By Alex Bell
14 December
2010
South Africa’s Presidency has failed in its attempt to keep a report on Zimbabwe’s 2002 elections hidden, after the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) dismissed the government’s refusal to release the document. See Supreme Court Judgement
The Mail & Guardian newspaper has been trying to have the report released since 2008, amid widespread speculation that it contained evidence showing that Zimbabwe’s 2002 disputed election was not free or fair. At the time the then President, Thabo Mbeki, commissioned Judge Sisi Khampepe and Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke to visit Zimbabwe and report back on the state of the 2002 election. The report was handed over to Mbeki but never made public, although the former President insisted the electoral process in Zimbabwe was completely democratic.
The newspaper’s efforts to get the report were repeatedly denied and eventually the High Court was brought in to rule on the matter. The High Court then ruled in the newspaper’s favour in June this year and Acting Judge S. Sapire ordered the government to hand over the report within 10 days. But just as the deadline was due to expire the Presidency announced that it would seek leave to appeal.
But on Tuesday the SCA threw out the appeal, after a unanimous decision by five judges who said that there was no need to change the High Court’s findings on the matter. Appeal Judge Robert Nugent said there was no evidential basis established by the Presidency for refusing access to the report.
The SCA judgement said: “There are three people who have direct knowledge of the mandate that was given to the judges – Mr Mbeki and the two judges – and two people who have direct knowledge of how that mandate was executed – the two judges themselves. Theirs would naturally have been the best evidence on those issues but it has not been forthcoming, without explanation.”
“Open and transparent government and a free flow of information concerning the affairs of the state is the lifeblood of democracy,” the SCA judgement said.
Mail & Guardian editor Nic Dawes told SW Radio Africa that he is very pleased with the the court’s deicison, calling it a victory for transparency in South Africa.
“What the judgement makes crystal clear is that it’s simply not good enough for government officials to say they believe that information should be kept secret. They need to justify such decisions on the basis of genuine evidence and a proper understanding of the constitutional and legal framework. In that sense this is a victory for all South Africans,” Dawes said.
He added: “The judgement also makes it clear that secrecy cannot be a default position by the government.”
In court papers, the Mail & Guardian argued that with new elections coming up in Zimbabwe it was important to see whether Robert Mugabe continued to hold office “by virtue of alleged illegalities and irregularities stretching back to at least 2002.” Dawes said that accessing the report “will provide us all with a much better understanding of what was going on in Zimbabwe ahead of the enormously controversial 2002 elections and what our president Mbeki was told about those circumstances by two senior judges.”
The government has argued that the report was ‘confidential’ and a “record of the cabinet and its committee.” They said it contained information “supplied in confidence by or on behalf of another state, for the purpose of assessing or formulating a policy,” and that the content of the report was not in the public interest. The government has also argued that the report would lead to a deterioration of relations between the two countries, as South Africa is the facilitator in Zimbabwe’s ongoing political crisis.
The newspaper has in turn argued that the report
is of enormous public interest, as the 2002 elections were marred by
vote-rigging, intimidation, violence and fraud by Robert Mugabe’s government,
despite South Africa’s contention that the election was free and fair.
Dawes
said on Tuesday that the government could take its appeal a level higher, by
approaching the Constitutional Court. But he said he hopes it doesn’t come to
that, because the SCA judgement clearly outlines the constitutionally of the
High Court’s decision.
http://www.moneyweb.co.za
Phakamisa
Ndzamela|
14 December 2010 16:27
JOHANNESBURG - The Mail & Guardian's
editor Nic Dawes said the newspaper was
awaiting its Christmas present from
the South African Justice system in the
next seven days after a court
ordered the Presidency to release a report
compiled by two judges on
Zimbabwe.
The Mail & Guardian victory at the Bloemfontein Supreme
Court of Appeal
comes after a battle with the Presidency for the release a
2002 Zimbabwean
report prepared by judges Dikgang Moseneke and Sisi
Khampepe.
The two senior judges visited Zimbabwe around the 2002 election
following a
request by then President Thabo Mbeki. The judges were
reportedly
commissioned to report on constitutional and legal issues
pertaining to
Zimbabwe's 2002 election. The Presidency refused to make the
document
public.
Then deputy information officer in the Presidency
Trevor Fowler said he
thoroughly examined the contents of the report and was
of the view that the
disclosure of the contents would reveal information
supplied in confidence
by or on behalf of another state or an international
organisation.
Fowler had argued the Promotion of Access to Information
Act (PAIA) entitled
him to refuse a request for access to a record of the
body if the record
contains an opinion, advice, report or recommendation
obtained or prepared
for the purpose of assisting to formulate a policy or
take a decision in the
exercise of a power or performance of a duty
conferred or imposed by law.
In his judgement Judge Robert Nugent said:
"In my view no evidential basis
has been established by the appellants for
refusing access to the report. It
might be that the report contains
information that was received in
confidence, and it might be that it was
obtained or prepared for a purpose
contemplated by s 44, but that has not
been established by acceptable
evidence."
Responding to the judgement
Dawes said the judgement was important in as far
as the specifics of
Zimbabwe are concerned and more importantly it
vindicated key constitutional
principles of freedom of information which
were the focus of debate and
controversy right now because of the Protection
of Information
Bill.
"There are two things about it one is the specifics of the
Zimbabwean
situation in 2002 and how important it is for us to know what two
of our
most eminent judges thought about what was going on there and indeed
what
they told President Thabo Mbeki, whose approach to the Zimbabwean
situation
has been very controversial," Dawes said.
"In a broad sense
what the document, what the judgement does is to set out
in great details
and clarity the responsibilities of the government when
they decide to
withhold information from the Republic and what it makes very
clear is they
can't just say we think that it is not in the public interest
to make this
report available. They have to give clear reasons based on
evidence and
reasons that conform to the Promotion of Access to Information
Act and the
constitution.
"We are awaiting our Christmas present from the South
African Justice system
not from the Presidency, from the justice
system."
Attempts to reach the spokespersons of President Jacob Zuma and
Thabo Mbeki
were unsuccessful.
Write to Phakamisa Ndzamela: phakamisa@moneyweb.co.za
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Lance Guma
14 December
2010
The chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Tribunal for
Rwanda
(ICTR), based in Tanzania, has accused the Zimbabwean government of
protecting 1994 genocide suspect, Potrais Mpiranya. Justice Hassan Jallow
has now petitioned the United Nations to ensure Zimbabwe cooperates in
arresting Mpiranya.
Mpiranya was the commander of the Rwandan
Presidential Guard and is accused
of leading the genocide that claimed the
lives of more than 1 million
people, mainly of Tutsi ethnic origin. Not only
is he wanted by the ICTR and
authorities in Belgium but the United States
‘Rewards for Justice Programme’
has a US$5 million bounty on his
head.
All this has not stopped Mugabe’s regime offering Mpiranya
sanctuary.
