http://www.apanews.net
APA-Harare (Zimbabwe)
Zimbabwe's main political parties have failed to meet
for talks to resolve
the country's power-sharing dispute amid revelations
that some of the
negotiators had snubbed the negotiations and travelled
abroad, APA learns
here Saturday.
The delay in convening a meeting of negotiators from ZANU
PF of President
Robert Mugabe and the rival factions of the former
opposition Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) saw the negotiators missing
Saturday's deadline set
by the Southern African Development Community (SADC)
by which they should
have agreed on outstanding issues from last year's
power-sharing agreement.
A spokesman for the main MDC wing led by Prime
Minister Morgan Tsvangirai
said negotiators from a breakaway MDC faction had
decided to travel on
government business at a time the talks were supposed
to have commenced this
week.
"The deadline set by the SADC troika for
the resolution of outstanding
issues has once again been missed because of
the intransigence, mischief and
insincerity exhibited by the political
players who are not taking the plight
of the people of Zimbabwe seriously,"
the spokesman said.
He said officials from the rebel MDC faction led by
Deputy Prime Minister
Arthur Mutambara were absent from the meeting of
negotiators convened by
Tsvangirai on Monday to deliberate on the sticking
matters.
The SADC security Troika led by Mozambican President Armando
Guebuza last
month gave Zimbabwe's feuding parties 30 days within which to
fully
implement terms of a power-sharing pact signed in September
2008.
An emergency summit of the Troika held in Maputo on October 29 gave
the
Zimbabwean parties 15 days to agree on outstanding issues from the
Global
Political Agreement, after which they should implement the agreed
matters
within the following 15 days.
South African President Jacob
Zuma is supposed to jet into Harare next week
to assess progress in the
negotiations which were called to save Zimbabwe's
coalition government after
Tsvangirai threatened to withdraw from the regime
last month.
JN/jk/APA 2009-11-21
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=25277
November 21, 2009
By Raymond
Maingire
HARARE - Zimbabwe's crisis talks failed to take off as planned
on Friday as
parties traded accusations for their continued failure to
convene.
The mainstream MDC led by Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai
blamed Zanu-PF
and negotiators from the smaller MDC in particular for
delaying the start of
the crucial talks.
"The MDC is extremely
concerned at the dragging of feet by Zanu-PF and
Professor Mutambara's party
in resolving the outstanding issues as advised
by the guarantors," the MDC
said Friday in a statement posted in its
official website.
"The
deadline set by the SADC troika for the resolution of outstanding
issues has
once again been missed because of the intransigence, mischief and
insincerity exhibited by the political players who are not taking the plight
of the people of Zimbabwe seriously."
The MDC, the most aggrieved
party among the parties in the inclusive
government, claimed "the body
language" from both Zanu-PF and the
Mutambara-led political outfit did not
show sincerity and faithfulness to
resolve the outstanding
issues.
"The unelected negotiators from the Mutambara-led political
formation, who
by some chance have found themselves in government, are
stalling the
resolution of Zimbabwe's political crisis," said the
MDC.
"While the negotiators of the major political parties met on Monday
at 10am
to deliberate on the sticking matters, the negotiators from
Mutambara's
grouping failed to turn up.
"Professor Welshman Ncube and
Hon Priscillah Misihairabwi Mushonga have
chosen to prioritise flying to
world capitals at the expense of resolving
critical issues that will deliver
real change to the people of Zimbabwe.
"The MDC expects urgent resolution
of issues that have stalled the work of
the inclusive government.
"We
expect that all parties, especially those that have chosen to ignore the
important time-frames, targets and deadlines set by SADC, should urgently
meet and clear the deck of the outstanding issues that have poisoned the
people's collective journey of hope spawned by the formation of the
inclusive government in February 2009."
The claims by the MDC were
dismissed by the Mutambara-led party which said
its negotiators were ready
to start the talks on Thursday.
Industry and Commerce Minister Welshman
Ncube, further accused Tsvangirai's
MDC of "grandstanding" by claiming SADC
had given the parties a deadline.
He said he had made enquiries on when
to meet but was informed by Justice
Minister Patrick Chinamasa that there
were "some" negotiators who said they
would not be available for the talks
this weekend.
Ncube, secretary general of the smaller MDC, blamed the
other parties for
alleged failure to commit themselves to the
talks.
"People are there but they are saying they have other
commitments," said
Ncube. "I
do not know what their commitments
are."
"We told him (Chinamasa) we are available as from yesterday
(Thursday) and
were ready to convene continuously and he said he was going
to consult the
others.
"He came back to say the others are not
available for Thursday, Friday,
Saturday and Sunday; the earliest they are
available is Monday. I do not
know who in particular was not
available."
Chinamasa, who was chosen by the parties to co-ordinate the
talks, could not
be reached to comment on the delay.
But Ncube, whose
party is not making any direct demands from the others,
sounded sceptical
about prospects of reaching a quick resolution to the
political stalemate
accusing his party's partners of bad faith.
"The problem is that when we
were negotiating we had developed a great deal
of trust and faith," he
said.
"Now because of the behaviour of different players there is very
little
trust now. It would be very difficult to compromise because there has
been a
breakdown of trust."
The talks were expected to start as soon
as the parties returned from a SADC
Troika summit in Maputo early this
month.
During the summit, all political parties signatory to the Global
Political
Agreement were directed to engage in dialogue with immediate
effect within
15 days from the date of the summit and not later than
30.
Following a meeting on Friday last week among President Robert
Mugabe,
Tsvangirai and Mutambara to formulate a strategy on how to
kick-start the
process , the parties resolved to begin their talks this
weekend starting
Friday.
South African President and facilitator in
the talks, Jacob Zuma, is
expected in the country anytime next week to
assess progress.
Zuma, who replaced former South African President Thabo
Mbeki, the chief
broker of Zimbabwe's power-sharing talks, will compile a
report on the
progress of the talks.
He will then forward it to
Mozambican President Armando Guebuza, who chairs
the
Troika.
Tsvangirai on Thursday said the SADC deadline was
flexible.
The MDC is up in arms over President Mugabe's apparent
violation of the
Global Political Agreement which ushered in the coalition
government.
Chief among its grievances is the continued refusal by Mugabe
to reverse the
unilateral appointment of party loyalists Gideon Gono and
Johannes Tomana to
the positions of Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe governor and
Attorney General,
respectively.
The controversial posts include those
of provincial governors, ambassadors
and permanent secretaries. The MDC also
wants Mugabe to unconditionally
swear in its nominee and party national
treasurer Roy Bennett to the vacant
post of deputy minister of
agriculture.
The GPA enjoins the three principals to consult before
appointing persons to
key government posts.
The MDC also wants a stop
in the selective application of the law by
Zanu-PF.
Since the
formation of the coalition government in February this year, a
dozen party
MPs have been arraigned before the courts on charges ranging
from inciting
political violence, abusing agricultural inputs, theft, rape,
electoral
fraud.
The courts have thrown out almost all the cases.
The MDC
wants a stop in hate speech by the state media and the continued
invasion of
productive farms by Zanu PF supporters.
It is also agitated by the slow
progress of reforms such as the freeing of
media space, the constitutional
reform process and the repeal of repressive
legislation.
On the other
hand, President Mugabe has refused to cede more political space
to his
former rivals arguing that the MDC was not following through on its
own part
of the bargain by effectively denouncing the continued existence of
western
imposed sanctions on members of his former administration and
associated
businesses.
http://www.fingaz.co.zw/
Friday, 20 November 2009 13:39
.as Biti acts on
Comptroller and Auditor-General report
Clemence Manyukwe, Senior
Political Reporter
CABINET will soon decide on the course of action to
take against ministers
who looted State assets before the formation of the
inclusive government in
February amid indications that there is convergence
in the thinking of the
three principals in the transitional arrangement to
wield the axe on those
caught on the wrong side of the law.
