The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Reserve Bank Warns Zimbabwe To Brace For Monetary Reforms > Copyright © 2003, Dow Jones Newswires

HARARE, Zimbabwe (AP)--The newly appointed head of the Reserve Bank told Zimbabweans on Thursday to brace for monetary reforms aimed at curbing soaring inflation and spurring recovery in the country's crumbling economy.

Bank Governor Gideon Gono, in his first monetary policy statement, stopped short of announcing a devaluation of the local currency demanded by business and industry leaders.

But he said some hard currency earnings would be sold to the highest bidders under a new currency auction system starting next month aimed at reining in illegal black market deals.

The central bank is also setting up a "whistle blower's fund" to reward those reporting illegal currency deals to the bank, Gono told business leaders at a briefing broadcast on state television.

Beneficiaries would be paid 10% of the value recovered from thwarted deals in hard currency, he said.

Zimbabwe is suffering its worst economic crisis since independence from Britain in 1980. Inflation has reached a record 619.5%, one of the highest levels in the world, and the country is gripped by acute shortages of hard currency, food, gasoline and other essential imports.

Gono said he wasn't intervening to curb soaring commercial interest rates, which are threatening to shut down heavily indebted businesses, because it would increase the speculation that fuels inflation.

But he said a range of "homegrown" measures would be introduced next month to "lay a road map for economic recovery" and fight inflation.

"There is going to be the pain of readjustment," he said. "If you want honey, you must expect to be stung by bees."

The government's official exchange rate is 824 Zimbabwe dollars to the U.S dollar, but the U.S. currency fetches up to 7,000 Zimbabwe dollars on the black market.

Under the new system, Gono said individuals and businesses who bring in foreign currency would be required to submit one-fourth of their earnings to auction and sell another fourth to the central bank at the official exchange rate.

They would be allowed to keep the rest in designated hard currency accounts to buy imports and raw materials, or offer for sale.

A range of incentives and penalties will be introduced to ensure hard currency is captured into the financial system as quickly as possible, Gono said.

The government's seizure of thousands of white-owned farms for redistribution to blacks, as well has erratic rains, have crippled Zimbabwe's agriculture-based economy.

Foreign aid and investment have dried up after nearly three years of political violence and economic turmoil.

Gono said the bank hoped to resume negotiations with the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and other financial institutions that have cut off loans to Zimbabwe, citing the country's mounting arrears and failure to meet prescribed economic targets.

"We seek to repay all our debts in the fullness of time," Gono said.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

December 18, 2003 14:19 ET (19:19 GMT)

Back to the Top
Back to Index

National Business Review, New Zealand
 
Opinion: Standing up to Mugabe
Pavel Molchanov

For a country that is not exactly used to playing power politics, New Zealand found itself on the receiving end of some unusually harsh criticism over its attitude to Zimbabwe's dictatorial regime of President Robert Mugabe.

Regardless of one's position on the political spectrum, any reasonable observer must recognise New Zealand's position, as affirmed at the recent Commonwealth summit in Nigeria, was entirely appropriate.

This position was fully endorsed by the UK, Australia and (implicitly) the US ­ all countries with which bilateral ties have been rather stressed this year. But I would argue for Prime Minister Helen Clark this was not a question of placating her nation's erstwhile opponents on the Iraq issue.

In the best traditions of human rights diplomacy, this was a decision guided by moral considerations, not national interest.

Granted, it was not a difficult call to make. There is nothing of practical significance Mr Mugabe can do to retaliate for Ms Clark's forceful condemnation of his regime. He cannot expel the New Zealand high commission in Harare (as he has threatened to do for the UK and Australia) because the office was moved to Pretoria several years ago to cut costs.

Even if he could, it would only isolate his own government further. Trade between the two nations is minimal (less than $7 million), and even if Mr Mugabe at some point decrees it cease, any economic consequences would fall solely on his impoverished citizenry.

The only real damage Mr Mugabe can inflict is to New Zealand's international reputation, by portraying it, along with the Commonwealth's other "old dominions," as imperialistically motivated stooges.

His message that the west is aiming to recolonise his country is on par with his earlier claim the Bush administration was planning an armed invasion. (Must be all those hidden oil reserves.)

Sadly, it resonates with many African leaders and ordinary people. The Southern African Development Community, for instance, has already denounced the Commonwealth's decision to extend Zimbabwe's suspension.

Of course, it is London ­ not Canberra or Wellington ­ that bears the brunt of such disapproval, but its geopolitical might means it is already far more used to accusations of heavy-handedness.

New Zealand is widely regarded, particularly in the Third World, as a liberal, broad-minded country, and as unfair as it is, Mr Mugabe's propaganda could affect this perception for the worse.

The spuriousness of Mugabe's suggestion that New Zealand's uncompromising stance against his tyranny is akin to neocolonialism should be self-evident to anyone with even a basic knowledge of modern New Zealand history.

Arguably, no western nation of a comparable size has done so much to advance the cause of majority rule and democratic governance in southern Africa.

For decades, Wellington was at the forefront of the anti-apartheid movement, particularly in its role as a vocal Commonwealth member.

This included the imposition of sanctions until the first free election in 1994. Prime ministers such as Sir Robert Muldoon and Jim Bolger also stood up for Namibia's right to self-determination, and NZAID still funds development assistance there.

It is also crucial to recognise New Zealand does have its supporters in the Commonwealth generally, and its African members specifically. Nigeria, for one, has adopted a middle-of-the-road position ­ in favour of continued pressure on Mr Mugabe, though tempered by careful diplomatic engagement.

Even more importantly, the Movement for Democratic Change (Zimbabwe's embattled opposition party) hailed the Abuja summit's decision as a recognition the situation in their country is not improving and may actually be deteriorating.

Now that Mr Mugabe has abruptly pulled out of the Commonwealth, it is unlikely New Zealand will play any major role in the movement to bring him back. This will be the job of Nigeria and, to a lesser extent, South Africa.

It remains to be seen whether the "quiet diplomacy" approach favoured by Zimbabwe's neighbours will bear fruit, but it appears increasingly probable any meaningful domestic change will only come after Mr Mugabe leaves office.

He shows every intention of holding on to power at any price.

In the most piquant irony of this entire debacle, Don McKinnon, the Commonwealth secretary-general, helped oversee the group's Harare Declaration during his years as New Zealand foreign minister. Signed in Zimbabwe's capital, this 1991 charter affirms the commitment of every member to a set of core democratic values.

By taking the lead on ensuring Mr Mugabe's gross violation of the declaration will not go unnoticed, New Zealand exemplifies the Commonwealth's lasting value ­ as the only global forum in which the voice of one small state can make a massive difference for the better.

Pavel Molchanov, an American, observes New Zealand affairs from Texas, where he is a financial analyst. Email psm4@duke.edu

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Hi
At 4.00 am a month ago, enjoying the sound of gentle rain, there was one clap of thunder, from a sky which the night before had looked empty.  I shot out of bed like a scalded cat and raced out to the new cold room to switch it all off.  Well it would have been too late anyway, but the bolt had taken out the telephone line.  I supplied five litres of petrol, and they came out and fixed the line.  I found out that I'd blown the modem, so bought a new modem and fixed that.  In desperation this week I collected the technician and his ladder and they fixed the thingie at the local junction box.  Sadly, the whole system is in its death throes, and it keeps going off at odd times during each day, so receiving the emails and replying is an extremely hit and miss affair.  Fairly typical for the dying throes of the whole country. 
 
Happily our good friends of South Africa are going to buy us a lovely new phone system from our lovelier friends in China, and theoretically we will be sorted out next year.  And even better is that the monstrosity of a  chinese cement factory next door will mean we go to the top of the list for new system.  Theoretically.  Dont hold your breath.
 
Meanwhile Clive went fishing, and I had the bad news for him on his return that our farm had been listed at last.  I've been checking the newspapers for ages, wondering what we were being kept for.  Aha, its the backlash for being thrown out of commonwealth.  And todays news indicates that our tractors and implements. are to be liberated as well, by presidential decree.  The sense of humour gets a bit thin.  Luckily we dont care that much any more, but it will be a bit crowded at the house in town, as our daughter moved in there when they were thrown off their farm!
 
However farming is no great shakes, as here we are in another dastardly drought.  Our president chose a really bad time for a land programme because we've had nothing but lousy weather since it started..a bit like a jinx, isnt it.
 
Living in 500+% inflation is a challenge, its quite an education as well.  Do you stagger at the price of milk, or a loaf of bread, or at the price of a car, or a meal, or wonder how to educate a young girl at 5.8 million per term?  You cant even forecast what a price will be, or how you are going to deal with it.  I keep thinking its got to crumble, but it doesnt, and I cant even work out why not.  The economists keep saying that governments crumble when inflation is as bad as this, but ours is invincible I think, and then pity the poor people who have to puzzle their way out of the mess.
 
But have a happy Christmas all, drink a toast to the survivors, wish them luck for the rough ride of the next year.  At some stage "Next year WILL be better"
Love,
Ann Hein..  Messages are my own personal opinions.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

IOL

        Mbeki, Mugabe meet - but what about Morgan?

            December 18 2003 at 02:24PM

      Harare - President Thabo Mbeki went straight into talks with
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe after his arrival in that country's
capital, but it appeared he would be ignoring opposition leader Morgan
Tsvangirai, whom he has met in all previous visits there in the last two
years.

      Mugabe met Mbeki at Harare International airport, stopped off at a
hotel amid an unusually heavy presence of Mugabe's presidential guard and
drove on for formal discussions at Mugabe's official residence, State House.

      "In the African revolution we shared the trenches together,"
Zimbabwean state radio quoted Mbeki as telling supporters of Mugabe's ruling
Zanu-PF party at the airport.

      Paul Themba Nyathi, spokesperson for Tsvangirai's opposition Movement
for Democratic Change, confirmed that party had received no contact from
Mbeki's office over a meeting.

            'In the African revolution we shared the trenches together'
      "If these guys are throwing a tantrum and don't find the political
will (for consultations with the MDC), we as a party are not going to beg
for an invitation," he said.

      Earlier on Thursday Mbeki's office in South Africa said a meeting with
the pro-democracy Zimbabwean leader would take place "only if he thinks it
is necessary".

      Mugabe last week withdrew Zimbabwe's membership of the now 53-member
body after it resolved to continue Zimbabwe's suspension for a second year.

      It was first excluded over presidential elections in March last year
that the majority of members of the association of former British colonies
saw as rigged in Mugabe's favour.

      Mbeki's office added that there would be no change in his policy of
"quiet diplomacy" over Zimbabwe. - Sapa

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Mail and Guardian

Mbeki meets with Mugabe, Tsvangirai

      Harare, Zimbabwe

      18 December 2003 17:24

South African President Thabo Mbeki held lengthy talks with President Robert
Mugabe in Harare on Thursday over Zimbabwe's crisis, and was due later to
see opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai, opposition officials said.

Mbeki was met by Mugabe at Harare International airport, stopped off at a
hotel amid an unusually heavy presence of Mugabe's presidential guard, armed
with automatic rifles, and drove off for formal discussions at the
president's official residence, State House.

"In the African revolution we shared the trenches together," Zimbabwe state
radio quoted Mbeki as telling supporters of Mugabe's ruling Zanu-PF party at
the airport.

A spokesperson for Tsvangirai's opposition Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC) said "the party's leadership" would be meeting Mbeki at a Harare hotel
later.

Diplomats said Mbeki appeared to have had a change of heart, his office
having earlier ruled out the likelihood of talks with the opposition leader.

The MDC was contacted over the meeting long after Mbeki arrived in Harare.

Mugabe last week withdrew Zimbabwe's membership of the now 53-member
Commonwealth after it resolved to continue Zimbabwe's suspension for a
second year. Zimbabwe was first excluded over rigged presidential elections
in March last year.

The MDC said in a statement on Wednesday night that it hoped that Mbeki's
visit would "fortify and complement the latest Commonwealth Heads of
Government Meeting position" that "the root cause of the Zimbabwe crisis is
a crisis of governance and legitimacy".

It said that "successful brokerage in the resolution of the Zimbabwe crisis
will be determined by even-handedness and the willingness to hear both sides
of the Zimbabwe political equation".

Mbeki's office said earlier on Thursday there would be no change in his
controversial policy of "quiet diplomacy" over Zimbabwe.

Mbeki last week returned from the Commonwealth summit in Abuja, Nigeria,
enraged after failing in his bid to get the body to have Zimbabwe readmitted
to the organisation, and shocked many colleagues in South Africa last week
when he accused Britain of opposing Zimbabwe's return so that it could
protect "its white, colonial kith and kin".

He also said Western nations' demand for democratic reform in Zimbabwe was a
disguised bid for "regime change" to get rid of Mugabe.

He also indicated support for the Harare regime's lawless seizure of
white-owned farms when he said that the four-year expulsion of about 4 000
white farmers was "probably inevitable". -- Sapa

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Mail and Guardian

DA: 'Read riot act to Mugabe'

      Cape Town, South Africa

      18 December 2003 13:40

President Thabo Mbeki needs to "talk straight and hard" with his Zimbabwean
counterpart, Robert Mugabe, during his current visit to that country, the
Democratic Alliance said on Thursday.

"The suffering people of Zimbabwe are looking to South Africa to come to
their rescue during their darkest hour," DA spokesperson Graham McIntosh
said in a statement.

"Today's [Thursday's] visit to Zimbabwe presents President Mbeki with his
last chance to restore his credibility on the matter," he said.

History will be a very harsh judge if the South African government does not
change its "quiet diplomacy" approach.

"President Mbeki must talk straight and hard with his Zimbabwean counterpart
today. That is his duty, both to South Africa but also to the people of
Zimbabwe and the region," McIntosh said.

The costs in economic terms and in the real human suffering Zimbabwe has
caused to its own people and to its neighbours, including South Africa, are
unacceptable and avoidable.

Mbeki should "read the riot act" to Mugabe. He should ensure Mugabe is given
a road map that respects a genuine process of negotiation for a transitional
government of national unity leading to a new Constitution and elections.

"The shadow-boxing and deceit around the so-called negotiations with the
[opposition Movement for Democratic Change] MDC must stop.

"What President Mbeki must discard is an outdated and increasingly unpopular
'liberation solidarity' with Zanu-PF, who have a record of exploiting tribe,
land and race to justify their oppression of those people who do not share
their political views," McIntosh said. -- Sapa

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Channel News Asia

South Africa, Zimbabwe should help solve each other's problems: Mbeki

      HARARE : South African President Thabo Mbeki arrived in Zimbabwe for
talks on political and economic chaos, and declared that the neighbouring
countries had common problems they could help each other resolve.

      The South African leader was addressing hundreds of Zimbabwean ruling
party supporters at Harare International Airport shortly after arriving for
the talks with President Robert Mugabe.

      "Our countries faced common problems. They shared common problems of
oppression. They share common problems today. And in reality that is why we
are here," Mbeki said Thursday.

      Zimbabwe and South Africa share a similar history. Mugabe's ruling
Zimbabwe African National Union - Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) and South
Africa's African National Congress (ANC) fought to liberate the black
majority from colonial and white minority rule.

      At an impromptu rally at the airport, Mugabe recalled that shared
history and said Mbeki was in the country as "a brother and also as the
President of the ANC and South Africa."

      Mugabe has said that any visiting head of state from a Commonwealth
country would be welcomed in Zimbabwe in their own right, but not as a
member of the 53-member grouping of mainly former British colonies.

      This follows Zimbabwe's angry withdrawal from the Commonwealth less
than two weeks ago after the grouping prolonged the southern African
country's 20-month suspension.

      Zimbabwe was suspended from the body in March last year, after Mugabe
was reelected in polls that observers said were marred by violence and
vote-rigging.

      "We greet our brother with that warmth of heart and warm greetings
because yesterday, as we fought imperialism, they were fighting a kind of
imperialism in the form of apartheid," said Mugabe.

      The two leaders then went to a hotel in central Harare for a
preliminary meeting. Later they departed to State House, Mugabe's official
residence, for the main talks.

