The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

ZAMBIA: Zimbabwean farmers increase tobacco production


©  IRIN

Evicted from land in Zimbabwe, farmers have made a new start in Zambia

JOHANNESBURG, 21 Nov 2003 (IRIN) - The fast-track land redistribution programme in Zimbabwe has forced many commercial farmers to seek greener pastures elsewhere, and Zambia is one of the neighbouring countries that has opened its arms to them.

However, fewer Zimbabwean farmers than was previously reported have been granted permission to farm in Zambia.

The Zambia Investment Centre (ZIC) told IRIN this week that since the beginning of Zimbabwe's land reform programme in 2002, a total of 41 Zimbabwean farmers had registered with the centre. ZIC issued investment certificates to just 31, allowing them to begin commercial farming.

"All the Zimbabwean farmers granted investment certificates to set up farming operations in Zambia are farming. They are engaged in [farming] tobacco, maize, wheat, etc," the ZIC said.

Despite their limited numbers, there had already been "an appreciable increase in the quantity of tobacco production this year", the agency noted.

"They have what it takes to undertake their various farming enterprises - there is in place an internationally backed financing arrangement, involving international banks and tobacco dealers," a ZIC spokesman told IRIN.

ZIC was expecting to receive many more applications from Zimbabwean farmers. "Zambia has the potential to accommodate a lot more farmers, due to her abundant land and water resources, than we currently have," the organisation said. Forty-seven percent of Zambian land is arable and "suitable for various types of crops".

"We therefore anticipate that more farmers will come and invest in Zambian agriculture, given the profile the sector has attained and [the] enabling environment being created by government," the ZIC said.

Agriculture has been designated a priority area by the Zambian government.

"The Zambia Investment Centre would therefore like more farmers of the calibre of Zimbabwean farmers to invest in Zambian agriculture," the organisation said.

The ZIC plays a facilitation role for potential investors, providing assistance to those issued with investment certificates in obtaining immigration permits and other necessary documents.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Obasanjo angry over failed meeting
Dumisani Muleya
PRESIDENT Robert Mugabe on Monday sabotaged his prospects of attending next
month's Commonwealth summit when he refused to meet opposition Movement for
Democratic Change leader Morgan Tsvangirai.

Senior diplomatic sources said Nigerian leader Olusegun Obasanjo had come to
offer Mugabe, who is desperate to attend the Commonwealth Heads of
Government Meeting (Chogm) in Abuja, Nigeria, a last-minute opportunity to
secure an invitation but left the country angry and exasperated.

Sources said Mugabe rejected Obasanjo's attempt to organise an emergency
meeting with Tsvangirai to break the political impasse, claiming he needed
to consult his party first.

The meeting would have helped Obasanjo to claim he had brokered a
breakthrough between the two sides and thereby opened a door to Mugabe at
Abuja.

Obasanjo had ostensibly plan-ned to meet Mugabe to formally tell him why he
had not been invited to the Chogm, but later saw an opportunity to try to
break the political impasse.

When he arrived in the country on Monday, he first met Mugabe before seeing
Tsvangirai later in the morning. Sources said Mugabe briefed Obasanjo on the
situation and claimed he was a victim of a racist campaign by the "white
Commonwealth" angered by his land reform programme.

Mugabe claimed he was trying to address the economic situation. He also said
there had been informal talks between Zanu PF and the MDC.

After meeting Mugabe, Obasanjo went to see Tsvangirai for a briefing.
Sources said Obasanjo's first words were: "What's happening Mr Tsvangirai?"
to which the MDC leader replied: "Since your last visit to Zimbabwe (with
South African President Thabo Mbeki in May) nothing has changed, except for
the worse."

"Obasanjo looked surprised because Mugabe had given him the impression there
was progress," a source close to the talks said.

Tsvangirai then went on to chronicle events from last year up to now.

Sources said Tsvangirai started with Colonel Lionel Dyck's purported mission
last December, followed by the visit to Zimbabwe of Cape Town Archbishop
Njongonkulu Ndungane in March and then the meetings between Patrick
Chinamasa and MDC secretary-general Welshman Ncube.

Tsvangirai also spoke about the church leaders' initiative and secret
meetings with Zanu PF chair John Nkomo in September in an effort to secure a
meeting between Mugabe and himself.

"It was an extensive briefing by Tsvangirai and Obasanjo was impressed," a
source said. "After that Obasanjo went back to Mugabe at State House hoping
to arrange a meeting between the two.

"But when he came back to Tsvangirai from State House he was visibly
disappointed because Mugabe had refused an immediate meeting with
Tsvangirai. Mugabe said he wanted to first consult his party and gave
February or March next year as dates for a possible meeting."

The sources said after Obasanjo's experience on Monday, there would be no
invitation to Mugabe "unless something dramatic happens" between now and the
opening of the conference on December 5.

Obasanjo is on record as saying Mugabe would not be invited unless there was
a positive "sea change" in Zimbabwe. His insistence on Monday that "we are
still consulting" suggested he had not found any "sea change" during his
visit.

Tsvangirai told Obasanjo Mugabe had failed to address Commonwealth concerns
raised when Zimbabwe was suspended from the club in March last year. The
issues include political reconciliation and democratic reforms.

Australian Prime Minister John Howard and officials at the Commonwealth
secretariat in London said after Obasanjo's visit this week that Mugabe
remained uninvited.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

      Zanu PF clashes over Banana
      Staff Writer

      THE Zanu PF politburo heard conflicting views over former president
Canaan Banana's record at an emergency meeting on Monday.

      Zanu PF sources said, despite official reports that only a couple of
members contested the decision to refuse Banana hero status, the ruling
party was divided into two opposing camps which clashed head-on over whether
or not Banana, a highly regarded nationalist and academic, should be buried
at Heroes Acre, the national shrine.

      The camp that supported Banana's case is believed to include
Vice-President Joseph Msika, Zanu PF chair John Nkomo, party secretary for
administration Emmerson Mnangagwa, spokesman Nathan Shamuyarira and other
heavyweights, although not all of them spoke at the meeting.

      Msika is understood to have led the argument for conferring hero
status on Banana. Contrary to reports, President Robert Mugabe appeared
initially to back this group.

      But an opposing front led by former army commander Solomon Mujuru and
his ex-airforce counterpart Josiah Tungamirai blocked attempts to declare
Banana a hero.

      The politburo decision so angered Banana's family that when Mugabe
visited Banana's Sentosa home to express his condolences on Tuesday there
was obvious tension, sources present reported. Banana's son Nathan, who
accompanied the body of his father from London where he died, avoided
talking to Mugabe altogether.

      Sources said the controversy over Banana's hero status forced Mugabe
to stay away from the burial in Esibomvu, Matabeleland South, on Wednesday.

      Mugabe has an impressive record of attending the funerals of his
adherents.

      Mujuru's camp argued Banana's criminal charges of sexual assault had
badly blemished his record and diminished his standing in society.

      Mujuru and Tungamirai were in charge of the armed forces when Banana
abused personnel assigned to guard him at State House between 1980 and 1987.

      Tungamirai testified during Banana's High Court trial in 1999. Banana
was convicted in 2000 and spent nearly a year in jail.

      Sources said political considerations played a key role in the
politburo's final decision.

      Those opposed to Banana's hero status argued that at the time of his
death he had become an opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC)
informal advisor. They cited his criticism of government's land reform
programme and denunciation of Zanu PF over political violence.

      In May 2000 Banana said "no one is ordained to rule for eternity".
This irked Zanu PF mandarins who viewed the remarks as an attack on Mugabe.

      Banana also said the presidential term of office should be limited
because "Zimbabwe cannot be ruled by one person".

      In 2001 Banana said Zimbabwe should put its house in order to avoid
targeted sanctions. He also said he supported a government of national unity
bringing Zanu PF and the MDC together.

      When Zanu PF denied its founder president Ndabaningi Sithole hero
status in 2001, Banana said the system of selecting heroes was flawed.

      "I think the problem is with the whole process of declaring heroes. I
believe that the question of determining who should be a national hero
should not be a party issue," he said. "You need an independent commission
to deal with the issue."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Murerwa in gloomy budget
Ngoni Chanakira
FINANCE minister Herbert Mure-rwa yesterday said government's failure to
implement agreed measures was the major cause of the country's deepening
economic crisis.

"Failure to implement agreed measures can only send wrong signals, fuelling
self-fulfilling inflationary expectations," Murerwa said when presenting his
record $7,75 trillion 2004 national budget to parliament.

"We should now address these challenges in earnest if the economy is to be
turned around."

Murerwa said the economy was expected to contract by 13,2% this year while
inflation, currently at 525,8%, will rise to 700% early next year.

For the first time in the country's history the minister dished out
trillion-dollar amounts to various ministries. Eyebrows were raised when
Murerwa told the House that he was earmarking a shocking $1,27 trillion for
defence and security when there is peace in the region.

The figure was the third largest vote after the civil service wages bill
($3,18 trillion) and the Ministry of Education, Sport and Culture ($1,52
trillion).

The defence and security amount was higher than that for Agriculture -
$587,6 billion - and Housing $10 billion. The meagre housing vote raises
doubts about promises by President Mugabe last week that government would
build a million houses in five years. It now costs about $15 million to
build a basic four-roomed house.

Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce (ZNCC) policy manager James Jowa told
the Zimbabwe Independent that like other budgets before, last year's budget
had not been a real budget at all. It missed all its targets.

"We have gone through 22 budgets but we seem to continue making the same
mistake of living beyond our means," Jowa said. "We love to spend what we do
not have. Chronic fiscal deficits and supplementary budgets have been the
chief architects of the hyperinflationary environment now prevailing in the
country."

He said of particular concern had been excessive budget overruns.

In August Murerwa presented a $671 billion supplementary budget despite
admitting that the resources are simply not there.

