The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
Following on last night’s
alert on the latest campaign against the Amani Trust, there have been a series
of new and very disturbing developments. As I reported last night, the state
news media had claimed that an Amani vehicle had been identified as one of the
vehicles ferrying the alleged attackers into Kuwadzana on Monday night. This
allegation was repeated in the Herald this morning where the state-owned
newspaper claimed the following:
At least
three vehicles linked to the attack have also been impounded and one of them is
believed to belong to Amani Trust, which kept safe houses in various high
density suburbs, housing opposition youths on the Police wanted
list.
These allegations are being
repeated regularly by the state-controlled radio.
The Trust has also been
informed by a friendly source that there are plans to firebomb the Amani offices
tonight.
These allegations are
wholly unfounded, but consistent with the continuous attacks that have been
mounted against the Trust over the past year. The threat to actually firebomb
the offices must be taken very seriously in view of the attacks in the past on
the Daily News and the Voice of the People radio station.
There must therefore be
concern for the safety of the staff and Trustees of the Amani Trust, and we hope
that calls will be made upon the government of
For more
information:
Email: tony@idasa.org.za
Tel: +27-(0)84-764
6995
The Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition regrets Monday night’s petrol bomb attack in Kuwadzana and sends its deepest condolences to the family of those killed and injured in the attack.
However the Coalition unreservedly condemns efforts by the government to try and place blame for the attack on the Amani Trust. The Coalition has it on sound authority that Amani Trust vehicles are grounded without fuel and were therefore nowhere near Kuwadzana on the fateful night.
In the past government has used similar contrived allegations to manipulate public opinion and create a smoke screen in advance of a so-called “retaliatory” attack on legitimate organisations who are seeking creative solutions to Zimbabwe’s current crises.
In particular the Coalition notes with grave concern the government’s sustained attack against media and other groups involved in the documentation of human rights abuses.
Mr Hain, minister for the EU, told the BBC's Newsnight programme the Zimbabwean president "was not welcome" in Europe.
European Union foreign ministers will decide next week whether to renew sanctions against Zimbabwe, including a travel ban for the country's rulers.
If they do not, Mr Mugabe would be able - if invited by France - to attend the summit on February 19.
Mr Hain's comments suggest the UK government is opposed to such a relaxation of restrictions.
To be personally invited by the president of France is
outrageous Michael Ancram Shadow foreign secretary |
"Our views on his odious regime are well known and the way he is devastating his country.
"I am sure the French share that view."
Speaking during Prime Minister's Questions, Tony Blair said the government stood behind travel restrictions on the Zimbabwe president.
The prime minister's spokesman said another set of sanctions would have to be agreed unanimously and the French had yet to submit a proposal over their planned Paris summit.
"This is a live issue. It will obviously be discussed on Monday. There's been no formal proposal yet from the French government and I'm not going to pre-empt our government's position," said the spokesman.
Discussions
Yves Charpentier, head of press at the French Embassy in London, confirmed France was considering inviting President Mugabe to the summit, but stressed: "Nothing has been decided yet.
"We will be discussing this among the EU members at next week's meeting."
But the Tories demanded to know whether the UK had approved a visit to France by Mr Mugabe at the invitation of Jacques Chirac.
Mr Blair said: "We've made it clear that we support the sanctions in place against Zimbabwe."
Hypocrisy
The Foreign Office earlier said it had had no request to waive an EU imposed travel ban on Mr Mugabe.
The summit was a matter for the French authorities, Downing Street said.
To allow Mr Mugabe to strut his stuff in Paris would be
absolutely unacceptable Menzies Campbell Lib Dem foreign affairs |
Conservative foreign affairs spokesman Michael Ancram said it was "hypocrisy of the highest order" for Mr Chirac to invite Mugabe when EU sanctions were supposed to ban travel within the union by Zimbabwe's rulers.
"President Chirac is well aware not only of the dire situation in Zimbabwe but that there are travel restrictions in force," said Mr Ancram.
Strut
He stressed: "No Franco-African summit can be exempt from the EU sanctions.
