International Herald Tribune
ReutersPublished: May 12,
2008
HARARE, Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe will not invite election
observers from Western
countries to monitor a presidential runoff unless
they remove sanctions,
state media reported Monday, rejecting opposition
demands.
Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa said Zimbabwe would not bow
to pressure
to invite election monitors from Western countries and the
United Nations.
"We will think favorably of them if they lift sanctions,"
the state-run
Herald newspaper quoted him as saying. "Until they do that,
there is no
basis to have any relationship with them."
After weeks of
equivocation, the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, said
at the weekend
he would contest the runoff against Robert Mugabe even though
he believes he
won outright in the first round and has accused the ruling
ZANU-PF of
vote-rigging.
Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) said he
would return home
to deal Mugabe a "final knockout" after almost three
decades in power.
But Tsvangirai said he would only run if
international observers and media
were given full access to ensure the vote
is free and fair.
Zimbabwe's government rejected any conditions for the
runoff, but it has
previously allowed in election monitors from regional
group SADC.
Only one European country - Russia - was invited to observe
the March 29
poll. Diplomats accredited in Zimbabwe were the only other
Western observers
allowed to monitor the vote.
The standoff has
dashed hopes that the election will bring relief to
millions of Zimbabweans
who are suffering because of severe food, fuel and
foreign currency
shortages and the world's highest inflation rate of 165,000
percent.
Mugabe has blamed Zimbabwe's economic collapse on Western
sanctions. Western
countries say the limited measures are designed only to
target Mugabe and
his top officials.
The MDC said it had stepped up
efforts to secure SADC peacekeepers for the
runoff after weeks of violence
that intimidated voters.
A former guerrilla leader, Mugabe has ruled
Zimbabwe since independence from
Britain in 1980. The West and rights groups
accuse him of human rights
violations and wrecking the economy, but he is
viewed as an independence
hero by many in Africa.
Official results
showed ZANU-PF lost its parliamentary majority for the
first time in the
elections, and that Tsvangirai beat Mugabe in a parallel
presidential poll,
but not by enough votes to avoid a runoff.
News24
12/05/2008 20:14 -
(SA)
Harare - Robert Mugabe's government on Monday brushed off
opposition calls
for conditions to be attached to a run-off presidential
vote in Zimbabwe, as
first round victor Morgan Tsvangirai prepared to return
home.
After more than a month spent lobbying neighbouring countries for
support as
his country sank deeper into a post-election crisis, Movement for
Democratic
Change (MDC) leader Tsvangirai has indicated his return is now
imminent.
But while Tsvangirai has insisted he will only run in a second
round against
Mugabe if the ballot is guaranteed to be free and fair, the
government has
ruled out any suggestion that Western observers will oversee
the voting and
said the MDC leader had no reason to fear for his
safety.
"If indeed there was a threat to his life, we have got law
enforcement
agents," Deputy Information Minister Bright Matonga told
AFP.
"Mischievous demands"
"Those demands are mischievous. He has
never told us he ran away from any
kind of danger and as far as we know he
is on holiday, at the same time
trying to drum up support for his campaign
to demonise Zimbabwe."
Mugabe's Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa said
the government would not
succumb to pressure from the opposition to invite
certain international
observers, and Western countries which have imposed
sanctions are not
welcome.
"We will think favourably of them if they
lift sanctions. Until they do
that, there is no basis to have any
relationship with them," the state-run
Herald daily quoted Chinamasa as
saying.
After being widely criticised for staying out of the country so
long,
Tsvangirai announced his intention at a news conference in South
Africa on
Saturday to return home "within a few days".
But he said he
would participate in the run-off only if there was a complete
cessation of
violence, a revamp of the electoral commission, and the
deployment of
international peacekeepers and foreign observers.
Campaign of
terror
The MDC says Mugabe is orchestrating a campaign of terror to
ensure a second
round victory.
A number of opponents of the regime
have been arrested, including the
president and Secretary-General of
Zimbabwe's main umbrella union
organisation, who remain in police
custody.
"They have been denied bail," lawyer Alec Muchadehama told AFP
on Monday,
referring to the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Union's president
Lovemore
Matombo and Secretary-General Wellington Chibebe who were arrested
last
Thursday.
A newly-elected lawmaker for the MDC was also arrested
on Monday in
connection with post-election violence in his constituency, a
colleague told
AFP.
MDC leaders met with Angola's President Jose
Eduardo dos Santos on Saturday
to urge him to send regional SADC
peacekeepers for the second round.
MDC Secretary-General Tendai Biti told
SA public radio there had been a
commitment from dos Santos to ensure the
run-off took place "within security
of the law and that means peace and
peace monitoring".
Monsters and Critics
May 12, 2008, 7:20 GMT
Harare/Johannesburg -
Zimbabwe's opposition Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC) leader Morgan
Tsvangirai, 56, will not return Monday to Zimbabwe to
begin campaigning in a
run-off presidential election as expected, his
spokesman
said.
Tsvangirai's spokesman George Sibotshiwe said the MDC leader, who
announced
Saturday he would contest a presidential run-off against President
Robert
Mugabe, would return to Zimbabwe 'within the next few days ... not
today.'
Tsvangirai on Saturday said he would return to Zimbabwe within
two days to
begin campaigning for a second round of voting in the March
election, which
the MDC is demanding be held by May 23, among other
conditions.
Mugabe, 84, who has ruled Zimbabwe since independence in
1980, is seeking a
sixth term in power, despite presiding over his country's
economic ruin.
The MDC had initially resisted a run-off, saying their man
beat Mugabe
outright in the first round on March 29.
Official results
however gave him 47.9 per cent against 43.2 per cent for
Mugabe - below the
50-per-cent-plus-one-ballot threshold needed for a direct
victory.
Ahead of his return Tsvangirai met over the weekend with
Angolan President
Eduardo dos Santos, a close ally of Mugabe, from whom he
sought assurances
on his safety in Zimbabwe.
Dos Santos heads the
political, defence and security committee of the
14-country Southern African
Development Community, which is mediating in the
Zimbabwean
impasse.
Asked whether the MDC leader had obtained the necessary security
guarantees,
Sibotshiwe told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa: 'They (SADC) are
working on
it.'
Tsvangirai has been based in South Africa and
Botswana for the past month,
amid concerns for his safety in Zimbabwe, where
the MDC says over 30 of its
members have been killed and hundreds of
supporters injured by pro-Mugabe
militia and soldiers since the
elections.
Ahead of his return, Mugabe's party and the Zimbabwe Electoral
Commission
poured cold water on some of the conditions the MDC leader
demanded for a
run-off.
ZEC was quoted in a Sunday paper in Zimbabwe
as saying it would 'likely' not
hold the run-off within three weeks of the
results being announced on May 2.
Patrick Chinamasa, Mugabe's reappointed
justice minister, also ruled out
allowing United Nations observers in to
monitor the poll and rejected the
MDC's call for the state-controlled ZEC to
be reconstituted.
nasdaq
HARARE, Zimbabwe (AFP)--A newly-elected lawmaker
for Zimbabwe's main
opposition Movement for Democratic Change, or MDC, party
was arrested Monday
in connection with post-election violence in his
constituency, a colleague
said.
Heya Shoko, who won a seat in
Masvingo province formerly held by President
Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF party,
is believed to be the first opposition
lawmaker to be arrested since a March
29 general election.
"I was with him in town when three detectives from
the CID law and order
sections took him away saying it was in connection
with some incidents in
his constituency," a fellow MDC lawmaker told AFP by
phone from Masvingo.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
05-12-081017ET
SW
Radio Africa (London)
12 May 2008
Posted to the web 12 May
2008
Tererai Karimakwenda
We received a report that the MDC MP
for Mutasa Central, Trevor Saruwaka,
was arrested Sunday morning at
Penhalonga Police Station. He had gone there
looking for one of the MDC
Youth members who had been abducted and detained
by war
veterans.
According to Pishai Muchauraya, the Tsvangirai MDC spokesperson
for
Manicaland, a group of CIOs arrived at the station while Saruwaka was
talking to the officer in charge, Assistant Inspector Goronga. They asked
why the MDC members were inside the police station. Goronga identified
Trevor Saruwaka as the MP for the area. The CIO's instructed him to
immediately arrest this elected official and detain him, claiming he was
inciting violence in Mutasa Central.
This is similar to countless
other reports we have received where the
victims are arrested when they
approach the police to file a complaint or
report an incident. The innocent
get arrested.
Muchauraya said the arrest follows an incident last week
when MDC supporters
were attacked by ZANU-PF supporters and war veterans at
Mutasa and Watsomba.
The MDC youths and villagers tried to defend
themselves.
The MDC retaliation came after police failed on a number of
occasions to
take any action after being told of the violence perpetuated by
ZANU-PF
supporters and war veterans. Other MDC supporters who went to
Penhalonga
Police Station to make such reports were threatened with arrest
and chased
away.
Muchauraya said the arrest of MP Saruwaka did not
come as a surprise to the
party. He added: "It is ZANU-PF's agenda to try
and frustrate the MDC
leadership ahead of a possible run-off, whose date
they are reluctant to
announce for fear of defeat and further
embarrassment."
SW Radio Africa (London)
12 May 2008
Posted to
the web 12 May 2008
Tererai Karimakwenda
Youth militia
descended on the home of a village head in Ward 8 Shamva and
attacked the
traditional leader and his wife with axes. Our correspondent
Simon Muchemwa
said Sabhuku Elias Madzivanzira, who was over 70 years old,
died on the
spot.
His wife suffered severe injuries but has been blocked from getting
medical
treatment. Muchemwa said she may die soon if nothing is done. He
explained
that Madzivanzira was targeted because his Ward produced a
majority of
opposition councillors in the March 29 election.
The
youths went on to burn down about 80 homes in the area, which is run by
Chief Mutumba. Muchemwa said all 80 of the families have fled and it is not
clear where they are living. The Shamva area is where we reported that 100
families were camping outside the police station after their houses were
burnt down.
According to our correspondent, ZANU-PF youth were given
blue uniforms last
Monday and are now known as the "Boys in Blue". Since
then violence has
escalated drastically in the Mashonaland Central and
Mashonaland East areas.
