The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

      Zvobgo blasts ‘new’ ZANU PF

        POWERFUL ruling ZANU PF party politician Eddison Zvobgo has accused
rivals within the party of hatching disloyalty charges against him in a bid
to oust him from the party and exclude him from the race to succeed
President Robert Mugabe as party leader and possibly state president.

      In a 23-page response to charges he had sabotaged Mugabe’s re-election
campaign last year, Zvobgo vowed to contest for the presidency when and if
Mugabe steps down.

      “Sometime in the past I was asked by the Press if I wanted to be
president and I said yes. The only qualification I put was that I would
never contest President Robert Mugabe but stand ready to contest anyone else
in ZANU PF,” Zvobgo wrote to party national chairman John Nkomo.

      “That pledge stands. I have reason to believe that this heap of lies
was designed to be a pre-emptive strike by those who want the same job but
are too chicken to admit it.”

      Mugabe, at the helm of Zimbabwe since independence in 1980, has
indicated he wants to step down and encouraged his followers to openly
debate his successor in ZANU PF.

      Whoever succeeds Mugabe in ZANU PF must face opposition leader Morgan
Tsvangirai in an election to choose the state president.

      Mugabe has not publicly said who he wants to take over his job in ZANU
PF or in the government, but party insiders say the ageing leader prefers
his long-time disciple, Emmerson Mnangagwa, to replace him both as party and
national leader. Mnangagwa has however publicly said he does not wish to be
Zimbabwe’s president.

      Zvobgo’s disclosure that he wants to contest for the presidency, which
follows a declaration last week by one of Mugabe’s vice-presidents, Joseph
Msika, that he was ready for the presidency if elected, is seen by party
insiders as an attempt to thwart the imposition of a successor by Mugabe.

      One of the ruling party’s top strategists, Zvobgo, along with retired
army general Solomon Mujuru, is said to have masterminded moves to prevent
Mnangagwa from taking over as party chairman four years ago.

      As party chairman in a presidium packed with much older men, Mnangagwa
would have been best-placed to take over the leadership of the party.

      Mugabe however appointed Mnangagwa secretary for administration to
keep him within striking distance of the party’s top job.

      Zvobgo, who had been given until yesterday to respond to the
allegations raised against him, is accused of decampaigning ZANU PF at
various rallies in his Masvingo stronghold. He is alleged to have attacked
Mugabe during the rallies and urged the electorate to vote for Tsvangirai.

      But Zvobgo,who dismissed the allegations as “demeaning” and “a pack of
lies”, wrote to Nkomo that the charges against him were being orchestrated
by “strangers” in the party and rivals afraid he could scuttle their chances
of succeeding Mugabe. He did not mention who the rivals were.

      Zvobgo wrote: “I need not remind you that the New ZANU PF of today, in
Masvingo as well as in other provinces, is now under the control of new
faces. Some of them have been party members for many years while a few are
visitors and strangers to our party.

      “These mafikizolos have nothing to lose if ZANU PF is harmed. If ZANU
PF is defeated

      tomorrow, they will simply walk away and join whatever is the
victorious party of the day. This breed is easy to identify. They shout
Mugabe’s name loudest – they know that the people do not want them but
believe they are secure in their blind fanaticism.”

      Zvobgo, who is scheduled to appear before ZANU PF’s disciplinary
hearing on 21 July, reminded Nkomo that in 1996 he was injured while
campaigning for Mugabe. He also told the ZANU PF chairman that he had in
that year raised one million pounds (Z$1,3 billion) almost single-handedly
for Mugabe’s campaign.

      Zvobgo wrote: “This particular allegation inflicts and draws blood
from my system. How many people in the politburo and central committee
narrowly escaped death campaigning for Cde Mugabe? I only know of myself.

      “The injuries I sustained during the 1996 presidential election left
me maimed for life. Although I should not boast, I personally raised one
million pounds abroad for his re-election in that year.”

      Zvobgo, who could be expelled from the party if found guilty of the
charges, reminded Nkomo that ZANU PF, which is facing its stiffest challenge
ever from the MDC, was not in a position to afford in-fights.

      He warned Nkomo the party could end up in the hands of “strangers” who
have found themselves occupying influential positions in the party only
because of their perceived loyalty to Mugabe.

      He wrote: “This kind of allegation is made by people who have nothing
to stand on but lies, lies and lies. All they have is the ferocity with
which they shout “Pamberi neZANU PF, pamberi na Comrade Mugabe and nothing
more. They were not in the war, they contributed nothing to the struggle but
merely eat by claiming to be more loyal to President Mugabe than true
vintage revolutionaries.

      “It is generally widely believed that unless care is taken,
revolutions may eat their children. But when they begin to eat their
fathers, then fate has doomed their nation’s dreams. Fortune-hunters may
become lethal weapons, for they regard purges of the founding fathers as new
Chimurengas. They pray, daily, that somehow, by good luck, they will
succeed.”

      The Masvingo strongman, who is widely seen as wielding immense
influence over who will succeed Mugabe, said he was keeping his options
open.

      He wrote: “This trial scheduled for the 21st of July will come to
pass. I shall keep all my options open.”


      Staff Reporter

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

      Mugabe determined

        UNFAZED by mounting pressure from American President George Bush to
leave power, President Robert Mugabe is plodding ahead with plans to hold
elections under the same laws and conditions that Bush, much of the
international community and Zimbabwe’s main political opposition say
produced a flawed election the last time.

      Days before his arrival in Southern Africa, Bush, the world’s most
powerful president, has stepped up calls on Mugabe to step down and pave way
for fresh and democratic elections to break Zimbabwe’s political impasse and
end the country’s deepening economic crisis.

      Bush last week told South African television that he would pile
pressure on that country’s president and

      regional power broker Thabo Mbeki to press Mugabe

      to hand over power to a transitional government that will be tasked
with organising free and fair elections

      in crisis-weary Zimbabwe.

      But Mugabe, who is well-known for his love for swimming against the
tide, has dismissed Bush’s African tour and the American President’s calls
on him to step down as a “non-event” and instead exhorted his supporters to
mobilise for victory in a fresh general election to be held in 2005.

      University of Zimbabwe (UZ) political scientist Eldred Masunungure
told the Daily News that Mugabe had staked the future of his ZANU PF party
on the general election about one and a half years away.

      The respected UZ political analyst said Mugabe will defy Washington,
the European Union, Southern African Development Community parliamentarians
and Zimbabwe’s main opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) party
and hold the general election under the country’s flawed electoral laws in
the hope his party can secure a two-thirds majority necessary to change
Zimbabwe’s Constitution.

      Masunungure said: “The ruling ZANU PF party wants to go ahead and hold
elections under the current legal frame work so that if they win a
two-thirds majority

      they can then amend the Constitution to suit their own party agenda.”

      Political analysts, democracy and human rights campaigners have long
complained that Zimbabwe’s electoral laws, under which elections are
organised by the country’s registrar-general who in turn is answerable

      to Mugabe, is heavily tipped in favour of the incumbent government.

      The US and EU, Switzerland, New Zealand and Australia, who have
imposed punitive targeted sanctions against Mugabe and his top lieutenants
chiefly because of Mugabe’s 2002 re-election which they say was secured
through violence and downright fraud, have called for Harare to democratise
its electoral laws.

      MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai, who refuses to recognise Mugabe’s
victory last year, has challenged the ageing Mugabe’s re-election at the
country’s High Court.

      Zimbabwe’s opposition parties led by the MDC last week vowed not to
participate in any future election called by Mugabe under existing
legislation which they say is tailor-made to ensure victory by ZANU PF.

      Political analyst and chairman of the Zimbabwe chapter of Transparency
International, John Makumbe said, “The current Constitution and Electoral
Act clearly constitute a winning formula for ZANU PF.

      “The government will not move to a system that will make the ruling
party lose future elections. They will

      argue that they will not move away from the provisions of the
Constitution.”

      Another UZ political scientist, Elphas Mukonoweshuro, said if the
government went ahead and held elections under existing laws it would
virtually be replaying the chaotic parliamentary and presidential elections
held in 2000 and 2002 respectively and which were castigated by the
international community as fraudulent and undemocratic.

      Masunungure predicted that the government was

      unlikely to heed calls that it amend the country’s electoral laws.

      He said: “For the government it is business as usual. As far as they
are concerned, the people were given

      a chance to decide in 2000 and in 2002. They will get

      another chance in 2005.”

      Masunungure said Zimbabweans should expect to see fundamental changes
to the country’s Constitution

      or even electoral laws once and if Mugabe and his

      ZANU PF party wins an overwhelming majority in the 2005 ballot.

      Reports from within ZANU PF and government circles suggest that the
ruling party wants constitutional amendments that will guarantee Mugabe
immunity from prosecution for any human rights violations that he might have
been committed during his 23-year tenure.



      By Pedzisai Ruhanya

      Deputy News Editor

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News (seems to be having formatting problems... again. B)

Leader

      Bush must tell Mbeki to act decisively on Zimbabwe

        I am always suspicious of people who are labelled moderate or, as
Americans would say, middle-of-the-road. But then, there are more confusing
ones who are left or right of centre. Still there are others who

      occupy positions to the left or to the right of the left of centre
while others are to the right or left of the right of centre. All these
positions are occupied

      by people who are afraid of

      extremes. Extremes entice me because I know exactly where

      I stand with an extremist adversary.

