http://www.dailynews.co.zw
By Xolisani Ncube, Staff
Writer
Saturday, 11 February 2012 14:16
HARARE - Coalition
government leaders have agreed to make fundamental
changes to the country’s
electoral laws following immense pressure from
civic organisations who argue
that a proposed polling station based voting
system will unnecessarily
expose voters to attacks.
President Robert Mugabe and his two coalition
government partners Prime
Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and his deputy Arthur
Mutambara agreed to drop a
proposed polling station based voter’s roll and
revert back to the ward
based voting system.
Announcing the changes
to journalists this week, Mutambara said the decision
to drop the proposals
was as a result of pressure from civic society
organisations who were
opposed to the system saying it exposes the
electorate to retribution and
intimidation.
“We have made a decision to drop that requirement in the
Electoral Bill. On
electoral reforms, we are no longer going to be pushing
for polling station
based voting, we are going back to the status quo which
was ward based
polling voting,” Mutambara said.
“We realised that it
puts voters at risk of retribution. So we have to find
means to counter
against double voting,” said Mutambara.
Mutambara said government leaders
agreed to ensure that the next elections
should not be
contestable.
During previous elections, ward based voter’s rolls were
used but many
people fled their homes after political rivals turned on them
for making a
particular voting choice.
According to human rights
groups and the mainstream MDC, more than 200
people were killed by suspected
Zanu PF supporters after Tsvangirai handed
Mugabe and his Zanu PF party
their first electoral defeat since independence
in 1980.
Government
through the minister of Justice Patrick Chinamasa, proposed to
change the
voting system and introduced ward based voters’ roll as a way of
dealing
with electoral fraud.
Rindai Chipfunde Vava, director of Zimbabwe
Election Support Network (Zesn)
said in as much as the proposed amendment
brings relief to voters, it still
falls short of expectations.
“We
cannot say this is best practise that we want, it is good for now due to
the
current political environment system that is volatile,” Chipfunde Vava
said.
“Other countries in the region are now using the polling based
voter’s roll
system because they have stable political environments and have
no reports
of intimidation and threats.”
She added, “As for now we
have to use this one (ward based voter’s roll) but
at a later stage, we
should revisit the practise so that we do the best for
democracy like other
countries such as Zambia.”
Jealousy Mawarire, director at Centre for
Elections and Democracy in
Southern Africa, said though the changes bring
some hope on voters,
political parties should ensure the safety of
electorates as well as the
results.
“We have to deal with those
people who were implicated in previous elections
so that we eliminate the
culture of intimidation and retribution in our
voter’s,” said
Mawarire.
“It does not matter whether we use ward based voter’s roll or
polling based
voters roll, what is important is that we deal with those
elements that
cause retribution and mayhem to voters.”
http://www.eyewitnessnews.co.za/
Eyewitness News | 10 Hour(s) Ago
The Harare Magistrates
Court has been shut down after five magistrates and
more than 20 other court
officials became ill with suspected typhoid.
Zimbabwe has been battling
an outbreak of the disease since November, but
until now infections were
confined to the western suburbs.
This is bad news for Harare as it means
typhoid has now hit the central
business district.
Saturday reports
say five magistrates and over 20 clerks were sent home with
suspected
typhoid.
The authorities had to shut down the court house as it had no
running water.
The court is near to the head office of President Robert
Mugabe’s Zanu-PF
and the main city library.
A health advisor in
Mugabe’s office warns that Zimbabwe’s filthy worn out
American dollar bills
may also be aiding the spread of typhoid.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com
10/02/2012 00:00:00
by
Staff Reporter
A LEADING constitutional lawyer says there is nothing
to stop President
Robert Mugabe renewing the contracts of the military and
police top brass.
Lovemore Madhuku, chairman of the National
Constitutional Assembly, says
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and his
deputy Arthur Mutambara negotiated
a flawed power sharing agreement which
left all executive authority at
Mugabe's discretion.
Tsvangirai and
Mutambara are fuming after Mugabe extended the term of Police
Commissioner
General Augustine Chihuri to 2014.
Mugabe’s announcement of the move came
a day after the MDC duo came out of a
meeting with the veteran leader and
told journalists that the police chief
was in the position in an acting
capacity while consultations continue.
Mugabe’s rivals are keen to see
the back of Chihuri, accusing him of
presiding over a partisan police force
and unprofessionalism.
But Madhuku says Tsvangirai and Mutambara are
seriously constrained by their
lack of authority on the matter.
"This is
what we have always seen with the inclusive government,” Madhuku
told the
Voice of America’s Studio 7 on Friday night.
“The reality is that power
resides with the President, but the other players
in the inclusive
government will always want to pretend that they also have
some power, some
responsibility, and this is what keeps creating this
circus.”
Tsvangirai’s spokesman, Luke Tamborinyoka, insisted on
Friday that Mugabe
had agreed in meetings with the Prime Minister on Monday
and Wednesday to
delay Chihuri’s appointment until further consultations had
been held.
“We refuse to be seduced into believing the position being
articulated by
Cde George Charamba [Mugabe’s spokesman] merely because it is
averse and
allergic to common sense; it is allergic to the constitution and
it is
allergic to the agreement by the principals themselves.”
He
described Mugabe’s decision to extend Chihuri’s term as mischievous and
called it a “technical coup”.
“I would assume that the principals will
put finality to this whole issue
when they meet again on Monday,”
Tamborinyoka added.
http://www.voanews.com
10 February
2012
The Treasury and
the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe this week changed pension and
pay dates for
civil servants to help banks mobilize cash and bolster
financial system
liquidity
Gibbs Dube | Washington
Zimbabweans are finding it
harder and harder to obtain cash from their
banking institutions - and banks
themselves are also feeling a severe
liquidity pinch.
