The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

News24

Cops break up farmers' meeting
28/11/2003 20:13  - (SA)

Harare - Police broke up a meeting of displaced white farmers and detained
at least four of their leaders for questioning, the group's lawyer said on
Friday.

More than 100 white farmers gathered at an agricultural research institute
north of Harare to discuss legal implications of the government's seizure of
thousands of white-owned farms for redistribution to blacks.

Police accused organisers of convening a public meeting without notifying
them - an offense punishable by up to six months in jail under strict
security laws - according to their lawyer, Beatrice Mtetwa. Participants
were ordered to disperse, witnesses said.

The meeting was organised by Justice for Agriculture, an association of
farmers thrown off their property under the controversial land program.

The group is demanding that the government pay them realistic compensation
or return their land.

Its head, John Worsely-Worswick, was detained for questioning at Harare's
main police station along with three other officials and a prominent lawyer,
Mtetwa said.

Police spokesperson Wayne Bvudzijena declined to comment on the arrests,
saying he was awaiting details from provincial police officers.

The farm seizures have crippled Zimbabwe's agriculture based economy,
leaving the country with acute shortages of food, gasoline, medicine and
other imports.

The World Food Program estimates more than 5.5 million people - almost half
the population - will need food aid to avert famine in coming months.

Many prime farms seized by the government went to ruling party leaders.
Others lie idle because of shortages of fertilizer, seeds and plowing
equipment.

The state District Development Fund said on Friday that 13 000 functioning
tractors remained in the country. At least 40 000 are needed for plowing
ahead of upcoming rains, the fund said, but many were destroyed during the
often-violent land seizures since February 2002.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Reuters

      Mugabe hints at Commonwealth exit
      (Reuters) - November 28 2003 11:04

      HARARE (Reuters) - President Robert Mugabe has suggested that Zimbabwe
could leave the Commonwealth, from which it was suspended last year after
his controversial re-election.

      Zimbabwe has been excluded from next month's Commonwealth summit in
Nigeria. The Commonwealth groups Britain and mainly its former colonies.

      "If our sovereignty is what we have to lose to be readmitted into the
Commonwealth, well we will say goodbye to the Commonwealth, and perhaps the
time has now come to say so," Mugabe said at a state funeral in Harare on
Friday.

      Zimbabwe accuses what it calls the "white" section of the
Commonwealth, led by Britain and Australia, of pursuing a vendetta because
of Mugabe's seizure of white-owned farms for redistribution to landless
blacks.

      Zimbabwe was suspended from the 54-member group after charges by
Commonwealth and European Union observers that Mugabe rigged his re-election
last year.

      Britain and Australia have been determined to keep Mugabe away from
the December 5-8 heads of government meeting in the Nigerian capital Abuja,
while several African members have tried to keep him in the group.

      The Zimbabwe issue has dominated preparations for the summit and
threatened to split the group along racial lines.

      On Friday Mugabe lashed out at what he called an "apologetic" stance
that some African countries had taken by failing to support his government
over the land reforms.

      "Those of this view allow the neo-colonialists and neo-imperialists to
drive us to apologise for representing and pursuing our interests, for being
ourselves," Mugabe said.

      "Is it the African solidarity and sovereignty, the solidarity of those
who are non-whites, or is the strength, the power of the few whites in the
Commonwealth that should dominate the view of the Commonwealth?" he said.

      Mugabe, 79, in power since independence from Britain in 1980, says his
local and international opponents have sabotaged Zimbabwe's economy to
punish him for the land programme.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

New Zealand Herald

Zimbabwe failure haunts Don McKinnon

29.11.2003
By HELEN TUNNAH
For a man campaigning to stay Commonwealth Secretary-General, Don McKinnon
is spreading a pretty downbeat message about his biggest headache, Zimbabwe.

"What we have achieved so far is probably nothing," McKinnon admits. "I have
failed totally to achieve anything, but no other organisation has achieved
anything either in creating a mood for change.

"But show me what the pressure point is on Zimbabwe and I'll do it."

McKinnon hopes to be appointed to a second term as Secretary-General at the
Commonwealth leaders summit in Abuja, Nigeria, next week. Zimbabwe's
President Robert Mugabe won't be there, excluded because of his country's
suspension from the 54-nation body after he kept his hold on power in last
year's rigged presidential elections.

Dissatisfaction over McKinnon's stand against Mugabe is thought to be behind
the announcement yesterday that Sri Lankan candidate, former foreign
minister Lakshman Kadirgamar, will be seeking to replace the New Zealander.

Mugabe continues to threaten to turn up at Abuja, but if he did his presence
could damage the body irreparably. Prime Minister Helen Clark, and her
British and Australian counterparts Tony Blair and John Howard, have said if
Mugabe attends, in any capacity, they will walk away from the summit.

Foreign ministers from South Africa, Lesotho and Mozambique are expected to
meet in Pretoria this weekend to discuss Mugabe's exclusion, but McKinnon
yesterday appeared confident he would not lose his position.

Sections of the Commonwealth have warned of the perils of a Mugabe-endorsed
alternative and McKinnon said he did not detect a situation that would
divide the 54-member Commonwealth.

"The support I have from the Pacific, from the Caribbean, from most of Asia
and a number of African leaders who have rung me in the past few weeks
suggests to me it is not a split. I spoke to a lot of leaders six or eight
months ago, and said to them, 'if you think it's time for a new
Secretary-General, I'll go home'," McKinnon says. So far, he isn't packing.

Now 64, he will be 69 by the time his spell at the head of the Commonwealth
Secretariat ends if it is extended for four years, from next April.

He got the job after promoting himself as a champion of the Pacific region
and developing states and after his role in helping to broker the
Bougainville peace accord. That earned him a Nobel peace prize nomination,
but political rivals say he is too reluctant to speak out against dominant
nations on humanitarian issues, citing East Timor's occupation by Indonesia.

Asked this week about the human rights record of Commonwealth host Nigeria,
McKinnon avoided overt criticism. He said Nigeria - a nation where violent
crime and corruption are rife, and where this year's elections were notable
for the hundreds killed - faced an "enormous challenge" in managing
deep-rooted ethnic rivalries and religious tensions between Christians and
Muslims.

"The African leader can have more problems in the first hour of the day than
other leaders face in an entire term. Sometimes these human rights issues
aren't as important to these leaders as putting food on the table and
providing education."

As Secretary-General he has restructured the Commonwealth's administration
arm into a more modern organisation and rates as one of his best
achievements securing special envoys to troubled spots, such as post-coup
Fiji.

His Mugabe failures aside, it may be his strident protests against European
and United States trade subsidies which bolster his muted impact during his
first term as Secretary-General.

Following the collapse of world trade talks in Mexico in September, amid a
standoff between developed and developing nations, McKinnon has ignited the
debate at the Commonwealth level.

Reflecting the language of key African nations, South Africa and Nigeria, he
has savaged the billions of dollars the US, Europe and Japan pour into
propping up their farmers, while driving down world prices for key African
exports such as cotton.

"If you want to keep Africa in poverty, then keep following those policies,"
he told the Weekend Herald.

His report to the Commonwealth summit is equally blunt. "The single biggest
measure developed nations could take to tackle world poverty would be to end
trade distorting subsidies. Sadly, talk is long and cheap on this topic;
delivery is short and progress painfully slow."

He expects Commonwealth leaders will agree to a strong statement on fair
trade in their communique, but accepts it may have limited impact.

"They may not act, but they will be left in no doubt about what is wanted."

The same could be said of the Commonwealth over Zimbabwe next week. McKinnon
has not spoken to Mugabe for 18 months, since the southern Africa state was
suspended.

Mugabe has moved on from keeping McKinnon waiting for lengthy spells at
Harare hotels and airport, to refusing to meet him at all. And, defiant of
international criticism, Mugabe has fast-tracked the seizure of farms owned
by white landowners.

A country once able to feed its own people is now reliant on food aid, with
half its 14 million people suffering from a famine crippling the nation. A
Commonwealth report, commissioned by McKinnon after Zimbabwe's suspension,
blamed the land seizures for the rising hunger.

The Guardian newspaper said McKinnon believed there was "conclusive
evidence" Mugabe's government had politicised food aid. People suspected of
sympathising with the main opposition, the Movement for Democratic Change,
are left to starve.