Countless reports have suggested the genocide suspect has built
up
businesses in Harare and is heavily involved in the training of ZANU PF
youth militias. In February this year then co-Home Affairs Minister Giles
Mutsekwa pledged the government’s cooperation in bringing Mpiranya to book,
if indeed he was in Zimbabwe.
"We are ready to assist as long as our
Rwandan colleagues provide security
agents from their country who will work
hand in hand with our police in
order to identify and arrest the suspect if
he is in Zimbabwe," Mutsekwa
told journalists. But as with all things in the
coalition government the MDC
ministers never have their way with a partner
in government who believes in
unilateral actions.
The tribunal on
Rwanda has already made it clear they are receiving little
cooperation from
Zimbabwe and state in their petition to the UN that
Mpiranya is enjoying
high level protection. “I would urge the Zimbabwe
government to devote top
priority to the case of this high-level fugitive in
order to secure his
location, arrest and transfer to the Tribunal.” Justice
Jallow said in the
petition.
Speaking to SW Radio Africa on Tuesday Sanderson Makombe, a
researcher in
criminal law, told us when Zimbabwe intervened in the war in
the DRC several
years back, many of its generals had built up business and
military
alliances with some of the genocide suspects. This explained why
Zimbabwe
was considered a safe destination by the fleeing suspects, Makombe
said.
Meanwhile Makombe said the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
was
formed by a resolution of the United Nations Security Council and since
Zimbabwe was a member of the UN it is supposed to cooperate in the arrest of
Mpiranya.
In the eighties Mugabe’s crack troops, in the form of the
5th Brigade,
killed an estimated 20 000 people in the Matabeleland and
Midlands
provinces. This year a leading authority on crimes against
humanity, Dr
Gregory Stanton who heads Genocide Watch, said the massacres
met the
criteria of genocide since they also targeted people based on
ethnicity and
language spoken.
Mugabe protecting Mpiranya becomes a
situation where one genocidal leader is
protecting one of his own.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
by Irene Madongo
14 December
2010
MDC-T legislator, Amos Chibaya, was arrested in Gweru on Sunday
after he had
addressed a youth meeting at his constituency in Mkoba the
previous day.
Chibaya’s driver was also arrested and both are still being
held in police
custody in Gweru.
Obert Ncube, Director of Elections
for the MDC Midlands South, said: “It
seems the police are reluctant to see
him go before the courts. They have
not brought up a charge against him. If
they had brought up a charge, then
he could have appeared before court. They
are still saying they are
investigating.”
According to Ncube, Chibaya
had been briefing the youths on what had been
discussed in parliament. It is
understood that there was some violence at
the meeting between the youths
and members of ZANU PF, but Chibaya was not
there when the trouble broke
out.
James Tsuro, a spokesman for the MDC-T in Midlands South, said the
arrest is
a continuation of chronic harassment of MDC members of parliament
by
pro-ZANU-PF authorities.
Chibaya’s arrest comes just days after
another MDC MP, Tongai Matutu, was
fined $100 for allegedly assaulting a
Masvingo chief. Matutu said the
charges against him were politically
motivated.
“We have these fictitious cases where our MPs are hauled
before the courts,”
Ncube said, “all these charges are always against the
MDC MPs. Whereas when
we witness what is on the ground we see that violence
is being perpetrated
by ZANU PF MPs and nothing is being done against
them.”
There are still widespread reports of villagers and MDC members
being
attacked by ZANU PF militants and war vets around the country, but the
police make no arrests. Any ZANU PF MP’s also implicated can rest assured
that they are also safe from any police action.
Peta Thornycroft
After
more balanced reporting that followed the 2008 signing of the
Global
Political Agreement (GPA) that established Zimbabwe’s unity
government, the
Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) quickly began
returning to partisan
reporting and promotion of President Robert
Mugabe and his ZANU-PF party.
Peta Thornycroft reports for VOA that
analysts say ZBC’s increasingly
strident support for ZANU-PF in news
reports and current affairs is stirring
political tensions and is a
major contravention of the 2008 multiparty global
political agreement
which brought the inclusive government to power in
February last year.
The Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation, ZBC, the only
broadcaster in
Zimbabwe has stepped up support for ZANU-PF in the last few
months
after Mr. Mugabe said he wanted fresh elections early next
year.
Andy Moyse, coordinator of the 10-year old Media Monitoring Project
of
Zimbabwe, said for a while after the global political agreement
(GPA,)
was signed, ZBC did reform.
"ZBC initially improved after
the signing of the GPA, a period of
euphoria that the parties had come to
some sort of agreement and were
looking forward to a period of
reconciliation."
Moyse said the ZBC even reported news about the
Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC), which narrowly won the 2008 elections.
But
that has all changed now.
One day last month, ZBC, which is
governed by an act of parliament,
started its main news bulletin of the day,
mocking MDC president,
Morgan Tsvangirai, who is the prime minister in the
inclusive
government.
((ZBC DRUMS ESTABLISH AND FADE))
"Welcome
to news hour, I am Grace Chikanie, here are the stories
making the headlines
in tonight’s bulletin: Tsvangirai chickens out of
next
election."
Days later Mr. Tsvangirai, concerned with ZANU-PF’s
growing violations
of the political agreement, went to Botswana to engage
with the
Southern African Development Community, or SADC, which guaranteed
the
inclusive government agreement. The expected meeting with SADC’s
Organ
on Defense and Security, which deals with Zimbabwe, did not take
place.
ZBC chose the following to headline its report:
(( ZBC
DRUMS ESTABLISH AND FADE))
"MDC-T [majority faction of MDC led by Mr.
Tsvangirai] leader Morgan
Tsvangirai returns from a wild good chase at the
SADC extraordinary
summit."
ZBC interviewed ZANU-PF justice minister
Patrick Chinamasa about Mr.
Tsvangirai’s trip, but did not interview or quote
Mr. Tsvangirai.
"That is the meeting of the [Organ on Defense and
Security]. It did
not take place because there was not a quorum. It was
caused by the
fabrication of a crisis by MDC-T," Chinamasa
said
The political agreement which established the unity
government
requires that independent broadcasters be registered and permitted
to
operate, but they have been prevented from doing so. ZBC was allowed
to
introduce a second channel.
Initially the new channel ran soap operas and
entertainment. Now it is
also using advertising slots for ZANU-PF political
jingles or songs in
praise of ZANU-PF and Mr. Mugabe.
The Media
Monitoring Project’s Moyse says the ZBC news and current
affairs programs and
the advertising jingles are significantly
advantageous to ZANU-PF at the
expense of the MDC and other parties.
"It is clearly giving a huge
bias to ZANU-PF in promoting ZANU-PF
policies. It is suppressing the
activities of MDC and the publicity
[the MDC] gets is all negative, so Morgan
Tsvangirai is portrayed as
being incompetent and basically stupid and not a
potential leader for
the nation."