In
what might pass for the most callous abuse of power in the country's
history, State assets worth several millions of United States dollars were
pillaged closer to the formation of the unity government between ZANU-PF and
the two Movement for Democratic Change formations.
The plunder of
government property and resources was brought to light by the
Comptroller
and Auditor-General, Mildred Chiri, in her report covering the
first quarter
of the current financial term.
Government critics are convinced that the few
cases that were uncovered in
the report could just be the tip of the iceberg
that must be unravelled by a
forensic audit.
Finance Minister, Tendai
Biti, told The Financial Gazette this week that he
will table before his
colleagues in Cabinet the damning report he received
from the Comptroller
and Auditor-General's Office on public accounts.
"I will table the report in
Cabinet. Cabinet will then come up with a
decision on the course of action
to be taken," Biti said.
The minister could not immediately say when he
intends to table the matter
in Cabinet.
The audit report, compiled by
Chiri, and tabled in Parliament last month
lifted the lid on the looting of
State funds and assets among other illegal
activities that were perpetrated
by some government officials before leaving
office.
The report said a
government minister went away with a Toyota Prado despite
the fact that it
was a pool car, which could not be handed out as part of
his exit package,
while another minister and his deputy are said to have
looted a lap top each
from the ministry.
At one of the mentioned ministries, the report said: "The
former cabinet
minister took possession of two motor vehicles which he had
been using
before leaving the ministry; the former deputy minister was
authourised to
purchase the vehicle which he had been using before leaving
the ministry and
the former permanent secretary took possession of four
motor vehicles which
he had been using when he left the ministry."
Chiri,
who conducts three main audits - financial, value for money and
specialised
audits charged that the possession of the said assets by the
government
officials was not authourised.
At another ministry, Chiri said the former
minister, his deputy and
permanent secretary illegally took possession of
three vehicles each
belonging to the government. The report also detailed
the abuse of funds and
fuel.
This could be the first time that action is
taken on officials fingered in
the looting of public assets exposed by the
government's top auditor as
previous cases of corruption captured in the
Comptroller and Auditor-General's
reports have largely been
ignored.
Biti's decision to take the matter up with Cabinet for possible
action
appears to have been influenced by the first Parliamentary report by
the
Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on the state of the Comptroller and
Auditor
General's Office, which described the office as a toothless
bulldog.
The report, which was tabled in the House of Assembly on November 3
by the
PAC chairman, Tapuwa Mashakada, said as part of giving the office
teeth,
there should be amendments of governing legislation to compel the
Finance
Minister to table a remedial plan of action on any corrupt
activities that
would have been brought to light by the
auditor-general.
"The committee feels that if audit reports are to have the
desired impact,
the enabling legislation should place an obligation upon the
treasury and
the accounting officers whose accounts have been qualified to
respond with a
remedial action plan to the Comptroller and
Au-ditor-General's annual
report. The Comptroller and Auditor-General would
then follow up on the
action plan and report on action taken in its next
annual audit," part of
the PAC report said.
The committee also said the
independence of the Comptroller and
Auditor-General was "to some extent
compromised" as the incumbent was
appointed by the President in consultation
with the Public Service
Commission. It recommended that Parliament should be
consulted instead.
http://www.thezimbabwetimes.com/?p=25274
November 21, 2009
By Our
Correspondent
HARARE - A Harare man charged with the theft of firearms
from Pomona Army
Barracks last month has been sentenced to 15 years
imprisonment after
pleading guilty.
Three of his accomplices, who are
members of the Zimbabwe National Army
(ZNA), will be
court-marshalled.
All the weapons that were stolen from the barracks were
recovered. They
include 21 AK 47 rifles and a shotgun.
Police
spokesperson Oliver Mandipaka told the media Friday that the accused,
who
was not immediately identified, had been arrested a week after the theft
of
the arms on October 20 this year.
"We can confirm the arrest of four
suspects in connection with a breaking
that took place at Pomona Barracks
and the subsequent theft of 20 AK 47
rifles, and one shot gun," Mandipaka
said.
While the civilian suspect was convicted in an ordinary court,
Mandipaka
said, the other three soldiers, a serving member and "a deserter"
would be
dealt with in terms of the court marshals of the Zimbabwe National
Army as
they are bound by the Defence Act.
The civilian suspect, said
to be a welder plying his trade in Harare's
Dzivarasekwa high-density
suburb, pleaded guilty to the offence.
He had appeared before Harare
magistrate William Bhila Friday afternoon who
slapped him with the lengthy
jail term.
He is alleged to have accompanied the soldiers on his vehicle
at 1 am on
October 20 to steal the weapons.
He was allegedly found
with four of the weapons with the rest having been
distributed among the
other accused persons, who allegedly used a bolt
cutter to break into the
barracks' armoury.
MDC transport manager Pasco Gwezere was seized from
his Mufakose home by
armed police and state security agents a week after the
break in, in
connection with the alleged crime.
He was on Friday
granted bail by the High Court but was denied immediate
release after the
state invoked Section 121 of the Criminal Procedure and
Evidence
Act.
The controversial law empowers it to freeze a court judgement for a
period
of seven days pending a written appeal against such ruling.
A
dozen more soldiers have been seized and detained for questioning by army
personnel and state security agents over the theft of the
firearms.
An MDC suburban house in Harare was also invaded by armed
police last month
in search of the weapons. They found nothing.
http://www.herald.co.zw/
Saturday,
November 21, 2009
Herald
Reporter
Zimbabwe and China are negotiating arrangements for contract
farming as the
Asian giant steps up efforts to assist the country's agrarian
reforms.
This was revealed by Secretary for Foreign Affairs Ambassador
Joey Bimha at
a symposium on China-Africa and China-Zimbabwe
relations.
"There are indeed ongoing negotiations for contract farming
arrangements in
the agricultural sector. The greatest impact of Chinese
involvement in
Zimbabwe has been in the agricultural sector, which as you
know is the
backbone of the economy," he said.
China has provided
US$260 million to Zimbabwe to support the agricultural
sector for the
purchase of inputs and machinery.
"We have been able to acquire
equipment, implements and critical inputs for
the revival of this
sector.
"This support for the agricultural mechanisation programme has
been
complemented by the secondment of experts in the areas of animal
disease
control, fisheries and grain," said Ambassador
Bimha.
Zimbabwe has also been designated as one of the 10 countries in
Africa to
host the first 10 agricultural demonstration centres in
Africa.
Apart from the support in agriculture, China has also supported
the countriy's
mining and manufacturing sectors with the China-Africa
Development Fund
acquiring shareholdings in Zimasco and uranium joint
ventures with the
Zimbabwe Mining Development Company.
Chinese
Ambassador to Zimbabwe Mr Xin Shunkang, yesterday said they had
provided at
least US$300 million to the country in the past three years and
urged the
strengthening of ties between the two countries.
"In the past three
years, the total amount of aid that the Chinese
Government provided to the
Zimbabwean Government is approximately US$300
million.
"Let's make
joint efforts to push China-Africa, China-Zimbabwe friendship to
a new
height," he said.
http://www.zimonline.co.za
by
Own Correspondent Saturday 21 November 2009
HARARE -
Political interference by officials from President Robert Mugabe's
ZANU PF
party has compromised professionalism at Zimbabwe's sole
broadcaster,
Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC), a public broadcasting
report has
said.
The report entitled "Public Broadcasting in Africa Series: On Air -
Zimbabwe" which was released early this week by the Open Society Initiative
Southern Africa (OSISA) said that politicians give instructions to media
professionals at ZBC, leaving journalists demoralised.