Bankers and
economists said financial sector liquidity is constrained by the
failure of
many companies to service loans, the sluggish recovery and scant
investment.
At the same time, they said, four Zimbabwean banks are
holding US$450
million in offshore accounts to meet the cash obligations of
their clients.
The Treasury and the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe this week
changed pension and
pay dates for civil servants to help banks mobilize cash
and bolster
liquidity.
The Banking Association of Zimbabwe has
proposed that four banks with large
off-shore accounts should repatriate at
least US$200 million to address
money supply issues.
Banker Witness
Chinyama said the central bank has not provided enough cash.
"Companies
and individuals can only have confidence in the finance sector if
there is
some kind of support from the central bank," said Chinyama.
Economist
Tony Hawkins of the University of Zimbabwe Graduate School of
Business said
the repatriation of offshore funds will have little impact on
liquidity.
Finance Minister Tendai Biti said last December that more
than US$2 billion
is circulating outside the formal banking sector.
http://www.radiovop.com
MASVINGO,
February 11, 2012 – Teachers in most parts of Masvingo are living
in
perpetual fear following some death threats from Zanu PF’s Bikita
District
Coordinating Committee (DCC) chairman Saviour Masase’s ‘we will
kill’
message that he started to preach at rallies last week.
Masase who
started to threaten teachers at Muchakata business center last
week said
Zanu PF was prepared to kill all teachers who are ‘politically
incorrect’.
His threats came to remind teachers about War Veteran
leader Jabulani
Sibanda’s last year announcement that Zanu PF has names of
all teachers that
are not supporting the liberation party in
Masvingo.
Teachers in Masvingo said they were not taking the threats
lightly since
most of their members were killed in the bloody campaign of
2008 elections.
“We have seen our colleagues being murdered by Zanu PF
thugs in cold blood
during previous elections. We are living in fear – each
time we hear about
elections we start to fear for our lives,” said one of
the teachers who
preferred anonymity for fear of
victimisation.
Progressive Teachers Union Zimbabwe (PTUZ) has condemned
in strongest terms
the threats by Zanu PF saying they were going to do all
it takes to stop the
victimisation of teachers.
PTUZ Secretary
General Raymond Majongwe said it was unfortunate that some
ambitious
politicians were trying to use uncouth methods in order to be
promoted.
“It is unfortunate that some rogue politicians are
victimising teachers in
order to gain mileage or promotion in their
parties,” said Majongwe.
Masase could not be reached for comment but Zanu
PF provincial chairman
Lovemore Matuke said he was not aware of the alleged
threats.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
By Lloyd Mbiba, Staff Writer
Saturday, 11 February 2012 12:37
HARARE - A Nigerian dealer has sensationally claimed that he
cannot be
deported because he has over the years assisted police, prison
services and
Zanu PF with “donations” in cash and kind, court papers
reveal.
Court papers produced in the High Court show that police,
prisons and Zanu
PF officials have solicited for cash and various items
including tissue
rolls, computers, printers, hair salon equipment,
stationery and cash for
Christmas parties.
The Nigerian, who is
chairman of the Nigerians in Zimbabwe Association (NIZ)
claims that Nigerian
dealers, most of whom run shops in Harare, regularly
give donations to the
organisations, effectively arguing that these were
“protection fees” to
avoid deportation.
The court case effectively exposes the organisations
of their links with
some unscrupulous Nigerian dealers masquerading as
businessman who
reportedly do not have adequate documentation to work in
Zimbabwe.
The controversial dealings between the police and the
Nigerians, Zanu PF and
Zimbabwe Prison Services (ZPS) when NIZ chairman
Felix Emeka Emewusim placed
before the High Court, letters from the police,
prisons and Zanu PF asking
for donations as an attempt to block his
deportation.
Emeka, who founded the NIZ to safeguard the interest of
Nigerians in the
country, faces deportation after his wife, a Zimbabwean,
exposed him as a
fugitive wanted in his native Nigeria and living in
Zimbabwe illegally.
NIZ is a trust formed to safeguard financial,
material and other interests
of the Nigerians in Zimbabwe, to advance and
promote the rights of Nigerians
to live in Zimbabwe without fear or
victimisation from the law enforcement
agents.
The soliciting was
done between 2009 and 2010.
Emeka filed an urgent High Court chamber
application to stop the Police,
prisons, Zanu PF receiving gifts from
Nigerians deportation and the matter
is before Justice Tendayi
Uchena.
A letter written by the police on June 11, 2010 and signed by one
Inspector
Marange, informed the Nigerians that the law enforcement agency
was opening
a salon and a barber shop in Harare to compliment the police
provincial
fund.
“Zimbabwe Republic Police Harare Province will be
introducing a hair salon
and barber shop at Harare Central Police Station.
We are now appealing for
donations from you in cash or kind as for the
project to kick start. Items
required to start the project are attached,”
reads the letter from the
police.
Attached to the letter was a list
of 60 items needed for the two initiatives
to be launched.
These
included hair chemicals, cosmetics, braids, television set and
chairs.
The police again wrote a letter to the Nigerians on 30 June, 2010
acknowledging receipt of a computer, printer and hair salon
equipment.
In another letter written in November 2010, the police said:
“The district
is holding its end of year Christmas party on the 11th
December 2010… Over
the years, the occasion has been a success through your
support either in
cash or kind. We are hopeful that through your usual
support, we are going
to have a successful gathering. The party will be held
at Rainbow Towers and
your invitations are to follow."
“The police
call upon the Nigerians to donate in cash or kind for the
project to
kick-start,” wrote the police in a letter signed by chief
superintendent,
Gwangwava.
Zanu PF on October 29, 2009 also appealed for donations from
Emeka to fund
their programmes.