"One may ask what then needs to be done?" Jowa asked.

"We do not need just an engine overhaul but a completely new engine to move
the economy ahead.

"The Minister of Finance in his 2003 budget statement mentioned the need to
restore confidence. He acknowledged what all of us had observed much
earlier, that the agrarian reform had played a part in the negative
publicity..

"But he did not announce the measures to be adopted to address these
fundamental issues. Probably the issues are beyond the budget and the
minister. But all the same it is quite refreshing that the government is at
least aware of the centre of the problem."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Mawere rejects Zanu PF's poisoned chalice
Itai Dzamara
IN what is seen as a blow to Zanu PF's efforts at self-renewal, business
mogul Mutumwa Mawere this week refused to be co-opted into the ruling party
on the grounds that his current responsibilites rule out a political role.
"Successful businessmen do notalways become successful politicians," he told
the Zimbabwe Independent.

Mawere was last week elected in absentia as Zanu PF secretary for economic
affairs for the volatile Masvingo Province alongside TeleAccess boss Daniel
Shumba who was chosen as chairman. On Monday Mawere turned down the
position.

In an interview on Wednesday, Mawere said he wasn't a Zanu PF politician and
wanted to remain a businessman.

"No, I am not a member of Zanu PF or any other party. I have never been in
politics. I am only a businessman," said Mawere.

"I am convinced that my contribution to national development is enough
through my business interests. I have chosen business as one of the
nation-building planks that will further the gains of political freedom," he
said while paying tribute to "those who struggled to make me relevant as a
black man".

Ruling-party sources say efforts to revive the party include the co-option
of business people and academics.

Mawere said he understood that Zanu PF members had hoped to include him in
their attempts to buttress the party, but he wasn't able to take up the
offer.

"They were looking for people who can help them solve their problems and had
hoped that I could contribute. There is nothing wrong in people electing you
to a political position. However, I have advised them to look for someone
else because I can't take on the responsibility," he said

Mawere is said to have been approached last month by Zanu PF leaders with an
invitation to join its structures and he requested time to look into the
issue. However, elections were held last week when he was in India. He
returned on Monday this week only to be informed he had been elected as the
party's provincial secretary for economic affairs.

Zanu PF holds its annual conference in Masvingo next month at which the
contentious issue of choosing a successor to President Robert Mugabe could
feature prominently.

Sources said Zanu PF secretary for administration, Emmerson Mnangagwa,
considered Mugabe's heir apparent, was behind the election of both Mawere
and Shumba who are seen as his protegés in the province.

Mnangagwa can solve the Masvingo challenge by dealing a blow to Samuel
Mumbengegwi's faction that would deny him key votes in the succession
battle.

Mawere denied allegations that Zanu PF's patronage system had helped him
grow his business empire.

"Do my services or products produced by my businesses appeal to customers
because of a Zanu PF identity?" he asked. "The people who work in the
companies where I have shares are defined as Zimbabweans, not Zanu PF. How
does one justify the claim that I benefited from Zanu PF patronage?"

Despite his denial of links with the ruling party in the past, Mawere raised
eyebrows when he formed the National Development Assembly to counter the
Lovemore Madhuku-led National Constitutional Assembly, a civic rights
organisation.

Mawere, owner of Africa Resources Ltd, has under his wings Shabanie Mashaba
Mines, a major producer of asbestos.

Meanwhile, Mawere has confirmed that his business entities have a major
shareholding in Media Africa Group (MAG), publishers of the Business Tribune
and the Weekend Tribune.

"It is not true to say Mawere owns MAG. I don't have a personal interest in
the group. My interest is a corporate one. My companies have major
shareholdings in the group," he said.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Tsvangirai files for Mudede's arrest
Vincent Kahiya
MOVEMENT for Democratic Change leader Morgan Tsvangirai yesterday filed a
High Court application seeking Registrar-General Tobaiwa Mudede's
imprisonment for contempt of court over his alleged refusal to transfer
ballot boxes to Harare.

Tsvangirai has for the past year been engaged with Mudede in mortal combat
over the outcome of last year's presidential poll won by President Mugabe.
Tsvangirai, whose election petition was heard in court two weeks ago,
believes that Mudede's conduct in the poll swayed the result in favour of
Mugabe.

Mudede is cited in the case in his personal capacity as the second
respondent while his office is cited as the first.

"I am bringing this application seeking an order from this honourable court
that the respondents are in contempt of this honourable court and that they
are in fact in contempt in a most serous and grave manner," said Tsvangirai
in his affidavit.

The contentious issue has been the failure by Mudede to move to the capital
from various parts of the country electoral material from the 2002 poll.
This is despite numerous High Court rulings compelling him to abide by
Section 78 of the Electoral Act.

The section compels the registrar-general to move all counted and rejected
ballot papers together with counterfoils and used voters' rolls in sealed
packets to a specified place for safekeeping.

The latest such ru-ling compelling Mudede to follow the law was by Justice
Moses Chinhengo on October 15. Chinhengo ordered that the electoral material
should be kept at the offices of the Registrar of the High Court.

Mudede has for the past year pleaded that he has no funds to move the
electoral material. But Chinhengo, who said Mudede had a statutory
obligation, quashed this argument.

"It must be clear therefore that the request that the ballot papers not be
brought to Harare because of the alleged lack of funds is an attempt by the
respondent (Mudede) not only to disregard the order of this court but more
importantly it is an attempt by him to have this court revisit its earlier
decision," Chinhengo said.

Meanwhile, the Administrative Court will on Monday hear an application by
Associated Newspapers of Zimbabwe to effect an October 24 ruling which
declared that the publishing company should be declared registered by
November 30.

The Administrative Court also ruled that the Media and Information
Commission (MIC) was improperly constituted and that its chairman Tafataona
Mahoso was biased against ANZ, publishers of the Daily News. Mahoso has
already noted an appeal against the Administrative Court's ruling.

The ANZ is seeking a confirmation order of the October 24 ruling so that it
can resume publishing after it was closed by government following a Supreme
Court ruling on September 11 that the company was operating outside the law.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Govt tightens grip on GMB
Augustine Mukaro
GOVERNMENT has tightened its grip on the Grain Marketing Board (GMB) and
grain distribution by appointing Zanu PF stalwarts to all key posts in the
parastatal's administrative structures, the Zimbabwe Independent heard this
week.

Sources say politicising of the GMB started at head office in Harare before
it spread to provinces when government appointed provincial managers in
August.

The first move was government's appointment of a taskforce to coordinate
grain distribution to starving people in 2001 and then the appointment of
Colonel Samuel Muvuti as GMB chief executive officer.

In September government appointed Zanu PF losing candidate in the Harare
Central parliamentary election in June 2000, Winston Dzawo, as GMB
operations director.

Government has also politicised GMB provincial structures by appointing
ruling-party henchmen as the parastatal's provincial managers. The
provincial managers have been vested with powers to control the distribution
and movement of grain to the populace in the countryside.

Highly-placed sources said all the appointees had links with the ruling
party in one way or another.

In Mashonaland Central, gov-ernment appointed Temba Mapu-ranga, a known Zanu
PF member who is understood to be vying for the provincial chairmanship in
the elections to be held tomorrow in Bindura. Contacted for comment,
Mapuranga, who was in Masvingo, said he would only comment next week.

"Contact me next week," he said.

An S Chatikobo was appointed provincial manager for Masvingo, John Mafa for
Mashonaland West, and Podiso Mafa for Matabeleland North.

Mafa referred all questions to GMB head office.

"All press issues are handled by our operations director," she said.

Norman Sobuza was appointed provincial manager for Matabeleland South while
a G Shiri was made responsible for the Midlands province.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Rains spell doom for wheat farmers
Augustine Mukaro
WHILE the onset of rains is good news for any farmer, the reverse is true
for the country's newly resettled wheat growers who risk losing millions of
dollars as they are still battling to harvest their crop.

Delays by the farmers in harvesting wheat has been compounded by their
inability to hire combine harvesters. The farmers have resorted to using
hand-held sickles to harvest the crop.

An agriculture expert told the Zimbabwe Independent that new farmers could
not achieve desired production levels due to lack of knowledge, skills and
finance. They do not have the capacity to match production levels of
displaced commercial farmers.

"Wheat is a very difficult crop to grow for the new farmers," said the
expert.

"Most of these farmers are growing wheat on land between 10 and 15 hectares
when the crop must be grown on a large area for someone to realise a profit.
Small areas are difficult for farmers to get a profit from since hiring a
combine harvester for 1 hectare now costs $300 000," he said.

The worst affected areas include Mushandike Irrigation Scheme, the largest
irrigated area under wheat in Masvingo Province, and in Mashonaland Central
province.

Local demand of between 400 000 and 500 000 tonnes per annum used to be met
through imports of gristing wheat used to blend the local product to get
high quality flour.

The Commercial Farmers Union (CFU) in August said only 4 500 hectares had
been put under wheat in the commercial farming sector because of continued
disturbances and uncertainty. The figure was a mere 6% of the area that used
to be planted before the land reform programme in 2000.

Commercial farmers used to put between 65 000 and 80 000 hectares of land
under winter crop, producing up to 300 000 tonnes of wheat.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Zupco chairman takes over bird sanctuary
Augustine Mukaro
ZIMBABWE United Passenger Company (Zupco) chairman and Chinhoyi Technical
College vice-chancellor Dr Charles Nherera has taken over a bird sanctuary
in the Mutorashanga area in Mashonaland West Province, the Zimbabwe
Independent heard this week.

Pinefarm Conservancy, popularly known as Cannonkopje Crane Centre, is
protected under a bilateral agreement between Zimbabwe and Switzerland. It
specialises in bio-diversity conservancy including breeding endangered
wattled cranes.