      While international criticism of Mugabe's government mounts, the South
African leader remains a key supporter of Mugabe's government.

      He believes in a policy of "quiet diplomacy" towards Harare, meaning
he does not publicly criticise Mugabe.

      Opposition political parties, church leaders and independent observers
have slammed the approach, saying it has not yielded concrete results.

      Zimbabwe is in the grip of severe economic hardships, and the country
is deeply divided between ZANU-PF and the main opposition Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC).

      Mbeki was at the forefront of brokering inter-party talks that broke
down last year after MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai launched a court challenge
against Mugabe's victory in disputed 2002 presidential polls.

      Meanwhile economic woes continue to take their toll on the country.

      This week Zimbabwe's inflation surged to close to 620 percent, up from
a previous figure of 526 percent. Employment is at around 70 percent and
there are severe shortages of food threatening half the country's 11.6
million people.

      Mbeki said Thursday he was "absolutely certain... that yes, indeed, we
will solve these problems, both this side of the Limpopo and that side of
the Limpopo", referring to the river that forms a natural border between the
two countries.

      He has promised that a solution to the political and socio-economic
crisis in Zimbabwe would be forthcoming by June next year, but to date there
has not been any sign of change.

      The massive food shortages have been blamed on drought and the
government's controversial land reform programme, under which white-owned
farmland has been seized and redistributed to blacks.

      - AFP

Back to the Top
Back to Index

    Reuters

      18 Dec 2003
      Zimbabwe’s food crisis spreads to cities
      By Busani Bafana

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

BULAWAYO, Zimbabwe (AlertNet) – Relief agencies, long experienced in
channeling food aid into Zimbabwe’s rural areas, are increasingly turning
their attention to the country’s towns and cities as harsh economic
conditions make staple foods unaffordable.

"There is an undoubted real need for more assistance in the urban areas,"
Horace Ndubiwa, chairman of the Bulawayo Welfare Society, told AlertNet.
"The number of people needing food assistance has as a result more than
trebled as life becomes very difficult to sustain, more so in the urban
areas."

The Bulawayo Welfare Society currently helps about 1,400 people on food aid
in Zimbabwe’s second-biggest city -- a fraction of the total number of
people in need.

Severe drought and low agricultural productivity during the past year have
hit Zimbabweans hard, prompting government appeals for international
assistance through the World Food Programme (WFP).

The response has not been overwhelming.

Several donor agencies have launched food aid programmes and provided
humanitarian support for children and other vulnerable groups in the
countryside, but little attention has been paid to the new urban needs.

More than five million people around Zimbabwe currently need food aid. The
government claims the situation is under control, but experts say the
situation will deteriorate if the drought continues.

In an apparent admission that the crisis is growing, the government last
month launched a nine-week survey to determine the levels and distribution
of poverty throughout Zimbabwe.

CRISIS GROWING

The latest report by the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET),
funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development, estimates the rural
population in need of food aid at 4.1 million between October and December,
and 5.1 million in the January-to-March period next year.

The trend is also getting worse in the cities.

"The role of the Welfare Society of Bulawayo will in the year ahead be more
critical than it has ever been, given the current situation," Ndubiwa said.
"Economists predict the further decline of the agricultural sector by 50
percent next year, amidst the government’s inability to finance the
2003/2004 season.

"If the Almighty does not bless us with abundant rains, 2004 is set to be
another and more difficult year in which lives are more than likely to be
lost due to hunger and starvation."

Run mostly by volunteers and social workers employed by the Bulawayo City
Council the society launched a pilot food aid programme in May with the help
of international donations.

Under the project, many households in the city receive 25 kg of mealie
meal -- finely ground maize -- five kg of beans, 25 kg of porridge and two
litres of cooking oil distributed through the housing offices of the local
council.

NGOs operating in the Matabeleland region have launched fresh appeals for
international aid in an effort to meet needs in urban areas.

"There is a definite need for food aid in urban areas as people cannot
afford a square meal due to the difficult economic times we are facing,"
said Norbet Dube, chairman of a consortium of NGOs in the region.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Farmers Decry Lack of Inputs, Equipment Losses

UN Integrated Regional Information Networks

December 18, 2003
Posted to the web December 18, 2003

Johannesburg

The ongoing lack of agricultural inputs and a new law that allows the
government to "compulsorily acquire" farm equipment have been slammed by
Zimbabwe's Commercial Farmers Union (CFU).

According to the newly gazetted Statutory Instrument, the government can
identify, value and "compulsorily acquire" any farm equipment or material,
not currently being used for agricultural purposes, on any agricultural
land.

The CFU hit out at the new regulation, and the lack of agricultural inputs
available for the planting season this year. The union said the government
should have liberalised the importation of agricultural inputs before the
season began, instead of debating the issue in parliament in mid-December.

The official Herald newspaper reported on Thursday that the parliamentary
committee on agriculture had suggested the private sector be allowed to
import maize seed and fertiliser as a matter of urgency to help ease the
shortage of inputs.

It quoted portfolio committee chairman Daniel Ncube as saying that the
shortage of inputs would impact on crop production.

The Zimbabwe Farmers Union (ZFU) had warned earlier this year that a
shortage of inputs, and inflation - currently over 600 percent - were
hurting the prospect of agricultural recovery in Zimbabwe. Aid agencies say
over six million people will need food aid in the first few months of 2004.

TOO LITTLE TOO LATE?

The CFU's George Hutchison told IRIN on Thursday that, should the government
allow private sector imports of inputs, it would still be too late for the
current agricultural season.

"By the time the imported [seed] arrives it will be already too late.
However, it may be of some use to [allow private sector] imports of nitrogen
top-dressing and various chemicals. But for seed, in my opinion, it is too
late - by the time the seed gets here it will be January at the earliest, so
they've missed the boat for this planting season," Hutchison noted.

He added that Zimbabwe could expect a harvest of between 800,000 mt to
900,000 mt this season, at best - still short of the more than 1.5 million
mt national consumption requirement.

Meanwhile, the CFU was seeking legal advice on the new regulation allowing
state acquisition of farmers' equipment.

Any equipment compulsorily acquired will be valued by any public service
official the Ministry of Agriculture deems is qualified to do so.

"An acquisition order will be accompanied by a notice in writing, inviting
the owner or holder to indicate within 14 days whether he or she is
contesting the order. When an acquisition order is served, ownership of the
equipment or material passes to the acquiring authority, who then has the
power to take immediate possession of the equipment or material," the new
regulation states.

Adding that "payment or compensation for the equipment will be at least 25
percent within 30 days, with the balance paid over five years (for
equipment) and one year (for materials)".

A CFU statement said the government had effectively "placed yet another
hurdle in front of commercial farmers who have lost their farms and now face
losing whatever equipment they might have salvaged from the land reform
programme".

The union noted that "many of our members, who have been evicted from their
farms in the past three years, have been storing their equipment in the hope
that they will be able to return to the land in the future". However, it was
now apparent "that they will lose out on this last vestige of hope".

The new regulation would further erode any capital savings the farmers were
hoping to maintain, and "in the current hyperinflationary times the country
is experiencing, being compensated over five years for their equipment will
leave many farmers destitute".

CFU President Doug Taylor-Freeme said it was "yet another way for government
to dispossess farmers under the guise of providing farm equipment for new
[resettled] farmers".

He took issue with the equipment valuation and compensation system, calling
it "meaningless".

"Farmers are still waiting for realistic compensation to be paid for the
fixed assets on their farms, and now the same is likely to happen for their
movable assets and inputs," he said.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Ruling On ANZ Case Expected Tomorrow

The Herald (Harare)

December 18, 2003
Posted to the web December 18, 2003

Harare

BULAWAYO-BASED president of the Administrative Court Mr Selo Nare is
tomorrow expected to hand down judgment in an application by the Associated
Newspapers of Zimbabwe to resume operations.

Mr Nare early this month ruled that the Administrative Court had
jurisdiction to hear an application by ANZ to publish The Daily News and its
weekly The Daily News on Sunday.

He then proceeded to hear arguments from the ANZ and the Media and
Information Commission's lawyers before he reserved his judgment.

ANZ had asked for an order seeking to enforce the judgment of the same
court, which ordered MIC to grant the newspaper group a licence to operate a
media business by November 30 this year failing which it would be deemed
licensed.

MIC appealed against that decision at the Supreme Court.

The appeal has the effect of suspending the judgment of Mr Nare.

Authoritative sources yesterday revealed that Mr Nare had communicated to
the court's registrar that he would announce his judgment tomorrow.

According to the sources, Mr Nare said the appeal against his decision to
hear the ANZ case would not stop him from announcing his judgment.

Mr Nare had written to the registrar of the court advising them that he was
proceeding with the ruling, the sources said.

He is expected to announce his ruling in Bulawayo.

MIC chairman Dr Tafataona Mahoso yesterday confirmed that the commission had
been advised that the ruling would be announced tomorrow.

"We are of the view that the court should stop from proceeding with the
ruling," said Dr Mahoso.

He said they were still discussing their legal position with their lawyers.

ANZ director of legal affairs Miss Gugulethu Moyo, who was informed on
Tuesday of the date of judgment said she would rather reserve her comments
until the court delivered its ruling.

"I have nothing to say at this stage.

But I will give my comment after the court's ruling, which we are waiting
for," said Miss Moyo.

MIC, in its appeal, is asking the Supreme Court to set aside Mr Nare's
judgment and permanently stay the proceedings.

The commission also argues that Mr Nare misdirected himself on a point of
law in asserting that the court had jurisdiction to hear the ANZ case.

The appeal will be heard on February 2 next year.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Anti-cholera campaign launched in Zimbabwe

      www.chinaview.cn 2003-12-19 03:04:02

          HARARE, Dec. 18 (Xinhuanet) -- The Ministry of Health and Child
Welfare launched the 100 million Zimbabwean dollars (about 121,359US
dollars) anti-cholera campaign on Thursday in the wake of unreliable
sanitation and safe water supply in urban areas.

          Health Minister David Parirenyatwa said that cholera would
continue to cause untold suffering to individuals, families, and communities
and that given the current sanitation and safe water supply situation, the
problem of cholera and other diarrhea diseases is likely to increase.

          Parirenyatwa said the increase in local incidence of cholera had
been compounded by gaps in the levels of awareness about cholera.

          It was important for communities to know the causes and the
prevention of the diseases.

          Cholera had killed more than 30 people in Kariba following the
latest outbreak.

          He added that cholera could kill and spread very fast if people do
not know what measures to take.

          The campaign will focus on advertising the measures that help in
the prevention of cholera and the general awareness about the disease.
Enditem

Back to the Top
Back to Index

South African maize too expensive for WFP
JOHANNESBURG, 18 Dec 2003 (IRIN) - Increasing maize prices in South Africa,
partly due to drought and currency fluctuations, have forced the WFP to look
to foreign markets to procure food aid for its emergency operation in
Southern Africa.

"It's unfortunate that South Africa may be heading into drought at a time
when Southern Africa has a huge need for food," Mike Sackett, WFP Southern
Africa Regional Director, said in a statement.

WFP had sourced "substantial amounts of maize from the South African market
over the last 18 months to feed millions of people across the region". But
South Africa is simply no longer competitive, he said.

WFP has been carrying out emergency feeding in the region since 2001. At the
peak of its operations last year 10.2 million people received WFP food aid.

Since January 2003, WFP has procured nearly a quarter of million tons of
maize in South Africa totalling more than US $35.5 million.

White maize prices in South Africa have increased by 32 percent since 1
December, rising from R927 (about US $142) for 1 mt to R1,225 (about US
$188).

The South African currency has also played a role in the affordability of
maize. It had weakened to its lowest levels of around R13 to US $1 about two
years ago but has staged a remarkable recovery, currently trading at R6.60
to the greenback.

WFP spokesman Michael Huggins told IRIN that the rand, using the UN's
average rand/dollar rate, has appreciated by 32 percent against the dollar.

While "not all donations to WFP are in US dollars, but also currencies such
as the euro, currency fluctuations in general always play a role in what we
can afford to buy," he said.

Huggins noted that rand had not only improved against the dollar but most
major currencies. The rand/euro rate was R9.5 to the euro last year
December, "it's averaging R6.4 to the euro this December".

"WFP still needs to procure more than 100,000 mt of maize for hungry people
across Southern Africa between now and the end of June 2004, and the fact of
the matter is that it's cheaper for us to buy food overseas and ship it here
than it is to buy food in South Africa," Sackett added.

Huggins warned that WFP was still facing a "dire situation" with regard to
its Southern Africa appeal.

"We appealed for US $311 million in June and to date we have received US
$149 million, which leaves a 51 percent shortfall. Given that we are heading
into the lean season it's going to be a very bleak picture for the Christmas
period and into the new year," Huggins said.

The need for food assistance is still significant in the region and WFP is
currently trying to feed 6.5 million people in Zimbabwe, Zambia, Lesotho,
Swaziland, Malawi, and Mozambique.

"That's even before we consider that Lesotho is heading for its worst
drought in memory. People are already talking about a total crop failure in
Lesotho. We will need continued international assistance for the foreseeable
future," Huggins added.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Allow Private Sector to Import Maize Seed: Committee

The Herald (Harare)

December 18, 2003
Posted to the web December 18, 2003

Harare

A PARLIAMENTARY portfolio committee yesterday said the private sector should
be allowed to import maize seed and fertiliser as a matter of urgency to
help ease the shortage of inputs.

The chairman of the portfolio committee on Lands, Agriculture, Water
Development, Rural Resources and Resettlement, Cde Daniel Ncube (Zhombe,
Zanu PF), said the shortage of inputs would impact on production. Cde Ncube
said this while presenting the committee's report on the 2003/2004
agricultural season inputs situation in Parliament.

Government, he said, should formally appeal to the non-governmental sector
and donor community to assist import the required inputs.

"The distribution of inputs should be targeted at farmers who have been
properly vetted as opposed to the prevailing free-for-all scenario," Cde
Ncube said.

He said seed production should be classified under agro-business and
commercial farmers who had complied with maximum farm size should be
protected from eviction.

The Ministry of Lands, Agriculture and Rural Resettlement, in conjunction
with seed houses and fertiliser companies, should come up with a
comprehensive plan which would restore and guarantee seed and fertiliser
security in the country, Cde Ncube said.

Inputs, he said, should be distributed to farmers by May of each year to
avoid last minute logistical bottlenecks.

The legislator said the land tenure system should be urgently clarified and
finalised to restore security and confidence in the agricultural sector.

Cde Ncube said the recent established Land Bank should also provide a
specific facility to assist seed growers with funding.

The Zimbabwe Farmers Union, he said, expressed concern over the tillage
rates that were being charged b the District Development Fund (DDF),
especially on communal and A1 farmers.

Cde Ncube said DDF was charging wet and dry rates of $32 000 per hectare and
$25 000 per hectare respectively and very few communal and A1 farmers could
afford such rates.

Responding to the committee, the Minister of Lands, Agriculture and Rural
Resettlement, Cde Joseph Made, said Government was working flat out to
secure inputs.

He said the Government was in the process of importing maize seed to cover
the shortfall arising from the high demand of seed following the successful
land reform programme.

The minister said the Government recently bought 4 500 tonnes of maize seed
that was imported by Pannar Seed Company.

He said the Agricultural Rural Development Authority (Arda) was playing an
instrumental role in producing maize seed as it produced about 90 percent of
the seed.

"We are strengthening the capacity of Arda so that it becomes a major
producer of maize seed as the authority is currently the major producer of
cotton seed," he said.

Cde Made said the DDF was providing tillage services under very difficult
circumstances.

He said the shortage of agricultural equipment had resulted in the
Government announcing regulations to acquire from farms equipment and
material that was lying idle.

The new regulations come in the wake of reports that some former commercial
farmers had either destroyed or removed equipment from farms to warehouses
in towns in a bid to derail the land reform programme.

Zimbabwe needs about 80 000 tonnes of maize seed but it is estimated that
only 32 000 tonnes are available for this season.

