The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

SICKENING FACT
Yesterday, on an upmarket GAME RANCH approx. 40km from KAROI, 'invaders' speared the game scouts HORSE in the stomach and it then had to drag itself from that location to the lodge where the game scouts noticed it. It (obviously) died from this barbaric act. These people are right now cutting the fences and removing them and then poaching the wildlife (mainly impala at this stage) by herding them across the removed fence and then shooting them for meat.

(Reported from Karoi)
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News - letters, opinions

Legacy of violence will catch up with Zanu PF

10/3/01 9:29:55 AM (GMT +2)


Eyewitness Rhodene, Masvingo

THE presidential election approaches.


What the majority of Zimbabweans must realise is that people are going to
vote for their future. It’s not about party politics or who fought in the
liberation struggle or who is a puppet of Britain. It’s about our future and
our survival.

Zanu PF can distribute cash handouts or use violence and intimidation and
other forms of pressure and coercion, but in the final analysis we are
voting for our future. Those that are going around the country beating up
people suspected of being opposition party members must also realise we will
all face the future.

When the dust settles we will all face the music. Even if Zanu PF wins, we
will have an obsolete government running a bankrupt country with no chance
of investment or international support. War veterans, in particular, must
realise that even Zanu PF will become so bankrupt that they too would not
afford to give the war veterans those sweeteners they are fighting for.

The war veterans will become such a liability to the government that they
may actually be considered a threat. A lot of people in Zanu PF may think
that the emergence of MDC is not a good thing. However, what such people
should realise is that it’s the way that Zanu PF has governed this country
in the past 21 years that has caused political dissent. That is what has
given birth to popular opposition.

Going around killing and intimidating the electorate is not going to solve
the problem the cancer is spreading. It’s time to treat the cause of the
problem and not to suppress symptoms. They cannot cure an illness by
suppressing symptoms. They need to cure the cause of those symptoms. They
are only nursing it and it will not go away. Meanwhile, the disease is
spreading and they are creating more problems in the long run.

Recently, I was watching a programme about crime in Jamaica and I realised
it is exactly a mirror image of what Zimbabwe is transforming itself into.
Around 1980 Jamaica went through elections marred by a lot of political
violence which was caused by politicians making use of violent criminals to
suppress campaigning by opposition parties. Criminals were allowed to
acquire weapons and use widespread violence in a game of political
affiliation encouraged by politicians.

The legacy of this violence and disregard to the rule law is a modern-day
Jamaica that is wrecked by violence to the point that authorities cannot
contain it. After the elections the criminals simply found a new application
for their violence. It started as a means of gaining and protecting
political territory but it spilled over and society is now plagued with
violence of a monumental proportion. It is this violence which characterizes
Jamaica and it is becoming almost impossible to eradicate.

Believe you me Zimbabwe is heading that way unless something drastic is done
to curtail this violence. Even if the MDC is defeated, violence will spill
over into society. It is not something that is going to remain a political
instrument but is going to manifest itself as an increase in violent crime.
Take a look at the farm invasions. It is not going to be easy for the
government to stop the farm invasions now. Even after the Abuja agreement
the perpetrators are still intensifying their actions.

In order to remain in power, Zanu PF is creating more difficulties for
itself instead of solving them. The economy is shrinking, poverty is growing
and internationally we have lost credibility. It is inconceivable for Zanu
PF to expect the electorate to support them while they are making life
unbearable for ordinary Zimbabweans.

A friend of mine said he witnessed a road rage after a small traffic
incident in Zimbabwe, and he thought it was all because people are
frustrated and even hungry. I could not simply dismiss it as indeed people
become more volatile when problems are mounting and especially when hunger
is at the door step.

A lot of the violence we are seeing does have a connection with the
difficulties people are facing in their day-to-day lives. However, it is
being directed at the wrong sections of the community the commercial farmers
and anyone associated with opposition parties. Zanu PF has this time managed
to deflect this anger and frustration and directed it towards farmers and
the opposition.

