The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
SOKWANELE
Enough is
Enough
We have a fundamental
right to freedom of expression!
On 17 August 2004, SADC leaders meeting in Mauritius adopted the SADC Protocol – Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections. Zimbabwe, as a member of SADC, also signed the Protocol and committed itself to implementing its standards.
“Mauritius Watch” provides a
regular, objective and non-partisan assessment of Zimbabwe’s compliance with the
Protocol. In the run-up to the 2005
Parliamentary Elections we note any significant failures to adhere to the SADC
standards.
This special weekly feature assumes an even greater significance now that the date of the Parliamentary Elections has been announced – 31st March. Less than 8 weeks remain before this crucial poll.
Last week the main opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), announced that it would be contesting the Elections. Although noting that “the regime has failed and failed dismally to comply with the (SADC) guidelines”, and declaring that “a free and fair election is not possible in Zimbabwe under the present conditions”, the National Council of the MDC decided “with a heavy heart” to participate in the electoral process. The statement announcing their decision ends: “We participate under protest. We participate without prejudice. We participate to keep the flames of hope for change alive.”
Date |
Incidents/Developments
|
SADC standards breached |
04.02.05 |
800
000 deceased Zimbabweans still on voters’ register Less
than eight weeks before the date of the parliamentary elections announced by
Robert Mugabe, the voters’ roll remains in a complete shambles with the names of
800 000 deceased Zimbabweans still appearing on it. This is among a litany of “chronic errors”
that could render an accurate and democratic election in March impossible
according to a report just released by an independent research group. FreeZim,
which compiled the report after carrying out extensive research on Zimbabwe’s
shambolic voters’ roll, is a local non-governmental organisation set up in
2002. In
addition to the 800 000 names of deceased voters on the roll, FreeZim also
established that another 900 000 people listed as eligible voters are not known
or do not live at the addresses under which their names appear. FreeZim has already presented these findings
in its preliminary report to the newly appointed Zimbabwe Electoral Commission
(ZEC). The chairman of the ZEC is High
Court Judge George Chiweshe, a known ally of Robert
Mugabe. Among
the startling revelations in the FreeZim report is the fact that in the Harare
North constituency, 50 per cent of the people registered as voters there do not
live at the addresses under which their names appear. The research group also said that they had
identified 300 000 names of voters that are duplicated over and again on several
pages of the register. “Over
two million of the 5.6 million names registered as voters are suspect – it is
obvious that there are chronic errors and the roll is overstated by chronic
proportions and cannot be ignored,” the group concludes. (See
the report in Zim Online (SA) www.zimonline.co.za
4.02.05) |
2.1.6 Equal opportunity to exercise the right to vote and be voted for 4.1.3 Non-discrimination in the voters’ registration 4.1.4 Existence of updated and accessible voters’ roll |
30.01.05 |
MDC ACTIVIST ASSAULTED An elderly official of the opposition Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) was last week severely assaulted by ZANU (PF) militia,
who accused him of selling MDC membership cards. Dinason Mbwana is the MDC branch chairman for Epworth and a
tailor by trade. It was while he was
visiting the authorities at Epworth Secondary School over an order for school
uniforms that he was accosted by about a dozen *youth militia. They dragged him into the bush and brutally
assaulted him with logs, sticks and sjamboks until he lost
consciousness. According to a medical report prepared by Dr Tarirai
Madamombe of Harare Central Hospital, the probability of permanent injuries as a
result of the assault were “highly possible”. Mbwana was able to identify two of his assailants and he
made a report to the local police.