A visit to the conservancy over the weekend showed that Nherera has deployed
five of his workers to occupy one third of the 1 145-hectare conservancy
which he wants to convert into farmland. Nherera's workers have allegedly
occupied staff houses and have barred caretakers from watering and feeding
the cranes.

Conservancy owner Rolf Hangartner said Nherera first approached him in July
with a letter purportedly from the Ministry of Lands for the subdivision of
the farm.

"Arex Chinhoyi denied the existence of any such subdivision at Pinefarm or
knowledge of Nherera's allocation," Hangartner said. "Arex suspected the
offer letter was a fraud."

Hangartner said on November 8, Chinhoyi provincial administrator Christopher
Shumba arrived in the company of Mutorashanga police and Nherera to claim
ownership of the conservancy. Nherera left his five workers on the farm.

"Shumba imposed Nherera and his employees on the conservancy premises to the
exclusion of owners and staff," Hangartner said.

"The illegal occupants don't allow caretakers to water and feed the cranes.
The sole water supply for birds and staff has since broken down, and is
outside our control," he said.

Hangartner, a Swiss national, bought the farm in 1993 with the support of
Zvimba rural district council, the South Ayrshire Natural Resources
Sub-committee and the Department of National Parks to establish a breeding
centre for the endangered wattled cranes.

"We have invested over US$20 million to be where we are now," Hangartner
said.

"This investment is protected by the agreement between the Swiss
Confederation and the Republic of Zimbabwe on the Promotion and Reciprocal
Protection of Investments," he said "The centre is acclaimed by the
International Crane Foundation in America as a vital African contribution to
saving Zimbabwe's wattled cranes, a unique venture in Africa."

Hangartner said Nherera's move was a clear violation of land redistribution
criteria which exclude conservancies and properties protected under country
to country agreements.

"Government had reconsidered its shortsighted intention to acquire the
conservancy and accepted Zvimba land committee's recommendation to delist
the conservancy," he said. "The property is however still listed."

Hangartner said he had pursued dialogue and had also taken the case to court
to spare the bird sanctuary from occupation.

He said letters written to Vice-President Msika, provincial governor Peter
Chanetsa, Local Government minister Ignatius Chombo, Foreign Affairs
minister Stan Mudenge by the Embassy of Switzerland and the International
Crane Foundation had not moved government to delist the conservancy.

"Court action by our lawyers is unopposed by the commissioner of police and
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but determination has been delayed for
months," he said

The cranes had ceased breeding in the northern Great Dyke as a result of
human disturbances to the nesting sites.

The conservancy currently has 13 cranes plus 24 other different bird
species. It also has up to 27 species of animals.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Editor's Memo

Harare on slide

THERE has been much comment in the government media recently of the
deteriorating situation in Harare. And not without justification. Water
supplies have been cut due to a number of factors including pumping capacity
and shortages of treatment chemicals, refuse has been allowed to pile up
around the city as the authorities battle with private contractors, and
roads and traffic lights go unrepaired for months.

Now the "City Fathers" want to hike rates fourfold to fund a $1,1-trillion
budget which includes upgrading and repairs to water supplies.

Ratepayers should mount a revolt against such an imposition. There has been
a marked deterioration in the "services" the city provides, and indeed they
are charged for "improvements" to their properties when all around them the
city is falling apart.

While for once I agree with many of the criticisms levelled in the
government press, there is an important part of the story they are not
telling. And that concerns the deliberate incapacitation of the mayor of
Harare by Local Government minister Ignatius Chombo.

Ignoring the democratic will of the city's voters, Chombo has suspended
Elias Mudzuri and set up a kangaroo court, called a committee of
investigation, to try him for "crimes" such as failure to provide a
strategic turnaround plan, arbitrary dismissal of senior staff, and inciting
a stayaway.

The committee comprises Zanu PF-affilated officials whose mandate is clearly
to prevent Mudzuri from doing his job. One is a losing Zanu PF candidate in
Mbare, another a failed Zanu PF Bulawayo mayoral candidate.

Some of the officials Mudzuri was trying to get rid of were planted in the
civic administration in the dying days of the Zanu PF municipal regime and
clung on there long after their sell-by date.

The idea behind all this interference is to show MDC government doesn't
work. But the MDC appears to be conspiring in its own failure. It lacks
direction, resolution or resourcefulness in coping with the crisis in
Harare.

Who's in charge with Mudzuri paralysed? Does anybody know? The minister
appears to be giving instructions to the Town Clerk, an unelected official
appointed under the old order, while shunting aside the acting mayor who
should also be the acting chief executive officer. But the rot goes deeper
than that.

I have been told of councillors who have not even had the courtesy to reply
to letters from their ward residents seeking their help. Many are simply not
functioning at any level. Their collective demand for a hike in their
allowances should be flatly refused until there is an improvement in their
performance.

The traffic lights at the junction of Bishop Gaul and Argyle roads, a
dangerous intersection, have been out of action for over six months. Roads
in Msasa, a prime business district, have reverted to dirt tracks.
Meanwhile, the Director of Works blithely ignores the protests of residents
who object to change-of-use applications by businesses likely to change the
character of their neighbourhoods by increasing traffic flows and litter.

This is an unresponsive, uncaring council that needs to hear the crack of
the party whip. But Morgan Tsvangirai and his "shadow ministers" appear to
be indifferent to the fate of their key constituency - the nation's capital.

Bulawayo by contrast is well run and looks a whole lot better. It is clean
and relatively efficient (the residents may differ on this but let them
spend a week in Harare!), and there is a sense of solidarity between
council, its officials and the electorate.

Harare is a disaster area by contrast. Councillors and officials are at war.
The government is able to play divide and rule by dealing directly with its
chosen instruments at Town House. And there is no coherence to the MDC
caucus in what should be its flagship council.

Instead of imposing an unacceptable budget on the residents of the capital,
the council should be looking at ways of relieving the rates burden. Cities
around the world cope under adversity by devising new management techniques
and diversifying the revenue base. Brazil provides several examples. So does
South Africa. It takes commitment and imagination.

Thinking outside the box.

The failure of mechanical equipment is cited as the reason for breakdowns
and inadequate service delivery. In fact this is an administrative problem.
There is a complete absence of a culture of supervision and maintenance. And
mechanical equipment is not needed to remove rubble, cut grass and tend
verges.

Where traffic lights cannot be replaced, a return to traffic circles might
do in some situations. What is clear is the complete absence of a plan or
direction. The announcement of a $1-trillion budget shows just how far
removed the council is from the public it is supposed to serve. It sounds
like a case of "think of a figure, then multiply by 10". The residents of
Harare must not be penalised for poor maintenance or inadequate investment
in infrastructure under Zanu PF.

The MDC, little heard of nowadays just when it should be speaking out on the
ruling party's appalling misrule, needs to treat this as a showcase
opportunity to demonstrate its capacity for governance. That means looking
for ways to save money, using revenues thoughtfully, and above all
responding to the needs of ratepayers. Cleaning the place up would be a good
start!

That is not happening. Harare is slowly but surely going the way of Lagos
and Kinshasa. Its residents deserve better but won't get it if they remain
silent.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Govt/displaced farmers set to clash as budget omits compensation
Augustne Mukaro
A CLASH between displaced commercial farmers and government looks inevitable
in the coming year as the 2004 budget has left out the sensitive issue of
compensation.

Commercial farmers who were forcibly evicted from their properties since the
beginning of farm invasions in 2000 have dragged government to court
demanding billions of dollars as compensation.

Government promised to compensate displaced farmers for the improvements
made on the farms but not the farms themselves.

Last year government allocated a mere $10 billion for compensation, which
farmers said was enough to pay for improvements on only 30 farms.

Finance minister Herbert Murerwa's budget gave agriculture the fourth
highest vote. The budget totally ignored compensation, concentrating on
financing inputs for the newly resettled farmers, suppression of animal
diseases, irrigation rehabilitation and capitalisation of the Agricultural
Development Bank.

"In order to improve productivity, mitigate the effects of drought and
restore the viability of the agricultural sector, I have allocated $587,6
billion to be channelled towards irrigation rehabilitation and development,
mechanisation, capitalisation of the Agricultural Development Bank,
livestock production and enhanced extension services," Murerwa said.

The minister said other than financial support for agriculture, government
was putting in place mechanisms for private investor participation in the
agrarian reform.

"Government has put in place mechanisms for private sector support which
include incorporation of already signed memoranda of understanding between
the ministry and private players."

Murerwa said government was also facilitating contract farming by providing
tax and non-tax incentives to private players supporting the agrarian
reform.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

'Budget offers little hope for economic recovery'
Reuter
ZIMBABWE Finance minister Herbert Murerwa unveiled a national budget for
2004 yesterday which analysts said offered little hope of quick recovery for
an economy facing its worst crisis in history.

Budget highlights:

- Economy expected to shrink by 8,5% in 2004, slowing down from a revised
contraction of 13,2% in gross domestic product (GDP) for 2003.

- Inflation, which soared to 526% in October from 208% in January, was
described as the country's "number one enemy". Murerwa said the inflation
rate was expected to shoot to 700% in the first quarter of 2004, before
starting to subside. He gave no further estimates.

- There were no firm proposals on how the government intends to tackle
chronic foreign currency, fuel and short-term food shortages.

- Instead Murerwa said the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe would announce a new
monetary policy in mid-December detailing, among others, proposals on
foreign exchange management, interest rates and the management of money
supply to help slow down inflation.

- Murerwa said the government would introduce value-added tax from January
1, and estimated the country's budget deficit would remain unchanged at
around 7,5% of GDP.

- Murerwa announced several but mostly small tax concessions for workers and
pensioners. But he maintained the corporate tax rate at 30%.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Budget puts Gono under pressure
Shakeman Mugari
THE budget presented yesterday is so vague that it will turn the pressure on
the newly-appointed Reserve Bank governor Gideon Gono.

Murerwa said details on how to tackle inflation and interest rates would
emerge in Gono's policy statement in mid-December this year.

