http://www.theaustralian.com.au/
Jonathan Clayton and Jan Raath
From: The
Times
July 04, 2011 10:48AM
THE Kimberley Process, the
mechanism set up to rid the world of "blood
diamonds" is on the brink of
collapse because of moves to allow exports from
Zimbabwe's fabulously
wealthy Marange diamond fields, campaigners have told
The
Times.
President Mugabe's henchmen have earned millions from illegally
mined gems
that are smuggled into Mozambique, but a decision to allow legal
exports
could give the ruling Zanu(PF) party a lifeline and allow it to buy
victory
in elections, expected later this year or early in
2012.
Mathieu Yamba, who is the chairman of the Kimberley Process and
comes from
the Democratic Republic of Congo, has come under huge pressure
from other
southern African states that recently declared Zimbabwe had met
Kimberley
rules and could legally export diamonds from Marange, which could
provide
income of up to $2 billion a year.
However, international
human rights groups, supported by some Western
countries including the US,
Canada and Israel, say that no consensus on the
status of Zimbabwe was
reached at a meeting in Kinshasa on June 23.
Arvind Ganesan, the
business and human rights director at Human Rights
Watch, said: "Governments
and companies should ignore Mr Yamba's decision
unless they want to make
blood diamonds available to consumers and ruin the
credibility of the
Kimberley Process."
The process - named after the 19th-century diamond
town in South Africa -
was created to stem the flow in the 1990s of diamonds
that are mined in war
zones, often under harsh conditions, then sold by
armed groups and rebels to
finance wars and coups in West
Africa.
Legal exports from Marange have been suspended since June 2009
because of
police and military abuses in the minefields. These included
killings,
beatings, forced labour and smuggling of gems in contravention of
Kimberley's rules.
In November 2009 Zimbabwe agreed to carry out a
phased withdrawal of armed
forces from the diamond fields, and allow
monitoring of diamond shipments.
Farai Maguwu, from the Centre for
Research and Development in Mutare, near
the diamond fields, told The Times
that nothing had changed: "The military
is still there, and their presence
leads to the continuation of violence and
smuggling."
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/
Jul 4, 2011,
11:26 GMT
Harare - Zimbabwean rough diamonds worth about 160 million
dollars, which
had been confiscated in the United Arab Emirates, have been
released for
sale, the minister for mines confirmed Monday.
The move
has sparked concerns that the Kimberley Process - the international
group
formed to clamp down on trade in diamonds used to fund conflicts -
might
collapse.
Confirming a report in The Herald newspaper about the release
of the
diamonds, Zimbabwean Mines Minister Obert Mpofu said: 'We still have
hurdles
to jump before it is a smooth sailing. We notice that it has not
sunk (in)
to America that it lost its efforts to have our diamonds off the
world
market.'
The diamonds were mined from the Marange fields, but
confiscated in November
in Dubai. Last week, Mpofu said the Kimberley
Process lifted the trade
embargo at a meeting in Kinshasa in spite of
objections from the United
States, European Union, Israel and
Canada.
Diamond exports from Marange have been suspended since June 2009
because of
alleged police and military abuses in the fields, including
killings,
beatings, forced labour and smuggling. Zimbabwe promised a phased
withdrawal
of armed forces and to allow a monitor to examine and certify all
diamond
shipments from Marange.
But human rights groups say Zimbabwe
failed to stop the abuses and has not
complied with process
rules.
The US State Department said last week that, contrary to some
reports, there
was no consensus reached at the Kinshasa meeting. It was
referring to a
press release by Kimberly Process chairman Mathieu Yamba that
the group had
unanimously agreed to lift Zimbabwe's diamond trade
ban.
'We believe that work toward a solution must continue, and that
until
consensus is reached, exports from Marange should not proceed,' said
State
Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland.
The Marange diamonds
are said to be in India now, according to a report by
Idex, an online
diamond exchange.
'Miners, retailers, and consumers have relied on the
Kimberley Process to
stop blood diamonds from being sold, but, with Chairman
Yamba's decision,
the KP has betrayed their trust,' said Arvind Ganesan,
business and human
rights director at Human Rights
Watch.
'Governments and companies should ignore his decision unless they
want to
make blood diamonds available to consumers and ruin the credibility
of the
Kimberly Process as well.'
http://www.businessday.co.za
South Africa’s government officials helped
Zimbabwe export hundreds of
millions of rands of blood
diamonds
SAPA
Published: 2011/07/04 02:47:46 PM
Zimbabwean rough
diamonds worth about 160 million dollars, which had been
confiscated in the
United Arab Emirates, have been released for sale, the
minister for mines
confirmed Monday.
Last week, State Diamond Trader officials admitted in
parliament that they
had helped Zimbabwe export diamonds from Marange,
despite an international
ban on the trade.
The South African
government says the Kimberley Process has now allowed
these diamonds to be
exported - but human rights groups say that is not
true.
The move has
sparked concerns that the Kimberley Process — the international
group formed
to clamp down on trade in diamonds used to fund conflicts —
might
collapse.
Zimbabwean Mines Minister Obert Mpofu said: "We still have
hurdles to jump
before it is a smooth sailing. We notice that it has not
sunk (in) to
America that it lost its efforts to have our diamonds off the
world market."
The diamonds were mined from the Marange fields, but
confiscated in November
in Dubai. Last week, Mpofu said the Kimberley
Process lifted the trade
embargo at a meeting in Kinshasa in spite of
objections from the United
States, European Union, Israel and
Canada.
Diamond exports from Marange have been suspended since June 2009
because of
alleged police and military abuses in the fields, including
killings,
beatings, forced labour and smuggling. Zimbabwe promised a phased
withdrawal
of armed forces and to allow a monitor to examine and certify all
diamond
shipments from Marange.
But human rights groups say Zimbabwe
failed to stop the abuses and has not
complied with process
rules.
The US State Department said last week that, contrary to some
reports, there
was no consensus reached at the Kinshasa meeting. It was
referring to a
press release by Kimberly Process chairman Mathieu Yamba that
the group had
unanimously agreed to lift Zimbabwe’s diamond trade
ban.
"We believe that work toward a solution must continue, and that
until
consensus is reached, exports from Marange should not proceed," said
State
Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland.
The Marange diamonds
are said to be in India now, according to a report by
Idex, an online
diamond exchange.
"Miners, retailers, and consumers have relied on the
Kimberley Process to
stop blood diamonds from being sold, but, with Chairman
Yamba’s decision,
the KP has betrayed their trust," said Arvind Ganesan,
business and human
rights director at Human Rights
Watch.
"Governments and companies should ignore his decision unless they
want to
make blood diamonds available to consumers and ruin the credibility
of the
Kimberly Process as well."
http://www.swradioafrica.com
By Alex Bell
04 July
2011
Suspicion was high on Monday following reports that Prime Minister
Morgan
Tsvangirai was barred from touring the controversial Chiadzwa diamond
fields
over the weekend.
The Prime Minister spent the weekend touring
Manicaland Province. He
previously said he planned to meet with villagers
from Chiadzwa, who have
been forcibly displaced by the diamond mining
operations there.
But according to The Standard newspaper, the visit was
barred. The newspaper
cited unconfirmed reports that the Manicaland
governor’s office had been
told by the Ministry of Mines to bar Tsvangirai’s
tour because he had not
been granted permission. The newspaper also reported
that ZANU PF supporters
had mobilised to disrupt the tour. A source who was
part of the Prime
Minister’s delegation said: “We have cancelled the
intended meeting with the
resettled people in Chiadzwa.”
“We are
informed that ZANU PF has mobilised to disrupt the meetings…” the
source is
quoted as saying. “To avoid confrontations, we found it fit not to
go
there.”
Tsvangirai’s spokesperson Luke Tamborinyoka has since said that
the Prime
Minister had not intended to visit Chiadzwa anyway.
It is
not the first time that a high level delegation has been prevented
from
visiting the area, and last year a parliamentary committee tasked with
evaluating conditions there was repeatedly blocked from visiting. It's
understood that all visits to Chiadzwa are meant to be cleared by the army,
which keeps firm control of the area.
Political analyst Clifford
Mashiri told SW Radio Africa on Monday that the
active barring of certain
groups from visiting Chiadzwa raises suspicions
that all is still far from
right at the diamond fields.
