Press Release No. 06/22
February
3, 2006
The following statement was issued today in Harare by the
International
Monetary Fund (IMF) mission to Zimbabwe at the conclusion of a
staff visit
from January 25 to February 1, 2006:
The purpose of the
visit, which occurred ahead of the IMF Executive Board's
review of
Zimbabwe's overdue obligations to the Fund, was to conduct a
review of the
current economic situation and provide advice on policies to
help Zimbabwe
achieve sustained growth, low inflation, and improved living
standards for
all Zimbabweans.
As in previous rounds of discussions, including in June
and August 2005, the
IMF mission emphasized that Zimbabwe's economic crisis
calls for urgent
implementation of a comprehensive policy package comprising
several mutually
reinforcing actions. These include: strong fiscal
adjustment; full
liberalization of the exchange rate regime for current
account transactions;
adoption of a strong monetary anchor; elimination of
quasi-fiscal activity
of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe and transparent
absorption of these losses
by the budget; and fundamental structural reform,
including price
deregulation, public enterprise reform, strengthening of
property rights,
and improvements in governance. In the absence of such a
comprehensive and
immediate policy package, Zimbabwe's economic prospects
would be bleak.
Zimbabwe also needs to strengthen relations with the
international
community. The Fund staff stands ready to assist the
authorities in
designing an appropriate policy package, which would help
achieve
macroeconomic stability and growth and improve the welfare of the
Zimbabwean
people.
These discussions took place against the
background of continued food
shortages in Zimbabwe. The IMF mission urged
the authorities to use foreign
exchange to ensure adequate food imports and,
in parallel, to improve the
efficiency of food distribution. The provision
of adequate social safety
nets and food security for vulnerable groups,
particularly those affected by
"Operation Restore Order" and HIV/AIDS are
critical priorities that should
be funded by the budget.
The staff
team would like to thank Zimbabwe's economic team led by Minister
of Finance
Herbert Murerwa, Minister of Economic Development Rugare Gumbo,
and Reserve
Bank of Zimbabwe Governor Gideon Gono, for useful discussions.
A further
elaboration of the Fund's policy advice and Executive Board's
views is given
in the press statement following the Board meeting on
September 9, 2005 (see
Press Release No. 05/205), the Public Information
Notice following the
Board's conclusion of the 2005 Article IV Consultation
with Zimbabwe (see
PIN No. 05/139), and the 2005 Article IV staff report
published on October
4, 2005.
The next Fund Board meeting to review Zimbabwe's overdue
financial
obligations to the IMF is tentatively scheduled for early
March.
IMF EXTERNAL RELATIONS DEPARTMENT
Public
Affairs Media Relations
Phone: 202-623-7300 Phone:
202-623-7100
Fax: 202-623-6278 Fax: 202-623-6772
Zim Online
Sat 4 February
2006
HARARE - Zimbabwe Finance Minister Herbert Murerwa was hopeful
on
Friday that the country would not be expelled by the International
Monetary
Fund (IMF), saying Harare had explained satisfactorily the source
of money
used to pay back outstanding debt to the Fund.
Zimbabwe, grappling its worst economic crisis since independence from
Britain 26 years ago, narrowly survived expulsion from the IMF last
September when it made a surprise payment of US$120 million or nearly 50
percent of the total US$295 it owed the Fund.
Harare made
further payments in the following months to leave its
current debt to the
IMF at about US$137 million.
Murerwa, who was
speaking after seeing off an IMF team that was in
Harare for the past week
for consultative meetings, said: "We have paid the
bulk of our arrears and
we have a little amount to pay so that we can get
this compulsory expulsion
removed."
The IMF executive board is scheduled to meet next month
and will among
other issues review Zimbabwe's continued membership of the
multilateral
institution.
Although impressed by Harare's
efforts to pay back, IMF however
questioned the source of the money used by
Zimbabwe to repay the debt given
severe shortages of foreign currency the
country has been experiencing over
the past six years.
Sources
privy to discussions between Murerwa and the IMF team that
visited Zimbabwe
say they had even demanded documentary evidence from the
Finance Minister
and Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe governor Gideon Gono to prove
that the money
used to pay the debt was raised form export earnings and hard
cash savings
as claimed by Harare.
The IMF began questioning the source of
Harare's funds following
reports that the money may have been provided by
China and the Democratic
Republic of the Congo. Former Zimbabwean
businessman Mutumwa Mawere also
complained to the Fund that the money used
to pay it was from export
earnings by his companies seized by the Zimbabwe
government. But Murerwa
said: "We gave the visiting IMF team the pertinent
information they wanted
about the source of the funds and they were
satisfied."
The Finance Minister said while the IMF team had
welcomed Harare's
efforts to repay it had also pointed out the need for
policy consolidation
so as to minimise the inadvertent squeeze on the
economy arising from the
arrears payments.
The IMF team had
also pointed out to Murerwa and Gono that they could
do more to let market
forces determine the exchange rate and help curb
inflation, a point Murerwa
said Harare was in agreement with.
He said: "They think we can do
more in liberalising the exchange
control system and to curb inflation. We
think we can do more. This is a
process and we think we are getting
there."
The IMF team will submit its finding to the Fund's board on
March 8,
which will then decide on Zimbabwe's fate.
If the
southern African nation state is expelled, it will become only
the second
country after the former Czechoslovakia in 1954 to be booted out
of the IMF.
- ZimOnline
Zim Online
Sat 4 February 2006
HARARE - Chaos is reigning supreme
at most primary schools in Zimbabwe
after the government last month
arbitrarily introduced Grade Zero, a new
entry level in schools for children
below the age of five.
Teachers, who said they were not qualified
to handle pre-school
children, condemned the introduction of Grade Zero in
schools saying it had
worsened the problem of hot-sitting.
"We
have no classrooms to accommodate these youngsters. Right now, we
have asked
parents to contribute towards building a shade where teachers can
conduct
their lessons," said a headmaster at a school in Harare.
The
secretary general of the Progressive Teachers' Union of Zimbabwe
(PTUZ),
Raymond Majongwe said while the idea of Grade Zero was noble, the
government
had failed to plan properly for its introduction.
"It (Grade Zero)
is a noble idea but the government has not invested
anything to accommodate
this stream in terms of classrooms, toilets and
other needs.
"You cannot expect a college graduate from Mkoba Teachers' College,
for
example, to take care of children who would have soiled themselves. They
were not taught to do that," said Majongwe.
Contacted for
comment, Ministry of Education, Sport and Culture
permanent secretary,
Stephen Mahere, defended the programme insisting no
schools had complained
over its introduction.
"We have not heard any complaints," said
Mahere.
Zimbabwe is in its sixth year of a bitter economic crisis
which has
impacted negatively on the country's once revered education
system.
Thousands of Zimbabwean teachers, disgruntled by poor pay and
working
conditions, have fled the country in droves to seek better
opportunities
elsewhere. - ZimOnline
Zim Online
Sat
4 February 2006
HARARE - Zimbabwe's international cricketers have
all but ended their
dispute with their national union after 16 of the
striking players accepted
new contracts yesterday.
A senior
Zimbabwe Cricket official yesterday said all the other the
players had
agreed in principle to sign the contracts and were expected to
do so by
Monday next week.
"Right now I can confirm about 16 have already
taken the contracts and
the rest have indicated they would do so by Monday,"
the official, involved
in the contract talks, said yesterday.
The development has thrown into doubt threats by the disgruntled
players to
drag Zimbabwe Cricket to court over money they claimed they were
owed in
match fees and allowances since September.
