The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
Evicted from land in Zimbabwe, farmers have made a new start in Zambia |
JOHANNESBURG, 21 Nov 2003 (IRIN) - The fast-track land
redistribution programme in Zimbabwe has forced many commercial farmers to seek
greener pastures elsewhere, and Zambia is one of the neighbouring countries that
has opened its arms to them.
However, fewer Zimbabwean farmers than was
previously reported have been granted permission to farm in Zambia.
The
Zambia Investment Centre (ZIC) told IRIN this week that since the beginning of
Zimbabwe's land reform programme in 2002, a total of 41 Zimbabwean farmers had
registered with the centre. ZIC issued investment certificates to just 31,
allowing them to begin commercial farming.
"All the Zimbabwean farmers
granted investment certificates to set up farming operations in Zambia are
farming. They are engaged in [farming] tobacco, maize, wheat, etc," the ZIC
said.
Despite their limited numbers, there had already been "an
appreciable increase in the quantity of tobacco production this year", the
agency noted.
"They have what it takes to undertake their various farming
enterprises - there is in place an internationally backed financing arrangement,
involving international banks and tobacco dealers," a ZIC spokesman told
IRIN.
ZIC was expecting to receive many more applications from Zimbabwean
farmers. "Zambia has the potential to accommodate a lot more farmers, due to her
abundant land and water resources, than we currently have," the organisation
said. Forty-seven percent of Zambian land is arable and "suitable for various
types of crops".
"We therefore anticipate that more farmers will come and
invest in Zambian agriculture, given the profile the sector has attained and
[the] enabling environment being created by government," the ZIC
said.
Agriculture has been designated a priority area by the Zambian
government.
"The Zambia Investment Centre would therefore like more
farmers of the calibre of Zimbabwean farmers to invest in Zambian agriculture,"
the organisation said.
The ZIC plays a facilitation role for potential
investors, providing assistance to those issued with investment certificates in
obtaining immigration permits and other necessary
documents.
Sources said Mugabe rejected
Obasanjo's attempt to organise an emergency
meeting with Tsvangirai to break
the political impasse, claiming he needed
to consult his party
first.
The meeting would have helped Obasanjo to claim he had
brokered a
breakthrough between the two sides and thereby opened a door to
Mugabe at
Abuja.
Obasanjo had ostensibly plan-ned to meet Mugabe
to formally tell him why he
had not been invited to the Chogm, but later saw
an opportunity to try to
break the political impasse.
When he
arrived in the country on Monday, he first met Mugabe before
seeing
Tsvangirai later in the morning. Sources said Mugabe briefed Obasanjo
on the
situation and claimed he was a victim of a racist campaign by the
"white
Commonwealth" angered by his land reform programme.
Mugabe
claimed he was trying to address the economic situation. He also said
there
had been informal talks between Zanu PF and the MDC.
After meeting
Mugabe, Obasanjo went to see Tsvangirai for a briefing.
Sources said
Obasanjo's first words were: "What's happening Mr Tsvangirai?"
to which the
MDC leader replied: "Since your last visit to Zimbabwe (with
South African
President Thabo Mbeki in May) nothing has changed, except for
the
worse."
"Obasanjo looked surprised because Mugabe had given him the
impression there
was progress," a source close to the talks
said.
Tsvangirai then went on to chronicle events from last year up
to now.
Sources said Tsvangirai started with Colonel Lionel Dyck's
purported mission
last December, followed by the visit to Zimbabwe of Cape
Town Archbishop
Njongonkulu Ndungane in March and then the meetings between
Patrick
Chinamasa and MDC secretary-general Welshman
Ncube.
Tsvangirai also spoke about the church leaders' initiative and
secret
meetings with Zanu PF chair John Nkomo in September in an effort to
secure a
meeting between Mugabe and himself.
"It was an extensive
briefing by Tsvangirai and Obasanjo was impressed," a
source said. "After
that Obasanjo went back to Mugabe at State House hoping
to arrange a meeting
between the two.
"But when he came back to Tsvangirai from State
House he was visibly
disappointed because Mugabe had refused an immediate
meeting with
Tsvangirai. Mugabe said he wanted to first consult his party and
gave
February or March next year as dates for a possible
meeting."
The sources said after Obasanjo's experience on Monday,
there would be no
invitation to Mugabe "unless something dramatic happens"
between now and the
opening of the conference on December
5.
Obasanjo is on record as saying Mugabe would not be invited unless
there was
a positive "sea change" in Zimbabwe. His insistence on Monday that
"we are
still consulting" suggested he had not found any "sea change" during
his
visit.
Tsvangirai told Obasanjo Mugabe had failed to address
Commonwealth concerns
raised when Zimbabwe was suspended from the club in
March last year. The
issues include political reconciliation and democratic
reforms.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard and officials at the
Commonwealth
secretariat in London said after Obasanjo's visit this week that
Mugabe
remained uninvited.
Zim Independent
Zanu PF clashes over Banana
Staff
Writer
THE Zanu PF politburo heard conflicting views over former
president
Canaan Banana's record at an emergency meeting on
Monday.
Zanu PF sources said, despite official reports that only a
couple of
members contested the decision to refuse Banana hero status, the
ruling
party was divided into two opposing camps which clashed head-on over
whether
or not Banana, a highly regarded nationalist and academic, should be
buried
at Heroes Acre, the national shrine.
The camp that
supported Banana's case is believed to include
Vice-President Joseph Msika,
Zanu PF chair John Nkomo, party secretary for
administration Emmerson
Mnangagwa, spokesman Nathan Shamuyarira and other
heavyweights, although not
all of them spoke at the meeting.
Msika is understood to have
led the argument for conferring hero
status on Banana. Contrary to reports,
President Robert Mugabe appeared
initially to back this
group.
But an opposing front led by former army commander
Solomon Mujuru and
his ex-airforce counterpart Josiah Tungamirai blocked
attempts to declare
Banana a hero.
The politburo decision so
angered Banana's family that when Mugabe
visited Banana's Sentosa home to
express his condolences on Tuesday there
was obvious tension, sources present
reported. Banana's son Nathan, who
accompanied the body of his father from
London where he died, avoided
talking to Mugabe altogether.
Sources said the controversy over Banana's hero status forced Mugabe
to stay
away from the burial in Esibomvu, Matabeleland South, on
Wednesday.
Mugabe has an impressive record of attending the
funerals of his
adherents.
Mujuru's camp argued Banana's
criminal charges of sexual assault had
badly blemished his record and
diminished his standing in society.
Mujuru and Tungamirai were
in charge of the armed forces when Banana
abused personnel assigned to guard
him at State House between 1980 and 1987.
Tungamirai testified
during Banana's High Court trial in 1999. Banana
was convicted in 2000 and
spent nearly a year in jail.
Sources said political
considerations played a key role in the
politburo's final
decision.
Those opposed to Banana's hero status argued that at
the time of his
death he had become an opposition Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC)
informal advisor. They cited his criticism of government's land
reform
programme and denunciation of Zanu PF over political
violence.
In May 2000 Banana said "no one is ordained to rule
for eternity".
This irked Zanu PF mandarins who viewed the remarks as an
attack on Mugabe.
Banana also said the presidential term of
office should be limited
because "Zimbabwe cannot be ruled by one
person".
In 2001 Banana said Zimbabwe should put its house in
order to avoid
targeted sanctions. He also said he supported a government of
national unity
bringing Zanu PF and the MDC together.
When
Zanu PF denied its founder president Ndabaningi Sithole hero
status in 2001,
Banana said the system of selecting heroes was flawed.
"I think
the problem is with the whole process of declaring heroes. I
believe that the
question of determining who should be a national hero
should not be a party
issue," he said. "You need an independent commission
to deal with the
issue."
Zim Independent
Murerwa in gloomy budget
Ngoni Chanakira
FINANCE
minister Herbert Mure-rwa yesterday said government's failure to
implement
agreed measures was the major cause of the country's deepening
economic
crisis.
"Failure to implement agreed measures can only send wrong
signals, fuelling
self-fulfilling inflationary expectations," Murerwa said
when presenting his
record $7,75 trillion 2004 national budget to
parliament.
"We should now address these challenges in earnest if the
economy is to be
turned around."
Murerwa said the economy was
expected to contract by 13,2% this year while
inflation, currently at 525,8%,
will rise to 700% early next year.
For the first time in the
country's history the minister dished out
trillion-dollar amounts to various
ministries. Eyebrows were raised when
Murerwa told the House that he was
earmarking a shocking $1,27 trillion for
defence and security when there is
peace in the region.
The figure was the third largest vote after the
civil service wages bill
($3,18 trillion) and the Ministry of Education,
Sport and Culture ($1,52
trillion).
The defence and security
amount was higher than that for Agriculture -
$587,6 billion - and Housing
$10 billion. The meagre housing vote raises
doubts about promises by
President Mugabe last week that government would
build a million houses in
five years. It now costs about $15 million to
build a basic four-roomed
house.
Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce (ZNCC) policy manager
James Jowa told
the Zimbabwe Independent that like other budgets before, last
year's budget
had not been a real budget at all. It missed all its
targets.
"We have gone through 22 budgets but we seem to continue
making the same
mistake of living beyond our means," Jowa said. "We love to
spend what we do
not have. Chronic fiscal deficits and supplementary budgets
have been the
chief architects of the hyperinflationary environment now
prevailing in the
country."
He said of particular concern had been
excessive budget overruns.
In August Murerwa presented a $671 billion
supplementary budget despite
admitting that the resources are simply not
there.
"One may ask what then needs to be done?" Jowa asked.
"We do not need just an engine overhaul but a completely new
engine to move
the economy ahead.
"The Minister of Finance in his
2003 budget statement mentioned the need to
restore confidence. He
acknowledged what all of us had observed much
earlier, that the agrarian
reform had played a part in the negative
publicity..
"But he did not
announce the measures to be adopted to address these
fundamental issues.
Probably the issues are beyond the budget and the
minister. But all the same
it is quite refreshing that the government is at
least aware of the centre of
the problem."
Zim Independent
Mawere rejects Zanu PF's poisoned chalice
Itai
Dzamara
IN what is seen as a blow to Zanu PF's efforts at self-renewal,
business
mogul Mutumwa Mawere this week refused to be co-opted into the
ruling party
on the grounds that his current responsibilites rule out a
political role.