Murerwa avoided the hot issues of interest rates and the exchange control,
which the market has been awaiting in anticipation of a sliding devaluation
of the dollar. The minister was vague on interest rates saying government
would pursue a policy that encourages growth on one hand, while fighting
inflation on the other.

"The details will be announced in the monetary policy statement to be issued
by the governor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe by mid-December," said
Murerwa.

On the exchange rate, the minister again referred to the Gono statement,
which he said would ensure there were no foreign currency leakages.

Analysts say the skeletal budget leaves Gono exposed. The burden now lies
squarely with Gono who is expected to pull the ailing economy from the
abyss.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

'Murerwa's forecast a mirage'
Ngoni Chanakira
ECONOMISTS say Finance minister Herbert Murerwa is probably dreaming when he
says inflation will stop at 700% before sliding next year. Inflation this
week shot up to 525,8% but economists predict it will continue soaring to 1
000% by year-end.

"The figure is highly unrealistic and government definitely will not achieve
it," economist John Robertson said yesterday. "If it is achieved it will be
because of strong medicine that government cannot give the public."

South Africa - Zimbabwe's largest trading partner - has an inflation rate of
5,7%, while Zambia, Malawi, and Botswana have rates of 21,1%, 8,5%, and 8,3%
respectively.

In his 2003 national budget Murerwa promised that inflation would reach 96%
before gradually decreasing to "all-time lows".

The minister told the same parliament in August, this year, when he
presented his $672 billion supplementary budget that as Zimbabwe's inflation
escalates and economic performance worsened a growing proportion of the
population was now living below the poverty datum line.

Yesterday the minister harped on about inflation again, this time saying it
remained an enemy.

"Inflation remains our number one enemy whose containment requires total and
unwavering commitment and collaboration of all stakeholders," Murerwa said.

"In order to arrest rising inflation and reduce it initially to double-digit
levels and ultimately to single digit figures, government will rigorously
implement fiscal and monetary stabilisation measures. These will be
complemented by structural measures to invoke an immediate positive supply
response from the productive sectors of the economy."

He said it was important that government policies "fight inflation".

"Continued failure to do so threatens to destroy the very social fabric of
the nation," Murerwa told parliament in August.

Zimbabwe is facing hyperinflation that has resulted in the prices increasing
almost on a daily basis causing hardships for citizens.

"Murerwa is probably dreaming and underestimating the current economic
crisis we are facing," Robertson said yesterday.

"He is probably thinking much will be done by the central bank when it
introduces a new monetary policy with changes in interest rates."

Murerwa said the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe incoming governor Gideon Gono
would announce a new monetary policy mid-December that would "invoke an
immediate positive supply response from the productive sectors of the
economy".

He was however vague on how this would be done.

A Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce economist said inflation was already
way off target.

"Is the minister surprised at the way things have gone or is it that he does
not believe his own inflation assumptions in the first place?" he asked.

"Zimbabwe's gross domestic product is set to decline by more than 12% this
year."

Zimbabwe's year-on-year inflation rose sharply from 116,7% in January 2002
to 198,9% in December 2002 and 525,8% this week.

Bankers said because of inflation the purchasing power of the Zimbabwe
dollar fell by nearly two-thirds during 2002, with a dollar in 2003 now
worth less than one cent of its value in 1990.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

What they said about 2004 national budget
Shakeman Mugari/Blessing Zulu/Augustine Mukaro
"IT is a budget cobbled together by a man with few alternatives. Murerwa had
little room to manoeuvre. To me it is a 'stand still' budget that would
change nothing in that it avoided key issues at the centre of the economic
crisis. There is no mention of efforts to lure international investors and
the issue of rule of law is still outstanding. There was also a deliberate
move to avoid interest rate and exchange." - MDC shadow Minister of finance
Tapiwa Mashakada.

"We are not satisfied though we are fully aware of the fact that the
minister tried his best. As a ministry we were however thrilled that for the
first time there is recognition of soccer in the budget." - Aneas Chigwedere
Education minister.

- "The budget responds to the various inputs that came from business. To me
it was a balanced budget which put into account the revenue and expenditure
side. It looks realistic. The biggest challenge for the minister is to make
it work, so that we are not having a budget that does not mean what it
says." - CZI president Anthony Mandiwanza.

- "I think there is awareness among business, labour and government that we
are in a crisis that cannot be postponed any further."- Kombo Moyana,
businessman and former RBZ governor.

- "We will not be supprised if they come up with another supplementary
budget. To us this is a non-event. It is a dishonest budget." - Tendai Biti
MDC MP for Harare East.

- "A workable budget should be at least 20% of the Gross Domestic Product.
Last year the budget was around 10% of the GDP and that has fallen far short
of the expenditure. This year's budget is only about 11,5% of GDP and it
falls in the same danger as last year." - David Chapfika, MP Mutoko North.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Govt calls private sector to the rescue
Blessing Zulu
GOVERNMENT has called on private players and foreign operators to come to
the rescue of Zimbabwe's crumbling infrastructure. Presenting the 2004
annual budget yesterday Finance minister Herbert Murerwa admitted that the
country's infrastructure required urgent rehabilitation but government alone
could not manage because of serious financial constraints.

"Practically all infrastructure in the country urgently requires
rehabilitation, upgrading or expansion," Murerwa said.

"In particular, the capacity as well as the quality of services provided in
sectors such as water, roads, railways, airports, electricity, education,
health, posts and telecommunications pose serious bottlenecks to the
country's economic growth prospects."

Murerwa said government as the traditional financier and provider of the
above infrastructure services was facing severe financial constraints, it
will involve private sector through concessioning and build operate and
transfer (BOT) schemes to meet the gap.

"Concessions will be explored with foreign operators for the rehabilitation
and upgrading of the railway track and signalling systems," he said.

He said the road dualisation programme would continue to be financed through
budgetary allocation complemented by private sector participation on BOT
basis.

All government projects ground to a halt this year with their allocations
being exhausted before doing any meaningful work.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

No position on price controls
Itai Dzamara
IN a characteristic portrayal of the confusion that grips government over
ways to solve the economic crisis, Finance minister Herbert Murerwa remained
silent on the controversial policy of price controls. Murerwa has in the
past admitted that price controls, introduced two years ago, are hurting
industry and commerce.

There is general confusion regarding government's position on price
controls.

The government introduced the populist policy of price controls in 2001 at
the height of political and social tension in the country.

The Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce and the Confederation of Zimbabwe
Industries have condemned price controls which they say serve only to feed
the black market.

Militant members of Zanu PF are understood to have remained adamant on price
controls which they regard as one of the few remaining ways to win the
hearts of the electorate.

As a way of cushioning themselves from the menace of price controls,
manufacturers have resorted to unorthodox re-branding of products.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Moyo pushes for revival of old doctrines

Dumisani Muleya

INFORMATION minister Jonathan Moyo has lately been attempting to present
himself as the ruling party's newfound ideologue as he regurgitates the
shibboleths of the 1980s in a bid for political survival, analysts have
said.

Political analysts say Moyo - once a trenchant critic of Zanu PF and now its
deputy spokesman - is loudly yearning to revert to what many would see as
the political dark ages of the 1980s when Zanu PF was a monolithic ruling
party in a de facto one-party state with a command economy.

Between Zimbabwe's Independence from Britain in 1980 and 1990, Zanu PF
adhered to one-party state politics and command economics in the name of
Marxism-Leninism.

That effectively nipped in the bud efforts to promote multi-party democracy
and corroded the economy inherited from the colonial regime in a relatively
healthy state.

Leadership and policy failures, as well as mismanagement and corruption,
which clearly manifested themselves early into self-rule as President Robert
Mugabe became preoccupied with power consolidation, worsened the situation.

The seeds of the current national decay and failure were sown at the time.

Analysts say Moyo is advocating a revival of Zanu PF's own version of Nazi
Germany's Gleichschaltung - marching in step - to preserve Mugabe's
faltering rule.

Professor Brian Raftopoulos of the University of Zimbabwe's Institute of
Development Studies said Moyo's recent harping on ideology shows he badly
wants Zanu PF to turn back the political and economic clock.

"Clearly Moyo's recent statements indicate that he wants a reassertion of
the totalitarian order of the 1980s. He wants to go back to the statist
approach to governance and an authoritarian system," Raftopoulos said.

"That is not surprising because of late we have seen a vigorous reassertion
of the state which lacks legitimacy and thus relies on coercion in its
exercise of power."

Raftopoulos said Moyo's campaign was indicative of an official desire for
bygone absolutism.

In statements carried in the state media recently, Moyo was quoted as saying
that beyond Zimbabwe's "limited" current economic crisis there was a more
critical crisis - which is "ideological".

He claimed Zanu PF's "nation-building" project of the '80s was derailed by
the introduction of economic reforms through the Economic Structural
Adjustment Programme in 1991.

"The daunting task of nation building for economic prosperity for all
Zimbabweans remains elusive unless we go back, at least conceptually, to the
project that was abandoned when we adopted Esap in 1991," Moyo recently told
the National Economic Consultative Forum.

"At the moment, we do not have ideological cohesion and stability to work
with a common purpose."

Moyo accused "ideologically excluded youths", an "ideologically indifferent
professional class", and a "rootless middle class" of sabotaging the
"nation-building project".

The minister, who used to denounce Mugabe and Zanu PF, recently told
students at the Midlands State University that "non-state actors" had
abandoned talk of "leadership change" in favour of "dangerous regime
change".

He criticised civic groups and intellectuals for abandoning Zanu PF after
1990, but also urged them to "come back home".

Analysts say Moyo's new line, which directly contradicts his past political
outlook when he condemned authoritarianism, echoes Mugabe's statements in
the '80s when he used to posture as a socialist.

"Moyo is campaigning for blanket national docility and subservience by civic
groups," Raftopoulos said.