President Mugabe himself led the 1970s rebellion and he should be quick to
appreciate the implications of this dissent if it’s not directed somewhere
else. Sooner or later, people are going to begin asking themselves who
really is causing these problems and they will surely home in on their
target. Let’s hope it will not be too late before we realise who is
responsible for all these problems. Zanu PF can buy time but they can’t
hide.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

From the Guardian - Letters

Wednesday, October 3, 2001
Before Zimbabwe disintegrates...

SIR: I really hope you have the space to publish this, and please feel free
to improve my English, but I would like to try and give you an idea of what
is happening in Zimbabwe today.

The ruin of a country must be a hard thing to imagine if you have not seen
it happen before. This, I tell myself, must be the reason that the EU, UK,
USA and South Africa are so low to act when they see a "rogue" state like
Zimbabwe sliding into the abyss. Then when all is ruined they will send
millions of dollars trying half-heartedly to get it right again, but by then
it is too late.

The present government has succeeded in turning the country into a disaster
zone, and now will drive it into civil war by denying justice and the power
of the free vote to its citizens. Allow me to tell you that this government
does not want free elections, because it will lose. To expect them to
suddenly change because of an agreement is sheer ignorance and deserving of
contempt. Diplomacy has no place here, it is very simple and clear; if we do
not have a large number of outside observers here in the next two months
(before Christmas) this country is doomed. Remember these words, it will
happen if action is not taken. The EU, UK, USA, South African nations have
to demand that:


the voters roll is opened to international scrutiny;

monitors are placed all over the country;

the counting process is open to international scrutiny;

the results are to be respected by both parties.
They can do this by all clearly stating that every single one of them will
on the same date within the next three weeks, implement the following:


all assets of any ministers, or cronies etc in any of these countries will
be frozen immediately;

any relatives of theirs, whether there for education, health or employment
will be deported;

any supplies like electricity, fuel etc. will be stopped;

if martial law is applied, a large UN peace-keeping force will be deployed
to ensure order.
Am I too naive to think this is possible? Maybe, but is it not better to
really hit a problem with all you have, rather than trying to clean up the
mess afterwards? We are in the lucky position whereby we do not really have
much tribalism, as in Congo, and people remember a better life, and want it
back. All else, like land will fall into place, as this has been agreed on
back in 1998.

Claims by the government about its sovereignty and independence etc., are
nonsense. In the parliamentary election of June 2000, more than half of all
voters voted for the opposition, with only the rural and uneducated
constituencies returning a vote in favour of the present government, and
this was with a highly irregular ballot, in which numerous results were
overturned due to irregularities. All of these people who voted for the
opposition want observers. Only the government, who ignored the people's
choice and has not elected any opposition member to cabinet, or any official
office, is afraid of scrutiny. However can a small group of people be
allowed to speak on our behalf and say no to observers? It is obvious they
are afraid of something.

These are not unreasonable demands, and this is what it all comes down to,
the big push. It is not about land or race or any of these issues they have
managed to confuse you with, it is about freedom. Our government is evil,
that much is obvious, please use every influence you have now, it will work
out cheaper in the run.

F. Nyoni,

Harare, Zimbabwe
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zimbabwean judge hits at justice minister

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

HARARE A senior Zimbabwe Supreme Court judge has attacked President Robert
Mugabe's justice minister over the credentials of Chief Justice Godfrey
Chidyausiku.

In a news statement released yesterday Judge Simba Muchechetere dismissed
Patrick Chinamasa's claims in Parliament last week that Chidyausiku "is a
more senior lawyer by date of admission and registration".

"I do not know why the minister has given himself the unenviable task of
vilifying me and my fellow Supreme Court judges," Muchechetere said. "It is
with regret that I am forced to put pen to paper on a matter of this
nature."

He said: "It is not usual that judges engage in correspondence via the
newspaper on matters concerning their profession. But the nature of Minister
Chinamasa's recorded reply (to a question in Parliament) gives a lot of
personal concern to me and, no doubt, others in the profession.

