http://www.mdc.co.zw
Saturday,
28 July 2012
The MDC National Executive met today to receive a report
and consider the
draft Constitution concluded by the Parliamentary Select
Committee and
Management Committee of Copac.
After extensive
deliberations, the executive committee was satisfied that
the draft
Constitution essentially captures the views of the people of
Zimbabwe and
represents an incremental gain in the democratisation process.
As such
the executive committee resolved to support the draft Constitution
and will
recommend the same to national council of the party, which is
scheduled to
meet on Friday 3 August 2012.
The national executive noted that some of
the positive aspects of this draft
include;
The resolution of the
question of citizenship by firstly, guaranteeing
citizenship to Zimbabweans
who were previously denied citizenship and
secondly allowing dual
citizenship to Zimbabweans by birth.
The establishment of foundations
for strong democratic institutions that
include; a stronger Parliament to
effect checks and balances on the
Executive while providing for a strong and
accountable President and the
creation of independent commissions including
the gender commission.
The provision of comprehensive mechanisms for
equal representation of women
in Parliament through the Zebra system in the
Upper House and provision of a
quota in the Lower House.
An
expanded and comprehensive Bill of Rights that guarantees equality of all
persons and now provides for economic, social and cultural rights including
the rights of children and workers.
The devolution of power to
the provinces.
The establishment of the National Prosecution Authority and
the
Constitutional Court.
Freedom of the Press and
Media.
Although there are some things that the MDC may have wanted
included in the
Constitution, the MDC respects the will of the people of
Zimbabwe and the
fact that some aspects of this Constitution had to be
negotiated.
The party resolved that the people of Zimbabwe must be given
opportunity to
decide on the draft through a referendum.
Hon. Douglas
Mwonzora
National Spokesperson
The people’s struggle for real
change – Let’s finish it!!!
http://www.voanews.com
27 July
2012
Chris Gande
| Washington
Stung by accolades showered on Prime Minister Morgan
Tsvangirai while
visiting Australia this week, President Robert Mugabe
responded in a
thinly-veiled attack, insinuating his ruling partner is being
used by the
West to work against the interests of ordinary
Zimbabweans.
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard early this week
likened Mr.
Tsvangirai to former South African President Nelson Mandela and
such other
icons as Burmese pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu
Kyi.
"You are a hero. Like Nelson Mandela, like Aung San Suu Kyi, like
Xanana
Gusmao - you are one of the remarkable figures of our times,” Gillard
said
to Mr. Tsvangirai at a luncheon in his honor.
But an unimpressed
Mugabe scolded Mr. Tsvangirai in a speech when he
officially launched a
share ownership scheme for villagers living in the
controversial Marange
diamond zone.
He warned the prime minister, without naming him, that he
would be a fool if
he allowed the praise to go to his head, adding the
accolades were going
Tsvangirai's way so he can divide the
people.
Mr. Mugabe also dismissed critics of the Zanu PF-hatched
empowerment
program, urging those in the Diaspora to return and take part in
the
initiative.
Prime Minister Tsvangirai, who is expected back home
Saturday, appealed to
Australia to lift targeted sanctions imposed on Mugabe
and his inner circle
by the West in 2002 over charges of rights
violations.
Organizing secretary, Nelson Chamisa, of the Tsvangirai MDC
party said Mr.
Mugabe’s attack was uncalled for considering Tsvangirai had
gone out of his
way to defend the president and call for the removal of
restrictions.
Commentator Nkululeko Sibanda, a lecturer at the
Huddersfield university in
London, told VOA Mr. Mugabe's remarks lack
political maturity.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw/
Written by Correspondent
Saturday, 28 July 2012
14:07
HARARE - Deputy Prime Minister, Arthur Mutambara has joined the
raging
succession fray by encouraging President Robert Mugabe to step down
and pass
the baton to an elected successor.
Mutambara told delegates
to a three-day Institute of People Management of
Zimbabwe (IPMZ) 2012
National Convention in Victoria Falls which started on
Wednesday that the
country had been robbed of growth by the 88-year-old’s
refusal to step aside
and pass on the baton to others.
Mutambara said it was high time the
country had a new president and
challenged the electorate to take a leaf
from United States of America (USA)
that had five different presidents since
1979.
“We need to allow new leaders with more energy. Can you imagine if
Carter
was still the president of America since 1979, it would mean there
will be
no legacy and there will no Bush senior, Clinton, Bush junior and
there will
be no Obama,” said Mutambara.
He said the changing of
presidents had brought progress in the USA.
“Look what those five
presidents have done. There is new energy, new people,
new excitement and
growth in USA.
“If Carter was still the president of America today, it
would have denied
the opportunity to those five people to bring new ideas in
the country,”
said Mutambara.
