http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
20:53
Dumisani Muleya
THE mysterious death of Zimbabwe’s most
decorated retired army general and
political kingmaker Solomon Mujuru in a
blaze which burnt him to ashes in
the early hours of Tuesday would almost
certainly have far-reaching
consequences on Zimbabwe’s political
landscape.
Given that Mujuru was a towering figure in Zimbabwe’s
political scene before
and after Independence from Britain in 1980, his
shock death, which left
emotional scars and anger in its trail, would
inevitably fuel the already
vicious power struggle within the faction-ridden
Zanu PF which President
Robert Mugabe (pictured), gradually losing control
due to old age and
ill-health, is tenuously struggling to keep
together.
Mugabe’s cutthroat succession battle is
increasingly becoming a clear and
present danger to Zanu PF and Zimbabwe’s
future.
This is now widely acknowledged within the party, hence agitated
and panicky
attempts to discuss the issue, particularly ahead of the next
critical
elections.
Zanu PF officials now agree that it would be
practically impossible for
Mugabe to become a candidate if elections are
held when they are
constitutionally due in 2013. This is why they are
desperately pushing for
elections before that to ensure Mugabe enters the
race when he is still fit
to sustain a rigorous campaign and hectic
schedule.
Mugabe is beleaguered with old age and ill-health.
Officially he is
suffering from “cataracts” –– a clouding of the eye lens
which results in
poor sight –– but some say he has prostate cancer and other
expected old age
ailments.
Talk of Mugabe’s health failures,
compounded by old age, has unleashed a new
wave of intrigue, plotting and
manoeuvring in his dynamic succession issue
which has left many ambitious
aspirants licking their wounds, as damaged
goods or buried under the
wreckage of ruined careers.
Mujuru, an influential figure in
Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle and recent
politics who had become very
wealthy owning a vast business empire,
demonstrated his political muscle in
2004 when he engineered the rise of his
wife Joice to the position of
vice-president of Zanu PF and the state.
Although his arch-rival Emmerson
Mnangagwa was racing ahead before the 2004
Zanu PF congress, Mujuru
decisively intervened and turned the tables against
a man who had managed to
mobilise eight out of 10 provinces to vote for him.
Prior to that
Mujuru, working with a consortium of groups and individuals
opposed to
Mnangagwa, had helped Vice-President John Nkomo to become Zanu PF
chairman
in 1999. Mujuru also assisted Nkomo to become vice-president in
2009,
blocking politburo member Oppah Muchinguri who was running for the
same
position on the Mnangagwa ticket.
So since the run of the century,
from 1999 onwards, Mujuru become more
powerful in Zanu PF as he exerted his
influence to largely determine the
outcome of congresses around high-ranking
posts besides that of Mugabe.
Mujuru tried and failed to challenge Mugabe
several times in recent years
although his faction succeeded in 2006 during
the Goromonzi conference to
thwart Mugabe’s plan to extend his term of
office by two years from 2008 to
2010 without going to
elections.
In the run-up to the 2008 elections, Mujuru, working
closely with some of
his allies in the politburo then, mainly Dumiso
Dabengwa and Simba Makoni,
fought hard to prevent Mugabe from becoming a
candidate at the polls.
Records of politburo meetings mainly between 2005
and 2008 show Mujuru and
Dabengwa as being some of the most vocal officials
in the politburo.
They wanted Mugabe to step down, arguing he was old and
tired and would lead
the party to defeat at the polls –– something which
actually happened
although he succeeded to hang onto power through a
campaign of violence and
brutality. Mnangagwa and his faction stood by
Mugabe.
Mujuru helped to create a groundswell of opinion within Zanu
PF against and
even forced for the convening of an extraordinary congress in
December 2008
in a bid to oust Mugabe.
Dabengwa has confirmed that
Mujuru and himself tried in vain to see Mugabe
to convince him to step down
but were ignored. Although Mujuru and Dabengwa
succeeded in securing an
extraordinary congress to try to remove Mugabe,
they failed in their main
objective as the Zanu PF leader for 34 years now
managed to cling onto his
position by his fingernails.
The congress was, however, marred by
public wrangling.
The late vice-president Joseph Msika and Nkomo almost
walked out after a
dispute erupted over the role of the then suspended war
veterans leader
Jabulani Sibanda. In a fit of rage triggered by a decision
to acknowledge
and allow Sibanda to address congress, Msika stood up and
said “John let’s
go” before Mugabe sprung onto action to stop them from
storming out.
His voice thundering across the Harare International
Conference Centre,
Mugabe angrily ordered everyone to sit down, anxiously
asking: “What will
the media say tomorrow about this?”
Although
they eventually failed to topple Mugabe, Mujuru and Dabengwa had
the last
laugh when their leader lost the first round of the elections in
March 2008
to Prime Minister and MDC-T leader Morgan Tsvangirai before
restoring to
violence and intimidation to retain power.
Mujuru was influential in
the formation of the inclusive government and the
current processes which
are expected to lead to free and fair elections. His
power cut across
politics and the corporate world in this country. This
explains why on
Tuesday senior Zanu PF ministers and top government
officials thronged his
farm and later Chisipite to pay their last respects.
There were also
dramatic scenes as ministers wept, creating a spectacle
probably a precursor
of attention-grabbing events almost certain to come in
months
ahead.
In terms of impact and political ramifications, Mujuru’s death
is being
widely compared to the assassination of Herbert Chitepo and killing
of
Josiah Tongogara.
Mujuru helped Mugabe to consolidate himself
as Zanu PF leader when he
arrived in Mozambique in 1975 after the death of
Chitepo. He also helped
Mugabe to survive internal upheavals, including
political coups, which
threatened to sweep the veteran nationalist from
power. He was also central
to the integration of the three rival armies in
1980 and managing the
explosive process until his retirement in
1992.
Political analyst Dr Ibbo Mandaza said Mujuru’s death would
have a serious
impact on Zimbabwean politics.
“The departure from
the political scene of Mujuru, who died last night
(Tuesday) in as yet
unexplained but most tragic circumstances, leaves a vast
political void,
with immense ramifications still to be fathomed and
understood in the months
ahead,” he said. “For, he was one of the major
pillars in Zimbabwe’s
post-independence politics, not least in the
foundation and life of the
state itself, to this day.”
Mandaza said Mujuru’s death could shake
the political scene although his
wife Joice would remain the favourite to
succeed Mugabe.
“Given the ongoing proverbial succession debate in
Zimbabwe, there will, of
course, be much speculation about the balance of
forces after his death.
Mujuru was a critical factor in ensuring things in
Zanu PF don’t fall apart.
In the final analysis, it will be necessary to
ensure a constitutional
political succession –– and transition –– in
Zimbabwe,” he said.
“Joice Mujuru has lost a husband and critical
political mentor. But he
leaves her a Vice-President of both Zanu PF and the
state, an unassailable
position as long as Zimbabwe stays on the
constitutional path,
multi-partyism and democratisation process in the
months ahead.”
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
20:04
Wongai Zhangazha
THE Constitution Select Committee (Copac)
has finished compiling the
preliminary district and provincial reports of
the draft constitution but
has raised fears that a stakeholders’ conference
might delay the
constitution-making process due to financial
constraints.
The preliminary reports were completed yesterday paving the way
for Copac to
start drafting a new constitution using the data compiled
during the
outreach programme.
Copac co-chairperson Paul Mangwana
said yesterday that although there had
been delays, they had made
satisfactory progress.
Mangwana noted that funding and politicisation
of the constitution-making
process were proving to be major
challenges.
“The progress made so far has been good,” said Mangwana.
“Yes, we have had
delays, but the district and provincial reports are now
done. They are still
in data format and work is in progress to develop them
into narratives. They
still have to be synthesised,” said
Mangwana.
“At this level, we will determine which of the views that
came through the
districts and provinces were the most popular. In some
thematic areas like
the Bill of Rights, we had as much as 300 responses and
the natural
resources thematic area had around 200
responses.”
Copac started working on the compilation of district,
provincial and
national reports on August 1 and had earmarked August 22 as
the date to
start work on the actual drafting of the constitution followed
by a
stakeholders’ conference on September 30.
A draft report is
expected to be presented to parliament on October 15 with
a referendum on
January 15 next year.
The timelines have been dismissed as
nonsensical by MDC leader Welshman
Ncube, who believes that a draft
constitution can only be ready for a
referendum towards the end of next
year.
Mangwana was non-committal on the dates and was not sure if
Copac would meet
the set timelines.
“I have difficulties in
talking about dates. The problem is when you are not
in charge of finances,
it’s difficult to know exactly when the whole process
will be done. At the
moment we have resources for the reports but we don’t
have resources for the
stakeholders’ conference which needs about US$4,6
million.
There are
also no resources yet for the referendum,” said Mangwana.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
19:27
Wongai Zhangazha
ZIMBABWE’S coalition government has no
capacity to look after failed asylum
seekers set to be deported from
neighbouring South Africa in the coming
months.
Reports suggest that
thousands of failed asylum seekers would be
expelled.
However, most failed asylum seekers have shown a
reluctance to return home
citing the country’s high unemployment rate
presently estimated at 80%.
Already, six provinces are experiencing
serious food shortages while
millions have no access to clean water and
sanitation.
The International Organisation for Migration (IOM)
estimates that there are
about 1,5 million Zimbabweans living in South
Africa.
The South African government launched the “Zimbabwean
Documentation Process”
last year to help Zimbabweans resident in South
Africa make special
applications for work, study and business
permits.
About 250 000 applications from Zimbabweans seeking
permission to remain in
South Africa have been processed and the South
African government has made
it clear that those who fail to get their papers
in order would be deported
from next month.
Most citizens who
left the country in the last decade did so for political
and economic
reasons.
However, the situation has slightly improved resulting in
some people
returning home.
A number of Zimbabweans are said to
be struggling socially and financially
in South Africa and the situation is
not made any easier by locals who
accuse them of committing crime and
“stealing” jobs.
What will happen if undocumented Zimbabweans are
deported given that the
country has no proper and concrete provisions in
place?
By the end of June, the inclusive government had managed to
implement only
25% of the Government Works Programme due to lack of capacity
caused by lack
of funding.
Social commentator Blessing Vava said
the coalition government was not ready
to assist deported failed asylum
seekers since there were a number of other
issues it was failing to tackle
in the country.
“From the look of things, our government is not
prepared to assist these
people,” said Vava.
“Mind you, already
we have alarming unemployment figures as thousands of
school and college
leavers are failing to get employment because our
industry is not
capacitated.”
“Moreover, the reason why millions fled the country was
because of the
economic and political situation the Zanu PF government got
us into and it’s
not serving and is still not serving the interests of its
citizens. And now
we have an inclusive government that seems preoccupied
with self-enrichment
instead of improving the lives of its citizens,” Vava
said.
Human rights organisations say the political situation has
remained tense in
the country ahead of the constitutional referendum and
elections.
The Zimbabwe Peace Project (ZPP) reported in June that prospective
election
candidates were now campaigning and this had resulted in people’s
rights
being violated.
Cases of politically motivated violence
remain high and the atmosphere has
remained volatile particularly in the
provinces of Midlands, Manicaland,
Mashonaland Central, Mashonaland East and
Masvingo.
The ZPP said it had recorded 1 014 politically-motivated
human rights
violations compared to 994 in May.
While Zimbabwe’s
economy has slightly improved following the introduction of
the US dollar,
commentators say the country’s economy was going to be put
under immense
pressure if the failed asylum seekers were brought home in
huge
numbers.
Social analyst Maxwell Saungweme said it would be a disaster
having the
failed asylum seekers returning without important issues being
addressed and
implemented first.
“At present, the government is
not prepared to receive such a big number of
Zimbabweans back home,” said
Saungweme.
“Economically with high levels of unemployment it will be
a disaster to have
these people come back. They will just add to the already
bloating
unemployment figures.”
Saungweme said politically, some
of the failed asylum seekers were going to
face some difficulties to fit
into society.
“Politically, these people will inevitably form part of
the opposition force
to this inclusive government which is not delivering
much. The government
has to prepare for more political pressure on top of
the pressure it is
currently getting from civil society and general populace
who feel the
priorities of the inclusive government are not pro-poor and not
beneficial
to the majority of Zimbabweans. If government was functioning
well one would
expect the department of social welfare to support these
people to
re-establish themselves at home.
But thinking that this
government will be able to do that now is dreaming,”
he
said.
However, economic justice and governance commentator David
Takawira said it
was now an opportunity for the government to prove its
existence.
Takawira said: “This is not a question of whether
government is prepared or
not, it is a question of whether government will
start accepting its
constitutional mandate to provide its citizen with
political, economic and
social freedoms and take care of its own citizens.
