High Court judges blast lower courts prosecutors - Zimbabwe Situation

High Court judges blast lower courts prosecutors

Source: High Court judges blast lower courts prosecutors | Herald (Top Stories)

Bulawayo Bureau

TWO High Court judges yesterday blasted prosecutors from the lower courts, saying they lacked enthusiasm and determination in their approach to legal matters, resulting in convicted persons being acquitted on appeal.

Justices Maxwell Takuva and Thompson Mabhikwa took turns to berate prosecutors in the magistrates’ courts, saying they lacked a better understanding of the law as evidenced by concessions by the State on appeal at the High Court.

The judges, who were presiding over criminal appeals at the Bulawayo High Court, said there was laxity in the manner in which prosecutors in the lower courts handled criminal matters.

“There is laxity in terms of prosecution in the lower courts, which in most cases results in concessions and subsequently acquittals when the matters are brought here on appeal. In some cases, you find that exhibits are not even produced in courts, which in itself is a reflection of insouciance and poor prosecution. If fact, they lack thoroughness in handling matters,” said Justice Takuva.

His anger was directed at Beitbridge regional court prosecutor Mr Munyonga Kuvarega whom he described as exuding lack of understanding of the law when he handled a matter involving a senior army cleric who was last year jailed six years for “stealing” a car belonging to a Gwanda businessman and stripping it.

Solomon Ndlovu (50), a captain in the Zimbabwe National Army (ZNA) and chaplain at Mbalabala Barracks, was in January last year convicted of theft of a motor vehicle by Beitbridge regional magistrate Mr Mark Dzira after a full trial.

Ndlovu was yesterday acquitted after successfully challenging his conviction and sentence before Justices Takuva and Mabhikwa.

The State, which was represented by Mr Khumbulani Ndlovu, conceded to the appeal, saying the matter was more civil than criminal.

Justice Takuva described as “nonsensical” the record of proceedings, saying it was full of irrelevant and unhelpful information.

“There is a need for someone to be serious about their work. It is absolutely nonsensical to bring a whole lot of documents to the High Court for us to go through when the information contained would be irrelevant. It’s an issue of concern to us when the law is not being followed by prosecutors in the lower courts, particularly in this matter before us,” he said.

Justice Mabhikwa weighed in: “Clearly, it appears the appellant (Solomon Ndlovu) in this matter got into a deal with the complainant, which could have somehow gone sour resulting in him reporting a case of vehicle theft. The prosecutor who handled the matter took a lackadaisical approach in this matter, a problem that is now more pronounced in the lower courts.

“The appeal is hereby allowed and both conviction and sentence are set aside. Accordingly, the appellant is found not guilty and acquitted”.

Ndlovu was sentenced to six years in jail of which two months were suspended for five years on condition of good behaviour.

A further six months were suspended on condition he restituted the businessman $2 500 leaving him with an effective 64 months to serve.

Ndlovu allegedly borrowed a Toyota Hilux vehicle from the businessman, Mr Osfael Mazibuko and later stripped and stole the engine and gearbox.

He then fitted the engine and gearbox onto another vehicle.

Aggrieved by both conviction and sentence, Ndlovu, through his lawyer Mr Abel Ndlovu of Dube and Associates, filed an appeal at the Bulawayo High Court citing the State as a respondent.

In his grounds of appeal, Ndlovu said Mr Dzira erred and misdirected himself by attaching a criminal liability to him for deviating and failing to perform according to the agreement that allowed him to take lawful possession and use the car.

He argued that the agreement between himself and Mr Mazibuko was purely a civil matter.

The State did not oppose the application, saying both the conviction and sentence were improper.

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 0