| The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
Lastword RECENTLY, one of the country’s two vice-presidents, Joseph Msika, was widely quoted as having said that “white people are not human beings”. He has neither, as far as I am aware, retracted this gross statement, nor denied it. Nor has he been asked to do so by any of his colleagues in government or by anyone working in the many organs which comprise what has become known as the state media. The only condemnations have emanated, predictably and rightly, from the independent press. Last week, the former Zimbabwe cricket captain, Alastair Campbell, apparently informed members of the British media of his misgivings about the Zimbabwe Cricket Union’s “quota” policies, whereupon all hell broke loose on the back page of the Herald (October 17). Msika is a quotable political entity, Campbell a sporting one. The Herald and its stable mates in the state media are supposedly in the job of collecting and commenting upon quotations from persons with a high public profile. Here then, for all reasonable minds to witness and digest, is a classic illustration of their lack of balance and objectivity in such matters. I am not well-versed in the rules and regulations governing what contracted players may, or may not, say to the media. I know for certain, though, that Campbell did not tell them (the British press) that “blacks are not human beings”, and had he done that then he would have fully deserved all that he got, and more. Fatwah It has become a matter of concern that to express even the mildest misgivings about the ZCU’s commitment to the system of quotas, or “goals” as the Zackrisson report so sweetly puts it, is to invite, literally, a Fatwah upon one’s head from certain quarters. The fact remains, however, that a quota system is autocratic and decrees mandatory composition, regardless of talent or ability. What, for example, if the Indian cricket authorities were, for whatever reason, to suddenly proclaim that future national teams must contain a minimum of four Muslim players, or five Hindu players? Or that no less than two Sikhs were to be included in every national side? Or at least three members of the Untouchable caste? They would very quickly become the laughing stock of world cricket, not to mention the objects of derision and justifiable criticism. More seriously, though, the morale of the Indian cricket team would suffer accordingly, as would, inevitably, the standard of their cricket. Yet, would we accuse Sourav Ganguly or Sachin Tendulkar of being racist, of indulging in class or religious bigotry in the event that they, as two of the team’s kingpins, objected to the imposition of such a system on their team’s selectors? Quite the opposite, in fact, as most sane people would rush to defend them in their efforts to present the best possible team at all times, regardless of any other extraneous factors, disciplinary infractions aside. As it is, the modern Indian team is a formidable, yet a happy mixture of all those elements and more — a perfect example of the merit system at work. Concern, not racism Yes, white cricketers are, to a man, very concerned about current trends in Zimbabwean cricket but not, as is constantly being alleged, because they are vicious racists determined to keep black cricket players at bay. They are legitimately concerned about the principle of merit selection versus the quota system and this concern does not make them racist. You see, under a quota system the only players that stand to lose will be those with white skins. To understand just a little about human nature would be to understand some of the tensions in the game at present. The point is, when will the leadership of the ZCU stand up and defend ALL their cricket players from the depradations of the press, state or independent? And to keep calling certain established players “multi-millionaires” in an attempt to portray them as selfish and greedy is also patently ridiculous and, given the worthless state of the local dollar, a sorry argument. Andy Flower could have been a “proper” millionaire years ago had he decided to ditch his loyalties to his country, as could a few other of our local players. The harsh fact of the matter is that until there is something else, other than the national squad, considered worthwhile aiming for in Zimbabwean cricket, then for so long will the competition for places in that squad be an acrimonious affair. The national squad, under the present system, is by far the tallest peak of a very high mountain, one which drops steeply away to the largely inactive and non-travelling “A” side, takes a further precipitous drop down to a tame inter-provincial contest and then, way down at the bottom of the slope, the intercity domestic league. It is a matter of absolute priority for the ZCU to gain entry for Zimbabwean sides into South Africa’s domestic one- and four-day competitions. Look at Kenya If we in Zimbabwe are to look anywhere for our future inspiration as a cricket-playing nation, then it need be no further than our near neighbours Kenya. Now there is a truly African cricket team, one that bounced back with alacrity from a disastrous run of defeats against two of the world’s most powerful sides to defeat India comprehensively last Thursday in Port Elizabeth. I use them, not as some would — as an excuse to suppress the abundance of white African talent |
| Friday, 26 October, 2001, 16:45 GMT 17:45 UK
Commonwealth team visit farms
Government says there are more people on the waiting
list for farms A visiting Commonwealth delegation to Zimbabwe has been to
occupied farms on Friday on the second day of their visit to assess whether
promises to end political violence and intimidation are being met.