As an immediate
intervention to tackle this crisis, there is need for the
government in
partnership with organisations such as IOM to develop a skills
or competency
database for easy referrals given the current backlog in
government
departments and industry. The approach should be rights-based
and
people-centred.”
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
19:15
Paidamoyo Muzulu
PRESIDENT Robert Mugabe is scheduled to
officially open the fourth session
of parliament next week but nothing
suggests that he would table any
legislative agenda introducing democratic
reforms since his eyes are set on
an early election.
Unless this session
and next year’s session produce something extraordinary,
then the seventh
parliament will go down in history as having betrayed
Zimbabweans hope for a
democratic state.
This parliament would be remembered for fluffing
the opportunity to amend
the Electoral Act, Posa, Aippa as well as
regulating the pervasive powers of
the CIO, and sacrificing it on the altar
of political expediency.
Despite having evenly balanced
representation among the main political
parties, parliamentary debates have
largely been staid and sterile. The
house has conveniently steered clear of
the democratisation agenda.
The legislature is devoid of any robust
personalities who debate fearlessly
in the mould of Lazarus Nyarayebani,
Sydney Malunga, Margaret Dongo,
Dzikamai Mavhaire and Timothy Mubawu, who
stood for their principles.
The parliament’s legislative agenda was
even made easier by the 2008 Global
Political Agreement (GPA) which gave
birth to the inclusive government.
Opening up of the public sphere and
reforming the media, constitutional
reforms, land audit, security sector
reforms and electoral changes were to
be the legislature’s top
priorities.
However, three years into its five-year term, the house
is yet to make any
significant move on these matters.
Instead, it
has dutifully passed enough laws to regularise the coalition
government
arrangement. The only significant sittings this parliament has
had were to
pass Constitutional Amendment 19 to create the offices of the
prime minister
and his deputies, pass the National Security Council Bill as
well as the
mandatory monetary bills.
After that constitutional amendment, the
inclusive government has not shown
any appetite or displayed any urgency to
introduce democratic legislative
reforms.
The legislature has
remained meekly silent, albeit for one flash when MDC-T
chief whip Innocent
Gonese introduced a Private Members Bill in a bid to
force parliament to
debate the Posa Amendment Bill. However, the Bill
remains on the order paper
three sessions after it was first introduced.
Gonese’s bill shook the
foundations of the coalition government with Zanu PF
legislators accusing
him of usurping the executive’s powers. Justice
minister Patrick Chinamasa
brought the Posa amendment to a halt in the
senate arguing that the matter
was a GPA issue.
This argument suggests that only government makes
decisions and laws while
parliament is just a conduit to pass
legislation.
Parliament has only dealt with matters presented by the
executive and passed
them without any amendments for fear of rocking the
shaky coalition
government.
The 2011 budget was passed without
any amendments even though legislators
from across the political divide had
initially agreed to block its passage
until certain concerns had been
addressed.
In a rare show of unity, Finance minister Tendai Biti and
Vice President
Joice Mujuru whipped their members to approve the budget
without debate or
any amendment.
It is only in some portfolio
committees where some members of the executive
have come out with an egg on
their faces.
Committees such as the Mines and Energy, Budget and
Finance and Public
Accounts have been a pain to errant ministers. The Mines
and Energy
committee even sought to have Chinamasa impeached for lying
before the
committee when he gave evidence on the status of Shabanie and
Mashaba Mines,
which are under state reconstruction.
Pedzisai
Ruhanya, Crisis Coalition Zimbabwe programmes manager, said the
ushering in
of an inclusive government in February 2009 had killed
parliamentary
democracy in the country.
“There is no parliament in Zimbabwe,” said
Ruhanya. “The inclusive
government destroyed the role of the House. There
are no longer any robust
debates because of the inclusive government. One
can say there is no longer
parliamentary democracy but executive
dictatorship,” Ruhanya said.
Trevor Maisiri, African Reform Institute
director, said parliament had
become a casualty of political grandstanding
by political leaders wishing to
score political points.
“The
legislative agenda has been overtaken by political expediency and
grandstanding,” Maisiri said. “Both Zanu PF and MDC-T are posturing for
elections. It seems they are only keen at dislodging each other from power.
These moves are meant to deliberately delay the legislative agenda for
democratisation.”
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
20:01
Paidamoyo Muzulu
CONTROVERSIAL Destiny of Afrika Network
(DANet) founder Obadiah Musindo has
launched an ambitious national housing
project aimed at delivering 110 000
stands in the next 24 months in his bid
to gain two million votes for Zanu
PF in impending elections.
Musindo
launched his national housing project in 2007. To qualify for a
stand, one
has to be a fully paid up member of DANet and invariably a Zanu
PF card
carrying member.
The controversial Musindo claimed that DANet was
allocated land by the
municipalities of Bulawayo, Gweru, Zvishavane,
Masvingo, Mutare, Kwekwe,
Kadoma, Chegutu, Norton, Marondera, Chinhoyi,
Karoi, Kariba, Hauna and
Birchenough Bridge.
Musindo said DANet
got the land from local authorities with the help of
Local Government
minister Ignatius Chombo.
Internal DANet correspondence in possession
of the Zimbabwe Independent
shows that the pseudo religious grouping has
embarked on a massive Zanu PF
membership recruitment drive.
In a
letter to all DANet committee members dated August 12 Musindo wrote:
“It is
as a result of our desire to mobilise two million votes for Zanu PF
in
upcoming elections that we highlight the following to your attention. All
structures of DANet must be restructured and restrengthened and every member
must be an effective agent of mobilisation.”
Musindo’s letter
further reminded the committee members that they either had
to support Zanu
PF or leave his organisation.
“Those who are not willing and
committed to fully campaign for Zanu PF and
boldly stand behind the
visionary leadership of Cde President Robert Mugabe
have no place in the
leadership circles of Danet,” read the letter.
Musindo confirmed the
Zanu PF mobilisation campaign on Tuesday saying DANet
had a duty to protect
Zanu PF’s continued rule of the country.
“We are at an advanced stage
to make sure Zanu PF remains in power and
Mugabe’s policies, like
indigenisation and economic empowerment, are
implemented,” he
said.
He said DANet would use its housing co-operative membership to
drum up
support for Zanu PF and members would each be asked to pay a US$1
subscription fee every month to show loyalty to the
organisation.
“We have land in most urban centres and growth points
across the country.
The first phase had 10 000 stands but in the second
phase we are aiming at
50 000 stands,” Musindo said.
He also
revealed that DANet was close to securing a R1 billion loan from a
South
African financial institution to fund its housing projects.
“We are
in the process of securing R1 billion for the project and we will be
developing pre-engineered houses just like the Chinese because the process
is faster and cheaper,” he said.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
19:59
MALAWI Watch said president Bingu wa Mutharika must recover a
US$20m debt
back from Zimbabwe and spruce down his bloated cabinet to size
in order to
resuscitate the country’s flagging economy.
The watchdog’s
executive director Billy Banda said Mutharika must move
swiftly “in
addressing our economic struggles so that we can recover
quickly”.
“One way to help our economy recover is by recovering
US$20m which was
unceremoniously lent to Zimbabwe. Malawian people need that
money at this
critical time of economic desperation,” said
Banda.
But Malawi’s Finance Minister Ken Kandodo told the Daily Times
that
officials went to Zimbabwe recently “in our efforts to recover the
money”.
“Even us as government are not happy that such an amount of
money has not
been paid back for such a long time,” said Kandodo, according
to the paper.
Malawi exported maize to Zimbabwe after paying local
suppliers in local
currency the equivalent of US$10 million.
The
Malawi Watch boss also suggested that another way to getthe country’s
economy into shape is downsize the cabinet reasonably from 40 to
12.
“Mutharika must also stop being extravagant. Why should a poor
country like
Malawi have a presidential jet that persistently excavates
unfathomable
holes in the pockets of the country’s economy and those of its
ordinary
citizens?” wondered Banda.
The French-made jet, the
Dassault Falcon 900 EX presidential jet, was bought
for about US$22,4
million in 2009 and is projected to cost an annual US$300
000 in maintenance
and insurance.
Malawi, Zimbabwe, Madagascar, Swaziland and the
Democratic Republic of Congo
were last week identified by the Sadc NGOs
Forum as hot spots in southern
Africa.
Malawi was rocked by
protests last month which resulted in the death of 19
people.
Police in Malawi reportedly opened fire against civilians
who were
protesting against acute fuel shortages and calling for the
devaluation of
the local currency, among other concerns. — Nyasa Times.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
19:50
BUSINESS tycoons Nick Van Hoogstraten, Jayesh Shah and Frank
Buyanga (FB) of
Hamilton Properties are alleged to be loan sharks who have
been playing the
role of the lender of the last resort because the central
bank is broke. In
May, Van Hoogstraten and Shah categorically denied being
loan sharks in
exclusive interviews with the Zimbabwe Independent, but
admitted bailing out
troubled financial institutions and
companies.
More than 500 people have reportedly lost their immovable
properties to
Buyanga’s company after allegedly accessing loans from it and
failed to
repay. But Buyanga claimed the people had sold their properties to
his firm.
Media reports recently claimed that Buyanga was on the run.
This week, the
31-year-old business magnate fielded questions from Zimbabwe
Independent
editor Constantine Chimakure (CC) on his business and other
related issues.
Below are the edited responses.
CC: Are you a
loan shark and what is your comment on reports that within a
short space of
time you acquired 500 immovable properties fraudulently?
FB: If your
definition of loan shark is to invest in the Zimbabwean economy,
then have
individuals conspiring to mislead the public and state organs of
my
intentions then the answer would be yes.
In Zimbabwe we have a classic case
of biting the hand that feeds us. I made
one huge mistake. Nick Van
Hoogstraten advised me a few years ago never to
give money to anyone
desperate or that needed it and in my own ambitions I
stormed the market
handing out cash. To my sad discovery the same
individuals and companies
later sought for my persecution.
CC:How many people who sold their
houses and later approached the police
have managed to pay you back as per
the agreement you had with them and the
Attorney-General’s
Office?
FB: A year has passed and only two people have made good on
the arrangement
facilitated by the AG and police. On hind sight, it is
disappointing to see
the avalanche of individuals that sought refuge from
the police and were
given all the necessary attention and now have failed to
deliver on their
promise.
It is fortunate that the police force, being
one of the best if not the best
in Africa, realised that I had invested a
great amount of money into the
economy which none of these ‘so called
complainants’ could ever pay me or
the company I represented back.
It is
their duty to protect the public and what the complainants
conveniently
ignored was the fact that the truth would sooner surface and
they would be
exposed. It is sad that tax payers suffer the costs of these
illegitimate
complaints.
CC: Media reports recently said you were on the run and
that one of your
employees has been arrested and arraigned in
court?
FB: I am constantly in touch with the police regarding
allegations that
continue to be raised against me.
CC: Your
employee?
FB: At the time of his arrest I was abroad. The bottom line
is that the said
employee was arrested as a result of a complainant who
misrepresented facts
in their report to the police after selling her
property to us.
The matter is still before the courts and is subjudice.
However, the
complainants misrepresented facts and with the aid of a Harare
lawyer they
forged affidavits. We have lodged a complaint with the Law
Society of
Zimbabwe against the lawyer. Strangely, the law society is yet to
act on our
complaint.”
CC: Why are you embroiled in a legal
wrangle with Zimra?
FB: Zimra raided our offices some months ago and
confiscated vital
documents. There has been some action taken (by my
company) but I cannot
comment on that at present.
CC: What are
the links between Hamilton Property and Hamilton Finance? Do
you own both
companies?
FB: Hamilton Property Holdings is a registered company
whose sole purpose
was and is to invest in property through the purchase of
properties and
assets. It is a standalone company that believes in the
turning around of
the Zimbabwe property market. It is why we took the
initiative to invest in
the market.
Hamilton Finance is a money lending
company which is licensed and operates
under the supervision of the Reserve
Bank of Zimbabwe and in the confines of
Zimbabwean law. These are two
different companies which if you were to come
to me seeking to buy or to
sell your property I would refer you to Hamilton
Property Holdings and if
you were looking to borrow money I would refer you
to Hamilton
Finance.
CC: Are you involved in the two companies?
FB:
Technically.
CC: What do you say to allegations that you are fronting
business tycoon Van
Hoogstraten?
FB: When one says front what
immediately comes to mind is weather fronts
were the front separates hot and
cold, in this case I would say no as there
is no separation in our
relationship. The only separation is my inability to
take advice that lands
me in trouble at times.
