the independent
By
Pius Langa
Following is South African Chief Justice Pius Langa’s speech at
the launch of Reporting the Courts — A Handbook for South African Journalists by
Kevin Ritchie, edited by Gwen Ansell.
THERE is no doubt that the media is
perhaps the most effective vehicle for expression. It is accordingly one of the
most important vehicles to impart information and knowledge.
This launch
is an important initiative because it demonstrates, in a tangible way, your
seriousness in accurately and adequately reflecting what goes on in the courts
of our land. Two questions may arise from this. What does go on in our courts
and why is it important for this to be reflected extensively in our media?
Before I deal with the two questions, let me make a few preliminary
remarks about the parallel responsibilities of the judiciary on the one hand and
the media on the other.
In a sense, in one sphere at least, there is a
complementary relationship between the work judges do and the work that
journalists do. The two institutions are critical anchors of a constitutional
democracy.
Democracy is about the full and free participation of all
citizens in the running of their state. In other words, it is government by, for
and in accordance with the will of the people.
In order for the people
to participate meaningfully, however, they need the parameters of their rights
and obligations to be defined. That is the work of the courts which, in turn,
can only fulfil this task in the process of adjudicating disputes.
It is
here that the media has a role. People need accurate and readily available
information, as well as the means to articulate their views or wishes to those
in government and in order to influence their fellow citizens.
This is a
crucial role: the dissemination of information and diverse views. Some of the
information will relate to the rights and obligations of individuals as
articulated by the courts. The two institutions are therefore vital in the
maintenance of a democratic state.
The two institutions also operate on
the basis of certain constitutional guarantees which are designed to benefit the
public. We speak of judicial independence; this is independence not only from
the executive and the legislature, but also from influences exerted by members
of society.
The constitution proclaims this independence and we in turn
seek to guard it jealously against any threat, potential or real. In arguing for
it, however, we may sometimes lose its true essence, which is that judicial
independence is not a privilege that is the exclusive preserve of judges, to
benefit them.
It is a right that belongs to all our people. It is they
who are entitled to a judiciary that is independent because that is what
guarantees them the protection and preservation of their rights and the quality
justice they are entitled to. Failure of this independence would result in
serious prejudice to society and the state, and seriously weaken our
democracy.
Similarly, Section 16 of the South African Constitution, which
articulates freedom of expression, specifically refers to freedom of the media
as a critical part of freedom of expression. Here again it is society that is
the true beneficiary of the freedom and independence of the media.
It
has been said: “An independent press is a matter of pride. But the independence
of a great institution has its source, its foundations, in the community, not in
the institution itself.” — the deputy chief justice of England and Wales in a
keynote speech at the Law for Journalists Conference in London, November 26
2004.
The freedom of the media is an invaluable attribute of a democratic
state. There is however a cost to this. Society must acknowledge and accept why
it is that free speech is one of the essential foundations of a democratic
society.
A docile media can only have limited value in contributing to
the strengthening of those foundations. To be played properly, that role demands
rigorous application.
Independence and a refusal to be intimidated are
indeed the hallmarks of a media that contributes to the quality of a maturing
democracy. It cannot be true, as was once said about British law, cynically I
should add, that “. . . free speech (is) a very good thing as long as it does
not cause trouble.” — Geoffrey Robertson QC, who made the remark in Freedom of
the Individual and the Law, seventh edition, Penguin Books, who now presides
over the International Criminal Court, Sierra Leone.
Free speech must
always be “a very good thing” whether or not it causes trouble. I do not believe
the media can do its job properly without causing trouble. Not infrequently,
though, the trouble it causes lands it in hot water.
Freedom of the
media, as an important aspect of democracy, must never be used as an excuse for
irresponsible reporting. Press freedom, like all other rights, is subject to
limitation. It is the task of the courts, in interpreting the law and the Bill
of Rights, to articulate the parameters of this right.
The media, like
all other public and private institutions, must be mindful of these boundaries.
In defining the boundaries, the courts are not antagonistic to press freedom.
Rather, the two institutions are complementary to one another; working together
to ensure the delicate balancing act that is often required to maintain harmony
in a democratic state.
Both institutions are required to do their work
competently and to exercise the greatest care in the performance of their tasks
at all times. This is a heavy responsibility, but these attributes are necessary
in order to enable them to be of the greatest benefit to our young nation and
also to ensure that the devastating effects that could result from the misuse of
the potent power that each possesses is avoided.
Awareness of this potent
power will make us careful how we use our tools, not to damage and destroy, but
to build and to heal. We should never lose sight of the context in which we
carry out our functions as well as the people who are the consumers of our
services.
Rich and poor, powerful and weak, strong and vulnerable, they
are the true beneficiaries of the fruits of democracy which we are called upon
to strengthen. Both institutions must always strive to give the public access to
the benefits of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. For journalists, there
is a whole world out there and the opportunity to make a difference — to improve
the quality of the information that the public receives; to challenge injustice,
bureaucratic fiat or judicial indifference wherever it raises its head; and to
do so in an engaging fashion.
Cases heard by the courts may be dull, but
they are terribly important. In the Constitutional Court we are constantly
seeking solutions to difficult issues which touch the lives of many people in
this country. In the space of 12 years, our constitution has become a dominant
feature of our lives.
It is the function of the court to lay the
foundations of a new jurisprudence. We deal with concepts such as equality,
human dignity, freedom, security of the person, the rights of children, labour
rights, rights to a fair trial, welfare rights, rights to shelter, healthcare,
prisoners’ voting rights, issues affecting immigrants and so on.
