Three Tsvangirai supporters died last
week
The European Union has said it will not impose sanctions on
Zimbabwe's leaders after being promised that election observers would be allowed
in ahead of the 9-10 March poll.
The EU had warned that unless observers were allowed to deploy over the
week-end, sanctions such as a travel ban would be imposed on President Robert
Mugabe and his close associates.
There has been no attempt to prevent us
deploying
|
Emma Udwin, EU |
Last week, the Commonwealth rejected pressure from the UK
to suspend Zimbabwe and also said it would send observers.
The opposition Movement for Democratic Change said that three of its
activists had been murdered and another four abducted in the past week in
pre-election violence.
"There has been no attempt to prevent us deploying some of the individuals
who will take part in the core team," European Commission spokeswoman Emma Udwin
told a news conference. "So there is no need to take a decision on sanctions."
The EU has not yet sent any observers into the country but hopes to have a
small team in place later this week and 150 before the elections.
British ban
After earlier saying that no foreign observers would be allowed, Zimbabwe
relented and invited representatives from several organisations.
However, Mr Mugabe said that British citizens would not be allowed and both
the EU and the Commonwealth have agreed not include any Britons in their teams.
Mugabe urged his supporters to defend
themselves
|
Mr Mugabe says that the former colonial power is trying to remove him from
power because of his plans to redistribute land.
Rejecting calls for Zimbabwe to be suspended, secretary general Don McKinnon
said that the most important thing was to get observers into the country, to
help ensure that the elections would be free and fair.
MDC secretary general Welshman Ncube said that the latest fatality was
Tichaona Katsamudanga who died on Monday after an attack last month.
Reconciliation
The man who will contest the March elections against Mr Mugabe on Sunday
urged his supporters not to respond to the violence.
"I know there are those among us clamouring for revenge. I want to tell you
that we cannot afford that," he said.
"When we come to power we will pursue a policy of reconciliation because that
is the only way to build a country."
On Friday, Mr Mugabe opened his campaign, blaming the violence on the
opposition.
"We don't condone violence, but I'm not saying you should fold your hands if
you are provoked," he said.
BBC
Monday, 4 February, 2002, 14:58 GMT
Zanu-PF
- more than just Mugabe
Zanu-PF will survive the post-Mugabe
era
By BBC News Online's Joseph Winter
People close
to President Robert Mugabe say that he is the only person
capable of holding
the ruling Zanu-PF party together.
This is because it is not - contrary
to what many assume - a homogenous
grouping happy merely to act as a vehicle
for Mr Mugabe to stay in power as
long as he wants.
Like political
parties throughout the world, it is riven by ideology,
method, ethnicity and,
above all, personal ambition.
For at least a decade, Zanu-PF heavyweights
have been vying with each other
to take over when the 77-year-old steps
down.
But Mr Mugabe has so far managed to play them off against each
other and
remain on top.
Dissent
During the debate on the
controversial media bill, some of these internal
tensions came to the
fore.
Ruling party MP Eddison Zvobgo said the original bill was "the
most
calculated and determined assault on our liberties guaranteed by
the
constitution".
Using his influential position as chairman of the
parliamentary legal
committee, this Harvard-educated lawyer succeeded in
delaying its passage by
two weeks and wringing some minor concessions from
the government.
Unlike others, Mr Zvobgo has never hidden his ambition to
succeed Mr Mugabe.
One of his closest allies, Dzikamai Mavhaire, then a
Zanu-PF MP, told
parliament in 1997 that "the president should go". He lost
his senior
position in the party, as have other Zvobgo allies in his home
area of
Masvingo.
Mr Zvobgo himself was sacked from the cabinet in
2000 and then also lost his
place in the Zanu-PF politburo.
Gravy
train
With the Movement for Democratic Change proving itself to be a
credible
challenger, Mr Mugabe felt he had to be able to focus his energies
on the
opposition, without being worried about which of his supposed allies
might
be stabbing him in the back.
But Mr Zvobgo is not
alone.
Just after the 2000 party congress decided that Mr Mugabe would be
its
candidate for these elections, I met a depressed Zanu-PF MP complaining
of a
missed opportunity to "get rid of the old man".
So why hadn't he
spoken up during the congress? "The place was crawling with
war veterans,"
came the reply.
These so-called "young Turks" do exist but they are not
ready to take the
risk of openly defying Mr Mugabe.
They know that
doing so at the moment would certainly mean internal
discipline - losing
their seats on the political gravy train - and
possibly
worse.
Socialism
While some oppose Mr Mugabe on
personal grounds or because they feel his
star is waning, others have
ideological differences or feel that the use of
violence is wrong.
On
several occasions, ministers and even the vice-president have announced
that
illegal occupations of white-owned farms would cease, only for the
president
to over-rule them.
Mr Mugabe has spent his political life espousing
socialism. He is currently
imposing price controls on a variety of staple
foods and taking land from
rich whites to give to poor blacks.
But his
Finance Minister, Simba Makoni, is a firm believer in the
free
market.
He once said that Zimbabwe needs the rest of the world
but the rest of the
world does not need Zimbabwe - something his fiercely
proud president would
never admit.
His understanding and belief in the
global economy was intended to persuade
international donors to resume their
aid, suspended because of concerns over
corruption and the land reform
programme.
But they knew that real power was concentrated in Mr Mugabe's
hands and that
however amenable and well-meaning his finance minister was,
the president
viewed the world through different
eyes.
Heir-apparent
While Mr Makoni is well-respected outside
Zanu-PF, the man currently
best-placed to succeed Mr Mugabe is Emmerson
Mnangagwa, the speaker of
parliament.
He was state security minister
in the early 1980s, when the army killed
thousands of Mr Mugabe's ethnic
Ndebele opponents.
Some see his hand behind the current campaign of
violence against opposition
supporters.
But many Ndebeles with bitter
memories of the 1980s, even within Zanu-PF,
would not welcome him becoming
president.
When the Mugabe era does finally come to an end, it will not
spell the end
of Zanu-PF.
But the divisions and personal rivalries
which are largely being suppressed
for the moment will come to the fore and
it may not be a pretty sight.
MSNBC
U.N. rights investigator slams Zimbabwe press
law
GENEVA, Feb. 4 — A U.N. special investigator for press
freedom on Monday
accused Zimbabwe of violating international human rights
law by imposing
tight restrictions on journalists.
''The provisions
infringe on the right to freedom of opinion and expression
as guaranteed in
article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,''
said United
Nations rapporteur Abid Hussain of
India.
Hussain, special rapporteur on
the right to freedom of opinion and
expression, said in a statement that he
had written to President Robert
Mugabe's government urging it to repeal the
controversial law limiting
foreign reporters' access to the country and
imposing tight controls on
local
media.