The pro-ZANU-PF advertising
shows up throughout the day on ZBC
broadcasts. One three minute long jingle
is called The Gushungo
network. Gushungo is the Mugabe family clan name and
also the name of
the dairy farm near Harare which Mrs Grace Mugabe took from
a white
farmer five years ago under Zimbabwe's land reform
program.
The jingle shows Mr. Mugabe relaxed and smiling and greeting
young
people on his mobile phone along with visuals of them
cheerfully
singing his praises.
Nhlanhla Ngwena, director of the
pressure group the "Media Institute
of Southern Africa" told VOA the ZBC is
mobilizing young people for
Mr. Mugabe and his ZANU-PF.
"The Gushungo
network is yet another attempt trying to mobilize and
rally behind President
Mugabe because the song itself is calling on
the youth to join the network -
you even hear Mugabe’s voice. They are
trying to project him as a warm person
who understands youth."
Ngwenya said bureaucratic obstacles had been
manufactured by ZANU-PF
to prevent independent broadcasters from acquiring
licenses.
"No credible or demonstrable evidence has been given on the
ground for
us to be persuaded into believing that this government will
liberalize
the airwaves any time soon."
Before the inclusive
government was formed, ZBC journalists used the
simple honorific "President
Mugabe" in news bulletins. Now they use
his full title.
"Head of state
and government, and commander-in-chief of the Zimbabwe
defense forces,
President Robert Mugabe."
Nelson Chamisa, spokesman for the main MDC
which signed the political
agreement told VOA ZBC broadcasts are becoming
harder and harder to
tolerate.
"Atrocious, it is atrocious, it is
atrocious. It is almost like hell
on earth, you get your eyes poisoned,
[your] ears; propaganda, people
of Zimbabwe have no appetite for that
trash."
Welshman Ncube of the smaller MDC party, which also signed
the
political agreement, said the inclusive government is going
backwards:
"There is regression not just of the public media, state
newspapers
and state security agents, almost all of them are reverting to
the
default mode of 2008."
ZANU-PF information spokesman George
Charamba told VOA he is unable to
"recognize" the criticisms against ZBC. VOA
was unable to reach a
spokesperson for ZBC.
http://www.radiovop.com/
14/12/2010 15:43:00
Masvingo, December 14,
2010 - Senior Zanu (PF) members who are against
President Robert Mugabe’s
call for polls mid next year have been sidelined
to attend the party's
annual conference which opens this week in the eastern
border city of
Mutare
A reliable source within the party here said several senior party
members-including Members of Parliament and some politburo members-who
publicly said the country was not ready to hold another ballot have been
left out from the delegation that will attend the conference.
The
source said the issue of Mugabe’s candidature had been dealt with and
nobody
was going to dispute that. The only hurdle remaining was to decide
whether
elections were going to be held next year or not.
“Those who were heard
to be against elections next year have not been
accredited. Several reasons
have been cooked up against them, including the
fact that their party cards
are not paid up, or they are still holding on to
old party
cards.
“Surprisingly, no subscriptions are being taken now, meaning they
cannot get
the new cards. This is a strategy by Mugabe to make sure that all
those who
go there are his ‘yes men and women’ who will not turn down his
proposals
for elections mid next year,” said the top source.
“For
legal reasons, I will not tell you names. But just watch out by
Thursday to
see who is still in Masvingo or who has not gone there,” he
said.
Some disgruntled part members who were left out were seen at
the party
offices here shouting while others were in a queue which was
static for
about an hour.
Zanu (PF) provincial chairman, Lovemore
Matuke declined to comment on the
matter, referring all questions to the
party national chairman, Simon Khaya
Moyo, who refused to take questions
from Radio VOP.
http://www.radiovop.com
14/12/2010
10:24:00
Bulawayo, December 14,2010 -A Zanu (PF) Bulawayo governor,
Cain Mathema said
he is pushing for the exhumation of Cecil John Rhodes
remains in Matopo area
which he accuses of blocking the rains.
Rhodes
is buried at Malindidzimu hill in Matopo just outside Bulawayo.
“I wonder
why years after independence of Zimbabwe his grave is still found
there. We
are going exhume it and send it to Britain where it belongs.
Right now we
are failing to get rains because of Rhodes’ bones buried at
Matopo Hills,”
Mathema told Radio VOP.
Mathema also said he is very angry with Rhodes’
grave and this has made him
stop visiting Matopo area.
Rhodes was
born in England on July 5, 1853 and was buried in Matopo on the
10th of
April 1902.He was elected to the Cape Parliament in South Africa and
by 1890
became Prime Minister. During this time, he actively pursued north
of the
Limpopo River. The result of his endeavours produced new British
annexations: Nyasaland (now Malawi), Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia) and
Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe).
Mathema added he wanted the David
Livingstone’s stature in Victoria Falls
removed and replaced by the one for
President Robert Mugabe.
http://www.eyewitnessnews.co.za/
Eyewitness News | 1 Hour
Ago
State media in Zimbabwe on Tuesday reported that MPs have been
promised
double pay and single cabs in January from finance minister Tendai
Biti.
Sources have told The Herald that the handouts and the raises are
intended
to placate MPs from ZANU-PF and Biti’s MDC party.
They were
so angry about their low pay that they threatened not to pass Biti’s
2.7
billion dollar budget.
MPs will see their salaries going up from around
400 dollars a month to
between 900 and 1,200 dollars. The lawmakers will
also be given new pick-up
trucks, even though they only got new double cabs
last year.
Most people in Zimbabwe earn below 200 dollars a
month.
What remains to be seen is whether it will it be enough to make
them want to
hang onto their jobs and boycott Robert Mugabe’s call for
elections next
year.
http://www.afrik-news.com/article18566.html
Tuesday 14 December 2010 / by Alice
Chimora
Zimbabwe’s former ruling party, Zanu-PF, is set to blow close to
$500,000 in
five days when it gathers for its annual Christmas bash
disguised as a party
conference.
President Mugabe’s party meets from
Wednesday (December 15) to Sunday
(December 19) in the eastern border city
of Mutare. About 4,000 delegates
drawn countywide and some from regional
liberation movements are expected at
the conference.
With a $500,000
budget and with some donations still said to be on their
way, the conference
is expected to be a feast for many Zanu-PF activists.
At recent past
conferences and congresses some have been accused of helping
themselves to
freebies and goodies that have been donated.
Zanu-PF chairman Simon Khaya
Moyo says Mugabe’s candidacy in the next
elections will not be an issue
because he got the mandate at the congress in
2010.
“The conference
is not about the president … We had our congress last year
and we elected
the president of the party who automatically becomes the
candidate in the
next elections,” said Moyo.
Realistically, Mugabe, 86, would contest his
last election next year because
if he wins, his term of office would end in
2016 when he would be 92. After
that, it would be unlikely that he would run
for another term.
Zanu-PF officials have publicly conceded that the
Mutare conference would
not discuss the controversial succession because his
rivals had failed to
call for an extraordinary congress to deal with the
issue.