The youth now travel in larger teams of 500 to 1,000
in order to make sure
they outnumber opposition groups that were forming to
defend themselves.
Muchemwa said the locals have implicated the Deputy
Youth Minister and Mt
Darwin MP Xavier Kasukuwere, as the chief architect of
the violence in these
areas. Our correspondent spoke to one of the ZANU-PF
youth members who fled
from their militia camp and he confirmed that they
were being paid to carry
out these brutal attacks.
Each targeted
opposition supporter is rated by the chief organisesrs
according to a "star"
system. A target with 5 stars is the highest rating,
meaning most wanted and
is to be killed. 4 stars mean you rate a severe
beating and torture. 3 stars
will get you serious intimidation and mild
assault. Muchemwa said the youth
are being paid Z$10 billion if the target
dies instantly. They get Z$5
billion if the target suffers serious injuries
that could lead to death and
Z$1 billion if they flee from their home.
A report from Chiredzi said
there was a queue of these youth militia members
at a local bank, where they
were cashing their cheques. The government is
obviously spending huge sums
of money on this violent campaign, while
complaining that they do not have
sufficient funds for the runoff
presidential election. To organize violence
on such a large scale requires
funding of salaries, vehicles, fuel, food and
ammunition for this so-called
"Operation Mavhotera Papi". Not forgetting the
alcohol and drugs used to get
the youth 'high.'
The violence is well
documented by the government of South Africa. A New
York Times newspaper
report on Saturday said South Africa's President Thabo
Mbeki sent a team of
retired generals to Zimbabwe to look into the
accusations of political
violence. The report said the Generals were briefed
by church and medical
groups that are helping the wounded and that they also
talked to the victims
in a Harare hospital.
Commenting on the Generals' visit, one doctor is
quoted as saying: "I was
blown away by their concern". Zimbabweans can only
hope that Mbeki can learn
to be as equally concerned.
Our
correspondent said people are devastated and angry at the violence and
are
vowing never to support a party that is capable of such horrific acts
against it's own people. If Mugabe thinks that violence this time is going
to ensure people vote for him in a presidential runoff, he is sadly
mistaken.
SW Radio Africa
(London)
12 May 2008
Posted to the web 12 May 2008
Lance
Guma
State sponsored violence against members of the Anglican Church
reached new
levels over the weekend as police in different parts of Harare
gatecrashed
church services and beat up parishioners loyal to new bishop
Sebastian
Bakare.
At the St Francis parish in Waterfalls riot police
interrupted the service
during 'holy communion' and told parishioners to
leave. Witnesses said the
parishioners assumed it was the usual police
over-zealousness and some of
them remained seated. The police then began
beating up people, including
women, in the church.
On Monday,
Newsreel spoke to Bishop Bakare who confirmed that similar scenes
were
witnessed in Borrowdale, Budiriro, Dzivarasekwa and other parishes. The
Christ Church parish in Borrowdale was raided by police who arrested the
warden there, a Mr Murombedzi. He was taken to Borrowdale police station but
after several hours of stalling over a charge they eventually released him.
A furious Bakare said what was happening was a 'national scandal' adding,
'even Ian Smith (former Rhodesian leader) allowed us to
worship.'
Sources told Newsreel that the ousted Bishop and Mugabe
supporter, Nolbert
Kunonga, has branded new bishop Bakare an MDC supporter
who is receiving
money from Britain. The accusation has provided an excuse
for a crackdown on
Bakare's followers, with instructions being given to the
police force that
all parishioners loyal to him be barred from using any of
the church
buildings in Harare. A High Court order that divided time for
church
services between Bakare and Kunonga was suspended, following the
granting of
an appeal to Kunonga by Chief Justice Godfrey
Chidyausiku.
On becoming Bishop, Kunonga plunged the Anglican Church into
disarray after
pledging his support for Mugabe's violent land-grab policy.
He targeted
priests who disagreed with him by posting them to remote areas,
while
members of the CIO threatened some with death. An attempt by Kunonga
to
withdraw the Harare diocese from the Province of Central Africa backfired
as
the province later dismissed him. Kunonga continues to defy the dismissal
and has relied on state security to beat up and intimidate his
opponents.
Out of some 69 vicars in the church 59 support Bakare, while
10 have
remained loyal to Kunonga. Coincidentally and not surprising those
10 were
ordained by Kunonga. Frustrated that the majority of parishioners
also
deserted him Kunonga has used state security operatives to keep the
doors of
St Mary's cathedral shut. Every Sunday Kunonga and a small group of
supporters open up the cathedral for their service, then lock it up
again.
PRinside
2008-05-12 19:03:03
-
HARARE, Zimbabwe (AP) - The U.S. ambassador to Zimbabwe said there
is
undeniable evidence that Robert Mugabe's party is driving a systematic
campaign of violence intended to intimidate opposition supporters before a
runoff presidential election.
Ambassador James McGee made the remarks in
an open letter to media
organizations that was published Monday in the
state-run Herald newspaper
alongside an unsigned editorial rebuking his
views.
The paper blasted McGee, accusing him of «very scandalous acts» and of
breaching diplomatic procedure by speaking out on the violence that has
riven Zimbabwe since its March 29 elections.
McGee said in his letter
that, as a supporter of human rights, he felt
compelled to speak out against
«atrocities being committed across Zimbabwe,»
and he vowed to press for the
prosecution of perpetrators of the violence.
He said it was undeniable that
some within Mugabe's ZANU-PF party have
started a systematic campaign of
violence meant to ensure Mugabe wins a
runoff against opposition leader
Morgan Tsvangirai.
McGee said the U.S. government has received confirmed
reports of at least 20
deaths and more than 700 incidents of violence
resulting in more than 200
people being hospitalized since the first round
of voting in March.
Detailed evidence of torture, beatings and the burning of
homes «paint a
deeply disturbing picture of an organized campaign of
violence against those
who voted for the opposition» orchestrated at the
highest level of Mugabe's
party, he said.
The evidence was passed on to
the United Nations and regional leaders. The
United States knows the
identities of many of those responsible for
instigating the violence and
carrying it out, McGee said.
«Until the violence stops, we will continue to
work with local and
international partners to help care for the wounded,
feed the hungry and
house the homeless. ... We will continue to gather
evidence of the
atrocities being committed so that the guilty can one day be
brought to
justice,» he said.
The state Herald said McGee failed to raise
the allegations with the
government through formal channels and did not
submit any evidence of the
allegations to law enforcement authorities to
enable them to take action.
Diplomats were guests in Zimbabwe and McGee
flagrantly disregarded the
nation's «rule of law» and made threats «in
typical policeman-of-the-world
fashion» against Zimbabweans he claimed were
involved in violence and could
be punished, it said.
«If this is not a
naked threat of violence from McGee, what then would be
defined as a
threat?» said the Herald in a prominent article that did not
identify its
author.
Observers inside and outside Zimbabwe have questioned whether a
second round
of voting could be free and fair with the opposition unable to
campaign
freely because of attacks and threats. Mugabe's ruling ZANU-PF,
meanwhile,
already has launched its runoff campaign.
According to the
Zimbabwe Association of Doctors for Human Rights, at least
22 people have
died and 900 have been tortured in postelection violence. The
country's
agriculture union has also said 40,000 farmworkers have been
displaced in an
effort to prevent them from voting in the runoff.
The presidential runoff
between Mugabe and Tsvangirai, the opposition
leader, will not be held in
the next few weeks, as required by law, the head
of the electoral commission
said on the weekend.
Tsvangirai maintains he won the most votes in the
first round but said over
the weekend that he would participate in a runoff
against Mugabe.
He said the vote must legally be held within 21 days of the
May 2
announcement of presidential results, but the head of the electoral
commission said more time was needed to ready the second
round.
Meanwhile, religious leaders in South Africa were briefed Monday by
President Thabo Mbeki on his efforts to mediate the Zimbabwe
crisis.
Ashwin Trikamjee, co-chairman of the Presidential Religious Working
group,
said Mbeki told them that a task force including retired army
generals from
South Africa had been sent to Zimbabwe to investigate
«complaints and
allegations of violence.
Once the task force has reported
back to mediators, steps will be taken to
«ensure the runoff election takes
place in as free and fair a manner as
possible,» Trikamjee said.
A
statement issued after the meeting called for the Zimbabwe crisis to be
resolved as «speedily as possible, in the interest of the people of Zimbabwe
and the whole of southern Africa.
Los Angeles Times
Its president
stands idly by as Mugabe and his thugs ruin Zimbabwe.
By James
Kirchick
May 12, 2008
The tendency to compare contemporary political
events to the Third Reich is
called reducto ad Hitlerum, so facile are the
alleged similarities and so
often is this tactic employed. With that caveat,
when I saw a photograph
Friday of smiling, garland-laden South African
President Thabo Mbeki holding
the hand of Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe,
I couldn't resist drawing a
mental parallel: British Prime Minister Neville
Chamberlain in 1938 waving
his copy of the Munich treaty before a crowd of
thousands, boasting that he
had achieved "peace for our time."
That
Mbeki, who last month insisted there was "no crisis" in Zimbabwe,
continues
to glad-hand Mugabe represents a complete abandonment of moral
responsibility. As he provides diplomatic cover, Mugabe's armed thugs roam
Zimbabwe's countryside threatening, torturing and killing people believed to
have voted for the opposition Movement for Democratic Change. The MDC claims
25 of its supporters have been murdered and 40,000 people have been
displaced since the March 29 parliamentary and presidential election. The
regime has detained journalists and trade union leaders as well as members
of the country's electoral commission, the body that verifies election
results.
The regime claims that MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai, while
besting Mugabe,
did not poll more than the 50% required for an outright win
and has mandated
a runoff. Given that the alternative would be an automatic
Mugabe victory,
Tsvangirai has decided to take part. Yet conditions for a
free and fair
election clearly do not exist in Zimbabwe. In an interview
with the New York
Times last week, a member of Mugabe's Politburo implicitly
promised war:
"We're giving the people of Zimbabwe another opportunity to
mend their ways,
to vote properly. This is their last chance."
