The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Harare Warns of Recession


The Monitor(Kampala)

November 3, 2001
Posted to the web November 4, 2001

Harare

Zimbabwe's government Thursday unveiled the troubled nation's 2002 annual budget, seen as clearly populist, and admitted it had failed to salvage the crumbling economy.

Zimbabwe's finance minister Simba Makoni painted a bleak picture of Zimbabwe's economy, predicting another year of economic depression.

The economy is expected to shrink 7.3 percent by the end of the year, against original estimates of 2.8 percent, and is projected to decline another 5.3 percent in 2002, Makoni said.

President Robert Mugabe last month declared an end to market reforms and a return to socialism ahead of presidential polls next year.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Financial Times

South Africa will not support Zimbabwe sanctions

By James Lamont in Johannesburg
Published: November 4 2001 17:19


South Africa said at the weekend it would not support selective sanctions
against neighbouring Zimbabwe as an international tool to promote respect
for the rule of law in the run-up to presidential elections.

Aziz Pahad, deputy minister of foreign affairs, said it was unclear what
sanctions would achieve and warned that they might precipitate economic
collapse in Zimbabwe.

"If sanctions are not going to be effective, they could make things worse.
We don't believe sanctions would work," he said.

The European Union is considering implementing "smart sanctions", including
the restriction of travel by government officials, if Zimbabwe bars EU
election observers from the country to oversee presidential elections in
April. The Cotonou Agreement between the EU and developing nations makes
provision for sanctions in response to rights abuses.

Zimbabwe's opposition Movement for Democratic Change has asked South Africa
to maintain economic lifelines with the country, arguing that isolation
would hurt civilians more than the government. South Africa has supplied
Zimbabwe with energy and may export of some of its agricultural surplus to
alleviate food shortages in Zimbabwe before the end of the year.

South Africa has put Zimbabwe's fragile economic stability as its top
priority. It fears Zimbabwe faces the total collapse of what was a strong
economy with revenues from tobacco, agricultural products and tourism. It
also fears economic hardship and mismanagement may exacerbate political
divisions between the country's Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups.

Over the past month, Pretoria's "quiet diplomacy" of engagement with
President Robert Mugabe to end land invasions and political violence has
hardened into a more candid analysis of Zimbabwe's economic straits.

"We don't fear Zimbabweans coming over our border. They come over anyway,"
said Mr Pahad. "As part of the SADC [Southern African Development
Community], we are working on how to ensure that the crisis does not deepen
into a Sierra Leone or a Democratic Republic of Congo."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

EU action on Zimbabwe and the Cotonou Agreement

A background paper  : 3 November 2001
by Trudy Stevenson,
Secretary for Policy and Research, MDC
 
The action on Zimbabwe currently being considered by the European Union falls within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement which defines the partnership between the African, Caribbean and Pacific group of countries -ACP - and the European Union - EU.
 
This agreement was signed in Cotonou, Benin on 23 June 2000.  It is essentially a trade agreement, replacing the Lome Convention which has defined our trading relationship with Europe up to now.  The agreement reflects the changes which have occurred internationally, whereby issues of rule of law, democracy and governance are now accepted as inseparable from economic development and trade, and "sovereignty" is no longer acceptable as a criterion for non-interference in the case of serious violation of internationally accepted norms of behaviour.  Thus Article 9 was being invoked a few months ago, and now the more serious Article 96 is on the table- see below.
 
Note that nowhere in either Article 9 or 96 is the word "sanctions" mentioned, merely "appropriate measures" - so much for Zanu-PF's ability to understand simple language!  The same applies to their interpretation of the American Zimbabwe Democracy and Recovery Act, which they call the Sanctions Act!
 
It is interesting to recall that only 5 weeks ago, on 27 September this year, the Minister of Industry and International Trade, Dr Herbert Murerwa, fast-tracked approval of this ACP-EU Partnership Agreement - Cotonou - by Parliament, presenting it and moving for its approval all in one day!   This is highly irregular, since the procedure laid down in Standing Orders is for any Bill or Agreement to be referred to the appropriate Portfolio Committee once it is presented, to allow the committee to study the matter thoroughly and make a report to the House before approval or rejection.
 
