http://www.newzimbabwe.com/
14/07/2012 00:00:00
by
AFP
AFRICAN Union leaders meeting Sunday will tackle the
continent's hotspots at
their biannual summit, even if elections for the
bloc's top job are likely
to overshadow the agenda after a deadlocked vote
in January.
South Africa's Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma will challenge the
sitting chairman of
the commission, Jean Ping, after neither won the
required two-thirds of the
vote at the last summit, leaving Ping in the job
for a further six months.
They will face off again on Sunday for the top job,
which Ping has held
since 2008.
Both candidates have issued
strongly-worded public statements ahead of
Sunday's vote.
Earlier
this week, Ping dismissed reports from South African media that he
was
pulling out of the race to allow Dlamini-Zuma to stand unopposed,
prompting
the Southern African Development Community to accuse him of
abusing AU
resources in his election race.
Analysts say unwritten tradition is that
continental powerhouses do not run
for the post of AU Commission chairman --
leaving smaller nations to take
the job -- and that South Africa's decision
to override this rule has
sparked bad feeling.
If no chair is
selected this time around, Ping could legally be asked to
stay on as leader
until the next summit in January 2013.
Security issues are also a top
priority at the gathering, with leaders
focusing on instability in Mali,
renewed violence in the Democratic Republic
of Congo and the ongoing crisis
between Sudan and South Sudan.
Following a Peace and Security Council
meeting Saturday, the AU demanded an
end to "unacceptable interference" by
Mali's ex-junta following a
destabilizing coup in March and called for the
former junta's dissolution.
The security arm of the pan-African bloc also
called a meeting at heads of
state level for regional powers seeking a
solution to escalating violence in
eastern DR Congo.
The council
urged a speedy solution to outstanding conflicts between the
Sudans at the
end of the security meeting, which was attended by Sudan's
President Omar
al-Bashir and his southern countrpart Salva Kiir.
The conference is
officially themed "boosting intra-Africa trade", the same
as for the bloc's
January summit.
Officials said they had decided to limit themselves to
one theme per year
rather than a new one each summit, as was previously the
case.
The meeting is being held in the Ethiopian capital after Malawi's
new
president Joyce Banda refused to host Bashir, wanted by the
International
Criminal Court on war crimes and genocide charges.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk
Parliament will this week hear calls to extend
sanctions on Zimbabwe as
Britain and the European Union are poised to
suspend a variety of punitive
measures in a bid to encourage
reform.
At Tuesday’s debate Mr Hain will claim that Mr Mugabe and his
associates are
planning further election violence to keep the rival Movement
for Democratic
Change from power, using money siphoned from the country’s
“blood diamonds”
Aislinn Laing and Peta Thorneycroft
7:32PM BST 15
Jul 2012
Peter Hain will claim that Robert Mugabe and associates are
planning further
election violence to keep the rival Movement for Democratic
Change from
power, using money siphoned from the country’s “blood
diamonds”.
The former cabinet minister will highlight a report by Global
Witness which
claims that Sam Pa, a Chinese businessman, has provided
funding and
equipment to Zimbabwe’s secret police in return for access to
diamond
deposits.
A spokesman for EU foreign policy chief Catherine
Ashton said “there was no
question” of lifting sanctions on Mr Mugabe, 88,
or anyone involved in
continued human rights abuses. Western diplomats have
said that conditions
could be lifted on the president if certain conditions
are met.
He said that while the body was “reflecting” on its policy
towards Zimbabwe,
following a call for sanctions to be lifted by the UN
Human Rights Chief,
regional mediator President Jacob Zuma and Mr
Tsvangirai, the president of
Zimbabwe would not be among those given a
reprieve.
“There is no question of lifting sanctions (an asset freeze
and travel ban)
against Mugabe or anyone involved in continued abuses of
human rights,
incitement to violence, etc -- that is simply not up for
discussion,” said
Michael Mann.
At Tuesday’s debate Mr Hain will
claim that Mr Mugabe and his associates are
planning further election
violence to keep the rival Movement for Democratic
Change from power, using
money siphoned from the country’s “blood diamonds”.
Mr Hain will
highlight a report by Global Witness which claims that Sam Pa,
a Chinese
businessman, has provided funding and equipment to Zimbabwe’s
secret police
in return for access to diamond deposits in eastern Marange.
Other firms
with concessions in Marange are said to have on their boards
senior members
of the armed forces, the group has claimed.
European officials told the
Telegraph last week that Britain and the EU were
preparing to lift sanctions
on 112 targeted individuals including Robert
Mugabe in an effort to persuade
him to hold free and fair elections next
year, as long as certain conditions
were met.
But Mr Hain, a former Minister for Africa, will push for the
sanctions not
only to remain but to be extended to those allegedly involved
in the country’s
secretive diamonds trade.
“More than enough damage
has been done already to the wonderful people of
Zimbabwe, as a
once-prosperous country has been reduced to penury,” Mr Hain
will
say.
“Let us ensure we do not perpetuate that terrible damage by
premature
suspensions of these highly targeted sanctions, especially on
those
responsible for the Marange blood diamonds, when the imperative is to
impose
more not less.”
In report last month entitled Funding a
Parallel Government? Global Witness
alleged that a Chinese businessman named
Sam Pa was awarded a diamond
concession after donating up to $100m and 200
military trucks to Zimbabwe’s
feared Central Intelligence
Organisation.
Sino Zimbabwe Development, a joint venture between the
state-owned Zimbabwe
Minerals Development Corporation and Mr Pa, was also
said to have on its
board three officials from the CIO which, Global Witness
claimed, may be
planning a military campaign aimed at stopping Morgan
Tsvangirai and the MDC
from taking power.
The same group also claims
that Anjin Investments, another joint diamond
venture between Chinese and
Zimbabwean companies, was being run by senior
defence
officials.
Meanwhile, Tendai Biti, the MDC Finance Minister in the
fractious coalition
government with Zanu PF, has repeated complained that
diamond revenues which
it was hoped might help revive the shattered economy
had not materialised.
Mr Hain is calling for EU sanctions to be extended
to include those named in
Global Witness’ reports.
“There is a real
risk that any money given by Sam Pa, Anjin and Sino
Zimbabwe Development to
the security forces will fund human rights abuses in
the run-up to next
year’s election,” he will say.
“By all means, if the intention is a to
wave a carrot and not just a stick,
then suspend a symbolic sanction on the
partner of a ZANU official or two –
but make sure that substantive sanctions
such as asset freezes on Anjin and
Sam Pa are imposed so the security forces
cannot build a war chest before
the election.”
However, a spokesman
for EU foreign policy chief said that while the body
was “reflecting” on its
policy towards Zimbabwe, following a call for
sanctions to be lifted by the
UN Human Rights Chief, regional mediator
President Jacob Zuma and Mr
Tsvangirai, the president of Zimbabwe would not
be among those given a
reprieve.
“There is no question of lifting sanctions (an asset freeze and
travel ban)
against Mugabe or anyone involved in continued abuses of human
rights,
incitement to violence, etc -- that is simply not up for
discussion,” said
Michael Mann.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
Written by Fungi Kwaramba, Staff
Writer
Sunday, 15 July 2012 15:03
HARARE - There was drama in
Mashonaland West yesterday when dozens of
soldiers and hundreds of Zanu PF
militia forced MDC secretary general Tendai
Biti to hold a rally in the bush
instead of Darwendale Stadium as tensions
ahead of elections rise in
Zimbabwe.
The soldiers ran amok yesterday morning, bringing down tents,
tearing
posters and threatening MDC officials who were preparing for the
rally.
According to Biti, hundreds of Zanu PF militia were brought in by
buses to
intimidate MDC supporters.
As Biti was addressing the rally,
the Zanu PF youths burnt grass around the
area the Finance minister was
addressing to scare people away.
“They bused tonnes of people from all
over and what I can say is that the
intimidation is just too high and our
supporters might get killed. To
imagine this is Darwendale close to Harare,
what about in remote areas?
“We still had to force the rally to go ahead,
we had a police clearance.
Instead of cancelling the rally, we quickly
cleared a bush where they still
attempted to burn us after putting the grass
around us alight.
“But the message we put to people at the rally is that
they must expect this
kind of intimidation but we will not fear, we will not
blink and we will
continue pushing,” said Biti.
He said they
apprehended one Zanu PF activist whom they handed over to the
police.
The soldiers were reportedly shouting that no MDC meeting
would ever be held
in the area and it took the intervention of co-Home
Affairs minister Theresa
Makone and Defence minister Emerson Mnangagwa for
the meeting to go ahead.
MDC officials who were at the venue said they
found themselves surrounded by
menacing soldiers in full military gear who
forced them to leave the
stadium.
Makone, who is also the chairperson
of the MDC women’s assembly, confirmed
the incident and the interventions
done to rescue the rally.
“I was told that soldiers were destroying the
set up of a rally in
Darwendale. I spoke to minister Mnangangwa and minister
Sekeramayi and both
professed ignorance on the disruptions.