Limited economic sanctions have been imposed against the regime by the
European Union, the US and Britain - aid agencies suggest sanctions may have
worsened the famine - but not by the Commonwealth.

Individual states have introduced political sanctions, including New
Zealand, which has a travel ban against Mugabe and about 80 officials or
government members.

Prime Minister Clark and McKinnon say a Zimbabwe solution at Abuja will have
to be agreed by the 52 invited leaders after a special committee comprising
Australia, South Africa and Nigeria failed to persuade Mugabe to abide by
the principles of good governance.

Mugabe reduced the effectiveness of the group by characterising John Howard
as a racist while reminding South Africa and Nigeria of the ties of African
unity, but the strength of such a rallying cry may be weakening as a new
generation of Africans emerge who were born after independence into the
constraints of poverty.

Mugabe's African neighbours are growing increasingly nervous about having a
failing state on their doorstep - three million Zimbabwean refugees are in
South Africa already - and the key to any progress on Zimbabwe lies with
South Africa's President Thabo Mbeki.

At the Abuja summit, Mbeki and Nigeria's President Olusegun Obasanjo will be
reminded they have a responsibility to Africa to lead calls for change in
Zimbabwe.

Clark is not detailing any message she will take to private talks or the
practical solutions New Zealand thinks can be found to the Zimbabwe crisis.
She is firm in wanting Zimbabwe expelled from the Commonwealth, while
knowing that will not happen, and describes the plight of the starving
millions as "horrific, horrific".

"We have said they should be thrown out, absolutely. They should have been
expelled quite some time ago, but suspension at least has the advantage of
they don't turn up."

Oxfam New Zealand's executive director Barry Coates says continuing pressure
from the Commonwealth is important, but it needs to be stepped up.
"Countries like South Africa are just not playing a strong enough role. This
is a humanitarian crisis."

Mbeki has shown little inclination to take a stand, retaining instead an
allegiance to a loyal opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime.

Diplomacy before the summit is carefully avoiding any criticism of African
leaders and their failure to isolate Mugabe - last week he signed a number
of human rights accords with the African Union - to avoid any perception of
a race-linked split within the organisation.

And there is also acute awareness of the symbolism if Obasanjo, as a black
leader and the host, delivers any criticism of Zimbabwe, supposing
Commonwealth leaders can actually agree to a statement.

If anything is achieved at Abuja, it may be because Mbeki and Obasanjo are
driven not by Commonwealth sensitivities, but the political and economic
realisms of the New Partnership for African Development, known as Nepad.

The major financiers of African aid, predominantly from Europe and the US,
have made it clear there will be no handover of funds under Nepad unless
African states sort out their governance, and that means resolving the
Zimbabwe mess.

Obasanjo and Mbeki reportedly argued against extending Zimbabwe's suspension
from the Commonwealth, but Nepad specifically requires members to deal with
errant African Union states through "peer review" procedures. Zimbabwe will
be the first test of those mechanisms.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

JAG OPEN LETTER FORUM
Email: justice@telco.co.zw; justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Internet: www.justiceforagriculture.com

Please send any material for publication in the Open Letter Forum to
justice@telco.co.zw with "For Open Letter Forum" in the subject line.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 1: Re Open Letters Forum No. 194 dated 26 November 2003

Who stole the land?

The matter is quite simple.

All ethnic and tribal groups represented in today's Zimbabwe, are guests in
this country.

The SAN, wiped out by the Bantu, were the only people who could claim this
part of Africa as theirs.

Lets out this to rest once and for all, rid ourselves of guilt and cross
examination and focus on the future.

Simon Spooner

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 2: News from Uganda

News from Uganda:-

Trumpet World Mission's John Mulinde recalls how, during Idi Amin's time
Christians went into the forests and held 24 hours prayers.. Amin had
declared Uganda an Islam state.  He went in 1979, and Milton Obote's
violent reign and civil war lasted from 1980 to 1985.  The economy was on
the verge of collapse with inflation up to 1000%.

WHO experts predicted that the nation would collapse in 1997 with one third
of the population dead, another third suffering and the remaining third too
weak to maintain the economy. The government saw no way out so it called
church leaders together admitting their predicament and asking for a ray of
hope.

One man spoke, "God has a plan for our nation and a purpose."

The result of prayer was that, the nation scarred by death and decay has
changed to what it is today.
President Museveni repealed Amin's Islamic covenant, and gave the national
flag to a group of intercessors.

Mulindi challenged the president to take action against corruption.
Museveni appointed a cabinet minister for Ethics and Integrity, a born
again Christian.

Now the inflation rate has dropped to 6-8% and the IMF says the country is
a prime example of economic recovery in Africa.

So there we have it.

All the best
Ruth

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 3: Locating relatives

Dear Sir/Madam

I am trying to locate my relatives who live in Zimbabwe. Given the
political environment in Zimbabwe, our family is seeking news as to their
well being and circumstances.

Their names are John Lockett and his children Pat (female) and Duncan
Lockett. I believe that John Lockett would have been a farmer in the 1960'
s. John Lockett was born in England and migrated to Africa as an adult.

Can you offer me any advice on how best to proceed?

Sincerely
Beth Eggleston
Project Officer
Metropolitan Services Coordination
Disability Services Commission
146-160 Colin Street
West Perth
Western Australia 6005

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All letters published on the open Letter Forum are the views and opinions
of the submitters, and do not represent the official viewpoint of Justice
for Agriculture.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Chefs caught in gold licence blitz
Blessing Zulu
ZANU PF chefs are among directors of companies whose gold-buying licences
were cancelled by government last week after they failed to deliver
stipulated amounts to the Reserve Bank, the Zimbabwe Independent has
established.

Documents in the possession of this paper indicate that Zanu PF bigwigs were
among those affected when government cancelled 14 gold concessions awarded
to nine companies.

Government abruptly cancelled the 14 gold concessions last week, alleging
the companies were involved in illegal trade of the precious mineral. Police
have been fighting running battles with illegal gold panners said to be
undermining infrastructure in the Midlands town of Kwekwe.

Those who lost licences include Midlands governor Cephas Msipa, a director
of Rynawald Trading with a concession in Zvishavane, McDonald Chapfika, a
commodity broker with close links to the army and Zanu PF, and the Gold
Mining and Minerals Development Trust formed by the Reserve Bank and headed
by businessman Nhlanhla Masuku.

Senior Mines and Minerals Development officials this week said there were
many politicians involved in the "game", hence difficulties in controlling
illegal trading in gold.

Msipa yesterday refused to comment on the matter, referring all questions to
his son, Christopher.

"My son is directly running that company and you can talk to him," he said.

Efforts to get comment from Christopher Msipa were unsuccessful.

Msipa's co-directors are listed as Christopher Zwelithini Msipa, James
Dzimbiri, Archford Dzimbiri, and principal officer Patience Saungweme.

Macdonald Chapfika, younger brother of Zanu PF MP for Mutoko North, David
Chapfika, was also caught in the licence blitz. Chapfika is the director of
Needgate Investments.

Chapfika confirmed to the Independent that he was the director of Needgate
Investments and said they were "shocked" by government's actions.

"Yes I am the director of Needgate and Msipa is the director of Rynawald
Trading," he said.

"We are compiling a report for government and we cannot pre-empt its
contents. But we are shocked by what the government did," Chapfika said.

Chapfika's co-directors at Needgate are Ottilia Masunda, Netsai Mugadza and
Paul Simbarashe Chimbodza.

Nhlanhla Masuku is the chairman of Gold Mining and Minerals Development
Trust which has five concessions in Mazowe, Shamva, Mudzi, Mutare and
Filabusi.

Masuku told the Independent that some companies had gone to court, but he
would not take that route.

"The whole thing does not make sense to us," he said.

"We will respond through the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe and the Ministry of
Finance who set us up," he said.

Masuku denied that the minister had given them any money.

"I am not aware of the $500 million that the Minister of Mines purports to
have given us," Masuku said.

The Independent has it on good authority that the trust had delivered a
paltry six kg of gold to the Reserve Bank in eight months

The other companies hit are Minerals Marketing Corporation of Zimbabwe,
Oleaster Investments Pvt Ltd, trading as Golden Syndicate, SAD Pvt Ltd, and
Shipford Investments trading as Golden Kopje.

The firms were licenced in March this year and the government splashed out
$500 million to assist them.