The report
pointed fingers at Mugabe's spokesman George Charamba, who is
also the
Information Ministry's permanent secretary, for treating the state
broadcaster as a personal empire.
"During interviews with journalists
and other practitioners at the ZBC, the
majority pointed out that there is a
great deal of interference by ZANU PF
officials which hinders the
professional and efficient operations of the
ZBC," the report
said.
"Politicians often give instructions to managerial staff on their
editorial
preferences. It is also alleged that the divisions and
factionalism within
the party (ZANU PF) play out in the
newsrooms."
The report quoted one journalist who spoke of how an unnamed
minister may
phone in and give instructions regarding a story and "soon
after a permanent
secretary will call and give instructions that counteract
the initial
initiative".
According to the 166-page report, some
journalists felt that the broadcaster
was being used as a "personal empire"
by those at the ministry, especially
Charamba.
"One journalist who
refused to be named said that Charamba was running the
corporation as his
personal fiefdom and this was demoralising to most of the
staff as they felt
that the core business of the broadcaster was no longer
taking precedence.
Charamba wields enormous power here, is untouchable, and
staff at the
broadcaster, including ZBC board is terrified of him," said the
report.
"All this has made journalists believe that whatever they do
they have to be
answerable to the government or individuals in the ministry
rather than the
general public."
The state-owned ZBC - also known as
Zimbabwe Broadcasting Holdings (ZBH) -
which runs Zimbabwe's only television
and radio stations was initially
conceived as a public broadcaster but has
been tightly controlled by Mugabe's
ZANU PF administration, which has the
final say on senior editorial and
managerial appointments.
Prime
Minister Morgan Tsvangirai's MDC party which joined Mugabe in a
coalition
government last February has criticised the state media for bias
in favour
of Mugabe and his ZANU PF party and against other parties in the
unity
government.
Speaking at the launch of the OSISA report Tsvangirai said
government should
not control the media, adding that the media should
regulate itself the same
way other professions do. - ZimOnline
http://www1.voanews.com
Mr. Tsvangirai as the leader for a decade of the former
opposition party
attested to the negative impact of politically slanted
broadcasting
Sandra Nyaira
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai
has endorsed a regional report on
broadcasting to highlight the lack of
progress since February under his
power-sharing government in reforming the
state-run broadcasting monopoly to
reflect a broader spectrum of political
views.
Mr. Tsvangirai endorsed the report published by the South
African-based
Africa Governance Monitoring and Advocacy Project and the Open
Society
Initiative for Southern Africa before departing late this week for
talks in
Libya with African Union President Muammar Gaddaffi.
The
report urged the repeal of Zimbabwean legislation repressing freedom of
the
media.
As leader of the former opposition, Mr Tsvangirai said state media
has
tarnished the image of those perceived to be enemies of the dominant
ZANU-PF
party of President Robert Mugabe rather than focusing on the issues
and
problems that are most of concern to the Zimbabwean people.
He
called for editorial independence in the newsrooms of the state-operated
Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation, and self-regulation by the media as a
general principle.
"I look forward to the day when the coverage of
events attended by political
leaders is decided upon by editors who have
only one consideration - what in
the best interest of their reading and
viewing public," the prime minister
said.
Mr Tsvangirai said he and
President Mugabe were soon to name the new
Zimbabwe Media Commission as the
caretaker of a free national media
environment.
Mr. Tsvangirai said
that although progress towards the full implementation
of the 2008 Global
Political Agreement has not been as rapid "or as
comprehensive as the
majority of us would like, there has nonetheless been
noticeable
progress".
For more on the regional broadcasting report, Sandra Nyaira
spoke with Faith
Zaba, a board member of the Media Institute of Southern
Africa in Zimbabwe,
who moderated this week's launch of the critical
document.
http://www.zimonline.co.za
by Own
Correspondent Saturday 21 November 2009
HARARE - At least 60
business executives from South Africa are expected to
witness next week's
long awaited signing of a Bilateral Investment
Protection Agreement (BIPA)
between Zimbabwe and South Africa, it was
announced on Friday.
South
African Trade Minister Rob Davies and his Zimbabwean counterpart,
Elton
Mangoma are expected to sign the deal in Harare next Friday after
which an
investment seminar will be held.
"The purpose of the seminar, which will
be attended by more than 60 business
people from South Africa, is to
highlight trade and investment opportunities
following the formation of a
transitional government of national unity in
Zimbabwe," South Africa's
Department of Trade and Industry said in a
statement.
The seminar and
signing ceremony come on the backdrop of the launch by the
government of
Zimbabwe of a five-year medium-term blueprint for the period
2010 to 2015
.
The blueprint, in which the Harare commits itself to encouraging new
local
and foreign investment to stimulate the economic growth and
development,
replaces the Short-Term Economic Recovery Programme (STERP)
that was
launched in March 2009 to curb the further decline of the
Zimbabwean
economy.
Signing of the agreement between the countries
that are each other's biggest
trading partner on the continent in addition
to being strong political
allies has on several occasions been postponed on
the eleventh hour,
apparently after Harare objected to a clause in the
accord referring to land
investments.
President Mugabe's chaotic and
often violent programme to seize white-owned
farm land for redistribution to
landless blacks has seen several farms owned
by foreigners and protected
under bilateral trade agreements between
Zimbabwe and other countries seized
without compensation.
The seizure of private land has raised questions
about Zimbabwe's commitment
to uphold property rights as well as agreements
entered with other
countries.
South African farmers on Thursday
called on Pretoria to ensure that
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's
controversial land reform programme is
included in the BIPA. - ZimOnline
http://www1.voanews.com/
The Famine
Early Warning Systems Network or FEWSNET says 1.6 million
Zimbabweans -
600,000 in the cities - will need food aid through December of
this
year
Patience Rusere | Washington
About 1.6 million people
in Zimbabwe risk going hungry and will need food
assistance between now and
the end of the year, the US based Famine Early
Warning Systems Network said
in a new food security assessment conducted in
September.
About one
million of those likely to require food distributions are in
Zimbabwe's
rural areas, the rest in the cities.
The report cites poverty and
unemployment as factors in continuing food
insecurity in the country, which
has seen a series of bad maize harvests due
to dislocation in the
agricultural sector after a decade of land reform and
chronic shortages of
essential inputs such as seed and fertilizer.
Board member Peter
Muchengeti of the National Association of
Non-Governmental Organizations
told VOA Studio 7 reporter Patience Rusere
that FEWSNET is on target as to
the continuing inadequacy of food supplies.
http://www.zimeye.org/?p=10577
By Moses Muchemwa
Published: November 20,
2009
Gweru - Gweru residents are facing a serious water
shortage that might lead
to an outbreak of diseases such as
cholera.
The Gweru City Council is failing to supply safe drinking water
due to
shortage of funds to replace ageing infrastructure.
The
director of engineering services, John Nantambwe, confirmed that US$5
million was needed to improve water supplies.
"We are operating with
three pumps instead of six because the other three
pumps are obsolete and
therefore beyond repair," he said.
Council is able to supply only 50
percent of the city's daily water
consumption.
He said the local
authority did not install any new pump or replace old
ones, thereby
worsening the situation.
"Our situation is getting desperate because the
population is growing while
at the same time our pumping capacity is being
reduced as a result of the
old pumps and other infrastructure that have
outlived their lifespan" said
Nantambwe.
The residents, Nantambwe
said were being subjected to erratic water supplies
because council could
only provide limited supplies daily.
A number of Gweru suburbs have gone
for months without the precious liquid
forcing residents to fetch water from
unprotected sources.