Mutambara’s comments come at a time
when President Mugabe is battling to
hold back the tide of calls from some
members of his Zanu PF party to
relinquish his stranglehold on the party
leadership amid deepening divisions
over his successor.
Mugabe has
been a Zimbabwean leader since 1980.
But in March 2008 he lost the first
round of a presidential election to his
bitter rival Morgan Tsvangirai in
which another presidential hopeful, Simba
Makoni played the spoilsport
role.
None of the presidential candidates received an outright majority
forcing a
runoff in June that Mugabe went on to ‘‘win’’ when Tsvangirai
withdrew from
the race in protest over violence against his
supporters.
After the controversial and disputed run off, Mugabe and
Tsvangirai however,
went on to form a government of national unity.
http://www.voanews.com
27 July
2012
Sithandekile Mhlanga | Washington
Zimbabwe's health
ministry says it has secured additional funding from
donors in the United
Kingdom and the United States to increase the number of
people receiving
life-saving anti-retroviral drugs.
Deputy health minister Dr. Douglas
Mombeshora said the fund would allow the
country to add at least 60,000
people living with HIV onto the ARV program
that is already assisting
80,000 patients.
Mombeshora, who did not disclose the total amount, was
speaking with VOA on
the sidelines of the 19th International HIV/Aids
conference that ended in
Washington Friday.
The United Kingdom’s
Department for International Development (DFID) and the
President's
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in the United States
will provide
the resources.
Mombeshora said the donors were pleased with the success
and progress that
Zimbabwe is making in implementing HIV/Aids programs,
hence the additional
assistance.
“We have been working closely with
the British and United States governments
and they are obviously pleased
with the way we are managing the programs,"
he said.
"The additional
60,000 will narrow the gap of people requiring HIV/Aids
treatment in the
country.”
Dr. Angela Mushavi is the National Prevention Mother-to-Child
Transmission
(PMTCT) and Paediatric HIV Care and Treatment Coordinator in
the health
ministry. She says government has learnt a lot from the
conference.
"We have learnt a lot that will help enhance the prevention
of
mother-to-child transmission of HIV in the country and many other
programs
that we are working on. In this day and era, no child should be
born with
HIV," she said.
Speaking at the plenary session Friday
morning, Dr. Yogan Pillay, South
Africa's strategic health programs
director, said African countries have
made outstanding progress in fighting
HIV/Aids.
But, he added, more donor funding is needed to maintain the
efforts.
http://www.thezimbabwemail.com
News Editor 27/07/2012 11:06:00
Zanu
PF has summoned Midlands provincial chairman Jason Machaya to appear
before
its politburo to explain the province’s rejection of the party’s
decision to
disband district co-ordinating committees (DCCs), impeccable
sources said
yesterday.
Machaya, who is also Midlands governor, was also expected to
answer charges
that his province had instead proposed the disbandment of the
politburo.
During the meeting at which secretary for administration
Didymus Mutasa
presented the party position on DCCs, several Midlands
officials, notably
Zanu PF’s Parliament chief whip and central committee
member Joram Gumbo,
allegedly made their position clear that disbanding DCCs
was not welcome.
Gumbo’s alleged attack on the decision to scrap DCCs,
described by party
leader President Robert Mugabe as “divisive”, has been
viewed as a revolt.
According to party insiders, the politburo is
expected to tackle Gumbo’s
case at a special meeting today.
“Gumbo
openly said the decision to disband the DCCs was wrong as it exposed
other
party members who are now laughed at. This did not go well with party
chairman Simon Khaya Moyo, who viewed it as disrespect of the politburo,”
said the source.
“Khaya Moyo has summoned Machaya to appear before
the politburo to explain
why a senior member like Gumbo had embarrassed the
politburo in front of
grassroots structures.”
Gumbo is believed to
belong to the Emmerson Mnangagwa faction which is
embroiled in a fierce
battle of succession against another faction allegedly
led by Vice-President
Joice Mujuru.
Defence minister Mnangawa’s faction had beaten the rival
faction in the DCC
battle in most provinces.
Zanu PF spokesperson
Rugare Gumbo yesterday denied Machaya had been summoned
to appear before the
politburo.
“It is mere speculation. The politburo never discussed such
things,” Gumbo
said.
Today’s meeting is also expected to feature a
showdown between Tsholotsho MP
Jonathan Moyo and Munyaradzi Paul Mangwana,
the Zanu PF co-chairperson in
the parliamentary constitution-making body,
Copac, over the draft
constitution.
Mangwana and Moyo have recently
engaged in no-holds-barred verbal
altercations over the draft
constitution.
“Tomorrow (today), it will be a showdown between Moyo and
Mangwana,” the
source said.