"It is bad enough that Mugabe and his thugs can attend UN-sponsored meetings in Europe, but to be personally invited by the president of France is outrageous.
"While it may not be intentional, this can only be interpreted as condoning genocide by starvation, ethnic cleansing, murder, rape and the destruction of the rule of law."
Menzies Campbell MP, Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, said Mr Mugabe should not be welcomed anywhere in the EU.
"To allow Mr Mugabe to strut his stuff in Paris would be absolutely unacceptable," said Mr Campbell.
REPORT ON MEETING WITH MINISTER MADE
Minister Made personally
called President Cloete on his cell phone and suggested that it was time a
meeting was held between him and the CFU.
The meeting was arranged for 9.00am Tuesday 21st January. The Minister also commented that he had
heard that Cloete had been trying to see the State President.
At the meeting the CFU was
represented by President Colin Cloete, Vice President Doug Taylor-Freeme and
Director Hendrik Olivier. This
meeting is significant in that the Union has not met formally with the Minister
for more than 18 months.
The Ministers opening
remarks were that we had been at each other’s throats for the last 30 months and
this was understandable. However,
prevailing circumstances indicated that we need to move forward.
He only commented that the
one man one farm issue was an interesting one and that was all he would say on
it. He referred to the land tax
proposals as not practical and the idea had been shelved, and that farm size
regulations were under review. He
was happy the way the A1 resettlement scheme was progressing. However, it was no secret that the A2
scheme needed to be relooked at and that it was under
review.
The Minister referred to LA
forms for delisting stating he was not happy with them and would not sign
any. The Minister spent a lot of
time emphasing that he is the acquiring authority and did not recognize any
deals done at a local level with officials in districts. He insisted he has three instruments
with which to acquire land; - Section 5, Section 8 and Section 7. He said that farmers have two choices –
on receiving a Section 5 notice either go through the courts and the Section 7
process, which could take up to 5 years
- or each farmer could come to see him and discuss their individual
circumstances.
The Minister said that if
farmers are in the position to farm they must – the country needs food security
and cannot rely on other countries to feed Zimbabwe. He gave assurances that if a farmer had
planted a crop it would not be taken away.
He said that the livestock sector needed to be built up again and
acknowledged that the dairy industry had been treated favourably but warned that
this was not to be viewed as a white preserve. He said every province had some lowveld
land, which had to be developed for irrigation, especially for winter maize in
the interest of food security. He
made reference to the Nuanetsi project and the Chirundu and Charara proposed
irrigation schemes, and indicated Governments intention to motivate these
projects into production.
However, he said that these
new projects and the new farmers needed equipment for mechanization. He stated that there are tractors,
combines; irrigation equipment etc sitting in warehouses in town and that ARDA
was in the market to buy this equipment, and could we pass on this message to
the farmers who may be interested in selling. He also said that if farmers did
not want to sell, would they consider hiring this equipment for a
fee?
He passed a comment that he
had noted that farmers were settling in other countries in the region and
expressed concern that they were trying to move equipment out of Zimbabwe, and
reminded us of the law banning the movement of equipment outside Zimbabwe. He acknowledged that moveable assets
belonged to the owner and he could not force them to sell.
A
discussion took place on the availability of inputs, such as fuel, chemicals,
fertilizer and coal. The Minister
said that an Arabian Bank had helped us out with some foreign currency for fuel
and he would talk to the Minister of Energy and ask him to prioritize fuel for
tillage. He indicated that he was
to meet with the South African Foreign Minister and he would be discussing with
her for help on raw materials and finished goods from South Africa to address
the fertilizer and chemical requirements.
He appreciated there was a coal crisis and understood that some new
farmers were losing tobacco because of no coal, but never offered a solution.
President Cloete said some
farmers were storing equipment for safe keeping in the hope they would be able
to farm again and emphasized that CFU Members are Zimbabweans and are committed
to the well being of our country.
We wished to be helpful where we could to overcome the crisis the country
is experiencing.