“It raises questions of transparency and we
have to ask what is happening
there,” Mashiri said.
Mashiri also
agreed that the situation shows that ZANU PF is fully in
control, not only
at Chiadzwa, but also politically.
“ZANU PF has been treating the MDC
like a junior partner and they continue
to do so. It is a very disappointing
development,” Mashiri said.
Last month a meeting of the international
diamond trade watchdog, the
Kimberley Process, ended in stalemate, with no
consensus on Zimbabwe’s trade
future. However, the group’s chairman, said to
be a ZANU PF ally, has
unilaterally announced that diamonds from Chiadzwa
can be sold. This is
despite ongoing concerns of the human rights conditions
at Chiadzwa and
reports of rampant smuggling.
http://www.radiovop.com/
Harare, July 04, 2011- Finance
Minister, Tendai Biti has said that he has
not received any proceeds from
diamond sales since January, statements
likely to further buttress calls for
transparency in diamond mining to weed
out corruption.
Biti said
Zanu-(PF)’s statement that his Ministry was refusing to award
civil
servants a pay increase despite receiving proceeds from diamond sales
were
not true, saying Treasury last received diamond money in 2010.
"This
MDC-T was formed on two pillars, the trade union movement and the
constitutional movement.
“Zanu-(PF) cannot today claim to be
interested in workers issues by claiming
that the Finance Ministry is
refusing to increase salaries because it has
received diamond money,” Biti
said in an interview.
“I have not seen the diamond money. As the Finance
Minister of this country,
I have not seen and I have not received fresh
diamond money since January
2011. The diamond money that Zanu-(PF) is
talking about is the money which
we received last year.”
Mines
Minister, Obert Mpofu could not be reached for comment on the
revelations by
Biti who has also demanded the enactment of a Diamond Act to
regulate the
mining and sale of diamonds to weed out corruption.
Prime Minister,
Morgan Tsvangirai has also called for transparency in the
mining and sale of
the precious gems, stating that the diamonds are being
looted thereby
depriving ordinary Zimbabweans an improved life.
Tsvangirai was quoted on
Thursday at a book launch hosted by the Zimbabwe
Congress of Trade Unions
saying “Where are all the proceeds going? Who is
pocketing the proceeds from
our national resources which must benefit all
Zimbabweans in their
diversity.
“This is the reason why some of us have voiced concern that
there is no way
we can fail to pay civil servants and to resuscitate
collapsed
infrastructure when every day sophisticated extractive machinery
is opening
the country’s belly in Chiadzwa,” said
Tsvangirai.
Economic analysts say Zimbabwe’s economic growth continues to
be stalled by
corruption, a factor undermining the development of most
African states.
http://www.swradioafrica.com
By Tichaona Sibanda
4 July 2011
Robert
Mugabe appears to have won his case, to award a minimum salary of
US$253 to
civil servants, which has left unions representing workers deeply
divided
over the issue.
The pay hike promised by Mugabe for some months has been
described as’
inadequate’ by Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai who said it is
still far
below the poverty datum line, estimated at US$502. Tsvangirai told
the
Zimbabwe standard that government did not discuss the salary increment
given
to civil servants and said he was shocked to read about it in the
newspapers.
The salary increase has seen unions going to war with the
Zimbabwe Teachers’
Union, the Teachers’ Union of Zimbabwe and Public Service
Association
representatives, accepting the increment. But the Progressive
Teachers’
Union of Zimbabwe (PTUZ) blasted their counterparts for accepting
the pay
hike, describing them as ‘sell outs.’
In the new salary
structure the lowest paid civil servant will earn a basic
salary of $159, up
from $128 per month. Housing allowance has been upped to
$50 from $30, with
the transport allowance rising to $44 from $28.
PTUZ secretary-general
Raymond Majongwe has said the pay hike was a
‘pretence and a cruel
insult’.
Economist Luke Zunga told SW Radio Africa on Monday that
government should
treat the issue of salaries with caution because it has
the potential to
bankrupt state coffers and fuel inflation
again.
‘It’s an open secret that there is no cash in the fiscus so
government has
to look at ways to sustain that wage bill or else they will
bring back chaos
in the economy,’ Zunga said.
He added: ‘At the
moment the issue has been politicised and there are
politicians who are
playing to the gallery to the detriment of the economy.
This government is
visibly broke and struggling to turn back an
unprecedented economic slide.
If the issue of salaries is not dealt with
properly it will destabilise the
economic recovery.’
Over the last three months Mugabe has been
proclaiming that civil servants
would get salary increases from cash
generated through the sale of diamonds.
But money from the Chiadzwa diamonds
is tightly controlled by ZANU PF and is
never sent to the
treasury.
Mugabe has tried to use the issue of civil servant salaries to
undermine the
MDC-T, who hold the finance portfolio in the inclusive
government. The two
parties have been engaged in an open conflict over this
issue and Mugabe has
used it to rally pro-ZANU PF workers to attack the
MDC-T, for its refusal to
implement the disastrous pay hike scheme.
http://www.bloomberg.com
By Brian Latham - Jul
4, 2011 5:14 PM GMT+1000
Many teachers in Zimbabwe are on strike
and may be joined by other state
employees after the government offered a
“paltry” wage increase, the Daily
News said, citing Raymond Majongwe, the
secretary general of the Progressive
Teachers’ Union of Zimbabwe.
The
wages of the lowest-paid government employees rose to $159 a month from
$128, or to $243 including allowances from $180, the Harare-based Daily News
said on its website.
The increase was negotiated by the Apex Council,
which includes the
government and some unions representing state employees,
though not the
Progressive Teachers’ Union, the Daily News said.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw/
By Godfrey Mtimba
Monday, 04 July 2011
11:48
MASVINGO - Officers from the Zimbabwe National Army (ZNA) 4-2
Infantry
battalion in Gutu have been accused of frightening villagers in the
surrounding areas by performing army drills and road runs while singing war
songs.
The villagers said they are living in fear of the over 200
military men who
perform drills every Wednesdays and Fridays around
Gutu-Mupandawana Growth
Point and the surrounding areas.
“We are
living in fear here because of these soldiers from the nearby camp.
They run
singing political songs that back Zanu PF and the message in the
songs sort
of warns us to support it or we will face consequences,” said
Monica
Tavaguta Nerupiri village.
Mupandawana growth point residents say they do
not understand why soldiers
do their drills in residential areas and
villages other than for the purpose
of intimidating them.
“We are
failing to see the logic of this, why would they come to do their
activities
in the residential areas, more so singing intimidating songs.
This is no
longer a normal military activity,” said Last Chin’ombe another
resident of
Mupandawana growth point.
The Zimbabwe National Army (ZNA) Masvingo
provincial spokesperson, Warrant
Officer, Kingstone Chivave dismissed the
claims saying the soldiers are mere
recruits from a satellite recruit
training centre who will be going through
their training paces.
“It’s
not true that soldiers are intimidating villagers here. We have
recruits
who are under training and they are not singing those songs.
We have our
special routes we use when running and we have even marked them
and
indicated ‘Recruits training’ and villagers should not be afraid of
these
recruits,” said Chivave.
He added that the army has even informed the
police about the activities of
the recruits.
But villagers insisted
that the soldiers were intimidating them.
The MDC leadership here say the
activities of the soldiers were a clear
indication that Zimbabwe was now a
military state run by the country’s state
security apparatus.
The
party said the use of soldiers was to intimidate rural folks ahead of
elections that Zanu PF wanted to force this year but failed.
“This
shows that the country is now a military state and is being run by the
military as they have the power to do whatever they wish.
It’s a Zanu
PF strategy to instil fear into villagers ahead of the elections
and it
would use the soldiers to force the ordinary rural folks to vote for
them,”
said Rensome Makumure MDC provincial vice-chairman.
Zanu PF is also
accused of deploying soldiers in civilian clothes in the
province’s seven
districts who are moving around in preparation of the
anticipated
elections.
http://www.radiovop.com
Harare, July 04, 2011-Zimbabwe Republic
Police has declared war on Movement
for Democratic Change supporters for
invading police stations.
Police accuse the MDC-T for invading their
offices whenever their activists
are arrested.