And
yet, as the world looks to South Africa for political leadership (as it
is
the region's economic powerhouse), Mbeki stands idly by. In fact, his
methods of dealing with the tyrant to his north -- supplying cut-rate
electric power, issuing nary a word of criticism, siding with Russia and
China to prevent the dispatch of a U.N. envoy to report on postelection
violence -- has exacerbated the political and humanitarian
crisis.
Why has Mbeki acted this way?
National liberation
movements rule the roost in much of southern Africa:
Angola, Mozambique,
Namibia, Zimbabwe and South Africa are all governed by
political parties
that emerged from armed revolutionary movements, and their
leaders tend to
close ranks when one is threatened. The leaders of South
Africa's ruling
African National Congress fear a domino effect, in which the
fall of a
sister liberation movement could portend a similar fate for its
own
political fortunes. "If Zimbabwe 'falls,' South Africa will be the next
target," South African historian R.W. Johnson wrote recently in the London
Review of Books.
Zimbabwean writer Blessing-Miles Tendi, writing in
the Guardian, offered
another explanation for South Africa's inertia: Mbeki
owes Mugabe a
political debt. Mugabe could have seized Zimbabwe's
white-owned farms in the
1990s but resisted, in part because of pressure
from the ANC, then trying to
convince South Africa's whites that they would
not lose their land in a
post-apartheid dispensation.
On a plane ride
from Johannesburg to Harare in 2006, I sat across the aisle
from a South
African military officer on a mission to train Zimbabwean
troops. Appalling
as it may seem, post-apartheid South Africa maintains a
firm military
relationship with the Mugabe regime. They formed a joint
commission on
military strategy and intelligence in 2005, for instance. Both
are also
members of the African Union and the Southern African Development
Community,
regional alliances that discourage unwanted meddling and
encourage mutual
sustainment. The AU even amended its constitution in 2003
to permit forceful
intervention in any AU country to rectify "serious
threat[s] to legitimate
order." This was widely seen -- correctly -- as a
form of regime
preservation.
The March 29 election gave a reticent Mbeki every
opportunity he needed to
gently urge a peaceful transition of power in
Zimbabwe. But his aversion to
the opposition Movement for Democratic Change
-- which the ANC's top brass
views as a "neocolonialist" threat partly
because of the support it has from
the West -- led him to quietly support
the breakaway candidacy of Mugabe's
former finance minister, Simba Makoni,
as a "third way" option to keep the
MDC boxed out.
Another
complicating factor is that Mbeki faces internal opposition from
South
African labor, which opposes his free-market economic reforms and is
allied
with its anti-Mugabe Zimbabwean trade union brethren. Victory for the
opposition in Zimbabwe would embolden Mbeki's domestic
antagonists.
Mugabe has easily manipulated Mbeki, a strange set of
affairs considering
that the former figure is a discredited dictator running
a morally bankrupt
kleptocracy, and the latter presides over a country
brimming with
international goodwill and a strong economy. It is not in
South Africa's
national interest, nor -- despite what he may think -- in
Mbeki's personal
political interest that Mugabe's disastrous rule continue.
No political
leader wants a failed state on his border, and Zimbabwe's
collapse is deeply
felt in South Africa, where more than 3 million
Zimbabweans have fled in
recent years, crowding into a country with 40%
unemployment.
As discredited as his role as mediator may be, Mbeki can
still act for good.
At the very least, he could demand an end to the
regime's unceasing violence
against its own people. He could threaten to cut
off fuel and electric
supplies. He could publicly demand Mugabe step aside.
If that's too
antagonistic, he could pressure Mugabe to allow journalists
and election
observers from free countries (i.e., not just teams from China,
Iran and
Venezuela, nations that Mugabe welcomed in March) to monitor the
runoff.
But by refusing to perform even the easiest of these tasks, Mbeki
has
exposed himself as an utterly feckless leader. The tragedy of Zimbabwe
falls
considerably on his head.
James Kirchick is an assistant editor
of the New Republic.
SABC
May 12, 2008,
14:30
Zimbabwe's Electoral Commission (ZEC) has confirmed that the second
round of
the presidential election will be delayed due to logistical
problems.
ZEC Chairperson George Chiweshe says it is unlikely the run-off
could be
held by May 23, as laid down by law. Chiweshe says the ZEC is
waiting for
funds to be allocated by government to hold the poll. The
opposition
Movement Democratic Change (MDC) says a delay will give
authorities time to
carry out attacks on its supporters.
A number of
former army generals from the SANDF are meanwhile in Zimbabwe
gathering
information on the level of violence in that country. This is part
of the
SADC mediation initiative led by South African President Thabo Mbeki.
This
has been revealed by religious leaders after a meeting with President
Mbeki
in Pretoria.
The New Times
(Kigali)
OPINION
11 May 2008
Posted to the web 12 May
2008
Ndung'u Wainaina
Kigali
Zimbabwe crisis coming hotly after
Kenya is indicative of grave dangers
ahead threatening governance, democracy
and human rights in Africa. It is a
vindication of severe weaknesses and
deficit of internal institutions in
resolving internal disputes and
conflicts not just within the country but
also within African
Union.
Of keen interest would be how Ghana and South Africa are set to
handle their
respective elections with ethnic cleavages starting to emerge.
While the
Africa Union may protest this assertion and parade Kenya as
contrary
evidence, my opinion remains. What happened in Kenya is
legitimization of
civilian coup against people's sovereign will through back
door.
The political deal brokered by African Union mediation process
led by Dr.
Kofi Annan cannot be the formula to brand and market. Nobody
should attempt
to propose this formula to Zimbabwe. It is fraudulent, cruel
and
illegitimate. It subverts democracy and human rights. Consolation is
that
despite the Robert Mugabe's incredible regime brutality, the
indomitable
spirit of the people of Zimbabwe and their yearning for
democracy remains
unbowed. African Union and others in international
community must stand with
the people of Zimbabwe in order to realize their
goal of democracy and human
rights.
Mugabe's barbaric acts of
crushing opponents seem as entrenched as ever. It
is significant to
emphasise that Mugabe lost the election but is forcing to
negotiate his way
out - a fact that has been confirmed by outcome of the
forced re-count of
votes. The South African government apparently support
for re-run is
misguided. How do you conduct and manage a re-run in an
extremely volatile
and conflict situation?
President Mbeki has his right of opinion but I do
not think the Southern
Africa Development Community necessarily shares the
same position. South
Africa might be the regional top dog with peculiar
historical ties to
Zimbabwean people but that must not be the excuse for
complacency and
baby-sitting Mugabe. Truth be told, Mugabe has a progressive
side. However,
his invocation of imperialism sabotage to justify brutalizing
and
annihilating Zimbabweans is unacceptable. A three-tiered pressure
approach
accompanied by clear division of labor between the African Union,
United
Nations, Zimbabwe's neighbors and the wider international community
is
required to bring change in Zimbabwe. It is important to observe that
constitutional and governance reforms are absolutely critical before going
into another election. A transient government and a reform agenda programme
is the starting point.
The first tier would build on the work of the
President Mbeki's mediation
process. He has been able to establish a
reasonable relationship with all
the key players in Zimbabwe crisis. It
therefore makes sense for this
process to be taken over, strengthened and
directed by the African Union to
coordinate the diplomatic efforts. SADC can
play key role focusing on
constitutional, electoral and political reforms,
national reconciliation and
socio-economic reforms. This would require
sustained, high-profile mediation
efforts. However, accountability for the
grave human rights violations must
not be sidetracked. Secondly, accelerated
and structured regional talks are
essential. South Africa and other
neighboring countries have taken heat for
their defense of Mugabe even when
he is committing absurd atrocities. This
has seriously damaged their
credibility and moral legitimacy to intervene.
Now is the time for them to
call in their favors with the brutal Mugabe's
regime. Zambia and Botswana
are showing progressive leadership in resolving
Zimbabwe crisis unlike
ambivalent South Africa. Regional talks based on the
prospect of Zimbabwe's
reintegration into the region should address the need
for long-term
stability, democratic reforms and transparent socio-economic
policy. Without
paranoia, Zimbabwe neighbours and friends will need to
reassure Zimbabweans
that Zimbabwe's stability and territorial integrity are
not threatened by
their intervention but it is for the good of the region.
African Union has
been accused for long for reluctance and lackluster
initiative in resolving
Africa's governance crisis. The West must accept
that given a chance and
support AU can deliver. Regional civil societies
have to take more bold
steps in helping Zimbabweans. I know Open Society
Initiative for Southern
Africa, Open Society Initiative for Eastern Africa,
Kenya's human rights
groups, South Africa's human rights and labour
movements amongst others are
working jointly with various Zimbabwean civil
society groups. Their active
involvement and participation in resolving
Zimbabwe crisis is of utmost
necessity. It is possible that Mugabe might
agree to constructive actions
with a group consisting of regional actors.
The wider international
community has a vital role to play too, providing
the context for the
regional talks and the UN's mediation efforts. This
would mean keeping human
rights at the top of the agenda; developing a set
of escalating sanctions
targeting top notch Mugabe supporters and incentives
to encourage progress
and punish recalcitrance by the regime; and monitoring
the regional talks to
ensure they do not degenerate into an excuse for
inaction and arena of
rewarding gross human rights violations. A development
partners' dialogue
forum could help address the urgent problems of hunger,
poverty, and
disease. It could also start contingency planning for a
transition to
democracy. The crisis in Zimbabwe goes beyond politics. After
decades of
oppression, institutional failure and poverty, the country
suffers deep
social divisions, incompetent and corrupt governance, collapse
of the social
amenities and deep-rooted structural poverty of major
proportions. The
creation of a development partners' forum would send a
powerful message to
Mugabe that there is an alternative to self-perceived
hostile relations with
the outside world.
Resolving Zimbabwe crisis must also address certain
persistent
misperceptions. The first is that ever tighter sanctions can
force change.
