The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

<
Back to the Top
Back to Index

CNN



Zimbabwe farmers say attacks go on


November 9, 2001 Posted: 12:46 PM EST (1746 GMT)


HARARE, Zimbabwe (Reuters) -- Government supporters have resumed their
attacks on white-owned farms despite international intervention, a farmers'
union has said.

A spokeswoman for the Commercial Farmers Union, said on Friday that property
was destroyed and planting disrupted.

Commonwealth foreign ministers had recently condemned such strikes, drawing
up a policy of land reform for President Robert Mugabe's regime in return
for financial aid.

A response on the attacks was not immediately available from the police or
the government.

The latest attacks allegedly took place on Thursday evening in Marondera
district, 74 kilometres (45 miles) southeast of Harare, the CFU spokeswoman
said.

The CFU represents 4,500 mainly white farmers.

"Twenty-five farm workers, including a three-year-old child and
eight-month-pregnant woman, were assaulted on Munemo and Mushangwe farms in
Ruzawi River Valley," she added.

Ten of the injured were treated in hospital the spokeswoman said.

Farmers say Mugabe has failed to honour his September endorsement of a
Nigerian-brokered deal under which his government agreed to end the farm
invasions in return for pledges of financial help from former colonial power
Britain.

The militants, who say they are supporting Mugabe's bid to redistribute
white-owned land to Zimbabwe's black majority, had also rampaged a nearby
farm village, smashing doors, breaking windows, burning down a house and
destroying a vegetable garden.

On Tuesday, 30 destroyed over Z$300,000 ($5,405) of property on a farm in
the same region as the owners cowered in their bedroom, she said.

"Estimates now stand at over Z$4 million worth of damage on just a handful
of farms in this district," she added.

Aid agencies have warned of severe food shortages in rural areas, citing a
combination of drought and the farm invasions.

On Thursday, the U.N. World Food Programme said it was planning a massive
relief food operation for more than half a million Zimbabweans faced with
starvation.

Mugabe denies responsibility for Zimbabwe's worst economic crisis since he
assumed power in 1980, blaming turmoil on sabotage by his opponents in
retaliation for the land programme.

Self-styled liberation war veterans have occupied thousands of white-owned
farms since February 2000.

An opinion poll released on Thursday showed Mugabe's popular support below
that of his main rival.

The poll found that 52.9 percent of Zimbabweans backed Morgan Tsvangirai of
the opposition Movement for Democratic Change, while 47.1 percent supported
Mugabe.

The MDC, which won 57 of 120 seats in last year's parliamentary vote, has
gained support countrywide, including in traditional rural power bases of
Mugabe's ruling ZANU-PF party.

Elections are due by April.


Zim Independent

Zanu PF spreads terror in Mash Central

Brian Hungwe
TERROR has gripped Mashonaland Central province with reports that two people
have so far died and houses razed by ruling Zanu PF party militias, the
Zimbabwe Independent has learnt.

Mt Darwin has become a no-go area for strangers as war veterans are
demanding to know the credentials of all visitors at the growth point’s bus
terminus.

Visitors have to endure interrogation sessions by war veterans. People
suspected by the veterans of having come to campaign for the opposition
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) are subjected to lengthy interrogation
often lasting several hours.

MDC provincial chairman for the province, Tapera Macheka, told the
Independent from Bindura yesterday that the situation had now got out of
hand.

“We cannot conduct our campaigns and our supporters have been displaced from
their homes,” Macheka said. “The situation is just tense and people are
being forced to attend Zanu PF rallies.”
Taurai Chiwetso is fighting for his life in Bindura after being beaten by
Zanu PF supporters for refusing to attend a rally in Chiwaridzo suburb.

In Mushumbi Pools, houses belonging to Ian Musandauka and Roger Mwinga were
burnt down last week by war veterans led by a Zanu PF official identified as
Joseph Zambezi.

In Guruve’s Ward 22, a number of people were displaced from their homes on
allegations that they sympathised with the MDC.

Among the displaced are Peter Chafesuka, Cliff Chirowapasi and Robson
Mwawara. Zanu PF has been conducting rallies throughout the province.

“Those that do not go for the rallies are beaten up or forced to relocate,”
Macheka said.

He also reported that two people were killed at Kitsiyatota squatter camp in
Bindura after refusing to attend the funeral of Voster Rupiya, who was Zanu
PF youth chairman for Bindura.

“They were killed on Friday last week and we are still to get their names,”
Macheka said.

Police spokesperson Assistant Commissioner Wayne Bvudzijena, said he had not
received any reports of political violence or the two murder cases in
Bindura.

Zim Independent

Gonarezhou settlers want to exploit wildlife

Godfrey Marawanyika
ILLEGAL settlers in the Gonarezhou National Park are exerting pressure on
government to grant them “appropriate authority” status, the right to
exploit and sell the park’s natural resources including its abundant
wildlife.

More than 2 000 permanent structures have been put up in the park,
accommodating more than double the 750 families originally allocated land.
If appropriate authority status is granted, the resettled farmers would be
free to kill game and sell it. While ostensibly operating along the same
lines as the highly successful Communal Areas Management Programme for
Indigenous Resources (Campfire), it seems this is an unprecedented situation
in which squatters will be empowered to help themselves to one of the region
’s most abundant game reserves.

Campfire works with local authorities who manage wild animals in their areas
of jurisdiction. They supervise the killing and sale of the animals in a
sustainable manner.

The latest request is being spearheaded by senior members of the ruling Zanu
PF party.

If approved, the issuing of the appropriate authority status is bound to
derail the establishment of the much awaited Gaza-Kruger-Gonarezhou
Transfrontier National Park (GKG) being undertaken by Zimbabwe, South Africa
and Mozambique.

In June the government resettled 750 villagers within an area of 11 000
hectares in the Gonarezhou National Park, the core of the proposed GKG
Transfrontier Park.

In July the government misrepresented facts to the other partners of the GKG
agreement when it told them that appropriate land would be allocated to the
invaders outside the park’s managed area. The
facts on the ground suggest otherwise.

Gonarezhou has been the source of the recent foot-and-mouth outbreak which
has since spread across the country.

Parks sources said there has not been much change to the situation because
of lack of manpower to contain the outbreak adding that the numbers of
invaders have also increased significantly.

Parks officers said the foot-and-mouth outbreak was most serious in the
Beitbridge area where pegging of land was being done adjacent to the
national park.

Despite assurances by the government that all people resettled in Gonarezhou
would be removed, nothing has been done to date.

Government has yet to grant the appropriate authority status to the
Department of National Parks.

“We do not have the authority as yet but there is no need for it,” said
Vitalis Chadenga, deputy director of National Parks.

“Gonarezhou is a Transfrontier establishment, as a national park people
cannot be resettled there.”

Chadenga said they have always stressed the need for people to be resettled
outside the park’s managed areas.

Sources within the Ministry of Environment said the government was given a
report which warned them against resettling people in the park.

“Government was given the report and the responsible minister is well aware
of the document, even his permanent secretary is well aware of the detailed
report,” the source said.

Ministry sources said if government granted the authority to people in
Gonarezhou, it would set a bad precedent as it would also have to grant the
same legal status to people resettled in other conservancies.

No comment could be obtained from the Minister of Environment and Tourism,
Francis Nhema, who was said to be out of the country.


Daily News

Riot police pounce on UZ students, property destroyed

11/9/01 7:43:06 AM (GMT +2)


Staff Reporter

SCORES of University of Zimbabwe (UZ) students clashed with riot police at
the campus on Wednesday, resulting in roperty worth millions of dollars
being destroyed.


The students were demanding their payouts. The disturbances took place as
the student leaders were locked up in negotiations with Gideon Gono, the
chairman of the University Council. The two parties sealed a deal in which
Gono undertook to give the students a relief fund of $3 000 each. In a
statement, Eddison Madondo, the acting information officer for the Students
Executive Council said: "The Students Executive Council delegation engaged
the Chairman of the Council, Dr Gideon Gono in a meeting this afternoon.

"After realising that hunger was reaching appalling and alarming levels, we
saw it necessary to negotiate a further advance. Initially we had put $8 000
as our figure but it was reduced to $3 000."
This is the second time in less than three months that the students have
been given an advance payment.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Comment


“IT’S the election stupid!”

Paraphrasing Bill Clinton’s remarks about the US economy seems the most
effective way of underlining the single issue dominating Zimbabwe’s national
life. Everything now revolves around President Mugabe’s desperate quest for
eternal power.

A poll published yesterday suggests that MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai has a
lead of nearly six percentage points over the incumbent. Tsvangirai would
win 52,9% of the vote against Mugabe’s 47,1%, according to the sample
survey.

While we don’t doubt the validity of the poll conducted by reputable
researchers, there are some loose ends.

Firstly, the outcome was based on people who had voted in last year’s
general election and were prepared to disclose who they voted for. This
means those in the 18-20 age group who didn’t vote last year have not been
factored in. While, given the political demographics, it can safely be
assumed a majority would vote for Tsvangirai, it is doubtful if they are
registered in sufficient numbers to make a difference.