Residents have appealed to council to urgently
address the water supply
problem, which they say is a time bomb as many of
them are using the bush to
relieve themselves, which pauses a health
hazard.
Last year, thousands of people succumbed to cholera due to
shortage of water
in towns and cities.
In the summer of 2008 Kokayi, a 35-year-old Methodist pastor in western Zimbabwe, was sitting in his home when a group of men gathered outside his door and began chanting political slogans. When he stepped outside, a group of 20 young men accused him of supporting the MDC (Movement for Democratic Change), the party opposing president Robert Mugabe and his Zanu-PF party in the upcoming elections. Kokayi explained that, as a pastor, he was politically neutral and did not publicly support either party. The men ordered him to chant the political slogans of the Zanu-PF. He refused. They began to beat and threaten him, yet still he refused. They then dragged him to the town's slaughterhouse and beat him again.
As Kokayi began to crawl back to his home, people in the village turned their heads, closed their doors, and hurried past the wounded pastor — afraid that empathy would attract the attention of the Mugabe thugs. Halfway to his home, a second group of Mugabe men recognized Kokayi. One man picked up a rock and hit Kokayi's head over and over again. As Kokayi began to lose consciousness, he heard the man exclaim to his cheering companions, "I've killed him!"
It was after dark when a group of women quietly placed him in a wheelbarrow and took him to a nearby hospital. There he was kept hidden from the vigilantes until he recovered from his wounds. Months later, Kokayi returned home and found his house burned to the ground, his food stock and animals stolen, and his farm and garden torn up. His wife and children had fled to a nearby country.
This is a summary of the story that Kokayi told to a gathering of 85 Christian pastors representing more than 20 denominations, community leaders, heads of various non-governmental agencies, police, and government representatives. The National Healing and Reconciliation workshop sponsored by the Pastoral Care and Counseling Center in Mutare, Zimbabwe was held during the first week of November.
Mazvita Machinga, a Zimbabwe doctoral student at Claremont School of Theology in Claremont, Calif., had organized the gathering in direct response to the initiative by the newly formed "Unity" government (a tenuous partnership between Robert Mugabe and Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the MDC) calling for healing and reconciliation.
The workshop was the first event of its kind in Zimbabwe that sought to build practical skills as well as design processes that individuals and communities could use for nurturing healing and reconciliation. My colleagues Frank Rogers, Andrew Dreitcer, and I, as founding members of Triptykos, were asked by Mazvita to help document and facilitate the workshop. Triptykos is a public action organization of the Center for Engaged Compassion at CST.
Zimbabwe, once a stable and prosperous country, has experienced economic collapse, due to the destructive policies of the Mugabe government. Beginning around 1999, and escalating during the election of 2008, villages across Zimbabwe suffered a rampage of organized violence and intimidation. Since the formation of a unity government in January, the violence has diminished, military "torture" camps have been dismantled, but communities continue to be traumatized. Victims are afraid to seek healing, perpetrators remain unpunished, and communities remain stuck in fear and alienation.
The first task of the four-day workshop was to encourage victims to tell their stories — this was a difficult request given that Mugabe and the Zanu-PF still control the military, and most victims still encounter their perpetrators within their communities and even within their own churches. For most victims at the workshop it was only when they met with other victims that they were willing to talk, and yet slowly, as the first day evolved, Kokayi and others felt emboldened to make their experience known.
At the end of Kokayi's story he was asked what happened to the men who beat him. "I see them every day — including the man who eagerly tried to kill me. I see him every day." He paused, then said, "I am a Christian pastor. I am supposed to forgive. But I am also filled with anger and bitterness. They have taken my humanity."
The shame, guilt, anger isn't limited to victims and perpetrators, as one pastor explained, "All of us are victims and all of us are perpetrators. Many of us saw our neighbors being harmed. We heard their cries for help, but we did nothing. The victims in our communities know we heard them and did nothing, and so we are also victims and also silent perpetrators of the violence that occurred."
How does healing happen for Kokayi and his community? How does reconciliation occur in a community that harbors victims, perpetrators, and so many silent witnesses to senseless violence? We gathered in Zimbabwe to find a way through these questions.
Next week: Part 2 — Healing victims and perpetrators in Zimbabwe.
Mark Yaconelli is the Co-Director of Triptykos and the author of "Wonder, Fear, and Longing: A Book of Prayers." Read about his experience in Zimbabwe at www.triptykos.com.
Dear Family and Friends,
The one
non-political word most likely to cause animated, angry
outbursts in Zimbabwe
is 'Zesa.' Officially the acronym stands for
Zimbabwe Electricity Supply
Authority, more appropriately it is known
as Zimbabwe Electricity Sometimes
Available.
We've now had three grim, gruelling weeks of power cuts where
the
lights go out at 4 or 5 in the morning and stay off until 9 or 10
at
night - every day of the week and weekend. Normal functioning
has
become almost impossible. Food bought with precious US dollars
is
going rotten in silent fridges; geysers are cold and there is no way
to
put a single hot meal on the table as zesa is non existent at
breakfast,
lunch and supper times.
Only receiving a few hours of power in the middle
of the night we
expected our bills would have reduced by three quarters but
this
isn't happening. Business and residential areas alike, Zesa
bills
continue to be more than most people earn in a month. Unexplained
and
incomprehensible is how you go from having a credit balance one
month
to owing 700 or 800 US dollars the next. Small businesses
already
struggling to stay open are getting bills ranging from 5,000
to
12,000 US dollars a month. It's become commonplace to get home and
find
you've been disconnected or, in my home town, to find that Zesa
employees
have actually physically removed MCB's (Mains Control
Boards) from your
house.
The worst comes when you emerge from a 16 hour power cut, cold,
tried
and hungry. The lights flicker once, twice and then stay off again
-
it's a fault on the line. Even though Zesa have a 24 hour fault
service,
they say they no longer attend at night, or before 8am in
the morning, and so
you wait. By the time they go looking for a fault
(after you have picked them
up in your car and driven them round and
round) and they have effected the
repair, you still don't get
anything done as you are back into the standard
16 hour power cut. If
there is more than one fault on the line then you can
go on like this
for days, staggering from power cuts to faults with the
briefest
flicker of lights in between but not even enough time to boil
a
kettle.
In out of town areas, people are going without electricity
for
multiple days, even weeks. One rural friend said they'd had no
power
for over a week. The only commercial farmer still operating in
the
area had recently been evicted by an army man and now there was no
one
with a vehicle prepared to travel the 20 kilometers to town to
collect Zesa
workers to fix the broken line.
Sitting here writing this letter by hand
I try and remember the last
time I saw Zesa doing any maintenance in my
suburb. I decide it must
be about 5 years ago when they came door to door and
cut overhanging
branches, cleared around poles and checked their lines. I
fume at
this thought and also at the information that a junior Zesa worker
in
his early twenties and without tertiary education is currently
earning
800 US dollars a month - nearly seven times more than a
degreed
teacher or nurse. Perhaps that's why our bills are so
high?
Until next week, thanks for reading, love cathy Copyright
cathy
buckle 21 November 2009.
www.cathybuckle.com
Email: jag@mango.zw; justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Please
send any material for publication in the Open Letter Forum to
jag@mango JAG OPEN LETTER FORUM - No..zw with "For
Open Letter
Forum" in the subject line.
To subscribe/unsubscribe to
the JAG mailing list, please email:
jag@mango.zw with subject line "subscribe" or
"unsubscribe".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
ZANU ASSASSINATIONS - JL Robinson
2.. Justice, Honesty & Integrity -
Robb WJ Ellis
3. The Land Question: A Case for a Transparent Agrarian
Reform & Land
Audit Process
4. Chris Dunbar - Request for
information
5. Request for information - Henk van
Stokkom
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
ZANU ASSASSINATIONS - JL Robinson
Dear Jag
The definition of
assassination is "killing by treacherous
violence."