"Clearly he is misinformed about my qualifications and experience as a
lawyer. When I graduated in 1967, neither Chidyausiku nor Chinamasa had
commenced their law studies, " he said.

Chinamasa's claims followed a question by opposition Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC) MP David Coltart on Chidyausiku's credentials.

The chief justice was appointed to the top judicial office recently amid
accusations of nepotism. Mugabe has allegedly packed the bench with
compliant judges.

"We worked and sacrificed for an independent Zimbabwe for very little reward
and it is painful that no thanks but contempt comes from a person like the
minister," Muchechetere said.

The attack came on the day the Supreme Court allowed Mugabe's government to
proceed with its land reform programme pending the court's main ruling on
the legality of the plan.

The government had appealed against a Supreme Court order last year which
prohibited the state from acquiring white-owned farmland for black
resettlement until it produced a "workable programme of land reform".

"Pending determination of this matter and without in any way prejudging any
of the preliminary issues the applicant is hereby granted leave to proceed
with applications for confirmation (of land acquisition) orders," the
Supreme Court said yesterday.


Oct 03 2001 12:00:00:000AM Dumisani Muleya and Reuters Business Day 1st
Edition

   Wednesday
03 October 2001
Back to the Top
Back to Index

From the Guardian

Judges free Mugabe to seize farms

Andrew Meldrum in Harare
Wednesday October 3, 2001
The Guardian

The revamped Zimbabwean supreme court delivered a temporary ruling yesterday
which upheld President Robert Mugabe's "fast track" seizures of white-owned
land.
Leading opposition lawyers said the judgment marked the end of the
independent judiciary in Zimbabwe.

Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku, who was appointed by Mr Mugabe earlier
this year, delivered the interim ruling allowing the government to carry on
seizing white farms until the court issues a full ruling.

The four-to-one majority judgment reflected the makeup of the bench that
heard the case: four of Mr Mugabe's new appointees and one veteran supreme
court justice.

The decision reversed a supreme court ruling last December that the regime
must halt all farms invasions and send police officers to eject illegal
occupiers until a workable and written plan of land reform was produced.

It made no mention of the earlier judgment, against which the court is
considering the government's appeal.

The final ruling, whenever it comes, is meant to settle the issue of whether
the land seizures are illegal.

The government made no immediate comment on the court's written judgment.
But a lawyer representing the white farmers, Adrian de Bourbon, said:
"Zimbabwe no longer has an independent judiciary, it only has a few
independent judges."

The finding overlooked several illegal and unconstitutional practices being
carried on by the government, he argued: land was being seized without
90-days' notice and without the payment of compensation in a reasonable
time, both of which are stipulated in the government's own Land Acquisition
Act, passed last year.

The government was also allowing considerable violence, theft and
destruction of property on the farms, Mr De Bourbon said, and this too was
against the law.

Zimbabwe's white commercial farmers are meeting to decide what to do now.

Some legal experts said the ruling, and the clear indication that the Mugabe
government had packed the supreme court with its adherents, had grave
implications, not least for the presidential election due by next April.

"The opposition MDC [Movement for Democratic Change] will have very little
confidence of a fair hearing in a number of cases coming up to the supreme
court in the run-up to the presidential elections," a senior lawyer said.

Mr De Bourbon said he would meet the president of the Zimbabwe Law Society,
Sternford Moyo, about the judgment. There was so much "disquiet" about it,
he said, that he was also going to seek meetings with the South African Bar
Association and the International Bar Association.

David Coltart, a human rights lawyer and the MDC MP for Bulawayo, said:
"This is a sad day in history of our supreme court.

"It is a complete denial of the aspirations of former Chief Justice Enoch
Dumbutshena to establish an independent judiciary.

"No one within Zimbabwe or in the international community is going to be
fooled by judgments emanating from a patently biased supreme court. This
court is simply complying with the will of its master."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

From CNN

Land reform ruling in Zimbabwe

October 2, 2001 Posted: 8:04 AM EDT (1204 GMT)


HARARE, Zimbabwe -- Zimbabwe's Supreme Court has allowed the government to
proceed with its controversial land reform programme, pending a ruling on
the legality of the plan.