Back to the Top
Back to Index


This is a powerful  report by 10 South African priests who spent 19 August to 3 September with their counterparts in Zimbabwe.  It is distributed by the Solidarity Peace Trust, a Zimbabwe/South Africa group set up by, I think, Bishop Pius Ncube from Bulawayo.  If it were possible for the various apologists of Zimbabwe to read it, I think they would have to hang their heads in shame.
 
 

 

 

“The Suffering Church of Zimbabwe”

 

 

A summary of observations by ten South African Church leaders

 

19 August to 3 September 2003

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by

 

The Solidarity Peace Trust

 

December 2003

 

  

I saw aged women coming to church without shoes. In my heart I felt that they were coming to church, and the only thing they were going to eat all day was the communion wafer.

 

 

What I find missing is the joie de vivre of the people – you hear them laughing, you hear them singing, but they are not joyful. Why should you be joyful when life is such a burden?

 

 

But among the priests there is division as well. One of the priests told me that the queues were not that bad and said “we have been demonised in the media.” I would have thought he could see the hardship of the people.

 

 

I struggle to sleep at night. I am just coming in to observe and I have been affected in such a bad way. I don’t know how the Government sleeps. When people speak to you they are looking over the shoulders all the time. The priest I was staying with was so afraid - the fear they have instilled in the peoples minds, is mind-boggling.

 

 

 

– if we don’t speak, people of God will perish: let the blood of this nation not be upon us.

 

                                                           

                                                            COMMENTS BY SOUTH AFRICAN CLERGY
Foreword from Bishop Kevin Dowling

 

Dear friends and all who seek for peace through justice,

 

This report from priests and pastors is both tragic and at the same time instructive for those who have “eyes to see” and “ears to hear”. To those who are wilfully blind and deaf, the cries of the poor, the marginalised, the vulnerable, and the oppressed in this report will go unheard – and yet another shocking injustice on our continent will not be addressed, and the “little ones” in Zimbabwean society will once again be sacrificed for political ends which have nothing to do with the ideals espoused by the African Union.

 

The Solidarity Peace Trust has prepared this report for one purpose only: to proclaim the truth in the ongoing quest for justice in Zimbabwe, and so that the suffering and cries of the oppressed millions in Zimbabwe will be heard. This quest of ours faces formidable obstacles, above all the obfuscation and manipulation of the reality by the Zimbabwe regime supported by an African leadership, particularly in the SADC region, which is nothing short of shameful.

 

It belongs to the Church and faith communities, especially but not only in the SADC region, to raise its prophetic voice in the name of all those who have been tortured, killed, raped, and denied basic human rights in Zimbabwe by a regime which callously disregards its fundamental duty in terms of the UN Charter. This duty and responsibility is very simple and clear: to protect and promote the rights and quality of life of every human being in Zimbabwe, regardless of race, religion, sex, economic condition, political persuasion, or any other distinguishing characteristic – but especially of the poor and marginalised in that society. That the Zimbabwe Government has not done so is abundantly clear from what you will read here.

 

What is truly iniquitous is the way the “land issue” and ideological red herrings such as “standing up against Western imperialism” and “you are getting engaged in the Zimbabwe question only because white farmers have been affected” have been used by African political leaders to mask what is the real issue. And that is, that President Mugabe and his Government have systematically engaged in human rights abuses of the very worst kind in order to retain political power.

 

To politicise food distribution in a time of famine; to deny access to health clinics by the poorest members of Zimbabwe society, i.e. by those who are regarded by the regime as MDC supporters and who are systematically excluded from such access, has nothing whatsoever to do with the “land issue” or anything else. It is simply a blatant abuse of power to make political opponents, and those who simply want a change of government, suffer for a choice which should be free.

 

To engage in systematic torture of MDC supporters, either real or perceived, on a countrywide scale is to engage in what is specifically prohibited by all conventions accepted by the world community; to train at least 30,000 young people as a youth militia and then unleash them on civil society to create mayhem by arson, torture, rape, murder and intimidation on behalf of the ruling party flies in the face of United Nations conventions on child soldiers, and borders on what is defined as “crimes against humanity”.

 

Such examples are not idle speculation. These human rights abuses have been carefully documented and attested to by Zimbabwean people themselves, aided by Churches and NGOs who care about people and not about meaningless myths. I personally witnessed victims of torture by the Zimbabwe regime in Bulawayo in June 2002, and I participated in the release of documentary evidence of systematic use of torture and the training of youth militia in Zimbabwe at 2 news conferences this year. The second news conference brought before the media three former youth militia who gave chilling evidence of the above - quite apart from the heartrending account of a young woman repeatedly gang raped in the youth militia training camps, and who was now trying to come to terms with the fact that she had AIDS  - and a baby to care for.

 

For African leaders to commit themselves to “solidarity” with President Mugabe and his regime, and to turn a blind eye to the suffering of millions of ordinary Zimbabwe citizens, again has nothing to do with the “land issue”, nor with “standing up against Western imperialism”. It has to be named for what it is, and Church leadership must fearlessly proclaim this.

 

Such “solidarity” is to take an option which clearly states that the ordinary African citizen in Zimbabwe does not have basic human rights which should be protected and promoted at all costs by African political leaders. Indeed, by African leaders who should be publicly proclaiming now their solidarity with their suffering African sisters and brothers in Zimbabwe – just as they did when their South African brothers and sisters were suffering under the brutal apartheid regime. Their silence and denial at the moment is deafening.

 

It is to take an option which, in effect, proclaims to the world community that ordinary African citizens can be “used” and “sacrificed” on an “altar”, i.e. not for some valid reason, but for what amounts to an ideology. It is this: that the protection of and support for manifestly unjust African political leaders like Robert Mugabe must be pursued against all odds and at any cost by African heads of state to ensure the “sovereignty” of African nations, to find “African solutions to African problems”, to resist “the use of human rights by Western nations to whip Africa into shape”, or whatever. It is to state that fundamental human rights, as enshrined in the United Nations Charter, mean one thing for the rest of the world, and entirely another thing for Africans. And that, I would submit, is an appalling affront to the dignity of African people in Zimbabwe and on this continent. Human rights are objective realities and belong to the essence of what it means to be human both as individuals, and as communities and nations. Human rights, therefore, mean exactly the same thing whether one is in Europe, or in Zimbabwe.

 

I hope that this report, and the others released by the Solidarity Peace Trust, will help in some small way to conscientise our African people everywhere, supported by all who have a concern for justice and human rights, to challenge African political leadership to fulfil its fundamental responsibilities on the African continent, and to stop hiding behind obfuscations and manipulation of truth and reality. Nothing less than decisive action on these issues is demanded by the present situation in Zimbabwe. We cannot allow the cries of so many poor, suffering and unprotected people in Zimbabwe to remain unheard. That would be to “walk by on the other side” and to condemn our sisters and brothers in Zimbabwe to a truly hopeless future.

 

Bishop Kevin Dowling

 

Trustee: The Solidarity Peace Trust

 

Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace representative within

South African Catholic Bishops’ Conference


 

 

Contents

 

                   Introduction                                                          6

 

1.       Impact of the trip in general terms                           9

2.       Fear, torture and intimidation                                  10

3.       Poverty and Starvation                                           11

4.       The rich and powerful                                            14

5.       The urban council elections                                    15

6.       Youth                                                                    16

7.       Media                                                                    16

8.       The suffering church of Zimbabwe                         17

9.       Queues, shortages and corruption                          18

10.     Positive observations                                             20

11.     Understanding of dynamics – who is to blame?       20

12.     What needs to be done?                                         22

13.     Detailed torture accounts                                        25

 

Photographs (- these have been removed to make this file smaller)

 

Front cover:                Procession with crosses to commemorate those who have died in political violence since 2000 in Zimbabwe: 29 June 2002, St Mary’s Cathedral, Bulawayo.

 

Back cover:                 Laying on of hands by pastors, 29 June 2002, St Mary’s Cathedral, Bulawayo.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Produced by:        The Solidarity Peace Trust, Zimbabwe and South Africa

 

Contact info:               email: selvanc@venturenet,co.za or leopard@metroweb.co.za

phone: + 27 (0) 83 556 1726


 

Introduction

 

The Solidarity Peace Trust has a Board consisting of church leaders of Southern Africa and is dedicated to promoting the rights of victims of human rights abuses in Zimbabwe. The Trust was founded in 2003. The Chairperson is Catholic Archbishop Pius Ncube of Bulawayo, and the Vice Chairperson is Anglican Bishop Rubin Phillip of Kwazulu Natal.

 

In August and September of this year, The Solidarity Peace Trust organised for ten priests and pastors from South African parishes to spend a fortnight in Zimbabwe. The priests came from Kwazulu Natal, Gauteng and Cape Town, and were billeted with Zimbabwean priests in urban centres around the country. They came from a cross section of denominations, including Roman Catholic, Anglican, Methodist, Baptist, and various Evangelical churches. The hosting towns were Harare, Chitungwiza, Bulawayo, Mutare, Kwekwe, Gweru, Masvingo, and other small towns. The priests arrived in mid August and left on 3 September.

 

The vision behind the exchange was that it would give South African priests the opportunity to to experience at first hand the problems being faced in our parishes at this time, and to carry this knowledge back with them to their bigger church communities in South Africa, to express solidarity with their Zimbabwean counterparts.

 

The visit also coincided with the Urban Council Elections in Zimbabwe, and while the priests were not formal observers, they were able to informally observe and comment on the elections in their hosting parishes.

 

There was no precise agenda given to the visitors apart from this – to be in Zimbabwe in solidarity and to live the life of a local parish priest for two weeks, to meet with ordinary parishioners and gather impressions of the current state of the nation.

 

On their last day in the country, the South African priests gathered in one city, together with a few Zimbabwean facilitators, and spent many hours discussing their observations with one another. The entire conversation was recorded and transcribed. In addition, priests also submitted their written findings at a later date.

 

Summary of findings

 

What was clear was that all the South African priests were deeply saddened and moved by what they observed. Some had been to Zimbabwe before in the recent past, and even they were shocked at the decline and the current poverty and starvation in small urban centres. Everyone commented on the high levels of fear in the general populace. Some had very personal exposure to intimidation, with one South African priest being chased out of his hosting parish by suspected CIO threats, and several others hearing terrible accounts of State torture from victims themselves. Priests were shocked at the inability of victims to receive justice, particularly as in several cases the torturers were the police.

 

Several witnessed what they considered election irregularities over the Urban Council Elections. All were horrified at the endless queues, the depression, the hopelessness, the exorbitant cost of basic commodities. Starvation and poverty and also the impact of HIV/Aids were frequent themes. The plight of the youth in particular was another common theme.

 

The visiting clerics also commented on the divisions within the Zimbabwean church, the silence of many priests and the collusion of yet others with government. They also noted the persecution of those priests who spoke out. Zimbabwean priests were able to learn much from their visitors, who were mostly very active in the struggle against apartheid in their own country, and who can remember facing the same timidity and insecurity in their own recent pasts.

 

The South African visitors drew their own conclusions as to who is to blame for the state of Zimbabwe today – western imperialism? or misrule by its own government? Observations were also made about the “land issue”.

 

Finally, the South African priests all felt there was a real need for them to do more – all were touched and wanted to return to South Africa and spread the word of their experiences, and to be available to help their Zimbabwean counterparts in any way possible. All felt they would pray for Zimbabwe, and some felt there was need for real action, that prayer without action was meaningless. The South Africans intend to lobby their own government based on their findings, and to inform their own parishes. Several have already spoken out strongly since their return including to the media.

 

Report structure

 

The rest of this report is made up of selected extracts from video transcriptions and written reports from the ten South African priests. The extracts have been reorganised in terms of theme, as the report-backs threw up common observations and concerns. In accordance with a request from the visiting priests, anonymity is preserved. There were concerns about negative repercussions for Zimbabwean priests if critical comments made by the visitors could be traced back to hosting parishes. There was also awareness from the visitors that they spoke as individuals and not on behalf of their bigger church communities in South Africa, and anonymity precludes the linking of their precise parishes to specific comments by themselves.

 

Rather than try to summarise or paraphrase, the priests’ words have been left as they were spoken. However, the report does not include every comment by everyone, for the sake of space and in order to avoid repetition. Italics and plain print alternate to indicate a change from one speaker to the next. All speakers should be assumed to be South African unless otherwise indicated. In the few instances when Zimbabweans spoke out, this has been indicated clearly.

 

Accounts of torture

There are a few very detailed reports of torture, which are included exactly as written by the priest who met the victims. Because of their length, they are added in their own section after the main body of the report. 

 

The way forward

 

The South African visitors were very aware that their fellow citizens do not have the full picture of what is happening in Zimbabwe, and nor do others in the SADC region. They formally requested that a final report be compiled based on their observations and that this be sent to both political and church leaders in the SADC region, as well as to others.

 

It is the wish of the priests who visited Zimbabwe that their observations are shared with as many others as possible in order to create greater understanding and empathy with ordinary Zimbabweans and their parish priests. The editors of this report have summarised these observations in good faith and in accordance with this request.

 

It is the hope of all participants in this exercise, that further exchanges of this nature will take place, in both directions, with Zimbabwean priests visiting countries in the region to relate their experiences, and priests from SADC coming to Zimbabwe at regular intervals. It was the perception of the Zimbabweans that the visit had given local church leadership hope and new ideas at a time when preaching to parishioners without hope has become the challenging task for many Zimbabwean pastors.

 

Regarding this present report, the Solidarity Peace Trust sees its only role in acting as a multiplicator, making the South African visitors’ impressions known to a wider audience in the region and beyond. Apart from this, the Solidarity Peace Trust would like the following statements to speak for themselves.

 

 

 


 

1.       Impact of the trip in general terms

 

We came to work in solidarity, to see the suffering of ordinary Zimbabweans  - to be a witness - and most importantly to take back what we’ve seen to our churches, to South Africa, to our own government – I can say, “I came, I saw, I witnessed  - and I don’t like what I saw.”

 

We will take back a message of suffering. People are living lives that are so desperate, and people across the border don’t know what is happening. The church is supposed to be for everybody. If a pastor was arrested in South Africa because he gave a practical ministry, the others would protest in solidarity. Priests here need to stand in queues and sing “we shall overcome.” We need to take back a message to South Africa, to take back the truth.

 

At the moment I’m ashamed to be Catholic, because so many people doing terrible things in this country are Catholic. The President is Catholic and the Foreign Minister is Catholic, Stan Mudenge. I was told Stan goes to church every week. Can you imagine what that has done to me? -  knowing that that man sits in a Catholic service every Sunday, and yet he isn’t moved by the suffering of his own people? I found a lot of poverty and things like that, but I also found a lot of people who are oblivious to what is happening on the ground.

 

I am ashamed to be Catholic because a lot of people who are causing the hardship and pain in this country - they are Catholic. There is only one man prepared to stand up and be counted and he is also Catholic – Archbishop Pius Ncube.

 

I was very fortunate because I spent my time with a man obviously close to the people. He is aware of the suffering the people are going through. He spoke passionately from the minute I got there until the minute I left. He prepared his parish for my arrival. He had come through the war - he told me of some of his escapades during the war, how people protected him and warned him where not to go on certain days.

 

The woman in Kwekwe whose sons were beaten for being MDC, when I was talking to her at her little vendor’s stand, I said I came through Bulawayo. She told me that when I went back to Bulawayo, I should tell Fr Ncube that “we are suffering in Kwekwe.” And I found it consoling that the person they were looking up to was the Archbishop Pius, who is Catholic.

 

I struggle to sleep at night. I am just coming in to observe and I have been affected in such a bad way. I don’t know how the Government sleeps. When people speak to you they are looking over the shoulders all the time. The priest I was staying with was so afraid - the fear they have instilled in the peoples minds, is mind-boggling.

 

How can a whole nation be subjected to that? This violence is black on black and it is people who live next door doing these things to each other. I cannot understand, I cannot comprehend.


 

2.       Fear, torture and intimidation

 

The level of fear in this country is tangible – you can feel it.