"Successful businessmen do notalways become successful
politicians," he told
the Zimbabwe Independent.
Mawere was last week
elected in absentia as Zanu PF secretary for economic
affairs for the
volatile Masvingo Province alongside TeleAccess boss Daniel
Shumba who was
chosen as chairman. On Monday Mawere turned down the
position.
In
an interview on Wednesday, Mawere said he wasn't a Zanu PF politician
and
wanted to remain a businessman.
"No, I am not a member of Zanu
PF or any other party. I have never been in
politics. I am only a
businessman," said Mawere.
"I am convinced that my contribution to
national development is enough
through my business interests. I have chosen
business as one of the
nation-building planks that will further the gains of
political freedom," he
said while paying tribute to "those who struggled to
make me relevant as a
black man".
Ruling-party sources say efforts
to revive the party include the co-option
of business people and
academics.
Mawere said he understood that Zanu PF members had hoped
to include him in
their attempts to buttress the party, but he wasn't able to
take up the
offer.
"They were looking for people who can help them
solve their problems and had
hoped that I could contribute. There is nothing
wrong in people electing you
to a political position. However, I have advised
them to look for someone
else because I can't take on the responsibility," he
said
Mawere is said to have been approached last month by Zanu PF
leaders with an
invitation to join its structures and he requested time to
look into the
issue. However, elections were held last week when he was in
India. He
returned on Monday this week only to be informed he had been
elected as the
party's provincial secretary for economic
affairs.
Zanu PF holds its annual conference in Masvingo next month
at which the
contentious issue of choosing a successor to President Robert
Mugabe could
feature prominently.
Sources said Zanu PF secretary
for administration, Emmerson Mnangagwa,
considered Mugabe's heir apparent,
was behind the election of both Mawere
and Shumba who are seen as his
protegés in the province.
Mnangagwa can solve the Masvingo challenge by
dealing a blow to Samuel
Mumbengegwi's faction that would deny him key votes
in the succession
battle.
Mawere denied allegations that Zanu PF's
patronage system had helped him
grow his business empire.
"Do my
services or products produced by my businesses appeal to customers
because of
a Zanu PF identity?" he asked. "The people who work in the
companies where I
have shares are defined as Zimbabweans, not Zanu PF. How
does one justify the
claim that I benefited from Zanu PF patronage?"
Despite his denial of
links with the ruling party in the past, Mawere raised
eyebrows when he
formed the National Development Assembly to counter the
Lovemore Madhuku-led
National Constitutional Assembly, a civic
rights
organisation.
Mawere, owner of Africa Resources Ltd, has
under his wings Shabanie Mashaba
Mines, a major producer of
asbestos.
Meanwhile, Mawere has confirmed that his business entities
have a major
shareholding in Media Africa Group (MAG), publishers of the
Business Tribune
and the Weekend Tribune.
"It is not true to say
Mawere owns MAG. I don't have a personal interest in
the group. My interest
is a corporate one. My companies have major
shareholdings in the group," he
said.
Zim Independent
Tsvangirai files for Mudede's arrest
Vincent
Kahiya
MOVEMENT for Democratic Change leader Morgan Tsvangirai yesterday
filed a
High Court application seeking Registrar-General Tobaiwa
Mudede's
imprisonment for contempt of court over his alleged refusal to
transfer
ballot boxes to Harare.
Tsvangirai has for the past year been
engaged with Mudede in mortal combat
over the outcome of last year's
presidential poll won by President Mugabe.
Tsvangirai, whose election
petition was heard in court two weeks ago,
believes that Mudede's conduct in
the poll swayed the result in favour of
Mugabe.
Mudede is cited in
the case in his personal capacity as the second
respondent while his office
is cited as the first.
"I am bringing this application seeking an
order from this honourable court
that the respondents are in contempt of this
honourable court and that they
are in fact in contempt in a most serous and
grave manner," said Tsvangirai
in his affidavit.
The contentious
issue has been the failure by Mudede to move to the capital
from various
parts of the country electoral material from the 2002 poll.
This is despite
numerous High Court rulings compelling him to abide by
Section 78 of the
Electoral Act.
The section compels the registrar-general to move all
counted and rejected
ballot papers together with counterfoils and used
voters' rolls in sealed
packets to a specified place for
safekeeping.
The latest such ru-ling compelling Mudede to follow the
law was by Justice
Moses Chinhengo on October 15. Chinhengo ordered that the
electoral material
should be kept at the offices of the Registrar of the High
Court.
Mudede has for the past year pleaded that he has no funds to move
the
electoral material. But Chinhengo, who said Mudede had a
statutory
obligation, quashed this argument.
"It must be clear
therefore that the request that the ballot papers not be
brought to Harare
because of the alleged lack of funds is an attempt by the
respondent (Mudede)
not only to disregard the order of this court but more
importantly it is an
attempt by him to have this court revisit its earlier
decision," Chinhengo
said.
Meanwhile, the Administrative Court will on Monday hear an
application by
Associated Newspapers of Zimbabwe to effect an October 24
ruling which
declared that the publishing company should be declared
registered by
November 30.
The Administrative Court also ruled
that the Media and Information
Commission (MIC) was improperly constituted
and that its chairman Tafataona
Mahoso was biased against ANZ, publishers of
the Daily News. Mahoso has
already noted an appeal against the Administrative
Court's ruling.
The ANZ is seeking a confirmation order of the
October 24 ruling so that it
can resume publishing after it was closed by
government following a Supreme
Court ruling on September 11 that the company
was operating outside the law.
Zim Independent
Govt tightens grip on GMB
Augustine
Mukaro
GOVERNMENT has tightened its grip on the Grain Marketing Board (GMB)
and
grain distribution by appointing Zanu PF stalwarts to all key posts in
the
parastatal's administrative structures, the Zimbabwe Independent heard
this
week.
Sources say politicising of the GMB started at head office
in Harare before
it spread to provinces when government appointed provincial
managers in
August.
The first move was government's appointment of
a taskforce to coordinate
grain distribution to starving people in 2001 and
then the appointment of
Colonel Samuel Muvuti as GMB chief executive
officer.
In September government appointed Zanu PF losing candidate
in the Harare
Central parliamentary election in June 2000, Winston Dzawo, as
GMB
operations director.
Government has also politicised GMB
provincial structures by appointing
ruling-party henchmen as the parastatal's
provincial managers. The
provincial managers have been vested with powers to
control the distribution
and movement of grain to the populace in the
countryside.
Highly-placed sources said all the appointees had links with
the ruling
party in one way or another.
In Mashonaland Central,
gov-ernment appointed Temba Mapu-ranga, a known Zanu
PF member who is
understood to be vying for the provincial chairmanship in
the elections to be
held tomorrow in Bindura. Contacted for comment,
Mapuranga, who was in
Masvingo, said he would only comment next week.
"Contact me next week," he said.
An S Chatikobo was appointed provincial manager for
Masvingo, John Mafa for
Mashonaland West, and Podiso Mafa for Matabeleland
North.
Mafa referred all questions to GMB head office.
"All
press issues are handled by our operations director," she said.
Norman
Sobuza was appointed provincial manager for Matabeleland South while
a G
Shiri was made responsible for the Midlands province.
Zim Independent
Rains spell doom for wheat farmers
Augustine
Mukaro
WHILE the onset of rains is good news for any farmer, the reverse is
true
for the country's newly resettled wheat growers who risk losing millions
of
dollars as they are still battling to harvest their crop.
Delays by
the farmers in harvesting wheat has been compounded by their
inability to
hire combine harvesters. The farmers have resorted to using
hand-held sickles
to harvest the crop.
An agriculture expert told the Zimbabwe
Independent that new farmers could
not achieve desired production levels due
to lack of knowledge, skills and
finance. They do not have the capacity to
match production levels of
displaced commercial farmers.
"Wheat is
a very difficult crop to grow for the new farmers," said
the
expert.
"Most of these farmers are growing wheat on land between
10 and 15 hectares
when the crop must be grown on a large area for someone to
realise a profit.
Small areas are difficult for farmers to get a profit from
since hiring a
combine harvester for 1 hectare now costs $300 000," he
said.
The worst affected areas include Mushandike Irrigation Scheme,
the largest
irrigated area under wheat in Masvingo Province, and in
Mashonaland Central
province.
Local demand of between 400 000 and
500 000 tonnes per annum used to be met
through imports of gristing wheat
used to blend the local product to get
high quality flour.
The
Commercial Farmers Union (CFU) in August said only 4 500 hectares had
been
put under wheat in the commercial farming sector because of
continued
disturbances and uncertainty. The figure was a mere 6% of the area
that used
to be planted before the land reform programme in
2000.
Commercial farmers used to put between 65 000 and 80 000
hectares of land
under winter crop, producing up to 300 000 tonnes of
wheat.
Zim Independent
Zupco chairman takes over bird sanctuary
Augustine
Mukaro
ZIMBABWE United Passenger Company (Zupco) chairman and Chinhoyi
Technical
College vice-chancellor Dr Charles Nherera has taken over a bird
sanctuary
in the Mutorashanga area in Mashonaland West Province, the
Zimbabwe
Independent heard this week.
Pinefarm Conservancy, popularly
known as Cannonkopje Crane Centre, is
protected under a bilateral agreement
between Zimbabwe and Switzerland. It
specialises in bio-diversity conservancy
including breeding endangered
wattled cranes.
A visit to the
conservancy over the weekend showed that Nherera has deployed
five of his
workers to occupy one third of the 1 145-hectare conservancy
which he wants
to convert into farmland. Nherera's workers have allegedly
occupied staff
houses and have barred caretakers from watering and feeding
the
cranes.
Conservancy owner Rolf Hangartner said Nherera first
approached him in July
with a letter purportedly from the Ministry of Lands
for the subdivision of
the farm.
"Arex Chinhoyi denied the
existence of any such subdivision at Pinefarm or
knowledge of Nherera's
allocation," Hangartner said. "Arex suspected the
offer letter was a
fraud."
