The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
THE OLD: THE F-7 |
THE NEW: The FC-1 |
|
By Clemence Manyukwe, Staff Reporter
Last updated: 06/10/2004 06:43:26 Last updated: 06/09/2004 13:42:47
ZIMBABWE has ploughed an estimated US$200m into the purchase of 12 new
fighter jets and military vehicles from China, New Zimbabwe.com has been
told.
The government's acquisition of the military hardware is set to cause a stink with critics led by the main opposition Movement for Democratic Change. The MDC has already queried the defence budget -- the biggest in the current financial year -- which it says is unjustifiable in peace time.
Due to sanctions imposed on President Robert Mugabe's regime, Zimbabwe's current fleet of European-made fighter jets is said to be crippled by a critical shortage of spares which has forced the government to look to China and the Far East.
Although the government has refused to disclose the type of aircraft being bought in the secret deal covered by the 1989 legal provision which excludes the acquisition of key military equipment from going through a tender board or to be advertised, sources tell New Zimbabwe.com the aircraft include the FC-1 (Fighter China 1), developed recently to replace the Chengdu F-7. The cost of each plane is US$20m.
The FC-1 was designed by China to replace the F-7 which has been widely criticised by military experts. Pakistan, which like Zimbabwe was using the F-7 is China's biggest customer for the FC-1.
Apart from the 12 jets, Zimbabwe has also put an order for 100 military vehicles. At least six of the jets are expected to be delivered any time this week, the permanent secretary in the Ministry of Defence, Trust Maphosa told the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Defence and Home Affairs.
It is not clear where the funding for the new aircraft is coming from as in the current budget, announced by government in November last year, the army was allocated $815, 49 billion (about US$154 million) with 69 percent expected to be chewed by salaries and the rest going to operations.
Mt Darwin MP Savior Kasukuwere queried the manner in which the purchase of military equipment had by-passed the State Procurement Board, a move he said might result in the army buying equipment which may be expensive, but having a short life span.
Maphosa told the parliamentary committee that the
decision to buy the military hardware from China was a political decision after
the force had encountered problems in procuring spare parts for equipment bought
in Western Europe as a result of European Union sanctions imposed against
President Mugabe's regime.
Zimbabwe has one of the most formidable
defence forces in Africa, whose highlight after the country’s independence
include assisting the Mozambican government subdue the former rebel Renamo in
the 1980s and repelling invasion forces who were threatening to overrun the DRC
capital, Kinshasa in 1998.
The Air Force of Zimbabwe has two bases in Manyame
(near Harare) and Thornhill (Gweru) with personnel estimated at about 5 000 in
1999. Currently, the Air Force has the Chengdu F-7 fighter jet, British-made
Hawker Hunters and recently demonstrated newly-acquired Russian-made MiG-23 jets
and Mi-35 helicopter gunships, armed for attacking targets on the ground,
especially with automatic gunfire, but often also with rockets and/or
missiles.
Additional reporting Daily Mirror
1.
Parliamentary Elections 2005
The
focus of the MDC since our national conference in December last year is on the
Parliamentary election in 2005. We are preparing for those elections. At the
centre of our campaign today is the need to raise
The
national campaign involves:
o
being
part of a broad alliance of all democratic forces representing all shades of
political opinion in Zimbabwe – political parties, civil society, advocacy
groups, traditional structures and other
stakeholders;
o
mobilizing
our party structures to extend the campaign for a free and fair election –
meetings with all elected officials in the party at various levels and designing
specific campaign tasks for every individual party member
everywhere;
o
engaging
all community leaders at every level to fight violence and to allow for free
political activity in their areas;
o
publicizing
the five consolidated demands for a free and fair election.
The
demands are:
o
Restore the rule of law. All forms
of political violence must end. Disband the Zanu PF youth militias. The police
and security forces must be impartial in the conduct of their duties. In
addition,
o
Restore Basic Freedoms and Rights.