“But
minister Mnangagwa managed to talk to the military bosses and the
soldiers
withdrew. It seems there are elements within the ranks of the state
organs
who take it upon themselves to cause mayhem in the country and we
have to
root them out. What we want is a free and fair election without
violence,”
said Makone.
MDC organising secretary for Mashonaland West, Wilson
Makanyaire said the
soldiers left them terrified after forcing them into the
bush.
“About 150 soldiers came to the stadium where we had pitched tents
and told
us that we could not hold the rally. They said Morgan Tsvangirai
was a
sell-out and chased us away.
We are now assembled in a bush and
the youths are clearing the space so that
we can at least have a rally,”
said Makanyaire in a telephone interview with
the Daily News on
Sunday.
The activists reported the matter to the police but failed to get
assistance.
“The soldiers claimed the area belongs to the army and
when we went to the
police they said they could not help us as they were
also scared,” said
Makanyaire.
Makanyaire said while the soldiers
were chasing them away, hundreds of Zanu
PF supporters swarmed the township
near the venue singing denigrating songs
of the MDC and creating further
tension.
MDC spokesperson, Douglas Mwonzora said the intimidation by the
soldiers and
Zanu PF militia was a co-ordinated plan to dampen the MDC’s
morale ahead of
elections which could be held next year.
The rally
that was supposed to start at 10 am only kicked off after 2 pm in
the
bush.
Contacted for comment, police spokesperson Wayne Bvudzijena cut off
the call
without responding to questions and later his phone rang
unanswered.
Elsewhere in Mutoko East, Mwonzora claimed soldiers from 2.1
infantry
battalion tore MDC party posters yesterday morning.
Zimbabwe
Peace Project (ZPP) which has monitors seeded around the country
says
soldiers are already active in Midlands, Manicaland and Mashonaland
provinces.
A report released by Crisis Coalition last year titled
“The Military Factor
in Zimbabwe’s Political and Electoral Affairs” details
the extent to which
soldiers are involved in political and social matters.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
Written by Xolisani Ncube and Chengetai
Zvauya
Sunday, 15 July 2012 12:55
HARARE - President Robert
Mugabe’s Zanu PF party is reportedly splashing
about $14 million on as many
as 550 vehicles as it prepares a massive
election campaign but the source of
the funding for the vehicles remains a
mystery.
The party’s
spokesperson Rugare Gumbo confirmed this to the Daily News on
Sunday. He
said the purchase is nothing extraordinary because his party is
preparing
for elections that Mugabe wants held this year.
“It is part of our
programme to prepare for the elections, and there is
nothing wrong with
that. This confirms we are a serious party, and we want
each province to
have their own vehicles for campaigning,” said Gumbo.
The vehicles, 150
of which have already been purchased from a local car
dealer, range between
$35 000 and $ 40 000 each.
In the past, Zanu PF has preferred the Nissan
brand but with its mysterious
newly found financial power, it is now going
for the much stronger and
expensive Toyota brand.
The vehicles are a
mix of both double and single cabs.
According to sources the party’s
national chairperson, Simon Khaya Moyo is
handling the vehicle
transactions.
When asked about the issue, Khaya Moyo, refused to comment
referring all
questions to Didymus Mutasa, the party’s secretary for
administration.
For his part Mutasa was in a combative mood when asked
about the issue.
“Before you write anything about us, can you publish
where the MDC is
getting its funds from, why are you interested in our
affairs while you
leave the MDC which is your party?
“Tell us where
your party is getting its funding from and then we can
discuss about our
party,” said Mutasa adding that “please mind about the
MDC, that is the
party you work for, don’t bother us.”
The purchases come as the coalition
government partners are fighting over
the lack of transparency in the manner
in which finances from the Marange
diamond fields, the largest in the world,
are being handled.
With this fleet, the former ruling party is looking at
having at least two
vehicles for every constituency.
Zimbabwe has 210
contestable constituencies and with 550 vehicles, the party
believes two
vehicles per constituency could do them a good job to reclaim
the lost
political ground to the two MDCs.
The source of the funds, however,
remains a mystery as financial reports
presented at the party’s December
annual conference held in Bulawayo last
year showed that the party was in
the red and was surviving on bank
overdrafts.
The report stated that
the party had spent about $6 million in the year
against a revenue stream of
only $4 million, leaving a deficit of $ 2
million.
But six months
down the line, the party is ready to splash three times its
annual revenue
on the expensive wheels.
Before the formation of the inclusive government
three years ago, Zanu PF
would turn to state assets for use in its political
activities as it
struggled for cash.
The development, which is likely
to cause further tensions in the inclusive
government, comes as Finance
minister Tendai Biti from the mainstream MDC
has raised fears of looting of
diamond proceeds raising the possibility of
the existence of a parallel
government.
Biti claims one of the companies mining diamonds in Marange,
Anjin, has not
been remitting its mining returns to state
coffers.
Anjin is a joint venture between Chinese government and a
suspected coterie
of military figures.
“There is no doubt that a
small coterie of individuals is benefitting from
Zimbabwe diamonds. Some of
us (officials) who are benefiting are not afraid
to flaunt our monies. We
are buying all kinds of assets,” said Biti.
“I am a government minister
and earning US$800. How do I buy some of the
assets that we are buying?
People are now buying private jets because of our
diamonds.” Biti said
without explaining who in Zanu PF was buying the jets.
As of last
December, Anjin claims to have contributed $30 million to
Treasury.
But figures presented in Parliament by deputy minister of
Mines and Mining
Development, Gift Chimanikire, reveal that Anjin extracts
an average of
234 749, 92 carats per month.
A reclusive Chinese
businessman, Sam Pa, reportedly finances a covert
operation whose purpose is
to sustain Mugabe’s regime.
The details of the deal that this mysterious
Hong Kong-based magnate has cut
with Mugabe’s secret service has not been
disclosed officially.
Officials close to Mugabe and the secret service,
however, deny there is any
connection.
Pa conducts his business
largely under the radar, keeps his name and face
out of the headlines and is
said to use a variety of different identities
and nationalities which he
changes with nonchalant ease depending on the
country and situation he is
in.
In Zimbabwe, elements of the deal have now begun to emerge and it
fits his
pattern of drawing members of a country’s elite into lucrative
joint
ventures so that, over time, he becomes indispensable to them.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com
15/07/2012 00:00:00
by Staff
Reporter
THE Parliamentary committee on Justice has recommended
the removal of
Registrar General Tobaiwa Mudede from any involvement with
elections before
the passage of the Electoral Amendment Bill which is
currently before the
legislative assembly.
“A matter of concern is
that responsibility for the voters roll continues to
be shared between the
Zimbabwe Election Commission (ZEC) and the Registrar
General’s Office, which
dilutes accountability,” said the committee.
“ZEC should be given sole
and exclusive responsibility for registration of
voters and the maintenance
of the voters roll.The compilation of the voters
roll must be done by one
organ and in this case by ZEC.”
The committee also recommended that all
exiled Zimbabweans should be allowed
to participate in elections through
postal voting, whether or not they are
on government duty.
Chinamasa
had insisted, when he presented the Bill to Parliament last week,
that
enabling Zimbabweans living abroad to vote was a logistical nightmare
beyond
the country’s means adding sanctions imposed by the West also meant
his Zanu
PF party would be at a disadvantage.
“With respect to people living in
the diaspora, let me say this right from
the outset, there are other 101
reasons why we are not ready for diaspora
voting and I will just enumerate
the few. The capacity to have polling
stations in every country where
Zimbabweans are is just beyond the capacity
of this country,” Chinamasa
said.
“The other consideration and it is very important, given where we
are
geo-politically, where we are, we have sanctions imposed against one of
the
three political parties in the inclusive government.”
The
committee also insisted that presidential election results should be
released within 48 hours, instead of the five days proposed by Chinamasa.
The provision is aimed at preventing the crisis of 2008 when a month-long
delay stoked tensions amid claims officials were massaging the figures in
Mugabe’s favour.
Changes to the country’s elections legislative
framework are part of a raft
of political reforms negotiated as part of the
Global Political Agreement
(GPA and are expected to culminate in new polls
now expected next year.
The committee also said the invitation of
election observers should be done
by the Zimbabwe Electoral commission (ZEC)
instead of the Ministry of
Foreign affairs as proposed by
Chinamasa.
Meanwhile, Parliament has passed a human rights bill
that restricts
investigators from probing the 2008 electoral violence or the
Gukurahundi
massacres of the 1980s.
The Human rights bill was
gazetted in June last year, but was stalled after
Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC) formations insisted that commissioners
be empowered to
investigate the Gukurahundi atrocities as well as the 2008
election
violence.
The MDC formations later climbed down from their demands
meaning the
commission, which was appointed last year, would now probe
issues from the
time the Bill becomes law.
The climb down followed
advice from United Nations human rights commissioner
Navi Pillay during her
visit to the country in May when she said,
universally, human rights
commissions do not carry out their duties
retrogressively.
“I welcome
the fact that Zimbabwe has established a Human Rights
Commission – a type of
national institution governed by a rigorous
international set of standards —
and appointed its members in 2010, and I
deeply regret the fact that the
bill that would enable it to function
properly is currently still stuck in
Parliament,” said Pillay.