Some of
our hearings catch the public imagination but others enjoy no publicity at all.
They are however all important beyond the interests of the litigants
themselves. They constitute an authoritative interpretation of rights and
constitutional provisions.
Left to the court alone, these important
decisions would never reach all corners of South Africa, as they should.
Thus many people who could benefit from this knowledge would remain in
the dark about what the constitution means to them. The general public is,
therefore, largely dependent upon the resourcefulness of the media.
If we
are to see information as a tool for greater achievements and the advancement of
a culture of rights, we should be seeking to improve the competence of our
reporting, in particular court reporting. This is what this book seeks to do.
And that is a great contribution to fulfilling a vision for this country
that our constitution embodies, that is the values of equality, human dignity,
freedom and the advancement of human rights. I accordingly congratulate you all,
the creators of the handbook as well as those who will use it for this
initiative.
the independent
By Wellington
Chadehumbe
FOLLOWING is the keynote address delivered by Wellington
Chadehumbe at the Zimbabwe Independent/FBC Banks and Banking Survey reception
held last week.
AN anonymous commentator once said: "Economists have an
irrational passion for dispassionate rationality." So in keeping with my trade,
allow me to entertain you with a few thoughts on the causal linkages I believe
to exist between truth, freedom and economic growth.
As some of you know, I
left this beloved country in 1996. I moved to South Africa to broaden my
horizons business-wise. I felt the need to operate on a pan-African stage,
rather than within a single country. I am still to achieve that vision in
full.
The most instructive experience so far and indeed the biggest fun has
been meeting and getting to know fellow Africans from other countries. Mostly, I
have been astounded by the similarities between our perspectives.
A key
similarity I have noticed among us is our fixation on freedom. Of course, we
must regard sovereignty as sacrosanct given our historical background. But the
benefits of that sovereignty must percolate through society and trickle down to
the individual. So I would like to challenge you to consider with me what
sovereignty must mean for this generation and for our children, and jointly try
and unravel the causal link between that sovereignty and our economic
wellbeing.
I will start by stating the obvious.
Now that we have obtained
political freedom, our challenge and responsibility is the judicious management
of our affairs. We must understand that we cannot use the same tools as we used
during yesteryears, struggling for freedom.
Instead of activism, we now need
cool calculation and strategy — measured words of wisdom instead of fiery
rhetoric. Otherwise, we will continue to sound and act as if we are still the
hapless victims we used to be before freedom. Such behaviour could not be more
contradictory and discordant with the concept of self-determination that we
treasure.
The management of our affairs responsibly must include having the
courage to confront our past and present failures with bold introspection, not
in the indignity of shame, but with a resolute determination to learn from our
errors and solve them with cogent analysis and resolute action.
I am
convinced that we do have the fortitude to shoulder these responsibilities and
the courage to confront truth, no matter how discomfiting. I believe that we
have the wisdom and insight to know that our freedom must be under-girded by
truth, if it is to be sustainable. My confidence stems from the knowledge that
there is nothing intrinsically wrong with us as Africans. If other peoples have
addressed similar issues time and again, similar capacity is surely within our
ken.
Our sovereignty must also translate to individual freedom, and the
extension of the right to participate and engage to all. This would be a
worthwhile demonstration of the fact that we positively believe in, value and
honour each other’s intellectual capabilities. This is also necessary for the
fulfillment of all. All humans desire the opportunity for self-expression.
However, freedom and truth are not only valuable for their own sake, but are
also critical for economic progress. This is the thesis of Amatya Sen’s book,
Development as Freedom. To Sen, development has no value if it does not expand
freedoms. He calls this concept the constitutive value of freedom.
Sen’s
views, of course fly in the face of conventional thinking on freedom and growth
in some parts of Asia, where Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy of capitalist dictatorship
(in Singapore) treats freedom as an unnecessary nuisance that should not
distract the noble pursuit of economic development.
Sen does not conceal his
distaste of Lee Kuan Yew’s approach. He writes: "Some have championed harsher
political systems — with the denial of basic civil and political rights — for
their alleged advantage in promoting economic development. This thesis (often
called "the Lee thesis") is sometimes backed by some fairly rudimentary
empirical evidence. In fact, more comprehensive inter-country comparisons have
not provided any confirmation of this thesis . . . Indeed, the empirical
evidence very strongly suggests that economic growth is more a matter of a
friendlier economic climate than of a harsher political system."
Like Sen, I
am most sceptical about the sustainability of the so-called economic miracles
taking place in some oppressive Asian countries. In fact, my own experience as a
businessman has revealed to me the flaws of the Lee thesis. I have learnt that
quality people can only be led, not managed and that leadership is at its
quintessence when the key tools it employs are inspiration and vision as opposed
to threats and intimidation. It appears as if fulfillment eludes us as humans
when the God-given right to free choice is tampered with by the dictatorial
tendencies of fellow mortals.
The value of freedom and truth as instruments
of economic growth has also been stressed by Bernstein in his book, The Birth of
Plenty, in which he argues that there are four key drivers of long-term economic
growth, namely scientific rationalism, property rights, capital markets and
efficient transport and communication systems.
Bernstein stresses the
importance of scientific rationalism this way, "At base . . . the history of
economics is the history of technology — after all modern prosperity rides in
the cockpit of invention."