It also emerged that
Zimbabwe Cricket had last week paid out over $12
billion for the overdue
match fees and allowances. Most of the 35 striking
players have already
accepted the cheques.
On Thursday, the international media ran a
story that has turned out
to be false when they claimed that the players had
gone back on strike after
Zimbabwe Cricket had failed to address their
grievances by the January 31
deadline the union had been given by the
government.
Zimbabwe Cricket is in fact now finalising the contract
issue after
deciding to talk to the players on a one-on-one basis without
involving the
representative Clive Field - a move critics say was a
divide-and-rule tactic
the union had adopted.
"Zimbabwe Cricket
saw me as a stumbling block and decided to talk to
the players themselves,"
Field told ZimOnline yesterday. "I did not object
because personally I was
getting fed up with the issue and had wanted
someone to take over from me.
So if the move will benefit the players and
they get what they want, I'll be
happy."
Clive said he had been quoted out of context on the story
claiming the
players had gone back on strike and that the interview in
question had been
done earlier in the week before the latest
developments.
The players had last week hired top lawyer Beatrice
Mtetwa to pursue
the overdue payments through the courts if Zimbabwe Cricket
did not agree to
pay them in foreign currency as they were
demanding.
But players who spoke to ZimOnline said they had become
weary of their
fight with Zimbabwe Cricket and felt the dispute would drag
longer if they
took legal action. There were also reports that most of the
players were
broke and opted to make peace with the union.
Among the players who have decided to take up the contracts are Test
players
Hamilton Masakadza, Blessing Mahwire, Prosper Utseya and Stuart
Matsikenyeri. Andy Blignaut and Charles Coventry were among the first six
players to accept the contracts last year.
But it was not clear
whether the players would still press ahead with
their other demands that
forced them to turn their back on national duty.
The cricketers were
disgruntled with the continued tenure of Zimbabwe
Cricket chairman Peter
Chingoka and managing director Ozias Bvute, who they
accused of bullying and
financial mismanagement. - ZimOnline
Zim Online
Sat 4 February 2006
MASVINGO - Zimbabwe's ruling ZANU PF
party is probing several senior
members of the party in Masvingo province
for allegedly misappropriating
about Z$1 billion during last year's
parliamentary election.
According to ZANU PF officials in Masvingo,
the funds which can no
longer be accounted for, were raised through the sale
of party cards in the
run-up to the controversial election won by President
Mugabe's ZANU PF
party.
Among those under probe are former
Masvingo provincial chairman Daniel
Shumba and another senior party official
in the province, Clemence
Makwarimba. The two have however strongly denied
the allegation.
Shumba, who has since quit the party to form his
own United People's
Party, on Friday denied any wrong-doing saying as the
provincial chairman,
he was not directly involved in the sale of party
cards.
ZANU PF provincial chairman for Masvingo, Samuel
Mumbengegwi,
confirmed that the ruling party had launched investigations
into the
missing funds.
"We are still to establish the exact
amount of money involved but
could well be over Z$1 billion. As our
investigations continue, we will be
able to give you the correct
figures.
But from the investigations carried so far, it is clear
that some
members of the District Co-ordinating Committee have a case to
answer," said
Mumbengegwi.
Contacted for comment, Makwarimba
vehemently denied abusing any funds.
"I did not take a single cent
from the party. This is just a political
game to tarnish the image of all
former provincial executive members,'' said
Makwarimba.
Cases
of embezzlement of party funds are not new in ZANU PF. Several
cabinet
ministers and senior party officials, among them Emmerson Mnangagwa,
have
been accused in the past of looting party funds with impunity. -
ZimOnline
VOA
By Peter Clottey
Washington,DC
03
February 2006
A spokesman for Zimbabwe's main opposition party
says Zambian officials gave
no reason for deporting party members earlier
this week. Nelson Chamisa,
the spokesman for the Movement for Democratic
Change, said Zimbabwe's
government, led by President Robert Mugabe, was
behind their deportation.
Chamisa dismissed claims on Zimbabwean state
radio that MDC leader Morgan
Tsvangirai and his delegation had violated
Zambian immigration laws. But
Chamisa said the MDC leader would not have
been allowed to stay in Zambia
for two days if he had disobeyed any
rules.
From the capital, Harare, Chamisa told Voice of America reporter
Peter
Clottey, "The MDC leadership, under the guidance and leadership of Mr.
Morgan Tsvangirai, had some business on the other side of the border, on the
Zambian side, in Victoria falls. And it was just for about two days, but
unfortunately, for some unknown reasons and unclear circumstances, the
Zambian authorities then requested us to be sent back to the Zimbabwean side
without clarifying the reasons as to why they were doing
that."
Chamisa said around midnight there was a contingent of about 57
Zambian
intelligence and the police officers besieging the hotel where they
were
staying and asking them to leave.
Chamisa said, "Certainly, I
mean this is something that borders on a lot of
suspicion and I think that
also raises a lot of sinister motives on the part
of authorities and on the
part of those involved. So naturally, as the MDC
leadership, we are going to
raise this matter with relevant authorities in
both Zambia and
Zimbabwe."
VOA
03 February
2006
In Zimbabwe, gross government mismanagement has resulted in
skyrocketing
prices and massive unemployment.
Unfortunately, economic
policies are actually getting worse, not better.
Farm equipment is being
seized contrary to court orders, fertilizer
companies are being
nationalized, and suburban neighbors of President Mugabe
face eviction from
their homes, ostensibly for national security reasons.
Finally, the
dismemberment of Gletwyn Estate, within Harare's city limits,
crosses a new
line in the government's assault on private property: for the
first time,
non-agricultural land is being seized for non-agricultural
purposes - in
this instance, reportedly to build low density/high income
housing for those
in the ruling elite, including especially the security
services.
These attacks on property rights and the rule of law could
not come at a
worse time for Zimbabwe, when inflation is officially
approaching
one-thousand percent, and unofficially has long since surpassed
that dubious
milestone, and millions of Zimbabweans rely on remittances from
overseas
relatives and food aid from the U.S. and other donors just to
survive.
Zimbabwe needs jobs and accountable government; it does not need to
put more
stolen property into the hands of corrupt officials and
politicians. Despite
good rainfall, every indication is that Zimbabwe will
have another bad
harvest in 2006, due to inadequate supplies of seeds and
fertilizers.
The government must learn that secure property rights are
fundamental to a
modern functioning economy and to maintaining high levels
of investment.
Already, new foreign investment has virtually dried up in
Zimbabwe, and
Zimbabwean investors put their money outside of the country
because
government policies put domestic investments at risk. The only
source of the
funds needed to stabilize and turn around the Zimbabwean
economy is the
international financial community, which first needs to see
implementation
of sensible economic policies and the restoration of
democracy.
President George W. Bush recently cited Zimbabwe as one of
several countries
in need of freedom and reform:
"At the start of
2006, more than half the people of our world live in
democratic nations. And
we do not forget the other half -- in places like
Syria and Burma, Zimbabwe,
North Korea, and Iran -- because the demands of
justice, and the peace of
this world, require their freedom, as well."
Zimbabwe needs to reverse
course, respect the rule of law, and re-open
political space so that all
Zimbabweans can work together to restore
freedom, prosperity and stability,
and see the country re-integrated into
the international
community.
The preceding was an editorial reflecting the views of the
United States
Government.
Mail and Guardian
Angus Shaw | Harare, Zimbabwe
03
February 2006 12:31
In Zimbabwe's capital and in need of a
bath or a hot meal? Call
a friend, though it'll likely take several attempts
to get through.
