
Mvindwa, Chamunorwa Chinyere, Cosmore Mangenda, Misheck
Kangwa, Callistus
Mutero, David Hamandishe and Farai
Chitsiko.
Reports say the soldiers were initially thrown into the Harare
Remand Prison
by a joint group comprising members of the army's military
intelligence, the
military police and the Central Intelligence Organisation
(CIO) two days
after the guns disappeared.
Ten junior officers were
arrested over the same case. Their whereabouts have
remained a mystery since
their arrest.
Following the alleged theft of the firearms, police raided
a house belonging
to MDC secretary general and Zimbabwe's Finance Minister,
Tendai Biti
allegedly in search of the missing firearms.
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written by JOHN MAKUMBE
Wednesday, 11
November 2009 17:47
The SADC Troika has given Robert Mugabe and Zanu
(PF) thirty days to
resolve the MDC defined outstanding issues with regard
to the global
political agreement (GPA). This is a commendable first time
for the SADC
since all along the toothless bulldog has handled Mugabe with
kid gloves.
Some of us know very well that the old man does not respond
very
positively to deadlines and time limits. At his age, this is quite
understandable. It remains to be seen whether any progress can be made to
get the inclusive government working again. The only problem with the SADC
Troika's demand is that there was no spelling out of the consequences of
failure to meet the set deadline. Mugabe will obviously take advantage of
this omission and drag his tired feet up to the time of the
deadline.
The MDC, for its part, now has to resume co-operating with
Zanu (PF).
That means they have to attend Cabinet and Council of Ministers'
meetings
again. This is necessary for the full government to work
effectively. The
forthcoming national budget is desperately awaited, and
nothing should be
allowed to stand in the way of that critical national
planning effort. The
MDC have the formidable task of persuading Western
countries to lift
targeted sanctions against Mugabe and some 200 of his
close associates.
There is no likelihood of any of the targeted
sanctions being lifted
in the near future, unless Mugabe and Zanu (PF) take
measures to
meaningfully repent from their evil ways within the stipulated
timeframe.
Currently there is ample evidence that violence, the ugly
monster, has
reared its head again in the name of Zanu (PF). Some schools
have already
lost teachers who have been targeted by war veterans and Zanu
(PF) militia
for allegedly supporting the MDC.
Farm invasions are
continuing against the few remaining white
commercial farmers. The state
media has not relented in its hate language
against Tsvangirai and the MDC.
We are unlikely to see any real change in
these matters in the next 30
days.
It is very likely that Mugabe will finally agree to appoint the
six
MDC provincial governors as per earlier agreements. But it is doubtful
that
the geriatric will allow Gideon Gono, governor of the RBZ to vacate
office.
Gono is Mugabe's meal ticket, and allowing him to leave the RBZ will
be like
spiting one's nose for Mugabe. Tomana is easily dispensable and
something of
a nuisance really. Mugabe will make a concession with the MDC
by sacrificing
Tomana in order to retain Gono.
The MDC will be wise
to accept that compromise at this stage. Their
best bet is to get the legal
reforms aimed at the RBZ through both the
Cabinet and Parliament as soon as
possible so that Gono will not be able to
inflict his usual damage to the
national economy.
With regard to the swearing in of Roy Bennett as
deputy minister of
agriculture, there is likely to be considerable
contestation between the two
parties. It is my strong view that the MDC
cannot afford to compromise on
this issue. The MDC did not dictate to Mugabe
who he should appoint as
ministers and deputy ministers. Why should he be
allowed to refuse to swear
Bennett into office? The issue regarding the
pending court case is for the
judiciary to determine.
For Mugabe to
refuse to swear Bennett into office simply because he
has a pending court
case is, in fact, an attempt to influence the judiciary
albeit in a subtle
way. It is the hope and expectation of every Zimbabwean
that at the end of
the thirty days the MDC and Zanu (PF) will have reached
an amicable
arrangement for the sake of this agonising nation.
http://www.zimonline.co.za
by Own
Correspondent Thursday 12 November 2009
HARARE -
President Robert Mugabe and his ZANU PF party will resist
calls by Prime
Minister Morgan Tsvangirai to fully implement last year's
power-sharing
agreement until at least after the party's congress next
month, a top
official told ZimOnline Wednesday.
The official, a member of ZANU
PF's inner politburo cabinet, said
Mugabe's party was keen not to portray
itself as weakened ahead of the
December congress at which new leaders shall
be elected.
Part of the strategy to show ZANU PF as a party that
remains alive and
strong included resisting all attempts by Tsvangirai's
MDC-T party to have
the global political agreement (GPA) fully implemented,
our source said.
The GPA or power-sharing agreement is the document
that gave birth to
Zimbabwe's coalition government and implementing the
agreement in full would
dilute ZANU PF and Mugabe's hold on
power.
"It will be almost impossible to make any further concession
for us
before the people's conference. That will be political suicide on our
part
as this would appear as if we would have lost ground and made
concessions,"
said the ZANU PF official who spoke on condition he was not
named.
The official said that Mugabe's position will not be
challenged at the
elective congress but the ageing leader was eager not to
appear to his
supporters as if he was bowing to pressure from
Tsvangirai.