“We have observed a
worrisome trend amongst MDC activists that whenever we
arrest any MDC
member/s for committing crimes, they mobilise themselves and
invade police
stations harassing and threatening officers, thereby
disturbing and
compromising security and smooth running of the station.
Should such
conduct manifest itself again we will invoke the necessary
standing orders
as they relate to security of police establishments and we
will use
necessary force to ensure compliance, besides invoking the
applicable laws,
“the police said in a statement it inserted in the state
controlled Sunday
newspaper.
The police said MDC activists invaded Rhodesville and Matapi
police stations
last month in search of Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s
senior aid
Jameson Timba who was arrested.
“It is unfortunate that
the behaviour of invading police stations is
synonymous with the MDC.Thruogh
admission in media reports the MDC have
invaded Rhodesville and Matapi
police stations in the latest arrest of Mr
Jameson Timba. It is invasion
like these that will not be tolerated in
future and may everyone please
take heed, “the police added.
Contacted for comment MDC-T spokesperson
Daglous Mwonzora said “The police
want to use this as an excuse to maim and
kill our supporters. There were no
such invasions and it’s untrue for the
police to say that. When Minister
Timba was arrested our members visited a
number of police stations trying to
locate him since thepolice did not want
to tell us which police station they
had put him.
Our members wanted
to give Minister Timba some food and warm clothing in the
process”.
MDC has been complaining about the selective application of
law in the
country, especially the continued arrest of its members. The
police recently
declared war against MDC when it accused the party
supporters of killing one
of officers in Glenview.
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
By Thelma Chikwanha, Community Affairs Editor
Monday, 04 July
2011 15:51
HARARE - Zimbabwe and South Africa could be headed for
another diplomatic
furore after Zanu PF strategist and serial political
turncoat Jonathan Moyo
suggested that facilitator to the Zimbabwe political
crisis, President Jacob
Zuma could be aiding the “regime change agenda” in
the country.
But Zuma’s international relations advisor, Lindiwe Zulu
immediately
dismissed Moyo’s astonishing claims, saying they will not be
distracted from
continuing their facilitation role for the sake of
Zimbabweans.
Political analysts also dismissed Moyo saying he was an
ambitious individual
who was strangely creating more unnecessary problems
between Zimbabwe and
South Africa.
The analysts said Moyo’s agenda
was far deeper than “defending” Mugabe amid
reports that the man who
sensationally said the 87-year-old leader was so
unelectable he could lose
to a donkey, was destroying Zanu PF from within
after a dismal failure in
the Tsholotsho “coup” of 2004.
Moyo, who has of late been at the
forefront of Zanu PF propaganda even
though the official spokesperson Rugare
Gumbo recently said he should not
speak on behalf of the party, questioned
whether Zuma’s facilitation role
was similar to US ambassador, Charles Ray’s
“regime change agenda.”
He wrote in the state media yesterday:
“Ambassador Ray’s intervention last
week must be taken very seriously when
seen not only against the background
of Tsvangirai’s demonisation of the
security sector as a backbone
institution but also as seen against the very
worrying archival fact that
the Facilitator’s Report of the ill-fated Sadc
Troika summit held in
Livingstone on March 31 is astonishingly entitled
“Zimbabwe Peace Process”.
“In God’s name, what peace process did the
Facilitator have in his mind? Is
Zimbabwe at war? Indeed, has Zimbabwe been
at war? Which or who are the
warring armies? Is the Facilitator not aware
that Zimbabwe has a GPA
government in place?
“The GPA stands for
“Global Political Agreement” and not “Global Peace
Agreement”.
The
GPA was signed after an inconclusive 2008 parliamentary election and not
after a war. Quite clearly, the attempt to revise the 2008 GPA from a
political to a peace process smacks of a sinister and totally unacceptable
attempt to allege that our country has rabies of war when it clearly does
not. Is the intention to justify Ambassador Ray’s regime change wish to
change the roots and foundation of our country?”
Moyo particularly
dwelt on paragraph three of Zuma’s report at the Troika
summit in
Livingstone which he said was dangerous for Zimbabwe. The
paragraph reads:
“The developments in the Northern part of our continent
should impress upon
all of us within the Sadc region, about the need and
importance of resolving
the Zimbabwean impasse speedily and in a way that
will not just satisfy the
Sadc region but also that would be acceptable to
the entire
world”.
Moyo commented on Zuma’s paragraph and said: “God forbid! Did the
Facilitator really believe that we in Zimbabwe should conduct our national
politics in a way that would be acceptable to the entire world? Which
entire world? Which country in Sadc conducts its national politics in that
way?
“It is such unacceptable sentiments, as captured under paragraph
three of
the Facilitator’s Livingstone Report which is now consigned to the
archives,
which dovetail with last week’s regime change call by US
Ambassador Ray to
change not just the roof of our government but also the
foundation or roots
of our governance as part of the Sadc election roadmap
which prove the
current threat to our national security represented by
Tsvangirai and his
MDC.
“The new issues about security sector reform,
media reform and the reform of
ZEC among others which Tsvangirai has tabled
as part of the so-called Sadc
roadmap to Zimbabwe’s elections are not only
outside the GPA as signed on
September 15, 2008 but they also constitute a
threat to our national
security and should be vigorously resisted for that
reason and that reason
alone.”
Contacted for comment on Moyo’s views,
Zulu said Zuma did not want to be
involved in the “irrelevant” newspaper
opinion but insisted that they will
continue with the mandate of solving the
Zimbabwean crisis given to them by
Sadc.
“We do not want to be side
lined from our mandate which is to assist in the
implementation of the
Global Political Agreement (GPA) and the drafting of a
roadmap which we have
done and Sadc has accepted the reports made by
President Zuma,” Zulu
said.
“We are not going to be side-lined from the process by people who
are not
even part of the negotiating team. We are trying to get Zimbabwe
back to
normal therefore we will not comment on anything outside the formal
process,’’
Zulu said.
Analysts canvassed by the Daily News called on
Sadc to heed to Moyo’s
ramblings which they believe are a seriously
undermining of the negotiated
government.
Political analyst Charles
Mangongera said it was about time that sensible
people in Zanu PF stepped
onto the scene and reign in Moyo who was now
destroying relations between
Zanu PF and the world.
“His unmeasured language is not suitable for
engagement. Zanu PF must put an
end to the nonsense. Moyo is a senior member
of the party and what he says
is perceived to be the views of Zanu PF,”
Mangongera said.
“Jonathan Moyo is just representing a small clique which
includes some
members of the security establishment,” Mangongera added
on.
“Moyo represents a small clique which includes some members of the
security
establishment and I sense that he is trying to ingratiate himself
with the
military so that he can strategically place himself. He sees them
as the
king maker and he wants to put himself in a strategic position,”
Mangongera
said.
Human Rights researcher Pedzisai Ruhanya said it was
unfounded for Moyo to
dismiss Sadc intervention through the facilitator Zuma
because Zimbabwe had
invited regional intervention because of the manner in
which elections were
conducted.
“If Moyo is a real political scientist as
he claims to be, he should know
that politics is about regime change and
regime retention and there is
nothing unlawful about the two sides of
politics. Moyo himself for the
better part of his political life has been
calling for regime change,”
Ruhanya said.
“His book entitled Voting
For Democracy published by the University of
Zimbabwe in 1992, is purely
about regime change.
“The question is why should Zimbabwe and the rest of
the world pander to
Moyo’s flip flopping at every stage of his political
life?”
Ruhanya went on to describe Moyo as an epitome of political
confusion which
any serious policy maker should not take heed of. He warned
the military
against taking Moyo’s advice.
“My warning to generals is
that whereas Moyo uses the pen to incite hatred,
if they follow his advice,
they will be sent to The Hague while he remains
safe. They need to be
careful,” Ruhanya said.
He urged the military to stick to their
constitutional mandate of protecting
the citizens saying that history would
judge them for not operating within
the mandate of the Zimbabwe Defence Act.
http://www.swradioafrica.com
by Irene Madongo
04 July
2011
Key ZANU PF officials have been approaching the MDC-T with the aim
of
working closely together in the post-Mugabe era, the MDC-T has
said.