Hangartner said on November 8, Chinhoyi provincial
administrator Christopher
Shumba arrived in the company of Mutorashanga
police and Nherera to claim
ownership of the conservancy. Nherera left his
five workers on the farm.
"Shumba imposed Nherera and his employees
on the conservancy premises to the
exclusion of owners and staff," Hangartner
said.
"The illegal occupants don't allow caretakers to water and feed
the cranes.
The sole water supply for birds and staff has since broken down,
and is
outside our control," he said.
Hangartner, a Swiss
national, bought the farm in 1993 with the support of
Zvimba rural district
council, the South Ayrshire Natural Resources
Sub-committee and the
Department of National Parks to establish a breeding
centre for the
endangered wattled cranes.
"We have invested over US$20 million to be
where we are now," Hangartner
said.
"This investment is protected
by the agreement between the Swiss
Confederation and the Republic of Zimbabwe
on the Promotion and Reciprocal
Protection of Investments," he said "The
centre is acclaimed by the
International Crane Foundation in America as a
vital African contribution to
saving Zimbabwe's wattled cranes, a unique
venture in Africa."
Hangartner said Nherera's move was a clear
violation of land redistribution
criteria which exclude conservancies and
properties protected under country
to country
agreements.
"Government had reconsidered its shortsighted intention
to acquire the
conservancy and accepted Zvimba land committee's
recommendation to delist
the conservancy," he said. "The property is however
still listed."
Hangartner said he had pursued dialogue and had also
taken the case to court
to spare the bird sanctuary from
occupation.
He said letters written to Vice-President Msika,
provincial governor Peter
Chanetsa, Local Government minister Ignatius
Chombo, Foreign Affairs
minister Stan Mudenge by the Embassy of Switzerland
and the International
Crane Foundation had not moved government to delist the
conservancy.
"Court action by our lawyers is unopposed by the
commissioner of police and
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but determination
has been delayed for
months," he said
The cranes had ceased
breeding in the northern Great Dyke as a result of
human disturbances to the
nesting sites.
The conservancy currently has 13 cranes plus 24 other
different bird
species. It also has up to 27 species of animals.
Zim Independent
Editor's Memo
Harare on slide
THERE has
been much comment in the government media recently of the
deteriorating
situation in Harare. And not without justification. Water
supplies have been
cut due to a number of factors including pumping capacity
and shortages of
treatment chemicals, refuse has been allowed to pile up
around the city as
the authorities battle with private contractors, and
roads and traffic lights
go unrepaired for months.
Now the "City Fathers" want to hike rates
fourfold to fund a $1,1-trillion
budget which includes upgrading and repairs
to water supplies.
Ratepayers should mount a revolt against such an
imposition. There has been
a marked deterioration in the "services" the city
provides, and indeed they
are charged for "improvements" to their properties
when all around them the
city is falling apart.
While for once I
agree with many of the criticisms levelled in the
government press, there is
an important part of the story they are not
telling. And that concerns the
deliberate incapacitation of the mayor of
Harare by Local Government minister
Ignatius Chombo.
Ignoring the democratic will of the city's voters,
Chombo has suspended
Elias Mudzuri and set up a kangaroo court, called a
committee of
investigation, to try him for "crimes" such as failure to
provide a
strategic turnaround plan, arbitrary dismissal of senior staff, and
inciting
a stayaway.
The committee comprises Zanu PF-affilated
officials whose mandate is clearly
to prevent Mudzuri from doing his job. One
is a losing Zanu PF candidate in
Mbare, another a failed Zanu PF Bulawayo
mayoral candidate.
Some of the officials Mudzuri was trying to get rid of
were planted in the
civic administration in the dying days of the Zanu PF
municipal regime and
clung on there long after their sell-by
date.
The idea behind all this interference is to show MDC government
doesn't
work. But the MDC appears to be conspiring in its own failure. It
lacks
direction, resolution or resourcefulness in coping with the crisis
in
Harare.
Who's in charge with Mudzuri paralysed? Does anybody know?
The minister
appears to be giving instructions to the Town Clerk, an
unelected official
appointed under the old order, while shunting aside the
acting mayor who
should also be the acting chief executive officer. But the
rot goes deeper
than that.
I have been told of councillors who
have not even had the courtesy to reply
to letters from their ward residents
seeking their help. Many are simply not
functioning at any level. Their
collective demand for a hike in their
allowances should be flatly refused
until there is an improvement in their
performance.
The traffic
lights at the junction of Bishop Gaul and Argyle roads, a
dangerous
intersection, have been out of action for over six months. Roads
in Msasa, a
prime business district, have reverted to dirt tracks.
Meanwhile, the
Director of Works blithely ignores the protests of residents
who object to
change-of-use applications by businesses likely to change the
character of
their neighbourhoods by increasing traffic flows and litter.
This is
an unresponsive, uncaring council that needs to hear the crack of
the party
whip. But Morgan Tsvangirai and his "shadow ministers" appear to
be
indifferent to the fate of their key constituency - the nation's
capital.
Bulawayo by contrast is well run and looks a whole lot better.
It is clean
and relatively efficient (the residents may differ on this but
let them
spend a week in Harare!), and there is a sense of solidarity
between
council, its officials and the electorate.
Harare is a
disaster area by contrast. Councillors and officials are at war.
The
government is able to play divide and rule by dealing directly with
its
chosen instruments at Town House. And there is no coherence to the
MDC
caucus in what should be its flagship council.
Instead of
imposing an unacceptable budget on the residents of the capital,
the council
should be looking at ways of relieving the rates burden. Cities
around the
world cope under adversity by devising new management techniques
and
diversifying the revenue base. Brazil provides several examples. So
does
South Africa. It takes commitment and imagination.
Thinking
outside the box.
The failure of mechanical equipment is cited as the
reason for breakdowns
and inadequate service delivery. In fact this is an
administrative problem.
There is a complete absence of a culture of
supervision and maintenance. And
mechanical equipment is not needed to remove
rubble, cut grass and tend
verges.
Where traffic lights cannot be
replaced, a return to traffic circles might
do in some situations. What is
clear is the complete absence of a plan or
direction. The announcement of a
$1-trillion budget shows just how far
removed the council is from the public
it is supposed to serve. It sounds
like a case of "think of a figure, then
multiply by 10". The residents of
Harare must not be penalised for poor
maintenance or inadequate investment
in infrastructure under Zanu
PF.
The MDC, little heard of nowadays just when it should be speaking
out on the
ruling party's appalling misrule, needs to treat this as a
showcase
opportunity to demonstrate its capacity for governance. That means
looking
for ways to save money, using revenues thoughtfully, and above
all
responding to the needs of ratepayers. Cleaning the place up would be a
good
start!
That is not happening. Harare is slowly but surely
going the way of Lagos
and Kinshasa. Its residents deserve better but won't
get it if they remain
silent.
Zim Independent
Govt/displaced farmers set to clash as budget omits
compensation
Augustne Mukaro
A CLASH between displaced commercial farmers
and government looks inevitable
in the coming year as the 2004 budget has
left out the sensitive issue of
compensation.
Commercial farmers who
were forcibly evicted from their properties since the
beginning of farm
invasions in 2000 have dragged government to court
demanding billions of
dollars as compensation.
Government promised to compensate displaced
farmers for the improvements
made on the farms but not the farms
themselves.
Last year government allocated a mere $10 billion for
compensation, which
farmers said was enough to pay for improvements on only
30 farms.
Finance minister Herbert Murerwa's budget gave agriculture
the fourth
highest vote. The budget totally ignored compensation,
concentrating on
financing inputs for the newly resettled farmers,
suppression of animal
diseases, irrigation rehabilitation and capitalisation
of the Agricultural
Development Bank.
"In order to improve
productivity, mitigate the effects of drought and
restore the viability of
the agricultural sector, I have allocated $587,6
billion to be channelled
towards irrigation rehabilitation and development,
mechanisation,
capitalisation of the Agricultural Development Bank,
livestock production and
enhanced extension services," Murerwa said.
The minister said other than
financial support for agriculture, government
was putting in place mechanisms
for private investor participation in the
agrarian
reform.
"Government has put in place mechanisms for private sector
support which
include incorporation of already signed memoranda of
understanding between
the ministry and private players."
Murerwa
said government was also facilitating contract farming by providing
tax and
non-tax incentives to private players supporting the agrarian
reform.
Zim Independent
'Budget offers little hope for economic
recovery'
Reuter
ZIMBABWE Finance minister Herbert Murerwa unveiled a
national budget for
2004 yesterday which analysts said offered little hope of
quick recovery for
an economy facing its worst crisis in
history.
Budget highlights:
- Economy expected to shrink by
8,5% in 2004, slowing down from a revised
contraction of 13,2% in gross
domestic product (GDP) for 2003.
- Inflation, which soared to 526% in
October from 208% in January, was
described as the country's "number one
enemy". Murerwa said the inflation
rate was expected to shoot to 700% in the
first quarter of 2004, before
starting to subside. He gave no further
estimates.
- There were no firm proposals on how the government intends
to tackle
chronic foreign currency, fuel and short-term food
shortages.
- Instead Murerwa said the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe would
announce a new
monetary policy in mid-December detailing, among others,
proposals on
foreign exchange management, interest rates and the management
of money
supply to help slow down inflation.
- Murerwa said the
government would introduce value-added tax from January
1, and estimated the
country's budget deficit would remain unchanged at
around 7,5% of
GDP.
- Murerwa announced several but mostly small tax concessions for
workers and
pensioners. But he maintained the corporate tax rate at 30%.
Zim Independent
Budget puts Gono under pressure
Shakeman Mugari
THE
budget presented yesterday is so vague that it will turn the pressure on
the
newly-appointed Reserve Bank governor Gideon Gono.
Murerwa said details
on how to tackle inflation and interest rates would
emerge in Gono's policy
statement in mid-December this year.
Murerwa avoided the hot issues
of interest rates and the exchange control,
which the market has been
awaiting in anticipation of a sliding devaluation
of the dollar. The minister
was vague on interest rates saying government
would pursue a policy that
encourages growth on one hand, while fighting
inflation on the
other.
"The details will be announced in the monetary policy
statement to be issued
by the governor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe by
mid-December," said
Murerwa.
On the exchange rate, the minister
again referred to the Gono statement,
which he said would ensure there were
no foreign currency leakages.