We are asking the regime to repeal those aspects of the Public Order and
Security Act and the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA)
that curtail personal freedoms of the people.
o
Establish an Independent Electoral
Commission (IEC). Elections are very
crucial to any country. They are basic right. We risk perpetuating our misery if
we allow Zanu PF to play games with our electoral system. Because of our
previous experience, the management and implementation of our elections muse
cease to be the sole prerogative of the Registrar General’s office. That office
has failed the nation on numerous occasions. We need an impartial body to run
our elections.
o
Restore Public Confidence in the
Electoral Process. This is a crucial matter. Zimbabweans are fast losing faith
in elections because of mistrust. We need a clean and accurate voters roll. The
roll must be freely available to interested persons and to all political
parties. People must vote in a single day; the counting of votes must take place
at the polling stations immediately after voting
ends.
o Restore the Secrecy of the Ballot. We need a set of confidence-building measures to resuscitate the sanctity of elections and the part they play in national development. Voting must take place in atmosphere that ensures total secrecy. We must change our ballot boxes. We need to use translucent plastic ballot boxes of secure, single piece construction. The practice of forcing chiefs and village heads to line up with their subjects, before voting, outside polling stations must stop.
The
International campaign:
The
international campaign involves:
n
engaging SADC governments and
political parties. What we are telling them is that the Zimbabwean crisis will
worsen unless the region takes a firm position on the conduct of elections in
this country. What we are telling them is that our electoral standards are still
very backward and we need their assistance in upgrading
them.
n
engaging civil society in SADC and
beyond. We are saying no-one should come to monitor Zimbabwean elections until
they are conducted in accordance with the SADC norms and standards. There must
never be a repeat of the experience of the last five years where Zimbabwean
elections cause division among civil society and governments in
n
Apart from our regular interaction
with diplomats, several missions are going into the region with this
message.
v
All we are asking Mugabe and Zanu
PF to do is to ensure that
v
The people seek the electoral
administrative safeguards to circumvent the violence that was unleashed since
February 2000 to this day. We need a safe, free and fair election to avoid the
subversion of democratic practices and procedures through unlawful political
directives.
v
We realise that time is short. To
put together an Independent Electoral Commission and to get to work effectively
may require more time and resources.
v
We are prepared to recommend that
the election be postponed to make way for such an important institution to set
itself up and get on with the job.
v
The idea is to have an election
process and a result that would lead to a resolution of the Zimbabwean question,
once and for all.
2. LAND & OTHER
MATTERS
Questions are being raised as to
our views on the latest confusion in Zanu PF over the land issue. Our standard response is that what is
happening today vindicates our long-held position that Zanu PF and Mugabe were
never interested in resolving the land question. Their intention was to cover up
for the crisis of governance, which they created in this country. What happened
was a response to our democratic challenge in the 2000 and 2002 elections?
They are now shifting their policy
positions almost daily because they never had a land programme in the first
place. Last year, they announced that the process was over. Zanu PF does not
have the ability to deal with the land question because of the manner in which
Mugabe treated that national asset. We shall
ensure that there is security of tenure and respect for private property rights
anywhere in this country.
We
believe the first step requires the return of the rule of law onto our land. We
shall bring
As I
have always said our corrective approach will be based on need, not greed. That
process will seek to achieve an equitable, transparent, just, lawful and
economically efficient distribution and use of land. We want to go further than
merely re-organising our land tenure and land management systems. We are
committed to the transformation of the communal lands into productive economic
units for the benefit of all.
We want
to extend property rights and titles to the communal areas. The intellectual and
creative energies of the people in the rural areas are being wasted. Our
objective is to transform the communal areas and to abolish the dual agrarian
structure in this country. We must have one land tenure system for
Through
a Land Commission, we shall audit land tenure and distribution. On the basis of
that audit, we will rationalize land allocation. We believe a comprehensive
agrarian reform programme is necessary for us to embrace and integrate all types
of land tenure and production systems.
Farming
is a serious business. It cannot be left to chancers and speculators.
Contrary to the
state-sponsored propaganda, there are fewer people on the land now than at any
time since independence 24 years ago. We
warned Mugabe that these desperate so-called new farmers are going to be a
source of instability.