He said: "If any concessions are made before the
conference this would
appear as if the party has lost steam . . . besides if
that is to happen
what will Mudhara (the old man or Mugabe) say at the
conference as people
will say he sold out."
ZANU PF spokesman
Nathan Shamuyarira was not immediately available for
comment on the
matter.
But the disclosures by the ZANU PF politburo member
dovetailed with
observations by several political analysts who told
ZimOnline earlier this
week that Mugabe was unlikely to yield to pressure by
MDC-T or by SADC to
speed up implementation of the GPA before his party's
congress because doing
so would undermine his stature before his
followers.
The Southern African Development Community (SADC)'s
organ on politics
and defence last week gave Mugabe, Tsvangirai and Deputy
Prime Minister
Arthur Mutambara 30 days to resolve outstanding issues from
the GPA.
The outstanding issues include Mugabe's refusal to rescind
his
unilateral appointment of two of his top allies to head Zimbabwe's
central
bank and the attorney general's office.
Mugabe has also
refused to swear in Tsvangirai ally Roy Bennett as
deputy agriculture
minister while the MDC-T is also unhappy by what it says
is selective
application of the law to target its activists and officials.
South
African President Jacob Zuma who has taken over from his
predecessor Thabo
Mbeki as facilitator in the Zimbabwe dialogue is expected
in Harare in about
two weeks according to other sources to try to pressure
Mugabe and his
coalition partners to quicken implementation of the GPA.
But
analysts said Mugabe was likely to only make token concessions
because of
the impending ZANU PF congress.
The politburo last August urged
Mugabe not to make any further
concessions to the MDC insisting that ZANU PF
had met all its obligations
under the GPA and that it was Tsvangirai's party
which had not fulfilled a
promise to campaigning for lifting of Western
sanctions imposed on Mugabe
and his top allies. - ZimOnline
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written by Staff
reporter
Wednesday, 11 November 2009 15:59
HARARE - War
veterans occupying former-Forester Estates in Mvurwi have
lambasted
President Robert Mugabe and his Zanu (PF) party for using the
controversial
land reform programme as a political campaign tool.
The war veterans,
who spoke to ***The Zimbabwean, said Mugabe had
treated the land reform
programme as a purely political issue that has
destroyed the economy instead
of taking the land reform as an economic
empowerment and a developmental
programmeme.
"I think Mugabe got it all wrong by politicizing this
ill-advised land
reform programme. When we came on this farm in 2000 I
thought that there was
a clear land policy in respect of the new farmers,
our leaders just
spearheaded the invasions without any future plans laid
down and that is why
this whole process has failed.
"President
Mugabe chose to trade this land with votes to the
unsuspecting masses under
the disguise of empowering them while he knew it
was to his personal benefit
and a few other party officials.
"Had this land programme been done
with a genuine concern, it could
have been a real success because it could
have attracted support from the
international community," said a
Mvurwi-based war veteran identified as Kufa
Kuda.
Zanu (PF)'s poor
planning
Another angry war veteran at the same farm attributed the
economic and
humanitarian crisis that has characterized Zimbabwe for the
past decade to
poor planning on the part of the Zanu (PF)
government.
"We have had a situation where our government and cabinet
were
occupied by economic and political criminals. Innocent civilians
suffered
the most from the effects of a corrupt and unjust system being led
by
ruthless and selfish leaders.
"Had the government managed to pay
us reasonable rates on our produce
over the years we have been on this land,
most of us could now be
self-sustained and producing enough for this
nation.
"I have often wondered how this US$300 million that this
country is
said to be owing China was acquired and how it was used as well,
if the
state still fails to pay farmers for their maize," said another newly
resettled war-veteran.
Other resettled farmers near Mvurwi also
castigated Zanu (PF) for the
continued victimization of MDC supporters in
newly resettled areas where
they are being ordered to vacate the farms
because of their patronage to
MDC.
The former Zanu (PF) government
led by Mugabe has been widely
criticized for corruption and politicizing
developmental programmes
alongside human rights abuses and lack of the rule
of law.
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=24881
November 12, 2009
By Owen
Chikari
MASVINGO - At least 500 people were left homeless in Masvingo
Wednesday
after they were evicted from farms owned by black
farmers.
They invaded the farms nine years ago.
Hordes of
villagers besieged the Masvingo magistrate courts to make court
applications
following the evictions from their settlements by the messenger
of
court.
The villagers are accused of invading farms owned by black
Zimbabweans which
had not been gazetted for resettlement by the
government.
The homeless villagers, some as old as 90, could be seen with
their
belongings by the roadside along the Masvingo-Mutare highway. They
have been
evicted at the beginning of Zimbabwe's rainy season.
Most
of the displaced so-called new farmers were evicted from Peinhest Farm
which, according to records, was owned by the late former Speaker of the
House of Assembly, Nolan Makombe.
Others said they were evicted from
farms owned by the Minister of Defence,
Emmerson Mnangagwa and the late
commander of the Zimbabwe National Army,
General Vitalis
Zvinavashe.
However, the claim by the villagers that they had been
evicted from farms
belonging to Mnangagwa and Zvinavashe could not be
independently verified by
The Zimbabwe Times.