Persistent power and water outages have
revived friendships and
socialising in Zimbabwe, homeowners
say.
People see more of each other during outages that last
several
days, according to businessman James Martin. He visits friends
across Harare
to wash after making sure their taps aren't
dry.
"We call it social bathing," he said.
When the power is out, he also invites himself over for dinner,
bringing
supplies from his thawing freezer and warm beer for
re-chilling.
There was less cheer in the beer this week. With
inflation
spiraling, its price rose by 40% on Monday, the fourth increase
since
October.
Martin buys scarce gasoline at five times
the official price.
Charges for phone calls have increased by
at least 1 000% in the
past year despite fast deteriorating
service.
Water shutoffs are blamed on pump failures and
shortages of
water treatment chemicals.
One Harare
entrepreneur with a well has begun advertising water
deliveries by truck and
the sale of storage tanks erected on stilts to
replenish household supplies
by simple gravity-fed hoses.
Last month, Martin's neighbour
paid Z$15-million ($150) to
replace a car tyre slashed open by the
razor-sharp edges of a pothole in a
main street in the capital. Zimbabweans
now joke that sober drivers steer in
a zigzag to miss the holes, while only
the drunk ones are foolish enough to
proceed in a straight
line.
City authorities say they lack the manpower, vehicles
and
gasoline to mobilise sufficient road repair crews.
Potholes deepened by seasonal rains have even inspired leading
Zimbabwe
artist John Kotze to paint one.
Kotze said the oil painting
symbolised the nation's economic and
political decline.
But "water in the pothole represents life. Blue sky reflected in
the water
signifies better days to come. I'm trying to be optimistic as
well," he
said.
The state power utility has warned electricity outages
are set
to persist, citing acute shortages of hard currency to import power
from
neighbouring countries and spare parts to fix and upgrade its aging
equipment. Zimbabwe imports 40% of its power.
Sydney
Gata, head of the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority,
noted in a recent
report the cost of monthly power imports rose from
$4,5-million
(?3,73-million) to about $9-million (?7,46-million) since
October.
He said the utility's total revenue from tariffs
raised only
one-third of the import bill.
Gideon Gono,
governor of the Reserve Bank, last week predicted
official inflation could
reach 800%, the highest in the world, by March.
Current inflation is
586%.
The power utility has proposed a threefold increase on
its
charges this month, but sales of home generators from China, heard
rumbling
in well-to-do suburbs and office compounds, have already
surged.
Accidents, meanwhile, have increased sharply at
traffic signals
blacked out during power outages. An experimental solar
powered signal was
reportedly too expensive and prone to theft of the solar
cells.
Shortages of new bulbs have also meant many working
signals show
only one approach illuminated.
"You take
your life in your hands when you think the lights are
down but there's an
oncoming green on the other side and people are speeding
through thinking
you are on red," said Harare driver Jonas Mashu.
The nation
is suffering its worst economic crisis since
independence from Britain in
1980, with acute shortages of food, gasoline,
medicines and other essential
imports. The crash has been blamed on
disruptions in the agriculture based
economy caused by drought and the
seizures of thousands of white-owned
commercial farms since 2000 in
Zimbabwe, once a regional bread
basket.
It took driver Mashu a week to find imported brake
and clutch
fluid for his van. He said he used a viscous and thick mixture of
soap and
water as a temporary measure, a tip he learned from a mining
prospector from
a remote area of the bush.
"Hardship
teaches us unusual lessons," Mashu said. - Sapa-AP
Tafadzwanashe and Tapiwanashe Fichani were charged with indecent exposure
after walking around in goatskin kilts, which left their buttocks exposed.
They spent two weeks in prison, where their mental states were evaluated.
The much-publicised case has reignited the debate over traditional versus
western dress in Zimbabwe.
The brothers were arrested while wearing the nhembe loincloths on
their daily walk to a shopping centre near their home in an upmarket suburb of
the capital, Harare.
'Mentally colonised'
Since their release, their father has been shielding them from the media.
But prior to their arrest, the 22-year-olds said that they had received a
calling from God to give up their western clothing when they were living in the
UK.
The brothers said that those who look down on them for their decision were
"mentally colonised", as they were just going back to how things were before
Europeans arrived in Africa.
The twins also shunned chairs and beds and sat and slept only on the floor.
'Disgraceful'
They have reignited a debate about the place of traditional dress, but not
many people in the capital are on their side.
"What they did is very disgraceful, especially to the parents," one man said.
"If human nature developed from apes, so there's development in life. So they
should appreciate the development of clothes," he added.
Another woman said she thought their move was "stupid".
"I think we're advanced. We can't wear those things," she said.
After their stay in prison, the public prosecutor says that it was concluded
that they are not mentally disturbed.
However, they were only allowed out on free bail after agreeing to wear
everyday clothes.
They left prison wearing shirts and shorts, seemingly having lost their
battle, but having caught the attention of the nation.
Is there anything wrong with exposing your buttocks in public, whether or
not you are in traditional dress? Do you think people in Africa should return to
more traditional attire, or are the alternatives more practical? Do you agree
with the twins that those who wear Western clothes are "mentally colonised"?
Let us know your views using the form below.
A selection of your views will be broadcast on the BBC's Focus on
Africa programme at 1700 GMT on Saturday 4 February.
The following comments reflect the balance of opinion we have received so
far:
In as much as we want to maintain African culture, we do not the ones that
are not good. We have moved ahead from the ape or stone age. We are moving ahead
with other continents, not copying the West. Sighting people in this way is very
disturbing. Please my brothers change your dressing mode.
I believe these two brothers did a great job. Africa has it own cultures, and
there was no need to arrest them. They are practising their cultures. Do not be
ashamed of your own cultures.
If men can be arrested on charges of indecent exposure for wearing loincloths
that exposes their buttocks, how do we then justify the wearing of
"tight-western clothes" by women that virtually exposes sensitive parts of
womanhood likely to turn men on? Isn't that also an indecent exposure in itself?
If women are free to wear what they please, why can't men do the
same?
Human development is a dynamic process. New developments world-wide are an
improvement upon an old system. As Africans, we have also developed and improved
upon our past. This is evident in the beautiful 'African dresses' we see around
- the traditional attire. To go back to animal skins is not only cruel to the
poor animals but 'counter development' in this 21st century.
I think one should adopt an attitude of 'each to his own'. Really if these
boys want to wear loincloth so be it. I will still be eating sadza tonight.
There are a few programmes on the old goggle box showing people in modern Europe
walking about naked. It's caused controversy without a doubt, but life goes
on. I do not see anything wrong; these boys were just practising their African
culture. We Africans must not be ashamed of our own culture. We must be proud of
it since our great great grand parents used to wear animal
skins.
I do not think exposing ones buttocks is indecent exposure. If that were the
case then all the supermodels should be arrested as they walk virtually naked in
fashion shows that are televised all over the world. Culture should be respected
too.
This is pure madness. They should also stop eating western food and eat
things harvested with stones.
I see no reason for forcing these guys to wear western clothes. As a matter
of fact people in the Zimbabwean village of Binga wear their traditional dress
daily. Why don't the authorities make noise about these people? Again this shows
how far people in Harare have succumbed to mental colonisation where they think
anything African is inferior. Recently in Virginia, a young man was acquitted of the charge of indecent
exposure for baring his buttocks (or "mooning" as it is called here). The
judge's reason for acquitting him was that if what he did was a crime then all
the women who wear thongs (G-String) on the beach must be arrested. We Africans
have become so mentally colonized that we frown on our own culture. These
brothers must be commended not castigated.