Mugabe and his cohorts are used to ostracism, and they are not
going to be
forced to give up power through West-styled sanctions. The
second is that
South Africa and certain East countries like China holds the
key, if only
they can exert their influence. China's influence and support
come out
recently through shipment of consignment of arms to Zimbabwe. Arms
moratorium to Zimbabwe is critical. Zimbabwe does not just need removal of
Mugabe's brutal regime. At best, Mugabe removal can only be beginning of the
real process of transforming governance. Zimbabwe faces real problems of
internal conflict and instability. Rule by fait has caused most formal and
informal institutions to wither. Change will require compromises, and will
be slow at best. There is a small window of opportunity to bring change in
Zimbabwe. African Union and Zimbabwe's neighbors backed by the international
community should seize the moment.
Writer is Director, International
Center for Policy and Conflict
President Thabo Mbeki and President Robert Mugabe |
President Thabo Mbeki and religious leaders have
agreed that the Zimbabwean situation should be resolved as speedily as possible.
Mbeki briefed members of the presidential religious working group at the Union
Buildings in Pretoria today on his facilitation of events in
Zimbabwe.
Co-chairperson of the religious group, Ashwin Trikamjee, said
after the meeting the run-off presidential election must take place in a
peaceful atmosphere.
Trikamjee said progress is being made in
investigating violence claims involving former defence generals. He said the
investigating team will report to Mbeki soon.
With an election run-off
looming, the Zimbabwean Electoral Commission is reported as saying that it will
take some time to get ready, as it still has to raise funds for the
run-off.
In an about turn, the opposition Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC) announced that it will participate in the run-off. But they called on the
UN and the EU to monitor the run-off. It's still unclear whether the MDC and
Zanu-PF will agree on a transitional government of national unity.
During
her budget speech tomorrow, Foreign Affairs Minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma is
expected to touch on the situation in Zimbabwe.
Zimbabwe Today
Another atrocity against the
people of Zimbabwe
As our politicians squabble, debate, impose conditions
and argue, as
international statesmen fudge and mumble their vague support
for our
suffering, it is easy to forget that down the dust roads and rural
tracks of
this country a daily horror is taking place. This is another
eye-witness
account.
The village of Chiweshe is near the small town
of Mazoe, some 150 kilometres
north of Harare. A Zanu-PF militia force,
numbering about 20 and led, I am
informed, by retired army major Cairo
Mhandu, arrived at the village late
one night last week.
Four
residents of the village, all of them known to be activists and
supporters
of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) were
rounded up.
Then, while other villages were forced to watch, the torture
began.
The four men - Jemedza Maguramhende, Tapiwa Meda, Alex
Chiriseri and Roda
Chavachimwe - were first flogged with whips made of
barbed wire. When they
became unconscious they were revived with water, then
beaten to death with
rifle butts.
The scene was described to me by
Ida, the wife of Mr. Maguramhende, as she
waited at a Harare clinic next
day, to take her husband's body for burial.
"They wanted my husband and they
got him," she told me. "They killed him
before my eyes."
A post
mortem on Maguramhende revealed that his jaws and temple had been
"forcibly
collapsed" and that he had a huge dent in the back of his skull.
Another
victim, Tapiwa Meda, was so badly beaten that he could only be
identified by
his wrist watch.
Apart from the four who died, two other men were beaten,
and are now in
intensive care in a private Harare hospital. They were David
Mapuranga and
his father, Richard. David is known to be a major MDC activist
who organised
support in the run-up to the election.
Both men were
whipped with barbed wire until they passed out. Richard's
wife, Marevaseyi,
told me that Mhandu, the militia commander, ordered that
they be revived
before being killed "so they can endure the pain of dying."
But the two
men were so badly beaten that they did not recover consciousness
despite by
doused with water. Mhandu turned his attention elsewhere, and
ordered the
whipping of Richard's sister, Margaret. She was tortured, with
effects that
even here I cannot bring myself to relate
Throughout this whole barbaric
nightmare, other villagers were forced both
to watch, and to sing songs in
support of Zanu-PF and its bloody history.
Around midnight the Zanu-PF
force left the village. The horror of that
dreadful night
remains.
Posted on Monday, 12 May 2008 at 09:49
IOL
May 12 2008 at
05:31PM
Two Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) leaders have
been denied
bail when they appeared in court on Monday, ZCTU said in a
statement.
ZCTU president Lovemore Matombo and secretary general
Wellington
Chibebe were remanded to May 23.
ZCTU acting
information officer Last Tarabuku said the presiding
magistrate said the two
men were not eligible for bail and had to remain in
custody in the interest
of justice.
Tarabuku said ZCTU's lawyer Aleck Muchandehama was
lodging an appeal
with the High Court.
Matombo and Chibebe were
arrested on Thursday after handing themselves
over.
The men
were charged for "inciting people to rise against government".
The
allegations arise from comments which the two made at this year's
May Day
celebrations at the Dzivaresekwa stadium.
Tarabuku said the state prosecutor told the court that the two men
would
abscond if they were given bail.
The men are being held at Harare
remand prison. - Sapa
Download this document
- Acrobat PDF version (490KB)
If you do
not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download it from the Adobe
website by clicking here.
Introduction
On March 29, 2008 the Zimbabwean people voted Zanu PF out of power. Today, for the first time in its 28-year rule, Zanu PF no longer has a parliamentary majority despite a concerted election campaign of vote-buying, electoral roll tampering, voter intimidation and general use of brute force. At the time of writing this report, a full month after the harmonised elections, the results of the presidential election have only just been released and the illegal recount of several House of Assembly constituencies has brought Zanu PF no relief.
The last time Zanu PF officially lost a national vote was in 2000, when the people voted 'no' in a referendum for a constitution which amongst other things would have extended the executive powers of the President. Within a few days of that referendum defeat the first of the now infamous commercial farm invasions had begun, and these soon turned into a massive and systematic nation-wide campaign to intimidate a sizable but vulnerable section of the population into support for the ruling party. All this is described in some detail n the JAG and GAPWUZ report Destruction of Zimbabwe's backbone industry in support of political power to which this report should be considered an addendum.
It should come then as no surprise that the immediate aftermath of Zanu PF's 2008 election defeat should include drastic consequences for the few remaining commercial farmers and their workers. Having maintained a slow erosion of the remaining commercial farms for the last few years, the Government of Zimbabwe has once again heightened its assault on these, its least wanted of citizens. The scale of this recent backlash has remained hidden from view until now. It is the aim of this report to make the current surge in invasions and human rights violations on the farms visible for what it is: violent, widespread and systematic. At least one-third of the remaining commercial farms have reported major disturbances in the last three weeks.
There have already been several reports in the local and international media highlighting this surge in farm invasions. However, what these reports do not make clear is the large scale of these invasions. This is not an isolated series of populist uprisings, but a co-ordinated and centrally planned push by the Government to remove the country's last few white farmers, to bully their workers into support for Mugabe ahead of the presidential election run-off, and to further extend the system of political patronage where farms are confiscated from farmers and given to the party faithful in exchange for continued support. The continued holding of the land is entirely dependent on continued support of the party.1
It must be firmly stressed that the methods used in the current political exploitation of the land issue, namely the violence towards white and black commercial farmers and their work forces as well as the political "re-education," mass psychological torture, pungwes, human rights violations and so on, are a continuation of what has been happening on Zimbabwe's commercial farms over the last eight years. These tactics are well known to Zimbabwe's farmers and their workers. In the study that led to the joint JAG/GAPWUZ report "The Destruction of Zimbabwe's backbone industry in pursuit of political power," almost half the survey sample of farmers report a clinically significant level of trauma. Anecdotal evidence also points to a high frequency of trauma-related health problems in the farming population.
It is also important to stress that the white commercial farmers are only one part of this victim group. The focus by the international media on the white farmers has created a useful smokescreen for Mugabe behind which gross human rights violations can be perpetrated against a population of some 1.5 million farm workers and family members. This population represents what might be termed the "swing" vote between the traditional MDC strongholds in urban areas and the Zanu PF strongholds in the rural areas. There is also a small contingent of black commercial farmers whose refusal to buy in to Zanu PF patronage systems has resulted in their being ostracised, intimidated, and in several cases, severely assaulted. In the Zanu PF rule book, to be a "sell out" is as bad a crime as being a white farmer.
A few days after the harmonised elections, reports began to trickle in of an escalation in war veteran, youth militia and apparent military activities on commercial farms. These violations included the usual litany of crimes against this section of Zimbabwe's population: the barricading of farmers into their homesteads, assaults and abductions, arson and torture, political re-education and voter intimidation, etc. The outcome of the elections led directly to Zanu PF unleashing its complete arsenal on the electorate.
It must be noted that compiling this report was complicated by the reluctance of farmers and their workers to be identified, a reluctance due to the very real probability of violent reprisal attacks. For this reason, the majority of people referred to hear have been given an anonymous code. However, the authors of the report are in possession of informants' real names.
Note:
1. The Government offer letter to new farmers explicitly states that the offer can be withdrawn at any time. This state of uncertainty binds the new farmer into an uncompromising fealty to the government, as he or she has no legal recourse should the offer be withdrawn.
Visit the JAG fact sheet
The Nation
(Nairobi)
12 May 2008
Posted to the web 12 May 2008
Kitsepile
Nyathi
Harare
Mr Richard Nhliziyo could not help crying as menacing
supporters of
Zimbabwe's ruling party set his three huts on fire in a
midnight raid that
left his grandchildren too traumatised to return to
school.
South Africa's President Thabo Mbeki and Zimbabwe's President
Robert Mugabe
walk down the red carpet at Harare International Airport. Mr
Mbeki and Mr
Mugabe held talks on Friday on Zimbabwe's election crisis.
Photo/REUTERS
"They accused me of campaigning for the Movement for
Democratic Change and
said I had no right to live among patriotic Zanu PF
supporters," Mr Nhliziyo
sobbed as he narrated his ordeal at one of the safe
houses provided by
churches in the second city of Bulawayo.
"All the
family's food reserves, clothes and property went up in smoke that
night and
I do not even imagine where to start... it is terrible."