It is common cause that scientific rationalism is
nothing other than human beings’ pursuit of truth. Therefore, Bernstein’s
quotation is synonymous with asserting that truth (or at least the quest for
it), is a driver of growth.
Kitty Fergusson, the author of the book, The Fire
in the Equations, takes the inviolability of truth to a higher level. She
observes that by presuming that the universe is objective (as scientific enquiry
does), that must mean that: "Reality has a hard edge to it and it does not cave
in or shift like sands in the desert in response to our opinions, perceptions,
preferences, beliefs, or anything else. Reality is not a democracy."
Therefore truth is absolute and when we find it, one of its benefits is
growth.
Let me now turn my attention to the causal link between freedom and
growth. In the modern age, freedom is best measured by the civil liberties that
a citizenry enjoys.
Bernstein argues that the preservation of property
rights drives economic activity this way: "Innovators and tradesmen must rest
secure that the fruits of their labours will not be arbitrarily confiscated by
the state, by criminals or by monopolists."
These freedoms must include the
freedom to transact and exchange. In Democracy as Freedom, Amatya Sen considers
the freedom of exchange so basic and normal that to him any attempt to restrict
free exchange is as ridiculous as an attempt to stop people from conversing.
The economist, William Baumol, also adds credence to Sen’s argument when he
writes on entrepreneurship. He advises that when entrepreneurs engage in
unproductive activities "such as rent-seeking or organised crime" any attempts
to resolve the problem should begin with an analysis of how the incentive
structure created by the regulators might have enlarged "the payoffs society
offers to such (unproductive) activities".
I have tried to show the
interdependence between truth and freedom. I have also provided arguments
suggesting a causal link between these two virtues and growth. I think we all
agree that growth is an imperative for Africa.
It stands to reason that we
can only demonstrate our love for growth when we passionately embrace these
virtues. We cannot violate these virtues and still claim to be committed to
progress. Embracing these virtues is the price we must pay for progress.
As
my dad used to say, I think for the love of alliteration: "Poor people prove
their preparedness to proceed from poverty to prosperity when they are prepared
to pay the price for that prosperity."
Are we prepared to pay the price for
prosperity through our passionate embrace of the virtues of truth and
freedom?
I have also argued that of the two virtues, truth is the more
fundamental because it is the begetter and benefactor of freedom — the only
citadel within which freedom can finally be free to be its true self.
From
this realisation, I have finally understood what the Lord Jesus means in John
8:32 when He says: "And you shall know the truth and the truth will make you
free." I therefore personally find it difficult to say "long live freedom", in
good conscience, without in the same breadth shouting, "long live truth".
*
Wellington Chadehumbe is an economist and the CEO of Triumph Venture Capital
(Pty) Ltd, a fund management company that manages the Southern African
Intellectual Property Fund. The views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author. FBC Holdings was the official sponsor of the Banks and Banking
Survey.
the independent
THERE are three effective
but painful strategies that could (in various combinations and sequences) begin
the process of forcing this failed and foul regime out — ultimately via
negotiations/talks and a supervised, free and fair election:
l Peaceful,
street demonstrations; non-partisan, under an umbrella organisation, staggered
over at least one month, coordinated with weekend demonstrations by exiles in,
for example, Johannesburg and London. The price would initially be bloodshed in
the streets of Zimbabwe’s cities, of course.
l A stay-away by the majority
of Zimbabwe’s workers for at least one full week — accepting the brutal violence
from the army this would cost us in the high-density suburbs.
l Sadc,
especially South African and Mozambican, sanctions or go slows — unofficial of
course — covering, for example, fuel port/rail imports and/or
electricity.
None of these three is easy to sell or achieve and is unlikely
to occur in the immediate future. The first two strategies will require
effective mobilisation and leadership of Zimbabwe’s working class together with
a portion of the middle class. The third may demand successful implementation of
at least one of the first two strategies.
As we saw in the pre-Movement for
Democratic Change era, a strong and effective Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions
leadership is a vital component of these strategies.
These strategies have
worked in other countries. There is nothing extraterrestrial about us
Zimbabweans or our country.
We may be "domesticated", resourceful and
buffered by what was once a strong and relatively sophisticated economy and a
significant population of educated exiles sending money home — but these
features are not unique to our situation.
However, usually for self-serving
or shortsighted reasons, all three strategies have been and will continue to be
opposed elsewhere within Zimbabwe’s family of classes.
Ian Smith’s downfall
was his fanciful dream of maintaining a minority, racist white regime in the
middle of black Africa. President Robert Mugabe’s may well turn out to be his
fanciful dream that an economy (including, for us, its agriclutural base) can be
bludgeoned, arm-twisted, quick-fixed, talked or bribed into serving his personal
political needs first and foremost, rather than serving certain basic economic
laws and pre-requisites for success.
In this respect, given the output from
the first years of Mugonomics, there are signs that we have entered a period of
greater opportunity to implement the first two strategies.
Rwendo,
Harare.
the independent
Corruption blitz netting only small fish
By Nelson
Chamisa
THE arrest of GMB chief executive Retired Colonel Samuel Muvuti
confirms to Zimbabweans that Zanu PF is the breeding ground of corruption and
unbridled political patronage. The MDC believes that his arrest is a token
attempt by a cornered regime to be seen to be taking action on a serious scourge
that has taken root in the higher echelons of Zanu PF.