They were required to surrender 150 kg of gold a month to the Reserve Bank's
Fidelity Printers and Refineries but are believed to have delivered only
39,2 kg in the seven months from April. On a monthly remittance of 150 kg
they should have delivered 1 050 kg by the time the licences were cancelled.

Mines minister Edward Chindori-Chininga described the output as "very
worrying".

In an interview yesterday Chindori-Chininga said the cancellation of the
concessions was final.

"That is a decision that has been made by government and the trust is going
to be restructured," he said.

He said two days after the cancellations the concessionaires delivered 90kg
of gold.

"It just shows that some of them were now trading on the parallel market
instead of delivering the gold to us," he said.

President of the Zimbabwe Miners Federation Nixon Misi told a local daily
that the banned concessionaires were fuelling the parallel market. Misi said
they bought gold at $28 000 and sold it for $65 000.

The country is said to be losing 70% of its gold to smugglers. Sources said
most of the affected companies were contemplating going to court to get
their licences back.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

MDC reads council members the riot act
Augustine Mukaro
THE opposition Movement for Democratic Change has ordered Harare acting
mayor Sekesai Makwavarara and all executive committee chairpersons on the
council to resign their positions by Monday.

The latest development in the Town House saga is likely to raise the
political temperature between the MDC and Local Government minister Ignatius
Chombo, who wants Makwavarara to continue as acting mayor.

Last month the MDC set up a commission to investigate problems at Town
House. Chitungwiza MP Fidelis Mhashu headed the commission.

The party's leadership has accepted the recommendations of the commission
and on Wednesday MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai said Makwavarara and all
executive committee chairpersons should quit their posts by December 1 to
restore order on the council.

Sources who attended the meeting said the party was prepared to expel the
councillors if they refused to comply.

Councillors who have been ordered to relinquish their posts are Falls Nhari
(finance), Fani Munengami (environment), Jerome O'Brien (audit), Christopher
Mushonga (housing), Wellington Madzivanyika (procurement) and Chipo Suka
(licensing).

The sources told the Zimbabwe Independent that Tsvangirai accused
Makwavarara of fuelling divisions in the party and questioned her leadership
qualities.

"Makwavarara caused divisions in the party by aligning herself more to
Chombo than her party," the source said.

"She is alleged to have gone to the extent of giving Chombo names of
councillors whom she felt threatened her position. The councillors were
subsequently suspended."

Sources said the MDC leadership was infuriated by Makwavarara who is accused
of allowing embattled town clerk Nomutsa Chideya to literally run the
council.

- Meanwhile, Tsvangirai was yesterday quizzed by the police in Kadoma over
an attack by unknown assailants on a Zanu PF member during the final
campaign for tomorrow's parliamentary by-election.

Tsvangirai's spokesman William Bango said the MDC leader was stopped and
questioned for almost two hours on his way back to Harare after his roadshow
in Kadoma.

This came as MDC spokesperson Paul Themba Nyathi said Zanu PF had set up
militia bases near polling stations to intimidate voters.

"The Zanu PF militia have set up bases 150 metres from all polling stations
from which they will carry out their intimidatory activities," Nyathi said.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

War vets cancel Mutare congress as succession battle hots up
Itai Dzamara
THE War Veterans Association has again postponed its annual congress
scheduled for this weekend in Mutare as the succession battle in Zanu PF
enters the home stretch.

The war veterans play a major role in the power games in the ruling party
and are already engaged in manoeuvres to find President Robert Mugabe's
successor.

The association's secretary-general Endy Mhlanga confirmed on Wednesday that
the congress had been postponed and would only be held after the Zanu PF
national conference, set for next weekend in Masvingo.

"Indeed the congress has been postponed again," said Mhlanga.

"It will only be held after the Zanu PF national conference. There are a
number of reasons for the postponement," he said.

"One of the reasons is that most war veterans are involved in Zanu PF
structures and will play a major role at the national conference. There was
therefore a lot of pressure on them organising the congress and the party
conference at the same time."

Mhlanga admitted that the succession debate had a role in the postponement
of the war veterans' congress.

"It is true that the issue of succession has been very dominant within the
war veterans' body and should have been discussed at the congress.

"We articulate the people's will and have a major role to play in ensuring
that the succession issue is handled properly. We obviously need to avoid
having the issue divide and antagonise the party, which has been the case so
far," said Mhlanga.

Association chairman Patrick Nyaruwata promised a fortnight ago that there
would be "miracles" over the succession issue from the war veterans,
claiming they had a major role to contribute towards the outcome.

The Zanu PF national conference is expected to tackle the succession issue,
with reports that Mugabe has recently indicated to the politburo that he
needs to retire from active politics early next year.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Herald accused of demonising judiciary in Daily News case
Blessing Zulu
ZIMBABWE Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) has accused the Herald of colluding
with "forces within the state that do not believe in the rule of law" to
demonise the judiciary.

The government-controlled news-paper on Tuesday ran a story in which Media
and Information Commission (MIC) lawyer Johannes Tomana accused
Administrative Court president Michael Majuru of pre-determining the outcome
of the legal wrangle between Associated Newspapers of Zimbabwe (ANZ) and the
MIC.

Tomana was reported as having filed an affidavit concerning Mujuru's alleged
behaviour. The paper claimed that Majuru was being investigated for
unethical behaviour regarding the MIC/ANZ dispute.

In a statement, ZLHR director Arnold Tsunga said the allegations against
Majuru amounted to a personal attack.

"The suggestions that Mr Majuru has now suddenly prejudged the matter
through an informal, incidental and fortuitous communication to a stranger
asking for help in a street, is mischievous and calculated to damage the
reputation of Mr Majuru in both his personal and professional capacity,"
Tsunga said.

He said the over-riding motive was that of maintaining and prolonging the
closure of the Daily News and sustaining the institutional attack on the
right to freedom of expression.

"This has been achieved since Mr Majuru has been left with no alternative
but to recuse himself from the matter. The recusal of Mr Majuru … prolongs
the matter and places the next (court) president to deal with the matter
under undue pressure," Tsunga said.

Constitutional law expert and chairman of the National Constitutional
Assembly, Dr Lovemore Madhuku, concurred.

"It a clear case of victimisation of judges and an attempt to influence
court decisions," said Madhuku.

He described Tomana's behaviour as highly improper and calculated to
undermine the judicial system.

Tsunga said state officials were not comfortable with judgements that did
not favour them.

"In fact the attack on Mr Majuru is a deliberate reminder to the judiciary
by those forces within the state who do not believe in the rule of law that
they are at risk if they make rulings that are seen to be against the state
or the ruling party," he said.

Tsunga said given the operating environment a record number of judges of the
Supreme Court and High Court bench had resigned since 2000.

"The pattern of events … shows that the state is determined to 'use the law'
to subvert justice and ensure that the Daily News does not get published
again," he said.

Tsunga said the Supreme Court was now being used to clamp down on people's
rights.

"It is extremely regrettable that the Supreme Court (which in any democracy
should be the defender of justice, civil liberties and fundamental freedoms)
is constantly referred to as the reason why the state continues to act in
the manner that it does in preventing the people of Zimbabwe from enjoying
their right to freedom of expression," he said.

Tsunga said if the MIC lawyer had been genuinely concerned at the conduct of
Mr Majuru, his remedy would not have been to rush to the press, but to make
an application for Majuru to recuse himself.

"ZLHR views the attack on the Administrative Court and on Mr Majuru by the
government-controlled newspaper as contemptuous, unwarranted and calculated
to bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

"It is also part of a wider, deliberate, systematic and sustained general
attack on the judiciary to manipulate it, reduce its independence and weaken
national institutions of protection that are vital for the restoration of
the rule of law and democracy," said Tsunga.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

US refutes accusations over sanctions
Iden Wetherell
UNITED States ambassador to Zimbabwe Joseph Sullivan has rejected
accusations that his country's sanctions have hurt the Zimbabwean economy,
saying the damage is entirely self-inflicted.

"Zimbabwe's policies and practices have isolated it from the international
community," he told the Zimbabwe Independent in an interview on Wednesday.

The attitude of the US was not responsible for foreign investors staying
away, Sullivan said.

"As Secretary of State Colin Powell has pointed out, international capital
is a coward. It avoids like the plague places where the rule of law does not
obtain - where there are no macro-economic fundamentals," Sullivan said.