The other imponderable is of course what effect intimidation will have.

When the entire resources of the state are placed at the disposal of the
incumbent including private militias armed and paid for by the government
with a mandate to instill terror, there will inevitably be a reluctance on
the part of many to turn out on the day, at least in the rural
constituencies.

Intimidation doesn’t stop at violence. It includes headmen recording the
names of those who vote and ministers telling susceptible rural folk that
the government has equipment that will reveal how an individual votes.
It also includes an unconstitutional ban on voter education by NGOs. Why
should voter education be entrusted to a government that is an interested
party?

Then there is manipulation of the mass media. While it is true that Zanu PF’
s propaganda has become self-defeating as it becomes more shrill and
increasingly preposterous in its attempts to discredit the opposition, the
fact remains that the publicly-owned broadcasting media and newspaper chain
are corruptly denying exposure to the diversity of political views
represented in the country.

The way in which the police have been used to harass directors of
independent newspapers and their failure to arrest those carrying out
political violence in Gokwe, Bindura, Guruve, Mberengwa and Chinhoyi are
signs of presidential manipulation. So are blatant violations of the Land
Acquisition Act.

Mugabe is going for broke. His followers are bullying and battering their
way to the ballot boxes. If this was a free and fair poll he would lose
heavily. And he knows it. How else do we explain his refusal to set up an
independent electoral commission?

But let us not forget this election will be decided by the number of people
who vote. Every vote counts unlike the first-past-the-post system used in a
general election.

It is therefore the chief duty of parties to get their members registered.
The Registrar-General is being as opaque as possible about the status of the
voters roll. Going on precedent it is bound to be a mess. And he has
steadfastly refused offers of assistance to sort it out from external
organisations.

Civil society must therefore ignore ministerial threats and make sure people
know their rights. The worst thing that could happen would be for Mugabe to
win on the basis of a 33% vote as he did the last time and thus hold the
country captive for another six years with no popular legitimacy facing a
hostile world.

That is the greatest incentive to get voters to do their duty. Imagine
Zimbabwe under a stubborn 78-year-old ruler bent on punishing the hundreds
of thousands of people who voted against him and determined to take the
country down with him. There will be food shortages, collapse of services,
hyper-inflation, widespread popular disaffection and international
isolation.

If you think things are bad now, imagine what it will be like if he wins!
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Editor's Memo

Iden Wetherell
THERE are a couple of stories that have surfaced recently that are
emblematic of how politically corrupted our society has become.

First, and most disturbing for those of us who work in the media, has been
the harassment of the Daily News over a change in its shareholding
structure. The police last month picked up four directors of ANZ, the paper’
s holding company, and transported them to Harare for questioning.

Included was Judith Todd who made a greater contribution to Zimbabwe’s
liberation than most of the frauds who claim that mantle today.

The directors appear to be the victims of a Zanu PF-linked businessman who
has used his political connections to pursue a vendetta against the
newspaper.

If it transpires the police have allowed themselves to be used in this way
it speaks volumes for the extent to which the force has been suborned. This
is not the first time they have reportedly received directions from the
businessman in his private wars against companies that have thwarted him.

But there are other facets of this story that give equal cause for concern.
Firstly, the Zimbabwe Investment Centre seems to have become a party to the
orchestrated witchhunt against the Daily News. No investor in his right mind
will want to get involved with an organisation which, rightly or wrongly, is
seen to be assisting the government in targeting legitimate investors for
political purposes.

The matter of ANZ’s shareholding structure was determined in the High Court
after a legal challenge to new local investors failed. That questions are
now being asked in the rival state media, purporting to come from the ZIC,
is significant.

Firstly, the state media has faced an unprecedented challenge from the
private media in general and the Daily News in particular on the circulation
front. As the public has become resistant to lies, so government newspapers
have seen their circulation fall. It is therefore in the government’s
interest to suppress the Daily News ahead of the presidential poll.

As ANZ CEO Much Masunda pointed out on Wednesday, if ANZ changed its local
shareholding arrangements by bringing in new Zimbabwean investors, that is
the business of the Registrar of Companies, not the ZIC. And why should the
government agency be so concerned by changes in a company’s holding
structure that reflect indigenisation?

When Stan Mudenge was grandstanding in front of the visiting Commonwealth
team recently, one of the things he brought up to induce a sense of outrage
was the fact that a British Foreign Office official had asked the Zimbabwe
government for guarantees that a proposed new printing press for the Daily
News, paid for in part by well-wishers in Britain, would have safe access to
Zimbabwe.

Mudenge was of course trying to expose a neo-colonial plot. But most of the
ministers present must have wondered why he should consider it so
extraordinary that, in the wake of a bombing of the paper by what most
people had concluded to be state agents, a foreign government should be keen
to ensure the safety of a replacement printing press purchased with
donations by its nationals.

I gather that foreign, largely British, shareholders continue to hold a
minority stake in ANZ. For a number of years President Mugabe toured the
world touting Zimbabwe as a safe investment destination. A number of
governments took him at his word and signed investment protection agreements
with this country.

Are we to understand from Mudenge’s remarks that those protocols no longer
have any validity? That foreign governments should not be concerned with the
fate of their citizens’ investments and that they are likely to be targeted
by businessmen with Zanu PF connections?

If that is the case, word will have spread very fast to the Far East where
Mugabe was only last month making promises of security for new investors.
Does he think investors don’t talk to each other? That word doesn’t spread?

The other episode that convinced me of endemic political corruption was the
story of how a senior member of President Mugabe’s office had written
letters on official notepaper in order to secure admission to a University
of Zimbabwe course which he then promptly failed.

The judge hearing the civil case said that Christopher Mushowe, at the time
director of state residences and now a deputy minister, had abused his
office in his dealings with UZ. He had tried to impress them with his
importance, a move that seems to have worked. Despite his lack of
qualifications, he was admitted to a course leading to a Master’s degree in
Public Administration.

When he failed to secure the necessary pass mark, UZ Vice-Chancellor Prof
Graham Hill, described by the court as an unimpressive witness, went to
great lengths to assist him by changing his mark from a fail to a pass. He
even telephoned him subsequently to let him know that he had passed.

The judge said the public expected exemplary behaviour from those in
leadership positions. Both Mushowe and Hill failed that test.

While one expects nothing better from the President’s Office and Zanu PF,
Hill’s behaviour is nothing short of disgraceful. He assured the court this
was the first time he had ever done such a thing. But his pathetic toadying
to power is inexcusable and in any other society would be met by demands for
his resignation by council and faculty. Academic integrity is his key
responsibility. And he betrayed it.

The University of Zimbabwe is my alma mater. I am deeply ashamed of the
behaviour of the authorities there who have compromised all those who carry
its degrees. A notable exception is the post-graduate committee which
resisted these irregularities.

President Mugabe is the chancellor. He has said nothing about this scandal
involving one of his officials apart of course to promote Mushowe, an
unsatisfactory student by any definition, to the post of Deputy Minister of
Transport and Communications.

In any other society leaking budget secrets to the press would be a
political scandal. Has Simba Makoni instituted an investigation into how
details of his budget surfaced in the press on the morning of his
presentation last Thursday? Isn’t this contempt of parliament? It obviously
wasn’t clever guesswork by the normally clueless government newspapers!

And what sort of budget is it where half the details are presented one day,
but the single item sabotaging the whole project — the allocation to
Defence — is coyly held back to the following day?

What happened here and will it set a precedent?

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Friday, 9 November, 2001, 15:04 GMT
Zimbabwe editor walks free
Destroyed Daily News printing press
The Daily News printing press was destroyed by a bomb
The editor of Zimbabwe's only privately-owned daily newspaper, the Daily News, has been been released on bail after being held overnight and charged with giving false investment information.

It comes as reports from Zimbabwe say the government intends to remove voting rights from most Zimbabweans living abroad.

Geoff Nyarota and Wilf Mbanga, a former director of the company which publishes the paper, appeared at a Harare Magistrates court on Friday where they were given $10,000 Zimbabwe dollars bail.


Nothing whatsoever will make me change the policy of my newspaper

Daily News editor Geoff Nyarota

The Daily News is fiercely critical of the government and in January, its printing press was destroyed by a bomb.

But Mr Nyarota appeared unintimidated by his spell in custody.

"Nothing whatsoever will make me change the policy of my newspaper," he said

"This was just a minor irritation."

Earlier this week, a government newspaper, The Herald, said that The Daily News might be shut down because its publishers had broken investment and foreign exchange control regulations.

Mr Nyarota and three colleagues were arrested in August after publishing a story which alleged that some police officers were involved in the looting of white-owned farms.

Election rules

New rules are to be introduced before next year's presidential election which would limit the use of postal votes to diplomatic staff and soldiers serving outside Zimbabwe, said The Herald on Friday.

Zimbabwean voters
There are fears that next year's poll may not be free and fair

In addition, Zimbabwean expatriates would be barred from using a return visit as a pretext for casting their ballot at home.

Political analysts say the government believes most of the hundreds-of-thousands of Zimbabweans living abroad support the opposition Movement for Democratic Change.