The MDC is convinced
that this regime has no genuine political will to tackle graft and unmitigated
theft that has become the hallmark of this government. Muvuti and Zupco boss
Charles Nherera are just small fish in a bigger pond replete with corrupt sharks
and tigers. Until the ministerial sharks and Zanu PF politburo tigers are
targeted and brought to account, the war against corruption will be mere
rhetoric and sloganeering. Zanu PF’s so-called anti-corruption crusade is merely
targeting the small fish and leaving the bigger fish to continue looting state
resources.
The regime should be pursuing genuine cases of corruption that
have captured the attention of the nation over the years. A case in point is the
Zupco saga, where Nherera and deputy Information minister Bright Matonga are
being accused of corruption when bigger names that have been implicated are
still free. Government and Zanu PF officials have been implicated in the looting
of farms and farming inputs, the War Victims Compensation Fund and the
Pay-For-Your-House scheme but they continue to freely roam the corridors of
government.
A UN report has named several cabinet ministers and senior army
personnel in the looting of diamonds in the DRC while one of Mugabe’s close
relatives reportedly received kickbacks from those who constructed the Harare
International Airport. All this has been swept under the carpet while small fish
continue to be sacrificed on the altar of political expediency.
The MDC
believes in a transparent and accountable government that has a genuine
commitment to combat corruption and graft; a government with a well-funded
police unit and an independent Attorney-General’s office that pursues all cases
of corruption without any fears of a backlash from a tainted and corrupt
political leadership.
We challenge national leaders and those holding public
office to declare their assets publicly.
* Chamisa is an MP and MDC
secretary for information and publicity.
Reporter's Journal
Inside Zimbabwe: A Special Report by Sheri Fink
August
28th, 2006
From http://www.theworld.org/worldfeature/zimbabwe/zimbabweRJ.shtml
Zimbabwe
has a reputation for treating journalists harshly -- reporters there have been
harassed and independent media outlets shuttered -- so I never imagined a
Zimbabwean military officer would casually invite me to visit his country on a
reporting trip. But that's what happened one evening last year in Nairobi,
Kenya.
I met Lt. Col. Carlos, a Zimbabwean special forces soldier (he's
asked me to keep his real name secret because he's involved in covert
operations), at a dinner party given by the local head of an American non-profit
group. I was in Kenya reporting on HIV for The World. Carlos was there visiting
his girlfriend, a neighbor of the dinner host.
Carlos and I chatted
casually, and when he learned I was a reporter, he began complaining that the
Western media were failing to give an accurate picture of his country. He said I
should come to Zimbabwe and see for myself whether it was the disintegrating,
violent place people said it was. I told him I thought Western journalists
weren't allowed to report there. He assured me that everything would be
fine.
I filed Carlos's unusual invitation away, and its memory didn't
resurface for nearly a year. I was heading back to Africa for The World, and I
mentioned the invitation to my editors. They were intrigued, but wary. They knew
that American and British journalists had been arrested in Zimbabwe in recent
years. They wondered to what extent Carlos could provide protection. And what
was Carlos's motive? Was he really offering to help me gain unfettered
journalistic access to his country, or did he intend to promote a positive view
of Zimbabwe by leading me around its famed tourist attractions?
My sense
was that Carlos was a patriot who truly believed that an open-minded journalist
would see the country as he did -- a still-proud nation that was being
mistreated by those bitter about the steps its government was taking to redress
the inequities of colonialism. Because Carlos was entirely unashamed of his
country and its military, I had a hunch that he would provide very open access
to it. Here was an opportunity to understand Zimbabweans who passionately defend
the country's policies in the face of widespread international
condemnation.
It took numerous phone calls and emails, and a meeting with
Carlos in Nairobi, to settle most of our concerns. Still, there would be no way
to know whether this was a good idea until the trip was complete. What I worried
about logistically was getting into and out of the country without having my
recording equipment confiscated. Any airport x-ray machine would easily pick up
the array of microphones and audio recorders. Carlos promised to accompany me
from airplane door to airplane door, arrival to departure.
The
abnormality of the country's situation became apparent just moments into the
flight from Nairobi to Harare. Flight attendants passed out copies of The
Herald, Zimbabwe's official daily newspaper, and the business section carried
this advertisement: "Own a Samsung laser printer for only $29 million..." The
country's inflation rate had hit nearly 1200 percent. (New money is currently
being issued and three zeros have been removed from the currency.)
The
financial stress that runaway inflation and an acute shortage of foreign
currency places on even the top echelon of Zimbabwe's society became clear when
I stepped into the hotel. Its owner looked harried. She was willing to offer a
significantly lower price if I would pay in U.S. cash. "It's not as if we have
tourists here anymore," she said.
On my first full day in the country,
another business owner, chain smoking cigarettes, explained the intricacies of
the country's black market. "The first thing you need to know about Zimbabwe is
that nobody obeys the law here," she said. "It's impossible." Her comment stuck
with me. I soon realized that the fact that many people break the law to survive
means, among other things, that many are paranoid of being prosecuted should
they run afoul of the government. This contributes to their general
unwillingness to speak on the record to journalists about any politically
sensitive matter.
Still, nearly everyone I met was willing to speak with
me, at least on background. Much of that was due to Carlos's influence. He was
extremely well connected across the country's political and racial divides, and
he was utterly fearless. Once, as I was interviewing him in his car, we drove
past the State House where President Mugabe lives. I noticed cameras pointing at
the road, and I said, nodding to my microphone, "I think I'll put this down."
Carlos replied, "No, it's OK, don't worry," and he described, using an
expletive, what he would say to Mugabe if he questioned us. He added, "I'll tell
him I'm minding my own business, better mind his own."