"He is hostile to civic organisations which used to identify with the
government because he does not like them to be autonomous to challenge the
rise of a dictatorial state."

Opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) MP Tendai Biti said it was a
"tragedy" to see ministers resisting democracy while clinging to "Stalinist
ideas".

"The attempt to flatten the state into a homogeneous political entity is
tragic and smacks of fascist thinking," Biti said. "The government has no
business in prescribing ideological fundamentals. Instead, it has a duty to
ensure macro-economic fundamentals are stable and sound for investment and
economic development."

Biti said Moyo's suggestions that Zanu PF had a consistent ideology in the
pre-1990 period were "false and dishonest".

"Zanu PF never had a consistent ideology after Independence. What it had was
exhausted nationalism, which it hysterically propagated through socialist
rhetoric. That's what Moyo is trying to revive but he is flogging a dead
horse," he said.

"The reality on the ground is that we are dealing with a ruthless regime
that always wanted a one-party state and to maintain power by force. This is
well-documented. The Matabeleland massacres bear testimony to this."

In its election manifestos before 1990, Zanu PF always mentioned the need
for a one-party state and "scientific socialism", claiming they were the
sine qua non for development. It also wanted a corporatist approach to
economic management.

During the 1985 election, for example, Mugabe wrote in the preface of his
party manifesto that a one-party state and socialism were the major goals
for Zimbabwe. He said Marxism-Leninism was the official ideology.

"Only when there is a one Zimbabwe people with one leader will a scientific
re-organisation of society along socialist lines be possible," Mugabe said.

"That is why Zanu PF seeks to bring all Zimbabweans under its umbrella so
that there is only one leader - the party - for one Zimbabwe."

As a result, Mugabe deeply resented opposition. He targeted the now defunct
PF Zapu in a ruthless manner.

"Zapu and its leader Dr Joshua Nkomo are like a cobra in the house. The only
way to deal effectively with a snake is to strike and destroy its head," he
urged his supporters in 1983. After his party's victory in 1985, Mugabe
called for the liquidation of Zapu, declaring: "Now take your sticks and
beat out the snakes among you."

Analysts say Moyo, Mugabe's willing henchman and spin-doctor, is intent upon
refocusing his unreconstructed party on its modus operandi of the '80s.

They say he wants an ideology of coercive mobilisation, aggregation and
integration of various interests into the "national project", penetration of
civic groups and self-imposition, which are all hallmarks of totalitarian
regimes.

The essence of totalitarianism lies in its ideology. It offers a set of
self-serving propositions about society and one-sided accounts of history in
which the existing order has to be radically overhauled and tries to
refashion the economy, society, family life, education and culture in its
own image.

Analysts say this is precisely what Zanu PF is trying to do. They see Moyo
as battling to achieve this through his last-ditch propaganda project which
has failed to find public purchase.

Political scientist Roy Macridis says as opposed to voluntary participation,
totalitarian regimes offer forced mobilisation or induced participation.

As opposed to representation, he says, totalitarian regimes offer coercive
integration and while democracies allow for a fairly broad parameter of
political competition, totalitarian regimes are more restrictive and the
will of the ruling party and its leader are often imposed on the people.

Macridis says penetration of civic groups is yet another trusted method of
totalitarian regimes, which differ in form and approach with democratic
systems.

Whereas democracies try to win the support of civic groups through sound
policies, totalitarian regimes try to penetrate, restructureand integrate
different interest groups.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Eric Bloch

Abandonment of privatisation ill-considered

 INDUSTRY and International Trade minister Samuel Mumbengegwi has done it
again — or, to be more correct, has undone it again! Whenever government
formulates a policy which is economically  counter-productive, it adheres
rigidly to that policy and either disregards all the negative repercussions
of doing so or blames selected third parties for those repercussions. After
all, it is well beyond the capability of the Zimbabwean government to admit
to error!

How can any in government be guilty of formulating an adverse policy, or of
failing to implement a policy effectively, when all in government are
infallible! And whenever government formulates a policy which is
constructive and economically advantageous, it either fails to implement it,
or implements it half-heartedly, or suspends or rescinds the policy.

And it is such an ill-considered suspension of policy that Minister
Mumbengegwi announced last week. Following his attendance at the recent
congress of the Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce, he announced the
suspension indefinitely of privatisation of state-owned companies. He said
government was no longer considering disposing of some of its entities as
they were locally owned and managed (in most instances he would have been
more correct if he had said “mismanaged”).

He said that “the government is already a major player in the indigenisation
programme and it has been considered not necessary to privatise such
companies”, and that government wants to stop the privatisation of strategic
parastatals and concentrate on improving their viability. In particular, he
said, parastatals such as the National Railways of Zimbabwe, the Zimbabwe
Electricity Supply Authority and Air Zimbabwe would no longer be considered
for privatisation but would be commercialised.

Zimbabwe first announced its intent to privatise parastatals approximately
13 years ago when it launched the Economic Structural Adjustment Programme,
but did nothing about it. Then, in 1998 government announced a new economic
programme, which was to have been implemented two years previously, called
the Zimbabwe Programme for Economic and Social Transformation, followed
nearly three years later by the National Economic Recovery Programme. Over
the last five years there were a number of very successful privatisations of
parastatals, bringing into being the immensely successful Cotton Company of
Zimbabwe Ltd, the very profitable and well managed Rainbow Tourism Group
Ltd, Daribord Zimbabwe Ltd, Zimbabwe Reinsurance Company Ltd, and a few
others.

History has demonstrated throughout the generations, and throughout the
world, that no government can consistently operate businesses efficiently.
They may do so for a period of time, but they do not consistently operate
businesses well because there is such a frequent conflict of interest
between political objectives and good and sound business needs.

Decisions are made by those in ultimate control of parastatals in accord
with political concepts and ideologies, rather than the common sense and
logic, expertise and experience normally applied by the businessman.   An
illustration of that type of conflict and irresponsible business
decision-making in parastatals is the frequency of non-viable pricing of
goods and services whenever government considers that prices should be
contained and the consumer thereby subsidised, notwithstanding that the
consequence can be destruction of the enterprise.

In addition, parastatals rarely succeed because, as a general rule, there is
very little personnel motivation. The parastatal employee functions in a
protected, secure environment aligned to that of the public service, wherein
the employee cannot readily be dismissed and is virtually assured of
employment until retirement. The fundamental principles that drive
aspirations within the private sector rarely prevail in parastatals.

Certainly, few Zimbabwean parastatals can credibly lay claim to successful
operations, viability and meaningful consumer service.   Instead, most are
technically insolvent, surviving only on immense borrowings attained on the
basis of almost unlimited government guarantees. Most of the parastatals are
either inherently inefficient, or unable to operate effectively due to
inadequacy of working capital or insufficient technological inputs and
expertise, or due to employee lethargy.

There are uncountable examples, including the incapacity of the National
Railways of Zimbabwe to transport sufficient coal from Hwange to where it is
needed, or to clear from its container yards in less than 21 days goods
which took less than five days to travel from Durban to Bulawayo. They
include the inability of Tel*One to repair the telephone of an elderly
couple of 94 years and 87 years respectively, very dependent upon that
telephone, in four weeks. They include the national airline being unable to
adhere to schedules despite the excellence of “check-in” personnel and
flight crews, because of insufficient aircraft, equipment and other
resources. In fact, its fares go up more frequently than do its planes!

By contrast, the privatised Cottco, RTG, Daribord and Zimre operate with
impressive efficiency, profitability and awareness of business
responsibilities of customer care.

Government should also not overlook that privatisation unlocks asset value
for the state, providing funding for infrastructural development, and
thereby creating and facilitating opportunities of national economic growth
and development, targeted at greater wellbeing for the populace.   Moreover,
disinvestment from parastatals releases government from a very great debt
burden. It enables the release of government from an ongoing obligation to
guarantee debts of parastatals, and provides funding for repayment of
government debt, which domestically exceeds $300 billion, whilst foreign
debt is believed to exceed US$1,3 billion.

A frequent argument used by government to justify parastatal operations is
the protection of the consumer, but that is spurious in the extreme.   Most
parastatals are monopolies, and few of them have demonstrated concern for
the consumers and for their other customers. Witness, for example, the
galloping escalation in Zimpost’s postal charges, Tel*One’s charges, the CSC
’s beef prices and Zesa’s accelerated increases in charges for electricity
and encroachment upon the constrained foreign exchange resources of its
customers. In contrast, competition within the private sector usually helps
to minimise, to some extent, the degree of price increases, although in a
hyperinflationary environment, frequent increases in prices are unavoidable.

And it is impossible to rationalise the minister’s statement that
privatisation “is at odds with the spirit of indigenisation”. That spirit is
not supposed to be indigenisation by proxy, ownership vesting in the state
for and on behalf of the populace. It is supposed to be indigenisation by
economic empowerment of Zimbabweans, and that is facilitated by
privatisation. Successful privatisations to date have enabled many employees
of the enterprises to become shareholders and, via the Zimbabwe Stock
Exchange, thousands of others have been able to invest directly into the
privatised enterprises, and tens of thousands to do so indirectly via the
investments of pension funds, insurance companies, unit trusts, and the
like.

Admittedly, upon privatisation, it is often a consequence that some
ownership of the venture transfers to non-Zimbabweans, but does so in
exchange for foreign currency capital injection, yields access to
state-of-the-art technologies, and often provides entry into lucrative
export markets and access to essential inputs.

If government’s repeated declarations of a genuine objective of indigenous
economic empowerment have foundation, the Minister of Industry and
International Trade needs to appreciate that far greater economic
empowerment is achieved by Zimbabwe’s indigenous population being able to
have a slice of the cake, even when some of the cake is owned by others,
than for all of the cake to be owned by government. This is especially so
when, in the hands of government the cake only grows stale, mouldy and
tasteless, whilst in the hands of the private sector it is full-bodied,
tasty and with a “cherry on the top”.