Officials in ZANU PF are generally understood to be split into two
factions,
one led by Defence Minister Emmerson Mnangagwa and the other by
Vice-President Joice Mujuru. Reports of infighting to take over the party
leadership from 87-year old Robert Mugabe are increasing, as his health
continues to deteriorate. The winner is unlikely to pose a challenge to the
MDC-T’s Tsvangirai, observers say, and key civilian officials are keen to
build bridges with the MDC-T leadership.
Those ZANU PF officials
belonging to the military however, are continuing to
condemn Tsvangirai.
Recently Brigadier-General Douglas Nyikayaramba said
Tsvangirai was a
national security threat and the army will die to make sure
Mugabe stays in
power. The military generals are understood to dread their
fate if
Tsvangirai comes to power.
On Monday, following reports that ZANU PF
insiders have admitted overtures
to the MDC, Douglas Mwonzora, the MDC-T
spokesman, confirmed that top ZANU
PF officials from both the Mujuru and
Mnangagwa factions have been speaking
to his party over the past few
months.
“Quite a number of ZANU PF people at parliament, at government
level, and so
on, have been making overtures to the MDC with an aim of
working together
with the progressive forces,” Mwonzora said. “People come
under the
realisation that President Robert Mugabe is not the hope for the
future
anymore.”
“Most of the people are talking post-Mugabe and
[have] come with the
acknowledgement that President Tsvangirai is the man
for the future and they
want to work with him,” he explained.
“They
look at a variety of factors. The attendance at rallies is a telling
sign
that he commands unquestionably the [support of the] majority of
Zimbabweans. Secondly, Tsvangirai is younger than Mugabe, of course.
Tsvangirai is a man of the people, he is loved by the people, he is down to
earth, very practicable. Mugabe is aloof, sick and so on.”
Mwonzora
said ZANU PF approaches to the MDC have been varied, with some
coming
directly, while others were more cautious.
Efforts to reach ZANU PF for a
comment were not successful.
http://www.ibtimes.com/
By
Michael Martin | July 4, 2011 11:31 AM EDT
Beijing solidified a business
partnership with Zimbabwe last week that
unionists say is responsible for
abusive work environments across the
southern African nation.
In a
diplomatic visit of Zimbabwean officials to Beijing, both nations'
ruling
parties pledged to make good on a 2010 treaty, promising strengthened
Sino-Zimbabwean political and economic cooperations.
But some
Zimbabweans say that ties are strong enough.
Late last year, the Zimbabwe
Allied Trade Workers Union Secretary-General
Muchapiwa Mazarura reportedly
said that strong ties between Beijing and
Zimbabwean President Robert
Mugabe's administration have enabled Chinese
companies in Zimbabwe to
operate above the law.
Mazarura explained that when Zimbabwean
authorities were alerted to numerous
accounts of the Chinese companies'
physical abuse and underpayment, labor
laws were not enforced.
"We
would like to warn the Chinese contractors who are operating in Zimbabwe
that if they do not follow the laid-down laws, the union is going to take
strong action against them," Mazarura told Newsday, a Zimbabwean
newspaper.
Mazarura sent a letter to Zimbabwean labor authorities. In the
past half
year, there has been no substantive response, and the nation's
unions have
been engaged in countless similar battles to hold Chinese
accompanies
accountable to local laws.
"The Chinese companies are
exploiting us," said Douglas, a Zimbabwean
construction worker represented
by Mazarura, in a phone interview from
Harare, Zimbabwe's capital. He asked
to use his nickname in order to insure
job security.
A general
laborer, Douglas says he makes .90 Zimbabwean Dollars, less than
one
American cent, each hour. It takes him four and half hours, nearly half
an
entire workday, to make enough money for just one two liter bottle of
cooking oil.
Although he says his salary is barely enough to support
his wife and two
children, physical safety is Douglas' chief
concern.
"We are working without safety clothes," he said, explaining
that workers
are not provided with necessary protective gear.
Douglas
also said physical abuse and arbitrary dismissals are a daily fear
for
workers at his construction company.
"There were some workers who were
beaten and fired at work without payment.
Once there was a truck of cement
some guys were unloading. One bag fell off
the truck, and they were beaten
and fired immediately," Douglas said.
Douglas' opinion of Chinese
enterprise in Africa has been soured by his
experiences with his
company.
"The Chinese are not helping Africa," he said, "They want us to
work
[without any] power."
Another construction worker from another
company who called himself Claudios
also has a very poor impression of
Chinese people after his experiences with
Chinese companies.
"The
Chinese are being very rude to us," he said, "Because they are a rude
society."
"They are taking us a slaves. They don't want to use local
labor laws."
Claudios said he often faces underpayment and late wages.
Like Douglas, he
also complained that he had not been given necessary
protective gear.
Individual workers' accusations have translated into
Mazarura's sweeping
attack on all Chinese enterprises in the
country.
Asked for a list of companies acting in breach of Zimbabwean
labor laws,
Mazarura said that no such list existed.
"This is true of
all the Chinese companies," Mazarura said.
In interviews with the
Zimbabwean press, Mazarura addressed "Chinese
companies," never leveling
complaints against specific enterprises.
Some analysts say attacking
Chinese enterprises as a collective unit may
worsen the situation of workers
in Zimbabwe and across Africa.
"The unionists ought to look at [the]
picture in broader way," said James
Shikwati, renowned African economist, on
the phone from Nairobi.
"It's ok to speak to a specific problem, but you
ought not demonize one
player [in African international business]. If they
tell the Chinese to get
out, there's not going to be any competition. A
monopoly would hurt the
workers, because now, if Chinese companies aren't
doing well, the workers
can go work for [a] US company or they can go work
for [an] Indian company."
Shikwati noted that while stories about
exploitation and inhospitable work
environments at Chinese companies are
popping up all over Africa, one must
still note that India, the US and South
Africa have all had histories of
exploiting labor in the
region.
Meanwhile workers like Douglas and Claudios remain with Chinese
companies
that mistreat them because of crippling political economic
instability.
"In a country where you have people trying to go to
neighboring nations like
South Africa to work, people are happy just to have
jobs, so if they are
abused by their employers, that isn't much of a factor
in their
decision-making," said Melvin Ayogu, a fellow at the Brookings
Institution's
Africa Growth Initiative.
The Economics Bureau of the
Chinese Mission to the United Nations was
unavailable for comment at time of
publication.
http://www.radiovop.com
Harare, July 04, 2011-FIFA President Sepp Blatter
arrived in Zimbabwe on a
private jet Monday at the start of a two-day visit
to meet administrators of
the southern African nation’s controversy-mired
game.
State radio said he is expected to call on President Robert Mugabe
and watch
a women’s international match against Malawi later in the day. He
will also
inspect training facilities that urgently need funding in
the
troubled economy.
An advance party of four FIFA officials arrived Sunday,
including two
match-fixing investigators.
Last year, Zimbabwe captain
Method Mwanjali and four team mates admitted
taking money to lose matches on
a 2009 tour to Thailand and Malaysia.
Zimbabwe lost 3-0 to Thailand and 6-0
to Syria and the
players said they were paid between $500 and
$1,500.
Zimbabwe Sports Minister David Coltart said Monday he hopes the
FIFA team,
which includes its head of security Chris Eaton, will recommend
punishment
for those found guilty.
“Hopefully FIFA will stick by the
(Zimbabwe) government’s determination to
deal with corruption,” Coltart told
The Associated Press. “We expect them to
endorse that there has been
criminality and
prosecution must follow.” Times Live
http://www.dailynews.co.zw
By Xolisani Ncube, Staff Writer
Monday, 04
July 2011 18:17
HARARE - Harare city councillors have rejected 2011
proposals for budgetary
cuts made by Local Government, Rural and Urban
Development Minister Ignatius
Chombo and now want to confront him on the
matter.
They say the drastic measures taken by Chombo a month ago
will have an
impact on service delivery.
The councillors resolved on
Thursday last week, to engage Chombo so he can
justify the cuts. They
believe Chombo effected the cuts to gain cheap
political mileage.
The
councillors, “resolved to recommend that the Minister of Local
Government,
Rural and Urban Development be engaged with the view of
expressing the
council’s concern on budget amendment and the impact on
service
delivery.”
The councillors claim that the budget cuts are not cost
effective and will
leave the city in the red, a situation which will affect
the city’s ability
to offer services to residents.
“The city
treasurer submits a report on the impact of the proposed budget
amendment to
overall service delivery,” the councillors resolved.