About 30,000 white Zimbabweans, and as many as a million farm workers and their families from other African countries, who have dual nationality, have already had their voting rights affected.

They are required to either renounce their right to a foreign passport, or forego their Zimbabwean citizenship.

Monitors

On Thursday the government said that it would only allow civil servants to monitor presidential elections, due early next year.

In last year's parliamentary elections, foreigners were banned but local civic organisation trained thousands of Zimbabweans.

Zimbabwean voters
There are fears that next year's poll may not be free and fair

Mr Chinamasa said that some of these organisations were funded by foreigners and therefore did not have Zimbabwe's interests at heart.

The opposition Movement for Democratic Change immediately cried foul, saying this was preparing the ground to rig the elections.

The European Union has threatened to impose sanctions if it is not allowed to monitor the poll.

It appears that Mr Mugabe will face his toughest ever challenge in the poll from the MDC's Morgan Tsvangirai.

An opinion poll published on Thursday said that a majority of voters will vote against President Robert Mugabe in the poll, although 20% were undecided.

The poll published in the Financial Gazette said that 52.9% of decided voters backed Mr Tsvangirai, against 47.1% for Mr Mugabe.

The poll was conducted by Target research agency in August and September in a nationally representative sample of more than 3,000 voters.


Zim Independent

Daily News threatens to sue police

Dumisani Muleya
ASSOCIATED Newspapers of Zimbabwe chief executive Muchadeyi Masunda
yesterday warned that his company — which publishes the Daily News — will
sue individual policemen if they persist with their politically-motivated
campaign against the paper.

Masunda’s comments came as police yesterday morning arrested Daily News
editor-in-chief Geoff Nyarota and former ANZ director Wilf Mbanga, claiming
they were probing the company’s shareholding structure.

The two were taken to the Criminal Investigation Department for questioning.
They were later transferred to Rhodesville police station. This followed a
story in the government-controlled Herald alleging ANZ had breached
investment procedures. It said the company had lost its investment permit
and faced closure.

ANZ officials have however dismissed the story as “lies”, saying it was part
of a wider government move to destroy the country’s single independent
daily.

Masunda said it was becoming increasingly clear individual police officers
were being used by powerful individuals connected to Zanu PF to attack the
ANZ and the Daily News.

“It has really got to a point where the aggrieved parties will have no
option but to take action against police officers in their individual
capacities,” he warned.

“In that situation it will be their pockets at risk because there is no way
in which it can be argued they were acting in their official capacity or
public interest,” he said.

The Registrar of Companies visited the ANZ this week with an “examiner” to
compare notes with company officials on the company’s registration and
shareholding status.

Masunda said his records tallied with those of the Registrar of Companies.
But the examiner — who accompanied the registrar to the ANZ — surfaced
yesterday at the CID offices where Nyarota and Mbanga were detained.

The current saga started when ANZ restructured its shareholding arrangement
in favour of local investors. The Independent Media Group — a consortium of
local investors represented by Renaissance
Asset Management — is now the majority shareholder.

But Diamond Insurance — a minority shareholder linked
to businessman Mutumwa Mawere — is claiming fraudulent misrepresentation in
the new shareholding set-up.


ANZ has said Mawere was working in cahoots with government to destroy the
Daily News.

However, Mawere on Wednesday denied this.

“Why are they bringing in the government? This is a matter between the
Zimbabwe Investment Centre (ZIC) and Diamond Insurance. Diamond Insurance is
an investor and we are concerned unless they believe we have no right to
complain.”

The ZIC, which appears to have been collaborating with the Herald to attack
the Daily News, is claiming to have cancelled the ANZ’s investment
certificate.

But ANZ officials said the certificate in question had expired and was thus
irrelevant. The company’s majority shareholding is now locally owned.



Yahoo News


Friday November 9, 04:42 PM


Zimbabwe sets date for editor's appeal

HARARE (Reuters) - A Zimbabwe court will rule next week on an application by
the editor of the country's only private daily to have fraud charges laid
against him by the state thrown out.


Daily News editor-in-chief Geoff Nyarota and Wilf Mbanga, a former director
of the newspaper's parent company, were arrested on Thursday as part of a
police probe into the investment structure of Associated Newspapers of
Zimbabwe, which publishes the paper.


Both were charged with three counts of fraud or alternatively contravening a
section of a law barring submission of false information to a lawful
authority.


The Daily News has been highly critical of President Robert Mugabe's ruling
ZANU-PF party and Nyarota has said his arrest was part of a government drive
against the private media ahead of elections in which Mugabe faces the
biggest challenge to his 21-year rule.


On Friday, lawyers for the two defendants told the court that police had
failed to show the charges against their clients revealed "a reasonable
suspicion that the offences which are attributed to the two persons were
committed".


But the state prosecutor said Nyarota and Mbanga had a case to answer,
arguing they had robbed the country of millions of dollars in potential
foreign investment through false submissions on the shareholding structure
of their company.


Magistrate Weston Nyamwanza said he would make a ruling on November 16. The
two men are out on bail.


The arrests come as the country undergoes and political and economic crisis
widely blamed on Mugabe's mismanagement.


Mugabe's government says Zimbabwe's independent media is funded by opponents
who want to topple him over his controversial and often violence drive to
seize white-owned farmland for redistribution to landless blacks


ZIMBABWE: New assault on free press

JOHANNESBURG, 9 November (IRIN) - A regional media watchdog on Friday condemned the continued detention of the editor-in-chief of Zimbabwe's only independent daily newspaper, Geoff Nyarota, as a fresh attack on dissenting views.

"This is a continuation of the government's strategy to silence all who dare to speak out against it," director of the Winhoek-based Media Institute for Southern Africa (MISA), Luckson Chipare, told IRIN.

Nyarota and Wilf Mbanga, a former director of the newspaper's parent company, were arrested at their homes early on Thursday morning and were still in custody on Friday, Nyarota's lawyer said.

"Both Mr Nyarota and Mr Mbanga have been charged with fraud, and alternatively contravening an act that prohibits the supply of false information to a lawful authority, and in their case to the Zimbabwe Investment Centre," Lawrence Chibwe told Reuters.
 
Daily News editor Nyarota said his arrest was part of a government drive against the private media before presidential elections in which Mugabe is facing the biggest challenge of his career. "This is all part of the harassment we are being subjected to," he said by telephone. The newspaper was launched in 1999 and has been highly critical of the ruling ZANU-PF party.

The government alleges that Zimbabwe's privately-owned media is funded by opponents and wants to topple Mugabe over his land policies. Several foreign journalists have been expelled from Zimbabwe and a bomb destroyed the printing press of the Daily News in January.
 
On the same day as the arrests came news that the state's media would be expanded in preparation for the election campaign. The Johannesburg-based newspaper Business Day reported on Thursday that the Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) is seeking a deal with satellite television services provider Multichoice Africa, in a bid to widen viewership.

The newspaper reported that the authorities were working hard to launch another huge government-controlled media group to be known as the New Ziana. This organisation, an attempt to bring state media under one umbrella, will have its own 24-hour television and radio stations, eight newspapers, publishing services and recording facilities to augment state-controlled Zimpapers and the ZBC.

The company, expected to be a rigid government monopoly, will emerge from the state news agency ZIANA, the Community Newspaper Group and other concerns. Last week Mugabe's Information Minister Jonathan Moyo and his department's permanent secretary, George Charamba, held a meeting with the government-controlled Zimbabwe Mass Media Trust, ZIANA, editors and consultants to finalise the plans.

In renewed belligerence against the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) Moyo reportedly told journalists at the meeting that anyone found to be sympathetic to the MDC would be immediately fired without benefits. Moyo told the journalists that they did not have to worry about the profitability of the new organisation as that was not its main objective.

"We were told that our main brief is to support the government. He said issues of profitability were not important as the government would bankroll the new media group. Some of us had voiced concern that the project would not be sustainable if it was seen as being partisan in the eyes of the public," said a source at the meeting.

The Guardian

Editors arrested for fraud as Mugabe tries to silence critics

Andrew Meldrum in Harare
Friday November 9, 2001
The Guardian

The Zimbabwe government charged the editor of the only independent Daily
News with fraud yesterday as part of its campaign to silence one of its most
biting critics in the press.
Geoff Nyarota and a former editor of the paper, Wilf Mbanga, were arrested
at their homes at 6.30am by plain clothes police and were still being held
late yesterday.

Both are to appear in court today to answer charges of fraud and of
allegedly supplying false information to a lawful authority.

The fraud squad inquiry centres on the registration of the newspaper's
holding company, Associated Newspapers of Zimbabwe.

The government claims the newspaper is operating illegally because its
holding company is not properly registered with the national investment
centre. Mr Nyarota and board members deny the claim.

In its campaign to neutralise the Daily News, the government has launched
several lawsuits against the newspaper, while President Robert Mugabe's
supporters have beaten its reporters. A bomb destroyed the paper's printing
presses in January.

Despite the intimidation, the Daily News has become the country's most
popular newspaper in the past two years. Its 100,000-plus circulation is
double that of the state-owned paper, the Herald.