As it was, both Hon. Madzimure and I warned that it was a very serious document with far-reaching implications to Zimbabwe, and pleaded with the Minister to give our Committee for Foreign Affairs and Industry and International Trade time to study it and make our report.  To his credit the Minister agreed to do so, however the Speaker (Mnangagwa) ruled this out of order on a technicality - the Minister had already replied to our interventions, so he had already "wound up", and could not now allow the matter to go to committee and then wind up again.
 
In his presentation, the Minister dealt only with the trade and strictly economic aspects of the agreement, emphasizing its importance for us to secure international trading partners and the much-needed foreign exchange. On our side we highlighted the fact that democracy and human rights are also protected in the agreement, but this aspect was given little or no importance in our "consideration" of the agreement before approving it.
 
It is true that all MPs were given a copy of the Cotonou Agreement some weeks before the debate, but I doubt whether more than 5 out of the 150 actually read it, or even had a copy of it to study when it was being debated!
 
For the benefit of the general public, including the other 145 MPs, I have extracted the clauses most relevant to our current situation, as follows:
 

COTONOU

Partnership Agreement between Members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group of states of the one part, and the European Community and its member states (EU) of the other part.
 
Signed in Cotonou 23 June 2000
 
EXCERPTS:
 
PREAMBLE
... Acknowledging that a political environment guaranteeing peace, security and stability, respect for human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law and of good governance is part and parcel of long term development; acknowledging that responsibility for establishing such an environment rests primarily with the countries concerned;
 
Acknowledging that sound and sustainable economic policies are prerequisites for development;
 
Referring to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and recalling the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,...
 

Article 1 Objectives of the partnership

...the Parties hereby conclude this Agreement in order to promote and expedite the economic, cultural and social development of the ACP States, with a view to contributing to peace and security and to promoting a stable and democratic political environment.
...

Article 9 Essential elements and fundamental element

Cooperation shall be directed towards sustainable development centred on the human person, who is the main protagonist and beneficiary of development; this entails respect for and promotion of all human rights.
 
Respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms, including respect for fundamental social rights, democracy based on the rule of law and transparent and accountable governance are an integral part of sustainable development.
...
The structure of government and the prerogatives of the different powers shall be founded on rule of law, which shall entail in particular effective and accessible means of legal redress, an independent legal system guaranteeing equality before the law and an executive that is fully subject to the law.
...
Good governance, which underpins the ACP-EU Partnership, shall underpin the domestic and international policies of the Parties and constitute a fundamental element of this Agreement.
 
The Partnership shall actively support the promotion of human rights, processes of democratization, consolidation of the rule of law, and good governance.
 
These areas will be an important subject for the political dialogue.
...

Article 10 Other elements of the political environment

1. The Parties consider the following elements as contributing to the maintenance and consolidation of a stable and democratic political environment: - sustainable and equitable development involving, inter alia, access to productive resources, essential services and justice; - greater involvement of an active and organized civil society and the private sector.
2. The Parties recognize that the principles of the market economy, supported by transparent competition rules and sound economic and social policies, contribute to achieving the objectives of the partnership.

Article 11 Peace-building policies, conflict prevention and resolution

1. The Parties shall pursue an active, comprehensive and integrated policy of peace-building and conflict prevention and resolution within the framework of the Partnership.
2. The activities in the field of peace-building, conflict prevention and resolution shall in particular include support for balancing political, economic, social and cultural opportunities among all segments of society, for strengthening the democratic legitimacy and effectiveness of governance, for establishing effective mechanisms for the peaceful conciliation of group interests, for bridging dividing lines among different segments of society as well as support of ran active and organized civil society.
...

Article 96 Essential elements:

consultation procedure and appropriate measures
 
As regards human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law.
 
1. Within the meaning of this Article, the term "Party" refers to the Community and the Member States of the European Union, of the one part, and each ACP State, of the other part.
 