However no arrests have been made and efforts to get a comment from
Constable Madondo, the investigating officer, proved
fruitless. (The full report can be seen in The Standard (30.01.05)
….. *Youth militia: The
Mugabe regime plans to incorporate more than 20 000 of its controversial youth
militias into the 21 000 strong police force ahead of the March parliamentary
election – see full article in our Mauritius Watch Report, Issue 11 of 10
January 2005. (See the report in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za 8.02.05) |
2.1.1 Full participation of citizens in the political process 2.1.2 Freedom of association 2.1.3 Political tolerance 4.1.1 Constitutional and legal guarantees of freedom and rights of the citizens 4.1.2 Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful elections 7.4 (Government to) take all necessary measures and precautions to prevent the perpetration of fraud, rigging or any other illegal practices throughout the whole electoral process, in order to maintain peace and security |
05.02.05 |
ACTIVISTS
ARRESTED FOR GIVING MDC SALUTE Thirteen opposition Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) party activists were arrested and fined Z$ 25 0000 each
by the police for allegedly insulting Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister Abednico
Ncube of the ruling ZANU-PF. The
activists were campaigning in the Gwanda area at the time when they met Ncube
who was also on the campaign trail. They
waved their open palms at Ncube, which the deputy minister claimed was insulting
to him because the open palm is a symbol of the opposition party. The
MDC publicity secretary for Matabeland South, Edward Mkhosi, expressed surprise
that the police had chosen to treat the giving of the MDC sign as a chargeable
offence. “We see this as a part of a
common pattern of intimidation that is returning to the province and the country
at large,” he said. (Reported by Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za 5.02.05) |
2.1.1 Full participation of citizens in the political process 2.1.3 Political tolerance 4.1.1. Constitutional and legal guarantees of freedom and rights of the citizens 4.1.2 Conducive environment for free, fair and peaceful elections 7.4 (Government to) safeguard the human and civil liberties of all citizens including the freedom of movement, assembly, association expression and campaigning … during the electoral process … |
04.02.05 |
DREADED CIO OPERATIVE REMAINS AT LIBERTY DESPITE COURT ORDER FOR ARREST Joseph Mwale, the dreaded Central Intelligence Organization (CIO) state security agent accused of master-minding the gruesome murder of two opposition MDC activists during the run-up to the 2000 parliamentary poll, remains a free man despite a court order to have him arrested. Although the police are aware of his whereabouts, Mwale, now sporting a heavy beard to disguise his identity, remains at liberty. It is widely known that he now operates in the Mutoko District, some 200 km north-east of Harare. Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) has condemned the government for deliberately failing to take action against Mwale. The CIO operative stands accused of murdering Talent Mabika, an MDC youth activist, and Tichaona Chiminya, the MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai’s personal assistant at Murambinda Growth Point in Buhera in 2000. The MDC activists were burnt to death when the vehicle they were travelling in was torched by Mwale and three of his accomplices. The accomplices have since been charged with murder and released on bail. It is understood that the impunity Mwale enjoys is linked to his popularity with the ruling elite on account of the success of the violent campaign he waged in destabilizing the farming operations of MDC legislator (and MP for Chimanimani), Roy Bennett at Charleswood Estate. “That one is a blue-eyed boy for the chefs (senior ZANU (PF) officials),” said a police officer based in Chimanimani. “He worked for them so tirelessly. Had it not been for him, Bennett could still be at his farm but Mwale made sure he was evicted and that happened.” At a recent ZANU (PF) provincial co-ordinating committee it was pointed out that the services of Mwale and his three accomplices were crucial to retaining the Buhera North seat. (See the full report in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za 04.02.05) |
4.1.2 Conducive
environment for free,
fair and peaceful
elections 7.5 (Government to) take all necessary
measures and precautions to prevent the perpetration of fraud, rigging or any
other illegal practices throughout the whole electoral process, in order to
maintain peace and security 7.7
(Government
to) ensure that
adequate security is provided to all parties participating in the
elections |
01.02.05 |
BAN ON DIASPORA VOTE TO BE CHALLENGED The decision by the Mugabe regime to ban all Zimbabweans living abroad from voting in the parliamentary elections, except military personnel and diplomats (who are loyal to the regime), is to be challenged in the Supreme Court. Prominent human rights lawyer Beatrice Mtetwa confirmed she had launched a constitutional case on behalf of the London-based Diaspora Vote Action Group, seeking to overturn the “illegal and unconstitutional” decision to bar Zimbabweans living abroad from voting. “The refusal for non-resident Zimbabwean-registered voters to participate in elections is unconstitutional and not in line with many protocols, including the recently agreed Southern African Development Community (SADC) protocol on free and fair elections,” said Mtetwa. “Other regional countries which have recently held elections, including Namibia and Mozambique, allowed their (non resident) nationals to vote. Why should Zimbabweans be excluded from exercising their political rights while being actively encouraged to pursue their economic rights through facilities like *Homelink?” she asked. If successful, the court application could benefit an estimated