Mr Mugabe is determined to silence the critical press before presidential
elections early next year in which he is seeking another six-year term.

An opinion poll published yesterday by the independent weekly, the Financial
Gazette, shows Mr Mugabe trailing the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai,
head of the Movement for Democratic Change, by 47.1% to 52.9%.


Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Guardian

Zimbabwe Opposition Party Attacked

Saturday November 10, 2001 5:10 PM


HARARE, Zimbabwe (AP) - About 200 ruling party militants stormed the
downtown offices of Zimbabwe's opposition party Saturday, attacking several
of its office workers and a passing motorist.

The militants held the office of the Movement for Democratic Change for
three hours before departing. Militants frequently take over white-owned
farms in the countryside, and they've also violently occupied businesses in
the capital city of Harare.

Militants told office staff of the MDC that they were taking revenge for the
alleged abduction last week of one of their leaders, Cain Nkala, according
to MDC official Nkanyiso Maqeda.

Maqeda said the police took more than an hour to respond to the opposition
party's emergency calls for help, and when they did arrive, they did little
to halt the violence.

The police had no immediate comment.

``One guy ... tried to drive away but they (the militants) dragged him out
and severely beat him up before slashing his tires with knives and axes, all
in full view of the police,'' Maqeda said.

According to Maqeda, two cars belonging to MDC lawmakers parked outside the
office were also vandalized.

The militant attack on the MDC office was led by Joseph Chinotimba,
president of the pro-government Zimbabwe Federation of Trades Unions,
witnesses said. Chinotimba is currently on bail for the attempted murder of
a MDC supporter and has organized violent occupations of white-owned farms.

MDC officials said the group of militants tried to force their way into the
office claiming to be police. When they turned violent, the staff barricaded
itself inside. Several workers were injured lightly in the fracas.

Ruling party militants have disrupted farming on the 1,700 white-owned
commercial farms they have occupied since March 2000, and the government has
announced plans to seize nearly 5,000 white-owned farms for redistribution
to landless blacks.

The opposition accuses President Robert Mugabe of ordering illegal land
occupations and a land seizure program under the guise of land reform to
shore up his party's flagging support countrywide.

The MDC was narrowly defeated by Mugabe's party in parliamentary elections
last year and holds 56 of the 120 elected seats. In the previous parliament
Mugabe controlled all but three seats.

The United States criticized Mugabe's government for last week's arrest of
the editor of the country's only independent newspaper and one of his
business associates on fraud charges. U.S. officials urged authorities in
Zimbabwe to ensure that that the will of the people is respected in the
upcoming presidential election.

Friday, 9 November, 2001, 15:56 GMT
Zimbabwe clash with Oppenheimer dynasty
Nicky Oppenheimer
Nicky Oppenheimer heads Africa's most powerful family
The Oppenheimer dynasty in South Africa is heading for a confrontation with the Zimbabwe Government over land reform.

The Oppenheimers control two of Africa's richest companies - the Anglo American Corporation and De Beers - and own 2.4 million acres of farmland in Zimbabwe - approximately the size of Belgium.

The family is resisting government calls to hand over a large proportion of its landholdings.

But Zimbabwe vice-president Joseph Msika has visited Oppenheimer ranches to tell them that an interim agreement has been reached.

Negotiations

Family spokesman Clifford Elphick told the BBC's World Business Report that it was not their understanding that land is going to be seized

"There is a process of discussion between Nicky Oppenheimer and the Zimbabwean government," he said.


We don't believe the seizure of land is imminent or on the agenda

Oppenheimer spokesman Clifford Elphick

In September 2000 President Robert Mugabe made a rare concession on his controversial land reforms by telling Anglo American that it could keep its properties.

Now there are reports that deputy chairman Nicky Oppenheimer is under pressure to give up farms.

"A compromise is that Nicky would give his management instructions to remove cattle from some areas so crops could be planted whilst the rain was falling," Mr Elphick said.

Different solutions?

The family would then reclaim its land, but the government wants it to remain under the control of black farmers.

The problem revolves around the question of what land the family is prepared to make available to the government.

The government says it wants a total of 65,000 hectares of land by the end of the year, claiming that Anglo American's possessions amount to the size of Belgium.

"We are running a very successful business with 20,000 head of cattle on that property. It is a question of making sure the business remains viable."

"At the same time we have to make land available to the invaders, if you want to call them that - the war veterans - which would suit their needs and the sort of agriculture they want to practice," Mr Elphick said.

There is a danger that Zimbabwe is making an example of the Oppenheimer dynasty because they are so powerful.

"I hope that isn't the case because we are looking for a compromise," Mr Elphick explained.

Mr Mugabe has authorised the seizure of more than 4,500 white-owned farms as part of his often-violent drive to redistribute land he says was stolen by British settlers more than 100 years ago.

Aid agencies have warned of impending severe food shortages in Zimbabwe - citing a combination of drought and the farm invasions.

Commercial farmers say Mr Mugabe has failed to honour a deal under which his government agreed to end farm invasions in return for pledges of financial help from former colonial power Britain.


Daily News

Nyarota arrested

11/9/01 8:03:28 AM (GMT +2)


Staff Reporters

AN error made by PriceWaterhouseCoopers in a letter to the Zimbabwe
Investment Centre (ZIC), on the shareholding in Associated Newspapers of
Zimbabwe, (Private) Limited (ANZ), the publishers of The Daily News, caused
the arrest of Wilf Mbanga, the founding Chief Executive Officer of ANZ and
Geoffrey Nyarota, the Editor-in-Chief, early yesterday.


The two were picked up by the police from their Harare homes around 6am
yesterday and taken to Morris Depot, where they spent the whole day being
questioned.

Last night the two were still being detained. They were moved to Rhodesville
police station, where a senior officer understood to be a war veteran
declared they would spend the night in police cells.
In a letter to Advocate Eric Matinenga, who is representing ANZ, instructed
by Lawrence Chibwe of the law firm
Stumbles and Rowe, David Scott, the senior partner of
PriceWaterhouseCoopers, the firm of chartered accountants and management
consultants, yesterday admitted his firm is to blame for the error.
The letter reads:

"Mr L G Neely, acting on behalf of Price Waterhouse, submitted an
application on behalf of our clients, to the Zimbabwe Investment Centre
relating to the above company (Associated Newspapers of Zimbabwe (Private)
Limited).
"Mr Neely has now left our employ.
He is resident in Bulawayo and is a partner of Deloitte and Touche
(Chartered Accountants). I have spoken to Mr Neely today, regarding the
above matter.

"Mr Neely has stated that he is prepared to issue an affidavit regarding a
clerical error that occurred on a letter dated 22 July 1998 (a copy of which
was published in The Herald on 8 November, 2001) wherein Mr Neely
inadvertently referred to a company named Motley Investments (Private)
Limited as a shelf company that was to change its name to Associated
Newspapers of Zimbabwe (Private) Limited. The correct name of the shelf
company was Motley Trading (Private) Limited.
"The certificate of incorporation and the memorandum and articles of
association that were sent by Mr Neely to our client, at that time, all
reflect the name Motley Trading (Private) Limited. It is clear, therefore,
that an unintentional clerical error occurred in the letter dated 22 July
1998 as outlined above.

"Motley Trading Private Limited changed its name to Associated Newspapers of
Zimbabwe ( Private) Limited, in accordance with the ZIC application, and the
company has traded under this correct name.
"The ZIC certificate was issued by ZIC in the name of Associated Newspapers
of Zimbabwe ( Private) Limited.
"The ZIC application clearly states that the investors were to be AMI
(Zimbabwe) Limited, non-resident with 60 percent shareholding and a local
consortium still to be finalised, plus executive and other staff who are
resident with 40 percent shareholding.

"The certificate issued by ZIC did not, therefore, contain the same details
as those supplied in the application form."
This letter was copied to Muchadeyi Masunda, the ANZ Chief Executive
Officer.
Chibwe said police were accusing Nyarota and Mbanga of contravening Section
40 of the ZIC Act. The two are denying the charge.

He said: "The charge is incomprehensible. The police are simply trying to
build up a fraud case on the basis of false
information supplied by the Zimbabwe Investment Centre and published in The
Herald."
Chibwe said the directive to arrest Nyarota and Mbanga came from "very
senior police officers and political
heavyweights", who instructed some junior officers identified only as Rwafa,
Nhema and Garwe to effect the arrests.
Chibwe and Matinenga were last night making frantic efforts to have the two
released. They filed an urgent application
before High Court judge, Justice Benjamin Paradza, but were unsuccessful.

Masunda yesterday dismissed as "mischievous", a story carried in The Herald
suggesting that the ANZ violated provisions of the ZIC Act.
Speaking after a meeting of the ANZ Board of Directors, Masunda said the
reports were part of a well-orchestrated
campaign to discredit and destabilise the company. He said the directors
would do everything possible to protect the interests of the company and the
individual rights of the journalists as well as the directors and/or
shareholders who have been subjected to harassment, arrests and intimidation
in their quest for a just and democratic society.