This definition
and the modus operandi of Zanu need to be considered
seriously by SADC and
Jacob Zuma.
It is nearly ten years since Martin Olds and David Stephens
were
assassinated by Zanu - and Zanu still continue today to
assassinate
their opposition at their (Zanu's) free will. The Editor of
the
The Zimbabwean has succinctly described how Mugabe and Zanu have
abused
the land issue to extend their tenure at the expense of the country
and
its people.
The recent invitation by the UN for Zanu to attend a
summit in Rome
indicates the cavalier attitude of that organisation to the
very ethos
that they are meant to live by.
Recent reports indicate
that a Zanu tycoon charged with 300 counts of
fraud and tax evasion has
entered a deal to pay a R40 million fine to the
State (RSA) and it is alleged
that he also paid off a "cat"
(mujiba?) acting for the SA Commissioner of
Police for another US$100 000
- for an audience with the Commissioner! These
reports tend to point
towards an even more brazen era in Zimbabwe and South
Africa where the
proof is now that "Crime does pay."
Perhaps all one
needs to do after such behaviour is "have a
shower" and then all will be
cleansed and you can zoot off and kill
another farmer, take another farm,
burn another homestead, starve a few
more animals, shoot a few more farm
workers and then have another shower
again?
As a person attempts to
analyse these dynamics analytically, I am not
quite sure how the likes of
Morgan Tsvangirayi, Tendai Biti or David
Coltart measure their progress (or
lack there of?) on a regular basis. I
would quite like to study their points
system!
J.L.
Robinson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.
Justice, Honesty & Integrity - Robb WJ Ellis
Justice, Honesty &
Integrity - The Three Missing Elements In Roy
Bennett's Trial
If
anyone were to use one word to describe the judicial system in
Zimbabwe, we
might hope for words like 'fair' and 'just' - perhaps even a
word like
'equal' may make the listing - but alas, such a list would be a
lie.
I
worked within the judicial system in Zimbabwe in the early to mid-1980s
and
watched the legal wheels turn, and perhaps then my only criticism
would be
that they turned ponderously slow.
But fast forward to the same system in
the courts in Zimbabwe today and
we witness an entirely different
story.
One of the cases which has sprung to prominence is the
banditry,
terrorism and weapons charges which have been preferred against
Roy
Bennett, the white commercial farmer who has become a regular target
for
the Mugabe 'treatment'.
Roy "Pachedu" Bennett has already spent
time in Mugabe's disgusting
jails, having been imprisoned by Parliament for
pushing Patrick Chinamasa
to the ground reacting to being the subject of a
Chinamasa haranguing in
which Bennett's forefathers were labelled as
'thieves' and
'murderers'. But that was only the last straw in the wholesale
abuse of
Roy Bennett, his family, his farm and his farm workers. Prior to
that,
Mugabe sent the army in to steal his farm. The army killed one
his
workers, brutalised and raped others and the stress of this whole
sorry
saga caused his pregnant wife to lose their child.
Mugabe makes
no secret of his dislike of the whites in general and
Bennett in
particular.
The evidence that Mugabe's prosecuting council - none other
than
his unilaterally appointed Attorney-General - will use is
fabricated,
elicited under duress and torture, manufactured and presented
displaying
the utmost prejudice.
The State's key witness, one Michael
Hitschmann, a former firearms
dealer from the Eastern Highlands town of
Mutare, is alleged to have
implicated Bennett in his 'confession' obtained
under torture. Hitschmann
supposedly heard and discussed with Bennett an
intended conspiracy to
assassinate Mugabe.
Hitschmann spent 2 ½ years
in Mugabe's prisons for his
'crimes'
Mugabe's state council have
worked tirelessly to present the Bennett case
in the worst possible light,
and even went so far as to issue the
indictment at the courthouse and have
his bail revoked. Bennett spent a
few days languishing once again in Mugabe
prisons - possibly amongst the
worst in the world.
Mugabe has refused
to swear Bennett into cabinet, stating that he is
facing serious charges -
which carry the death penalty if a conviction is
secured - and prefers to
wait for the court to 'exhaust their authority'
before he can consider any
move.
Mugabe talked himself in full circle by bringing up the subject
of
pardons, stating that any pardon can only be applied once the court
has
completed their remit. How is it then that Mugabe was able to issue
a
blanket pardon for all persons involved in the Gukurahundi in the
early
to mid-1980s in Matabeleland and the Midlands?
Was he not
obliged to wait due court process before issuing such
an
order?
Bennett has lost his Chimanimani farm, his wife lost a baby,
and then he
sought refuge in South Africa - a safe haven - until it was
deemed
'safe' to return by none other than the South African
government.
His very livelihood was plucked from his hand, illegally and
with undue
and specific force. He and his family have had to realign
themselves to
being displaced persons, dispossessed commercial farmers, and
yet Mugabe
is not happy with that.
He wants Bennett to suffer. And so
Bennett does. Under Mugabe's
evil eye and deathlike grip on Zimbabwe and the
law courts, he has little
option but to rely heavily upon his legal
representative to ensure that
justice is preserved.
Bennett is
innocent. If there is anyone out there who believes in justice
and fair play
and can put a stop to this farcical charade, justice will
be well and truly
served.
The Attorney-General does not just do Zimbabwe an injustice by
being
where he is - but the whole of Africa.
The man is ignorant of
court procedure, and although the defence council,
Beatrice Mtetwa, is making
mincemeat of him, the judge, who has already
sidestepped a defence request to
recuse himself, will obviously do what
he is told rather than the right
thing.
The Attorney-General has no respect for courts or legal system -
what
little remains of it.
And since when does the Zimbabwean
Attorney-General prosecute a case in
court? That has to be a
first!
But it is Mugabe who should facing treason charges because he is
the one
with the blood of thousands of innocent Zimbabweans on his
hands.
There is a long list of people who have faced the very same
charges that
Bennett currently faces. In every single case, the charges have
been
dismissed. Mugabe has corrupted the judiciary to such an extent that
he
now uses 'the law' and his judiciary as tools of oppression, as a
method
to tie his victims up financially and to divert their
attention.
What is different in Bennett's case is the extent to which
the
Attorney-General's office have gone to create 'evidence'.
Mugabe
desperately wants Bennett convicted.
Not the Mugabe justice that would
see people die at the hands of his
minions, but the justice that every sane
person in the world seeks
Justice is the right to a fair hearing, reasonable
punishment if found
guilty - and entire vindication if cleared in a court of
law.
Justice should be blind - blind to colour creed and religion - but
in
Zimbabwe it is prolonged, pro-Mugabe and pro-ZANU PF.
In Zimbabwe,
the law has become an ass.
Robb WJ
Ellis
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.
The Land Question: A Case for a Transparent Agrarian Reform & Land
Audit
Process
A sober interrogation and an intellectual conversation focused
on
Zimbabwe's agrarian reform, devoid of partisan emotion,
incendiary
sloganeering, and ideological vitriol, is now necessary for
the
formulation of a people driven land reform programme. A
comprehensive
independent land audit conducted by a civic commission, whose
findings
are to be made public, must be a precursor to this
endevour.
As much as the government published the lists of all farms
gazetted for
acquisition, in the name of transparency and political fair
play
Zimbabweans deserve to know who the recipients and beneficiaries of
all
the seized land are.
