The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
----------------------------------------------------------
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><
----------------------------------------------------------
Issue 1,
IMPORTANT NOTICE
-------------------------------
We need your help! Standing strong together, as
Africans, in unity, means spreading this newsletter as widely as possible! Whether in
But please remember: any-one that wants to receive this
newsletter directly from solidarity4zim@highveldmail.co.za must subscribe
through e-mail in person!! This is to avoid problems with local and
international Spam laws and regulations. (More info at the end of this
letter)
----------------------------------------------
“An injury to one, is an injury
to all!”
----------------------------------------------
CONTENTS
-----------------
1.
Disenfranchisement in
perspective
2.
News Flash 1
3.
Disenfranchisement Today
4.
News Flash 2,3,4
5.
SADC protocol explained
6.
News Flash 5,6
7. A
liberators perspective
8.
Human rights since 2000
9.
Human Rights Today
10.
11. News
Flash 7 and 8
12. About
this initiative
13.
Agenda
14.
Distribution and Contact
information
DISENFRANCHISEMENT IN
----------------------------------------------------------
In all the concern over
It was exactly this situation that led to the War of
Liberation in
When a country is in severe crisis, and deeply
polarized, it is the politics of inclusion that can solve the problems. As it
was in 1980, so should it be in 2005. Proportional representation, and the
opportunity for all Zimbabweans, both inside and outside
NEWS FLASH 1 Mugabe bars SADC pre-election monitoring and Troika: Sunday
Mirror (14/02) and Zim Online (11/02)
----------------------
The Zimbabwean government has indicated that it will not
allow a visit to the country by a SADC pre-election observer team. Originally,
the team was supposed to visit the country ahead of the election to assess
whether SADC electoral guidelines have been properly implemented. However, the
government has now indicated that the delegation will only be welcomed if it
forms part of the normal election observer team. The South African government
has begun to express concern over the fact that they have still not received an
official invitation from the
On the same note it is alleged that the Mugabe regime has denied the SADC troika consisting of South
African President Thabo Mbeki, Lesotho Prime Minister
Phakalitha Mosisili and
departing Namibian President Sam Nujoma access to
HOW
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As indicated in our editorial, disenfranchisement is the
greatest problem in the forthcoming
- Inability to register – through displacement, removal
of citizenship, inability to prove residence;
- Confiscating IDs so that you cannot prove your
identity on polling day;
- Threats about the ways in which your vote could be
detected;
- Intimidation so that you are “forced” to vote for
Zanu-PF;
- Violence against opposition
members;
- Coercion of rural people by chiefs and
headmen;
- Denial of the postal vote to citizens outside the
country;
- Limiting the number of polling stations in areas of
high opposition support.
All of these were alleged to have taken place during
2000 and 2002. Which will apply in 2005?
Inability to register will be a fact for many
Zimbabweans, and mostly the youth and displaced people such as the former
commercial farm workers. Unable to provide proof of residence, they will not
have been able to confirm their place on the voters’ roll. Of course, millions
of Zimbabweans outside the country will be denied a vote due to there being no
postal vote. The feeble argument offered by the Minister of Justice to a court
challenge to this decision, that Zanu-PF cannot campaign outside the country due
to selective sanctions, does not apply to South
Violence and intimidation may well frighten other voters
away, but current signs are that violence may be diminishing. However,
intimidation and coercion are still present, and take two forms. The first lies
again in the creation of “no go” areas, policed by the militia and traditional
leaders, who may well force people to vote for Zanu-PF. The second lies in the
controlled access to food, and all indications suggest that food is short and
getting shorter. Access to food has and will probably be used again as a form of
compulsion against the rural voters.
We are still to see what the layout of polling stations
might be, but this may well be used again to prevent many people in urban areas
from casting their votes. This could be more serious now that voting is only on
a single day. Finally, there is always the sticky problem of the voters’ roll
itself, and here the presence of perhaps hundreds of thousands of “ghost” voters
may negate any possibility that a citizen’s real vote has any
impact.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Our modest demand is simple and just. We demand
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEWS FLASH 2
----------------------
A strategic planning meeting and training session at the
Sheraton Hotel in
NEWS FLASH 3
Dispossession of Farm Settlers Continues Daily Mirror (14/02)
----------------------
Farmers who say they occupied Shuri Shuri Farm in Chegutu, Mashonaland West during
the land occupations in 2000 have been ordered to leave the farm by officers
from the Air Force of Zimbabwe. Nelson Samkange, the
provincial governor of Mashonaland West, said that
settlers who refused to leave the farm would be “acting against government
policy.” Defending the Air Force’s claim to the land, Samkange also said, “If war veterans liberated the country,
they cannot say it is their land. They took it for all
Zimbabweans.”