Meanwhile, Stumbles and Rowe have queried why Richard Mbaiwa, the acting
executive director of the ZIC, sent a copy of his letter to The Herald after
he had stated that he would copy it only to the Minister of Finance and
Economic Development, the Governor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, the
Attorney-General and the Police Commissioner.
In a letter dated 7 November, the law firm noted that he violated Section 39
of the ZIC Act, (Chapter 24:16) on secrecy and confidentiality.
n Tomorrow, The Daily News will carry the full text of the Stumbles & Rowe
letter to the ZIC.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

From ZWNEWS, 9 November

No monitors, no recognition

US officials, declaring that free and fair elections cannot be held under current conditions in Zimbabwe, have warned that a refusal by President Robert Mugabe to permit independent monitoring of next year's presidential elections, "could make it difficult" for the people of Zimbabwe and the international community to view next year's presidential election as legitimate. Senior officials in the US Administration, speaking to ZWNEWS, also said they were deeply disturbed at the latest attempts by the Mugabe government to shut down The Daily News, the country's largest independent newspaper. Its editor was arrested on Thursday for the third time since May.

The US Administration called on the Zimbabwe government to drop proposed laws, announced this week, which would ban international monitors and observers from the presidential poll, scheduled for next March. An opinion poll published this week by Zimbabwe's Financial Gazette, an independent weekly, suggested Mugabe is trailing in popularity some five points behind opposition Movement for Democratic Change challenger Morgan Tsvangirai. "The political environment in Zimbabwe today is marked by a significant deterioration in respect for the rule of law and the judiciary, government-sponsored political intimidation and violence, harassment of the independent press, and clear determination to ignore the concerns of the international community," a top US official said. "Consequently, the United States is forced to conclude that the current conditions in Zimbabwe do not allow for a free and fair electoral process as outlined in the norms and standards for elections in the Southern African Development Community. Zimbabwe adopted these norms and standards on March 25, 2001.''

The comments marked the most explicit warning yet from the United States that Washington may refuse to recognise Mugabe if he announces he's won an election from which foreign monitors were banned. The proposal to ban foreign monitors, along with continuing state-sponsored political violence and intimidation, "suggests that the government of Zimbabwe lacks commitment to a free and fair electoral process," the official added. "The United States once again calls upon the government of Zimbabwe to re-establish the rule of law, ease its campaign of political violence and intimidation, and allow international election monitors immediate and unfettered access."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

From The Daily Telegraph (UK), 9 November

Weapons dealer 'runs business from Berkshire'

A former captain of the Rhodesian rugby team who now lives in Berkshire was yesterday named as the main arms supplier to Zimbabwe. Using parliamentary privilege, Paul Farrelly (Lab, Newcastle under Lyme) singled out John Bredenkamp, a United Kingdom resident. Until now there had not been much reference to him in the British press, other than in the sports pages. In a debate on the Export Control Bill, Mr Farrelly said: "It's a little known fact that the main arms supplier to Zimbabwe is a UK resident, who runs his huge business empire from the Royal County of Berkshire - genteel Ascot and Windsor to be precise." Urging MPs to back the Bill, which puts stricter controls on arms exports, Mr Farrelly added: "With a fortune estimated at £400 million he's got deep pockets, expensive libel lawyers and a dangerous reputation. "He's also extremely clever, very careful and doesn't readily leave end-user certificates [for arms] just lying around. So it's safer for the press to chronicle his handling of sports stars, through his sports agency Masters International, than his handling of arms. But Mr Bredenkamp has long had form of a very distinctly unsporting kind and is exactly the sort of person based here who this Bill should tackle."

Mr Farrelly said Mr Bredenkamp had been a "key figure in sanctions-busting so long ago for Ian Smith, the former Rhodesian Prime Minister, and when the regime changed, he quite simply changed his allegiance". Mr Farrelly described Mr Bredenkamp as a potential successor to Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe. Although he had residency in this country, he was not a holder of a British passport. "Mr Bredenkamp appears to break no UK laws, nor embargoes, nor restrictions - however formal or informal - by ostensibly keeping all his African arms dealing activities offshore." Mr Farrelly said he hoped the Bill would allow the Department of Trade and Industry to investigate the workings of people such as Mr Bredenkamp. However, Nigel Griffiths, the export controls minister, said he could not comment on specific cases. But he added: "You did raise an important principle which I think the House will want to have the Government's views on record about. I can assure you and the House that the Bill gives us the power to control UK citizens and anyone operating in the UK who traffic and broker in arms to arms-embargoed destinations, such as Zimbabwe. They will be indeed caught," he added.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Comment from The Independent (UK), 8 November

We must impose targeted sanctions on Zimbabwe

All those who wish Zimbabwe well have cause to be concerned about the worsening situation in that country, where the wide-scale harassment of opponents and white farmers in the past two years has exacerbated problems caused by the government's mismanagement of the economy. Whatever hope there once was that Robert Mugabe's government would respect the vital Abuja agreement it entered into with the Commonwealth seven weeks ago no longer exists. Instead, prospects for this blighted land have worsened rather than improved. President Mugabe, who last week gave the clearest indication yet that he intends to remain in office until his death, has blatantly violated the Abuja agreement. His government continues to harass opposition members and his cadre of war veterans continue to occupy farmers' land, while Mr Mugabe himself has refused to allow election observers from the European Union or other concerned bodies into the country ahead of next year's presidential election. That he is intent on confrontation became even more apparent last week when his Foreign Minister summoned the ambassadors of Britain, Spain and Belgium to his office to harangue them on the European Union's threat to impose sanctions. In another alarming development, Mr Mugabe has now ordered Zimbabwe's only independent daily, The Daily News, to close.

There is no doubt that land redistribution is important in Zimbabwe, which is why we welcomed Britain's undertaking in the Abuja agreement to help finance orderly reform. However, as has long been suspected, it is now clear that President Mugabe merely uses land inequity to win the support of the disillusioned black masses to shore up his decadent regime. President Mugabe has plunged his nation into crisis. It is believed that as many as 75 per cent of Zimbabweans are living in terrible poverty, with many facing the threat of starvation. Inflation is running at a calamitous 83 per cent and there has been a 40 per cent fall in agricultural output predicted for this year. It is imperative that the international community acts quickly to impose targeted sanctions on President Mugabe and his ministers. They should be banned from travel abroad, their foreign assets frozen and Zimbabwean Airways denied foreign landing rights. Perhaps that, at last, might help drive some sense into Mr Mugabe.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe
Media Update # 2001/44
October 29th - November 5th 2001

CONTENTS
1.  SUMMARY
2.  THE NATIONAL BUDGET: state media suppresses crucial
    information
3.  CITIZENSHIP & VOTER REGISTRATION
4.  US COURT RULING
5.  OBJECTIVITY: MMPZ "disappointing"? From a subscriber

1. SUMMARY

o   The week provided ample evidence that the recent changes
    and restructuring in the government-controlled media
    engineered by the Ministry of Information are now paying
    dividends. The two main media institutions, Zimbabwe
    Newspapers and ZBC, have now become dedicated,
    professional and efficient propaganda machines for the
    government, manipulating the news in favour of the ruling
    party at the expense of the truth. There can no longer be
    any question that the constant stream of coordinated
    misinformation being disseminated by these two
    organizations is a grave and extreme abuse of journalistic
    standards. And in the case of the national broadcaster,
    which still enjoys a de facto monopoly of the airwaves, its
    distortion of the news is an insult to its mandate to provide
    the public with diverse, fair and accurate information of
    national issues and amounts to a serious contravention of
    Zimbabweans' constitutional right to fair and accurate
    information.

o   In the days before the announcement of the national
    budget, ZBC and Zimpapers created the impression that
    Zimbabweans were expecting a "people's budget", one
    that held down prices and put money back into people's
    pockets. When it was delivered, allocations to Health,
    Social Services and Agriculture were highlighted by
    Finance Minister Simba Makoni, which allowed the
    government-controlled media to confirm that Makoni had,
    indeed, produced a people's budget. What was ignored,
    despite Makoni's warning, were the effects hyper-inflation
    would have on the increased allocations, the huge budget
    deficit, and his failure to address the macro-economic
    issues creating the economic crisis which he himself
    identified.
   
o   The state media also ignored the unprecedented failure of
    the budget presentation to disclose a number of vote
    allocations, including those for the President's Office, and
    the Ministries of Defence and Foreign Affairs. They also
    overlooked the limited availability of the budget documents
    for the Press, which, together with the lack of transparency
    in the budget presentation itself, amounted to an attempt
    to manipulate news of the budget's contents in a way that
    would allow only the "good news" to be highlighted. Most of
    the media also missed the fact that in his introduction,
    Minister Makoni provided the most frank - and gloomy -
    assessment of the country's economic performance and
    forecast for the budgetary year ever given by a government
    official.
    The state media took no account of this and provided no
    sensible analysis beyond statements and comments
    supporting the measures designed to ease the financial
    pressures on the public, which were discussed in isolation.

  o   During the week, the state media also distorted news of
    the US court ruling against ZANU PF and President
    Mugabe so badly that fact could not be separated from
    fiction.
   
o   It also obscured the issues involved in the on-going voters'
    registration exercise and failed to provide any useful
    information for the electorate about its conduct, a fault
    shared by the private Press. And none of the media have
    explored the purpose and potential of the "single-
    nationality" Citizenship Act.