2 a) If despite the political dialogue conducted regularly between the Parties, a Party considers that the other Party has failed to fulfil an obligation stemming from respect for human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 9, it shall, except in cases of special urgency, supply the other Party and the Council of Ministers with the relevant information required for a thorough examination of the situation with a view to seeking a solution acceptable to the Parties.  To this end, it shall invite the other Party to hold consultations that focus on the measures taken or to be taken by the party concerned to remedy the situation.
.
The consultations shall begin no later than 15 days after the invitation and shall continue for a period established by mutual agreement, depending on the nature and gravity of the violation.  In any case, the consultations shall last no longer than 60 days.
 
If the consultations do not lead to a solution acceptable to both Parties, if consultation is refused, or in cases of special urgency, appropriate measures may be taken.  These measures shall be revoked as soon as the reasons for taking them have disappeared.
 
b) The term "cases of special urgency" shall refer to exceptional cases of particularly serious and flagrant violation of one of the essential elements referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 9, that require an immediate reaction.
 
The Party resorting to the special urgency procedure shall inform the other party and the Council of Ministers separately of the fact unless it does not have time to do so.
 
c) The "appropriate measures" referred to in the Article are measures taken in accordance with international law, and proportional to the violation.  In the selection of these measures, priority must be given to those which least disrupt the application of this agreement.  It is understood that suspension would be a measure of last resort.
 
If measures are taken in cases of special urgency, they shall be immediately notified to the other Party and the Council of Ministers.  At the request of the Party concerned, consultations may then be called in order to examine the situation thoroughly and if possible find solutions.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

From The Independent on Sunday (UK), 4 November

White farms under siege as famine looms

Harare - The looming risk of mass starvation in Zimbabwe worsened yesterday as militants moved on to more white-owned farms, beating one worker for refusing to shout ruling party slogans and forcing hundreds of others to stop work. Last night three white farming families were barricaded in their homes after hundreds of militant supporters of President Robert Mugabe's Zanu PF party, gathered on four farms in Guruve, 100 miles north of Harare. Despite a September deal signed in Nigeria to end such seizures, the occupiers told farm workers they had to make room for new black settlers on the land. The continuing violence threatens to worsen already critical food shortages in Zimbabwe. Farming experts have predicted a 40 per cent fall in agricultural output this year due to the communalisation of commercial farming. The country needs to import at least 700,000 tons of wheat and maize, but has no foreign currency to buy it. A recent report by the privately owned Financial Gazette said nearly three million villagers had registered for food aid with the government. The worst hit people had already started eating tree roots and leaves for lack of other food.

Conceding that three-quarters of Zimbabwe's 12.5 million people were now living in abject poverty, the Finance Minister, Simba Makoni, warned last week that the country urgently needed aid from abroad. But analysts say President Mugabe, who faces a crucial presidential election early next year, will remain the major hurdle to efforts by some of his more moderate ministers to normalise ties with the donor community. Mr Makoni warned that inflation had reached 83.6 per cent, which would be the average rate next year. But while he was urging ties with donors, the Foreign Minister, Stan Mudenge, a close ally of Mr Mugabe, was summoning British and EU diplomats in Harare to censure them for their stance on Zimbabwe. Mr Mudenge is said to have expressed dismay at the EU's "confrontational attitude" towards Zimbabwe. He also launched a broadside at Britain for violating the Abuja Accord on ending the land crisis. He claimed Britain was mobilising international sanctions against Zimbabwe. But, in private, Zimbabwe has asked the United Nations Development Programme to help mobilise food aid worth £200m. The president sent the Finance Minister to hold urgent private talks with Victor Angelo, the UNDP resident representative in Zimbabwe, reports said last week.

From The Sunday Telegraph, (UK), 4 November

Zimbabwe calls for aid to prevent famine

Harare - Robert Mugabe’s government has admitted for the first time that the country is facing a famine disaster as supplies of maize, the country's staple food, dry up and poor families search arid bushlands for edible tree roots to replace it. Zimbabwe's finance minister, Simba Makoni, last week warned parliament that the country faced "unprecedented hunger". While avoiding any reference to the government-backed farm invasions that have brought about Zimbabwe's food crisis, he called for huge international aid. Dr Makoni said: "Escalating prices and a high unemployment have eroded the quality of life, especially in rural areas. We now have 75 per cent of our people living below the poverty line and their per capita income has dropped to $381 a year (£260). This, with a chronic shortage of food, means that we have to appeal to the international community for assistance."