 

I had to leave the small rural town I was staying in. That is another kind of situation. You know, I had heard that people were being intimidated for supporting another political party but I thought it was not going to happen to me, because I came as a minister of a South African church and was not supporting any local political party. But last Friday when I got back to the house there, as I entered the door Fr C said “we need to talk”. He got me into a panic, I was saying, “what have I done?” He was in a very anxious state - he had received a few calls from a man who later called himself Dube, who asked by name --where was I? Fr C said, I think you need to go. It was a scary situation – was I safe to stay another night there? This caller Dube had said about me – “get out of town, get out of the country, you are causing problems for us here.” But I felt I wasn’t even doing anything political, I was just meeting church leaders, praying with them, meeting one NGO, World Vision, in order to understand what was happening in the country.

 

I’ve been through that in South Africa, I’ve been intimidated. I prayed with Fr C and left. But I have seen, and I have heard - and I know it is true people are suffering in this nation. People are dying in this nation.

 

I had the privilege of meeting a couple of people during the week, who shared with me horrific stories of torture. I thought we were through with all this in our region. I have never ever come across such brutality as I have this last week and it is haunting.

 

If these MDC people are treated so badly, who stands with them? They stand by themselves. They are all alone. What do you say to a man who has been forced to eat his own faeces? Forever he will be a broken man.

 

Zimbabwean response: I wouldn’t agree that forever he will be a broken man, because what you said before - they are all alone - that is not true. People know that these things are happening to so many people, because so many people want change. It is important for you to speak out back in South Africa, because when we hear of protests outside the country, it gives hope to people here. They feel not alone. The fact that you listened to him is factual proof that he is not alone, but that other people realise and that other people care.

 

It is no longer humiliation, torture becomes a political statement if others will listen.

 

I went to the house next door. The guy has a big problem. The Ruling Party attacked him, because they wanted him to vote for them and they took everything – his ploughs, all his tools for farming. And what they did is they came back at night and chopped the tails off his oxen.

 

I said to him don’t worry, they did this because they know that oxen get their power from the tail - but they didn’t know the Power is from above - have courage. And he said, I said to them “What do you want? I am a man of God - there is nothing I can do. I won’t vote for either party.” He said to me “what must I do in this situation?”

 I said you have answered yourself – you have to pray.

He said, “You go and report to the police, they report to the same people who did this, so it’s no use.”

 

I had time to visit cities around Gweru. To sum up what I’ve seen is that power in the wrong hands is destructive. I have seen that Zimbabwean people –their rights have been violated.  Nobody has the right to have freedom to abuse whoever he wants, yet the State does that here.

 

Zimbabwean: Politicians are afraid of pastors. I have heard of pastors with midnight knocks on their doors. For weeks we have to put pastors in safe houses. The reason they pursue us, is because they are afraid of us. Once they know you are monitoring them, they become afraid and we should not forget that.

 

 

3.       Poverty and starvation

 

In Y, which is a poor area, I saw aged women coming to church without shoes. In my heart I felt that they were coming to church, and the only thing they were going to eat all day was the communion wafer.

 

I have seen pain. The way I can describe the situation here is pain, pain, frustration, depression, fear, you name it - this is what I have experienced.

 

I was very conscious of eating better than others. The meals in the presbytery were very simple -there was no lavishness and I felt they were trying to be at one with the people around. This upset me really at X parish itself, this lady told me that she wasn’t sure where she was going to get her next meal from, or how to get money for her children to go to school. Her dress was beautifully washed and ironed – but her shoes, there were no laces in her shoes and they were too small for her.

 

I went out with World Vision to distribute food - it was a heart-moving situation. I saw how people are suffering there. At one distribution point we found hundreds of people who were waiting. The sad thing is that most of these people are not working and I found myself asking how people were surviving out there. I met people who said they hadn’t had food for more than a day.

 

What I find missing is the joie de vivre of the people – you hear them laughing, you hear them singing, but they are not joyful. Why should you be joyful when life is such a burden?

 

We saw people selling mealies and the police arrested them - it was pitiful because you can see these people are hungry - they are very hungry.

 

Yesterday I went to a supermarket and asked a vendor outside how much he earns a month and he earns Z$400 a week - but one loaf of bread is Z$1,000 and maize is Z$1,000.

 

In fact, even going to the restaurant, a lot of lessons were learnt. As an outsider, I asked for certain things like chicken, like beef, and the restaurant would say we have run out of food in the country.

 

I remember another incident -I was at Gwanda train station and a goods train came along and stopped. People around there ran to the goods train to see what it is carrying and I heard people shouting “mumbu, mumbu” which means “mealies, mealies,” and I realised how desperate people were – they are always waiting for people to bring something, to bring mumbu or whatever.  In South Africa we are taking things for granted, but here it’s a different story altogether – even for maize it’s a big thing for them, although even to get maize it’s so expensive. I see these people in town – what about those people out there in the bush? I saw on a video this old man eating monkey bread. Others are surviving by eating roots from certain trees, and I said, “Wow, this is really bad, people are really starving.”

 

I think a lot of people are living in total despair. People cannot survive except from other people’s generosity.

 

One school-teacher, who is a temporary teacher, earns Z$20,000 a month – he pays 10,000 rent so he has 10,00 to live on. I had him to a meal, which was a simple meal of meat and sadza and relish and he said he hadn’t had such a sumptuous meal in how long, but it was an ordinary meal.

 

What I noticed is there is a problem – the economic situation is very bad. When you look around you can see that people are hungry. I had to go house to house and I discovered that people are hungry, they were not afraid to share their sufferings they are going through, they said bread is too expensive for them and it is very hard to get mealie meal and it is hard to go to town because transport costs too much and even transport is a problem and does not flow as it should because of fuel problems.

 

My pastor took me to Old Township. There it was really a poverty stricken area. What I witnessed there was heart wracking. Overcrowding, people lived in shacks, you’d find a mother trying to get some corn out and feed some babies. They live so close together and I was praying there will never be a fire there because that whole township will be destroyed.

 

It is impossible to even buy a loaf of bread if you are not working. It is coming towards December time. But how are people going to get anything - there are long queues and no money. I just experienced so many things, but for example I was standing by the main gate and the pastor brought a lady. She told me that she cannot buy food because she has no cash. They did try to come together to get a solution but it is impossible.

 

I notice there is a big difference between the poor and the rich. What is the cause of this - the poor are getting poorer and the rich are getting richer. A gentleman said every day I wake up and come to town and queue all night, and then whosoever comes the next morning I say take my place for five thousand dollars and this is how I survive.

 

We saw a small little child in Harare - she came to me and said, “I am hungry.” She said they are two brothers at home and a little one and herself. Her parents died of TB and they all survive by what this little sister can do, aged less than ten, washing cars to put bread on the table.

 

My eagerness to chat to people landed me in a beer hall. I bought myself a beer and chose a comfortable corner. I identified a group of 4 people that I could join, two youngsters and two fairly old men. The language spoken was a mixture of Sindebele, English and a little bit of Nambian. I introduced myself to them and they did likewise. These are some of the observations in the discussion: a.) as a South African who was eager to hear about their country, I was like a hero to them. b). The semi-old man was concerned about the fact that tomorrow was a pay day for the  industry he was working at. He had a family to support and a student who was waiting for money. He was concerned about what the bank would say when he wanted to withdraw his money. c). The old man in our midst, who was also a pensioner, said that he receives pensions that would buy him only three loaves of bread per month!

 

The plight of the mere citizens there is very real. Right now, not a single of them is prepared to tell of their experiences except if they have gained confidence in you. The old man in the bar for instance had to say that he has taught himself how to live on only one main meal i.e. dinner, since he no longer can afford three meals.

 

They await the year 2006 in which the President is supposed to retire. But how much damage will be caused by then?

 

Politicisation of food

 

Food is being distributed on partisan lines through the district administrator’s office. As a result, MDC supporters are beaten whilst queuing for food. They are told that they should get their food from MDC.

 

The first day, I saw the Daily News article about the chiefs and headmen being supposed to hand out WFP food. And a young man said,  “my father lives in a rural area and because he asked a question in a ZANU meeting he was labelled MDC and couldn’t get food.”

I don’t know how people can use food to get votes and things like that.

 

While there I read a report in the newspaper about the Government wanting the Tribal Chiefs to take charge of the distribution of the food of the World Food Aid Programme. I discussed this with one or two people and their feeling was that this should not happen because if you were not a ZANU – PF supporter, you would not have access to this food.

 

The unfairness practiced at GMB posts is beyond telling. A bag of maize is sold at Z$ 1080. Only members of the Ruling Party were buying the maize at cost. Should you belong to the opposition you could be charged up to Z$11 000.00.

 

The day I visited the GMB, my host who has a car was away for a few days. I had no option but to walk for 7km to the post. On my arrival, I discovered only about 60 bags were available, which were expected to be supplied to the whole community. The quantity was insufficient. A certain prominent member purchased 40 bags of maize at once. This was illegal since no family was allowed to purchase more than two bags of maize for a month. The shortage of maize was also caused by the railway workers strike. Workers were striking for a wage increase.

 

I remember two women who presumably came from afar for maize – but in vain. The superior distributor easily turned his back on them. They did not follow the right procedure; the procedure was that they should produce a letter from their local councillor.… Nobody could just buy without the approval of the superior distributor.

 

HIV/Aids

 

In Europe populations fall because of birth control, here the population is falling because of Aids.

 

The other thing that frightened me is the explosion of the Aids crisis, which we have not experienced yet in RSA. I was showed parish records where whole families have been wiped out. I saw children playing in the front garden, the father was dead, and the mother not far off. The priest was telling me that this year he has had a hundred funerals – he said, “we have more funerals than we have baptisms.” And these are young people who are dying.

 

 

 

People with HIV/Aids are scared to come out because they are not given any treatment after tests and counselling, they are only tested for statistic purposes only. I had to persuade a family to go for HIV/Aids testing in a hospital other than the clinic.

 

 

 

4.       The rich and powerful

 

Stan Mudenge’s wedding

 

I went to Stan Mudenge’s wedding [Foreign Minister of Zimbabwe]. It was a completely different world from what I had experienced the rest of the week. I was walking with a priest and I said, “this is clearly money here” – and he said, “no, it is ZANU PF,” meaning that they are the only ones who have money. The wedding cost Z$55 million. There was so much military all over – there were green bombers, there were ambulances, in fact when the President arrived, he flew in with about two or three helicopters, he was fetched in his vehicle and when he took off again the ambulance had to follow him.

 

We were all in tents and we had a wonderful meal with rare roast beef and salads and potatoes and things and you know there were lovely drinks. And the ordinary people were all sitting outside in the blazing sun and had been sent off somewhere else to have their lunch and then they had to sit and listen to the speeches and the little that was in English was all political rhetoric.

 

Mugabe said that western imperialists are trying to impose their rule on Zimbabwe and that Mudenge is his right hand man who goes to garner support around the world for Zimbabwe. It is only Europe and America that is against them and all other nations are under our wing.

 

Mugabe said - and it was obviously a joke – “There is no sugar in the country – and they blame the President!” Everyone laughed at this, but who should they blame? He was blaming everyone else and blaming imperialism. It is not in their vocabulary to blame themselves and how can they? How can they take 55 million of tax-payers money for a party - and down the road people are starving. I mean, some people are having one meal in two days. I spoke to a teacher who lost his job in 2000 because he is MDC and who hasn’t worked since then. He has a wife and two children and a three-month old baby – how do they live?

 

The wedding was like Alice in Wonderland – the marquees and all that, and just down the way the people were in the sun – people were bussed in for the wedding from all around. Food was provided for them, which was sadza and stew but we had rare roast beef and chicken and fruit cocktail with ice cream. It was ridiculous. The bridal couple were served by people in white gloves etc.

 

Law and order

 

Is there any law? There is ZANU PF and there is the rest of the country. There is ZANU PF with flashy cars and helicopters and 55 million to spend on a party, and then there is the rest of the country starving to death.

 

Why does the law fail to take its course in this situation, when people are tortured?

 

The ruling party seems to be determined to silence all dissenting voices, thus today it is alleged that some traditional leaders are being denied their monthly allowances if they continue to stay or associate with members of the opposition. Some of the leaders have also been forced to evict some of their subjects, suspected not to belong to the ruling party. It is also now alleged that in some cases blood brothers no longer talk to each other when they don’t belong to the same political party. The most criticized POSA [Public Order and Security Act] is being overused by police to squash all opposition meetings. There is now an increase in political violence whenever there are any forms of elections. It is only the hope of many Zimbabweans that sanity will prevail and that every one will once again associate and move freely and peacefully.

 

 

 

5.         The Urban Council Elections

 

I tried to contact the person you gave me, who was running for City Council. On the Friday night he phoned me. He made an arrangement we should meet each other. I tried to contact him again, and somebody kept putting the phone down. I was recommended to speak to the lady selling fruit. She told me there is a big problem - Z is not here. I asked her to give him a message from me. So anyway, she said, “there is a big problem, because he has been harassed and is running from place to place”. I asked if he would come back to his office and she said he would the next morning at ten o’clock. She said, “Father, I don’t think you are going to see him.” Somebody else came forward and told me it was very dangerous and Z was still on the run. They said he would come to me and he didn’t come. He was probably being watched.

I saw the burnt MDC offices in this town.

 

I asked why she was not registered and she said, why should I, when there is no future for us? I explained voting could change the future. Quite a lot of men were saying my power is my vote.

 

In Y township an old man told me,  “Father, I voted yesterday” – he was the oldest man in the parish. The young people seem to have just given up - a lot of them have not registered. Even among the religious, the nuns, many have not registered and those who were, would not vote. People are living without hope.

 

On Saturday I had two youngsters who took me walking through Y. There were people outside the polling booths and we walked through this whole township, opposite the polling stations were groups of people toyi toying. We went into the market and I asked them who was dancing and singing at the polling station? I was told it was ZANU PF. I asked if it was not illegal to do that in a polling booth? There were police there and I just walked straight and ignored them. They turned their vehicle around and went slowly past me several times.

On Sunday there was nobody voting.

 

There were elections. I visited the township - there was this good lady giving people soup so that they would vote for the Ruling Party and even there on voting day, they were there bribing the people with food.

 

One guy said to me, “what is the use of voting, because we vote and the outcomes are not what they should be.” I see people now losing interest in voting altogether.

 

In these areas we also saw the Ruling Party (ZANU PF) supporters canvassing for votes. The allegation is that when you vote for ZANU PF you will be rewarded with a 50kg mealie meal.

 

The political situation is different from ours since the Ruling Party in Zimbabwe has got a right to intimidate others. This party dominates the radio and local television station. The opposition party is not allowed to function and operate openly. On the day of elections people were highly intimidated and bribed with food by the Ruling Party.

 

 

6.       Youth

 

Youngsters would dearly love to have opportunities… a young man and his grades show he has

A’s but because he doesn’t have money.…

 

I also visited Redcliff. I went to a hospital there to see somebody who was taken ill from the parish. There were relatives around the bed and the same topics came up from young people – what is it like in South Africa, is there work there? People were astounded that it took only two months to get a passport. It takes 10 months here, I gather. There is an impression that South Africa is a Mecca. And I had to say a lot of the people are struggling. It struck me that there is hardly anybody on the road selling their wares here.

 

I find a terrible despondency in young people. I have handed out my telephone number to so many youth who believe there are jobs for them in South Africa and they do not believe there are unemployed South Africans. We have problems of our own, and youths coming from all over Africa. We need to generate hope in young people here – in South Africa young people played a key role in brining about change and they could do so here if they had more hope.

 

I met two boys from secondary school who were wondering if they would even be able to go back to school next term because of school fees. They are paying something like Z$17,000. For us in South Africa it would be a small thing with the exchange rate – perhaps churches could sponsor children here at school – if people could sponsor food, clothes – but it is hard because the whole thing is controlled by the Ruling Party here – they control everything that goes in or out of here.

 

Youth militia

 

Part of the 60 who got jobs as temporary teachers were militias who have not even passed O levels, 20 places were reserved for them, who were now going to teach all sorts of subjects that they themselves have not passed. I’m sorry, but your country is being run into the ground by a madman.

 

The other thing is this whole youth militia. The priest I was with said it reminded him of the Nazi “brown shirts” because they seem to just do what they like.