      But I do not trust those who hover around the centre, who fear to take
a solid stand for fear of antagonising someone. It is quite risky to trust a
moderate with an agreed position. Moderates excel in striking compromises;
and when people compromise none of them end up with what they wanted in the
first place.

      Why should the MDC be expected to compromise, as some moderates in
both parties and in South Africa are clamouring?

      An injustice was done and the MDC should simply maintain its position.
Mugabe simply has to go. The country and the whole world cannot continue
pampering a man who ignores public opinion while people are being killed in
his name. Are we and the international community no longer agreed that the
last presidential elections were tampered with? (And here I use the word
“tampered” as a moderate when an extremist would accurately say “stolen”.)

      Why do we ask the victim of a robbery to share his property with the
burglar who has been found with the loot? Instead of arresting the thief, we
are constantly harassing the victim in order to justify the action of the
burglar. Here in Zimbabwe,

      we have a very simple situation that is deliberately being

      made to look complicated. Both George Bush and Thabo Mbeki must be
warned not to continue using Zimbabwe as a playground where international
norms, laws, human rights and other practices are disregarded at will. This
has to stop and Bush must make it clear to Mbeki that if he does not want to
uphold internationally accepted mediation practices, he should leave the
Zimbabwean issue to people who would like to resolve the problem.

      Mbeki is playing a very dangerous and retrogressive game in Zimbabwe.
Since he has no policy on Zimbabwe, he calls that vacuum “quiet diplomacy”.

      Bush must take note that if he relies too much on Mbeki, he will not
get anything resolved in Zimbabwe. He must be reminded that the people of
Zimbabwe have long lamented how Mbeki is a stumbling block to our own
efforts to correct the bad situation in our country.

      After his quiet diplomacy was exposed as a sham, he came up with his
“African solutions to African problems”.

      He immediately and shamelessly headed for France and asked the French
to assist in resolving the Zimbabwean issue.

      Having failed, he is now back in the quiet diplomacy cover but is
trumpeting that only Zimbabweans should be left to solve their own problems.
If we had taken such a stand, would he be president of South Africa today?
In spite of the exaggerated contributions of the African National Congress
and its Umkhoto weSizwe, it was the international community that finally
made De Klerk yield.

      Zimbabweans can easily solve their own problems if people like Mbeki
could stop weighing in with misplaced support of the very person causing all
these problems.

      Statesmen do not take sides in conflict resolution; they are impartial
referees.

      The heart of the matter is that Mbeki has unwittingly become the
dictator of Zimbabwe by proxy; Mugabe is just his gaffer. Mugabe wouldn’t
last a month if Mbeki decided otherwise. Mbeki is toying with

      Zimbabweans, living out his dictatorial fantasies on us, which is
something he wouldn’t dare dream of doing to his own people.

      Whenever we prod our old man and he appears willing to make a move, it
is Mbeki who spoils all our efforts. I believe now that Mbeki and his
country are gaining from our misery and from the chaos in our country. Apart
from Mbeki’s cowardice in confronting Mugabe, what we are seeing is a
deliberate policy by South Africa to strengthen their economy at our
expense.

      Last week, we were scheduled to receive a group of German legislators
but we did not. After being denied permission to meet people of their
choice,

      including members of the

      opposition, they ended up going to South Africa instead.

      Zimbabwe had everything to gain from such a visit. Is it

      possible Mbeki does not want Europeans to poke around

      Zimbabwe so he can continue fooling the international community about
his designs on our country?

      Meanwhile, South Africa shields and protects cruel and undemocratic
labour practices by Zimbabwe before the International Labour Organisation
(ILO) when even the Congress Of South African Trade Unions

      deplores what is going on here.

      But again, by keeping Zimbabwe in indefinite and perpetual turmoil,
South Africa continues to strengthen its economic domination of the region.
I dare say Zimbabwe, with its highly literate labour force and if in proper
hands, can compete toe-to-toe with South Africa on the economic front.

      We had such a symbiotic

      relationship before. Hear me, world, we are not economic pushovers or
minnows. We just have a government that is

      destructive, malicious, unable, greedy and blind to international
economics. Our government thinks economic theories, laws and practices used
all over the world do not apply to us. Moreso the pity, for we have a
government we do not deserve.

      In the meantime, the ILO views our nation in the most negative way and
describes our country as a rogue state which can no longer be recommended to
global investors and business.

      We in Zimbabwe knew that all along. We have been saying this all along
but South Africa goes over our heads and defends the rot in our country’s
labour practices. And it does so on the international stage, making it look
like Zimbabwe’s rank and file do not know what they are doing.

      Two weeks ago, South African Defence Minister Mosiuoa Lekota
ignorantly blamed the MDC for the failed talks. He lamented how the MDC’s
court challenge to the presidential elections had weakened South Africa’s
position as a mediator.

      He did not urge Mugabe to stop the phony treason trials of the person
he ought to sit down and negotiate with. Given this kind of buffoonery and
skewed, biased diplomatic behaviour, what can we really expect from these
men? Sadly, Mbeki is even worse.

      And then only last week Botswana and Zambia, our neighbours who appear
to have been pushed away from the

      Zimbabwean problem by the South Africans, were quoted in the Business
Day as saying that the legitimacy of the Zimbabwean President is a matter
that needs to be decided by the Zimbabwean courts.

      How can Botswana and Zambia not know that their neighbour Mugabe and
South Africa do not want this issue to be brought before the courts? Our
neighbours say: “Let the courts decide.” Mugabe says: “If you go to court, I
will not sit down and talk to you.” Mbeki says: “Let Zimbabweans settle
their own problems” while he supposedly interferes quietly through his quiet
diplomacy. The region has no leader at all. Now, George Bush, let’s talk a
little. We welcome you to Africa. You come to Africa soon after making
Saddam Hussein a homeless president, confining him to some caves somewhere.
I cannot say “well done” because you still fail to justify your drastic
actions in Iraq. What I can say is that I hope you do not continue with this
“gung-ho” type of problem solving. Your battle in Iraq defeated the United
Nations more than it defeated Saddam and we do not need that kind of
international adventurism at all. We have a problem here in Zimbabwe and it
is not an exaggeration that people are suffering needlessly under our
Mugabe. Many would love to see him go. But if your solution to our problem
is the same as the one you applied in Iraq, then please forget it. We are
peace-loving people and we only need the kind of assistance that will make
it possible and easier for us to resolve our problems peacefully. The person
you should get tough with is Mbeki. Make him play his role as a responsible
regional leader, a role befitting the president of South Africa. As you talk
to our dictators around the continent, please keep in mind that you do not
incite us to stand up and fight for our rights then fly back home and watch
as we get butchered. Tackling Africa’s dictators is a full-time job that
needs the participation of the international community. Welcome to Africa!
Joseph Whande Joseph Whande writes on social and political issues

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

      Fuel crisis set to worsen

        Despite the reported success of President Robert Mugabe’s recent
“fuel-foraging” trip to Libya, Zimbabwe remains dry and lurching towards its
most serious shortage yet.

      There were claims from both Mugabe’s delegation and the Libyans after
last week’s visit to Tripoli that fuel would start trickling in “as soon as
possible”.

      As Foreign Minister Stan Mudenge confidently put it: “Certainly, there
will be fuel coming from Libya very soon.”

      And his Libyan counterpart, Abdul Mohammed, claimed: “The first
shipment of oil to Zimbabwe will be dispatched as soon as possible.”

      But Zimbabwe’s fuel service stations remain dry, indicating that Libya
’s Tamoil company has not resumed supplies.

      It is understood that Libyan and Zimbabwean officials agreed that
Harare has first to reduce its US$67 million (Z$55.2 billion) debt to Tamoil
and fulfil its obligations in terms of an earlier 360 million deal by
resuming supplies of agricultural commodities before oil is supplied.

      Delivery would also depend on Zimbabwe’s ability to resuscitate its
financing agreement with the Libyan Arab Bank in terms of the original deal.

      Harare, which had a 90 million financing facility with this bank, owes
it US$43 million. Altogether, Zimbabwe owes fuel suppliers more than US$100
million.

      Zimbabwe procures fuel through short and long-term credit financing
and with cash. Libyan authorities maintain that they still need to acquire
Zimbabwean fuel sector-related assets before they can enter into a serious
agreement with Mugabe.

      As a result, a Libyan delegation has been dispatched to Harare to tie
up this deal. Before Mugabe visited Libya, there was a meeting between fuel
stakeholders, bankers, fuel industry representatives and government
officials to discuss the issue of assets.

      Mugabe was in a dilemma about how to get Tripoli to resume supplies –
and thus reverse a fuel crisis that has steadily worsened since 1999 –
without auctioning off Zimbabwean assets to Libya.

      In other desperate “emergency” measures, Zimbabwe has banned the
carrying of fuel in containers, like jerry cans, as a way of avoiding “fuel
wastage”. In terms of the ban, a state permit is needed to carry fuel in a
container.

      The ban has been extended to public transport operators. The country’s
struggle to import fuel has given rise to a thriving black market, which has
seen fuel sold locally at up to Z$2 000 a litre, around R10. Some service
stations are quoting fuel prices in US currency, usually at 55 US cents a
litre. The official price of petrol is Z$450 a litre.

      Zimbabwe needs Z$40 million a month to import about 87 000 metric
tonnes of petroleum products. Annually, the country needs US$360-million to
import enough fuel.

