via Road rehabilitation project collapses | The Financial Gazette by Shame Makoshori 22 Jan 2014
THE US$206 million Plumtree-Mutare road rehabilitation project has stopped after lead contractor, Group 5 of South Africa pulled out after Zimbabwe defaulted on loan repayments to the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA).DBSA bankrolled the construction project, one of a few undertaken since the country dollarised its economy in 2009, and had so far disbursed US$54 million for the project.
The default has affected sub contractors who have also withdrawn after debts swelled, leaving them in cash flow problems.
In DBSA, government had found one of a few regional and global lenders willing to take the risk despite Zimbabwe’s precarious credit ratings.
DBSA disbursed US$54 million in September 2011 and was expected to release further tranches in 2012 and 2013.
In terms of the agreement between DBSA and the government of Zimbabwe, the Zimbabwe National Roads Administration (ZINARA), which was the implementing agent for the project on behalf of the Ministry of Transport, and Group 5 were directed to establish Infralink (Private) Limited to spearhead road projects.
The first phase was the rehabilitate, operate and transfer contract covering one year, targeting the 801,5 kilometre Harare-Bulawayo-Plumtree and the Harare-Mutare roads.
The two strategic arteries provide linkages to cross-border corridors, and the deal was expected to cost US$257 800 per kilometre.
ZINARA controls 70 percent shareholding in Infralink.Group 5 controls 30 percent.
ZINARA, through several existing transport related revenues such as fuel levies, transit, overload, abnormal load and toll fees, would bankroll a debt service fund, which is now at the centre of controversy.
At the centre of the standoff understood to have sucked the two countries’ governments is that after a two year grace period, Infralink was required to open a debt service account.
It was expected to deposit quarterly loan instalments for a specified period, after which surplus funds would be directed to a maintenance reserve account.
The account would then be used to bankroll periodic and major maintenance interventions, the Financial Gazette understands.
But by the time DBSA arrived in Zimbabwe to evaluate the project last year, the debt service account had not been opened as scheduled by September.
No money had been channelled towards repayment.
Yesterday, sources familiar with the deal alleged that the money had been redirected to other projects.
DBSA has halted further loan disbursements for the trunk road.
Group 5 and ZINARA had not responded to questions by yesterday, while Transport, Communications and Infrastructure Development Minister, Obert Mpofu, was unreachable.
The ministry’s permanent secretary, Munesu Munodawafa’s mobile phone was engaged most of yesterday.
Officials were making frantic efforts to revive the deal.
“When DBSA came to monitor the project, they found that it was progressing well although it was behind schedule,” a source said.
“But the debt service account was not opened. There appeared to be no intention to do so. Now DBSA is withholding further tranches. There was even no provision in the 2014 National Budget towards servicing of the debt. That is a question that ZINARA must be able to answer.”
Documents seen by this newspaper indicate that all parties had been convinced that the project would be viable.
“Independent traffic studies have confirmed the feasibility of the two routes under consideration and the Zimbabwean government has in addition made available other transport related levies/taxes, which are more than sufficient for purposes of paying down the lenders’ facilities,” reads part of the agreement.
The documents indicate that government had been negotiating a similar transaction for the Beitbridge-Harare-Chirundu road at an estimated US$1,1 billion.
The source added: “The South African government had guaranteed the loan. DBSA will demand funds from South Africa and South Africa will in turn demand from Zimbabwe. The risk is that we are sitting on another project half done”.
Apparently, the project had courted controversy over allegations that ruling party bigwigs had flexed political muscle to loot the funds.
Zimbabwe’s failure to service its obligations could explode into a diplomatic tiff between Harare and South Africa, which guaranteed the loan.
Cash-strapped Zimbabwe, which requires US$14 billion to repair its crumbling infrastructure that has been affected by years of neglect, saw the multiparty transaction as a catalyst to rebuild a seamless road transportation system that would enhance regional trade, improve foreign direct investment and increase revenues into the fiscus through several related taxes.
The deal was also key to reigniting economic recovery for the country, which has entered its 14th year in turmoil, at the same time improving safety conditions on roads plagued by a scourge of traffic accidents.
Economic hardships that have blighted Zimbabwe had hit on government’s ability to fund infrastructure rehabilitation.
COMMENTS
The road that has been built is good. Too good it now appears. Another fruit of the unity government being destroyed.
Which financial institution will lend Zim money when the so called govt behaves in this gutter fashion. What assistance from international community can we expect! Haa yaa BHORA MUGEDHI yauraya nyika! Cde President wake up!
Thanks roads were built before independence we could be driving on dust road harare to byo
..AND do not ask anyone to account for the money.
ZPF will point a finger as far from themselves as possible and sing like that man whachmacall him?? ‘WASN’T ME’
@ Lucy you right again. Whatucall me “I KNOW NOTHING” RINGS TRUE FOR ALL ZANUS.
no surprise at all. It seems to be instille din Zimbabweans to be corrupt and loot and also taking a loan means get the money and not pay back!!! How is it that Rhodesia under full worldwide sanctions managed to maintain if not further improve road infrastructure??!!!!! shame on Zimbabwe since independence. It seems Rhodesia although wrong to segregate provided for the nation as a whole much better! less corrupt and more efficient. The ministers don’t even turn up to parliament now but quick to collect the pay cheque! shameful
Do not forget that its the same minister who destroyed the diamonds funds.
Its high time S Africa pays for its misguided approach to our situation here.The public in S Africa wont take this nonsense as we do here.
It is a lesson to this development bank of Africa.
It is the same as when the Romans left Britain. The roads were no longer repaired properly and soon became mere tracks.
wake up world, you lend money to these clowns and they have NO intention of repayment, and be rest assured the younger generations are NOT going to be held responsible for these debts…
Collapsed like the whole nation under Bob and the boys
This is so sad. This and other major road improvement projects have the potential to lift the whole country upward, creating jobs in construction, toll collecting, road maintenance, and most importantly, increased local commerce as a result of better transportation. Increased usage also means increased tax collection too, which can surely help the national budget.
The money was lent because ZINARA was able to show that they had sufficient capacity to repay, based solely on toll collections. The fact that they did not follow through speaks volumes about where ZANU-PF’s priorities lie. Where has the toll money gone? It’s disappeared the same way the diamond money has disappeared. The web of corruption that pervades this entire economy has killed off a major opportunity for national financial growth.
There are a dwindling number of lenders willing to trust ZANU-PF with their money. In fact with the collapse of this deal, this may be the last one. Say goodbye to any future financial support from South Africa or the Development Bank of South Africa… and Chinamasa is wasting his time if he thinks there’s any chance international bankers will ever forgive this country’s debts! Especially if the country ends up screwing South Africa, it’s largest trading partner! How can a country that treats it’s most important ally like that, ever be expected to act responsibly when REAL money is involved?