Sustainable economic growth can only be
attained with the permanent
inclusion of Zimbabwe's communal farmers into the
mainstream economy. The
peculiarity of our history is such that most
commercial farmers were
white. It is time to recognise that fact and realise
that the land issue
is both an economic and political imperative, an issue
that supersedes
one's race or ethnicity.
In 1888, white colonists
under the auspices of the British South Africa
Company, led by Cecil Rhodes,
expropriated the country's best
agricultural lands and began colonial
rule.
The solution to correcting this colonial imbalance, decongesting
communal
areas, and empowering previously disadvantaged indigenous
citizens
through agriculture, while maintaining productivity is
attainable.
White farmers wanting to sell land were legally obliged to
offer it to
the state first. If the state did not want the land, it would
issue a "no
present interest" certificate (valid for one year), which then
enabled
the seller to dispose of the land on the private market. Throughout
the
1980's there was a steady flood of land available to the Government
of
Zimbabwe. The land acquired included that abandoned by white
farmers
during the war, as well as land sold willingly by some
landowners.
Senior members of ZANU (PF) under the VIP Farm Scheme
acquired farms by
taking advantage of the state's "no present interest". Farm
land
totalling over a million hectares was transferred and the VIP Farm
Scheme
also leased state land acquired under the resettlement programme to
ZANU
(PF) officials and government ministers-none of these farms are
in
production today.
In 1981, the Government of Zimbabwe passed the
Communal Land Act, which
changed the name of the Tribal Trust Lands to
Communal Areas and
transferred authority from the traditional leaders to the
local
authorities. The 1992 Land Acquisition Act was enacted to speed up
the
land reform process by removing the "willing seller, willing
buyer"
clause, limiting the size of farms and introducing a land tax
(although
the tax was never
implemented.) The land protection clauses
of the Lancaster House
Agreement expired in 1990.
As part of the
Lancaster House Agreement signed in London in 1979, a
land-reform program was
established, under which land was to be purchased
from white farmers for
redistribution to landless peasants on a "willing
seller, willing buyer"
basis. Australia, Britain, France, the
Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the U.S.
and the World Bank signed on to
provide funds for this program, as well as
funds for development. Total
funds pledged for both amounted to $1.9 billion,
but the land
redistribution program was so grossly mismanaged that most
countries
withdrew their financial support in 1992.
In the first phase
of the Land Reform Programme (1980-85) the Government
of Zimbabwe announced
its intention to resettle 162 000 families on 10.5
million hectares of land
within five years. By 1986, 3.4 million hectares
had been acquired at a cost
of GBP 80 million, reducing the amount of
land under white ownership to 29
percent.
By 1996, the United Kingdom had contributed in terms of aid to
Zimbabwe
GBP500 billion pounds since Independence. Of this total, GBP47
million
was targeted for land reform, and approximately GBP100 million
was
budgetary support which should have been used for land reform.
What
happened to all those funds? The UK Land Resettlement Grant closed
down
with GBP3 million still unspent following the discovery of
massive
corruption and the misuse of land resettlement funds.
The
following criterion constitutes the noble Government of Zimbabwe
parameters
by which all land was to be acquired:
i) Derelict land;
ii)
Under-utilised land;
iii) Land owned by absentee landlords;
iv)
Land from farmers with more than one farm or with oversized
farms,
and
v) Land adjacent to communal areas. (However, if this was
the only farm
of the farmer's possession and if the farmer wanted to continue
farming,
he would be offered another farm).
These principles were
discarded before implementation. The day after ZANU
(PF) lost the
constitutional referendum, violent farm invasions
commenced.
The
government had further stipulated maximum farm sizes for each
agro-ecological
region as follows:
Agro-ecological
Region
Small-Scale
Commercial Farms(ha)
Medium-Scale
Commercial Farms(ha)
Large-Scale
Commercial Farms(ha)
I
20
100
250
IIa
30
200
350
IIb
40
250
400
III
60
300
500
IV
120
700
1500
V
240
1 000
2000
Today senior members of ZANU (PF)
own multiple farms and are absentee
landlords; most of these properties are
underutilised-hence Zimbabwe's
perennial food shortages.
By 1997, the
end of phase one of the land reform and resettlement
program, the government
had resettled 71 000 families (out of a targeted
162 000) on almost 3.5
million hectares of land. Close to 400 black
political acolytes leased 400
000 hectares of state land and about 350
black people had bought their
farms.
In November 2002, Agriculture Minister Joseph Made said the
land-grab was
over. He said in total the government had seized 12 million
hectares of
land from white farmers. In January 2006, Agriculture Minister
Joseph
Made said Zimbabwe was considering legislation that would
compel
commercial banks to finance blacks who had been allocated
formerly
white-owned farmland in the land reforms. Made threatened local
banks
with withdrawal of their banking licenses, should they fail to lend
a
substantial portion of their income to these land occupiers.
The
current fast track land reform programme in Zimbabwe is chaotic and
was
fashioned as a political survival stratagem by ZANU (PF) designed to
appease
a restive peasantry and to punish perceived enemies. Gradualist
land tenure
reform that pays special attention to the legal status and
economic
activities of women must also avoid arbitrary evictions of the
landless and
ensure landholders invest in the land. Leaving things the
way they are is not
a viable option, agrarian reform is an urgent
national endevour.
2010
Proposed agrarian reform roadmap:
1.. All land must be converted into
50 year leaseholds.
2.. Each commercial farmer must be allocated a
group of communal
farmers
whom the farmer assists with agronomic
advice and expertise.
3.. The farmers pay no corporate tax for the
duration of the lease once
the farmer has built a school, clinic and
adequate housing on their
farm
or collective community.
4..
A fund, managed by the Revenue Authority, comprising of all civic
stakeholders is inaugurated with the purpose of financing smallholder
farmer development.
5.. Young farmers are attached to farmers as
understudies and included
in tenant farming schemes run by the
respective Farmers Associations.
6.. Each Farmers Association is
allocated additional state land under
trust
which is eventually
resurveyed and apportioned to new qualified
farmers.
Phil Matibe - www.madhingabucketboy.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.
Chris Dunbar - Request for information
Dear Jag
With the current
and continued disruptions to the farming community I
hope that this request
is not an added burden.
I am hoping to visit and document as many of the
old Portuguese
settlements, citrus groves that are scattered around Zimbabwe,
more so to
the north of Harare.
I am particularly eager to visit the
old church built in 1629 north of
Guruve.
I am asking for help in
achieving this with grid references and local
knowledge, the National
Monuments have helped to a degree but still need
some more specific
locations.
Are you able to assist?
Thanks
Chris
Dunbar
Foodstuffs Auckland
Retail Support - Produce
021 812
384
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.
Request for information - Henk van Stokkom
Dear Jag
Through one of
your readers I received this e-mail address.
I am looking for more
information on `Arriston' an exchange
quoted farm in Zimbabwe (I was
told).
Do you have any information or can you point me somewhere on
Internet
since I cannot find anything via Google.
Thanks for your help
!
Best regards,
Henk J.Th. van Stokkom.
henk@vanstokkom.nl
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All
letters published on the open Letter Forum are the views and opinions
of the
submitters, and do not represent the official viewpoint of Justice
for
Agriculture.
Even if you have not been paying attention to Zimbabwe lately, you were still bedazzled by the ongoing political drama. President Mugabe is confirming every low expectation the people of Zimbabwe have of him. In the end you were probably left wondering what the people of Zimbabwe should really do next;
Defeat Mugabe to rebuild Zimbabwe, or rebuild Zimbabwe to defeat Mugabe?
Nothing succinctly sums up Zimbabweans’ quandary more than that. It’s not just the main opposition –MDC-T under siege by Mugabe, it’s the whole nation. It is a worrisome dilemma.