But he thanks
his gods that the militia spared his life as over 30 people
have been killed
countrywide for supporting the MDC, which ended the ruling
party's 28
year-old uninterrupted control of parliament in the March
elections.
At least 3,000 villagers from across the country have been
displaced in
politically motivated violence spawned by President Robert
Mugabe's first
round defeat to MDC leader Mr Morgan Tsvangirai.
The
violence escalated last week as the MDC finally confirmed that it will
take
part in the second round of voting after all, civic groups and doctors
that
have been treating the victims said.
There are reports that hundreds of
schools have been closed down as the war
veterans have set up bases in the
institutions of learning to spearhead the
violence in rural areas which were
considered Zanu PF strongholds before the
embarrassing defeat.
Mr
Mncedisi Makhulumo, a teacher, told a heart rending account of how he was
humiliated in front of his pupils by the militia before he was forced to
abandon his job.
One of them grabbed me by the collar and threw me to
the ground, in front of
my pupils and their parents," Mr Makhulumo
said.
MDC as a puppet party
"I was ordered to openly declare my
allegiance to Zanu PF, sing their songs
and denounce MDC as a puppet party
of the West before I was heavily
assaulted."
Fears mounted here at
the weekend that the orgy of violence that has already
driven 2,000 refugees
to seek asylum in neighbouring Botswana would worsen
when the campaigns
intensify after Mr Tsvangirai confirmed that he would
take part in the
presidential election runoff.
Zimbabwean doctors treating victims of the
violence and torture on Friday
spoke of "a dramatic escalation" of the
attacks directed and carried out by
agents of the government and the ruling
party.
The number of wounded soared to more than 900 since the disputed
elections
on March 29, with 22 confirmed deaths, the report said."This
figure grossly
underestimates the number of victims countrywide as the
violence is now on
such a scale that it is impossible to properly document
all cases," the
Zimbabwe Association of Doctors for Human Rights
said.
So many victims had come in with broken bones over the previous 24
hours
thathospitals and clinics in Harare were running out of plaster,
according
to the report dated May 8.
Mr Tsvangirai on Saturday
announced from South Africa, where he has been
staying since escaping the
violence a month ago that he would contest the
run off, despite the evidence
of intensifying violence.
He called for an end to the violence and an
international peacekeeping force
to calm the situation ahead of the
runoff.
A South African observer mission that monitored the March 29
elections last
week said it would be impossible to hold the election amid
the violence.
Although the first round of the polls was generally
peaceful, the Zimbabwe
Electoral Commission (ZEC) took a month to release
the results, a situation
that fuelled tension as it became clear that Mr
Mugabe lost.
The official results rejected by the opposition as
fraudulent put the
opposition leader ahead of the geriatric former guerrilla
leader.
The ZEC is yet to set a date for the run-off which should have
been held 21
days after the results were released, with reports that the
commission is
broke to hold the polls within such a short
period.
Meanwhile, the veterans of the country's liberation war and
unemployed
youths lured with money have stepped up the terror attacks on
civilians as
the ruling party prepares for the runoff.
In the latest
travel warning issued to its citizens planning to travel to
Zimbabwe, the
United States government warned that the ZANU-PF party has
unleashed a wave
of political violence.
It said the terror campaign is designed to cow
opposition members and
supporters into submission and deter them from
participating or voting their
conscience in a possible runoff
election.
"Soldiers, police, war veterans and youth militia loyal to the
ruling party
have been deployed in rural areas throughout Zimbabwe to
systematically
intimidate voters through killings, beatings, looting of
property, burning
of homes and public humiliation," reads the
warning
But the government still strenuously denies the accusations with
the army
issuing a statement last week denying reports that soldiers had
been
deployed countrywide to campaign for Mugabe.
The Zimbabwe
National Liberation War Veterans Association (ZNLWVA) chairman,
Mr Jabulani
Sibanda who has led the Zanu PF storm troopers since the violent
2002
presidential elections campaigns also tried to distance the war
veterans
from the violence.
"We are busy campaigning for President Mugabe," he
said. "Why should we set
up torture camps to abuse fellow
Zimbabweans?"
Former Home Affairs Minister, Dr Dumiso Dabengwa who last
year shocked Zanu
PF to the core when he backed former Finance Minister, Dr
Simba Makoni in
his challenge for the presidency believes that Mr Mugabe has
lost control of
the situation in the country.
"I have been informed
that a clique of powerful people within Zanu PF
convinced Mugabe to stay on
despite losing the election and this why the
situation in the country has
deteriorated to these levels." He said the only
way out for the country was
a government of national unity, which must be
formed by Mr Tsvangirai as his
party won most of the seats in parliament. A
fresh election would then be
organised within two years.
Meanwhile, Mr Tsvangirai who said he would
return to Zimbabwe "soon" has
come under severe pressure from his supporters
to "stand with the victims"
of the violence, if he entertained any chances
of retaining their support.
"We are now having a shepherd who has
abandoned his flock," said renowned
political analyst Professor Eldred
Masungure. The violence in Zimbabwe has
also become a source of concern for
neighbouring countries that are likely
to be affected by an influx of
illegal immigrants.
Last week, the Botswana government instructed its
public media to expose the
plight of Zimbabwean refugees escaping political
violence as asylum seekers
continued to flee across its border.
By Lee Shungu, on May 12 2008 14:30
Zimbabwe's only president since independence, Robert Mugabe has officially launched a 'patriotic' campaign mainly through unleashing terror and violence against opposition party members, The Zimbabwe Gazette has established.
Speaking to this reporter, a Zimbabwe National Army (ZNA) official based in Harare said last week, their seniors instructed them to incite violence.
“This order- which came from the highest office has been officially given to soldiers, war veterans and the notorious youth militia around the country.”
“If you are complaining that currently there is too much violence in the country, you have not seen anything yet. We are coming after you,” he said.During the weekend, South African president, Thabo Mbeki was in the country and had talks with Mugabe. The outcome of the meeting was not disclosed, but SA sources hinted the issue was on violence.
The MDC president, Morgan Tsvangirai is also reported to have snubbed a meeting with Mbeki during the weekend.
According to the ZNA official, all these stories and rumours we hear- about ZANU PF and MDC supporters clashing, are a reality.
“The only difference is the news source. The country's sole broadcaster, Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) will tell you the MDC supporters have attacked ZANU PF supporters. Of, course, this will be a lie. It would have happened vis-a-vis.”“The independent media tries by all the means to tell the truth. ZANU PF is behind all the violence,” he emphasised.
Results of the March 29 presidential elections were in favour of Tsvangirai who got 47.9 percent, whilst Mugabe had 43.2 percent. The results were released after ZANU PF claimed the MDC had rigged the election and ordered for a re-count.
The ruling party also lost the majority of seats in Parliament for the first time since 1980.
The ZNA member says terror has been widely seen by the ruling party as the solution to 'win' votes.
“The recent elections reveal people no longer want Mugabe in power, but the aging leader is and will do anything to stay in power.”
“As the army, it is difficult for us to refuse orders, especially from an individualistic perspective for example in this case- unleashing terror,” he said.
Currently, a group of war veterans is causing havoc in and around Murehwa, about 60 kilometres North East of Harare.
According to a witness, last week along Murehwa road, the group stopped a bus destined for Murehwa, before assaulting passengers.
“I was also a passenger in the same bus. We were ordered to disembark from the bus before being asked to chant party slogans.”
“About sixteen of us refused and we were not allowed to get back on the bus, so we decided to walk, of which the war veterans labelled us MDC supporters and started attacking us with stones.”
“As we ran for dear life, we then agreed to fight back, so we stopped and picked up logs, stones and metal rods near a farm boundary wire and thus the war veterans retreated,” he said.
The man- who was in a state of shock said he will not be travelling to his rural home, for now and if he does travel- will go wearing a ruling party T-shirt.
“On our way back, we met the same fate. Obstacles were placed on the road, and the bus driver had to stop. A group of war veterans emerged from the bush, and again labelling us Harare residents who support Tsvangirai.”
“It is when one passenger with a V3 mobile phone (with Mugabe's face as wallpaper) claimed he was going to call Mugabe informing him war veterans were causing noise. That is when the bus driver was ordered to take off,” he added.
National Post, Canada
Posted: May 12, 2008, 10:57 AM by Marni
Soupcoff
Lorne Gunter
"What can we do for the people of Burma if
their government will not
grant foreign relief workers visas to enter the
country after last
weekend's cyclone?" a colleague asked last
Friday.
The short answer is: Pray for the souls of those who have died
and pray
again that those still alive manage somehow to survive, because the
real
answer — the one the world knows to be true but won't admit — is
nothing
can be done if the Burmese junta won't allow it.
The problem
in Burma, Darfur, Zimbabwe, Lebanon and most
humanitarian-crisis hotspots is
that short of invasion there is little,
if anything, the world can do except
sit back and watch. And the world
is not going to invade.
Even in
places where "the world" (read, the West) has troops on the
ground — recall
Rwanda and Srebrenica — the United Nations or the
Western-led coalition in
charge is almost always too fearful of being
called racist or imperialist to
use force, so it does nothing as carnage
goes on all around.
There is
much talk at the world's jaw-jaw organizations such as the UN
and the
Commonwealth about "responsibility to protect" and "soft power,"
but for all
this high-minded sentiment and flowery rhetoric, nothing
short of hard power
is going to save most victims of humanitarian
crises. And the West, quite
rightly, is reluctant to go around invading
sovereign nations each time some
generalissimo or president-for-life
decides to use a cyclone, drought,
tsunami or social unrest to keep his
people down and weaken his
opposition.
Our leaders can condemn the actions of these brutal
oppressors until
they are blue in the face. They can pass resolutions at
international
summits calling for action. They might even try sanctions
against the
strongmen's imports or freezing their secret foreign bank
accounts.
Still, the sad truth is the dictators of the world know we're
not really
going to do anything to them — at least nothing that worries them.
Most
have killed thousands of their own people already. Time and again
they
have proven their indifference to human life, so words of outrage
are
never going to cause them to change their ways.