four million Zimbabweans living abroad, mainly in South Africa, the United Kingdom, America and Europe. But it is unclear whether the Supreme Court, now packed with pro-Mugabe judges, would even consider entertaining the application before the elections. (Reported in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za 01.02.05) *Homelink is a plan mooted by Zimbabwe Reserve Bank governor, Gideon Gono, through which Zimbabweans in the diaspora have been urged to send much-needed foreign currency home. Given the extent of the diaspora – estimated at between 3 and 4 million politically and economically displaced people - the project could help to revive the crisis-ridden economy and raise the shattered credibility of the Mugabe regime. Gono’s plan was met with anger and jeers in the United Kingdom and in South Africa where the majority of displaced Zimbabweans who have fled the state-sponsored violence are struggling to survive under extremely difficult circumstances. |
2.1.1 Full participation of citizens in the electoral process 2.1.6 Equal opportunity to exercise the right to vote and be voted for 2.1.7 Independence of the Judiciary and impartiality of electoral institutions 4.1.1 Constitutional and legal guarantees of freedom and rights of the citizens 4.1.3 Non-discrimination in the voters’ registration 7.2 (Government to) establish where none exist, appropriate institutions where issues such as … citizenship, residency … and compilation of voters’ registers would be addressed |
31.01.05 |
PRO-DEMOCRACY GROUP FEARS ELECTION BAN The Zimbabwe Election Support Network (ZESN) is training 7 500 election monitors but the civic group is unsure whether they will be allowed to observe the March parliamentary poll. In the 2002 presidential election the government accredited only 400 ZESN monitors out of the 12 000 the pro-democracy organisation had trained to observe the poll, controversially won by Robert Mugabe. The Zimbabwe Electoral Commission, which was appointed a few weeks ago to oversee elections, is yet to send invitations to either local or foreign observers to monitor the March ballot. The Mugabe regime has in the past threatened to bar ZESN and other local non-governmental organizations from observing elections, accusing them of being pro-opposition. (Reported in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za 31.01.05) NOTE: The Mugabe regime is already in flagrant breach of Article 7.10 of the SADC Protocol, which requires the “relevant electoral institutions” of the host country to issue an invitation to SADC 90 (ninety) days before the voting day “in order to allow an adequate preparation for the deployment of the Electoral Observation Mission”. Less than two months remain before the parliamentary election, which Mugabe has decreed will take place on March 31. |
7.8 (Government to) ensure the transparency and integrity of the entire electoral process by facilitating the deployment of representatives of political parties and individual candidates at polling and counting stations and by accrediting national and/other observers/monitors 7.10 (Government to) issue invitation to SADC 90 days before the voting day … |
02.02.05 |
PROTEST AT
MILITARISED ELECTORAL SYSTEM Zimbabwe cannot hold a democratic election next month because heavily militarized electoral systems and institutions as well as draconian legislation continue to tilt the scale in favour of the ruling ZANU (PF) party, according to the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition (CZC) group. The CZC is a coalition of major pro-democracy and human rights groups, churches, women’s and students’ groups and the labour movement in Zimbabwe. In the report entitled “Things Fall Apart”, the CZC bemoans the deployment of military officers loyal to Mugabe and his ZANU (PF) party at the centre of the election system and state institutions responsible for government. “Despite minor and cosmetic changes, the electoral laws are still heavily weighed in favour of the incumbent – electoral processes and institutions continue to be militarized or Zanuised”, reads part of the report which is expected to be handed over to SADC later this month. In addition to the militarization of the electoral system, security and media laws enacted by the Mugabe regime in the last five years have drastically reduced the democratic space, to the point at which it is nearly impossible for the opposition to carry out its activities or to campaign. (Reported in Zim Online: www.zimonline.co.za 02.02.05) |
2.1.3 Political
tolerance 2.1.7 Independence
of the Judiciary and impartiality of the electoral
institutions 4.1.2 Conducive
environment for free, fair and peaceful elections 7.3 (Government
to) establish impartial, all-inclusive, competent and
accountable national electoral bodies … |
|
ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL LEGISLATION : SADC
CHECK LIST
SOKWANELE has also now produced a detailed analysis
of the Zimbabwean statutes that are in breach of the SADC Protocol on Democratic
Elections and the policy breaches by the ZANU (PF) government.
Entitled “ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL LEGISLATION : SADC CHECK LIST”, the document can be seen on our website at www.sokwanele.com |
|
Note: The
fraudulent and violence-ridden elections of 2000 and 2002 were narrowly “won” by
Robert Mugabe and his ZANU (PF) party, who have maintained their iron grip on
the country by using strategies designed to annihilate all forms of
opposition.
As many independent commentators have already pointed
out, there is no prospect that the parliamentary elections scheduled for March
31 will be fair and free. Equally, given
the magnitude of the task and the few weeks remaining before the poll, there is
no prospect of the regime’s compliance with the SADC Protocol on Democratic
Elections. Indeed, in recent months we
have witnessed a steady movement by the regime away from compliance with any
international norms for democratic elections.