The government had appealed against a Supreme Court order which prevented
the state acquiring white-owned farmland for black resettlement until it
produced a "workable programme of land reform."

In a written judgement issued on Tuesday, carried by Reuters news agency,
the court said: "Pending determination of this matter and without in any way
pre-judging any of the preliminary issues ... the ... applicant is hereby
granted leave to proceed ...with applications for confirmation (of land
acquisition) orders."

Zimbabwe has been isolated by the international community over Mugabe's
endorsement of the invasion of more than 1,000 white owned farms since
February 2000.

At the beginning of last month, Mugabe supported a Nigerian-brokered
agreement to end the land seizures in exchange for funds from former
colonial ruler Britain to implement a fair land reform programme.

But recent media reports have said pro-government militants were still
trying to seize property illegally.

President Robert Mugabe, who is on a visit to Thailand, told the country's
board of trade on Tuesday that Britain was trying to sabotage his country's
foreign trade relations.

He said Britain was using the issue of land reform to put pressure on
Zimbabwe's trade partners.

"They (Britain) have even gone to the extent of going to Arab countries ...
where we import oil, to persuade them not to sell to Zimbabwe."

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Zimbabwe pushes on with land reform
Squatters on a white-owned farm last year
Ruling signals green light for land confiscation

Zimbabwe's Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa has welcomed a Supreme Court ruling that the government can continue with its controversial programme of redistributing white-owned farm land.

He told BBC's Network Africa that the reforms will continue within a week.

Land timeline
Oct 01 Supreme Court backs land seizures
Sep 01 Government agrees to end illegal land occupations
Nov 00 Supreme Court declares land seizures illegal
June-Nov 00 Thousands of farms listed for acquisition
Apr 00 Act allows land seizures without compensation
Feb 00 Illegal land occupations begin

Mr Chinamasa also denied accusations that Tuesday's interim ruling had been made by judges sympathetic to President Mugabe.

But the BBC's Southern Africa correspondent Barnaby Phillips says the manner in which the Zimbabwean Government has interfered with the judiciary means this is an extremely contentious decision.

It is nevertheless a significant victory for the Zimbabwean Government.

It means that President Robert Mugabe can now argue that his land reform programme is legal, in compliance with international demands, and paves the way for the government to confiscate the vast majority of white-owned farms.


I believe we no longer have an independent judiciary

CFU lawyer Adrian du Bourbon
The interim ruling, which will hold until its final judgement on whether the land reform programme complies with the law, reverses a decision taken by the Supreme Court last November.

Unprecedented

The legal representative of the Commercial Farmers Union has described the decision as unprecedented.

Former Chief Justice Anthony Gubbay
Anthony Gubbay decided to retire early after government pressure

Adrian du Bourbon told the BBC that the government now has a free-hand to do what it wants with thousands of farms

He said the ruling has left the impression the court does not recognise "that there is a break down of law and order" on white-owned farms.

Supporters of President Mugabe, the self-styled war-veterans, began their illegal and violent land invasions in February last year.

British money

Many black and white people who opposed the invasions have been intimidated, beaten up killed or have had their properties looted.

Last month, in an agreement with the British, at a Commonwealth ministers meeting in Abuja, Nigeria, the Zimbabwean Government promised not to violate the law, whilst redistributing white-owned land.

Farmer inspects looted property
Courts had consistently found in favour of white farmers

The British agreed to source finance for a legal and orderly land reform programme.

But in practice the government has ignored that ruling and violent invasions of farms continued.

Last year the government and its war veteran supporters put pressure on the country's Chief Justice and three judges to resign and replaced them with those widely seen as more sympathetic to Mr Mugabe.

The courts had consistently upheld the rights of white farmers in rulings which had caused considerable embarrassment to the government both at home and abroad.