This follows similar recent actions chasing settlers
away from other farms in Mashonaland East and West,
Matabeleland North and Manicaland, including Little
England Farm and Inkomo
Farm.
NEWS FLASH 4
Church Leaders Criticize Robert Mugabe Zim Online (14/02)
----------------------
Zimbabwean church leaders at an interdenominational
prayer meeting held on the 13th of February sharply criticized ZANU (PF). Bishop
Cephas Mukandi of the
SADC PRINCIPLES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The conduct of a transparent and open election process
in accordance with established legislation is fundamental to a democratic
society. An open election process not
only serves to ensure the right of political participation, it also presupposes
adherence to other basic human rights such as the right to freedom of
expression, movement, peaceful assembly and association.
In recognition of the important role that an open
election process plays in consolidating citizens’ participation in the decision
making processes, SADC has made significant progress, in recent years, in
consolidating democratic practices and institutions in the region and the
individual member countries.
Regrettably, the level of commitment to political liberalisation and democratisation
still varies greatly from country to country and this has opened the door to
external and internal criticism of the electoral processes and results in
several member states.
In an effort to address this ambiguity and uncertainty
and to respond proactively to the “AU Principles Governing Democratic
Elections”, the member states of the SADC during August 2004 adopted the “SADC
Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections”. These Principles and Guidelines not only
provide a set of general criteria against which the impartiality of elections
can be measured; they also serve as a public expression of the SADC’s commitment to the consolidation of democracy in the
region.
As a practical tool, the Principles and Guidelines
provide a solid yet non-specific framework through which the concepts of
“freeness” and “fairness” within the electoral process can be measured. In general, the term “freedom” refers to
those elements of the electoral process that impact on a voter’s opportunity to
participate in the electoral process without being exposed to coercion or
restrictions, whilst “fairness” refers to those aspects that impact on impartial
or equitable access to the process for all qualified individuals. The obvious difficulty
with using the SADC
Principles and Guidelines to measure “freeness” and “fairness” is the fact that
most of the principles and guidelines are open to interpretation, and at present
it still remains to be seen how these two concepts will be practically defined
and applied by the SADC members. All of
the criteria for a strict interpretation of “free and fair” are present, but it
is still up to the leadership and citizens of the region to determine the level
of latitude and interpretation that will be allowed.
The adoption of the “SADC Principles and Guidelines
Governing Democratic Elections” is undoubtedly a positive step on the road
toward long-term sustainable democracy in the SADC region, but it is not yet a
fully functional instrument. Apart from
the problem of interpretation, as discussed above, there is also the dilemma of
enforcing the Principles and Guidelines when no provision has been made for
sanctions against governments or leaders who do not comply. The enforcement of the principles and
guidelines, therefore, depends greatly on the resolve of regional leaders to
hold themselves and their brethren accountable.
As yet this resolve has not been adequately tested.
Within the above context, it is important for the
citizens of the SADC region to view the “SADC Principles and Guidelines
Governing Democratic Elections” as a work in progress. The practical application and enforcement of
the principles and guidelines will depend as much on the content of the
document, as the will of the people.
Consequently, it is imperative that the citizens of the SADC region
ensure their participation in the evolution of this process by demanding that
their leaders implement and enforce the Principles and Guidelines in accordance
with the democratic ideals of the people.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“The people shall govern!”
- the Freedom Charter Congress
of the People,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEWS FLASH 5
Losers in ZANU (PF) Primaries rule out standing as independents Fin. Gaz. (10/02)
----------------------
Longstanding ZANU (PF) members who did not get their
party’s nomination to stand as a candidate in the March 31st election have ruled
out standing as independent candidates in the election. Many of the ruling party
members had been troubled by what they saw as the imposition of candidates by
the governing bodies of the party.
Margaret Dongo, a former ZANU (PF) Member of
Parliament who is running as an independent in the Harare Central constituency
in the upcoming election, confirmed that overtures had been made to her by some
ruling party candidates to form a “loose coalition” of independent candidates.
Dongo suggested, however, that such a coalition was
unlikely to emerge because the candidates feared reprisals by the ruling
party.
NEWS FLASH 6
SA Government Opposes COSATU Blockade
----------------------
The South African Foreign Affairs Minister, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma has said
that an attempt by the South African trade union organisation COSATU to block roads on the border with
VOICES FROM WITHIN - A LIBERATORS PERSPECTIVE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The black people of
The overwhelming majority of the people are struggling
to make ends meet whilst the ZANU PF elite are liberally helping themselves to
the country’s resources. This elite that benefited from
the generous lease of state farms acquired with the help of British funds are
again the principal beneficiaries of the so called ‘land reform’ that has
destroyed the country’s agriculture and crippled the economy. The majority of
the population is now largely dependent on western donors for food aid in a
country that used to boast of surpluses.