      In terms of the original agreement with Tamoil, the National Oil
Company of Zimbabwe was to pay for the fuel in local currency,


      From Page 13

      deposited into a local clearing account. This money would then be
invested locally by the Libyans, and it was anticipated that these
investments would offset any debt due to Libya. But the investments made so
far cannot pay for fuel supplied.

      The Zimbabwean assets that Libya has targeted include the oil pipeline
between Harare and the border city of Mutare, which receives oil from Beira
in Mozambique.

      This is the country’s chief oil supply line, providing nearly all
Zimbabwe’s fuel.

      Tamoil, which used to supply 70 percent of the country’s fuel, wants
key assets like these before it will resume fuel supplies.

      The Libyan firm – 55 percent owned by a private Dutch consortium and
45 percent by the Libyan government – is offering US$48 million for the
pipeline. Zimbabwe wants US$100 million for it.

      Tamoil also wants the huge fuel depots at Msasa in Harare, as well as
a 50 percent stake in Petrozim, which is jointly owned by Noczim and Lonrho.
Once it has taken over Noczim’s share, the Libyans intend entering into
negotiations with Lonrho for the complete control of Petrozim.

      Tamoil also wants to acquire the Zimbabwean government’s 51 percent
equity in major lubricants supplier Oil Blending Enterprises. TotalFinaElf,
from which Zimbabwe is reportedly trying to source fuel, has a 49 percent
stake in the company.

      Sources said the Libyans are also interested in reviving the derelict
Feruka Oil Refinery in Mutare and hope to buy storage tanks there and thus
control the most critical oil infrastructure in Zimbabwe. This would leave
Mugabe’s government powerless in the fuel sector. Harare has already sold
off the country’s biggest storage tanks, in Beitbridge, to TotalFinaElf and
is wary of any further sales of state assets.

      Tamoil, meanwhile, wants to establish Tamoil-Zimbabwe Ltd, a 50-50
joint venture with Noczim. It is speculated that the Libyans will buy up
Zimbabwean assets through this company.



      – Sunday Times

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

      Zimbabwe’s domestic debt leaps to $446 bn

        ZIMBABWE’S domestic debt leapt by $100 billion in the first six
months of this year to $446 billion, an increase analysts said could be
partly blamed on the government’s inability to borrow from the international
community.

      Latest statistics released by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe show that
the increase in domestic debt was driven by the government’s use of its
overdraft facility with the central bank.

      According to the Reserve Bank’s figures, its advances to the
government stood at $50.3 billion in the week ending 16 May, up from zero in
the week ending 27 December 2002.

      Outstanding government stocks declined by only one billion to $14.8
billion in the same period.

      Veteran economists said the upsurge in domestic debt was a sign of a
severe debt trap.

      “The government is now borrowing to repay its debts and that is a
signal of a debt trap,” University of Zimbabwe economist Brian Muchemwa told
the Business Daily.

      “It’s now rare for the government to borrow to finance exhaustive
expenditure since most of its funds are used for

      transfer payments and consumption purposes.”

      Interest due on Treasury bills (TBs) is now at $173.5 billion for TB’s
worth only $207.5 billion.

      The government’s interest burden ballooned from $134 billion at the
beginning of the year.

      Economists said the government was being forced to resort to borrowing
on the domestic market because it was unable to secure funds offshore.

      International multilateral agencies and foreign financial institutions
have suspended financial assistance to Harare because of government policies
that have eroded the rule of law and property rights.

      “The government is failing to obtain any funds from the international
community, hence its reliance on the domestic market,” said David
Mupamhadzi,

      an economist with Trust Bank Corporation.

      He said increased government borrowing on the domestic market would
crowd out the private sector.

      The economist further warned that government borrowing would also put
pressure on interest rates.




      Business Reporter

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

      Policy delay could further knock economy

        THE delay in announcing a new monetary policy could further knock
Zimbabwe’s already embattled economy, worsening the country’s worst economic
crisis in 23 years, economists said yesterday.

      The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe was expected to announce a new monetary
policy last month, as was promised by outgoing Reserve Bank Governor Leonard
Tsumba.

      Tsumba indicated at the end of May that the central bank – which last
made monetary policy adjustments at the end of last year – would make a
monetary policy statement in June, which however would contain very few
changes.

      Analysts said further communication from the Reserve Bank on its
monetary policy was crucial because of Zimbabwe’s worsening economic crisis.

      “The absence of a monetary policy implies an unstable economy. We need
a new monetary policy to enable us to plan effectively in the financial
sector,” Sunshine Asset Management Company chief executive Gibson
Maunganidze told The Business Daily.

      University of Zimbabwe economist Albert Makoche added: “I wonder what
kind of economic management style those in authority are trying to do.
Zimbabwe needs frequent adjustment of monetary policy.

      “It’s very unfortunate that the government is failing to monitor the
policies that directly affect an economic system. The absence of a new
monetary policy is going to create uncertainty in the financial sector,
hence a possible crash of the whole sector.”

      A monetary policy is used to deliberately manipulate money supply and
interest rates to influence the level of economic activity in a country.

      But analysts said the monetary policy announced last year by the
central bank had failed to achieve its objective, to boost the country’s
productive and export sectors, and had to be replaced.

      In its last monetary policy statement, the Reserve Bank announced a
dual interest rate regime under which the productive sectors would benefit
from concessionary rates.

      Interest rates for non-productive borrowing would be determined by the
market in an attempt to discourage consumptive borrowing.

      “The dual exchange rate was designed without enough forecast given the
poor response,” one analyst said.

      He pointed out that the central bank was also frequently rejecting
high bids on its Treasury bills in an attempt to keep rates low. He said it
was necessary to introduce a new monetary policy that would suit both the
Reserve Bank and investors.

      Money market investors have been prejudiced of millions of dollars
because rates are below inflation, which rose to a record high of 300.1
percent in the year to May.

      Analysts said in coming up with its prevailing monetary policy, the
central bank had failed to take into account

      the impact on economic activity of suppressed interest rates at a time
inflation is ballooning.

      They said these distortions had worsened uncertainty at a time local
business is already uncertain because of the economic crisis, dramatised by
soaring inflation, severe hard cash and raw material shortages and declining
domestic demand for goods.

      The commentators said worsening uncertainty had hit hard on the
financial sector and other companies, which were finding it hard to take
long-term decisions.

      “Delays in introducing a new monetary policy are going to worsen
uncertainty and the market will not take any direction,” said Trust Banking
Corporation economist David Mupamhadzi.

      He said a monetary policy statement that addressed fundamental
macroeconomic issues was crucial to ensure that all players in the economy
knew the direction in which the country was heading.,

      “Government should come up with a new monetary policy which will
address inflation, money supply and interest rates,” the economist said.

      This should be coupled with a comprehensive fiscal policy, analysts
said, adding that failure to make a new monetary policy statement as
promised had further dented confidence in the government, which had also
failed to review its exchange rate policy as it promised earlier this year.

      When the Finance Ministry devalued the Zimbabwe dollar in February, it
indicated that its exchange rate policy would be reviewed on a quarterly
basis, which has not happened.




      By Stanley Taderera

      Business Reporter

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

Letters

      Civic organisations should be vanguard in fight for freedom

        The letter published in your Saturday 5 July issue by Takura
Zhangazha raised a lot of interesting debate around the work of civil
society organisations in Zimbabwe.

      I have been and am still involved in civil society advocacy work. I
feel quite challenged by a contribution of such intellect.

      I totally agree with Zhangazha that civil society organisations seem
to have taken a back seat on a sinking ship and are hoping that someone else
is going to save them and normalise the situation.

      There is much division among civic organisations, thus making them
ineffective.

      The political situation in the country calls for a committed
leadership who believe in people power and who should focus their energies
on empowering the ordinary people.

      Every day people are being harassed, threatened, humiliated and
suppressed because the current government believes it has perpetual power
over everyone’s life.

      The truth is that there are no longer organisations that are capable
of organising the masses and instilling confidence in them that they can
change the situation.

      The work of civic organisations is primarily to answer to their
constituency and represent those who are voiceless.

      Surely there should be ways of getting around the problem of being
refused access to the electorate? After all, those who are being used to
suppress the masses are our own relatives and we live with them.

      If they see that the masses are capable of resisting their action,
they will definitely join the struggle; they cannot just stop carrying out
their orders when they know that people

      are not ready for change.

      Change is something that can be achieved both by words and action. The
security forces

      who are being used need to have confidence that they have a base to
fall back on when they support the masses.

      If the masses back down, then those forces become afraid that if they
support mass action, they could be victimised. It is a normal human reaction
to protect oneself because you never know who is on your side and who is
not.

      Civil society organisations should take advantage of their past
experience and go out in full force to educate people that what is happening
is wrong. If there are oppressive laws, people should have a say whether
they want those laws or not.

      Many laws have been passed in Zimbabwe – for example the Access to
Information and Protection of Privacy Act and the Public Order and Security
Act – which are aimed at suppressing dissenting voices.

      People’s voices should be heard; no one in their right frame of mind
supports these repressive laws.

      We know that the government is paranoid and it would do anything to
stay in power

      because it has so much to lose. Its human rights record will haunt it
if the incumbents are pushed out of power.

      The current government must also know that it is digging its own grave
by refusing people a say in their government. Bob Marley says in one of his
prophetic songs that “you are running and running away, but you can’t run
away from yourself . . .”

      He also says: “Time will tell.”