Gumbo (Rugare) confirmed the development
yesterday saying: “There was not
much we discussed on Wednesday. We are
going to debate it tomorrow
(today).” - NewsDay
http://www.radiovop.com/
Bulawayo, July 28,
2012-The Minister of Mines and Mining Development, Obert
Mpofu has vowed not
to remit money from Marange diamond proceeds to the
Ministry of Finance
which is headed by Tendai Biti from the MDC-T.
Speaking during the
official opening of the Mining, Engineering and
Transport (Mine Entra) in
Bulawayo on Thursday evening, Mpofu accused
minister Biti of " reaping
where he didn’t sow." by pleading with Mpofu’s
ministry to remit diamonds
proceeds into the national treasury.
“Biti is a liar. The mining industry
is the largest contributor to the
country’s economy. Biti has never
supported the mining sector yet he wants
to reap where he did not sow,” said
Mpofu.
Mpofu claimed that the mining industry is contributing two thirds
of the
country’s economy.
He also boasted that that he recently
bought the Zimbabwe Allied Banking
Group (ZABG) bank to support the
country's mining industry.
Presenting his Mid-Term Fiscal policy in
Parliament Biti last week minister
Biti said he was forced to cut his 2012
budget from US$4 billion to US$3, 4
billion, blaming poor revenue inflows
from diamonds from the Marange fields.
He said of the US$600 million
which was expected from diamond sales this
year, only US$41, 6 million had
been received during the first half of the
year.
Commenting on last
week’s industrial action by civil servants Biti said the
civil servants
should ask Mpofu where money from Marange diamonds sales is
going, instead
of continue blaming him.
http://www.timeslive.co.za/
Sapa-dpa | 28 July, 2012 10:53
Famine has raised its
head in Zimbabwe again, as the numbers of people
depending on aid to avoid
starvation soared by 60% from last year to 1.6
million, according to the
United Nations World Food Programme (WFP).
The agency said that one in
five of the country's rural people were in need
of famine relief. Grain
production in the last year was 1 million tonnes,
the worst since 2009,
which at 800 000 tonnes was the worst year on record.
Zimbabwe had a
reputation as "Africa's breadbasket" until 2000 when
President Robert Mugabe
launched his violent seizures of white-owned farms,
forcing 1 500 white
farmers of their land and displacing a million farm
workers and their
families.
The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank have said
that year
marked the beginning of the collapse of one of Africa's most
successful
economies.
The latest figures were released after a
lengthy study by UN agencies, the
Zimbabwe government and non-governmental
organisations involved in
agriculture.
Already, the report said,
rural residents of the country were feeling the
effects of the food
shortages, a pattern marked by empty domestic granaries
and farmers selling
their cattle to raise money to buy food.
The report blamed erratic
rainfall, low supplies of seed and fertilizer, and
bad farming
practices.
At the height of the last rainy season, farmers unions slammed
a supply
arrangement set-up by government officials. Political figures in
Mugabe's
Zanu-PF party snapped up cheap fertiliser and seed and sold large
quantities
of it at inflated prices while peasant farmers waited
helplessly.
During the current winter wheat season, promises of cheap
supplies from the
government also came to nothing, resulting in the lowest
wheat crop forecast
yet of 5 000 tonnes.
The WFP said it would rely
on "regionally procured cereals" to make up the
country's current
shortfall.
Commentators have pointed out that the biggest regional
producer is Zambia,
where scores of white farmers moved and became
large-scale producers again
after being driven off their land in Zimbabwe in
the last decade.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com
27/07/2012 00:00:00
by Gilbert
Nyambabvu
ROYAL bank has handed over its operating, becoming the
third financial
institution to collapse in the last two
months.
Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Governor, Gideon Gono, confirmed the
development to
NewZimbabwe.com Friday, adding a full statement would be
issued on
Monday.The bank had struggled to meet minimum capital requirements
which
have since been increased to US$12 million for commercial banks but
officials had insisted a deal would soon be tied up with Kenya-based
Commercial Bank of Africa (CBA).
Said chief executive, Jeffrey
Mzwimbi in March this year: "We have been in
discussions with a number of
private equity and banking investors who are
interested in investing in
Royal Bank and naturally we are excited that a
bank of CBA's size and market
stature is interested in investing in Royal
Bank.
"As is customary
for large investments of this nature, the investment by CBA
will require
various approvals which we are working on."
However, the latest development
suggests the negotiations were not
successful.
Royal Bank becomes the
second bank to give up its licence after Genesis
Investment Bank was also
closed last month having failed to raise funds to
meet the statutory capital
requirements.