What do
you expect from a people who lie dumped and abandoned in the bush: with no
support, no schools, no medical care, no income, no seed, no skills, no inputs
and no food. Nothing! There is a looming disaster in these farms. Hunger,
disease, poverty and hopelessness are setting in fast. Many of them are already
turning to the MDC for solutions.
3.
Corruption and the Economy
Mugabe’s anti-corruption drive has
backfired. He is failing to deal with corruption in business after realising
that the net is much wider at the top of his party.
We need an independent
anti-corruption commission with sufficient powers to investigate and prosecute
everybody. Without such a body, Mugabe’s efforts won’t go anywhere. He is
scared to investigate senior military and party officials who seized farms,
stole farm machinery and scooped all the farm produce worth billions of dollars
from white farmers.
When
Gideon Gono took over as Governor of the Reserve Bank of
He has
devalued the currency to a level that is higher than the December black market
rate. Nothing has improved. If anything the economy is in a far worse position
than in December last year.
He is
overseas trying to encourage those Zimbabweans in the Diaspora to send money
home. That Zimbabweans are sending money home is nothing new. They have always
been doing it.
Mugabe
may want their money, but what about their rights? What about their vote?
Without a political solution to the crisis, we find ourselves in a situation
where Mugabe is
sounding more and more like a clown.
Food production is down this year,
our economy is still in free fall --
down this year by another 10 per cent.
Industry is down 40 per cent; tourism is down 80 per cent. Nearly 80 percent of
all the jobs we had are all gone.
The whole country has been reduced
to a flea market.
Life expectancy has
fallen a year for every year that Mugabe has been in power -- from 59 years on
average in 1980 to 36 years now.
I thank you.
The incredible and
utter stupidity of Zimbabwe's rulers
Posted by McQ
Just when you think a situation can't get worse, some dunderhead and his government step forward to disuade you of that notion:
Zimbabwe's land minister said Tuesday that the government intended to nationalize all farmland that it had not already confiscated under a contentious program of land seizures begun four years ago.The minister, John Nkomo, said the government planned to take control of remaining farmland, abolishing all deeds, and turn it back to farmers under 99-year leases. Leases on wildlife conservancies would be limited to 25 years, he said, because that land is considered more valuable than farmland.
"Ultimately, all land shall be resettled as state property,'' Mr. Nkomo was quoted as saying Tuesday in the government-controlled newspaper The Herald. "It will now be the state which will enable the utilization of the land for national prosperity."
Obviously Mr. Nkomo missed the last century completely as we saw the utter and complete failure of states "utilization of the land for national prosperity" in the guise of the eastern bloc nations.
He's also going to have difficulty blaming the impending failure on whites:
Very little white-owned farmland remains in the nation. The government has already confiscated more than 42,000 square miles of formerly white commercial farmland and game reserves, and only about 500 of the original 5,000 or so white farmers are believed to still hold property.
The result of previous confiscations has been economic havoc:
Zimbabwe's economy has been in free fall since 2000, when President Robert G. Mugabe's government began taking over white-owned commercial farms and redistributing the land, mostly to supporters of his ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front, or ZANU-PF.The confiscations wrecked commercial farm exports as well as the chemical and machine industries, which supported agriculture. Foreign investors also fled, and the resulting shortages of goods and foreign exchange have halted economic growth and pushed inflation as high as 620 percent a year.
So the answer? Why confiscate more farms, of course.
And as to the current economic crisis ... well its just not Zimbabwe's fault:
Zimbabwe's government says its economic problems have nothing to do with the land seizures and can be laid to drought and a Western plot to restore colonial rule.
But since title has yet to be given on the redistributed land previously confiscated, is it any wonder that banks and other financial institutions won't lend money to their "owners".
Nkomo claims that a 99 year lease is tantamount to ownership. Well try running that one by the financial institutions which would be stuck with the default and see how far you get you ditz. They're going to tell you nothing short of a deed will suffice for appropriate collateral.