Mnangagwa and
Zvinavashe owned adjacent farms in the Masvingo East
commercial farming
area.
The villagers argued that they were legally settled on the
properties by war
veterans at the height of the farm invasions in 2000 and
have been in
occupation for the past nine years.
"I was given the
land by the war veterans and I have been staying on this
property since
2000," said Patrick Chiwa.
"I do not know why we have suddenly become
squatters, having stayed here for
nine years without any problem.
"We
are calling on President Robert Mugabe to intervene because I think we
are
just being victimised by some politicians."
Masvingo provincial
administrator Felix Chikovo on Wednesday confirmed that
all those who had
been evicted had occupied black-owned farms despite being
issued with
eviction notices long back.
"The affected people you are talking about
invaded black-owned properties
and as you know the land reform programme was
initiated to empower blacks,"
said Chikovo.
"The owners of those
invaded properties initiated their eviction and as
government we just have
to look for alternative land to resettle them.
"Whether those evicted had
invaded a minister's farm, it does not matter;
the fact of the matter is
that the government has ordered those occupying
black-owned farms to move
out."
It is understood court officials at Masvingo Magistrates Court were
forced
to give the affected people temporary warrants to remain on the
properties
until the eviction cases were finalised by the courts.
"We
were ordered to give the affected families some warrants for them to
stay
put on the farms until their cases have been heard in court," said a
court
official who requested anonymity.
"This was just done on humanitarian
grounds since the affected people had
nowhere to stay following their
eviction."
The villagers have been evicted at the peak of the summer
cropping season,
with most farmers already busy planting their
crops.
Mugabe's government evicted nearly all the 4000 white commercial
farmers
under a controversial land acquisition programme he says was
designed to
redress the country's historical land imbalances.
Since
2000, Zimbabwe had to rely on imports to meet its food requirements.
The
decline in food production was blamed on the controversial and sometimes
violent land reform programme which saw the original white commercial
farmers removed from the farms.
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=24894
November 12, 2009
By
Tagwirei W. Bango
ANY chief executive dreads the day when immediate
subordinates and staff
turn into a gadfly, especially with the tacit
direction and blessing of the
board. When internally generated executive
abuse becomes visible to
shareholders, striking at the heart of patience and
motivation, it is folly
for a model principal to remain silent in the
forlorn hope that tomorrow
shall sort itself out.
The essence of a
legitimate and a successful national election is either a
confirmation of
the status quo or outright regime change. Even, in a
traditional African
setting, leadership succession in royal families is a
given, positive step
for communal and national stability.
When Zimbabweans settled for Morgan
Tsvangirai as their first choice for
leadership in the initial plebiscite
whose results were clearly and
deliberately distorted by the incumbent and
his institutions last year, the
people openly rejected the dominant
political fiasco - for regime change.
Tsvangirai has since been vindicated:
his short record and copious patience
in a clearly loveless union has
spawned a temporary stabilizer; national
temperance; and optimism, at home
and even beyond.
For close to 270 days, Tsvangirai - the man who won
Zimbabwe's presidential
election on March 29, 2008 - has endured so much
executive abuse that many
thought he would throw in the towel within hours
of his being sworn-in as
the Prime Minister of the Republic of Zimbabwe.
Cracks emerged early, hardly
before the ink had dried up after the curiously
called Global Political
Agreement was signed.
Neither the abduction
and torture of activist Jestina Mukoko and several
Tsvangirai agents nor the
confusion at his swearing in ceremony at State
House and the first arrest of
Roy Bennett achieved an expected effect. The
slow recognition of
Tsvangirai's new official role by security service
chiefs attracted
mealy-mouthed attention and no sanction from expected
quarters when
convention and the Constitution are normally unkind to such
foul public
manners.
Commander-in-chief Robert Mugabe, who presided over the
ceremony, seemed
unable to notice the absence of his top military brass. To
Zimbabweans that
meant little compared to a record-breaking climb-down and a
rare act of
capitulation by one of Africa's remaining strongmen and a former
liberation
war idol. The people urged Tsvangirai on; reflecting a national
sentiment
that irked a trembling few.
Since then, Tsvangirai's abuse
has never ceased.
Given the depth of the meltdown, perhaps Tsvangirai
erred in assuming
unfettered political goodwill and an affirmative
institutional hug to see
through a process that mirrored the changing
milieu.
But eight months into a union, he remains officially homeless
together with
Speaker Lovemore Moyo and all his out-of- Harare ministers and
officials.
Suggestions for executive appointments in his office have to be
vetted and
approved; and so far only four out of the proposed 11 have
passed.
We are told, ad nauseum, and even by Mugabe himself that
Tsvangirai runs a
parallel state administration with only four civil
servants officially
accepted into his office thus far, in a country that
employs more than a
quarter of a million public servants.
Mugabe
insists he must first clear Tsvangirai's travel plans. But Mugabe
never
returns the favour, nor consults him on his numerous foreign forays.
Mugabe
determines the weekly Cabinet agenda, as all requests for public
debate;
policy clarity and national issues for inspection have to pass
through the
President's office.