The central bank was also forced to place Interfin Bank
under curatorship to
prevent wider systemic problems as the institution
teetered on the brink of
collapse due to inadequate capitalisation, poor
management and high levels
of non-performing insider and related party
exposures.
Meanwhile, addressing this year’s Confederation of Zimbabwe
Industries (CZI)
congress in Nyanga on Friday RBZ governor, Gideon Gono new
measures would be
introduced to ensure the stability of the country’s
financial services
sector.
“Maintenance of banking safety and
soundness is essential, given the key
role played by banks in facilitating
economic growth. Accordingly, the
current reforms in the banking sector,
which place more emphasis on the need
for banks to be adequately
capitalised, through mergers and acquisitions
will be sustained and
strengthened,” he said.
“Experiences in Zimbabwe demonstrate the need for
effective corporate
governance within the financial institutions as most
bank failures are due
to weaknesses in corporate
governance.
“Proposed amendments to the Banking Act seek to improve the
legal and
regulatory environment in the country, as well as tackle specific
issues
currently being faced by banks such as abusing depositors’ funds
through
insider lending.
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk
Published on Saturday 28 July
2012 06:00
AN ASYLUM seeker from Zimbabwe who had been refused British
residency sent
several poignant messages to his partner in the last moments
before he was
found hanged.
Factory worker Bee Moyo, 45, came to the
UK five years ago but was upset
after having been refused a resident’s
permit, an inquest in Rotherham
heard.
He argued with his new partner
Sibonakele, whose surname is also Moyo, and
stormed out of the house saying
he was going to hang himself from a tree in
some local woods.
The
hearing was told the father-of-six sent a series of texts in the early
hours
of March 12 this year to Ms Moyo, who he had wanted to marry.
He had
accused her of having an affair which she had strenuously denied.
His
first text, timed at 12.37am, said: “I’m going to marry the tree.
Goodnight
and goodbye and have a good life.”
The next text at 2.46am read: “Just
getting ready. Tell my people.” At
3.21am he texted: “I’m sorry.”
Ten
minutes later another message said: “Goodbye Sibonakele. Tell them what
happened.”
At 3.40am he texted: “Are you ready to tell the truth or
what?”
After being alerted by Mr Moyo’s partner, police mounted a frantic
search in
Ferham Park, Masbrough, shining powerful torches into the
trees.
Officers could not find him in their initial search but later
located his
body hanging from a tree at 5.57.
Ms Moyo told the
hearing she moved in with her partner in December last year
at his home in
Cavendish Road, Holmes, Rotherham. He had six children, two
in Leeds and
four back in Zimbabwe.
Although they had talked of marriage he “seemed
unhappy”. While she worked
he had lost his job and he was a proud
man.
“He was a good man and wanted to contribute,” she said. “He thought
his
children were suffering.”
Mr Moyo accused her of having an affair
which she was adamant was untrue and
then Mr Moyo told her he was leaving to
hang himself from a tree.
He then rang to say he was in Ferham Park. “He
took nothing with him and did
not have a drink or take any medication or
drugs,” she said.
She tried to talk him out of ending his life but he
remained in that
mindset. She did not know whether he intended to kill
himself or whether it
was a cry for help.
Police found the body
hanging from a tree with a ligature made of tights.
Mouth-to-mouth
resuscitation failed.
Rotherham coroner Nicola Mundy said as well as his
residency application
being refused by the Home Office, Mr Moyo was out of
work which affected his
self-esteem and he was unable to provide for his
children financially.
“Clearly he was struggling to cope with matters and
sending texts to his
partner and friends indicating his intention to end his
life,” she said.
“Such was his partner’s concern she left work and got
back in the early
hours and spent time trying to persuade him there was a
solution but despite
her efforts he wouldn’t be dissuaded.”
Ms Mundy
recorded an open verdict saying there was a possibility that Mr
Moyo had
intended to be found and resuscitated.
Seven-time Olympic medallist Kirsty Coventry is a symbol of hope in her native country of Zimbabwe. JOE spoke to her as she prepared for her fourth Olympics.
By Mark O'Toole
There will be around 10,500 athletes from 204 nations participating in the London 2012 Olympics over the coming weeks and none are probably more important to their country than Kirsty Coventry of Zimbabwe.
The swimmer competed in all three Olympics of the previous decade, winning a gold, a silver and a bronze in Athens and three silvers and a gold in Beijing four years later.
Now at 28 she enters her fourth Olympics in London as Zimbabwe’s second-ever Olympic medallist since they were recognised as an independent state in 1980, three years before Kirsty’s birth.
In one of the world’s most divided and economically destitute nations, Kirsty’s success and demeanour have shone like a beacon of pride for all Zimbabweans, regardless of colour, social-standing or political affiliation. Robert Mugabe has christened her the nation’s “Golden Girl” post her 2008 success. She’s also white. It’s complicated.