“Once again the Zanu PF party is
calling on you its friend and well-wisher
to give generously towards the
funding of programmes to be undertaken during
this year 2009. We count on
your organisation to donate generously.
“The party will hold one main
congress and other several constitutional
meetings which include politburo,
Central committee, National Consultative
Assembly, Youth and women’s
Executive and National Assembly meetings. Your
donation towards these
programmes will be greatly appreciated,” read a
letter written by the late
Zanu PF secretary for finance David Karimanzira.
The ZPS also
acknowledged receipt of donations from the Nigerians in 2009.
“On behalf
of the commissioner of prisons, officer commanding the region
headquarters
staff we wish to express our profound gratitude for your
unwavering support
to our station."
“We acknowledge receiving 576 rolls of tissues valued as
US $140.00…….Hope
you support us in the future,” the ZPS letter to the
Nigerians read.
A shadowy journalists group calling itself the African
Media on Economic
Development Trust (Amed) also wrote to the Nigerian on
July 19, 2010 asking
for $6 300 to travel to a conference in
India.
Emeka is currently appealing against the state order to deport him
for
staying in the country illegally.
His Zimbabwean wife Edina
Mutembwa says her former husband is a fraudster
who was already married in
Nigeria and is a fugitive from justice.
However, Emeka dismisses these
claims and says he has been legally married
to Mutembwa since 2005.
http://www.radiovop.com/
Bulawayo, February 11, 2012---There is outcry in
Mberengwa after villagers
were forced to pay US$10 each for the
electrification of their traditional
chief’s homestead.
Villagers of
Mataruse area under Chief John Bhera-Mataruse a known Zanu PF
activist, were
last week ordered by a group of war veterans led by Tavona
Chigwengwenene
to pay US$10 each for the electrification of chief’s
homestead near
Mbirashava primary school.
Edius Moyo the former MDC -T chairman for
Mberengwa district confirmed the
incident to the Radio VOP on Thursday
saying Chigwengwenene called for a
meeting at Ruvuraugwi Primary school in
Mataruse area on Wednesday and asked
villagers to contribute
US$10.
“People were ordered to make contributions to the chief as he is
planning to
electrify his homestead. Chigwengwenene and his group are
collecting the
US$10 from each household on the chief's behalf,” said
Moyo.
Moyo added: “This is not acceptable, actually they have taken it
too far
because it’s not our job to fund the electrification of the chief’s
homestead, he should find his own source of funding instead of fleecing
innocent citizens”.
Mberengwa has been a Zanu (PF) stronghold since
independence, the party’s
militias and war veterans have been mostly
terrorising opposition supporters
in the past few years.
Last year
another group of war veterans and Zanu (PF) youths led by Sayinai
Madhaka
declared war against MDC supporters in Mberengwa district, saying
their
party should start setting up a refugee camp as they will be all
forced to
flee.
Early last year a group of war veterans were arrested after
disrupting a
constitutional parliamentary committee consultative meeting on
the new
constitution held at Vutsanana Secondary School in the same
district.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
By Own Correspondent
Saturday, 11 February
2012 14:06
HARARE - A High Court judge yesterday granted incarcerated
mainstream MDC
youth league president Solomon Madzore leave to appeal to the
Supreme Court
for his release on bail.
After numerous postponements
and denials of bail by several courts, Justice
Hlekani Molly Mwayera with
the consent of the state, granted Madzore the
right to appeal to the highest
court in the land for his freedom.
His lawyer Gift Mtisi of Mtisi
Musendekwa legal practitioners told the Daily
News that he was happy with
the outcome of the application.
“We are naturally elated and very
positive about our prospects that a
different judge would probably grant the
applicants their freedom.
“Other detainees and some among the accused
have been granted either bail or
leave to appeal so the state is not blind
to the environment and events that
are taking place around it hence their
concession, it was the state that
consented first and the judge granted,”
Mtisi said.
He added that the ruling came as a relief.
“This is a
breath of fresh air and our chances are good, we are ready and
are likely to
lodge our papers as early as Monday next week,” Mtisi said.
Prosecutor
Edmore Nyazamba appeared for the state.
In the bail application, Mtisi
argued that his client deserved to be granted
bail because the police had
been given enough time to complete their
investigations.
Madzore is
charged together with 27 other MDC activists of murdering police
inspector
Petros Mutedza in Glen View last year.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw/
By Chris Goko and Gift Phiri
Saturday, 11 February 2012
14:07
HARARE - Ex-South African leader Thabo Mbeki’s government was
so frustrated
with President Robert Mugabe that it reportedly considered
ditching him
prior to the 2008 harmonised elections, excerpts from a
confidential memo on
Zimbabwe show.
In its bid to contain the
country’s never-ending problems, the then Pretoria
administration set up a
task-force led by Sydney Mufamadi, former
presidential chief of staff Frank
Chikane and Mojanku Gumbi to engage
Zimbabwe’s political protagonists on
various topics, and scenarios,
including the formation of a coalition
government.
“South African government (SAG) has come to the conclusion
that RGM (Robert
Gabriel Mugabe) never meant to keep any of the promises
made to SAG,” read
the paper from one of the key meetings between Welshman
Ncube’s Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) faction and Mbeki’s
aides.
“This was seen as the highest level of abuse of the person and
office of the
presidency, as commitments made at such levels though not
written should
form a binding undertaking/decorum accorded to heads of
state,” it said,
adding there was widespread belief in South Africa (SA)
that Mugabe had
“deliberately led Mbeki along the garden path”.
“TM
(Thabo Mbeki) has been abused by RGM who has played him a fool in this
regard,” the paper noted.
While the explosive observations reflect
Mbeki and the South African
government’s exasperation with Mugabe’s
intransigence, analysts say this was
a long and widely-held view of the
regime north of the Limpopo, hence a
different mediation effort or approach
by President Jacob Zuma’s new
government.