Analysts say the skeletal budget leaves
Gono exposed. The burden now lies
squarely with Gono who is expected to pull
the ailing economy from the
abyss.
Zim Independent
'Murerwa's forecast a mirage'
Ngoni
Chanakira
ECONOMISTS say Finance minister Herbert Murerwa is probably
dreaming when he
says inflation will stop at 700% before sliding next year.
Inflation this
week shot up to 525,8% but economists predict it will continue
soaring to 1
000% by year-end.
"The figure is highly unrealistic and
government definitely will not achieve
it," economist John Robertson said
yesterday. "If it is achieved it will be
because of strong medicine that
government cannot give the public."
South Africa - Zimbabwe's largest
trading partner - has an inflation rate of
5,7%, while Zambia, Malawi, and
Botswana have rates of 21,1%, 8,5%, and 8,3%
respectively.
In his
2003 national budget Murerwa promised that inflation would reach 96%
before
gradually decreasing to "all-time lows".
The minister told the same
parliament in August, this year, when he
presented his $672 billion
supplementary budget that as Zimbabwe's inflation
escalates and economic
performance worsened a growing proportion of the
population was now living
below the poverty datum line.
Yesterday the minister harped on about
inflation again, this time saying it
remained an enemy.
"Inflation
remains our number one enemy whose containment requires total and
unwavering
commitment and collaboration of all stakeholders," Murerwa said.
"In
order to arrest rising inflation and reduce it initially to
double-digit
levels and ultimately to single digit figures, government will
rigorously
implement fiscal and monetary stabilisation measures. These will
be
complemented by structural measures to invoke an immediate positive
supply
response from the productive sectors of the economy."
He said it was important that government policies "fight inflation".
"Continued failure to do so threatens to destroy the very
social fabric of
the nation," Murerwa told parliament in
August.
Zimbabwe is facing hyperinflation that has resulted in the
prices increasing
almost on a daily basis causing hardships for
citizens.
"Murerwa is probably dreaming and underestimating the
current economic
crisis we are facing," Robertson said
yesterday.
"He is probably thinking much will be done by the central
bank when it
introduces a new monetary policy with changes in interest
rates."
Murerwa said the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe incoming governor
Gideon Gono
would announce a new monetary policy mid-December that would
"invoke an
immediate positive supply response from the productive sectors of
the
economy".
He was however vague on how this would be done.
A Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce economist said
inflation was already
way off target.
"Is the minister surprised
at the way things have gone or is it that he does
not believe his own
inflation assumptions in the first place?" he asked.
"Zimbabwe's gross
domestic product is set to decline by more than 12%
this
year."
Zimbabwe's year-on-year inflation rose sharply from
116,7% in January 2002
to 198,9% in December 2002 and 525,8% this
week.
Bankers said because of inflation the purchasing power of the
Zimbabwe
dollar fell by nearly two-thirds during 2002, with a dollar in 2003
now
worth less than one cent of its value in 1990.
Zim Independent
What they said about 2004 national budget
Shakeman
Mugari/Blessing Zulu/Augustine Mukaro
"IT is a budget cobbled together by a
man with few alternatives. Murerwa had
little room to manoeuvre. To me it is
a 'stand still' budget that would
change nothing in that it avoided key
issues at the centre of the economic
crisis. There is no mention of efforts
to lure international investors and
the issue of rule of law is still
outstanding. There was also a deliberate
move to avoid interest rate and
exchange." - MDC shadow Minister of finance
Tapiwa Mashakada.
"We are
not satisfied though we are fully aware of the fact that the
minister tried
his best. As a ministry we were however thrilled that for the
first time
there is recognition of soccer in the budget." - Aneas Chigwedere
Education
minister.
- "The budget responds to the various inputs that came from
business. To me
it was a balanced budget which put into account the revenue
and expenditure
side. It looks realistic. The biggest challenge for the
minister is to make
it work, so that we are not having a budget that does not
mean what it
says." - CZI president Anthony Mandiwanza.
- "I think
there is awareness among business, labour and government that we
are in a
crisis that cannot be postponed any further."- Kombo Moyana,
businessman and
former RBZ governor.
- "We will not be supprised if they come up with
another supplementary
budget. To us this is a non-event. It is a dishonest
budget." - Tendai Biti
MDC MP for Harare East.
- "A workable
budget should be at least 20% of the Gross Domestic Product.
Last year the
budget was around 10% of the GDP and that has fallen far short
of the
expenditure. This year's budget is only about 11,5% of GDP and it
falls in
the same danger as last year." - David Chapfika, MP Mutoko North.
Zim Independent
Govt calls private sector to the rescue
Blessing
Zulu
GOVERNMENT has called on private players and foreign operators to come
to
the rescue of Zimbabwe's crumbling infrastructure. Presenting the
2004
annual budget yesterday Finance minister Herbert Murerwa admitted that
the
country's infrastructure required urgent rehabilitation but government
alone
could not manage because of serious financial
constraints.
"Practically all infrastructure in the country urgently
requires
rehabilitation, upgrading or expansion," Murerwa
said.
"In particular, the capacity as well as the quality of services
provided in
sectors such as water, roads, railways, airports, electricity,
education,
health, posts and telecommunications pose serious bottlenecks to
the
country's economic growth prospects."
Murerwa said government
as the traditional financier and provider of the
above infrastructure
services was facing severe financial constraints, it
will involve private
sector through concessioning and build operate and
transfer (BOT) schemes to
meet the gap.
"Concessions will be explored with foreign operators
for the rehabilitation
and upgrading of the railway track and signalling
systems," he said.
He said the road dualisation programme would continue
to be financed through
budgetary allocation complemented by private sector
participation on BOT
basis.
All government projects ground to a
halt this year with their allocations
being exhausted before doing any
meaningful work.
Zim Independent
No position on price controls
Itai Dzamara
IN a
characteristic portrayal of the confusion that grips government over
ways to
solve the economic crisis, Finance minister Herbert Murerwa remained
silent
on the controversial policy of price controls. Murerwa has in the
past
admitted that price controls, introduced two years ago, are hurting
industry
and commerce.
There is general confusion regarding government's position
on price
controls.
The government introduced the populist policy
of price controls in 2001 at
the height of political and social tension in
the country.
The Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce and the
Confederation of Zimbabwe
Industries have condemned price controls which they
say serve only to feed
the black market.
Militant members of Zanu
PF are understood to have remained adamant on price
controls which they
regard as one of the few remaining ways to win the
hearts of the
electorate.
As a way of cushioning themselves from the menace of
price controls,
manufacturers have resorted to unorthodox re-branding of
products.
Zim Independent
Moyo pushes for revival of old doctrines
Dumisani
Muleya
INFORMATION minister Jonathan Moyo has lately been attempting to
present
himself as the ruling party's newfound ideologue as he regurgitates
the
shibboleths of the 1980s in a bid for political survival, analysts
have
said.
Political analysts say Moyo - once a trenchant critic of
Zanu PF and now its
deputy spokesman - is loudly yearning to revert to what
many would see as
the political dark ages of the 1980s when Zanu PF was a
monolithic ruling
party in a de facto one-party state with a command
economy.
Between Zimbabwe's Independence from Britain in 1980 and 1990,
Zanu PF
adhered to one-party state politics and command economics in the name
of
Marxism-Leninism.
That effectively nipped in the bud efforts to
promote multi-party democracy
and corroded the economy inherited from the
colonial regime in a relatively
healthy state.
Leadership and policy
failures, as well as mismanagement and corruption,
which clearly manifested
themselves early into self-rule as President Robert
Mugabe became preoccupied
with power consolidation, worsened the situation.
The seeds of the
current national decay and failure were sown at the time.
Analysts say
Moyo is advocating a revival of Zanu PF's own version of Nazi
Germany's
Gleichschaltung - marching in step - to preserve Mugabe's
faltering
rule.
Professor Brian Raftopoulos of the University of Zimbabwe's
Institute of
Development Studies said Moyo's recent harping on ideology shows
he badly
wants Zanu PF to turn back the political and economic
clock.
"Clearly Moyo's recent statements indicate that he wants a
reassertion of
the totalitarian order of the 1980s. He wants to go back to
the statist
approach to governance and an authoritarian system," Raftopoulos
said.
"That is not surprising because of late we have seen a vigorous
reassertion
of the state which lacks legitimacy and thus relies on coercion
in its
exercise of power."
Raftopoulos said Moyo's campaign was
indicative of an official desire for
bygone absolutism.
In statements
carried in the state media recently, Moyo was quoted as saying
that beyond
Zimbabwe's "limited" current economic crisis there was a more
critical crisis
- which is "ideological".
He claimed Zanu PF's "nation-building" project
of the '80s was derailed by
the introduction of economic reforms through the
Economic Structural
Adjustment Programme in 1991.
"The daunting task
of nation building for economic prosperity for all
Zimbabweans remains
elusive unless we go back, at least conceptually, to the
project that was
abandoned when we adopted Esap in 1991," Moyo recently told
the National
Economic Consultative Forum.
"At the moment, we do not have ideological
cohesion and stability to work
with a common purpose."
Moyo accused
"ideologically excluded youths", an "ideologically indifferent
professional
class", and a "rootless middle class" of sabotaging the
"nation-building
project".
The minister, who used to denounce Mugabe and Zanu PF, recently
told
students at the Midlands State University that "non-state actors"
had
abandoned talk of "leadership change" in favour of "dangerous
regime
change".
He criticised civic groups and intellectuals for
abandoning Zanu PF after
1990, but also urged them to "come back
home".
Analysts say Moyo's new line, which directly contradicts his past
political
outlook when he condemned authoritarianism, echoes Mugabe's
statements in
the '80s when he used to posture as a socialist.
"Moyo
is campaigning for blanket national docility and subservience by
civic
groups," Raftopoulos said.
"He is hostile to civic organisations
which used to identify with the
government because he does not like them to
be autonomous to challenge the
rise of a dictatorial
state."
Opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) MP Tendai Biti
said it was a
"tragedy" to see ministers resisting democracy while clinging
to "Stalinist
ideas".