Sport can be dangerous in Zimbabwe whatever your background. Henry Olonga and Andy Flower were black and white respectively, but were effectively exiled in the wake of their protest against Mugabe’s tyranny in 2003. White cricket captain Heath Streak’s father’s farm was seized for redistribution as part of the forceful repossession of land by Mugabe’s government.
Mugabe, like a lot of dictators, will associate himself with successful sports people, while punishing any sports star that voices opposition to his reign.
Outside of sport, things have quietened down since the near-civil war between Mugabe’s Zanu PF and current Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s MDC in 2008, though elections are due to take place this year. The country has experienced over 90 per cent unemployment in the past few years and hyperinflation has seen the introduction of such extreme measures as the Zimbabwean trillion dollar bill.
In short, things have been very difficult but in Coventry they have possibly the only unifying force in the country.
Kirsty Coventry: Zimbabwean on a pedestal
When I speak to Kirsty she is in peppy form, bright and engaging, I immediately ask her a downer question – it must be a lot of pressure being seen in that way and being put on a pedestal?
“Yeah I think being somewhat removed from it on a daily basis,” she answers before pausing to consider her next word as she is careful about this sensitive subject, “I’m maybe put on a pedestal and lot of people look up to me, but that’s what’s driving me and encouraging me.
“So I’ve been very lucky with the community in Zimbabwe being behind me and backing me up, it’s such an honour...such a great honour,” she says.
“I’m very proud to be Zimbabwean and to represent Zimbabwe. I’ve always tried not to read too much or involve too much politics in my sport...it’s not ignorance, I mean I know exactly what’s going on...” she says saliently, before offering a nearby and immediate vision for what sport can do in Zimbabwe.
“You know if you look at other countries like South Africa and what a rugby game can do to unify a country and that’s how I kind of want to look at and approach my sport in swimming,” referring to the 1995 World Cup win for Zimbabwe’s neighbours that healed some rifts leftover by apartheid a few years previously.
It’s a positive, yet non-confrontational approach that Kirsty evidentially wants to adopt, you mention her words after the 2008 World Short Course Championship, the closest she came to making a political statement in the past:
“I know that's part of why I'm doing what I do. I hope it makes a difference and gives people back home hope that things will change for the better. People have to remain positive and believe in those dreams. It's really important."
Her tone turns from peppy to serious for a moment when you repeat these words to her, it’s clear that this is an important point.
“It is really important. You have to believe in yourself and each other."
London 2012
It was at the Olympics in 2004 that Kirsty first broke onto the scene, winning three medals (a bronze in the 200m Individual Medley, a silver in the 100metres backstroke and a gold in the 200metres backstroke. Beijing brought more medals but it sounds like she is taking London 2012 in her stride.
“I’m going to be swimming three events, the 100metre backstroke, the 200m backstroke and the 200m Individual medley, I decided to drop the 400m after dislocating my knee and getting pneumonia a couple of months ago.
“I’m looking to go to London to have fun and enjoy it and I’m confident with my training and where I am and my experience. This being my fourth Olympics...I’d love to get on the podium, I know it’s going to be a lot harder than in previous years, but I’m up for that challenge.”
The future
Regardless of the outcome at these Olympics she’s taking some time off to relax before embarking on another chapter of her life. After a safari holiday at home, politics looms for Kirsty
Having worked with Archbishop Desmond Tutu’s charitable foundation Lapdesk Kirsty hopes to become one of four new athlete representatives on International Olympics Committee.
“Yeah, you know I’d love to be involved with the IOC in the future in any way I can. I’d love to do that and regardless of when I retire I would love to stay involved in my sport and sports in general especially having seen the impact that I’ve been able to make at home and I’d love to carry that on.
“I’d love to keep that part of my life and bridge that gap between business and sports and seeing it grow because as I said sport is wonderful way to bring people together. “
Whether in the pool or in parliament, Zimbabwe needs her. Mugabe may only be right about one thing the past few years.
She is their Golden Girl.