And Africa wonders why it suffers so ...
When hamfisted land reform threw the security of Zimbabweans' property tenure into turmoil, food production dropped through the floor. So now the country's trying to fix that by nationalizing all the land.
Posted by Jesse Walker at June 9, 2004 10:03 AMIs Mugabe trying eradicate the entire population? Genocide via famine? If he is, he's doing a pretty good job.
Posted by: grizzly on June 9, 2004 10:38 AMLooks like Comrade President ran out of whites to steal from.
This leaves South Africa as the only black African country with private land ownership.
Comrade President insists that everything's OK and the bumper crop is coming.
If he's lying and the people don't take his head come harvest time, perhaps they
deserve him.
I blame the Imperialism of the patriarchal machano-capitalist global system
for the problems of Zimbabwe, a system that exploits gays, lesbians, the
transgendered, women, the poor, and people of colour.
Confronted with
global hegemons, what else was Mugabe to do, BUT nationalize the land, to
prevent its exploitation by the alien compradors intent on expropriating the
surplus value of the people's resource for the benefit of their patrons in the
1st world?
And who says a Liberal Arts degree is worthless?
Posted by: Joe L. on June 9, 2004 11:09 AMHah! I hope they starve.
Posted by: rst on June 9, 2004 11:26 AMWell rst, "they" are going to be the people of Zibabwe, not the Mugabes of Zimbabwe. That's the tragedy, "they" are about to be in a train wreck, NOT of their own making. So this is a tragedy, not justice.
Posted by: Joe L. on June 9, 2004 11:28 AMWhat's so different about that than what goes on here in the US? You can lose your land/building to someone with a bigger checkbook than you so that a hotel or stadium can be built. You only own your property until the government decides they want to do something else with it.
(Here in San Diego, Gran Havana Cigar Factory is losing their building and $3M investment so that Marriott can build a hotel. And don't forget everyone that got ousted to build the new stadium downtown).
Posted by: Andy on June 9, 2004 11:44 AMExactly so Andy, and the elections are rigged too! And the camps are just waiting to be opened!
Really, your post is over the top! US does NOT equal Zimbabwe, OK. What is happening with eminent domain is a far cry from what is transpiring in Zimbabwe.
One is bad and one is HORRIBLE. Let's try to keep the two in perspective, one yields money to Nordstroms, property owners, and politicians, one yields corruption, starvation, and misery, there IS a difference.
To a purist there may be no difference,but in reality there is.
Posted by: Joe L. on June 9, 2004 11:49 AM"This leaves South Africa as the only black African country with private land ownership."
Ahhh, no. See Kenya.
Posted by: Gary Gunnels on June 9, 2004 12:02 PMA few weeks ago, U2 lead singer and whiney activist, Bono, gave a commencment speech to the graduating class at the University of Pennsylivania. Since Africa is one of his pet causes, he implored the grads to use their knowledge to save the desperate starving people who are unfortunete enough to live their.
While I'm not arguing with sentiment, I call his tactics into question. One of the main causes of the problems in Africa are tin pot scumbags like Mugabe. No amount of good intentions are going to stop the years of petty tribal violence. Western doctors may find the cure to AIDS, but it doesn't help if the local leaders attribute the disease to evil spirits rather than a virus.
I doubt a wide-eyed, upper-middle class kid was a sociology degree is going to help much. A .45 ACP hollow point, placed between the eyes of Mugabe and other tin-pot slimeballs like him would be a much greater service to the people of Africa. Get the people causing the problem out of the way, then we'll talk about sending in the "experts" to clean up the mess.
Posted by: Mark S. on June 9, 2004 12:56 PMSo this is a tragedy, not justice.
I never said it was just. But they brought it upon themselves anyway. The people played right along, without even considering the effect of confiscating that land. It seemed like a good idea on its face to take from the white devil who took from them. On the whole the situation is no more or less just than say, revenge.
Posted by: rst on June 9, 2004 01:05 PMrst, As Gandalf said, "I have pity even for Sauron's slaves..." Not everyone in Zimbabwe supports(ed) this. It's not like the opposition in Zimbabwe got to participate in fair and free elections.