Using the Urban
Councils Act Section 314(1), Chombo amended the $260 million
2011 council
budget affecting areas such as health, water and rentals.
Section 314 (3)
of the Urban Councils Act states that, “The council shall,
with the due
expedition, comply with any direction given to it in terms of
subsection (1)
by the minister.”
Residents lobby groups say the unilateral budget cuts
proposed by the
minister, who in the past has fired elected local government
officials on
flimsy grounds, have a capacity of exposing ratepayers to
another deadly
cholera outbreak that claimed over 4 000 lives in
2008.
The groups are arguing that the cuts are mostly affecting the
operations of
the city’s health facilities which cater for most poor
residents.
The city health account was projected to realise a $11,9
million deficit
before the cut which now leaves it further in the
red.
Combined Harare Resident Association (CHRA) chairperson Simbarashe
Moyo last
week said the budget cut was an attempt to de-campaign MDC
councillors.
He said Chombo was pretending to be protecting the interests
of the
residents yet he is in actual fact fighting them.
“Why did he
just slash the budget without clear reasons?” asked Moyo.
“Chombo has
imposed himself as mayor-general who is in charge of affairs of
all the
councils in the country.
We know that he is fighting MDC councils to make
them appear as if they are
not doing anything.”
However, Harare
Resident Trust (HRT) co-ordinator Precious Shumba welcomed
the cuts saying
council should deal with the bloated workforce which they
claim was
consuming more of the revenue generated.
http://www.swradioafrica.com
By Lance Guma
04 July
2011
Co-Home Affairs Minister Theresa Makone has been criticized for her
perceived lack of effort in fighting the corner of 24 MDC-T members, charged
with allegedly killing a policeman in Glen View 2. Anna Manjoro, mother of
Cynthia Manjoro, a 26 year old IT specialist who is still behind bars, told
our Behind the Headlines programme of her frustration in trying to get an
audience with Makone.
On Friday High Court Judge Tendai Uchena heard
the bail applications for the
group and it was expected Manjoro would be
freed, seeing as it’s clearly
understood she was nowhere near the scene of
the crime. However only 12 of
those who have been locked up for over a month
were granted bail, while the
other 12, including Manjoro, were considered a
‘flight risk’ and denied
bail.
A desperate Mai Manjoro says she has
been battling to get an audience with
senior MDC-T officials over her
daughter’s plight. “I tried to speak to
comrade (Nelson) Chamisa. I was told
that I would get back to you. I didn’t
get any feedback. I tried Mai Makone,
she didn’t even talk to me. I tried
the Speaker of Parliament’s office, I
didn’t get any joy. I just wanted to
find out what the situation is,” she
said.
Last year Makone hit the headlines just a week after being sworn in
as
co-Home Affairs Minister after she and Presidential Affairs Minister
Didymus
Mutasa went to Mbare, Matapi and Stodart police stations in Harare,
to
demand the release of Mutasa’s son Martin. The 47 year old Martin Mutasa,
notorious ZANU PF activist Themba Mliswa and George Marere had been arrested
after trying to seize shareholdings worth US$1 million from a company owned
by a white businessman.
But it would appear no such enthusiasm is
being shown by Makone to take an
interest in the case involving Cynthia
Manjoro and the other 23 MDC-T
supporters. There were reports Makone had
pledged to meet Mai Manjoro over
her daughter’s plight, but this has still
not happened.
Mai Manjoro said she read about the incident involving
Makone and Minister
Mutasa’s son and, “I saw some comments which were really
nasty and
castigating her actions. It’s like we are in an animal farm where
other
animals are more equal than others. That’s how I would put the
situation.”
She said all she wanted was ‘someone to say we are doing ABC to
help. The
top guys should be seen to be concerned.”
SW Radio Africa
has information that even Police Deputy Commissioner-General
(Operations),
Innocent Matibiri, has confessed to members of the Manjoro
family that he
knows Cynthia is innocent. He however claimed Manjoro’s
alleged boyfriend
Darlington Madzonga drove her car, which was seen near
scene of the crime.
Matibiri confirmed Manjoro was being used as bait to get
Madzonga.
It
is this admission from the police which is infuriating Cynthia’s mother.
“If
they really wanted Darlington Madzonga, they should have taken one of
his
close relatives. In this case he does not care because he has many
girlfriends I suppose. If he had been committed to marrying Cynthia, at
least it would make sense but in this case I don’t even know him. Last time
I spoke to Darlington Madzonga he said he would go with his lawyers to the
police.”
http://bulawayo24.com
by Moyo Roy
2011July04
12:28:12
British Member of Parliament Denis MacShane who says he has been
committed
to regime change for much of his political life recently said he
would like
to see regime change in Zimbabwe.
Speaking recently in the
House of Commons during the debate about
humanitarian aid to Libya,
MacShane, who claims to have campaigned for the
collapse of apartheid rule
in South Africa said he would want to see regime
change in Zimbabwe and in
Burma.
He is the same MP who urged Zimbabwean asylum seekers to accept Mr
Tsvangirai’s appeal to return home – saying there was no longer any reason
for them to be able to "jump the queue", following Morgan's speech saying
there was peace and stability in Zimbabwe.
He is the same MP who
urged businesses to disinvest from Zimbabwe. This is
not the first time he
has said that, he once told the House of Commons that
British Airways and
Virgin Atlantic flights and taxpayer’s aid to Zimbabwe
should be suspended
until the Mugabe regime has been replaced. He added that
Tory MPs who
invested in firms propping up Mugabe should be required to
disinvest along
similar lines that helped bring an end to the apartheid
regime. MacShane
singled out Robert Goodwill, the Tory MP for Scarborough
and Whitby who has
refused to sell his shares in a company involved with
Zimbabwe on the
grounds that "this is not a good time to sell shares."
MacShane said that
BA amd Virgin Atlantic made stopovers in Harare and these
should now be cut.
He also revealed that Lufthansa and KLM flew directly to
Harare and
described these flight as a 'life-line for the Zimbabwe regime'
which the EU
should sever.
Britain is a quandary about what to do about Zimbabwe
especially since the
disputed 2008 elections. It tried to bring in the
United Nations Security
Council to pass a resolution to impose sanctions on
Zimbabwe or allow
military intervention but these were vetoed by China and
Russia.
President Robert Mugabe's government has has always accused the
British
government and Western nations for its woes, especially the labour
government of Tony Blair. Mugabe and his supporters have always said
Tsvangirai is a foreign invention.
http://www.newzimbabwe.com/
04/07/2011 00:00:00
by Staff
Reporter
A CATTLE thief has been sentenced to 189 years in jail for
stock theft –
dwarfing the previous record sentence of 47 years for the
crime.
Fabion Nyamayedenga, 40, from Murehwa, raided farms and kraals in
Mashonaland East province between October 2009 and December 2010.
He was
arrested earlier this year in Buhera.
Nyamayedenga was charged with 22
counts of stock theft and was convicted of
all but one by Buhera magistrate
Henry Sande last week.
Murehwa businessman, Searchmore Muvirimi, who had been
charged alongside
Nyamayedenga, was acquitted.
The magistrate
conditionally suspended 90 years of Nyamayedenga’s sentence,
meaning he
would be eligible for release after 99 years.
The harsh punishment is in
line with tough new sentencing guidelines in
stock theft cases after law
makers moved to change the law in response to
rising cases of cattle
rustling.
Magistrates must impose a mandatory nine-year minimum
sentence.
In July 2009, Masvingo man Zakaria Chigome was jailed for 47
years for
stealing 21 cows, 11 of which had calves.
The sentence was
at the time said to be the longest imposed in a stock theft
case.
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
South African is bringing a quiet feud
with Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe into
the open, urging Zimbabwe's people to
follow an election plan that has been
drafted by the regional body SADC and
negotiators of the three parties in
the GNU.
04.07.1106:21am
Chief
Reporter
Diplomats said South Africa was beginning to acknowledge
that ordinary
people in Zimbabwe need help to depose their leader. Amid
grinding poverty,
political and military rulers in Zimbabwe have enriched
themselves at the
expense of their countrymen. And this cabal is threatening
to disrespect the
wishes of the people if any other leader other than Mugabe
is elected. Those
who have tried to fight for liberation have been beaten up
or detained.