"The attempt to flatten the state into a
homogeneous political entity is
tragic and smacks of fascist thinking," Biti
said. "The government has no
business in prescribing ideological
fundamentals. Instead, it has a duty to
ensure macro-economic fundamentals
are stable and sound for investment and
economic development."
Biti
said Moyo's suggestions that Zanu PF had a consistent ideology in
the
pre-1990 period were "false and dishonest".
"Zanu PF never had a
consistent ideology after Independence. What it had was
exhausted
nationalism, which it hysterically propagated through socialist
rhetoric.
That's what Moyo is trying to revive but he is flogging a dead
horse," he
said.
"The reality on the ground is that we are dealing with a ruthless
regime
that always wanted a one-party state and to maintain power by force.
This is
well-documented. The Matabeleland massacres bear testimony to
this."
In its election manifestos before 1990, Zanu PF always mentioned
the need
for a one-party state and "scientific socialism", claiming they were
the
sine qua non for development. It also wanted a corporatist approach
to
economic management.
During the 1985 election, for example, Mugabe
wrote in the preface of his
party manifesto that a one-party state and
socialism were the major goals
for Zimbabwe. He said Marxism-Leninism was the
official ideology.
"Only when there is a one Zimbabwe people with one
leader will a scientific
re-organisation of society along socialist lines be
possible," Mugabe said.
"That is why Zanu PF seeks to bring all
Zimbabweans under its umbrella so
that there is only one leader - the party -
for one Zimbabwe."
As a result, Mugabe deeply resented opposition. He
targeted the now defunct
PF Zapu in a ruthless manner.
"Zapu and its
leader Dr Joshua Nkomo are like a cobra in the house. The only
way to deal
effectively with a snake is to strike and destroy its head," he
urged his
supporters in 1983. After his party's victory in 1985, Mugabe
called for the
liquidation of Zapu, declaring: "Now take your sticks and
beat out the snakes
among you."
Analysts say Moyo, Mugabe's willing henchman and spin-doctor,
is intent upon
refocusing his unreconstructed party on its modus operandi of
the '80s.
They say he wants an ideology of coercive mobilisation,
aggregation and
integration of various interests into the "national project",
penetration of
civic groups and self-imposition, which are all hallmarks of
totalitarian
regimes.
The essence of totalitarianism lies in its
ideology. It offers a set of
self-serving propositions about society and
one-sided accounts of history in
which the existing order has to be radically
overhauled and tries to
refashion the economy, society, family life,
education and culture in its
own image.
Analysts say this is precisely
what Zanu PF is trying to do. They see Moyo
as battling to achieve this
through his last-ditch propaganda project which
has failed to find public
purchase.
Political scientist Roy Macridis says as opposed to voluntary
participation,
totalitarian regimes offer forced mobilisation or induced
participation.
As opposed to representation, he says, totalitarian
regimes offer coercive
integration and while democracies allow for a fairly
broad parameter of
political competition, totalitarian regimes are more
restrictive and the
will of the ruling party and its leader are often imposed
on the people.
Macridis says penetration of civic groups is yet another
trusted method of
totalitarian regimes, which differ in form and approach
with democratic
systems.
Whereas democracies try to win the support of
civic groups through sound
policies, totalitarian regimes try to penetrate,
restructureand integrate
different interest groups.
Zim Independent
Eric Bloch
Abandonment of privatisation
ill-considered
INDUSTRY and International Trade minister Samuel
Mumbengegwi has done it
again — or, to be more correct, has undone it again!
Whenever government
formulates a policy which is economically
counter-productive, it adheres
rigidly to that policy and either disregards
all the negative repercussions
of doing so or blames selected third parties
for those repercussions. After
all, it is well beyond the capability of the
Zimbabwean government to admit
to error!
How can any in government be
guilty of formulating an adverse policy, or of
failing to implement a policy
effectively, when all in government are
infallible! And whenever government
formulates a policy which is
constructive and economically advantageous, it
either fails to implement it,
or implements it half-heartedly, or suspends or
rescinds the policy.
And it is such an ill-considered suspension of
policy that Minister
Mumbengegwi announced last week. Following his
attendance at the recent
congress of the Zimbabwe National Chamber of
Commerce, he announced the
suspension indefinitely of privatisation of
state-owned companies. He said
government was no longer considering disposing
of some of its entities as
they were locally owned and managed (in most
instances he would have been
more correct if he had said
“mismanaged”).
He said that “the government is already a major player in
the indigenisation
programme and it has been considered not necessary to
privatise such
companies”, and that government wants to stop the
privatisation of strategic
parastatals and concentrate on improving their
viability. In particular, he
said, parastatals such as the National Railways
of Zimbabwe, the Zimbabwe
Electricity Supply Authority and Air Zimbabwe would
no longer be considered
for privatisation but would be
commercialised.
Zimbabwe first announced its intent to privatise
parastatals approximately
13 years ago when it launched the Economic
Structural Adjustment Programme,
but did nothing about it. Then, in 1998
government announced a new economic
programme, which was to have been
implemented two years previously, called
the Zimbabwe Programme for Economic
and Social Transformation, followed
nearly three years later by the National
Economic Recovery Programme. Over
the last five years there were a number of
very successful privatisations of
parastatals, bringing into being the
immensely successful Cotton Company of
Zimbabwe Ltd, the very profitable and
well managed Rainbow Tourism Group
Ltd, Daribord Zimbabwe Ltd, Zimbabwe
Reinsurance Company Ltd, and a few
others.
History has demonstrated
throughout the generations, and throughout the
world, that no government can
consistently operate businesses efficiently.
They may do so for a period of
time, but they do not consistently operate
businesses well because there is
such a frequent conflict of interest
between political objectives and good
and sound business needs.
Decisions are made by those in ultimate control
of parastatals in accord
with political concepts and ideologies, rather than
the common sense and
logic, expertise and experience normally applied by the
businessman. An
illustration of that type of conflict and irresponsible
business
decision-making in parastatals is the frequency of non-viable
pricing of
goods and services whenever government considers that prices
should be
contained and the consumer thereby subsidised, notwithstanding that
the
consequence can be destruction of the enterprise.
In addition,
parastatals rarely succeed because, as a general rule, there is
very little
personnel motivation. The parastatal employee functions in a
protected,
secure environment aligned to that of the public service, wherein
the
employee cannot readily be dismissed and is virtually assured of
employment
until retirement. The fundamental principles that drive
aspirations within
the private sector rarely prevail in parastatals.
Certainly, few
Zimbabwean parastatals can credibly lay claim to successful
operations,
viability and meaningful consumer service. Instead, most are
technically
insolvent, surviving only on immense borrowings attained on the
basis of
almost unlimited government guarantees. Most of the parastatals are
either
inherently inefficient, or unable to operate effectively due to
inadequacy of
working capital or insufficient technological inputs and
expertise, or due to
employee lethargy.
There are uncountable examples, including the
incapacity of the National
Railways of Zimbabwe to transport sufficient coal
from Hwange to where it is
needed, or to clear from its container yards in
less than 21 days goods
which took less than five days to travel from Durban
to Bulawayo. They
include the inability of Tel*One to repair the telephone of
an elderly
couple of 94 years and 87 years respectively, very dependent upon
that
telephone, in four weeks. They include the national airline being unable
to
adhere to schedules despite the excellence of “check-in” personnel
and
flight crews, because of insufficient aircraft, equipment and
other
resources. In fact, its fares go up more frequently than do its
planes!
By contrast, the privatised Cottco, RTG, Daribord and Zimre
operate with
impressive efficiency, profitability and awareness of
business
responsibilities of customer care.
Government should also not
overlook that privatisation unlocks asset value
for the state, providing
funding for infrastructural development, and
thereby creating and
facilitating opportunities of national economic growth
and development,
targeted at greater wellbeing for the populace. Moreover,
disinvestment
from parastatals releases government from a very great debt
burden. It
enables the release of government from an ongoing obligation to
guarantee
debts of parastatals, and provides funding for repayment of
government debt,
which domestically exceeds $300 billion, whilst foreign
debt is believed to
exceed US$1,3 billion.
A frequent argument used by government to justify
parastatal operations is
the protection of the consumer, but that is spurious
in the extreme. Most
parastatals are monopolies, and few of them have
demonstrated concern for
the consumers and for their other customers.
Witness, for example, the
galloping escalation in Zimpost’s postal charges,
Tel*One’s charges, the CSC
’s beef prices and Zesa’s accelerated increases in
charges for electricity
and encroachment upon the constrained foreign
exchange resources of its
customers. In contrast, competition within the
private sector usually helps
to minimise, to some extent, the degree of price
increases, although in a
hyperinflationary environment, frequent increases in
prices are unavoidable.
And it is impossible to rationalise the
minister’s statement that
privatisation “is at odds with the spirit of
indigenisation”. That spirit is
not supposed to be indigenisation by proxy,
ownership vesting in the state
for and on behalf of the populace. It is
supposed to be indigenisation by
economic empowerment of Zimbabweans, and
that is facilitated by
privatisation. Successful privatisations to date have
enabled many employees
of the enterprises to become shareholders and, via the
Zimbabwe Stock
Exchange, thousands of others have been able to invest
directly into the
privatised enterprises, and tens of thousands to do so
indirectly via the
investments of pension funds, insurance companies, unit
trusts, and the
like.
Admittedly, upon privatisation, it is often a
consequence that some
ownership of the venture transfers to non-Zimbabweans,
but does so in
exchange for foreign currency capital injection, yields access
to
state-of-the-art technologies, and often provides entry into
lucrative
export markets and access to essential inputs.
If
government’s repeated declarations of a genuine objective of
indigenous
economic empowerment have foundation, the Minister of Industry
and
International Trade needs to appreciate that far greater
economic
empowerment is achieved by Zimbabwe’s indigenous population being
able to
have a slice of the cake, even when some of the cake is owned by
others,
than for all of the cake to be owned by government. This is
especially so
when, in the hands of government the cake only grows stale,
mouldy and
tasteless, whilst in the hands of the private sector it is
full-bodied,
tasty and with a “cherry on the top”.