Under the legislation approved by
Zimbabwe's parliament last week, a
state-appointed commission will license
journalists, who could face up to
two years in jail for breaking the
regulations.
Hussain warned that the
bill would ''give rise to excessive
government control over the media'' and
urged the government to agree to his
request, first made in September, to
make a fact-finding visit.
Zimbabwe is
preparing for elections March 9-10. Britain, the United
States and the
European Union are threatening sanctions against Mugabe and
his inner circle
if he fails to ensure the voting is fair.
ABC NEWS
Zimbabwe Opposition Says More Supporters
Killed
By Stella Mapenzauswa
HARARE (Reuters) -
Zimbabwe's leading opposition party accused President
Robert Mugabe's party
on Monday of killing three of its activists and
abducting four in the buildup
to March elections.
The EU said Zimbabwe had fended off a threat of
sanctions by allowing it to
send in election observers, but confusion
surrounded the question. An EU
spokeswoman in Brussels said observers had
arrived, but EU diplomats in
Harare said they had not.
Morgan
Tsvangirai, leader of the chief opposition Movement for Democratic
Change
(MDC), launched his campaign on Sunday to sever Mugabe's 22-year hold
on
power in presidential elections set for March 9-10.
Tsvangirai appealed
for calm from his supporters, despite what he described
as a "campaign of
violence" waged by Mugabe's ZANU-PF party.
MDC Secretary-General Welshman
Ncube said in a statement that ZANU-PF
militants had also tried to violently
break up at least four MDC rallies
over the weekend, assaulting opposition
supporters in front of police.
"Over the past week, ZANU-PF has murdered
three MDC activists," Ncube said,
adding that the latest fatality was
Tichaona Katsamudanga, who died on
Monday after an attack last
month.
"Yesterday (Sunday) ZANU-PF supporters... abducted four MDC
supporters in
Chipinge South," he added. "They are still missing." The
ZANU-PF and police
were unavailable for comment.
The MDC says nearly
100 of its supporters have died in political violence
since early 2000, when
militants loyal to Mugabe began invading white-owned
farms.
"I know
there are those among us clamoring for revenge. I want to tell you
that we
cannot afford that," Tsvangirai said. "When we come to power we will
pursue a
policy of reconciliation because that is the only way to build
a
country."
On Friday, Mugabe insisted it was the MDC that was fueling
unrest and told
supporters as he launched his own election campaign: "We
don't condone
violence, but I'm not saying you should fold your hands if you
are
provoked."
BIGGEST THREAT
Tsvangirai, 49, is seen as the
biggest threat to Mugabe's bid to extend a
presidency that the MDC says has
ruined a once-vibrant economy and isolated
the country
internationally.
EU foreign ministers agreed last week to impose "smart
sanctions" on Mugabe
and 19 top associates if Harare prevented deployment of
EU observers by a
Sunday deadline.
In Brussels, a European Commission
spokeswoman said a six-strong advance
team had arrived in Zimbabwe. The
observers will check on opposition claims
that Mugabe plans to rig the
vote.
"There has been no attempt to prevent us deploying some of the
individuals
who will take part in the core team," Commission spokeswoman Emma
Udwin told
a news conference, adding that some had already arrived. "So there
is no
need to take a decision on sanctions."
But an official at the EU
office in Harare said no observers had yet arrived
in Zimbabwe.
"There
are no observers in the country. We have not yet received an
invitation from
the Zimbabwe government," the official said. He declined to
be named and
would not give further details.
International condemnation of Mugabe's
government has mounted as Zimbabwe
pushes through parliament laws which
opponents say set the stage for a
dictatorship.
The latest, on
Thursday, was a tough media bill that critics say will stifle
debate in the
run-up to the poll by restricting access for foreign reporters
and imposing
tight controls on local media.
A United Nations special investigator for
media freedom accused Zimbabwe on
Monday of violating article 19 of the
U.N.'s Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, which upholds freedom of
opinion and expression.
Abid Hussain said he had written to Mugabe's
government urging it to repeal
the media law.
Mugabe has remained
defiant. On Saturday, he vowed again that his
controversial program of
seizures of land from affluent white farmers would
continue, calling the
policy "the last Zimbabwe revolution."
At least nine white farmers have
been killed and hundreds of workers have
been assaulted in land invasions by
pro-government militants since
February
2000.
Government To Revisit Privatisation
Policy?
Zimbabwe Standard (Harare)
February 3,
2002
Paul Nyakazeya
IN what could be seen as a policy u-turn,
the government has said the
privatisation of public utilities has failed as
it has resulted in economic
hardships for consumers.
This was said by
industry and international trade minister Herbert Murerwa,
in a speech read
on his behalf by his permanent secretary, Stewart
Comberbach, at the First
Regional Members' Strategic Meeting for Africa held
in Harare on
Monday.
The meeting drew participants from African consumer
organisations, as well
as some from Bangladesh.
Said Murerwa: "One
such policy that has hit consumers hard is the
privatisation of public
utilities which has made it difficult for most
consumers to afford the
consequent astronomically high bills. Furthermore,
the opening up of local
market to foreign goods has, in some cases, crippled
local industry and
resulted in the flooding of the market with inferior and
sometimes dangerous
products.
"Some of the negative consequences of theses economic
programmes could have
been foreseen and avoided, or at least minimised, if
local conditions had
been adequately taken into
consideration."
Murerwa said Zimbabweans were experiencing the worst
economic climate since
independence, because of the "ever increasing prices
of commodities, and the
hostile economic environment".
He said in an
attempt to come up with a viable economic recovery programme
for Zimbabwe,
the government would welcome input from consumer
organisations, as their
objectives were similar to the government's own
goals.
"Many
development models have been tried in Africa in attempts to lift
the
continent out of its economic difficulties, but results so far have not
been
very encouraging," the minister said.
Economists interviewed by
Standard Business generally agreed with Murerwa's
sentiments, especially in
light of the current economic difficulties.
Said Rudo Dhla-ndhlara, an
economic consultant: "Privatisation of public
utilities is not a wise move,
especially when the economy is at an all time
low, with inflation pegged at
112%. The inflationary environment has also
had negative effects on company
production costs for both domestic and
export markets.
"This reduced
the competitiveness of the country's exports, thereby
compounding the current
foreign exchange crisis. A lot of people will be
retrenched, worsening the
situation in many people's homes. It will all boil
down to
subsidies."
Consumer Council executive director, Elizabeth Nerwande, said
government
should adopt polices that protected the interests of consumers.
"With
privatisation of public utilities making it very difficult for
consumers to
afford high prices, the consumer's position will remain weak in
the market
place as a result of lack of effective protective mechanisms to
safeguard
their interests," said Nerwande.