He is a friend, mentor and advisor. As a matter of
fact, he extended US$25
million to me for investing in the Zimbabwe market
in 2008. In my
stupidity, I invested in these troubled properties at a time
he clearly
pointed out to me that the world property market was on the brink
of
collapse. In my ambition to mop up, I got involved and finally got my
fingers burnt.
To my surprise, even after technically losing well over
US$10 million he
told me that was back pocket change and I shouldn’t stress
about it. I have
decided to keep the US$15 million in London towards my
pension.
Generally, Van Hoogstraten is misunderstood in the Zimbabwe market.
He has
for long been talking of pulling out but we have been able to
convince him
to stay a while longer. I have personally witnessed his walk
and can say
without a shadow of doubt that he has love for Zimbabwe and its
people, he
has great respect and speaks highly of our president and shares
his vision
of total empowerment.
He himself is the best form of
empowerment I have experienced in the UK,
Zimbabwe and other parts of the
world.
CC: How are you linked to South Africa President Jacob Zuma,
controversial
arms dealer Fana Hlongwane and former Defence minister Siphiwe
Nyanda?
FB: I am not prepared to discuss my relationship with any of
these gentlemen
without their authority.
CC: Why are you suing
the SA Home Affairs and to what tune are you suing
them?
FB: This
matter is subjudice at the present moment.
CC: What do you say to
assertions that you go around flaunting your wealth?
FB: It’s just a
matter of being in a small pond, the splashes are
exaggerated. When in the
south of France, Bermuda or London they don’t bat
an eye lid.
CC:
How much are you worth, business wise?
FB: Van Hoogstraten once asked
Jean Paul Getty (the richest living American
in 1967) how much he was worth
and his answer was, ‘if you know how much you
are worth, then you are not
worth very much’. One thing I do know is that I
don’t own anything but have
access to everything money can buy.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011 18:55
Happiness
Zengeni
NATIONAL milk supply remains low against demand and Government
needs to
urgently step in to support the dairy industry in order to improve
the
supply side, according to Dairibord chief executive Antony
Mandiwanza.
The CEO of the oldest dairy firm in Zimbabwe, Mandiwanza insists
it is
government’s responsibility to promote milk production while companies
as
his play their roles as processors by beneficiating the milk..
He
noted various government projects which had helped the dairy industry
since
Independence, like the EU Intervention Package, which provided for the
plant
in Chipinge; the Norad and various other government-negotiated grants
which
had helped the industry as well as the research stations like
Henderson and
Grasslands, which had been set up by past governments for
those
purposes.
Mandiwanza also noted that Zimbabwe had the highest milk producer
price in
the world, at between 55-59c a litre against 35-39c in South
Africa, 18-20c
Uganda, 28c in Kenya, 22c in the US and 14-21c in New
Zealand
In the half year to June, raw milk supply for the group was 29% ahead
of the
same period last year as a result of a 25% growth in raw milk intake
in
Zimbabwe and a 41% growth of raw milk intake in Malawi. Raw milk
production
increased from 3,7 million litres at full year to 4,2 million
litres per
month.
Mandiwanza said Dairibord remains the market leader
both in milk and milk
products and ice cream in spite of the situation with
milk supply.
Subsidiary Lyons’ new Cascade plant was now in full production,
with a total
daily output of 80 000 litres, businessdigest established
during a tour of
the factory. The new machine had started working from
July.
Explaining the production process, Lyons staff said the plant, which
has an
installed capacity of 120 000 litres operates a 24 hour shift. The
process
uses 7-8 tonnes of manufacturers’ sugar Star Africa currently being
the
largest supplier, ahead of Triangle and imports.
Lyons business
analyst Costa Manyika said noted that importing the sugar was
cheaper but
there were a lot of hassles involved at the border. The group
also imports
skimmed milk powder.
At the Dairibord group level, electricity outages
remained a problem but
group had purchased a backup generator.The Nutriplus
plant in Chitungwiza
has also been commissioned.
In the half year to June
beverages contributed 45% to the total sales volume
whilst liquid milks and
foods contributed 39% and 16% respectively.
Dairibord said it had only
increased its shareholding to 68,4% in Malawi
only by default.
“The
Malawi government sold its 40%, which was taken up by the Malawi
Investment
Centre, while a trustee made up of employees was supposed to take
the
remaining 20%. However they could only pay for 10%. That meant that the
balance had to be split proportionally according to the shareholding,”
Mandiwanza explained.
He however said Dairibord would have liked to
increase its shareholding
regardless of the current situation in Malawi, as
it had a more long term
view of the market.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011 18:51
Paidamoyo
Muzulu
CHINESE-controlled ferrochrome producer Zimasco is importing
coking coal for
its smeltering operations from Botswana where the commodity
is generally
cheaper and always available, according to the company’s mining
executive.
Sinosteel, a Chinese investment company, controls 73% of Zimasco
while the
remainder is owned by locals.
Zimasco Mining executive Reason
Mandimika told the Zimbabwe Independent in
an interview that importing coal
was necessitated by bottlenecks in the
local supply chain and at times the
costing by local suppliers.
Zimasco expects to increase its annual
ferrochrome production to 600 000
tonnes once it completes refurbishment and
construction of a new furnace in
Kwekwe. This follows the government’s
renewal of a ban on export of raw
chrome ore in March this year.
Hwange
Colliery and Sengwa Coals are the two main suppliers on the local
market but
suffer operational hitches, among them recapitalisation and
ageing
equipment, particularly in the last decade where hyperinflation
wreaked
havoc on business.
“We have been importing coking coal for our furnaces from
Botswana primarily
because of two reasons; it’s cheaper and always
available,” Mandimika said.
Mandimika added that the coal from Sengwa was not
up to the quality required
for smelting chrome.
“Sengwa coal has high
sulphur and generally not suitable for our
operations,” Mandimika
added.
Mandimika, however, was not at liberty to disclose the quantities and
cost
of importing coal from Botswana.
He referred the paper to the
company’s public relations manager Clara
Sadomba who unfortunately was away
on business.
Operations at Hwange Colliery have been affected by the
company’s huge debt
and lack of strategic vision by the company executives,
according James
Logan, an investor.
“As a long time shareholder I am
horrified to find our company to be US$88
million in debt,” said Logan.
“Executive vision appears to have been
missing for a long time.”
Logan
added that the company faced an even greater commercial threat from
competitors.
Directors at Hwange are embroiled in turf wars as the
company continues to
lose its share of the local market.
Shareholders
removed the Tendai Savanhu-chaired board from office a
fortnight ago during
the company’s annual general meeting.
However, Savanhu is contesting that
their removal was done unprocedurally
and the meeting should be
reconvened.
Chrome miners recently told parliament that production at the
factories was
being constrained by power outages and lack of raw materials
such as coking
coal from the domestic market. They also asked parliament to
lobby the
government to reconsider the raw chrome ore exports.
The
revival of Hwange is linked to the economic fortunes of the country
since
there would be a guaranteed electricity supply from Hwange Thermal
Power
station.
“Hwange forms the cornerstone of Zimbabwean industry through basic
energy
for the generation of electricity,” Logan said. “The economy will not
recover until there is a steady supply of reasonably priced electrical
power.”
Meanwhile, Hwange started exporting coking coal to India in
June, in a deal
that is expected to reach 50 000 tonnes a month.
The
coal will be railed to Maputo port in Mozambique for export tothe Indian
market.
“This will be the first ever coal to be moved by a Zimbabwean
company to
(India) targeting its vast steel making industry,” Hwange
Colliery said.
Hwange is targeting further potential coal and coke sales to
Democratic
Republic of Congo, Zambia, Tanzania, Botswana and
Mozambique.
Hwange’s main customer is the Hwange power station, which is
adjacent to the
mine and takes about 180 000 tonnes a month of coal.
The
reopening of Ziscosteel after Essar Africa’s investment will see Hwange’s
customer base increase as the steel-making company was the second largest
customer before its closure.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011 18:50
IN
everything that can be done badly, Zimbabwe takes the cup. Its President
Robert Mugabe provided the ultimate in mixed messages earlier this week
after he agreed to privatise the country’s steel business, the barely
breathing Zisco, in a US$4billion deal with Essar Group which is best
described as a sprawling conglomerate.
Only a fortnight ago, Zimbabwe’s
Minister for Youth Development,
Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment,
Saviour Kasukuwere, ripped trashed
175 indigenisation applications by
companies operating in Zimbabwe and
threatened to kick them all out by
September.
Firms, many of them in mining, have until then to redo
their applications,
presumably by transferring more equity into the hands of
local Zimbabweans
rather than attempting to meet indigenisation regulations
through social and
labour contracts — the feature of the applications that
so angered
Kasukuwere.
Back to the Essar deal, however, which
moved Mugabe to say: “If partners
come in the way they (Essar) have come,
because they extended their hand and
that they took over the debt Zisco had
created, we’ll go beyond the 49%. We’ll
give you 54%. We say come, don’t be
afraid. But come as friends and not as
exploiters.”
In terms of
the deal, Essar Africa Holdings will pump US$705 million into
Zisco which
immediately dissolves its debt and gets the plant back to 1,2
million tonnes
of steel a year.
A new company, ZimSteel, will be created which
houses Essar Africa’s 60%
stake in Zisco, with government holding the
balance. Capacity of Zisco’s
plant will then be taken up another million
tonnes annually.
Essar Africa will also control Zisco’s mining assets
— the Ripple Creek and
Mwanetsi iron ore mines as well as a limestone
deposit, which will be held
in NewZim Minerals.
This will
involve, at some future point, the lion's share of the investment
promised
by Essar, roughly US$3,5 billion for a beneficiation plant.
But it’s very
fuzzy when and how this will be built. For the record, Essar
Africa is a
difficult company to contact, notwithstanding the fulsomely
supplied contact
details at the foot of its press release.
Water and rail
infrastructure will be improved, especially linking Hwange,
but there’s no
mention of how the coal industry, which will be important in
supplying the
regenerated Zisco with metallurgical coals, will be
revitalised through this
process.
“There’s no doubt this is a shot in the arm to the
Zimbabwean economy,” says
Charles Shonhayi, a mining analyst for Frost &
Sullivan which has been
following the re-emergence of Zimbabwe’s mining
sector. “The value chain has
been struggling so the upliftment of National
Railways of Zimbabwe is
helpful,” he says.
That may be so but
what about the rest of the mining related economy
currently bedevilled by
the indigenisation legislation? If, as Mugabe
claims, you open your cheque
book — which one assumes is the approach of a
friend not an exploiter — does
that mean the requirements of indigenisation
fall away?
Stuart Murray,
CEO of Aquarius Platinum, the company that owns 50% of the
highly successful
Mimosa platinum mine in Zimbabwe, is philosophical. “I
tell shareholders
that when we hear something about indigenisation, we’ll
tell them,” he
says.
“So far, there’s been no formal rejection of the company’s
indigenisation
application notwithstanding the comments by minister
Kasukuwere.”
“If, as Mugabe claims, you open your cheque book...does that
mean the
requirements of indigenisation fall away?”
Says another
executive: “It’s easier for Essar to operate in Zimbabwe
because it’s not
listed. Public companies have to make announcements and
provide details and
structures of deals.”
Still, this doesn’t guarantee success. It’s
worth remembering that a similar
private investment in a Zimbabwean
state-owned company was announced when
Sinosteel bought control of Zimasco,
a formerly state-owned company that
produces
ferrochrome.
Sinosteel has found it difficult to operate in Zimbabwe,
which owns 12% of
world chromite reserves but its production has fallen to
1,2% of world
output from 5% previously.— Mining mx.com.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
18:26
Paul Nyakazeya
THE Tobacco Industry and Marketing Board
(TIMB) says the industry failed to
meet this year’s projected target of 177
million kgs of tobacco owing to
crop losses of up to 31%at the farms and
21% during the re-handling
process.
The tobacco selling season officially
closed yesterday, with mop-up sales
scheduled to last until end of
September.
As the tobacco selling season comes to an end, farmers are
counting their
losses while the TIMB indicated that the target of 177
million kgs would not
be met.
TIMB CEO Andrew Matibiri said drought and
and re-grading of tobacco
impacted negatively on the projected target as
130,2 million kgs of tobacco
had so far been auctioned, raking in US$357,3
million according to figures
released on Wednesday.
“During the current
marketing season, tobacco farmers’ crop was affected by
intermittent rains,
forcing them to embark on the re-handling exercise which
however accounts
for 21% in losses,” he said.
“Other weather related conditions in farms
affected the golden leaf,
accounting for 31% of losses. It is against this
background that
agricultural experts are calling for extensive educational
campaigns on
tobacco growing and handling to ensure that the forthcoming
season will not
record high tobacco losses,” Matibiri said.