Kwasi Appeaing Addo, your comment is interesting. I trust you are a
vegetarian yourself. Don't mix animal rights with cultural rights. Those nhembe
are made from skins from dead animals. It's a kind of economising since you use
all parts of the already dead animal. What's wrong with eating the flesh and
wearing the skin if that's you taste? It's not like fur where they kill just for
the skin! Africans and anyone else with a past, be yourself, don't blindly
imitate the values of others. Look at Sumo wrestlers - they are highly respected
for keeping up their traditions and value. Sadza nema dora tinodya tichiguta. To
each his own.
I'm really ashamed of this type of dressing in Africa. We are now in a
civilised world and we are supposed to follow up the current attires and stop
drawing back our future to nothing. The two brothers have tarnished the image of
their country. I think people of any country should wear clothes worn by their culture.
Westerners should wear western clothes, Asians should wear Asian clothes and
Africans should wear African clothes. I think Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe
should show his anti-Western feelings by wearing a loincloth. Lead by example
Mugs.
Africans should not feel that wearing jackets and ties is a mark of
subjection to Colonialism; I don't think Japanese, Chinese, Indian and
Indonesian businessmen and women need revert to kimonos, cheong-sams, dhotis and
sarongs to prove their freedom. Rather than regard the suit, the shirt and the
shorts as 'Western' dress, people the world over wear 'universal' dress. They
wear such clothing to demonstrate that they are modern and connected with the
world economy. For a Zimbabwean to revert to wearing the loincloth of 100 years
ago is as absurd as it would be for a contemporary Welshman to walk around
wearing nothing but woad (blue paint), and then claim that this is the
traditional dress he would have worn before Roman and Anglo-Saxon colonialism.
BBC
News, Harare
Twin
Zimbabwean brothers arrested for wearing loincloths have agreed to end their
shocking campaign for traditional dress and wear shirts and shorts.
They had
spent two years studying there, but left after Tafadzwanashe was arrested on
fraud allegations and deported.
John Ene,
Lagos Nigeria.
Abe Magong, Sudan
larkai, Accra, Ghana
Kwasi
Appeaing Addo, UK
Edson Mukundwi, Sheffield England
Charles T.J.S. Banda, Lilongwe, Malawi
RK, USA
TK Dzimega, London, UK
Wilberforce Majaji, Zimbabwean in
Michigan USA
Kobina Markin, Maryland,
USA
Chido, Zimbabwean in Japan
Mr Paul Mowell, Anambra State Nigeria
Yogs, USA
Patrick Willis, London, UK
By
Tichaona Sibanda
03 February 2006
Zapu leader Paul
Siwela predicts that the current unprecedented
hardships being faced by most
Zimbabweans will force them to rise and revolt
against Robert Mugabe and his
Zanu (PF) regime.
The outspoken and fiery leader who favours
federal governance to the
current political set-up said the current trend of
events in the country
point to Mugabe exiting from his post earlier than
expected.
Since the beginning of the year the country's already
dire economic
situation has reached new lows, with analysts pointing to a
total collapse
of the system.
Siwela cites critical shortages
of food currently sweeping through
major cities in the country as a sign
that 'the road ahead is full of bumps
and surprises.'
He said
the decision that has to be taken by the people is only one
decision, and
that is that Robert Mugabe and Zanu (PF) must be removed from
office.
'How you remove him, that is something else, but at
this stage the
focus is to remove Robert Mugabe and Zanu (PF),' said
Siwela.
He said Zimbabweans should be told to brace themselves for
more
hardships to come as government will fail to rescue the country from
the
economic predicament it finds itself in.
'It is these
hardships that will propel them to say enough is enough,
we have had enough
of this dictatorship.Mugabe must go. If it means killing
a few people yes,
he will kill 30, 50, a 100 or so but that's the price
people have to
pay.
'It happened elsewhere and it should not come as a surprise
when it
happens here, so people must brace up for that too,' said
Siwela.
SW Radio Africa Zimbabwe news
By Violet
Gonda
3 February 06
A delegation of MDC officials,
led by party chairman Isaac Matongo,
will be in the UK this coming week to
start a tour of Europe, USA and South
Africa to meet with opposition
structures. The MDC representative in
Brussels, Grace Kwinjeh, said the
party is inviting the diaspora to
contribute to a policy and ideology report
that will be presented at the
forthcoming party congress.
Mr
Matongo and his team includes Nelson Chamisa, Thokozani Khuphe and
Ian
Makone and they will hold regional meetings in Leeds, Birmingham, London
and
Southend on Sea.
It's been a busy time for the MDC leadership who,
in an unrelated
event, were deported by Zambian authorities in the early
hours of Thursday
morning. Although Zambian authorities say the opposition
leaders violated
Zambia's immigration laws the MDC says this is the
continued paranoia about
opposition activities and merely demonstrates that
the region does not take
it's obligation to human rights
seriously.
Eddie Cross, who was one of the delegates in Zambia with
party
President Morgan Tsvangirai, says everyone in the delegation had
presented
themselves to an immigration officer both on the Zimbabwean side
and the
Zambian side. It's reported that a significant number of CIO
operatives
greeted the MDC delegation on the Zimbabwe side and they wanted
to know the
exact nature of the delegation's visit to Zambia. According to
Cross, the
opposition leaders refused to divulge any
information.
He alleged Zimbabwe CIOs followed the delegation into
Zambia and
pitched up at the hotel were the MDC leaders was staying. Cross
claims hotel
management had to remove the security agents after complaints
by the MDC. He
said they were surprised to see more than 50 Zambian law
enforcement agents
that night, who came with a search warrant to evict the
MDC leadership. The
MDC denies falsifying their identities.
Eddie Cross said the leadership had gone to Zambia to hold a 2 day
detailed
strategy session and chose Zambia because of the sensitive nature
of their
discussions. The opposition believes the Mugabe regime has planted
informers
in every sector and bugged most meeting places including hotels in
Zimbabwe.
Commenting on the deportation of the MDC leadership
from Zambia,
Kwinjeh said it's unfortunate that SADC states have also taken
on the
continuation of harassing the MDC.
She said the
opposition has found it increasingly impossible to hold
any political
activity in Zimbabwe because of repression. She said, "It's an
unfortunate
situation that we have such a hostile environment in Zimbabwe
that does not
allow us to carry out democratic activities as
Zimbabweans."
SW Radio Africa Zimbabwe
news
By Violet Gonda
3 February
06
On the Programme Commentary we find out what happened in
Zambia when
the MDC leadership were deported. Violet speaks to one of the
MDC officials,
Eddie Cross, who alleges Zimbabwe CIO's followed the
delegation into Zambia
and pitched up at the hotel where the MDC leaders was
staying. Cross claims
hotel management had to remove the security agents
after complaints by the
MDC but that night more than 50 Zambian law
enforcement agents came with a
search warrant to evict the MDC leadership.
The MDC denies falsifying their
identities.
SW Radio
Africa Zimbabwe news
The Guardian
Transcript of a speech given last night
by the international development
secretary, Hilary Benn, to the Royal
African Society, entitled: Political
governance, corruption and the role of
aid
Friday February 3, 2006
"I would like to thank Camilla,
Dapo, the Royal African Society and SOAS for
hosting tonight's
event.
This is the third in a series of speeches I am making as part of our
consultation on the government's development white paper to be published in
the summer. The aim is to hear your views, and I look forward to the
debate.