      It is now that civil society has to wake up and smell the coffee and
think seriously of its role. If civil society organisations cannot represent
the masses, then what is their purpose?

      They are supposed to be the bridge, the representatives of true
democracy and the benchmark for good governance.


      David Jamali

      Harare

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Daily News

Letters

      What is my rate of inflation?

        I would like to be enlightened by one of our economic experts. They
say our inflation is around 300 to 400 percent.

      I am a teacher and was earning $98 000 at the beginning of 2003. I
live 15 km from school and am paid $4 950 a month for my 3 litres of fuel a
day.

      Even after tax, I had $57 000 to live on. Six months down the line, I
now earn $186 000 and pay $99 000 for my fuel.

      After tax, there is $12 000 left. My rates account alone is now $9
500.

      What is my rate of inflation?


      A McCormick

      Harare

Back to the Top
Back to Index

SABC

            AU silence on Zimbabwe hypocritical: DA
            July 08, 2003, 15:15


            The African Union (AU) is hypocritical to expect the US to solve
the crisis in Liberia while ignoring US concerns about Zimbabwe, Joe
Seremane, the Democratic Alliance (DA) acting leader, said today.

            "The Liberian civil war should certainly feature high up on the
agenda of this week's AU summit in Mozambique, but it is a travesty that the
political and economic meltdown in Zimbabwe is completely absent from that
agenda," he said in a statement.

            While the crisis in Zimbabwe was no more important than the
conflict in Liberia, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), or any other
trouble spot on the continent, it had one of the highest international
profiles. "Consequently, it has considerable potential to deter foreign
direct investment in the region and to impact on the success of the New
Partnership for Africa's Development (Nepad). Solving the crisis in Zimbabwe
is a sure way to kick-start Nepad," said Seremane.

            The effectiveness of the AU and the success of The African Union
(AU) is hypocritical to expect the US to solve the crisis in Liberia while
ignoring US concerns about Zimbabwe, Joe Seremane, the Democratic Alliance
(DA) acting leader, said today.

            "The Liberian civil war should certainly feature high up on the
agenda of this week's AU summit in Mozambique, but it is a travesty that the
political and economic meltdown in Zimbabwe is completely absent from that
agenda," he said in a statement.

            While the crisis in Zimbabwe was no more important than the
conflict in Liberia, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), or any other
trouble spot on the continent, it had one of the highest international
profiles. "Consequently, it has considerable potential to deter foreign
direct investment in the region and to impact on the success of the New
Partnership for Africa's Development (Nepad). Solving the crisis in Zimbabwe
is a sure way to kick-start Nepad," he said.

            The effectiveness of the AU and the success of Nepad would not
be tested by the simple cases where consensus was easily reached - such as
the civil war in Liberia, or the military coup in the Central African
Republic. "They will be tested by the tough cases where the erosion of
democracy is more insidious, and the abuse of human rights is perpetrated by
past liberation struggle brothers-in-arms. Zimbabwe is just such a case,"
Seremane said.

            It was a poor rationalisation to say that the issue of Zimbabwe
was too divisive to be addressed by the AU. If it had the potential to be
divisive, that was all the more reason to have it on the agenda. "Those AU
members that would like to deal with Zimbabwe at the summit should lobby
other members to come round to their point of view.

            As the outgoing chairperson of the AU and leader of the Southern
African Development Community region's biggest economy, President Thabo
Mbeki should lead this campaign," Seremane said. - Sapa
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Znet.org

      Zimbabwe
      Confronting Neoliberalism

      by Leo Zeilig
      July 07, 2003

        Consider two things. First,  a report from a  Reuters correspondent
in Zimbabwe writing on the  4 June - in the midst of the stayaway and the
‘mass action’, “Zimbabwe strike cripples economy for  third day. Police
maintained tight security in the capital Harare two days after they used
tear gas, clubs and warning shots to disperse thousands of opposition MDC
protesters trying to hold marches around the countries.” The correspondent
is in the country and able to establish the scale of these ‘marches’, these
words should not be taken lightly. Now consider the second report, this time
published in Newsweek - and all together more extravagant, “Serious risk
lovers can visit Zimbabwe. Robert Mugabe’s country used to be regarded as a
model for African economic management, as well as one of the continent’s
safest and most stunning safari destinations. For the past three years
Mugabe’s desperate efforts to keep in power have skidded the country into
chaos, hunger and near civil war ... Lines at filing stations can sometimes
last for days - and that’s a mere nuisance by Zimbabwean standards. As the
collapse of Zimbabwe’s tourism industry has compounded its economic crisis,
street crime has worsened.
         “Outside the cities travellers are advised to avoid driving at
night when armed thugs like to set up roadblocks and collect ‘tolls’. At the
same time, it’s best to steer clear of Mugabe’s security forces; they
frequently detain travellers on flimsy charges, suspecting them of being
spies or foreign journalists.
         “Security forces at a checkpoint recently shot a foreigner who was
not carrying proper identity papers. And it’s also best to save your camera
for the wildlife. Photographing some official buildings (the president’s
house, for example) is a crime punishable by two years in prison. Two
Canadians were detained in February because one a commercial photographer
was spotted photographing a billboard.”
         I must record my sources, as I didn’t read either of the reports in
their original: The first quote was cited in the weekly column Chatterbox,
in the state run Herald newspaper (5 July 2003), the second was cited in a
column by the arch neo-liberal Eric Bloch in the weekly Independent (27 June
2003). Let’s start with the first story. ‘Thousands of opposition protesters
’. I scanned the press, made countless phonecalls to friends and contacts
around the country and travelled extensively across the capital, Harare
during the first three days of the stayaway looking for exactly such
‘marches’. On Friday, the last day of the proposed ‘mass action’  - the
opposition had labelled it ‘D-day’ - I spent most of the day in African
Unity Square, the stated venue of the action waiting for the ‘march’ that
was going to take us to State House. There were none. The only significant
action occurred at the University of Zimbabwe, were students rose up on
Monday expecting similar action across the country only to be viciously
beaten by the army. This was widely reported. I saw the blood stained
corridors, smashed doors, and heard the testimony of battered students. I am
unfortunate enough to be able to vouch for this one. Malcolm X wrote in one
of his lectures to ‘young people’, that it is ‘easy to mobilise students
because they never consider the odds against them.” Students are easily
sacrificed. But in the cities nothing. In the townships hardly anything.
          Now the second report. I was taught to believe that too many
personal anecdotes are evidence that you are losing the argument, so please
bear with me. I have travelled extensively at night out of cities and into
rural areas and never come across informal ‘tolls’ set up by armed thugs. I
was detained in Bulawayo for conducting an interview in public (and was held
for two days in Tunisia for the same thing  many years ago) and held for
three hours, threatened (verbally) and eventually told that the police would
be happy to accept a bribe. I did. It cost me Zim$40,000.  But you are
sensible not to go by personal experiences. I haven’t after all taken
photographs of bill boards and there are plenty of roads and nights that I
have not travelled on. So I investigated. Perhaps Zimbabwe really was more
like the reports I was reading in the international press. I contacted by
same network of friends and contacts dotted throughout Zimbabwe and
established that they too have not come across such ‘tolls’ or rampaging
armed gangs frequently referred to. But my scientific credentials still not
proved I dug further. One good friend, who lives in the large township of
Mbare in Harare, did report violence and intimidation. This, he told me,
comes from a vigilante group set up two years ago called the Chipanganos.
The have imposed their terror on the township, he told me, “It is difficult
and bloody dangerous to move around after dark. If they see you them prepare
to be harassed. They claim that they are an anti-crime group and they have
had some success, crime has fallen but we are all as scared as hell”.
Dreadful, but verging on civil war?

        The real picture?

        So how do we find the real picture? On the first point I feel fairly
confident that there were no major demonstrations during the MDC’s mass
action, the only serious attempt was at the university. The reasons were
simple. The cities were militarised, with patrols of armed soldiers on
street corners and Mugabe’s ‘youth militias’ patrolling the street. It was
the coming of age for the states’ ‘youths’ - one Border Gezi youth (named
after the Zanu politician who spearheaded National Youth Training)
interviewed in Chegutu - a government stronghold an hour from the capital -
commented “we now effectively work for the government. I didn’t travel to
Harare for the stayaway but I gave the police names of local youths I knew
who were organising meetings here during the stayaway”. But surely there
would be no state large enough to withhold the ‘thousands of opposition
protesters’ reported. There was - according to my very imperfect
investigations - a vital subjective factor missing: leadership. After more
than two years of prevaricating the MDC made a decision to shift towards
‘jambanja’ - mass action, which militants had been demanding for years. But
wary of the past all that emerged was a paradox: everyone gave their support
to the ‘action’ (with the strong conviction that it would succeed) but
refused to join it - that is, to protest in their ‘thousands’. Apart from
our students, who gallantly and insanely refused to weigh the odds.