2. THE NATIONAL BUDGET: State media suppresses crucial
information

Before the budget ZBC created the concept of a 'people's budget'
during its interviews with people on the street and was able to
continue with this theme after its presentation by airing more street
interviews with only those people who thought they would benefit
thanks, in part, to a lack of transparency in Makoni's presentation.
The state broadcaster quietly ignored Makoni's surprisingly honest
but gloomy assessment of the economic crisis facing the country
and his failure to offer any solutions, highlighting, instead, the extra
allocations to the few ministries for which Makoni provided detail.

In its Newshour bulletin (1/11, 8pm) ZBCTV merely announced in a
15-second news item that Makoni had presented the budget with
snippets of detail from the presentation only emerging after item
nine out of 17 monitored news items. In the same bulletin ZBCTV
conducted a countrywide round-up of public opinion from its
regional reporters all welcoming the budget without a single quote
from anybody. Bank boss Gideon Gono was also invited onto the
news desk to comment. Representing expert opinion, Gono
praised Makoni, saying: ".The minister needs to be
commended for a job extremely well done. I say so against a
background where the nation entrusted him to spend $224
billion. It's expected that he will spend about $185billion.The
budget deficit was supposed to be 50% but it's 12% therefore
on that basis, it's a job well done." He added that Minister
Makoni would under-spend by $40 billion.
But his comments were thoroughly confusing because it was not
made clear that Gono was referring to Makoni's observations
regarding government's expected savings from the 2001 budget,
while Makoni had clearly stated that he intended to collect $251.9
billion and spend $390.2 billion, thus creating a deficit of about
$138. 3 billion (for the 2002 budget)
ZBCTV failed to question Gono about the effects on the economy
of the extra spending contained in the 2002 budget when he
brushed it aside by saying: ".In turnarounds it is necessary
sometimes to spend more in order to revitalize the economy.
That's precisely what he is doing and I fully endorse that kind
of strategy".
All radio stations carried the report the following morning (2/11,
6am).
Immediately after the budget ZTV (1/11, 4.45pm) sourced
comments from five ZANU PF legislators who all praised Makoni.
However, Deputy Health Minister, David Parirenyatwa, was also
quoted saying that the $22billion allocated to his ministry was not
enough. All radio (1/11, 8pm) quoted him providing a more detailed
explanation why his ministry needed more.
But this did not deter ZBC (2 & 3/11), which sent its reporters out
to seek comment from ordinary people who celebrated the amount
allocated to Health. The broadcaster made no attempt to inform the
public of the fact that the value of $22billion in 2002 would be little
different from this year's paltry $12 billion after inflation had taken
its toll.
Although the ZBC aired a post-budget analysis programme
(ZBCTV, 1/11, 4:45 pm) the government-controlled broadcaster
restricted scrutiny to Makoni's statement and failed to provide
informative independent analysis, even with the help of
commentators Ibbo Mandaza and Dr Samuel Undenge, and the
businessman and banker, Enock Kamushinda, who, in an earlier
programme, had urged ZTV's audiences not to focus on
government expenditure but on how it generated funds (31/10,
7.15pm).

In its subsequent reports (2/11 and 3/11), ZBC swamped its
audiences with comments of praise from street interviews and
government apologists without providing any informative analysis
(ZTV quoted 23 voices, while radio quoted nine). While those
accessed would only have had a limited understanding of what the
budget was about, the interviews helped to portray the impression
that Makoni had indeed produced a 'people's budget'. The
emphasis of any analysis focused narrowly on the health and
agriculture votes. Issues such as the overall performance of the
economy, the huge budget deficit, and his admission that hyper-
inflation would continue next year, were suppressed in the state
media.

ZBC's bias in support of ZANU PF also manifested itself in other
ways. Before the budget, ZTV quoted six ZANU PF MPs as
against three from the MDC. But afterwards, it quoted ruling party
sources six times without accessing a single comment from the
opposition. On Radio 1/3 eleven (11) voices were accessed from
ZANU PF MPs, while the opposition was not quoted at all. Radio
2/4 quoted six (6) ZANU PF voices and one from the MDC.
However, the MDC MP was only quoted before the budget
presentation. It was unprofessional for ZBC to quote MDC MPs on
their expectations of the budget and then ignore them after the
presentation.

Only The Zimbabwe Independent (2/11) noted that there were non-
disclosures in the allocations to the Ministries of Defence, the
President's Office (which includes the CIO), Foreign Affairs, and
the Vote of Credit, among others.
In its article "Non-disclosures dog budget", The Zimbabwe
Independent criticized Makoni for being vague with regard to macro-
economic issues, especially the interest and exchange rate
regimes.
The absence of explicit reference to the amount of money allocated
to Defence, which has dominated past national budgets, received
no attention from ZBC or Zimpapers, which both failed to question
the lack of transparency in the budgetary process.  Although The
Herald carried details of these votes in a special four-page
supplement that also contained Makoni's entire parliamentary
statement, the details were tucked away in a table without a story
to explain why some of the allocations had nearly doubled.
The Daily News story, Defence gobbles up $34 billion (3/11)
corroborated the Independent by noting that "budget estimates
were only made available to the state media, with the rest of
the journalists being told to collect their copies from
Parliament yesterday (Friday) morning".
The paper even quoted Makoni as saying the government printers
had problems, resulting in only five copies being printed on the day
he presented his budget. However, it failed to take this up with the
government printers.
Like ZBC, Zimpapers roundly hailed the budget as being "people-
oriented". Part of The Herald's front-page lead story read:
    Described as people-oriented, the budget aims to
    give more disposable income to the workers and
    breathe life into public sector investment
    programmes".

And in its comment The Herald used the higher spending on social
services to reinforce President Mugabe's recent declaration that
government was again embracing socialist policies without
mentioning that even by Makoni's accounting, inflation would wipe
out the gains: "The budget clearly vindicates the President's
statement that ESAP is no more as the Government has now
given priority to issues of health, social services, education,
capital development projects, land reform and empowerment,
among others."
The Herald's uncritical praise reappeared in The Sunday Mail's
editorial (4/11): "So terms like a populist budget or gloomy
budget have been used to describe what in reality is a
confirmation of the decision by Government to return to basics
or its original plan of putting the people first".
In contrast, The Zimbabwe Independent (2/11), The Zimbabwe
Mirror (2/11), and The Standard (4/11) all ran stories dismissing the
budget as a political gimmick meant to woo restless voters ahead
of the 2002 Presidential Election.
Perhaps because of its early deadlines, The Daily News report on
the budget (2/11) merely focused on Makoni's gloomy assessment
of the economy's performance and only provided inadequate one-
sentence highlights of vote allocations in a panel of its main story.
The Independent however, made a great effort to provide its readers
with a breakdown of the budget's main points, including comment
and analysis. It featured a 16-page supplement containing 18
budget-related stories to back up its front-page news story that
noted the budget was ".silent on a programme for economic
recovery".
The Zimbabwe Mirror carried two articles that were both critical.
The newspaper quoted analysts who, like those reported in The
Independent, ". described the 2002 budget as 'populist'  -
tailored to hoodwink the electorate ahead of the presidential
elections scheduled for next year".   The two papers also quoted
the MDC dismissing Makoni's work as a "no solution budget."
The following day, The Daily News (3/11) began to catch up
with "reaction" articles that were also critical of the budget,
while The Standard's "Budget 2002: much ado about
nothing" echoed sentiments in the rest of the private press.
The story quoted economic analysts dismissing the budget
". as a mere 'election budget' which fails to address the
economic problems facing the country"


3. CITIZENSHIP AND VOTER REGISTRATION

There was little information in the media regarding the on-going
mobile voter registration exercise in preparation for Zimbabwe's
presidential poll, announced to have started on October 15 and due
to end on December 13. Nor has there been a thorough
examination of the Citizenship Act, a controversial piece of
legislation passed into law in July and widely interpreted as being
aimed at disfranchising a large section of Zimbabweans.
ZTV and Radio 2/4 (31/10, 8pm) reported that mobile registration
was in progress. Registrar-General Tobaiwa Mudede was quoted
on ZTV stating that voter registration was going on smoothly.
However, the two reports were confusing in that the news reader
stated that both "mobile registration and inspection of the
voters' roll were currently in progress" when on ZTV Mudede
said, "at the moment we are having a mobile registration
going on.Around the 12th we will be having an inspection."
No effort was made to clarify the confusion caused by the
conflicting statements. Furthermore, the news item was buried
deep in the running order of the bulletins.