In a bid to raise money,
the cash-strapped Zimbabwe government has either
privatised or commercialised
public utilities such as the Post and
Telecommunications Corporation, the
Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority
and the Cold Storage Company. The move
has resulted in steep price hikes for
services and goods offered by affected
organisations.
Other companies ear-marked for privatisation are Air
Zimbabwe, part of
National Railways of Zimbabwe, the Forestry Company of
Zimbabwe and the
Department of Meteorological
Services.
Daily News
High Court ruling exposes election to rigging:
Madhuku
2/4/02 12:23:34 PM (GMT +2)
Staff
Reporter
LOVEMORE Madhuku, the chairman of the National Constitutional
Assembly, on
Thursday said allowing people to vote wherever they liked during
the 9 and
10 March presidential election would expose the process to massive
rigging.
On 25 January, High Court Judge Justice Rita Makarau ordered
Tobaiwa Mudede,
the Registrar-General, to allow people to vote anywhere
during the
presidential poll. This followed a court challenge by the
opposition MDC of
a government order to force people to vote in their
constituencies.
People, mostly supporters of the MDC, have fled their
rural constituencies
in the face of brutal attacks by Zanu PF supporters
ahead of the
presidential election. Madhuku, a constitutional law lecturer at
the
University of Zimbabwe, said allowing people to vote wherever they
wished
would expose the system to massive rigging.
He said: "Yes,
people have been displaced but the numbers are not
significant. Let us try to
be sober about it. "A more reasonable court
application would be to allow
transportation of the displaced people to go
and vote in their
constituencies. Allowing people to vote anywhere would
be
chaotic."
Madhuku was speaking in Harare at a Zimbabwe Election
Support Network public
meeting on "The upcoming tripartite elections in
Harare and Chitungwiza". On
23 January the government gazetted a statutory
instrument announcing that
the elections for the Harare mayor and
councillors, and for the mayor of
Chitungwiza, would be held at the same time
as the presidential election.
This was despite a Supreme Court ruling
that the elections for Harare be
held on or before 11 February.
The court
did not set a date for the Chitungwiza mayoral poll. The statutory
instrument
was declared invalid by High Court judge Justice Moses Chinhengo
last Monday.
Mudede on Friday gave notice that the mayoral and council
elections for
Harare would go ahead on 11 February as ordered by the
courts.
Daily News
Zanu PF youths raid maize-meal delivery
trucks
2/4/02 11:19:01 AM (GMT +2)
From Mduduzi
Mathuthu in Bulawayo
ZANU PF youths were stopping maize-meal delivery
vans and taking by force
the scarce staple food in Victoria Falls and
demanding Zanu PF membership
cards from residents as a crippling maize-meal
shortage took root in
south-western Zimbabwe last week.
Victoria Falls
residents equated the activities of the Zanu PF youths to
extortion.
They
said they were being forced to buy Zanu PF cards, now known as the
"internal
passport", to enable them to buy maize-meal.
The latest raids follow a
similar swoop by the youths on Zambian
cross-border traders two weeks ago.
The youths seized an assortment of
goods. Villagers chase Social Welfare
officers away From Our Correspondent
Some Zanu PF supporters and villagers in
Mhende Ward 3 of Chirumhanzu
District recently forced two officers from the
Department of Social Welfare
to flee after they opposed what they said was an
irrational distribution of
drought relief funds.
More than 500 Zanu PF
supporters gathered at Chirumhanzu Primary School and
Mangoma business centre
challenged the two officers to disburse at least $1
000 to each of the 1 500
families in the ward. The villagers said that $500
per family was too little.
The government recently announced that each
family would receive at least $1
000 a month for food supplies in the face
of a severe food shortage
throughout the country.
Ward Councillor, Phineas Zvenyika noted that most
families in Chirumanzu
District were receiving between $1 000 and $2 000 per
month. Some villagers
in wards like Chengwena, Chinyuni, Maware and Siyahokwe
had been receiving
at least $1 000 a family since the introduction of the
scheme in October
last year.
Zvenyika said since October, less than
200 families in Mhende Ward 3
actually benefited from the scheme. He said
that transparency and fairness
had not been exercised in the distribution of
the funds. David Whindizi, the
Zanu PF youth leader in Mhende Ward, openly
castigated the government for
delays in the distribution exercise.
He
said that about 4 000 people face starvation in Mhende Ward if no
contingent
plans are taken to avert the looming disaster.
He stressed that $500 a family
was not enough to buy one 50kg bag of maize,
now selling at $750.
A
Zanu PF official who declined to be named, said that the drought relief
fund
had been hijacked by senior officers who misused the fund at the
expense of
the villagers facing starvation.
The official said in some cases the
funds could easily be misappropriated
because it was likely that no
professional auditing was carried out. A
school teacher, who refused to be
named for fear of reprisal, noted that the
rural electorate were now feeling
the pinch of the economic hardships.
They were expecting the government
to resolve the crisis. However, the
government had failed dismally to provide
even basic commodities like bread,
sugar, cooking oil and mealie-meal, the
teacher said. The villagers openly
ordered the Department of Social Welfare
officers to leave the two venues of
distribution, before they became
violent.
The angry villagers openly threatened to burn the truck that was
used to
ferry the officials.
At that moment the welfare officers sped off.
They were ordered not to
return unless they brought adequate money for
distribution to all needy
villagers. About 60 000 people in Chirumanzu
District face starvation and
the situation has been worsened by the
fast-track land resettlement
exercise, throughout the country.
The
national food reserves have drastically declined with at least 500 000
metric
tonnes to be imported. Lands and Agriculture Minister, Dr Joseph Made
late
last year in December skirted a question on food reserves from the Zanu
PF MP
for Makoni West, Gibson Munyoro. Instead of answering the position on
food
reserves, Made concentrated on hectrage under cultivation in the
present
cropping season.
Daily News
Thousands won't vote despite renouncing British
citizenship
2/4/02 11:23:40 AM (GMT +2)
Staff
Reporter
THOUSANDS of former British citizens in the country who
renounced their
British citizenship will not, after all, be able to vote in
the March
presidential poll.
More than 5 000 former British nationals
and other European nationals
renounced their Zimbabwean citizenship and are
now permanent residents.
Others renounced their foreign citizenship so that
they can vote next month.
Under the new Citizenship Act dual citizenship is
illegal.
A standard letter from the office of the Registrar-General dated
25 January,
2002 notified all former British and foreign citizens that they
had been
struck off the voters' roll and had been disenfranchised.