The South African-initiated
dialogue was taking place after Mugabe was
attempting to push for fresh
elections even before the finalisation of the
Kariba draft constitution,
which the three main political parties had agreed
to put in
place.
Although Ncube acknowledged holding several consultative meetings
with the
South African delegation prior to 2008, he said he could not recall
any
meeting in which the late deputy Foreign Affairs minister Aziz Pahad was
in
attendance as the paper alleges.
“We had dozens of meetings with
the trio (Mufamadi, Chikane, Gumbi) and not
Pahad (and) we did touch on
literally everything under the sun concerning
Zimbabwe and the obtaining
situation then,” Ncube told Weekend Post on
Wednesday.
“We held
dozens of meetings, but they refrained from talking about Zanu PF
or the
MDC-T and which is why I am saying if it was a record of their own
meetings... I would say it’s possible,” he said of the alleged minutes of
the meeting he is supposed to have attended along party secretary-general
Priscilla Misihairabwi-Mushonga and Moses Mzila-Ndlovu.
The meetings
were also allegedly attended by the Zimbabwe Institute of Isaac
Maposa and
Nozipho Ndebele — facilitators of the ongoing dialogue, which
eventually led
to the signing of the Global Political Agreement.
Asked if he believed
the then Pretoria administration and its advisors held
views contrary to
Mbeki’s stated quiet diplomacy or “softly-softly”
approach, Ncube said:
“It’s quite possible that in their own discussions
they could have expressed
that view, but they never expressed it to us.”
According to the record on
motivating factors for the dialogue, Pahad
wandered loudly if it was time to
use the “trump card” and change policy on
Zimbabwe.
“This would be a
last ditch approach, and if it fails close shop on
Zimbabwe. Stop providing
a buffer or protective shield of the Harare
regime,” it said.
The
paper also allegedly shows the parties discussing — in detail — Zimbabwe’s
fast-deteriorating socio-political environment, including Zanu PF divisions,
which had taken some “military overtones and capability that has dangerous
implications.”
“This presents the stakeholders with an opportunity to
re-craft the
framework around elections and the constitution,” it
said.
In the meetings, Mbeki’s officials said Zimbabwe desperately needed
a way
out, but Mugabe’s Zanu PF was in denial as it failed to accept that
there
was a crisis.
“SAG wondered if the Zimbabwe government was
ready to be helped and whether
Zanu PF leadership was prepared to do
something to get a solution,” the
minutes say.
“SAG felt that
whatever action taken needs to be strategic and not one that
is likely to
worsen the situation. SA needs to be strategic.
“Zimbabweans need to
assist SA by working on Sadc/AU. These bodies need to
be convinced that they
need to act on Zim.” The SA government emphasised
that a timely intervention
was critical but needed to be informed by a
proper analysis of the balance
of forces in Zimbabwe.
The meeting discussed Zanu PF succession, with the
SA government officials
keen to assess Joice Mujuru’s capabilities to
succeed Mugabe in Zanu PF.
“Mujuru seen as brave and with military
support but nor wise,” the
confidential minutes say.
“Mujuru never
had the numbers to beat the Mnangagwa camp at the last
congress. If anything
they had three provinces against Mnangagwa’s seven.
RGM had to step in and
campaign for Mujuru and endorse her candidature
against
Mnangagwa.”
The SA delegation emphasised that whatever it does, “there is
need to ensure
that a positive outcome occurs,” the minutes say.
The
SA government officials also expressed worry about the MDC-T policy, and
wanted the UK government to take sides with SA on the Zimbabwe
situation.
“Need to bring MT (Morgan Tsvangirai) group into the dialogue
process with
SA to avoid problems in the future with MT,” the minutes
say.
Mufamadi is reported to have told the meeting that there was
“overwhelming
demand for change in Zimbabwe.”
“RGM’s political
capital is all but finished,” the minutes say.
The balance of opinion in
Zimbabwe is that there is need for change.
Ever since Zuma took over the
mediation effort in Zimbabwe, there has been a
marked shift in Pretoria’s
policy towards Zimbabwe. — Weekend Post
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/
MISA-Zimbabwe welcomes the
inclusion of media freedom and the right to
access to information as
captured in the first constitutional draft
published in The Herald on 9
February 2012. Chapter 4 of the draft outlines
the declaration of rights
which includes freedom of expression and the media
as stated
below:
11.02.1212:13pm
by MISA
4.11 Freedom of Expression and
Freedom of the media
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression,
which includes –
a) Freedom to seek receive and communicate ideas and
other information
regardless of frontiers;
b) Freedom of artistic
expression and scientific research and creativity;
and
c) Freedom of
the press and other media communication
2. Freedom of the press and other
media of communication includes protection
of the confidentiality of
journalists’ sources of information
3. The state shall not –
a)
Exercise control over or interfere with anyone engaged in broadcasting,
the
production or circulation of any publication or dissemination of
information
by any medium; or
b) Penalise anyone for any opinion or view or content
of any broadcast,
publication or dissemination
4. Broadcasting and
other electronic media of communication have freedom to
establishment,
subject only to licensing procedures that –
a) Are necessary to regulate
airwaves and other forms of signal
distribution; and
b) Are
independent of control by government or by political or commercial
interests.