Party leader Mugabe normally delivers the main address at the
Zanu-PF
conference where most policies which his government would promulgate
in the
future are announced.
The conference is also used as a
platform where the party attacks its
opponents, mainly the West and America,
and with calls for the lifting of
what the party describes as illegal
sanctions, taking centre stage at most
of these conferences.
Prime
Minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s Movement for Democratic Change (MDC),
which is
a partner to the shaky coalition government before the signing of
the
coalition pact, would also get a bashing from such conferences.
Clemence
Manyukwe, a political editor of Financial Gazette commenting on the
conference says, ‘There is a general feeling that if the conference endorsed
early polls ZANU-PF would be clearly defying the national mood, which to all
intents and purposes, is seemingly against snap polls.”
Manyukwe says
there are genuine fears the country could be plunged back into
political
chaos and economic instability witnessed before the consummation
of the
global political agreement.
But prominent Harare lawyer Terence Hussein,
who has represented ZANU-PF
luminaries in elections-related matters before
the courts, said chances of
the conference leaving the party leader with egg
on his face over the
election issue were next to nothing.
“It seems
the position for the holding of elections is pretty strong. The
conference
usually supports its leadership, I don’t see any decision opposed
to the
leadership, I don’t see that happening,” said Hussein.
http://www.radiovop.com
14/12/2010
15:42:00
Harare, December 14, 2010 - There is an outcry among
officers in the
Registrar General’s Office over officers who have been
dispatched to South
Africa to quicken the process of issuing Zimbabweans
with relevant papers to
enable them to regularise their stay in the
country.
The local officers are alleging favouritism and nepotism in the
selection of
officers who were sent to South Africa and who are believed to
be earning
between US$ 15 000 and US$22 000 in the one to three months they
will stay
in the country. This is compared to the US$4.85 a day that the
local
officers are getting for doing a similar job.
The RG's office
is battling to meet a December 31 deadline to register
undocumented
Zimbabweans.
Officials at the RG’s office at Makombe Building told Radio
VOP that seven
officers left the country last week to beef up staff
processing papers for
Zimbabweans. The officers will join the 40 who left a
few months ago.
However there have been concerns on the slow pace at
which these officers
are processing the papers amid allegations that their
recruitment was more
to do with money than the job at hand.
Among the
40 who initially left for South Africa, the majority were said to
be senior
officers who normally don’t do the job of processing
identification
papers.
The RG officers in South Africa simply help Zimbabweans sign
forms which are
then send to Zimbabwe for processing, verification, clearing
and production.
The local officers have since threatened to go slow if their
allowances are
not increased.
South African government has insisted
that it will not extend the December
31 deadline by which Zimbabweans should
have regularised their stay in South
Africa.
http://www.sabcnews.com
December 14 2010 ,
7:03:00
Home Affairs Department says it will not be able to complete
the
documentation of Zimbabweans living in South Africa before the December
31st
deadline.
Addressing the media in Pretoria today, Home Affairs
Minister Nkosazana
Dlamini-Zuma said although the deadline will not be
extended, deportation
can only start once all pending applications have been
processed.
The Department says the processing of pending applications
will continue
after the December 31st, but the Department will not accept
new applications
after the deadline. "An extension is not going to happen
actually, we will
not extend the deadline. Among other challenges, is the
early closure of
Home Affairs offices in Zimbabwe."
According to Home
Affairs Minister, the South African Police and the
Zimbabwean government are
stalling the process. "The Zimbabweans are not
able to produce passports at
the rate that will allow everybody who has
applied for it to have it before
the 31st. The verification with the police
taking the fingerprints, checking
records takes time."
South African Home affairs managers will now only go
on leave after the 31st
and the department will arrange with police to
manage queues and avoid
stampedes. The Minister could not confirm when
deportation of undocumented
Zimbabweans will start.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Alex Bell
14 December
2010
A British bank, accused of circumventing the European targeted
sanctions in
place against the Robert Mugabe regime, has defended its role
in Zimbabwe,
saying it has had “a banking presence in Zimbabwe for over a
hundred years.”
Standard Chartered Bank is accused of giving loans to
Mugabe’s allies
through syndicated facilities offered by non-European Union
(EU) banks, as a
way of getting around the targeted EU measures. According
to Africa
Confidential, the British financial institution has been directing
loans
through banks in Zimbabwe and through the African Export Import Bank
(Afreximbank) and the Eastern and Southern African Development Bank (PTA
Bank).
In a written reply to SW Radio Africa’s request for a response
to the latest
claims, Standard Chartered said it has a long history of
banking in the
country.
“The Bank has taken the conscious decision to
maintain its longstanding
commitment to doing business there and to the
long-term interests of its
staff in Zimbabwe and their extended families
which they support, despite
what we acknowledge is clearly a very difficult
operating environment. We
also have a clear responsibility to our corporate
clients in Zimbabwe, who
are also supporting their staff and their
dependents,” the group said.
The Bank added: “Standard Chartered has a
robust policy framework in place
to ensure we continue to operate the
strictest international standards of
governance. Standard Chartered Bank and
its branches comply with UK and EU
sanctions and with US sanctions to the
extent that they affect our
business.”
Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
(RBZ) Governor Gideon Gono revealed in July
that Standard Chartered,
Afreximbank, PTA Bank and a Chinese tobacco trader
Tian Li, were responsible
for more US$400 million in lines of credit, which
had gone to 23 Zimbabwean
companies in 2010 with the RBZ’s approval. Key
allies of Mugabe, including
Gono and the Mujuru’s, are reportedly benefiting
from the loans, despite all
of them being on the sanctions list.
http://www.radiovop.com
14/12/2010 10:25:00
Masvingo,
December 14, 2010 -Some Zimbabwe's hospitals and clinics here have
run out
of the BCG vaccine which is used to prevent mainly tuberculosis in
children
under the age of five years old.
Top officials at Masvingo General
Hospital disclosed that the health
institution was also facing critical
shortages for syringes used with the
vaccine.
“Even if we have the
vaccines, at times we do not have specific syringes for
BCGs. The problem is
serious and we have since discovered that the infant
mortality rate is
gradually increasing,” said the source.
Children are immunized to reduce
their chances of getting infected by
diseases such as tuberculosis, measles,
polio, tetanus, diphtheria and
whooping cough.
Masvingo Provincial
Medical Director (PMD) Dr Robert Mudyiradima however,
said the situation was
not out of hand as portrayed by ‘mothers who rush to
the press with their
issues’.
“They are blowing issues out of proportion here. We are aware of
certain
problems that they may encounter but I assure you we will be able to
deal
with the problem swiftly,” Said Dr Mudyiradima.
However, mothers
who are being turned away said their last hope was
Mogenster Mission
Hospital – which is run by Reformed Church in Zimbabwe
(RCZ).
“We
were turned away at Mazorodze clinic in Mucheke but some of the staff at
clinic tipped us that we must go to Mogenster if we are really sure to get
our babies vaccinated,” said Tracy Manzete.