“The main obstruction to its progress is a dispute
over its temporal
limitation, i.e. whether or not it should cover historical
events prior to
2009. My strong advice to the political leaders and
parliamentarians has
been that – like most other Human Rights Commissions
around the world - it
should not become involved in historical
investigations.”
http://www.canada.com
By The Associated Press July 15, 2012 1:01
PM
HARARE, Zimbabwe - Police in Zimbabwe say a five day hunt for
a prominent
businessman ended with his bloodied body being found in the
trunk of his car
with a plastic bag wound around his head.
Police
official James Sabau said the car was identified in Harare on Sunday
after a
massive campaign of fliers pinned on trees and email and media
notices
posted since Alan Banks, 52, went missing on Wednesday. A murder
investigation has been opened, he said.
Sabau said the style of
killing was very rare in Zimbabwe. "We are not used
to such cases," he told
reporters.
Zimbabwe has no Western-style organized crime.
Banks
was seen as a popular figure in the nation's small white community.
Relatives told police they knew of no business or private grudges against
him.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com
15/07/2012 00:00:00
by Staff
Reporter
MDC leader Welshaman Ncube has warned that tensions over
the 1980s
Gukurahundi conflict will not go away until political leaders
become more
open over the emotive issue and work towards some form of
restorative
compensation for the victims.
Said Ncube in an interview
with The Sunday Mail: “(What) should be done is a
basic minimum, otherwise
it will not go away. We must admit frankly and
openly that Gukurahundi
happened in the manner in which it happened.
“That there were people who
were killed, people who were maimed, people who
lost their homes, people
were driven into exile. There are people today who
can’t still get documents
arising out of Gukurahundi: there is no father,
there is no mother, there is
just a child who can’t get a birth certificate.
“So let’s start by at
least acknowledging and saying, ‘We as Zimbabweans
went through this
unfortunate phase of our history. It was wrong, it should
have not
happened’.”
Rights groups claim some 20,000 innocent civilians were
killed in the
Matebeleland and Midlands regions when the then Prime Minister
Robert Mugabe
deployed a North Korean-trained army taskforce to deal with
what officials
described as a dissident menace in the two
regions.
The conflict continues to divide opinion within Mugabe’s own
Zanu PF party
with some senior officials arguing the 1987 Unity Accord
between Mugabe and
then PF Zapu leader Dr Joshua Nkomo should be last word
on the issue.
Said Defence Minister Emmerson Mnangagwa last July: “We
don’t want to
undermine efforts by our national leaders to reunite the
people. If we try
to open healed wounds by discussing such issues, we will
be undermining and
failing to recognise the statesmanship exhibited by
President Mugabe and Dr
Jushua Nkomo when they signed the unity accord in
1987.
"The people who very vocal on the Gukurahundi have selfish agendas
that they
are pushing. They want to divide the nation by making unfounded
allegations.”
But former information minister and Zanu PF politburo
member, Jonathan Moyo,
countered that “the Gukurahundi issue is not a closed
chapter” adding that
Zanu PF must in fact take the lead in resolving the
issue or risk having
“charlatans and vile opportunists” exploit the
explosive subject for cheap
political advantage.
Mugabe has not
directly apologised for the conflict, only describing it as a
moment of
madness.
Ncube said the Zanu PF leader needs to do more
insisting: “It’s not enough,
to just stand up one day and say this was a
simple moment of madness and
then thereafter say everyone who mentions that
is either a tribalist or
divisionist. You can’t do that. There must be an
unconditional acceptance.
Unlawful, wrong killings, maiming, burnings of
homes were done. That’s the
first thing.
“The second thing is that
those who suffered in one form or another and
those who are still suffering,
you must at least have what we might call
restorative compensation. To say
let’s look at all the children who are
affected, let’s make an exceptional
law that says that anyone who comes
forward as a child and says, “I lost my
parents” you give them a birth
certificate. You give them an ID.”
The
MDC leader said the Organ on National Healing formed as part of the
Global
Political Agreement could have taken lead in helping resolve the
issue.
“Let us first stop behaving as if Gukurahundi did not happen,”
he said.
“Let’s accept it happened and let’s say come forward, for
instance, the
Organ on National Healing. When we proposed it during the
negotiations, we
thought that it would do some of these things without going
back to open old
wounds … ‘You did this to me, you did that to me’ because
we couldn’t agree
on that. But at least we were able to say let us correct
the persisting
injustices.
“So the Government, all it needs to do is
say, “Register-General, go to the
affected areas, call on anyone who lost a
document which can’t be replaced
because of our rigid rules, make sure they
get their documents. It’s just as
simple as that.
“So the rest … giving
money to people, trying people, we are saying forget
about it now let just
deal with the continuing injustices for now as a basic
minimum.”
http://www.newzimbabwe.com
15/07/2012 00:00:00
by Staff
Reporter
HARARE City Council is releasing raw sewerage into
rivers that feed the
capital’s water sources, a report recently presented to
Parliament has
claimed.
The report also painted a picture of
lawlessness in the capital and
Chitungwiza where structures were being built
on wetlands, marshlands, and
water-ways as well as below electricity
pylons.
“Sewage pump stations in Chisipite, Avonlea, Borrowdale Brooke
and Budiriro
are currently not working and are located adjacent to rivers.
The raw sewage
is discharged into river channels instead of being
transmitted to treatment
plants,” reads part of the Natural Resources and
Environment on Waste
Disposal and Management in Harare and
Chitungwiza.
The report said Harare was struggling to provide water to
its residents as
its infrastructure was designed for 250,000 people only
instead of over the
current estimates of 2.5 million which is ten times its
carrying capacity. A
new design with a carrying capacity of 4 million was
said to be in the
pipeline.
In addition, satellite towns such as
Chitungwiza, Ruwa and Norton were not
contributing to Harare’s water
treatment costs but the capital cannot
disconnect them because this could
trigger outbreaks of cholera and typhoid.
The report further claimed that
a Chinese firm mining diamonds in Marange,
Anjin, was building a the Anjin
Multi-purpose Centre that includes a hotel
on wetlands in Harare, despite
submissions by the Environmental Management
Authority that environmental
laws were not being observed in that project.
MPs also expressed concern
over Chitungwiza saying: “Chitungwiza residents
built their houses on
improperly planned places like on water ways and marsh
lands.
“All of
these uncontrolled housing developments that closed all open spaces
meant
for schools, marshy lands and for aeration of the community space were
unfortunately authorized by the municipality.
“A report on houses built
on improperly planned places was prepared and the
conditions to implement
the recommendations are now in place. Rectification
would be done where
houses are built along roads, over sewage pipes or
directly below
electricity pylons.”
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
Written by Fungi Kwaramba, Staff
Writer
Sunday, 15 July 2012 14:56
HARARE - Councilors and town
officials creamed off millions of dollars from
the cash-strapped town of
Chitungwiza, where four million plus residents are
enduring life-threatening
water shortages and sanitation woes.
Sewers flow freely on the potholed
streets of this once-promising town 30 km
from Harare, where water is
scarce.
The amount of cash that has streamed into city fathers’ pockets
from
underhand dealings is astonishing, an investigation has shown.
A
litany of deals from illicit sales of council land to desperate home
seekers
has ensured money continued to flood councillors and top
administrative
officials at the expense of long-suffering residents who at
times are forced
to endure strong-arm tactics from council for them to pay
rates.
A
report on the allocation, change of use, subdivision and repossession of
stands by a team appointed by Local Government Rural and Urban Development
minister Ignatius Chombo exposes the massive corruption weighing down
service delivery.
Already, seven councillors Jacob Rukweza, Boniface
Manyonganise, Brighton
Mazhindu, Lorraine Usaiwevhu, Rangarirai Mutingwende
(deputy mayor), Obert
Muchawaya and Ernest Muridzi have been suspended on
corruption charges.
The charges include altering land use as well as
selling stands at inflated
prices.
“The numerous church, school,
recreational and crèche sites and open spaces
that were illegally converted
into residential stands gave birth to more
than 2 200 stands,” reads the
report.
“Using agents, councillors and employees would sell “the more
than 2 200
stands to people for a minimum price of $4 000 up to
$6,500.
“Out of this shocking underhand deals council received a paltry
$200 as a
“service fee” while the rest was pocketed by the councillors
involved”.
Authorities at the council parcelled out land reserved for
schools and beer
halls to those prepared to pay, resulting in houses
sprouting up everywhere
the report noted.
Wetlands and road buffer
zones were not spared.
The town is now clogged with numerous buildings
built at several open spaces
that served as buffer areas.
The 31-page
report recommends stern disciplinary measures against council
officials who
used their clout to get land.
Notable beneficiaries of the land
allocation scam include popular prophet
Emmanuel Makandiwa and former Zanu
PF deputy mayor Fredrick Mabamba.
While Makandiwa’s giant United Families
International (UFI) church appears
on the verge of being spared, Mabamba
faces criminal charges.
“Mabamba’s “United We Stand Housing Cooperative”
should be criminally
investigated,” the report stated.