What happens if MDC continues to play fair and square, courteous and by the rules? It doesn’t matter; the cobra will still bite you whether you call it cobra or Mr Snake. Mugabe will always be Mugabe – the master of political deception.
Speaking of snakes, Mugabe is a snake oil salesman who knows how to handle African diplomacy (or more precisely – African dictatorship). Whenever there is a crisis (artificially created by him in the first place), he does not cringe. In spite of his casualness, he is quick to tell the world that the crisis is a Zimbabwean problem which Zimbabweans themselves must solve.
Of course ‘Zimbabweans’ refer to Mugabe and his kleptocrats. We all know the solution is State-sponsored violence, which is an integral part of Zanu PF existence. The army, police and CIO have been a cohesive force of terrorizing the people of Zimbabwe and for cowing activists and the opposition into submission. In addition, the youth militias are not just a bunch of random thugs, they are on State payroll. Zanu PF believes in freedom of speech and nonviolence; but only for itself.
Mugabe’s stratagem zeros in on a dragging approach, no matter how much it costs the nation. Reports indicate that as SADC’s two-week deadline (requiring outstanding GPA issues to be addressed) looms, Mugabe has predictably done absolutely nothing to remedy his violations of GPA terms; Whether it’s reversing his arbitrary appointment of Zimbabwe’s most inept and thoroughly discredited Reserve Bank Governor in history –Gideon Gono, or removal of the excessively obsequious Attorney General, an enabler of Mugabe’s transgressions. Similarly, cessation of violence and restoration of rule of law remain a pie in the sky.
After all, how can Mugabe budge on the removal of AG Johannes Tomana given his critical ‘State assignments’ including the most recent one- to ‘convict’ Roy Bennett, regardless of the treason case’s hollowness? It is no coincidence that the judge in question has refused to recuse himself after massive conflict of interest was unearthed, otherwise the whole plot would have to be re-choreographed and its frivolity exposed.
With the same token, Gono bankrolls Mugabe’s ‘projects’ and stashes his cash in Asia. In any case he stands to resume his job as money-printing CEO as Mugabe intensifies efforts of resuscitating the Zimbabwe dollar. From their adulterated economic perspective which has long-ignored economics 101, the Zimbabwe dollar is necessary for economic activity which creates revenue (in hard currency) for the State. They need it to buy US dollars from the ‘market’. Of course today they have the audacity to perpetuate the grand delusion that sanctions caused Zimbabwe’s economic ruin.
What a nostalgic feeling they have for the black-market economy that created fly-by-night millionaires! People worry about hyperinflation and zeroes re-emerging? Well, “As monetary authorities” Gono, will make another guarantee as he did in July 2008; "This time, we will make sure that those zeros that would come knocking on the Governor's window will not return. They are going for good.” Did anyone believe that?
As you saw, after MDC dis-disengaged, Zimbabwe was temporarily but deceptively peaceful again in spite of scattered incidence of violence in the aftermath of SADC’s intervention (whose outcome is hardly consequential). For the umpteenth time, Zanu PF and the fringy MDC-M politicians told us how they now want to work in brotherhood for Zimbabwe’s sake. Mutambara’s gibberish must be ignored. It’s like taking the advice of the fox on how to protect chickens. The paradox of it all is that violence actually increased to include incarceration of activists and ZCTU leadership.
What looked like a promise of hope is suddenly morphing into a promise of peril. When the Global Political Agreement appended a National Healing and Reconciliation clause, many of us were convinced that it had effectively removed the liability of possible misapprehensions about future calls retribution. It is especially true considering the egregious human rights abuses committed by Mugabe and his ilk. The clause was a de facto amnesty for them.
But then again, at Independence Mugabe backpedalled on his own terms having pleaded with white Zimbabweans, imploring them to stand shoulder to shoulder with black people in building a strong Zimbabwe. As the possibility of Zimbabwe having an inclusive government was gathering momentum, far-fetched political punditry quickly predicted that Mugabe would welcome the opportunity to finally exit the political stage. They were wrong, Mugabe is drunk with power.
The problem is; even if Mugabe were to drop dead today, Zimbabwe’s political quagmire will not end. In fact it is likely to degenerate. Can you imagine what will happen given all the Zanu PF sharks jostling for power? Mugabe’s mess will be with us for some time, long after he is gone. He used it to further his politics of patronage. Mentioning succession planning is a mortal sin in Zanu PF.
Mugabe made sure that every Zanu PF shark’s political future was entirely in his hands. Their promotion, demotion or excommunication depends on him. In a way he acts as the magnet that holds the party together. His absence means an implosion and the demise of Zanu PF as we know it. In his absence it will take quite some time for Zanu PF to rediscover its mediocrity.
The problem is that Mugabe is surrounded by people of his mold. Consider Didymus Mutasa - the man cursed with the mind of Idi Amin, being one day at the helm of Zimbabwe one day, then you begin to see that Mugabe is a novice of a devil. His mind is genocidal. Not to mention other politicians in Zanu PF, the Army and CIO. Zanu PF relies on thugs for intellectual guidance.
“We would be better off with only 6 million people, with our own people who supported the liberation struggle. We don’t want these extra people,” said Didymus in 2002. (What a cool name!)
But there are also many pieces to the ever confounding imbroglio; it’s not just the political duplicity that is affecting people, it’s also the emotional toll Mugabe is exacting on Zimbabweans. We have an entire generation whose lives have been shattered. Political violence and lawlessness are still rampant.
South Africa has gained immensely from Zimbabwe’s troubles; cheap labour, extension of South Africa’s markets as Zimbabwe became a de facto province of South Africa. The most unsettling being the emigration of most of Zimbabwe’s best brains. Can you imagine individuals like Strive Masiyiwa, Mutumwa Mawere, Mthuli Ncube, etc, making South Africa their permanent home and nearly giving up their birthrights due to political persecution? But of course, it’s a scenario preferred by Zimbabwe’s politicians. The majority of colleagues I went to University with (in Zimbabwe)have resettled in South Africa.
As xenophobic attacks spiked again this week, many of us were reminded of the evils of Mugabe regime. These attacks are a result of Mugabe-induced displacements of our brothers and sisters. In fact I observed a moment of silence at the sight of the suffering, seeing mothers carrying kids on their backs running away from marauding xenophobes raring to kill as they did last year in Johannesburg. They are being brutally attacked by fellow black South Africans. Zuma must be ashamed of his dithering.
It takes politicians with no hearts to afford a nap when your own people are in such destitution, sleeping in foxholes yet you have the audacity to say we are independent. These are Zimbabweans who have run away from Mugabe and his thugs. Like most of us, we are not in the Diaspora because we want to be here, we are here because of Mugabe. The day that he becomes harmless, we will go back (quickly).
Pretoria has also amassed massive political capital. Isn’t if fun acting king-maker and then peacemaker? In the article “Indictment of Thabo Mbeki” (September 2008) I wrote “The true barometer of the success of his so-called ‘quiet diplomacy’ and “African solutions” should have resulted in the long-overdue departure of the octogenarian dictator.” Mugabe lost an election, Mbeki rewarded him. If SADC and the African Union had stood up to Mugabe, Zimbabwe would never be such a pariah.
As usual, Mugabe bullies them. On June 26 2008, as the African Union Summit in Egypt was gathering momentum, Mugabe threatened African leaders to stay out of the Zimbabwe crisis stating; “I know some people are gearing themselves for an attack on Zimbabwe. I want to see any country which will raise its finger in the AU, our elections have been free.” But it was the same Mugabe who earlier issued a fatwa that a ‘mere X’ remove him.