Over my time in
Zimbabwe, Carlos introduced me to senior military officers, white farmers, poor
black urbanites, wealthy business people, lawyers, musicians, university
professors, and journalists working both for government newspapers and those
working furtively in violation of the country's restrictive media laws. Most
importantly, Carlos also respected my need to report independently. Without him
present, I met with opposition political leaders, human rights activists, health
workers, and impoverished Zimbabweans who had been displaced by the government's
massive slum clearance campaign.
The reporting trip exceeded my
expectations. The only challenge left was to get the precious audio recordings
and myself back out of the country. The night before I left, Carlos and some of
his friends gathered at the hotel bar, celebrating and drinking double gin and
tonics. When I went to bed, the group headed out to continue the party. I
reminded Carlos that my flight was early in the morning. He assured me not to
worry, just call him at 7 a.m. to wake him up, and he'd come to pick me up at
the hotel.
In the morning, I called and called, but Carlos didn't answer.
I phoned his friends, but they couldn't reach him either. An hour passed, and I
took a taxi to the airport. I checked in for the flight, hoping in vain that
Carlos would appear before I had to proceed through security. Surely, when it
came time to pass my bags through the x-ray machine, the screeners would spot
the radio equipment and audio recordings. Would they ask what I'd been doing,
confiscate the evidence, or even toss me in jail? Had I been set up? I waited
until just before departure. Then, trying my best to look nonchalant, I placed
the two carry-on bags on the x-ray belt and held my breath.
I walked to
the other side, expecting the contents of the bags to trigger a hand search, as
happens almost everywhere else I fly. But, miraculously, the guards didn't ask
me to stop. I picked up the bags and turned toward the gate, and at just that
moment Carlos burst through the security checkpoint, brandishing his airport ID.
"See, I told you everything would be fine," he said. And, while it hadn't been
fine for some journalists who went before, for me, indeed, it was.
the independent
THE fight for control of the
opposition MDC’s regional offices in Matabeleland North has taken on a fresh
dimension after the courts in Hwange on Monday granted a peace order barring the
Arthur Mutambara faction from using the premises.
A Hwange court ordered that
an employee of the Tsvangirai faction, Michael Phiri, currently working at the
offices, should not be interfered with in executing his duties.
The Mutambara
MDC on Wednesday challenged the peace order. A magistrate deferred the hearing
to a later date.
At the same time there have been claims that the Mutambara
faction’s administration officer, Gertrude Simango, was forced to flee after
receiving death threats.
Spokesperson for Tsvangirai’s camp, Nelson Chamisa,
this week dismissed the whole incident as minor and said his party was not
concerned about who occupies which offices in the country.
"The MDC is
committed to non-violence and that remains the guiding principle of the party,"
Chamisa said.
"But it is regrettable that there are individuals in the
struggle who are concerning themselves with shadow boxing. We are not worried
about who occupies what offices in the struggle to liberate
Zimbabwe."
Abednico Bhebhe of the Arthur Mutambara group said they would wait
for the outcome of the appeal made in the courts on Wednesday.
"We have
always been in control of the premises and people who moved into the party
offices did so after the administrator had fled following death threats over the
phone," Bhebhe said.
Police in Hwange confirmed that they intervened in the
matter on Monday. — Staff Writer.
the independent
Clemence Manyukwe
STAKEHOLDERS in the media and communications
industry have recommended the withdrawal of the Interception of Communications
Bill currently before parliament to pave way for the drafting of an alternative
law.
A new law needed to be drafted after wide consultations to address a
number of contentious issues such as the usurping of the judicial powers in
issuing warrants.
In its submission to the parliamentary portfolio
committee on Transport and Communications, the Zimbabwe Internet Service
Providers Association (Zispa) on Wednesday contended that there was a likelihood
that if the Bill was passed in its current form it could be successfully
challenged on constitutional grounds.
The organisation said the Bill’s
effectiveness in combating serious crime was also questionable, given that those
involved in such activities were likely to use encrypted
communications.
These encrypted communications are extremely difficult to
crack without access to days of processing time on supercomputers that are not
available in this country, Zispa said.
“Zispa recommends that the
Interception of Communications Bill 2006 be withdrawn in its present form and
that a new Bill be drafted following well-publicised public meetings to obtain
feedback from affected parties, detailed discussions with key stakeholders in
the sector and a study of similar legislation and its implementation in other
countries,” the organisation said.
Zispa also queried the Bill’s lack of
judicial oversight as the Transport and Communications minister may issue
interception warrants on suspicion that “a serious offence has been or is being
or will be committed”.
The Bill says the minister may issue warrants for
the interception of communications on application by the Chief of Defence
Intelligence, the Director-General of the President’s Department of National
Security (the CIO), the Commissioner of the Zimbabwe Republic Police and the
Commissioner-General of the Zimbabwe Revenue Authoritity.
“Normal
international practice for legislation of this kind is for warrants to be issued
as the result of some judicial process, and for provision to be made for an
annual review of the implementation of the Act to ensure that its measures are
not being abused,” the internet service providers said.
the independent
Shakeman Mugari
AN
International Monetary Fund (IMF) team is scheduled to visit Zimbabwe next month
for their annual Article IV Consultations amid deepening meltdown of the
economy.
Businessdigest understands that government and the IMF have since
agreed on the date which sources said should be around mid-September.
The
visit comes two months late after it failed to take place as planed in July and
has been hanging in the balance amid market speculation that it could have been
scuttled by the widening rift between Harare and the Bretton Woods institution.