Mabamba through
his Housing Cooperative, accumulated more than 500 housing
stands.
The former primary school teacher is enjoying a fairy-tale
rags-to-riches
story having grabbed most of the open spaces in the mostly
working class
town.
Incensed by rampant corruption in the populous
town, the mainstream MDC
fired 24 councillors in the town in
2010.
Chombo chose to capitalise on the MDC action and took the
councillors under
his arms, declaring they would keep their positions
despite being fired from
their party.
It appears his new birds became
a bit too embarrassing to control and the
usually boisterous Chombo has done
a Damascus.
With a free for all situation characterising everyday
business at
Chitungwiza council, Chombo decided to act.
He appointed
a commission led by Fungai Mbetsa, the Manicaland provincial
administrator
in February this year.
Town clerk Godfrey Tanyanyiwa, who appeared to be
at the centre of things,
got the axe.
He faces criminal
charges.
“Stands 10023-10046 were created allegedly after a lot of
pressure from
councillors Muridzi, Manyonganise, and Mazhindu through the
town clerk
Tanyanyiwa."
No change of use was done as required by
section 26 (3) of the Regional,
Town and Country Planning Act,” reads the
report in part on Tanyanyiwa.
Apart from the land chaos, the
investigations also revealed the town was in
a precarious financial
situation as evidenced by its failure to meet
statutory obligations and to
execute service delivery.
The town is in serious arrears, yet at one
point management awarded a 132
percent salary increment across the board and
recruited 204 employees
without approval from the ministry.
The
council owes several banks $3,4 million after it was forced to borrow in
order to meet the bloated wage bill.
Just recovering from this mess
means Chitungwiza residents, while getting
some satisfaction Tanyanyiwa and
the councillors are in the line of fire,
have many more days before “life”
comes back to this idolised town.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com
15/07/2012 00:00:00
by Sunday
Mail
MDC leader Welshman Ncube has dismissed claims he is a
tribalist and denies
as “blatant, deliberate, malicious lies” claims by
Prime Minister Morgan
Tsvangirai that he played a key role in the split of
the MDC in 2005. Ncube,
currently industry and commerce minister in the
coalition government spoke
to The Sunday Mail about these and various other
issues including
Gukurahundi, Deputy Prime Minister Arthur Mutambara,
sanctions and his
prospects at the next elections. Following are excerpts of
the interview …
Biti’s policies
I think the Minister of Finance
(has not has done enough to support the
revival of industry, and he) knows
it. He might have his explanations of why
not. Clearly, not enough has been
done. Let me just illustrate with two
examples. There is Zetref (Zimbabwe
Economic Trade Revival Facility), which
was supposed to have a US$70 million
facility almost from the beginning of
the inclusive Government. Two years
down the line, only US$20 million of the
US$70 million had been disbursed
and the remainder is still sitting in the
bank.
That is because it is
the Minister of Finance who is responsible for
establishing relationships
with those banks. It is the Minister of Finance
who is responsible for the
methodology; the mechanisms that will allow that
money to move quickly from
the banks . . .
Then two, let me give the example of Dimaf (Distressed
Industries and
Marginalised Areas Fund). The decisions on Dimaf, we decided
as Cabinet that
as of end of last year, there should have been a minimum of
US$20 million
put by the Government into Dimaf for Bulawayo and then the
other US$20
million was supposed to come from Old Mutual as of last year,
and that was
for last year. We did not put even a cent, as Government, into
that fund. Up
until 17 April this year, we put US$10 million into that fund.
We decided in
January this year, that in addition to that original US$20
million we would
take from the SDR (Special Drawing Rights) Fund another
US$30 million to be
put into the Dimaf Fund. The US$10 million will be added
to the existing
US$40 million to make it US$50 million for
Bulawayo.
The US$30 million would then go to outside Bulawayo. Up to
today, not even
US$30 million is there. Indeed, as I have said, only US$20
million of the
original US$30 million is there. Why this is the case, is, of
course, for
the Minister of Finance to explain. But clearly, if we have not
implemented
the decisions we have made ourselves, clearly we have not done
enough. I am
not sure whether the money is there or not. All I know is that
he himself
made the proposal that we are going to get the money out of the
SDR. He was
going to recall the SDR money. It was supposed to be US$120
million; US$30
million of it would go to Dimaf this year. It has not gone to
Dimaf.
Whether he has recalled the money from the IMF, I do not know. All
we keep
doing at Cabinet and outside Cabinet is: Please can we have this
money and
he keeps saying, “Look, someone increased the salaries of civil
servants,
now we cannot meet the budget every month. We are living from hand
to mouth.
The money we could have put there, we have now had to cover the
shortfall on
salaries.”
Supporting Makoni
It was a few days
before the sitting of the nomination court, just maybe
seven or so days. We
then decided we were going to have our president
nominated as our candidate.
While we were busy working, the president (Prof
Mutambara) calls me and
says, “No! I have just had a meeting with Simba
Makoni. I am not running if
Simba Makoni is running.”
He said reconvene the national council to decide.
So, we reconvened the
national council. This was now three or so days before
the nomination court.
We presented his case. (When we asked why) he said:
“If Simba is running, I
will not, we must support him.”
So, that was
the scenario, three days before the nomination court . . . When
we did the
post-mortem of the election, everywhere we went our members were
very angry
about that decision. Even today, if you go to any meeting where
our
supporters are, one of the things they still question is: “Why on earth
did
you do that.”
Mutambara
Gibson (Sibanda) would have probably been
a more obvious choice (as leader
of the party). Remember, at the time of the
split . . . The public discourse
became: These people are Zanu-PF and are on
a Zanu-PF agenda. If you were in
Mashonaland you would say, mandeere
apanduka! (The Ndebeles have rebelled!).
You, therefore, had a situation
where the split of the party was being cast
as having been engineered by
Zanu-PF, which had basically co-opted the
so-called Ndebeles in the
party.
The general feeling among the leaders of the party under the pressure
of the
moment was if we supported any leader from Matabeleland at that time,
it
would put us in the stereotype of how our opponents had described
us.
It became important, therefore, to negate that stereotype. So, the
question
then arose: Who do we find, who is not Gibson Sibanda, who is not
me, who is
not Paul Themba Nyathi? It was then that Arthur’s name was
brought up and
specifically on the day suggested by Job Sikhala, (Gabriel)
Chaibva and
Priscilla (Misihairabwi Mushonga). They are the ones who
proposed that name.
The overwhelming judgment of our members is that we
should never have done
that. We have not stopped paying the price, even
today. If you go to any
community, people who were members of the party at
that time say: “How could
you have done that to us? We were not able to
explain to anyone else how we
could do that. What sort of party has leaders
who run away from battle at a
time they should be in battle?”
All I
can say is that it was felt that as a person from Mashonaland, as a
young
person who was untainted by acrimonious split, he might just provide
that
extra edge, which the rest of us who were being accused and
counter-accused
would not provide. That was the feeling at that time. But
history has passed
and we all know the outcome.
Sanctions role
Like many other lies
which have been told, one of the lies, for instance, is
that I drafted one
of this puppet democracy Bill or Act in America. If you
look at that Act,
just as an example, it is badly written, the grammar,
everything can never
be drafted by anyone who studied in our legal system.
It is not possible,
never did it, never participated in it, but the more
generous aspect of your
question, did we call for sanctions? In the united
MDC, we did support, and
it’s on record, targeted sanctions, that is to say
travel bans, account
freeze for individuals whom we deemed were responsible
for perpetrating
violence.
That history will record we did support that. We never at any
time supported
economic sanctions against Zimbabwe. We never supported the
placing of
business entities such as banks, Zisco and so forth on sanctions
list, we
never did that.
We still don’t support it and we have never
supported it. You then ask, do
we ever regret supporting the imposition of
targeted sanctions? No. we don’t
regret saying that those people who were
responsible for violence should be
banned from travelling freely. That we
don’t regret, yes we regret that
those who imposed sanctions then went on
and imposed sanctions which went
beyond those things that we thought were
necessary.
Causing MDC split
Let me, in fact, make a broader
comment. It’s unfortunate that so much ink
was committed to paper in respect
of that book, which is just lies and more
damned lies. It’s not just that.
Just about everything written in that book
about me is a lie. Brazen,
blatant, deliberate, malicious lies. The authors
of those lies know that
they are lies.
There is a litany of them including from the time of the
congress - the
first congress of the MDC - Morgan lies that there was a draw
in the vote
between me and Gift Chimanikire and that Gift was then persuaded
to
withdraw, which is a lie.
I had more provinces voting for me than
Gift. Gift had the second highest
number of votes. Tsvangirai now wanted to
change the rules and say whoever
got the highest must first get a majority
of the provinces voting, and
congress refused to accede to his request, and
stuck with the rules that
whoever got the highest votes is the
winner.
You come to the Mbeki thing which again is lies, lies, lies,
lies. Mbeki
never interfered in any way in the affairs of the MDC. The
incident he
describes in his book, for instance, where we went to see
President Mbeki,
myself, Gibson and Gift and he lies that Paul Themba Nyathi
and Dulini went
to that meeting, they didn’t. Those who went were myself,
Gibson and
Chimanikire, the three of us.
