AS A weary England squad finally arrived
in Zimbabwe almost 48 hours behind schedule, two cricket boards were becoming
embroiled in yet another dispute. It is no surprise that money again lies at the
heart of the matter, with Zimbabwe Cricket seeking compensation from the ECB
after the one-day series was reduced from five to four matches.
In a rearranged itinerary, England will play in
Harare tomorrow and on Wednesday before flying to Bulawayo for back-to-back
fixtures next weekend. The match scheduled to take place yesterday has been
dropped because Duncan Fletcher, the England coach, and David Morgan, the
chairman of the ECB, refused to countenance squeezing it in early next week.
Zimbabwe Cricket believes that England are thereby
responsible for a loss of income from areas including television rights,
advertising and ticket sales. Even though the claim is thought to amount to less
than £100,000, Morgan insists that no payment will be made as the fault lies
with Zimbabwe.
He
dismissed a request from Peter Chingoka, the Zimbabwe Cricket chairman, to play
today. “That would have meant five one-day internationals in eight days,” Morgan
said. “Four games in eight days is in itself a fairly heavy schedule and Duncan
not surprisingly did not want to play more than that.
“Zimbabwe Cricket have indicated that they will
suffer a significant financial penalty as a result, but we have made it clear
that we do not believe that the ECB is liable. It is a consequence of the delay
in accrediting part of the British media.”
Chingoka said that he was “disappointed” with the
response, while Lovemore Banda, the Zimbabwe Cricket media and communications
manager, said: “Zimbabwe Cricket would like to keep (the matter) between
ourselves and our counterparts from England.”
The change in itinerary means the squad will spend
seven nights in Harare and only three in Bulawayo, where the likelihood of
demonstrations against Robert Mugabe’s Government is considered to be greater.
Practice facilities are also better in the capital and the Harare Sports Club
ground looked a picture when England trained yesterday before the game there
tomorrow.
So far, the only conspicuous evidence of opposition
to the tour has been some graffiti scrawled in red capital letters on a wall in
Robert Mugabe Road, opposite the team hotel. It read: “England go home” and
“Shame on England”. There were no protesters when the party arrived at the
airport or when the team bus was escorted to the hotel.
Morgan is taking no chances, however. The number of
backroom people with the squad now exceeds the number of players 15 to 14. As
well as the eight coaches, management and medical staff who were in Namibia for
the warm-ups, there are three ECB officials, Richard Bevan from the Professional
Cricketers’ Association, two security officers from a company based in South
Africa and a local liaison man.
“(The fact that) we are here assisting the management
of the tour is evidence that we regard this as a different and special trip,”
Morgan said at a press conference in which he offered perhaps his most defiant
and forceful defence yet of the decision to play in Zimbabwe.
He hopes that fulfilling the matches — even four
instead of five — will “bring closure” to an issue that has become big enough to
be known as the Zimbabwe Affair. “Within the international cricket community, if
we were not to make this tour it would have been nothing short of a painful
running sore,” Morgan said.
Attitudes towards the chairman have touched both
extremes. Jonathan Agnew, the BBC Cricket Correspondent, suggested that after
keeping the tour alive his diplomatic skills might be well employed in solving
the Iraq situation. Others, who think that England should not be here, have
called for his resignation.
Morgan denied that he could have curtailed the trip
on Wednesday after Ehsan Mani, the ICC president, said that member countries
would be sympathetic towards a withdrawal. “The support of world cricket was
completely conditional on making our very best efforts to obtain accreditation
for the media concerned,” he said.
This is the background against which England are
about to undertake one of the least appealing matches in more than a century of
international cricket. Ian Bell and Kevin Pietersen could make one-day debuts at
this level and Simon Jones will join them if he is preferred to Alex Wharf. But
whatever the extent of an anticipated victory it will be no cause for
celebration.