Nor was the US responsible for the World Bank and International Monetary
Fund giving Harare the cold shoulder. Zimbabwe ceased payment of its
obligations to the Bretton Woods institutions in 2001, he pointed out.

Sanctions have not prevented Zimbabwe exporting goods worth US$100 million
on a preferential basis to the US market last year. Nor have they stood in
the way of the US$140 million a year the US has spent over the past two
years on food and HIV/Aids prevention, Sullivan said.

While the US had experienced only minor interference with its food
distribution, there were "many credible reports of partisan distribution of
food by government", he said.

Legislation governing sanctions was directed solely at those responsible for
the breakdown in the rule of law, Sullivan said. While it was not possible
to disclose the names of those to whom travel restrictions applied because
of US privacy laws, those affected had been informed, he said.

The names of those to whom financial sanctions apply were published earlier
this year.

Contrary to reports that the opposition Movement for Democratic Change had a
hand in framing the US Democracy and Economic Recovery Act, Sullivan said no
parties other than those in the US had a role.

He noted that for the past two years 50% of Zimbabweans have needed food
assistance. Zimbabwe's neighbours who were equally affected by drought last
year reported only 20% of their populations in need. This year the figure
was lower still while Zimbabwe's remained at over 50%.

At the height of the catastrophic drought in Ethiopia in the mid-1980s, only
20% of its population required and received aid, Sullivan noted.

The US favours inter-party dialogue as the route back to legitimacy,

Sullivan said. "The 2002 election did not confer democratic legitimacy on
this government because of the way it was conducted," he said.

"Democratic government requires a free and fair process."

The ambassador said while it was impossible to say there had been progress
in restoring democratic institutions or democratic practice and a return to
the rule of law, it was important to leave those goals in place.

It was US policy "to see Zimbabwe become a prosperous democratic country
that respects the rule of law", the ambassador said.

Both President George Bush and Secretary Powell have pointed out that
Zimbabwe is not adhering to its own commitments.

"I have in private conversations with government officials heard that
addressing the political crisis was critical in order to address the
economic crisis," Sullivan said. "But we have not seen the political crisis
addressed with the urgency articulated in private conversations."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Divisions emerge in Mash Central after Zanu PF poll
Augustine Mukaro
FORMER Information minister Chen Chimutengwende was last weekend imposed as
Mashonaland Central provincial chairman without an election taking place,
creating a rift between emerging politicians and the old guard, the Zimbabwe
Independent heard this week.

Dickson Mafios, an emerging political powerhouse in the province who was
heavily tipped to pip Chimutengwende to the post, was sidelined from the
race for chairmanship on a technicality.

Mafios this week confirmed that he had been willing to run for the
chairmanship but policy changes did not allow him to "cross-floors".

"As a party we have district co-ordinating committees and that is where
people are chosen," Mafios said.

"The selections are done using categories, which are mainly youth, women and
the main wing. Party policy does not allow anyone chosen in one category to
contest in another," he said.

Mafios said the actual voting was done at district level so that last
weekend's event was more of an allocation of provincial positions and
endorsing them.

"We agreed in principle that Chimutengwende should be provincial chairman
and everybody accepted it. Voting was done at district level and last week
we were allocating and confirming positions," he said.

Highly placed sources told the Independent in Bindura on Sunday that the
change of policy was done to sideline Mafios because he was chosen by the
youth league.

"The protocol is that district youth wings should have nominated him but
none of the seven districts brought his name forward."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Urban dwellers to get assistance
Loughty Dube
ZIMBABWE'S hard-pressed urban dwellers might get assistance when the
Zimbabwe Vulnerability Assessment Committee (ZVAC) completes its assessment
of the food situation in urban areas this week. It seeks to determine who
needs food aid.

The assessment was commissioned at the end of September by donor agencies to
look into the situation in the country's urban areas that have not been
spared by the food shortages and the ravaging drought.

ZVAC chairperson Joyce Chanetsa confirmed to the Zimbabwe Independent that
the urban assessment was complete and that their team was analysing data
before meeting at the end of this week to evaluate its findings.

"The first preliminary report will be out before the end of this week. We
have finished compiling the data and we are now analysing the results and
any action that will be taken will arise from the preliminary report," said
Chanetsa.

The assessment comes shortly after the World Food Programme (WFP) warned
that the food situation in urban areas was getting critical.

The WFP says it is facing a US$111 million shortfall from a US$197 million
international appeal it sent out to donors in June this year.

The United States Agency for International Development in August launched an
urban intervention programme whereby the agency would subsidise the price of
sorghum meal in some urban areas.

The sorghum meal is popular with urbanites who cannot afford the ever
escalating prices of other foodstuffs.

Chanetsa said the urban assessment covered the whole country and included
mining and border towns, growth points and the major cities of Bulawayo and
Harare.

The completion of the urban food assessment comes a week after the WFP
launched another urgent appeal for donations for Zimbabwe's over five
million hungry people.

Many households in urban areas can no longer afford basic food commodities
because of escalating prices and a high inflation rate.

Inflation is currently at 526%, according to figures issued last Tuesday by
the Central Statistical Office.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Govt/Zanu PF loses $800 million to sanctions
Staff Writer
ASSETS worth 825 000 euros ($800 million at the official exchange rate) have
so far been seized from government and Zanu PF officials by the European
Union as part of targeted sanctions against Zimbabwe's political leaders.

The assets are worth about $6,1 billion on the parallel market rate of 1
euro: $7 500.

The EU imposed sanctions on President Mugabe and his close associates just
before the March 2002 presidential election after it accused Mugabe's regime
of human rights violations.

The European Union has also imposed a travel ban on government ministers and
senior officials. The ban has been extended to cover senior Zanu PF
officials and first lady Grace Mugabe. MEPs would like the sanctions regime
extended to cover spouses of government ministers, as in the case of United
States travel restrictions.

Several civic groups have since the assets freeze been petitioning the EU on
the quantum of the assets which have been frozen to date. The inquiry into
the amount of assets seized is meant to gauge the effectiveness of the
sanctions. Western diplomats this week said there was a good possibility
that senior politicians were able to move their monies to banks in the Far
East before the net closed in on them.

A letter from the EU Committee of Petitions to a South African-based
pressure group clarified the issue of the assets freeze.

"The total sum of the 825 000 Euro had been reported by members states as
the amount of assets frozen belonging to members of the Mugabe regime in
Zimbabwe," said Committee of Petitions chairman Nino Gemelli. Gemelli said
five members of the EU had not reported to the committee.

This he said had no impact on the final figures as the countries concerned
did not have anything to report.

The correspondence did not however disclose where the assets had been
seized.

At the time when government announced the assets-freeze last year President
Mugabe said there were no assets to freeze. He said if any were found the EU
could donate them to charity.

Observers have said the seizure of the assets was a bold statement that the
European Union was serious about sanctions.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Diplomatic row brews as Mugabe's nephew takes farm
Staff Writer
PRESIDENT Mugabe's nephew, Gabriel Mugabe, has laid claim to a farm
protected by a bilateral agreement between Germany and Zimbabwe in what
could turn into a diplomatic row between the two countries.

The German embassy in Harare has written to the Foreign Affairs ministry to
express its disquiet over the acquisition of Cluny Farm in Makonde. The
property is owned by a German national, Franz Alexander Ditze, who bought it
in 1994.

Zimbabwe and Germany in 1995 signed the Encouragement and Reciprocal
Protection of Investments Agreement, which came into effect in April 2000.

There have been past attempts by various people to force Ditze off his farm.

"The embassy regrets to state that the non-action on the side of the
competent authorities of the Republic of Zimbabwe obviously has led some
Zimbabwean nationals into believing that they could claim Cluny Farm under
the government's A2 settlement scheme," the German embassy said in letter to
the Foreign Affairs ministry in February.

In September last year the German Foreign ministry summoned Zimbabwe's
ambassador to Berlin, Gift Punungwe, regarding the threat to German-owned
properties in Zimbabwe. Punungwe re-affirmed Zimbabwe's commitment to the
bilateral agreement. He also assured the Germans that full compensation
would be paid in terms of the agreement if the property was taken by
government.