We went again at the behest
of the same people I told you about earlier on
and the neutrals who said
“talk and try to be an electoral pact”. Those same
people, around the time
of the split, in October, they said “look, you guys,
this thing is going to
get worse, you need someone to facilitate, we believe
that President Mbeki,
because he has been facilitating the dialogue between
you and Zanu-PF, he
can facilitate the dialogue among yourself. Please go
and ask him to
intervene. If he doesn’t intervene, you will split.”
We then said if that
is your advice, we will go. So we went to see President
Mbeki and Gibson
narrated what had happened. President Mbeki said, “If you
guys are telling
me the truth, that this is what happened at the meeting, I
do not think your
case is redeemable. But because you have come all the way
and you have asked
me, I will do it.”
So he picks up his phone and puts a call to Morgan, he
says, “I have your
people here and I think you are headed for a split and
they think that they
need a facilitator and they have asked me to facilitate
a dialogue between
you and them in the interest of your party, and I agree
with them that going
by what has happened, you guys need to sit down and
talk.” Morgan says, “Mr
President, you are not the president of the MDC. I
am. We have no problem
tell them to come back. I will not come to you, I
will not ask you to
facilitate.”
Devolution and tribalism
One
of the deliberate misconceptions to say a call for devolution is a call
by
tribalists. Devolution, as we understand it, is a system of government
where
central Government devolves power to communities and to regions to
manage
their own affairs, and we believe that even if you go back to the
Bible, you
will recall, I cant remember the characters, the fellow who was
doing
everything in the Bible and his father-in-law came and said, look, you
are
in meetings sunrise up to midnight. You have no time because everyone is
coming to you for decisions, the state is not functioning. Why don’t you
appoint your people there and let them do these things for you and you then
deal with the important and big cases? It’s written in the Bible to that
effect. And that is all we are saying about devolution. Devolve power to
entities at the local level so that people can manage their own
affairs.
Why do we have to say, for instance, a person who wants a liquor
licence in
Chiredzi must have the liquor licence processed in Harare by the
national
liquor board? Who is best placed to determine whether the place
they want to
open a bottle store is a hazard to children, someone sitting in
Harare or
the local people there at council or whatever level it is?
The
institutions which we are saying should devolve to already exist. You
have
governors, you have provincial governors you are appointing them
centrally
and imposing them on the people. We are saying allow those people
to elect
their governors to say in this area we want so and so to be our
governor and
lead us. Why does that divide anybody?
We are saying in a particular
province, devolve power to the province and
say, “Ok, the issues of tourism
in this province, let’s manage them, let’s
look at the road infrastructure,
let’s decide the priorities. Which road
should take precedence over that
road.
We have not (presented devolution as a Matabeleland thing) …
Neither have
the people, it’s the opponents of devolution and our opponents.
You see
Professor Ncube you see Matabeleland; you see Makoni you see
Zimbabwe. It is
not my mind-set which is the problem, it is the mindset of
those who
perceive that once Professor Ncube is leading a party the first
thing you
see is Matabeleland. When Job Sikhala leads a party, you don’t see
Mashonaland; when Makoni leads a party you don’t see Mashonaland
…
Gukurahundi
The minimum that should be done is a basic minimum,
otherwise it will not go
away. We must admit frankly and openly that
Gukurahundi happened in the
manner in which it happened. That there were
people who were killed, people
who were maimed; people who lost their homes,
people were driven into exile.
There are people today who can’t still get
documents arising out of
Gukurahundi: there is no father, there is no
mother, there is just a child
who can’t get a birth certificate. So let’s
start by at least acknowledging
and saying, “We as Zimbabweans went through
this unfortunate phase of our
history. It was wrong, it should have not
happened.” Just as a national … to
say that everybody accepts that everybody
accepts that it should have not
happened.
It’s not enough, to just
stand up one day and say this was a simple moment
of madness and then
thereafter say everyone who mentions that is either a
tribalist or
divisionist. You can’t do that. There must be an unconditional
acceptance.
Unlawful, wrong killings, maiming, burnings of homes were done.
That’s the
first thing.
The second thing is that those who suffered in one form or
another and those
who are still suffering, you must at least have what we
might call
restorative compensation. To say let’s look at all the children
who are
affected, let’s make an exceptional law that says that anyone who
comes
forward as a child and says, “I lost my parents” you give them a birth
certificate. You give them an ID.
Let us first stop behaving as if
Gukurahundi did not happen. Let’s accept it
happened and let’s say come
forward, for instance, the Organ on National
Healing. When we proposed it
during the negotiation, we thought that it
would do some of these things
without going back to open old wounds. “You
did this to me, you did that to
me” because we couldn’t agree on that.
But at least we were able to say
let us correct the persisting injustices.
So the Government, all it needs to
do is say, “Register-General, go to the
affected areas, call on anyone who
lost a document which can’t be replaced
because of our rigid rules, make
sure they get their documents.” It’s just
as simple as that. So the rest
giving money to people, trying people, we are
saying forget about it now let
just deal with the continuing injustices for
now as a basic
minimum.
New Constitution
Yes, I think we have (an acceptable
constitution) from what the negotiators
tell me. I was told in a meeting
this morning that the drafters are not
ready with the final draft they are
supposed to prepare. They have proofread
the document and they asked for
certain amendments to be made and we are
waiting to see the draft.
So
I am thinking maybe next week or the week after we will have a final
version. It is a version which will not make everyone happy. If you are a
purist, you will not be happy - either you say what the people said there
was not followed or this is not good enough - but we are in a polarised
Zimbabwe.
The constitution is a political document ultimately and our
political
contestations are reflected in our positions on the constitution …
which
means, eventually, the constitution that we will have has to be a
compromise
and, if the constitution is a compromise, it will not have all
the things I
want.
Coalition government
It’s a very difficult
question, but working within Cabinet unless and when
you are debating
contentious political issues around, for instance, election
road map,
security sector reform, I think Cabinet has operated generally as
a cohesive
institution made up of Zimbabweans. I think if you were to be a
fly and sit
in Cabinet, you will not often be able to tell, if you did not
know in
advance, that this is a Zanu PF minister and this is an MDC
minister.
Because the debates are objective and rational and people
get persuaded by
the logic of the argument … Some of the things might even
surprise you,
because Cabinet discussions are confidential, I can at least
tell you this
that positions which some people think are Zanu PF positions,
as we
understand outside Cabinet, you will find them enthusiastically and
sometimes shockingly being propagated by an MDC-T minister.
Election
chances
I think I said earlier on that I think we have been the fastest
growing
party in the last one and half years. We have been the party which
has
remained rooted and grounded in the communities. Every week we have an
outreach programme. Every day our lower structures have an outreach
programme.
I believe that we have done very good work. I believe that
a lot of the
people have begun to understand the things we stand for, a lot
of people
have begun to understand the principled positions we take on
issues and for
that reason I believe that we have rebranded our party, we
have rebuilt our
party into a party which is capable of winning the next
elections. I believe
most sincerely we are going to win the next election.
Not just potentially;
I believe we are going to win the next
election.
Briefing Zuma
It is all fiction, absolute brazen lies.
We hardly ever talk about the
facilitation process except through the normal
channels. More importantly,
understand that the facilitator is not a
judge.The facilitator never makes a
determination. He literally facilitates.
He sits parties down. The
facilitator will never determine what should
happen. President Mbeki never
did it. President Zuma has not done it and, I
believe, will never do it.
All this insinuation is based on a
misunderstanding of what the role of the
facilitator is. So, you cannot
influence the facilitator to do anything
because he is not required to make
a decision. He is only required to
facilitate.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com
15/07/2012 00:00:00
by Business
Reporter
THE Chinese majority owner of chrome miner and smelter,
ZIMASCO has
approached the government for an exemption from the country’s
economic
empowerment laws, a deputy minister has confirmed.
Under the
country’s economic empowerment programme, foreign companies are
now required
by law to transfer control of 51 per cent of their Zimbabwe
operations to
locals.
But government officials have previously indicated that investors
from
friendly countries such as China could be exempted from the
requirement.
Deputy indigenisation minister Tongai Matutu recently told
Parliament that
Zimasco had submitted its plans for compliance with the
law.
“The position is that ZIMASCO has submitted its provisional
indigenisation
and economic empowerment proposal, that proposal has been
under
consideration and there have been negotiations going on about
compliance
issues,” he said.
“However, the management of ZIMASCO has
been arguing that since they are
Chinese, they have been actually friends of
Zimbabwe and therefore they
should be exempted. They have also argued that
they have got a five-year
development plan which they believe should not be
disturbed by bringing on
board a new investor.
“But nevertheless, I
think the negotiations are going on and I would like to
believe that a
solution will be agreed upon and they will comply.”
Sinosteel Corporation
became the majority shareholder in Zimasco after
purchasing 92% of Zimasco
Consolidated Enterprises (ZCE) in 2007. But
various share purchases since
then have seen Sinosteel reduce its interest
to 73%.