Unilateral Zanu-PF decisions; sweeping policy shifts,
positions and
statements; dubious state-sanctioned actions and arrests of
political
activists; and partisan directives are often dumped on
Tsvangirai's desk
devoid of courtesy or prior
consultation.
Government institutions are forced to mask a unique Zanu-PF
concern; symbols
of change are either downplayed or simply put off; routine
state business is
either privatized or coated with Zanu PF paint; board and
staff appointments
at public companies are re-furrowed to an old boys'
network; and policy
generation and execution is still largely an exclusive
Zanu-PF affair.
A traditional Zanu-PF bureaucracy still rules the roost,
even though a
ministerial portfolio may officially be under an MDC
politician. Even at
local government level, all the top executives are
either Zanu-PF activists
or they sympathise with that party. They determine
the agenda for action and
implement decisions at a pace and under the strict
direction of Minister
Ignatious Chombo and Zanu-PF because of deliberate
legislative distortions.
Hate speech, propaganda frames and blame abound
- all directed at
Tsvangirai - and, specifically to show all that nothing of
significance in
the area of governance has changed. Despite his commitment
to work, a
deceptive, over-boiled line that kept Zanu-PF together about
Tsvangirai's
past is often beamed and repeated, to thread a restless and
confused Zanu-PF
constituency together.
New poisoned arrows point at
his legitimacy and credibility daily, ready to
wreak havoc on his executive
authority.
The Council of Ministers (CoM) and the National Security
Council (NSC) are
the only two significant power centres and institutions
set up under the
GPA. Tsvangirai is supposed to chair the CoM and (on paper)
is an
indispensable player in the NSC. I shall leave discussion on the two
to
another date; suffice it to say the old Joint Operations Command (JOC) is
still very much alive.
The CoM has yet to cut its teeth into the
political fray. The other
important institution is JOMIC. With all due
respect, it is pointless to
bring this body into this
debate.
Tsvangirai faces an enormous character test to survive the
vicious temper of
a raging current as he swims against a well-honed and
tested dose of
political wickedness, insincerity and executive
abuse.
Zimbabwe is in danger as the terrain the country's Prime Minister
is up
against presents a fresh, irregular dilemma at every turn.
When
a spouse packs a few bags and leaves a matrimonial home, the decision
hardly
resides in a latest abusive event. Experienced conflict managers
search
deeper for telling words beneath the song before fostering counsel.
Tsvangirai maintains that he is still in the matrimonial home. He only came
out of the closet to allow Zimbabweans and their neighbours access into a
troubled home.
Tsvangirai's most vocal, public critics should know
better: almost all of
them have performed dismally in their private, once
voluntary marriages.
They know from armpit experience the difficulties of
voluntary marriages,
let alone those of forced loveless unions.
As a
genuine partner, Tsvangirai needs space, sovereignty and sense of
inclusion
to remain true to his executive mandate. Zanu-PF and Mugabe are
unable to
explain Zimbabwe today to their traditional supporters. Still
trapped in the
nostalgic view that they are still solely in power, the fear
of regime
change has become their belated war cry.
When Mugabe dined with "tea-boy"
Tsvangirai in 2008, he realised late that
he had swallowed his own bile by
surrendering 28 years of unrestrained
political supremacy. That day is
historic in that Mugabe fully accepted an
irreversible process towards
regime change.
The GPA clearly identifies the political players in charge
of the present
caretaker regime in Zimbabwe. In the national interest, the
inclusive
government shall facilitate a new Constitution, dispute-less
election and a
definite change of regime: a legitimate government from a
visionary party.
Today's horse and donkey blend has given us a mule - a
mule cannot reproduce
itself. Tsvangirai can't change and replace a regime
he leads. Mugabe can't
change or replace a regime he is part of as President
by negotiation. And
either will have to give way in a few moons time - for
regime change!
Slowly and frustratingly, but surely, change is coming to
Zimbabwe.
(Tagwirei W. Bango was spokesman to Morgan Tsvangirai before he
became Prime
Minister.)
http://www.zimonline.co.za
by Patricia Mpofu
Thursday 12 November 2009
HARARE - Zimbabwe Congress of Trade
Unions (ZCTU) president Lovemore Matombo
and four other unionists spent the
fourth day in jail on Wednesday after
police successfully applied to court
for permission to keep the unionists in
detention pending
trial.
Matombo, Michael Kandukutu, Percy Mncijo, Dumisani Ncube and Nhawu
Ndlovu
were last Sunday arrested in Victoria Falls while addressing members
of the
labour union for allegedly convening a public meeting without
clearance from
the police.
They were detained overnight at Victoria
Falls police station before being
transferred to Hwange where they have been
kept since then.
ZCTU spokesperson Khumbulani Ndlovu said yesterday that
the union's lawyers,
working with the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights were
preparing a High
Court application for the release of the five
unionists.
"Police have applied for further remand," said Ndlovu. "So our
lawyers are
making an urgent application for their release," she
said.
The government's draconian Public Order and Security Act (POSA)
requires
Zimbabweans to notify police first before holding public meetings
and
demonstrations. However professional and other special interest groups
such
as the ZCTU are not required to notify police of meetings to discuss
issues
specific to their work or field.