So, I don't see this as something that can be blamed on the "people". You might want to move on from gloating about the darkies gettin' their comeuppance...
This is going to have dire consequences for Zimbabwe, and IF the government were popularly elected I'd be saddened, but would have to agree with you that "they" are gettting the government they deserve. As "they" really didn't get much say in this government I feel a great deal of sorrow for what is about to happen.
I am astonished that Mugabe is taking this route, it's not like it hasn't been tried in Tanzania and Mozambique before and things went so well THERE. It's not like there isn't some evidence for what works and doesn't work in nation and economy-building.
Posted by: Joe L. on June 9, 2004 01:30 PMSo, when do we liberate Zimbabwe? I mean, isn't the purpose of our military to bring peace and plenty to oppressed peoples the world over?
Posted by: Sir Real on June 9, 2004 01:33 PMYou might want to move on from gloating about the darkies gettin' their comeuppance...
Please.
Like the government being popularly elected would make any difference? You have been conditioned to react to such attitudes as to one happy that some "darkies" are "gettin' their comeuppance." Quaint, and ignorant. "Democratically elected" and "popularly supported" have no autocorrelation except for those with raging hard-ons for democracy.
Posted by: rst on June 9, 2004 01:43 PMMark S.,
I cannot believe that I am defending Bono, but when I read his
rationale for forgiving third world debt, I was sympathetic. If I remember his
argument (at least one of them) correctly, he said that the money was loaned to
dictators like Mugabe and Mobutu, who used it to live lavish lives and oppress
their people. The money is gone and the people left to pay it back received no
benefit from the money.
Also relying on memory, I think that Mises advocated defaulting on all government debt for similar reasons, as well as discouraging people from ever making a loan to a government again.
Posted by: KentInDC on June 9, 2004 01:47 PMDarn rst, the last bit of your post made no sense to me at all... daggone but I never understood statistics... autocorrelated... doesn't that have something to do with variables being cross-correllated in a Chi square or BLUE regression test?
Whatcha say'n? Whether Mugabe got elected fair'n square makes no difference? The people of Zimbabwe "deserve" what's about to happen to them because they have him as President (apparently for Life?)
And lest there be any misunderstanding, I accused YOU of "gloatin' bout the darkies". that seeemed to be the thrust of part of your comment.
Yepper, those of us with raging hard-ons for democracy do think it makes a difference in how to feel, think, and deal with a situation if the government in question was freely elected.
IF Mugabe had been freely elected and had a majority in his Parliament, I'd say that Zimbabwe was in a cleft stick of its own making. Just as when I regret the actions of Tony Blair and HIS government in Britain, but then I think that Blair ran for the position of Prime Minister and that his party has a majority in Parliament, so Britons are receiving the effects of their votes for good or ill. Sweden does lots of socialist things that appall and amaze me, France's 35 hour work week amazes me, BUT I see that the voters of those nations are getting the government they said they wanted AND if the results stink they can throw that government out of office without resorting to a civil war.
The same can not be said of Zimbabwe. So as Zimbabwe has slid into some kind of Leftist Twilight nightmare, I have sadness for the people of Zimbabwe, being ruled, not governed by a man and a party that is poised to bring great misery upon them.
Posted by: Joe L. on June 9, 2004 01:56 PMStupidity, followed by formalized stupidity.
In what way was the land not nationalized before? The government had demonstrated their willingness to seize land on a whim. This is just another in a long list of African kleptocracies that will doom their people to starvation for generations.
Posted by: Jason Ligon on June 9, 2004 01:59 PMJoe L.:
I have to say that Mugabe aside, the populist seizing of land by occupation and terror in Zimbabwe gives an element of accountability to the folks who participated. In some sense the people of Zimbabwe are being lorded over by a theif who will destroy their lives, but in another, the populace was perfectly willing to loot from others given half a chance.