But orders for the police to evict the invaders have rarely been obeyed.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

From The Times (UK), 3 October

New court backs Mugabe's seizure of white-owned land

Harare - Zimbabwe’s new Supreme Court made its first significant judgment yesterday when it backed the government’s seizures of white-owned land. Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku said that the court, which is dominated by recent appointees of President Mugabe, had overturned a ruling by the court of his predecessor, the former Chief Justice Anthony Gubbay. That court had ordered that all steps to seize land be suspended until the government had restored the rule of law on the country’s embattled farms. For the first time since the takeover of white-owned farms began in February last year, the government has secured a measure of legality for its violent campaign. Diplomats said that Mr Mugabe would present the judgment to the international community as proof of its adherence to the rule of law and to the agreement drawn up by Commonwealth foreign ministers in Abuja, Nigeria, last month to end the state-driven violence. The ruling follows Mr Chidyausiku’s appointment to replace Mr Gubbay, who reluctantly resigned in March after being threatened with violence by supporters of Mr Mugabe’s Zanu PF party. Mr Mugabe added three new judges, prompting accusations that he was "packing the court" to ensure that its decisions would be favourable to his regime.

Adrian de Bourbon, the advocate who represented the Commercial Farmers’ Union, said: "I don’t believe we have an independent judiciary any longer." The new court’s decision was announced two working days after the final papers were submitted. "It leaves one with the suspicion that the argument wasn’t considered," Mr de Bourbon said. Mr Chidyausiku dismissed an application by Mr de Bourbon yesterday for a week’s delay for him to draw up a challenge. He said that the court would rule later on a Government application for a declaration that it had established law and order on commercial farms and that its so-called fast-track land acquisition programme was legal. The court also directed the Administrative Court, which hears objections from farmers against acquisition of their farms, to start hearing cases, following a nine-month suspension ordered by Mr Gubbay’s court. David Coltart, legal director of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change, said: "We now have to assume this is a politically biased judiciary and we can not rely on the Constitution any more. However, the rest of the world is not going to believe that the land-reform programme is being done lawfully simply because a patently biased judiciary has ruled in favour of its master."

From The Guardian (UK), 3 October

Judges free Mugabe to seize farms

Harare - The revamped Zimbabwean supreme court delivered a temporary ruling yesterday which upheld President Robert Mugabe's "fast track" seizures of white-owned land. Leading opposition lawyers said the judgment marked the end of the independent judiciary in Zimbabwe. Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku, who was appointed by Mr Mugabe earlier this year, delivered the interim ruling allowing the government to carry on seizing white farms until the court issues a full ruling. The four-to-one majority judgment reflected the makeup of the bench that heard the case: four of Mr Mugabe's new appointees and one veteran supreme court justice.

The decision reversed a supreme court ruling last December that the regime must halt all farms invasions and send police officers to eject illegal occupiers until a workable and written plan of land reform was produced. It made no mention of the earlier judgment, against which the court is considering the government's appeal. The final ruling, whenever it comes, is meant to settle the issue of whether the land seizures are illegal. The government made no immediate comment on the court's written judgment. But a lawyer representing the white farmers, Adrian de Bourbon, said: "Zimbabwe no longer has an independent judiciary, it only has a few independent judges." The finding overlooked several illegal and unconstitutional practices being carried on by the government, he argued: land was being seized without 90-days' notice and without the payment of compensation in a reasonable time, both of which are stipulated in the government's own Land Acquisition Act, passed last year. The government was also allowing considerable violence, theft and destruction of property on the farms, Mr De Bourbon said, and this too was against the law. Zimbabwe's white commercial farmers are meeting to decide what to do now.

Some legal experts said the ruling, and the clear indication that the Mugabe government had packed the supreme court with its adherents, had grave implications, not least for the presidential election due by next April. "The opposition MDC [Movement for Democratic Change] will have very little confidence of a fair hearing in a number of cases coming up to the supreme court in the run-up to the presidential elections," a senior lawyer said. Mr De Bourbon said he would meet the president of the Zimbabwe Law Society, Sternford Moyo, about the judgment. There was so much "disquiet" about it, he said, that he was also going to seek meetings with the South African Bar Association and the International Bar Association. David Coltart, a human rights lawyer and the MDC MP for Bulawayo, said: "This is a sad day in history of our supreme court. It is a complete denial of the aspirations of former Chief Justice Enoch Dumbutshena to establish an independent judiciary. No one within Zimbabwe or in the international community is going to be fooled by judgments emanating from a patently biased supreme court. This court is simply complying with the will of its master."