Human rights groups accuse
the police of using the POSA willy-nilly to bar
meetings of any group
perceived as unsympathetic to President Robert Mugabe
and his ZANU PF
party.
On Monday the African Regional Organisation of the International
Trade Union
Confederation (ITUC-Africa) wrote to Mugabe demanding the
immediate release
of the trade union leaders who were arrested on a tour of
the country
meeting ZCTU structures.
The arrest of the ZCTU officials
comes barely two weeks after police
arrested two top members of the national
association of non-governmental
organisations also in Victoria Falls where
they were attending a meeting of
directors of NGOs working in the
country.
Last year, Matombo was arrested and detained together with
several human
rights activists after organising a mass action against the
Reserve Bank of
Zimbabwe's unpopular cash withdrawal limits. - ZimOnline
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written by
Stanley Chikomba
Tuesday, 10 November 2009 17:44
'We should
never lose sight of the seriousness with which Michael
Mugabe takes his
relationship with the president - Mafukidze'
HARARE - He is a short,
slightly built, dark in complexion and walks
with a limp. Many human rights
lawyers, activists and MDC politicians and
activists know him as the state's
conduit of legal repression.
He is Michael Mugabe, the son of
President Robert Mugabe's late
brother Donato.
Michael has
personified state repression by taking a lead in
prosecuting human and
political rights activists, usually on blatantly
trumped up
charges.
His long list of victims includes prominent human rights
activists
such as Jestina Mukoko, Alec Muchadehama, Tendai Biti, Roy
Bennett, Mordekai
Mahlangu, Beatrice Mtetwa, journalists Vincent Kahiya,
Constantine Chimakure
and even the Prime Minister Morgan
Tsvangirai.
Most of the cases against the above mentioned individuals
have
something to do with Robert Mugabe.
The wisdom of previous
Chief Justice Gubbay eloquently explains how a
prosecutor should conduct
himself.
"Like Caesar's wife, the prosecutor must be above any trace of
suspicion," said Gubbay while passing a ruling some years ago.
It
is such wisdom that leaves the mind boggling as to why and how
Mugabe is
always thrown into the fray whenever cases to do with the
president are
brought to court.
His deployment is never a mere coincidence.
Allocation of sensitive
cases is a matter of serious consideration in the
Attorney General's Office.
Like Michael, the AG, Johannes Tomana, has
publicly announced his
political affiliation, notwithstanding that he is
required to discharge the
functions of his office in the public interest,
without fear or favour.
At the time of the announcement his political
affiliation, Zanu (PF)
was the ruling party.
Considering the
political shenanigans that has surrounded the
abduction, detention, torture
and ill-treatment of the accused persons by
faceless state agents, it is
highly unlikely that anyone will get a fair
trial.
Lawyer Tererai
Mafukidze believes no accused person can get a fair
trial in a case
involving Mugabe if it is prosecuted by Michael.
"We should never lose
sight of the seriousness with which Michael
Mugabe takes his relationship
with the president," said Mafukidze.
Early this year, media and human
rights lawyer, Harrison Nkomo, who
represented Jestina Mukoko and Roy
Bennett was arrested and charged with
"insulting the president" after
Michael Mugabe laid a complaint against the
lawyer with the police. Michael
alleged that Nkomo had asked him to inform
his "father" of the citizens'
desire that he retires from office.
"As a representative of the
Attorney General (the public officer
constitutionally charged with
prosecuting criminal offences) Michael is
required to be independent of any
political or other influence in making
decisions relating to the prosecution
of the accused persons," said
Mafukidze.
Michael has often invoked
section 121 of the Criminal Procedures and
Evidence Act as a way of
prolonging and punishing any of his "father's"
perceived enemies.
He was, however, cut down to size last month by High Court Judge,
Charles
Hungwe, who gave him a tongue lashing telling him not to make a fool
of
himself by abusing the law.
Source: The
Zimbabwean Date: 11 Nov 2009 BULAWAYO - Farm workers have abandoned work fearing arrest and prosecution
for continuing to till the land at white-owned farms being targeted by Zanu (PF)
officials and sympathisers. A report by the Commercial Framers Union (CFU) said that thousands of farm
workers had become targets of Zanu (PF) officials, in a bid to intimidate them
from continuing to work at the last remaining white owned commercial farms. "Farm employees are under constant threat and, when the farmer is not
present, the attorney general's office (AG's) frequently targets the employees.
A significant number have been prosecuted and even imprisoned, resulting in
their being unable to produce desperately needed food for a food-insecure nation
heavily dependent for the last decade on food aid," Deon Theron, the CFU
president wrote in a report detaining the continued disturbances on white-owned
farms. Farm grabs by Zanu (PF) officials and army officers continue despite the
formation of a unity government that has called for a stop to farm disturbances.
A SADC tribunal outlawing the land grabs has largely been ignored. According to Theron, the current increased onslaught against CFU members and
employees will have a huge catastrophic effect on "the ability of the nation to
feed itself in the 2009/2010 season." About 150 white commercial farmers face
prosecution for contesting moves to grab their farms. The chaotic land reform
which began in 2000 is blamed for the yearly food shortages, a charge that
President Robert Mugabe denies.