 

 

 

7.       The media

 

The cook from the parish who went to buy The Daily News always put it in a plastic bag for fear of being beaten up. The priest also introduced me to SW Radio Africa.  So in the evenings before we even had supper, we would listen in to what was happening. On the national radio he told me about this song – our land is our prosperity – and it goes on and on and on. The tv was like an ornament in the house, we never watched it.

 

I spent time in the evening watching ZBC – they must change and call it ZANU PF Broadcasting because you only hear about ZANU PF. And what they tell you, it is not the truth - because when you look around the country, what you see, is not what you hear on tv. They tell you about new computers and all that stuff, that the President is going to what-what place, but they don’t tell you about the queues that you see, people starving. They don’t talk about poverty. When they talk about fuel, they just promise that there will be fuel. Now, when I looked into the situation in town I found that people have trouble getting their own money – they are allowed only Z$ 5,000. I spoke to an old lady who queued for thee hours and got only Z$ 5,000, but it takes Z$1,000 to get to town.

 

You know back there in South Africa I like to watch news.  I’ve seen some stuff on things happening here in Zimbabwe and how people have been tortured, so I had a taste of that fire and brimstone before I got here. But I was still not prepared.

 

 

 

8.       The suffering church of Zimbabwe

 

The church is really suffering – it is the suffering church of Zimbabwe. These days we priests talk about the holistic approach – so that we are not just preaching words, but considering the whole person, so if the church cannot help members of their congregation – I do not blame the church leaders, but they cannot help the situation.

 

One church leader said the politicians are interfering with our work. They are trying to tell us what we should do and what we should not do, what we should say and what we should not say. So it was really scary - I thought are these people trying to be God, to dictate to church leaders what they should say. People from the Ruling Party of Zimbabwe - the government - is trying to tell the church what to do.

 

I stayed with a very interesting pastor – Pastor B. In February of last year he stood up and challenged some issue in the church – his senior, who is also a senior ZANU PF politician, cut off his salary and said you should not be paid and allowed him to carry on in his parish without

being paid. He is not earning a salary for six months. He is experiencing many hardships.

 

Is this what we as pastors are going to allow - that a man can preach and do God’s work without earning money to feed his family? This man is just one out of hundreds of pastors around Zimbabwe being picked on.

 

All what we need to do is what God has called people to do, not what any government wants us to do.

 

One of the pastors was saying, well we have a problem, which is lack of unity in the church. A house in disunity cannot be saved. I asked people the problems they were encountering; poverty, HIV/Aids, and the famine in the country, and how the superior powers are using food as a means to get people to vote for them. I heard a story about a woman who went to buy maize and was asked what party she supported. She was asked where she had been buying maize.

 

But among the priests there is division as well. One of the priests told me that the queues were not that bad and said “we have been demonised in the media.” I would have thought he could see the hardship of the people.

 

Most priests in South Africa kept quiet during apartheid. I found it so difficult not to speak out in M. But I felt it was not my place to speak out – but yes the silence of some priests…. At the wedding another old priest pulled me aside and told me Mugabe had ruined the country. But he was afraid and would only say it quietly.

 

The pastors in these areas are having a tough time, because preaching doesn’t help. The congregation leave the services and go back to their crime.

 

Church leaders who stand for peace and justice are ill-treated and isolated. I noticed this when I went around visiting Methodist, AFM and Roman Catholic Churches.

 

The other thing I see is that churches seem to deny that there is a problem in the country. Even pastors seem to compromise. As preachers of the gospel we know the kingdom is all about justice and peace but on this situation of Zimbabwe, pastors seem to just say “the Kingdom of God is coming,” and they don’t preach for peace and justice. I’m saying this because I visited another church where the pastor preached as if he was in South Africa, as if there was no problem, but how do I face the injustice here? How do I survive? How do I speak to the people here about the injustice they experience?

 

 

 

9.  Queues, shortages and corruption

                                                                                        

As I was going around looking at the situation, queuing for cash, queuing for petrol, queuing for food - which is so expensive - people were expressing their anger, their pain, in words, saying “we are suffering.”

 

What I’ve been picking up talking to people is that people are really suffering – the shortage of food, of petrol. A few church ministers were saying they cannot visit outstations because there is not fuel.

 

I don’t know how to describe the money situation – you have money and you need cash and you queue even overnight, and you are told in the bank, there is no money, there is nothing for you - and what does this mean? It means you are not going to be able to get food or other necessities – you cannot get those things.   Back at home for a thousand rand I would get a lot of things. Wow, I could get things to eat for a month but here it is scary.

 

On Saturday morning the queues in town were the worst in ten days. They were all along the road outside – queues and queues and queues of people.

 

I met people who said, “things are bad we have to queue for so long for everything.” But they were too afraid to speak out as to where the problem really lies.

 

One Saturday afternoon my host Fr. B was to visit K. This place is ±40 km away from the seminary. K was a mining place. It had a small hospital, which was run by the Catholic Church. Here there is a great shortage of water; we were to provide the nuns with a few litres of water. The only ambulance is lying in the yard without fuel.

 

It was shockingly quiet as we drove around, and we noticed the following: people were standing in abnormally long queues. There is a scarcity of money. People have got to carry lots and lots of Zimbabwe dollars, which will purchase only a few items.

 

Cars also had to queue so as to get fuel at the garages. Sometimes fuel would get finished before some cars can reach the petrol attendants. An alternative would be obtaining petrol from the black market where it is sold at alarmingly high prices.

 

I first saw a long queue of taxis parked in the different garages. On one of my cross–examinations from one of the taxi drivers, he told me that Zimbabwe’s garages have got no fuel at all; they sometimes have to get fuel from the black market, which is very expensive.

 

Money confiscated

 

An elderly lady had died, and after the funeral there was a bit of a feast and a lady that I spoke to said that they would not have been able to have the tea if their friends had not rallied around. They spoke of two places that had been raided and had their own money seized by the police. At a garage Z$ 29 million was confiscated from a box clearly labelled “wages”. The police took it because you are only allowed Z$5 million at a time. Whether they received receipts I don’t know.

 

Bureaucracy and corruption

 

People are really, really struggling. I went to the shops and a few things cost thirty thousand dollars. This temporary teacher has only Z$10,000 to live on after paying rent of Z$10,000. He has a job through government but will get paid only in three months time! How he is supposed to survive I don’t know.

In trying to get the job – he saw 60 temporary jobs advertised. 800 people turned up and they had to wait until 2 pm for the interviewers to arrive, although they had been told interviews would begin at 8 am. But he was eventually told he would get the job. He had to get a photo taken for Z$1,500 and it cost him Z$6,000 to get the forms to apply – he was sent from one government office to another, and in each he had to buy application forms. When he went to hand in the forms, he was told he didn’t need the forms or photo – money wasted.

 

The worst is he went to the police to get fingerprints done, which were needed for the application. The police just told him to get out of the station they were too busy. He and his friend each had to pay the police Z$ 2,000 to get their fingerprints taken! This man had to pay Z$10,000 just to get a job, which will only earn him Z$20,000 per month for three months! You cannot tell me that money is going into government coffers – and half the forms he had to buy weren’t necessary.

 

People were pinpointing quite clearly that there was corruption around, that there was lack of work and sometimes the work was reserved for ZANU PF.

 

 

 


 

10.     Positive observations

 

One thing I have discovered here is every house has a little garden. It has brought out the best and the worst in the people.

 

What inspired me most is that this nation seems to be growing. People are just standing and trying to make ends meet and going ahead. But I am grateful for the NGOs distributing food. The EFZ [Evangelical Fellowship of Zimbabwe] are really trying by all means to get things going better.

 

It is very, very, very important to know this world belongs to those who believe - the lord’s words will be fulfilled. On the other side you see people who are happy. We went to two graduation ceremonies. I gave words of encouragement, said it is wonderful to see people getting degrees. If we could encourage people to learn - we have got UNISA helping all sorts of people who did not go to school and get any education.

 

In front of 15 pastors in Mutare, those contesting for city council have made a promise and we must hold them to that promise. The church played a very constructive role in bringing together parties from across the board and got an agreement from all politicians to not campaign violently, and that they would accept the outcome of the election gracefully. The church has used its influence to denounce violence and to bring people together to unite them, to agree to a code of conduct.

 

 

11.     Understanding of dynamics: who is to blame?

 

The conflict is not so much about ZANU PF and MDC. The problem is about the incumbent government and its people. It is violence that is being generated by the State machinery against its own people, whether it’s against journalists, whether against the church, so I think that has to be clear.

 

The sad thing is that it is not something from outside, and it is not the whites against the blacks - it’s people from the same tribe doing things to each other, because some dare to support another party.

 

Somebody is making a lot of money out of what is happening in this country. It’s not somebody from outside. They say it is the imperialist west – it is not; it is people who have been elected into positions of power, who are abusing this power. And ZANU PF use people on the ground to snitch on each other and this is what the youth militia are about – it’s the police, the army, the CIO, the green bombers – they all come together to pick people up. This young guy was taken into the bush and beaten up with his brother. He was accused of speaking ill of the President.  Why can’t there be a differing of opinion? It is in differences that we celebrate our life.

 

Maybe we could explain it, if it was a white on black situation but it is a black on black situation and it is also tribal - you are Shona, you are Ndebele. People would say nothing is happening [in terms of development] down here in our region. This is giving credit to that ex [colonial] government, because they were doing things for the people but this government is doing nothing for the people.

 

What I have seen and heard here – it smacks of apartheid, by which I mean the suffering and state oppression reminds me of what we went through in South Africa.

 

The ordinary people are above, the government should be taking advice from them, but it is happening the other way round.  

 

There are people who I can say they enjoy their comfort zone through the suffering of others.

 

Even within ZANU there is admittance that there is a crisis.

 

The land issue

 

It’s not just about land here. At home you hear all about the ills of the land story. There is poverty and no money - people are being beaten into submission. The number of people who have wealth in this country right now are fewer than in colonial times – and a bigger poverty gap.

 

Well as far as I understand the situation here, I would say the government has caused the food problem. I think they did not have a good strategy of dealing with this land issue. Invading the farms – you allocate ignorant people, poor people land – how do you think they are going to grow food for the whole nation, when they have no equipment? I think there was a better way of dealing with this issue. Another newspaper had a whole list of the farms that have been taken over by the government. Those people also don’t know how to farm. What can you expect but disaster in that situation.

 

If I heard correctly on the radio yesterday, tomorrow our South African government is going to pass a land appropriation bill. I may be wrong, but I get the impression from Zimbabweans that land redistribution was a necessity that many knew had to be done, including the farmers themselves. The British are being blamed, but for twenty years, nothing was done, then there was no order about it and no consideration was paid to those thrown out of jobs. If land issues are dealt with in South Africa, it must be done lawfully and in a fair manner.

 

One man said to me maybe even Mandela could not do what our President did, by giving us land and houses free. So he says he stands with the President.

 

The youth – from twelve thirteen years up - selling themselves, prostituting to make a living - the young guys go out stealing at night. I believe why the area became so crowded - they came from the rural areas. The farmland is lying wasted and dry. When the white farmers were working they had employment, but now they have come into town to live hand to mouth. These two feet walked on those grounds and it was really wracking.

 

I went to some farms, which had been taken away from farmers, it seems that those farms are not functioning anymore. I perceive it might be the lack of knowledge or no money to continue farming.

 

 


 

12.     What needs to be done?

 

Prophetic ministry

 

Zimbabwean comment: The role of prophetic ministry is not about contesting political power - God has not called us to play that role. Generally your role is to ensure that politicians behave, but once you start to challenge political power by becoming part of it, you change dynamics. You have congregations and you do not ask people in your congregation what party they belong to. We said to them please don’t get derailed.

 

Zimbabwean comment: There is a vacuum – who can bring these people together, what will happen who will bring a solution? The church can do this – but are we ready, are we mature enough? Because it’s not only that. After visiting the President’s office I received strange phone calls at night. But the fact is here. But even if the church is being intimidated we need to be mature enough to say we need a solution, we need to be with the people and their suffering, and say – come, we need to solve this problem. It doesn’t matter what you believe, we need a solution.

 

Lobbying and material support

 

What is the international community doing about this situation? If this was happening in England, would they sit back and do nothing? But because this is happening in Africa, even some of the leaders here are supporting what is happening.

 

The people in Zimbabwe are our brothers and sisters, we need to support them. Back in South Africa I will share the story of Zimbabwe and mobilise them to pray for Zimbabwe. And also to see if there isn’t a way practically we can help, maybe in a small way. Which could also be very hard to do because everything has to go through “the powers” here.

 

I have been thinking, I don’t know what I am going to do now. Many young kids cannot pay the school fees. But maybe I can take two children and make a difference. You can take one child and make a difference. But I have learnt the secret of giving - the more you give, the more the Lord blesses you. I hope I will be mobilising the churches to pray for Zimbabwe. The woman I met yesterday said if you South Africans do not do anything, we are all going to die - Zimbabwe is finished, the economy is gone.

 

Prayer

 

We need help, help us to serve you better, to serve you more. In South Africa I believe prayer made a difference. 1994 we though we were going to be fighting. I was involved and I will never forget it. Day and night we were going all over the place meeting with leaders and groups and saying we need to pray. And we got together to pray at that time - Buthelezi was saying he was not part of the political process. It was then that he decided to join the prayers and it was there that he agreed to enter the political process. I want to encourage church leaders in this nation to do that. It is only God who can save this nation right now because it is finished - the economy, the social life, everything. I love this country, I love this country, I will pray for help.

 

On Wednesday they organised a group of people and I preached. I tried to encourage people with my sermon. I tried to advise people not to sink but to swim above their disaster. I could sense they were very happy that there are some people that can move such a long way and pray for them. We shall have to find a way of speaking to our church in South Africa. We have to inspire the church on that side. What man cannot change God can change. If we get more to pray we can bring change. We have got to conscientise our government on the situation here. Now that we are here we should find a way of making them aware of what is here.

 

Prayer – and Action

 

I firmly believe in prayer. I am pastoring a church known as the prayerful church but I also believe that praying and praying and doing nothing is not going to be much good. I love it when Jesus says to people who are starving, “what do we have to eat?” and they say, only five loaves and five fishes and Jesus says, “bring it to me” – and he distributed – he prayed and then he acted. Something should be done before the nation is totally finished. I believe something must be done - if it will cost somebody to die then he must die – but something must be done for the sons of the soil here in Zimbabwe to survive. I believe there is something more we can do - let us not only pray, let us take action.

 

It was really heart-wracking to see these situations. I think as South Africans we need to go back and really table these issues because God says we must love our neighbours as we love ourselves and also that actions speak louder than words.

 

I believe it is time for Christians to take an action. They must come together and pray for an answer. What we need now is a solution – there is no other way.

 

We also have got our own problems in South Africa - we are not here to sort out the problems in Zimbabwe, but we are here just to say we are standing with you. Don’t look to us as people who can solve your problems.

 

The problem is pastors who try to act, are trailed for not supporting the right party. So it is difficult for them to act.

 

In one of the churches around here, a pastor was preaching and had to change the subject when some people marched in half way. So how are local pastors supposed to address the issues?

 

Zimbabwean comment: for the first twenty years the church has been happy to sit back and let the politicians do it all. There is a mind-set that politics is a dirty business, and is not for church leaders to get involved. I agree that things are not shifting - things are so desperate you have to be blind not to see, and have no heart at all. People are beginning to question what is the role of the church. But you are working against this mindset that has developed over time.

 

People latch on to the idea of prayer as a safe alternative to action and not as a spring-board - a safe alternative, because you can pray and then go away and do nothing. But if you have to wrestle, fight, and pray for the Kingdom then that is a costly business, and most people are trying to avoid the cost. You in South Africa have your own history of breaking through this fear that made cowards of so many, and silenced so many, but gradually the priests came forward and made a stand and I think your visit can help local church leaders to find their way. It is empowering for them just to have you here. It will lead the local church leaders to find their God given role. We are learning from one another but solidarity between churches here and there is a key.