Behind the façade of democracy which the regime likes to put on all their
activities, we have seen a deliberate and systematic attempt to subvert every
institution of government in order to secure in the forthcoming poll a
pre-determined result favouring ZANU
(PF).
Ends
SOKWANELE
Enough
is Enough
We have a
fundamental right to freedom of expression!
SOKWANELE
REPORT
Exclusive
Archbishop meets Prisoner of
Conscience
08 February 2004
On Saturday 5th February, far beyond the reach of any reporters or the probing lens of any cameras, an event of major significance took place. In the prison compound at Mutoko, some 140 kilometers north-east of Harare, one of Zimbabwe’s leading clerics and outspoken critic of the Mugabe regime, met and talked with a prominent member of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), now a prisoner of conscience incarcerated by that regime. Archbishop Pius Ncube of Bulawayo met Roy Bennett the imprisoned opposition MDC member of parliament for the Chimanimani constituency.
Roy Bennett is serving out in the Mutoko prison the harsh and grossly disproportionate sentence imposed upon him by parliament. In October 2004 the ruling ZANU (PF) party used their majority in parliament to slam a twelve month term of imprisonment with hard labour upon Bennett. The pretext for this blatantly racist attack upon an opposition legislator who happens to be white and massively popular with his constituents, was an altercation in parliament between Bennett and Patrick Chinamasa, the Minister of Justice. In response to provocative jibes from Chinamasa that his ancestors were “thieves and murderers”, Bennett pushed Chinamasa to the floor. A minor scuffle that would have merited perhaps a reprimand from the Speaker in any normal democratic institution (or a small fine if prosecuted in the criminal courts) was used as the occasion for ZANU (PF) to vent its anger upon a former member of the party who had dared to switch his allegiance to the opposition when he saw how corrupt ZANU (PF) had become. The unprecedented severity of the sentence was only the latest act of vengeance inflicted upon Bennett, who with his family and workers, has been the target of a sustained campaign of persecution over the last several years.
“They were acting out of spitefulness and hatred”, said the plain-speaking Archbishop in an interview with our reporter. “They are jealous of this man succeeding. They are hateful because he joined the opposition”. Not that the Archbishop wished to condone Bennett’s behaviour in parliament. “That was wrong”, he said, “but the sentence was way beyond what was appropriate. They (the ZANU (PF) members of parliament) disregarded the extenuating circumstances and his apology. Instead the regime capitalized on this unfortunate incident. They are fixing him. It is just vengeance”.
So why was a busy Archbishop taking the best part of a whole day to travel from Bulawayo to the other side of the country in order to see Bennett ? “Out of sympathy”, declared the prelate without a moment’s hesitation. “This is my stand against injustice”. The Archbishop was well briefed too. During the interview he paged through a dossier on his desk, listing the gross abuses to which Roy Bennett and his family and workers had been subjected by a violent and unforgiving regime – from the violent and unlawful seizure of his Charleswood Estate in Chimanimani to the arrests, beatings, torture and rape of his workers by the CIO, militia and agents acting for the State.
The Archbishop traveled from Harare to Mutoko in the company of Roy Bennett’s wife, Heather and a family friend. A visitor to one of Zimbabwe’s high security prisons can never be sure what kind of reception awaits him these days – and the more so if the person visited is a high-profile prisoner of the stature of Roy Bennett. Visits are limited and strictly controlled. Heather Bennett can only see her husband once a fortnight and on the most stringent terms. Other would-be visitors have been turned away at the prison doors. So how would the Archbishop be received, even given that he was accompanying the prisoner’s wife during one of her fortnightly visits ? In the event he was courteously received and the visit was permitted to continue for the (unusually long) period of 45 to 50 minutes, albeit under the watchful gaze of two prison guards and with the prisoner (as ever) on the other side of a strong mesh fence to his visitors.
Asked how he found Bennett the Archbishop said he was remarkably cheerful, confident and “very positive”. The Archbishop was able to tell Bennett that what he had done for his workers was appreciated. “He has assisted them and helped them to develop in a wonderful way”, he explained to our reporter, “a man of the people”.
Considering the abuses and injustices Bennett has suffered, Archbishop Pius was amazed at his readiness to forgive his tormentors. “He told me”, said the man of God, “that he had learnt that to harbour bitterness was only to hurt oneself. He reads his Bible every day”.