More than 1.4 million people in Matabeleland and Masvingo, where the poorest are grubbing in the bush for edible tree roots, have registered with the government for food aid. Dr Makoni has issued a warning, however, that government stocks have been depleted and that there is no money to import more. In Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's second city and capital of Matabeleland Province, the state-owned Grain Marketing Board's vast silos are empty. The Southern African Development Community's famine early warning system network (Fewsnet) says Zimbabwe must import 200,000 tons of food immediately if it is to avoid famine.

Altogether, it adds, Zimbabwe needs to import 846,000 ton of food by the middle of next year to see it through to the next harvest. President Mugabe's controversial fast-track resettlement programme has seen about 80 per cent of the country's commercial farms earmarked for state acquisition. More than 100,000 militant supporters, often armed, have invaded thousands of Zimbabwe's farms, preventing farmers planting their crops. As a result, the commercial maize crop has dropped by more than two thirds in the past two years, with many other crops suffering a similar fate.

The Zimbabwean economy, which has shrunk by 7.3 per cent this year, is expected to decline further. The finance minister predicts that it will shrink by at least another five per cent next year. Already Zimbabwe's supermarket shelves are emptying as food shortages and unworkable price controls take effect. Traditionally the country has been an exporter of food, able to feed itself and most of its southern African neighbours, but officials from the World Food Programme say they are considering moving 40,000 ton of maize from neighbouring Mozambique, one of the world's poorest countries, to stave off imminent disaster in Zimbabwe. So serious are the food shortages that they could damage Mr Mugabe's prospects of re-election next year.

From News24 (SA), 43 November

Zim FM summons envoys

Harare - Zimbabwe's foreign minister has summoned a group of European ambassadors in Harare after the European Union took steps to impose sanctions on Zimbabwe over rights abuses, the state-run Herald reported on Saturday. Foreign Minister Stan Mudenge wanted to question the diplomats from Britain, Spain and Belgium and the European Union's head of mission about Britain's role in the decision taken by EU foreign ministers on Monday to move towards imposing sanctions on the southern African nation, the paper said. He also questioned Britain's commitment to the Abuja agreement, a Commonwealth-brokered deal reached two months ago in which Zimbabwe agreed to curb political violence in exchange for British financing of its land reforms. British ambassador Brian Donnelly reportedly said he would inform his government of Zimbabwe's concerns.

On Monday, EU foreign ministers agreed to invoke Article 96 of the Cotonou agreement that governs relations between the European Union and its African, Caribbean and Pacific partners. That means Zimbabwe will be sent a formal letter by the 15-nation EU asking for consultations within 15 days on five contentious issues: ending political violence, election monitoring, press freedom, judicial independence, and a halt to illegal occupations of white-owned farms. Once the consultations are completed, the European Union will have up to 60 days to decide what action to take. It is widely expected any such action will include sanctions aimed at isolating President Robert Mugabe's regime. The EU decision followed Zimbabwe's refusal to accept European election observers, as the southern African state gears up for a presidential vote due by April next year. It also followed a Commonwealth delegation's appeal in Harare one week ago for Mugabe's government to respect its own laws and investigate reports of widespread rights violations.

From The Zimbabwe Independent, 2 November

EU rejects claims of British arm-twisting

Britain does not have the power to recommend the imposition of sanctions on Zimbabwe by the European Union; such a decision has to be agreed to by all member-states, the new European Commission head of delegation in Zimbabwe, Francesca Mosca, told the Zimbabwe Independent this week. Mosca said the issue of sanctions was not a one state mandate. "The EU is made up of 15 members so it is impossible for a single nation to take a leading role in the inception of resolutions without the consent of other member-states," she said. Government functionaries have claimed that the British government is mobilising the EU impose sanctions on Zimbabwe. Mosca said the position of the EU was to engage in talks with government concerning pertinent issues which have created the tensions between EU nations and Zimbabwe. The EU, she said, was still optimistic that Zimbabwe would allow the trading bloc’s observers to monitor the presidential poll next year. "The EU is concerned about violence in Zimbabwe," said Mosca. "One of the major priorities of our organ has been primarily focused on the presidential election next year. It is our mission that there should be free and fair elections," she said. Zimbabwe last week refused to admit European Union observers saying this was a violation of the country’s sovereignty. EU ministers of foreign affairs held a meeting on Monday under the auspices of the General Affairs Council where they noted there had been no progress in regard to ending violence or violations of human rights in the country.