At the same time,
the consumer is beneficiated by cost minimisation as a
result of
technological enhancement, personnel motivation, competition
instead of
monopolistic operation, and like factors. So, government gains by
way of
unlocking of value and reduction of debt, the indigenous population
gains by
way of employee and public equity participation and consideration
of consumer
attitudes, and the economy as a whole benefits. However,
government will
undoubtedly be as myopic to these attributes of
privatisation as it is to any
other measure which thwarts its attempted
total control of all Zimbabwe and
its economy.
Zim Independent
Muckraker
How will tourism police cope with
Jocelyn?
A PICTURE tells a thousand words, they say, and nothing could
more
poignantly illustrate the horrors of Zanu PF’s land “reforms” than
the
photograph carried by the Standard on its front page last
Sunday.
It showed a champion Friesland dairy cow, known as Daisy Girl,
hacked to
death at Kennilworth Farm near Chipinge on the night of October 26
by
suspected land invaders from a neighbouring property. This
unsuspecting
animal, used to the tender hands of its owners at one of the few
dairy farms
still functioning in the district, was hacked to death by people
using blunt
machetes. They went for her legs first and then attacked the
remaining
carcass.
We hope the picture is reproduced as widely as
possible. Much has been
written about the lawlessness and violence that has
been the trademark of
Zanu PF’s land occupations in so far as they have
impacted on farmers and
their workers. It is estimated that up to 500 000
people have been made
homeless in the only land reform programme in history
that has dispossessed
more people than it has resettled (134 000).
But
we rarely see the tragedy that has afflicted livestock, including beef
and
dairy herds built up with care and planning over decades. Those
vast
investments in money and man-hours have been laid waste by mobs
of
ruling-party supporters who have cruelly slaughtered or neglected one of
the
country’s most valuable resources.
Then there is the wildlife
poached, estimated at 60% of the total in some
places.
Don’t let’s
hear again of President Mugabe’s “bold stance” on the land issue
or the
fulfilment of some historic mission without looking at the pictures
of the
dumb creatures who are just another statistic of Zanu PF’s
lawless
mobs.
Another victim of lawlessness has been the country’s
tourism industry.
Tourists have stayed away in droves from what they
understandably see as an
unpredictable state where human rights abuses take
place on a daily basis.
There has recently been a campaign in the government
media, led by the
Zimbabwe Tourism Authority, to pretend that tourists are
returning to
Zimbabwe.
There is of course no evidence whatsoever for
this. Reports that the police
appear reluctant to apprehend those responsible
for the expulsion of
tourists from Hippo Pools recently and the theft of
their property helps to
explain the continued absence of visitors which no
amount of sloppily
produced colour brochures and deceptive CD-Roms can entice
back!
But, the eternally optimistic state media tells us, in a move to
“further
boost the rapidly recovering tourist sector”, the government has
established
a tourism police. Crimes against tourists will now be dealt with
separately,
the Zimbabwe Council for Tourism’s Paul Matamisa told the Sunday
Mail. This
would restore confidence in the country’s tourism industry, he
said.
The ZRP has recruited 22 officers who were currently undergoing
training, he
added. So far, so good.
But the story then suffered a
severe credibility crisis when it was
disclosed that “Harare business woman
Jocelyn Chiwenga” had “donated 22
uniforms” in support of the
scheme.
This we assume is the same Jocelyn Chiwenga who was reported to
have
assaulted lawyer Gugulethu Moyo at Glen View police station in March?
The
same Jocelyn Chiwenga who gave police officers their marching
orders
regarding what to do with Moyo and how to treat her?
It
evidently has not occurred to those behind the tourism police scheme
that
there is absolutely no point setting up a special force when the
regular
force takes its orders from ruling-party harridans who they decline
to
prosecute for assault despite the fact that a crime was committed on
their
own property in front of their very eyes!
Did Matamisa, ZCT
president Shingi Munyeza, and other private-sector players
cited in the
Sunday Mail story as enthusiastic supporters of the tourism
police scheme not
explain this fact of life to the authorities, or the
significance of allowing
the Hippo Pools incident, including the assault on
the resort’s manager, to
go unprosecuted? Are foreign tourists aware that
they are likely to be
searched and have their foreign currency confiscated
at any time, as happened
over the weekend to visitors from Zambia?
Perhaps Greg Stutchbury, who
was waxing lyrical on an international radio
station last week about the
Victoria Falls Hotel and the prospect of a
tourism recovery there without
once referring to the governance issue, could
bring us one of the Far Eastern
tourists he imagines seeing there. We are
keen to actually identify one of
these elusive species who we are told can
be spotted on golf courses in the
vicinity of the Falls. Perhaps Greg could
dart and capture one and relocate
it to our office for verification. If all
else fails he could use his
butterfly net!
Uganda’s president Yoweri Museveni should not be surprised
if Uganda is
given a wide berth when Commonwealth leaders decide on the next
venue for
Chogm in 2005. It doesn’t have much of a chance as it is, with
Africa
hosting Chogm this year. But the pronouncements of Museveni’s special
envoy,
Prof Mondo Kagonyera, last week will have advertised his
country’s
unsuitability.
Courting Zimbabwe’s support, Kagonyera cast
caution to the wind and
proclaimed Zimbabwe had done nothing to warrant
suspension from the
Commonwealth.
“Zimbabwe has done nothing wrong nor
faulted any of the rules of the
Commonwealth,” he declared after meeting
President Mugabe.
In fact Zimbabwe has not only violated every single
tenet of the Harare
Declaration, it has failed to meet the terms of the
Commonwealth Troika set
out in the Marlborough House statement of March 2002;
in other words, the
terms enunciated by Olusegun Obasanjo and Thabo Mbeki
together with John
Howard when Zimbabwe was suspended. These involve
addressing issues of
governance and engaging with the Commonwealth
secretary-general Don McKinnon
in finding a way forward.
Zimbabwe
refused to even allow McKinnon to visit Harare to discuss
the
issue!
How Kagonyera can then proclaim that Zimbabwe had done
nothing to warrant
suspension beggars belief. Clearly, Uganda is prepared to
ignore the
sustained assault on the civil rights of the Zimbabwean people in
order to
secure Zimbabwe’s support for the next Chogm to be held in
Kampala.
That makes Uganda a particularly unsuitable candidate. Countries
which
ignore human rights abuses, electoral fraud and attacks on press
freedom are
not appropriate hosts. Uganda was among the many countries
consulted by
McKinnon before the Commonwealth decided not to lift the
suspension. A clear
majority of the 54 member states agreed with the
secretariat that the
suspension should remain in place until the Abuja
summit. We don’t recall
Uganda raising any objection at the time.
The
state media has decided that the majority should be ignored in favour of
a
minority of two which has subsequently risen to five! Meanwhile,
Obasanjo,
who was prevailed upon to write a rather embarrassing letter to
Australia’s
John Howard making all sorts of claims that have turned out to be
untrue, is
now having second thoughts. This week he made it clear to Mugabe
that
Zimbabwe had not done enough to meet the terms set out at the time of
its
suspension. There has not been the “sea change” he talked about in New
York
last month. So Zimbabwe’s case — and Uganda’s — is looking
increasingly
lame.
Cde UT Surface this week tried to let Mugabe’s
followers down gently. It
would be difficult for the president to go to
Abuja, he explained, because
Mugabe would be attending the Zanu PF conference
in Masvingo at the time.
What a coincidence!
What was Joseph
Chinotimba doing conducting the draw for the second round of
the Zifa Unity
Cup last week? He was pictured in the Sunday Mail digging his
hand into the
trophy containing the ballots with the assistance of Zifa
chief executive
Ndumiso Gumede. Nothing more clearly exposes the
politicisation of
soccer.
Chinotimba was the self-styled commander-in-chief of farm
invasions on the
periphery of Harare in 2000 and a controversial municipal
police official
who mysteriously kept his job while being occupied elsewhere:
for instance,
threatening judges.
He was rewarded for his delinquency
with a 4x4, from whom we are unsure. He
is also, we should remind ourselves,
Zanu PF’s failed candidate for the
Highfield seat earlier this
year.
So exactly what was he doing conducting the draw for the Zifa Unity
Cup?
What value does he add to Zifa? And what, as a matter of interest, is
his
current source of income?
At least Zifa have said they will
tighten up the selection criteria for fans
accompanying the Warriors on
foreign tours after the looting of duty-free
shops in Accra and Nouakchott
last week. Taking advantage of understaffed
shops as their plane put down en
route to the World Cup qualifier, fans
helped themselves to a variety of
goods, it was reported. Perfumes, beer,
whisky, chocolates, and magazines
were scooped up by the Zimbabwe supporters
as staff failed to cope.
In
the Mauritanian capital trusting locals were assured the Zimdollar was on
a
par with the greenback. Traders and taxi drivers only discovered
their
mistake when banks reopened after the Islamic weekend. Zimbabwe
National
Supporters Association vice-president Eddie Nyatanga exempted
“reputable
businessmen and corporate leaders” in the party from any
wrongdoing.
“Such people can never lower themselves to steal a can of
beer,” he
reassured us!
Jonathan Moyo gave a few hostages to fortune
in his address to the Zimbabwe
Staff College on Monday.
“The judiciary
had been the first choice of attack,” he was reported as
saying, “in efforts
aimed at regime change since almost the whole bench was
hostile to land
reform.”
It was not entirely clear from the Herald report who was doing
the attacking
and when!
But we liked the bit about the British and
Americans wanting to give the
impression that politicians were living well
while most people were
suffering, “when in fact there are some people who
live luxurious lives but
are not necessarily in government”.
“It was
surprising,” Moyo said, “with ordinary people finding it difficult
to survive
that there were some people who were able to buy luxurious goods
including
posh cars.”
Yes indeed. We heard about those people filling up their posh
cars with
goods in Johannesburg just after Christmas. We heard about people
who were
definitely in government using scarce forex to load 4x4s and
trailers for
the return journey to Zimbabwe after partying with their
families at plush
Johannesburg hotels at a time when half the population of
Zimbabwe faced
starvation.
Moyo claimed people were tired of
“propaganda” from the private media which
had been predicting for the last
four years that the country would collapse.
Journalists for these papers had
become “spent forces” he said, far removed
from reality.
And Moyo, we
take it, represents reality? The reality of a country that is
not anywhere
near collapse?
Moyo seems nervous about his own future. Debate on the
succession issue
outside the institutional framework was “dangerous”, he
warned.