Sinosteel
recently injected US$35 million into the company for the
refurbishment of
one of the smelters at the Kwekwe plant.
"The investment from Sino Steel,
which owns 73 percent of the company, will
be used to rebuild furnace number
two was received and work is currently
underway,” Zimasco’s Marketing and
Administration General Manager, Clara
Sadomba said.
"The restoration of
the furnace will help increase output of high carbon
ferrochrome from the
current levels of 170 000 metric tonnes per annum to
230 000 metric tonnes
per annum."
Zimasco operates smelters in Kwekwe and Chrome mines in the
nearby town of
Shurugwi.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
Written by Tendai
Kamhungira, Court Writer
Sunday, 15 July 2012 15:00
HARARE -
People with HIV/Aids have been stigmatised in today’s society, and
deliberate transmission of the disease has been criminalised in a
development that has created more questions than answers.
Gone are
the days when the disease used to be a death sentence.
In the early days,
HIV/Aids was treated just like the Biblical leprosy, but
these days diseases
such as cancer and cholera have become deadlier.
People who deliberately
transmit the disease have been accused of
contravening Section (79) of the
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Chapter 9:23.
The law
criminalises, “Any person who knowing that he or she is infected
with HIV or
realising that there is real risk or possibility that he or she
is infected
with HIV intentionally does anything or permits the doing of
anything which
he or she knows will infect or does anything which he or she
realises
involves a real risk of infecting another person with HIV.”
It is a crime
punishable by up to a period of 20 years in jail.
But can this offence be
proven given the legal complications?
Can the State successfully
criminalise a disease?
Last week Harare regional magistrate Clever Tsikwa
acquitted a Belvedere man
who was accused of deliberately infecting his wife
with HIV, after ruling
that evidence in the matter “falls far short of
proving as case against him”.
This case is a classic example which shows
this offence is difficult to
prove under the current
circumstances.
In his ruling magistrate Tsikwa said: “The problem with
offences of this
nature is the fact that the medical history of an accused
would constitute
the most important evidence for the
state.
“Unfortunately how to gather such evidence for a successful
prosecution of
such cases is yet another problem because there is no law in
Zimbabwe which
compels testing institutions to reveal or make public a
patient’s HIV
status.”
Magistrate Tsikwa further said: “The word
deliberate used in the charge
denotes that the accused must have done or had
sexual intercourse with the
complainant with full consciousness and
intention to infect complainant with
HIV.”
The legislation of
criminalising the transmission of HIV/Aids has been met
with mixed
reactions.
Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR), a rights lobby
organisation last
week advocated for legislators to revisit the legislation,
which they said
is discriminatory in nature and does not assist in behaviour
change.
“Law makers created an impulsive law in trying to deal with the
spread of
HIV; it was a new thing which they did not really know how to deal
with,”
Tinashe Mundawarara, the ZLHR programme manager told journalists in
Harare
last week.
A Harare prosecutor said the issue had become
thorny and needed to be
revisited in order to come up with a clear cut
position that will not end up
working against or stigmatising people living
with HIV.
Once
again the targeted sanctions against Zimbabwe are in the news, with a report in
the London Daily Telegraph that the EU is planning to conditionally suspend them
to encourage progress towards free and fair elections.
The
EU’s Ambassador to Zimbabwe, Aldo Dell'Ariccia, threw cold water over this
report but did say that discussions were under way which could lead to greater
‘co-operation’ with Zimbabwe.
The EU
measures are only due for review in February and any decision to lift them could
hardly be made arbitrarily, as similar measures have been imposed by the US and
other countries.
What is
clear to the Vigil is that the MDC’s requests for the lifting of sanctions are
having some effect (in Europe at least), amplifying Mugabe’s propaganda about
the alleged damage they are doing to the Zimbabwean economy.
But if
the EU – or the MDC for that matter – think lifting sanctions will make any
difference in securing free and fair elections the Vigil believes they are in
for disappointment. The MDC committed itself to calling for an end to sanctions
when it signed up to the misbegotten GPA. Another crazy concession was the GPA’s
call for an end to outside broadcasts to Zimbabwe – something over which the
Zimbabwean authorities have no control whatsoever. Zanu PF can now argue that
this impossible requirement is now the deal breaker.
Sanctions
have only really been symbolic – of marginal consequence to the EU or Zimbabwe.
How else is one to explain the report on Friday from the UK’s Parliamentary
Committees on Arms Export Controls which note that ‘sensitive equipment’ had
been sold to Zimbabwe among other countries regarded by the Foreign Office as
having dubious human rights records. (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmquad/419/41925.htm)
As for
lifting the travel ban, this would give the Vigil an opportunity to demonstrate
against visits by Zimbabwean human rights abusers. We are already exploring what
legal steps we could take against them should they come
here.
Anyone
who seriously believes that lifting sanctions will make an economic difference
to Zimbabwe cannot have read a recent article in the Zimbabwe Independent by the
Zimbabwean economist Erich Bloch, who makes the point that the fundamental
economic problem in the country is corruption (see: Eric Bloch Column: Govt must
act on corruption – https://www.zimbabwesituation.com/old/jul7a_2012.html#Z21).
They could also take a look at Eddie Cross’s article on indigenization which he
says is part of a Zanu PF plan to collapse the economy so that they can devour
the corpse (see: https://www.zimbabwesituation.com/old/jul14a_2012.html#Z12
– The Kasukuwere circus).
What is
making a real difference to Zimbabwe in fact is the UK’s aid. According to a
report by the Voice of the People Radio, the representative in Zimbabwe of the
UK’s Department for International Development, Dave Fish, said that Britain’s
development aid to Zimbabwe since February has already amounted to more than
$300 million (see: UK’s development Aid to exceed $300 million – https://www.zimbabwesituation.com/old/jul2_2012.html#22).
Until now we understood from official figures that British aid amounted to $100
million or so a year. It is curious that the UK has given Zimbabwe 10 times as
much as Finance Minister Biti says he has received from the diamonds in the same
period!
The
Vigil believes that some of this aid should be given to support change rather
than compensate for the looting of diamonds, along the lines proposed by the MDC
Treasurer General Roy Bennett in his recent speech in Oxford (see: https://www.zimbabwesituation.com/old/may30_2012.html#Z13
- Roy Bennett Speech: Smoke and mirrors: another look at politics and ethnicity
in Zimbabwe).
Other
points
·
Next
Saturday the Vigil will again be supporting the MDC diaspora campaign aimed at
increasing pressure for reforms before the expected elections next year. The
UK’s contribution to the monthly 21st Global Protest will take the
form of a demonstration outside the Russian Embassy in protest at reports that
Russian military helicopters are being supplied to Zimbabwe in return for
platinum concessions (for full details see Events and Notices
below).
·
Vigil
supporters were shocked to hear of the sudden death on Monday of Khama
Matambanadzo, Chairman for South East District of the MDC UK & Ireland. We
had got to know Khama through his involvement with the 21st Movement
protests this year. Our condolences go to his family and friends and his
colleagues in the MDC.
·
Founder
Vigil member Bee Tapa was surprised to meet his former teacher Grace Nyaumwe at
the Vigil. She taught him Shona at St Paul’s Mission School in Murewa in
2001.
·
The
Vigil notes that British tour operators are again featuring Zimbabwe in their
travel brochures. Anyone planning to go to Zimbabwe might care to look at the
experience of a couple who recently visited a Zimbabwean National Park (see: https://www.zimbabwesituation.com/old/jul11_2012.html#Z21
- Our bitter sweet Matobo – returning to the playground of
childhood).
·
The
Swaziland Vigil, on Friday 20th July, is to present a petition to the
Commonwealth calling for the suspension of Swaziland because of human rights
abuses and lack of democracy (for full details see Events and Notices
below).
For latest Vigil pictures check: http://www.flickr.com/photos/zimbabwevigil/.
Please note: Vigil photos can only be downloaded from our Flickr website – they
cannot be downloaded from the slideshow on the front page of the Zimvigil
website.
FOR THE
RECORD: 54
signed the register.
EVENTS
AND NOTICES:
·
Swazi
Vigil presentation of petition to the Commonwealth Secretariat. Friday
20th July. Meet at Charing Cross Station at 3 pm (Trafalgar Square
exit) for immediate move to present the petition at 3.30 to the Commonwealth
Secretariat, Marlborough House, Pall Mall, London SW1Y
5HX.
·
Sixth
21st Movement Free Zimbabwe Global Protest. Saturday
21st July. Meet at the Vigil at 2 pm. Once the Vigil is set up a
group will go by public transport to the Russian Embassy, 6-7 Kensington Park
Gardens, London W8 4QP. We plan to be outside the Embassy from 3.30 – 4.30 pm.
We are targeting the Russian Embassy because of reports of the sale of Russian
military helicopters to Zimbabwe. Nearest station: Notting Hill
Gate.
·
Next
Swaziland Vigil.