Sources close to the issue said bickering between the fund and Zimbabwe had
forced the IMF to postpone the visit twice in the past three months. There were
reports that when the meeting was due in July Harare pleaded for more time to
put its house in order.
"They requested for the meeting in July but the
government said it needed more time to put its house in order," a source said.
Government was yet to present its fiscal and monetary policies, the source
said. He said when government later requested the IMF to visit in August it told
the fund it was busy with its annual meeting.
"But now they have agreed on
the date and the team will be arriving in the country mid next month."
The
visit comes eight months after the IMF stayed a decision to expel Zimbabwe,
giving it a six months reprieve but demanded sound policies to stop the economy
from further collapse.
The IMF also refused to reinstate Zimbabwe’s voting
rights which were suspended in 1999 after the government stopped servicing its
debt. Since then the IMF has refused to extend balance of payments support to
Zimbabwe and other multi-lateral organisations have followed suit.
Sources
however said government is still bitter about the IMF’s decision. Minister of
Finance Herbert Murerwa wrote to the IMF in March complaining that Zimbabwe’s
treatment at the February board meeting which led to the decision was
inconsistent with the normal practice of the fund.
In the letter Murerwa
also wanted to know why the IMF had refused to reinstate Zimbabwe’s voting
rights despite having cleared its arrears under the General Resources Account.
Businessdigest understands that the IMF has not responded to the letter and
analysts say they are unlikely to reverse the decision until government
implements sound macroeconomic policies demanded by the IMF since Zimbabwe’s
crisis started.
The IMF has urged Zimbabwe to reduce money supply growth,
cut government expenditure, reduce the bloated public wage bill and remove price
controls. Despite promises government has not done so.
Article IV is meant
to monitor members’ compliance with the obligations to direct their policies
toward fostering orderly economic growth with reasonable price stability.
It
also seeks to ensure stability by promoting sound economic and financial
conditions, and to follow exchange rate policies in keeping with these
objectives.
Economic commentators said nothing fundamental had changed since
the IMF’s last visit. They said their end report was likely to be as damning as
the last one because Zimbabwe had not implemented any reforms to stop the
economy from bleeding.
"It’s the same. We are still printing money, the wage
bill is still high, the government is spending like never before and the budget
deficit is widening — all of which is out of line with IMF’s advise to
Zimbabwe," said an economist with a local bank. "They (IMF team) will find the
government doing the same thing that they have been strongly advised against."
financial gazette
Nelson Banya News Editor
Commander Chiwenga summoned to testify
A PARLIAMENTARY committee will,
within the next two weeks, probe the Zimbabwe Defence Forces’ supply contacts in
a move that could open a can of worms.
Claudious Makova, who chairs the
Parliamentary committee on defence and home affairs, told The Financial Gazette
that his committee would summon General Constantine Chiwenga, commander of the
ZDF, for a hearing on supply contracts to the military.
“We want to see the
commander of the defence forces within two weeks. What we want to find out,
you’ll probably pre-empt by publishing. What challenges are they facing in
procurement? We want to go deeper,” Makova, a retired colonel who is the ZANU PF
representative for Bikita in the House of Assembly said.
Chiwenga told the
parliamentary committee last week that the ZDF was having problems procuring
fabric used in manufacturing military fatigues. He called for a probe into the
operations of David Whitehead, the main supplier of the material.
“We have
immense problems with monopolies. You go to David Whitehead and say you want 50
000 metres of camouflage material and after one week they will come and say: ‘we
can only supply 5 000 metres, but the price has increased’,” Chiwenga told the
committee. He further charged that the firm was ‘on the agenda of
sanctions.’
Zimbabwe has, since 2000, when the United States and Britain,
among other western states, imposed an arms embargo citing human rights
violations by the government, encountered problems in sourcing military
equipment and spares from its traditional source markets. The country has
increasingly turned to China for military requirements.
A member of the
parliamentary committee, who declined to be named, said the committee had
received information pointing to possible conflict of interest among the army
top brass.
“We have summoned him (Chiwenga) so that he explains how their
procurement goes. We insisted that he appear before the committee next week,”
the member said.
Lucrative contracts to supply the requirements of the
security forces, most of which are a closely guarded secret, have long been the
subject of intense speculation amid reports that top government and army
officials are the main beneficiaries.
Jocelyn Chiwenga, the ZDF chief’s wife
has, through her company Zimsafe, been a long-standing supplier of luminous
protective clothing to both the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) and the army.
Relatives of top police officers are also said to have clinched contracts to
cater for various police needs.
Makova said the committee’s objective was to
assist in streamlining the procurement process.
“We want to see how we can
help,” he said.
Permanent secretary for defence, Trust Maphosa told the
parliamentary committee that the budgetary provision for uniforms was
inadequate. Out of the $200 billion allocated in the 2006 budget, the army had
already spent $132 billion, while a $100 billion deficit was projected for the
Air Force of Zimbabwe.
Maphosa said $660 billion was needed to meet the ZNA’s
uniform requirements next year.
fin gazette
Staff Reporter
RESERVE Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) governor Gideon Gono says central
bank had not been prepared for the strong demand for smaller value notes, and
has also reacted to concerns that the $43 billion he printed in new currency
could have mismatched the old currency levels, boosting money supply growth and
stoking inflation.
RBZ will print more smaller denominations to meet that
demand, Gono says, but this will be done with a matching reduction in the amount
of new larger notes released onto the market.