The
notice of objection reads in part: "You are hereby notified that I
have
reason to believe - (a) that you are not entitled to be registered as
a
voter in . . . (b) that you are not qualified for registration as a voter
in
. . . on the grounds that you have in terms of Schedule 3 section 3 (3)
of
the Constitution of Zimbabwe ceased to be a citizen of Zimbabwe and
that,
unless you give notice of appeal . . . before the expiration of seven
days
from the date of this notice.
"If you give due notice of appeal,
the matter will be set down for hearing
before a magistrate of the province
in which you reside and the day and
place appointed for such hearing will be
notified to you in due course." The
development is likely to affect many
people who received the notice after
seven days within which to appeal had
expired as a result of delays in the
postal system.
The move is likely
to be seen as a desperate attempt to reduce the number of
voters in urban
centres whose political sympathies seem to favour the
opposition. In the June
2000 parliamentary election, Zanu PF lost almost all
urban seats.
"We
are spitting blood over this issue," said a Mount Pleasant dweller
who
renounced his British citizenship. "We will try to use all routes of
appeal
until they are exhausted."
The Daily News was last week inundated
with people who were in the same
predicament.
"I renounced my British
citizenship on the understanding that I would be
able to cast my vote in
March but now that I am being denied that right I
have to fight it out," said
one woman from Chisipite.
Technically, those who renounced either of
their citizenships are eligible
to vote in the March poll in which President
Mugabe will battle it out with
MDC's Morgan Tsvangirai.
Other minnows are
Shakespeare Maya of the National Alliance for Good
Governance, Paul Siwela,
an independent, and Wilson Khumbula, also
an
independent.
Daily News
Hunger gnaws Masvingo
2/4/02
11:28:52 AM (GMT +2)
From Energy Bara in Masvingo
MORE than
one million people are in desperate need of food aid in Masvingo
as hunger
tightens its grip on the province.
Villagers in Masvingo had a poor
harvest last year. The situation has
reached critical levels in Mwenezi and
Chiredzi districts, where some
families are going for days without
food.
Miriam Sengwe, a villager in Chiredzi said: "We are surviving by the
grace
of God. We have exhausted all our food reserves and some people are
going
for days without food.
We are relying on whatever is edible."
The Grain Marketing Board depots have
run out of maize stocks. The province
has run out of maize-meal and other
basic food stuffs. In Gutu alone, nearly
100 000 people are in dire need of
food aid.
Nixon Chingarande of Gutu
said: "We are appealing to the government to
urgently send food to starving
villagers here. "The situation is so bad that
some people are going to die of
hunger unless urgent measures are taken to
avert the situation. Having two
meals a day is now impossible." Masvingo
provincial administrator, Alphonse
Chikurira, yesterday said the situation
in the province was very serious and
more funds are needed to avert the
crisis.
He said the government had
provided $80 million for drought relief.
But judging by the situation on
the ground it appears they have not been
able to access the funds. The
government's ban on non-governmental
organisations' (NGOs) distribution of
food aid has worsened the situation.
Dzikamai Mavhaire, the provincial
chairman of the Red Cross Society said
NGOs had either stopped or scaled down
their operations following the ban.
NGOs such as the Red Cross Society
and Redd Barna are some of the
organisations involved in offering assistance
to the hunger-stricken
province. Chidyausiku says court was too lenient in
discharging three
American gunmen Court Reporter CHIEF Justice Godfrey
Chidyausiku and two
other judges of the Supreme Court, justices Wilson
Sandura and the now
retired Nicholas McNally last November ruled that the
discharged three
American gunmen should have been sentenced to five years for
illegal
possession of arms of war.
The three, Gary George Blanchard,
Joseph Wendel Pettijohn and John Lamonte
Dixon were arrested in March 1999 at
the Harare International Airport and
charged under the Aircraft Offences Act
as read with section 360 of the
Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act and the
Law and Order Maintenance Act
for possessing an assortment of
weapons.
In the judgment made available last Friday, the three judges
said on the
first count the appellants were each sentenced to six months in
prison with
labour. On the second count the three were each sentenced to 21
months in
prison with labour, of which nine months in jail with labour was
suspended
for five years, upon certain conditions, and six of the remaining
12 months
of their sentence was ordered to run concurrently, with six months
in prison
imposed on the first count was too lenient.
The three
appealed against both conviction and sentence in the Supreme
Court. The
Americans were released in August 2000. In arriving at the ruling
which was
overturned by the Supreme Court, the High Court said the sentence
on the
Americans was reduced because they took into account the period they
were at
Chikurubi Maximum Security Prison after their arrest and their
complaints
against police brutality.
Chidyausiku said: "In conclusion, I am
satisfied that the sentence imposed
in this case was manifestly lenient. A
sentence of five years' imprisonment
with labour would have
been
appropriate for the offence.
"In the result the appeal against
conviction and sentence by the three is
dismissed, while the appeal against
sentence by the State is allowed." He
said the back-dating of the sentence
was absurd and irregular.
"The learned trial judge did not give any
reasons for back-dating the
sentence nor did he cite any authority under
which he made the order. The
order of the learned judge in this regard is
clearly incompetent,"
Chidyausiku ruled.
The Chief Justice said the
possession of materials such as silencers, tear
gas canisters and target
selectors was not consistent with or supportive of
the three's contention
that the weapons and material were for their own
protection.
"In my
view, possession of such considerable quantities of offensive weapons
and
material was very serious. Indeed, many countries including Zimbabwe,
view
illegal possession of firearms and offensive material very seriously,"
he
said.
He said the sentence of the High Court trivialised the offences
committed by
the Americans given that the three had brought into the country
offensive
weapons.
Daily News - Leader Page
This is the Dark Age in the history
of democracy
2/4/02 10:41:47 AM (GMT +2)
SOME
time in the not-too-distant future, historians will refer to the last
few
weeks as The Dark Age of the development of democracy in Zimbabwe. In
Europe,
it was the age of unenlightenment, after the fall of the Roman
Empire, when
the barbarian Goths, Vandals and the Huns came down on the
continent from the
north and the east.
They destroyed much of the enlightenment and
knowledge built up by the
Romans. The legislative changes introduced recently
have as their naked
purpose the re-election of a president. Not one of them
is intended to bring
Enlightenment to the people who still believe
independence translates into
freedom from unrepresentative rule -
colonialism.
This particular president has grown unpopular because of
unwise political
and economic policies. The poverty of a country once admired
as an example
of Third World prosperity has been blamed on his
administration's
incompetence.
The corruption and arrogance of
successive administrations have inhibited
the people's political and economic
advancement. Their political rights have
been trampled underfoot. Today, in
the second year of the 21st century, they
are brutalised as a warning against
voting for anyone except the incumbent
president.