Ditze has since gone to the High Court to ward off Gabriel Mugabe's moves to
evict him. Andrew Mugandiwa of Wintertons is representing Ditze. Last Friday
Justice Alfas Chitakunye granted Ditze a provisional order barring Mugabe
from evicting him from the farm. He also filed another application on
Tuesday challenging the listing of the farm for compulsory acquisition and
subsequent eviction under Section 8 of the Land Acquisition Act.

Ditze said the acquisition of the property was irregular. He said the
government said it had acquired the farm by order on October 6. The farm had
been gazetted for compulsory acquisition on August 8.

Ditze said the order to acquire the farm should have been done within 30
days of the gazetting of the farm.

"It accordingly follows that the order was made after the expiry of the
30-day period. The notice (in the Government Gazette), so I am advised, is
irregular and of no legal force and effect," he said.

The court papers said Mugabe, who is managing director of office furniture
manufacturer Byco, visited Cluny Farm on November 4 and told Ditze that he
"had been given the farm".

Ditze, in his sworn affidavit, said Agriculture minister Joseph Made who was
in the company of six men, visited the farm the next day and ordered workers
to stop working.

"They broke into the farmhouse and conducted a search," said Ditze. "I do
not know what they were looking for. However, nothing was removed from the
house."

Ditze said on Wednesday last week Gabriel Mugabe visited the farm again in
the company of three "henchmen".

"The henchmen were wielding axes and knobkerries. He demanded that I should
vacate the farmhouse not later than November 22," said Ditze.

He has however contended that he has the right to remain on the farm until
January 7 next year as stated by the law.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Editor's Memo

      Killing Zim

      THE latest edition of the Atlantic Monthly, an influential US
political magazine, has landed on my desk. It contains an article on
Zimbabwe by Pulitzer Prize winner Samantha Power who lectures at the John F
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

      Her thoughts on Zimbabwe, coming after a visit here when she met a
wide variety of people, will be of interest to readers.

      The Zimbabwe case, she argues, "illustrates the prime importance of
accountability as an antidote to idiocy and excess". Her article is
appropriately titled "How To Kill A Country".

      Repudiating Ian Smith's contention that the black majority was
incapable of governing, Power believes Zimbabwe "offers testament not to
some inherent African inability to govern, but to a minority rule as
oppressive and inconsiderate of the welfare of citizens as its ignominious
white predecessor".

      Robert Mugabe has by his actions compiled a "how-to" manual for
national destruction, she says.

      "The country's economy in 1997 was the fastest growing in all of
Africa; now it is the fastest shrinking," Power says. "A onetime net
exporter of maize, cotton, beef, tobacco, roses, and sugarcane, it now
exports only its educated professionals who are fleeing by the tens of
thousands.

      "Although Zimbabwe has some of the richest farmland in Africa,
children with distended bellies have begun arriving at school looking like
miniature pregnant women.

      "How could the breadbasket of Africa have deteriorated so quickly into
the continent's basket case? The answer is Robert Mugabe…"

      Power describes a trip through the Mazowe valley, once the
"breadbasket of the breadbasket".

      "Yet driving through it today is like visiting a refugee camp that has
been hit by a hurricane. Fields that should brim with knee-high,
forest-green winter wheat now contain only the crackling yellow stubble of
last year's crop. The barbed wire that once hemmed in cattle has been ripped
away by squatters who have plopped down cheap cement houses in the middle of
arable fields and killed off cows and sheep for food."

      Power points out that Mugabe's campaign of racist expropriation is not
new.

      "Mugabe's belief that he can strengthen his flagging popularity by
destroying a resented but economically vital minority group is one that
dictators elsewhere have shared," she says. "Paranoid about their
diminishing support, Stalin wiped out the wealthy kulak farming class, Idi
Amin purged Uganda's Indian commercial class, and, of course, Hitler went
after Jewish businesses even though Germany was already reeling from the
Depression. Whatever spikes in popularity these moves generated, the
economic damage was profound, and the dictators had to exert great effort to
mask it."

      Which leads the author to examine the significance of the closure of
the Daily News, a move clearly designed to limit the flow of information
about Zimbabwe's deteriorating condition.

      In a 24-page appeal to the international community delivered in July,
Mugabe's cabinet defended the land seizures as "empowering the poor", and
criticised donors' scepticism towards what it called "pro-poor" policies.

      "Everyone and everything was responsible for food shortages except the
real culprit, Mugabe himself," Power says. "By exaggerating Zimbabwe's crop
yields in Potemkin fashion, the cabinet downplayed its needs, making it
impossible for the WFP to get from donors - already stretched thin in Iraq,
Afghanistan and Liberia - the food Zimbabwe will need to stave off
widespread starvation in 2004."

      She describes the formation of ruling-party militias as typical of
tyrants who never stop worrying about the loyalty of their militaries.

      You can see in Zimbabwe Africa's worst tendencies in microcosm, Power
says. But she rebuts sceptics who argue that democracy promotes tyrannies of
the majority.

      "When a ruler operates without constraint he can institute a tyranny
of the minority," she argues, "and he can plunder his country's economy and
starve his people without any corrective."

      Only democratic accountability can provide the bedrock concept that no
developed or developing country can live without, Power argues.

      "An outspoken press, a healthy opposition, periodic elections, and an
independent judiciary are rightly valued for themselves, but their greatest
virtue is practical: they deter and thwart top-down demolition."

      Despite every effort to destroy his country, Mugabe has not destroyed
its spirit, Power says, pointing out that despite torture opposition
activists remain brazen in their dissent. Mugabe's mounting crackdown is
testament to his frustration with the resilience of civil society.

      Mugabe and Smith share a common misconception, Power concludes. "They
both fail to realise that a government cannot survive indefinitely when it
advances the political and economic desires of the few at the expense of the
many."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Murerwa’s budget: full of sound and fury …

Ngoni Chanakira

FINANCE minister Herbert Murerwa’s 2004 budget has finally been presented to
parliament and is now “history”, at least as far as its targets are
concerned.

Murerwa said the total budget stood at $7,75 trillion with constitutional
and statutory appropriations accounting for $1,33 trillion.

Commentators have either praised the budget for trying to stabilise the
nation’s crisis-torn economy or dismissed it as a populist non-event that
leaves much of the donkey work to new Reserve Bank governor Gideon Gono.

Analysts point out that Murerwa tried to do the usual balancing act to
please all and sundry at a time when government is in a fix and the economy
a bottomless pit.

Despite advice from all sectors, government has failed to control soaring
inflation, mend its relationship with the international community, stop
spending money it doesn’t have, and boost exports by giving exporters better
incentives.

From 600% next month, inflation was likely to head up to 700% in the first
quarter of next year, the minister said.

Murerwa admitted that inflation is the “worst enemy” facing Zimbabwe’s
economy and that overspending must stop. How this would be achieved however
was not evident in his statement last week.

Analysts however contend that this is the major problem currently facing
Zimbabwe because officials simply promise things without spelling out
exactly how they are to be achieved.

What Murerwa promised in many instances is not new but a rehashed version of
excuses made in budgets presented before him by his predecessors.

Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries (CZI) president and Dairibord Zimbabwe
chief executive officer Antony Mandiwanza summed up the mood at a
post-budget breakfast meeting last Friday when he said the 2004 budget was a
“suspense statement”.

“This, ladies and gentlemen, is a suspense statement,” Mandiwanza said. “It
has good policy pronouncements but we need more detail. Without specific fis
cal policies and a monetary statement we run the risk of triggering
speculation.”

Murerwa did not provide concrete detail about the monetary policy,
preferring to pass the task to Gono.

The minister did not even bother to accompany his statement with the
estimates of expenditure — the blue book, although this shortcoming can
probably be attributed to the Government Printers rather than the minister’s
office!

“Government will pursue an interest rate policy which will encourage growth
on one hand while fighting inflation on the other through discouraging
speculative and consumptive borrowing,” Murerwa said. “The details will be
announced in the monetary policy statement to be issued by the governor of
the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe by mid-December 2003.”

In three weeks therefore Gono is expected to perform miracles. The former
Jewel Bank chief is expected to transform an economy that is in the
intensive care unit to one that is not only thriving but also vibrant.

The Zimbabwean economy has deteriorated progressively over the past four
years.

Real output has dropped by one third, inflation has reached 525,8% for
October and social conditions are deteriorating.