        Mugabe’s building blocks


        Any demagogue needs a social base to stay in power, and Zanu are no
exception. They have built theirs brilliantly (from the perceptive of
‘demagogues’). There have been three elements to it: the war veterans
(funded and radicalised since 1998), the peasantry many who are real
recipients of land redistribution and lastly the ‘youths’. Firstly on the
latter. When I asked an MDC student leader before the ‘mass action’ -
labelled the ‘final push’ (a time when most people seemed to be convinced of
it’s imminent success) what he thought of the threat posed by Mugabe’s
‘patriotic youths’ he laughed dismissively, “I don’t think the training of
Border Gezi youth is an obstacle … what is 15 000, it is nothing but just a
small number we are looking at a programme [the mass action] which is
staged.  What we are talking of [is] mass action, we are talking of bringing
to town 50 000 people, we are talking of bringing 100,000s, millions of
people to town. Therefore I don’t expect 15 000 youths facing the million
crowd. I don’t think it will work that way...The point which I want to
stressed ... [is that] people are now prepared to face armed solders so
surely if you are prepared to face armed solders the question of youth
trained, Border Gezi  trainees falls away, because we are even prepared to
face bulldozers.  We are prepared to face those who are carrying AK and
riffles.  So the process we have embarked on now is to try and remove fear
that has been stored in people especially the civilians who are gong to
participate because they still, some still think that the Border Gezi youths
are of importance which is not true they are just our brothers and sisters
probably the failures in life.  So we do not think they are going to be
obstacles in our struggle”
         It would be mean and cynical to challenge his complacency with
hindsight, and I so wanted to believe him when we spoke. But the ‘programme’
that he talked about, and the ‘mass action’ committees that he told me had
been built not only in colleges across the country but ‘also in the
corridors of halls of residence’ in every college, were not much to talk of.
In fact, it seems that they only really functioned as ‘distributions depots’
for whistles and red cards (football metaphors are constantly used in
Zimbabwe’s political culture - the red cards were to be waved on the march
to state house).
         It would be lazy, however, not to interrogate the opposition’s
complacency. It goes back a long way. In February 2001 the left-wing MDC MP
Munyaradzi Gwisai (now expelled from the party together with the
International Socialist Organisation) addressed an party ‘leadership seminar
’.  The blame for the party’s current morass he argued was the “hijacking of
the party by the bourgeoisie, marginalisation of workers, adoption of
neoliberal positions and cowardly failure to physically confront the Mugabe
regime and bosses.” Gwisai concluded with the prophetic warning that “It is
not only imperative that the party moves much more leftward ... in order to
relink to its base.” So let it be known that there were fraternal critics,
who mapped out a strategy that may have enabled the MDC to outflank Mugabe
from the left. Exposing the regimes fake anti-imperialism.
         The MDC preferred to take another route by embracing, indeed almost
choking to death on a diet of neo-liberalism. This pulverised and
disorientated activists. The saviours become the international community -
the bombers of Kabul and Baghdad - and further structural adjustment was
advocated to realign the economy to ‘global realities’. When the world was
shifting to the left - under the combined influence of the ‘war on terrorism
’ and the ‘anti-capitalist movement’ - the opposition in Zimbabwe could be
seen waiting on the ‘good graces’ of Tony Blair and George Bush.

        Economic implosion

        I don’t want the above to be seen as an apology for the regime or to
understate the crisis. It is horribly real. Zimbabwe is unpleasant place.
Harare is a permanent queue - for fuel, bank notes (that have almost dried
up), sugar, salt, mealie meal (the main food staple). Take the case of two
groups of people: children and workers. One of the most striking things
about walking around the city are the children. Small and large school
children, in their tatty school uniforms, hang around supermarkets and
shopping centre - the sort that litter the ‘Avenues’, a middle-class area
just out of the city centre and rapidly being proletarianised. They clutch
sponsor forms in plastic envelops and approach people asking for a
contribution towards their school fees.  School fees have risen, like
everything, beyond the reach of almost everyone. In one school in Harare
they increased from $30,000 to $90,000 a term (students at the Great
Zimbabwe University are currently involved in a struggle to the death with
the administration who have increased fees to $325,000 up from $125,000).
          The other group is the security guards. They are ubiquitous to the
cities. They comprise the worse paid, most miserable group of workers in the
city. They are paid to guard banks, shopping malls, house and blocks of
flats.  They get paid $47,000 a month but the term ‘paid’ is purely
theoretical. With transport from the townships costing as much as $1000 a
day, many choose to cycle, if they can afford the hardware. The night shifts
in this rotten, cold weather are the worse. The security guard - Tendai - to
our block I see hunched up every night, his face covered in a make-shift
balaclava. He lives in Highfield (Gwisai’s old constituency) and faced with
the rocketing fares, leaves at one or two in the afternoon for his evening
shift that starts at seven. He usually walks it, but sometimes borrows a
colleague’s bike. The ZCTU - the main trade union federation - are now
demanding a monthly minimum wage of $125,000. With inflation more than 300%
even this seems measly.
         The big picture is just as bleak. The main forex earner tobacco
used to raise US$500, halfway through the year it had bought in just US$30.
The barter agreement that traded Libyan fuel for Zimbabwean beef, tobacco
and sugar has been revived. The original one collapsed six months ago
because the government were unable to keep to their side of the bargain.
Although the land reform have had a huge effect on the agricultural sector,
food aid that has been keeping thousands alive is being ‘substantially’
scaled down according to the World Food Programme. They estimated that 4
million people will require food aid in the coming 12 months as opposed to 6
million in the last year.
         The economic crisis that has alienated the ‘international community
’ is not due to the thorough-going Marxist policies of in embattled and
principled regime. On the contrary. The regime lurches backwards and
forwards between price controls, subsidies (where they are possible) and
government intervention on the one hand and neo-liberal devaluation,
privatisation and adjustment. The ‘price controls’ heralded by the regime as
proof of the governments popular credentials were hastily scrapped.

        The way out?

        What are the solutions? Is it the craven desire that the
‘international community’, under Bush’s leadership, will liberate Zimbabwe?
The London branch of the MDC wanted to call a recent demonstration ‘After
Saddam, Mugabe. Regime change in Zimbabwe.’ These sentiments resound on the
street. There is the hope that ‘Bush will deal with the ‘old man’ since we
are unable to’. They reflect the despair that grips Zimbabwe’s opposition
movement.
         Civil society - the frenetic and self-important world of NGOs and
their endless public meetings, community groups and congresses - advertise
in the Daily News about ‘preparations for a transitional government’. The
radical trade unionist Raymond Majongwe is scathing, “that’s nonsense. This
are exactly the same people I meet in the same circles, people are already
jostling for power. What transition are they talking about? Do they know who
Robert Mugabe is? I doubt it. Mugabe has gone out on TV, gone public to say
the issue about transition is nonsense. People don't know Mugabe. Mugabe is
a person who is ready to die for what he believes in. Mugabe has to be
kicked out. You don't negotiate with Mugabe cause he know no negotiations,
his history proves the man does not respect any other idea as long as  its
not in line with his.”
         Jonathan Moyo - the reviled Minster for Information and Publicity -
writing under his nom de plume Nathaniel Manheru - is equally dismissive,
“the so-called transitional government ... would be an imposition on the
people of Zimbabwe of some ‘agreed’’ acceptable jolly good fellow who would
have to be an uncle Tom ... to ensure ... [the] reversal of the gains of the
Third Chimurenga” (shona for uprising). It is a horrible sensation when you
are forced to half agree with these bullies and party bosses, but Moyo has a
point.
          What does the opposition propose? Consider the following. A
western diplomat interviewed in the monthly magazine Parade explained why he
saw ‘no end in sight to Zim’s woes’. His prescription was predictable
enough: privatisation, adjustment and austerity. Have a listen. “A future
government of Zimbabwe may have to summon Herculean might to resurrect the
... economy. It will have to downsize its bureaucracy, ‘reform’ land reform,
secure international financing and devalue the Zimdollar.” It gets nastier,
“Then it will have to wean its population from negative borrowing rates,
dirt cheap fuel and donated food. Worse still, the later a new government of
Zimbabwe gets started, the more arduous - and eventually futile - it tasks.”
So it clear, Zimbabwean have been having it easy - lazing around on food
handouts and taking trips to seaside on that infuriatingly cheap fuel.
           On land the diplomat surpasses himself, “Admittedly, evicting
some settlers from farm houses and the surrounding land would be an
unpleasant, divisive and risky move ... In another two years new farmers
will be more physically and emotionally attached to the land while many
white farmers will no longer reside in Zimbabwe. At that point the
government will have to live with costly compensation claims hanging over
its head.” Our diplomat concludes that even if a new ‘transitional’
government comes to power it is far from clear that they will have the
political will and “skill to guide the population through the bruising and
tumultuous transition period we describe above”. So even if the government
is replaced, ‘transitioned’ or reformed Zimbabweans must prepare to give up
the good life, and get ready for a ‘bruising and tumultuous transition
period’. Where do these people live?
         The secession debate was launched a few weeks ago by Mugabe, ‘to
discuss in the open who will replace me.’ Subsequently contenders for the
presidency have been paraded on the front cover of the Herald. The main
runners seem to be the speaker of parliament Emmerson Mnangagwa and Simba
Makoni, the streetwise professional outspoken in his advocacy of ‘adjustment
and privatisation’, who fell out with the government last year. The reforms
would be the same - who ever wins - and closer to our western diplomat than
state socialism. The rumours in Harare are that Mugabe will hold
presidential elections during the parliamentary ones scheduled for 2005,
handing power over to a trusted successor.
          So what are the alternatives? The collapse of the ‘mass action’
and the ‘final push’ has given the government a temporary advantage. The MDC
are weak and seem unable to pursue the full consequences of ‘jambamja’ by
ditching their commitment to neo-liberalism, and their sycophantic and
nonsensical attachment to the ‘international community’. But this does not
make the opposition redundant, or open the gates to a ‘third force’
(‘neither MDC nor Zanu but ...’) though it does alter the picture. As the
crisis deteriorates there is the real possibility of a ‘final push’ emerging
under the directions of the streets: through strikes, riots and
demonstrations, when people will finally protest ‘in their thousands’. But
the subjective factor still demands an answer: how will Zimbabwe’s
opposition respond, can they break from the neo-liberalism that has failed
them so disastrously?