 

Nowadays we see some change with pastors starting to say something is wrong. To be patriotic means you have to go along with all the evil that the government is doing. If you say this is evil, you are accused of being not patriotic.

 

I was so disappointed with SADC – they clapped Mugabe on the back and condemned sanctions – but there are no sanctions.

 

Church leaders have a much more powerful role than politicians because even politicians go to church and seek advice and say - lead us! During the days of apartheid, the church was a very real vehicle for change. The church was an alternative government - it is now time for this church to arise and see this.

 

We need to send the report to SADC leaders – our voices are South African and so our voices must be listened to. We are running congregations and we have an audience and can stand up and preach. After my sermon I will say I want to feed back on Zimbabwe. At conferences I will ask to speak on Zimbabwe.

 

We as South Africans, once had an experience of oppression by whites. The fearing of a white was injected in a black man’s head like the present situation in Zimbabwe. But men of God stood up against the regime that was oppressing Africans. We need to bring together the servants of God in a time of oppression.

 

I conclude by saying to the church and leaders, that we are a prophetic voice to the nation – if we don’t speak, people of God will perish: let the blood of this nation not be upon us.

 

 

 


 

13      Detailed torture accounts

 

 

I had the opportunity of interviewing some people who had been victimized and what follows is a transcript of those interviews.

 

For the purpose of this report, I will not be identifying the interviewees, but their personal details are known to me.

 

Interviewee 1:

 

Thirty year old male, he is a member of the Zimbabwean Congress of Trade Unions.

 

He is the Regional Organising Secretary of this branch. Just some background to the events that took place; the MDC had organized a mass protest for the 2 June 2003. On the 20 May 2003 the police visited his place of work; he was not at work. They left a message for him to report to the M police station. No reason was given for their visit or their request that he report to the police station. On the 31 May 2003 he heard that the police were looking for him. On the 1 June 2003 they once again came to his work to look for him, but he had reported for duty and left. On all these occasions they also visited his home and harassed his family. It seems the reason that they were looking for him was that he was accused of organizing the mass protest that was to take place on the 2 June 2003. This he denies, as the protest was organized by the MDC and not the trade unions.

 

On 2 June 2003, the day of the mass protest, some of the workers reported for duty, as normal. However, some workers and residents gathered for the protest. The MDC leaders, who were to lead the protest, were arrested by the police. The police also dispersed the crowd, with the result the protest did not take place. He did not attend the protest, so the next day, 3 June 2003, he thought he was clear and reported for duty as normal. At 10am he went to the bakery to buy some bread. On his way he met four soldiers and two policemen. They asked his name and when he gave this, they arrested him. He was detained without any notification of the charges against him. He asked them to notify his employers and his family that he was detained, but they refused. He managed to get a message to his family via a friend.

 

Torture during police interrogation

 

At 6 pm he was taken from his cell to an interview room. There he was accused of bad mouthing the President on May Day, when he addressed a rally. During the interviews by various officers, he was repeatedly beaten with a baton when they were not satisfied with the answers he gave to their questions. At one stage they stripped him naked in the presence of a female police officer.

 

The beatings continued. At one stage, he defecated, and they made him eat his own faeces. Soon after this he passed out. When he awoke he was fully clothed and taken back to the cells. During the night someone would call his name and tell him that he was not going to make it through the night. The next day he was charged under the Public Order Security Act (POSA).

 

For three days he was not able to walk. Neither his lawyer nor his family was able to see him until he was able to walk. His bail was Z$1000.00. On being released, he spent a day at M Hospital, on being discharged; he spent a further two weeks in bed in a Private Hospital. In all he spent ±Z$500 000.00 dollars on medication, doctors bills and hospital fees. On 3 July he appeared in court and his case was postponed to 3 September 2003, because the dockets were not available for further investigation. His personal thoughts on what was happening in the country, was that those in power did not care about the people and that their President used the Land Issue as a weapon. Anyway it was only the ZANU PF supporters who were getting the land.

 

Interviewee 2:

 

School teacher who worked in rural areas.

 

He was of the opinion that the political situation, up until the end of 1999, was fair. However, the situation worsened after the Referendum and the emergence of the MDC as a political entity in the country. Threats and intimidation of those who seemed to support the opposition became the order of the day. The turning point came in June 2000, during the Parliamentary Elections when ZANU PF nearly lost power to the opposition. During the Presidential elections those who supported the opposition were victimized. Because he lived in town, he was accused of being an MDC supporter and also trying to indoctrinate his pupils against the government. In November 2001 he was prevented from teaching in his school. Since then he has not been able to find employment in the Education Department, even though he is a qualified teacher.

 

Torture by police, youth militia and war veterans

 

On 1 June 2003 the police at 12:50 am came to their home and arrested him together with two of his young brothers. They were taken to the mountains by a contingent of police, war veterans and youth militia. Here they were stripped and beaten for three hours. When the beatings stopped they were left in the veldt and had to find their own way home. That night people were being beaten all over town. His opinion was that people were not able to hold meetings freely. They were not able to plan or do anything of political nature if they were of the opposition. The freedoms of association, assembly and speech have been compromised. There is no political tolerance in their country and one is not allowed to wear or display party regalia if it is not of the ruling party. The truth is that people want change, but they are afraid to speak out for fear of reprisals.

 

The tribal chiefs and headman are being manipulated. The Electorate is being forced by fear to tow the line. NGO’s are only allowed to operate if their policies are in line with the ZANU PF policies. Another sad factor in this whole food saga is that illiteracy plays a big role. As the illiterate are duped into voting for ZANU PF in exchange for food. It seems his only crime is that he was a teacher who lived in town and thought in rural areas. According to him many teachers were leaving the teaching profession, because they were being victimized.

 

Interviewee 3:

 

Mother of four young children. Before her arrest she was married to a teacher. She is an executive member of the local branch of the MDC.

 

Torture by police and war veterans in police station

 

She took part in the mass action that took place in M on 18/19 March 2003. She was beaten by four policemen with gun butts and batons and arrested. She was released on 21 March 2003 on Z$3000.00 bail. Since her arrest her health has detracted. On 2 June 2003 she once again took part in the mass protest that was organized. On the way to the protest they encountered many soldiers and police, who were heavily armed. They started beating people and she was again arrested. On the evening of 3 June 2003 they were called individually to the interview room. During the interrogation she was beaten under her feet and all over her body with a baton. She was also kicked during the process. During this time they were without food and water. On the morning of 4 June 2003 they were, once again, called individually so that statements could be taken from them. When her turn came, she entered the room and found that there were about nine men in the room. Some of them were war veterans and others were from the Police Force. They made her sit on a chair with her legs on a table. While they were taking her statement, they were beating her.

 

She was menstruating at this time, and noticing this, they forced her to remove the soiled pad and placed it in her mouth. She was also kicked in her stomach. During this time her lawyer was trying to see her but he was refused access. All of them who were arrested on 2 June 2003 appeared in court on 4 June 2003. Bail was set at Z$3000.00 per person. At this court appearance she was not able to stand and had to be assisted. They appeared in court again on 5 June 2003 and both cases against her were withdrawn with no reasons given. Her lawyer was advised by a Police Officer that she could make a statement at the police station and report the brutality that she and others underwent while in police custody. At the time of this interview no action had been taken.

 

Victimization of family and theft

 

Because of her and her family’s involvement in the MDC, her home had been stoned and windows broken. Her husband, who has since deserted her, was victimized at the school where he taught. He was threatened and told to get rid of her. On once occasion the war veterans went to her house and demanded that her husband hand over her clothes to them as a sign that he no longer was involved with her. They burnt all her clothes in front of her house. She was left with one dress, one skirt and one blouse. She no longer stays with her husband, because after this he told her to leave, and she has had to find shelter elsewhere. Since all this her husband has stopped supporting her and the two children that are with her. The two remaining children live with their father. Her thoughts on the situation are that hunger has forced certain people to resort to desperate measures.


Back to the Top
Back to Index

JUSTICE FOR AGRICULTURE

COMMUNIQUÉS - December 18, 2003

Email: justice@telco.co.zw; justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Internet: www.justiceforagriculture.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.  PR Communiqué
2.  Legal Communiqué

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.  PR Communiqué

We repeat Desmond Tutu's excellent and very clear statement re the
Commonwealth and Zimbabwe. Herewith also in the interest of transparency
the full text of Mbeki's letter posted on the ANC website after CHOGM at
Abuja.  The capital letter notes are JAG's commentary and challenge to
these falsehoods.

Issued by: Office of Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu

15 December 2003

ARCHBISHOP TUTU CALLS FOR CLARITY ON COMMONWEALTH AND ZIMBABWE

The Commonwealth Heads of Government have recently been meeting in Nigeria.

I respect the African leaders who participated in that meeting, some more
than others. But I have to confess that I have been baffled with what
appears to have happened there and the reactions of some of the
participants.

I am at a loss to understand the reasoning for a lifting of the suspension
of Zimbabwe. Presumably that particular sanction was imposed in order to
persuade President Mugabe to change his policies, to respect the rule of
law, to curb violence against those who were not members of his own ZANU-PF
party, etc. What most observers seem to say is that at best the
unsatisfactory status quo which led to the suspension remains unchanged.

Many more contend that things have got worse. I am afraid I do not
understand on what grounds an appeal for the lifting of the suspension
could have been made.

I would also wish to have clarification on how the decisions arrived at,
apropos Zimbabwe, might be labelled undemocratic? It seems heads of state
voted and in terms of the votes, if reports are to be believed, the
decisions appear to have been arrived at in the time honoured manner as in
the re-election of the Commonwealth Secretary General when an overwhelming
majority voted for him. It seems that the normal voting procedure was
followed also in deciding on whether to lift Zimbabwe's suspension or not.

I am sad that we South Africans declared that the last elections in
Zimbabwe though not free were yet legitimate. That is distressing semantic
games.

Had we had something similar in 1994 here at home with the NNP being
declared a winner despite the elections not having been free but legitimate
we could have quite rightly shouted "foul".

Nations do not normally interfere in the domestic affairs of other
sovereign nations unless and until those domestic issues pose a threat to
the security and stability of other nations. Had the international
community invoked the rubric of non-interference then we would have been in
dire straits in our anti-apartheid struggle.

We appealed for the world to intervene and interfere in South Africa's
internal affairs. We could not have defeated apartheid on our own. What is
sauce for the goose must be sauce for the gander too.

We have great expectations of the peer review system of the African Union
but it will be a futile exercise if we are not ready to condemn human
rights violations unequivocally without fear or favour whatever the
struggle credentials of the perpetrator. Human rights are human rights and
they are of universal validity or they are nothing. There are no peculiarly
African human rights, what has been reported as happening in Zimbabwe is
totally unacceptable and reprehensible and we ought to say so regretting
that it should have been necessary to condemn erstwhile comrades.

The credibility of our democracy demands this. If we are seemingly
indifferent to human rights violations happening in a neighbouring country
what is to stop us one day being indifferent to that in our own?

Issued by the Office of Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu

For further information, please call Ms Lavinia Crawford-Browne at 021 552
7525.

LETTER FROM THE SOUTH AFRICAN PRESIDENT

We will resist the upside-down view of Africa

The 2003 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) opened in Abuja,
Nigeria at the close of this past week. Its substantial agenda included the
controversial issue of Zimbabwe. Contrary to false reports peddled by some,
CHOGM dealt with all matters on its agenda, including Zimbabwe.

Its longest session considered a Report entitled "Making Democracy work for
Pro-poor Development", prepared by a Commonwealth High-Level Expert Group
on Development and Democracy. This Report was commissioned pursuant to the
Fancourt Declaration adopted by CHOGM when it met in our country in 1999.

By the time the Abuja CHOGM concluded, it had continued the suspension of
Zimbabwe from the councils of the Commonwealth. Zimbabwe had left the
Commonwealth, rendering this decision meaningless. The SADC countries,
supported by Uganda, had decided to express their strong disagreement with
the CHOGM decision. Time will tell what impact all of this will have on the
Commonwealth. But it is necessary to recall some of the history that has
led us to this situation.

When it met in Coolum, Australia in 2002, CHOGM charged a Troika made up of
the Chair of the Commonwealth, the Prime Minister of Australia, and the
Presidents of Nigeria and South Africa, to take action on Zimbabwe, in the
event that the Commonwealth Elections Observer Team made a negative finding
about the 2002 Zimbabwe Presidential elections. This was the full extent of
the mandate given to the Troika.

This Observer Team concluded that "the conditions in Zimbabwe did not
adequately allow for a free expression of will by the electors." On this
basis, the Troika decided to suspend Zimbabwe from the councils of the
Commonwealth for one year, which should have meant the conclusion of its
mandated mission.

However, the Troika also decided that it would meet again in a year's time
to consider the evolution of the situation in Zimbabwe, in the context of
various policy decisions taken earlier by the Commonwealth. Nevertheless,
later, the then Chair of the Commonwealth, Australian Prime Minister
Howard, insisted that the Troika should meet six months earlier than it had
decided, which it did out of respect for his position as Chair of the
Commonwealth.

The reason he insisted on this otherwise unscheduled meeting was that he
wanted the Troika to impose additional sanctions on Zimbabwe, for which it
had no mandate. The two other members of the Troika told him as much and
argued that the Troika should meet at the end of the one-year, as
originally agreed. Nevertheless, the Chair was determined to have his way.

Accordingly, contrary to all normal practice, he decided to announce to the
world at a press conference, that he disagreed with his colleagues in the
Troika and wanted more Commonwealth sanctions imposed on Zimbabwe. At one
stroke, this both destroyed the Troika and put in question the democratic
principle of decisions by majority.

The majority on the Troika then advised the Chair that if he wanted
additional sanctions, he, and not the Troika, would have to get a mandate
from all the Heads of Government of the Commonwealth. They also indicated
their opposition to the continuation of the suspension beyond the one-year
that had been agreed earlier. Nevertheless, the Chair requested the
Secretary General to consult these Heads.

In his report, after this process of consultation, the Secretary General
said: "Some member governments take the view that it is time to lift
Zimbabwe's suspension from the councils of the Commonwealth when the
one-year period expires on March 19 2003. Some others feel that there is no
justification for such a step and that there is in fact reason to impose
stronger measures. However, the broadly held view is that Heads of
Government wish to review matters at CHOGM in Nigeria in December 2003 and
that the suspension of Zimbabwe.should remain in place pending discussions
on the matter at CHOGM.The members of the Troika have now concluded that
the most appropriate approach in the circumstances is for Zimbabwe's
suspension.to remain in place until.CHOGM in December 2003."

Unfortunately, the Secretary General has never explained what he meant by
"the broadly held view", especially in the light of the fact that some
Heads of Government were not consulted, and others were wrongly led to
believe that we supported the continuation of the suspension. The statement
that we had expressed ourselves in favour of the continuation of the
suspension was false.

We must also make the point that the Zimbabwe government has never been
given the possibility to respond to the report of the Commonwealth
Observers, contrary both to the principles of natural justice and the rules
of the Commonwealth itself.

BOTH OBASANJO AND MBEKI VISITED MUGABE AFTER THE LONDON MEETING, BOTH ARE
SERVING HEADS OF STATE OF COUNTRIES IN THE COMMONWEALTH. WHY DIDN'T THEY
DISCUSS THE COMMONWEALTH DECISION WITH HIM?

THE SG OF THE COMMONWEALTH REPEATEDLY TRIED TO COME TO ZIMBABWE, OR EVEN
ENGAGE HIM, BUT HE WAS REBUFFED.

This is especially important in the light of the fact that other Election
Observer Groups, such as our own, made determinations about the Zimbabwe
Presidential elections that differ from the finding of the Commonwealth
Observers. For instance, the largest of our Observer Teams, made up
essentially of representatives of civil society found as follows:

"It appears that the will of the people was demonstrated to a degree
reflected by the number of people who came out to vote and who did get an
opportunity to vote. The turnout at the polls and the number of people who
voted was second only to the first election following the liberation of
Zimbabwe. This view must be seen in the context of the obstacles and
problems that characterised the pre-election period that is described
boldly and frankly in the body of this report. The (Observer) Mission is,
therefore, of the view that the outcome of the elections represents the
legitimate voice of the people of Zimbabwe."