The Herald (1/11) also carried the story the next day, reporting
that, "preparations for next year's presidential election begin
this month with the inspection of the voters' roll running from
November 12 until December 2". The article at least clarified the
TV report but concentrated on a political agenda rather than its
educational value to voters. Thus it quoted Mudede dismissing the
MDC's call for an independent Electoral Commission. Side
reference was also made to government's rejection of the European
Union and the Commonwealth requests to send observers to
monitor the election because this was a ploy to oust the
government ".in the manner Western powers schemed the
defeat of former Yugoslav leader, Slobodan Milosevic".
The private press also restricted its coverage to voter registration.
But the stories merely scratched the surface, badly exposing the
media's over-reliance on civic organizations or political parties to
expose weaknesses in the electoral processes for them.
A typical example was The Daily News story (3/11), Voter
registration exercise tipped in ZANU PF's favour - Ncube, in which
the paper was content to record MDC secretary general Welshman
Ncube's claims that "his party has detected a number of
irregularities in the current voter registration exercise which he
believes were designed to sway votes in ZANU PF's favour in
next year's presidential election".
Although Ncube identified the irregularities in the story, the paper
failed to follow this up with comment from the Registrar-General's
office.
Neither did it investigate queries made in parliament by ZANU PF
and MDC MPs about the efficiency of officers in the RG's office
involved with voter registration. And Chief Charumbira's question
about why ".the RG's office only advertised (voter registration)
in the State-controlled Herald newspaper..." (The Daily News
3/11), also went uninvestigated.
The press-release journalism also manifested itself in coverage of
the threats by civic society groups calling for a nationwide
programme of civil disobedience if government failed to embrace
conditions that facilitate the holding of a free and fair presidential
election.
None of the media - The Financial Gazette (1/11), The Daily News
(1/11) and The Zimbabwe Mirror (2/11) - went beyond the
communiqué issued by 150 non-governmental organizations. They
did not relate the communiqué's demands, such as the call for "a
more intensive voter education programme" in the rural areas,
to their proper relevance in relation to the voter registration exercise
and how it is being conducted.
Civic organisations in voter registration drive, an IRIN story carried
in The Zimbabwe Independent (2/9) also eloquently recorded civic
society's discomfort with the on-going "compilation of the voters'
roll.without any genuine public input", but failed to take the
RG's office to task over this.
For example, as the voter registration exercise nears the halfway
mark, the public remains no wiser as to the number of mobile
registration centres in their areas and where they are operating,
their operating times, and what documents are required to register.
And although the private Press has covered the implications of the
Citizenship Act at some length, they still have to make it topical
and correlate it with the current voter registration exercise.
 It would be interesting, for example, to know the number of voters
who are likely to be disenfranchised by the Citizenship Act and
relate it to Zimbabwe's total potential voting public. In fact, is the
AG's office already drawing up a master record that lists all such
Zimbabweans? And as voter registration unfolds, are registration
officers explaining to the public, especially in farming areas, the
implications of this Act?
The MMPZ strongly believes it is time the media seriously makes
the RG's office their concern and penetrates the layers of secrecy
that have accumulated there for years.


4. THE US COURT RULING

The government-controlled media resorted to propagandist bluster
to obscure the outcome of a landmark US court ruling in favour of
the families of four MDC activists who are seeking to sue President
Mugabe, ZANU PF and ministers Stan Mudenge and Jonathan
Moyo for unleashing violence against the opposition in last year's
parliamentary election.
In its efforts to drown the essence of the ruling, The Herald (2/11)
ran a story under the misleading headline, President immune to
prosecution, US judge rules, which accused the American judicial
system of being part of a Western conspiracy involving the MDC,
".determined to rubbish Zimbabwe, ZANU PF, President
Mugabe, the government and its leadership".
The paper tried to underline President Mugabe's immunity to
prosecution at the expense of the court's damning findings that
ZANU PF was responsible for the systematic persecution,
including murder and torture, of its political opponents in last year's
parliamentary election campaign.
The Herald further undermined whatever credibility it may still have
possessed when it sought to dismiss the ruling out-of-hand by
quoting Zimbabwe's ambassador to the United Nations in New
York, Tichaona Jokonya, who said it ".was not a legal case but
a political issue being orchestrated by the powers that support
the MDC."
The paper tried to divert public attention from the ruling by omitting
it entirely on the grounds that it "was.not immediately
available." and focusing on Jokonya's waffle dismissing ".the
assertion in the judgment that President Mugabe could be
sued in his capacity as the First Secretary of ZANU PF."
Here was a clue as to what the ruling was about, but because the
story was so distorted by Jokonya's comments, it was impossible
to establish a single fact.
ZBC merely carried the interview with Jokonya (ZTV, 2/11, 7am &
8pm and all radio stations 6am).
There did not seem to be such confusion in the coverage of the
same issue by the private press.
In contrast, the private media restricted its coverage to informing its
readers of the ruling, its meaning and the context in which it was
made.
The Daily News (2/11), Judge warns Mugabe, and The Zimbabwe
Independent's story the same day, Mugabe's days of immunity are
numbered - US Court, simply spelt out to readers that Mugabe
and his party had been found liable for the crimes of murder and
torture, although Mugabe himself was personally immune to
prosecution as head of state.
However, the papers pointed out that he was not immune from
being served with a complaint in his capacity as first secretary of
ZANU PF.
The Standard (4/11) naturally followed this up by explaining the
next step in the matter in its story, Mugabe faces US$63m suit.
The paper explained that following the US court ruling a US
magistrate was now expected to rule in the lawsuit against
Mugabe, this time in his party portfolio capacity. It quoted the
spokesman for the plaintiffs, Topper Whitehead, to support this
assertion and explain what happened: ". We have fulfilled all
legal requirements while ZANU PF chose to squander their
opportunity by not appearing in court after the papers were
served on them. They were therefore held in default."     
Notably however, none of the newspapers provided any information
about the fate of Ministers Mudenge and Moyo and whether the
court had absolved them.


5. OBJECTIVITY- MMPZ disappointing?
By Ben Mahaka,

Impartiality seems to have died completely within everyone in
Zimbabwe who has the responsibility of informing. While this may
please those amongst us who want to advance their causes at any
cost and those who need to have their skewed views corroborated
- no matter how patently obvious the shortcomings in reporting, it
does nothing but shame the writers in the eyes of those who
somehow manage to remain impartial and understand the meaning
of journalistic ethics.

It's even more troubling when the referees like yourselves can justly
be accused of the above.

I used to look forward to your weekly emails that analyzed trends
in the Zimbabwean media. You reported clearly and justified your
comments but over the past year you have also clearly taken an
emotionally charged and biased view that clearly is fed by the
same political interests that drive the independent press. (The word
"independent" is used loosely here because we all know that
owners often influence editorial policy).
Your role (in your own words) "is to sensitize media practitioners to
their role in presenting balanced and impartial information"  - not to
rant and rave in line with anything that is claimed in the private
press - even if these views are expressed unchallenged in your
social circles and so you appear heroic in your friends' eyes.

By choosing to be monitors, you have chosen a much narrower
route than the man on the street. You have chosen to disagree with
close friends and even your paymasters if you can see that they
are wrong - no matter how impolite that might seem. You have
committed to awarding penalties to the away team if one of the
players on your home team players commits a foul.

When you stop seeing any fault in your home team then the whole
game is a farce. When, during the 90 minutes that the game is
played, you support one team, you have become a cheat, and you
are now no better than the hooligans throwing bottles from the
bleachers. You are even more corrupt than they are because you
masquerade as defenders of fairness.

I strongly believe in a free and diverse press and I welcomed the
introduction of the independent press in this country. I saw it as
means of holding a too-powerful government accountable for its
policies and deeds. I believed that having an independent press to
spar with the government-controlled media would stimulate
constructive debate that would lead to constructive change in our
nation. They have proved me wrong.and you have disappointed
many of us out here.

Ends
The MEDIA UPDATE is produced and circulated by the Media
Monitoring Project Zimbabwe, 15 Duthie Avenue, Alexandra Park,
Harare, Tel/fax: 263 4 703702, E-mail: monitors@mweb.co.zw,
Web: http://www.icon.co.zw/mmpz

Send all queries and comments to the Project Coordinator. Please
feel free to circulate this message.

We invite subscribers to submit their observations on media
coverage of issues and events, including the work of MMPZ.
Please keep your messages brief.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Food exports continue despite ban

Vincent Kahiya
FOOD exports to neighbouring countries are continuing despite the blanket
ban on the cross-border trade in basket goods by the Ministry of Lands,
Agriculture and Rural Resettlement, the Zimbabwe Independent has
established.

Trucks carrying cooking oil, sugar, flour and margarine are crossing
Zimbabwe’s northern border at Chirundu en route to Zambia and the Democratic
Republic of Congo.

The Lands ministry moved in to suspend the commercial exports of maize and
maize meal, wheat and flour, cooking oil, margarine, liquid milk, soyabeans
and soyabean by-products saying this had triggered food shortages in
Zimbabwe.

In written responses to the Independent this week, Industry and
International Trade permanent secretary Stuart Comberbach confirmed that
export of foodstuffs was continuing to meet standing quotas.

“Commercial exports of sugar destined to meet the country’s standing quotas
under the bilateral agreement and multilateral obligations will not be
affected as long as there is adequate supply of sugar on the domestic
market,” he said.