To achieve this
goal, the government introduced the General Laws Amendment
Act, the Public
Order and Security Act and only last week the obnoxiously
fascist Access to
Information and Protection of Privacy Bill was hurried
through
Parliament.
To do this, Parliament's age-old Standing Rules and Orders,
which give the
august House its reputation as the repository of the fairest
forms of
debate, were suspended.
The House was turned, if not into a
beerhall, then into a theatrical farce,
with MPs behaving very badly indeed.
The Bill roused such intense passion
even erstwhile allies exchanged
invective.
All three laws have as their general theme the protection of
the President
from criticism and the imposition of massive hurdles in the
path of the
opposition parties and critics of the President and the
government to
perform their legitimate function of monitoring
them.
The last law was so ill-prepared and its objectives so nakedly
anti
democratic, even members of the ruling party found it a repulsive
invasion
of every tenet of democratic principles which they thought their
party
espoused.
This is at a time when any exposure of their
unsatisfactory conduct of the
country's affairs would reduce the chances of
the President's re election.
This is at a time when the opposition
parties could attract far more crowds
to its rallies than the ruling party,
whose popularity has plummeted because
of their use of violence to force
people to vote for their candidate.
The government has blamed others for
their failure. Among them are the rich
countries of the West, which have
denied them economic aid because of a
horrible human rights
record.
Included on the "blame list" are a minority community, the
progeny of the
settlers who invaded the country in 1890.
The sins of
the fathers have been visited upon the sons and daughters, now
blamed for
retarding the economic progress of the indigenous people.
One specific
charge is that they have monopolised all the prime farming land
in the
country. They may have earned the country billions of dollars in
foreign
exchange, but the government feels its own land reform programme
will yield
even more foreign exchange, which many experts, some in the
government,
believe is so much like pie in the sky.
Before the 2000 election, Zanu PF
unleashed the so-called war veterans in
the rural constituencies. Bloodied
and battered, the voters trudged to the
polls to vote with the Cockerel of
Fear perched on their shoulders.
Today, Zanu PF, with the subtlety of the
Barbarians who brought the Dark
Ages to Europe, still aims to bring back The
Dark Age of the one-party
system to
Zimbabwe.
Daily News - Leader Page
This is an edited address given by Moyo to a
Press freedom seminar held on 22 January 1993 in Harare and reproduced, with
kind permission, from the Zimbabwe Independent.
Dear leader mentality kills Press freedom
2/4/02 10:42:52 AM (GMT +2)
By Jonathan Moyo
FREEDOM of the Press in Zimbabwe is an important topic. The topic is
important given the present threat to freedom of the Press in this country
coming from all sorts of quarters in and outside the Zanu PF government.
The threat is potentially disastrous for other basic freedoms enshrined in
our Bill of Rights, not least because the stability of Zimbabwe's political
system appears to be in dire straits due to political corruption and
bureaucratic incompetence.
Ruling politicians have become extremely nervous about their precarious
hold on power. Empirical evidence from throughout the world shows that when
ruling politicians become nervous about the security of their political
positions, they target the Press with reckless abandon.
They do this by making preposterous claims about threats to national
security. A few months ago, the Minister of State for National Security, Sydney
Sekeramayi, claimed that Zimbabwe was facing a serious threat to national
security from especially sections of the Press.
Such claims are preposterous not least because they fail to recognise that
more often than not, national security is compromised by those in power who are
in a position to trade in official secrets to which they have unlimited access.
On the basis of this premise, one can analyse considerable public information to
show that Zanu PF poses the greatest threat to national security in Zimbabwe
today.
The fact that the Press is often the first target of nervous politicians
makes freedom of the Press a good barometer of the existence of other freedoms
enshrined in our Bill of Rights.
That's why freedom of the Press is the nerve of all human rights, be they
individual or collective in nature. Where there is no freedom of the Press,
there are no other freedoms. For example, of what use is our constitutional
right to form and/or join political parties unless that right is pursued and
defended in the Press?
How can that right be enjoyed when those in power make every effort to
portray dissenting views in the Press as opposition politics bordering on
treason?
Indeed, it is not possible for Zimbabweans to enjoy the full extent of
their constitutional rights, and to exercise their commensurate duties, without
freedom of the Press.
This is true of the individual right of expression as it is of the right to
collective conscience, including the right to group dissent from sectional
decisions purporting to represent the majority will such as the 1987 Unity
Accord between Zapu and Zanu PF, which has been mischievously paraded as a
national agreement when it clearly was not.
One pervasive feature of politics here is that, like elsewhere in Africa,
Zimbabwe suffers from a crisis of governance in which some individuals have
sought to run away with politics by personalising political power.
As a nation, we have failed to construct a viable system of governance
capable of producing a government which can govern with charity towards all and
malice toward none. Our system of government does not know much about charity
because it is full of malice towards individuals and institutions perceived to
be enemies of the ruling party.
However we might want to kid ourselves, the fact is that there can be no
freedom of the Press in a country with such politics which are symptomatic of a
crisis of governance. Governance is one of those concepts better defined in
terms of what it is not.
In the first instance, governance is not equivalent to leadership which,
because it suggests that political power is vested with the head of state and
government, gives rise to personal rule. A situation of personal rule is not
only bad for governance, but it ipso facto becomes a major political constraint
of freedom of the Press.
The past 12 years have seen the institutionalisation of a "dear leader"
mentality, which has dealt a blow to freedom of the Press. It is a matter of
public record that over the years since independence, The Herald, The Chronicle
and ZBC, have never criticised President Mugabe. Not even once.
The desired subliminal effect of this miscarriage of journalism is that
readers and listeners of these media mouthpieces are supposed to believe that
Mugabe is infallible. Of course, that is nonsense. You and I know that everyone
makes mistakes and that Mugabe has made a lot of mistakes.
But the mistakes have not been covered by the government-controlled media
because of the "dear leader" mentality which has served as a major political
impediment to freedom of Press.
Yes, we should credit achievements, but this should not be done to cover up
mistakes. Indeed, the fact that Mugabe's mistakes have neither been reported nor
analysed in the government-controlled media partly explains why they have not
been corrected and why the country has an aloof political leadership which
imagines itself to be above accountability.
The tragedy of all this is that some media personnel have unashamedly
played a critical role in normalising this abnormal situation and only posterity
will tell how such editors will be treated by future generations.
The point here is that personal rule is far removed from governance. A
country run under the grip of a "dear leader" mentality cannot have a free
Press. This is a result of the mistaken belief that political power resides in
leadership. It does not, because there is more to political power than
leadership.
Theoretically, the foundation of democratic government is the consent of
the people. But in practice, the people only express their consent during
elections which, in our part of the world, tend to be fraudulent.