And for the future ? It was during the course of this interview that Bennett confirmed that he wished to stand as a candidate in the March parliamentary elections. Had he not already suffered enough in his bid to win freedom for Zimbabwe ? On the contrary, came his reply: “We have sacrificed too much to stop now. We must go forward”. At which point the Archbishop spoke of his Christian conviction that the journey to freedom is never painless, but that somehow God uses that pain to bring out the best in his children.
The 45 minute interview was soon over. The small quantities of high protein food and other limited range of toiletries permitted by the prison authorities, were duly handed over, to be inspected by the prison guard and approved. (Bennett has always made a point of sharing such small benefits as he receives with those who share his cramped prison cell with him, so not all the treats were for him personally). A moving farewell. Heather Bennett will not be able to see her husband again for another fortnight. The Archbishop tells Roy, “Don’t lose heart. Be courageous. We are praying for you”.
The visit is over, but no doubt the strengthening words of Archbishop Pius Ncube will remain with Roy Bennett for many days and weeks to come. And who doubts the Archbishop was speaking for many, many thousands of Zimbabweans, not to mention the countless supporters and well-wishers around the world, of Zimbabwe’s currently most famous prisoner of conscience.
Ends
Zimbabwe farmers mark new territory | ||||||||
White farmers - evicted from their farms in Zimbabwe during the country's controversial land redistribution policy - will soon be signing a land deal to begin farming in Nigeria's north-western state of Kwara.
The invitation came from Kwara's state governor, Bukola Saraki, whose goal is to use the farmers to kick-start Nigeria's moribund agricultural sector. "I had a tobacco farm in Zimbabwe employing around 450 people, but I was chased away two years ago," Dan Swart, a broad man in his late 50s, told me as he and four other white farmers discussed the boundaries of their new farms in a hotel bar. "Then we were given the offer to come to Nigeria." 'Commercial farmers needed' Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa, but despite an abundance of fertile land, most of its food is imported - a legacy of years of corruption and misrule. "Our farming sector is largely driven by peasant farming. And small family groups don't have the capital for mechanised farming or the ability to raise credit from banks.
"We thought: 'Those are farmers. Zimbabwe doesn't want them. I'm sure they'd rather stay in Africa than go somewhere else'. "So we sent someone to talk to them." The plan is to have 15 Zimbabweans moving to Kwara this month. They will initially live in the bush in tents while they build their homes. Then, as the months progress, more farmers and their families should fly out. Within a decade, as many as 100 farmers could be based in Kwara. "I hope... in about 10 years' time our airport will be busy and young chaps coming out of university will think about going into farming," said Mr Saraki. "Banks will invest in the agricultural sector. And Kwara will be the backbone for Nigeria's agricultural drive." Overtures Nigeria is not the only African country to try to woo the 4,000 white farmers who have been displaced.
Zimbabwe's Commercial Farmers Union has also had overtures from Ghana, Tanzania and Malawi. Some farmers have already resettled in Mozambique and Zambia. But Nigeria is the first country to offer incentives. Governor Saraki has promised to help facilitate bank loans, and invest about 300m-400m naira ($2m-$3m; £1m-£1.6m) in irrigation, electricity, roads and housing. The new farms will be built on land leased for 25 years around Shonga village - an underdeveloped region of gentle green hills near the state's northern border. Initial fears The Zimbabweans have already begun marking out their territory - striding around in knee-long shorts under the midday sun with hand-held GPS devices, while they wait for the final go-ahead from the state government.
Initially, many people in Shonga were concerned that the Zimbabweans would steal their land, introduce a South African-style apartheid, and exploit their resources. But local officials have made efforts to explain that the farmers want to settle in Shonga, employ local workers and pass on better farming methods. "In the beginning we had fear as we were not alerted. But now some people have told us about them and we are willing to receive them," said a young mother, standing in the shade of a tree in Shonga village. Her words were echoed by a motorbike driver on the dusty main street: "We welcome them, of course. We hope they will bring us jobs." The Zimbabweans have also asked that no-one is relocated to make way for the farms, although one family will be moved on from their small red brick compound in the middle of the bush. 'Mad' But even with this good will, can the project really succeed? It is a hugely ambitious scheme, and one that invites scepticism.
Nigeria is currently ranked as the third most corrupt nation on earth, and many people do not trust government officials to keep their promises. It is also a volatile country, with thousands of people killed in inter-communal violence in the last five years alone. The Zimbabweans, however, are ready to face these challenges and determined to build a new life. "Africa's never easy. "We've realised the potential agriculturally. So let's just stick and see what we can do," said Allen Jack, the wiry leader of the Zimbabwean team. "My friends think I'm mad," added Dan Swartz. "But once we succeed they will come... a lot will come." |