Written by Natasha
Hove
Source: AllAfrica Global Media Date: 03 Nov 2009 Harare — In recent years Zimbabweans have faced severe food shortages
and staggering hyperinflation. As a result, residents in the capital, Harare,
have increasingly turned to urban gardening. They grow produce just about
anywhere they can – in backyards, vacant lots, on roadsides and on rooftops.
Urban gardens covered eight percent of land in Harare in 1990, according to
the U.N. Development Programme (UNDP). Coverage had doubled four years later,
and by 2001 people were growing crops on 25 percent of the city's land area,
says UNDP. Micro-gardens not only contribute to a household's food needs, but often any
surplus can be sold in exchange for protein. Those with access to outer city
plots often supply grocery stores and restaurants with produce because their
transport costs are less compared to rural farmers. Misheck Dondo has been farming in his backyard since he lost his job five
years ago. He started a small garden with basics that included tomatoes and
onions. These vegetables did not require a big capital investment and produced a
surplus that he could sell to pay for his children's school fees. Over the
school holidays his children help him in the garden. Today, Dondo's backyard garden is full of vegetables, grains, chickens and
rabbits. "I have no farming experience but you would never know, I make so much
money," he says. After being diagnosed with diabetes, Mambo decided she would eat healthy.
Unfortunately, this was beyond her means. With Zimbabwe importing most of its
food from neighboring countries, a healthy diet comes at a high cost. Determined
to watch her health, Mambo began to plant vegetables such as lettuce, beetroot
and leeks in a vacant lot near her home. Soon her effort for a healthy lifestyle
turned into a business as she sold her excess produce to restaurants and
friends. "I am not a part of any farmer schemes," Mambo says. "The farmers are too
experienced - how can I compete?" However, Mambo managed to make enough from her
garden to quit her real estate job six months ago. Now she devotes her time to
finding vacant land and farming vegetables. She makes U.S.$500 to $600 a month -
far greater than the average monthly government salary of $150 and more than she
was making in real estate. Gardening has enabled her to enroll her two children
in private school, which is typically beyond the means of most Zimbabweans. "My problem is when the electricity goes I cannot get water from the
borehole," she says. "At least my workers are very dedicated they go and find
water."
Mitchelle Ajida
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written by Editor
Wednesday, 11
November 2009 07:57
We carry two pictures this week of Pasco Gwezere,
the abducted MDC
transport manager, who was brought to court on Saturday for
remand.
It was evident that he had been severely tortured after
being
kidnapped by the CIO. The magistrate ordered that he receive urgent
medical
attention, which had been denied him for several days.
We
are shocked and appalled that a registered medical practitioner, a
Dr
Dhobhi, who is in charge of the clinic at the Harare Remand Prison, has
refused to treat Gwezere.
For a doctor, who took the Hippocratic
Oath to save lives and relieve
suffering, to behave so callously, is
horrifying in the extreme.
We understand that Dhobhi has, since 2007,
been part of the cabal of
prison officers who have been denying tortured
prisoners access to media
attention. His name was mentioned in 2007 when he
was responsible for
ordering the removal from the Avenues Clinic in Harare
back into prison of
several MDC officials and a photo-journalist who had
been badly tortured.
We concur with the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human
Rights publication, The
Monitor, which expresses concern at the continued
complicity of state
doctors in "torture, cruel and other inhumane and
degrading treatment or
punishment of accused persons".
This matter
should be referred to the Zimbabwe Medical Association for
their urgent
attention. So-called doctors, who have chosen to behave like
thugs -
inflicting pain and suffering rather working to relieve it - should
surely
be struck off the Medical Register.
Gwezere's defence lawyer, Alec
Muchadehama, with the consent of the
prosecutor, appealed to the presiding
magistrate to order prison officials
to allow private medical practitioners
to attend to him. His left leg was
becoming septic, he could hardly walk,
his face was swollen and he was
evidently in severe pain.
Despite
all this, and the fact that it is un-procedural, the prison
officials deemed
it necessary for him to appear in court in leg irons and
hand
cuffs.
Furthermore, we feel that the international community should
show its
abhorrence at Dhobhi's behaviour by adding his name to the list of
individuals against whom targeted measures are applied.
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written by ZWANAI SITHOLE
Wednesday, 11 November 2009 16:24
HARARE - Parents whose children are
sitting for "A" and "O" level
examinations in Zimbabwe are spending a
fortune on extra lessons for their
children as the country's education
standards continue to plunge to mediocre
levels.
Most parents in
the country have resorted to hiring private teachers
to supplement the
student's lessons which have been interrupted by incessant
teachers' strikes
and the shortage of teaching staff and textbooks in
schools. The situation
was particularly bad last term when students only
attended lessons for a
month due to a crippling strike called by ZIMTA
demanding better working
conditions and higher salaries.
Parents who spoke to the ***The
Zimbabwean this week said they had
lost faith in the quality of education
which their children were getting
from formal schools. "I pay US$5 per day
for extra lessons for my form six
son. Last term the boy did not learn
anything as the teachers were on strike
and some left for greener pastures
in South Africa. What is more disturbing
and painful to us parents is that
the schools keeps on asking top up fees
while our children are not learning
anything in schools," said a parent,
Tendai Moyo.