Outside elections, the institution of government closes its doors to the
public. Cabinet ministers and civil servants conveniently use the Official
Secrets Act to keep the public ignorant of what the government is up to.
The negative attitude towards information disclosure by the government,
especially the executive branch, is common throughout the world. What makes our
situation unique is that information is hidden from the public in order to
protect the President or his ministers.
In other countries which, like us, claim to be constitutional democracies,
the government's inclination to secrecy is countervailed by legislative
openness. Legislatures in democracies where the separation of powers is more
real than apparent, use their independence to hold government accountable to the
people. In such countries, the Press is better able to do its job. But not in
Zimbabwe.
Our experience is that Parliament has become a bully's pulpit used by the
Presidency to intimidate dissenting MPs and citizens, especially the Press, to
toe an imaginary party line.
Instead of opening up to the public and playing its constitutional role as
expected, our parliament has remained an ugly mirror image of the Rhodesian
parliament through the use of the draconian Parliamentary Immunities, Privileges
and Powers Act, 1971.
A free Press can only exist in a political environment in which the civic
public realm is so organised as to produce independent individuals,
organisations which enjoy craft-literacy and craft competence capable of
self-organisation, self-management and self-determination without political
conditionalities.
Daily News
Serious shortage of pork, poultry
looms
2/4/02 11:07:50 AM (GMT +2)
Farming
Editor
THERE is likely to be a serious shortage of livestock products
such as pigs
and poultry this year because of a decree by the government
which allows the
Grain Marketing Board (GMB) to seize maize from commercial
farmers.
Stockfeed manufacturers are already facing problems in
procuring maize to
make stockfeed. The GMB is confiscating maize from
commercial farmers using
new legislation passed on 28 December 2001, a
desperate move expected to
help the parastatal to improve maize stocks which
are at critical levels.
Zimbabwe is facing maize shortages because of a
poor rainfall season last
year that affected crop yields while a 50 percent
reduction in maize
production in the commercial farming sector as a result of
the controversy
surrounding the land issue, resulted in reduced
output.
Grain farmers are now compelled to deliver maize and grain stocks
no later
than 14 days after harvest, a development that has come about at
the
gazetting of Statutory Instrument 387 of 28 December 2001.
GMB
operations manager, Justine Mutasa was on record as saying the company
had
impounded 36 000 tonnes of maize from commercial farmers by
21 January
2002.
The 32 000 tonnes is, however, an insignificant quantity as it can
be used
by the country for a week only, provided it is quality maize that
does not
require heavy processing, food experts have said.
Zimbabwe
needs immediate maize imports of about 150 000 tonnes for use for
the next
month. A further 200 000 tonnes is required before the next harvest
in
April.
Commercial farmers however said most of the stocks being
confiscated by the
GMB was D grade maize that was not suitable for human
consumption and could
only be used for livestock feeding. The 36 000 tonnes
is enough to feed
livestock in Zimbabwe for a month only.
The Farmer
Magazine issue of 29 January 2002 said some farmers were
struggling to get
adequate supplies of stockfeed because of the maize
seizures. Stockfeed
manufacturers have confirmed the
shortages.
Daily News
GMB seals deals with SA firms for supply of
maize
2/4/02 11:08:45 AM (GMT +2)
By Takaitei
Bote
THE Grain Marketing Board (GMB), last week sealed deals with two
South
African companies which are going to supply Zimbabwe with 60 000 tonnes
of
maize.
Zimbabwe is facing a serious food shortage crisis because
production last
year was affected by farm occupations which forced commercial
farmers to
reduce production by 50 percent, while the communal sector was
affected
alternately by poor and excessive rains.
Zimbabwe, which has
completely run out of maize, needs 150 000 tonnes
immediately which would be
used for the next month. A further 200 000 tonnes
is required for use until
the country is able to harvest maize after April.
The 60 000 tonnes which
are to be imported into the country soon will only
be able to sustain the
country for two weeks. While national consumption is
150 000 tonnes a month,
120 000 tonnes is required for human consumption in
a month, while 30 000
tonnes is for livestock.
The GMB, which is heading an 18-member
delegation from Zimbabwe visiting
South Africa to buy maize, had had very
little success since the visit two
weeks ago. The GMB signed a contract with
Cargill South Africa, which is to
supply Zimbabwe with 50 000 tonnes at a
value of US$175,75 (Z$9 666,25) a
tonne ex-silo.
Ex-silo means that
the GMB will organise its own transport and will incur
more costs to finally
land the maize in Zimbabwe. In another contract, the
GMB agreed with the
Republic of South Africa Agri (RSA Agri) which will
supply it with 10 000
tonnes of maize delivered to Bulawayo at a cost of
US$221 (Z$12 155) a
tonne.
Cargill South Africa managing director Andreas Rickmers,
asked if the
company was going to supply maize, said: "Yes, I can not comment
on that. We
do not disclose any trade deals to the Press. If the GMB wants to
disclose
it, it is up to it."
Last week Rickmers confirmed his company
was negotiating with the GMB, but
he refused to give details. RSA Agri
director Jonathan Edwards said: "We
have agreed to supply 10 000 tonnes of
maize to GMB. Letters of credit are
being organised and hopefully we will be
able to start moving the maize next
week latest."
Sources in the South
African maize industry said however, the GMB would need
to fork out another
US$32 (Z$1 760) a tonne for the transportation of the 50
000 tonnes of maize
to Zimbabwe and another US$40 (Z$2 200) a tonne for
handling and bagging
costs since they agreed GMB would organise its own
transport.
One
commodity trader in South Africa said: "The GMB could have saved money
if it
had signed an agreement to let Cargill deliver the maize into the
country.
Now they are having to organise with transporters who will charge
more
money."
The commodity broker said if Cargill had delivered the maize to
Zimbabwe, it
would have cost Zimbabwe about US$230 (Z$12 650) a tonne but it
would now
cost the country more than US$250 (Z$13 750) a tonne to involve
another
transporter.
The South African sources said Viamax Logistics,
a transport company, was
currently negotiating with GMB to import the 50 000
tonnes of maize into
Zimbabwe.
Viamax managing director, Andrew Lunga
refused to give details. He said:
"Procedurally, I am not allowed to talk to
the Press. "There is a
confidentiality agreement with our customers and
ourselves that we should
not disclose such information."
The sources
said it would probably take two weeks for the 50 000 tonnes to
land in
Zimbabwe while people here starve. Meanwhile the five Zimbabwean
companies
which had won tenders to source maize for the GMB, have allegedly
been
dumped.
Sources close to the GMB said last Friday that most of the
companies had
allegedly failed to raise a performance fee, which a tender
respondent pays
at agreement point.