The country’s balance of payments has been under severe pressure since 1999,
when Zimbabwe began to accumulate payment arrears.

There is little productive investment in the economy and there are reports
of significant capital flight and emigration of skilled labour.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF), which Zimbabwe loves to hate, says
the economic crisis reflects to a large extent inappropriate economic
policies.

The IMF said these shortcomings include loose fiscal and monetary policies,
the maintenance of a fixed exchange rate in an environment of rising
inflation and administrative controls.

“Increased regulations and government intervention have driven economic
activity underground and contributed to the chronic shortages of goods and
foreign exchange,” the IMF said.

“The impact of these policies has been exacerbated by the fast-track land
reform programme, recurring droughts, and the HIV/Aids pandemic. Meanwhile
investor confidence has been eroded by concerns over political developments,
weak governance and corruption, problems related to the implementation of
the government’s land reform programme, the push for an increased
indigenisation of the business sector, and the selective enforcement of
regulations.”

Murerwa painted an even gloomier picture.

The minister said the economy was estimated to contract by 13,2% this year
and inflation to peak at about 600% by December before going up again to
700% during the first quarter of 2004.

Analysts said like other budgets before it, government had missed virtually
all targets.

They said the need for supplementary budgets — this year amounting to $672
billion in August — showed government could not stick to its promises of
controlling expenditure.

They said Zimbabwe needed to restore confidence by reducing uncertainties
associated with any particular risk if the budget was to be taken seriously.

“We have become a risky investment destination which affects the tourism
business,” Zimsun chief executive officer Shingi Munyeza said.

Others said the country needed to observe and protect property rights that
were being abused by farm invaders in broad daylight.

“They (property rights) form one of the central pillars of private
enterprise development,” a Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce economist
said. “They also ensure security of tenure and investment in the eyes of
both domestic and foreign investors.”

Analysts said the problems not addressed in the previous budget would simply
spill over into 2004 although with greater intensity this time around.

They said the 2004 budget did not focus on how inflation would be contained
or how foreign currency would be generated — agriculture, manufacturing and
mining were all declining.

They said because there was no monetary policy, targets had already been
missed by some agriculture sectors such as tobacco.The analysts said job
creation was being “talked about” but in reality companies were closing
down.

Murerwa, while not saying how, promised to eliminate corruption in both the
public and private sectors.

Analysts question why the defence and security portfolio was given the third
highest vote of $1,27 trillion when there was regional peace and social
services were deteriorating.

At the breakfast meeting the minister defended the defence vote, saying:
“There is no telling what will happen in the country.”

Economist John Robertson in a paper presented at a recent labour relations
seminar said if Zimbabwe is to experience better rates of economic growth in
the coming years investment spending would have to lead the way.

“This immediately highlights the need for lower inflation, moderate interest
rates and conditions that will help stabilise the exchange rate,” Robertson
said.

“The exacting standards of good fiscal management and good economic planning
will have to take over completely from the slap-dash policies of
government-sanctioned looting and pillaging that we have seen in the last
five or six years.”
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Mumbengegwi’s confession of failure

THE announcement by Industry and International Trade minister Samuel
Mumbengegwi that government was abandoning its privatisation programme marks
a serious departure from the reform measures government has been touting for
a number of years.

While ministers have previously emphasised the need for successful
commercialisation of public enterprises, this was always seen as a
preliminary to ultimate divestment. But Mumbengegwi, it would seem, in
keeping with the backward behaviour of the anti-reform wing of President
Mugabe’s government, has closed the door to a vital component of economic
recovery.

Speaking to the Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce in Bulawayo recently,
he said NRZ, Air Zimbabwe and Zesa would not be privatised but
commercialised.

These are companies that continue to drain the fiscus despite government
assurances that they would be placed on a sound footing.

This paper revealed the shocking news last week that from 18 planes at
Independence, Air Zimbabwe had been reduced to a fleet of three. NRZ is
technically insolvent. Zisco is a disaster. In all these cases taxpayers
pick up the tab for the state’s managerial incompetence.

Why is it assumed that a government that cannot manage its own budget can
manage the budgets of public corporations where managers and workers are
sheltered from best practice and keep their jobs irrespective of
performance?

NRZ is unable to perform its basic function of moving goods and passengers.
As a   result the operations of Wankie Colliery and Zisco are prejudiced.
Goods which take less than a week to be shipped by rail from Durban to
Bulawayo now take a further three weeks to be released from NRZ’s goods
yard.

Tel*One behaves like a parastatal in responding to the needs of customers
who have no alternative service provider to turn to because government has
been slow to license the fixed-line service of even one of its own
supporters.

Air Zimbabwe has been failing its passengers for several years now. An
energetic campaign by government to bring tourists to the Victoria Falls
will collapse in part because the national airline is incapable of providing
a world-class service. Tourists will take SAA to the Zambian side instead.
They resent being dumped at airports because of late arrivals or last-minute
schedule changes.

Government cannot oppose privatisation of these poorly-performing companies
on the grounds of a poor track record of divestment to date. Cottco,
Dairibord, and Zimre all operate efficiently and profitably following their
release from the clutches of state control. At the same time they have
relieved the fiscus of the burden of subsidies and contributed in tax to
national revenues. That in turn enables government to spend money on other
things.

Commercialisation on the other hand has added to the burden of consumers.
Blithely ignoring the price controls the private sector is subject to, state
companies like Zesa, Tel*One, Zimpost and the CSC have hiked costs at
regular intervals adding hugely to the vicious cycle of inflation.

The pretext for hanging on to these concerns is that indigenous Zimbabweans
will benefit. It is difficult to see how indigenous Zimbabweans are
benefiting from government ownership at Air Zimbabwe, Zisco, NRZ and
Zimpost. There have been no benefits of technology transfer, capital
injection, or new markets which privatisation would yield. Instead there has
been a continued decline in which consumers are being fleeced.

Mumbengegwi’s claims that privatisation is at odds with indigenisation
should be seen as the last hurrah of a regime wedded to outmoded and
damaging economic policies, using the excuse of indigenous ownership to mask
sheltered employment for its own parasitic elite.

Nothing more clearly illustrates the economic bankruptcy of this regime than
its abandonment of a policy programme that has brought benefits to
governments and ordinary people — many of whom become first-time
shareholders — around the world.

Zimbabwe’s policies are not only at variance with best practice overseas,
they are at odds with trends within the region.

Mumbengegwi has exposed Zanu PF’s incorrigible failure to learn from its
mistakes and from the success of other societies. He has provided one more
reason why this regime should not be allowed to punish its people any
further.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Eric Bloch

Sanctions not the cause of economic decline

Finance minister Herbert Murerwa is one of the very few ministers in the
Zimbabwean government who deservedly should be the subject of high regard,
notwithstanding his inability to turn around Zimbabwe’s increasingly
distressed economy, or even to halt its decline. That inability is not
because he does not know what to do, but because that which is necessary is
in outright conflict with the ideologies and precepts of the ruling party,
Zanu PF, in general, and those of President Robert Mugabe in particular.

Regrettably, either Murerwa is unable to convince his cabinet colleagues and
the president to “bite the bullet” by recognising realities and enabling him
to take the drastic steps necessary for economic recovery, concurrently with
their collective action to create an economically conducive environment, or
he is unwilling even to attempt to do so. The latter is probably the case,
for in all probability the minister is reluctant to pursue a path which is
likely to lead him to the precipice of dismissal from office, which must be
seen as the most probable reaction of the president to anyone’s endeavours
to motivate change to the policies so long espoused by him.

Murerwa’s critics focus solely upon the catastrophic extent of Zimbabwe’s
economic decline, holding him responsible for not taking the measures
recognised by most as prerequisites for economic recovery. They fail to take
note of the reasons why he does not do so, first and foremost of which must
undoubtedly be that he is not allowed to do so. That his capability is
underestimated is demonstrated by the quality of his representation of
Zimbabwe when he was High Commissioner to London, and is evidenced by the
very constructive manner in which he has, at various times, served as
Minister of Tourism and the Environment, Minister of Commerce and Industry,
and as Minister of Higher Education. His performance in those offices is
clear proof that he is a man of significant ability, and yet that ability
does not reflect in his current field of high responsibility. It must,
therefore, be assumed that that is due to him being restrained from doing
that which is necessary, and being unable or unwilling to shake off the
constraining shackles.