Another parent,
George Makaka, called on the government to urgently
address the current
crisis in the education sector. "I have two children
writing national
examinations this term. I am paying close to US$50 per
month for extra
lessons alone and on top of that I need to pay for their
school fees. This
is a heavy burden for us parents especially when we
consider that times are
hard,' said Makaka. Some teachers are reported to
have left the profession
this term to concentrate on offering extra lessons
to children.
"I
get more money by conducting private lessons than being a full time
teacher
employed by the government. When I was employed my salary was US$150
but now
I generate that amount in a day's work. The money is also not taxed,'
said
teacher, Never Moyo.
http://www.zimonline.co.za
by Simplicious
Chirinda Thursday 12 November 2009
HARARE - A special
parliamentary committee leading Zimbabwe's constitutional
reform process
said on Tuesday it will next week start sending out teams
countrywide to
consult citizens on the proposed new constitution.
One of the committee's
chairmen, Douglas Mwonzora, told ZimOnline that
outreach teams to gather
people's views and ideas they want included in the
new constitution will be
deployed next week.
"The deployment is starting next week and we are
finalising on the numbers
at the meeting we are going to have this week,"
said Mwonzora. "We just want
to rationalise the number of outreach
teams."
The committee's work had over the past two months stalled due to
a lack of
funds but the government is understood to have released US$3, 5
million to
be used to kick-start the outreach programmes.
In addition
to funding shortages, sharp differences have also emerged
between the
political parties over the writing of the new constitution that
threaten to
derail the reform process.
President Robert Mugabe's ZANU PF party has
said any new constitution should
be based on a draft constitution secretly
authored by the thre main
political parties on Lake Kariba and known as the
Kariba Draft.
However, civic organisations and the MDC parties are
opposed to it, saying
the document leaves largely untouched the
wide-sweeping powers that Mugabe
continues to enjoy even after formation of
a power-sharing government with
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and Deputy
Premier Arthur Mutambara.
Under last year's power-sharing deal the
country is supposed to have a new
constitution in the next two years to pave
way for new elections.
The draft constitution will be put before the
electorate in a referendum
expected in July next year and if approved by
Zimbabweans will then be
brought before Parliament for
enactment.
Once a new constitution is in place, the power-sharing
government is
expected to call fresh parliamentary, presidential and local
government
elections.
Zimbabweans hope a new constitution will
guarantee basic freedoms,
strengthen Parliament and limit the President's
immense powers. - ZimOnline
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written by The
Zimbabwean
Wednesday, 11 November 2009 17:51
Another day in
the Matabeleland North Provincial Capital, Lupane, has
just taught me that
"freedom" is just as much an overstated word as "Love".
How often do we hear
people abuse the word love or the phrase "I love you"
forselfish gain? Today
I learnt that being free does not necessarily mean
that one is outside
prison. In as much as our parents and grand parents
didn't feel free during
the colonial era and yet they of course were not all
locked up in prison
cells. It reminds me of one of the late legend Lucky
Dube's songs: "Born
free but always in chains" and well known local
playwright Raisdon Baya's
work of theatrical art called: "Everyday
Prisoners". Just like some mental
experts
will tell you we are all abnormal in our small little way, we
are also
prisoners in one form or another. Youths in Lupane and all over
Zimbabwe are
prisoners of a destiny that only a new constitution can
reshape.
Presenting on a topic called "Youths and the Systems of
Governance in
the New Constitution", Lupane based civic activist David
Nyathi painted a
sad but real picture of the typical young person one will
encounter in
Lupane. He said, apart from the young person that has left
Lupane for other
towns and cities, countries or continents to seek a better
life, "The
average young person you will meet in Lupane today represents one
of the
saddest you will meet anywhere else in Zimbabwe. She/He is a young
person
who is lucky to have reached and completed their O'levels, they are
even
luckier if they make it to A' level".
"She/He is unskilled and
unemployed, she/he is of no fixed aboard and
depends on donor assistance for
food and clothing. She/He is victim to all
kinds of inexplicable illnesses
and has little or no access to treatment.
She/He cannot openly or proudly
tell you where or how she/he gets the little
money she/he spends daily.
She/He is an orphan taking care of little
brothers and sisters. She/He owns
no birth certificate or identity document.
She/He will marry and have
children by age 17 and be too much of a drinker
by age 15 with less
opportunities and very little hope for the future."
What makes Nyathi's
account even sadder is the fact that Lupane is a
province rich in timber and
under going immense growth through the
construction of a dam, university and
a brand new government complex.
Local timber of no benefit
However, all these positives are hardly benefiting the locals of
Lupane let
alone its young people. For starters, the timber that is grown in
Lupane is
harvested by outside companies who hire outside labour to harvest
and
process it outside of Lupane. When the timber is turned into furniture
Lupane locals have benefited nothing from it and cannot even afford to
buy
the furniture that it produces. The same tale is told of the
construction of the dam, university and government complexes. The
construction companies involved are from nowhere
near Lupane, the
labourers are not from Lupane and cannot even
communicate well with the
Lupane locals. The programmes that have started
enrolling students to Lupane
State University are based in Bulawayo making
it difficult for Lupane locals
to presently benefit from the institution's
courses.