“We had been guided by the
previous demand for higher denominations, thus the deliberate bias of the stock
towards higher denominations which had been the characteristic demand pattern of
the older set of bearer cheques,” said Gono.
The $44 billion worth of new
notes created had been “related to the stock of existing old bearer cheques in
circulation, estimated at about $44 trillion by the end of the first week of
July 2006.”
However, data from RBZ itself had shown cash in circulation at
nearly half that level in June.
Gono said 22 percent of the currency was
missing at the end of the campaign.
“Out of about $45 trillion (old value)
currency that was in circulation at the time of launching Project Sunrise, a
total of $35 trillion (old value) was accounted for through
re-banking/withdrawal into the Reserve Bank coffers, leaving a balance of $10
trillion (old value) which has been trapped into the wilderness of underground
markets either inside the country or doing overtime outside the borders.”
financial gazette
‘We didn’t profiteer’
Staff Reporter
Retailers deny
cashing in on currency switchover
RETAILERS were rolling in the money in the
days ahead of the currency switchover, but the head of the country’s largest
grocer says the days after the deadline have been nightmarish for retailers.
Since last Monday, when the deadline for change to new notes passed,
retailers have faced the double pressure from consumers angry at the shortage of
smaller denominations for change, while also having to face accusations from
government and central bank that they had used the switchover period to unjustly
raise their prices.
Willard Zireva, CEO of OK Zimbabwe, rejects descriptions
of retailers as “unscrupulous” opportunists that used the confusion of the
changeover to raise prices for profiteering reasons.
“For retailers, it’s a
matter of principle. Prices don’t just move, they move only when there is a
change in the chain. Prices are strictly based on what the chain dictates. If it
moves, we have to move or we might as well close business. We are a volume
business, we have no interest in arbitrary price hikes,” Zireva said last
Friday.
Reports say at least one of the country’s major retailers had seen
sales come in 50 percent ahead of budget in the three weeks that followed the
announcement of the new currency, as consumers rushed to dispose of what extra
cash in old currency they had ahead of the August 21 cut-off date. Since then,
disputes ensued at till-points as consumers protested at having to forfeit
change.
“We have been having quite a challenge in the branches. We placed
orders for smaller notes with our banks, but the orders did not arrive for three
days, ” Zireva said.
financial gazette
Nkululeko
Sibanda Own Correspondent
ZANU PF Politburo member Tendai Savanhu, long
suspected to be the force behind the ruling party faction baying for Sekesai
Makwavarara’s blood, has been sucked into the administrative circus that led to
the suspension of the city’s principal officer in June.
Before this
week’s hearing into Nomutsa Chideya’s suspension, the deputy chairperson of the
commission running the City of Harare had tactfully stered clear of the
personality clashes that have reduced Town House into a battleground.
But
after Monday’s hearing, attention might shift from William Nhara, who has been
unleashing venom against the commission chairperson in his capacity as spokesman
for the ZANU PF Harare Province, to Savanhu who is believed to harbour ambitions
to run the affairs of the city.
Presenting his heads of argument on Monday,
Takunda Tivaone, the complainant in the hearing, said Chideya abused his
authority as Town Clerk by ordering council employees to deliver water to
Savanhu’s residence using fire tenders.
This, Tivaone said, was abuse “of the
highest order” because council had no mandate to deliver water to individuals
regardless of their standing in society or position of authority.
“The issue
should have been referred to council for debate and resolution before being
undertaken,” he said. “In line with council regulations, this kind of action
amounts to high level abuse of authority on behalf of the Town Clerk,” added
Tivaone.
What worsened the situation was that Savanhu is not on the list of
officials and institutions, such as Parirenyatwa Hospital, that can get water
from council when in emergencies.
Chideya was suspended from council on
allegations of incompetence, mismanagement and failure to resolve outstanding
labour disputes involving suspended heads of departments.
Two of the charges
have since been dropped because of lack of evidence.
While there is no end in
sight to the wrangles at Town House, service delivery in the capital has sunk to
irretrievable depths.
financial gazette
Learning
institutions, libraries in dire need of resources
Zimbabwe’s education
system is arguably one of the best not only on the African continent but in the
world at large and the ongoing “poaching” of Zimbabwean-trained nurses,
pharmacists, doctors, engineers, lawyers, academics, and corporate leaders alike
is clear testimony.
Universities and colleges have mushroomed in recent
years, alongside a variety of vocational training centres, nursing schools,
mining schools and information technology centres, among others. This is indeed
in line with the inspirational Chinese proverb to the effect that “If you plan
for one year, plant rice. If you plan for ten years, plant trees [but] if you
plan for a thousand years, educate mankind.
My only problem, however, is the
pace at which most of our tertiary institutions are deteriorating so much so
that if no remedial action is taken now, these oases of knowledge will soon run
dry and we will only have ourselves to blame. We cannot therefore sit back and
watch whilst institutions of higher learning stampede towards the precipice of
oblivion.
Dilapidated facilities
Albert Camus, a French novelist,
essayist, playwright and the winner of the 1957 Nobel Prize for Literature had
this to say about universities: “After all manner of professors have done their
best for us, the place we are to get knowledge is in books. The true university
of these days is a collection of books.” Indeed, a library is the lifeblood of
any institution of learning, moreso higher learning, and it is obviously
oxymoronic to have a university without books.