COMMENT
The meeting was an
icebreaker. The Minister did most
of the talking. At no time did the
CFU pledge all the equipment to Government as is suggested in the media
today. Equipment is owned by
individuals not the Union.
Having heard what the
Ministers position is, this will be helpful in future meetings with him, where
we hope to get into deeper discussions on bread and butter
issues.
We are also aware that some
of the points the Minister has indicated are not necessarily happening on the
ground.
Doug Taylor
Freeme
Harare, 23 January 2003
Your Excellencies,
I
have humbly requested you to come here today in order to express my grave
concern at how the Zimbabwe crisis seems to be fast disappearing on the horizon
of international attention.
It is indeed a great tragedy
that influential countries in Africa and the rest of the international community
only accept the existence of crises of governance in Africa when it is too late
and after thousands of innocent people will have been slaughtered. Zimbabwe
today is one such country in which the symptoms and makings of an unfolding
great tragedy have been on the wall for Africa and the rest of the international
community to see but there has been no sense of urgency to forestall the
catastrophe.
Tragically, supposedly
leading countries in Africa, such as South Africa and Nigeria are now on the
forefront, chiding the international community for its condemnation of the
brutal Mugabe regime; denying the existence of the tragic circumstances in which
Zimbabweans find themselves; cheering Mugabe in the name of a dubious African
brotherhood to go on perpetrating the outrage and waiting for the policies of
the Mugabe regime to produce mass graves which they regard as an adequate and
sufficient definition of the existence of a crisis in Zimbabwe.
If this is an expression of
the so-called African solutions to African problems, or an early manifestation
of the so-called NEPAD peer review mechanism, then Africa is fated or condemned
to remain a beleaguered and crisis-ridden continent for a long time to
come.
Your Excellencies will
recall that immediately after the rigged March 2002 presidential poll, and in
what now appears to have been a sinister parallel process to the mission of the
Commonwealth Troika, Nigeria and South Africa offered themselves as mediators in
the search for a solution to the Zimbabwean crisis. We in the MDC accepted the
offer in good faith and in line with our firm commitment to pacific resolution
of political disputes.
However, we now realize that
the offer was nothing but a cynical and cruel act of deception. The real
strategy and ill-intention of these two countries was simply to give Zimbabweans
a false sense of hope and thereby buy time for Mugabe to make good his bloody
electoral fraud and consolidate his dictatorship. They are now convinced that
Mugabe has now achieved both objectives and have now embarked on the last steps
to legitimise him. In pursuit of this desperate strategy, Presidents Obasanjo
and Mbeki have now come out openly in support of the Mugabe dictatorship against
the people and forces of democracy in Zimbabwe. They have publicly expressed
their determination to subvert their terms of reference and repudiate their
expected impartial and objective role in the Commonwealth Troika. As a result,
the forthcoming Commonwealth Troika meeting in South Africa is now a cruel
gimmick and serious opinion in the international community must totally ignore
the incoherent rants that will emanate from it.
Only this week, the Nigerian
Foreign Minister, Mr. Sule Lamido was in Harare conferring with Mugabe. We only
got to know about it in the media. He never bothered to consult with the MDC
leadership. His message to Zimbabweans was as clear as it was brutal. In
essence, his message was that Nigeria would continue to buttress Mugabe in his
quest to maintain tyrannical rule over Zimbabweans.
It is unfortunate that even
at this late hour, Nigeria as spelt out by Mr. Lamido, continues to dishonestly
and deliberately misread the nature of the political crisis in Zimbabwe. The
Zimbabwe crisis has never been and is not a racial issue between black and
white.
The people being starved to
death are not white; the majority of those killed by the regime’s killing
machine are not white; those who languish in jail as I speak to you and are
subjected to incessant torture and subhuman conditions are not white; those in
the rural areas who are daily subjected to brutal treatment are not white. It is
therefore despicable and cheap for anyone to reduce such a tragedy to an issue
of race for the sake of a fake African brotherhood and political
expediency.
Crying out when our people
are being brutalized and murdered does not make us surrogates or puppets of
anybody. Instead it makes us human, together with the international
community.