July 28th, 2012
Perched on top a mountain in the leafy suburb of
Harare is a range of imposing villas that to the outsider must appear to be out
of sync with the sprawling squatter camps like Porta Farm, Caledonia Farm and
the mushrooming squatter camp near to Borrowdale. These shanty towns act as
footnotes to the mansions dotted across the skyline. Yet this is the reality in
Zimbabwe. This is a two faced country, emphasising with an ever widening gap
between the rich and poor, for in Zimbabwe it is patently obvious that the rich
get richer and the poor get poorer. The upper classes today consist mainly of
politicians, army bosses and other business owners and farming magnates. We all
know where they got their massive assets from and at whose expense. What amazes me is someone like Obert Mpofu, who has bought
up scores of properties in Zimbabwe and recently funded the Zimbabwe Allied Banking Group (ZABG) to the tune of
US$22,8 million through his company Trebor Khays. (Trebor being an anagram of
Obert). He claims he is just a “ shrewd businessman”, does he really think we
are so stupid? “Finance Minister Tendai Biti recently said he found it difficult
to relate the wealth accumulated by cabinet colleagues to their monthly
government salaries of just US$800.” Another of Mpofu’s businesses is Kahanondo Safaris, who offer the best of upmarket tourism, and whose fleet
of vehicles for hire make the poor locals drool with envy as they are forced to
travel in dangerous ‘chovvas’ and can only dream about leather interiors and
sleek mercs. Harare is like the Mercedes Benz capital of the world, as they are
now so common, and around the city it is no longer surprising to see top of the
range Hummers, Lamborghinis and other fancy cars racing around. These nouveau
riche prefer not to shop in Zimbabwe, and rather fly to foreign countries and
grab whatever they can lay their hands on, while the rest of us poor souls
languish in Zimbabwe, living in squalid conditions. Our politicians think nothing of a jaunt
off to Rio, gobbling up US$7 million, at of all things a Sustainable Development
Conference. The cost to the tax payer for these jaunts was reported in SW
Radio, In his 2012 Budget Review the Finance Minister had warned about the
extravagant travel costs of senior officials, saying $45.5 million had been
blown on foreign trips last year. This averages out to about $4 million per
month being spent on travel by government officials. Then of course there are
Mugabe’s regular trips to the Far East, his health care costs would build new
hospitals in this country.
It is a sad tale of two realities in Zimbabwe – a country with so much promise, yet only for the few with political connections and who have relatives in influential positions. The promise, “houses for all by 2000” has came to naught and so have mostother government sponsored initiatives. Millions of Zimbabweans live in hardship and only a fraction in opulence. The poor live in squatter camps, their children do not go to school as there are not employed, while the rich drive latest vehicles send their children to the most expensive schools and have practically everything at theirbeck and call. This is Zimbabwe, a country where the dreams of the nation have been deferred, not because people are not ready to live modestly (like what I read about in Greece) but simply because those in power make it impossible for the sons and daughters of this great nation to realise their dreams.
Dear David and Eddie,
Peter Schaeffer, a writer, researcher, and businessman who has
advised the US Congress and numerous government agencies on issues relating to
the political and economic transformation of less developed countries, with a
particular focus on property rights and served for several years as the Senior
Advisor to the head of USAID wrote this to me yesterday in relation to those
that are supporting the draft constitution:
“What Locke was saying was that government's fundamental (essential)
role was to protect the citizens' personal security, personal property and
personal choices. They are not simply interrelated, they are interconnected and
form the foundation for everything else. A three-legged stool, if you will.
One may be good at balancing for a while, but eventually we all have to sleep
and then a two legged stool tips over.
Sorry, compromise is great, but the MDC seems intent on ceding
fundamental principles, not just tactical matters. They will regret it.”
I hope this is of use.
Yours sincerely,
Ben
In his reply to Ben Freeth’s letter, David
Coltart said that the land
provisions are “racially discriminatory and
should never be in any modern
democratic constitution.” He also said that
even worse than these land
provisions was that “far too much power is still
vested in the executive.”
In other words, the constitution abrogates
fundamental human rights and does
not contain the necessary checks and
balances to constrain Presidential
powers. Yet, Coltart argues that we
cannot “pick and choose” which elements
we like, and urges us to accept the
constitution in its entirety or risk
subverting the whole process. His
argument is baseless on a number of
counts.
The first is that human
rights and the separation of powers, amongst others,
are not minor elements
but the core pillars upon which a democratic
constitution stands or falls.
Remove one of those pillars and the whole
edifice of the constitution
crumbles. Equally worrying, is that the
constitution specifically
contradicts the rulings of the SADC Tribunal which
were based on
international customary law and the Vienna Convention on the
Law of
Treaties. As ZANU(PF) systematically discredited and dismantled the
Tribunal, the MDC did nothing but maintain a shameful silence. Now Coltart
is asking the people to do that same: turn a blind eye to grievous flaws
inserted into the constitution at the behest of those who militate against
the Tribunal and international law.