In addition to visiting DFID's website, you should visit Guardian
Unlimited - on there you'll find a message from "Jonny Boy" saying that
Hilary Benn is as pompous and useless as his father was when he was a
minister. I've certainly provoked!
A great deal was promised in 2005:
Increased aid, commitments to reach the
UN target of 0.7%, debt
cancellation, better ways of dealing with conflict,
action on getting
children into school, and fighting the diseases that kill
so many, and
developing countries committing themselves to play their part
through good
policies and the rule of law.
Now all of this is, of course, about making
poverty history. But the dream
that unites us won't be fulfilled without
good political governance, and
it's that I want to talk about this
evening.
Now my starting point is that only developing countries - led by
their own
people and their own governments - can ultimately make the
decisive changes
that are needed to fight poverty.
State-building can
not be imposed. Its foundation must be a shared
understanding between those
who govern, and those who give their consent to
be governed - the "deal"
between citizen and state. And this foundation has
to be laid by each
country itself.
It's a process. It takes time. Look at our own history. A
thousand years of
progress, sometimes moving forward, sometimes back. Magna
Carta. A bloody
civil war between parliament and King in the 17th
century.
The rotten boroughs and rotten politicians at the start of the
19th
century - a culture of patronage that finally gave way to the universal
franchise, as people demanded a voice in how they were governed.
Our
history tells us that public institutions evolve through a process of
bargaining between the state and groups in society.
And such
institutions in developing countries cannot be constructed by
simply
transferring models from rich to poor countries. They need to do it
for
themselves.
However, as donors we can assist the process of creating more
effective
states that can do it for themselves, and one of the ways we can
help is to
be clear - and perhaps clearer than we have been in the past -
about the
nature of that deal.
Clear - as we search for the right
kind of conditionality - that our aid is
conditional on clear principles.
Respect for human rights and international
obligations; commitment to
improved public financial management and to
fighting corruption; and a will
to reduce poverty.
These are the essential foundations of our
partnership. By accepting them,
our partners undertake to use the aid for
the purposes for which it has been
given. We expect the money to be
accounted for, and it is right and proper
that we do so.
But we also
recognise that where possible the best way to do this is through
the
government's own system of accountability so that it does not end up
accounting to us - the donors - in one way, and to its own people in
another, or not at all.
Now, the biggest challenge we as donors face
and governments face in
applying these principles is in the poorest
countries, where governance is
weakest and corruption can be a major
problem.
Now some would argue that we should refuse to work in such
countries at all
until these problems are sorted out.
I think that
view is wholly mistaken.
Let's take the case of Kenya, a country much
discussed in the media, and
which I visited a few weeks ago.
Now,
after years of misrule, the people of Kenya rejected Daniel arap Moi's
appointed successor in peaceful elections in 2002. Last year they rejected
the new government's wishes in a constitutional referendum - reflecting in
part their anger at the continued misuse of public resources.
In
Kenya I met President Kibaki. We had a full and frank discussion, as they
say, about the persistence of corruption. I made no secret of our
concern.
During the same visit, I also announced that we will be putting
£55m into
improving education.
Some have criticised this. They say I
should have suspended British aid
entirely.
I put this question to
them. Just because poor people live in a country
where corruption is a major
problem, does that mean we should walk away?
Should they be made to suffer
because governance is bad? I think not.
What I think it does mean,
however, is that we should work in different ways
in different circumstances
to ensure that the money gets to where it is most
needed.
That's why
we have refused to give Kenya any direct budget support - money
which goes
straight into the government budget to be used for supporting
general
spending. That's why in Kenya we have already taken a different
approach -
money ear-marked for a particular purpose.
Now this support to Kenya has
helped an additional 1.5 million children to
go to school after the new
government announced the abolition of school fees
in 2002. Our new aid will
help build 12,000 new classrooms, improve water
and sanitation facilities
and expand the supply of textbooks and
instructional materials for all
18,500 primary schools across Kenya.
One change the government has made
in Kenya, is to send money for schools
direct to the schools' bank accounts,
so reducing the opportunity for
corruption. I saw for myself that school
budgets are posted on blackboards
so that parents can hold staff to account,
and make sure the money for the
school goes on educating their
children.
We also ensure that payment is agreed for planned expenditure,
that further
payment is made only on evidence that the existing funds have
been spent
satisfactorily.
Audits and surveys to track money provide
additional assurance - for example
a joint government of Kenya and Price
Waterhouse Coopers survey of primary
education spending last year showed
that "...overall the flow of funds has
been efficient.......and at school
level, funds received have been correctly
recorded and used for their
intended purposes."
But that's not all, alongside providing money for
education, we are also
helping to build systems that can help prevent
corruption - if they are
used. Improving public financial management and
procurement practice, and
helping with governance, justice, and law and
order. Assisting Kenyan
citizens to hold their government to account through
civic education and
support to Transparency International.
However,
none of this will work if government itself doesn't act. All the
institutions in the world are no good if there isn't a will to
act.
And that's why so many eyes in the world are - rightly, today - on
the
government of Kenya as they face a choice about what to do in response
to
the Githongo dossier.
And let me pay tribute here to John
Githongo's bravery in blowing the
whistle on the extent of the problem. The
resignation of the finance
minister yesterday will allow the allegations
against him and his Ministry
to be fully investigated, and I applaud the
Kenyan people and media for
bringing this about.
Swift action by the
government will send a clear signal to the people of
Kenya, and to the
world, that the commitment to good governance means
something. Failure to
act, simply won't be acceptable, least of all to the
Kenyan
people.
Let me ask a second question. Even where there is no reasonable
hope of
working with the government - as is the case in Zimbabwe - does that
mean we
should stop caring about its people? Would it be right to punish
Zimbabweans
for their repressive regime; a regime they did not freely
elect?
I think not.
The poorest still deserve help with life's
basic necessities regardless of
the quality of their government. That's why
in Zimbabwe DFID provides
life-saving humanitarian aid - not through the
government - but through the
UN and NGOs - £30m this year to help feed
people, support the growing number
of orphans, and fight HIV and
AIDS.
There are those who say that giving governments support is wrong;
it's like
writing a blank cheque encouraging corruption and inefficiency.
That our aid
is best spent through NGOs.
Well we do a lot of work
with and through NGOs. Some of the most impressive
projects I have seen -
some of the most remarkable people that I have met -
are working to build
the fabric of civil society and its capacity to hold
those in power to
account.
But even the most enthusiastic supporters of civil society, and
I am one,
recognise that ignoring governments and creating parallel systems,
is not
the long-term solution to corruption nor a sustainable path to
development.
Should a farmer in Malawi have to rely on an NGO for health
and education?
Like you and me, she wants justice - she wants her rights and
that of her
children realised - and she'll only get that in the long-term
from good
government.
The other argument is that our aid - in
whatever form - can prop up bad
governments.
And that's a risk that
we need to take seriously - and we do. That's the
argument for having a
range of instruments through which to channel our aid.
Now, apart from
the moral case against it, corruption is also a big problem
because it has
huge economic, social and political costs. Businesses don't
invest. Jobs are
not created.
Money which should be spent on services for the poor is
stolen. People
distrust politicians and may eventually give up on the
political system and
seek answers elsewhere
In short, corruption
destroys the "deal" - the bargain - between the citizen
and the state; and
it harms the poorest most.
Having to deal with weak governance is almost
a universal problem for
ordinary people in developing countries. And in
surveys, poor people point
out the effects of petty corruption - bribing a
teacher to teach your child;
bribing officials in order to sell your produce
in a market; bribing the
police not to harass you.