Saturday 28th July from 10 am – 1 pm. Venue: Swazi High Commission,
20 Buckingham Gate, London SW1E 6LB. Please support our Swazi friends. Nearest
stations: St James’s Park and Victoria. www.swazilandvigil.co.uk.r
·
Zimbabwe
Action Forum (ZAF). (NB: please note change of date). Saturday
28th July from 6.30 – 9.30 pm. Venue: Strand Continental Hotel (first
floor lounge), 143 Strand, London WC2R 1JA. Directions: The Strand is the same
road as the Vigil. From the Vigil it’s about a 10 minute walk, in the direction
away from Trafalgar Square. The Strand Continental is situated on the south side
of the Strand between Somerset House and the turn off onto Waterloo Bridge. The
entrance is marked by a big sign high above and a sign for its famous Indian
restaurant at street level. It's next to a newsagent. Nearest underground:
Temple (District and Circle lines) and Holborn. Future special ZAF meetings:
Saturday 13th October when we mark the 10th
anniversary of the Vigil and Saturday 10th November when our special
guest will be Ben Freeth. These two meetings will take the place of the regular
ZAF meetings in October and November. Both events at 6.30 pm at Strand
Continental Hotel (first floor lounge), 143 Strand, London WC2R 1JA. For
directions see entry above.
·
Relaunch
of ROHR Nottingham Branch:
Saturday 4th August starting at 2 pm. A fundraising do will follow
till late. Zimbabwe traditional food, music and dance. Venue details to follow.
·
ROHR
North East Fundraising Event. Saturday
18th August from 2 – 7 pm. Venue: Longbenton
Methodist Church Hall, Chesters Avenue, Longbenton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE12
8QP. Directions: from Four Lane Ends Metro Station, start out on Benton Road.
At roundabout take the first exit onto West Farm Avenue. Turn left onto Chesters
Avenue. For more information contact Tapiwa Merrymore Semwayo on
07412236229, Catherine Tshezi on 07428189705 and Susan Ndhlovu on
07767024586.
· The
Rain that Washes showing
at The Lounge, Leicester Square Theatre, from Monday 17th September –
Saturday 6th October at 7 pm. Check: http://leicestersquaretheatre.ticketsolve.com/shows/126523428/events
or phone
the booking line: 08448733433 for
specific dates and to book tickets. ‘Instantly plunged into a young
man’s compelling story of growing up in turbulent Zimbabwe, we live and breathe
his extraordinary journey from innocence to escape, finally returning to his
homeland to witness the greatest betrayal of all . . . Inspired by a series of
interviews between Zimbabwean Christopher Maphosa and writer Dave Carey, The
Rain That Washes is a true story that is poignant, political and, most of all,
personal’.
·
Zimbabwe
Vigil Highlights 2011 can be
viewed on this link: http://www.zimvigil.co.uk/the-vigil-diary/363-vigil-highlights-2011.
Links to previous years’ highlights are listed on 2011 Highlights
page.
·
The
Restoration of Human Rights in Zimbabwe (ROHR) is the
Vigil’s partner organisation based in Zimbabwe. ROHR grew out of the need for
the Vigil to have an organisation on the ground in Zimbabwe which reflected the
Vigil’s mission statement in a practical way. ROHR in the UK actively fundraises
through membership subscriptions, events, sales etc to support the activities of
ROHR in Zimbabwe. Please note that the official website of ROHR Zimbabwe is http://www.rohrzimbabwe.org/. Any other website
claiming to be the official website of ROHR in no way represents the views and
opinions of ROHR.
·
ZBN
News. The
Vigil management team wishes to make it clear that the Zimbabwe Vigil is not
responsible for Zimbabwe Broadcasting Network News (ZBN News). We are happy that
they attend our activities and provide television coverage but we have no
control over them. All enquiries about ZBN News should be addressed to ZBN News.
·
The Zim
Vigil band (Farai
Marema and Dumi Tutani) has launched its theme song ‘Vigil Yedu (our Vigil)’ to
raise awareness through music. To download this single, visit: www.imusicafrica.com and to watch the video
check: http://ourvigil.notlong.com. To watch other Zim
Vigil band protest songs, check: http://Shungurudza.notlong.com and http://blooddiamonds.notlong.com.
·
Vigil
Facebook page:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=8157345519&ref=ts.
·
Vigil
Myspace page: http://www.myspace.com/zimbabwevigil.
·
Useful
websites: www.zanupfcrime.com which reports on Zanu PF
abuses and www.ipaidabribe.org.zw where people can report
corruption in Zimbabwe.
Vigil
co-ordinators
The
Vigil, outside the Zimbabwe Embassy, 429 Strand, London, takes place every
Saturday from 14.00 to 18.00 to protest against gross violations of human rights
in Zimbabwe. The Vigil which started in October 2002 will continue until
internationally-monitored, free and fair elections are held in Zimbabwe. http://www.zimvigil.co.uk.
By Clifford Chitupa Mashiri, 15th July 2012.
It is an undeniable fact
that by colluding with Zanu-pf in Parliament last
week in voting for two
retrogressive Bills, MPs of Zimbabwe’s MDC formations
grossly betrayed
trust, brought shame on themselves and sparked a backlash
at home and
abroad.
Zanu-pf Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa said on 11 July 2012
exiled
Zimbabweans ‘can forget about taking part in new elections’ as he
steered
the Electoral Act Amendment Bill through Parliament.
He
claimed there were logistical problems and that only one political party
had
access to those in the Diaspora.
But that is not true, because among
other Zanu-pf loyalists, Chinamasa
freely travels all over the world since
the last sanctions review.
The question of logistics is nonsense because
all other countries in the
region and beyond use their embassies and
consulate offices for their
Diaspora voting processes.
Similarly,
Zimbabwe can use its missions in Angola, Australia, Austria,
Belgium,
Botswana, Brazil, Canada, China, Cuba, DRC, Egypt, Ethiopia,
France, Ghana,
India, Indonesia, Iran, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Kuwait, Libya,
Malaysia,
Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Portugal, Russia, South
Africa, Sudan,
Sweden, Switzerland, Tanzania, UK, UN New York, USA
Washington,
Zambia.
It is on record that Patrick Chinamasa turned down election
funding from the
United Nations and Simon Khaya Moyo Zanu-pf Chairman
rejected EU funding for
polls. So that excuse is out.
Mugabe’s charm
offensive
In an unprecedented since the formation of the MDC in 1999,
Mugabe was last
week on a charm offensive praising MDC ministers, Deputy
Prime Minister and
surprised Cabinet when he reportedly warned media
Minister Shamu against
using the state media to vilify Tsvangirai and his
wife, daughter of Zanu-pf
official, Macheka. The seductive remarks were
understood as instrumental in
wooing the opposition to let the two the rogue
Bills pass.
Betrayal
A dictionary definition of betrayal is being
unfaithful in guarding,
maintaining, or fulfilling a cause.
Reports
from Harare say supporters of both MDC formations countrywide are up
in arms
with their parties. According to NewsDay columnist Conway Tutani,
“They
are hurt and angry extremely and understandably so because the burning
human
rights issues they thought were on the Zimbabwe Human Rights
Commission
table...” (NewsDay 13/07/12).
Also hurt and angry are commercial farmers
who survived the chaotic and
partisan farm seizures who had thought the
human rights commission would
investigate their cases which occurred before
2009. They have arguably
suffered twice – after being denied compensation
despite winning at the SADC
Tribunal before it was suspended.
Why did
MDCs help Zanu-pf ?
The MDC’s support for Mugabe’s Zanu-pf in denying people
right to have
pre-2009 rights probed and disenfranchising exiled Zimbabweans
could
arguably be down to gravy train mentality or retaliation for the
incident in
June 2009 in which Tsvangirai was booed after telling Zimbabwean
exiles in
London to return home to help rebuild the nation.
Oddly, up
to the present day, Zimbabwe has no shortage of labour with over
80 percent
unemployment rate, most of who are surviving on vending
vegetables and cell
phone ‘juicing’ cards on the streets of Harare.
It could also be argued
that there is fear of political competition for
parliamentary seats from
exiled candidates. In April the MDC-T’s
spokesperson Douglas Mwonzora was
quoted as saying:
“We are sorry for some opportunists who think that
things are now safer who
come back and want to be elected. There will be no
positions for them and
the Election Directorate led by the party’s
chairperson Lovemore Moyo is
setting a criteria to deal with opportunists.
But there are genuine people
who are in the Diaspora” (ZimEye 28 April
2012). But, the Diaspora has
repatriated billions of US dollars to support
Zimbabwe.
MDCs help for Zanu-pf has also been likened to the Stockholm
Syndrome or
traumatic bonding whereby strong emotional ties develop between
captives and
their captors even to the extent of defending their captors
(see (NewsDay
MDC Negotiators less than candid,
13/07/12).
Shame
Shame is the ‘painful feeling arising from the
consciousness of something
dishonourable, improper, ridiculous, done by
oneself or another.’ Shame is
usually characterised by many reactions from
rationalisations, to denials,
regrets, accusations, buck-passing,
resignations in some cultures and even
suicide in extreme cases.
To
date, only two Zimbabwean leaders I know committed suicide out of shame.