At the same time, the consumer is beneficiated by cost minimisation as a
result of technological enhancement, personnel motivation, competition
instead of monopolistic operation, and like factors. So, government gains by
way of unlocking of value and reduction of debt, the indigenous population
gains by way of employee and public equity participation and consideration
of consumer attitudes, and the economy as a whole benefits. However,
government will undoubtedly be as myopic to these attributes of
privatisation as it is to any other measure which thwarts its attempted
total control of all Zimbabwe and its economy.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Muckraker

How will tourism police cope with Jocelyn?

 A PICTURE tells a thousand words, they say, and nothing could more
poignantly illustrate the horrors of Zanu PF’s land “reforms” than the
photograph carried by the Standard on its front page last Sunday.

It showed a champion Friesland dairy cow, known as Daisy Girl, hacked to
death at Kennilworth Farm near Chipinge on the night of October 26 by
suspected land invaders from a neighbouring property. This unsuspecting
animal, used to the tender hands of its owners at one of the few dairy farms
still functioning in the district, was hacked to death by people using blunt
machetes. They went for her legs first and then attacked the remaining
carcass.

We hope the picture is reproduced as widely as possible. Much has been
written about the lawlessness and violence that has been the trademark of
Zanu PF’s land occupations in so far as they have impacted on farmers and
their workers. It is estimated that up to 500 000 people have been made
homeless in the only land reform programme in history that has dispossessed
more people than it has resettled (134 000).

But we rarely see the tragedy that has afflicted livestock, including beef
and dairy herds built up with care and planning over decades. Those vast
investments in money and man-hours have been laid waste by mobs of
ruling-party supporters who have cruelly slaughtered or neglected one of the
country’s most valuable resources.

Then there is the wildlife poached, estimated at 60% of the total in some
places.

Don’t let’s hear again of President Mugabe’s “bold stance” on the land issue
or the fulfilment of some historic mission without looking at the pictures
of the dumb creatures who are just another statistic of Zanu PF’s lawless
mobs.

Another victim of lawlessness has been the country’s tourism industry.
Tourists have stayed away in droves from what they understandably see as an
unpredictable state where human rights abuses take place on a daily basis.
There has recently been a campaign in the government media, led by the
Zimbabwe Tourism Authority, to pretend that tourists are returning to
Zimbabwe.

There is of course no evidence whatsoever for this. Reports that the police
appear reluctant to apprehend those responsible for the expulsion of
tourists from Hippo Pools recently and the theft of their property helps to
explain the continued absence of visitors which no amount of sloppily
produced colour brochures and deceptive CD-Roms can entice back!

But, the eternally optimistic state media tells us, in a move to “further
boost the rapidly recovering tourist sector”, the government has established
a tourism police. Crimes against tourists will now be dealt with separately,
the Zimbabwe Council for Tourism’s Paul Matamisa told the Sunday Mail. This
would restore confidence in the country’s tourism industry, he said.

The ZRP has recruited 22 officers who were currently undergoing training, he
added. So far, so good.

But the story then suffered a severe credibility crisis when it was
disclosed that “Harare business woman Jocelyn Chiwenga” had “donated 22
uniforms” in support of the scheme.

This we assume is the same Jocelyn Chiwenga who was reported to have
assaulted lawyer Gugulethu Moyo at Glen View police station in March? The
same Jocelyn Chiwenga who gave police officers their marching orders
regarding what to do with Moyo and how to treat her?

It evidently has not occurred to those behind the tourism police scheme that
there is absolutely no point setting up a special force when the regular
force takes its orders from ruling-party harridans who they decline to
prosecute for assault despite the fact that a crime was committed on their
own property in front of their very eyes!

Did Matamisa, ZCT president Shingi Munyeza, and other private-sector players
cited in the Sunday Mail story as enthusiastic supporters of the tourism
police scheme not explain this fact of life to the authorities, or the
significance of allowing the Hippo Pools incident, including the assault on
the resort’s manager, to go unprosecuted? Are foreign tourists aware that
they are likely to be searched and have their foreign currency confiscated
at any time, as happened over the weekend to visitors from Zambia?

Perhaps Greg Stutchbury, who was waxing lyrical on an international radio
station last week about the Victoria Falls Hotel and the prospect of a
tourism recovery there without once referring to the governance issue, could
bring us one of the Far Eastern tourists he imagines seeing there. We are
keen to actually identify one of these elusive species who we are told can
be spotted on golf courses in the vicinity of the Falls. Perhaps Greg could
dart and capture one and relocate it to our office for verification. If all
else fails he could use his butterfly net!

Uganda’s president Yoweri Museveni should not be surprised if Uganda is
given a wide berth when Commonwealth leaders decide on the next venue for
Chogm in 2005. It doesn’t have much of a chance as it is, with Africa
hosting Chogm this year. But the pronouncements of Museveni’s special envoy,
Prof Mondo Kagonyera, last week will have advertised his country’s
unsuitability.

Courting Zimbabwe’s support, Kagonyera cast caution to the wind and
proclaimed Zimbabwe had done nothing to warrant suspension from the
Commonwealth.

“Zimbabwe has done nothing wrong nor faulted any of the rules of the
Commonwealth,” he declared after meeting President Mugabe.

In fact Zimbabwe has not only violated every single tenet of the Harare
Declaration, it has failed to meet the terms of the Commonwealth Troika set
out in the Marlborough House statement of March 2002; in other words, the
terms enunciated by Olusegun Obasanjo and Thabo Mbeki together with John
Howard when Zimbabwe was suspended. These involve addressing issues of
governance and engaging with the Commonwealth secretary-general Don McKinnon
in finding a way forward.

Zimbabwe refused to even allow McKinnon to visit Harare to discuss the
issue!

How Kagonyera can then proclaim that Zimbabwe had done nothing to warrant
suspension beggars belief. Clearly, Uganda is prepared to ignore the
sustained assault on the civil rights of the Zimbabwean people in order to
secure Zimbabwe’s support for the next Chogm to be held in Kampala.

That makes Uganda a particularly unsuitable candidate. Countries which
ignore human rights abuses, electoral fraud and attacks on press freedom are
not appropriate hosts. Uganda was among the many countries consulted by
McKinnon before the Commonwealth decided not to lift the suspension. A clear
majority of the 54 member states agreed with the secretariat that the
suspension should remain in place until the Abuja summit. We don’t recall
Uganda raising any objection at the time.

The state media has decided that the majority should be ignored in favour of
a minority of two which has subsequently risen to five! Meanwhile, Obasanjo,
who was prevailed upon to write a rather embarrassing letter to Australia’s
John Howard making all sorts of claims that have turned out to be untrue, is
now having second thoughts. This week he made it clear to Mugabe that
Zimbabwe had not done enough to meet the terms set out at the time of its
suspension. There has not been the “sea change” he talked about in New York
last month. So Zimbabwe’s case — and Uganda’s — is looking increasingly
lame.

Cde UT Surface this week tried to let Mugabe’s followers down gently. It
would be difficult for the president to go to Abuja, he explained, because
Mugabe would be attending the Zanu PF conference in Masvingo at the time.
What a coincidence!

What was Joseph Chinotimba doing conducting the draw for the second round of
the Zifa Unity Cup last week? He was pictured in the Sunday Mail digging his
hand into the trophy containing the ballots with the assistance of Zifa
chief executive Ndumiso Gumede. Nothing more clearly exposes the
politicisation of soccer.

Chinotimba was the self-styled commander-in-chief of farm invasions on the
periphery of Harare in 2000 and a controversial municipal police official
who mysteriously kept his job while being occupied elsewhere: for instance,
threatening judges.

He was rewarded for his delinquency with a 4x4, from whom we are unsure. He
is also, we should remind ourselves, Zanu PF’s failed candidate for the
Highfield seat earlier this year.

So exactly what was he doing conducting the draw for the Zifa Unity Cup?
What value does he add to Zifa? And what, as a matter of interest, is his
current source of income?

At least Zifa have said they will tighten up the selection criteria for fans
accompanying the Warriors on foreign tours after the looting of duty-free
shops in Accra and Nouakchott last week. Taking advantage of understaffed
shops as their plane put down en route to the World Cup qualifier, fans
helped themselves to a variety of goods, it was reported. Perfumes, beer,
whisky, chocolates, and magazines were scooped up by the Zimbabwe supporters
as staff failed to cope.

In the Mauritanian capital trusting locals were assured the Zimdollar was on
a par with the greenback. Traders and taxi drivers only discovered their
mistake when banks reopened after the Islamic weekend. Zimbabwe National
Supporters Association vice-president Eddie Nyatanga exempted “reputable
businessmen and corporate leaders” in the party from any wrongdoing.

“Such people can never lower themselves to steal a can of beer,” he
reassured us!

Jonathan Moyo gave a few hostages to fortune in his address to the Zimbabwe
Staff College on Monday.

“The judiciary had been the first choice of attack,” he was reported as
saying, “in efforts aimed at regime change since almost the whole bench was
hostile to land reform.”

It was not entirely clear from the Herald report who was doing the attacking
and when!

But we liked the bit about the British and Americans wanting to give the
impression that politicians were living well while most people were
suffering, “when in fact there are some people who live luxurious lives but
are not necessarily in government”.

“It was surprising,” Moyo said, “with ordinary people finding it difficult
to survive that there were some people who were able to buy luxurious goods
including posh cars.”

Yes indeed. We heard about those people filling up their posh cars with
goods in Johannesburg just after Christmas. We heard about people who were
definitely in government using scarce forex to load 4x4s and trailers for
the return journey to Zimbabwe after partying with their families at plush
Johannesburg hotels at a time when half the population of Zimbabwe faced
starvation.