And large scale
corruption is a problem too. For countries with scarce
resources, they can't
afford funds to be siphoned away into foreign bank
accounts or spent on
luxury goods.
So while - for all these reasons - we must be tough on
corruption, let's not
be smug about it. Let's just remember our own history.
Corruption, like
temptation, exists everywhere. There are many countries
where there is good
political governance and yet corruption persists. Good
systems cannot
perfect human nature. We are all fallible.
And the
final argument for doing something is that corruption undermines
public
confidence in aid and its effectiveness - after all, it is taxpayer's
money
that we provide to poor countries. We have to make sure it is well
used
So what should we do?
· First - I think we need to
recognise that corruption is most able to
thrive where accountability is
weak.
Good political governance makes it much harder for governing elites
to
plunder public wealth for private gain. Developing the institutions to do
this takes time, and is one of the most important challenges that developing
countries face.
· Second - corruption is both a cause and a
consequence of poor - and
sometimes outright bad - governance.
The
primary challenge for our partner governments is building strong,
responsive
and accountable institutions.
· Third, in a globalised world, corruption
is played out on a global stage.
We need to recognise that globalisation
has increased the opportunities for
some ruling elites to make enormous
fortunes from siphoning off a country's
natural resources or its tax
base
There is huge potential as we know for illicit income from natural
resources. Consider the enormous waste of Nigeria's oil wealth over past
decades or the destruction of forests in a whole number of
countries.
The extractive industries transparency initiative is one way
of addressing
these problems. It is shedding new light on Nigeria's oil
revenues. The
results of the first audit of oil and gas accounts were
published last week.
And for the first time, Nigerians know how much
money their government
received from sales of oil.
And where there
are bribe-takers, there are also bribe-givers. We have to do
our bit in rich
countries to address corruption in procurement and in other
areas where
bribery is prevalent, as well as to speed up recovery of stolen
assets, and
prevent money laundering. I'll say more on this in a later
speech.
·
And finally, aid can be part of the solution to the problem of
corruption.
In the past it has sometimes been part of the problem, where
aid was used to
buy support in the Cold War, rather than to fight poverty.
All too often it
rewarded dictators and the corrupt. Mobutu's Zaire received
enormous aid
flows during this period.
Most aid went into projects
that were both "off-plan" and "off-budget" - in
other words not part of the
government's accounts, and thus reduced the need
for governments to improve
their public financial management - or to account
to their people. Donor
projects often paid local staff high salaries,
drawing them away from the
civil service, undermining the strength of
government. Limiting
capacity.
We have learned from these mistakes, and our approach has
changed.
Where we can, we work with and through governments to support
them in
becoming more accountable, more responsive, and better able to
achieve
progress - and ultimately more legitimate. And where we can't, we
will still
find ways of helping poor people. And we will continue to work to
help
countries fight corruption.
Now what does this mean in
practice?
· It means helping anti-corruption commissions in Sierra Leone,
Malawi,
Zambia and Uganda where a major clean-out of corruption in the
Uganda
Revenue Authority has led to a 35% rise in tax revenue. In Sierra
Leone
we're working to link part of our aid to progress in reducing the
theft of
drugs from the health service.
· It means supporting in
Nigeria a community policing initiative. Given the
depressing catalogue of
human rights abuses in Nigeria, DFID could have
pulled out of police work
altogether. Instead, a public survey last year
showed that where the new
approach to policing has been tried, people felt
more secure, trusted the
police more, and thought that police corruption had
been reduced.
The
chief of police has asked for our support to expand the scheme to other
parts of Nigeria.
· It means funding a range of work to help civil
society hold their
governments to account - for example helping NGOs that
monitor oil revenue
in Bolivia or work with parliamentary committees to
track education spending
in Malawi. One NGO I met in Bangladesh, called
Samata, helps landless people
claim their rights to state land.
· In
Tanzania, public service reform, supported in part by DFID, saw an
increase
in pay levels by up to 15% - helping to reduce the incentive for
petty
corruption.
So, the question I want to pose is this: which aid
instruments should we use
for different circumstances? What is the best way
we can go on helping poor
people but minimise the risk of corruption? How
best can we help our
development partners make progress?
Now, all of
this is about helping to build good governance.
Question. So what is it
that makes a good government? And why is that
important for addressing
corruption and for development?
Now good political governance - the
quality of how we govern and how we are
governed - is something that we all
take for granted in this country,
although we still argue about it, and on
occasions, question its existence!
But at heart, all of us want the same
thing - whether you live in Leeds,
whether you're that farmer in Malawi I
mentioned: security, a decent job,
education and healthcare when we're ill,
the chance to raise a family, the
opportunity to play a role in society, and
to hand on a better future to the
next generation.
We want to be able
to express our views, our faith, freely. Some, and I'd
encourage you to do
so, may even want to join a political party!
We want a government that
represents our interests and takes our views into
account.
Good
political governance is, I think, based on four things - authority,
responsiveness, accountability and legitimacy. And by governance I'm not
talking about government - I'm talking about people - you and
me.
First, authority. All governments need authority. It's simply about
being
able to get things done. Does the government have the money, the will
and
the capacity to build wells, provide health services to villagers, offer
a
good education to children, and raise taxes to do all these
things?
When those are absent, countries suffer. In what was then Zaire,
Mobutu was
authoritarian, but had no authority. His corrupt and incompetent
regime left
most of the country to fend for itself, as it got poorer and
poorer, despite
its enormous natural wealth.
Secondly, governments
must respond to the aspirations of their citizens
through some kind of
representative government, and this includes respecting
peoples' civil and
political rights.
Take Burundi - when President Pierre Nkurunziza was
inaugurated last year,
in elections with a turn out of over three quarters
of eligible voters, he
announced his commitment to free primary education.
He implemented it.
Enrolments have risen sharply as a result, and DFID
has provided support to
help with the consequences.
Thirdly, there's
accountability. This means having to explain and answer
questions on what
you have done. It applies to public officials, to
ministers and to
governments.
In developing countries, it's not about me or other donors
being
accountable - its about developing country governments being
accountable to
their own people.
A free and open media plays a hugely
important role in helping to make this
happen. In Kenya, the media - from
newspapers to private radio stations to
mobile phones - are doing a lot to
uncover and expose malpractice at the
highest levels of the state.
Revelations from the Githongo dossier were
first covered by both the major
Kenyan newspapers.
Civil society matters too. It helps people to come
together and acquire a
voice.
I also think that the tax system is
crucial for accountability. Now I said
earlier that developing countries
should be primarily accountable to their
own citizens, not donors. Tax is at
the heart of the social contract between
state and citizen; when citizens
pay tax, they demand services back. As
someone once said, "No taxation
without representation!"
But the best way to ensure the accountability of
governments is a political
system that encourages scrutiny and questioning.
And of course the ultimate
test is a free and fair election. Giving the
people the final say. The
ability of citizens to elect and then get rid of
their government and change
its leaders is fundamental.
Finally,
there's legitimacy. The extent to which people think their rulers
have
earned the right to govern. In the long-term the best way to gain
legitimacy
is to rule justly in the public interest and to be elected to do
so.
Now in Uganda, President Museveni came into power with legitimacy
in much of
the country following the overthrow of a brutal regime. Huge
progress
reinforced that legitimacy - poverty has been reduced from 56% to
38% over
the last decade. But now his efforts to change the constitution so
that he
can remain in power are steadily eroding his legitimacy and that of
his
government.