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Mail and Guardian

Harare opposition mayor detained again

      Harare, Cape Town

      08 July 2003 13:43

Zimbabwe police arrested the opposition mayor of Harare, Elias Mudzuri, for
the second time in two days on Tuesday on unspecified charges, he said.

On Monday Mudzuri, who has been suspended by the government for alleged
misconduct, was arrested when he returned to his office after several weeks'
leave. He was later released without charge.

"They want to lock me up. Maybe they'll come up with a charge," Mudzuri said
via mobile phone from a police station in Harare.

Mudzuri denies the charges that led to his suspension, and has appealed
against it in the courts.

His party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) accuses Local Government
Minister Ignatius Chombo of using his "political muscle" to hamper Mudzuri's
work as the first opposition mayor of the capital.

Mudzuri said on Tuesday his lawyer was with him at the police station trying
to secure his release.

In January Mudzuri was arrested along with 21 councillors, municipal workers
and residents for holding a meeting in a Harare suburb without police
permission, as required under a strict security law.

Earlier today, Zimbabwe riot police broke up an opposition demonstration in
the capital Harare as a petition to US President George Bush was due to be
handed over to the US embassy.

Around 30 supporters of the MDC carrying placards reading "Mugabe step down"
and "We want a transitional government now" ran chanting through the streets
of central Harare.

But they scattered when riot police, wearing helmets and carrying
truncheons, arrived swiftly on the scene.

Meanwhile an MDC official said another group of opposition supporters was
due to hand over a petition to Bush via the US embassy in Harare.

Bush is travelling to neighbouring South Africa on Tuesday as part of a
five-nation African tour that began late Monday. The US embassy in Harare
could not immediately confirm whether it had received the petition, which
labels South African President Thabo Mbeki an "imperialist" who wants to see
Zimbabwe perpetually weak so as not to pose a threat to his own country.

"President Mbeki has indeed lost the moral authority to mediate in the
Zimbabwean crisis," read part of the petition. "Zimbabwe cannot continue to
suffer because of President Mbeki's imperialist ambitions."

The MDC rejected Mugabe's victory in presidential polls last year, in which
he beat MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai by 400 000 votes.

The opposition and international observers said the election was rigged and
marred by violence and intimidation.

Last week Bush said he wanted Mbeki to put pressure on Mugabe to hold fresh
elections in Zimbabwe.

Mbeki's policy toward Zimbabwe has been one of behind-the-scenes efforts to
reconcile the government and the opposition.

Tuesday's petition signed by "MDC supporters", called on the US president to
impress on his South African counterpart the need to "advise Mugabe to see
sense and retire now."

"We need a transitional government within the next three months leading to
free and fair elections under international supervision," it added.

Police spokesperson Oliver Mandipaka said he could not confirm whether
anyone was arrested in connection with Tuesday's street protest.

An AFP reporter saw some civilians on the back of a police Land Rover near a
central Harare park where a policeman was picking up discarded placards.

Meanwhile the Democratic Alliance criticised the African Union (AU) as
hypocritical to expect the United States to solve the crisis in Liberia
while ignoring US concerns about Zimbabwe, Democratic Alliance (DA) acting
leader Joe Seremane said on Tuesday.

"The Liberian civil war should certainly feature high up on the agenda of
this week's AU summit in Mozambique, but it is a travesty that the political
and economic meltdown in Zimbabwe is completely absent from that agenda," he
said in a statement.

While the crisis in Zimbabwe was no more important than the conflict in
Liberia, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, or any other trouble spot on
the continent, it had one of the highest international profiles.

"Consequently, it has considerable potential to deter foreign direct
investment in the region and to impact on the success of the New Partnership
for Africa's Development (Nepad).

"Solving the crisis in Zimbabwe is a sure way to kick-start Nepad," he said.

The effectiveness of the AU and the success of Nepad would not be tested by
the simple cases where consensus was easily reached -- such as the civil war
in Liberia, or the military coup in the Central African Republic.

"They will be tested by the tough cases where the erosion of democracy is
more insidious, and the abuse of human rights is perpetrated by past
liberation struggle brothers-in-arms. Zimbabwe is just such a case,"
Seremane said.

It was a poor rationalisation to say that the issue of Zimbabwe was too
divisive to be addressed by the AU.

If it had the potential to be divisive, that was all the more reason to have
it on the agenda.

"Those AU members that would like to deal with Zimbabwe at the summit should
lobby other members to come round to their point of view.

"As the outgoing chairperson of the AU and leader of the Southern African
Development Community region's biggest economy, President Thabo Mbeki should
lead this campaign," Seremane said. - Sapa , Sapa-AFP
Back to the Top
Back to Index

News24

Zim law to stop Mugabe snubs
08/07/2003 11:03  - (SA)


Harare - A new law has been proposed in Zimbabwe which, if passed, would
dock six months' pay from parliamentarians who walked out when the president
was making a speech, a newspaper said on Tuesday.

Walking out while President Robert Mugabe makes a speech has become routine
procedure for opposition Movement for Democratic Change parliamentarians,
who do not recognise Mugabe's legitimacy as president.

According to the state-run Herald newspaper, the bill to amend the
Privileges, Immunities and Powers of Parliament Act is aimed at "putting to
a stop to the continued boycott of President Mugabe's addresses to
parliament by MDC legislators".

The MDC and its leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, have rejected Mugabe's victory in
2002 elections, which Mugabe won by 400,000 votes, saying the poll was
rigged and marred by intimidation and violence.

Recently all the country's parliamentarians received a 600% pay increase,
even as Zimbabwe goes through a serious economic crisis, with 70% of the
workforce unemployed and inflation running at more than 300% a year.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

ZIMBABWE: Lack of funds hampers urban feeding scheme
      IRINnews Africa, Tue 8 Jul 2003

      NGOs need additional fnunds to assist the most needy

      JOHANNESBURG, - An international NGO on Tuesday said a shortage of
funds was hampering the delivery of assistance to Zimbabwe's urban poor.

      Help Germany coordinator Hans Sittig told IRIN: "With the limited
funds we are just managing to provide help to those who fall under our
programme. But that is just scratching the surface. There are many other
vulnerable groups who are desperately in need of assistance."

      The development agency is currently running a feeding programme for
malnourished children aged under six in Harare and Bulawayo, in conjunction
with the local health department and the World Food Programme (WFP).

      Sittig said: "The situation in Bulawayo is a lot more serious than in
Harare, where we see a high incidence of children who are suffering from
growth faltering. This can be directly attributed to the critical food
shortages in the city."

      Previously, relief operations were directed at people living in rural
areas, but aid workers have started turning their attention to the urban
poor, who do not have the cash to buy food and no crops to look forward to
in lean times.

      Sittig said it was still too soon to assess whether the pilot feeding
programme, started in March in Bulawayo, was successful. "These are early
days but, so far, we have seen some progress. However, there have been cases
where there has been no improvement in children."

      He added that the situation in the country's two major cities had
worsened as many people face hyperinflation (300 percent) and unemployment.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

New24

Backlog at Zim crematorium
08/07/2003 13:42  - (SA)


Harare - The crematorium run by the Harare city council has run out of gas
for its furnaces where cremations are carried out, a state-run newspaper
reported on Tuesday.

The Herald said more than 30 bodies had been "piled up" in funeral parlours
around the capital because of the suspension of cremations.

Gas used for the furnaces is imported from South Africa.

Zimbabwe is going through an economic crisis and has been plagued by
shortages of basic commodities.

The Herald also reported that Rido Mpofu, the president of the Urban
Councils Association of Zimbabwe, said municipalities around the country had
been forced to halt housing projects because of the shortage of fuel and
cement.

The suspension of building had "serious implications" for attempts to meet
the national urban backlog of 700 000 housing units needed, he said. -
Sapa-DPA
Back to the Top
Back to Index

New24

Cops break up MDC demonstration
08/07/2003 13:41  - (SA)


Harare - Zimbabwe riot police broke up an opposition demonstration in the
capital Harare on Tuesday as a petition to US President George W Bush was
due to be handed over to the US embassy, an AFP reporter saw.

About 30 supporters of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) carrying
placards reading "Mugabe step down" and "We want a transitional government
now" ran chanting through the streets of central Harare.

But they scattered when riot police, wearing helmets and carrying
truncheons, arrived swiftly on the scene.

Meanwhile an MDC official said another group of opposition supporters was
due to hand over a petition to Bush via the US embassy in Harare.

Bush is travelling to South Africa on Tuesday as part of a five-nation
African tour that began late on Monday.

The US embassy in Harare could not immediately confirm whether it had
received the petition, which labels South African President Thabo Mbeki an
"imperialist" who wants to see Zimbabwe perpetually weak so as not to pose a
threat to his own country.

"President Mbeki has indeed lost the moral authority to mediate in the
Zimbabwean crisis," read part of the petition. "Zimbabwe cannot continue to
suffer because of President Mbeki's imperialist ambitions."