An array of repressive legislation reminiscent of the
Rhodesian era has been crafted to suppress voices of dissent. State institutions
such as the police, the armed forces and the intelligence services have been
thoroughly corrupted to become pliant tools of the ruling
party.
Millions have fled the country and become economic
refugees within the region and further a field. Tragically, they have not only
lost the hope of economic survival back home but their inalienable right to vote
as well. Reminiscent of the qualified
franchise for blacks in the Rhodesian era, numerous obstacles are placed to the
registration of voters with the youth being the most affected and having to seek
‘endorsement’ from the landlords to qualify as voters in their
constituencies. Turning majority age has become a legal nicety devoid of
significance in terms of citizen rights.
To dream of ‘free and fair’ elections in the present
political landscape is to indulge in wishful thinking and stretching one’s
imagination too far beyond any political relevance given the ruling party’s
determination to cling to power at all costs. Talk about anything else but
losing the election is absolutely out of question and beyond the realm of the
practicable for them. From the delimitation of constituencies, the registration
of voters, the compilation of the voters roll (largely inflated with ghost
voters), the management of the election itself by trusted military intelligence
officials, access to the electorate and the media, to Mugabe’s right to appoint an additional one quarter of the
total number of elected parliamentarians, the battle is won for ZANU PF before
the formal contest has even begun.
Talk about the so-called SADC Principles and Guidelines;
in present day
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“All National Groups Shall have
Equal Rights!”
- the Freedom Charter Congress
of the People,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUMAN RIGHTS DEVELOPMENTS IN ZIMBABWE
2000-2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The popular rejection of the government-inspired
constitutional proposal in February 2000- the first electoral defeat suffered by
the ruling party ZANU(PF) since taking power in 1980- indicated eroding support
for the ruling party among the electorate.
The political opposition, the Movement for Democratic Change
(
The government’s campaign to stamp out political dissent
was framed as a re-launch of the liberation war. The political opposition was
now cast as nefarious agents of colonialism. State sponsored violence began
under the guise of a land redistribution exercise, ostensibly aimed at
redressing outstanding historical imbalances in land ownership between whites
and blacks. The reality however, was that this exercise was used to obscure and
legitimate the perpetration of gross human rights abuses by portraying these
abuses as an unfortunate but inevitable consequence of much needed and morally
justified social justice reforms. Despite this characterization, documented
evidence has indicated that peaks in violence were neither confined to
commercial farmland, nor necessarily a result of land invasions. Rather,
violence intensified during periods of elections and those targeted were
perceived as or actual members of the opposition in every community, both rural
and urban. The government’s use of violence was not only meant to punish the
opposition but also to inflict psychological harm on those victims’ families and
communities who bore witness. It is evident that the much broader aim was to
relay a message to the electorate at large: support and vote for the ruling
party or face retribution.
The partisan nature of violence and human rights
violations in this period has been well documented. Violence has been largely
attributed to ruling party supporters and functionaries, and includes summary
executions, torture, extra-judicial killings, kidnapping, rape, disappearances,
unlawful detention, illegal arrest, arson and beatings. The perpetration of
these abuses has been significantly aided both by the introduction of
restrictive laws designed to erode basic constitutionally guaranteed freedoms,
and by the state’s aggressive drive to re-structure the state apparatus aimed at
ensuring the subservience of the police, judiciary, army, and civil service to
party dictate. Through the politicization of law enforcement agencies- often
themselves perpetrators of violence- not only were victims effectively unable to
access legal relief or remedy, but more importantly, the perpetration of
violations could occur with almost absolute impunity creating the impression
that the ruling party was not only the law, but they were above the
law.
THE CURRENT HUMAN RIGHTS & ELECTORAL
ENVIRONMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The government’s sustained campaign against political
dissent over the past few years has so undermined the electoral and democratic
environment that a free and fair election in the upcoming March 2005
parliamentary elections seems unlikely. Despite introducing a few superficial-
and largely technical- reforms in certain procedural aspects of elections, the
government persists in curtailing political opposition through violence or
repression.
Laws still remain in place, which substantively restrict
a citizen’s ability to exercise basic freedoms of assembly, expression and
association. Political opponents continue to be arrested, detained and tortured.
Despite recent government exhortations condemning the use of violence, violence
is still perpetrated against the populace by ruling party supporters or by
adjunct groups, such as the youth militia.
Even if levels of violence remain lower than in past
elections, the cumulative effect of state-sanctioned violence over the past few
years has effectively entrenched the belief within the electorate that to vote
against the ruling party will necessarily incur brutal reprisals. To persuade
them otherwise now, will be a long and difficult
process.