Take Darfur for
example. The crisis there has been going on for more
than three years. The
Sudanese junta, through its surrogate, the
Janjaweed militia, has killed
300,000 or more of its is own citizens and
forced another 2.5 million to flee
the country.
One tank corps from any Western army and one division of
infantry could
secure the region in under a week. Probably just a squad of
tanks, a
dozen helicopters and brigade of foot soldiers could do the job. But
as
we've learned from Iraq, the trouble is not successfully invading
an
underdeveloped nation, it's what you do after the invasion that's
the
tricky part.
There's a year-old agreement between the UN and
Sudan's bloody dictators
to let in Western peacekeepers and food supplies,
but Khartoum has never
honoured it and the UN hasn't the fortitude to enforce
it.
About 10 months ago, Western leaders gathered in Paris to
discuss
Darfur. Afterwards, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said
the
world could not "continue to sit by." The world, Ms. Rice said,
would
"redouble its efforts." But a redoubling of nothing is still
nothing.
No country with the military capacity to do something does
anything.
They don't want to be culturally insensitive to the African
Union's
ability to solve crises on its own continent, even though the AU has
no
ability to solve crises. And they don't want to anger China,
the
sponsors of the Sudanese regime. China is not going to risk
alienating
Khartoum for fear of losing oil supplies it desperately needs. And
the
West is not going to rankle China because what it really wants
(in
addition to a continued stream of cheap manufactured goods) is
Chinese
help disarming nuclear North Korea.
I am not advocating the
creation of an Invasion-of-the-Month club. Far
from it. I'm in favour of a
return to the Westphalia principles. For
nearly 350 years, from 1648 to the
invasion of Kosovo in the mid-90s,
the twin peace treaties of Westphalia
called on European nations to
respect one another's sovereignty. Invasions
were permitted when one
nation threatened a neighbour's security or autonomy,
but they were
forbidden just because one government disliked how the
government next
door was treating its own people.
That's why, for
instance, the Allies in the Second World War invaded
Germany over its march
on Poland, not its treatment of the Jews. It was
an arrangement that kept
Europe (largely) peaceful for more than three
centuries.
There are
places like Afghanistan, from which a military attack on the
West was
launched (and would be again in the absence of our troops),
that justify
Western military intervention. But as hard as it would be
to live by
Westphalian ideals in the age of 24/7/365 news coverage of
atrocities such as
those in Burma, Haiti, the Congo, Chechnya and
elsewhere — unless the West
wants to be in more or less permanent
invasion mode — we'll have to learn to
curb our impulse to soothe every
problem in the world.
lgunter@shaw.ca
Thought Leader, SA
Sunday, May 11th, 2008
Michael
Trapido
I
actually needed three sources (News24, the SABC and iafrica) to confirm
that
I hadn’t misread President Mbeki’s views on Zimbabwe, as given to
al-Jazeera
in Doha, Qatar. In essence it confirmed that the people of
Zimbabwe were to
solve their own problems and the rest of the world were
simply there to
assist. Staggering!
There are two major errors — among the multitude — in
this offering;
firstly, South Africa raced to the United Nations Security
Council to tell
the world to butt out — they must not assist (they can give
money I would
imagine, just don’t stop the butcher from cutting up the meat)
and secondly,
as our president well knows, the ruling party will not budge
one inch while
they are holding the guns and South Africa is bouncing
gatecrashers at the
door.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article3913183.ece
Chris
Mcgreal, the Observer columnist, summed up Burma and Zimbabwe as
follows:
“The two regimes have much in common besides decades in power and a
deep-seated paranoia. The crisis in Burma lays bare how both regard their
own survival, and enrichment, as paramount, no matter how many of their
citizens die along the way. It’s a common trait in authoritarian regimes.
The Burmese army doesn’t really think it is better able to deliver aid than
the World Food Programme. But the regime is fearful of allowing in hordes of
foreigners from countries it blames for Burma’s problems because that would
be an admission of its own failings and limitations.
General Than
Shwe and the rest of the junta know they are deeply unpopular
and that only
fear and a sense that the army is all-powerful is what keeps
the population
from rising up. So large numbers of Burmese who survived the
cyclone are
likely to die because their government, like the regime in
Zimbabwe, is
really afraid of its own people.
They were dying unnecessarily through
neglect in Burma even without a
cyclone. Healthcare is dire. Hospitals are
ill-equipped and antiquated.
Parts of the country were fed by the WFP long
before Nargis hit. Burmese
live about 15 years less than people in Thailand
or Vietnam. Not that the
generals show any concern so long as they are
building mansions from the
profits of Burma’s natural
gas.
Zimbabweans are dying in vast numbers too, with the lowest life
expectancy
in the world because of acute shortages of food, medicines and
work, while
the Zanu-PF elite enriches itself.
That, in a nutshell
describes the plight of the people of both of these
countries — held in
check by the military who support these rogue regimes,
they daren’t rise up
for fear of anihilation. In the case of Zimbabwe no
matter how much the rest
of Africa or it’s own people plead for sanity to
prevail, Zanu-PF and Mugabe
carry on regardless.
Unlike Burma, Zimbabwe did not have something as
dramatic as a cyclone to
introduce the world to their plight but the results
are the same as the
various humanitarian agencies are pointing out.
A
monument to man’s inhumanity
At this point I think it necessary to
distinguish the ANC from the
government. At present the ANC and members of
the government along with our
opposition parties, trade unions and the
majority of South Africans are
fully behind the people of Zimbabwe. They are
showing true solidarity with
our northern neighbour’s plight. The president
has shown himself, and some
may admire him for this, as a true friend to
Robert Mugabe and the Zanu-PF
but seemingly indifferent to the plight of the
people.
His disastrous policy of quiet diplomacy contributed to the worst
downturn
of the economy since the Weimar Republic and allowed Mugabe to turn
on his
people with impugnity. Then when the world could stand it no more,
instead
of allowing the United Nations to involve themselves, he raced to
block any
UN resolution aimed at assisting them.
The MDC have asked
Mbeki to recuse himself as mediator. If you have ever
been to court and seen
how careful our judges and magistrates are to avoid
claims of bias, then you
will appreciate just how bad this looks. Of course
a Business Day article
alleging that the president ignored the advice of two
judges he appointed to
monitor the 2002 election won’t help his cause
either. Their report was
scathing on the way that election was held
Now having refused to recuse
himself, “the impartial mediator” expects
Zimbabweans to resolve their own
problems. Let’s look at how they have been
able to do this in the past as a
result of him running interference for
Mugabe.
Leaving aside the
humanitarian disaster and everything that contributed
towards it (mass
murder of whole groups of black people, implosion of whole
suburbs, torture,
exiling more than a quarter of the population and the
like) let’s simply
examine this election so far.
Before the election, primarily the
government media operated internally,
meaning the overwhelming majority who
have no access to the internet, got to
hear the government tell them how
Mugabe was saving them from the
colonialists — who, by the way, left a
couple of decades ago.
As the editor of the Standard found out, you don’t
criticise Bob. There is
violence and intimidation on a large scale to ensure
voters knew who to vote
for and no provision for the exiles — who number in
their millions — to
vote. There are no international observers to stop
Mugabe rigging the vote,
no foreign press unless they were from discredited
sources who would not
tell the world what was going on or at least stay
within the boundaries
given to them which prevented them seeing how bad it
is. This is by no means
exhaustive of Mugabe and Zanu-PF
conduct.
Just to recap thus far, quiet diplomacy was a major contributor
to a
humanitarian disaster and prior to the elections. This provides us with
a
wonderful example of how the Zimbabweans can help themselves and provide
solutions — like rigging an election or mutilating their population. Of
course, it must not escape your attention that not only are Mugabe and
Zanu-PF totally incapable of running a country, they are even incapable of
rigging an election properly. They somehow managed to lose it. Talk about
not being able to organise a piss-up in a brewery.
Without rehashing
all the events I’d like to point out the following. Mugabe
knew he had lost
almost immediately. He thereupon decided that a run-off was
the result and
launched a massive campaign of violence to re-educate the
voters. If they
couldn’t understand how to vote then they needed to be
killed or sent into
exile prior to the next round of voting.
While he knew almost immediately
that there was a run-off, his ZEC was
happily counting away or was that
actually a case of filling in enough dead,
non-existent and anonymous
voters, in favour of Mugabe in order to bring him
up to 43%? Either way, it
took five whole weeks to get there. Let’s face it,
in a normal election
Makoni would beat Mugabe, never mind Tsvangirai.
So that’s leaves us with
a run-off where Mugabe and the Zanu-PF will ensure
that this time there are
no mistakes. Their own monitors (some of whom were
arrested for being stupid
enough to miss the wink when they were being told
to be impartial) won’t
allow Tsvangirai voters to fool them again. As
confirmed on Saturday,
Zanu-PF have already rejected Tsvangirai’s
conditions — observers,
peacekeepers and the like — for the election.
This is hardly surprising
when their own respected former home affairs
minister Dumiso Dabengwa says
that Zimbabwe is de facto under military rule
with soldiers campaigning for
Mugabe!
What about the solutions to South Africa’s Zimbabwean problem Mr
President?
Let’s take a look at the cost of our current Zimbabwean
policies on South
Africa.
If South Africa was hammering Mugabe I
would not raise this issue but as we
appear happy to defend this disgusting
man let’s see at what cost to our
people. How much do you think it costs
South Africa every year to babysit
three to four million exiles?
R10-billion, R20-billion — you give me the
figure. That is a direct cost to
the state — medical care, policing and on
and on. Now ask yourself how many
homes could we have built or mouths could
we have fed for South Africans
with that same money. Please remember, the
exiles are here because we are
allowing their government to brutalise their
people to the degree that they
would rather live here illegaly than in the
country of their
birth.
In order to assist you I urge each and every one of you to read
the Sunday
Times’ in-depth analysis of what this is costing our country
every year.
Leave aside the battering that South Africa and Africa are
taking in terms
of reputation and credibility just what we are losing in
rands and cents.
Again, ask yourself what the country could have done
with that money to help
our citizens. How many more people could have had
homes, electricity, lights
and water, better schooling and who knows what
else but for this
misadventure in propping up Mugabe — a man loathed and
despised by our
Zimbabwean brothers and sisters?