More than anywhere else in the modern world, Africa gives credence to Hobbes. What passes for a horror movie in the western world actually happens there. The stories from the Hutuu massacres vs. Six Days Later - which one is scarier? I try very hard not to think about it, because I don't believe there is a solution for the misery in Africa.
Posted by: Jason Ligon on June 9, 2004 02:14 PMJason,
I don't absolve the people of Zimbabwe, just like I don't absolve
Germans for Hitler, but I do think that this a great tragedy in the making and I
see the citizens more like the steerage class passengers on the Titanic than as
culpable oppressors.
I like to HOPE that Africa can improve. If we wash our hands of it, it will take longer for it to improve. If we enable the kleptocrats and simply act as if that's the way things are supposed to be. Akin to Brandt's "Ost Politic" which seemd to assume and grant a legitimacy and permanence to the DDR that wasn't merited.
So if you and others want to criticize USAID feel free, or if you want to point out the bad behavior of US clients go ahead. If we give money to small groups and companies, not Mobutu or his ilk, things will get better. If we expect the US to not support non-democrats then slowly things may get better.
Africa is just joining modernity. Think what was going on in Europe from 1618 until 1715 and ask yourself are Africans "backward" or just progressing thru an equivalent period in their history?
Posted by: Joe L. on June 9, 2004 02:24 PMLets put this in perspective. What is happening in Zimbabwe is NOT a black vs white thing; the majority of black Zimbabweans did not support the land invasions. Shortly before the land invasions began in 2000, a referendum was held to solicit voter approval for a constitution giving the government greater powers to seize land. This was rejected by the majority of voters. It was this result which frightened Mugabe and his henchmen into their desperate attempt to hang on to power at all cost, as they saw the voters turning away from their corrupt regime.
The land invasions and subsequent violence were carried out by Mugabe's paid thugs, and had no other purpose than to attempt to keep this psychopathic dictator in power.
Posted by: Jill on June 9, 2004 02:48 PM"This leaves South Africa as the only black African country with private land ownership."
What about Senegal, Ghana and Ivory Coast, in W. Africa? I know that for a long time they had more economic freedom in parts of W.Africa, relative to the rest of Black Africa.
Posted by: Rick Barton on June 9, 2004 03:17 PMSir Real said:
"So, when do we liberate Zimbabwe? I mean, isn't the
purpose of our military to bring peace and plenty to oppressed peoples the world
over?"
I know he's being sarcastic, but to make this simple for Dubya, does a
shoe-repair person make house calls? (And the US military making house calls is
a far cry from the shoe-repair person doing so.)
If shoes need fixing, they
get brought to the shop. The US is the shop.
But, before we are overwhelmed
by shoes, Dubya could get started by simply making all Spanish-speaking
Caribbean islands into our 51st state.
That would make it clear nearby
"shoes" are welcome on the mainland, if they choose.
Is shoe phobia greater than war phobia? My plan would find out.
Posted by: Ruthless on June 9, 2004 03:21 PMGreed reigns power to the few and oppression to the masses.(Africa 2004)
Posted by: Hydroman on June 9, 2004 03:29 PM"See Kenya." Noted. That's what I get for trying to find information in the Zimbabwe Daily Herald/Liar.
I note that the system of 99-year leases that the government proposes to adopt is similar to how privatization is done in China. Also that China is a major development partner of Zimbabwe since the latter ruined its credit.
The background to this decision is that while the government was inflating
the currency to cover its loss of revenue from the commercial farms, (around
400% last I heard) there was a huge run on real estate. Naturally the government
concluded that real estate ownership was to blame.
I accused YOU of "gloatin' bout the darkies".
"as to one...", i.e., I was informing you that your accusation was ignorant.
An autocorrelation is the degree to which the conditions mutually imply each other. Whether a leader is democratically elected, and the degree of popular support his every action enjoys, have nothing to do with each other.
That having been said, Mugabe didn't just appear out of nowhere, the man was a black nationalist guerilla *elected* to power in 1980. That you give no credence to ZANU's questionable electoral practices is of no consequence.
Posted by: rst on June 9, 2004 03:44 PM