Moyo claimed people were tired of “propaganda” from the private media which
had been predicting for the last four years that the country would collapse.
Journalists for these papers had become “spent forces” he said, far removed
from reality.

And Moyo, we take it, represents reality? The reality of a country that is
not anywhere near collapse?

Moyo seems nervous about his own future. Debate on the succession issue
outside the institutional framework was “dangerous”, he warned.

“We should not be misled as a nation that the succession debate is important
for everybody when those who are pushing for it seek to redefine our social
being,” he said.  Those pushing the succession debate would want to make it
appear that the target was the president when in actual fact the aim was to
uproot the country’s whole social fabric, he claimed. It was all about
regime change, not succession.

So who’s worried here? Who’s clinging to Mugabe’s coat-tails for dear life?
Who wants to smother debate?

If the British and Americans have failed in creating the conditions for
regime change why is Moyo so obsessed by it?

While Moyo claims the public is tired of what the private press has been
saying about the regime, the Herald last Friday suggested popular sentiment
is not exactly pro-Zanu PF.

“Streetwise illegal dealers can be heard on the pavements of many streets
slandering the president, lampooning the land reform programme, and
castigating the state for allegedly bringing about an economic milieu that
is unfavourable to the common man,” the paper disclosed.

So there you have it. People actually slandering the president and
lampooning land reform. Next they will be suggesting we need a new
government!

It is all the fault of the West of course. But despite “cataclysmic
vicissitudes the Zimbabwe economy has demonstrated near-outlandish
resilience”. And Pollyanna-like, the Herald believes it won’t take a lot to
put things right.

“We believe that if all Zimbabweans put their hands on deck, our economy
will come right soon,” it said. “During the Great Depression of the first
half of the last century the economies of many countries tittered (sic) on
the brink of collapse but are among the best today.”

Many people will have had difficulty suppressing a titter on reading this!
All we have to do is put our hands to the deck of the Titanic and all will
be OK. After all, the US emerged from the Great Depression and is today
doing fine. Let’s just hope it doesn’t take 10 years and a world war to put
us right! Oh yes, and we need somebody to play FDR.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Comment

Mugabe sinks Obasanjo’s diplomacy

 THE visit on Monday of Nigeria’s Olusegun Obasanjo has raised hopes in
government circles that even at this late hour President Mugabe may be
invited to the Commonwealth heads of government meeting in Abuja next month.

The visit followed sustained pressure by Zimbabwe’s diminishing number of
friends to get Obasanjo to relent on Nigeria’s earlier decision not to issue
an invitation to Mugabe on the well-established grounds that suspended
states cannot attend. Fiji and Pakistan have both been excluded in the past
for democratic deficits.

Mugabe told Obasanjo that Zimbabwe had no case to answer and was entitled to
attend, a refrain taken up by Stan Mudenge in his ministerial statement to
parliament on Wednesday. Zimbabwe’s suspension had lapsed on March 19, one
year after its imposition, he claimed.

Given these distortions, it is necessary to review the record. The Troika of
“club” leaders, John Howard (current chair), Thabo Mbeki and Obasanjo, was
asked at the Coolum summit in February 2002 to base their recommendations
for dealing with the Zimbabwe crisis squarely on the findings of the
Commonwealth election observer mission covering the presidential poll. This
they did in their Marlborough House Statement of March last year. Zimbabwe
would need to address the problems raised by the monitoring team with regard
to electoral procedures and governance, they said, in order to bring the
country into conformity with the Harare Declaration of Commonwealth
principles. Secretary-general Don McKinnon was tasked to engage with the
Harare authorities to ensure compliance.

Instead of following this advice, the Zimbabwe government proceeded to
denounce the observer mission, making all sorts of allegations about its
composition and its head, which in the most part turned out to be false. At
no stage did it address the central issue of electoral misconduct. Indeed,
the army remains a key player in electoral supervision, the Electoral
Supervisory Commission continues to be an instrument of the incumbent, and
as recent events in Chinhoyi show, the opposition is prevented by force from
contesting elections. Freedom of choice has also been diminished by the
closure of the Daily News.

In a serious breach of protocol, McKinnon has been prevented from visiting
Harare to consult with Mugabe, being told to liaise with Mudenge instead.

It is therefore hardly surprising that when the Troika members consulted in
March they could not find sufficient grounds to warrant lifting the
suspension. There has developed in official Zimbabwean circles a myth that a
minority of one on the Troika (Howard) overruled a majority of two. In fact
the decision by the Troika not to lift the suspension was based on an
extensive programme of consultation with Commonwealth leaders undertaken by
McKinnon in February. It was this wide consensus — including African,
Caribbean and Pacific states — that buttressed the Troika, two of whose
members were admittedly trying to prevaricate.

However, despite Obasanjo bearing the impression of the last person to have
sat on him and no doubt anxious not to have a diplomatic disaster on his
hands at Abuja, he did muster sufficient resolve in recent months to exclude
Mugabe from the forthcoming meeting.

Now, in response to exhortations from Malaysia’s foreign minister, prodded
into action by Mudenge, and regional leaders, Obasanjo has gone the extra
mile for Mugabe. And what did he find on Monday? The Zimbabwean president
claiming that he was the victim of a racist plot and that although there had
been “a change of attitude” by Morgan Tsvangirai, his electoral petition
remained an obstacle to further talks.

It is not Tsvangirai who needed to change his attitude. It is a stubborn
incumbent in State House who has refused point blank to adhere to
Commonwealth principles. Unless Obasanjo is blind he will have understood
that clearly enough. After all, he and Mbeki assumed they had cleared the
petition obstacle when they were here in May. In a democracy aggrieved
parties are perfectly entitled to appeal to the courts for justice.

Obasanjo will now consult with other Commonwealth leaders who, we must
assume, will see no reason to bend the rules for a rogue state that only
this week used unwarranted brutality to crush a legitimate protest against
its ruinous economic policies. Sam Nujoma’s brief to put Zimbabwe’s case at
Abuja now looks problematic. If anything, Obasanjo’s hand has been
strengthened in his dealings with Mugabe’s apologists. Despite an anxiety to
please, let’s hope he remains steadfast in upholding the values for which
the Commonwealth stands.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Does Dube know the price of bread?

HOW in heaven's name does an educated person like Cuthbert Dube of the
Premier Services Medical Aid Society arrogantly tell his members that it
will take six months to refund a claim of just $5 000?

What galaxy is he from? I, with my little knowledge, know inflation is
galloping towards 1 000%.

By the way, does Dube know that a loaf of poorly made bread now costs:
nearly $4 000?

Leslie Vollenhoven,

Gweru.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Zanu PF defacing our history

HAVING broken all the rules in the book, Zanu PF now wants to call its
plunder of our resources, its scandalous land reform programme and
systematic purging of the soldiers of democracy, Chimurenga Three.

Maybe my history teacher got it all wrong. He said the land question was the
main motivation behind the first and second Chimurengas, but not the only
one. People took up arms against a minority authority which had imposed
itself on the majority. It was a titanic battle pitting the oppressed
against the oppressor.

The oppressed fought for the right to exist and to participate in the
creation of a vision for Zimbabwe. They sacrificed their lives for justice,
peace, equality and freedom for all. They fought for the right to belong to
the community of the free world.

There are parallels in the current struggle. On one side is a regime, Zanu
PF, determined to rob us of all of the ideals mentioned above. On the other
side, the majority's will persevere in spite of the persecution.

Chimurenga is in our midst, but you don't need the brains of a rocket
scientist to determine which side is which. We, the people of Zimbabwe, are
in another struggle for liberation, Chimurenga Three, from Zanu PF's
clutches.

One can understand why this party is desperate to associate its outlawed
rule with "the people's struggle". It has never been able to grasp the true
essence of Chimurenga.

Chimurenga is an unbroken chain, laid on the foundation of a determined
human struggle. The spirit is not static; it matures with age and assumes
different forms.

Zanu PF's uneducated interpretation of Chimurenga revolves around the land
issue and every other project the regime embarks on. Is the party aware that
it didn't exist when Nehanda inspired the first Chimurenga?

Both Mugabe and his party are defacing our history. They now want to take a
leap ahead of us, to force themselves into the present and the future, by
inventing history. Mugabe is using the party to deconstruct his irrevocably
notorious legacy. With its continued perpetuation of a stolen mandate, the
party is defeating itself. It's even surrendering its stake in Chimurenga
Two.

Obert Ronald Madondo,

Toronto, Canada.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Letter to Mbeki: Mugabe beyond diplomacy

THE world welcomed your timely response to the US-Iraq confrontation. The
world and the region recognise your status as the "first among equals" among
southern African leaders. The world is mystified that no such morally
correct stand is being taken by the South African government over the crisis
in Zimbabwe. Diplomats repeatedly characterise your stand as
"incomprehensible". Could you please become comprehensible.

Not even a superficial glance at Zimbabwe can conceal the fact that a
catastrophe has been unleashed. At the risk of repeating what is already
known, the following are just a few fundamentals:

Zimbabweans are poorer now than at any other time in the last century.
Inflation is running at 526% and rising. Imagine: every week the price of
bread doubles. Most basics have all but disappeared from store shelves.

For many people, there is no mealie-meal, no oil, no fuel, no flour, no
beef, no salt, no sugar, no biscuits, no grain for either humans or animals.
The national cattle herd has been decimated; most chicken, pig and sheep
breeders have been forced to slaughter.

Critical fuel shortages enter their third year with no sign that the
government is doing anything. Millions are starving. The agricultural sector
has been systematically vandalised. The land reform process has been grossly
mismanaged and hijacked by unscrupulous officials. With Robert Mugabe's

"Operation clean sweep", the process has become openly racist, targeting
even tiny holdings and non-arable mountain reserves. Only a few landless
peasants are benefiting, and tens of thousands of hectares of prime land now
lie fallow.