The respondent of a tender pays a
certain percentage of the value of the
contract as a security deposit and if
the respondent fails to perform, the
money is taken by the
tenderer.
Newsday
Mugabe Reverting To Strong-Arm
Ways
By Samson Mulugeta
AFRICA
CORRESPONDENT
February 4, 2002
Harare, Zimbabwe -- An
intelligence official who had run one of his era's
dirtiest undercover wars,
Ken Flower expected the worst 22 years ago as he
strode toward the office of
this country's new leader, a man he had tried to
assassinate several
times.
Robert Mugabe laughed when Flower showed a readiness to confirm
his agents'
attempts to kill the leader of the liberation struggle. "Yes, but
they all
failed, otherwise we would not be here together.
"We were
trying to kill each other; that's what the war was about,” Flower
recalled
Mugabe saying. "What I am concerned with now is that my public
statement
should be believed when I say that I have drawn a line through
the
past.”
Flower, who commanded the Rhodesian secret service that
helped kill
thousands of Mugabe's guerrilla comrades in a decade-long bush
war, wrote in
his memoirs that he left Mugabe's office thinking he might have
a place in
the newly declared nation of Zimbabwe.
Today, 22 years
after Mugabe took office as a conciliator, he has polarized
his country with
his struggle to stay in power. In the past decade, as he
and his party have
lost support over the declining economy and rampant
corruption, Mugabe and
his supporters have defended their positions
increasingly through violence
and intimidation, scholars and independent
political analysts say. At 77,
Mugabe is seeking a new six-year term as
president in elections next month,
and pre-election violence, a fixture of
politics here for many years, is
running higher than usual.
Human-rights groups say Mugabe's ruling party,
the Zimbabwe African National
Union,has launched a campaign of intimidation,
beatings and murder against
the opposition Movement for Democratic Change.
Independent newspapers
catalog daily attacks against the opposition, and they
carry photographs of
opposition members of parliament who have been abducted
and beaten by gangs
linked to the ruling party.
The head of the army,
a Mugabe ally, has said the military will not support
a victory by anyone who
did not fight in the liberation war, a pointed
rejection of Mugabe's
opponent, MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai, who officially
launched his campaign
yesterday.
For many who have followed Mugabe's career, his transformation
from
statesman to strongman is a return to form.
"His style has been
very authoritarian since the days of the liberation
struggle,” said John
Makumbe, a professor of political science at the
University of Zimbabwe. "All
that has been disguised by a democratic
constitution which he went along with
as long as he got his way.”
Mugabe was born into a poor village family in
1924, a year after Britain
granted self-governing status to white settlers
who had trekked north from
South Africa at the turn of the century under the
leadership of mining
magnate and politician Cecil Rhodes. As a youth, he was
a loner who didn't
much like sports but loved books. He won a scholarship to
the University of
Fort Hare in South Africa, the region's first black
university and the alma
mater of South African leader Nelson
Mandela.
Returning to Rhodesia as one of the country's few educated
blacks, Mugabe
quickly rose to leadership in the black rebellion against the
white minority
government, which jailed him for 10 years.
After years
of bitter guerrilla war, Mugabe and other black leaders
negotiated a
transition to majority rule under the 1979 Lancaster House
agreement brokered
by Britain. But he chafed at the compromise.
"Why should we be denied the
ultimate joy of having militarily overthrown
the regime?” Mugabe asked at the
time, complaining that the leaders of
Zambia and Mozambique, who had harbored
his guerrilla fighters, had forced
him to negotiate.
After winning
election as prime minister, Mugabe gave many indications of a
commitment to
reconciliation. He vowed there would be no retribution against
whites and
kept white officials in his cabinet and as head of the army.
Michael
Pearce, a white architect who had opposed the Rhodesian government
from
exile, said he returned because of Mugabe. "He seemed fantastic,”
Pearce
said. "He won the war, did everything. We forgot this man is a
revolutionary,
not a democrat.”
Even in those early, relatively conciliatory years in
power, Mugabe did not
shy away from using force. In 1983, he sent his army's
North Korean-trained
Fifth Brigade to the southern Zimbabwean region of
Matabeleland, the home
turf of an ethnic and political rival group. The
troops suppressed an
uprising there by veterans of the liberation war -- but
they also sowed
terror. According to a 1997 report by Zimbabwe's Catholic
Commission for
Justice and Peace, the Fifth Brigade killed at least 2,000
people, including
women, children and elders it suspected of helping or
harboring dissidents.
The atrocities were largely ignored by the world,
but not by many
Zimbabweans, who still wait for a day of
reckoning.
"Mugabe wants to die in office,” Makumbe said. "Otherwise, he
knows one day
he will be called upon to account for his
actions.”
Still, until recently, Mugabe had retained his reputation as a
hero of the
liberation struggle and father of the country. Millions of
Zimbabweans
credit Mugabe for advances in education, health and agriculture
under his
rule.
"I wouldn't be where I am today if it weren't for
him,” said Dr. P.F.
Chimedza, a family practitioner in Harare. "We received
first-rate
education, and my friends and I went on to medical school. We now
have a
health facility in every district of the country, and Mugabe made
that
possible.”
Mugabe and his party lost support as a generation
reached adulthood with no
memory of his role as a liberation leader and as
the economy declined
steadily. In 1996, Mugabe won re-election, but his
victory was tainted by a
turnout of only 32 percent and by the withdrawal of
his rivals, who
complained that the vote was rigged. In 2000, the newly
formed MDC won an
unprecedented 57 of 120 elected parliamentary
seats.
Increasingly, Mugabe has sought to rally his supporters with the
emotional
issue of land. About 4,000 commercial farmers, the descendants of
the
original white settlers, own about half of Zimbabwe's land, while
millions
of impoverished blacks remain landless.
While Mugabe's
government and the white farmers union have promised to
develop a plan for a
peaceful redistribution of land to blacks, and Britain
has promised to help
fund the necessary land purchases, no consensus was
reached. For the past two
years, Mugabe supporters, notably ex-combatants
from the war of liberation,
have been seizing land on their own.
The ex-guerrillas have looted
property and beaten and murdered farmers and
farm-workers who resisted,
according to Amnesty International, Human Rights
watch and Amani Trust, a
Zimbabwe-based human-rights organization.
Since 2000, Mugabe and his
allies have promulgated decrees and laws
legalizing the expropriation of
land, have forced out judges who ruled
against them and introduced
legislation making it a crime for the press to
criticize the
president.
Last month, President George W. Bush signed legislation that
would impose
targeted sanctions against Mugabe and other top government
officials if the
State Department rules that the upcoming election is not
free and fair.