We accepted this determination and have no reason to conclude that the
eminent South Africans who came to this conclusion were wrong, whereas the
Commonwealth Observers were correct. This is particularly so given the fact
that they spent a longer period of time in Zimbabwe than the Commonwealth
Observers, and did more than any other group to help ensure that the
elections were free and fair.

THE COMMONWEALTH OBSERVER REPORT IS A MUCH WEIGHTIER, MORE DETAILED
DOCUMENT THAN THAT OF THE SA OBSERVER GROUP. MBEKI IGNORES THE FINDINGS OF
THE SADC PARLIAMENTARY GROUP, THE NORWEGIANS, THE EU OR THE USA. THE ONLY
OTHER GROUP THAT WAS MORE THAN A ONE OR TWO MAN TEAM WAS THE NIGERIAN TEAM,
MADE UP OF NO MORE THAN 8 PEOPLE, WHO HARDLY MOVED OUT OF MEIKLES HOTEL.

In addition, to ensure the continuous coverage of all parts of Zimbabwe, it
worked together with the other South African Observer Teams, as well as the
Cabinet Ministers we sent to Harare to ensure the effective access of our
Observer Teams to the Zimbabwe government to deal quickly with any problems
that could arise.

AHEAD OF THE POLL IN MARCH 2003, IT WAS REPEATEDLY STATED BY MEMBERS CLOSE
TO THE SA OBSERVER GROUP THAT THEIR FINDINGS WOULD BE "CREDIBLE AND
LEGITIMATE." REGARDLESS OF WHAT THEY SAW.

THE NIGHT BEFORE THE POLLS, SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE SA OBSERVER GROUP WERE
AT MDC HEADQUARTERS IN HARARE AND SAW A GROUP OF MDC POLL MONITORS GUSHING
BLOOD, AND INJURED. THEY HAD BEEN ATTACKED AND FORCED TO LEAVE THEIR
POSITIONS AS POLL MONITORS. A MAJORITY OF POLLING STATIONS HAD NO MDC
MONITORS.

We have also studied and taken seriously the observations and
recommendations contained in the 42-page Report of our Observer Mission.
These observations include issues of political violence, legislation and
state institutions relevant to the elections, the role of the media, and
the general political situation. Those who present themselves to the public
as experts would do well to study this Report.

IT WAS A GOOD REPORT. ONE THAT IN ALL NORMAL ELECTION PARLANCE WOULD HAVE
RULED THE POLLS NEITHER CREDIBLE NOR LEGITIMATE....IN OTHER WORDS, UNFAIR.

When we met in London as the Commonwealth Troika, we were restricted solely
and exclusively to the findings of the Commonwealth Observer Report. We
also had no mandate to consider the substance of this Report and never did.
Neither did the Abuja CHOGM, though it decided to continue the suspension
of Zimbabwe, on the untested assumption that the Commonwealth Observer
Report was correct in its conclusion.

WHY SHOULD ANY OTHER REPORT BE CONSIDERED BY THE COMMONWEALTH OTHER THAN
THE COMMONWEALTH REPORT? IT COULDN'T TAKE ON REPORTS FROM OBSERVER MISSIONS
OTHER THAN ITS OWN. SHOULD THE SA PARLIAMENT HAVE TAKEN ON THE NORWEGIANS'
REPORT?

At its March 19, 2002 meeting in London, at which it suspended Zimbabwe for
a year, the Troika reiterated a critically important statement made by the
Coolum CHOGM. It said that the land question was at the core of the crisis
in Zimbabwe and could not be separated from other issues of concern.

THIS HAD BEEN DISCUSSED AND AGREED IN ABUJA AT THE MEETING OF COMMONWEALTH
FOREIGN MINISTERS ON SEPT 6 2001, AND A WAY FORWARD MAPPED OUT. ZIMBABWE
DID NOT ADHERE TO A SINGLE CONDITION IN THE AGREEMENT MUDENGE HAD SIGNED.

At the Abuja CHOGM, the land question in Zimbabwe was not discussed.
Indeed, the land question has disappeared from the global discourse about
Zimbabwe, except when it is mentioned to highlight the plight of the former
white landowners, and to attribute food shortages in Zimbabwe to the land
redistribution programme.

THAT IS NOT TRUE, AND MEDIA REPORTS WOULD SHOW THAT THE MAJORITY OF NEWS
REPORTS FOR MORE THAN A YEAR WERE ABOUT STARVATION, TORTURE, BEATINGS,
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS, COURT CASES, AND THE FINANCIAL CRISIS.

JOURNALISTS ARE OBLIGED TO WRITE ABOUT ZIMBABWE'S LOSS OF COMMERCIAL
AGRICULTURE AS IT WAS THE CORNER STONE OF THE ECONOMY, AND HAS BEEN
DESTROYED, AND IS THE MAIN REASON FOR THE ECONOMIC CRISIS AND FOOD
SHORTAGES, AS EVEN THE SMALL SCALE AND COMMUNAL FARMERS HAVE BEEN WIPED OUT
BY THE FINANCIAL CRISIS ARISING OUT OF LOSS OF FOREIGN CURRENCY FROM
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION.

MOST JOURNALISTS HAVEN'T WRITTEN A WHITE FARMER STORY FOR OVER A YEAR, AS
THERE ARE HARDLY ANY LEFT!!! THEY DO WRITE ABOUT WHITE FARMERS IF THEY ARE
KICKED OFF BY CABINET MINISTERS, JUDGES OR OTHER POLITICAL HIERARCHY.

The current Zimbabwe crisis started in 1965 when the then British Labour
Government, under Prime Minister Harold Wilson, refused to suppress the
rebellion against the British Crown led by Ian Smith. This was because the
British Government felt that it could not act against its white "kith and
kin", in favour of the African majority.

At the constitutional negotiations in 1979, the British Conservative
Government insisted that the property and other rights and privileges of
this "kith and kin" had to be protected. It therefore ensured that
Zimbabwe's independence constitution had entrenched clauses, valid for ten
years, which, among other things, protected the property rights of the
white settler colonial "kith and kin", including the landowners.

The large sums of money promised by both the British and US governments to
enable the new government to buy land for African settlement never
materialised.

THE BRITISH DID PAY FOR LAND, FAR TOO LITTLE CONSIDERING THE PLEDGES MADE
AT LANCASTER HOUSE AND THE LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION AND COMMITMENT THAT WAS
MUTED THERE AT LEVELS EXCEEDING £2 BILLION STERLING. IT PUT IN ONE POUND
FOR EACH POUND PUT IN BY THE ZIM GOVERNMENT, AND MORE LAND WAS BOUGHT THAN
WAS EVER RESETTLED. IN THE DYING DAYS OF JOHN MAJOR'S ADMINISTRATION, THE
TORIES CANCELLED AID FOR RESETTLEMENT AFTER IT WAS REVEALED THAT FARMS HAD
BEEN BOUGHT WITH BRITISH MONEY AND HANDED OUT TO THE ELITE INSTEAD OF TO
THE POOREST OF THE POOR AS HAD BEEN AGREED IN 1980. BY 1986, ZIMBABWE'S
ANNUAL BUDGETS WILL SHOW LITTLE MONEY WAS SET ASIDE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF
RESETTLEMENT, BECAUSE THE DEPT OF AGRICULTURE FOUND IT HAD MADE MISTAKES.

THAT NEWLY RESETTLED PEOPLE WERE GOING BACK TO THE COMMUNAL LAND, AS THEIR
NEW HOMES WERE FAR FROM CLINICS, SCHOOLS AND FAMILY INFRASTRUCTURE. SO
RESETTLEMENT WAS PUT ON ICE FOR THE PLANS TO BE REDRAWN TO BUY LAND
ADJACENT TO COMMUNAL LANDS. BUT BY NOW THE ECONOMY WAS FALTERING. ZIMBABWE
HAD BEEN ON EXPENSIVE MISSIONS TO MOZAMBIQUE, IT HAD EMBRACED ESAP, AND THE
VITALITY OF THE LAND REFORM PROGRAMME JUST DIED.

The land dispossession carried out by the settler colonial "kith and kin"
through the barrel of the gun had to be sustained, despite the fact that
even in 1979, the British government recognised the fact that land was at
the core of the conflict in Zimbabwe, as did the 2002 Coolum CHOGM.

AS ABOVE. ON 6 SEPT 2001, AT ABUJA, COMMONWEALTH FOREIGN MINISTERS AGREED A
WHOLE LOT OF REFORMS FOR MUGABE, WHICH STAN MUDENGE SIGNED...ABOUT HUMAN
RIGHTS, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ETC., AND TO HALT LAND SEIZURES UNTIL A UNDP
SOLUTION AND PLAN COULD BE WORKED OUT. SOUTH AFRICA WAS PRESENT AND
SIGNATORY TO THE ACCORD.

In 1998 we intervened to help mediate the growing tension between Zimbabwe
and the UK on the land question. This, and other factors, led to the
international conference on the land question held in Zimbabwe that year.

At that conference, the international community, including the UK, the UN,
the EU and others agreed to help finance the programme of land
redistribution that had been an essential part of the negotiated settlement
of 1979, which, in return for introducing majority rule, guaranteed the
privileges of the white settler colonial "kith and kin". Nothing came of
these commitments.

BECAUSE THE ZIM GOVERNMENT COULD NOT EVEN FACILITATE THE INITIAL PLAN OF
ACTION WHICH WAS BEING FUNDED BY UK, USA AND FRANCE. ZIM NEVER SHOWED UP
FOR ANY OF THE PLANNING MEETINGS. AND THE DONORS WHO CAME FORWARD TO FUND
THE PLANNING, THEN STOPPED AS THERE WAS NO PROGRESS, NONE! ZIM DID NOT SHOW
UP TO THE MEETINGS, IT COULDN'T EVEN PUT A COMMITTEE TOGETHER TO DISCUSS
THE LAND ISSUE SO THAT A START TO THE PLAN COULD BE MADE.

Later, the British government could not find a mere £9 million to buy 118
farms, which purchase had been agreed at the international conference.

These would have been used to resettle the war veterans who had begun to
occupy farms owned by the white "kith and kin", continuing a struggle for
the return of the land to the indigenous majority, which had started at the
end of the 19th century.

THIS BIT OF NONSENSE COMES FROM A REPORT PUBLISHED BY MUDENGE AND ONLY MADE
AVAILABLE IN NOVEMBER 2001. IT WOULD TAKE TOO MUCH SPACE HERE TO EXPLAIN
THIS. BUT IT IS WRONG INFO, WHICH MBEKI HAS TAKEN FROM ZANU PF AND
PRESENTED AS FACT.

INTERESTING TO NOTE THAT EVEN THE ZJRI INITIATIVE EMBARKED UPON IN GOOD
FAITH BY FARMERS WHICH INVOLVED A MILLION HECTARES AND THE FINANCING TO GO
WITH IT WAS ALSO REJECTED BY GOVERNMENT.

Again we intervened to help solve the Zimbabwe land question. We managed to
get pledges from various countries, other than the UK, to provide this £9
million. Having handed this matter over to the UN, it collapsed in the
intricacies of the UN bureaucracy. Though there were willing sellers and
willing buyers, and the necessary funds, the 118 farms were not bought.

IT WASN'T ONLY THE UN WHO FAILED, THE DEPT OF AGRIC ALSO FAILED TO GET
THEIR ACT TOGETHER. AGAIN ALL THIS COMES FROM MUDENGE'S REPORT WHICH MBEKI
HAS TAKEN AS FACT.

With everything having failed to restore the land to its original owners in
a peaceful manner, a forcible process of land redistribution perhaps became
inevitable. Though we were conscious of the frustration that had built up
in Zimbabwe, we urged the government of Zimbabwe both privately and
publicly to act against the forcible seizure of white farms and other
violence in the country. On one of these occasions, at Victoria Falls and
in the presence of President Mugabe, I told the world press that, together
with Presidents Nujoma and Chissano, we had raised this matter with
President Mugabe.

For the record, we must mention that our national broadcaster did not
record my comments on this matter. The SABC television team that covered
this press conference later explained that at that point it did not have
the necessary cassette to record these comments. Soon after this press
conference, the BBC interviewed me to confirm the remarks I had made. And
yet afterwards, many worked hard to propagate the blatant untruth that we
had said nothing about any of the contentious issues in Zimbabwe.

MBEKI IS RIGHT, HE DID SAY AS PER ABOVE. BUT, HE ALSO KNEW THAT THE LAND
QUESTION WAS NOT AS SIMPLE AS THIS. THE FIRST SERIOUS INVASIONS/SEIZURES
BEGAN AFTER A NEW OPPOSITION MASS BASED PARTY MOBILISED SUPPORT TO REJECT A
NEW CONSTITUTION, FOUR MONTHS BEFORE CRUCIAL PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS. SO
MUGABE HAD TO LAUNCH LAND INVASIONS. THERE ARE SO MANY INDEPENDENTLY
VERIFIED REPORTS ABOUT THE PLANNING AND EXECUTION OF THE INVASIONS THAT
MBEKI IS FOOLISH TO IGNORE THEM.

FOR MORE THAN A DECADE, ALL LAND SOLD, HAD TO BE PUT TO GOVERNMENT FOR
PURCHASE FIRST. THEY SIGNED CERTIFICATES OF NO INTEREST. MONEY WAS
AVAILABLE IF THEY HAD STUCK TO THEIR 1980 PLAN.  BY 1999 (AHEAD OF FAST
TRACK LAND REFORM WHICH COMMENCED IN 2000) IN EXCESS OF 80% OF ALL RESIDUAL
COMMERCIAL FARMS HAD CHANGED HANDS UNDER CERTIFICATES OF NO INTEREST SIGNED
BY GOVERNMENT.

INCIDENTALLY THE BRITS AND AMERICANS HAVE GIVEN ZIM SO MUCH SPACE TO GET
THEIR LAND INVASIONS REGULARISED. THE TWO COUNTRIES HAVE FED MORE THAN HALF
THE POPULATION FOR TWO YEARS NOW, AND ARE GOING TO HAVE TO CONTINUE FOR THE
FORESEEABLE FUTURE. THIS WILL HAVE COST MORE THAN ANY KIND OF INTERNATIONAL
FUNDING FOR LAND REFORM.

In his book, "Decolonising the Mind", the Kenyan writer, Ngugi wa Thiongo,
writes about the consternation among some Europeans that he had started
writing in his native language, Gikuyu. He says:

"It was almost as if, in choosing to write in Gikuyu, I was doing something
abnormal. The very fact that what common sense dictates in the literary
practice of other cultures is questioned in an African writer is a measure
of how far imperialism has distorted the view of African realities. It has
turned reality upside down: the abnormal is viewed as normal and the normal
is viewed as abnormal. Africa actually enriches Europe: but Africa is made
to believe that it needs Europe to rescue it from poverty. Africa's natural
and human resources continue to develop Europe and America: but Africa is
made to feel grateful for aid from the same quarters that still sit on the
back of the continent. Africa even produces intellectuals who now
rationalise this upside-down way of looking at Africa."

For example, those who fought for a democratic Zimbabwe, with thousands
paying the supreme price during the struggle, and forgave their oppressors
and torturers in a spirit of national reconciliation, have been turned into
repugnant enemies of democracy. Those who, in the interest of their "kith
and kin", did what they could to deny the people of Zimbabwe their liberty,
for as long as they could, have become the eminent defenders of the
democratic rights of the people of Zimbabwe.

WHO IS MBEKI TALKING ABOUT IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS WORLD IN ZIMBABWE? WHO ARE
THESE FORMER OPPRESSORS WHO ARE NOW EMINENT DEFENDERS OF THE RIGHTS OF THE
PEOPLE OF ZIMBABWE?

During the Abuja CHOGM, those accustomed to the practice of disinformation,
described as "spin", did everything to communicate false reports to the
media. They campaigned and lobbied to ensure the continued suspension of
Zimbabwe. We deliberately avoided engaging in any of these activities. We
fed no stories to the media. We did not campaign. We lobbied nobody. Yet
the story is put out that we lobbied, blocked agreements, and dismally
failed to achieve our objectives.