Only yesterday the South
African Foreign Minister, Dr. Nkosazana Dhlamini-Zuma arrived in Harare, and we
can only guess that she is on a similar a mission similar to that of Mr. Lamido.
Past experience tells us that Dr. Dhlamini-Zuma will not even bother to hold
consultations with the MDC. The last time Dr. Nkosazana Dhlamini-Zuma was here
she even refused to accept that the murder, torture, political violence, rape
and all the other brutalities associated with the Mugabe regime constituted a
crisis that continuously beckon for international attention.
Your Excellencies, the
credentials and bona fides of the MDC as a Zimbabwean national political party
that articulates and expresses the national interests of Zimbabweans are a
matter of public record. We do not beg and will never beg for recognition from
any one, not even from the mighty South African and Nigerian presidents. The
people of Zimbabwe have long granted us that recognition and no one can wish us
away. We won the March 2002 presidential poll and that is why we are here today.
How can any normal person ignore that?
We won 57 seats in the June
2000 parliamentary elections; we have challenged a total of 37 seats in the
courts and seven of those have been declared invalid; we control 5 major cities
including Harare, the capital city and the commercial and intellectual heart of
the nation; we control Bulawayo and Chitungwiza, the second and third largest
cities respectively. These are cities inhabited by genuine and patriotic
Zimbabweans who are not puppets of anyone. They are just tired of corrupt and
murderous regime that feeds on its own people.
There cannot and will never
be any solution to the current crisis in Zimbabwe without the participation of
the MDC as a party which carries the legitimate mandate of the people of
Zimbabwe.
For a people who have just
come out of the shackles of some of the most brutal dictatorial regimes in
African history and benefited from the active and positive intervention of the
international community, Nigerian and South African memories are surely very
short and defective.
It is this kind of behaviour
and arrogance that points to the existence of a sinister and active plot or
conspiracy on the part of Nigeria and South Africa to lead the way in
legitimising a murderous and brutal illegitimate regime.
Let me say this clearly to
Nigeria and South Africa: They are simply deluding themselves and Mugabe, their
ally against the people of Zimbabwe. The people of Zimbabwe will never, never
accept this little strategy of repackaging and sanitizing the Mugabe tyranny.
Together with Mugabe, Presidents Obasanjo and Mbeki will bear a very heavy
responsibility for the results of the catastrophic path that they are
deliberately charting for Zimbabwe.
As Mr. Mbeki prepares for
the London meeting with Mr. Blair, we want to make it quite clear to Her
Majesty’s government that we in the MDC, representing the majority of
Zimbabweans, do not regard Mr. Mbeki as an honest broker. He has amply
demonstrated his total unwillingness to come to terms with, and incapacity to
assess the deteriorating and dangerous Zimbabwe situation
objectively.
He is however free to carry a brief from
and repeat and broadcast the political positions of ZANU PF, which is something
he has been doing quite well for some time now.
We thank the remainder of
the Commonwealth, the European Union, the United States of America and the rest
of international community who have firmly stood by us in confronting the Mugabe
tyranny. We call upon them to remain steadfast as we embark on the final push
against this primitive and predatory dictatorship.
We are however dismayed by
the emerging discordant voices coming from certain quarters within the EU,
particularly from France and Portugal. Whilst we appreciate the significance
attached to the February 2003 Francophone Summit and the April 2003 Lisbon
EU/ACP Summit, we are convinced that efforts to rehabilitate an openly
illegitimate and murderous regime can only be counterproductive in the long run.
Any avenue granted to Mugabe
to attend international meetings at which he is treated as a statesman and an
equal is an affront to the feelings of the people of Zimbabwe. It amounts to a
recognition and support of Mugabe’s gruesome record at home. The people of
Zimbabwe remember only too well that France and Portugal maintained ties and
actively supported the illegal Smith regime when all the international community
isolated that racist regime. We remember the weapons provided to Ian Smith to
enable him to suppress the people of Zimbabwe in their struggle for democracy
and justice.