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus, heretofore stalwart
supporters of
Mugabe, all voted for the bill.
Other one-time admirers
have lamented Mugabe's evolution.
"It is a great sadness what has
happened to President Mugabe,” South
Africa's former Anglican archbishop,
Desmond Tutu, told reporters last
month. "He was one of Africa's best
leaders, a bright spark, a debonair,
well-spoken and well-read
person.”
Independent (UK)
Mugabe arrests 'Independent' reporter
Basildon Peta is first international journalist jailed under repressive
new
'security' laws
By Leonard Doyle, Foreign Editor
05 February 2002
Basildon Peta, Zimbabwe correspondent of The Independent, was arrested
and
charged last night under the country's repressive new Public Order
and
Security Act, less than a week after the legislation came into
effect.
Mr Peta, who is secretary-general of the Zimbabwean Union of
Journalists,
was being held in the central police station in Harare and was
expected to
appear in court today. His arrest coincided with claims from
Zimbabwe's main
opposition party that forces loyal to President Robert Mugabe
have killed
three of its activists and abducted another four in the build-up
to next
month's presidential elections.
Mr Peta was charged with failing to notify the authorities about
a
demonstration last Wednesday by the journalists' union against the
new
legislation. He could spend two years in jail under the charges.
"This is the first high-profile arrest under the new Public Security
Act,"
said Lovemore Maduko, a leader of the country's National
Constitutional
Assembly. "We are worried about Basildon's safety. It is very
possible that
he will be beaten up, and that it will later be claimed that he
was attacked
by prisoners or some other such nonsense."
Mr Peta was able to make a brief phone call to his wife, Florence. "He
told
me he was fine and not to worry," she said, "but I think he is in
low
spirits."
Mr Peta, a Zimbabwean national, is the first correspondent for
the
international media to be arrested under the draconian legislation. The
Act
makes it a crime to criticise or ridicule the President, and prescribes
a
death sentence or life imprisonment for anyone convicted of
"insurgency,
banditry, sabotage or terrorism".
Mr Peta has been regularly harassed by the police and threatened with
jail
over articles he has written for The Independent and other media. Last
year
his name appeared at the top of a security service hitlist of
opposition
figures. Mr Peta and four other journalists were to be "killed or
harmed"
before the presidential election.
Before his arrest yesterday Mr Peta was told by police officers that
they
were acting on orders from the highest levels of the Mugabe regime. Over
the
weekend Mr Peta's house was ransacked by the police, and he was told to
go
to the police station yesterday.
Mr Peta was accompanied to the police station by his lawyer,
Tawanda
Hondora, chairman of the Zimbabwean Lawyers for Human Rights
organisation.
Mr Hondora himself was savagely beaten by members of the ruling
Zanu-PF
party last year in full view of uniformed police officers.
The latest crackdown came as the European Union balked at the imposition
of
sanctions after deciding that President Mugabe was doing nothing to
block
the deployment of EU observers before the presidential election on 9
and 10
March.
Last week the foreign ministers threatened a visa ban and freeze on
overseas
assets for leading members of the government if election observers
were
obstructed or if the international media and the opposition were
prevented
from operating.
Commenting on Mr Peta's arrest, the Labour MEP Glenys Kinnock said: "I
urge
the authorities to release him and allow him and his colleagues to
report
freely. There is no point in pursuing the idea of an open election if
the
opposition cannot hold rallies or if journalists are being taken
into
detention."
The EU says it is holding off imposing sanctions because it still hopes
to
get its team of election observers into Zimbabwe. "The most important
thing
is to have observers in the country to help deter harassment," said
Emma
Udwin, the spokeswoman for Chris Patten, the European commissioner
for
external relations.
In Brussels and Harare, there were conflicting reports on whether
EU
observers had started to arrive. The EU said it expected its advance team
of
six to be in place this week.
Desperate Doctors Forge Marriage Certificates to Stay in
Town
African Eye News Service (Nelspruit)
February 4,
2002
Marvelous Mpofu
Bulawayo
Zimbabwe health officials
plan to prosecute 27 newly qualified doctors who
forged marriage certificates
to avoid being deployed in rural areas.
The country's attorney general's
office on Monday said it was treating the
matter as a serious criminal
offence and that the doctors could face three
years in jail if found guilty
of forgery.
The 27 were amongst 80 junior doctors who began serving a
five-year
internship on Friday.
Interns are generally deployed to the
rural areas unless they can present a
legitimate excuse to remain in the
city.
The doctors' single status was discovered when authorities at
Harare central
hospital noticed a 26-year-old intern had submitted a marriage
certificate
dated 1980. This would have made him four years old on his
wedding day.
The discovery prompted the authorities to send 30
certificates to the
registrar general for verification where only three were
found to be
authentic.
Hospital superintendent Christopher Tapfumaneyi
confirmed the incident.
"The doctors took one marriage certificate and
inserted their details before
making photocopies which they had certified by
lawyers," he said.
The lawyers are also being investigated by the
attorney general's office.
Many doctors shun working in the rural
hospitals because of unfavorable
working conditions, drug shortages and lack
of accommodation and recreation.
Harare Axes 'Educationals' for Media
Journalists
African Eye News Service (Nelspruit)
February
4, 2002
Posted to the web February 4, 2002
Patience
Rusere
Harare
Zimbabwe's Council for Tourism (ZCT) and the Zimbabwe
Tourism Authority
(ZTA) have both suspended programmes to bring foreign-based
travel
journalists to the country on educational trips.
The
programmes, introduced last year, were meant to introduce influential
writers
to Zimbabwe's wildlife and adventure tourism industry, and
simultaneously
counter growing international concern about political
developments in the
country.
"We hoped the journalists would realise that Zimbabwe remains a
cheap
destination and is still safe for tourists. But we have been forced
to
suspend the programme, because these foreign writers have instead gone
home
and written some very negative things," said ZCT president Pedia
Moyo.
The educational trips were sponsored by the local travel industry,
including
the national carrier Air Zimbabwe, the Department of National
Parks, the
United Touring Company, Zimbabwe Sun Hotels, and a series of
smaller
operators.
"We were very generous. We simply let them go
wherever they wanted, and
allowed them to speak to anyone that wanted. We
expected positive publicity,
but have instead been flooded with negative
articles about everything from
the quality of our tourism product to national
politics. The programme
simply never paid off," said Moyo.
Zimbabwe's
tourism industry has been in crisis since President Robert Mugabe
sanctioned
a controversial land reform programme in 1999, sparking land
invasions and
racial violence.
The political turmoil resulted in a 60% drop in tourist
arrivals between
2000 and 2001, with tourism earnings plummeting from US$6
billion in 1999 to
just US$1 billion in
2001.