Morgenster is about 30
kilometres away from Masvingo town. Those who went to
Morgenster with their
babies said they were being asked to pay US$ 5.
“We had no option. We
went there (Mogernster) and we spent the whole day in
a queue and we paid
US$ 5 for the services per child,” said one mother.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Tichaona
Sibanda
14 December 2010
ZANU PF leader Robert Mugabe will this week
create his own piece of history
by becoming Africa’s second oldest person to
be endorsed as a Presidential
candidate.
The one who still holds the
record was the geriatric, senile, late
life-President of Malawi, Kamuzu
Hastings Banda. At 98 years of age Banda
stood in Malawi’s first democratic
election in 1994, and was roundly
defeated by Bakili Muluzi.
If
elections are held next year, Mugabe will be 87 years old, just 12 years
short of Banda. By endorsing Mugabe to stand as their candidate for
elections ZANU PF risks facing the same humiliation as Banda if the poll is
held under free and fair conditions.
If Mugabe did win an election held
in 2011, his first term of office would
end in 2016 when he would be
92.
His opponents in the MDC contend Mugabe ‘cannot win an election, but he
can
still steal it,’ through intimidation and violence. Among other strong
arm
tactics used in the past to keep him in power were boundary changes,
irregularities in registration, lack of access to state-controlled media and
partisan security officials.
Our correspondent Simon Muchemwa told us
ZANU PF delegates to their
conference in Mutare have already been whipped
into line to endorse Mugabe’s
candidature for the elections.
The
conference will run from Wednesday to Saturday, with at least 5,000
delegates expected to converge on the eastern border city of
Mutare.
‘There are reports in the various media suggesting ZANU PF has
yet to decide
on supporting Mugabe’s stance on having elections next year.
The politburo
is reportedly divided on the issue, but once that is tabled
before the
conference, I don’t think there is anyone who would dare
challenge Mugabe on
that,’ Muchemwa said.
He added; ‘The fact that
they will endorse him as their candidate for the
elections means Mugabe
still has his eyes on a poll next year.’
Muchemwa said despite the stalemate
at the politburo level, nearly all
ZANU-PF provinces are falling over each
other to endorse Mugabe’s
candidature for the make-or-break polls, intended
to bring finality to the
squabbles in the government of national
unity.
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai recently said the country’s
elections
cannot be held in June 2011 as demanded by Mugabe. He said that
before a new
ballot is organized a revised constitution must be in place
with electoral
reforms.
‘It is not possible to have elections in June
next year because we need to
have a referendum first. I don’t think at the
moment you can conduct an
election when the police, army, militia, war
veterans are used to
intimidate, coerce, and cause torture and death to the
people,’ Tsvangirai
said in an interview with Reuters news
agency.
Observers have suggested that having the ZANU PF Congress in
Mutare will
enable the ruling elite to pop out and keep on eye on their
diamond
concessions at Chiadzwa.
http://www.voanews.com
The financial disclosure policy would oblige office bearers to
declare their
assets, thereby promoting transparency, honesty and
accountability
Tatenda Gumbo | Washington 13 December
2010
Following up on last week’s observation of International
Anti-Corruption
Day, Zimbabwean government officials and civic organizations
are calling for
adoption by the country of the United Nations Convention
Against Corruption.
The policy would oblige public office bearers in
Zimbabwe to declare
personal assets to promote transparency, honesty and
accountability in
public finance.
Alois Chaumba, representative in
Zimbabwe of the Anti-Corruption Trust of
Southern Africa, says corruption
has created a massive financial gulf
between public officials and citizens.
Chaumba noted that at independence in
1980 the predecessor of ZANU-PF
adopted a similar code, but this was never
translated into
action.
Chaumba said the proposal for the declaration of personal assets
by public
officials, which the Movement for Democratic Change formation of
Prime
Minister Tsvangirai has backed - as have some members of parliament of
ZANU-PF and the rivel MDC formation of Deputy Prime Minister Arthur
Mutambara - must be put in place to curb corruption.
Chaumba told VOA
Studio 7 reporter Tatenda Gumbo that continued illegal
enrichment of
politicians is hurting ordinary people by diverting scarce
resources.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/
Tuesday, 14
December 2010
Zimbabwe's Minister of Sport, David Coltart, has called
for a police
investigation into claims of match-fixing made against the
national team.
Zimbabwe players and officials have admitted being paid to
throw matches on
a trip to Thailand and Malaysia.
They made the
admissions in sworn testimony to an enquiry held by the
Zimbabwe Football
Association (Zifa).
The allegations of match-fixing centred on a tour
where Zimbabwe lost 3-0 to
Thailand and 6-0 to Syria.
Minister
Coltart told the AP news agency that Zifa "must initiate [a] police
investigation right now" because of what he called "very serious
allegations".
But the Zifa President Cuthbert Dube said that no
action had yet been taken
because the investigation had widened to take in a
previous trip to Asia in
2007.
The Chief Executive of Zifa, Henrietta
Rushwaya, was fired in October,
having been accused of failing to account
for a loan made to Zifa of US$103
000 and authorising a 2008 trip to
Malaysia where elite club Monomotapa
masqueraded as the Zimbabwe national
team.
She is hoping to be exonerated through the government's labour
court where
her case has yet to be concluded.
The BBC's Steve Vickers
in Harare says that the sports minister's call for
the police to take action
is not a surprise given the extent of the findings
of the Zifa inquiry into
match-fixing, and that Zifa itself has still not
handed out bans to the
players who are implicated.
http://af.reuters.com/
Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:48am
GMT
* Mugabe party eyes early poll despite opposition
*
Tsvangirai's U.S. briefings seen as treason
* Fears election dispute will
plunge country into crisis
By Cris Chinaka
HARARE, Dec 14
(Reuters) - Zimbabwe faces a new political storm with
President Robert
Mugabe pushing for an early election opposed by rivals
while hardliners are
threatening Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai over
secret briefings with U.S.
officials.
Mugabe's ZANU-PF party is expected to officially endorse the
86-year-old
leader this weekend as candidate for a general election he wants
by
mid-2011, although analysts say the vote could still be postponed for at
least a year due to regional pressure.
With the political calendar
cloudy, there are fears the country is rolling
back into another crisis
similar to the disputed 2008 elections which forced
regional leaders from
the Southern African Development Community (SADC) to
intervene.
"If
one looks at all that is going on around us now, it's fair to conclude
that
we are heading into a crisis, a very big political storm," said Eldred
Masunungure, a political science professor at the University of
Zimbabwe.
Alongside the push for an early poll, state media are reporting
that ZANU-PF
hawks are pushing for an official investigation against
Tsvangirai over U.S.
State Department cables released by WikiLeaks regarding
his briefings with
the U.S. ambassador in Harare, Charles Ray, which some
officials see as
"bordering on treason".