The second argument Coltart uses
is that if we do not accept this deeply
flawed document we will play into
the hands of ZANU(PF) hardliners. But,
hold on a minute ... are the people
of Zimbabwe being asked to judge the
draft constitution on its own merits or
to make a political decision? Is
Coltart asking us to blindly accept the
founding law by which we are to be
governed, and to vote along party lines
for a document conceived through an
elite political pact? Just because
Jonathan Moyo is rejecting it for
political reasons, do the people of
Zimbabwe also have to accept it for
political reasons? But there is more. By
my reading of the constitution, the
MDC has already played into the hands of
the hardliners by capitulating on
human rights, executive powers, and the
question of justice.
The third argument on which Coltart can be
challenged is his notion that the
draft constitution will lead to more
accountability, more democracy, and the
loss of power by hardliners. This is
an odd claim given that, by Coltart’s
own admission, the new constitution
makes “the fundamental error of thinking
that men can be trusted with
power.” Indeed, it is possible that such
unconscionable executive powers
could remain in the hands on Robert Mugabe
or his successor. If so, this is
hardly likely to lead to a loss of power by
hardliners. But even this misses
a central point. The constitution (whether
it is the new or old) and the
rule of law are irrelevant to hardliners. If
Robert Mugabe blatantly
disregarded the last constitution, why should he
abide by the new one? By
what constitutional authority, for example, does
the President instruct the
police to defy court orders and ignore their
constitutional duty to protect
the people from atrocities committed by his
party supporters? The truth of
the matter is that they subverted the old
constitution and then inserted the
offending clauses in the new draft
constitution. Is this what Coltart’s is
trying to sell us as “an all out bid
to protect people”?
The fourth
argument Coltart advances is his now infamous line that “we just
do not have
any other options.” This is his ‘killer quote’ to convince any
doubters that
unless we, like the MDC, compromise with a regime that has
brought nothing
but poverty, humiliation and misery – and which created a
Diaspora that has
conveniently been denied the vote – matters will only get
worse. The MDC won
elections and ceded power because ‘they had no other
option’; they
legitimised the seizure of farms based on race because ‘they
had no other
option’. When Mugabe refused on budge on any GPA reforms, they
joined him by
calling for the removal of sanctions because ‘they had no
other option’.
Although the MDC has given in on almost every major political
decision,
including principles of natural justice, Coltart denies the charge
of
appeasement. Instead, he claims there is no non-violent “practical
alternative”. Perhaps this is because he mistakes non-violence for pacifism
and collusion rather than as a mode of struggle and resistance against
tyranny.
But now, we the people do have an option to decide upon
whether or not to
adopt the draft constitution. We must deliberate and
discuss the merits and
flaws of the draft constitution rigorously and
openly. We must decide
whether any president should be trusted with such
sweeping constitutional
powers. If necessary, we should sink this rickety
and leaky ferry and start
afresh with a sturdy and seaworthy vessel of state
that can confidently
withstand the constitutional gales and storms that lie
ahead. But, above
all, we must not be blackmailed into accepting the
unacceptable.
Dale Doré
Harare, 28 July 2012
Dear Family and Friends,
Sitting in empty
cardboard boxes on the pavement outside a
supermarket, two little children
paint a vivid picture of life in
urban Zimbabwe today. It’s been three and
half years since the
winners of our 2008 elections were forced to share power
with the
losers and life isn’t easy for most people. In February 2009
when
our own currency became so worthless that we changed to the US
dollar,
rent for a couple of rooms in a high density area was US$20 a
month,
now its US$100 a month. Electricity for those two rooms was US$15
in
2009, now its US$50. A litre of fuel in February 2009 was 75 cents,
now
its US$1.45 making every trip in a commuter minibus burn a hole in
already
empty pockets.
The mothers of the children sitting in cardboard boxes are
unemployed
but keep food on the family table by selling goods on the
pavements.
They’ve got everything from fruit and veg to sweets,
cigarettes,
biscuits, belts, carrier bags, cell phones, batteries, socks,
watches,
hair extensions and anything small and lightweight you can think
of.
Their prices are usually lower than in the supermarkets they
sit
outside and it’s a constant war. The vendors are selling
illegally,
they don’t pay rent, rates, taxes or have any overheads and are
a
constant headache to legitimate shop keepers, health officials
and
police. It’s very hard not to support the vendors when you know
that’s
their only way of supporting their families but equally hard
not to
sympathise with shop owners who are struggling to stay afloat
amidst ever
increasing wage and utilities costs.
These two little poppets in their
empty fruit boxes watch wide- eyed
as Zimbabwe passes them by on a late
winter morning whipped by a cold
wind. Less than fifty metres from their
little boxes a huge mound of
garbage sprawls across the pavement and into the
road. Ash, plastic
bags, bottles, rotting banana skins, batteries and the
inevitable
flies and rats. The pile has been there for a couple of weeks
but
local authorities seem unable to see it. A few metres away a
vagrant
wearing filthy rags is asleep, sprawled right across the pavement
but
local officials seem unable to see him.