In recent weeks, analysts say, the JOC has effectively
vetoed government
initiatives, including agreement to implement the
outstanding 24 issues in
the global political agreement that gave birth to
the GNU, ordering arrests
of senior MDC officials and banning MDC meetings
in apparent breach of
Cabinet directives.
They point to the arrest of
minister of State in the PM's office Jameson
Timba and threats made on the
person of Finance minister Tendai Biti by war
veterans, who barricaded him
his office threatening to manhandle him over
payouts and for defying
Mugabe.
It is alleged that the JOC has also shown open disdain for the
MDC factions
in the coalition. A military brigadier general has said the PM
was a present
danger to national security and cannot be allowed to take over
power.
Mugabe's spokesman George Charamba wrote in a weekly column in the
local
daily Herald, that "brigadier general Douglas Nyikayaramba was a
general
with an army," suggesting he had full backing of securocrats and
that he
spoke on behalf of the JOC. This “fifth column,” according to
political
analyst Ibbo Mandaza is hell-bent on frustrating the MDC factions
into
quitting the GNU.
“To put it simply, there is a fifth column
within the Zimbabwean state,
purporting both to represent the ‘securocrats’
who are opposed to the MDC
and its involvement in the GNU and reflect the
mainstream Zanu PF thinking,”
Mandaza said.
Diplomatic sources say
President Jacob Zuma's facilitation team has
apparently been instructed to
depart from diplomatic parlance and secrecy to
level the unusual broadside
on Mugabe and the JOC's escalating repression.
In the process, Zuma has
placed himself at odds with his predecessor,
President Thabo Mbeki, who
pathetically publicly embraced Mugabe in a futile
effort to end a wave of
violence in advance of the 2008 elections.
Our source said South Africa
was committed to diplomatic efforts to resolve
the crisis, in which
supporters of Mugabe have beaten and intimidated
opposition-party
supporters.
But he also said ordinary people were not bound by the
diplomacy of South
Africa and other nations.
Zanu PF spindoctor Prof
Jonathan Moyo has complained that President Zuma was
taking sides with Prime
Minister Morgan Tsvangirai's MDC party. Analysts say
Zuma has been even
handed and handled the mediation without bias, but with a
firm hand that
threatens Mugabe's hold on power. It is the endgame for Zanu
PF, analysts
say.
"We respect President Zuma's mediation, however, we have also said
we take
strong exception to the behaviour of at least one member of his
facilitation
team Lindiwe Zulu on the basis of comments she is making
publicly, which
comments show exceeding bias such that even partisan people
will have
problems with some of these comments," Moyo said.
Zulu has
opened up about the delicate mediation in Zimbabwe, and pointed out
that
Zanu PF was refusing to share power. She has insisted on security
sector
reforms that have shaken Zanu PF to the core. And that includes a
plan to
retire the partisan chief of police and the head of the army.
Tsvangirai has
said the securocrats should take off their uniforms and
square off with him
in the political arena.
And a recent rally in Gweru, Tsvangirai told his
supporters that the people
will have to end this. He said the people had the
power and capacity to end
the tyranny that has oppressed them for
years.
He said it was a lesson of history that people power can topple
tyrants "and
I am confident that you have the capacity to do so," Tsvangirai
said.
Asked whether the remarks were directed at Mugabe, he replied:
"Everybody
knows who I am talking about."
Zuma's insistence on full
implementation of the GPA and the election roadmap
and by implication
Mugabe's ouster has been rejected by his allies in SADC,
who have urged a
softer approach to the crisis and solidarity among
Zimbabwe's neighbors in
southern Africa.
Zulu has defiantly told Zanu PF that President Zuma is
not bothered with
statements made outside the mediation process and will not
be bothered by
the ranting of Zanu PF officials. Zulu has said the mediation
team will be
guided by the position taken at the talks.
A Southern
African diplomat said: "Lindiwe Zulu is no doubt espousing
President Zuma's
view. Mr. Zuma has explained his position that he wants the
GPA fully
implemented and the roadmap followed. He doesn't want to see
another 2008,"
he said of the internationally condemned 2008 disputed
president election
that saw Mugabe the election loser remain in office.
"President Zuma's
mediation is clearly in contrast with the pronouncements
and show of
friendship toward the Zimbabwean leader by Mr. Mbeki," the
diplomat
said.
Asked how he viewed Zuma's robustness in handling Zimbabwe's
convoluted
mediation, the diplomat said, "Mr. Zuma has always been his own
man and at
times a bit of a loose cannon."
Reports of a feud between
Zuma and Mugabe -two of the continent's best-known
leaders of liberation
movements against white domination -have long been
whispered.
An aide
of PM Tsvangirai who has sat through a recent meeting between Zuma
and
Tsvangirai at his rural home in KwaZulu Natal said for Zuma, Mugabe
represents a type of African independence leader who fought successfully for
independence, then drifted toward tyranny by clinging to power.
"He
(Zuma) thinks Mugabe now despises the very people who put him in power,
and
he think it is his privilege to be there for eternity," said the PM's
aide.
After the recent meeting between Tsvangirai and Zuma, the
senior aide
suggested that Zulu was speaking with Zuma's
blessing.
"She is free to say what everybody feels. She is President
Zuma's foreign
policy advisor. Do not underestimate how tough Zuma is in
private talks with
Mugabe," the official told The Zimbabwean
http://www.ipsnews.net/
By Tariro Madzongwe
HARARE, Jul. 4,
2011 (IPS) - For over four years now, Tendai Dzingirai * has
lived each day
afraid that it may be his last. Dzingirai is one of almost 60
inmates on
death row in Zimbabwe’s prisons. But like the other prisoners,
Dzingirai
does not know when he will finally meet his fate – especially
since the
country has not had an executioner for the last six years.
Since 2005,
when the country’s last hangman retired, there has been a
moratorium on
executions as the country is still searching for a
replacement.
"For
this matter we are waiting for a proper directive from cabinet. There
is
currently a moratorium on the death penalty since the matter is before
cabinet," said the country’s deputy minister of justice Obert
Gutu.
And it may be a long time before one is found as Zimbabweans shun
the job
because of superstition and cultural reasons.
According to
Gutu, Zimbabweans mostly look down on the hangman’s job since
it entails the
"murdering" of people, which most locals believe brings "evil
spirits" to
the hangman and his family.
"In the African culture, a job that entails
the killing of another human
being is not considered a job at all. It is
looked at with contempt and
superstition, mostly because as Africans we
believe that if one kills
another human being the spirit of that person will
return to torment its
killer and his family."
He added that a
majority of Zimbabweans, like himself, did not believe in
the death
penalty.
"To the best of my knowledge I am not sure when (a hangman) will
be engaged.
I don’t know whether the process is in motion, but I know there
is currently
no hangman. Ordinary Zimbabweans are not comfortable with the
death
penalty."
Gutu castigated the death penalty describing it as a
primitive and inhumane
form of punishment that should not be on the statute
books of any civilised
and progressive country.
"My own suggestion is
that all people on death row should have their
sentences immediately
commuted to life imprisonment. It is psychologically
traumatic and inhumane
to keep people on death row perpetually," Gutu said.
Gutu said his
ministry has been advertising the job since 2005 and not many
people have
expressed an interest in applying.
Like any other civil service job, the
monthly salary is pegged at around a
paltry 300 dollars. The job is reserved
for men only and the identity of the
person will remain a closely guarded
secret.
In one of the advertisements by the ministry of justice,
requirements for
the job include dexterity in tying a knot and a
cold-hearted person. Anyone
prone to mercy or hesitation is instructed not
to apply.
The hangman will be stationed at the Chikurubi Maximum Prison
in Harare and
is warned that his work will have no routine. On any given day
he could be
required to execute between two to four prisoners. But months
and even a
year could pass before another hanging.
"It’s not a job
one can openly talk about, it’s a gory job only those deemed
evil and cursed
can ever want to do. Culturally, people shun the spilling of
human blood,
whether the victim is guilty or innocent," Gutu said.
Pedzisai Ruhanya, a
human rights academic and programs manager for Crisis
Coalition in Zimbabwe,
said the country had to do away with the death
penalty.