Tobacco is
one of the country’s top foreign currency earners, contributing
26% to Gross
Domestic Product last year.
TIMB said this year’s selling season opened early
because:
l Tobacco seed beds are prepared in June, while the selling season
traditionally starts in May and ends in August, a situation which usually
compromises preparations as small scale farmers always failed to meet
deadlines;
l Some farmers are into diverse crops and want to concentrate
on single
crops. Most tobacco farmers are also into wheat and winter
crops;
l Early selling enables farmers to repay debts, as many say they fail
to
access loans from banks;
l Those who access loans said an early
opening would ensure that they would
escape high interest rates prevailing
at banks if they repaid early;
l Contract tobacco farmers said early selling
would enable them to apply for
new loans on time;
l Many farmers do not
have storage facilities for their tobacco.
TIMB said the industry was
prepared for high volumes of tobacco after six
other suppliers of tobacco
wrapping material were licensed to avoid
shortages that occurred last
season.
No shortage of the packaging material was reported this season.
However, the
booking system put in place to reduce congestion at the auction
floors was
not as effective, as growers continued to bring their tobacco
without
registering. The board had decentralised its booking offices, but
some
farmers still failed to take advantage of the arrangement.
This
resulted in congestion at the Tobacco Sales Floors, which were the only
operational auction floors when the selling season opened. Boka Tobacco
Auction Floors opened late due to renovations while Millennium Tobacco
Auction Floors also came on board later on.
Over the past two months
tobacco sales were averaging between 500 and 600
bales per day in contrast
to an average of about 4 000 bales which used to
be traded per day at the
peak of the season. Farmers however said it was
normal as the selling season
was now coming to an end.
Millennium Tobacco Auction Floors Chairman, Hillary
Mombeshora, said the
drop in prices had affected farmers’ returns and said
the 170 million kgs
target might not be achieved this year.
“Tobacco is
the only crop whereby farmer is guaranteed cash payment there
and then.
However indications are that the target set of 170 million kgs
cannot be
reached,” he said.
“Liquidity challenges initially affected prompt payment to
farmers but the
situation has eased with most farmers expressing
satisfaction with services
rendered,” Mombeshora said.
Mombeshora said
the licensing of new tobacco auction floors was now the
solution to ease
congestion and fetching higher prices at auction floors,
but there was a
need for more training of farmers on how best to grow
quality
leaf.
Tobacco farmers this year got cash payment for almost all their
deliveries
after the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe increased the cash payment
threshold from
US$2 000 to US$10 000 per sale.
Farmers who deliver less
than 4 000kg of the golden leaf in one go received
their payment in
cash.
The US$10 000 threshold applied per every single sale made and farmers
with
more than 4 000kg could split their sale into two within the same day
and
still get US$10 000 per sale.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011 19:44
By
Ibbo Mandaza
SPECULATION about the possible political developments in
Zimbabwe in the
aftermath death of Solomon Mujuru (herein referred to as
‘‘Rex’’), his
legendary nom de guere this week, is understandable given his
historical
role in both the struggle for liberation and the life of the
nation in the
period since independence in 1980.
The spontaneous and
nationwide reaction as news of his death spread last
Tuesday was an
acknowledgement that here, indeed, was not only a national
hero in the true
sense of the term, but also a national leader whose
influence pervaded
Zimbabweans in all walks of life and across the political
divide.
Neither heroes nor leaders are made by
‘‘Politbureaus’’, let alone the
‘‘decision’’ of this or that person; they
are made by history and the
accompanying acknowledgement; spontaneous and
natural, of a nation and its
people.
But as the case of Rex confirms,
leaders like him also ‘‘made’’ or ‘‘unmade’’
history, just as history ––
including both circumstance and opportunity ––
moulded him into the man we
are honouring whilst simultaneously profiling
the political animal that he
was, Machiavellian (the end justifies the
means!) in the true sense of the
word, shrewd and even ruthless, if
necessary.
Some in our
contemporary Zimbabwe will remember him as the ‘‘kingmaker”
across the
national spectrum: the numerous examples of politicians today who
would not
have made it without his support, in many cases, simply catapulted
from
nonentities into a cabinet post; the current securocracy, almost every
leading member of which is directly –– and at least indirectly –– his
product, even if some have expediently developed amnesia or self-denial;
that coterie of corporate pimps and comprador elements who thrived on his
patronage and ‘‘protection’’; not to forget even those white farmers and
similar corporate interests whose fate might have been as precarious as that
of most of their ilk, were, it not for his quiet mediation or
intervention.
But it is to the extent that Rex ‘‘made’’ or ‘‘unmade’’
history during his
political life that I wish to return and end my account.
I do so with
reference to specific episodes during the last stage of the
liberation
struggle, and during the period since the Zanu PF congress of
1999. In
short, these were instances in which some in our midst found their
political
fortunes made good through Rex’s intervention whilst others
conversely lived
to see theirs unmade.
By a curious coincidence
of history and events, Monday, August 15, 2011 was
the night during which
both Rex died tragically and Wilfred Mhanda (Dzinashe
Manchingura, his nom
de guerre), the legendary ZIPA leader, also launched
his book, Dzino:
Memories of a Freedom Fighter.
To be brief, Dzino’s account of Rex as one
who ‘‘sold’’ out his ZIPA
comrades in favour of Robert Mugabe in 1976/77 was
to be confirmed the
following morning on Tuesday August 16 by President
Mugabe himself as he
spoke after viewing the former Zanla commander’s
charred remains at One
Commando Barracks.
Without that
historical ‘‘sell out’’ in Beira, Mozambique in January 1977,
Mugabe and the
old nationalist guard might have been relegated to the
dustbin of history in
favour of Dzinashe Machingura and his ZIPA
‘‘revolutionaries’’, hardly
three years before Zimbabwe’s independence in
1980.
It was also
Rex’s intervention again in 1978 that saved the day, not only
for Mugabe and
the old nationalist guard, but also for Tongogara and Rex
himself. This
was the occasion of the purported ‘‘coup’’ attempt led by
Joseph Taderera
but subsequently implicating the former Dare re Chimurenga
members, namely
Rugare Gumbo, Henry Hamadziripi and Kumbirai Kangai.
What is
important in this regard is that, without Rex’s quick action, the
‘‘coup’’
might have succeeded, while Mugabe and Tongogara were away from
Maputo, in
Malta at yet another of those abortive attempts at resolving the
‘‘Rhodesian
crisis’.
There is this unfortunate tendency in autobiographies and
biographies by
former combatants of Zimbabwe’s War of Liberation, including
Dzino himself,
to view such events in terms of ‘‘revolutionary’’ and
‘‘anti-revolutionary’’
or‘‘progressives’’ and ‘‘sell-outs’’ in the implicit
suggestion that yours
was the only noble course as opposed to the actions of
those who
successfully overtook you in what was nothing less than a power
struggle.
In retrospect, even Mugabe might be deceiving himself in
concluding that Rex
was merely a pawn, however pivotal, in a power struggle
in which he emerged
as Prime Minister in 1980 and, subsequently, as virtual
‘‘Life President’’.
An outcome which, according to Edgar Tekere’s
autobiography (A Lifetime of
Struggle), might not have been a foregone
conclusion were it not that Rex
and his fellow generals who put their weight
behind the Mugabe-Muzenda
alliance against their internal
rivals.
This was Rex the Machiavellian at work. For example, he
acknowledged
privately to me in those days that the happenings around the
Gukurahundi era
were contradictory to the principles of the liberation and
yet he had
become such an integral and pivotal part of the new Zimbabwean
state,
something he could no longer reconcile with principle, including
having had
to see such of his Zipra comrades, including Dumiso Dabengwa and
Lookout
Masuku, languish in detention during that period.
But it
was during the Zanu PF congresses of 1999 and 2004 that Rex played
Machiavellian politics behind the scenes as part of his plan to see a
peaceful leadership succession in Zimbabwe.
Certainly, it was
largely through Rex’s efforts, assisted by that other
strategists like
Eddison Zvobgo, that John Nkomo emerged victorious over
Emmerson Mnangagwa
in the contest for the position of Zanu PF chairman in
1999.
Rex
also played a key role to ensure that during the 2004 Zanu PF congress
his
wife, Joice Teurai defeated Mnangagwa to become vice-president of both
Zanu
PF and the State.
The process had been a bruising affair. The last
four years during which
the issue of Mugabe’s succession has heated up, with
the incumbent’s
apparent rebuff of Joice Teurai Mujuru’s presidential
ambitions during his
birthday interview on February 20, 2007 and the
inexorable rise of Morgan
Tsvangirai and his MDC as serious contenders for
state power, Rex became
even more active behind the scenes.
Not
only Rex who believed by 2007 Mugabe had become a political liability
for
Zanu PF, there were many others who believed and still do. Although
during
the 2006 Zanu PF conference in Goromonzi, the issue of succession had
become
critical, Rex and his allies failed to challenge Mugabe directly.
Emboldened
by their cowardice, Mugabe went on to throw the gauntlet at
them.
To this day many in and outside Zanu PF have no doubt Rex
could have
successfully launched a motion in the politburo which would have
compelled
Mugabe to retire before the 2008 elections, but he
didn’t.
Others would argue that his ‘‘quiet diplomatic’’ support for
Mavambo-Kusile-Dawn was part and parcel of Rex’s strategy to try and compel
Mugabe to stand down as presidential candidate in 2008. Mavambo leader Simba
Makoni had that ‘‘secret’’ meeting with President Mugabe on January 27 2008
on the advice of Rex although we don’t know for sure what was
discussed.
Whatever the case or the truth of Makoni’s explanation
both this ‘‘secret’’
meeting and Rex’s subsequent failure to make good his
alleged undertaking
that he would bring into the Mavambo fold a significant
number of the Zanu
PF heavyweights put paid to Makoni’s political ambitions
in 2008. Rex may
have, albeit inadvertently, ‘‘unmade’’ Makoni
altogether.
But after all is said and done Rex left his wife Joice on
the eve of a new
dispensation on firm ground if Zanu PF and Zimbabwe are to
follow a
constitutional and democratic succession process.
Mandaza is
a Zimbabwean academic, author and publisher.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
19:24
ECONOMIC sanctions slapped on Zimbabwe by the West are “an honour”
to the
nation as they demonstrate how important the Southern African country
is on
the global political platform, “prophet” Andrew Wutawunashe
claims.
NewsDay reports that Wutawunashe said this while addressing thousands
of
Zion Christian Church worshippers at the church’s headquarters at Mbungo
Shrine.
“Sanctions are an honour. If you are slapped with sanctions, it
shows you
are important. It is a way to try to suppress an important nation,
which is
an envy of the world,” Wutawunashe said.
It seems to have
escaped Wutawunashe’s notice that President Robert Mugabe
and his surrogates
have been pleading for the repeal of the same “illegal”
sanctions that
Wutawunashe deems honourable.
What happened to his Eminent Church Leaders in
Zimbabwe, we would like to
know?
Speaking of “men of the cloth”, the
Sunday Times reports that Destiny of
Afrika Network leader “Reverend”
Obadiah Musindo has been taken to court by
his former wife for allegedly
“spitting” in her face, “threatening her life”
and holding onto their
daughter’s toys.
In his defence, Musindo claimed that he was a “peace-loving
man and a
Christian”.
“I don’t believe in violence and will never involve
myself in physical
confrontation,” Musindo said.
“She wants to show me in
bad light. I harbour political ambitions and she is
aware of this. She is
out to tarnish my good name and reputation and
minimise my chances of
holding political office.”
We are not sure about the “good name and
reputation” part Reverend!
Meanwhile the Destiny of Afrika Network is
distributing a “Loyal (sic)
Membership Card 2011”. They probably meant
Loyalty Membership Card. Members
are supposed to pay subscriptions of US$1
for each month of the year. In a
letter written to committee members Musindo
states:
“Those who are not willing and committed to fully campaign for Zanu
PF and
boldly stand behind the visionary leadership of Cde President Robert
Gabriel
Mugabe have no place in the leadership circles of Destiny of Afrika
Network.
The same principles apply to the ordinary card carrying
members.
“You are therefore being commanded to take this order
seriously.”
The less said the better.
We were greatly amused by
Professor Jonathan Moyo’s backtracking on his
article in the Sunday Mail,
“Zanu PF: An introspection”.
In the article, Moyo questioned why comrades in
the “nationalist movement”
seemed to be “afraid of change” and did not want
to be criticised. The
“Generation 40” had been excluded and marginalised by
the nationalist
movement, Moyo wrote.