Quoting unnamed government
sources, the weekly Sunday Mail said comments by
Tsvangirai suggesting that
his Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) was not
genuine in calling for the
lifting of Western sanctions against ZANU-PF and
that he was working with
Washington to oust Mugabe amounted to treason.
"He took an oath of office
which does not permit him to commit the
treasonous offence he has committed,
and so President Mugabe has an
obligation to set up a commission of
inquiry," the newspaper quoted one
official as saying.
BITTER
ATTACKS
Tsvangirai has refused to be drawn into the spat. His aides say
he is not
guilty and describe the controversy as personal attacks on the
prime
minister.
Analysts say Mugabe's camp could be waging a
psychological war on
Tsvangirai. Treason charges, that could turn the MDC
leader into a political
martyr at a time when there are questions over his
leadership qualities, are
unlikely to be pursued.
Mugabe's officials
are delighted with comments by former U.S. ambassador
Christopher Dell, also
released by WikiLeaks, depicting Tsvangirai as a
"flawed figure, who is not
readily open to advice, indecisive and with
questionable judgment in
selecting those around him".
State media have only highlighted Dell's
opinion of Mugabe as a shrewd and
tactical politician while skirting
uncomplimentary reference to the
Zimbabwean leader as a ruthless survivor
with "deep ignorance on economic
issues".
ZANU-PF has turned up the
volume with more bitter attacks on Tsvangirai on
state radio and television
ahead of an annual party meeting this week that
will endorse Mugabe's
candidacy.
Mugabe and his party have held power for over 30 years,
initially with a lot
of promise, but critics say they have since driven the
country into an
economic ditch and hung onto power through violence and
vote-rigging. Mugabe
denies these charges.
Analysts say Mugabe has
already deployed his war veteran campaigners in the
countryside ahead of any
election.
"I think Mugabe is almost set to have elections because he
believes the MDC
is in some bad shape, and that without political reforms,
he can win the
elections," Masunungure said.
"His major problem is
that SADC is not convinced that early elections are
good for Zimbabwe or the
region, and he will face a crisis of legitimacy
internationally," he
added.
REGIONAL PRESSURE
Tsvangirai and a smaller MDC faction in
the coalition are trying to mobilise
regional pressure on Mugabe to deliver
on promised reforms and Zimbabwe's
business leaders are against early
elections they say will scupper economic
recovery.
Senior Western
diplomats in Harare say a free and fair vote is impossible in
a few months
and are counselling for more time for reforms, including the
repeal of
repressive laws, media freedom, new electoral laws and updating of
the voter
register.
"People fear that an election on ZANU-PF terms will simply mean
violence,
but there is also a danger that Mugabe risks doing a Gbagbo,"
Masunungure
said of Ivorian President Laurent Gbagbo who is refusing to
concede defeat
after calling a poll he thought he would
win.
"Tsvangirai may have his problems but he and the MDC still enjoy a
lot of
goodwill in a population tired of ZANU-PF."
Lovemore Madhuku,
chairman of political pressure group National
Constitutional Assembly, said
it was still possible ZANU-PF may not call
early elections for strategic
reasons.
"Mugabe values and has thrived on regional and continental
solidarity and he
may not want to offend fellow African leaders if he thinks
there are some
strong reservations," he said.
"His first option will
be to bring them on board, but Mugabe has survived
this long politically by
pressing his advantage but also always keeping his
options open," he said.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com/
14/12/2010 00:00:00
by Staff
Reporter
THE recently-formed Development Foundation for Zimbabwe (DFZ) is
hosting a
two-day conference on the diaspora’s role in driving development
in Zimbabwe
starting on Thursday in Victoria Falls.
This week, we
caught up with one of the trustees of the DFZ, Alex Magaisa,
to find out
more about the organisation and its aims:
[NEW ZIMBABWE.COM] NZM: What is the
purpose of this conference?
[ALEX MAGAISA] MAGAISA: The conference is
designed to open up channels for
Zimbabweans based in foreign countries,
commonly referred to as the
Diaspora, to participate more actively in the
development processes in
Zimbabwe.
Development is not a one-day event
and is multi-faceted – touching as it
does on economic and social
circumstances as well as governance structures
and processes whose
efficiency is essential to progress. It’s about creating
an environment that
enables men and women to use their talents to the
maximum and we believe the
Diaspora is a key resource in the country’s
development.
The Diaspora
has so far been more of an outsider in the broader
developmental process and
has sometimes been viewed with scepticism by other
key stakeholders within
the country. This despite its immense contributions
to the country, albeit,
so far, at mostly informal levels.
NZM: But why a Diaspora conference in
Victoria Falls?
MAGAISA: Well, we are not trying to re-invent the wheel.
We have done our
homework and we know that a number of Diaspora-related
conferences and
events have been held in various stations in the Diaspora,
including London,
Washington and Johannesburg. We realise that it’s high
time the Diaspora
comes home, not only because it is the home we are talking
about when we
talk of investment and other ideas but to show confidence to
all
stakeholders whom the Diaspora is seeking to engage.
In our
tradition, the man who is marrying a bride may start by sending
emissaries
to his future in-laws but eventually he must come out and present
himself
personally! Also, we realise as fact that some of the stakeholders
in the
government, for example, are encumbered by travel restrictions from
visiting
certain countries where Zimbabweans are based, so engagement has
not been
easy.
Advertisement
This is an opportunity to engage everyone
on home soil. We understand that
not everyone in the Diaspora can make it to
Victoria Falls but this must not
be seen as an end in itself but as part of
a series of activities and events
aimed at engaging the Diaspora.
NZM:
Why the focus on the Diaspora? Some will ask, are these not the same
people
who ran away from Zimbabwe when things got tough?
MAGAISA: It’s very easy
to take a disparaging approach towards the Diaspora.
A more positive view,
however, is looking at the Diaspora as the
representation of a country’s
competitive advantage on the global economic
landscape. The Diaspora has
many faces – people left Zimbabwe for a variety
of reasons, including the
political and economic challenges of recent years.
Human beings, like all
animals, learn to adapt in difficult conditions. Just
as the herd of zebra
travels long distances in the African Savannah to find
water and greener
pastures in times of need, human beings tend to migrate in
response to
challenges and the call of better pastures. It doesn’t make them
bad people.
It simply means they have adapted, and for Zimbabweans, that
adaptation is
thanks to the fantastic investment made by Zimbabwean
taxpayers over the
years – funding education, health and other social
facilities that helped
those in the Diaspora to become who they are.
It’s too much of a
generalisation to say they all ran away from Zimbabwe.
There are many who
left to seek opportunities but that doesn’t mean they are
permanently
detached from their home country.
NZM: Well, some people who remained at
home might say that the Diaspora is
seeking to return because it’s tough out
there. Your view?
MAGAISA: Well, it is tough in the Diaspora as many
Zimbabweans who came out
seeking new pastures can testify. Things can be
good in the first years -
higher salaries, car loans, mortgages for homes,
bank loans, credit cards,
etc account for that early bliss.