The cost of Zimbabwe
to South Africans, in financial terms, I would imagine,
must exceed even
that of the Eskom debacle and the arms deal combined.
Accordingly not only
are we doing the morally indefensible but we, like the
Zimbabweans, are
paying an enormous price in order to do it.
In conclussion I would once
again point out that the ANC, certain members of
the government, trade
unions, opposition parties, the majority of the people
of South Africa,
Zimbabwe, the PAP and AU, the UN and wherever else you
look, want resolution
and the end of Mugabe.
If you want a better life for yourself and the
people of South Africa and
Zimbabwe then make yourself heard!
Call
for the bill and then send the exiles home to the government of their
choice.
Reuters
Mon 12 May
2008, 11:22 GMT
By Nelson Banya
HARARE (Reuters) - Before
Zimbabwe's disputed elections in March, 2 billion
Zimbabwe dollars could get
you a room in a five-star hotel. Today, Gabriel
Matope hopes it will buy him
two litres of cooking oil -- if he can find
some.
More than six weeks
after the poll and ahead of an expected run-off in which
the opposition
wants to end President Robert Mugabe's 28 years in power,
Zimbabwe's
economic crisis is deepening every day and pushing ordinary
citizens to
despair.
Hopes for change are giving way to resignation as citizens
wonder whether
the run-off -- for which a date has still not been set -- can
actually end
the turmoil.
"We continue to wait: for elections, for
results, for cash at the banks, to
buy groceries ... for everything we wait.
But, for how long?" asked Matope,
an unemployed mechanic, as he queued to
withdraw money at a bank in central
Harare.
Zimbabweans had hoped the
March 29 elections could help end their country's
economic meltdown, which
has triggered inflation of 165,000 percent, 80
percent unemployment, severe
food and fuel shortages, and a flood of
refugees to neighbouring
states.
Instead, prices have skyrocketed in the stalemate since the poll
and reports
of politically motivated attacks are spreading.
Bread,
which is not available in most shops any more, cost 15 million
Zimbabwe
dollars before the election, and now costs 200 million. Fuel costs
have
doubled. Bank note shortages mean queues for cash spill out onto the
street.
Analysts said they doubted a popular uprising in response to
the turmoil,
but said more and more Zimbabweans were clamouring to get out
of the
country -- exacerbating a drain of skilled and manual labour that has
already taken a hefty toll.
Mugabe's government accuses businesses of
profiteering as part of a Western
plot to unseat him.
IMPACT ON
POLITICS
Eldred Masunungure, a political scientist at the University of
Zimbabwe,
said the post-election crisis might strengthen the opposition
Movement for
Democratic Change if the run-off is fair -- something of which
the
opposition and Mugabe's Western critics are far from convinced it will
be.
"As conditions continue to deteriorate and violence engulfs the
country, it
is clear ZANU-PF will get more unpopular and its chances of
victory in the
run-off are diminished," he said, suggesting the ruling party
might prefer a
compromise such as a unity government ahead of fresh
polls.
He pointed to the introduction of new 100 million (about $0.40 at
the
interbank rate) and 250 million Zimbabwe dollar bank notes introduced
this
month to ease the effects of 165,000 percent inflation.
"The new
notes are ample evidence to the fact that things have spun out of
control.
There's a leadership vacuum in this country, following the
inconclusive
election, and that is totally unsustainable," Masunungure said.
Central
Bank Governor Gideon Gono said he feared there may be no economy to
speak of
if the run-off results are disputed.
Official results showed opposition
leader Morgan Tsvangirai beat Mugabe for
the presidency in the first round,
but not by enough votes to avoid a
run-off.
"It would be a tragedy of
unimaginable proportions and a great setback if we
are to have a loser in
this race refusing to recognise the winner," he wrote
in a commentary in
Zimbabwe's Financial Gazette weekly.
The MDC says it favours a free
market economy, will do away with government
controls and has promised to
reverse moves by Mugabe to give majority shares
in foreign-owned business to
locals. Mugabe blames the West and its
"puppets" in the opposition for the
economic rot.
afrol, Norway
afrol News, 12 May -
Despite faced with deepening economic crisis, Zimbabwe
has paid back US $700
million to the African Development Bank.
"Zimbabwe has, in all, paid
$700m to the Bank Group despite numerous
economic challenges currently
facing the country, both globally and
locally," the bank group said in a
statement, attributing the country's
efforts to pay its debt to "testimony
of the government's determination to
live up to its international financial
obligations obligations vis-à-vis
donor agencies and development
partners."
On 14 April 2008, Zimbabwe paid US $200m to the African
Development Fund and
US $500m to the African Development
Bank.
Zimbabwe's challenges have contributed to its under-performance in
the
agricultural, manufacturing, mining and tourism sectors.
Like
many other developing countries, the Southern African country has not
been
spared by the global food crisis and the corresponding surge in food
prices,
as well escalating oil prices.
Besides, its domestic economic development
has been characterized by high
inflation, output contraction and rising
interest rates.
The absence of balance of payments support, declining
capital inflows,
recurrent droughts and rising oil prices have severely
undermined the
economy’s productive capacity, resulting in most industries
operating below
30% capacity.
"Though the country is currently
experiencing balance of payments
constraints resulting in delays and,
sometimes, failure in meeting its
financial obligations vis-à-vis donors,
the government, however, fully
acknowledges its external financial
obligations," the bank group said.
"The government remains committed to
honoring its debt obligations. In line
with its commitment to fruitfully
engage its partners, goodwill payments are
being made with a view to
normalizing relations and paving the way for new
disbursements."
Zimbabwe has also been commended for its commitment
to "instituting
macro-economic reforms aimed at addressing its economic
challenges." Its
focus on enhancing food security, foreign exchange
generation and increasing
the supplies of basic commodities was
noted.
Meanwhile, the bank group warned that the near doubling of prices
of some
staple food crops in recent months had serious implications for
Africa,
especially the poorest nations where poor people were forced to
spend huge
proportion of their income on food.
In a new report -
Africa Economic Outlook - launched Sunday, the bank called
for an urgent
action.
"Besides the rising price of crude oil, in the last three months
since
January 2008, prices of some major food crops have nearly doubled,’
the
report said.
It said prices of major staple crops had doubled in
the three months after
January this year. The price of rice was increased
from US $373 per tonne to
US $760 while that of maize increased from US $171
per tonne to US $220.
"These large and sudden price increases have now
started to have severe
implications in many African countries."
Mutumwa Mawere
The
race is definitely on and notwithstanding the provisions of the
Zimbabwean
electoral laws, no one including the Zimbabwean Electoral
Commission (ZEC)
knows precisely when the run off will be held.
It now turns out that the ZEC
is conveniently out of funds when it is common
cause that the incumbent
President needs time to refuel and hopefully poison
the atmosphere
sufficiently to discredit his nemesis to his electoral
advantage.
If
President Mugabe had won the first phase there is no doubt that Gono
would
have been deployed to robb someone or further mortgage the country to
fund
the election. All of a sudden the ever busy printing press cannot be
put to
use to manufacture money to finance what is fast turning out to be
the
mother of all battles.
Ordinarily common problems call for common sense
but the Zimbabwean crisis
is different. At this defining hour in the
nation’s post colonial history,
the country is being run by a cabinet whose
legitimacy is questionable and
whose President has lost the trust of his
people to be a credible custodian
of political morality.
The last
mile is always a decisive one and it would be wrong to assume
otherwise
given the nature and context of the contestation for power in
Zimbabwe.
For the first time, President Mugabe is going travel this
last mile of his
political career as a wounded animal, albeit armed with
poisonous
instruments targeted at defenceless and vulnerable people.
President Mugabe
still believes that the justice of his cause is the justice
of his tactics.
It is evident that President Mugabe and his former ruling
party have not
accepted that the people who voted for the opposition did so
voluntarily and
as such a different outcome should be expected in the run
off election.
ZANU-PF would like to convince the Zimbabwean public that
the election ought
to be about whether Zimbabwe should revert to its former
colonial status or
remain under the control of the incumbent President who
evidently has little
to offer rather than vernom against his opponents. What
is clear is that
ZANU-PF has not accepted that Zimbabweans can make their
own rational
political choices.
Unlike business where the customer is
king, politics has a different modus
operandi requiring competitors to throw
mud at each other so that voters can
decide who looks better than the
other.
President Mugabe is advantaged in the game as he has the state
machinery at
his disposal to use to discredit his opponent. Regrettably,
after 28 years
of independence, the game of politics in Zimbabwe has not
been transformed
to a higher level where serious conversations about the
future of the
country can be held.
The strategies and tactics of
President Mugabe are as predictable as night
follows day. As expected, he
will continue to make the case that Tsvangirai
is less Zimbabwean than him
and that a vote for Tsvangirai will not be in
the national
interest.
Before the 29th March election, President Mugabe had made the
case that MDC
was an agent of imperialism but unfortunately the voters did
not buy this.
Subsequent to the election, President Mugabe has accepted the
allegation as
true that the MDC bought its votes as he genuinely believes
that no rational
Zimbabwean can conceivably think that Tsvangirai and MDC
symbolizes the
change that the country needs.
The sanction issue will
gain traction in the run off. President Mugabe will
argue that he has been
betrayed by his colleagues in SADC who promised that
if a deal is struck
paving the way for elections; Zimbabwe would be rewarded
with the lifting of
the sanctions. The absence of a spirited call for the
lifting of sanctions
by SADC will naturally be used by President Mugabe as a
pretext for changing
the ground rules for the run off.
President Mugabe will argue that all
bets should be off since the light at
the end of the tunnel appears to be
Tsvangirai’s train carrying a lot of
unwelcome passengers. After the first
phase of the elections, President
Mugabe is convinced that Tsvangirai’s
train is carrying in its first class
cabin former white
farmers.
President Mugabe is behaving as if he must have a say on who
Tsvangirai
should trust in his camp. While President Mugabe can ask the
country to look
east he has not accepted that Tsvangirai is also entitled to
ask Zimbabweans
to look west. Even President Mugabe is looking west in so
far as he desire
to get the sanctions lifted is concerned but has not
accepted that the West
is fully entitled to decide who they should trust
with their money after
their experience with him over the last 28
years.