The meeting, largely viewed as the beginning of the process to impose sanctions on President Mugabe’s rogue regime, focused on reviewing the situation in Zimbabwe. Issues like an end to political violence, facilitation of electoral monitoring, freedom of the media, independence of the judiciary as well as an end to the illegal occupation of properties came under scrutiny. Mosca said the council reiterated the EU’s readiness to assist Zimbabwe in preparing for and holding the election. She said she hoped the country would respond rapidly to the EU’s offer to send an exploratory mission for that purpose and then invite it to send EU observers to monitor the election itself. Last year’s parliamentary election held in June was characterised by a wave of political violence which resulted in at least 35 deaths. Mosca said the EU was not allied to opposition political parties as suggested in some political circles. The grouping was involved in a broad dialogue to foster relationships with all parties. "We have been involved with the government, non-governmental organisations, civic societies and the other political parties in the context of a broader exchange of views," she said. Mosca said the EU indirectly assisted the electorate through assistance in the purchase of ballot boxes, election observer support and other electoral concerns.

On the land issue, the EU envoy said the organisation recognised the inequities of Zimbabwe’s agrarian structure, its historical origins and the need to redress the imbalance. She said that the EU agreed that land reform could contribute to poverty reduction and was essential for stability. "The EU will therefore support land reform, including non-governmental initiatives, provided that these are implemented in a transparent, fair and sustainable manner, with respect for the law, broadened stakeholder and beneficiary participation and the inclusion of community-based land redistribution initiatives," she said. Asked to comment on the flow of aid to the country by EU member states, Mosca said that the issue depended on individual nations.

From The Zimbabwe Independent, 2 November

Govt builds fuel stocks

Zimbabwe is building up large fuel stocks to face international sanctions and provide for campaigning for the presidential election next year. Government sources said Zimbabwe was taking advantage of the concessionary arrangement with the government of Libya, which in August provided a US$90 million line of credit to import huge stocks of all oil products. The Zimbabwe Independent understands that a Libyan business delegation met President Mugabe at his Munhumutapa offices on Tuesday for almost four hours to discuss investment opportunities in Zimbabwe. The Libyan fuel is being paid for in local currency which is deposited at the Jewel Bank. The Libyans would like to use the proceeds from the sale of fuel to invest in agriculture, tourism and fuel industry.

The Independent has been told that Libyan investors were in Mashonaland West and Mashonaland East inspecting farms on Tuesday. The respective governors Peter Chanetsa and David Karimanzira accompanied the investors on the trips. As Libyan investors continue to explore business opportunities here it is not clear whether Zimbabwe has started to pay for the fuel and, if so, how much has been imported. Fuel industry sources this week said Zimbabwe was importing almost one-and-a-half times its normal monthly consumption in a bid to build stocks which had been virtually wiped out in the last 20 months of critical foreign currency shortages. Zimbabwe’s current monthly consumption is around 60 million litres but as much as 90 million litres are being pumped through the pipeline from Beira, with over a third of all imports going into the reserves.

"The idea is to build between six months and a year’s reserves of all products before the expiry of the deal with the Libyans," a source in the industry said. "Before the shortages started almost two years ago, Zimbabwe used to have six months reserves but the truth of the matter is that other than the Libyans, no one is prepared to go into a big deal with Zimbabwe because of the country’s high risk factor. Zimbabwe would rather make hay while the sun shines," the source said. The industry sources said Zimbabwe had enough storage facilities such as the underground tanks in Mabvuku and Msasa, which can store up to 700 million litres of fuel. This is enough to supply the country for 10 months. Zimbabwe consumes two million litre of fuel per day. There are however other storage facilities at Birmingham Road in Harare, Beitbridge, Bulawayo, Gweru, Mutare and the smaller urban centres. These have a combined capacity of over 500 million litres.