However, his opening remarks upon presenting his 2004 budget statement to
parliament last week were exceptionally disappointing. In acknowledging that
“the country has once more experienced another year of severe socio-economic
hardships”, he attributed blame to the international community. He said that
“the sanctions imposed on the country have worsened the economic
 environment”.

That has long been the excuse resorted to by the president, by Zanu PF
apologists, and by other cabinet ministers, but it is an excuse which is
baseless and specious. Although it cannot be denied that certain sanctions
have been applied on Zimbabwe, and are currently in force, their nature is
in the main not of an economic nature, and have little economic impact. They
are almost wholly sanctions which are targeted against those wielding
political control in Zimbabwe.

The facts are that no economic sanctions have been imposed upon Zimbabwe by
any of the international community, other than that some have withdrawn aid
which they previously provided for Zimbabwean developmental purposes. Even
those who have withdrawn that aid have continued to provide humanitarian aid
such as the provision of food and of funding to combat HIV/Aids. But none
have discontinued or barred trade with Zimbabwe, and the few who have
imposed constraints upon investment in Zimbabwe have only done so
notionally, for the current Zimbabwean economic circumstance renders
Zimbabwe an unattractive investment destination and, therefore, with or
without sanctions, little investment is, or will be, forthcoming.

Of economic consequence is that Zimbabwe has been suspended by the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), and is no longer a recipient of
development funding from the World Bank. But that is not due to politically
motivated sanctions. Suspension by the IMF is as a direct result of
Zimbabwean default in debt-servicing. Similarly, funding is not forthcoming
from the World Bank because its constitution bars it from providing funding
to any country whose arrears with the bank exceed stipulated limits.

The only sanctions imposed upon Zimbabwe are that its membership has been
suspended in the Commonwealth, precluding Zimbabwean participation in its
deliberations such as those shortly to be conducted at Chogm in Abuja,
Nigeria, and that the European Union and the United States have imposed
sanctions which are targeted at specified individuals. To all intents and
purposes those targeted sanctions preclude the hierarchy of the Zimbabwean
government and of Zanu PF, and members of their families, from travelling to
the European Union and to the United States, and also that any funds of such
persons as can be located be frozen.

No other sanctions have been imposed, and hence it is wholly spurious for
sanctions to be alleged as the cause, or worsening, of the economic
environment. In contradistinction, the very countries that are attacked by
Zimbabwe’s politicians for having imposed targeted sanctions are foremost in
supplying aid for humanitarian purposes, and that aid has effectively
supplied Zimbabwe with significant inflows of foreign exchange or of
imported requirements and have therefore effectively contributed to the
economy and relieved the state’s fiscal burden.

By way of illustration, it is relevant to note the continuing support of the
US, notwithstanding it being a focal point for Zimbabwean government ire and
criticism. Not only has the US continued to give assistance to Zimbabwe, for
humanitarian purposes, but it has markedly increased that assistance. In
2000, the extent of assistance was US$13,6 million, which increased to
US$21,3 million in 2001, and then increased dramatically in 2002 to US$148,3
million, whilst 2003 commitments are only marginally less, at US$138,4
million.

Much of that assistance (which at currently prevailing parallel market
exchange rates equates, in 2003, to nearly $828 billion!) has been directed
at providing food to Zimbabwe, which food support would not have been
necessary had government not destroyed Zimbabwean agriculture (even if
government pretends that the food shortages are due to drought). Much else
of the significant financial assistance given by the US is to combat the
HIV/Aids epidemic. Over the last two years the US has provided 380 000
metric tonnes of food aid, at a value of US$235 million, making the United
States government the largest single donor of food relief to Zimbabwe,
equating to over 40% of total international contributions to the World Food
Programme (WFP) for Zimbabwean food relief.

Most of the other 60% of WFP’s magnificent support for the millions of
starving Zimbabweans emanates from the member states of the European Union
(EU), as does considerable aid in the fields of health and education. Thus,
whilst the USA and the EU have imposed sanctions upon Zimbabweans, they are
of minimal economic consequence, and it is therefore very distressing that
Murerwa has joined the bandwagon who try, without credibility, to blame
sanctions for the state of the economy. Minister Olivia Muchena emulated
Murerwa in making that unfounded allegation on the day following the budget
presentation. That state of the economy was summed up in the budget
statement as being “rising inflation, erosion of real incomes, critical
foreign exchange shortages, decline in savings and investment, capacity
under-utilisation, company closures and high unemployment”.

The minister has correctly identified the symptoms, but has misdiagnosed the
causes. Those causes are the acts of commission and of omission of the
Zimbabwean government. Those acts include a near-total failure to impose and
maintain law and order, disregard for the fundamental principles of
democracy, alienation of cordial international relations, destruction of
agriculture, imposition of a command economy, with regulation being the
order of the day, widespread nepotism, pronounced corruption, absence of
fiscal disciplines, and creation of racial divides. As long as those causes
of economic decline are entrenched and rigidly adhered to, no economic
measures as government may resort to can succeed in achieving economic
recovery.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Muckraker

Why is the Herald silent on Georgia?
IT was the wealthiest of the Empire’s former dependencies when it secured
independence. It had the highest per capita GDP in the region. But a
combination of corruption, cronyism and eventually chaos impoverished its
people, leading to a successful rising that saw its stubborn old-guard
leader forced out.

Events in Georgia last weekend will have inspired Zimbabweans with a fine
example of what peaceful “people power” can achieve in removing an obdurate
and parasitic regime. But it will also have served as a rebuke.

The opposition, following the blatant theft of an election by President
Eduard Shevardnadze, came out onto the streets in their tens of thousands.
Eventually their critical mass was so strong that the army gave up trying to
control the situation. And Russia’s foreign minister told Shevardnadze —
himself an ex-Soviet foreign minister —  that he should work out his
differences with the opposition which had successfully used parliament as
the central forum for its protest. It shows us that where the numbers are
irresistible, the forces of repression cannot prevail

A visitor from Georgia may be forgiven for concluding that, given their
docility, Zimbabweans generally prefer things as they are. But the
authorities were clearly worried: the Herald didn’t mention Georgia on
Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday.

Do journalists with the state media have any say over what they write? We
ask because despite the finding of the Utete committee on land reform that
only 127 000 families had been allocated land so far under A1 and 7 500
under A2, and of these many had not yet taken up their allocations, scribes
such as Alfred Chagonda writing in the Herald last week continue to claim
that 300 000 have been resettled under A1 and 50 000 under A2.

What is happening here? Is Chagonda genuinely ignorant of the Utete report,
or does he know what the real figures are but is obliged by the
story-tellers at Munhumutapa Building to go on peddling their false
statistics? The Herald repeated the now discredited figures again on
Wednesday. What’s the charge to be: ignorance or deception?

Meanwhile, the Herald’s chief reporter seems to be under the same gun. He
managed to slip this into a report on the upcoming Zanu PF conference:
“Although Dr Muzenda will be greatly missed, his patriotism and commitment
to the total liberation of Zimbabwe should inspire members to remain
steadfast in safeguarding the country’s sovereignty and independence.”

Are those the chief reporter’s words? And what about these?: “Zimbabwe has
this year witnessed a systematic Western media barrage bent on creating gory
scenarios in the country.”

Really? Who has been creating the “gory scenarios” for the Western media to
write about?

We feel sorry for vice-chancellors with a distinguished academic record
having to say all sorts of strange things when awarding honorary doctorates
to the president. He was featured on the front page of the Sunday Mail last
weekend receiving a citation from Midlands State University Vice-Chancellor
Professor Ngwabi Bhebhe who said Mugabe was being honoured for “empowering
the majority”.

At a time when the majority are experiencing unparalleled unemployment and
poverty, this was a particularly inappropriate time to award Mugabe a
doctorate in anything, let alone commerce, one would have thought!

Unless you read the report carefully.

“The impact of your economic policies,” Bhebhe was quoted as saying, “have
been particularly felt in the commercial and industrial sectors.”

Indeed they have. Four hundred companies closed last year and over 290 so
far this year, according to the CZI. Many companies that have gone to the
wall didn’t respond to the CZI survey so we can be sure the number is much
higher.

These closures are a direct product of the toxic business climate Mugabe’s
damaging policies have spawned. Mugabe had “braced himself to completely
dismantle foreign ownership of the economy”, the citation said.