President Mugabe was a darling of the same west until they discovered
that
their investment in him had produced negative returns not only for them
but
for the people of Zimbabwe many of whom are seeking asylum in the
West.
President Mugabe will use the argument that the only segment of the
Zimbabwean population that is in a hurry to get him out of power can only be
former white farmers. Accordingly, he will continue to argue giving up power
to Tsvangirai will necessarily lead to a reversal of the land reform
program.
President Mugabe is of the view that the land reform program is
irreversible
and by putting the land issue at the centre of the contestation
of power he
has successfully diverted attention from his record on other
nation building
issues that ought to have been at the centre of the national
democratic
revolution.
Zimbabwe needs to turn a new leaf and yet it
appears that President Mugabe
would rather remain in power fully cognisant
of the fact that he run out of
steam and the country will be better served
if he were to take a back seat.
Is there anything new that can be expected
from President Mugabe?
The Zimbabwean voters have already shown President
Mugabe a yellow card and
in so doing they have signalled that they need
change and now want to
reclaim their future.
Common sense would call for
President Mugabe to change the tone of politics
on the recognition that out
of four candidates, Tsvangirai was rated as
number one.
History has
already recorded that Tsvangirai has beaten President Mugabe in
a race in
which President Mugabe controlled everything except the will of
the people.
Surely the more than a million voters who selected Tsvangirai
cannot all
have been bribed by the British and Americans. At some stage, the
will of
the people must and should be respected.
Will President Mugabe
acknowledge Tsvangirai as the favourite horse in this
final mile? Will he
continue to invest in gutter politics? What should the
response of
Zimbabweans be in this final mile?
We know that intimidation is good currency
for any discredited politician.
It is not unexpected that President Mugabe’s
people regard the last mile as
one in which terror should take centre stage.
Evidence is abundant on the
ground that the run off will be conducted under
different rules to justify
its reclassification as a totally new election.
Already the rules are being
manipulated to favour the underdog and it is
evident that when the electoral
laws were put in place no one could have
imagined that President Mugabe
would be a victim.
Because Zimbabwe is
too important to all who care about it, this is a time
that differences must
be put asunder and all good minds be deployed to make
sure that this be the
final mile for President Mugabe. He needs a rest and
it is important,
therefore, that all the Zimbabweans in the diaspora who are
immune from
intimidation and are registered to vote be energised to regard
this last
mile as theirs and quietly and purposefully go home and vote while
encouraging those at home not to succumb to fear.
The Presidential
vote is a national referendum on who should preside over
the executive
branch of the state for the next five years. Just pose to
think and imagine
a Zimbabwe after five years under President Mugabe. If you
see light at the
end of the tunnel then do nothing but remain a passenger.
President Mugabe’s
record is known as are his views on the Zimbabwe he wants
to see. Nothing
much will change for the better if he were to be elected and
deep in his
veins he knows that the game is up.
Will Zimbabweans once again rise to the
challenge? Tsvangirai has accepted
to be in the race and the rest must
surely fall on all Zimbabweans who have
the right to vote to exercise their
historic duty in the name of all future
generations who will naturally look
at this last mile as the golden mile.
The future is within grasp and the
past is full of pain to allow for any
pontification.
The Namibian
(Windhoek)
12 May 2008
Posted to the web 12 May 2008
Christof
Maletsky
Windhoek
THE International Transport Workers' Federation
(ITF) has described as
"laughable" claims by a senior Zimbabwean government
official that the arms
shipment carried by a Chinese ship had made its way
into that country.
The ITF, along with many other international trade
unions and civil society,
actively campaigned that the ship, An Yue Jiang,
not be allowed to offload
the weapons ordered by the Zimbabwean government
at regional harbours.
It left Luanda on Tuesday last week after it
was allowed to refuel and the
ITF said by late Friday morning the ship was
approximately 120 nautical
miles off the coast of Namibia, in international
waters, making around 8,5
knots, a slower speed than before because it is
sailing against the Benguela
current.
It was well outside of Namibian
territorial waters and was expected to reach
Cape Town by late
tonight.
It carries three million rounds of AK-47 ammunition, 1 500
rocket-propelled
grenades and more than 3 000 mortar rounds and mortar
tubes.
The ship was recalled after pressure from civil society in the
region and
the refusal by dockworkers at Durban harbour to offload the
weapons and
later from Beira port in Mozambique, where it was refused
permission to
dock.
The ITF helped mobilise trade unions across
southern Africa to block the
delivery of the arms for Zimbabwe, and make it
impossible for them to be
removed from the ship on land or sea.
"For
over two weeks ordinary working men and women have kept these bullets
and
bombs out of the hands of Mugabe's killers.
That work
continues.
The ship and its cargo of destruction remain under close
watch.
Any attempt to further arm the government of Zimbabwe will be
resisted,"
said ITF General Secretary David Cockroft.
Cockroft also
dismissed claims by Zimbabwe that the arms shipment was in his
possession as
"empty propaganda of someone who doesn't know when he's
beaten".
There is an international campaign going on whereby people call, fax or
write to those listed below and give them a piece of their mind. You may
wish to do the same, or just have the details for when you need
them.
Below numbers with names......If you have any other useful details,
please
send.
...........................................................................................
Didymus
MUTASA (State Security): 02582 2087
Didymus Mutasa: 011200532 -
774189
STD NO. 201 HEADLANDS
Nathan SHAMUYARIRA* : 04 862073-6
7
RUBIDGE CL BORROWDALE
SAMUEL MUMBENGEGWI MUMBENGEGWI S C: 04 882930
22
STOUR ROAD VAINONA BORROWDALE
CHIMUTENGWENDE C C C: 04 251386
8 SAN
FERNANDO 130 FIFE AVE HARARE
CHIHURI AUGUSTINE: 04 862410
431 BINTON RD
BORROWDALE
Mnangagwa - 011 605700
OFFICE OF PRESIDENT 04
252440
MUNHUMUTAPA BLDG S MACHEL AVE HARARE
Gono's Office:
703096
Presidential guard: 707745 or 707451---2156
Francis Nhema: 04
882926
3 FARTHINGHILL P O BORROWDALE
BVUDZIJENA WAYNE: 04 884971
75
STONECHAT LANE BORROWDALE
CHIYANGWA P HON: 04 883148
8 HOBOURNE HILL
BALLANTYNE PARK HARARE
KANGAI K M: 04 861944
25 GLENFOREST RD BORROWDALE
HARARE
MANGWANA P M: 04 797845
9 BATH RD AVONDALE
TOBAIWA MUDEDE MUDEDE
T: 04 860033
903 TOP CLOSE HATCLIFFE BORROWDALE
O.MUCHINGURI - 020
61840
4 BAHUNIA CLOSE MUTARE
CIO boss BONYONGWE H: 04 497849
76 ORANGE
GROVE DR HIGHLANDS
NICHOLAS T.GOCHE: 0718 2204 CERES FARM SHAMVA 0718
2205
Ministry of DEFENCE SEKERAMAI S T THE HON: 04 860042
MADE J M: 04
492982
101 HARARE DR ATHLONE HARARE
CHOMBO I DR Min Loval Government and
Mugabe strongman: 067 25297
221 CHITOMBORWIZI CHINHOYI
HARARE address - 19
Cuba Avenue, Mt Pleasant
BARWE REUBEN: 04 740245
51 LAWLEY AVE BELVEDERE
HARARE
MSIKA J W (Vice PRESIDENT): 04 883097
11 NIGELS LANE
HIGHLANDS
Saviour Kasukuwere:04 369444
19 TWICKENHAM DR MT
PLEASANT
Patreck Chinamasa 04 860006
2 HONEY BEAR LANE BORROWDALE
HARARE
Joseph Chinotimba *04 614826
State House Office of the
President:
700071, 700073-76, 700098, 701947, 701956, 708682, 708690,
708691,708712
Police Commisioner
Augustine Chihuri: 250008/792621/
700171
Home Affairs Minister
Kembo Mohadi: 011-605424/ 430422/ 794628/
703695 Text him 011-605424
Resident Governor for Matabeleland
Cain Matema:
cell no: 011871431
Work no: 09 887596 .
CHIWENGA CONSTANINO GUVEY: 04
862530
614 NICK PRICE RD BORROWDALE HARARE
Amos Midzi:* 04 301712
Charm
Muchinguri: 04 496629
Minister of Economic Development
Sylvester Nguni:
04-862032 / 04-862035
Obert Mpofu:* 09 246060
Bulawayo CID: 09
884132
SAMUEL MUMBENGEGWI: 04 882930
22 STOUR ROAD VAINONA
BORROWDALE
Shamuyarira Nathan: 04 862073
67 RUBIDGE CL BORROWDALE
MPOFU
OBERT 04 852033/4
2501 GAYDON RD GREYSTONE PARK BORROWDALE
Lt Col
Mazaiwana: *04 741 604
Chihuri cell is: +26311808290
Bvudzijena *cell*
*is:* +26311801172
Lt Co Sedze L: 04 860533
Herald House and ask for the
Editor: 708296 / 704088 / 794893 / 705199
Lt Tsodzai: 04 860 953
Made: 04
860 953
CHIHURI AUGUSTINE: 04 862410
Chihuri cell: +263
11808290
CHIWENGA: 04 862530
BUKA FLORA :04 745342
14270 STRAKER AVE
GUNHILL HARARe
BONYONGWE Happyton ( CIO director): 04 497849
76 ORANGE
GROVE DR HIGHLANDS*
Here are some FAX numbers:
President's Office:* +263 4
708848
Fidelity Printers:* +263 4 486474
RBZ: +263 4 707800 / +263 4
706450
Min. Info & Pub: +263 4 790402 / +263 4 707768
Min. Ind &
Int Trade: +263 4 704116 / +263 4 729311
Min. Of Chombo: +263 4
792307
MORE NUMBERS ON
http://www.telone.co.zw/