However,
sooner or later reality bites! There is also pressure from home
because
everyone seems to think the Diaspora is an infinite tunnel of gold.
You
don’t want to disappoint family and friends so yes, one is under
constant
pressure.
But not everyone is struggling. Zimbabweans are intelligent and
highly
educated people with a wonderful work ethic and a good proportion is
in
incredibly good jobs. They get things done and they have done well in
their
new stations. There is always the odd story that is negative but every
nation surely has bad apples? There are many success stories in the Diaspora
and it’s a pity that we don’t often showcase our people’s
successes.
Often, we highlight the bad apples and so an impression is
created that the
Diaspora is all bad and desperate. I don’t think that’s the
case. I don’t
think it is fair that those wishing to return are doing so
simply because
they have found it tough in the Diaspora. They are coming to
invest not to
look for jobs so surely they must have done well.
NZM: You
didn’t really answer why there is so much interest in the
Diaspora?
MAGAISA: Well, if you look across the world, most countries and
development
agencies are fast recognising that the Diaspora is a critical
resource for
development. Naturally, migrants move in search of better
pastures in order
to help themselves, their immediate families, their
parents and siblings
whom they leave at home. They occasionally help their
relatives and when
they get more they extend their hand to the
communities.
Zimbabwean migrant communities -- like the Chinese, Indian,
Fillipino,
Ghanaian migrants -- have been doing this for years. The World
Bank reported
recently that remittances to developing countries are expected
to reach $325
billion by the end of 2010. This is a rise from $307 billion
in 2009. And
all this, during a period of severe financial constraints
around the world.
The World Bank estimates that with economic recovery
taking shape
remittances to developing countries will rise even more in the
next couple
of years. And please note that these are ‘recorded’ remittances.
There is
more that it remitted outside the formal channels that probably
goes
unrecorded.
Our idea, which is by no means new and is shared by
many in the field of
development, is that with better institutionalisation,
helping to track the
patterns of migration and the flow of these
remittances, governments,
business and policy makers can tap into this
information and formulate
policies that help to safeguard and even leverage
these inflows for wider
development.
A significant point is that
these inflows from remittances are double or
even triple the magnitude of
official aid to development countries.
NZM: So you say this could be a better
alternative to aid?
MAGAISA: Of course, there is no doubt in my mind
about that. In fact, we in
Africa and most of the developing world should be
moving away from
dependency on aid. Africa does not need more aid, it needs
more investment.
Aid does not create jobs save for a few in the aid agencies
but investment
does and creates even more opportunities.
Aid creates
a culture of laziness. Investment makes people work and produce.
We should
be saying ‘no to more fish’ and asking instead for fishing rods,
lines and
nets. In any event, the old cliché that there is no free lunch
applies to
aid – all that we refer to as ‘aid’ does not come free. So we
have to search
for alternatives to promote development and the Diaspora is a
key
source.
We must proceed with caution, however, because unless channelled
properly
and converted into investment, remittances can also lead to a
culture of
laziness in the recipient communities. Ask any Zimbabwean in the
Diaspora
and they will tell you of the challenges of sending money home
every month
and how they despair sometimes when however much they send, the
folks at
home keep demanding more but doing nothing to create other sources
of income
for themselves.
There is an impression that money shoots
out of a natural spring in the
Diaspora! It is not like that. People have to
work for it and they work
hard.
But we are also saying those in the
Diaspora sending money home should pause
and ask: is there no better way of
sending this money home as an investment,
create a job for the person at
home and make them self-supporting so that in
five years’ time, perhaps, I
don’t have to be sending money every month?
Calculate how much you have sent
in the last five to 10 years and ask if
there has been any return at
all?
In most cases there is no return at all but instead more is demanded
of you.
That is the challenge and unless we take leadership in formulating
and
implementing these ideas, we will continue to bleed money.
NZM:
Coming back to the DFZ, how do you see your efforts in a polarised
political
environment like in Zimbabwe?
MAGAISA: You know, when we are stuck or
appear to have reached a cul-de-sac
on any issue, one of my comrades in
these Diaspora initiatives likes to
raise an old quote from someone in the
past which goes something like, ‘now
that we have seen that it can’t be
done, let us think of how it can be done’.
It always raises my spirits, this
reaffirmation of the idea that nothing is
impossible. It’s great to have
people with so much positive thinking around.
Our country has been
challenged over the last few years – economically,
politically and socially
– there is no denying these facts. In fact, this is
why we are taking these
initiatives, to help our country resuscitate. There
is a choice to sit back
and do nothing; to take a ‘wait and see’ attitude
but you know what, whilst
we ‘wait and see’, many others who see
opportunities in Zimbabwe are not
waiting. They are taking them. By the time
we have waited and seen, there
will be nothing of value there.
Our country will continue to be a source
of wealth for others and yet our
communities will not benefit much from
them. Our view is that a let’s wait
and see approach is an expensive
luxury.
NZM: As with any initiative like yours, it’s just a matter of
time before
you are dismissed as a political outfit by this group or that.
How do you
stay above it all?
MAGAISA: One of the most dangerous
perceptions in our society is that
everything is seen through the lens of
politics. You know, this has caused
many outstanding individuals out there
to stay away from development
efforts – because of the risk of being
labelled with the tag of politics. We
must move away from that culture where
everything is perceived in political
colours.
We are Zimbabweans
first before we become anything else, be it
businesspeople, politicians,
activists, etc. That is the common and most
important thread that binds us –
our Zimbabweanness. So instead of saying
what are these ‘politicians’ doing,
perhaps we should be first asking what
are these ‘Zimbabweans’ up
to?
No, for the sake of clarity I must emphasise that we are
non-political and
non-partisan. If any of us chose to become politicians we
would have joined
political parties and there are many in Zimbabwe but we
have chosen to focus
on development projects, working with everyone who is
interested in
advancing this good cause. I like to think that if our country
had fewer
politicians and more development practitioners and businesspeople
we would
go very far.
NZM: But Dr Magaisa, as a columnist for New
Zimbabwe.com some will say you
are a critic of government, politicians. How
then do you work with them?
MAGAISA: Someone once said that criticism
without offering solutions is
meaningless. I think the word ‘critic’ is
overrated and often misused. I don’t
consider myself a ‘critic’. I just see
myself as a son of Zimbabwe who is
enamoured with his country and its people
and wants to contribute to its
greatness. If it means identifying errors and
suggesting ways of rectifying
them, then so be it.
I like to think
those who understand my work in its totality see it simply
as part of a
whole package designed to advance of our nation. I don’t focus
on
individuals, I choose to focus on ideas – placing ideas on the social
marketplace and debating them with the objective of facilitating growth in
ideas and institutions. Through this ‘Ideas Factory’ I have made friends and
acquaintances in various forums. We agree sometimes and we agree to disagree
at other times and I think that is healthy because no-one has a monopoly of
ideas.