Moyo went on to posit that the Sadc
election roadmap “is all about confusing
everything to ensure that the next
elections are held when it is practically
impossible for President Mugabe to
be candidate”.
However this week, in an interview entitled “Prof Moyo unpacks
Zanu PF
introspection”, Moyo attempted to retract some of the politically
incorrect
views he had expressed.
After claiming in the first article
that a delay in the elections would make
it “practically impossible for
President Mugabe to be candidate”, Moyo now
sang a different
tune.
“Otherwise the candidate for Zanu PF is of course President Mugabe in
terms
of the constitution of our party which says that the first secretary
and
president of Zanu PF is the party’s candidate in any national election
for
the leadership of the country.”
Strangely, Moyo now viewed President
Mugabe (87), as having a “disposition
in relation to the interests of our
G40”.
Moyo goes on to state that Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai was the
donkey
he referred to when he said Mugabe cannot beat a donkey in an
election.
Yet only recently Moyo raised a fuss about statements made by PM
Tsvangirai
to the effect that President Mugabe lied about the outcome of the
recent
Sadc Extraordinary Summit held in South Africa.
“I strongly
believe that it is high time that the law should take its
course. It is
totally unacceptable for Tsvangirai and Jameson Timba to call
Cde Mugabe a
liar,” Moyo said.
Apparently Moyo has the licence to call the prime minister
a donkey. Where
is Jomic when you need them?
The Fallen Heroes of
Zimbabwe Trust (FHZT), which has been leading the
exhumations at Chibondo in
Mt Darwin, has identified the remains of a
comrade who was in the Zanla High
Command during the liberation war, ZBC
reported.
“The Fallen Heroes Trust
through its chief exhumer, Cde Jimmy Motsi, has
identified remains of Cde
Rauya, who is said to have been in the Zanla high
command in the
1970s.”
We hope that once you are done in Mt Darwin, Cde Motsi, you will move
on to
Matabeleland. Your services will be required there.
Meanwhile, ZBC,
reports that the FHZT treasurer, Mandi Chimene, “added her
voice to the
ongoing chaos in Britain, which was triggered by the shooting
of a black man
Mark Duggan”.
The UK government is exploring whether to turn off social
networks or stop
people texting during times of social unrest, the BBC
reports.
Premier David Cameron said the intelligence services and the police
were
exploring whether it was “right and possible” to cut off those plotting
violence. These include Facebook, Twitter and specific technologies such as
text messaging. Texting and Blackberry Messenger are said to have been used
by some during this week’s riots.
This is hypocrisy at its best from the
British government, which all too
recently was lecturing Egypt on the vices
of repression. “You do have a
choice here. This repression –– if you opt for
that, that will end badly for
Egypt, badly for the world. It is the wrong
choice,” Cameron had said.
Cameron said that if the Egyptian regime used
violence and repression on
protesters it will lose any remaining
international credibility it had left.
Cameron would do well to take heed of
his own advice.
The Zimbabwe Republic Police says the current situation
in Britain exposes
the hypocrisy of the so-called human rights organisations
which have not
openly condemned London’s heavy-handedness in dealing with
protesters while
quick to blame Third World countries when faced with
similar circumstances,
ZBC reports.
Police chief spokesperson, Senior
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Bvudzijena
expressed his surprise that the
international community has not condemned
Britain’s use of water cannons on
civilians yet they have for long been
demonising the Zimbabwe Republic
Police for using “minimum force” to
maintain law and order.
Bvudzijena
said the Britons had deployed 16 000 police officers, a number
which
translates to half of ZRP’s total human resource.
We agree, heavy-handedness
by the police anywhere in the world is
deplorable.
However, the ZRP
cannot use events in the UK to justify how they have been
used by former
ruling party politicians to ruthlessly suppress any dissent.
Who can forget
the image of the battered and swollen head of PM Morgan
Tsvangirai after
being beaten by the police in custody in March 2007? What
of human rights
campaigner Jestina Mukoko, who was abducted and tortured on
spurious
charges?
“On 16 February 2011, the European Union extended sanctions against
Zimbabwe,” ZBC states. “Their reasons, continued allegations of violence,
human rights abuse, lack of rule of law and alleged failure to implement
democratic reforms. Until this day the West is still obsessed with the issue
of Zimbabwe’s human rights.”
For good reason we believe!
Finally,
the city of London will be hosting the Olympic Games in 2012.
However many of
the famous events, which go to make up this spectacular
event, are to be
especially altered for 2012. A copy of these changes has
been leaked, and is
reproduced below:
Opening Ceremony
The flame will be ignited by a
petrol bomb thrown by a native of the area in
the traditional dress of
balaclava and shell suit. The flame will be
contained in a large overturned
police van situated on the roof of the
stadium.
100 metres
sprint
Competitors will have to hold a DVD player and microwave oven (one in
each
arm) and on the sound of the starting pistol, a police dog will be
released
from a cage 10 yards behind the athletes.
110 metres
hurdles
As above but with added obstacles (i.e. car bonnets, hedges, garden
fences,
walls etc)
Hammer
Competitors in this event may choose the
type of hammer they wish to use
(claw, sledge etc) the winner will be the
one who can cause the most
physical damage within three
attempts.
Fencing
Entrants will be asked to dispose of as many stolen
goods as possible in
five minutes.
Shooting
A strong challenge is
expected from local men in this event. The first
target will be a moving
police van. In the second round, competitors will
aim at a post office
clerk, bank teller or wages deliveryman. The
traditional .22 rifle has been
replaced in this event by a choice of either
a Browning automatic handgun or
sawn-off 12-bore shotgun.
Boxing
Entry to the boxing will be
restricted to husband and wife teams, and will
take place on a Friday night.
The husband will be given 15 pints of lager
while the wife will be told not
to make him any tea when he gets home. The
bout will then
commence.
Cycling time trials
Competitors will be asked to break into
the University bike shed and take an
expensive mountain bike owned by some
mummy’s boy on his first trip away
from home. All against the
clock.
Cycling pursuit
As above, but the bike will be owned by a
visiting member of the Australian
rugby team, who will witness the
theft.
Modern pentathlon
Amended to include mugging, breaking and
entering, flashing, joyriding and
arson.
Swimming events
All
waterways are currently being tested for toxicity levels, once one is
found
that can support human life, swimming events will be organised, please
note
that the Synchronised Swimming event for this year will comprise
dropping
acid and watching all the funky ripples on the pool.
The marathon
A
safe route has yet to be decided.
Men’s 50km walk
Unfortunately this
will have to be cancelled as the police cannot guarantee
the safety of
anyone walking the streets of East London, especially anyone
that appears to
be... mincing.
The closing ceremony
The flame will be extinguished by
police riot water cannon following the
inevitable pitch invasion by confused
West Ham organised hooliganism club.
The stadium itself will then be boarded
up before the local athletes break
into it and remove all the copper piping
and the central heating boiler.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
19:20
FOREIGN Direct Investment (FDI) is a key requisite for the recovery
of the
Zimbabwean economy. Without it, Zimbabwe is devoid of the capital
that is
essential for the substantial development of its economic sectors
and
thereafter the working capital that is required for the funding the
operations of enterprises in those sectors.
FDI is also a primary
access vehicle to state-of-the-art technology transfer
required to ensure
the viability and international competitiveness of those
enterprises, and to
a very major extent, is also the passkey to world
markets. In addition, as
Zimbabwe has lost a considerable wealth of
skills — a consequence of the
immense brain drain experienced for more than
a decade, FDI enables access
to critically-needed expatriate skills to
assure economic operational
viability until such time as Zimbabwe has
rebuilt its own resource base of
skills.
If Zimbabwe cannot substantively exploit its vast resources
of precious
metals and minerals, rebuild and grow its manufacturing sector,
exploit its
myriad of remarkable tourist attractions to a far greater extent
than is
presently the case, effect substantial value-addition to its
agricultural
and minerals output, and restore and enhance its infrastructure
(including
energy generation, road, rail and air transport services and
facilities,
telecommunications), it cannot achieve any major economic
upturn.
Without that upturn, massive unemployment will continue to
prevail
(currently about 90% of the employable population has no formal
sector
employment). Ongoing mass unemployment results in continuing poverty
nationwide, suffering and distress. Currently, estimates place more than
80% of the population as struggling to survive on incomes significantly
below the poverty datum line, the minimum income required for absolute
essentials without endangerment of health and wellbeing.
It is
estimated that more than half of Zimbabwe’s population battles to
exist on
incomes below the food datum line, i.e income as is needed to
avoid
malnutrition and starvation. Thus, Zimbabwe’s greatest single need is
to
create employment for an overwhelming majority of its employable
population,
and that requires expansion and growth of existing enterprises,
and the
creation of many more.
An expanded economy also means growth in
revenue flows to the national
fiscus, which is facing a current year deficit
of US$700 million, and an
accumulated national debt ofmore than US$7
billion. The magnitude of that
debt, and its ongoing growth in consequence
of the fiscal deficits,
precludes access to international funding needed to
achieve the necessary
economic growth.
Although Zimbabwe has
much resource wealth, that wealth is of no
significance if the resources
cannot be accessed and constructively used.
Hence Zimbabwe’s best (and, in
reality, only meaningful) vehicle to the
transformation of the economy is
FDI.
Tragically, Zimbabwe’s political hierarchy includes all too many
that abhor
FDI, even though they claim to the contrary.
Endlessly,
they pursue policies and introduce legislation which demotivate
international investors from investing in Zimbabwe. First, investors seek
security of their outcry, and that the environment must be conducive to such
security.
Of primary importance to their sense of investment security
is that the
Zimbabwean political environment be credibly perceived to be
stable,
democratic and free, with unmitigated respect for property and human
rights,
and law. With rare exception, foreign investors do not have that
perception
of Zimbabwe’s political arena.
They witness the
recurrent breaches by the political parties of their Global
Political
Agreement, and hence the recurrent instability, fragility of and
conflict
within the so-called Government of National Unity. They are
witnesses of
abuses of law against political opponents, frequent physical
attacks upon
those opponents and their properties, wide-ranging and
oppressive
misapplication of authority, and endless interventions of the
heads of
security forces within the political arena.
Moreover, not only do
many of Zimbabwe’s laws not facilitate investment, but
they are contrary to
internationally acceptable and investment required
criteria. Amongst those
is the Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment Act,
and its underlying
regulations.
Investors are mostly very supportive of the principles
of indigenisation and
widespread economic empowerment of the majority of the
populace. But that
support does not extend to the investors willing to
provide the major
substance of the investment capital, the transfer of
technology and
associated know-how, and access to the investors’ markets,
whilst being
reduced to the status of minority equity holders with little or
no authority
in enterprise policies and operations, and even being deprived
of
determination as to who will be their co-owners of the
enterprises.
All those unacceptable features are compounded by the
intending investors
not even being assured of fair and reasonable
compensation for their inputs
into the ventures, or as to when such
compensation will be forthcoming.
This is especially so in relation to the
mining sector, where the Ministry
of Youth Development, Indigenisation and
Economic Empowerment is insistent
that the co-shareholder be “designated
entities,” most of which are the
state itself.
Exchange
control,regulations and frequent changes to them, also deter
investors.
There was great appreciation of the Reserve Bank
of Zimbabwe (RBZ) whenit
greatly relaxed the controls in February 2009,
giving investors some sense
of assurance that their ventures would not be
jeopardised by regulations.
Although the exchange controls presently
in force are still very markedly
less onerous than what prevailed more than
three years ago, frequent changes
to the controls which generally intensify
the authority of RBZ, inevitably
create ongoing fears of further
counter-productive controls being
introduced. These fears were
significantly intensified on August 1 when the
RBZ issued Directive RM80 in
respect of remittance of sale proceeds from the
disposal of immovable
property.
Although the newly applied constraints on the remittance
from Zimbabwe of
proceeds from disposal of immovable property apply
primarily to Zimbabwean
residents, and non-resident individuals can still
relatively readily remit
property disposal proceeds, the impact of the
regulations is to further
depress the property market, with consequential
diminution of property
values and hence is yet further discouragement of
investment.
As negative as those measures are, they are worsened
by being introduced
without prior notice. The prejudice to persons who
disposed of properties
shortly before the issue of the directive, and had
yet to remit the
proceeds, results in gross dissatisfaction for those
persons, and ancillary
further discouragement of investors.