From their cardboard boxes
the eyes of the two children grow wide as a
quad bike roars past carrying two
policemen in uniform but not wearing
crash helmets. Outside the bank a man
walks past carrying a generator
on his shoulder and inside the bank I queue
to pay a bill. The amount
owing is US$10 but the bank charges an additional
US$2 to accept the
payment.
The sights seen by two children in a
cardboard box on a pavement is a
dramatic contrast to those seen by our eight
member Olympic team at
the opening ceremony. Smiling and waving they carry
our flag high and
we are so proud of them: Kirsty Coventry, Christopher
Felgate, James
Fraser Mackenzie, Wirimai Juwawo, Ngonidzashe Makusha,
Cuthbert
Nyasango, Sharon Tavengwa and Micheen Thornycroft.
Perhaps
one day two children who started off in a cardboard box will
also have the
chance to show the world what Zimbabweans can do,
regardless of their skin
colour and ancestral background or of the
incessant dirty, greedy political
fighting that suffocates all of our
lives. Until next time, thanks for
reading, love cathy. 28th July
2012. Copyright � Cathy Buckle. www.cathybuckle.com
http://www.cathybuckle.com
July 28, 2012, 4:50 am
The issue of sanctions has
dominated this week’s world news. Sanctions, you
could say are the 20th/21st
century alternative to military intervention
which in the end solves nothing
and brings down suffering and death on
innocent citizens. Syria is the
particular country that has brought the
sanctions issue into focus. The
opponents to Assad’s rule claim that the
west is not doing enough to support
them in their attempts to topple the man
they regard as a tyrant and
dictator. Without a UN resolution, the west
replies, we cannot act and
Russia and China have consistently blocked such a
resolution. So the
fighting goes on in Syria in what is virtually a civil
war in a country
riven by religious and ethnic divisions.
Zimbabwe, however, is not in a
state of civil war but, despite having a
Government of National Unity, the
country is ruled by a man with a history
of violence who has surrounded
himself with partisan police and military who
are ready to use force against
those who oppose Mugabe’s regime. The western
world, while continuing to
supply humanitarian aid, can do little to show
their disapproval of the
Mugabe regime except by applying economic and other
sanctions against firms
and individuals. Calls for sanctions to be lifted
have come from all sides
though as Tony Hawkins points out, lifting personal
sanctions will not help
the dire state of the economy or promote political
reform. The Prime
Minister, Morgan Tsvangirai has repeatedly called for
sanctions to be lifted
although he now seems to accept that it must be
conditional on free and fair
elections, including the Referendum on the new
constitution. The US has
declared that it will not lift sanctions until
there are peaceful polls and
reforms, Australia is reviewing the sanctions
issue and the UK announced
that most of the names and companies on the
sanctions list will be removed –
but not until after the Referendum has been
held. Commentators make the
point that neither Robert Mugabe or his inner
circle are off the hook since
EU sanctions remain in place against them.
Zanu PF, of course, dismisses
all this talk of sanctions as ‘nonsense’ but
you can bet that, come
Christmas, bigwigs of both parties will be itching to
come and do their
shopping at Harrods again!
While we wait for the Referendum date on the
new constitution to be
announced, there have been increasingly critical
comments about the document
itself coming from different quarters. The draft
constitution states that
dispossessed white farmers will not be compensated
and neither will they be
allowed to challenge the takeover of their
properties. In effect, the new
constitution has legalised the theft of land;
it also stipulates that war
veterans, including we assume those who
violently invaded the farms, should
be “recognised and accorded respect,
honour and recognition” This, in spite
of the fact that a 2008 SADC Tribunal
ruling declared the land grab was
illegal and that the farmers should be
compensated. Not surprisingly, Zanu
PF are resisting a Land Audit which
would reveal just how many of those
invaded farms have been allocated to the
new elite. One particular white
farmer faces eviction after he permitted the
MDC to hold a rally on his
farm. And around the country violent Zanu PF
thugs continue to disrupt MDC
rallies. In Makoni South, the MP wants to know
why there is a 400 strong
army battalion in his area. In the capital, Zanu
PF thugs fight for control
of the commuter omnibus ranks in Mbare. Even the
presidential spokesperson,
Didymus Mutasa has called for the disbanding of
the notorious Chipangano
gang which he blames for losing his party support
among the people.
The truth is that all is not well in Zimbabwe. The
economy is in meltdown
and Mugabe and Zanu PF continue to behave as if they
have some ‘divine right’
to rule the country. While the imposition of
sanctions will solve none of
these problems, they do at least convey the
world’s abhorrence at Mugabe’s
appalling human rights record.
Yours
in the (continuing) struggle, Pauline Henson.