We are not, and should not be surprised at this kind of behaviour and the
turning of reality upside down on the part of those that Ngugi wa Thiongo
described as those "that still sit on the back of the continent." The
tragedy is that there are some among us, those that have the possibility to
occupy the media spaces, who claim that they are Africans, among them
intellectuals, "who now rationalise this upside-down way of looking at
Africa", according to which "the abnormal is viewed as normal and the
normal is viewed as abnormal".

In his book "Diplomacy", Dr Henry Kissinger discusses the place of the
issue of human rights in the East-West struggle during the Cold War. He
writes that:

"Reagan and his advisers invoked (human rights) to try to undermine the
Soviet system. To be sure, his immediate predecessors had also affirmed the
importance of human rights.Reagan and his advisers went a step further by
treating human rights as a tool for overthrowing communism and
democratising the Soviet Union.At Westminster in 1982, Reagan, hailing the
tide of democracy around the world, called on free nations 'to foster the
infrastructure of democracy, the system of a free press, unions, political
parties, universities, which allows a people to choose their own way, to
develop their own culture, to reconcile their own differences through
peaceful means'.America would not wait passively for free institutions to
evolve."

WHY DOES MBEKI QUOTE KISSINGER AND WHY SUCH A CYNICAL VIEW OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
OF COURSE REAGAN USED THE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES FOR HIS OWN ENDS. THIS IS NOT
REAGAN COUNTRY, NOT A REAGAN OR KISSINGER SITUATION.

In time, and in the interest of "kith and kin", the core of the challenge
facing the people of Zimbabwe, as identified by the Coolum CHOGM, has
disappeared from public view. Its place has been taken by the issue of
human rights. Those who have achieved this miracle are not waiting
passively for free institutions to evolve.

It is clear that some within Zimbabwe and elsewhere in the world, including
our country, are following the example set by "Reagan and his advisers", to
"treat human rights as a tool" for overthrowing the government of Zimbabwe
and rebuilding Zimbabwe as they wish. In modern parlance, this is called
regime change.

WHO IS HE TALKING ABOUT? AGAIN WHAT HAVE REAGAN AND KISSINGER GOT TO DO
WITH THE GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES TAKING PLACE EVERY DAY IN ZIMBABWE.

In its statement after the Abuja CHOGM, SADC and Uganda said: "We also wish
to express our displeasure and deep concern with the dismissive, intolerant
and rigid attitude displayed by some members of the Commonwealth during the
deliberations. The Commonwealth has always operated on the basis of
consensus. We fear that this attitude is destined to undermine the spirit
that makes the Commonwealth a unique family of nations. This development
does not augur well for the future of the Commonwealth."

PITY UGANDA ISN'T A DEMOCRACY.

But, once more, some Africans have turned things upside down. They argue
that, internationally, we face some trouble or other because we confirmed
positions at the Abuja CHOGM that we have explained before, publicly. They
will not say that the Commonwealth is faced with an impending crisis
because of the positions it took, which have very little to do with the
urgent task to encourage the entire political leadership of Zimbabwe to act
together to resolve the political, economic and social problems facing the
people of this sister country.

In its Report, having made its determination about the 2002 Zimbabwe
Presidential elections, the Commonwealth Observer Team said: "We call on
all Zimbabweans to put aside their differences and to work together for the
future of their country. We believe national reconciliation is a priority
and that the Commonwealth should assist in this process."

Our own Observer Mission said: "The Mission recommends an urgent programme
of political reconciliation and economic restructuring and transformation
that places the people and country of Zimbabwe first and transcends the
differences that were demonstrated in the election process."

This is also what the Heads of Government from Uganda and the SADC
countries said to their colleagues at the Abuja CHOGM, arguing that the
continued isolation of Zimbabwe would not facilitate the achievement of
this goal. Unfortunately, others had already made public statements that
one of the principal outcomes of this meeting would be, not a Commonwealth
commitment to this goal, but the continuing suspension of Zimbabwe from the
councils of the Commonwealth. For them, it was important that this
objective should be achieved, to maintain their credibility especially with
the media, whatever else was decided that might actually relate to the
future of the people of Zimbabwe.

WHAT HAS THE ZIMBABWE GOVT DONE TO DESERVE ITS REINSTATEMENT ? IT IS FAR
WORSE NOW THAN IT WAS IN COOLUM.

Many things have gone wrong in Zimbabwe leading, among other things, to a
high degree of polarisation in the country and a serious economic crisis.

Together with the rest of the SADC countries, we have discussed these
negative developments with the government and people of Zimbabwe, and will
continue to do so. At the same time, we have made a commitment to work with
the people of Zimbabwe, represented by both the ruling party and the
opposition, to arrive at the situation in which "all Zimbabweans put aside
their differences and work together for the future of their country".

Whatever happened at the Abuja CHOGM, and perhaps because of what happened
at the Abuja CHOGM, the outcome visualised by the Commonwealth and South
African Election Observers will be realised, regardless of the negative
speculations made by some that so-called quiet diplomacy has failed. This
outcome demands of us that, regardless of the fact that we are poor and
need the support of others richer than ourselves to overcome our problems,
we should always refuse to "rationalise the upside-down way of looking at
Africa."

MBEKI IGNORED THE MDC AND THE TRADE UNIONS AND CIVIL SOCIETY UNTIL SHORTLY
BEFORE BUSH'S VISIT. HIS HIGH COMMISSIONER FACILITATED INFORMAL
DISCUSSIONS, LASTING A FEW WEEKS BETWEEN TWO LAWYERS, ONE FROM MDC (NCUBE)
AND CHINAMASA (ZANU PF) OVER THE CONSTITUTION, WHICH CAME TO NO CONCLUSIONS
AND WHATEVER HAD BEEN AGREED WAS NEVER EVEN PRESENTED TO THE TWO
ORGANISATIONS NEC AND POLITBURO. APART FROM THAT NO TALKS, NOR TALKS ABOUT
TALKS ETC., EVEN THOUGH MBEKI TOLD FRANCE, GERMANY AND CANADA IN NOVEMBER
THE OPPOSITE, INCLUDING PRESENTING FICTION ABOUT SOME KIND OF GOVERNMENT OF
NATIONAL UNITY.

Our poverty and underdevelopment will never serve as reason for us to
abandon our dignity as human beings, turning ourselves into grateful and
subservient recipients of alms, happy to submit to a dismissive, intolerant
and rigid attitude of some in our country and the rest of the world,
towards what we believe and know is right, who are richer and more powerful
than we are.

Thabo Mbeki

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

2.  Legal Communiqué

Communiqué to farmers regarding SI273A of 2003

Farmers must not lose heart over the Presidential Powers acquisition of
farm equipment or material regulations.

There are various things that farmers need to insist upon and understand
before dealing with the situation.

Anybody approaching you to commandeer your equipment/fertiliser etc needs
to establish:

1. That the land is agricultural land.
2. That the land where your equipment/fertiliser etc has been legally
acquired under the land "reform" programme.
3. That your equipment/fertiliser etc is not being used by yourself or
anybody that you have allowed to use it.

As the owner you also need to establish that the person wishing to
commandeer your equipment/fertiliser etc:

· Is an employee of the public service.
· Has credentials to carry out a proper valuation.
· Has a certificate signed by the acquiring authority.
· Has given you seven day's notice of the intended acquisition.
· Gives you 14 days to contest the acquisition orders.
· Applies through the acquiring authority to the Administrative Court
within 30 days to confirm the acquisition order.

Please ensure that proper documentary evidence of the above is kept and
that should equipment be commandeered you take photographic evidence and
get proper descriptions (which are witnessed) of anything that might be
commandeered.

This is merely an attempt to legalise the looting currently taking place.
It is nothing new.  JAG is working on a constitutional challenge and needs
your financial assistance in challenging this draconian bit of legislation.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

JAG OPEN LETTER FORUM
Email: justice@telco.co.zw; justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Internet: www.justiceforagriculture.com

Please send any material for publication in the Open Letter Forum to
justice@telco.co.zw with "For Open Letter Forum" in the subject line.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 1: Thank God

Thank God for Desmond Tutu!!!

How badly we have needed an African of his moral stature to 'call it the
way it is' over the issues of terror, tyranny torture and the subversion of
law and government in Zimbabwe!

How dire has been the need for an African of his stature to express
incredulous disbelief towards the incomprehensible attitude of Thabo Mbeki
towards the repression of the Mugabe regime.

Hopefully, this statement will underline to the Americans and their Western
allies the fact that Thabo Mbeki is not and never can be a reliable or an
honest broker in the effort to restore democracy and human rights in
Zimbabwe.

Only a statement by Nelson Mandela himself could have carried more weight.

Let us pray that Desmond Tutu's fearless utterances will be a turning
point.

That they will help to align the forces needed to force change and to
restore Democracy to Zimbabwe.

Rob Gass

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 2: Kith and Kin

The letter by Eddie Cross of 15th December makes magnificent reading - the
Truth shines out of it like a beacon.

This letter has got to be seen internationally and particularly in South
Africa.  I do hope he will circularise it as widely as possible.

"There is none so blind as those that will not see" - and its time all this
racist bigotry was exposed for what it is, out right lies and an excuse to
be lawless and take what one has not worked for.

As a white African from pioneer stock - I am proud to be a child of Africa.
I respect my British ancestry but it stops there.  I have nothing in
common with them and feel totally alien to the people in UK.  This is my
home and my family and I will fight it out here until justice is done.

All the lies in the world cannot overthrow the power of Truth.

Lorna Begbie
17th December 03

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 3: Thank You

This is to thank all those who, in their many and various ways, have helped
to ensure that the Daily News situation, and through it the wider Zimbabwe
crisis, have been kept further up the political and media agenda than would
otherwise have been the case.

All at the Daily News are most encouraged by the determination of so many
around the world to keep up the pressure to ensure its return. Indeed, it
is only when the Daily News is back on the streets that Zimbabweans will
know that the minority regime is prepared to countenance a return to
democratic values, for which the Daily News has become the standard bearer.

So, while taking this opportunity to wish you the Compliments of the
Season, let us also resolve to maintain our efforts to keep 'telling it
like it is', so that sanity at last prevails.

Thank you.
Derek Smail

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 4:

Dear Jag,

I gather that the new legislation about what the state can or cannot
acquire is causing surprise. I cannot be surprised because Jag tried to
tell the CFU about the problem 18 months ago. At that stage it was not
serious because some 72% of their members were okay Jack.

This is the Third Chimurenga old boy.

One hundred and seven years ago fellow named Selous wrote about what is now
referred to as the First Chimurenga. I cannot comment if he was right or
wrong but it is one side of the Chimurenga history in print.

"...the various peoples known as Mashunas, whose principle characteristics
are avarice, cowardice, and a complete callousness to the sufferings of
others, will be inclined to doubt that they were governed by an angel from
heaven, they would infallibly kill that angel, if his wing feathers were of
any value to them, provided that they believed that at the same time that
the crime might be committed with impunity." - F. Selous - 1896.

The activities of the last four years need to be carefully analysed and
compared by the individual so that an independent opinion can be formed
that is totally unbiased towards the farmers that have been targeted by the
legislation, and the people who have enacted the legislation. That is not
to say that all farmers with land or equipment are feathered angels or not,
or that there are not a lot of nests that need feathering out there.

Not so feathered Angel.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 5: Zimbabwe Farm Equipment Up For Grabs

"A minority group of about 4,500 white farmers used to own a third of the
country's land, 70% of prime farm land before the government launched a
`fast track' land reform programme in February 2000".

As a white commercial farmer I am extremely perturbed that the statistics
of white owned farmland have been so readily accepted by journalists (and
your own premier), and have never been verified.  Whatever happened to
investigative journalism or journalistic integrity?

These are the facts, which if you take the trouble to, you can verify with
the Commercial Farmers' Union or JAG, or maybe the government census/deeds'
offices: -

Total land in Zimbabwe : 39 million hectares
State owned land : 27.6 million i.e.  70%
Private owned land : 11.2 million i.e.  29%
Commercial farm land : 8.6 million i.e.  22%

White commercial farmers owned 70% of the above 22% of commercial farmland,
this is where the mythical "whites own 70% of prime farmland" comes in - a
dangerous lie and a wonderful piece of propaganda bought by the world.
This untruth perpetuates the belief that the Zimbabwean problems are
racial, which suits some people to believe.  The well-managed 22% (not 70%)
grew the economy, which has now plummeted.

80% of farms owned in Zimbabwe were purchased after 1980 (Zimbabwe
Independence - April 18 1980), when the present government came in to
power, not `stolen' or given as gifts to returning WWII soldiers. (Maybe
you can verify this from the Deeds Office). Two of my neighbours bought
farms from the government with "letters of no interest".  The government
has now stolen these farms.  Land in this country has no value (for
compensation purposes) as we are told as it has been stolen, yet if there
is a farm property as the only asset bequeathed in a deceased estate,
estate duty is payable.  This you can verify from my own attorney!

At present the government is stealing not only farmland but also the
infrastructure, building equipment, implements, machinery, with no
compensation.

White Zimbabweans represent 0,5% of the population now.  The figure was
never more than 3% of the total population.  That equitable land reform
programmes were needed, was never disputed by white Zimbabweans.  These
programmes were promised by Mugabe in 1980 but only in 2000 when he saw
that he was losing popularity, was the `fast track' land reform
implemented.

However, for the minute minority of Zimbabwean whites (or should I say the
`kith and kin' of Tony Blair according to Thabo Mbeki) to be blamed for all
the ills of this country is ludicrous - what more can we be blamed for -
AIDS? Drought?  May we now also be called `the previously disadvantaged'
for at least a decade?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All letters published on the open Letter Forum are the views and opinions
of the submitters, and do not represent the official viewpoint of Justice
for Agriculture.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

JUSTICE FOR AGRICULTURE

JAG PRESS RELEASE STATEMENT - December 18, 2003

Email: justice@telco.co.zw; justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Internet: www.justiceforagriculture.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

JAG, as a signatory to the CRISIS Coalition Freedom Charter along with 350
other civic organisations, endorses the CRISIS Coalition press statement
applauding the Commonwealth as the only organisation that has censured
Zimbabwe for not standing by democratic principles.

JAG finds it incomprehensible and deeply disturbing that in the light of
continued non-observance of the UN Charter the UN sees fit to continue to
invite the regime and its leader to address its organs as though the UN
Charter is completely irrelevant.

JAG reminds the UN of what the regime that they continue to fail to censure
has perpetrated:

· The systematic murdering of 20,000 people or more in the 1980's.
· The systematic torture and/or arrest of anybody deemed to be opposed to
the regime.
· The violent and unlawful farm and company invasions.
· The continued enactment of some of the most repressive legislation in the
world.
· The subversion of the Zimbabwe Constitution, its judiciary, police force
and army.
· The persecution of anybody or organisation wishing to exercise
his/her/its right of free speech.
· The "training" and ideological brainwashing of our youth.
· The state sponsored electoral violence that has seen the Commonwealth,
the EU, the USA and the SADC parliamentarians fail to recognise the last
presidential election as democratic.
· The state sponsored looting of private property owned by Zimbabwean
citizens.

JAG also reminds the UN that due to the above factors:

· Zimbabwe now has the fastest shrinking economy in the world.
· Zimbabwe has the highest percentage of food insecurity and potentially
starving people anywhere in the world.
· Zimbabwe has the highest inflation rate in the world.
· Zimbabwe has more than 3.5 million of its 11.7 million population that
are outside its borders.
· Zimbabwe has a life expectancy that has reduced dramatically to 37 years
and falling.
· Zimbabwe has seen the decimation of more than half its wildlife in the
last 4 years.
· Zimbabwe has seen more than half a million people illegally and forcibly
evicted out of their homes over the last 4 years.

JAG asks the UN and its organs to reconsider its position in supporting the
destruction of Zimbabwe's people by its silence on the above and the
continued invitations to the Zimbabwe regime to contribute to its many
conferences

Back to the Top
Back to Index