In order to have a free and fair election in March
therefore, a fundamental restoration of democratic rights needs to be
undertaken. This can neither be done under the current shadow of state-sponsored
violence, nor under palpably unconstitutional and repressive pieces of
legislation that continue to restrict democratic
space.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“All Shall be Equal Before the
Law!”
- the Freedom Charter Congress
of the People,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
The African Union’s human rights monitoring body, the
African Commission on Human and People’s Rights, has formally adopted a report
that is highly critical of the Zimbabwean government’s human rights record. The
report was the result of investigations done by the Commission three years ago.
The report now forms part of the official record of the African Union, and is
being circulated by Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human
Rights.
In particular, the report recommends that the Zimbabwean
government take steps to restore the impartiality of the judiciary and the
police force, and to end arbitrary arrest of political opponents. It also
recommended that repressive legislation be re-examined and recommended the
creation of a truly independent electoral oversight
body.
When the report was first circulated at the African
Union a year ago, its adoption was delayed because the Zimbabwean government
claimed they had not seen the report and had not been given a chance to respond
to the allegation, despite the fact that the report had been in circulation for
some months before.
-------------------------------
The Zimbabwean government is late in submitting four
reports on human rights to the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights.
Countries that have signed on to the Commission are supposed to submit periodic
reports to the Commission.
Secretary to the African Commission, Germain Baricako, said that the
secretariat of the African Commission reminds states of their reporting
obligations four times a year, and has adopted Guidelines on State Reporting
indicating the minimum reporting obligations of signatory states. The Commission
does not however have any punitive powers against states that do not comply with
their reporting duties.
NEWS FLASH 7
Candidates Barred from Campaigning in Barracks Sunday Mirror (14/02) & Zim Online
(11/02)
----------------------
Independent and opposition parliamentary candidates have
been barred from canvassing, campaigning or distributing campaign literature in
military camps and police barracks within their constituencies. Independent
candidate Margaret Dongo has applied for permission to
enter Tomlinson Depot in Harare Central constituency where she is running for
election, but was refused. ZANU (PF) candidates however can freely visit the
camps to canvass for support.
NEWS FLASH 8
MISA-Zambia Appeals to AU over Zim Press Laws Misa
Website
----------------------
The Zambian chapter of the Media Institute of
ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER
----------------------------------------
Over
the past decades numerous South African progressive civil society organizations
have emerged that work on issues that form an integral part of the current
crisis in Zimbabwe. These range from humanitarian issues such as food relief, to
issues such as human rights and civil liberties, from democracy to trade union
work. But ever since the intensification of the Zimbabwe crisis in 2000,
Zimbabweans have rightly been complaining that their fellow Africans, and first
and foremost their South African neighbors, have hardly done enough to aid the
plight of the people of Zimbabwe. However, over the past year several South
African civil society organizations of all walks of life have committed
themselves to working together in order to maximize their out-pout with regards
to the crisis, as well as show solidarity in practical sense as well as on a
moral level. COSATU’s courageous attempted fact-finding missions to Zimbabwe are
only one example of practical solidarity for the people of that country.
Recently
the Zimbabwe Solidarity and Consultation Forum has been created as a result of
this solidarity process that has been developing in South Africa and the SADC
region. This forum consists of organizations from all walks of life: student
movements, trade-unions, churches, and specialist NGOs. This newsletter is one
of their several projects.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“There Shall be Peace and
Friendship!”
- the Freedom Charter Congress of the People,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENDA
--------------
Where? Musina,
CIVICUS, Amnesty International South Africa (AISA) and
SANGOCO are organising a Zimbabwe Solidarity
Rally/Concert (ZSR), which is scheduled to take place on
In
24,
“The importance of this conference is that it will
provide civil society representatives from
If you would like to receive more information about this
event please contact info@csvr.org.za
DISTRIBUTION DETAILS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove your
name from our mailing list, please contact the respective distributor (who you
received this Newsletter from). To subscribe or unsubscribe one can also contact
solidarity4zim@highveldmail.co.za with the word subscribe or ‘unsubscribe’ as subject. Please note
that you must subscribe in person (that is; you must e-mail from the address you
wish to receive the newsletter on).
The default format of this Newsletter is Rich Text
(HTML), a more graphic layout but also a larger file. A Plain Text format can be
requested by sending us an e-mail to solidarity4zim@highveldmail.co.za with
‘request plain text’ as subject.
We also offer a print-friendly version, which can be
printed out onto three pages A4, front to back. This version is specifically
intended for distribution in
Letters, reactions or opinions can be sent to
solidarity4zim@highveldmail.co.za with the words ‘Newsletter reaction’ in the
subject.