5. All state media of communication shall –
a) Be
free to determine independently the editorial content of their
broadcasts or
other communication
b) Be impartial; and
c) Afford fair
opportunity for presentation of divergent views and
dissenting
opinions
6. Freedom of expression does not include-
a) Incitement
to violence; or
b) Advocacy of hatred which is based on nationality,
race, colour, tribe,
birth, or place of birth, ethnic or social origin,
language, class,
religious belief, political or other opinion, custom,
culture, sex, gender,
marital status, age, disability or natural difference
or condition, and
which amounts to discrimination or hostility
4.12
Access to information
1. Everyone, including the press and other media of
communication, has the
right to access to-
a) Any information held by
the state; and
b) Information held by anyone else in so far as that
information is required
for the exercise or protection of any person’s
rights under this
constitution or any other law.
MISA-Zimbabwe
position
MISA-Zimbabwe is encouraged by this paradigm shift in the
proposed draft
constitution as it explicitly guarantees not only media
freedom and access
to information, but also protects journalists and their
sources of
information. The draft Bill of Rights captures the requisite
ingredients
necessary for the flourishing of independent, diverse and
pluralistic media.
This is a vast improvement compared with the current
constitution which does
not explicitly provide for freedom of the media and
access to information.
However, section 13.15, which provides for the
establishment of the Media
Commission posits contradictions to the spirit
and letter of media freedom
and access to information.
The
commission, for example, retains the powers to “take disciplinary action
against journalists and other persons employed in the press news media or
broadcasting who are found to have breached the law or any code of conduct
applicable to them.” In a democracy, the duty of a media regulator is not to
‘discipline’ journalists or media houses but to secure an environment that
promotes free media activity.
In addition, the section also seeks to
entrench statutory regulation while
at the same time recognising the need
for self-regulation. The Commission,
itself a statutory body, is given the
powers to “encourage self-regulation
of the press and other media
communication, in preference to control by the
state or any agency of the
state.” This leaves the principle of
self-regulation at the discretion of
the Commission instead of guaranteeing
it as a fundamental ingredient for
nurturing media freedom as stipulated by
the Banjul Declaration on the
Principles of Freedom of Expression in Africa
and other regional and
international instruments on freedom of expression.
Therefore it will be
highly commendable for the provision of self regulation
to be captured under
the Bill of Rights rather than as a privilege of the
commission as is
provided for under the draft constitution.
In our humble opinion, the
state has no business regulating the print media.
The best practice in the
region and the world over is that the media have
professional mechanisms of
regulating themselves. If the media commission is
to be established, then it
should be for the sole purpose of regulating the
broadcasting sector’s
finite frequency spectrum.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com/
10/02/2012 00:00:00
by Sports
Reporter
SPORTS Minister David Coltart has launched an astonishing
attack on Zimbabwe
Cricket after a shocking display by the cricket team
during the just-ended
tour of New Zealand.
In an amazing Twitter
rant, Coltart accused Zimbabwe Cricket of failing to
get its priorities
right, but reserved most of his invective for the panel
of selectors chaired
by Givemore Makoni.
Zimbabwe’s performance on the tour had been
“disgraceful”, Coltart added in
a series of tweets after Zimbabwe’s 202-run
defeat by the Black Cats in
their third One Day International match on
Thursday.
New Zealand swept the ODI series 3-0 after winning the first two
test
matches by 90 and 141 runs respectively.
Last month, Zimbabwe
slumped to an innings and 301-run defeat in a one-off
Test as the hosts made
them pay for loose bowling and shoddy fielding.
“National pride is at
stake, this disgraceful performance was a combination
of poor selection and
wrong priorities. I feel for [Brendan] Taylor who
tried,” Coltart
said.
“There is a need for a serious rethink in Zimbabwe Cricket. Ten
support
staff in New Zealand including two managers meant that specialist
players
were left in Zimbabwe.
“It’s top heavy. One of my broad
political philosophies is a belief in small
government and the same applies
to administration of sports teams.”
Coltart, a huge cricket fan,
questioned the non-selection of top order
batsman Vusi Sibanda, who was
overlooked because he had elected to play in
Australia instead of signing
for a local franchise.
As Zimbabwe were suffering punishing defeats in
New Zealand, Sibanda was
back from his Australian jaunt, leading Mid West
Rhinos to impressive
victories in the Coca-Cola Pro50
Championship.
“I really question the team selection,” Coltart went on.
“Vusi's
non-inclusion; and how could Shingi [Shingirai Masakadza] be left
out after
superb performances in the first two ODIs?
“Meanwhile, back
at the ranch Vusi Sibanda and Gary Ballance on 140 and 115
not out speak
with their bats. Imagine if they had been playing today!”
South Africa are
the next team to tour New Zealand and the local media have
been contemptuous
of the departing Zimbabweans.
“Farewell dreadful Zimbabwe, now for a real
challenge,” said a headline in
the New Zealand Herald.
Columnist Adam
Parore twisted the knife: “The less said about Zimbabwe the
better, although
I can't let their dreadful tour end without a few comments.
“They are the
worst side to tour this country, below even the poor
Bangladesh outfits of
the past five years. A lot of what we saw was no
better than club
cricket.
“Thankfully, there is something special to look forward to with
the South
Africans arriving over the weekend. Their tour should provide
plenty of
terrific contests - the mainly drab Zimbabwe disaster can be
quickly
forgotten.”
Parore cited Zimbabwe’s “substandard fielding” as
the genesis of their
problems, adding: “This is the one area of the game
where teams are in total
control of their own standards and not affected by
the quality of
opposition.”
A Zimbabwe Cricket spokesman said: "The
minister, like all cricket fans, is
rightly concerned by our poor showing
and is within his rights to call it as
he sees it.
"We have a job of
creating the right environment for our cricket team to be
able to complete,
and we are disappointed these efforts are not always
reflected in
performances.
"We don't take such setbacks as the disappointing defeat to
New Zealand
lightly, and we will take the advice and criticism of all
cricket lovers
onboard as we prepare the team for the next assignment."
http://nehandaradio.com/
February 11, 2012 12:08
am
By Pedzisai Ruhanya
The administration of elections,
their context as well as the content under
which they take place have been
contested issues in post-Independent
Zimbabwe and so are some of the
individuals managing the elections.