So with that in mind, I have never found myself unable to
negotiate paths
with people from across the country whatever their
orientation in politics,
economics or other indices. Respect is the key – as
long as you respect each
other and the idea, then working for mutual success
should not be a problem.
And I believe this is the same spirit that informs
my colleagues in the DFZ
and other Diaspora organisations trying to do their
bit for Zimbabwe.
If you look back into our history, there is actually
more that binds us than
there is for division. In any event, I would like us
to get to a stage where
we deal with institutions, such as the DFZ and the
ideas that inform them,
rather than the individuals in them who are
fallible.
NZM: Last word, Dr Magaisa?
MAGAISA: I would like to
encourage Zimbabweans in the Diaspora and friends
of Zimbabwe to take more
seriously their role in development in all its
forms. I know that individual
circumstances differ and that various
circumstances encumber us and
therefore prevent us from doing all we would
like to do. But I also know
that there is a huge reservoir of interest and
goodwill for
Zimbabwe.
Things may not be perfect yet, but we must remember that others
are
exploiting the opportunities in the country whilst we wait and see.
Let’s
stop being perennial moaners because that may gain us pity but nothing
else
of substance.
Any one interested in learning more about and being
involved in the DFZ’s
work, please visit the website at www.dfzim.com and make contact.

THE MAVHURADONHA WILDERNESS

DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE MINING OPERATIONS
Johnny Rodrigues
Chairman for Zimbabwe Conservation Task
Force
Landline: 263 4 339065
Mobile: 263 712 603
213
Email: galorand@mweb.co.zw
Website: www.zctf.mweb.co.zw
Website: www.zimbabwe-art.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=15148470211
Temporary website: www.zctfofficialsite.org.
BILL WATCH SPECIAL
[13th December 2010]
House of Assembly Portfolio Committees: 13th to 17th
December
The following meetings are open to members of the public, as
observers only, not as participants. [See note at the end of this bulletin on public attendance and
participation at different types of committee meetings] As there are sometimes last-minute changes to the schedule, it is recommended that you avoid possible disappointment by checking with
the relevant committee clerk that the meeting is still on and still open to the
public. Parliament’s telephone numbers are Harare 700181 or 252936-55.
[Names of committee clerks are given below]. If attending, please use the Kwame Nkrumah Ave entrance to
Parliament. IDs must be produced.
Monday 13th December at 2 pm
Thematic Committee: Gender and Development
Brief on water and sanitation organisations in
Zimbabwe.
Committee Room No. 3
Chairperson: Hon Chitsa Clerk: Mrs Khumalo
Tuesday 14th December at 10 am
Portfolio Committee: Local Government, Rural and Urban Development
Oral evidence from Harare City Treasurer Mbvumbi on Harare Water
Account
Committee Room No. 413
Chairperson: Hon Karenyi Clerk: Mr Daniel
Thematic Committee: MDGs
Presentation on the 2010 MDG report from YET [Youth Empowerment
Trust]
Government Caucus Room
Chairperson: Hon Chief Mtshane Clerk: Mrs Nyawo
Wednesday 15th December – no meetings open to the
public
Thursday 16th December at 10 am
Media, Information and Communication
Technology
Presentation from Mr Gwatidzo on the operations of private ICT
stakeholders
Committee Room No. 413
Chairperson: Hon S. Moyo Clerk: Mr Mutyambizi
Public Attendance at and Participation in Committee
Meetings
·
Open to the public to attend as observers
only: Portfolio and thematic committee meetings where oral evidence is
being heard. Members of the public can listen but not speak. [As listed above.]
·
Stakeholders by invitation: At some committee meetings stakeholders [and those who notify
Parliament that they consider themselves stakeholders] are invited to make oral
or written representations and ask questions. [These meetings will be highlighted in these
bulletins.]
·
Not open to the public: Portfolio and thematic committee meetings in which the committees
are doing private business – e.g. setting work plans, deliberating on reports
and findings, or drafting reports for Parliament, or when the committees make
field visits. [Veritas does not list these meetings in these
bulletins.]
·
Public Hearings: When committees call for public hearings, members of the public are
free to submit oral or written representations, ask questions and generally
participate. [Veritas sends out separate notices of these public hearings.]
Note: Zimbabweans in the Diaspora can send in written submissions by email
to clerk@parlzim.gov.zw
Veritas makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot
take legal responsibility for information
supplied.
As we in the Zimbabwean Diaspora grow roots in our countries of residence, the question arises: what constitutes a Zimbabwean identity? Many of us now have partners, children and extended families, as well as friends abroad. How will the younger generations relate to Zimbabwe? How do we continue to maintain roots there apart from the occasional holiday?
Identity is mobile these days, just as people are. This makes it much easier to lose contact with our Zimbabwean heritage than we immediately perceive.
The bond of a shared language can help to maintain a sense of community amongst Zimbabweans abroad - no matter how long ago we left, or how far we’ve travelled.
Since Shona is spoken by over 90% of Zimbabweans, learning and retaining it is also a good way to solidify one’s ties with people in Zimbabwe. As such, we present over the coming weeks, lessons in Shona to help those of you who want to learn it for the first time, or who want to recap some concepts.
These lessons are focused on simple conversations. The basic language skills are often enough to break down conversational barriers, to identify with others, and to pass on heritage by signalling to children who have been brought up abroad that Zimbabwe, too, is an important part of their identity.
Shona is a relatively easy language to pronounce because vowel sounds do not alter from
word to word. All words end in a vowel. Shona is a phonetic language - spelling easily indicates how the word sounds.
Vowel Pronunciation
a as in army e as in egg I as in big o as in hot u as in who
All vowels are pronounced e.g. roora (marry) pronounced as ro-o-ra, and kuuya ( to come)
pronounced as ku-u-ya. Note that Shona has no l,q,x,c except the combination of ch-.
Pronouns
In Shona, as in many other languages, there are different forms of addressing people depending on the familiarity of the relationship and the relative ages. Peers can be addressed casually, whilst elders, regardless of how old you are, are addressed with respect, or in the more formal way. As such, the pronouns for ‘you’, and ‘he’ or ‘she’ change depending on how ‘senior’ the person is.
I - Ini You – Iwe (singular, to a peer) You - Imi/mu (This applies for all plural forms of ‘you’, and is also the form for addressing a single, senior person) She/He - Iye It - icho We - ti Us - isu They - va/ivo (note that ‘they’ remains the same for peers and seniors) Their - avo
We’ll use these expressions in the next lesson, but for now just familiarise yourself with the variations. Remember that a language is not learned by memorising grammar, but by speaking the words. The audio for this lesson can be obtained from http://www.learnshona.com in an mp3 format that can be played on the computer, on many phones and music players.
Next week’s topics include possessives, greetings and the verb ‘to know’. We’ll also have a set of common phrases that follow on from the concepts in this lesson.
Nyasha Madavo.