While in Rome this week, Mugabe sputtered in feigned rage (as per trademark), the equivalent of ‘f-bomb’ tirades against the West. Pulling spectacular tantrums, Mugabe attacked the "neocolonialist enemies’ for blocking Zimbabwe’s access to world food markets. What an oddity! Markets for maize? The last time Zimbabwe exported food was before the self-destructive farm seizures back in 2000. Of course it’s convenient now just to heap scorn on other nations for our failures.
Zimbabwe’s struggles have to do with at least meeting subsistence threshold. Isn’t there a looming widespread drought as before? Unless the same ‘neocolonialist enemies’ through their NGO’s come to our help with food just as they did to stop the cholera hemorrhage, people will die.
Maybe Mugabe was referring to international markets sanctioned against Gono’s Flowers or milk exports from his wife’s Gushungo Farms recently. Now we know that sanctions are biting them (in their behind!). How many children are going hungry or are malnourished in Zimbabwe who desperately need that milk? If these people were patriotic enough and really sensitive to the people’s plight, shouldn’t they feed the hungry given the multiple farms they now have? A recent report indicated that nearly half of Zimbabwe’s children are malnourished while thirty percent suffer from diseases related to nutrition deficiencies.
It’s about them and their sons and daughters, nephews and nieces. That explains why they are resisting Zimbabwe’s democratization so vehemently. This week, the Swiss government seized assets worth US$350 million belonging to Abba Abacha, one of Sani Abacha’s three sons. US$700 that was stashed in Swiss Banks has already been returned to Nigeria by Swiss authorities. It is part of the US$2.2 billion looted by Nigeria’s former President Abacha, a vicious dictator. The moral of the story is that after all the misery he caused to his people (including hanging Ken Saro-Wiwa) , HE DIED. Someday, Zimbabwe’s day of reckoning is also coming.
The irony of sanctions is really underwhelming and largely misunderstood. Zanu PF will continue to feign moral outrage and instigate violence to prevent the lifting of sanctions and then turn around to criticize MDC for not lifting sanctions. That will give them an excuse for not doing anything. In other words even constitutional overhaul will move forward if sanctions are removed otherwise it’s the Kariba Draft. Even UN cannot enter Zimbabwe to assess human rights situation unless sanctions are removed. But clearly these are targeted sanctions. For Zanu PF no issue, big or small, is immune to political exploitation.
It’s like the US Republican Party which has openly declared that it wants President Obama to fail.You can see how Republican lawmakers consistently oppose every bill no matter how good it is for the country.
So is Zimbabwe marching into total oblivion? That’s an overstatement. We have a democratically elected Prime Minister with very high approval from the vast majority of Zimbabweans. In spite of all the life threatening machinations presented by Mugabe et al, he remains fully competent to lead (with grace). As embodied in its illustrious and distinguished Speaker of Parliament -Honorable Lovemore Moyo, Zimbabwe Parliament is bleeding with talent. There are many capable men and women who should be forcefully moving Zimbabwe’s reform agenda forward instead of ‘being away on leave.’
This is not an attempt to sell a narrative that MDC should get a free pass. But people have to understand what MDC(T) is dealing with. It’s very easy to blame MDC for the impasse -a common phenomenon I always find ridiculous from all facets, especially from those unbothered about the reality of the birth pains of democratic transition or undoing Zimbabwe’s 29-year old dictatorship. Zimbabwe’s choices are limited. What about China promising Zimbabwe US$8 billion? Well, looks like China owns everybody these days (US debt to China is over $1 trillion). But remember Chinese Money – Zimbabwe’s Ultimate Catch 22. (www.nationalvision.wordpress.com)
Of course MDC needs a new aggressive strategy in dealing with Mugabe and a better job of expectation management. For example, the recent passage of Finance Reform Bill, that partly incapacitates Gono from running the Reserve Bank as Gonomugabe Incorporated is a commendable achievement. It’s a product of hard work at the Biti-led Finance Ministry. Amnesty clause is no big deal; it’s about moving the country forward. Likewise other Ministries like Home Affairs and Information can also push vigorously for such kinds of reforms. These constitute pressing national priorities.
In the province of diplomacy, MDC’s going back to SADC and AU – the GPA guarantors, is a necessary exercise even though the results come in dribs and drabs. With the world in turmoil and economies constipated globally, no one really cares about the Zimbabwe situation. It’s a long march for change. But Zimbabwe heal thyself, the emperor has no clothes!
============
Dr Paul Mutuzu
www.nationalvision.wordpress.com
The tempo of events in Zimbabwe continue to
gather pace - and all of it has
a more serious nature than happenings of
late.
Which begs the question: What is Robert Gabriel Mugabe up
to?
He continues to prosecute the MDC for all and sundry - and then he
also has
other possible MDC sympathisers arrested on bogus charges, and he
shows no
sign of relenting.
Roy Bennett's trial continues as I write,
and it is apparent that the
prosecutor in this case - none other than the
unilaterally appointed
Attorney-General, Johannes Tomana - is somewhat
floored by the strength of
the defence case. Tomana also slipped up by
presuming a ruling by the
sitting judge, and had the temerity to question it
with a comment: "We didn't
expect that ruling."
Not that long ago, a
State prosecutor was sentenced to five days
imprisonment for making a rude
noise at a ruling by the judge.
Tomana was not disciplined for that
comment, but we begin to wonder if the
Bennett trail is not working to a
pre-written script. Justice in Zimbabwe is
an elusive matter.
We also
read of how seven students at the Great Zimbabwe University were
arrested
for 'conducting an illegal meeting' and that then swiftly changed
to charges
concerning the presence of an illegal weapon.
A security detail within
the President's unit has been sentenced to twenty
months imprisonment for
attempting to sell ammunition - at US$10 a round. (I
wonder whether the
imprisonment was gauged on the actual intent, or for the
audacious price
asked per round.)
There has been much written about the deadline given by
the SADC summit to
resolve the outstanding issues - although ZANU PF have
denied that a
deadline was given, and we see that Mugabe is not in an rush
to have the
situation sorted out, primarily because that resolution would
require him to
concede some more power and position to the MDC.
He
also attended the food summit in Rome this last week - with a entourage
of
some 60 people - and really needed to be in Zimbabwe to oversee the
negotiations. But since there were no negotiations, his presence would have
been negated.
Did he have prior knowledge that nothing would be
tabled or discussed while
he was away?
There has been talk that
Mugabe is entirely disinterested in any
negotiations or discussions between
his party and the two MDC bodies, and we
also are aware of the temperature
within the various political circles is
heating up.
More and more
ZANU PF head honchos are telling the world that they are not
finished and
that they will 'be back' with more verve and vigour. Didymus
Mutasa told ABC
that ZANU PF have as good as won the next election - even
though we are not
aware, as yet, of any date of that election.
ZANU PF have already started
the operation that they call 'voter education'
which is a misnomer for
exercising their will over the potential MDC voter
base.
Even though
the three political parties are obliged to live up to the two
agreements
signed last year, very little has been lived up to by ZANU PF.
Their hate
speech has taken on a new level, voter intimidation has increased
in
measure, the prosecution of MDC MPs and their supporters continue
unabated -
whilst the MDC can do very little in their own defence.
The MDC is a
party borne of the need for DEMOCRATIC change and therefore
will not cross
the line into crime and violence. For this reason they leave
themselves
vulnerable.
Is Mugabe intending to abandon any pretence of a unity
government and
establish a pro-Mugabe police State? Indications on the
ground would suggest
that this is a probability more than a
possibility.
And with Mugabe upping the ante with relative ease, we await
the next ZANU
PF audacious action.
So let's be careful out
there!
Robb WJ Ellis
The Bearded Man
http://mandebvhu.instablogs.com/entry/mugabe-to-go-it-alone/