In any
critical political transition relative to the management of credible
elections it is important to address both the institutional and personnel
inadequacies of the systems governing the process. Elections in Zimbabwe
should not be reduced to a simple issue of “free and fair” because this does
not do justice to the process which is far more complex than
that.
The Commonwealth has argued phraseology such as “free and fair” or
“representing the will of the people” has largely been abandoned by
international election observers over the past decade. Instead, they call
elections either “credible” or “not credible”.
It is in this context
that I seek to interrogate the credibility or
otherwise of Zimbabwe’s
electoral institutions and the personnel involved.
It is the constitutional
responsibility of any citizen to scrutinise
democratic processes with
credible arguments and evidence as long as it does
not border on slander
against public officials responsible for running
public
institutions.
In this regard, the personnel of the Zimbabwe Election
Commission (ZEC) and
the Registrar-General’s office should be subjected to
public scrutiny with a
view to increasing public accountability and
transparency in the political
systems relative to the administration of
elections.
These two institutions and the individuals running them have
been part of
the crisis the country is faced with, not forgetting the
political players,
the repressive or coercive apparatus and other
institutions such as the
media, churches, compromised and “Zanufied”
intellectuals and the arts
sector.
I will concentrate on the ZEC, the
Registrar-General’s Office and the women
and men who make these institutions
fail the nation. Joyce Kazembe has been
with the ZEC since its predecessor
the Electoral Supervisory Commission
(ESC) as its vice-chairperson. She has
been with the electoral management
body since 1996, which makes 16 years
now.
This means Kazembe was involved in the 1996 presidential run-off in
which
President Robert Mugabe contested alone after the late nationalist
Ndabaningi Sithole pulled out alleging electoral malpractices.
Registrar-General Tobaiwa Mudede was also part of the electoral team as the
Registrar of elections.
Tobaiwa Mudede
Kazembe was also part
of the 2000, 2002, 2005 and the 2008 violent and
hotly-disputed presidential
election run-off deemed not credible by
Zimbabweans, the Southern African
Development Community (Sadc) and the
African Union (AU), leading to the
signing of the Global Political Agreement
(GPA) in September 2008, and
consequently the consummation of the inclusive
government in February
2009.
During the 2008 election, Kazembe was vice-chairperson of the ZEC,
deputising retired Brigadier-General George Chiweshe, now High Court Judge
President. Chiweshe got promoted to the current post after running the sham
June 2008 poll.
These are the five elections Kazembe was involved in.
It is crucial to note
that in two of the presidential elections, Mugabe was
a lone contestant in
1996 and June 2008. Kazembe and her colleagues did not
see anything untoward
about such processes and they declared Mugabe the
winner.
In the 2002 and 2005 elections Major-General Douglas Nyikayaramba
— recently
promoted by Mugabe — was the ESC chief elections officer.
Kazembe was
deputy chair to Sobusa Gula-Ndebele.
It was during that
period that Nyikayaramba allegedly recruited intelligence
officers, soldiers
and Zanu PF activists into the secretariat of the then
ESC, now ZEC. Kazembe
and Gula-Ndebele did not raise issue with a serving
army general running an
election in which his commander-in-chief, Mugabe,
was a candidate. How bad
can things get?
The 2002 presidential election process and outcome was
disputed on account
of violence, intimidation and political murders as well
as the involvement
of the security apparatus outside the provisions of the
Defence Act and the
Electoral Act. It was a controversial victory for Mugabe
that Kazembe and
her colleagues presided over and declared “free and
fair”.
So why should the public trust people like Kazembe with running
elections
again given their appalling record? What further boggles the mind
are purely
arrogant and misguided outbursts by Kazembe that the ZEC
secretariat is
professional and her claims there is no infiltration by the
security forces.
Such kind of arrogance is deplorable.
Let us take a
look back at how the ZEC administered the March 2008
elections including
the sham June presidential poll run-off. Kazembe was at
the time deputy to
Chiweshe.
The June 2008 run-off was marked by just about everything the
Electoral Act
forbids; political violence, abductions, enforced
disappearances, arson and
killings. Before that there were suspicious and
alarming delays in releasing
the results of the first round of the
presidential election.
The ZEC, under Chiweshe and Kazembe, did not see
anything wrong with all
this. It took the majority of political players,
ordinary citizens, Sadc and
the AU to say the run-off was not credible and
thus Mugabe’s “victory” was a
sham. The point is that Zimbabweans are not
fools; they are not ahistorical,
they know their electoral history and those
who are part and parcel of the
problem.
It is not only ZEC staff that
cannot administer credible elections but some
of the commissioners like
Kazembe who should be stopped from running
elections not only because we
have hard evidence of past incompetence and
malpractices, but also current
inadequacies.
Kazembe should tell Zimbabweans why they endorsed
discredited electoral
outcomes as credible. Is she not bothered her name is
now associated with
disputed election results? Has she not had enough of the
job having been
there for more than a decade now?
These same
questions should be asked of Tobaiwa Mudede, the
Registrar-General who has
been in his post for a longer period.
Apart from the 1980 elections,
Mudede has been involved in the
administration of polls since 1985 which
took place amid the Gukurahundi
massacres. How can an election that takes
place under circumstances of
genocide and crimes against humanity be deemed
credible? The 1985 election
was the worst so far, followed by the June 2008
run-off.
It is vital that when Zimbabweans, especially political players,
human
rights and political activists talk about the need for credible
elections
they not only focus on the ZEC. Focusing on the ZEC while leaving
out
critical players is not helpful and would not assist the country secure
necessary reforms and democratise our electoral institutions.