“We should not be misled as a nation that the succession debate
is important
for everybody when those who are pushing for it seek to redefine
our social
being,” he said. Those pushing the succession debate would want
to make it
appear that the target was the president when in actual fact the
aim was to
uproot the country’s whole social fabric, he claimed. It was all
about
regime change, not succession.
So who’s worried here? Who’s
clinging to Mugabe’s coat-tails for dear life?
Who wants to smother
debate?
If the British and Americans have failed in creating the
conditions for
regime change why is Moyo so obsessed by it?
While Moyo
claims the public is tired of what the private press has been
saying about
the regime, the Herald last Friday suggested popular sentiment
is not exactly
pro-Zanu PF.
“Streetwise illegal dealers can be heard on the pavements of
many streets
slandering the president, lampooning the land reform programme,
and
castigating the state for allegedly bringing about an economic milieu
that
is unfavourable to the common man,” the paper disclosed.
So there
you have it. People actually slandering the president and
lampooning land
reform. Next they will be suggesting we need a new
government!
It is
all the fault of the West of course. But despite “cataclysmic
vicissitudes
the Zimbabwe economy has demonstrated near-outlandish
resilience”. And
Pollyanna-like, the Herald believes it won’t take a lot to
put things
right.
“We believe that if all Zimbabweans put their hands on deck, our
economy
will come right soon,” it said. “During the Great Depression of the
first
half of the last century the economies of many countries tittered (sic)
on
the brink of collapse but are among the best today.”
Many people
will have had difficulty suppressing a titter on reading this!
All we have to
do is put our hands to the deck of the Titanic and all will
be OK. After all,
the US emerged from the Great Depression and is today
doing fine. Let’s just
hope it doesn’t take 10 years and a world war to put
us right! Oh yes, and we
need somebody to play FDR.
Zim Independent
Comment
Mugabe sinks Obasanjo’s
diplomacy
THE visit on Monday of Nigeria’s Olusegun Obasanjo has raised
hopes in
government circles that even at this late hour President Mugabe may
be
invited to the Commonwealth heads of government meeting in Abuja next
month.
The visit followed sustained pressure by Zimbabwe’s diminishing
number of
friends to get Obasanjo to relent on Nigeria’s earlier decision not
to issue
an invitation to Mugabe on the well-established grounds that
suspended
states cannot attend. Fiji and Pakistan have both been excluded in
the past
for democratic deficits.
Mugabe told Obasanjo that Zimbabwe
had no case to answer and was entitled to
attend, a refrain taken up by Stan
Mudenge in his ministerial statement to
parliament on Wednesday. Zimbabwe’s
suspension had lapsed on March 19, one
year after its imposition, he
claimed.
Given these distortions, it is necessary to review the record.
The Troika of
“club” leaders, John Howard (current chair), Thabo Mbeki and
Obasanjo, was
asked at the Coolum summit in February 2002 to base their
recommendations
for dealing with the Zimbabwe crisis squarely on the findings
of the
Commonwealth election observer mission covering the presidential poll.
This
they did in their Marlborough House Statement of March last year.
Zimbabwe
would need to address the problems raised by the monitoring team
with regard
to electoral procedures and governance, they said, in order to
bring the
country into conformity with the Harare Declaration of
Commonwealth
principles. Secretary-general Don McKinnon was tasked to engage
with the
Harare authorities to ensure compliance.
Instead of following
this advice, the Zimbabwe government proceeded to
denounce the observer
mission, making all sorts of allegations about its
composition and its head,
which in the most part turned out to be false. At
no stage did it address the
central issue of electoral misconduct. Indeed,
the army remains a key player
in electoral supervision, the Electoral
Supervisory Commission continues to
be an instrument of the incumbent, and
as recent events in Chinhoyi show, the
opposition is prevented by force from
contesting elections. Freedom of choice
has also been diminished by the
closure of the Daily News.
In a
serious breach of protocol, McKinnon has been prevented from visiting
Harare
to consult with Mugabe, being told to liaise with Mudenge instead.
It is
therefore hardly surprising that when the Troika members consulted in
March
they could not find sufficient grounds to warrant lifting the
suspension.
There has developed in official Zimbabwean circles a myth that a
minority of
one on the Troika (Howard) overruled a majority of two. In fact
the decision
by the Troika not to lift the suspension was based on an
extensive programme
of consultation with Commonwealth leaders undertaken by
McKinnon in February.
It was this wide consensus — including African,
Caribbean and Pacific states
— that buttressed the Troika, two of whose
members were admittedly trying to
prevaricate.
However, despite Obasanjo bearing the impression of the last
person to have
sat on him and no doubt anxious not to have a diplomatic
disaster on his
hands at Abuja, he did muster sufficient resolve in recent
months to exclude
Mugabe from the forthcoming meeting.
Now, in
response to exhortations from Malaysia’s foreign minister, prodded
into
action by Mudenge, and regional leaders, Obasanjo has gone the extra
mile for
Mugabe. And what did he find on Monday? The Zimbabwean president
claiming
that he was the victim of a racist plot and that although there had
been “a
change of attitude” by Morgan Tsvangirai, his electoral petition
remained an
obstacle to further talks.
It is not Tsvangirai who needed to change his
attitude. It is a stubborn
incumbent in State House who has refused point
blank to adhere to
Commonwealth principles. Unless Obasanjo is blind he will
have understood
that clearly enough. After all, he and Mbeki assumed they had
cleared the
petition obstacle when they were here in May. In a democracy
aggrieved
parties are perfectly entitled to appeal to the courts for
justice.
Obasanjo will now consult with other Commonwealth leaders who,
we must
assume, will see no reason to bend the rules for a rogue state that
only
this week used unwarranted brutality to crush a legitimate protest
against
its ruinous economic policies. Sam Nujoma’s brief to put Zimbabwe’s
case at
Abuja now looks problematic. If anything, Obasanjo’s hand has
been
strengthened in his dealings with Mugabe’s apologists. Despite an
anxiety to
please, let’s hope he remains steadfast in upholding the values
for which
the Commonwealth stands.
Zim Independent
Does Dube know the price of bread?
HOW in heaven's
name does an educated person like Cuthbert Dube of the
Premier Services
Medical Aid Society arrogantly tell his members that it
will take six months
to refund a claim of just $5 000?
What galaxy is he from? I, with my
little knowledge, know inflation is
galloping towards 1 000%.
By
the way, does Dube know that a loaf of poorly made bread now costs:
nearly $4
000?
Leslie Vollenhoven,
Gweru.
Zim Independent
Zanu PF defacing our history
HAVING broken all the
rules in the book, Zanu PF now wants to call its
plunder of our resources,
its scandalous land reform programme and
systematic purging of the soldiers
of democracy, Chimurenga Three.
Maybe my history teacher got it all
wrong. He said the land question was the
main motivation behind the first and
second Chimurengas, but not the only
one. People took up arms against a
minority authority which had imposed
itself on the majority. It was a titanic
battle pitting the oppressed
against the oppressor.
The oppressed
fought for the right to exist and to participate in the
creation of a vision
for Zimbabwe. They sacrificed their lives for justice,
peace, equality and
freedom for all. They fought for the right to belong to
the community of the
free world.
There are parallels in the current struggle. On one side
is a regime, Zanu
PF, determined to rob us of all of the ideals mentioned
above. On the other
side, the majority's will persevere in spite of the
persecution.
Chimurenga is in our midst, but you don't need the
brains of a rocket
scientist to determine which side is which. We, the people
of Zimbabwe, are
in another struggle for liberation, Chimurenga Three, from
Zanu PF's
clutches.
One can understand why this party is desperate
to associate its outlawed
rule with "the people's struggle". It has never
been able to grasp the true
essence of Chimurenga.
Chimurenga is
an unbroken chain, laid on the foundation of a determined
human struggle. The
spirit is not static; it matures with age and assumes
different
forms.
Zanu PF's uneducated interpretation of Chimurenga revolves
around the land
issue and every other project the regime embarks on. Is the
party aware that
it didn't exist when Nehanda inspired the first
Chimurenga?
Both Mugabe and his party are defacing our history. They
now want to take a
leap ahead of us, to force themselves into the present and
the future, by
inventing history. Mugabe is using the party to deconstruct
his irrevocably
notorious legacy. With its continued perpetuation of a stolen
mandate, the
party is defeating itself. It's even surrendering its stake in
Chimurenga
Two.
Obert Ronald Madondo,
Toronto, Canada.
Zim Independent
Letter to Mbeki: Mugabe beyond diplomacy
THE world
welcomed your timely response to the US-Iraq confrontation. The
world and the
region recognise your status as the "first among equals" among
southern
African leaders. The world is mystified that no such morally
correct stand is
being taken by the South African government over the crisis
in Zimbabwe.
Diplomats repeatedly characterise your stand as
"incomprehensible". Could you
please become comprehensible.
Not even a superficial glance at Zimbabwe
can conceal the fact that a
catastrophe has been unleashed. At the risk of
repeating what is already
known, the following are just a few
fundamentals:
Zimbabweans are poorer now than at any other time in
the last century.
Inflation is running at 526% and rising. Imagine: every
week the price of
bread doubles. Most basics have all but disappeared from
store shelves.
For many people, there is no mealie-meal, no oil, no fuel,
no flour, no
beef, no salt, no sugar, no biscuits, no grain for either humans
or animals.
The national cattle herd has been decimated; most chicken, pig
and sheep
breeders have been forced to slaughter.
Critical fuel
shortages enter their third year with no sign that the
government is doing
anything. Millions are starving. The agricultural sector
has been
systematically vandalised. The land reform process has been
grossly
mismanaged and hijacked by unscrupulous officials. With Robert
Mugabe's
"Operation clean sweep", the process has become openly racist,
targeting
even tiny holdings and non-arable mountain reserves. Only a few
landless
peasants are benefiting, and tens of thousands of hectares of prime
land now
lie fallow.
The knock-on effects are disastrous.
Agro-industry has been eviscerated,
forex earnings almost obliterated,
hundreds of thousands of jobs lost, the
tax base seriously depleted and banks
thrown into disarray. Small businesses
everywhere are collapsing. The
brain-drain amongst all races is huge.