Over
and above the legislative barriers to investor confidence, the ongoing
deficiencies of the parastatals in general, and that of Air Zimbabwe, Zesa,
National Railways of Zimbabwe and TelOne in particular, also continue to
alienate investor confidence, as do the repeated threats by the Minister of
Finance to increase mining royalties and taxation, and the ceaseless clamour
from labour for wage increments far beyond the means of employers. Until
all these issues are constructively addressed, most FDI is naught but
wishful thinking, and economic recovery of substance cannot occur.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
19:12
By Brian Raftopoulos
GIVEN the economic and political
convulsions that have marked Zimbabwean
politics for the last decade, it is
not surprising that the momentous events
in North Africa have been
internalised and constructed in contested ways by
the major political
players in Zimbabwe. With the Zimbabwean landscape torn
by the polemical
rupture between the redistributive language of Zanu PF
which has monopolised
the legacy of the liberation struggle, and the two MDC
factions and the
civic movement which were formatively shaped by the
politics of human rights
and constitutionalism from the 1990s, the complex
events of the Maghreb have
resonated differently within Zimbabwe.
President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu
PF has responded with renewed coercion of
opposition and civic leaders and
combined this with the launch of its
campaign for the next election, which
could take place this year or in 2012.
Soon after the events in Tunisia and
Egypt, Zanu PF organised a form of
pre-emptive demonstration and violence
demanding a greater indigenisation of
the economy.
This
action and its accompanying demand need to be understood within the
context
of the attempt by Mugabe’s regime to construct the “sanctions” or
“targeted
measures” imposed by the European Union and the United States on
key Zanu PF
figures as a regime change strategy, which amounted to broader
economic
sanctions against the people of Zimbabwe.
The anti-sanctions campaign
has thus become the central focus of the party’s
strategy not only to win
the next election but also to mobilise popular
opinion to give the
impression that the real heirs of the events in North
Africa are not
opposition forces but Zanu PF itself.
In this scenario, the popular
uprisings in North Africa have been
interpreted as struggles against
authoritarian regimes propped up by Western
imperialism, and thus share a
common vision with Zanu PF’s anti-imperialist
message.
One of its key
media messengers, Tafataona Mahoso, wrote: “In what ways can
the
anti-sanctions launch be compared and contrasted with what people have
been
trying in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain, Jordan, Yemen and Libya?
The answer is
imperialism, made up of the imposition of neoliberal
corporatist policies
expressed in our region as structural adjustment
programmes; made up of the
unilateral Nato-driven security programme called
the ‘war on terror’ in the
Middle East and masquerading as Africom in the
rest of Africa; made up of
the global financial crisis and Western efforts
to prescribe responses to
the crisis for other regions of the world; made up
of the myth of ‘change’
and ‘democracy’ which tries to substitute mere words
for real work,
production and livelihoods; and made up of strenuous efforts
to impose and
maintain the Western media template on the rest of the
world.”
Furthermore, as one of Zanu PF’s chief ideologues, Jonathan
Moyo wrote that
the fight against the “regime-change sanctions” strategy is
the latest in a
long-line of anti-colonial struggles to “reclaim” the right
of “indigenous
people” to the resources of their country.
Thus, the
battles against the colonial regime were continued in the land
struggles of
the post 2000 period and currently find their embodiment in the
fight to
impose majority indigenous control over the entire economy. Key to
this
final struggle, cast in a Fukuyama style End of History gambit, is the
intent to mobilise the youth as the key beneficiaries of the
process.
In Moyo’s words: “In the same way that the armed struggle in
the Second
Chimurenga was necessary to fulfil the objectives of the first
Chimurenga
against colonialism, the transformation of the ownership of the
majority
equity in our economy through indigenisation is necessary as an
expression
of the Last Chimurenga to complement the economic gains of the
Third
Chimurenga against neo-colonialism…”
In such articulations,
the battle for democratisation and human rights in
North Africa is either
ignored or denigrated as a foreign, Western agenda.
Moreover, there has been
a selective coverage of the events in North Africa
with limited coverage in
the state media of the events in Libya compared to
the much wider reportage
of the events in Egypt and Tunisia. Because of the
close relationship
between Mugabe’s regime and Gaddafi, the state media has
largely parroted
Gaddafi’s interpretation of the popular demonstrations in
Libya as a
Western-sponsored ploy to effect illegal regime change.
Once again in
Moyo’s words: “Evidence abounds showing that the US and its
European allies
wish that what is happening in Libya could happen Zimbabwe
and elsewhere in
Southern Africa where former liberation movements are in
power.”
Armed with such interpretations of these events, the Zanu
PF state arrested
45 activists in early March who had gathered to watch a
video on the North
African protests. Thirty-nine of these activists were
later released but the
rest have been charged with treason. Aside from this
incident, there have
been two bogus campaigns calling for mass protests
through social networking
websites, which have predictably come to naught.
This is because whatever
the similarities in the authoritarian regimes
confronting the peoples of
North Africa and Zimbabwe, there are also crucial
differences.
The “Egypt moment” in Zimbabwe occurred in the late
1990s when a strong
alliance of trade unions and civic forces confronted the
Mugabe regime in a
series of strikes, stayaways, demonstrations, the
creation of a vibrant
constitutional movement and the formation of a strong,
national and
multi-class opposition party, which effectively challenged the
ruling party
at the polls throughout the 2000s and in 2008, against great
odds and a long
history of state violence, defeated the party of liberation
in the
elections.
The decisive difference between the current
events in North Africa and the
situation in Zimbabwe was the role of the
military, which in Zimbabwe
effectively blocked the popular vote from being
translated into a change of
state power.
Currently, it is highly
unlikely that any such an uprising will occur again.
The least
important reason for this is the low levels of internet
penetration in
Zimbabwe. More fundamentally, the livelihood structure of the
Zimbabwean
economy has been completely deconstructed in the period of the
crisis, with
the formal working class effectively decimated.
This has undercut a key
constituency of the opposition movement. Moreover,
there has been a movement
of about two million Zimbabweans into the
diaspora, which has in some ways
displaced the crisis at national level onto
a broader regional and
international plane. In addition, the land
occupations of the post 2000
period have not only caused displacement and
economic disruption but they
have also created a constituency for Zanu PF
through the substantive numbers
of Zimbabweans who have received land.
However, the impact of the
North African events have been felt more
indirectly in Zimbabwe, through
their effects on the mediation by Sadc.
Prior to these events the South
African-led Sadc facilitators had for the
most part followed former South
African President Thabo Mbeki’s “quiet
diplomacy”, which amounted to some
levels of criticism of the Mugabe regime
behind closed doors, while
providing that regime with regional solidarity in
official
statements.
In the aftermath of the events in North Africa and the
Ivory Coast, the
regional body took a much more critical approach to Zanu
PF. At the Sadc
Troika summit held in Livingstone, Zambia in March, the
organisation
confronted Mugabe’s obstruction of the Global Political
Agreement (GPA) in a
much more head-on manner. Noting with “grave concern”
the political
polarisation in Zimbabwe characterised by the “resurgence of
violence,
arrests and intimidation”, the summit produced five resolutions
which
included:
There must be an immediate end to violence,
intimidation, hate speech,
harassment, and any other form of action that
contradicts the letter and
spirit of the GPA;
All stakeholders to
the GPA should implement all the provisions of the GPA
and create a
conducive environment for peace, security and free political
activity;
Sadc should assist Zimbabwe to formulate guidelines
that will assist in
holding an election that will be peaceful, free and
fair, in accordance with
the Sadc Principles and Guidelines Governing
Democratic Elections; and,
The major import of these resolutions was
that they broadly repeated the
demands that had emerged from the two MDCs
and the civic movement since
2009, and importantly refrained from any
mention of the sanctions issue.
Moreover, they appeared to be addressing the
securocrats in Zanu PF, who
have been the main obstacle to a more democratic
transition and who also
represent one of the key factions in the succession
battle in the party.
The immediate response of one of Zanu PF’s key
spokespersons and
strategists, Moyo, was to launch a furious attack on Sadc
and South African
President Jacob Zuma.
Sensing the extreme
danger in alienating Sadc, senior Zanu PF officials
quickly distanced
themselves from Moyo’s foolishness. In his speech on the
anniversary of
Zimbabwe’s Independence, Mugabe confirmed this conciliatory
tone by a
renewed commitment to the GPA, and an expression of gratitude for
Sadc’s
“continued support in our efforts at ensuring the unfolding
implementation
of the Global Political Agreement”.
While Zimbabwe is unlikely in the
immediate future to experience the kinds
of popular struggles we have
witnessed in North Africa, the effects of these
events have nevertheless
transformed the context in which the Sadc mediation
and the GPA are
unfolding. In the present context, particularly in the light
of Mugabe’s
deteriorating health, it has become much more difficult for Sadc
to provide
the kind of regional cover that has granted the Mugabe regime the
space it
needed to obstruct a more substantive democratic transition in
Zimbabwe. The
recent demonstrations in Swaziland and Malawi have added to
the pressure on
Sadc to confront the authoritarian legacies in the region.
Professor Brian Raftopoulos is a leading Zimbabwean scholar and
activist.—
Open Space
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011 19:09
By Rindai
Chipfunde-Vava
THE registration of voters and compilation and maintenance
of an accurate
national voters’ roll have long been recognised as essential
components of
any fair electoral process.
Since the voters’ roll records
who can vote, it may ultimately have a
determining effect on who wins the
poll. Therefore, it is imperative that
the voters’ roll, which is the
administrative cornerstone of democratic
elections, is as accurate and
up-to-date as possible.
While an incomplete voters’ roll may
disenfranchise some citizens who would
otherwise be entitled to vote, a roll
that is inflated with duplicate
entries, the deceased or those who have
emigrated lends itself to electoral
fraud.
If the roll is
inflated, the count can be falsified (through ballot box
stuffing, multiple
voting or manipulation of the figures on returns) without
appearing to be
too blatantly implausible in relation to the number of
registered
voters.
Inaccurate voters’ rolls also have a knock-on effect on the
delimitation of
constituencies, portraying an inaccurate number of voters
for each area. In
the same way, an inflated roll acts as the justification
for printing an
excessive number of ballot papers, further expanding
possibilities for
electoral fraud.
The question of the accuracy —
or inaccuracy — of the voters’ roll is a
contentious issue and has been used
as a basis for the allegation that
successive elections in Zimbabwe did not
meet the basic requirement of being
“air” in accordance with internationally
accepted democratic standards.
All elections from 1985 onwards have
been conducted under the auspices of
successive electoral supervisory bodies
but the same Registrar-General
(Tobaiwa Mudede), who is perceived by some
observers and opposition parties
to be partisan. As a result, many people
have little faith in the voters’
roll which is under the control of this
body, believing that it has been
deliberately tampered with and that the
number of voters has been inflated
to facilitate manipulation of the
election results.
Considering the critical importance of a credible
voters’ roll, the Zimbabwe
Election Support Network (Zesn) conducted a study
of the roll to test its
accuracy, currency and completeness. Zesn employed a
double-barrelled
method, including both desk and field research. The
research took almost six
months to complete and the results were
shocking.
According to Zesn, almost a third (27%) of the registered
voters were dead,
less than a fifth (18%) of the country’s eligible young
people were
registered, and two-fifths (41%) of voters had not changed their
details
after changing their residential addresses. The findings indicated
that no
serious efforts had been taken for ages to update and cleanse the
national
voters’ roll. While it is mandatory for the government to
continuously
update the voters’ roll, such a crucial exercise has not been
meticulously
undertaken in Zimbabwe.
While the survey pinpointed
some massive concerns, the state of the voters’
roll is still largely veiled
in secrecy. The Zimbabwe Electoral Commission
(ZEC) has admitted that the
voters’ roll is a shambles, but the commission
says it needs US$20 million
to embark on a new voter registration drive.
While the
Registrar-General — who is in charge of compiling the voters’
roll — said
that his office was updating the register, he did not indicate
whether this
exercise would be completed ahead of the next elections.
However, Prime
Minister Morgan Tsvangirai has made it clear that a chaotic
voters’ roll is
unacceptable and that he would prefer the country to adopt a
totally new,
biometric voters’ roll.
The impact of the research cannot be
underestimated. Based on empirical
evidence rather than anecdotal evidence,
the report provided the public with
credible information about the alarming
state of the voters’ roll. The
report has also been used as an advocacy tool
by various organisations
calling for the roll to be cleansed and sparked
interest among
parliamentarians, with requests from MPs for training on the
voters’ roll.
The research unearthed a number of irregularities in
the country’s voters’
roll, a finding that is entirely consistent with
previous studies conducted
by independent researchers. Given the cumulative
evidence, one major and
incontrovertible conclusion can be drawn — Zimbabwe
urgently needs a new
voters’ roll.
Conducting the next general
election using a flawed voters’ roll that does
not inspire confidence in any
of the stakeholders — from voters to political
parties — would compromise
the legitimacy and credibility of the entire
electoral
process.