When
dealing with political transitions, it is important to learn something
from
the theory of elite continuity so that there are no face powder changes
that
fail to produce desired institutional renewal.
As reforms take place at
the institutional level, it is also imperative to
make sure that the elites
that preside over repression and electoral
malpractices also pack their bags
if they are not willing to reform and
adopt a new political culture of
transparency and democratic accountability.
The elite continuity theory
postulates that in most transitions, there are
considerable continuities in
both institutions and personalities between the
old regime and the new
establishment.
In the case of the media, the institutions that emerged
after the fall of a
prior regime are controlled and influenced by the new
political elite. There
is a high degree of continuity in structures and
personnel, political
interference into broadcasting and a partisan
state-controlled press, just
as is the case at the ZEC.
Zanu PF, like
the Rhodesian Front, has staffed institutions such as
state-controlled ZBC
and Zimpapers with party surrogates who sing for their
supper and do hatchet
jobs for their incompetent and illegitimate political
handlers. The party
workers in these institutions and their ideologues who
masquerade as
commentators in newspapers, radio and television are part of
this
well-orchestrated process to control and run state institutions in
service
of these elites.
These continuities also replicate themselves at the ZEC
and the
Registrar-General’s office. This is all designed to ensure Zanu PF
elites
continue to cling to power by brute force. These and others are
well-crafted
and thought out processes by Zanu PF to entrench itself in
power without the
democratic consent of the people of
Zimbabwe.
Ruhanya is a PhD candidate in Media and Democracy at the
University of
Westminster, London.
http://www.cathybuckle.com/
February 11, 2012, 7:26 pm
Dear Family and
Friends.
It’s mango time in Zimbabwe. Small, sweet, sticky orange mangoes
whose
string gets caught in your teeth; these are the mangoes we used to
play with
as kids, washing them when the pulp was finished, combing the
string into
hair and then drawing a face on the hard oval pip. Then there
are the big
kidney shaped mangoes which you really need to eat outside or
sitting in a
bath because it’s impossible not to end up with juice running
down your chin
and dripping all over your shirt. In recent years the big
red ball mangoes
have been added to the juicy tropical extravaganza.
Weighing almost a
kilogram each they are stringless with very sweet, firm,
orange flesh. The
problem is you know they are stolen.
Buying these
huge ball mangoes on the side of the road at one US dollar
apiece, it’s hard
to put out of your mind the knowledge that they have come
from a farm that
was violently seized two years ago from its owners and for
which no
compensation was paid. You know you are eating stolen fruit and by
doing so
it’s a bit like being an accomplice to a crime. This is one of the
thousands
of things that sit on our consciences every day and weigh the
country down
with a huge burden of guilt, like a sin that needs to be
confessed and
absolution given.
The ball mangoes will inevitably follow the same route
as the apples, plums,
pears, litchis, peaches and nuts before them. Every
year the harvest will
get less and less as the men who grabbed the farm and
reaped what they did
not sow, will be unwilling or unable to water, prune,
fertilize and control
diseases on the vast orchards they
seized.
Nowhere is there a more graphic demonstration of the national
shame we
carry around than in our supermarkets. Going shopping in Zimbabwe
with a
notebook tells the most shocking story of where we are in terms of
producing
our own food eleven years after Zanu PF’s land seizures.
In
the cereals aisle of my local supermarket there were fifteen varieties,
only
two were made in Zimbabwe and both were more expensive than their
imported
South African counterparts sitting on the shelves alongside them.
There were
eight different makes of jam on display, two were Zimbabwean,
four South
African, one made in Spain and one from Cyprus. There were ten
makes of
pasta on sale, all but one were from South Africa. Of the eight
different
brands of coffee on the shelf not a single one was Zimbabwean.
There were
thirty two varieties of sweet biscuits on sale, four were
Zimbabwean, twenty
five South African and three from Greece. There was no
fresh Zimbabwean
milk or cream to buy. Flour and maize meal was all in local
packaging but if
anyone is any doubt about where the vast majority of the
contents originated
they need look no further than the ceaseless stream
trains and trucks coming
over our borders.
In the last few weeks more and more alarming statistics
have been released
about this year’s expected national harvest. Plantings of
all the major
crops are down by between thirty and fifty percent. The
President of the
ZCFU, Donald Khumalo said we could expect to see a deficit
of one and a half
million tonnes of maize this harvest. Shamefully Zimbabwe
is expected to
have only produced enough food for one quarter of the
population. Mr
Khumalo said “we have basically lost direction as a
country.” His
counterpart in the CFU, Charles Taffs said the country should
brace for a
big disaster.
Already we are preparing for the propaganda
and the blame game, despite the
fact that since November the farming unions
and experts have been warning
that there just wasn’t enough planting and
farming being done on all those
millions of seized hectares. This is the new
Zimbabwean disease: sitting
waiting for free ploughing, fuel, seed,
fertilizer, tractors, boreholes,
irrigation equipment and even
harvesters.
Eleven years after land was forcibly seized from white
Zimbabweans without
compensation and given to black Zimbabweans but without
Title Deeds, the
result is sitting on our supermarket shelves. Until next
time, thanks for
reading, love cathy
http://www.cathybuckle.com
February 10, 2012, 3:02 pm
It’s one of those nightmare
scenarios that wakes you up in a cold sweat: the
banks have run out of
money. Up until the moment you presented your cash
cheque over the counter
or inserted your card into the machine, all was
well. Then comes the crunch,
the bank has no money!