From The Sunday Independent (SA), 4 November

Bin Laden link with war gems shocks De Beers

Sierra Leone and De Beers, the South African-based global diamond giant, have reacted with alarm to a United States media report that terror suspect Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda network had made millions by trading in smuggled diamonds from the west African country. The Al-Qaeda network has collected millions of dollars in the past three years from the illicit sale of diamonds mined by rebels in Sierra Leone, The Washington Post reported on Friday. Quoting unnamed US and European intelligence officials and two sources with direct knowledge of the diamond sales, the newspaper described an operation that has helped finance the Al-Qaeda network, which the US blames for the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington.

The newspaper said diamond dealers, working with men identified by the FBI as important Al-Qaeda figures, bought diamonds from the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) rebels at below-market prices and sold them for big profits in Europe. The Post quoted unnamed sources as saying that since July, these diamond dealers had bought far more diamonds than usual, paying premium prices for them. The newspaper said investigators believe this suggests that Al-Qaeda, perhaps anticipating its accounts would be frozen after September 11, strove to protect its money by sinking it into diamonds, which can be easily hidden, hold their value and are hard to trace. "I now believe that to cut off Al-Qaeda funds and laundering activities, you have to cut off the diamond pipeline," the Post quoted an unnamed European investigator as saying. "We are talking about millions and maybe tens of millions of dollars in profits and laundering."

Solomon Berewa, the Sierra Leone justice minister, said on Friday that Freetown would do its best to stop the alleged diamond trade between Al-Qaeda and the RUF. "The RUF have been dealing in diamonds as far back as the start of their campaign, but we never would have imagined this connection," Berewa said. Tom Tweedy, speaking for De Beers, expressed shock on Saturday at the news of Al-Qaeda having bought gems from the Sierra Leonean rebels. He said he had not been aware of Bin Laden's involvement with "blood stones", but that "anything is possible". De Beers has not had any presence in Sierra Leone for more than 15 years, he said, last buying from that country in about 1985. De Beers has been at pains in recent years to co-operate with international efforts to cut off the supplies of diamonds that feed regional conflicts such as the one in Sierra Leone. "Diamonds are a high value, low volume item," Tweedy said. "Where there is not a regulated diamond industry, it's open to abuse." He said that the United Nations had, with the Sierra Leone government, put in place structures to stop dealing in conflict diamonds, which accounts for two percent of the gem market. Tweedy said the UN had done a "magnificent job" of putting in place processes for fraud-free certificate systems which ensured that diamonds carried proof of having come from legitimate mines. Tweedy said De Beers "encouraged every authority to nail and smash" conflict diamond dealing.

Reuters reports that the diamond industry edged closer on Thursday to agreeing on ways to curb illegal exports of so-called "blood diamonds" from war-torn Africa, but reservations by the US still hung over a possible deal. Officials and industry experts from 25 countries ended their latest round of talks known as the Kimberley Process in the Angolan capital of Luanda with broad agreement on a certification scheme to ensure that exported diamonds carried proof that they came from legitimate mines. Under the proposed scheme, certificates to verify the origin of each package's contents would accompany each shipment of stones, with additional certificates from each country traversed, delegates said. But the US - the world's biggest jewellery market - raised concerns that the proposed certificates could be incompatible with World Trade Organisation rules.

Sierra Leone's Berewa said there had been reports of Bin Laden links in local tabloid papers, but that the report in the Washington Post was in a different league. "We dismissed those with a wave of the hand, but if the Washington Post reports this, we will take action," he said. "We and the international community will take action to find out what's happening and do our best to stop it, if it's true." Foday Sankoh, Sierra Leone's controversial former vice-president and leader of the RUF, who has been in jail since his arrest last May, paid a mysterious visit to South Africa in February last year. Sankoh, who was subject to a UN travel ban because of suspected human rights abuses, left the country when his presence was exposed, apparently due to a bungle in the South African department of foreign affairs.