It is a tragedy that France and Portugal
are now repeating the same mistake. They are maintaining a tradition of siding
and supporting dictatorships against the democratic aspirations of the people of
Zimbabwe. The irony is that this betrays the gallant history of the French
people who manufactured and exported to the whole world, through the French
Revolution, the now universal values of liberty, democracy and
justice.
To Paris and Lisbon we have
a clear message: Your place is not at the same table with Robert Mugabe,
toasting goblets of the blood of innocent women and children. As part of the
great democracies of the world, your place is among the brutalized and oppressed
people of Zimbabwe as they struggle to rid themselves of this burdensome yoke of
tyranny. Like you, Zimbabweans crave to live in a democratic country,
characterized by the rule of law, respect for human rights, peace, stability,
security and economic progress. These are not EU values. They are universal
human values. Zimbabweans too yearn to live under such gentle
bonds.
Your Excellencies, the
situation has deteriorated since the fraudulent March 2002 presidential poll.
Political violence has become the permanent centrepiece of the Mugabe regime’s
governance strategy; in fact political violence is the only policy that this
regime is implementing; the rule of law continues to be violated; the judiciary
is systematically subverted.
Law enforcement continues to
be partisan; the militarisation of politics is now complete and any pretence to
democratic politics has been effectively subverted through systematic
state-sponsored violence as the world witnessed in the recent local government
elections.
The operations of local
government units that the MDC democratically won and therefore controls are
being strangled with the Mayors being brutalized; the man-made famine that is
stalking the nation is now actively complemented by the genocidal policy of
denying food to perceived political opponents.
HIV/Aids is wreaking havoc
on the most productive section of the population. Hunger and the total collapse
of the health sector have worsened the problem.
The state of the economy
completes this catastrophic picture. Half of the nearly 12 million population of
Zimbabwe face starvation and the Mugabe regime has no money to buy food; fuel
shortages have ground the country to a virtual stand still; industry has
collapsed and unemployment is conservatively estimated to be in the region of
70%; the GDP dropped by –12.1% in 2002; and by the regime’s own figures,
inflation now stands at over 200%, but independent experts place commodities
inflation at the much higher figure of 500%.
Poverty has increased to
unprecedented levels with over 80% of the population living below the poverty
datum line of less than US$1 a day. Foreign currency inflows have virtually
dried up, registering a miserly US$ 500 000 in the month of December 2002. The
Mugabe regime is therefore both politically and economically
bankrupt.
In the face of this economic
collapse and sustained tyrannical and brutal rule, the tolerance of the
population has been stretched to the limit. The Zimbabwe population is now more
restive than at any time since the June 2000 parliamentary elections; and I want
to say once again, that we have reached a stage whereby we can no longer counsel
patience on such a dangerously restive population.
There is clearly a red light
flushing for the Mugabe regime to stop. There is a gathering storm of the
people’s anger, we have no power to stop it, and we refuse to take
responsibility for whatever transpires.
Your Excellencies, you will
have by now heard of attempts by the Mugabe regime to engage the MDC through
some shadowy emissaries. The sum total of those efforts was to try to bring the
MDC into some kind of political arrangement designed to legitimise the Mugabe
regime. While we remain committed to the peaceful settlement of political
disputes, we rejected those overtures as sinister and insincere for three
reasons:
First, democracy and
democratic politics means that a political party that carries the mandate of the
electorate must be allowed, unimpeded, to form a government that expresses the
general popular will of the people. Consequently any formula to resolve the
Zimbabwe crisis must, necessarily, either chart a permanent path towards a
recognition of this sacred fact or at the very least, develop a road map for a
return to legitimacy through a free and fair presidential poll observed and
monitored by the international community. We in the MDC have the mandate of the
people of Zimbabwe and therefore democratically we are the senior partners in
the Zimbabwe political equation. ZANU PF must not be allowed to abrogate that
reality and, through force of arms dictate the terms of a political
settlement.