From The Daily News, 2 October

Farm invaders burn down workers’ houses

Sixteen farm invaders, led by a man identified only as Comrade Sibanda, burnt down about 70 workers’ houses at Barrymore Farm in the Virginia farming area near Macheke, leaving hundreds of farm workers homeless and without food. Yesterday, about 100 of the farm workers were camped outside the Barrymore police post, giving statements to one police officer deployed from Macheke to deal with the serious case of arson on the farm. George Goodman, the farm manager, said yesterday he was winding up operations on the farm because of the incessant conflict with the farm invaders. "I am winding up operations. There is no farming taking place on this farm and I cannot pay my workers anymore," said Goodman. About 70 permanent and 100 casual workers face an uncertain future if the farm is closed.

The families, some of whom have worked for over 30 years on the farm, said they lost food, blankets and other possessions they had worked for all their lives when their thatched kitchens were burnt. Only the asbestos-roofed main structures remain standing in the farm compound. The farm workers said five of the assailants, including Sibanda, were arrested on Saturday. But the officer-in-charge of Macheke Police Station referred questions to the officer commanding Macheke District in Marondera, who could not be reached for comment.

Goodman said he had to cut short his visit to Nyanga when news reached him on Saturday morning that there was trouble on the farm, which he has leased since 1992. Yesterday afternoon, some of the farm workers were preparing food at the tobacco barns where Goodman has given them temporary shelter following the destruction of their huts. The workers said a group of war veterans, led by Sibanda, arrived on Friday afternoon and abducted a security guard, Rinos Showa. They allegedly beat him up and said he was supposed to leave the farm. They later released him and returned to the farm at around 8pm. "We ran into the mountains with our children when they returned at night, shouting at us to remove our belongings and leave the farm," said Jamiya Ndemenga, a mother of five.

The workers said they had nowhere to go. The foreman, Loiter Mariyano, who has worked on the farm for 32 years, blamed the government for the lawlessness on the farms. A nearby farm, Chilinda, has been shut down with 220 workers losing their jobs because of the activities of the invaders. Goodman said his farm had been listed, delisted, and listed again and he was not sure whether it was still listed as a new wave of violence spreads across commercial farms despite an agreement between Harare and London in which the government agreed to uphold the rule of law. In Bubi, Matabeleland North, Lameck Mhanyai, a worker at Dollar Block Farm, had his arm broken in an attack when about 200 suspected war veterans and Zanu PF supporters descended on the farm last week. Although the police denied any knowledge of the incident, officials at Inyathi Hospital said they had treated nine workers, one with a broken arm. In a separate development, farm invaders raided Windsor Ranch extension in Mutorashanga which is not listed for resettlement.

From The Daily News, 2 October

Grenade blast kills war vet

A war veteran was killed and more than 20 patrons injured on Sunday when a hand grenade exploded in a crowded bar in Nkayi, as relations between MDC supporters and war veterans reached boiling point. This is the second such incident to occur at the Carlton Cocktail Bar in Nkayi, about 90km north-east of Bulawayo. About two months ago a grenade hurled from a group of suspected war veterans into the bar failed to explode and was removed by the police bomb disposal unit. It is believed that the war veteran accidentally dislodged the grenade’s pin, resulting in the explosion which ripped off his arm. Other people were injured by flying shrapnel. Nkayi MP, Abednico Bhebhe, of the MDC, yesterday condemned the incident and said he believed the bomb was meant to be used to attack or kill MDC supporters. Matabeleland North police spokesman, Inspector Alfred Zvenyika, yesterday confirmed the incident and said the police were investigating the matter. He said they had deployed dozens of officers to the volatile area to monitor the situation. Hospital authorities refused to speak to The Daily News.