The MDC rejected Mugabe's victory in presidential polls last year, in which
he beat MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai by 400 000 votes.

The opposition and international observers said the election was rigged and
marred by violence and intimidation.

Last week Bush said he wanted Mbeki to put pressure on Mugabe to hold fresh
elections in Zimbabwe.

Mbeki's policy towards Zimbabwe has been one of behind-the-scenes efforts to
reconcile the government and the opposition.

Tuesday's petition signed by "MDC supporters", called on the US president to
impress on his South African counterpart the need to "advise Mr. Mugabe to
see sense and retire now".

"We need a transitional government within the next three months leading to
free and fair elections under international supervision," it added.

Contacted for comment by AFP, police spokesperson Oliver Mandipaka said he
could not confirm whether anyone was arrested in connection with Tuesday's
street protest.

An AFP reporter saw some civilians on the back of a police Land Rover near a
central Harare park where a policeman was picking up discarded placards.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Press Freedom Petition to Go to AU Leaders



Agencia de Informacao de Mocambique (Maputo)

July 8, 2003
Posted to the web July 8, 2003

Maputo

Press freedom organisations, spearheaded by the Media Institute of Southern
Africa (MISA), have drawn up a petition demanding the release of all jailed
African journalists, and the repeal of all repressive media legislation in
the member states of the African Union.

The petition, to be presented to the AU leadership on Wednesday, declares
"Active participation of citizens in shaping policy and decision making of
their countries is impossible if their own governments continue to deny them
the rights necessary to ensure such participation. These include the rights
to freedom of expression, assembly, association and political participation,
as well as media freedom to facilitate a free exchange of information, ideas
and opinion."


The petition adds "It was with great hope and expectation that all Africans
and friends of Africa welcomed the launch of the African Union and looked
forward to a new future based on its constitutive Acts. However two years
into this bold experiment, no significant progress has been made. Even
worse, two of the first five countries to sign up, i.e. Eritrea and
Zimbabwe, have been turned into living hells for the media by the
governments of those countries."

Prominent media figures across the world have issued statements supporting
the petition. Thus Timothy Balding, Director General of the World
Association of Newspapers (WAN) stated, "The right for journalists to
practice without fear of legal persecution and personal injury is
fundamental to any functioning democracy. Too many journalists in Africa are
forced to operate in appalling conditions which not only infringe on their
capacity to operate as media professionals, but also violate their basic
human rights." Aidan White, General Secretary of the International
Federation of Journalists (IFJ) took an even stronger stance. He declared,
"In most African countries journalists work under intolerable conditions
because of disregard for their professional, social, trade union and basic
human rights.

Governments must realise that the promotion of human rights, peace,
tolerance and stability, public accountability, access to information and
general people's participation in the decision making process are key
challenges for a vibrant and constructive Africa." The Regional Director of
MISA, Luckson Chipare, acknowledged the importance of the "Declaration of
Principles on Freedom of Expression" that has been adopted by the African
Commission on Human and Peoples Rights.

This declaration stresses "the fundamental importance of freedom of
expression as an individual human right, as a cornerstone of democracy and
as a means of ensuring respect for all human rights and freedoms". But
Chipare wondered how the Commission would enforce these fine intentions.
"How can the provisions of the African Charter be enforced on those
governments who do not adhere to them ?", he asked, recalling that in
southern Africa, in 2002 alone, 27 journalists were beaten, 4 were bombed,
45 were detained, 38 were threatened and 40 were censored.

The media organisations warn that the AU will have no credibility if it does
not take issues of press freedom seriously. The petition ends by calling on
African leaders "to without delay release all incarcerated journalists,
re-open all closed media houses, repeal anti-media legislation and recognise
the importance of a free press, freedom of expression and other associated
rights as vital ingredients necessary to build free, democratic and
prosperous societies. Only when this is done will the NEPAD (New Partnership
for Africa's Development) initiative and any future similar initiatives have
any real meaning for the peoples of Africa."
Back to the Top
Back to Index

SABC

            Zim still experiencing acute cash shortage
            July 08, 2003, 18:15


            Zimbabwe is still experiencing an acute shortage of cash that
has seen financial institutions cutting down on the withdrawal amounts per
day.
            Automated Teller Machines are completely empty making the lives
of ordinary citizens difficult. The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe has just
announced it is printing over R218 million worth of cash to inject in the
market and counter the current shortages.

            Commercial banks blame the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, the central
bank blames it on foreign currency shortages. Commercial banks are now on
the receiving end. Belmont Ndebele, General Manager at ReNaissance Merchant
Bank said: "It seems as if the central bank got its mathematics wrong. Last
year it predicted inflation would come down to 96% by December this year. At
over 300% today, that is highly unlikely."

            The forex crunch, is now biting the government hard. It is
reportedly battling to raise forex to pay diplomats abroad. The diplomats
have reportedly gone for months without pay. "It is an embarrassing phase in
Zimbabwe's litany of economic woes," added Ndebele.

            The request by the government to have financial institutions
paying the salaries of their diplomats abroad is unprecedented. Economists
say it speaks volumes about the state of the economy. The government is,
however, of the opinion that the economy is on the road to recovery.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

VOA

Open Letter To President Bush To Get More Involved In Zimbabwe
Joe De Capua
08 Jul 2003, 13:46 UTC


In South Africa, an Afrikaans think tank has sent an open letter to
President Bush, calling on him to help bring about political change in
Zimbabwe. President Bush is due to arrive in South Africa Tuesday.

The “Group of 63” is very critical of the Mugabe-government, accusing it of
election fraud, intimidation and violence. It also says the South African
government has done little to solve the problem. University of South Africa
professor Dannie Goosen is chairman of the Group of 63. He spoke to English
to Africa reporter Joe De Capua about why the group is asking for US
involvement in Zimbabwe.

Professor Goosen says, “We perceive the situation in Zimbabwe as the most
serious human rights problem that we are faced with in southern Africa. We
feel that as the most powerful force in contemporary society much more
pressure should be put on the (Zimbabwe) government to bring about change in
the correct direction.” He also says the United States should call on South
Africa to get more involved.

Professor Goosen says, “President Bush should demand a change of
government…because we think that the previous election was not based on
legitimate grounds. So we think that a new election should be the answer and
that the popular should eventually be recognized as the legitimate one.”

The Group of 63 says it believes that Movement for Democratic Change leader
Morgan Tsvangirai won the last presidential election in Zimbabwe. President
Mugabe has resisted pressure from the United States and Britain, calling it
outside interference in Zimbabwe’s internal affairs.

Professor Goosen says President Bush should appeal to Mr. Mugabe that
current policies are leading to both an economic and human rights crisis in
his country.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

The Economist
 
Bringing regime change to Africa
Jul 8th 2003
From The Economist Global Agenda


As President George Bush begins his tour of Africa, he is demanding that Liberia’s President Charles Taylor step down, and preparing a possible military intervention. America is also putting pressure on Zimbabwe’s leader, Robert Mugabe, to resign

Bush to Taylor: Go, or else


SOME thought North Korea or Iran or maybe Syria might be next on President George Bush’s list for regime change, after Iraq. But it now seems likely that the strife-torn former American colony of Liberia, whose 14-year civil war has inflamed conflicts across West Africa, will be the next to undergo American-led military intervention to bring about a change of government. On Monday July 7th, as Mr Bush was setting out on his first official visit to Africa, a 20-strong American military team flew in by helicopter to the heavily fortified American embassy in the Liberian capital, Monrovia, to assess the security situation. On Tuesday, arriving in Senegal, Mr Bush said he had still not decided whether to send a larger contingent, of up to 2,000 troops, to restore order—and, if necessary, to remove Liberia's president, Charles Taylor. As he was speaking, troops loyal to Mr Taylor prevented the American military observers from visiting a refugee camp outside Monrovia.

Last week, Mr Bush told Mr Taylor he must step down immediately. Mr Taylor said over the weekend that he would accept a proposal to go into exile in Nigeria but that he wanted to wait for America's troops to arrive before resigning. He has offered to resign before, only to continue clinging to power. Unlike in the case of Iraq, American armed intervention in Liberia has the full backing of both the United Nations and France. The French, and several West African states, have offered to contribute to a peacekeeping force for Liberia. West African leaders on Tuesday renewed their calls on Mr Bush to intervene.

Mr Taylor emerged in the 1980s from the training camps of his friend—and America’s foe—the Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi, with the aim of spreading rebellion around West Africa. He certainly achieved it. After launching a revolt in his own country and establishing himself as its chief rebel warlord, in 1997 Mr Taylor won an election for president, and started sponsoring uprisings in neighbouring countries. He backed Foday Sankoh, a Sierra Leonean rebel (also Libyan-trained) whose troops hacked off the limbs of thousands of civilians, and with whom Mr Taylor traded guns for diamonds. In 1999, the two men backed a rebellion in Guinea. Both uprisings were abruptly stopped when Britain sent troops into Sierra Leone in 2000. Liberians have fought on both sides in the uprising in Côte d’Ivoire. Last year, France sent troops there to keep the peace.

Mr Taylor’s moment of reckoning has been coming for some time now: though they deny it, his neighbours have been backing Liberian rebel groups, which have taken more than half the country in recent weeks and are besieging Monrovia. In June, as he was attending peace talks in Ghana, a UN tribunal investigating atrocities in Sierra Leone’s civil war issued an arrest warrant for Mr Taylor on war-crimes charges. This forced him to flee back to Monrovia, whereupon the rebels launched attacks to try to dislodge him. Amid the worst bloodshed since the civil war’s early days in 1990—which is continuing despite a supposed ceasefire—Liberians have been demonstrating outside the American embassy in Monrovia, between dodging bullets and grenades, to plead with Mr Bush to intervene.