Second, ZANU PF has never
made it a secret that the test for the viability and sustainability of any
political solution is its acceptance by those commanders of the Zimbabwe Defence
Forces who are highly politicised along partisan lines. We totally reject this
blackmail and the holding of democratic politics to ransom. The ZDF should be a
national institution, which is totally outside organized political party
politics and should not intervene in political contests among political parties.
It is the people of Zimbabwe
and not a politicised officer corps who have the mandate and the legitimacy to
play the role of kingmakers in Zimbabwean politics. We will never compromise on
this sacred reality.
Third, the Mugabe regime
continues to target and destroy MDC party structures and arrest MDC leaders on
trumped up charges in order to torture them. A number of MDC party functionaries
have been tortured and subsequently died as a result. Just recently Stephen
Chasara and Davies Mtetwa both members of the Chitungwiza MDC executive died
within three months of each other as a result of the torture inflicted upon them
while in police custody. A number of our MPs are routinely arrested and tortured
while in police custody. Latest examples are Job Sikhala, MP for the St Marys
constituency in Chitungwiza; Paurina Mpariwa MP for Mufakose in Harare; Paul
Madzore MP for Glen View, also in Harare. All three were arrested and tortured
in just one week. Many more have been tortured and will continue to be tortured.
Torture is a crime against humanity. We could not therefore agree to engage a
government, which routinely tortures our MPs and party officials.
However, we remain committed and available to engage in any serious process or engagement, which charts a path towards a peaceful resolution of the Zimbabwean political crisis. Our position for the way forward is quite clear.
We believe that the crisis
in Zimbabwe has degenerated to such dangerous levels that it is time to abandon
regional or sectional efforts in favour of the intervention by the international
community through the United Nations Security Council, in accordance with
Article 39 (Chapter 7 powers) of the United Nations Charter.
The Mugabe regime now
clearly constitutes a threat to regional security and stability. It is daily
committing crimes against humanity recognized as such by the international
community and the United Nations.
Any dialogue towards a political solution
must be based on a firm commitment to return the country to legitimate
government. In order to create a national atmosphere in which meaningful
dialogue can take place, the Mugabe regime must be forced to role back its
programme of misrule.
Political violence, torture,
human rights violations and political repression must come to a full
stop;
The abuse of the criminal
justice system and the police force must stop;
The rule of law must be
upheld and selective law enforcement must stop;
The politicisation and use of the
uniformed and security forces as political organs of ZANU PF must come to an
end; repressive laws such as POSA and AIPPA must be repealed;
Militias must be disbanded
and war veterans must be disarmed;
The politicisation food
relief distribution must be abandoned;
And there must be an end to abuse of the
regime-controlled electronic and print media.
Without the implementation
of these steps to return the country to some semblance of order, we will not
accept and the international community must reject any pretence on the part of
ZANU PF to engage on a serious dialogue to return the country to
legitimacy.
We are opposed to a
government of national unity or any form of political arrangement that seeks to
legitimise the Mugabe regime. However we are prepared to take part in a
transitional authority, without executive governmental functions.
The terms of reference of
such an authority must be specifically to lay down the administrative framework
for a return to legitimacy through fresh presidential and legislative polls with
unfettered observation by the international community. We are convinced that
there is no other way out of the political crisis except through the ballot
box.
The Mugabe regime cannot be
trusted to preside over the dismantling of its tyrannical rule and therefore the
role of the international community through the United Nations Security Council
is quite critical to the success of such a process.
We in the MDC remain ready
to play our part in the peaceful resolution to the problems that face our
country. We have stated in the past and we would like to state again that we in
the MDC seek no revenge or vengeance for the injuries of the past.
We shall never allow the
hatreds of the past to affect the future. We do not and will never subscribe to
the politics of retribution. We understand Mugabe’s wish and yearnings for a
dignified exit and we are ready to play a constructive and positive role in such
an exercise.
But time is running out.
The people’s
anger has reached alarming and explosive levels and we may no longer have any
capacity to control them. The persistent suffering of the people may
collectively result in a people's storm, which may turn out to be a tragic but
simplifying catastrophe.
Morgan Tsvangirai
MDC
President.