As I write those words I am immediately
transported back to the bank in my
‘hometown’ in Zimbabwe. That’s where I
was when the last cash crisis hit the
banks. The currency was Zim dollars in
those days – just 8 years ago – but
now it’s $ US and those precious dollars
are in short supply. I’m no
economist but like most people I can grasp the
hard reality of cash in my
pocket. $577 is the calculated minimum monthly
income for a family of five
and inflation is 5.7%. Those are the facts but
however high your salary or
healthy your bank balance, the truth is: you
need cash to survive. The news
that some banks in Harare have run out of $
US must have sent cold shivers
down the spines of many Zimbabweans. We have
seen hundreds of desperate
customers queuing outside banks in Harare before.
But the world has changed
since the last cash crisis in Zimbabwe. The
western world – even the mighty
US - has slid into economic recession. Only
China and the Far East have
remained relatively immune to the economic
collapse but is China likely to
bail out their old friend Mugabe? It seems
unlikely.
Meanwhile, our near-neighbour, Mozambique has prospered over
the years but
their success does not mean they can afford to ignore unpaid
debts and this
week they threatened to cut off Zimbabwe’s power if their
debts are not
paid. In my old ‘hometown’ the power situation is already
desperate with
daily power cuts for hours at a time. Without electricity
there is no power
to operate water pumps and the danger of water-borne
diseases only adds to
the general misery. It is calculated that it would
take $ 1.4 billion to
replace Harare’s antique water system No student
grants have been released
for this academic year and we learned this week
that the government needs
$62 million to pay students’ loans and grants.
Nurses have just rejected a
22.5% pay rise thus adding to the growing number
of desperately dissatisfied
workers and increasing the possibility of
industrial action and civil
unrest.
Against this background, diamond
wealth will surely rescue the country from
economic collapse? The Marange
diamond fields are among the biggest in the
world and diamond auctions are a
fairly regular occurrence; this week it was
1.5 million carats of the
precious stones up for auction with each carat
worth $ 40 – cheap at the
price apparently! Zimbabweans are entitled to ask
where all that diamond
revenue is going? And if it isn’t going into
government coffers then whose
pockets is it lining? This Friday comes the
news that civil servants’ pay
day has been postponed for five days because
of the shortage of cash.
Foreign-owned banks in Zimbabwe have been urged to
bring in $200 million
from their off-shore accounts in an attempt to supply
the needs of desperate
citizens. Those bank queues will surely re-appear as
Zimbabweans scramble to
get their hands on the elusive $ US. Yet, this is a
country sitting on one
of the world’s biggest diamond fields; clearly
something is very wrong.
Zimbabwe should perhaps take a lesson from their
near-neighbour, Botswana.
Their diamond industry is jointly owned by De
Beers and the Botswana
government and 80% of the profits go direct into
government coffers for the
benefit of all Batswana.
Just a couple of weeks ago Robert Mugabe was at
the AU bragging about
Africa’s fabulous mineral wealth; what he didn’t tell
his fellow African
leaders was how his own country is using its diamond
wealth: how many
schools and hospitals it has built or how many families it
has lifted out of
poverty. Until the diamond wealth benefits the whole
population and not just
the ‘fat cats’- of both parties - diamonds will
continue to be the source
of greed and dishonesty.
Yours in the
(continuing) struggle PH.
CONSTITUTION WATCH 2012
[10th February 2012]
COPAC Press Briefing 9th February
At a press briefing just before lunchtime yesterday, Thursday 9th
February, the COPAC released a press statement signed by all three party
co-chairpersons giving the following information:
The draft is not final – it is still under review
· The Select Committee is still, with assistance from technical
experts, reviewing “the first draft
proposal of the new constitution”.
· A lot of work has been so far been done, but the draft proposal is “work in progress until it is approved by
COPAC”.
· The Select Committee states categorically that
“No suggested positions in the first proposal can be taken as
final.”
Zimbabweans urged be patient The statement urges
Zimbabweans to exercise patience and “give the Select Committee and the team of
experts the opportunity to finalise the draft” and warns that “people should not to be distracted by
hearsay”.
Disclaimer on Presidential age limit and terms of
office The co-chairs stressed that
the Select Committee has “not yet
deliberated on, among other issues, the age limit or the terms of office of the
President”; and that neither COPAC nor its co-chairs had given information
to the press on the substance of Presidential qualifications or
disqualifications.
[Note: There have been
articles in the independent newspapers suggesting that in the outreach process a
majority of Zimbabweans stated that people who have already served two terms, or
are over 70, should not be allowed to contest Presidential elections and
predicting that the new constitution may provide accordingly.]
Undertaking to avail draft in vernacular and Braille and
English The statement repeats the
COPAC commitment that once the final draft is in place it will be translated
into all vernacular languages as well as Braille and “availed to all Zimbabweans to comment at
the Second All-Stakeholders Conference before the referendum”.
Funding
At the press conference there were several questions raised about
funding and the COPAC co-chairs had the following to say in
response:
· The drafting process has been extended by 15 days. The process
is being financed by donors who have already made the funds for the additional
days available. According to the
co-chairs the drafting process should be complete by the end of
February.
· The Second All Stakeholders’ Conference is expected to cost
approximately $14 million. The
Government is funding the conference which is envisioned to take place at the
end of March. The Finance
Minister is looking into the matter of financing the conference and it is
expected that the funds will be made available.
· The donors will be financing publicity up to the Referendum and the
estimated cost is $2.9 million which has already been made
available.
“Full Draft Constitution” Published by The Herald
In today’s [10th February 2012] issue of The Herald there is an eight-page
pullout claiming to be the full text of the “Constitution 2012 – 1st Draft”.
COPAC have not confirmed that this
leaked draft is in fact the draft they received from the three lead
drafters. Even if it was the correct
version, it could only be the first draft which COPAC is in the process of
reviewing. It is still a work in
progress and as the lead drafters have been booked for 15 more days, obviously
changes are anticipated.
Veritas makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot
take legal responsibility for information supplied