Medical, industrial and
educational expertise is dissolving. Nurses are
striking for a 7 000% pay
rise, desperate to make ends meet, while bodies
rot in mortuaries because
hearses have no fuel to fetch them. Government
price controls have backfired.
Almost all small bakeries have been put out
of business, and bread sales have
simply gone into black market mode. In
effect, the entire population has
become a nation of petty criminals as
there is no other way to survive.
Cross-border smuggling is rampant.
On my most recent visit, I gave a
lift to an elderly man who showed me his
scars: Zanu PF militia had smashed
his legs with bricks for campaigning for
the opposition. Dissenting
newspapers are bombed and harassed.
Opposition leaders are arbitrarily
arrested or attacked.
Food and fuel distribution are regularly
reserved for Zanu PF card-holders.
Documented human rights abuses at the
hands of government agents now run
into the hundreds of
thousands.
The majority feel once again - as they did under Ian Smith
- that they have
no recourse to the law. The constitution has been emptied of
meaning.
Meanwhile, officials and unscrupulous businessmen and foreign
hunters make
millions by pillaging the country's resources, often with
government
connivance. Patriotism is dead. President Mugabe harps constantly
about
Zimbabwe's sovereignty, but Zimbabwe has never in its history been
so
dependent on the outside world, and never so vulnerable.
To
blame all this on foreign saboteurs is absurd. Only a centralised
machinery,
a governing power, could bring about such comprehensive vandalism
and
collapse.
The environmental impact is catastrophic. One tiny example:
in the Nyanyadzi
district young baobab trees are stripped of bark to make
fibre mats for a
tourist market which no longer exists. Unsold mats hang
everywhere; the
baobabs die. This inward-turning, hopeless destruction is
happening
nationally. Extensive denuding of tree-cover is affecting water
supplies.
Even non-arable conservancies are being carved up amongst Zanu PF
heavies.
In satellite photographs, Zimbabwe looks like semi-desert. The
latest count:
60% of wildlife on private conservancies is gone; 40% in
national parks in
two years. South African citizens are implicated in the
slaughter.
I am sure you do not need reminding, Mr President, of
Nepad's explicit
commitment to environmental health for all, as well as to
the principles of
good governance. No amount of prevarication and
sidestepping can conceal the
fact that Robert Mugabe's government is
primarily responsible for the
meltdown, and that it is a regional disaster.
If Zimbabwe is not rescued,
Nepad is dead.
This is not about
saving a few thousand whites, who are not even remotely an
electoral or
pragmatic threat to Zanu PF, and who will in any case survive.
It is not
about some mythical return to a pernicious colonial or
neo-colonial rule. It
is not about kowtowing to self-serving programmes
dictated by the World Bank
or rapacious multinationals. It is not about
narrow party politics. And it is
not just about removing a single man from
power.
Mugabe is not the
only member of the Zanu PF government who has publicly
threatened death to a
constitutionally-protected opposition or boasted about
being greater than
Hitler. Hitler - do we really need to remind ourselves? -
murdered six
million people on purely racial grounds, and launched the most
destructive
war the planet has ever known. These are not boasts worthy of
any statesman,
whatever his liberation credentials. In Zimbabwe, those
credentials have been
comprehensively betrayed and abandoned.
It is time, Mr President, to turn the corner.
It is now a much wider matter of upholding moral,
humane and democratic
principles. It is about saving millions of lives, and
averting the already
massive refugee crisis. It is about serving the majority
for whom the
liberation wars in the whole region were fought. It is this
majority which
is suffering: not the colonials, who effectively no longer
exist, and
certainly not the new elite who are making astounding profits from
the
crisis itself.
"Quiet diplomacy" has not worked, not because
it is in itself a bad policy,
but because Mugabe and his henchmen have
already put themselves beyond
diplomacy. Current "power-sharing" initiatives
simply avoid the central
problem: that Zanu PF has been abusing power for
years (are the 20 000
Ndebele dead of the 1980s Gukurahundi not testament
enough?).
They have consistently proven themselves tyrannical,
incompetent and
untrustworthy. They have deliberately destroyed truthfulness
in Zimbabwe.
Their lies are transparent to a 12-year-old, their public
assurances
contravened daily on the ground. "Sharing" with them will solve
nothing,
unless tied to a clear programme for a thorough election-based
overhaul.
President Mbeki, no one expects from you an armed invasion, or
even punitive
sanctions. But the majority of oppressed people in the entire
region look to
you to express open, upright, consistent, and public outrage
at the slow
genocide and state-sponsored criminality being perpetrated in
Zimbabwe.
They need this moral support to help themselves. They need
your powerful
presence to help permit a non-violent change to a peace-loving
and selfless
government. They need you to lead the region's leaders into an
unequivocal
stance against a terror which can no longer be shut away within
Zimbabwe's
borders: it is a cancerous regional problem.
Above all, President Mbeki, we all need to hear your voice, loudly and now.
Dan
Wylie,
South Africa.
Zim Independent
Independent voices gagged
By Otto Saki
THE passing
of the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act
(Aippa) in March
last year saw the enactment of registration requirements
for media houses and
journalists. The Associated Newspapers Zimbabwe (ANZ)
then launched a
constitutional challenge to provisions of the Act that they
regarded as a
violation of freedom of expression as provided for in the
constitution and
other international instruments which Zimbabwe is party to.
The Supreme
Court in September this year refused to give the ANZ audience,
ordering that
the ANZ comply with the provisions of the Act before they can
challenge the
constitutionality or otherwise of the Act. Acting on the
Supreme Court
judgement, the state forced the ANZ to cease operations
leading to the halt
in production of the Daily News and the Daily News On
Sunday.
The
Supreme Court ruling has attracted the attention of virtually all
human
rights organisations, civic groups, and members of the legal
fraternity. The
Supreme Court decision, which prompted the closure of the
Daily News, has
received widespread condemnation on the perception that it
abrogated its
duty to defend and protect the freedoms provided for in the
constitution and
other international covenants that Zimbabwe signed and
ratified. The
subsequent seizure of ANZ property by the Zimbabwe Republic
Police without
judicial sanction is a further violation of certain
fundamental rights in
Zimbabwe. The directors, staff and journalists of the
ANZ were not spared
either as the police subjected them to arbitrary arrests
and detentions from
time to time.
The ANZ then filed an
application for registration in compliance with the
requirements under Aippa
to the Media and Information Commission (MIC). The
MIC turned down the
application on the basis that the ANZ had not satisfied
the requirements. The
ANZ appealed against the decision of the MIC with the
Administrative Court,
which found in favour of the Daily News on October 24.
The Administrative
Court ruled that the MIC was improperly constituted, that
it was biased
largely due to the conduct of its chairperson and also that it
acted ultra
vires its powers in terms of Aippa.
The Constitution of Zimbabwe
provides in Section 20 of the Bill of Rights
for the freedom of expression
and in verbatim states: "Except with his own
consent or by way of parental
discipline, no person shall be hindered in the
enjoyment of his freedom of
expression, that is to say, freedom to hold
opinions and to receive and
impart ideas and information without
interference, and freedom from
interference with his correspondence."
It is evident from the above that
freedom of expression is one of the
elementary rights which must be guarded
jealously by all individuals in
society for its violation affects the
enjoyment of other rights.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR) in Article 19 states:
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion
and expression; this right
includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive
and impart information and ideas through
any media and regardless of
frontiers."
Even though not
necessarily binding, the provisions of the UDHR have been
considered to be an
authoritative guide to human rights and constitute
general principles of law
and are widely held as having acquired legal force
as customary international
law. Some jurists have also regarded the UDHR as
part of the United Nations
Law.
The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, which Zimbabwe
ratified in
1986, equally provides for freedom of expression under Article 9
(1) when it
states that "Every individual shall have the right to receive
information".
The African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
meeting at its 32nd
Ordinary session in 2002 adopted the Declaration of
Principles on Freedom of
Expression, the preamble of which reaffirms "the
fundamental importance of
the freedom of expression as an individual human
right, as a cornerstone of
democracy and as a means of ensuring respect for
all human rights and
freedoms" in Africa.
The Declaration
recognises the key role the media and other means of
communication play in
"ensuring full respect for freedom of expression, in
promoting the free flow
of information and ideas, in assisting people to
make informed decisions and
promoting the free flow of information and
ideas, in assisting people to make
informed decisions and in facilitating
and strengthening
democracy".
An important aspect of the states' positive obligation to
promote freedom of
expression and of the media is the need to promote
pluralism within and to
ensure equal access of all to the media. This entails
that states not only
refrain from interfering with the rights but also take
positive steps to
ensure that rights, including freedom of expression, are
respected. In
effect governments are under an obligation to create an
environment in which
independent media can flourish, thereby satisfying the
public's right to
information.
Article 14 of the Declaration
provides that "states shall promote a general
economic environment in which
the media can flourish". The Declaration
unequivocally affirms the principle
of independence of media regulatory
bodies, as this is a vital condition for
the promotion and protection of the
right to freedom of expression. To ensure
the free flow of information and
ideas, media regulatory bodies should enjoy
both organisational and
operational autonomy - a requirement that the MIC of
Zimbabwe cannot
satisfy.
Zimbabwe also ratified the International
Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights in 1991 which provides for the freedom
of expression under Article 19
(2) as follow: "Everyone shall have the right
to freedom of expression; this
right shall include freedom to receive and
impart information and ideas of
all kinds regardless of frontiers, either
orally, in writing or in print, in
the form of art, or through any other
media of his choice".
It is clear that freedom of expression is one
of the fundamental rights; all
state parties to the above cited instruments
are expected to implement
measures that further enhance the enjoyment of
these rights. The ANZ case is
emblematic of the patent suppression of the
freedom of expression by the
state. It goes without saying that the existence
of an independent media is
important in the furtherance of democracy and
democratic values in society.
To this end, Zimbabwe Lawyers For Human Rights
is campaigning for the
respect and protection of freedom of expression in
Zimbabwe. The granting of
a publishing licence to the ANZ is only but a step
towards the promotion,
enforcement, and realisation of the right to freedom
of expression in
Zimbabwe.
- Otto Saki is a projects lawyer with
the Zimbabwe Lawyers For Human Rights.