The knock-on effects are disastrous. Agro-industry has been eviscerated,
forex earnings almost obliterated, hundreds of thousands of jobs lost, the
tax base seriously depleted and banks thrown into disarray. Small businesses
everywhere are collapsing. The brain-drain amongst all races is huge.

Medical, industrial and educational expertise is dissolving. Nurses are
striking for a 7 000% pay rise, desperate to make ends meet, while bodies
rot in mortuaries because hearses have no fuel to fetch them. Government
price controls have backfired. Almost all small bakeries have been put out
of business, and bread sales have simply gone into black market mode. In
effect, the entire population has become a nation of petty criminals as
there is no other way to survive. Cross-border smuggling is rampant.

On my most recent visit, I gave a lift to an elderly man who showed me his
scars: Zanu PF militia had smashed his legs with bricks for campaigning for
the opposition. Dissenting newspapers are bombed and harassed.

Opposition leaders are arbitrarily arrested or attacked.

Food and fuel distribution are regularly reserved for Zanu PF card-holders.
Documented human rights abuses at the hands of government agents now run
into the hundreds of thousands.

The majority feel once again - as they did under Ian Smith - that they have
no recourse to the law. The constitution has been emptied of meaning.

Meanwhile, officials and unscrupulous businessmen and foreign hunters make
millions by pillaging the country's resources, often with government
connivance. Patriotism is dead. President Mugabe harps constantly about
Zimbabwe's sovereignty, but Zimbabwe has never in its history been so
dependent on the outside world, and never so vulnerable.

To blame all this on foreign saboteurs is absurd. Only a centralised
machinery, a governing power, could bring about such comprehensive vandalism
and collapse.

The environmental impact is catastrophic. One tiny example: in the Nyanyadzi
district young baobab trees are stripped of bark to make fibre mats for a
tourist market which no longer exists. Unsold mats hang everywhere; the
baobabs die. This inward-turning, hopeless destruction is happening
nationally. Extensive denuding of tree-cover is affecting water supplies.
Even non-arable conservancies are being carved up amongst Zanu PF heavies.
In satellite photographs, Zimbabwe looks like semi-desert. The latest count:
60% of wildlife on private conservancies is gone; 40% in national parks in
two years. South African citizens are implicated in the slaughter.

I am sure you do not need reminding, Mr President, of Nepad's explicit
commitment to environmental health for all, as well as to the principles of
good governance. No amount of prevarication and sidestepping can conceal the
fact that Robert Mugabe's government is primarily responsible for the
meltdown, and that it is a regional disaster. If Zimbabwe is not rescued,
Nepad is dead.

This is not about saving a few thousand whites, who are not even remotely an
electoral or pragmatic threat to Zanu PF, and who will in any case survive.
It is not about some mythical return to a pernicious colonial or
neo-colonial rule. It is not about kowtowing to self-serving programmes
dictated by the World Bank or rapacious multinationals. It is not about
narrow party politics. And it is not just about removing a single man from
power.

Mugabe is not the only member of the Zanu PF government who has publicly
threatened death to a constitutionally-protected opposition or boasted about
being greater than Hitler. Hitler - do we really need to remind ourselves? -
murdered six million people on purely racial grounds, and launched the most
destructive war the planet has ever known. These are not boasts worthy of
any statesman, whatever his liberation credentials. In Zimbabwe, those
credentials have been comprehensively betrayed and abandoned.

It is time, Mr President, to turn the corner.

It is now a much wider matter of upholding moral, humane and democratic
principles. It is about saving millions of lives, and averting the already
massive refugee crisis. It is about serving the majority for whom the
liberation wars in the whole region were fought. It is this majority which
is suffering: not the colonials, who effectively no longer exist, and
certainly not the new elite who are making astounding profits from the
crisis itself.

"Quiet diplomacy" has not worked, not because it is in itself a bad policy,
but because Mugabe and his henchmen have already put themselves beyond
diplomacy. Current "power-sharing" initiatives simply avoid the central
problem: that Zanu PF has been abusing power for years (are the 20 000
Ndebele dead of the 1980s Gukurahundi not testament enough?).

They have consistently proven themselves tyrannical, incompetent and
untrustworthy. They have deliberately destroyed truthfulness in Zimbabwe.
Their lies are transparent to a 12-year-old, their public assurances
contravened daily on the ground. "Sharing" with them will solve nothing,
unless tied to a clear programme for a thorough election-based overhaul.

President Mbeki, no one expects from you an armed invasion, or even punitive
sanctions. But the majority of oppressed people in the entire region look to
you to express open, upright, consistent, and public outrage at the slow
genocide and state-sponsored criminality being perpetrated in Zimbabwe.

They need this moral support to help themselves. They need your powerful
presence to help permit a non-violent change to a peace-loving and selfless
government. They need you to lead the region's leaders into an unequivocal
stance against a terror which can no longer be shut away within Zimbabwe's
borders: it is a cancerous regional problem.

Above all, President Mbeki, we all need to hear your voice, loudly and now.

Dan Wylie,

South Africa.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Independent voices gagged
By Otto Saki
THE passing of the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
(Aippa) in March last year saw the enactment of registration requirements
for media houses and journalists. The Associated Newspapers Zimbabwe (ANZ)
then launched a constitutional challenge to provisions of the Act that they
regarded as a violation of freedom of expression as provided for in the
constitution and other international instruments which Zimbabwe is party to.

The Supreme Court in September this year refused to give the ANZ audience,
ordering that the ANZ comply with the provisions of the Act before they can
challenge the constitutionality or otherwise of the Act. Acting on the
Supreme Court judgement, the state forced the ANZ to cease operations
leading to the halt in production of the Daily News and the Daily News On
Sunday.

The Supreme Court ruling has attracted the attention of virtually all human
rights organisations, civic groups, and members of the legal fraternity. The
Supreme Court decision, which prompted the closure of the Daily News, has
received widespread condemnation on the perception that it abrogated its
duty to defend and protect the freedoms provided for in the constitution and
other international covenants that Zimbabwe signed and ratified. The
subsequent seizure of ANZ property by the Zimbabwe Republic Police without
judicial sanction is a further violation of certain fundamental rights in
Zimbabwe. The directors, staff and journalists of the ANZ were not spared
either as the police subjected them to arbitrary arrests and detentions from
time to time.

The ANZ then filed an application for registration in compliance with the
requirements under Aippa to the Media and Information Commission (MIC). The
MIC turned down the application on the basis that the ANZ had not satisfied
the requirements. The ANZ appealed against the decision of the MIC with the
Administrative Court, which found in favour of the Daily News on October 24.
The Administrative Court ruled that the MIC was improperly constituted, that
it was biased largely due to the conduct of its chairperson and also that it
acted ultra vires its powers in terms of Aippa.

The Constitution of Zimbabwe provides in Section 20 of the Bill of Rights
for the freedom of expression and in verbatim states: "Except with his own
consent or by way of parental discipline, no person shall be hindered in the
enjoyment of his freedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold
opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without
interference, and freedom from interference with his correspondence."

It is evident from the above that freedom of expression is one of the
elementary rights which must be guarded jealously by all individuals in
society for its violation affects the enjoyment of other rights.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in Article 19 states:
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right
includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive
and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of
frontiers."

Even though not necessarily binding, the provisions of the UDHR have been
considered to be an authoritative guide to human rights and constitute
general principles of law and are widely held as having acquired legal force
as customary international law. Some jurists have also regarded the UDHR as
part of the United Nations Law.

The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, which Zimbabwe ratified in
1986, equally provides for freedom of expression under Article 9 (1) when it
states that "Every individual shall have the right to receive information".

The African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights meeting at its 32nd
Ordinary session in 2002 adopted the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of
Expression, the preamble of which reaffirms "the fundamental importance of
the freedom of expression as an individual human right, as a cornerstone of
democracy and as a means of ensuring respect for all human rights and
freedoms" in Africa.

The Declaration recognises the key role the media and other means of
communication play in "ensuring full respect for freedom of expression, in
promoting the free flow of information and ideas, in assisting people to
make informed decisions and promoting the free flow of information and
ideas, in assisting people to make informed decisions and in facilitating
and strengthening democracy".

An important aspect of the states' positive obligation to promote freedom of
expression and of the media is the need to promote pluralism within and to
ensure equal access of all to the media. This entails that states not only
refrain from interfering with the rights but also take positive steps to
ensure that rights, including freedom of expression, are respected. In
effect governments are under an obligation to create an environment in which
independent media can flourish, thereby satisfying the public's right to
information.

Article 14 of the Declaration provides that "states shall promote a general
economic environment in which the media can flourish". The Declaration
unequivocally affirms the principle of independence of media regulatory
bodies, as this is a vital condition for the promotion and protection of the
right to freedom of expression. To ensure the free flow of information and
ideas, media regulatory bodies should enjoy both organisational and
operational autonomy - a requirement that the MIC of Zimbabwe cannot
satisfy.

Zimbabwe also ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights in 1991 which provides for the freedom of expression under Article 19
(2) as follow: "Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this
right shall include freedom to receive and impart information and ideas of
all kinds regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in
the form of art, or through any other media of his choice".

It is clear that freedom of expression is one of the fundamental rights; all
state parties to the above cited instruments are expected to implement
measures that further enhance the enjoyment of these rights. The ANZ case is
emblematic of the patent suppression of the freedom of expression by the
state. It goes without saying that the existence of an independent media is
important in the furtherance of democracy and democratic values in society.
To this end, Zimbabwe Lawyers For Human Rights is campaigning for the
respect and protection of freedom of expression in Zimbabwe. The granting of
a publishing licence to the ANZ is only but a step towards the promotion,
enforcement, and realisation of the right to freedom of expression in
Zimbabwe.

- Otto Saki is a projects lawyer with the Zimbabwe Lawyers For Human Rights.

Back to the Top
Back to Index