Comberbach said the permit system was still in place for other agricultural
and food items.

“Should there be exports of some basic foodstuffs to the DRC and other
countries, it could be that some of the exports that were issued prior to
the suspension are still valid and are being drawn down subject to
availability of goods,” he said.

However, small traders, who were the main targets of the ban, have continued
to export goods using haulage trucks and long distance buses.

Cross-border traders who spoke to the Independent this week said the
implementation of the ban was confusing as banned goods were leaving the
country daily.

“This is affecting us small traders who try to cross the border with a
pick-up truck because we are being told to go back,” said a small trader
based in Victoria Falls.

“Surprisingly, I teamed together with four other traders who had CD1 forms
and we took cooking oil and sugar across the border without any problem.

“They say that goods in short supply cannot be exported but cooking oil
which is being rationed in the shops is being exported,” the trader said.

Traders have continued to buy goods in bulk straight from manufacturers or
from wholesalers for export.

AH Tawanda of the Cross-border Traders Association of Zimbabwe this week
said without elaboration that his organisation was in talks with the
government to try and regularise the industry for members to continue
exporting.

Daily News

Beef shortage looming

11/9/01 7:44:25 AM (GMT +2)


By Takaitei Bote

A beef shortage is looming in Harare. Wholesalers and butcheries say they
are experiencing erratic supplies from cattle producers because of controls
on the prices of beef and fears associated with outbreaks of foot-and-mouth
disease and anthrax.


Butcheries, Abattoirs and Allied Services Association chairperson, George
Chiromo this week said: "There is a shortage of beef on the market. Whether
farmers are holding onto their cattle or not, I cannot confirm but the
situation does not seem to be improving."

Chiromo said the recent decision by the government to re-introduce price
controls on basic commodities including beef and other meat products was one
of the causes for the current shortages of beef.
Chiromo said: "The other reason for the shortage of beef is that commercial
farmers whose farms were listed for compulsory acquisition had slaughtered
the breeding stock as they faced an uncertain future. This means that there
is less beef coming from the sector because production levels have been
reduced."
The Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries, last month warned that there would
be severe food shortages following the introduction of the controls.

Reports say farmers are holding onto their cattle because of the controls on
the prices of beef.
Abattoirs were last month forced to reduce beef producer prices from between
$115 to $120 a kg to between $100 and $105 a kg in line with the government
price controls.

Cattle Producers' Association (CPA) chief executive officer, Paul d'Hotman,
last month warned that the future of the beef industry was shaky and
controls would worsen the viability crisis already being felt by the sector.
D'Hotman said the problems with basic controls was that cost of production
increased while income remained fixed. Yesterday, D'Hotman was not available
to comment on reports that farmers were holding onto their cattle.
The government introduced controls on basic commodities in a bid to protect
consumers against the increases in prices of essentials.



Business Day



Emergency food operation for Zimbabwe

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

HARARE - The UN World Food Programme (WFP) plans to launch an emergency food
relief operation to save more than half a million people from starvation,
the agency has announced.
"In reponse to the swelling number of Zimbabweans facing growing hunger, the
UN World Food Programme has announced it is planning a large-scale relief
food operation aimed at assisting more than half a million people in the
country," the WFP said in a statement released in Harare from its African
regional offices in Kenya.

Experts have recommended feeding 558,000 villagers who face acute food
shortages.

The operation is expected to start in December in the hardest hit 22
districts located in the south, west and extreme north of Zimbabwe.

"What we are seeing right now is a developing complex emergency, a variety
of problems which when added up, gravely threaten the lives of hundreds of
thousands of people," said WFP regional director for eastern and southern
Africa Judith Lewis.

Zimbabwe is traditionally self-sufficient, but this year it is unable to
fill its food gap due to lack of foreign exchange, erratic rains and farming
disruptions.

The disruption in farming activities due to land reforms and a sharp
downturn in the economy has also led to a steep rise in staple food prices,
which has seen the cost of living soar.

An estimated 75% of Zimbabweans live in abject poverty.


AFP

Daily News

Life expectancy set to drop to below 40

11/9/01 9:06:47 AM (GMT +2)


Staff Reporter

Zimbabwe's life expectancy, currently pegged at 40 years, is projected to
drop to 37 years in five years time as the HIV/Aids pandemic continues to
claims more lives.


Dr David Parirenyatwa, the Deputy Minister of Health and Child Welfare, said
70 percent of the country's hospitalised patients were suffering from
HIV/Aids-related diseases. About 2 000 people are reported to be dying of
Aids every week. He was speaking at a two-day workshop on mitigating gender
issues on HIV/Aids in Zimbabwe, which was organised by the Gender Forum.

The Gender Forum was launched by the UN Gender Working Group in 1998 to
disseminate information on women empowerment and to strengthen gender
debate. In June, the United Nations Children's Fund projected that
Zimbabwe's average life expectancy would drop to 27 years within the next
decade from 44 years.
The country's life expectancy was pegged at 62 years in 1990. Parirenyatwa
said the denial and stigma associated with Aids in Zimbabwe was a stumbling
block in the fight against the pandemic.

He said: "There is need to provide correct statistics of people who are
dying from Aids related diseases." He said there was need to de-centralise
the selling points for anti-retroviral drugs to make them easily accessible
to HIV/Aids patients.

Anti-retroviral drugs reduce viral loads in patients. MDC's Matibe in legal
wrangle over looted farm By Lloyd Mudiwa
PHILEMON Matibe, the losing MDC candidate in last year's Chegutu
parliamentary elections, is in a legal catch-22 situation as he fights for
the possession of Aitape Estates and his property which he says was looted
from the farm at the instigation of Paddy Zhanda, a former Zanu PF Central
Committee member, and his business partners.

The court on Wednesday asked Matibe to prove that he had owned Lot 1 of
Paarl, which the government designated, and that he was now the new owner of
Aitape Estates, which he received as replacement. The government allocated
Matibe's old farm, Lot 1 of Paarl, to settlers in June this year.

Mashonaland West provincial Governor Peter Chanetsa, however, gave Matibe
another farm, Aitape Estates, in September as replacement. Chanetsa gave
Matibe the replacement on condition that he withdrew his High Court
electoral petition challenging Zanu PF's Webster Shamu (Charles Ndlovu)'s
victory in the Chegutu parliamentary poll.

Matibe complied and was given the farm. But, Zhanda, who is also the former
Zanu PF provincial chairman for Mashonaland East and board chairman of the
Cotton Company of Zimbabwe, his partner in Groundnut Seed Development
Company (Pvt) Ltd, Basil Nyabadza, and Joseph Nyanzira allegedly looted
Matibe's agricultural equipment from the new farm.
Matibe then filed an urgent application in the High Court seeking an order
directing the suspected looters to return his agricultural equipment and
stop disrupting farming operations. It, however, emerged, during the hearing
in Justice
Mahomed Adam's chambers on Wednesday, that Lot 1 of Paarl might not even
have belonged to Matibe.

He, therefore, could not be given a replacement for a farm he did not own in
the first place. Rob Birrell, who is in the United States, sent an e-mail on
Wednesday to her lawyers Stumbles and Rowe asking them to assist Zhanda's
lawyer Ray Passaportis of Wintertons.

"I would like you to assist Zhanda's lawyers by informing him that the farm
that Matibe is using to gain access to Mr Phillippus Brink's Farm does not
belong to Matibe," he said. "Therefore, the right to ownership of Aitape
Estates as Matibe stipulates is, we feel, unlawful."

Birrell said the title deeds and share holdings of Lot 1 of Paarl belong to
Ivanco Farms P/L, which he owns.
The equipment allegedly looted by Zhanda may belong to Ivanco Farms, he
said, adding that its ownership needed verification.
Part of Birrell's e-mail, produced in court, reads: "Please, further advise
Mr Passaportis that we have attempted through the High Court to remove
Matibe from Lot 1 of Paarl with no success and that the process of
arbitration is in progress."
Adam also asked Matibe to show that he was in possession of Aitape Estates
when Zhanda allegedly looted his property.
Matibe, through his lawyer, Innocent Chagonda of Atherstone and Cook, said
the government gave him documents giving him possession of the farm, after
taking it over from Brink, the previous owner, Chagonda said.

Adam said the fact that the government had given Matibe the farm did not
mean he was in possession since the government might have acquired the farm
unlawfully. He gave Matibe up to Thursday to establish possession and to
respond to Birrell's assertions. Zhanda and Nyabadza, in their opposing
affidavits, said their company Groundnut Seed Development Company (Pvt) Ltd
reached an agreement in July last year with Brink, who planned to emigrate
to New Zealand with his family, to purchase Aitape Estates.

They said they had already paid Brink $2,2 million for his dairy herd and
$240 000 for his household goods. Zhanda and Nyabadza said they undertook to
buy the farm after a dispute involving a $36 million debt granted to Brink
by Agridev was resolved. They said Brink was challenging the acquisition of
his farm by the government in the Administrative Court, but the Chegutu
Lands Committee had allowed them to plant crops on the farm while it
considered de-listing the farm.




Back to the Top
Back to Index