Yet, most universities in this
country have an alarming scarcity of books to such an extent that students have
to scramble for the few available textbooks. Where such books exist in
abundance, as in the University of Zimbabwe library, they are archaic books that
were written well before World War II and are denizen to theories that have long
been refuted or overtaken by events, and material that has since been rendered
irrelevant by developments in the academic field.
To me, a tertiary
institution without books is like water that is not wet and as long as we do not
pay urgent attention to our institutions of higher learning, we run the risk of
not only turning them into national archives but also transferring them from the
intensive care unit they are currently housed to the academic morgue.
As
Lawrence Clark Powell, an American librarian, said, history has it that no
university in the world has ever risen to greatness without a correspondingly
great library.
The library issue aside, the prevailing information
technology tide has seen the use of computers at virtually every organisation
worth its salt and universities throughout the world are embracing this
development by increasingly using computers. From online lectures to
lecturer-student interaction on the local area networks (LANs) at campuses,
e-learning is becoming a reality.
It is worrisome when university or college
students have to queue to use a computer, or worse still, learn only the
theoretical aspects thereof because the institution cannot afford computers.
Where is the corporate world, then, when such situations continue unabated and
talks about corporate social responsibility are as vociferous as ever before?
At times I am reluctant to blame the corporate world because the management
of most of these institutions of higher learning leaves a lot to be desired.
Instead of reprimanding such mismanagement, we seem to condone it by actually
honouring “gallant sons and daughters” who are presiding over archives for
libraries. It defeats logic and all facets of reasoning when institutions that
train managers and leaders alike fail to prove that charity begins at
home.
Former students should also shoulder the blame taking into cognisance
that aspects like university alumni are pitifully lacking in this country.
Universities have churned out chief executive officers, entrepreneurs of high
standing, journalists, teachers, engineers, doctors, marketers, quantity
surveyors, government ministers and politicians alike and the sooner we
implement the ziva kwawakabva (give back to institutions that made you who you
are today) concept, the better for this country’s development.
In other
countries, former students sponsor university activities so much so that even
funds for research work are availed to further the cause of academic excellence.
I have confidence in what Zimbabweans can achieve and it is high time we did
something for the benefit of our young brothers and sisters who yearn for a
better tomorrow. It is said that you cannot prevent birds of sorrow from flying
over your head but you can prevent them from building nests in your hair.
When your former university is under threat of obsolescence owing to the
unavailability of funds, matendere apfunya chisero mumusoro mako (nests are
already all over your head) and its time to act!
Grants and
fees
University students now pay fees which may not be very exorbitant but
owing to the background of most of the students — which is characterised by
abject poverty — is beyond the reach of most of them especially in the wake of
dwindling grants and loans and escalating inflation. Unsubstantiated claims are
that cases of prostitution and moral decadence are skyrocketing as a result of
such financial gaps and although I am not privy to such malfeasance, it is
regrettable especially at a time HIV/AIDS is wreaking havoc in the country. We
cannot afford numerous posthumous graduations and unorthodox behaviour at our
institutions due to financial constraints.
The need to review loans and
grants cannot be overemphasised and we appreciate, too, that the Government
cannot do it alone. There are many graduates who have capitalised on the
prescription of debts by defaulting repayment of loans advanced to them by the
Government; repayments that could have reignited the revolving fund. And as you
read this article and you have not paid a dime towards the extinguishing of your
debt but you still feel triumphant about it, know that you are missing it
somewhere — most probably upstairs.
Conclusion
Tertiary education in
this country is in urgent need of attention if Zimbabwe is to maintain its
dominant position on the academic chart. Paying a deaf ear and a blind eye to
the goings-on in this sector is tantamount to sacrificing the academic future of
this country on an altar of social expediency to the detriment of the
future.
n Canisio Mudzimu is a social commentator based in Harare.
financial gazette
Njabulo
Ncube Chief Reporter
A WATER conference called by the City of Bulawayo
to raise $4,7 billion flopped last week when only about $96 000 was donated
towards the municipality’s ambitious project intended to address the chronic
water shortages threatening the second capital’s survival.
Bulawayo
faces chronic water shortages due to the location of its feeder dams in low
rainfall areas in Matabeleland South.
Information obtained by this newspaper
indicates that one of the country’s building societies chipped in with $50 000,
a Bulawayo-based pump manufacturing company donated $40 000, a senator gave $1
000 and $5 000 was raised by individuals. The embassies of South Africa, Kuwait
and the European Union pledged to donate funds but no figures have yet been
disclosed.
“As far as cash donations were concerned there was not much but we
hope to follow up certain pledges made by embassies and other international
financiers,” said Phathisa Nyathi, the municipal spokesman.
“Someone has
promised to provide funding for the entire pipeline from the Zambezi to Bulawayo
provided we meet certain conditions. We will in due course talk to him to find
out his conditions,” said Nyathi, adding that it would be improper at this time
to disclose the identity of the person.
As a short term measure the council
intends to resuscitate the Nyamandlovu Aquifer boreholes in Nyamandlovu at a
cost of $160 million, drill more boreholes at a cost of $4,7 billion, and
construct a water booster in Insiza at a cost of $200 million. The local
authority also plans to link Mtshabezi dam to Umzingwane feeder dam at a cost of
about $3 billion.
The council regards the construction of the 450 kilometres
pipeline from the Zambezi River to Bulawayo as the only permanent solution to
the city’s chronic water shortages. Under its long-term plan, the municipality
has budgeted US$500 million for the Zambezi Water Project, which has been on the
cards since 1912.