An angry exchange of words was reported between a Canadian envoy and a Zimbabwean official at one farm south of the capital. A diplomat told AP news agency that officials were reluctant to allow them to talks to a group of white farmers.
But a BBC correspondent who caught up with the team as it toured Bita Farm the Wedza communal area, 140km south of the capital Harare. There, he said, the ministers listened attentively to presentations from the farm owner, government officials and representatives of the 82 families who have been resettled on his farm. Acid scarred women The farmer pleaded with the government to spare his land because, according to him, farm workers would suffer if it is taken away. At its peak the farm produced tobacco, maize and paprika.
One of the members of the visiting team, Canadian Keath Martin told the BBC: " I have reports that farm workers have been brutalised and a number of them beaten up and some killed." " We saw pictures of women that had acid thrown over their faces and that is profoundly tragic," he added. On Thursday the group held talks with President Robert Mugabe in the capital, Harare. Invasion continues Neither side would comment officially on the talks but Mr Mugabe is reported to have told them he is committed to the deal agreed in Abuja, Nigeria, last month. The main aim of the mission is to set a timetable for President Mugabe's government to comply with the Nigerian-brokered deal to end the violent invasions of white-owned farms.
But opposition groups and white commercial farmers in Zimbabwe say the Abuja accord has had little success and the illegal occupation of commercial farms by groups of government supporters, so called war veterans and landless peasants has continued. The seven-member Commonwealth team is due to visit southern Masvingo and eastern Mashonaland East provinces. It is led by Nigerian Foreign Minister Sule Lamido and includes representatives from South Africa, Kenya, Britain, Canada and Australia, as well as the Commonwealth Secretary General, Don McKinnon.
'Ongoing implementation' Mr McKinnon told the BBC it was a priority of the mission to "ensure the ongoing implementation" of the agreement, signed in the Nigerian capital Abuja. He said the talks would not be limited to the single issue of farm invasions.
"If you look at the Abuja agreement it was well beyond land itself. There was an undertaking that the rule of law would be observed too," he said. But according to the Reuters news agency, analysts warn the mission may hear the right words but see little or no action.
There have been mixed messages from Harare.
The government has promised to cooperate with the delegation amid continuing hostility to white farmers who have questioned its commitment to the Nigerian deal. Mixed messages Under the deal signed in Abuja, Zimbabwe agreed to stop homeless black people from seizing white-owned farms. In return for Zimbabwe agreeing to respect the rule of law, Britain agreed to find £36m ($53m) to compensate white farm-owners whose land would be redistributed to poor black families. But Mr Mugabe's government has recently launched several verbal attacks against farmers who believe the deal is not being taken seriously.
"With this sort of approach, I don't see where the Commonwealth will find room for progress," political analyst Chenjerai Hove was quoted as saying. Militants have occupied nearly 2,000 white-owned farms since last year, with the tacit approval of the government. Farmers say the violence has not let up since the Commonwealth deal, and that there has been no action by the government to evict illegal land invaders. Reports of violence and intimidation directed at members of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change are also persisting. |
According to reports in the independent Zimbabwean media, price caps on basic foodstuffs have forced many producers to operate at a loss, leaving them with no choice but to go out of business.
The baking industry, which has been losing an estimated $33,000 a day, has been hit particularly hard.
Rationing now in force
Basic goods including bread, wheat, maize, cooking oil and soap are reported
to be becoming increasingly scarce as a result, with rationing now in force in
many areas.
The Zimbabwean Government imposed the price caps on 10 October, citing the need to bring the country's inflation rate under control, which is currently running at over 70% a year. The country's soaring inflation stems from the weakness of the Zimbabwean
dollar and its heavy reliance on imported fuel, priced in US dollars.
A slump in the world price of metals and agricultural commodities, the
country's principal exports, has deprived Zimbabwean importers of hard currency.
Grain shortages caused by the government's policy of seizing white-owned
farms have also fuelled a sharp increase in food prices.
Some observers in the Zimbabwean capital, Harare, believe that the price
controls are a populist measure designed to shore up electoral support for Mr
Mugabe's government ahead of presidential elections next year.
"The government wants to be sure that it can rely on the urban vote, but the
policy is backfiring already. We are heading into serious shortages, and the
people are angry," said one local source.
Zimbabwe is due to hold presidential elections by April 2002, but no firm
date has yet been set.
Currency squeeze