"If the state
does not allow citizens to kill each other so what right does
the state have
to kill its people? The death penalty is out dated…"
Ruhanya paid tribute
to Zimbabweans for shunning the hangman's job adding
that it was a
deplorable job no man should do.
"Only the devil himself can do that job
– not a normal human being. After
all the hangman is paid peanuts like the
rest of civil servants. Is 300
dollars (a month) enough for one to kill
people for? Never. Zimbabweans
should refuse to take up this
job."
Zimbabwe’s last hangman is said to be struggling with his
conscience and
claims to have regretted his job.
Many Zimbabweans
interviewed by IPS said they could not image doing the job.
Petros
Kamujarira, who earns a living repairing people’s shoes, said he
preferred
to die poor rather than be employed as an executioner.
"In my family from
my ancestors they was never a murderer so why should I be
the first one to
bring evil spirits into the family? Never will I ever do
it. It’s against
the Lord and our spirit mediums even if you have the
blessings of the
country’s laws. It’s still wrong and it will bring bad luck
through evil
spirits into the family," he told IPS.
"I am not so sure if I want to
have such a job which only entails killing
people. What would my wife,
children and relatives think of me knowing that
when I leave home daily for
work I will be going to kill someone else’s
mother, father, brother or
sister?" said John Mapapu who earns a living as a
vegetable vendor in one of
Harare’s high density suburbs.
Reverend Julius Zimbudzana from the
Anglican Church in Zimbabwe said
Zimbabweans were holy people and that is
why the position was still vacant.
*Name has been changed. (END)
[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]
FROM THE ZIMBABWE
VIGIL
We have been asked by
the Zimbabwe ‘We Can’ movement to circulate the following news
release.
Zimbabwe ‘We Can’
News Release
5th July
2011
Zimbabwe We Can (ZWC)
members held a very successful meeting on the 25th of June following
the meeting held on the 28th of May 2011. The follow on meeting held
in Greater Manchester, attracted more participants than the first one as it
included invited guests from groups that were under-represented at the initial
meeting.
The purpose of the
meeting was to put in place interim structures to support the operation of the
movement until elections are held at a national conference to appoint the
leadership substantively.
It was another very
successful conference with open discussions about the very worrying situation in
Zimbabwe. The significantly increased representation from groups not adequately
represented in the first meeting, such as young people and women, confirmed that
the Zimbabwean people’s concerns are generally similar. The search for solutions
is inclusive. It is indeed time for the voices of the silent majority to be
heard.
Participants agreed
that our great nation is fast approaching a crossroad – a crossroad where the
nation can slide in a direction where threats of violence will continue to be
the order of the day, a direction where our nation continues to be mentioned in
the same vein as the world’s pariah nations – outposts of tyranny.
Alternatively, we the people can choose to say ‘enough is enough’ and reclaim
what is rightly ours – our freedoms and our humanity. No one should take that
away from us
The participants all
agreed on the fact that now is the time for Zimbabweans to finally start
demanding our freedom. They shared the same sentiments that the sun is setting
on dictators, autocrats and their hangers on. It was agreed that the tide is
rising and the voices of the people are getting louder and louder from the
mountains and valleys, from the lowveld to the highlands, from the concrete
jungles of the diaspora and the ranks of our police and armed forces, whose
image is now being tarnished by a select few. Attendees shared the same view
that freedom can no longer be denied to the people and no one person should
claim ownership of the war of liberation because all the people of Zimbabwe made
sacrifices and fought together. It was agreed that there are no Zimbabweans who
have a right to lead the country more than others. Attendees agreed that, just
like our mothers and fathers fought against colonialism, it is time now to pick
up from where our forefathers left and fight against
oppression.
Views were echoed
that the Zimbabwean brand must be rebuilt, that we must build an identity that
we and our children will be proud of. Attendees shared the views that we can no
longer allow the image of our great nation to be tarnished by a select few whose
interests are only to grab from starving men and women whom they threaten with
bazookas and grenades. Participants shared the view that, sadly, we have to
stand up against those with whom we once fought alongside because they have
chosen to betray The People. We once fought alongside each other as
Zimbabweans. When victory was won two social classes emerged in Zimbabwe – an
extremely rich one and an impoverished class. We have to stand up and fight
against the fact that this very rich class is willing to destroy the national
education system because they send their children to top universities around the
world. Their children are being nurtured to be future leaders of the world
whilst the average Zimbabwean’s child is being groomed in the so called national
youth service camps to be ‘green bombers’ so that they follow orders to murder,
rape, beat and steal to name a few dirty assignments on behalf of the rich
elite.
Freedom for the
people of Zimbabwe continues to be a pipe dream- a myth. The people can no
longer accept the sacrifice of their freedom ‘in the name of patriotism’. Our
loyalty to our nation can no longer be mistaken for lack of interest.
This movement calls
on every Zimbabwean to join hands in the spirit of our nation, to rise up and
say to those who have failed us, ‘You are fired!’
Together we
can!
Zimbabweans, let’s
share ideas. Get in touch with us on:
E-mail: zimwecan@gmail.com,
Phone: +44
7940793090, +44 7858231828
Facebook: Zimbabwe
We Can (ZWC) http://www.facebook.com/pages/Zimbabwe-We-Can-ZWC/212227838819923
Zimbabwe Vigil
Co-ordinators
The Vigil, outside
the Zimbabwe Embassy, 429 Strand, London, takes place every Saturday from 14.00
to 18.00 to protest against gross violations of human rights in Zimbabwe. The
Vigil which started in October 2002 will continue until
internationally-monitored, free and fair elections are held in Zimbabwe. http://www.zimvigil.co.uk
CONSTITUTION WATCH
CONTENT SERIES 6/2011
[1st July
2011]
The Nature of a Constitution
The constitution of a country is a set of rules that define the
nature and extent of the country’s government.
It is sometimes referred to as the country’s fundamental or basic law,
and usually has supremacy over all other laws.
A constitution establishes the basic institutions of the State and
regulates the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government and the
relationships between those branches; many modern constitutions also regulate
relationships between individuals and their government, particularly by
guaranteeing individuals certain fundamental human rights.
In this Constitution Watch we shall examine some of the provisions
that can and should go into a constitution, dealing with them under the
following headings:
I. Institutions of government
II. Relations between individuals and the
government
III. Local government institutions
IV. Amendment of the constitution
V. Checks and balances
VI. Other matters
I Institutions of
Government
First and foremost, a country’s constitution must set out how the
country is governed, and must deal with the following
institutions:
1. The Executive Branch of Government
A constitution must specify who will have executive powers in
the State. It must say, for example,
whether the powers should be exercised by a President or a Prime Minister; and
if the powers are to be exercised by two or more people it must apportion the
powers clearly between them [This is one
of the most serious defects of the present Constitution as amended by the GPA:
the demarcation of powers between the President and the Prime Minister is so
vague that it makes their relationship unworkable.]. A constitution must also lay down what
powers are vested in the Executive and any limits on the exercise of those
powers.
2. The Legislative Branch of Government
A constitution must establish the legislative or law-making branch of
Government. If there are to be two or more law-making bodies (for example, a
Senate and a National Assembly) the constitution must indicate the relationship
between them and set out their respective powers. The constitution must specify if and how
other institutions of the State, including the Executive, are accountable to
Parliament. If the legislative branch is
to control taxation, then the constitution must also specify this [under the present Constitution, taxes
cannot be imposed unless Parliament passes a law authorising their
imposition].
3. The Judiciary
The judiciary [i.e. judges, magistrates and the court system] perform
a vital role in every State, by interpreting laws and resolving disputes. Hence a constitution must establish the
country’s court system and give the courts sufficient jurisdiction, i.e. power,
to carry out their role. In particular
the constitution should make it clear how far the courts can question the
actions of members of the Government and the validity of laws made by the
legislature.
4. Other Institutions of Government
In addition to the three main branches of Government, the Executive,
the Legislature and the Judiciary, there are other important institutions of the
Government which should be dealt with in a constitution. Some of these institutions form part of one
or other of the three branches. For
example, in many countries the Government’s functions are exercised through a
Cabinet of Ministers, and in that event the constitution should specify which
Ministers form the Cabinet and what its functions are.