Sufficient time and resources are required to create a new
roll. An
appropriate registration methodology must also be agreed and
adopted by
relevant stakeholders, who must ensure that there is a conducive
environment
for the registration process. There should be incentives for
citizens to go
and delete their dead relatives from the roll, as was the
case in
Mozambique. The international community would also need to offer
assistance,
especially with funding, technology and technical
assistance.
A new, clean voters’ roll will go a long way towards
increasing the
credibility of electoral processes in Zimbabwe — and ensure
that all
eligible Zimbabweans are able to exercise their democratic right to
vote in
future.
Rindai Chipfunde-Vava is a political
scientist currently working as
Director of the Zimbabwe Elections Support
Network.—OpenSpace.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
19:41
Itai Masuku
SADC’S preoccupation with political
issues is really detrimental to the
region it seeks to develop. We have
raised this issue before, why is Sadc,
which is primarily a vehicle to
promote economic development, overly focus
on political issues?
One would
like to think that perhaps it was better off the grouping had
remained the
Southern African Development Co-ordination Conference, which it
was until
1992 when the Sadc treaty was signed in Namibia whose objective,
according
to Sadc and itself, shifted to include economic integration.
Both
Sadc and Sadcc’s predecessor, the Frontline States, was clearly a
political
platform. But as all the member countries of the frontline states
had
attained political independence, there was now need to focus on Economic
independence, which must be the main focus. with the political issues having
thei9r due attention. Economic or more precisely development issues
continue to take the backburner at all the summits.
The key
issues of the Luanda summit that anyone has constantly been reminded
of were
the political unrest in Madagascar, Malawi, the DRC and Zimbabwe.
What about
the long delay in implementing the Sadc trade protocol? What
about
addressing the infrastructural challenges in the region that are
hindering
development? What about the debate on currency convertibility,
convergence
or adopting a common currency as partof the goal of regional
integration?
What about the Millennium Development Goals?
These can’t achieved by
mere statements of intent, there must be pragmatic
steps taken in improving
the economies in order to realize these goals.
Really, these summits
have merely become hot air. If, as we are led to
understand, Sadc’s role in
the mediation process in Zimbabwe is that the
political parties should find
homegrown solutions, isn’t that stating the
obvious? Why spend all that
money and time so that people can be told the
obvious?
This
reminds one of an old video clip that used to be run on ZTV in support
of
Zanu PF. In it, a spokesperson for a group of women stated that the women
had run into serious problems when they couldn’t obtain
bread.
Zanu PF, the woman proudly boasted, gave them a solution: They
had to bake
the bread themselves! Not a revolutionary solution I would say,
but perhaps
better than Marie Antoinette’s statement: “If they can’t afford
bread, let
them eat cake.” It is time economic issues took centre stage at
Sadc.
As one always says, if you were to ask the proverbial man on
the street what
Sadc is all about, they would clearly tell you that it’s a
political
organization.
And yet before the formation of the Sadc
Organ on Politics, Defence and
Security, there was more focus on economic
issues.
That organ has now become like an octopus in Sadc, spawning
various
political offshoots such as the troika on this and the troika on the
troika
on that; typical political gobbledygook.
Well, man doesn’t
live on political gobbledygook at all but on bread and
butter. Sadc is
losing focus.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011
19:39
Constantine Chimakure
NEWS that the three political
parties to the GPA have converged on the issue
of the date for the
constitution review referendum and the elections should
ordinarily be good;
but in our case it is a worrying development. Talking of
elections without
exorcising the demon of June 2008 sends shivers down the
spines of many. Had
meaningful and tangible efforts been made to turn over a
new leaf in how
elections are conducted in Zimbabwe, most would welcome the
opportunity to
express their political choice or vote.
While elections could serve
as the solution to the political logjam
obtaining in the country, they would
be fallacious without concrete and
tangible reforms.
The last
elections, the presidential run-off of June 2008, were
characterised by an
orgy of violence. The spectre thereof is still being
felt in communities
across the country.
In their wisdom the three political parties
agreed to institute an organ of
national healing.
Their agreement on
when to hold elections begs the question of whether they
deem the nation
“healed” enough to put them through another rollercoaster.
If anything,
the prevailing peace is only superficial and the reality is
that the nation
is haemorrhaging, crying out for recourse. Incidents of
violence and
intimidation are still reported and these have to be eliminated
or at least
minimised before we start talking of the next elections.
The Standard
reported this week that war veterans’ leader Jabulani Sibanda
allegedly
warned Masvingo villagers that the former liberation war fighters
would be
“roasting livers of sellouts” in the next election. Such blatant
acts of
intimidation must be nipped in the bud before any talk of
elections.
It is also important to see how the political parties are
going to expedite
the implementation of stalled reforms. For example, media
reforms have been
put on ice pending the conclusion of the
constitution-making process. There
is a plethora of problems
here.
One is whether there will be enough time to effect all the
necessary changes
between the referendum and the next elections -- which
could be a space of
six months.
It makes no sense putting the reforms
on hold pending the outcome of the
referendum. The issue of the referendum
to accept or reject a new
constitution was crafted at a time of high
political temperatures, after the
signing of the GPA, and there are certain
grey areas such as what would
happen if the new document is
rejected.
In the same breath, if the constitution is rejected and we
revert to the
Lancaster House constitution as amended 19 times, how would
the reforms be
effected? This brings to the fore the problems we have with
agreeing to
dates and not benchmarks.
The adherence to timelines and
not significant and acceptable reforms is a
waste of time. It has to be made
clear to the three political parties that
we are a nation that is still
bleeding and needs healing. Merely
constituting an organ of national healing
is not enough to bring healing to
a nation.
One can use the media
as a dip stick to see how much the nation is
suffering, calling out for real
healing, not these cosmetics changes.
As such, it is disturbing to hear
that the political leaders are focusing
more on elections. This is the wrong
approach to the problems obtaining in
the country.
This approach is
what bred violence and the thuggery that has come to
characterise the fight
for political office. What is important is to agree
on reforms first and
then hold elections later. A rush for elections will
definitely be another
recipe for chaos and disaster.
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/
Thursday, 18 August 2011 19:37
THE
untimely death of retired army commander General Solomon Mujuru in the
early
hours of Tuesday morning in a blaze which burnt his body to a crisp
has
echoes of the assassination of Herbert Chitepo and the killing of Josiah
Tongogara in a car accident.
Chitepo, the Zanu chairman and leader in
exile key in the formation of Dare
reChimurenga (War Council), died on March
18 1975 in a car bomb blast in
Lusaka, Zambia.
Although to this
day we still do not know the truth about who actually
killed Chitepo, many
theories and accounts have been advanced and written on
it.
Former Zambian President Kenneth Kaunda set up a Special
International
Commission on the Assassination of Herbert Wiltshire Chitepo
which concluded
that he was killed due to internal strife in Zanu. It blamed
infighting,
characterised by intimidation, abductions, torture and killings,
for Chitepo’s
murder. Frontline states leaders believed Chitepo was a victim
of Zanu
struggles within the struggle.
While the Zanu faction led
by Ndabaningi Sithole believed the findings of
the Special Commission, the
camp led by Robert Mugabe was unconvinced. In
fact, it denounced the Zambian
government and blamed imperialists,
counter-revolutionaries and saboteurs
for Chitepo’s death.
CIO founding director Ken Flower in his book
Serving Secretly linked Chitepo’s
death to Rhodesian intelligence operations
but did not say exactly who
killed him. Peter Stiff in See You in November:
Rhodesia’s No-Holds-Barred
Intelligence War says a former British SAS
soldier Hugh Hind was
responsible.
In his biographical account,
The Legend of the Selous Scouts, Lt Col
Reid-Daly, says the CIO was behind
it but forged documents to lay blame on
Zanu members.
In their
book, The Chitepo Assassination, David Martin and Phyllis Johnson
try very
hard but in vain to prove CIO culpability.
There are many theories
and versions of Chitepo’s death. Academics and
researchers have entered the
debate but no one has been able to prove beyond
reasonable doubt who killed
Chitepo.
The same applies to Tongogara’s death. Not all of these
mysterious deaths
are by definition assassinations but there seems to be a
history and pattern
of high-profile politically-motivated killings in this
country by different
methods. Although no one as yet knows the truth about
Mujuru’s death, the
incident reeks of foul play. It has all the hallmarks of
murder, whether for
political or other reasons.
Mujuru’s
mysterious burning to ashes has once again highlighted the spectre
of death
that accompanies politics, especially in a situation where there is
vicious
infighting linked to succession. While we don’t know the truth about
Mujuru’s demise, wherever there are succession fights, particularly in
authoritarian regimes, assassinations are used as a political tool to
eliminate rivals.
Many politicians and their agents seem to
subscribe to the political
doctrine of Machiavelli which denies the
relevance of morality in political
affairs and holds that craft, deceit and
brutality are justified in pursuing
and maintaining political power. Mujuru
might be a victim of this
philosophy.
From Julius Caesar to
Mahatma Gandhi, political leaders seem to be born with
death following them
like their own shadows. Although Gandhi lived up to 78,
many others like
Martin Luther King, John F Kennedy died too young and could
have contributed
a lot more to their countries and humanity.
The list of assassinated
people in positions of power suggests that while
politics is almost like a
game, the stark reality of sudden death makes it a
dangerous
adventure.
We sincerely hope Mujuru was not caught up in the evil
designs of
politicians involved in Zanu PF’s power struggles. The truth is
that most
people out there, including Mujuru’s relatives and political
allies, don’t
believe he died in a fire accident, let alone caused by a
candle! They think
it was murder.
So in order to lay the matter
to rest there is need for a professional,
independent and through inquiry
into events and circumstances leading to the
death of Mujuru. Otherwise,
this will remain a mystery like the Chitepo and
Tongogara deaths, further
poisoning the already toxic and cutthroat
political environment.
Read more |
UN agencies barred from food assessment for 'political reasons' |
Dry spell ends prospect of good harvest |
More food production, but not enough |
Asking for more humanitarian money |
[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]
http://www.businessday.co.za
Zimbabwean documentary filmmaker
tries to understand how a man he once
admired became a tyrant, writes Chris
Thurman
Published: 2011/08/18 09:13:55 AM
EVERY South African has a
"Zim story". They range from "I have
family/friends in Zimbabwe who lost
their farm" to "Zimbabweans get all the
piecework because they’re cheaper to
hire".
But too often, behind the Zim stories told by South Africans —
black and
white, rich and poor — there lurks the spectre of another claim:
"SA is
heading the way of Zimbabwe."
In the past, this invocation
demonstrated a reactionary misunderstanding of
the major differences between
countries. As the political commentator
Stephen Grootes noted after the
recent African National Congress Youth
League conference, however, "Until
now our view has been that we are
different from ‘that p lace a cross the
Limpopo’ because there will always
be a strong tempering voice, a civil
society, a business lobby, a middle
class to keep the extremists at bay.
This congress makes us wonder if that
mechanism is still working in the case
of Julius Malema."
It is not surprising that Malema’s fiery rhetoric
about nationalisation of
resources and expropriation of land has brought the
figure of Robert Mugabe
and his Zanu (PF) party into the forefront once
again.
Yet while Malema has, if nothing else, been consistent during his
short
career, Mugabe didn’t start out as a maniacal demagogue — or did
he?
Robert Mugabe ... What Happened? It’s a question asked over and over
in
recent years.
It’s now the title of a documentary film in which
the director, Simon
Bright, presents a narrative that, as he describes it,
"mirrors my own
changing perception of Mugabe".
Bright, whose family
had been strongly opposed to Ian Smith’s vision of a
white-ruled
"independent" Rhodesia, candidly admits he spent the early part
of his
career applying his talents as a propagandist for the Zimbabwean
agriculture
ministry in the 1980s.
His films, Corridors of Freedom (1987) and Limpopo
Line (1990), both
recounted and contributed to the combined resistance of
southern African
countries to the apartheid state.
A slow process of
disillusionment can be tracked through Bright’s role as
co- producer in
Ingrid Sinclair’s Flame (1996), which reveals abuses against
the women who
fought for Zimbabwe’s freedom, to his imprisonment by Mugabe’s
henchmen in
2003.
So the film is "a journey for my own understanding, unpicking my
Mugabe
hero- worship". In doing so, Bright has compiled some remarkable
footage in
addition to reconfiguring his own material: "In some ways, the
film is an
archival tribute — a montage of southern African documentary
cinema from the
1930s to 2010."