America has been reluctant to intervene militarily in Africa since its humiliating withdrawal from Somalia in 1993, after 18 American troops were killed. But the success of the British and French interventions in Sierra Leone and Côte d’Ivoire shows that a fairly small number of well-armed, professional soldiers can quickly overcome ill-disciplined rebels. Liberia’s various groups of drugged-up, drunken fighters ought, on paper at least, to be no match for even a modest American-led force. Liberia’s troubles threaten to re-ignite the conflicts in neighbouring countries, which is why France, Britain and the UN are pressing America to intervene.

Though American troops may soon arrive in force in Liberia, Mr Bush and his secretary of state, Colin Powell, will not be visiting the country on their tour of Africa this week. Nor will they visit Zimbabwe, whose state-controlled media have attacked Mr Powell for putting pressure on the country's dictatorial president, Robert Mugabe, to resign, by promising that massive American aid would be sent to the impoverished country as soon as he is gone. Zimbabwe’s main opposition, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), is widely believed to have been the true winner of last year’s elections, though Mr Mugabe declared himself re-elected. The MDC is challenging the official election result in the courts. Mr Mugabe has responded by putting the MDC’s leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, on trial for treason. Mr Bush will discuss Zimbabwe’s deep political and economic crisis with other African leaders, and MDC officials will lobby him to step up the pressure on Mr Mugabe to quit. On Tuesday, police dispersed protesters in Zimbabwe's capital, Harare, who had called on Mr Bush to force Mr Mugabe out of office.

Mr Bush and Mr Powell will be bombarded with demands for attention as they tour Senegal, South Africa, Botswana, Uganda and Nigeria—from governments and oppositions, from charities and pressure groups, from businesses and from the UN. Besides pressing Mr Bush to intervene militarily in Liberia, Kofi Annan, the UN’s secretary-general, is urging him to contribute troops to a French-led peacekeeping force in the even bloodier conflict in Congo, in which up to 4.7m people have been killed in the past five years. In Sudan’s religious conflict, between a Muslim government and Christian and animist separatists, more than 2m have died since the early 1980s, though progress towards peace is now being made, through American and African diplomatic efforts. Even in Uganda, one of the continent’s relatively peaceful countries, rebels are terrorising villages and kidnapping children to serve as soldiers.

Africa has so many grave problems that not even the world’s superpower has the resources to solve all of them. At least Mr Bush, contrary to initial expectations, is showing resolve to try to tackle some: before setting out for his Africa trip, he announced extra food aid to help avert mass starvation in Ethiopia; and a $100m anti-terrorism programme to improve security at East Africa’s ports and airports. Most importantly, Mr Bush will use his trip to promote his $15 billion plan to fight AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. Congress has yet to approve the spending on the project but Mr Bush says he hopes his African trip will help raise awareness in America about the scale of the continent’s AIDS crisis.

As Mr Bush said in an interview with African journalists ahead of his trip, “It’s in our national interests that Africa become a prosperous place, it’s in our interest that people will continue to fight terror together…It’s in our interest that when we find suffering, we deal with it.” Given that the president has his hands full trying to rebuild Iraq, brokering the peace talks in the Middle East and facing down North Korea and Iran over their nuclear ambitions, it is rather surprising that he has found the time to tackle some of Africa’s problems. Surprising but welcome.


Back to the Top
Back to Index

BBC
 
African press mulls Bush visit
US President George Bush (left) with Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade
In Senegal, protesters called Bush a "butcher"

As George W Bush begins his five-nation tour of Africa, newspapers across the continent give the US president a mixed reception.

Some are sceptical about his motives and commitment, while others argue that Africa cannot afford to turn down offers of assistance from the world's most powerful country.

The US president will find millions of people looking for something more than speeches: concrete and durable solutions for HIV/Aids, and a firm commitment to throwing US resources and weight behind ending the west Africa and the Great Lakes conflicts.

Star - South Africa


It has not been forgotten that Bush declared Africa largely irrelevant to US foreign policy... Bush must convince us that this trip has not been planned with an eye on the 2004 presidential elections... We welcome Bush, but with a fair measure of cautious scepticism.

People Daily - Kenya


It is true Bush is going to spend a sum of money... surpassing any his predecessors committed to Africa, and yet he will never be liked on this continent... In Kenya especially, America has become a dirty word... Africans respect power, of course. But there is something they respect more. Wisdom. They are not sure what they are seeing in the White House represents anything close to that.

The Nation - Kenya


Mr Bush... is coming to Africa at a time when his popularity... is rapidly waning at home and abroad because of what has been described as his 'Macho rhetoric'... Mr Bush will be hoping to make the whole world believe that America cares about Africa despite ample evidence to the contrary.

The Herald - Zimbabwe


President Bush is advised not to display a one-eyed view of the continent... He must also be prepared to listen carefully to what the African leaders will have to say and move in tandem with them for the resolution of the Zimbabwe crisis.

Standard - Zimbabwe


Bush is obviously coming to Africa in a humble mood. He has been conciliatory in pre-visit interviews and, in the wake of the Iraq war, he obviously needs the support of sophisticated developing leaders like Mbeki... The US needs Africa, its resources and its people, on its side.

Business Day - South Africa


President Bush's visit to South Africa is welcome as a gesture of American goodwill and recognition of Pretoria's leading role in Africa... The presidential visit is a compliment to our fledgling democracy.

Pretoria News - South Africa


Continuing anti-US chatter... is being fanned by emotion, not objective judgment of the simple fact that a country and a continent with enormous need for prosperity cannot afford to slam the door shut when the richest and strongest country in the world asks how and where it can assist.

Rapport - South Africa


The first US President who says what he means, means what he says and then acts on it will bear watching (and listening to, including between the lines) very carefully indeed on his African safari.

The East African Standard - Kenya


President Bush will give Kenya a miss on his African visit for security reasons? This tells you that American claims at 'shock and awe' technology in combating terror are nothing but high-sounding hype.

Nation - Kenya


Why are American presidents so picky when it comes to touring our part of the world? After you have done the crucible of strife and terror that is the Middle East, what on earth is there to fear about Kenya?

The East African Standard - Kenya


The visit [to Nigeria] by President Bush will give the impression of an endorsement of the last general elections in the country... While it has spared no effort to oust President Mugabe of Zimbabwe for electoral malpractices such as the ones perpetrated by Obasanjo, it appears that America, the 'defender of democracy' is set to endorse the questioned legitimacy of Obasanjo with this planned visit... Coming to the country at this time is most inauspicious thing to do.

Daily Trust - Nigeria


BBC Monitoring, based in Caversham in southern England, selects and translates information from radio, television, press, news agencies and the Internet from 150 countries in more than 70 languages.

Back to the Top
Back to Index

Cape Times

      The tough women who stand behind Bush, Mbeki
      July 8, 2003

      By John Battersby

      Pretoria: While Presidents Thabo Mbeki and George Bush try to find
each other as they discuss the fight against terrorism, the Zimbabwean
political crisis and the development of Africa, the tough talking is likely
to be done by the two formidable women behind them: Mbeki's legal adviser
Mojanku Gumbi and US national security adviser Condoleeza Rice.

      The two trouble-shooters - both known for their personal loyalty to
their bosses and their no-nonsense approach to complex political problems -
will have played a crucial role in setting the stage for tomorrow's talks
between Mbeki and the United States president on the eve of the African
Union's
      second summit.

      Rice, the first woman to occupy the key post of national security
adviser in the US, is known for her deft handling of delicate negotiations
with Russia over missile defence.

      Gumbi, the only woman among 260 advocates practising law at the
Pretoria Supreme Court during the apartheid era, has been at the centre of
the complex peace deals of the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Great
Lakes region.

      Rice, one of Bush's most trusted security and foreign policy advisers,
was often to be heard justifying the US decision to invade Iraq. She is
often at the president's side.

      Gumbi, 54, euphemistically known as Mbeki's legal adviser, is the
president's right-hand person and was detained during the anti-apartheid
struggle.

      Rice, 49, was born in 1954 and grew up in Birmingham, Alabama, in the
days of segregation.

      On the eve of Bush's historic visit to Africa, the second by an
American President following former President Bill Clinton's visit in 1998,
America's two most influential papers - The New York Times and the
Washington Post - both ran prominent reports yesterday noting the recent
surge of interest in Africa by the Bush administration.

      The New York Times's report said that the Bush administration saw
Africa as "a source of both threats and opportunities and no longer one that
can be left at the bottom of the foreign policy to-do list".

      The newspaper said that the focus of the trip was "on fighting poverty
and disease and promoting democracy".

      "But it has taken on a new cast in recent weeks as Bush has
assertively called for changes of government in Zimbabwe and Liberia and
moved to the brink of sending American troops to Liberia as peacekeepers,"
the Times report said.

      The Washington Post report said that Bush has surprised observers with
the focus his administration has put on Africa.

      High on the US agenda tomorrow is expected to be the issue of
Zimbabwe.

      High on South Africa's priorities will be the Middle East road map,
the aftermath of the Iraq war, the future of multilateralism, and the
scourge of HIV/Aids.
Back to the Top
Back to Index