In the Zimbabwean context, the security forces [the defence forces
and the police force] will need to be dealt with carefully because they exercise
the coercive powers of the State: that is to say, they compel individuals to do
what the Government wants, and the way they are currently exercising those
powers is controversial. The
constitution should indicate how far the security forces are to be under the
control of the government – how far they are to be controlled by the President
or the Prime Minister or the Cabinet – and whether Parliament should have a
supervisory role over their activities.
Apart from the security forces, a constitution may set up other
institutions such as commissions to conduct elections, to appoint people to
public offices, to foster human rights, to combat corruption, and so on. These institutions should be established by
the constitution rather than by ordinary legislation if they need to be
independent in order to exercise their functions properly.
5. Appointment and Election to Governmental
Institutions
A constitution must indicate how people are appointed or elected to
the various institutions of the State, so that the institutions can continue to
exist beyond the life-time of their first members. In the case of the Legislature, for example,
the constitution should state how members of Parliament are elected or
appointed, though in many countries the details of the electoral or appointing
process are left to be covered by ordinary legislation.
6. Relations Between Institutions of Government
A constitution must indicate how the different institutions of
government function in relation to each other.
For example:
Relations between the Executive and the
Legislature
The constitution should state whether members of the Executive such
as Ministers are to be members of Parliament.
If not, how is the Executive to influence the laws passed by Parliament
[as it must do, in a modern State]? The
constitution should also indicate how far the Executive should participate in
the law-making process: for example,
must Acts of Parliament be assented to by the Head of
State?
Relations between the Executive and the
Judiciary
By specifying how judicial officers are appointed, the constitution
will indicate how far the judiciary is to be independent of the Executive: in other words, if judges and magistrates are
appointed at the discretion of the Head of State they will be subservient to the
Executive, but if they are appointed by a non-partisan commission they are
likely to be independent. The
constitution should also state to what extent the actions of the Executive can
be reviewed by the courts.
Relations between the
Legislature and the Judiciary
Similarly, relations between the Legislature and the judiciary will
be affected by how judges and magistrates are appointed, and the constitution
should state what powers the courts have to declare laws to be
invalid.
II Relations Between
Individuals and Government
An important part of every modern constitution is a Declaration or
Bill of Rights, which sets out fundamental human rights which are at least
partially protected against violation by the Government. The nature and extent of these rights vary
from constitution to constitution, but generally all or most of the fundamental
rights that are set out in such international conventions as the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights should be included.
Most progressive constitutions also have provisions for Social and
Economic Rights set out in the International Covenant Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights.
III Local Government
Institutions
The history and circumstances of a country will determine whether,
and to what extent, the country’s constitution should deal with devolution of
power [the transfer of power from central government to provinces, districts and
local authorities]. In Zimbabwe it is
essential for historical reasons that a new constitution should give at least
some powers to provinces, and that urban and rural local authorities should be
given more autonomy.
IV Amendment of the
Constitution
Every written constitution must state clearly how it can be
amended. Usually a constitution requires
special procedures — a referendum or larger than ordinary majority in
Parliament, for example – which must be followed before an amendment can be
validly made. If a constitution makes no
provision for its amendment then it cannot be amended, because all the
institutions of State are subordinate to the constitution and they have no
inherent power to alter the law under which they were established.
V Checks and
Balances
Every constitution must set some limits on the exercise of power by
members of the different branches of a State’s government. If there are no such limits the State will
tend to be despotic, where the powers concerned are exercisable by the
Executive, or ineffective where they are exercisable by the Legislature or the
Judiciary. This is the basis of the
doctrine of separation of powers.
There is a particular need for limits and balance in regard to the
following:
ˇ The extent of the powers exercisable by each of the branches of
Government. Power should not be
concentrated in the Executive branch because, as indicated, that will lead to
despotism. On the other hand, the other
branches should not be allowed to exceed their legitimate powers either. If the Legislature has too much power and is
able to pursue divergent policies from the Executive, there is a danger of
government confusion or paralysis. If
the courts are over-zealous in reviewing Executive decisions, there is a danger
of the courts usurping the functions of the Executive; and similarly if the courts can too readily
overturn legislation the courts may themselves become an unelected
Legislature.
ˇ The way in which powers are exercised. Particularly in the case of
the Executive, decisions should be taken collectively rather than
individually. For example, the power to
make decisions should be vested in the Cabinet rather than in the President or
the Prime Minister.
Checks and balances must not be so great as to prevent a government
from taking effective action. There must
be co-operation between the different branches of government if the business of
government is to conducted smoothly.
Where a constitution divides governmental powers between different
institutions, those institutions must learn to practise compromise and common
sense. But compromise and common sense
are habits of mind and cannot be embodied in a written
constitution.
In addition to balancing the powers of the different institutions of
government, every democratic constitution must try to balance the other
conflicting interests that exist in every State. Some of the interests that need to be
balanced are the following:
ˇ Individuals versus the State
Zimbabwe’s history, and the history of many other countries, shows
that individuals and vulnerable groups need to be protected against oppression
by their governments. The purpose of a
Declaration or Bill of Rights is to provide this protection, but it mustn’t go
too far. The rights of the majority, who
in a democratic State are represented by the Government, cannot be ignored. Governments must be able to take reasonable
measures to preserve the national interest while at the same trying to protect
minority interests. In other words, a
balance must be struck between general and particular
interests.
ˇ Differing Class Interests
In Zimbabwe there are stark differences between the lifestyle enjoyed
by members of the wealthy élite, who wield political and economic power, and
that of the rural and urban poor. The
constitution-making process is directed and controlled by the élite, and there
is a danger that their interests will be reflected in the new constitution to
the detriment of the poor. That tendency
must be resisted if the new constitution is to attain legitimacy, to be regarded
as “our” constitution, by the majority of Zimbabweans. One way to ensure that the interests of
ordinary people are reflected in the constitution is to protect their social and
economic rights in the Declaration or Bill of Rights.
VI Other
Considerations
The need for flexibility
The governmental system established by a constitution must be
flexible enough to allow institutions to develop over time and to cope with
unforeseen situations. This entails,
firstly, that the constitution should not seek to prescribe exhaustively what
should happen in every conceivable situation; and, secondly, that the procedures
for constitutional amendment should not be so difficult as to prevent amendments
when they become necessary.
A written Constitution may not reflect the real
constitution
One should remember that the wording of a written constitution very
often does not reflect the true nature of a country’s system of government. In the United States, for example, procedures
have evolved for encouraging co-operation and compromise between Congress, the
legislature, and the President. These
procedures are not mentioned in the constitution. And if a foreigner who was unfamiliar with
the Zimbabwean political scene read our present Constitution before its latest
amendment, he or she might well have believed that political parties were of
little or no importance in our system of government, because the Constitution
mentioned political parties only once (in section 41(1)(e)), and then only
incidentally.
Culture of constitutionalism
If a constitution is not embraced by the people of the country, if it
is not regarded as “our” constitution by the great majority, then it may lose
legitimacy and either be subjected to frequent amendment by whichever group of
politicians is currently in power, or ignored by a despotic government or else
overridden completely in a coup d’état.
To avoid that fate, the constitution must contain provisions that are
acceptable to the majority. This doesn’t
mean that most of the people must agree with everything in the constitution,
only that the constitution as a whole is broadly acceptable. In addition, the government should make
concerted and prolonged efforts to ensure that everyone is aware of the
constitution and its importance to them.
This goes further than informing people of their rights under the
constitution; people must be made aware of their responsibilities too, and of
the way in which the various institutions of government work and the part they
play in the government of the country.
Conclusion
A constitution can be compared to a house. A house defines the space within which its
inhabitants conduct their daily lives, and a constitution defines the way in
which the inhabitants of a country conduct their political affairs. A house may be large or small, and a
constitution may be lengthy or brief; a
house and a constitution may be well-organised or haphazard. It is possible for a family to live happily
in a small, disorganised house or to live miserably in a well-appointed
palace; and it is possible for a nation
to live peacefully and contentedly in a country whose constitution is badly
thought out, or to live in disharmony in a country with a model
constitution.
In other words, a constitution does not determine whether the
inhabitants of a country will be happy and united or discontented and
fractious. Our new constitution, whether
it is well or badly drafted, will not itself bring happiness to Zimbabwe. That will depend on Zimbabweans
themselves.
Veritas makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot
take legal responsibility for information supplied