Governments that display the four qualities I have
described are more likely
to result in effective and capable
states.
Given that countries are likely to be at different stages in
their political
development, we should not set absolute standards or
benchmarks to be
applied uniformly.
It would be wrong to judge a
country emerging from conflict by the same
standards as a country that has
never experienced war.
We must judge governments, I think, by where they
are going - there may be
problems along the way - but are they heading in
the right direction? Are
accountability and responsiveness improving? Is the
government gaining
authority?
And in answering these questions we
should also look at what they are
achieving. How many children are in
school, how is health improving, what is
happening to incomes, are peoples'
rights respected? In short, we need to
understand better both who and what
is making change and development happen
in each country.
And over the
past five years DFID has undertaken a series of what we call
"drivers of
change" studies in 16 countries.
The purpose is to identify who holds
real power, who benefits and who
opposes change - and how change comes
about. Because if we don't as donors
understand the politics of the places
where we work, then our task will be
all the more difficult.
We have
learned that when we are faced by difficult circumstances such as I
have
described earlier, we should not turn aid off like a light switch.
So
rather than stop aid outright, we need to ensure our assistance is
designed
to address the very different political governance circumstances we
find in
each country. Let me illustrate this by the case of Ethiopia,
another
country in the spotlight and again one I visited recently.
The government
committed what I think were serious human rights abuses last
year - killing
and arresting people, and detention of the opposition just
after the recent
elections - bad in themselves, but also a breach of trust
in our
relationship.
Yet here is a country with massive needs, a desperately
poor population,
which receives significantly less aid than most other
countries in
sub-Saharan Africa.
Now, the government has good
programmes for reaching for people in education
and health and water. If I
had stopped all aid to the government as a result
of the recent human rights
abuses, it is not the government that would
suffer, but poor
people.
And there are no effective non-government channels for reaching
the millions
of poor people in Ethiopia. So I have adopted an alternative
course.
I stopped direct general budget support which could be used for
any purpose,
and we are now looking at different options to be sure our
funds will be
used to reach poor people.
At the same time, with other
donors, we will continue to push the Ethiopian
Government on human rights
and governance.
It may not work in the short term but this is the best
way of improving both
the quality of the life of poor people and the quality
of governance in
Ethiopia. This will undoubtedly be a long-term and
difficult process: but we
must try.
In some cases we have seen major
improvements in governance - we shouldn't
get too depressed about the
difficulties we face - and our aid is increasing
correspondingly. Tanzania
continues to do well. I agreed last month to £310
million in support over
the next three years direct to the government
budget, with 10% of that
conditional on continued good performance in
governance and budget
management.
So what does all of this mean for how donors in general, and
DFID in
particular, should operate?
It comes back to the question I
asked at the beginning.
It means - I think - that we need to have a more
sophisticated response to
poor and weak governance. We need a clearer idea
of what the right thing to
do is in different circumstances. And we need to
recognise that countries
are at different stages of development.
We
must refrain from the temptation to micromanage - telling governments
that
they must reform this or that institution before we will help. But we
mustn't become a soft touch - in the long run, I don't think people would
thank us for that!
I recognise this is a complex issue; one where it
is hard to get the balance
right. But I take it very seriously and so must
all of us who dream about a
better world. Surveys show that an alarming
number of people think that most
aid is wasted. So if we are to sustain
their support after 2005 and with
other things happening in the world, we
have to show that this isn't the
case - which it isn't.
As ever,
development - and that includes DFID - does best when it listens
and learns
in the light of experience. That is why your views today and in
the weeks to
come will be so important as together we try and find a way
forward.
Because ultimately I believe government can and does make a
difference to
peoples' lives. Politics has done this here in the UK,
changing the lives of
poor people in a way that would be unrecognisable to
their ancestors. And
poor people in developing countries want politics to do
the same for them,
and they want to be part of the process.
I think
making progress is about making politics work.
Politics that determines
the choices we make. Politics that determines what
kind of society it is we
wish to live in and create and hand on to the next
generation. And it will
be politics that will help us make poverty history.
From The Star (SA), 3 February
By Karyn Maughan
Nearly three years ago, a South
African businessman persuaded a court that
the Democratic Republic of Congo
owed him about R72-million for his exposure
of a R6-billion cobalt theft
operation, allegedly operated by fugitive
millionaire Billy Rautenbach. Now,
after spending R7-million to ensure that
he receives the money due to him -
Frans Rootman has made legal history by
attaching his claim for the money on
to an estimated R6-billion reparations
payment that Uganda has been ordered
to pay the DRC. Rootman's legal team
also claim that his efforts to get the
money back have stopped the DRC from
completing any financial transactions
overseas. The judgment has recorded
that his claim has been recognised in
the United States, Britain, Belgium,
Zambia and Uganda.
Rootman's
attachment of the currently undetermined reparations payment,
which was
ordered by the International Court of Justice in The Hague just
before
Christmas, is the latest in his efforts to recover the money he is
owed.
Speaking to The Star yesterday, the 49-year-old father-of-two said he
had
received death threats over his refusal to back down. But what kind of
message would it send to the little guys trying to do business in Africa if
I just gave up? "At least I have the resources and know-how to fight this,"
he said. In addition to seizing and auctioning off a DRC presidential
Falcon-50 Jet for about R12-million, Rootman's lawyers have also
successfully frozen R120-million worth of gold, diamonds and foreign
exchange deposited by the DRC in two Belgian banks.
Rootman's
woes began when, at the request of the DRC's late president,
Laurent Kabila,
he started investigating the disappearance of large amounts
of cobalt, a
heavy metal central to the operation of jet engines, from the
DRC's
state-controlled mining company, Gecamines. At the time, the disgraced
former head of Hyundai South Africa, Rautenbach, against whom an
international warrant of arrest is currently outstanding,was chief executive
of Gecamines. He is believed to be living in Zimbabwe. Rootman recovered 139
tons of cobalt but was never compensated for his efforts, despite being
promised 10% of any amount he tracked down. After six years of legal
wrangling, which saw Rootman's claim make its way through several courts,
Pretoria High Court Judge Willie Hartzenberg ruled in the businessman's
favour in 2003. But the euphoria of the precedent-setting victory was
short-lived. According to Rootman's legal team, the DRC has prevented him
from recovering the money by hiding its overseas assets.
In an
effort to force the government to assist him, Rootman asked the
Pretoria
High Court to order that President Thabo Mbeki had a constitutional
duty to
help him enforce Judge Hartzenberg's ruling. Judge Chris Botha was
not
convinced and ruled that Mbeki was not responsible for Rootman's
predicament
and did not have to take steps under the constitution to help
citizens
enforce their legal rights against a foreign country. He added that
officials in the Office of the President, who had not bothered to answer any
of Rootman's letters, had "not served him well". Rootman's legal team look
set to appeal against Judge Botha's ruling in the Supreme Court of Appeal in
Bloemfontein later this year. For now, however, they are pinning their hopes
on being able to recover the cash from Uganda's reparations payment. After
hearing an application brought by the DRC in June 1999, the International
Court of Justice found the Ugandan army's activities in the DRC between
August 1998 and June 2003 violated human rights law.
Financial Times
By John Reed in Cape Town
Published: February 3
2006 18:24 | Last updated: February 3 2006 18:24
South Africa plans
to regulate conditions under which foreigners buy
land, in an attempt to
speed up its restitution programme, President Thabo
Mbeki said on
Friday.
Mr Mbeki made the announcement in his annual State of
the Nation
speech marking the opening of parliament. "This will be done in
line with
international norms and practices," he said.