In fact he has gone further than that. He has completely dismantled the
economy!

But we liked the president’s remarks on how disappointed he was with
construction work at the Midlands campus. As a result he was having to
receive his degree in the open.

“Ndapiwa degree mudondo (I have received a degree from the bush),” he said.

Shouldn’t that have read: “I have received a degree from a bush university”?

Still with bushy academics, Stan Mudenge must be deeply disappointed that
President Luiz da Silva of Brazil gave Zimbabwe a big miss during his recent
sweep through the region. Although he went to South Africa, Lula was
focusing on Lusophone states, of which Brazil is the largest. He managed to
visit all sorts of funny little places, but completely overlooked the
Lusophonie’s most anxious and insistent candidate-member — Zimbabwe.

Readers will recall that Stan has been trying to establish a claim to
membership on the basis of some obscure events over 400 years ago when the
Munhumutapa kingdom (not a reference to Jonathan Moyo’s department) was
looking for balance-of-payments support. He reckons that reviving ties to
Lisbon will dish the Brits. But with Lula coldly spurning his advances, Stan
must be heart-broken.

Oh well, as the maputukezi say, Não faz mal — don’t worry about it!

Muckraker was shocked to learn last weekend that the Supreme Court was now
part of the Zanu PF regime.

According to a report in the Sunday Mail, Information minister Jonathan
Moyo, in a notice opposing an ANZ court application, “argued that by drawing
parallels, as it did in its press release on October 9 2003, between the
Rhodesian regime and the current Zimbabwean ‘regime’ that the Supreme Court
is part of, the ANZ has shown how ‘unprepared’ it was not to respect the
highest court in the country”.

This all looks “not” a little convoluted here. But the salient point Moyo
appears to make is that the Supreme Court is regarded as part of the regime
that he is part of. It may be debatable as to how far the parameters of a
“regime” extend. But the distinction between the executive and judicial arms
of the state is one that we would have thought any minister would be keen to
underline, not occlude. After all, aren’t the Supreme Court judges, together
with others, expecting to stay on after Mugabe and Moyo have gone?

We note however that harassment of those considered too independent-minded
appears to have resumed through the agency of ministerial spooks.

Poor old Olusegun Obasanjo has become Zanu PF’s latest target of abuse. This
stems from his most recent visit to Zimbabwe where he made it clear he was
still consulting on whether Zimbabwe would be invited to the Abuja Chogm
next month.

In fact, he was doing a number of Zimbabwe’s friends a favour by appearing
to go the extra mile for Mugabe. This followed representations from Malaysia
and Uganda, among others.

But we can always count on Mugabe to kick his friends in the teeth. He
refused to humour Obasanjo by holding an unscheduled meeting with Morgan
Tsvangirai which would have enabled Obasanjo to argue that talks were under
way and therefore Mugabe should not be shut out of the summit. Instead he
came under a torrent of ridicule in the Nathaniel Manheru column which is
the mouthpiece of Mugabe’s office boys.

Obasanjo emerged from his talks “tired and sombre” after failing to secure
the summit between Mugabe and Tsvangirai, Manheru claimed. “In sharp
contrast, the supposedly embattled Zimbabwean head of state emerged
playfully shadow-boxing, only too happy to dramatise Obasanjo’s dilemma.”

The South Africans were meanwhile enjoying the whole drama as it played out
to the detriment of the general, we were told. And why’s that? Because his
diplomatic failure spikes Nigeria’s chances of a UN Security Council seat.
The office boys reminded the Nigerian ruler that he would need Africa’s
support when Nigeria’s candidacy for a seat comes round. Meaning don’t cross
us.

This of course presumes they will still be around to threaten and bully
weaklings like Zambia when the opportunity arises!

Having said that, Zambia doesn’t need to go on behaving like a submissive
state. It now exports fuel to Zimbabwe, despite producing none of its own,
and its farmers — including many from Zimbabwe — are selling maize to their
mendicant neighbour. It even puts former presidents, charged with misrule,
on trial!

We were gobsmacked by the twist  the Herald gave to Obasanjo’s categorical
‘No’ to Mugabe.

The Herald reported on Wednesday that “Obasanjo reiterated yesterday that he
was still to invite President Mugabe to next week’s Commonwealth Heads of
Government Meeting.”

But this is what Obasanjo actually said:

“We will not have an invitation (for Zimbabwe). If there is no invitation
they will not come.”

 Which part of ‘No’ does the Herald not understand?

The Zimbabwe Independent revealed last week that claims in the official
media that there was near-unanimity on Canaan Banana’s non-hero status at
last week’s politburo meeting were less than accurate. Something that had
been thought “in the bag” at the beginning of the meeting turned out to be
out of the bag by its conclusion.

The blemishes, it would seem, outweighed the shine. But as just about
everybody has commented, if blemishes were generally an obstacle, how come
“Hitler” and Border passed the test?

Meanwhile, an irreverent reader has written in to suggest what the poet
Algernon Swinburn may have thought would be a fitting epitaph to the nation’
s first president:

“Now Canaan’s newly met his god, Not earth to earth, but sod to sod. It was
for sinners such as this Hell was created bottomless.”

Our thanks to Algy who would probably be aghast to see his work thus
transformed.

At a breakfast meeting on the budget this week, economist Rob Davies,
referring to government’s 10-point recovery plan, said the only other
organisation he knew of that had a 10-point plan was Alcoholics Anonymous.
He said rule number one: you have to admit you’re an alcoholic. We thought
that was a bit hard on ministers!

Wags are pointing out that following the failure of Merp, the millennium
recovery plan, we had Nerp, the revival plan. When that fails, what will the
next R be? A resuscitation plan?

Looking at George Charamba’s long-winded justification this week of the
unpopular Sendekera Mwana Wevhu, the latest partisan agricultural jingle, we
were amused to see George Bush’s spokesman entangled in a similar, if
smaller, knot recently.

Trying to minimise the political damage done by a Republican senator’s
remarks on a Supreme Court ruling, press officer Ari Fleischer said “the
president typically never does comment on anything involving a Supreme Court
case, a Supreme Court ruling, or a Supreme Court finding — typically.”

Asked why the president had given a speech expressly to comment on an
affirmative action case recently before the court, Fleischer replied that
was why he had stressed the word typically.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zim Independent

Mandiwanza calls for Noczim's deregulation
Ngoni Chanakira
CONFEDERATION of Zimbabwe Industries (CZI) boss Antony Mandiwanza says the
cash-strapped National Oil Company of Zimbabwe (Noczim) is highly
inefficient, grossly underutilised and should be deregulated immediately.

In an emotional address at the post-budget seminar in Harare last Friday,
Mandiwanza, who is also Dairibord Zimbabwe Ltd chief executive officer, said
industry was fed up with Noczim and it should be deregulated as a matter of
urgency.

"The role of Noczim is very questionable to us the private sector,"
Mandiwanza told Finance minister Herbert Murerwa.

"Noczim is highly inefficient, grossly underutilised and should be
deregulated. I wonder why we continue to have it."

He said government should also deregulate the use of the Beira pipeline and
allow private fuel importers to hire the facility when they needed it.

"This will be cheaper and cost-effective," he said. "Noczim should just
charge for use of the pipeline and not get involved in fuel imports because
it has completely failed and we (business) have serious problems especially
in the transport industry."

Mandiwanza said Noczim should play an administrative role such as monitoring
fuel pricing and should "get out of the fuel importation business".

"It should simply deal with strategic and operational issues haunting our
economy," Mandiwanza said.

In his 2004 budget statement Murerwa said in view of the deregulation of the
fuel industry, Noczim would continue to supply fuel to the public sector as
well as the agricultural sector and was expected to charge break-even prices
for all its products.

Before the liberalisation of fuel procurement, amortisation of the Noczim
debt was part of the pump price build up.

"In view of the many direct fuel importers now involved, I propose a levy of
$110 per litre of diesel and petrol, both leaded and unleaded to be
collected at the point of entry by Zimra," Murerwa said. "This measure is
effective from December 1 2003 and does not include illuminating paraffin
and aviation fuel."

Noczim, which is known more for its corruption scandals, has been accused of
uneconomic pricing policies that have led to government embarking on
unsustainable borrowing requirements in excess of $150 billion.

Back to the Top
Back to Index