From BBC News, 2 October

Blair promises to stand by Africa

British Prime Minister Tony Blair has described the current state of poverty in Africa as "a scar on our consciences". And he said that if the world as a community focused on it, it could be healed but if not "it will become deeper and angrier". In his speech to the annual Labour party conference, Mr Blair called on the international community to back a partnership for Africa, between the developed and developing world based around the New African Initiative. "This would offer greater investment, aid and debt relief for Africa," he said. "But it's a deal: On the African side: true democracy, no more excuses for dictatorship, abuses of human rights; no tolerance of bad governance, from the endemic corruption of some states, to the activities of Mr Mugabe's henchmen in Zimbabwe. Proper commercial, legal and financial systems."

In a speech which correspondents described as ambitious, Mr Blair spoke of a "moral duty" to provide international military and humanitarian action in countries anywhere. "If the world continues to ignore the sufferings of African nations, like in the war- ravaged Democratic Republic of Congo, it would breed anger and frustration which would threaten global stability," he said. Mr Blair also mentioned the world's inaction during the 1994 genocide in which nearly around 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were massacred by Hutu extremists. And he promised: "If Rwanda happens again we would not walk away as the outside world has done many times before."

Declassified documents obtained by a US non-governmental agency had showed that the United States knew in advance that the 1994 Rwandan genocide was likely to happen but nevertheless insisted that United Nations peacekeepers should be withdrawn. Following his government's intervention in Sierra Leone's civil war, Mr Blair indicated that he would be ready to use British troops to implement future peace plans. During last May's British election campaign, Mr Blair promised that he wanted to make Africa a key priority during his second term in office. He followed that up with a meeting last month with some African leaders to discuss his proposed partnership with the continent.

From The Daily News, 2 October

Mugabe denied opportunity to present Zimbabwe’s case

President Mugabe was denied a golden opportunity to explain his case in Brisbane and Commonwealth leaders will not have direct dialogue with him until their rescheduled meeting set for early next year. But Don McKinnon, the Commonwealth Secretary-General, said the postponement of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Brisbane, Australia, was a missed opportunity for Mugabe. In response to questions from The Daily News, McKinnon said: "It is unfortunate that with the postponement of CHOGM, Commonwealth leaders will not have the opportunity to engage in dialogue directly with President Mugabe, but we are confident that the opportunity will present itself again at the rescheduled summit in Brisbane, which will probably be in early 2002."

The postponement of CHOGM came about after some heads of government indicated they would not attend for security reasons. Security fears arose after the terrorist attacks in the United States on 11 September, in which about 7 000 people died. McKinnon said despite the postponement of CHOGM, the Abuja agreement between Harare and London remained binding. A team of Commonwealth ministers would visit Zimbabwe soon, he said. "The foreign ministers at the Abuja meeting had intended to go to Harare after CHOGM. The postponement has not affected that and we will now be looking at new dates for the visit," said McKinnon. He said the Abuja meeting was the beginning of a new process. The initiative by the Southern Africa Development Community heads of state was welcome, he said.

CHOGM Protests
 
The CHOGM meeting in Brisbane may have been postponed, but the two simultaneous protests in London and Pretoria are very definitely still on.
 
On Saturday 6 October, there will be two large, colourful, and peaceful demonstrations - one in London, and one in Pretoria. It is very important that a strong protest is registered, to make sure that the delegates to CHOGM fully appreciate the importance of holding the government of Zimbabwe to the public promises it recently made in Abuja and Harare. Please make a HUGE effort for this one. We cannot emphasise this strongly enough.
 
London : Starts at noon on Saturday 6 October outside the Zimbabwe High Commission in the Strand, followed by a march to Trafalgar Square. Tel 01765 607 900 for details.
 
Pretoria : Starts at noon at the Union Buildings (corner Vermuelen and Leyds Streets), followed by a march to the Zimbabwe High Commission at 798 Merton Street, Arcadia. Tel 082 885 0771 for details.
Back to the Top
Back to Index