One
was the late Morris Nyagumbo for his complicity in the Willowgate
Scandal
and the other the late former Minister and ambassador Edmund Garwe.
This
time, we are unlikely to see any show of shame, given the fact that
there is
no culture of resigning in Zimbabwe.
Public Outcry
Claims by some MDC
officials that they will fight for the setting up of a
truth and
reconciliation commission have not been bought by all people given
the fact
they have failed to get any of the so-called outstanding issues in
the GPA
addressed by Robert Mugabe.
Highly –respected and self-exiled MDC-T
treasurer, Roy Bennett reportedly
said that cases of human rights abuses
which happened during the 2008
Presidential election run-off and Gukurahundi
massacres in the 1980s should
not be swept under the carpet for political
expediency.
When it became clear that the Electoral Amendment Bill had
been passed
denying exiled Zimbabweans the right to participate in national
elections,
the MDC SA said it was greatly disappointed “to say the least”
with the
outcome.
Perhaps not necessarily in response to the two
Bills but one of the world
powers expected to help, the US ambassador
designate Bruce Wharton said that
although his country’s policy is not about
regime change, the US will not
standby if the rights of Zimbabweans are
trampled on by their leaders.
Reports also say at a special debate to be
held in the Commons on Tuesday,
former cabinet minister Peter Hain will urge
the British government to keep
restrictive measures already in place and to
add more names, including those
in a new Global Witness report, to the list
of individuals and entities
subject to sanctions.
“Robert Mugabe has
never to date shown any inclination to accept defeat at
the polls, and I do
not think sanctions should be lifted or relaxed,” said
Hain (The Guardian,
14/07/12).-
Backlash
Some authorities see a backlash as a sudden or
violent backward whipping
motion; or an antagonistic reaction to a trend,
development, or event. While
that is unlikely in Zimbabwe, the authorities
in Zimbabwe should expect a
backlash soon.
As a matter of principle,
in view of the collusion of the MDC formations
with Zanu-pf in the
dis-enfranchisement of millions of exiled Zimbabweans
and the restriction on
the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission’s terms of
reference to investigate
only post-2009 alleged violations, it is only right
and proper for the
leaders of developed countries to consider tough measures
to reverse the two
offending Bills.
Western countries should summon Zimbabwean ambassadors
in their countries
and hand them letters of disquiet and disapproval urging
for a nullification
of the two proposed laws which violate human rights
(blocking rights probes
and denying exiles the vote).
If that fails,
they can expel Mugabe’s senior envoys and if ineffectual, add
the names of
Morgan Tsvangirai, Welshman Ncube and Arthur Mutambara and
their wives to
those on the targeted sanctions list as soon as before the
London Olympics.
If that fails, they can expand the list with the names of
all those who
voted for the two Bills. That should work.
Clifford Chitupa Mashiri,
Political Analyst, London,
zimanalysis2009@gmail.com
COURT WATCH 12/2012
[12th July 2012]
Case Against Torture
[continued from Court Watch 11/2012 of 30th
June]
Court Watch 11/2012 outlined two recent criminal prosecutions of
police officers for conduct amounting to torture – welcome evidence of action by
the relevant authorities to end an established culture of impunity for State
agents:
· the case in Bulawayo in which the prosecution of three policewomen
had resulted in convictions for assault
· the trial of police Chief Superintendent Joseph Chani in Mutare – this case has now been concluded.
Senior Police Officer Gaoled for Murder and Assault
Chief Superintendent Chani’s trial ended on 5th July when the High
Court convicted him of one count of murder with constructive intent and three
counts of assault. Referring to Chani as
a “menace and a law unto himself” who
had tarnished the image of the police force, and expressed no remorse for the “uncontrollable assaults” he had
committed on his victims, the judge sentenced him to 18 years imprisonment on
the murder charge, and 3 years on the assault counts, which were taken together
for purposes of sentence. The two
sentences will run concurrently, resulting in an effective sentence of 18 years
imprisonment. [Note: Murder with “constructive intent” is
when someone causes the death of another person “realising that there is a real
risk or possibility that his or her conduct may cause death and continues to
engage in that conduct despite the risk or possibility” – Criminal Law Code,
section 47.]
In discussing these two cases it was
pointed out that although the Declaration of Rights in the Constitution
enshrines the right not to be subjected to torture, the Criminal Law Code does
not incorporate torture as a criminal offence, and prosecutions [including the
two cited above] have to be for other offences.
This situation is not satisfactory, and there is a strong case for
Zimbabwe to accede to the UN Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman
or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
[CAT] which lays a duty on States parties to strengthen the content and
implementation of their law and legal and administrative machinery to act
against torture. [Note: it is too late for Zimbabwe to sign and ratify the Convention
so the process would be for Parliament to pass a motion approving accession to
the Convention, an instrument of accession to be drawn up and signed by the
President and then be lodged with the UN.]
Arguments Why Zimbabwe Should
Accede to CAT
1. Zimbabwe has
already affirmed in principle its acceptance of the universal norm that
torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are
unacceptable
· Zimbabwe was in
the UN General Assembly when CAT was adopted by consensus on 10th December 1984.
[The final text was arrived at after extensive previous discussions within the
UN system over a period of more than ten years.]
· Zimbabwe is
already party to the following human rights instruments which include
prohibitions of torture:
o the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [UDHR] [article
5]
o the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [ICCPR]
[article 7]
o the African
Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights [article 5] .
· Zimbabwe has
affirmed in its own Constitution’s Declaration of Rights that its citizens are
protected from torture and inhuman or degrading punishment.
2. Having agreed to
the principle of outlawing torture, now it is time to move on to
specifics. CAT ensures the
principle is translated into specific laws and other measures to prevent and
punish torture.
3. Zimbabwe is now
out of step with the rest of Africa and the world. Since CAT came into force in June 1987 after
20 countries had ratified it or acceded to it, the number of States Parties to
CAT has risen to 150 out of 193 UN members.
In Africa, 44 of the 54 AU members, 12 of the 15 SADC members and all
Zimbabwe’s neighbours are States Parties.
Advantages of Signing
CAT
1. To the
legal/judicial system
· States Parties
must take effective legislative, administrative, judicial and other measures to
prevent acts of torture
· All acts of
torture, as defined in the Convention, must be made criminal offences under the
name “torture” and be punishable as grave offences, with acknowledgment of the
fact that torture can never be justified.
[Note: South Africa as a States Party to CAT is preparing a Prevention and
Combating of Torture Bill which provides for an criminal offence of
torture]
· Statements extracted by torture must not be admissible in court
proceedings
2. Prosecution of
offenders ends culture of impunity
· States Parties
must assume comprehensive jurisdiction, including extra-territorial
jurisdiction, to prosecute offenders.
Where a state does not prosecute a perpetrator, it must co-operate with
other states asserting jurisdiction, e.g., assist in investigation and extradite
the perpetrator
· Inter-State co-operation and assistance is mandatory in prosecuting
perpetrators
3. For victims of
torture
· Police, prisons and other security agents involved in questioning and
detaining suspects more accountable
· Victims of torture entitled to redress, compensation and
rehabilitation
· States Parties
prohibited from extraditing persons to states where they may face
torture
4. Obligation for
educating and training of all stage agencies
· States Parties
must ensure that education and information regarding the prohibition of torture
are included in training law enforcement personnel, civil or military, medical
personnel and public officials among others
· Interrogation rules and methods and custody arrangements for
prisoners and detainees kept under systematic review
5. Part of the
international system
· Support from the CAT Committee to States
Parties
· Regular reporting to the CAT Committee against Torture, promoting
accountability
· A system of
regular visits by CAT sub-committee to places of detention [Note: this is in the Optional Protocol to CAT]
· Support of
national institutions performing similar functions at the national
level
· Opportunity to serve on and gain experience from UN committees and
sub-committees.
Minister
of Justice’s Commitment on CAT
In 2011 Zimbabwe was the subject of Universal Periodic Review proceedings by
the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.
The Minister of Justice and Legal Affairs, Patrick Chinamasa, was responsible for
presenting and defending Zimbabwe’s report on compliance with international
human rights instruments. In March this
year, responding to the Council’s recommendations for action by Zimbabwe, the Minister told the Council that Zimbabwe will be acceding to
CAT.
Optional
Protocol and Opt-in Articles
If we now join the majority of UN, African and SADC countries by
acceding to CAT, as promised by the Minster of Justice, we should at the same
time accede to the Optional Protocol to CAT, which enables the UN Committee
Against Torture to set up regular visits to places of detention; and also adopt
the two Opt-in CAT
articles: –
Article 21, which would allows the Committee to receive communications
from other states claiming that another State Party is not fulfilling its CAT
obligations, and Article 22, which allows the Committee to receive
communications from or on behalf of individuals who claim to be victims of a
violation by a State Party of its CAT obligations. [CAT and Optional Protocol available on UN Office of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights website at www2.ohchr.org/English/law/cat.htm
and www2.ohchr.org/English/law/cat-one.htm – or
from veritas@mango.zw]
Veritas makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot
take legal responsibility for information
supplied.