(Angus Reid Global Scan) – Adults in South Africa are split on the desired
course of action in dealing with a neighbouring country, according to a poll by
ACNielsen. 40 per cent of respondents support a human rights-anchored form of
intervention, advocating pressure on the Zimbabwean government to uphold human
rights.
Zimbabwe’s government—headed by Robert Mugabe since 1980—has been repeatedly
criticized for human rights abuses. 35 per cent of South African respondents
believe the neighbouring country’s sovereignty must be respected and the people
in Zimbabwe should sort out their own problems, while 25 per cent endorse the
concept of "quiet diplomacy"—operating behind the scenes.
The United Nations (UN) estimates that close to 4 million of Zimbabwe’s 13
million inhabitants are in need of food relief. Earlier this month, the UN
condemned Mugabe’s Operation Restore Order, a government-sponsored urban
clearance campaign that has affected more than 700,000 inhabitants through
housing evictions and demolitions.
On Jul. 13, South African deputy-president Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka made her
first official trip to Zimbawe. Following a meeting with Zimbabwe’s joint
vice-president Joyce Mujuru, the South African deputy-president declared, "There
is always a co-ordinated approach to assist Zimbabwe. We need to understand as
well the extent of the challenges and the impact on the people. I was getting a
global understanding of the challenge."
Polling Data
Which one of the following do you think would be the best action for the
South African government on Zimbabwe?
A human rights-anchored form of intervention, advocating pressure on the
Zimbabwean government to practice the type of human rights that South
Africans enjoy |
40% |
Respecting sovereignty—Zimbabwe politics should not be interfered with and
Zimbabweans should sort out their own problems |
35% |
"Quiet diplomacy"—Ordinary people would not necessarily know what is
happening behind the scenes, it is good to operate in this way |
25% |
Source: ACNielsen Methodology: Telephone interviews with 2,500 South
African adults, conducted in late May 2005. Margin of error is 1.3 per
cent.
|