There are rare images of Mugabe as a
young man, as well as of the country in
which he grew up and which he left
to study at various African universities
in the 1950s. There are indicators
of the broader context for Zimbabwe’s
independence and civil war in the
1970s, including the pan- African
influence of Zambian president Kenneth
Kaunda, Mozambique’s Samora Machel
and Julius Nyerere of Tanzania (none of
whom, it should be mentioned,
entirely trusted the young Mugabe). The film
also reminds us of the various
alternatives to the absolute rule of Mugabe
and Zanu (PF) that have been
successively and successfully quashed. Before
Morgan Tsvangirai’s MDC there
was Joshua Nkomo’s Zapu. The late Edgar
Tekere, a critic of Mugabe from
within the Zanu ranks, was also effectively
sidelined; likewise, Simba
Makoni. Tekere and Makoni are among the wise
"talking heads" who provide
insight into Mugabe’s rise and reign as tyrant.
Bright also shares extensive
interviews with newspaperman Trevor Ncube, as
well as with ministers of
Mugabe’s first cabinet in the halcyon days after
the elections in 1980 and
with other significant figures in subsequent
Zimbabwean politics (one of
whom, Michael Auret, is the film’s
producer).
So where did it all go wrong? Were the seeds of hatred sown
during Mugabe’s
11-year incarceration ? Did his appetite for violence
develop during the
"bush war"? ("People are a product of their environment —
that’s the problem
with revolutionaries and liberators as leaders," says
Brigh t. "W ars of
liberation are never glamorous.") What roles were played
by the apartheid
government, the instruction in brutality of North Korea, or
the failure of
the British to keep to the Lancaster House agreement? What
about the death
of Mugabe’s first wife, who had been a strong (and
beneficial) influence on
him ?
Or was it something much earlier in
Mugabe’s life? Bright admits he’s often
heard the theory that Mugabe’s
pro-Shona ethnic bigotry stems from the
childhood trauma of his father
abandoning his mother and "running off with
an Ndebele woman". But he is
reluctant to psychologise Mugabe too much. "I
have a problem with the idea
that Mugabe is essentially evil and cruel —
that he pulled wings off flies
as a boy."
But w e do get an insight into his disciplinarian Jesuit
schooling and
glimpses of an unsociable, lonely child.
Ultimately, of
all the possibilities mooted in Robert Mugabe ... What
Happened?, the most
convincing answer is voiced by Wilfred Mhanda: nothing —
"Mugabe hasn’t
changed. There is nobody in the world more consistent than
Robert Mugabe.
It’s just that the circumstances surrounding him have
changed."
In
other words, Mugabe’s desire for power has manifested itself in different
ways over the years, and the post-2000 madness of election-rigging, farm
invasions and citizen brutalisation has merely been a continuation of this.
"As my knowledge of Mugabe deepens," says Bright , "that is more and more my
opinion." International goodwill in the 1980s notwithstanding, Mugabe would
never be — could never be — a reconciliatory and inspirational icon like
Nelson Mandela; Bright’s film makes it clear that Mugabe knew this, and
would come to resent his inferiority to SA ’s saviour. He had manipulated
the internecine Zanu-Zapu conflict to his advantage, and has remained a
canny self-preserver ever since.
The question is, where does Zimbabwe
go from here? Bright is encouraged by
"the stronger position taken by
President Zuma and the Southern African
Development Community (which should
have been taken years ago). Mugabe’s
power has until now been backed by a
so-called ‘critique’ of western
imperialism — one of the aims of the film is
to burst that balloon — and he
will now be increasingly isolated. When he
dies, Zanu (PF) will, I expect,
implode; dictators can’t have heirs
apparent."
South Africans, meanwhile, are left to ponder the paradox of a
man whose
bearing, tastes and mannerisms are more English than the Queen —
yet who
professes detestation of Britain. Still, perhaps that’s not entirely
dissimilar to a man who claims to be opposed to capitalist exploitation but
lives a life of conspicuous brand-oriented consumption ... and we’ve
swallowed that myth without even blinking.
• Robert Mugabe ... What
Happened? will be screened at the Tri-Continental
Film Festival in
Johannesburg, Durban and Cape Town on September 9-25 ,
followed by
theatrical release at Cape Town’s Labia Theatre.
Woodside woman faces terror in
Zimbabwe
Special to the Almanac Michealene Cristini Risley seems to be a typical Woodside mom -- she has coached her three sons' soccer and basketball teams, works from home while juggling the boys activities and play dates, and she loves to garden, write and hang out with her investment banker husband and her best friends. It's that work, though, that sets her apart. In 2007, leaving her 4-, 10-, and 11-year-old sons and husband behind, Michealene Risley went to Zimbabwe, Africa, planning to spend two weeks filming a documentary about a heroic woman's fight to save girls from sexual abuse. A week into the filming, Ms. Risley was arrested, accused of being a CIA spy, interrogated, deprived of food and water, and incarcerated in a filthy, crowded prison. She survived to tell the tale, return to her family and complete the documentary. The film, "Tapestries of Hope," tells the story of Betty Makoni, who began the Girl Child Network to help girls who had been sexually abused and to fight the myth that led to much of the abuse -- that having sex with a virgin could cure a man of HIV/AIDS. Local residents will get a chance to see the film at 7 p.m. Saturday, Aug. 20, at Kepler's bookstore in Menlo Park. It is the second film for Ms. Risley, whose resume includes work in Hollywood for Amblin Entertainment and Disney, as well as Mattel and Sega. Her first film was about sexual abuse, based on her own childhood experiences and meant to increase public awareness of the topic. The film, "Flashcards," was nominated for an Academy Award, shown on PBS and used by the Canadian Mounties to train their officers. Ms. Risley had no intention of making a documentary when she met Betty Makoni in the spring of 2007. Ms. Risley was on a book tour promoting her first book, "This is Not the Life I Ordered," which she had written with three friends -- Jackie Speier, Jan Yanehiro and Deborah Collins Stephens, and she was busy with her young family. But over a breakfast date, Ms. Risley and Ms. Makoni, who has also survived childhood sexual abuse, bonded. "By the time we were done with breakfast she had asked me to go to Zimbabwe." In short order Ms. Risley raised money, bought bags-full of the present Ms. Makoni said the girls would most appreciate, new underwear, and arranged to go to Zimbabwe with assistant Lauren Carara. Ms. Risley says her husband, Eric Risley, was, as always, supportive of the project. Mr. Risley, the managing partner at Architect Partners, investment bankers specializing in mergers and acquisitions, did ask her to think about one thing. "He said to me, about a week before I left, 'You have to ask yourself this one question: If you don't come back, would this have been worth it?'" He did not try to talk her out of making the trip, however, "and when I went to prison, he never said I told you so." Even so, Ms. Risley said she didn't think much about danger before she left. "I think I went to Zimbabwe very naive," she says. "Until I got there, I really didn't know how dangerous it was." Betty Makoni had also told Ms. Risley not to worry because she had a private security team. Upon arriving, however, the danger was obvious. "The first day we were stopped by (Zimbabwe's) Central Intelligence Organization," Ms. Risley says. "So I knew we had to be careful." Ms. Makoni told her she had been followed by agents of the CIO for years. "So then my husband's words started flashing through my head," Ms. Risley says. She began filming, mostly at a Girl Child Network "Empowerment Village" near Ms. Makoni's home, where a group of young girls were living and being educated as they recovered from abuse. One morning Ms. Risley and the assistant, Ms. Carara, went off for breakfast. "When we came back from breakfast there were 15 men waiting to arrest us at Betty's house." The men, who were armed, questioned them, searched their belongings, and even counted the money in her suitcase. "They thought I was CIA," she says. "They thought I was an American spy." The two Americans and Ms. Makoni were taken to the police station and interrogated in separate rooms. Ms. Risley later found out that her interrogator was the head of the CIO. "When I sat in front of him, he had three grenades on his desk. He had an AK-47 hanging on the wall," she says. "I got a little nervous," Ms. Risley says. "Oh my god, my husband was right," she says she remembers thinking. "Holy cow, what did I do?" After being questioned from 9 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. with no food or water, they were allowed to go home and told to come back in the morning. "I thought we were going to go back to pick up our equipment," Ms. Risley says. "I was still in disbelief. What would they want with a little filmmaker?" The next morning, however, "they started interrogating us all over again." There was no way to deny how serious the situation was. At one point during the second day of questioning, a female agent took Ms. Risley to the restroom. Ms. Risley begged to call her husband. "She actually let me try, but I couldn't get reception," she remembers. "I started to tear up again and she said, 'Do you believe in God?' and I said yes, and she said, 'Then you need to pray.'" Later, Ms. Risley says, they found out that the four-story building they were held in was the CIO's central torture facility. The lower floor, Ms. Risley says, contains a pool full of sulfuric acid. "When Mugabe and his thugs wanted you to disappear, they threw you in the pool. Even your bones disintegrate in that," she says. A call finally came from the U.S. Embassy. "Jane Howell introduced herself and said: 'You need to get out by the weekend or you'll be raped or killed.'" She told Ms. Risley that no one, not embassy officials or the human rights lawyers her husband had hired, would be allowed to see them for the first 48 hours of detention. Late in the day, Ms. Risley and Ms. Carara were told to follow the female agent down a hall. "I suddenly realized we were in prison," Ms. Risley says. There were both men and women held in the filthy facility, with feces everywhere and holes in the ceiling. Prisoners appeared to be diseased or dying. "l learned very quickly that if we were going to survive, we would have to bribe people," Ms. Risley says. They were forced to take off their bras, shoes and socks, and hand over their possessions. Guards wrote down how much money she had on a paper and gave it back to her with an eraser, allowing her to transfer money by simply changing the amount on the paper. Bribes got them in to a 5-foot by 5-foot cell with six other women. The cell had one light bulb, a small bench and an unlocked door. The women in her cell began to tell her their stories. One woman was having asthma attacks. "She was terrified because her three kids were home alone." Most of the women had been arrested because they had illegally crossed the border to get food for their children. One woman had been beaten by her husband so badly she was unrecognizable. In the middle of that endless night, Ms. Risley says, "I started weeping." One of the women said: "Why do you weep? Why do you cry?" "I said, I cry for you, for your lives." The woman, Ms. Risley says, seemed unable to understand why Ms. Risley would care. "It's OK. This is our lives. We'll be OK," she was told. "I think that was probably the most profound moment of my trip," she says. "Here I was sitting there with all these women who just wanted to feed their kids. We're all moms. We just want to take care of our kids." Tears come to Ms. Risley's eyes as she remembers the scene. "That night I saw two men having sex. I saw a guy being tortured. I stepped on feces and I was urinated on from the fourth floor." The bribes she had given to the first guards had to continue at each shift change and she began to fear she'd run out of money. The first meal she had came at 11 a.m. the next day, when Ms. Makoni sent in food, enough for most of the prisoners. "We just fed everybody," Ms. Risley says. That afternoon, Ms. Risley and Ms. Carara were taken into the hallway and told, "We can get you out of the country tonight if you will agree to pay the airfare," which was only the equivalent of $130. "I said just get us out of here," Ms. Risley says. While Ms. Carara went back to the house with Betty Makoni to grab their things, Ms. Risley was taken to the airport. The Zimbabwean officials took her new laptop computer, but they gave her back her films, which she carried on the plane. "I couldn't figure out why they would let me take my film," she says. She later found out that a Facebook friend of the film project had helped free them. Ms. Risley had been posting information about the project on Facebook. When they were arrested, she had been able to warn a colleague to take everything off the page. He replaced it with: "Michealene and her assistant have been arrested in Zimbabwe -- please pray for them." An international reporter in Greece who had been supporting the project on Facebook saw the note and called a contact at the CIA, who called Zimbabwe's president, Robert Mugabe. The reporter was soon told, "She's coming out and she has her film." Ms. Risley and Ms. Carara flew to Johannesburg that night. "I had never been dirtier in my life," Ms. Risley says. "I took three baths when I went to the hotel." Eric Risley told his sons about their mother's imprisonment only after she had been freed. Would she do it again? "I most definitely will take on hard issues, but I would do a lot more due-diligence in a risky area before I would risk my life and my family's happiness," Ms. Risley says. For now she is working on a book about the project, which will be titled: "Tapestries of Hope, the Story of One Survivor's Journey to End Violence against Women." She hopes to release it as an e-book in December. Ms. Risley said she will continue to work on issues concerning violence against women, which she sees as one of the most pressing problems of the 21st century. "One out of every three women will suffer rape or violence in their lifetime," she says. "How can I teach my three boys to respect women when the world around them shouts out a very different message?" Barbara Wood is a freelance writer, photographer and gardener who lives in an old farmhouse in Woodside. ● Saturday: 'Tapestries of Hope' to be shown at Kepler's |