Shortly before Sankoh was arrested, Berewa, then the attorney-general in Sierra Leone, emerged from Sankoh's house following an earlier shootout, brandishing papers that he said proved Sankoh was enriching himself by dishing out diamond concessions to various parties, including South Africa. Sankoh's rebels controlled much of Sierra Leone's diamond fields during the bloody civil war during which Sankoh's forces stand accused of mutilating about 10 000 civilians and using drugged child soldiers to spearhead a reign of terror. Sankoh later struck a deal in July 1999 with the government whereby he became vice-president and minister of mines in a government of national unity, thus formalising his influence over the country's highly lucrative diamond industry. Liberian leader Charles Taylor, who headed a ruthless rebel group that seized power in that country, was considered a close ally of Sankoh. Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was a supporter of Taylor, and through him of Sankoh, and is believed to have benefited from the rich pickings in Sierra Leone's diamond fields. Sankoh was jailed in May last year after being held by the militia of Johnny-Paul Koroma and handed over to the government. In March this year the Sierra Leone government said that it had no plans yet to put Sankoh on trial.

The top diamond trade body in Antwerp, Europe's prime centre for the stones, said on Friday it was "very, very surprised" at press reports saying that the Bin Laden network had made millions from trading in diamonds. "This is completely new. We are very, very surprised," said Youri Steverlynck, speaking for the Antwerp high diamond council. Steverlynck said his organisation had never heard of Islamic terror organisations being funded via the diamond trade, which he insisted was now very strictly controlled, with no more than 1 to 1,5 percent of output being smuggled. He said that two Lebanese traders named in the Washington Post article as key Antwerp figures in the alleged trading "are not registered in Belgium, either as members of a diamond market or as diamond traders". The high diamond council "does not know them", he said. Steverlynck suggested that the Washington Post article might be referring to a "previous situation", as in recent years diamond trading circuits had been tightened considerably. "It is impossible to organise a totally clandestine diamond trading operation on a large scale," he said. "But perhaps there is trafficking on a small scale."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Telegraph

Zimbabwe calls for aid to prevent famine
By Brian Latham in Harare
(Filed: 04/11/2001)


ROBERT MUGABE'S government has admitted for the first time that the country
is facing a famine disaster as supplies of maize, the country's staple food,
dry up and poor families search arid bushlands for edible tree roots to
replace it.

Zimbabwe's finance minister, Simba Makoni, last week warned parliament that
the country faced "unprecedented hunger". While avoiding any reference to
the government-backed farm invasions that have brought about Zimbabwe's food
crisis, he called for huge international aid.

Dr Makoni said: "Escalating prices and a high unemployment have eroded the
quality of life, especially in rural areas. We now have 75 per cent of our
people living below the poverty line and their per capita income has dropped
to $381 a year [£260].

"This, with a chronic shortage of food, means that we have to appeal to the
international community for assistance."

More than 1.4 million people in Matabeleland and Masvingo, where the poorest
are grubbing in the bush for edible tree roots, have registered with the
government for food aid. Dr Makoni has issued a warning, however, that
government stocks have been depleted and that there is no money to import
more.

In Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's second city and capital of Matabeleland Province,
the state-owned Grain Marketing Board's vast silos are empty. The Southern
African Development Community's famine early warning system network
(Fewsnet) says Zimbabwe must import 200,000 tons of food immediately if it
is to avoid famine.

Altogether, it adds, Zimbabwe needs to import 846,000 ton of food by the
middle of next year to see it through to the next harvest. President
Mugabe's controversial fast-track resettlement programme has seen about 80
per cent of the country's commercial farms earmarked for state acquisition.

More than 100,000 militant supporters, often armed, have invaded thousands
of Zimbabwe's farms, preventing farmers planting their crops. As a result,
the commercial maize crop has dropped by more than two thirds in the past
two years, with many other crops suffering a similar fate.

The Zimbabwean economy, which has shrunk by 7.3 per cent this year, is
expected to decline further. The finance minister predicts that it will
shrink by at least another five per cent next year. Already Zimbabwe's
supermarket shelves are emptying as food shortages and unworkable price
controls take effect.

Traditionally the country has been an exporter of food, able to feed itself
and most of its southern African neighbours, but officials from the World
Food Programme say they are considering moving 40,000 ton of maize from
neighbouring Mozambique, one of the world's poorest countries, to stave off
imminent disaster in Zimbabwe.

So serious are the food shortages that they could damage Mr Mugabe's
prospects of re-election next year.
Back to the Top
Back to Index