What then can
be said about the local leadership that has sat back and
watched this bias
takes place unabated? According to local councillor, Kane
Kine Mpofu, their
efforts have been thwarted by centralization of
government.
Lack of
youth action lamented
"We cannot do this alone. Just last week I
personally arrested some
criminals at the dam site and handed them over the
police. If young people
like you do not help us to bring about the change
then our efforts are
futile. We need to change the way our government
operates and that can only
take place through a new people driven
constitution and that can only come
about if you participate fully. We
need to call for the devolution of
power so that all our leaders can be
accountable to us not to central
government," said Mpofu. Mpofu is one of
the youngest councillors in the
Kusile district rural council, and he
laments the lack of youth action in
Lupane despite the existence of over
three youth civic society organizations
in the area. "We long for a vibrant
youth movement that will speak on our
behalf and represent us like NYDT has
been doing for the last six or so
months. We need our own youth council like
the Bulawayo youth council. Maybe
we can call in the Kusile rural youth
council." added a young person from
the gallery. Consequently, the
parliamentary select committee will visit
places like Lupane soon to discuss
what their wishes are for the new
constitution. Lupane youths have said they
want devolution of power so that
they can control their own resources and
determine the pace of their town's
development. Honestly, what can be said
of a major timber production town
that has more bottle stores than shops and
not even one furniture shop or
that many carpentry workshops for that
matter?
Someone up there just does not care, and it is time for young
people
to make sure that they take part in this constitution making process
which
will force leaders to care and be accountable to their constituents.
Let us
change the meaning of being "born free" now, once and for all
generations to
come. - NYDT
Whenever the crisis in Zimbabwe looks to
be in danger of collapsing the
fragile unity government, the principals call
on SADC - who invite them all
to a conference!
Life for one Robert
Gabriel Mugabe must be quite easy because he can cause
whatever pandemonium
he wants with garish acts, raids and other dubious
activities and when
someone doesn't like it, the answer is to go somewhere
and talk about
it.
They say that talk is cheap - but in this case it is exceedingly
costly.
Costly insofar as lifestyles in Zimbabwe are concerned. Costly
insofar as
the deteriorating standards of life in Zimbabwe are
concerned.
And costly insofar as hosting the various negotiators,
mediators and other
interested personages in a foreign country are
concerned.
Look at what Mugabe has achieved for more than a year of
talking.
He has not done anything for the people of Zimbabwe, has not
stood by the
signed agreements he has with the two factions of the MDC (even
though he
says he has) and somehow, even though he lost the election in
March 2008,
his party continue to run (ruin?) Zimbabwe.
He is happy
that his party do the 'acceptable minimum' to keep the perceived
wolf at bay
- and for some reason SADC are happy that his 'efforts' reflect
his
'commitment' to the power-sharing government.
I do realise that nine
times out of ten, talking, discussing, negotiating -
call it what you will -
has a place in resolving issues and making plans to
sort things out - i.e.
time frames - but when was SADC, the AU, the UN and
the free world going to
realise that nothing that Mugabe says or signs means
anything more than a
delay?
A delay in the achievement of democracy in Zimbabwe. A delay in
the coming
storm that Mugabe and his senior apologists will have to ride if
they want
to remain outside of a prison cell.
I have said it so many
times in the recent past - each day that Mugabe
remains in power is victory
for him - because it is another 24 hours that he
has withstood the wishes of
the people, another 24 hours that he has stood
on his own pathetic
principles - and he remains standing.
I often ask why it is that the free
world allows Mugabe to get away with
murder - and let's face it - what
Mugabe is doing to the Zimbabwean people
is resulting in deaths, deaths that
he could have avoided.
Is the free world afraid that Mugabe might shout
at them? He does that
whether the free world says anything or not, so that
excuse falls way short
of the mark.
Is the free world afraid that
Mugabe may insinuate that the resistance to
his continued rule in Zimbabwe
might be racially based? He will play the
race card as often as he wants and
has played it very liberally in the past.
Is the free world afraid of
what they may find in the event that Mugabe is
forced from the top job in
Zimbabwe (by democratic means)? We are already
beginning to see the
destruction that his rule has wrought.
The Auditor General has already
given us facts of corruption within just one
governmental department - much
more of this must be just waiting to be
found.
Mugabe protects the
governor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe who helped
himself to foreign
currency held in accounts held at the central bank.
Mugabe claims that Gono
is 'no thief', but the majority of that money
remains unaccounted
for.
Is this not theft? Is there anything new in this in
Zimbabwe?
But the international bodies refuse to stand up and say,
"Enough!"
"Enough of the talking, the excuses, the delays, the deception
and the
duplicity!"
Well, in the forlorn hope that someone with a
backbone and the power to
stand up against Mugabe may hear me, I say,
"Enough of the talking already!"
Robb WJ Ellis
The Bearded
Man
http://mandebvhu.instablogs.com/entry/enough-of-the-talking-already