South
Africa's property market has shown some of the fastest nominal
growth in the
world during the past three years. Government officials have
blamed foreign
speculators for driving up prices and sabotaging a
land-reform programme
aimed at restoring some of the country's white-owned
farmland to majority
blacks.
"Land reform and land restitution are critical to the
transformation
of our society," Mr Mbeki said. "Accordingly, the state will
play a more
central role in the land reform programme, ensuring that the
restitution
programme is accelerated."
Land is an emotive issue
in southern Africa, the last subregion of the
continent to
decolonise.
President Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe has expropriated
most of the
country's white-owned farms during the past six years,
contributing to an
economic tailspin. Namibia recently began to expropriate
some white-owned
farms in cases where the owners and claimants could not
reach agreement.
Unlike its neighbours, South Africa has to date
followed a
"willing-buyer, willing-seller" policy that respected property
rights and
the rule of law. However, on Friday Mr Mbeki said that Thoko
Didiza,
minister of agriculture and land affairs, would this year review the
policy.
Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, Mr Mbe-ki's deputy, made a similar statement
at a
national land summit in Johannesburg last year.
The
agriculture minister would also "review land acquisition models
and possible
manipulation of land prices", Mr Mbeki said.
South Africa's
government faces local elections on March 1 amid
frustration among some poor
blacks on the quality of local government, which
is dominated by the ruling
African National Congress. During the past year
and a half, several poor
municipalities have been rocked by riots against
corrupt or incompetent
local leaders.
Mr Mbeki painted an upbeat picture of South Africa
in his speech,
saying his country had entered an "age of hope". However, he
cited a poll
showing that only 45 per cent of South Africans thought that
local
government was performing well.
The president said he
planned to "pay special attention to the
critical task of strengthening
local government." The government would work
"to ensure that each and
every?.?.?.??municipality is properly positioned to
discharge its
responsibility to the people". Mr Mbeki also committed the
government and
the private sector to investing R372bn ($61bn, ?51bn, £25bn)
in public
infrastructure over three years to create jobs and improve rural
and urban
areas.
Daily Mirror, Zimbabwe
From Our
Correspondent in Bindura
issue date :2006-Feb-03
THE Minister of
Health and Child Welfare, David Parirenyatwa, this week said
there was need
to construct a new Mashonaland Central provincial hospital in
Bindura
because the present one had overstayed its usefulness.
Speaking during a tour
of the hospital, Parirenyatwa said the hospital built
in 1937 could no
longer accommodate new equipment.
"Everything at this hospital is almost
falling apart, the buildings are too
old such that we cannot install new
equipment. Last year some dialysis
machines for kidney patients were donated
to the hospital, but the machines
are not being used as they cannot be
installed in these old structures,"
Parirenyatwa said.
He pledged to work
with Bindura Town Council and all other government
departments to speed up
plans for the construction of a new provincial
hospital, which he said,
would start soon.
He brought a plan for the proposed new provincial hospital
that was shown to
the Governor and Resident Minister, Ephraim Masawi, who
was present during
the tour.
The current hospital, with a capacity to
accommodate 120 patients, serves 12
other districts in the
province.
Parirenyatwa expressed concern over the shortage of basic equipment
at the
hospital, as most of them were now grounded.
"I have noticed that
kitchen staff has turned to firewood to prepare meals
for patients. This is
unacceptable for such a big institution which caters
for Mashonaland Central
Province," Parirenyatwa said.
Malfunctioning boilers and shortages of coal
were cited as the main reasons
why the hospital resorted to the use of
firewood as the source of power.
"Only one boiler out of the three that we
have is working at the moment and
this makes it difficult for us to feed our
patients on time," an employee at
the hospital told Parirenyatwa.
When
the minister visited the hospital mortuary, a terrible stench could be
smelt, as most bodies had turned bad due poor refrigeration.
Parirenyatwa
said poor mortuary refrigeration was not confined only to
Bindura hospital,
but in most government run health institutions throughout
the country.
He
promised that measures would be taken soon to change the face of all
hospitals in the country.
"As you are all aware, the government is going
through a difficult time as
the shortage of foreign currency persists. My
ministry, however, continues
to look for other alternatives to survive,"
Parirenyatwa said.
Most hospital equipment and drugs are sourced outside
Zimbabwe, but the
government has been struggling to get hard to buy
them.
Daily Mirror, Zimbabwe
The Daily
Mirror Reporter
issue date :2006-Feb-03
THE government has completed
auditing A2 farms amid reports the review
unearthed multiple farm ownership
and that vast tracts of productive land
was lying idle.
Lands, Land
Reform and Resettlement Minister Didymus Mutasa told The Daily
Mirror on
Wednesday that the audit was complete, but his ministry was still
studying
the report before its final release to the public.
"We have completed the
audit, but we will inform you when it is ready to be
released as a public
document," said Mutasa who is also the Minister of
State for National
Security. "I will be calling for a press conference to
reveal issues raised
in the audit."
Last month, Mutasa, the first black Parliamentary Speaker,
said preliminary
indications in the audit showed that 70 percent of land
allocated to new
farmers was productive while the rest was lying idle.
He
said the audit had identified a number of problems affecting farming
activities in areas where people were resettled during the land reform
exercise.
The land reform programme which kicked off in 2000 has had its
ups and
downs.
Some farmers were wrongfully allocated land and later
shifted while
accusations of multiple farm ownership have been at the centre
of the
programme with fingers being pointed at people in influential
positions.
Despite the allegations and a previous audit, no one has really
been brought
to book or found guilty.
Only Obert Mpofu, then a Governor
in Matabeleland, gave up a farm in line
with the one-man-one farm
policy.
The land audit was conducted on 4 867 farms that were allocated to A2
farmers countrywide.
Last December, Agriculture Minister Joseph Made told
the Zanu PF people's
conference in Esigodini that the acreage under crops on
the farms was only
25 percent.
The conference recommended to the
government to deal decisively with the
issue of multiple land
ownership.
It also resolved that people owning both A1 and A2 farms should
choose what
they preferred so that they release other farms.
Daily Mirror, Zimbabwe
From
Paidamoyo Muzulu in Chinhoyi
issue date :2006-Feb-03
FUEL shortages
facing the country have affected drought relief distribution
in Mashonaland
West, with villagers in Omay going for three months without
receiving food
aid from the government.
District Administrator for Kariba, Jim Kadziya, told
the provincial
development committee in Chinhoyi recently that apart from an
acute shortage
of the precious liquid, the dilapidated state of the roads
had also
contributed to donors shunning the area.
He said the area last
received 120 tonnes of maize in October last year.
"A number of reasons have
been proffered, among them, the shortage of fuel
and the reluctance of
transporters to use the bad roads in Omay communal
area," Kadziya said. He
added that he had since written to the Grain
Marketing Board (GMB) in a bid
to find a way the food aid can be distributed
in the district. GMB was
expected to deliver 2 000 tonnes of maize every
month.
However,
Provincial Administrator for Mashonaland West, Christopher Shumba,
said:
"Efforts are being made to make sure that Omay communal area would
receive
food relief. Fuel would be made available to make it easier for the
GMB to
transport the maize to the area."
Meanwhile, Save the Children (UK), a
non-governmental organisation (NGO),
has been supplying supplementary food
to primary school pupils in the area.
"Save the Children (UK) has come to the
aid of pupils in the area and they
provide supplementary feeding at primary
schools. This has been of great
help to the children from Omay," Kadziya
said.